@@GetGuudMTG Do u think change emrakul for ulamog would still make it work or u need the specific passiv of emrakul as wincon to close the game? (great video effort)
Sorry mate, I completely missed this comment! To be honest I don’t think it would work quite as well without it I’m afraid. But if you have ulamog already and not emrakul, maybe test it with ulamog to see if you enjoy the deck before you craft it? Just every time you play ulamog, think to yourself, would emrakul be better here?
2nd person, seems like some gameplay might be a good idea then? I’ve got a long list of content ideas, gameplay videos are near the top after a couple other projects first :)
damn holy shit this level of effort into this video deserves way more views. good shit man
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words 🤜🤛
Amazing content and very very useful information
Glad you enjoyed! 😀
Wish i could see the eldrazi deck being played, aldo becuse i did't see emrakul being played that much compared to ulamog
If enough people are interested in gameplay, that’s definitely something I can do! You’re the first person who has indicated it though
@@GetGuudMTG Do u think change emrakul for ulamog would still make it work or u need the specific passiv of emrakul as wincon to close the game? (great video effort)
Same here
Sorry mate, I completely missed this comment! To be honest I don’t think it would work quite as well without it I’m afraid. But if you have ulamog already and not emrakul, maybe test it with ulamog to see if you enjoy the deck before you craft it? Just every time you play ulamog, think to yourself, would emrakul be better here?
2nd person, seems like some gameplay might be a good idea then? I’ve got a long list of content ideas, gameplay videos are near the top after a couple other projects first :)