I've noticed that ever since the Cathy Newman interview, the media in the UK will no longer have Jordan Peterson interviewed by one person. It is now always two-on-one or three-on-one. Therefore they can't make themselves look like an idiot anymore. Because now there will always be someone to immediately jump in and change the subject to cover for the other persons argument being destroyed by Peterson.
This show is always a panel, and never a panel biased in one direction. Wright is left leaning (but quite reasonable and open to discourse and shown here), Sophie is a left wing nut job and the guy on the end was quite clearly an old fashioned conservative. I wouldn't use this as an example
I don't think it's working. He still did a pretty good job at making that feminazi twit look like an idiot. Quite easily too. If you watch the entire interview, he comes at her with all these statistical facts and studies done on equal outcome, and she says that she chooses to follow studies from Berkley. A far leftist school... Lol
These anti-intellectual Liberal Arts types honestly believe and openly state that things like logic and vigorous debate are "white systems of oppression" and must be destroyed for the world to be a better place.
It's the vocal minority of Muslims who throw homosexuals off roof-tops. The rest just watch in silence. Same thing with Liberal Arts types when it comes to reason, logic, and debate. A few bring megaphones to scream at people standing in line for Jordan Peterson speaking events before pulling the fire alarm and breaking windows. The rest of you watch in silence.
You'll figure it out real fast when hard-working people stop having their tax dollars given to Liberal Arts bullshit "studies" programs that are nothing more than ideological indoctrination centers.
@@joeblack8915 American and Canadian TV personalities are much worse in terms of depth of thought. But it's because of the cultural difference - on US or Canadian TV, the most important factor, ultimately, is time. So the selection and training of TV personalities, and their goals, are different; there is no time to explore anything in depth, it's all about getting the most interesting points (preferably scandalous ones) out before the time break. To be clear, I am not saying that the Brits are smarter, or more likely to be factually and/or logically correct. They may be - and from what I can see, quite often are - just as wrong, but their position is still more elaborate and sophisticated.
@@chemendez9380 I would find out later that I had broken bones in myself, “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.”
@@jhibbitt1 as you would expect him to be when faced with other intellects. I dont find all his arguments convincing or solid enough to get behind. Hes correct about the PC brigade but there are many who have been vocal on that including people like Douglas Murray and even Stephen Fry. I disagree with him being banned from universities, thats just wrong.
Archer the wright stuff has been made a bigger group of fools than Cathy ha, these people don't hide their bias in the slightest, they wear their stupidity as a badge of honnor.
Archer No I like Jordan Peterson and I think this was a good interview. Some points they agreed on, some points they did not and it was a pretty calm atmosphere. The only problem was the woman.
@@MrGeorgerocker JBP is absolutely controversial, thats a totally fair claim to make. He brings up topics that many people disagree with and challenges new ideas, thats really close to the definition of controversial.
@@MG-ln1yw so far everything here is true, he is indeed "controversial" and indeed people are stupid to the point that he is controversial And it's simple why it happened. They have been subtly gradually implementing idiotic ideals in people as something normal in daily life and he's fighting as if he never got behind any of them in the first place, which I extremelly respect, and that's why he won't change the way he talks to suit anyone that has already been manipulated with pretty words and pretty ideals and doesn't even know, if we were 20 years ago he wouln't be controversial at all, but because pf that gradual and subtle implementation of unquestionable ideals on society, he comes as "controversial" when he, you know, questions...and even more so when the answers to the questions aren't as beautiful as they want them to be And that's why he's usually either hated or loved
Rob Lutter I don't know, man. As an Englishman, I shuddered when I saw that he was on The Wright Stuff. The questions they asked were biased, innane and superficial.
Joely7 The comments he makes about "the interview" and the Marxist takeover of educational establishments. If you read Max Horkheimers quote The Revolution Will Be Without Guns things might make a little more sense. 👍
The young today are getting lead like blind sheep along the ulta left path toward socialism by their educators, I’m sick of being called the ultra right which is nazieism the correct definition is conservative,
It's not unreasonable that she might have read him saying that the majority of the people who read his book are male. But there wasn't much reason to dwell on the nuance there
4 ปีที่แล้ว +21
Jordan: "I had a ham sandwich for lunch." Woman: "So you are advocating all vegans to be killed!"
Self Enlightenment is hard earned, not for everyone? Mirrors of consciousness, are in the mind of reflection!😅🙏 Asking tough questions, is the driver, as Peterson says?
That woman never broke from a frown once. As far as she was concerned she was sat with "the enemy" and she just repeats what she has read in The Guardian. Shameful.
He questions the feminist orthodoxy: he says that we have equality of opportunity (which we do) but that attempting to control equality of outcome is never going to work, because we are individuals and will decide for ourselves. If I, as a woman, want to be an engineer; nothing stops me, nothing prevents me except myself and the fact I am not good enough at maths. Should they lower the criteria for me? No, I'd rather we had engineers who were properly qualified than have equality of gender at the risk of lowering expectations. Would I like more women in stem? Yes, if they choose to be. And that belief runs contrary to modern feminism.
2manynegativewaves parroting? Listen pal, I coined the term legacy media and You would’nt dare talk like that to my face. Im big and im hard. I’d put you in a headlock, make you say ‘legacy media’ 3 times in a girls voice and then cleveland steamer your face.
6 ปีที่แล้ว +2
2manynegativewaves You go from comment to comment, spitting out your bile like a bitter, tantrum throwing child. You're the sort of person who desperately needs Dr Peterson's help.
Alt right includes all conservatives and moderates. It also includes blue dog democrats, libertarian and classical liberals, and even moderate liberals. As long as you're not an authoritarian intersectionality ally you can consider yourself part of the alt right. And the actual alt right loves it.
No matter how they try to twist, deflect and spin, Mr. Peterson's clear and succinct points cut like thunderbolts to the logical truth. Every interview is an intellectual fencing match and *Mr. Peterson is the Grand Maestro.*
ssazerac I agree. He's like the Michael Jordan of psychology and they are challenging him on the court. They really have no chance and you can see it. Totally out classed. He knows exactly how to manipulate the conversation into his favour. I think this pisses them off even more. That and he keeps making more and more money through sponsers on patreon....
Well its a lot easier to win a debate with someone when the facts and the data support your position. Sprinkle some charm and a good vocabulary and bobs your uncle the challengers look foolish
Simon Hodge "Bob's your uncle?" You Canadian? Lol I am. Anyways yeah, it's true. It's kinda like watching a one legged man in an ass kicking competition. There no real chance...anyone can beat them.
isn't it interesting how Peterson's critics immediately talk about the type of fans he has rather than ideas and arguments that he is proposing. perhaps it's a way of distracting people from the ideas (something critics know they have no response to)
Paulette Smither his favorite authors are the likes of Dostoevsky and Nietzsche. If he's a racist because he likes those authors then more than half of academia is racist.
It's literally textbook logical fallacy (guilt by association). They have to start teaching logical fallacies in school, it's so embarrassing how many people don't recognize this basic con man shit for what it is, haha
The prick with a lisp is a soy boy wig-wearing idiot just by claiming Cathy newman skillfully left the impression of being befuddled by the 'gotcha' segment in her interview with JBP.
Cathy is not a victim she was just outclassed in by Jordan at one point he had to slow his pace down to let her catch up. It was a brilliant lesson in thinking for yourself rather than just falling back on the generic cliches.
God who is that woman? The first thing she does is bring up the Alt-right. This is the reason Peterson is so popular. I am getting so sick of shit like this. I am a gay man and I am certainly not Alt right but I love Peterson because he talks such common sense and lumping me in with the Alt right just alienates me more from people like her on the left. They are doing this to themselves.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals." - C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)
I agree. Just because what he says appeals to all kinds of individuals doesnt mean he's wrong. If everyone who disagrees with you is an alt right sympathizer, than what are you? They're angry they don't have a perfect argument and call them names? It's childish and closeminded.
The left are iliberal in their demands for liberality. They are exclusive in their demands for inclusivity. They are un-diverse in their call for diversity. What a paradox the left find themselves in. They are failing and they are doubling down on more stupidity. More young men are waking up to what DR. Peterson is saying because they see they have been lied to by the left and they’re not going to take it anymore...
Thats what the left media does to everyone who questions or doubts their ideology. They try to brand you a racist, white supremacist, homophobe, misogynist, They have been doing it for years and this is why very few politicians or media people dare to go against the party line.
This guy is a legend he qualifies his argument with facts whereas these guys come across as pissing in the wind. I hate the media agenda that paints him as this raving alt right looney.
ShaneJoshua1980 I don’t like Jordan Peterson. I’m a liberal. I know that he’s a liberal. Why does everyone have to spin everything as either good or bad, left or right. I may not like Peterson, but I recognise that he isn’t alt right at all.
ShaneJ - Come off it, man. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid. Peterson's claims about a massive left-wing Postmodernist conspiracy in the universities are so exaggerated and overblown. It reminds me of Hillary Clinton's blathering about "a massive right-wing conspiracy". Sure, there are SOME left-wing nut-balls in SOME university departments (such as sociology, psychology, gender studies, anthropology) at SOME universities. But most professors just teach their subject and most students just want to get good grades, go to a good grad school, and eventually make lots of money and buy lots of stuff. I'd say that's about 95% of the people involved. Look at it this way - the 'humanities' subjects where Peterson encounters all these "Maoist" intellectuals - what proportion of the universities do they make up? Not very much. Is Peterson really saying that the freaky left-wing Postmodernists have also taken over all the other faculties, like civil engineering, computer science, medicine, law, mathematics, physics, geology, accounting, aeronautical engineering, architecture, business and management, chemistry, dentistry, German, and town planning? I mean, get real!
Thomas McCarthy LOL bro. India is more fucked than USA. We were in bed with Soviet Russia till the 1980s. Many public intellectuals are socialists. We have governments of some states importing illegals from Bangladesh to expand their voter base. We're lucky that we don't have the crazy multi gender advocates but that is not long away. Many people in leading universities are already speaking of there being multiple genders. And I think that the USA is in a better position than many people make it out to be when talking about dealing with leftists. And I hope you guys keep doing it.
Notice how Sophie just keeps her mouth shut when she realizes she is actually talking to Jordan and not tweeting about him? love the silence, silence of the lamb.
I don't believe that. "Well I read an article that said that you do" Someone needs to explain to this woman the difference between a primary and secondary source.
The Wright Stuff was fortunate enough to have this extraordinary man on the show and all they did was talk about the nonsense connection between Jordan and the alt-right. Seriously, given that the mainstream media is now in direct competition with content creators like him, I have to ask, what were they thinking? If this is the best they can do I'll stick to TH-cam.
Because they are intellectually lacking and unable to debate him on any legitimate level so they have no choice but to resort to underhanded attacks, faulty correlations, and false accusations. It's the typical leftist tactic. How is Jordan somehow responsible for the actions of ALL of his followers? That is such leftist nonsense. I mean are Michael Moore or Obama responsible for the left-wing nut bag that shot the GOP lawmakers? I mean what a bunch of nonsense.
Helmholtz and in UK, there's been some suggestion he may run for office in Canada, tho not sure if that's just wishful thinking, I'm tempted to get emigration papers ready just incase!
Wiggy was agreeing with Peterson, so it was 2 on 2. I thought Mathew Wright and the Labour MP did well in dealing with the wriggler. I liked how Mathew said “ I believe that you believe”. ... that’s how you deal with Peterson.
Sophie didn't learn a thing from the Cathy Newman interview and tried to outsmart Jordan. It's a cringe worthy attempt. Jordan dismissed any criticism with consumate ease.
solatiumz . Not sure who she is. She was introduced as the leader of the WEP. I think they are the woman's equality party. Which sounds like an extremely sexist hate group.
They tried...but Peterson challenged their integrity and they knew they hadn't got the facts to support their claims..and they knew that if they pursued this any further that it would end up as ridiculous as the Newman interview
Daedalus this happens too often though. Watch 15 mins of Peterson and, as a professional, they should know better and more. Either they are terrible at their job or there is a narrative because this was pretty embarrassing and to arm yourself incorrectly is one thing but to arm yourself with similar tools as the previous loser (Cathy Newman) is incompetent and very coincidental. I’m starting to question the levels of incompetence among mainstream journalists and what their agenda may actually be
@@ChuckGuvener90 I think the bigger picture may be to make television in the UK irrelevant...those working for it dont seem to realise that this is on the table
The reverence I have for this man is infinite. Jordan Peterson is a genius with such a deep care in his soul...He is so beautifully gracefully powerful. I just get everything he shares...he actually teaches every time he speaks.. The world should listen.
@Benedict Hampus which in itself is exactly what Jordan Peterson says, think for yourself even if you agree with him, you can also disagree with him. That is the freedom of being an individual.
The one on the right with the silly hair is a Conservative MP, the woman is a politician in the "Women's Equality Party" - lol, and the guy on the left is the host.
Well articulated Jack - I share your sentiment exactly. I couldn’t last more than 5 minutes in the same room as her. Awful condescending presence about her.
I am so happy Jordan debates so well. I hate that the “journalists “ always act as if Jordan is responsible for what other groups do or say in response to his lectures 🙄
Absolutely agree. That is a highly questionable strategy I seem to witness a lot when Peterson is confronted. They never discuss actual content, they only rave about 3rd parties reacting to Peterson, something he obviously has no say in.
It's a testiment to his profession. He understands psychology and how to navigate all kinds of social situations. Yeah basically he's like the Michael Jordan of psychology, and all these people are trying to challenge him on the court.....yeah they have no chance. He knows what he's doing.
2manynegativewaves That is not the definition of a sociopathic mentality. You don't like Dr. Peterson because you've been told to. Be honest, you haven't actually listened to any of his lectures, have you?
They see him as a major threat to their narrative and agenda so they have to target him with every weapon in their armoury. Thankfully, so far, Jordan Peterson is impervious to their hostility and while he continues to tell the truth about their wretched programme he will endure.
Wishful thinking in short. Long ramble version: a common human failing- consciously or unconsciously avoiding anything that might question your easy, favored, explanation about the universe- we all like to feel in control, safe, and efficient (lazy). In other words: they don't actually watch enough un-edited JBP to learn what he's really truly about; they only go along with what others say (due to yet another human failing- tendency to want to fit in with the group, or get along with what others around you are doing/saying, even if you know it is nonsense- you avoid finding out for sure so that you can feel "cool" because you are also "in the know" about that thing which you do not actually know much about (you pretend to know about it by using the sound-bite-style summary you heard from somewhere), and get a nice little ego-boost; feeling a bit more important/special that way.
*Sophie Walker slowly slides down her chair out of sight and through a trap door beneath the desk. Meanwhile, Harry Enfield on the far right of the desk watches on in the wig out of the movie Psycho*
The woman in the middle, is totally upstaged by 3 male smarty pants, she sounded like a whiny femtard from the get go, notice when they all laughed at each other, she just sat there looking sheepish. the guy on the end looks like a mixup of Trump, david ike and the milky bar kid.
She immediately jumps to ad hominem - ('why are you so popular with the Alt-Right?). This tactic is always used by a person who does not have a convincing argument to hand.
But the thing is, the alt right does like him, most conservatives like him, and I have noticed that people, usually conservatives, who are racist, sexist, homophobic, etc., absolutely love him. Now, why is that?
@Amy Thompson Yes some people on the alt right do love him. But millions of people who are not on the alt right also love him. So where does that get you? What percentage of your audience being alt right gets your view points or ideas dismissed. 1% 2% 30%? Guilt by association is not a game you want to play and peoples ideas stand on their own merits. If I told you that ice is cold and someone on the alt right agreed with my statement that ice is cold does that invalidate my statement that ice is cold?
Oh brother...sigh....his base is the alt right. The racists, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobes love him. Sure, there may be some who are slightly on the left who agree with SOME of what he says, but more liberal psychologists say the same thing. Peterson became famous over the pronoun thing, which most people agree with, including myself, but his ideas are very conventional and conformist in many ways, and there really is nothing that special about the man. To me, he IS the dumb person's smart person. He totally ignores the atrocities of Trump and his bigoted and incompetent cabinet and his deplorable supporters., He even defended the indefensible on Bill Maher, which made me lose all respect for him. And your lack of logic is pretty amazing...really, ice cream? LOL The differences between your youtube page and mine says it all, sorry.
Amy Thompson Watch out - through misuse and overuse leading to desensitization, eventually, there will be nothing to call anyone who remotely disagrees with you.
sigh...the old "disagree" thing doesn't work any more. Sorry, but I DO disagree with bigots who hold all the "isms" and "obias" and will continue to do so without any guilt. I look at Peterson's videos and others concerning him, and by looking at the comments, I can tell the type of people who support him...imagine that! It's really easy and it's also easy to see they are not the best and brightest.
He's not "in over his head." Jordan starts to lose his cool less than three minutes into the video, but people like yourself always find new ways to defend his ravings.
@@TheBermudaMan Lose his cool? I would argue the reverse. He is remarkably well behaved despite the numerous interruptions he experiences while trying to explain himself.
@Horsey Daniels hey deffo loses his cool against that French interviewer but he still makes his points and admits that he was disappointed in himself. Personally I thought it was badass
And the guy on the left agrees with him anyway, hes just doing his job, a job he has quit after refusing to apologise for a guest stating a biological fact about a transgender guest
what are you talking about? I'm watching it right now and it's 1 on 1. edit: sorry, just noticed there are two of them. You're still wrong tho it's not 3 v 1. second edit: sorry, I just finished the whole thing and you were right, there are three of them. (lol jp btw, anyone else thrown off by their cropping. I was like where the fuck is this 3rd voice coming from?)
oh no a troll who means less then my last shit has called me a bad name, what ever shall i do, you have hurt me and i now need to reevaluate my life cause some prick online was mean. Please oh wise ass sage who no one gives a shit about, bestow upon me your superior insights as to who should be a hero and roll model of people in this day and age?
Yeah but it also means he is hated by both extremes and media loves and supports extremes and hates normal, common people soo... not a chance he'll get a fair treatment ever.
but he still puts himself out there to make sure a reasonable voice is heard knowing he will be attacked, knowing he will be hated, but he will make people think and consider his words carefully. that is at least noble if not heroic. knowing your odds are against you but you need to have this fight no matter what.
It's like children with talking to a very smart grown up. He's right about the UK although the poison of identity politics is spreading in parts of the UK too.
Maz Klassa Very true, It's like we are saturated with political correctness In all the media outlets, Channel 4 being the worst contender, And has been for a very long time!!! But of course nothing gets done about it, Simply because if you say anything you are deemed bigoted, Or Sexist, Regardless of the reality, And the truth being told.
Alpha State No they're not men babies. They've watched lots of very intellectual TH-cam videos and they're actually at the cutting edge of Western philosophy. It's just that the brainwashed cultural Marxist libtards can't see beyond their echo chambers. But bear in mind that this is deep stuff and takes a while to grasp.
"Cathy Newman was sitting there with her mouth wide open, and slowly closing again, like a goldfish." This guy is hilarious!!! Love how Peterson was caught off guard by that great remark.
she's the Leader of the Woman's Equality Party, the one Sandi Toksvig was smarming about how she was going to be an MP for and they was going to change the UK for the better from their posh Chelsea homes. Strangely Sandi went quite on that and suddenly took the host job for QI ( I wonder why? but not much, can guess)
No need to apologise for Wright, he needs to put the questions forward and handed himself well enough by letting Jordan express his views, and not trying to twist his words. On the other hand Sophie.....
Two against one at most. The blonde gentleman seemed to be making general conversation and was not attacking him. The lady was on the attacking asking facetious though pointed, questions and the host was being a fair moderator.
He has been speaking about these issues for years and there are dozens of his lectures available it's quite late in the game that people are now paying attention. He is "defensive" when defending against unfair accusations but I think he has more of a cassandra complex generally speaking.
AWE SUM Hm. Don't agree. If you were constantly being deliberatly mis-represented you would also be defensive. And it was clear that the WEP woman had an aggressive agenda.
Jordan is super aware and articulate, something these interviewers could never hope to achieve. The interview with Cathy Newman was a total embarrassment to Cathy Newman.
She's breaking down. I have a video of her presenting a live Chan 4 news preview from about a month ago..she's nearly in tears..it is amazing! I can't believe it hasn't been covered anywhere..it's like her anger and her emotions are just choking her!
She is a mouthpiece for the establishment. A useful idiot because of her own bias. She tried this time and failed because Peterson is smarter than her by a mile.
Skyzen Skyluke I've not seen it anywhere. I filmed it off the TV as I was shocked at the state she was in. I have it on my phone..may send it to Sargon or Paul Joseph Watson.👍
Always love how people that comment their appreciation of Peterson often make the disclaimer I am neither left or right. What’s the problem if you are left or right? It doesn’t mean you can’t critically examine his statements and decide upon agreement when there’s agreement and highlight a difference of views if there are any. Most people aren’t entirely left or right but compose some sort of amalgamation therein, but to say I don’t subscribe to the left or right is highly suspect. If that is the case, I wish they would stop trying to shield themselves for potential unfair criticism and simply stand by your convictions.
J Wroot no, no he isn't, only if you agree with him, he's vile to people he disagrees with. He's a pathetic little script reader, not the great journalist he thinks he is
They are so obsessed with labeling his listeners as alt right. When are they gona stop falsifying that narrative and actually take the time as journalist should to listen to what is being said. Like have some integrity.
And the thing is, it's not even in their interests to associate him with the alt-right. They're just going to blur the lines between what's really alt-right and not, then they won't even recognise their true enemies and only see enemies everywhere. The real alt-right will hide in plain sight from them. Is that something they really want?
"She (Cathy Newman) sat there looking at you with her mouth open and slowly closing like a goldfish - because she did´t know what to say." So funny, and accurate!
marccas10, They have become toxic, and lack values. Justifying abuse and violence shows how morally bankrupt they are. Their Ideology is intellectually bankrupt.
That's exactly that point. To generalise is to perpetuate the myth. Like the left demonising the right. It's not tit for tat. You can be liberal and agree with JP.
The main voice of the Left at present is the Regressive Toxic Left. The Moderates remained quiet when the Aggressive Violent Left have been Abusive, Aggressive and Violent. The Moderate Left have handed the voice of the Left to the Extreme Left by their lack of criticism of the Extreme Left. Dave Rubin and others have abandoned the Left as they have become Extreme.
Piers Trindal you're 100% right. In fact it's true those with the loudest voices both left and right seemingly try to outdo each other in their respective extremities. JP speaks against identity politics then we see people stereotyping a group like the OP did. It's counter productive and pushes the extreme left even more extreme. I'm pretty central personally so all I can do is look both ways and shrug my shoulders!!
A pathetic attempt to discredit JP by labelling him as the newest boogie man the "alt-right". and the typical personal attacks that result from an inability to counter a argument.
Alt-right again? Stop half arsing your research Sophie. Id like to see her go 30 minutes with Dr P. In an interview. In fact, I have an idea 💡 Anyone that wants to call this man anything but what he is should spend 30 minutes with him uninterrupted, trying there best to prove their arguments.
Oh man after Jordan spoke to the lady beside him, she didn’t want anymore smoke, she stayed silent for the rest of the interview fearing to be ‘cathy newmaned’. That’s tough 🤣🤣🤣
Why are you supporting a guest of yours in her attacks against Peterson? Why didn't you ask her where her evidence was for claiming the alt-right loves him? Why did you drag on about the death threats, when Peterson has nothing to do with them?
Is there any TV interviewer who can actually make a proper follow up question instead of just shouting out their incredibly biased and oponionated questions?
That kind of attitude is why you will never change anyone's mind and why Jordan does it for a living. He goes out of his way not to 'own' people because hostility makes people less likely to change their world view
@GreyboSneed I enjoyed hearing one of the callers say they called up to argue against JP's views but that after hearing him talk (instead of what the far left says about him), he'd been persuaded by JP.
Enough of this Alt-right accusations. I'm an ex-muslim and follower and a student of professor Peterson. He is showing your young people here in the west to be responsible and useful, he helps them to make something out of themselves and stand up and don't rot in their dreams. I wish there was one like him in power in my country then we would have a much better situation that pure corruption! Let him talk and be heard, don't shoot the messenger when he shows you what the problem is!
TV hosts -- You're not going to trip up Jordan or get him to cower by bringing up some BS another person says. He will tell you, "That's incorrect and here's why it's incorrect." No hesitation and no waffling. He knows exactly what he's saying AND he knows exactly what he's said in the past. He is not unsure or confused about whatever subject you're talking about. You can't run circles around him. This is a man who makes a living operating on people's minds without a scalpel. You are all out of your depth.
There was a strong implication during this interview that Jordan Peterson was somehow responsible for Cathy Newman receiving death threats for HER behaviour during this interview. This is a prime example of the importance of Jordan's points on individual responsibility
You're right but bear in mind, these alleged death threats were only claimed, no evidence was produced to verify her claims. As is usual in these cases, when the left leaning person loses an argument, as Cathy Newman clearly did, they try to frame themselves as the victim in some way, thus undermining the opponents comments or beliefs.
Why, why, why do people STILL TRY to win an argument with Jordan Peterson???........IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!! Jordan peterson is an absolute genious and utterly OUT-CLASSES everyone else in this interview!
Look....Genius! Is old fashioned and IQ is old fashioned...OK BUT! To move the attitudes of cultures on, Requires Einstein style attitudes...Where he had to divert from the Trilogies Of Education holding him back......And when his Einsteinian Uniqueness-eventually was appraised, The established Conventionally Educated, through Trilogy ruts, realised what they had been lacking the vision to See, And willingly, sponged off his Unique abilities....How many others are being held back in the same way...Where established out of date Traditions over rule progress, preferring the rut...over which specialisation cannot see! RDR
Lady. Don't you mean bitch or cunt? Fuck Matthew wright and his show. I use to like it but then I woke up. Fucking journalist cunts!! Mentally ill puppets trying to act smart. Too many of us are awaken and we don't watch shitty debates on tv because they're fake or set up.
She represents everything men today despise about Western, “educated” women. And the kind of woman that wonders where all the good men went. What a shrew
This womans party representative obviously didn't do her research. It was really pathetic. DO BASIC RESEARCH before you do an interview with this man. This man is brilliant. Attempting to minimize him is pathetic.
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
I've noticed that ever since the Cathy Newman interview, the media in the UK will no longer have Jordan Peterson interviewed by one person. It is now always two-on-one or three-on-one. Therefore they can't make themselves look like an idiot anymore. Because now there will always be someone to immediately jump in and change the subject to cover for the other persons argument being destroyed by Peterson.
Exactly so
This show is always a panel, and never a panel biased in one direction. Wright is left leaning (but quite reasonable and open to discourse and shown here), Sophie is a left wing nut job and the guy on the end was quite clearly an old fashioned conservative. I wouldn't use this as an example
Well certainly failed because he easily made all three of them look like the total fools that they truly are
I don't think it's working. He still did a pretty good job at making that feminazi twit look like an idiot. Quite easily too. If you watch the entire interview, he comes at her with all these statistical facts and studies done on equal outcome, and she says that she chooses to follow studies from Berkley. A far leftist school... Lol
They can't handle the truth.
What a dangerous man ..... preaching logic and rational thought. Quick deport him :D
Badenoch to where ?? 😁
These anti-intellectual Liberal Arts types honestly believe and openly state that things like logic and vigorous debate are "white systems of oppression" and must be destroyed for the world to be a better place.
Lol
It's the vocal minority of Muslims who throw homosexuals off roof-tops. The rest just watch in silence. Same thing with Liberal Arts types when it comes to reason, logic, and debate. A few bring megaphones to scream at people standing in line for Jordan Peterson speaking events before pulling the fire alarm and breaking windows. The rest of you watch in silence.
You'll figure it out real fast when hard-working people stop having their tax dollars given to Liberal Arts bullshit "studies" programs that are nothing more than ideological indoctrination centers.
Watching Jordan Peterson debate the average uk tv personality is like watching a NASA computer debate a fridge magnet.
@Minimalism 74 people would disagree with you
@Minimalism XD
What's where they're from got anything to do with it? So American and Canadian TV personalities are fellow brainiacs then??
@@joeblack8915
American and Canadian TV personalities are much worse in terms of depth of thought. But it's because of the cultural difference - on US or Canadian TV, the most important factor, ultimately, is time. So the selection and training of TV personalities, and their goals, are different; there is no time to explore anything in depth, it's all about getting the most interesting points (preferably scandalous ones) out before the time break.
To be clear, I am not saying that the Brits are smarter, or more likely to be factually and/or logically correct. They may be - and from what I can see, quite often are - just as wrong, but their position is still more elaborate and sophisticated.
Best comment ever 👌😉
Jordan: Brings intelligent arguments to the table that actually make sense
Other people at the table: bUt ThaT oNe yoUtuBe coMmeNt SaiD
Literally!
LoL 🤣
So frustrating
@@chemendez9380
I would find out later that I had broken bones in myself, “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.”
“You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.” “You’re OK. You’re OK.”
I don't think that being combative and in denial constitutes arguments that make sense
It would be so much more interesting if Jordan Peterson debated with someone intelligent.
anna mack watch him talking to Douglas Murray
Look for his debate with Slavoj Zizek. It is on his channel and it is amazing.
It -wouldn't.- The _entertainment factor_ comes when any lefty _(who by definition can't be intelligent)_ meets *intellect* (JP).
he has done and he's noticeably different. talking with sam harris and matt dillahunty, he was much more aggressive and seemed intimidated by them
@@jhibbitt1 as you would expect him to be when faced with other intellects. I dont find all his arguments convincing or solid enough to get behind. Hes correct about the PC brigade but there are many who have been vocal on that including people like Douglas Murray and even Stephen Fry.
I disagree with him being banned from universities, thats just wrong.
Keep inviting Peterson to your programs so he can keep embarrassing you all.
Archer the wright stuff has been made a bigger group of fools than Cathy ha, these people don't hide their bias in the slightest, they wear their stupidity as a badge of honnor.
Archer and they will still blame him 4 their own stupidity
The left doesnt have anyone who can stand toe to toe with him. Brilliant mind.
Imagine if he went on TYT
Archer No I like Jordan Peterson and I think this was a good interview. Some points they agreed on, some points they did not and it was a pretty calm atmosphere. The only problem was the woman.
Jordan: You should pet a cat when you have the chance.
Cathy: So you're saying we should kick dogs
This is something Cathy would say....Correct!
This,THIS right here haha brilliant!
EyeQ 77 yes indeed!! Brilliant!
he should pet her
More like.. " Do you mean to take advantage of a woman and touch her pussy?"
"The controversial psychologist" in your description. Really? Fighting for free speech is controversial now
Its just another way of manipulating viewers that dont know anything yet, they read that and immediately worried about siding with him
@@MrGeorgerocker JBP is absolutely controversial, thats a totally fair claim to make. He brings up topics that many people disagree with and challenges new ideas, thats really close to the definition of controversial.
@@Bl4ckWarHawk Its astonishing how fact driven argumentation can be controversial in 2020. It says more about the stupid masses than Mr Peterson.
I bet fighting for freedom will eventually become a sin or something like that in the near future: /
@@MG-ln1yw so far everything here is true, he is indeed "controversial" and indeed people are stupid to the point that he is controversial
And it's simple why it happened. They have been subtly gradually implementing idiotic ideals in people as something normal in daily life and he's fighting as if he never got behind any of them in the first place, which I extremelly respect, and that's why he won't change the way he talks to suit anyone that has already been manipulated with pretty words and pretty ideals and doesn't even know, if we were 20 years ago he wouln't be controversial at all, but because pf that gradual and subtle implementation of unquestionable ideals on society, he comes as "controversial" when he, you know, questions...and even more so when the answers to the questions aren't as beautiful as they want them to be
And that's why he's usually either hated or loved
He’s too good for this
Rob Lutter I don't know, man. As an Englishman, I shuddered when I saw that he was on The Wright Stuff. The questions they asked were biased, innane and superficial.
Elroi The Overseer He your idol?
Elroi The Overseer
100% agreed.
BTW he's 100% correct about this IMHO.
Joely7
The comments he makes about "the interview" and the Marxist takeover of educational establishments.
If you read Max Horkheimers quote The Revolution Will Be Without Guns things might make a little more sense. 👍
Yotto O.
I must admit that his knowledge base on issues such as ww2 seems a little nieve and mainstream, but that's another story.
Cathay Newman is an embarrassment, and I am not alt right. I am in the middle where most of Peterson's viewers are.
@Josip It's quite clear he not only does this for men, but women too.
Gotta walk the line brother
Cathy Newman is not an embarrassment, but she did embarrass herself in that particular interview.
The young today are getting lead like blind sheep along the ulta left path toward socialism by their educators, I’m sick of being called the ultra right which is nazieism the correct definition is conservative,
@The Macallan trolllllll
Woman: I read that you said something..
Jordan: well I didn't say that, I said...
Woman: yeah but I read it so I'm right.
And that's what makes JP an island of reason in a sea of BS.
@@andy1185 So right
JP: READ MORE-.-
It's not unreasonable that she might have read him saying that the majority of the people who read his book are male. But there wasn't much reason to dwell on the nuance there
Jordan: "I had a ham sandwich for lunch."
Woman: "So you are advocating all vegans to be killed!"
“You’re wrong because my feelings don’t want you to be right”
Exactly
Hahaha...soooooo true
Self Enlightenment is hard earned, not for everyone? Mirrors of consciousness, are in the mind of reflection!😅🙏 Asking tough questions, is the driver, as Peterson says?
That woman never broke from a frown once. As far as she was concerned she was sat with "the enemy" and she just repeats what she has read in The Guardian. Shameful.
He questions the feminist orthodoxy: he says that we have equality of opportunity (which we do) but that attempting to control equality of outcome is never going to work, because we are individuals and will decide for ourselves. If I, as a woman, want to be an engineer; nothing stops me, nothing prevents me except myself and the fact I am not good enough at maths. Should they lower the criteria for me? No, I'd rather we had engineers who were properly qualified than have equality of gender at the risk of lowering expectations. Would I like more women in stem? Yes, if they choose to be. And that belief runs contrary to modern feminism.
An adult talking to children. No wonder the legacy media is dying.
Sophie is the LEADER of the Women's Equality Party, and is this thick. Let that sink in.
Good one.
2manynegativewaves parroting? Listen pal, I coined the term legacy media and You would’nt dare talk like that to my face. Im big and im hard. I’d put you in a headlock, make you say ‘legacy media’ 3 times in a girls voice and then cleveland steamer your face.
2manynegativewaves
You go from comment to comment, spitting out your bile like a bitter, tantrum throwing child.
You're the sort of person who desperately needs Dr Peterson's help.
Our human legacy is dying.
Alt right appears to now mean anyone who doesn’t 100% follow the status quo
If you're not LGBTI then you're alt right.
Alt right includes all conservatives and moderates. It also includes blue dog democrats, libertarian and classical liberals, and even moderate liberals. As long as you're not an authoritarian intersectionality ally you can consider yourself part of the alt right. And the actual alt right loves it.
paul paul I've seen several homosexuals considered "alt-right" because they wouldn't toe the line.
Basically, if you're not a commie, you must be a Nazi! Even if you object to Nazis in the strongest terms.
There are definitely a lot of people who are deliberately trying to conflate _alt-right_ with _anyone who criticises feminism._
JP: HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY!
Cathy: So you're saying women cannot be happy without compliments from men?
Or that they should only be happy for a single day out of the entire year?
So youre saying a woman has no value or no reason to be happy if she doesnt have any children
Each one of these 3 comments could've come from her mouth without irony or comedic wit. Truly outstanding ! 👏
So many ways that could've been interpreted
No matter how they try to twist, deflect and spin, Mr. Peterson's clear and succinct points cut like thunderbolts to the logical truth. Every interview is an intellectual fencing match and *Mr. Peterson is the Grand Maestro.*
ssazerac I agree. He's like the Michael Jordan of psychology and they are challenging him on the court. They really have no chance and you can see it. Totally out classed. He knows exactly how to manipulate the conversation into his favour. I think this pisses them off even more. That and he keeps making more and more money through sponsers on patreon....
Well its a lot easier to win a debate with someone when the facts and the data support your position. Sprinkle some charm and a good vocabulary and bobs your uncle the challengers look foolish
Simon Hodge "Bob's your uncle?" You Canadian? Lol I am. Anyways yeah, it's true. It's kinda like watching a one legged man in an ass kicking competition. There no real chance...anyone can beat them.
ssazerac fuckin amen
Which Hitchens are you referring to? The Religious one or dead one?
isn't it interesting how Peterson's critics immediately talk about the type of fans he has rather than ideas and arguments that he is proposing. perhaps it's a way of distracting people from the ideas (something critics know they have no response to)
Paulette Smither Do you have some examples?
Paulette Smither Such as?
Standard SJW tactic.
Paulette Smither his favorite authors are the likes of Dostoevsky and Nietzsche. If he's a racist because he likes those authors then more than half of academia is racist.
It's literally textbook logical fallacy (guilt by association). They have to start teaching logical fallacies in school, it's so embarrassing how many people don't recognize this basic con man shit for what it is, haha
These hosts are all insufferable.
Charlie Graham indeed.
Agreed. they are borderline aggressive, agenda-driven, and lazy thinkers.
Charlie Graham
Arnt they always...?
Its by design
The prick with a lisp is a soy boy wig-wearing idiot just by claiming Cathy newman skillfully left the impression of being befuddled by the 'gotcha' segment in her interview with JBP.
watch out, they'll label you "alt-right" for that!
Cathy is not a victim she was just outclassed in by Jordan at one point he had to slow his pace down to let her catch up. It was a brilliant lesson in thinking for yourself rather than just falling back on the generic cliches.
Hello there how are feeling today ?
I think 90% of the world outclasses her in listening.
This guy has a very calm way of making others reveal their bias and stupidity.
I couldn't agree with you more.
JD Worx This interview was pathetic though, what kind of people did they have there? They'd manage to gather about half a brain between them three.
That hit spot on
He is a DR. And knows very well how to deal with ill people
God who is that woman? The first thing she does is bring up the Alt-right. This is the reason Peterson is so popular. I am getting so sick of shit like this. I am a gay man and I am certainly not Alt right but I love Peterson because he talks such common sense and lumping me in with the Alt right just alienates me more from people like her on the left. They are doing this to themselves.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals."
- C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)
adsie79 i could feel your anger while reading your comment ! and you're damn right : this need to stop !
I agree. Just because what he says appeals to all kinds of individuals doesnt mean he's wrong. If everyone who disagrees with you is an alt right sympathizer, than what are you? They're angry they don't have a perfect argument and call them names? It's childish and closeminded.
Amen
The left are iliberal in their demands for liberality. They are exclusive in their demands for inclusivity. They are un-diverse in their call for diversity. What a paradox the left find themselves in. They are failing and they are doubling down on more stupidity. More young men are waking up to what DR. Peterson is saying because they see they have been lied to by the left and they’re not going to take it anymore...
“If you’re against feminism and Cathy Newman you’re alt right” this is pretty much what the hosts were assuming Jordan’s support was comprised of
straw man
truthseeker el oh el
I don't think she was saying that. If she was it was badly done. What she was trying to do is poison the well with 'guilty by association'.
The left seem to be everything they wrongly call others
peterson is a red-baiting loon who spews identity politics for aggrieved white males.
I love how he shut down that female's agenda, and her false accusations, straight off the bat! Beautifully done!
Yeah bro she stayed silent for the rest of the interview.
Thats what the left media does to everyone who questions or doubts their ideology. They try to brand you a racist, white supremacist, homophobe, misogynist, They have been doing it for years and this is why very few politicians or media people dare to go against the party line.
This guy is a legend he qualifies his argument with facts whereas these guys come across as pissing in the wind. I hate the media agenda that paints him as this raving alt right looney.
Importantly he is able to patiently and with absolute composure, contend with the crass media barracking he is routinely subjected to. That's bravery.
ShaneJoshua1980 I don’t like Jordan Peterson. I’m a liberal. I know that he’s a liberal.
Why does everyone have to spin everything as either good or bad, left or right. I may not like Peterson, but I recognise that he isn’t alt right at all.
NewBenCity you don't like a man whom I'm going to guess you've never met, how strange
ShaneJ - Come off it, man. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid. Peterson's claims about a massive left-wing Postmodernist conspiracy in the universities are so exaggerated and overblown. It reminds me of Hillary Clinton's blathering about
"a massive right-wing conspiracy". Sure, there are SOME left-wing nut-balls in SOME university departments (such as sociology, psychology, gender studies, anthropology) at SOME universities. But most professors just teach their subject and most students just want to get good grades, go to a good grad school, and eventually make lots of money and buy lots of stuff. I'd say that's about 95% of the people involved. Look at it this way - the 'humanities' subjects where Peterson encounters all these "Maoist" intellectuals - what proportion of the universities do they make up? Not very much. Is Peterson really saying that the freaky left-wing Postmodernists have also taken over all the other faculties, like civil engineering, computer science, medicine, law, mathematics, physics, geology, accounting, aeronautical engineering, architecture, business and management, chemistry, dentistry, German, and town planning? I mean, get real!
He never disrespects people, I don't always agree with him, but I like him as a person and speaker.
I'm an Indian guy living in India who listens to JBP.
Am I alt-right?
You're basically Hitler.
NorthEast Lad
Thanks for the heads up mate.
Really need some ethnic cleansing to reduce the population.
Join me.
Thomas McCarthy
LOL bro. India is more fucked than USA. We were in bed with Soviet Russia till the 1980s. Many public intellectuals are socialists.
We have governments of some states importing illegals from Bangladesh to expand their voter base.
We're lucky that we don't have the crazy multi gender advocates but that is not long away. Many people in leading universities are already speaking of there being multiple genders.
And I think that the USA is in a better position than many people make it out to be when talking about dealing with leftists.
And I hope you guys keep doing it.
abhishek kumar I know exactly what you are saying ! I'm Brazilian btw.
Thiago F
Lol Brazil is fucked too. Your country too has a lot of socialism. But hey I hope you guys win the world cup in the summer at least.
Notice how Sophie just keeps her mouth shut when she realizes she is actually talking to Jordan and not tweeting about him? love the silence, silence of the lamb.
@daniel ndungutripp OMG CC riders LMAO
lol i love that reference
Suffers badly from cognitive dissonance when faced with someone who can dismantle her carefully crafted slur.
@@garrycoates2147 Appreciate the remark; though I dispute it was carefully crafted - well-made things don't fall apart when there's a breeze.
Silence of the lamb bahaha
I don't believe that.
"Well I read an article that said that you do"
Someone needs to explain to this woman the difference between a primary and secondary source.
Thank you!
Can you say, defensive?!
The Wright Stuff was fortunate enough to have this extraordinary man on the show and all they did was talk about the nonsense connection between Jordan and the alt-right. Seriously, given that the mainstream media is now in direct competition with content creators like him, I have to ask, what were they thinking? If this is the best they can do I'll stick to TH-cam.
And, unironically, we are on TH-cam as we speak. I don't think I've watched proper television in nearly 2 years now.
I stopped watching mainstream media 3 years ago. There's far more intelligence on TH-cam.
sibeliandrift
*_If only ..._*
Mainstream media is long dead, and smells funny.
Because they are intellectually lacking and unable to debate him on any legitimate level so they have no choice but to resort to underhanded attacks, faulty correlations, and false accusations. It's the typical leftist tactic. How is Jordan somehow responsible for the actions of ALL of his followers? That is such leftist nonsense. I mean are Michael Moore or Obama responsible for the left-wing nut bag that shot the GOP lawmakers? I mean what a bunch of nonsense.
Mr Peterson knows his stuff, I'm gonna buy his book
I read 12 rules for life, well listened to the audio book on audible, it changed my life for the better so so positive.
I prefered the hundreds of hours of his university lectures.
Me too!
@@escapethewest same here
@@dmg1849 What is the "JQ"?
Channel 5 why don't you do something good for this country, get rid of Matthew Wright and give Jordan Peterson his own show.
He is leaving......soooo
Nope sorry. Dr. Peterson is he needed elsewhere 😆
Would be far better.
Helmholtz and in UK, there's been some suggestion he may run for office in Canada, tho not sure if that's just wishful thinking, I'm tempted to get emigration papers ready just incase!
Who will speak to the cucks then?
His patience and performance is admirable
You ganged up on him 3 on 1 and STILL got embarrassed.
GenericDreamers .. Actually Boris Johnson's love child on the right was more on jp's side.
Gavin Rogerson LOL
I thought it was Luke Skywalker in the Holiday Special th-cam.com/video/scf2QL_fc8U/w-d-xo.html
Wiggy was agreeing with Peterson, so it was 2 on 2. I thought Mathew Wright and the Labour MP did well in dealing with the wriggler. I liked how Mathew said “ I believe that you believe”. ... that’s how you deal with Peterson.
Wriggler? Like the Super Mario World ones? That if you jump on them they fuck your shit up? Cause that's all he did to Wright and the Poli-chicken
Sophie didn't learn a thing from the Cathy Newman interview and tried to outsmart Jordan. It's a cringe worthy attempt. Jordan dismissed any criticism with consumate ease.
Who is she?
solatiumz . Not sure who she is. She was introduced as the leader of the WEP. I think they are the woman's equality party. Which sounds like an extremely sexist hate group.
They tried...but Peterson challenged their integrity and they knew they hadn't got the facts to support their claims..and they knew that if they pursued this any further that it would end up as ridiculous as the Newman interview
BRIANMORAN It was a flawless victory for Jordan.
So what you're saying is...
Daedalus this happens too often though. Watch 15 mins of Peterson and, as a professional, they should know better and more. Either they are terrible at their job or there is a narrative because this was pretty embarrassing and to arm yourself incorrectly is one thing but to arm yourself with similar tools as the previous loser (Cathy Newman) is incompetent and very coincidental. I’m starting to question the levels of incompetence among mainstream journalists and what their agenda may actually be
When it comes to mischaracterising another person I don't think one can blame google search results
@@ChuckGuvener90 I think the bigger picture may be to make television in the UK irrelevant...those working for it dont seem to realise that this is on the table
The reverence I have for this man is infinite. Jordan Peterson is a genius with such a deep care in his soul...He is so beautifully gracefully powerful. I just get everything he shares...he actually teaches every time he speaks.. The world should listen.
@Benedict Hampus which in itself is exactly what Jordan Peterson says, think for yourself even if you agree with him, you can also disagree with him. That is the freedom of being an individual.
It seems that on average 3 out of 3 TV hosts are "not mentally well" ... this is so cringe-inducing!
The one on the right with the silly hair is a Conservative MP, the woman is a politician in the "Women's Equality Party" - lol, and the guy on the left is the host.
The TV host here is A okay dude
You have the patience of a saint Jordan. Never has the line "Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right!" Been so apt.
marccas10 😀
"Here I am, stuck in the middle with you" - Stealers Wheel ;)
Hello there how are you doing today ?
Sophie Walker - you can almost feel the passive aggression just boiling under that calm, patronising exterior when she talks.
You are delusional.
She's so angry cathy Newman got dusted by Peterson 😂😂
Well articulated Jack - I share your sentiment exactly. I couldn’t last more than 5 minutes in the same room as her. Awful condescending presence about her.
She wasn’t calm though. But other than that you are right.
I agree. She should try some calming techniques, like ironing or cleaning the cooker.
I am so happy Jordan debates so well. I hate that the “journalists “ always act as if Jordan is responsible for what other groups do or say in response to his lectures 🙄
Absolutely agree. That is a highly questionable strategy I seem to witness a lot when Peterson is confronted.
They never discuss actual content, they only rave about 3rd parties reacting to Peterson, something he obviously has no say in.
I do not know how Peterson manages to put up w/ twits like these. I couldn't do it. :/
pretty sure the money doesnt hurt. lol
Tom R: questionable trade-off.
It's a testiment to his profession. He understands psychology and how to navigate all kinds of social situations. Yeah basically he's like the Michael Jordan of psychology, and all these people are trying to challenge him on the court.....yeah they have no chance. He knows what he's doing.
@Johan - Lol. The "guy with the ugly hair" is a conservative MP....en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Fabricant
solatiumz. For a minute there, I thought he was Boris Johnson’s love child
Attacked and ridiculed from all sides and he barely raises a brow. I strive to be that persistent and dangerous in social confrontations.
It was like a Bruce Lee movie ... but with ideas
2manynegativewaves That is not the definition of a sociopathic mentality. You don't like Dr. Peterson because you've been told to. Be honest, you haven't actually listened to any of his lectures, have you?
TheBear yea well said. He's fucking brilliant one of my favourite intellectuals
It was like watching a chess Grand Master check mating 3 amateur players simultaneously in a demonstration match.
I don't get how people can watch any footage of Mr. Peterson and somehow conclude he is an extremist of any sort
They see him as a major threat to their narrative and agenda so they have to target him with every weapon in their armoury. Thankfully, so far, Jordan Peterson is impervious to their hostility and while he continues to tell the truth about their wretched programme he will endure.
The extremists are the hosts.
Wishful thinking in short.
Long ramble version: a common human failing- consciously or unconsciously avoiding anything that might question your easy, favored, explanation about the universe- we all like to feel in control, safe, and efficient (lazy).
In other words: they don't actually watch enough un-edited JBP to learn what he's really truly about; they only go along with what others say (due to yet another human failing- tendency to want to fit in with the group, or get along with what others around you are doing/saying, even if you know it is nonsense- you avoid finding out for sure so that you can feel "cool" because you are also "in the know" about that thing which you do not actually know much about (you pretend to know about it by using the sound-bite-style summary you heard from somewhere), and get a nice little ego-boost; feeling a bit more important/special that way.
*Sophie Walker slowly slides down her chair out of sight and through a trap door beneath the desk. Meanwhile, Harry Enfield on the far right of the desk watches on in the wig out of the movie Psycho*
Best comment ever.
😂😂😂😂
The woman in the middle, is totally upstaged by 3 male smarty pants, she sounded like a whiny femtard from the get go, notice when they all laughed at each other, she just sat there looking sheepish. the guy on the end looks like a mixup of Trump, david ike and the milky bar kid.
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
WTF is that bloke doing with the WIG?????
She immediately jumps to ad hominem - ('why are you so popular with the Alt-Right?). This tactic is always used by a person who does not have a convincing argument to hand.
But the thing is, the alt right does like him, most conservatives like him, and I have noticed that people, usually conservatives, who are racist, sexist, homophobic, etc., absolutely love him. Now, why is that?
@Amy Thompson Yes some people on the alt right do love him. But millions of people who are not on the alt right also love him. So where does that get you? What percentage of your audience being alt right gets your view points or ideas dismissed. 1% 2% 30%? Guilt by association is not a game you want to play and peoples ideas stand on their own merits. If I told you that ice is cold and someone on the alt right agreed with my statement that ice is cold does that invalidate my statement that ice is cold?
Oh brother...sigh....his base is the alt right. The racists, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobes love him. Sure, there may be some who are slightly on the left who agree with SOME of what he says, but more liberal psychologists say the same thing. Peterson became famous over the pronoun thing, which most people agree with, including myself, but his ideas are very conventional and conformist in many ways, and there really is nothing that special about the man. To me, he IS the dumb person's smart person. He totally ignores the atrocities of Trump and his bigoted and incompetent cabinet and his deplorable supporters., He even defended the indefensible on Bill Maher, which made me lose all respect for him. And your lack of logic is pretty amazing...really, ice cream? LOL The differences between your youtube page and mine says it all, sorry.
Amy Thompson Watch out - through misuse and overuse leading to desensitization, eventually, there will be nothing to call anyone who remotely disagrees with you.
sigh...the old "disagree" thing doesn't work any more. Sorry, but I DO disagree with bigots who hold all the "isms" and "obias" and will continue to do so without any guilt. I look at Peterson's videos and others concerning him, and by looking at the comments, I can tell the type of people who support him...imagine that! It's really easy and it's also easy to see they are not the best and brightest.
Interviewer realizes 30 seconds into interview he is in over his head.
He's not "in over his head." Jordan starts to lose his cool less than three minutes into the video, but people like yourself always find new ways to defend his ravings.
@@TheBermudaMan Lose his cool? I would argue the reverse. He is remarkably well behaved despite the numerous interruptions he experiences while trying to explain himself.
@@TheBermudaMan Dream on.
@Horsey Daniels hey deffo loses his cool against that French interviewer but he still makes his points and admits that he was disappointed in himself. Personally I thought it was badass
@@TheBermudaMan ooh. Not a popular comment. Mind you, it is a retarded comment.
3 against 1? This was absolutely NOT fair. They needed at least 10 more idiotic talking-heads to even begin to have a chance against Peterson.
And the guy on the left agrees with him anyway, hes just doing his job, a job he has quit after refusing to apologise for a guest stating a biological fact about a transgender guest
what are you talking about? I'm watching it right now and it's 1 on 1.
edit: sorry, just noticed there are two of them. You're still wrong tho it's not 3 v 1.
second edit: sorry, I just finished the whole thing and you were right, there are three of them.
(lol jp btw, anyone else thrown off by their cropping. I was like where the fuck is this 3rd voice coming from?)
Johnny Nonuts, Quillo, dreamer097 Ahhh, do you find the concepts of irony, sarcasm & humor difficult to Grasp?
Do you find the concept of responding to a detail rather than the *humour difficult to grasp?
I have nothing but absolute love and adoration for Jordan Peterson. If more men were like him the world would be a better place.
this man is my hero. not alt right or left, just reasonable and logical.
blue magus i like to call him radical centrist
oh no a troll who means less then my last shit has called me a bad name, what ever shall i do, you have hurt me and i now need to reevaluate my life cause some prick online was mean.
Please oh wise ass sage who no one gives a shit about, bestow upon me your superior insights as to who should be a hero and roll model of people in this day and age?
Yeah but it also means he is hated by both extremes and media loves and supports extremes and hates normal, common people soo... not a chance he'll get a fair treatment ever.
but he still puts himself out there to make sure a reasonable voice is heard knowing he will be attacked, knowing he will be hated, but he will make people think and consider his words carefully. that is at least noble if not heroic. knowing your odds are against you but you need to have this fight no matter what.
blue magus It's not a good idea to have heroes.
It's like children with talking to a very smart grown up. He's right about the UK although the poison of identity politics is spreading in parts of the UK too.
BANKO007 it's already spread. It's in tv adverts, soap narratives, literature (50 shades of grey).
Maz Klassa Very true, It's like we are saturated with political correctness In all the media outlets, Channel 4 being the worst contender, And has been for a very long time!!! But of course nothing gets done about it, Simply because if you say anything you are deemed bigoted, Or Sexist, Regardless of the reality, And the truth being told.
Nothing of any substance was said by either side.
It was a vague middle-brow discussion between a TH-cam celebrity and a TV host.
Please, don't flatter him or yourself Peterson he is psuedo intellectual hack passing off self help and quackery to inadequate man babies
Alpha State No they're not men babies. They've watched lots of very intellectual TH-cam videos and they're actually at the cutting edge of Western philosophy. It's just that the brainwashed cultural Marxist libtards can't see beyond their echo chambers. But bear in mind that this is deep stuff and takes a while to grasp.
Got to meet Dr Peterson this evening at Oxford... was awesome
Lucky, git. lol
Yeah, at the Oxford Union. Didn't get to ask him a question personally, but book signed and words heard
You lucky, lucky basterd 😉
"Cathy Newman was sitting there with her mouth wide open, and slowly closing again, like a goldfish."
This guy is hilarious!!! Love how Peterson was caught off guard by that great remark.
What a horrible panel, full of baseless accusations and ideologies. Jordan keep strong and aim straight. God bless
It's daytime TV. Mass consumption for the utterly moronic.
Not impressed with the interviewers. Their fixation with the alt right betrays their ignorance of the alt right.
As a British person, I would like to apologise for Wright and that woman - whoever she is.
This "alt-right" bollocks has got to stop.
she's the Leader of the Woman's Equality Party, the one Sandi Toksvig was smarming about how she was going to be an MP for and they was going to change the UK for the better from their posh Chelsea homes. Strangely Sandi went quite on that and suddenly took the host job for QI ( I wonder why? but not much, can guess)
YW :) got to love a party that says we are for only half the population lol
No need to apologise for Wright, he needs to put the questions forward and handed himself well enough by letting Jordan express his views, and not trying to twist his words. On the other hand Sophie.....
anyone with a different opinion to me is alt right
I think Wright was pretty reasonable and listened to what he had to say. The woman was a total shill though
Can always tell they've no argument when they come out with "alt right" and start playing the victim narrative.😱
This girl at my university called me alt-right because I said Jordan Peterson is the professor we need right now in these Dark Times. Yup.
Jordan Peterson is def someone I can listen to everyday and learn something new.
Tomi Adewole pfft I've been called a negro Nazi since 2011. Long story short. Liberals are dumb
Three against one? Jordan still destroyed them. Is that journalism these days? Rather sad people aren't they these media types.
64kdwg the one with sheep hair is with Peterson I think
Two against one at most. The blonde gentleman seemed to be making general conversation and was not attacking him. The lady was on the attacking asking facetious though pointed, questions and the host was being a fair moderator.
Maybe next time they can make it 4 to one. JBP still outmatched the bunch.
He has been speaking about these issues for years and there are dozens of his lectures available it's quite late in the game that people are now paying attention.
He is "defensive" when defending against unfair accusations but I think he has more of a cassandra complex generally speaking.
AWE SUM Hm. Don't agree. If you were constantly being deliberatly mis-represented you would also be defensive. And it was clear that the WEP woman had an aggressive agenda.
Peterson handles radical left wing idealogues in his sleep at this point.
Okay, that's funny stuff, right there.
Yeah, he's like Neo when he finally realized he's the one 1!!!! Just going through the motions at this point.
I was just thinking that. Like he's not even intellectualizing it anymore. Without missing a beat he just reaffirms his logic.
Left wing and right wing are both extreme.
Nailed.
Jordan is super aware and articulate, something these interviewers could never hope to achieve. The interview with Cathy Newman was a total embarrassment to Cathy Newman.
Nice job reminding me of how much I cant stand TV.
Cathy Newman is a great accomplished journalist?!
Really?!!
got any examples?
She's breaking down. I have a video of her presenting a live Chan 4 news preview from about a month ago..she's nearly in tears..it is amazing! I can't believe it hasn't been covered anywhere..it's like her anger and her emotions are just choking her!
Douglas B. where is the link to that video
She is a mouthpiece for the establishment. A useful idiot because of her own bias. She tried this time and failed because Peterson is smarter than her by a mile.
Mart G . Was thinking the same myself. There are plenty of other examples of her rank, agenda driven, ‘interviews’
Skyzen Skyluke
I've not seen it anywhere. I filmed it off the TV as I was shocked at the state she was in. I have it on my phone..may send it to Sargon or Paul Joseph Watson.👍
I bought his book. I'm neither left not right, I just love his voice of reason. He is exactly what this chaotic world needs.
168dp 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
No it isn't, this world needs a culling. Thanos had the right idea, but he tried to be indiscriminate. We need to give JP the Infinity Gauntlet...
Hypersonik couldn’t agree more . The gene pool gets weaker with every generation
@@SR-kv1ic I see you're a positive fellow...
Always love how people that comment their appreciation of Peterson often make the disclaimer I am neither left or right. What’s the problem if you are left or right? It doesn’t mean you can’t critically examine his statements and decide upon agreement when there’s agreement and highlight a difference of views if there are any. Most people aren’t entirely left or right but compose some sort of amalgamation therein, but to say I don’t subscribe to the left or right is highly suspect. If that is the case, I wish they would stop trying to shield themselves for potential unfair criticism and simply stand by your convictions.
It’s like he’s still defending himself for defending himself. Story of his life I’d say.
Very well said.
Hundreds of interviews is crazy wouldn't you say ?
I think Jordan thrives on these discourses, it's intellectually stimulating for him and for those observing, and at the same time educating us all.
Wright isn’t intelligent enough to debate Peterson. He’s sadly lacking.
Yeah, can't go from ball pit to MMA gym...
What's the point of an intelligent debate on TV if Mr. Average Joe can't understand anything of it anyway?
Boo bear x but Matthew Wright is a really nice guy
J Wroot no, no he isn't, only if you agree with him, he's vile to people he disagrees with.
He's a pathetic little script reader, not the great journalist he thinks he is
J Wroot nice guys finish last (look into the etymology of nice, or better yet watch Peterson's lectures where he discusses it)
They are so obsessed with labeling his listeners as alt right. When are they gona stop falsifying that narrative and actually take the time as journalist should to listen to what is being said. Like have some integrity.
And the thing is, it's not even in their interests to associate him with the alt-right. They're just going to blur the lines between what's really alt-right and not, then they won't even recognise their true enemies and only see enemies everywhere. The real alt-right will hide in plain sight from them. Is that something they really want?
Because integrity went out the window a long time ago for journalist. Their ideological agent has replaced integrity.
"You have no evidence of that."
Lady looks desperately at her notes for evidence that she knows does not exist.
"She (Cathy Newman) sat there looking at you with her mouth open and slowly closing like a goldfish - because she did´t know what to say." So funny, and accurate!
watching in 2020, he was exactly right about the marxists wasnt he??
He was
You don't have to be a genius to be right about it. , It would be enough to know some history.
I have a theory that China is trying to weaken our society so it collapses itself but I'm probably just crazy there.
@@AImighty_Loaf I mean every powerful country does that to everyone all the time...
Sheesh
someone has been waiting just so they can be right
I dont think she knows what alt right means.
It's that hip new music all the kids are listening to these days.
Anyone she disagrees with, obviously.
She’s alt-left. Fascism with a smile.
This twit doesn't know what many things are. She's the type you'd like to see go hiking in Morocco
@@WeAreWafc or "ctrl-Left"
The left today.
1. Wilfully misrepresent.
2. Smear.
3. Toxify
4. De-platform
5. Bankrupt (if possible).
Any questions?
marccas10, They have become toxic, and lack values. Justifying abuse and violence shows how morally bankrupt they are. Their Ideology is intellectually bankrupt.
Erm... aren't you currently willfully misrepresenting and toxifying etc "the left" in your statement?
That's exactly that point. To generalise is to perpetuate the myth. Like the left demonising the right. It's not tit for tat. You can be liberal and agree with JP.
The main voice of the Left at present is the Regressive Toxic Left. The Moderates remained quiet when the Aggressive Violent Left have been Abusive, Aggressive and Violent. The Moderate Left have handed the voice of the Left to the Extreme Left by their lack of criticism of the Extreme Left. Dave Rubin and others have abandoned the Left as they have become Extreme.
Piers Trindal you're 100% right. In fact it's true those with the loudest voices both left and right seemingly try to outdo each other in their respective extremities. JP speaks against identity politics then we see people stereotyping a group like the OP did. It's counter productive and pushes the extreme left even more extreme.
I'm pretty central personally so all I can do is look both ways and shrug my shoulders!!
He's wide awake, probably had a good night's sleep. Has his morning joe. They don't have a chance.
what a relief to hear someone actually speak clearly, to be direct. I'm so happy Mr. Jordan is here.
A pathetic attempt to discredit JP by labelling him as the newest boogie man the "alt-right". and the typical personal attacks that result from an inability to counter a argument.
MGTOW Texan JP isn't Alt Right but he should be
Alt-right again? Stop half arsing your research Sophie. Id like to see her go 30 minutes with Dr P. In an interview. In fact, I have an idea 💡
Anyone that wants to call this man anything but what he is should spend 30 minutes with him uninterrupted, trying there best to prove their arguments.
Colin Cannon this would be an amazing show. Every week, 30 minutes of some dumbass trying to insult Jordan, while he ends their careers.
tha fuck is the jq
@Zigmas Kisielius the "JQ" is the "Jewish Question" and anyone who goes on about it can be rightly ignored as an Anti-Semite
death threats on standby for sophie lol
Fran Ohmsford What if you dont understand the "JQ" and go on about it to learn wtf it is.
?
Another train crash interview. Demolitions using logic and facts.
Oh man after Jordan spoke to the lady beside him, she didn’t want anymore smoke, she stayed silent for the rest of the interview fearing to be ‘cathy newmaned’. That’s tough 🤣🤣🤣
Why are you supporting a guest of yours in her attacks against Peterson? Why didn't you ask her where her evidence was for claiming the alt-right loves him? Why did you drag on about the death threats, when Peterson has nothing to do with them?
Hugh Mongous!?!
Best they can do... guilty by association
HUGH MONGOUS WHAT
No. It's my name. I am Hugh Mungus
Because they can't argue his beliefs lol they would lose immediately
Three stooges and one brilliant mind.
Don't belittle the three stooges
Brilliant, Peterson gave fact after fact and destroyed any attempt to discredit him! 👌🏼
Is there any TV interviewer who can actually make a proper follow up question instead of just shouting out their incredibly biased and oponionated questions?
Her attack didnt last long. The Alt Right, come on darling is that all you got? Oh dear
My admiration to the show for putting up a video of them getting owned
Luis Montemayor
😎damn straight
That kind of attitude is why you will never change anyone's mind and why Jordan does it for a living. He goes out of his way not to 'own' people because hostility makes people less likely to change their world view
@GreyboSneed I enjoyed hearing one of the callers say they called up to argue against JP's views but that after hearing him talk (instead of what the far left says about him), he'd been persuaded by JP.
If they hadn't done it, someone else would have (and did)- that's why!
He's NOT controversial he's correct, look at the science.
This woman thinks she can say “alt right” and his argument can just be dismissed. She has no argument
Enough of this Alt-right accusations. I'm an ex-muslim and follower and a student of professor Peterson. He is showing your young people here in the west to be responsible and useful, he helps them to make something out of themselves and stand up and don't rot in their dreams. I wish there was one like him in power in my country then we would have a much better situation that pure corruption! Let him talk and be heard, don't shoot the messenger when he shows you what the problem is!
TV hosts -- You're not going to trip up Jordan or get him to cower by bringing up some BS another person says. He will tell you, "That's incorrect and here's why it's incorrect." No hesitation and no waffling. He knows exactly what he's saying AND he knows exactly what he's said in the past. He is not unsure or confused about whatever subject you're talking about. You can't run circles around him. This is a man who makes a living operating on people's minds without a scalpel. You are all out of your depth.
I love how JP always speaks data and statistics and interviewers always rely on anecdotal evidence.
Will Giani and their "feelings"
@@jamienelson3470 Yep .. 'feelings' 🙄 😏.
There was a strong implication during this interview that Jordan Peterson was somehow responsible for Cathy Newman receiving death threats for HER behaviour during this interview. This is a prime example of the importance of Jordan's points on individual responsibility
You're right but bear in mind, these alleged death threats were only claimed, no evidence was produced to verify her claims. As is usual in these cases, when the left leaning person loses an argument, as Cathy Newman clearly did, they try to frame themselves as the victim in some way, thus undermining the opponents comments or beliefs.
Modern journalists are competing for the idiocy award. Here we have seen some natural talent.
Nobody can outdo Don Lemon.
Why, why, why do people STILL TRY to win an argument with Jordan Peterson???........IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!!
Jordan peterson is an absolute genious and utterly OUT-CLASSES everyone else in this interview!
Look....Genius! Is old fashioned and IQ is old fashioned...OK BUT! To move the attitudes of cultures on, Requires Einstein style attitudes...Where he had to divert from the Trilogies Of Education holding him back......And when his Einsteinian Uniqueness-eventually was appraised, The established Conventionally Educated, through Trilogy ruts, realised what they had been lacking the vision to See, And willingly, sponged off his Unique abilities....How many others are being held back in the same way...Where established out of date Traditions over rule progress, preferring the rut...over which specialisation cannot see! RDR
Just a matter of COMMON SENSE....no more or less....
IQ is not “old fashioned”
him against ben shapiro would break the universe
@@kajenbop maybe not old fashioned
Maybe just not obvious or demonstrated for a generation or two?
That ladys first attempt was to put an alt-right spin onto Peterson. Went rather quiet after that didn't she.
Lady. Don't you mean bitch or cunt? Fuck Matthew wright and his show. I use to like it but then I woke up. Fucking journalist cunts!! Mentally ill puppets trying to act smart. Too many of us are awaken and we don't watch shitty debates on tv because they're fake or set up.
I keep being distracted by that old dude's golden hair. He's doing well folicly if that's real
It's real. It's just not his ;)
Everyone has an opinion
.....heard he got it from wayfair but its actually a tea cosy.........quite trendy at moment if you like a brew up.
I searched for this comment lmaooo
Disaffected Leftie and massive JBP fan here. #notAltRight #notMale
She represents everything men today despise about Western, “educated” women. And the kind of woman that wonders where all the good men went. What a shrew
Shrews are cute, whereas Cathy Newman ...
@@DieFlabbergast Is a bot programmed to say "So you're saying" to everything.
That was painful to watch, that woman is so dense.
He's too smart for these lefties
What she said: "I'm talking about what I saw."
What she meant: "I'm talking about what I wanted to see."
She didn't even read the book
This womans party representative obviously didn't do her research. It was really pathetic. DO BASIC RESEARCH before you do an interview with this man. This man is brilliant. Attempting to minimize him is pathetic.
'The Wright Stuff' just had itself wiped CLEAN by the Lobster Man.
Everytime he speaks the truth it gives me chills! damn!