Should you buy Can-Am or Polaris's FASTEST Side-by-side?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @jr88brutus
    @jr88brutus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I don’t know why in the off road community why you guys always compare a 4 seater to a 2 seater. Stop doing it, makes you less credible.

    • @joshc606
      @joshc606 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s probably what they had available? Be a friend and go buy both for them to test.

    • @douglowenthal1320
      @douglowenthal1320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bull shit not a proper comp.

    • @Buckshot530
      @Buckshot530 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      in this case, Can-Am doesn't have a 4 seater out yet for them to do a comparison with.

    • @goprozack4255
      @goprozack4255 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      You would think these people are "experts" but then do something so obvious like that.... Sad

  • @TimLaurie-b7d
    @TimLaurie-b7d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Weird, the 4 seater is longer than the 2 seater?!?!?

  • @robbnutter4665
    @robbnutter4665 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I've always heard that Can Am has SERIOUS fit and finish issues. If the Can Am is a two seater, why didn't you compare it with a Polaris RZR Pro 2?

  • @joshc606
    @joshc606 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like this style of review. Better than video with just commentary.

  • @dblurton6542
    @dblurton6542 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Trail Tech Voyager Pro GPS will link up to the Buddy Track system on a Polaris so you can do the live tracking with your non-Polaris. It also has a belt temp sensor and a two mic Bluetooth intercom.

  • @timpeifer6682
    @timpeifer6682 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    2 differnet machines nobody talking about ..the can am is 78 inches wide the widest stock side by side in these classes has a transmission th not gunna blow every 2 seconds..the spider control arms offer 40 percent more stability and strength in upper ball joint

    • @FuckSXSBlog
      @FuckSXSBlog 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      and somehow its still a POS.

  • @StevePaige
    @StevePaige 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'll buy the Talon. Thank you.

  • @Rubbermeetsrd
    @Rubbermeetsrd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I bet that Can Am is missing more plastic than the panel missing on the dash. In my experience Can Am build quality is shit.

  • @brianhowell8117
    @brianhowell8117 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The mavrick has 6 lug wheels the rzr has 5 lug wheel pattern crazy machines hoping toget a mav r soon

  • @nocowhips
    @nocowhips วันที่ผ่านมา

    What cage is that on the Mav R?

  • @hwinterr
    @hwinterr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    CVTs are great, no idea why everyone hates them lol in fact they were so good F1 banned them many years ago

  • @BlettzaHrekleW
    @BlettzaHrekleW 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People are nuts to buy something like this ( just to drive through the woods ) , most people dout spend this on a Truck let alone a offroad sxs.. Ill stick with Cfmoto and their new Z10 that will have 225 HP but engine is capable of making 260 Hp in triple cylinder.

  • @KuschallRacing
    @KuschallRacing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    but...mav r got now as well a 4 seater....

  • @jameselroy7472
    @jameselroy7472 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4door price is always 10k more expensive than 2dr. But its only a couple grand more expensive than the 2 seat mavrick? Thats a deal from polaris. I see the value un the rzr over mavrick

  • @MichaelE-c2i
    @MichaelE-c2i 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Still prefer my 2023 Arctic Cat Wildcat XX.

  • @kevingoodrich3050
    @kevingoodrich3050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The X3 is better overall than both. The X3 can go down trails the Mac R is to wide. It's quicker and lighter than both in both 2 and 4 seat rigs. Ther are trails at the Oregon Coast our friends could not go down because of the width. Haed pass on both of those rigs. In the end it's you money buy what you want.

    • @madweazl
      @madweazl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And then there are those of us that couldn't care less about narrow trails and blast through the open desert and sand dunes. There are different rigs for different people.

    • @GardenTrailAdventures
      @GardenTrailAdventures หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not better. Different. Have both Drive Both. X3 definitely not better.

  • @stgraves260
    @stgraves260 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yeah I pass on both. No way is a toy that has less technology worth more than a full size vehicle you can drive state to state and not just limited to off road use only.

  • @SPACE-IS-FAKE-777
    @SPACE-IS-FAKE-777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don’t care how much money you have, these machines are overpriced period.

  • @Debacle83
    @Debacle83 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Both crap. Meant to stress you out because everything breaks all while keeping you broke so you can’t actually have something that last. Like land. Gold. Silver. Your peace of mind

  • @Lopez_67
    @Lopez_67 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2 seater vs 4 seater 🙄
    What a pointless comparison...

  • @rhuaustin9004
    @rhuaustin9004 หลายเดือนก่อน

    horrible comparison
    .4 door vs 2 door..