As an A380 freak, the final nail in the coffin was the introduction of ETOPS certified planes. Frankly, I don't understand how Airbus thought that the A380 would succeed. The original 777 was ETOPS certified long before the A380's first flight. If Airbus also offered a freight version of the A380, like Boeing do with the 747-8, then I'm almost certain that the A380 program would have been a success. Obviously, the pandemic doesn't help. But as of right now, it's not too late for Airbus to introduce a freighter version of the A380.
@@OES-siv187bxuhk Given that 747-8F is stopping production, I do not believe A380F will be viable again, especially it doesn't have a nose door to hold extra-long cargo
It is more useful to pay attention to the engine. When the first 777 came out in 94, the engine available was 77k lbf, supporting the 200 model. a few years later a 93/98K lbf engine was available, capable of supporting either a extended range version of 200, or a longer body in the 300. Later, an even higher thrust engine at 115k lbf, came out to support the 300 ER.
I've flown the Boeing 777-300ER several times, it's such a beautiful plane. My most memorable/best experience was an almost 16-hour flight from Toronto to Taipei on EVA Air a few years ago.
B777-300ER - really fantastic. Been on Cathay Pacific, Air France, KLM, Emirates, American Airlines, British Airways... I like them all ... also interesting to see how different airlines organises their cabin arrangements.
As a doe-hard 777 fan, I do consider these two seemingly similar variants one generation apart. The 300ER imo is one of the all-time-greats in the commercial aviation industry. Very well-designed around it's purpose with incredible efficiency and reliability. No excessively fancy technology out there, but she has utilized mature technologies to their maximum.
The larger wing of the -300ER also includes the raked wingtips (later incorporated into the 787), which the -300 does not have. The -300ER also contains further aerodynamic improvements not mentioned in the video.
I’m. Lucky to have experienced the b777, 787 and a380,330,320,350 and out of all of those I was the most comfortable in a350 but the pure sensation and power that you first feel when the first take off clearance is given is phenomenal on the 777 and I would much rather compensate my comfort to the roaring beauty of the 777(ge90 variant not the Trent. 8000
It strikes me that adding four metres to the wingspan of a model is a much more significant alteration to type than “merely “ inserting plugs before and aft the wing to stretch an airplane. I’m going to assume that the larger wing is 1. More efficient in terms of fuel burn, and 2. Capable of storing more fuel.
I might be wrong here but I think the difference in wingspan resides in the added raked wingtips. So yes, more fuel-efficient but I don't think there is any fuel stored that far out.
Longer wings provide better lift for the added weight and reduces the fuel burn, which also helps to extend the range, however it sometimes limits the aircraft maneuverability in some airports and which gates they would be allowed to use. That's why the 777X has foldable wings, to fit in gates and taxiways that would otherwise not accommodate its massive wings.
I love the 777-300ER with Air France and Air Canada, both very nice. Air Canada use the 777 to fly domestic too so I get to fly it alot to Montreal and Vancouver from Toronto!
@@yanihat2369 Not necessarily, the 200LR has GE90-115BL nearly identical to the 300ER GE90-115B, the 200ER also has an option for GE90's but not the -115B, the only available GE90 for the 200ER is the GE90-94B
I’ve only flown on AA’s 777-200 twice in MCE/PE and loved it. My trips to Europe on the -300 were to be in business class and all cancelled due to C-19. So that sucked.
Delta Airlines’ 777-200LR with the new Delta One cabin is my favorite type to fly also my favorite kind of plane. Unfortunately Delta had retired their entire 777 fleet! 🤔😢
My favourite airline for flying the B777-ER is EVA Air between LHR and BKK, which I have done many times since 2006. Their economy cabin is fairly comfortable and their cabin crew are fantastic. At the moment there is obviously no service but I look forward to its return in maybe late 2021.
It makes sense for emirates to have the -200 ER/LR and the -300 ER versions considering they can fly to virtually any major city in any continent. They can use the -200 LR for flights to Auckland when flights open up since the a380 won’t get filled up. The ER variants can easily fly nonstop to the US.
The main differences are the engines, the centre fuel tank, the raked wing tips and the main landing gear forward strut. The flight decks are pretty much identical. One other common thing about the aircraft is how it is easy to fly, even over short sectors (
also: You could choose between Pratt & Whitney, Rolls Royce and General Electric Engines on the normal 777-300 version, while the -300ER only offers the GE90
Only flown the 777-300 once in short houl with CX and it was a great flight. Much better than the 77W long haul flights I've had with the infamous 3-4-3 economy class configuration.
My favorite. Non stop flight of AirIndia 777-300er from New York JFK to India New Delhi. A 13.45hrs flight with Indian food and bollywood movie. Love it.
Gorgeous jets, but I still greatly miss the Olympic, TWA, and PAN AM Boeing 707's that my family used to fly nonstop to Greece in, from JFK in NYC! Of course they flew faster than the current more efficient commercial jets, and could do the NYC to Athens route in about 8 hours! I can still hear and feel those 707's spooling up for takeoff as a kid/teen sitting by the window!
I've ever flown the 777 once with Cathay Pacific from Hong Kong to Tokyo (Haneda). It was maybe the 777 300 that I flown at. It's also my first and only time that I've flown with the 777
Have flown the B773ER several times, with several airliners. I really like the aircraft, also the sound of the engines while starting up (GE90-115) An increadable sound which goes through the bones! My best experience with this aircraft (service wise) was Garuda Indonesian, non-stop Amsterdam- Jakarta.and Singapore-Amsterdam.
The raked wingtips allowed for better aerodynamics, and the GE90-115B engines provided more thrust and better fuel burn over larger periods of time. The plane was also lighter compared to the -300, by removing unecessary items from the construction of the plane, they saved over 300kg of weight
Aircrafts came to service and ,retired but the boeing 777 still reigns the sky...hatsoff to all the people related to aviation who made huge efforts to make air travel smoother and hassle free
Also worth noting the differences in propulsion. The 777-300 uses smaller turbofans by Rolls-Royce and Pratt & Whitney versus the mighty GE90 used on the 777-300er variant.
I used to do business in the KSA, was very surprised Saudia would use triple sevens on near empty short flights like Jeddah to Riyadh or Riyadh to Dammam, excellent service tho with complimentary Cardamom coffee and almond filled dates.
JRC Adventures oh you need to, the friendliness is on point, and yes the orange pride livery is very nice, I have a model aircraft with the orange pride livery
The raked wingtips, perfect length, large but well-proportioned engines, and sharp tail fin are what make the -300ER my favourite 777 variant. I even think the -300ER looks better than the new -9 and -8, especially when viewed from the top or from the front, as the new 777s tend to look too chubby with the older fuselage combined with the thick new wing and plump new engines.
You know people, I was thinking Boeing could just have only upgraded the regular 777-300er and call it the 777-300x and that it. But of course, that what the Real Boeing would do, not the farce of today
The 777-300ER is also used for short-medium haul routes too. Air. Newzealand uses them from Sydney or Melbourne to Aukland and Dubai to Muscat on Emirates.
The 777-300ER was designed as a direct replacement for the 747 _Classic_ models. But it became not only a 747-100/200 replacement, but also replaced the 747-400 on many long routes. That's why even British Airways and United Airlines bought the plane.
I believe the -300ER variant gets its extra wingspan from its raked wingtips, making the aircraft more fuel efficient and giving the aircraft more lift.
Yes. The 777 landing safely after engine explosion shows how much safe the 777 is. Also, the 777-300ER doesn't have Pratt and Whitney engines that failed.
-200ER is basically -200 with higher mtow and range. the 777-200LR tho has bigger wings, bigger engines and many more changes similar to 777-300ER providing even higher mtow and range.
The Boeing 777-300 and 777-300 ER are one of the most beautiful planes,and smooth planes to fly on. I especially like flying in them with Air Canada and Emirates.
I've flown five times with triple seven. SIN to DXB return with SQ SIN to IST return with TK DXB to SIN with EK DOH to RAK with QR CMN to DOH with QR All using GE90 except for SQ using RR.
So far my only Boeing 777 (-200ER) flight has been on Austrian Airlines between ORD & VIE. Despite being seated over the wings near the 737 sized engines, I was still able to get some good sleep.
My best memory of B777 is on ANA's new business class "The Room", still remember the smell of the new B77W (JA796A), and ANA's service quality is amazing. Except for airlines, the GE90-115B roar is my favourite so that's why I prefer the ER model. Love Love B777!!!
Mee too, I also love ANA since is the cleanest airline. And of course, it have my favorite planes the 777, 787, a380. ( I love all planes for be honest) Can wait to try them in the future and when they have the new 777x🤩
The 777-300ER has a larger wingspan than the 777-300 along with bigger and more powerful engine. You’ll be able to see that almost right away if you put the two side by side.😃
I've flown Boeing 737,747,767,787&777-(300&200).. Airbus 319,320,330,340,350..Hoping to fly theA380 after the pandemic..Most of my trips are long haul flights, flying with B777-300ER planes of Emirates, Cathay, Qatar, Thai and KLM..Im here in Abidjan with minimum flight time of 30 hours to the Philippines.
One thing not mentioned is that, at the same range, the 777-300ER can carry significantly more cargo than the standard -300. In many cases this more than makes up for the higher cost of the longer range version.
My favourite airline to operate the 777-300ER was Virgin Australia, however, since the airline has withdrawn the 777s and A330-243s from the fleet due to Covid, i would have to say that my favourite 777 operator is now Air New Zealand.
Singapore airlines and Emirates,,but I find Singapore airlines B77W better because they still have the 3-3-3 seat configuration on their economy seats :)
you really cant make this comparison without taking about the extraordinary GE90...above all the variant wich powered the 300ER...the trust is significantly different...it is too a way to reconize the 777-300ER by his huge air intake. take care.
the 777-300er range was supposed to have a 2-3-2 configuration or 3-3-2 if I remember, but thanks that airlines don't see economy just no important( except Jal), it is not that good at al.
This is my favourite aircraft! :) Thank You for creating this video. I do believe Air Canada mainline ordered from Boeing as well for their 777-300ER fleet.
The 777-300ER was effectively the final nail in making quadjets obsolete, for passenger service.
As an A380 freak, the final nail in the coffin was the introduction of ETOPS certified planes. Frankly, I don't understand how Airbus thought that the A380 would succeed. The original 777 was ETOPS certified long before the A380's first flight. If Airbus also offered a freight version of the A380, like Boeing do with the 747-8, then I'm almost certain that the A380 program would have been a success. Obviously, the pandemic doesn't help. But as of right now, it's not too late for Airbus to introduce a freighter version of the A380.
The Boeing 777 put the a340 program out of business
@@OES-siv187bxuhk Given that 747-8F is stopping production, I do not believe A380F will be viable again, especially it doesn't have a nose door to hold extra-long cargo
@@OES-siv187bxuhk the a380F would need to retain the floor in the middle for structural reasons.
QATAR AIRWAYS D BEST EVER
The 777 is a beauty!
That’s an Understatement🙂
The 747 is even more beautiful
Yes she is
I rate 787 and A350 higher. But 777 are up there 😍
@@momoooo12 yeah they really are “up there.” WAY up there, many miles above the ground.
The B777-300ER looks beautiful, especially with it's raked wingtips 😍
Yup my fav aircraft
Facts
What about the 787?
@@almightyian 787's too a beauty!
It is more useful to pay attention to the engine. When the first 777 came out in 94, the engine available was 77k lbf, supporting the 200 model. a few years later a 93/98K lbf engine was available, capable of supporting either a extended range version of 200, or a longer body in the 300. Later, an even higher thrust engine at 115k lbf, came out to support the 300 ER.
yeah 115k lbf is still insane to this date.
@@morrish044 Just to imagine the 777x will have 130+ k lbf though it might never be used since it's not necessary
@@tpr1808The 777x will actually use a weaker engine, rated at 110k lbf (search it up!)
GE90🔥🔥🔥
I've flown the Boeing 777-300ER several times, it's such a beautiful plane. My most memorable/best experience was an almost 16-hour flight from Toronto to Taipei on EVA Air a few years ago.
B777-300ER - really fantastic. Been on Cathay Pacific, Air France, KLM, Emirates, American Airlines, British Airways... I like them all ... also interesting to see how different airlines organises their cabin arrangements.
Don’t forget United airlines
As a doe-hard 777 fan, I do consider these two seemingly similar variants one generation apart. The 300ER imo is one of the all-time-greats in the commercial aviation industry. Very well-designed around it's purpose with incredible efficiency and reliability. No excessively fancy technology out there, but she has utilized mature technologies to their maximum.
The larger wing of the -300ER also includes the raked wingtips (later incorporated into the 787), which the -300 does not have. The -300ER also contains further aerodynamic improvements not mentioned in the video.
You provided more important details than in the video. I would also add that the Ge90 is the only engine option on the 777-300er.
P-8 Poseidon also uses raked wingtip even though it's based on 737 NG
Also that is more efficient than the regular 300
I’ve only flown the 777 twice. Return Amsterdam to Vancouver with KLM. Really nice aircraft.
I fly it a lot crossing over pacific ocean routes, it is a bit loud to me, I always prefer 787 or a350...
I’m. Lucky to have experienced the b777, 787 and a380,330,320,350 and out of all of those I was the most comfortable in a350 but the pure sensation and power that you first feel when the first take off clearance is given is phenomenal on the 777 and I would much rather compensate my comfort to the roaring beauty of the 777(ge90 variant not the Trent. 8000
AR Aviation It is a music if I hear it for less than an hour, listening to it for 15 hours is a disaster
It strikes me that adding four metres to the wingspan of a model is a much more significant alteration to type than “merely “ inserting plugs before and aft the wing to stretch an airplane. I’m going to assume that the larger wing is 1. More efficient in terms of fuel burn, and 2. Capable of storing more fuel.
I might be wrong here but I think the difference in wingspan resides in the added raked wingtips. So yes, more fuel-efficient but I don't think there is any fuel stored that far out.
I think they utilised extra fuel tanks else where in the plane rather than enlarge the wing tanks.
Longer wings provide better lift for the added weight and reduces the fuel burn, which also helps to extend the range, however it sometimes limits the aircraft maneuverability in some airports and which gates they would be allowed to use. That's why the 777X has foldable wings, to fit in gates and taxiways that would otherwise not accommodate its massive wings.
The larger wing also includes the raked wingtips, which the -300 does not have. An omission on the author’s part.
You'd be generally correct about point 1
until today i never knew ER stood for Extended Range. This is why i love this channel. You learn stuff
@Muhammad Isa and Xlr stands for extra long range lol
and SR stands for Short Range lol
And nothing stands for normal range
This thread was longer than the video...
777 RG is for Regional high density route
Delta's triple 7 is my favorite and maybe Emirates too.
I do not like Delta anything
Klm ?
@@MarktheSharkC Etihad isn’t too terrible either
@@MaulinAgrawal1217 I agree!
@@MarktheSharkC Airbus is better tho
I love the 777-300ER with Air France and Air Canada, both very nice. Air Canada use the 777 to fly domestic too so I get to fly it alot to Montreal and Vancouver from Toronto!
I flew United 777-200ER from New Jersey to Brussels, it was an amazing flight, just loved it.
Flew the 777-300ER a few times with Korean Air and always loved it
Quick guide to tell both apart externally:
If it has Trent 800s or PW4000s, it's a -300 for sure
If it has raked wingtips, it's a -300ER for sure
GE90 for 300ERs
@@yanihat2369 Not necessarily, the 200LR has GE90-115BL nearly identical to the 300ER GE90-115B, the 200ER also has an option for GE90's but not the -115B, the only available GE90 for the 200ER is the GE90-94B
-300ER may have the raked wingtips, but so does the -200LR, which was made after the success of the -300ER.
@@3rdEyeMarc ye but -200LR smol
I have flown in Emirates 777-300ER several times and its a very comfy ride..Undoubtedly one of the best airline services in the world..
I’ve only flown on AA’s 777-200 twice in MCE/PE and loved it. My trips to Europe on the -300 were to be in business class and all cancelled due to C-19. So that sucked.
Thank you for making a video on this! I’m happy many people will now learn about the near forgotten 773 (non-ER). :)
I'm looking forward to flying the 777X with SIA or ANA. The 777 is my favourite series of aircraft
Me too!!! But on Cathay Pacific
@@tapaschakraborty8534 I hope either Qantas or Air New Zealand orders the 777X in the future.
Flew a round trip with Emirates Airlines from South African to Portugal via Dubai with the 777 ER ... was a wonderful trip 😀👍
Delta Airlines’ 777-200LR with the new Delta One cabin is my favorite type to fly also my favorite kind of plane. Unfortunately Delta had retired their entire 777 fleet! 🤔😢
Have flown numerous times with Emirates in Boeing 777-300 ER. What a fantastic aircraft it is.
My favorite 777 operator is Saudi Arabian Airlines! They operate about 30-32 Boeing 777-368ER’s! Greetings from Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦😉♥️❤️👍💪
As of today it is 35
🤗I’m learning so much aviation from ultra detail to those little juicy details about aircraft types thx guys happy holidays 🎄🛫🛫🛫
Congratulations 🎉👏 of being the top comment 👍😁 (as of now 😈)
@@itstomatogear6806 How many times has this comment been copy pasted?
Thanks for the feedback! - TB
@@SimpleFlyingNews I’m happy
This is really well explained! Even my 6 year old cousin knows about the 777 a lot! 👍
My favourite airline for flying the B777-ER is EVA Air between LHR and BKK, which I have done many times since 2006. Their economy cabin is fairly comfortable and their cabin crew are fantastic. At the moment there is obviously no service but I look forward to its return in maybe late 2021.
Japan Airlines because there are still one of the few with 9 abreast seating in economy
So does EVA air on some ultra long haul routes like TPE-JFK or TPE-CDG or TPE-IAH.
emirates has 10 row seating in economy right?
Biman Bangladesh Airlines also features 9 seats in a row on economy class
It makes sense for emirates to have the -200 ER/LR and the -300 ER versions considering they can fly to virtually any major city in any continent. They can use the -200 LR for flights to Auckland when flights open up since the a380 won’t get filled up. The ER variants can easily fly nonstop to the US.
The main differences are the engines, the centre fuel tank, the raked wing tips and the main landing gear forward strut. The flight decks are pretty much identical. One other common thing about the aircraft is how it is easy to fly, even over short sectors (
Philippine Airlines (PAL) Is my favorite airline to B777
Agreed, friendliest airline, and better legroom than most airlines
I’ve been on that over a years ago. Smooth 11 hour flight from MNL to SFO!
also: You could choose between Pratt & Whitney, Rolls Royce and General Electric Engines on the normal 777-300 version, while the -300ER only offers the GE90
Cathay Pacific and Singapore Airlines, have some of the best 77w's that I've flown on.
Only flown the 777-300 once in short houl with CX and it was a great flight. Much better than the 77W long haul flights I've had with the infamous 3-4-3 economy class configuration.
Quite a few airlines have 3-4-3 on the 77W too.
My favorite. Non stop flight of AirIndia 777-300er from New York JFK to India New Delhi.
A 13.45hrs flight with Indian food and bollywood movie. Love it.
Gorgeous jets, but I still greatly miss the Olympic, TWA, and PAN AM Boeing 707's that my family used to fly nonstop to Greece in, from JFK in NYC! Of course they flew faster than the current more efficient commercial jets, and could do the NYC to Athens route in about 8 hours! I can still hear and feel those 707's spooling up for takeoff as a kid/teen sitting by the window!
I've ever flown the 777 once with Cathay Pacific from Hong Kong to Tokyo (Haneda). It was maybe the 777 300 that I flown at. It's also my first and only time that I've flown with the 777
Have flown the B773ER several times, with several airliners. I really like the aircraft, also the sound of the engines while starting up
(GE90-115) An increadable sound which goes through the bones! My best experience with this aircraft (service wise) was Garuda Indonesian, non-stop Amsterdam- Jakarta.and Singapore-Amsterdam.
would have liked more detail. like they achieved extra range?
The raked wingtips allowed for better aerodynamics, and the GE90-115B engines provided more thrust and better fuel burn over larger periods of time. The plane was also lighter compared to the -300, by removing unecessary items from the construction of the plane, they saved over 300kg of weight
@@3rdEyeMarc and then fat Americans put it back on again
thank you for showing these aircraft. It has been fun flying on the 777s.
I love Air Canada’s livery, especially the design on the cockpit windshield.
True, it looks lovely
Aircrafts came to service and ,retired but the boeing 777 still reigns the sky...hatsoff to all the people related to aviation who made huge efforts to make air travel smoother and hassle free
Also worth noting the differences in propulsion. The 777-300 uses smaller turbofans by Rolls-Royce and Pratt & Whitney versus the mighty GE90 used on the 777-300er variant.
I used to do business in the KSA, was very surprised Saudia would use triple sevens on near empty short flights like Jeddah to Riyadh or Riyadh to Dammam, excellent service tho with complimentary Cardamom coffee and almond filled dates.
Some info on why the ER has better range. Like fuel tank placement etc
I like flying the klm 777, its my national airline so it makes me feel at home when I'm flying on one
I’ve never flown KLM, but they have some of the most beautiful liveries to me, especially the orange pride 777
JRC Adventures oh you need to, the friendliness is on point, and yes the orange pride livery is very nice, I have a model aircraft with the orange pride livery
The Boeing 777-300ER was the first plane I flew on. Love those GE90s
The raked wingtips, perfect length, large but well-proportioned engines, and sharp tail fin are what make the -300ER my favourite 777 variant.
I even think the -300ER looks better than the new -9 and -8, especially when viewed from the top or from the front, as the new 777s tend to look too chubby with the older fuselage combined with the thick new wing and plump new engines.
You know people, I was thinking Boeing could just have only upgraded the regular 777-300er and call it the 777-300x and that it. But of course, that what the Real Boeing would do, not the farce of today
The b777 300er and the Emirates livery combine really well, and I can't think of any other airline liveries that can top that.
Singapore Airlines, Cathay Pacific, etc.
Great comparison bro! Awesome content
Thanks for the feedback! - TB
Hey simple flying can you also make a video about the difference between ER- Extended Range and LR - Long Range
Thanks for the feedback! - TB
The 777-200LR has bigger wings, engines, raked wing tips, extra fuel tanks and many more changes similar to that of 777-300ER
The 777-300ER is also used for short-medium haul routes too. Air. Newzealand uses them from Sydney or Melbourne to Aukland and Dubai to Muscat on Emirates.
The 777-300ER was designed as a direct replacement for the 747 _Classic_ models. But it became not only a 747-100/200 replacement, but also replaced the 747-400 on many long routes. That's why even British Airways and United Airlines bought the plane.
Nah. BA bought the 777-9 as a 747-400 replacement, not 777-300ER.
I believe the -300ER variant gets its extra wingspan from its raked wingtips, making the aircraft more fuel efficient and giving the aircraft more lift.
I remember my flight from Singapore to Paris using Air France B777-300ER, it was awesome 👌
Is it safe to fly 777 now long haule for example paris santiago after engine failure ? A video on that would be ....
Yes. The 777 landing safely after engine explosion shows how much safe the 777 is. Also, the 777-300ER doesn't have Pratt and Whitney engines that failed.
I flew the 777-300er from Lisbon to Luanda and the returning flight with TAAG in 2012
Awesome plane and very comfortable
Can you do the difference of the -200 -200ER & -200LR?
This please!
-200ER is basically -200 with higher mtow and range. the 777-200LR tho has bigger wings, bigger engines and many more changes similar to 777-300ER providing even higher mtow and range.
The B777 to me is one of the best looking jets ☝🏾❤️
i love the 777-300 it gives me so many memories of when we were able to travel overseas with TAM airlines :D
the difference is the “ER”, which stands for “easily recognisable” or something like that ? or was it “extended roof “?
Extended Range.
The Boeing 777-300 and 777-300 ER are one of the most beautiful planes,and smooth planes to fly on. I especially like flying in them with Air Canada and Emirates.
Take a look at it’s wingtips, the 7773er do have the sharp wingtip like the 772lr while the 7773 have the same with 7772
Japanese JAL and ANA is the first to reture their B777 300 fleet.
Great
Now please compare the 777-200ER to the 777-200 LR
Literally the same video, just replace -300 with -200ER and -300ER with 200LR. :D
200LR vs 300 ER 😁
@@yanihat2369 One is short one is long
My favorite jet is 777/300 er in Emerarites livery. Gorgeous aircraft!
Well I like to fly 777-300er but I can’t get more excited for 777-9X
whats the 777-300er gear tilt angle
Then what is the 777 LR? I know it's only in the 777-200 but the 200 also has an ER variant so what's the difference?
It's basically a shorter 777-300ER.
I've flown five times with triple seven.
SIN to DXB return with SQ
SIN to IST return with TK
DXB to SIN with EK
DOH to RAK with QR
CMN to DOH with QR
All using GE90 except for SQ using RR.
The 777 is the widebody I’ve flown the most. Beautiful machine. Looks even prettier in Swiss or British Airways liveries
Turkish Airlines 777-ER, LAX to IST flight was phenomenal..
So far my only Boeing 777 (-200ER) flight has been on Austrian Airlines between ORD & VIE. Despite being seated over the wings near the 737 sized engines, I was still able to get some good sleep.
My best memory of B777 is on ANA's new business class "The Room", still remember the smell of the new B77W (JA796A), and ANA's service quality is amazing.
Except for airlines, the GE90-115B roar is my favourite so that's why I prefer the ER model.
Love Love B777!!!
Mee too, I also love ANA since is the cleanest airline. And of course, it have my favorite planes the 777, 787, a380. ( I love all planes for be honest) Can wait to try them in the future and when they have the new 777x🤩
Question, can the b777x be thought of as a b777neo?
The 777X is a bigger upgrade than any neo planes. Just calling it new engine option won't be suitable.
@@rv7w602 ahhh gotchya, my bad.
Emirates has ordered 777-300 tho. That's not in East Asia. :P
You didn’t understand what he meant.
The 777-300ER has a larger wingspan than the 777-300 along with bigger and more powerful engine. You’ll be able to see that almost right away if you put the two side by side.😃
Yes definitely, the GE90-115B's are a sight to see
@@3rdEyeMarc sure are
I've flown Boeing 737,747,767,787&777-(300&200).. Airbus 319,320,330,340,350..Hoping to fly theA380 after the pandemic..Most of my trips are long haul flights, flying with B777-300ER planes of Emirates, Cathay, Qatar, Thai and KLM..Im here in Abidjan with minimum flight time of 30 hours to the Philippines.
One thing not mentioned is that, at the same range, the 777-300ER can carry significantly more cargo than the standard -300. In many cases this more than makes up for the higher cost of the longer range version.
The 777-300 has worse mtow than even the 777-200lr since it's a 777-200er stretch
I like the 787 flown them countless times from Europe to the U.S very quiet, smooth and the lighting is great as well.
Really? An entire video on this?
My favourite airline to operate the 777-300ER was Virgin Australia, however, since the airline has withdrawn the 777s and A330-243s from the fleet due to Covid, i would have to say that my favourite 777 operator is now Air New Zealand.
I have only recently ever flown on a 777. I've flown on almost every airbus and boeing but the 777 always evaded me until a recent trip.
One of my favorite planes. Cathay Pacific is the fave 777-300er
I never knew the ‘-300’ has/had an available non- ‘-ER’.
Yeah it does but I was never all that popular unlike the ER variant. The 777-300 non -ER is pretty much nonexistent now.
Yeah like the 777-200ER and LR version of the 777-200
I didn’t know either
@@ChrisZoomER At least I managed to fly on it before, with Cathay!
Only sold 60.
Singapore airlines and Emirates,,but I find Singapore airlines B77W better because they still have the 3-3-3 seat configuration on their economy seats :)
you really cant make this comparison without taking about the extraordinary GE90...above all the variant wich powered the 300ER...the trust is significantly different...it is too a way to reconize the 777-300ER by his huge air intake.
take care.
Please do on 777 and a350
the 777-300er range was supposed to have a 2-3-2 configuration or 3-3-2 if I remember, but thanks that airlines don't see economy just no important( except Jal), it is not that good at al.
So ER stands for Extra Range?
Extended range
My favorite airline to fly the 777-300er is Aeroflot it”s amazing.
Never got the chance to sea the MALAYSIA AIRLINES seawave livery on the 777
TAKING THE 777 ER FROM FRANKFURT TO TORONTO THIS SUMMER. MY MAIDEN VOYAGE ON THE 777
What is the meaning for the ER ?
ER (Extended Range)
This is my favourite aircraft! :) Thank You for creating this video. I do believe Air Canada mainline ordered from Boeing as well for their 777-300ER fleet.
EVA air flies the 777-300er & 777-300. Great staff and the aircraft ride is extremely smooth.
I like to fly Emirates 777-300ER
I love that plane
It's about time people learned this, commonly referring to the 300ER as a "777-300"
777-300er my national carrier's flagship plane.