Airbus A350-XWB-1000 vs Boeing 777-300ER [4K]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • Images and data comparison the new Airbus A350 XWB 1000 and the Boeing 777 300 ER.
    Boeing 777-312 (ER) from Singapore Airlines (9V-SWB) landing taxi and takeoff at Barcelona el Prat Airport (BCN) Spain
    Airbus A350-1041 XWB (F-WMIL), the first A350 1000 to start to flight, serial MSN059, takeoff , taxi and landing at Toulouse Blagnac Airport (TLS) France
    Data source aviones.findthe...
    ©Javier Rullan 2017 All Rights Reserved
    Visit my blog:
    www.javrullan.e...
    www.javrullan.e...

ความคิดเห็น • 521

  • @rezkykyzer
    @rezkykyzer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Lets accept the fact that the A350-1000 has a beautiful design compared to B777-300ER, but the B777-300ER is one of the safest with 10 doors, and the top selling twin engine aircraft in the world and still counting with the new B777X.

  • @worldofai-games1036
    @worldofai-games1036 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'd go with the A350. The 777 has more weight capacity, total thrust, and thrust per weight compared to the A350, but the A350 has better wings, which allows shorter takeoff distances and easier ascend to higher altitudes during cruise. It translates to excellent fuel savings (less wind/air resistance the higher you go).
    Also, if you look at the section profile of the A350 and 777, it looks like Airbus is able to use the interior space more effectively, resulting in a smaller cross section. The row of windows runs through the center of the fuselage on the 777, while it runs higher than center on the A350. As a result, the 777 has more unused space above the passenger cabin than the A350. Boeing will be using the same fuselage cross section for the 777x. They are only thinning the walls to allow a more comfortable 3-4-3 seating.

  • @hafidzandi2920
    @hafidzandi2920 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I'll go with the B777-300ER. I love those GE90-115b engines! So powerful. But, the A350 is also very great and comfortable.

  • @dunodisko2217
    @dunodisko2217 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This… is literally the exact video I was looking for. Props.

  • @KevinJTrebilcock
    @KevinJTrebilcock 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Anyone notice the birds at 2:52 being blown to the ground by the reverse thrust 😬

    • @ahmettalha04
      @ahmettalha04 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      lmaooo

    • @hooli4110
      @hooli4110 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes

    • @hooli4110
      @hooli4110 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is seriously saw it on the runway, The ATC needs some spectacles

    • @BillCipher1337
      @BillCipher1337 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Looks like a multikill

    • @TooKoolCruz
      @TooKoolCruz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lmao. When I saw them I was like crap

  • @nyyyankee
    @nyyyankee 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    the wheels look nicer on the 777, but theyre both awesome

  • @turbofanct6679
    @turbofanct6679 7 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    WOOOOO A350 wing flex!!!! :D

  • @AlexX-oe2pd
    @AlexX-oe2pd 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    1:40 That a320 looks so tiny ))

    • @BRUSDHDFhd
      @BRUSDHDFhd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ye

    • @ChrisZoomER
      @ChrisZoomER ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I couldn't stop laughing at that scene!

  • @ashfaq1999
    @ashfaq1999 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I live close to london’s heathrow airport & see these aircraft flying overhead daily. Both are great aircraft 👌

  • @thee_jetsetter208
    @thee_jetsetter208 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The 350 looks Beastly 😎

  • @craftyboy7zac624
    @craftyboy7zac624 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great spotting! You managed to spot an a350-1000 AND a Beluga!

  • @abdulrafeykhan9309
    @abdulrafeykhan9309 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    well Boeing's 777 is a huge success story but now it looks a bit dated compared to the more modern Airbus A350.
    A350 has more beautiful wings, specially those sexy sharklets, and it has more sleek and sound body work. It also has a pretty face. Having said that, 777 is an iconic plane and the next generation 777x will surely maintain that presence. It will be interesting to see a further stretch of A350 to compete with 777x.

    • @jorisbongo7905
      @jorisbongo7905 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      777x

    • @hodb3906
      @hodb3906 ปีที่แล้ว

      The a350 competes in cost per capita rather than direct size with the 777x. Why do you think the 777x is stretched? To reduce cost per passenger even more since the a350 is lighter and has greater range where new wings and more efficient engines on the 777x isn’t going to cut it against a cleansheet like the a350.

  • @Mikkinnen
    @Mikkinnen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I mean, that both planes are amazing. 350 is more elegant, but 777 is like animal, like shark.

  • @Avionicx
    @Avionicx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Gotta love that GE90!

  • @thureintun1687
    @thureintun1687 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For the elegance and beauty of it, id go with A350.
    A350 and neo versions are made to look beauty

  • @bangerbengali
    @bangerbengali 7 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    A350 is really groundbreaking

    • @anthonyblankenship3082
      @anthonyblankenship3082 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      bangerbengali no it took technology ideas from the 787 and the size of the 777

    • @winwinniewinfield
      @winwinniewinfield 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      And airbus played it safe also with the design and many features where the 787 really pushed it.. end of the day you'll eventually see it on both A/C as it always happens end of the day all I care about is. is it safe

    • @mytree3979
      @mytree3979 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Rockington TheThird WHY DOES EVERYONE SAY THAT THE A350 IS A COPY OF THE 787 AND 777....THAT'S NOT TRUE!!!

    • @anthonyblankenship3082
      @anthonyblankenship3082 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Airbus twat

    • @TheGodGamer55
      @TheGodGamer55 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What’s worse, obesity till you die or a minor addiction to tea? Fuck Boeing, Airbus all the way.
      I like the 767 pitot tubes though.

  • @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO
    @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Always been a Boeing fan, but Airbus has really been stepping up their game in the last decade. I definitely prefer the larger windows on the 777.

  • @The747Captain
    @The747Captain 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love both!
    great video!

  • @chrispaw1
    @chrispaw1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The 777 looks very dated now that we have the A350, technicaly its inferior too.

  • @pspecs
    @pspecs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great presentation...… love the video. I love both airplanes and would be happy on either one.

  • @tyreeclark1948
    @tyreeclark1948 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Whoa did anyone notice the flock of birds at 2:50!?

  • @Abel0179
    @Abel0179 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    777 all the way. The 777-300ER is the best airplane ever built. I can't wait to see the 777X!

    • @farukche3848
      @farukche3848 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      jlAbel7 no A350 is the best aircraft yet

    • @tonyt73
      @tonyt73 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@farukche3848 Not so fast, the 777X is better than A350 (all variants)! =D

    • @koifishgamer4956
      @koifishgamer4956 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonyt73 a350 is better and more comfortable than the 777x

    • @tonyt73
      @tonyt73 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Koi fish gamer How in the world could that statement come close to being accurate since 777X has yet to enter the market???

    • @2001COUPE
      @2001COUPE 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tonyt73 he's a idiot. That's all

  • @disco.lemonade
    @disco.lemonade 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Im an Airbus person myself, and I do like them both because I like planes in general, but I love the 777. Love it.

    • @ZigZag9639
      @ZigZag9639 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      But...the economy class hasn't improved on the Boeing 777 for a loooong time. =(

  • @johnnycunningham2606
    @johnnycunningham2606 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    a350 is better. longer range, cleaner, quieter, more comfortable and streamlined

  • @smokie747
    @smokie747 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Nice job airbus you've just created the new 777 airframe with 787 look

    • @splittheseam00
      @splittheseam00 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      smokie747 i

    • @TheGodGamer55
      @TheGodGamer55 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The 787 has the saddest looking cockpit windows out there (litterally), airbus is powering into the future with the new sharklets and cockpit design

    • @supremeaviation570
      @supremeaviation570 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Corben Austin don’t be mad because it’s true lmao

    • @supremeaviation570
      @supremeaviation570 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Klown The A350 windows look like raccoon faces

    • @aviationloverexpert7435
      @aviationloverexpert7435 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 787 windows are bigger than a350's and 777x will have larger windows still than 787!

  • @TheINVG
    @TheINVG 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    777 forever....best twin engine plane ....and handsome

  • @luismong3086
    @luismong3086 7 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    The Overall Design of the a350 is Just Beautiful Compared to the 777

    • @johnrussell511
      @johnrussell511 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Just remember just how long the 777 has been king.

    • @arthurchristmas4112
      @arthurchristmas4112 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That is not an argument as to why it is better John russell

    • @RamakrishnanSRM
      @RamakrishnanSRM 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +John russell
      It's time for King's retirement. LOL

    • @seven6228
      @seven6228 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Luis Mong not in my opinion. I think the 350 is just ugly with that raccoon nose and that weird winglet

    • @TheGodGamer55
      @TheGodGamer55 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I love the cockpit windows, Boeing has nothing on airbus

  • @Ricy365
    @Ricy365 7 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    a350

  • @diego90XD
    @diego90XD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hard to choose one🤔I love the engine sound of both of the airplanes

  • @GG.823
    @GG.823 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Im going to vote A350 cuz i like the model little bit and also its lite
    I have fly with 777 and a350 but i compared a350 imo little bit smooth than 777

  • @2001COUPE
    @2001COUPE 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The 777 has been bad ass since its first flight , and still holds it own to the newer A350. Sorry but as usual the A350 was Airbus to late answer to the 777, and now Boeing has an all new model in the works. Boeing always ahead of the game!

    • @guillaumedupont7565
      @guillaumedupont7565 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And now where the new 777 LOL !! ....You are sooooo funny !!."Boeing always ahead of the game!!...Yes and very close to bankruptcy !!
      6

    • @rayawira
      @rayawira 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This comment didn't age well. Lol

  • @imranafg
    @imranafg 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    777 has of the cleanest safety record in aviation history king of the skys

    • @basembenyamin2965
      @basembenyamin2965 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      But the A350 hasn't had a single accident yet!

    • @tonyliu1264
      @tonyliu1264 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Basem Benyamin get some help how many years has the a350 been in service and the triple 7 is in service for about 30 years and it has less than 10 major accidents search it up before you say anything

    • @Lyxzzzzzzzzzzzzz1
      @Lyxzzzzzzzzzzzzz1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It accidents are mostly pilot error but there is one 777 which crash due to design which was BA38

    • @avionOasia
      @avionOasia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The 777 has had only had about 5 major accidents since 1994 the a340 has only had 1 crash and its been in service since 1993

    • @marvinenglish4547
      @marvinenglish4547 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Croosin GD and all passengers and crew survived

  • @williamtell5365
    @williamtell5365 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've flown on both, they're both excellent aircraft.

  • @user-ei7hu6ve7m
    @user-ei7hu6ve7m 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Overall the video is great though and you spotted the numer 4 beluga!I love belugas

  • @jacklayton34
    @jacklayton34 7 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    4750m for a 777-300ER to take off??? That shows you the bias and inaccuracy of this video, so all other info should be taken with the same skepticism. Dubai's runway is 4000m long and the 777 takes off there every day in summer (40+C) enroute to North America and Australia (14-17 hour flights). That's the longest possible runway it needs. It takes off out of Newcastle (2100m) every day.
    Yes I agree the 350 is prettier, but it should be, its a 30 year newer design. Let's see if they've made 1500 of them 30 years from now, shall we?

    • @johnnyneverletmedown53
      @johnnyneverletmedown53 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ah, you can pretty much guarantee that they will make 1500 as a minimum. The A350 is a beautifully engineered and thought out aircraft, and well ahead in quality control and operating efficiencies... It is a game changer, far more that the hyped up "dreamliner", which is a cramped up marketing syndrome, with still unresolved battery issues which are now just boxed up. Never declared why they were catching fire or a solution, just encased now in heavy weight added external solution...Now 737 Max while we talk about philosophy of quality, oh Boeing quality control to the fore.... Sorry, Boeing has put profit before aeronautical engineering since moving head office from Seattle. The bean counters in Chicago will be responsible for it's downfall, unless the focus returns to quality, not short term shareholder price. Yeah, way more than 1500 A 350's coming your way Jack, for sure.

    • @tabrezmahamedhossen6393
      @tabrezmahamedhossen6393 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      My brother a350 it's a state of the art of aeronautic engineering with safety first. 777-300er is one of my favorite plane which I have been travelling in. But Boeing has started placing safety as an option on its plane. I will still prefer to fly 777-300 rather than the upcoming 9x. The 350-1000 is a more balanced aircraft flying more safely and economically

  • @turi0710
    @turi0710 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the runway length needed for takeoff is wrong. a part from military, no airport in europa has 5k meters long runway

  • @audewilkin5659
    @audewilkin5659 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The price of the A350-1000 is 359 millions according to the Airbus website, the price of the 777-300ER is 320 millions.

  • @2010kb1
    @2010kb1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The 777 killed off the 340 design and airbus had to counter with the 1000.777x will be bigger and have many upgrades including a larger high lift low drag wing.Emirates ordered how many hundred 777x's so Boeing is still leading in the super twin engine range.A-350 should do well though.

    • @SkylaxAviation
      @SkylaxAviation 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ken Bailey No no and no. A340-600 or A340-500 is very efficient aircraft. I mean, he can remplace a 747. For A350-1000 is désigned for compete with 777X. Like A350-900 ULR. A350 has more order than 777. Just wait because 777x too is very good and new aircraft like A330 Ceo / Neo

    • @Major-Kong
      @Major-Kong 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Skylax, wrong, the 777x lineup has over 300 orders already and they have only just started building the prototype 777-9x this year, all up orders are as stands the A350 family, 852 ordered with 142 delivered, 777 family, 1,962 ordered with 1,534 delivered, the 777 family wins that argument also.

    • @aviationloverexpert7435
      @aviationloverexpert7435 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      A340 is not efficient due to 4 engines and a single deck aircraft. Past aircraft like 707 and DC 8 were successful with 4 engines because they started the dawn of the jet age.

    • @alabama1413
      @alabama1413 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @soaringtractor,what utter nonsense! 777ER is inferior to the A350-1000

    • @johnnyneverletmedown53
      @johnnyneverletmedown53 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @soaringtractor Ah, Tractors logic at it again. It has been there for 20 years so therefore is the way of the future. Kinda like the 737 Max story, or is that "bullshit" too, in your usual eloquent way tractor?

  • @amerashraf7038
    @amerashraf7038 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent Comparison ♥♥♥

  • @lahan3628
    @lahan3628 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the text it says WXB but from what I know it's
    XWB 😉

  • @chromebomb
    @chromebomb 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    a350 for sure but idk once 777x comes out. A350 is amazing i like

  • @cedwanders
    @cedwanders 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Might Boeing 777-300ER!! for the win!!!and the GE 90-115B size and sound is just WOW !! can't wait for the new 777x!!!

  • @jaskiratsingh7692
    @jaskiratsingh7692 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A350-1000 is very nice

  • @xdeniselprox3932
    @xdeniselprox3932 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    no hace falta que diga lo mucho que me gustan tus vídeos javier😊

  • @Mortimer_Duke
    @Mortimer_Duke 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WXB?

  • @ZigZag9639
    @ZigZag9639 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love you Budgie! Airbus is the greatest.
    #GoodbyeBoeing

  • @AlternativeDesign100
    @AlternativeDesign100 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i don't believe the claimed runway takeoff lengths. they are too long. i think the 777 is more in the order of some 3600m

  • @petersue8549
    @petersue8549 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The figures you quote for the A350-1000 are for the A350-900. The -1000 has a typical pax of 366 to a max of 440. It's range is 15,557 km. which is less range than the -900 variant.

    • @aviationloverexpert7435
      @aviationloverexpert7435 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The recent MTOW increase means A350K now has more range than the -900 variant that it was stretched from

  • @arnab9288
    @arnab9288 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GE90 engines are insane!!

  • @bboyjunyor
    @bboyjunyor 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4700m .. takeoff length for the 777??? there are a handfull of airports with a runway that long! :))))))

  • @Racko.
    @Racko. 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Half of the information in the video about the planes are wrong

  • @Alexeologist
    @Alexeologist 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it just me or the A350 deployed thrust reverser only on the left engine :/

  • @raoultak
    @raoultak 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I prefer the Boeing concept and for sure their conventional yoke.

  • @jaytduce
    @jaytduce 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One thing not pointed out in the video is which plane will still be flying in 20 years. The Airbus product has a short life therefore it will be scrapped long before the Boeing is.

  • @ChrisZoomER
    @ChrisZoomER ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've always been partial towards the 777.

  • @artfromcalifornia104
    @artfromcalifornia104 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Stop confusing a 350-1000 with BOEING 777-300ER, a350-1000 competitor to 787-1000 and that it, and when people ask well who is better? My answer to that who is better BMW or Mercedes? And speaking about 777 family, airbus failed to that with a340-500 and a340-600, airbus much better on a320 family then Boeing 737-800 and 737-900er or Max. And that’s how this market work as is right now

  • @bigtaxrefund
    @bigtaxrefund 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ 2:01 the writing on the bottom of screen says A350 WXB 1000. Its supposed to say XWB. It means XTRA WIDE BODY. even though boeing has been in the game longer than airbus, airbus still has better product. theyre much quieter and more fuel efficient. @ 2:51 thats a lot of birds hanging around the airport. the a340 took 100 tonnes of fuel from germany to los angeles. the a350 only consumes 77 tonnes. thats 23 tonnes of fuel savings for the same payload

  • @romeoguitar
    @romeoguitar 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    which is easier and cheaper to maintain

  • @sidneydowman7288
    @sidneydowman7288 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    very very good film thank you

  • @K_WJ89
    @K_WJ89 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A350 😍

  • @mmdanivia133
    @mmdanivia133 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    voted for GE90s

  • @rajnirvan3336
    @rajnirvan3336 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Be interesting to see when the A350 1000 is in operation very soon

  • @jacquesloubser5609
    @jacquesloubser5609 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When it comes to the A350-1000 there is nothing to argue about. Pls do not try to compare because the 777 is much older technology ...

    • @Major-Kong
      @Major-Kong 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 777X will share almost nothing with the earlier 777's, the body will be 10% wider, the wings are completely different, new engines for better economy, both 8x and 9x will be longer airframes than the 200 and 300er's and both will gave a lot more endurance than the earlier aircraft they will replace.

    • @kiribetio123
      @kiribetio123 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jacques Loubser much older technology but much better for sure

  • @unknowndriver231
    @unknowndriver231 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    both planes are awesome but i will take a 777-300er and yeah a350-1000 is also good

  • @densoe711
    @densoe711 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love it Airbus

  • @nielskay3935
    @nielskay3935 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GE90's - The sound of Music

  • @buckfi1109
    @buckfi1109 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Data’s are not correct. Example: price 350 much higher but max Cap is 440 pax - don’t know where you got this numbers ? 350-900?

  • @Sky_AVVV
    @Sky_AVVV 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Both are amazing aircraft but a350 is just different

  • @vijoyantogeorge
    @vijoyantogeorge 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    you are comparing old king with new king..

    • @guitarscoverskevin3517
      @guitarscoverskevin3517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 777X is the new King, airbus never existed, A350 is a hybrid between 777 and 787

  • @jacoc.2183
    @jacoc.2183 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boeing 777/300ER 💪✊👊

  • @heybudi
    @heybudi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does the landing gear exactly the same?

    • @JavierRullanRuano
      @JavierRullanRuano  ปีที่แล้ว

      They may have the same number of wheels, but it is not exactly the same, they are different manufacturers

    • @heybudi
      @heybudi ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JavierRullanRuano could you please make a video about it?

  • @opicatchu2164
    @opicatchu2164 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    very difficult to choice !!! both are magical planes...but as i live in Toulouse...i choose A350 !!

  • @kirilmihaylov1934
    @kirilmihaylov1934 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PART OF the information is not accurate at all .... both planes carry more passengers and cost more ..... especially the AIRBUS which price is around 360 mln us dollars .....

  • @Jack-pl2he
    @Jack-pl2he ปีที่แล้ว +2

    777-300er number one

  • @SkylaxAviation
    @SkylaxAviation 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    No forget Airbus A330 and Neo!

  • @AB-im4bz
    @AB-im4bz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    @RashadLynes nrrr not really mate 777x is already in trouble, Lufthansa is rethinking their order as it might keep their 747-8 which were gonna be replaced by 777x. cathay too as its downsizing, emirates too as its cutting routes, qatar is blocked by neighbours and isn't flying as many routes singapore is in loss for the first time in years and might go for more a350s and some 787s instead of 777x. So it's not looking good still two years to go for its first delivery so anything can change

    • @Major-Kong
      @Major-Kong 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not what I've been hearing, but still you can keep the dream.

  • @zest8
    @zest8 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think the cost for A350 is wrong-140M euros is too low

  • @brandan648
    @brandan648 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A350 is so beautiful 😍

  • @jltrain-zgamingrailfan202x3
    @jltrain-zgamingrailfan202x3 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only reason why Boeing 777 & Airbus A350-1000 XWB should compete with each other, is that both of the planes have the same 777 style landing gear.

  • @blackmambalim
    @blackmambalim 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    watch out for the 777-400 in development

  • @luigiraho4016
    @luigiraho4016 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A350 is the best

  • @ZeusFaucon
    @ZeusFaucon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    just wow the a350😗

  • @djonymorais
    @djonymorais 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These numbers seem very inaccurate!!! The 777 demanding 4700 m of runway length???? That would kill the 777.

    • @nicholasnuzzi386
      @nicholasnuzzi386 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      João Carlos Morais that is over 3 miles of runway

  • @MrErictyrones
    @MrErictyrones 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Airbus nice but Triple 7 and 787-10 will dominate.

  • @winwinniewinfield
    @winwinniewinfield 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 777 is just beautiful love it the a350 is nice also can't wait to hop a ride on one !! This is a beautiful time for aviation between safety and new aircraft gotta love it !!! Airlines tho ehhh not so much lol!!!

  • @sebastianlim2499
    @sebastianlim2499 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wasnt 9V-SWB the plane that caught fire?

  • @user-ei7hu6ve7m
    @user-ei7hu6ve7m 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Number this phone is not editing for some reason

  • @maeledzo5180
    @maeledzo5180 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ce serait mieux de comparer l'a350 au 777x plutôt de le comparer au 777-300 qui est bien plus vieux

  • @galernasalvaje
    @galernasalvaje 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    El coste de operación del Airbus es mucho mayor que el de Boeing

    • @jeffersonnicholas2106
      @jeffersonnicholas2106 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      galernasalvaje VLC Spotting Forever in this case the a350 has a less operation cost than b777-300er

  • @laavidity8339
    @laavidity8339 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    GE90 has a size of 3.3meters and Trentxwb has 3.0meters but I like the A350-1000 xwb more

  • @loucoporloiras5874
    @loucoporloiras5874 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    COMO NÃO CONHEÇO O A350, FICO COM O 777 300 ER PORQUE JÁ VOEI NELE.

  • @Slyze33
    @Slyze33 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    not sure about 148M$ as the a350's price tho lol

  • @donkeyb9660
    @donkeyb9660 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I prefer 777 - 300er a little more. A350 and 787 both destroy every other twin jet though.

    • @SkylaxAviation
      @SkylaxAviation 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Donkey B No A330 ;)

    • @robbieshaft
      @robbieshaft 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      757, so powerful 😊

    • @cageordie
      @cageordie 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Except the Bombrdier CSeries, they aren't in the size class, but their fuel burn per passenger mile is in the same class and better than anything else of their size. Technology moves on and these are the class leaders. Bombardier and the A350 take the 787 sales pitch of operating smaller aircraft from smaller airports to the next stage. These three make smaller airports possible for intercontinental travel. Bombardier recently operated a representative test aircraft out of London City Airport, usually only available to regional jets and turboprops, and flew to JFK with no stop. Nothing as big or bigger can do that, BA does it with an A318 or A319, but they can't get off with the upwind transatlantic fuel load, so they have to stop for fuel in Ireland. 787 and A350 will be able to make the South Pole routes from NZ to South Africa or Perth, Australia to Argentina.

    • @genuinebmwrepairs4286
      @genuinebmwrepairs4286 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      why does every mention the a350 with 787. 787 is the size of an a330. the a350 is a bigger plane

    • @ammemaybay2061
      @ammemaybay2061 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      genuine bmwrepairs a350-1000 vs B777-9x

  • @nutboltdakage1990
    @nutboltdakage1990 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    straight up insult to the A350-1000 XWB because most of the people compare the A350-1000 XWB with the B787-dreamliner

  • @vegardpig8634
    @vegardpig8634 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the 777 got those huge ass engines though

  • @steventun8625
    @steventun8625 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bro found a Airbus beluga

  • @harrydoherty8299
    @harrydoherty8299 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Airbus is lighter,shorter takeoff run ? Just a guess.

  • @toddrone
    @toddrone 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    777-300ER,. if it ain't Boeing,.then I ain't going!!

  • @fabiosouris617
    @fabiosouris617 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    350 best than all aeroplane

  • @farukche3848
    @farukche3848 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A350 !