I met a guy who used to say that it was shot in space, I knew it was not possible, and I confirmed it when I saw the VFX breakdown behind the scene shots.
@@Muradsahar it’s also very impressive that this VFX was in crafted in 2013, and technology nowadays has evolved and yet still not have come close to the brilliance of the cgi in those times
From " Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN " awesome movie but with a small budget to " GRAVITY " Alfonso is one of, at least to me, one of the greatest movie directors of all times.
OffPlanet, well, look again. There's a snippet with her and N. Kidman at the 2018 Oscars on YT. It's scary. Plastic surgery applied to an actress bears the risc of putting her out of business. But she made the decision. Why Mrs. Bullok decided this way is beyond me.
True that. People criticizing this movie what really have they achieved in their own lives? The sheer amount of hard work that went behind filming this is enormous.
If you're suggesting that NASA is faking everytihing with CGI, then I'd say EVERYONE should learn from them. Because if everything that NASA releases is CGI, then they have the absolute best VFX artists that can pump out hours of CGI every now and then. Not to mention the render times it would take to render everything NASA supposedly does in your eyes. You people show just how little you know about that matter.
i think 53 million a day is enough to easily pull it off. For crying out loud a stupid dumb movie did this in 2013 come on wake up and smell the coffee!!
@@hawthornselitelevel1220 again.. render times and not to mention live streams. Explain to me how such big render files could possibly be rendered in real time?
Yeah...that's what everybody would wanted but truth is....life Isn't always happy at the end. It's more methaphoric I think....not everything can happen the way we want. 😞
The zero-g scenes in Apollo 13 were miles ahead, since they actually show real weightlessness. They actually built the set inside NASA's plane "The vomit comet", which then repeatedly went into a dive providing 25-30 seconds of true weightlessness on each dive. They should have went with that approach in "Gravity" too. I have yet to see a convincing "fake" weightless scene. Oversett
Ron Howard: Lets build a space ship inside of a Jet and dive repeatedly to create zero g's James Cameron: Lets build a full size cruise ship, put people on it and actually sink it. Alfonzo: Hey go stand over there in front of that green screen
+Anthony Studios One thing you're never going to get is a movie actually filmed in space. Therefore, you will deal with a downpour of CGI when it comes to space-related films.
Agreed. This movie seemed like a scene from Interstellar. The only reason this got all the praise was because it had reasonable CGI that looked 'better'. The only reason for this is because Christopher Nolan (Director of Interstellar) decided not to use much CGI, in fact 70% of the scenes that look like CGI aren't.
8 years later & this movie is still absolutely amazing.
I can't believe it's already that old.
Honestly this is one of those movies that just keeps pulling you back, it's so personal and beautiful.
such a great movie, You wouldn't think it wasn't shot in space.
I met a guy who used to say that it was shot in space, I knew it was not possible, and I confirmed it when I saw the VFX breakdown behind the scene shots.
@@Muradsahar it’s also very impressive that this VFX was in crafted in 2013, and technology nowadays has evolved and yet still not have come close to the brilliance of the cgi in those times
Becouse space is shot in the Earth 😂
Gravity... Masterpiece in so much fields
masterpiece
the music is so beautiful
From " Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN " awesome movie but with a small budget to " GRAVITY " Alfonso is one of, at least to me, one of the greatest movie directors of all times.
sandra is one of those women who gets better looking the older she gets.
OffPlanet, well, look again. There's a snippet with her and N. Kidman at the 2018 Oscars on YT. It's scary. Plastic surgery applied to an actress bears the risc of putting her out of business. But she made the decision. Why Mrs. Bullok decided this way is beyond me.
@@fuerLutzinot that deep
Sandra Bullock..perfect MILF!!!!
You people cant be satisfied, can you now? This movie was amazing. Perfect. Everything.
True that. People criticizing this movie what really have they achieved in their own lives? The sheer amount of hard work that went behind filming this is enormous.
@@gauravjain7653 hard work doesnt automatically mean its amazing lmaoooo
@@user-sf8ff3ir1u hard work ? They put up >4 years of their lives in making this movie. I am not sure what your greivance it ?
@@gauravjain7653 i had a stroke reading this
Sandra u played yo part... bravo
1:56 Damn hooligans!
Hahaha
Really awesome 👍
hey...so few works of art actually cut a new trail...see the passion of joan of arc...this epic broke all of the glass over our brains thank...love...
i actually thought this was filmed in space
No you didn't.
me too
Actually it WAS filmed in space, w/ the smartphone of a big fan of Dr. Stone. Don't believe this "Behind The Scenes" conspiracies, they are all fake!
@@NipapornP rlly
@@emretufan3759 nope haha
how did this not won best movie in the oscars?
It got 7 Oscar's. That's not enough?
Bruh it won a ton of awards
@@cyberpunkchloe9 i said best picture.
@@hckingking i said best picture.
NASA could seriously learn from these people.
Aishisu Fuyu what do you mean
What a S T U P I D comment.....!!!!
If you're suggesting that NASA is faking everytihing with CGI, then I'd say EVERYONE should learn from them. Because if everything that NASA releases is CGI, then they have the absolute best VFX artists that can pump out hours of CGI every now and then. Not to mention the render times it would take to render everything NASA supposedly does in your eyes. You people show just how little you know about that matter.
i think 53 million a day is enough to easily pull it off. For crying out loud a stupid dumb movie did this in 2013 come on wake up and smell the coffee!!
@@hawthornselitelevel1220 again.. render times and not to mention live streams. Explain to me how such big render files could possibly be rendered in real time?
What song is playing through the video?
Hey Emily. The background music is a production track i chose from our company's catalogue.
Hope you enjoyed the video:)
the movie would have been perfect if clooney was also survived... they both survived.. land to earth.. happy ending...
Yeah...that's what everybody would wanted but truth is....life Isn't always happy at the end. It's more methaphoric I think....not everything can happen the way we want. 😞
thanks for uploading.
Is the ISS?
Its a movie that its set on though,
NASA PLEASE MAKE BETTER VIDEO LEARN FROM GRAVITY
U are rigt!
jessie james was a FOOL to cheat on her. Shes beautiful.
seeing jesse james history with american chopper, the dude is a real asshole to everyone else any Hollywood
The zero-g scenes in Apollo 13 were miles ahead, since they actually show real weightlessness. They actually built the set inside NASA's plane "The vomit comet", which then repeatedly went into a dive providing 25-30 seconds of true weightlessness on each dive. They should have went with that approach in "Gravity" too. I have yet to see a convincing "fake" weightless scene.
Oversett
What about 2001: A Space Odyssey?
Cuaron likes to shoot long takes, tho. Also, it costs allot.
This film is a work of art, not a documentary on weightlessness...
Ron Howard: Lets build a space ship inside of a Jet and dive repeatedly to create zero g's
James Cameron: Lets build a full size cruise ship, put people on it and actually sink it.
Alfonzo: Hey go stand over there in front of that green screen
Those are completely different movies, you missed the point of this one lad....
THere were too much of this 'daughter'
eh, the CGI was ok, and the actors were good. The story could be better.
the story of this movie is so bland.... could have been an amazing movie but lol
interstellar was better by miles... why did this movie get all the praise
interstellar was better in story but this movie is better in effects
manuel diaz i disagree. i prefer models and real practical effects than a downpour of CGI
+Anthony Studios One thing you're never going to get is a movie actually filmed in space. Therefore, you will deal with a downpour of CGI when it comes to space-related films.
Jay Alford except intertsellar. which was mostly models and sets...
Agreed. This movie seemed like a scene from Interstellar. The only reason this got all the praise was because it had reasonable CGI that looked 'better'. The only reason for this is because Christopher Nolan (Director of Interstellar) decided not to use much CGI, in fact 70% of the scenes that look like CGI aren't.