The Whirlpool 2 in 1 washer vs giant comforter

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 มี.ค. 2023
  • As you can see, it barely did anything at all.
    I think a giant sized Dexter commercial front load washer would've been the perfect washer for this.

ความคิดเห็น • 161

  • @thebiglt2187
    @thebiglt2187  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't think you people even know how HE washers wash. Do you really think the performance would be better without the agitator? Do you people truly believe an impeller alone would be much better at washing a queen size comforter than the full agitator?

    • @spzhzyd-ex2hr
      @spzhzyd-ex2hr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You should've put the agitator out of the washing machine

    • @Leenightwolf
      @Leenightwolf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No disrespect to you but that washer is a piece of Garbage and it can't do anything so what is the point of this machine and they call it high efficiency washer I REALLY DON'T THINK SO.

    • @DorothySnow-jb1os
      @DorothySnow-jb1os 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have this washing machine and I love it! The agitator has never been used as I have huge loads.I have both queen and king size comforters and they come out clean and perfect every time.

    • @Leenightwolf
      @Leenightwolf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DorothySnow-jb1os yeah and it's probably because the comforters was already cleaned right before you put them in your washer that's why they came out clean

    • @DorothySnow-jb1os
      @DorothySnow-jb1os 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Leenightwolf Nope they were really dirty!! They came out of the washer smelling and looking really clean

  • @petermaz701
    @petermaz701 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    What a shame, such an expensive washer and it can’t even wash a comforter, very poor agitation.

    • @toyotatacomaguy23
      @toyotatacomaguy23 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it did turn this over though

    • @mtgau2000
      @mtgau2000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You need a bigger one, tho

    • @skrcountryball81
      @skrcountryball81 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True

  • @mitchg707
    @mitchg707 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This is so depressing to watch, but I GREATLY appreciate you posting it. All these Manufacturers should be ashamed for putting these machines on the market. I'd never want to put my name on this, that's for sure.

  • @calebramirez7498
    @calebramirez7498 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This is why old school washers are better because they have really good agitation

    • @mtgau2000
      @mtgau2000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah

  • @rayban-usa5482
    @rayban-usa5482 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Get the 5.2 size, It has no problems handling large comforters. Its the best washer I have ever owned. The results are spectacular. You can customize it to wash just about anything to the way you like it. NIght and day difference Agitation is robust with the extra room.

  • @andybub45
    @andybub45 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The best agitators are dual action like the ones on the lower end whirlpools. They actually turn clothes over. That’s the one thing that turned me away from the higher end whirlpools. These one piece agitators are basically giant impellers. And yes I know on this one it can be removed but on lots of them you can’t.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes they should make real dual action agitators for their higher end HE washers instead of having these fake dual action agitators. This is why I prefer the modern belt drive whirlpool washers because they have the classic direct drive dual action agitators.

    • @toyotatacomaguy23
      @toyotatacomaguy23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the best agitator was whirlpools old one piece agitator which they put in their old direct drives, turned stuff over amazingly

    • @user-qp9pu1xi4k
      @user-qp9pu1xi4k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or bring back the swift movements of direct drives. That will get some water movement action.

  • @jlb2126
    @jlb2126 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Even if I set it to "deep fill," it only fills halfway at most. Also, it starts agitating before there is much water in it which is a waste. It adds a little water in spaced increments. Takes forever for the clothes to get saturated. I'd rather have an old-fashioned machine that fills deeply first and then agitates more aggressively. Whoever designs these machines is overthinking this by making something simple that actually works into something complex that may work in theory, but not in real life. I miss my old Speed Queen.

  • @ty_shunz3274
    @ty_shunz3274 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The comforter never moved around, I hate this washer. I have one as well. Very disappointed in Whirlpool!

    • @ScantPear
      @ScantPear หลายเดือนก่อน

      And whirlpool does not even take repercussions on this… they just continue making this trash like nothing is wrong…

  • @fruitypebblez4309
    @fruitypebblez4309 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought one of these at home depot. Just before delivery i watched this video and several others and was like oh hell no. I went to home depot and cancelled it before they came. I re purchased the same GE agitator water control washer i got 8 yrs ago. It buries the clothes in the water and the agitator is much more aggressive. It has a delicate option as well for clothes. The GE 4.2 ot 4.5 cb ft are the only ones closest to the old fashioned washers.

  • @ChilesRussellTaylor
    @ChilesRussellTaylor ปีที่แล้ว

    Adorable Calico Kitty 🐱

    • @mtgau2000
      @mtgau2000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wdym

  • @kookyrt
    @kookyrt 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lil Pumpkin was the star 🌟 of the show😊 i just bought this exact washing machine and now am having anxiety about washing my comforters in it. Dang it stayed in the same position the whole time it was being “agitated “ good Lordt, what did we just spend a grand for?😅

  • @xcuddlepuddlex
    @xcuddlepuddlex 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Litterally saved me from getting this Tomorrow. Front load whirlpool chrome here I come

  • @TheRandy3D
    @TheRandy3D 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My Maytag is the same thing basically, hate it hate it hate it...always have to throw stuff in wet to get enough water and it can't handle a huge load of laundry, so it's smaller loads and always have to wet things in order to get a little extra water

    • @jessicaorozco1206
      @jessicaorozco1206 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’m returning mine on Monday they’re coming for it. I couldn’t get it to work at all. It was just spinning in the water was not filling up. It was running somewhere else.

  • @China-Sucks
    @China-Sucks ปีที่แล้ว +10

    For something this bulky, you should remove the agitator and then manually fill the washer FULL with water. This model tries to skimp on water to "save the environment" at the cost of cleaning your clothes well. I bought one of these last year and I HATE IT. But, as long as you bypass the water and always fill it up on DEEP WATER, it does ok. I recommend you DO NOT BUY!

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว

      It won't let me fill the tub up manually and without the agitator, the comforter wouldn't move a single bit

    • @LatriceFowler
      @LatriceFowler 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      With or without the agitator it’ll do the same thing … nothing! We hate we bought this stupid machine.

  • @letzygutierrez7006
    @letzygutierrez7006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    just got this washer plus the dryer and seeing all the bad reviews makes me sad after spending almost 2k
    Not the biggest fan of it

  • @radiogirl85
    @radiogirl85 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have one and like it. I took the agitator out to wash a huge load but the items are still a little wet. I should have probably left the agitator in. The directions it comes with are useless.

  • @patcola7335
    @patcola7335 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Yeah a front loader is definitely better for this kind of load. If you want an old school type top loader you have to do research.
    The only decent top loaders that Whirlpool makes IMO are the Amana NTW4516FW, Maytag commercial MVWP585/86, Whirlpool WTW4816FW and Whirlpool commercial non-vended CAE2795FQ. You also have the Speed Queen TC5.
    Those machines still have traditional agitators and wash more like the old school washers did, especially the Speed Queen.

  • @donniedarko979
    @donniedarko979 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would not touch a washer with removable agitator. Thanks for sharing

  • @bigred1964b
    @bigred1964b ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Bought one and returned it next day after 90%customer bad reviews 😭💯

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is why I want to stick with old-school washers in the future

    • @caspermagana13
      @caspermagana13 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I bought it 2 day ago at Home Depot and try to return it, but they said it’s not returnable. It’s replaceable if it’s not working good but it’s working it just sucks.

    • @bigred1964b
      @bigred1964b 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@caspermagana13 keep records on problems untill warranty is still good,

    • @normahardesty3244
      @normahardesty3244 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No good I sent mine back.

    • @bigred1964b
      @bigred1964b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@normahardesty3244 👍💯💯💯

  • @katel1126
    @katel1126 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just bought this machine and its the biggest pos i have ever seen in my life. Less than a week its going back

  • @jimi-bg6kz
    @jimi-bg6kz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Somewhere I read the idea behind these washers is that the clothes are supposed to rub against each other to clean. I don't think that is the best way. Besides it's supposed to save. My old washer took a half hour to wash. This one took up to 1 1/2 hrs.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep that's how they wash, but traditional washers still have better wash action. I think this washer is decent, but I wish I still had my old Maytag Atlantis.

  • @Blurain727
    @Blurain727 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You're gonna need a front loader or an HE top loader that's capable of some intense action (for example, LG) for that comforter.
    Cute cat, btw :)

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ik
      A giant Dexter washer would take care of this

  • @Ififitzisitz
    @Ififitzisitz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yep, an older washer like a Maytag would power through this like a champ.

  • @brunoshow124
    @brunoshow124 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My 80's Maytag would've turned that comforter over countless times.

  • @Palootski
    @Palootski หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have this same issue with the POS Whirlpool that we just bought. How did you get so much water in the machine ?

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because I used the bulky items cycle

  • @Kjgotswagg
    @Kjgotswagg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Please don't use fabric softener it's bad for the machine😢

  • @christopherchris9006
    @christopherchris9006 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the reason why I got a Speed Queen washer!

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I wish my family could've got one, but they are wickedly expensive

    • @gullreefclub
      @gullreefclub 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@thebiglt2187they are not cheap but if they last 20 years or so and remember the Speed Queen comes with a either a 3, 5, or 7 year “bumper to bumper warranty” which means there is no reason to buy an extended warranty

  • @dublinbluetune
    @dublinbluetune 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The manual says that you are supposed to remove the agitator when you wash bulky items

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And sometimes you should've listen to it. Without the agitator, the comforter wouldn't move. I've tried it before and I don't recommend it.

  • @emhprmex9259
    @emhprmex9259 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My whirlpools different but my problem is in the spinning because the machine shake a lot and loud. I try different setting…

  • @kalifornia2006
    @kalifornia2006 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I just got this washer delivered today. Not a fan. I hope they take it back I don’t want it.

  • @AmericanSCPO
    @AmericanSCPO 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you put a comforter in there, take the agitator out. Yes, it will get clean. People used to wash clothes on a rock and a river bed. Ive washed a king comforter in washers smaller than that.. im positive this washer is fine its the people im questioning.

  • @danieljacob9216
    @danieljacob9216 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Supposed to remove the agitator for comforters and bulky items..at least according to the directions i got with mine..

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would perform worse without the agitator

  • @Candlerman2199
    @Candlerman2199 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    May I ask, have you read the instructions?

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It didn't come with any. This washer was returned by its original owner at Lowe's.

  • @robertpimpo4698
    @robertpimpo4698 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's why I didn't buy that machine should of taken it to laundry mat

  • @jimski1
    @jimski1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m so fed up with whirlpool

  • @robertpimpo4698
    @robertpimpo4698 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's why that washer got all the bad reviews

  • @ElevatorWasher5000
    @ElevatorWasher5000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like my 4957

  • @echoesvayne9790
    @echoesvayne9790 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i would have removed agitator and deep fill for that

    • @jerricagoodwin6034
      @jerricagoodwin6034 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s what the manual recommends as well.

    • @mb3775
      @mb3775 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the whole idea of the removable Agitator

  • @wilmerrosales9773
    @wilmerrosales9773 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This fucking washer sucks too bad I got stuck with it

  • @DimeloYuka
    @DimeloYuka 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My home come with this Washer and I hate it so much

  • @jameshoward1215
    @jameshoward1215 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My direct drive Kenmore will wash that with no hesitation

  • @user-ve9hm9jt8w
    @user-ve9hm9jt8w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do u get the lid open without it draining and spin like mine does? Watefull and annoying.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wait what? It actually does that? Wow that's just horrible design or is it a front loader?

  • @washingandmowing15
    @washingandmowing15 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ^^ or just a front loader in general.

    • @dariusconyers1
      @dariusconyers1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Front loaders trash

    • @woke1497
      @woke1497 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah, those break down too fast

    • @washingandmowing15
      @washingandmowing15 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@woke1497 front loaders do?

    • @tennillej9601
      @tennillej9601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      None of them wash comforters well I've found I've owned both, only one that did was an old 90s top loader that actually filled with a good amount of water

  • @inherentfrequencies1137
    @inherentfrequencies1137 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    REMOVE THE AGITATOR............THATS WHY THEY MADE IT REMOVABLE

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That wouldn't help. It would just float around. At least the agitator is moving it around a little, but without it, nothing.

    • @inherentfrequencies1137
      @inherentfrequencies1137 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wash large quilts (without the loft) every week with the agitator out - works great. Perhaps this machine can't handle the loft?????????????????
      @@thebiglt2187

  • @flattenme
    @flattenme ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you have to submerge it by hand, the washer isn't doing its job. Today's top loaders with an inverter are a joke. Whirlpool's agitator or no agitator washer is a bigger joke. The corkscrew shouldn't go back and forth. Get a GE front loader if you really want clean clothes or a clean comforter. SMH

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All I want is an old-school used washer ngl. I miss having one.

    • @dregenius
      @dregenius ปีที่แล้ว

      You're absolutely right. I sell plenty of appliances and one thing I've realized is that modern front loaders have been through "trial by fire" and are so much better for it, while modern top loaders are literally all "MVPs" - minimum viable products. Because most americans are surprisingly stubborn and ignorant and have sworn off ever buying a front loader because their great aunt's friend's neice bought one in 2003 and kept it in an unfinished basement and went on vacation for 6 months and came back and it smelled funky inside. These people will buy *literally* anything that loads from the top and not care at all whether it actually works to clean clothes. lmao

  • @cptspinach
    @cptspinach 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seeing this video and the comments below... do people not read the instructions?!

  • @Blurain727
    @Blurain727 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is why bedding is best washed in a front loader

  • @RA-lk1vz
    @RA-lk1vz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Obvious the machine is too small for the blanked

    • @Carlos_mm213
      @Carlos_mm213 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Smaller older ones could easily flip this over

  • @marionelizabeth1
    @marionelizabeth1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you had removed the agitator for such a large item like you were supposed to, your result would have been better. Why do you think the agitator is removable anyway???

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It would've been worse. An impeller alone wouldn't be able to move around a comforter. Agitators are required to wash such an item.

    • @timpost464
      @timpost464 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Even with the agitator removed washer pos.
      Seems like the younger generation who is designing things in this world doesn't have a clue.
      Same with the new stoves. They put the small burners in the back so you have to reach over your big pots to stir the little ones in the back. It's ridiculous.

  • @briandoyle4298
    @briandoyle4298 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The wash action on these machines sucks!
    I guess they figured the ppl buying these machines would be sitting behind a desk all day, and wouldn’t be washing ‘work’ clothes with ground in dirt and such.
    My sister bought a Cabrio set. I wanted to try it out to see how it did with my work clothes. I wasn’t impressed.
    I took the wet load home, and ran em in my Maytag Dependable care machine with the dual action agitator, and the water was dark, like the load hadn’t been previously washed.
    After the Maytag dies, if it ever does, I will buy the Speed Queen Classic clean TR5.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Man I wish we could've got the speed queen tc5 since it's the only old school washer being made, but jesus it's way too expensive.

    • @briandoyle4298
      @briandoyle4298 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh I know, but it’s not something that you would have to replace for 15-20 years is the way I see it!
      You get what you pay for!

  • @cutflower36
    @cutflower36 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm looking for a machine right now, this one is barely moving.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would recommend a Speed Queen, but they are very expensive. The next best washer on the market is the Whirlpool belt drive washer. They are labeled as whirlpool, Amana, Roper, etc. They all have dual action agitators that will clean clothes better than most HE washers and they use a good amount of water too.

    • @cutflower36
      @cutflower36 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thebiglt2187 thank you

  •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    try WITHOUT the agitator. That's what the machine was MADE FOR!!!! bulky, large items you are supposed to remove the agitator.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The agitator moves the comforter around much more than without it. Don't always listen to the manual.

  • @punchline43
    @punchline43 หลายเดือนก่อน

    l'm already lost. Why would you put detergent into a dry empty washer before adding a large load like that? And why such a teensy little amount? Makes no sense.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  หลายเดือนก่อน

      This detergent is very concentrated

    • @punchline43
      @punchline43 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thebiglt2187 Ok thank you.

  • @rhyta5042
    @rhyta5042 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why would you leave the lid for the detergent in the washer? This is the fastest this machine will agitate. I made the mistake of buying one and I regret it. With comforters like this, I take it to the laundromat and wash in a front loader. This machine is pretty sad. p.s the downy ball doesn't always work, you should manually add fabric softener

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sometimes I throw it in there so I don't have to get my hands wet and soapy while rinsing it off (most of the time) and the downy ball works fine. Everytime I use it, most of the fabric softener is empty.

    • @rhyta5042
      @rhyta5042 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thebiglt2187 Did your comforter smell like Downy? I've had them open before the rinse and then get rinsed away.

  • @tyronlemons5203
    @tyronlemons5203 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still don't know if I would get one
    I've seen a million vids on this washer but I still have no idea if I would get it or not
    someone tell me if it's worth is

    • @scottwilliams7249
      @scottwilliams7249 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unless you’re getting a commercial Maytag top loader, or the Alana with a dual action, it’s definitely handy. But if I could do it over again, it would be dual action Amana or Maytag, or an LG Top Loader.

    • @China-Sucks
      @China-Sucks ปีที่แล้ว

      Take a pass...TRUST ME!

    • @DylBuilder1
      @DylBuilder1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@China-Sucks Do you have one?

    • @tyronlemons5203
      @tyronlemons5203 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@scottwilliams7249 I got a LG top loader right now

    • @scottwilliams7249
      @scottwilliams7249 ปีที่แล้ว

      I personally have the 2-1. It’s a decent washer overall. I don’t necessarily understand all the hate. The scary thing is it actually seems like it outcleans the old direct drive Kenmore that it replaced. The Kenmore was a 2012-ish and was a problem child since day one. My grandmother had a 2001 Kenmore Elite Direct-Drive that was absolutely amazing, and to this day I don’t think anything will outclean that particular model.

  • @rexoliver7780
    @rexoliver7780 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That “dual action” style agitator needs to turn in one direction only-to pull the load down. Instead the agiator just pushes the load back up again. It’s fighting against itself. Poor design.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea it would be nice if it was a real dual action agitator

  • @WayokRider
    @WayokRider 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lack of water

  • @wyzemann
    @wyzemann 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Next time, try folding the comforter in half and then fold both halves toward it like a burrito. Now, you can position it around the impeller or agitator and get a better wash action. There should be no need to wash again because He washers move detergent & water sufficiently through the load.
    Try folding it similar to this:
    m.th-cam.com/video/GdcmhKaQmNg/w-d-xo.html
    What's wrong with “sounding like a science teacher?”🤓😎

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because it's weird using scientific terms instead of basic terms we all know

  • @ritajewell
    @ritajewell 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have the same washer and HATE it! GARBAGE!

  • @KeithsTVHD1
    @KeithsTVHD1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    no thanks!

  • @robertwhite9898
    @robertwhite9898 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s pitiful. No thanks I wouldn’t consider purchasing that washer & for the asking price not worth it. Bad design. The Older ones can easily out perform that one

  • @caspermagana13
    @caspermagana13 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Two day with it and I hate it. Don’t buy this washer it sucks.

  • @tennillej9601
    @tennillej9601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Way too overloaded what size is this machine? Be better off using the laundry mat

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think it's 4.8 cu. Ft.

    • @tennillej9601
      @tennillej9601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thebiglt2187 I have trouble washing comforters in my huge front loader so I don't think its just yours, old school ones are so much better i would pay big money for one

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tennillej9601 I would much rather have a refurbished old-school washer instead of this, but sadly my parents don't trust used washers. When I move out I'll try to stick with old-school washers.

    • @tennillej9601
      @tennillej9601 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thebiglt2187 I don't blame them we picked up a used 90s I think at least top loader it ran perfect at the start but after a while it leaked and had rusted out from the bottom I wish I could upload photos I still have the machine sitting in my backyard for months now but it's past it's time, they don't make them like they used to.

  • @BoeingAviation737.
    @BoeingAviation737. ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nothing

    • @CreeseDF
      @CreeseDF ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Everything

    • @BoeingAviation737.
      @BoeingAviation737. ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No rollover

    • @tyronlemons5203
      @tyronlemons5203 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think some brands of washers don't care about rollover and I honstly don't see the point of roolover plus the water is dirty so the blanket did get clean but you can tell me I'm wrong this is my opinion

    • @siggrizzler4869
      @siggrizzler4869 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tyronlemons5203 The point of rollover is to clean? If nothing is moving or rolling over, then it's essentially just soaking. Yeah, obviously that will extract loose dirt and debris, but cleaning requires friction. I.E. rollover, which causes the item(s) to rub together to clean. When you wash your hands, do you just hold your hands under the faucet? No, you rub them together - especially if they're more heavily soiled. This washer does an incredibly poor job in this video of creating any real cleaning action, beyond just being in water.

  • @cbr2574
    @cbr2574 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Pésima lavadora

  • @nancychamberlin6520
    @nancychamberlin6520 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just returned this machine. That agitator is useless. Piece of junk. Look at the reviews on TH-cam you will be horrified.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just by the comment on this video alone I can see how bad it is lol. I wish whirlpool reused their direct drive dual action agitator as the agitator for these machines. They did that with their maytag commercial washers (they use the kenmore dual action agitator).

  • @user-oq5bv8ue4c
    @user-oq5bv8ue4c 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FAIL!!!

  • @ronaldorodriguez7792
    @ronaldorodriguez7792 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a piece of trash washing machine

  • @blackhaze8233
    @blackhaze8233 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine paying almost 1k for these HE washer's and Thay can't even wash clothes. All u get is a noisy POS.

    • @thebiglt2187
      @thebiglt2187  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This was under $200.

    • @blackhaze8233
      @blackhaze8233 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thebiglt2187 thank God..I'm glad you didn't spend More than that on trash like this. Find and get u 1988 GE filter Flo washer.

  • @multimill
    @multimill ปีที่แล้ว

    Front loader would have dealt with this, no problem.