How Helping Ukraine Deters Beijing: Inside the Politics of Political Signaling

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
  • Check out my book "How Ukraine Survived": amzn.to/47gnlEf. You can also read it for free by signing up for a Kindle Unlimited trial at amzn.to/3QMsBr8. (I use affiliate links, meaning I earn a commission when you make a transaction through them. Even if you read for free, you are still supporting the channel.)
    Although rarely ever at the forefront, part of the West's motivation to assist Ukraine is to deter the People's Republic of China from invading Taiwan. This video explores the logic of how this is happening. We begin with the direct and indirect military effects before transitioning to the political signals that aid to Ukraine sends. As a final note, we explore some data from an experiment on what would deter Chinese citizens from wanting to unify Taiwan militarily.
    0:00 Help Ukraine, Deter China?
    2:18 Indirect Benefits of Ukrainian Aid to Taiwan
    7:48 Direct Benefits of the the Aid Bill to Taiwan
    10:10 Political-Military Signals to China
    11:55 Economic Signals
    13:28 What Are the PRC's Beliefs?
    16:01 Experiment on Public Opinion in China
    The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.
    Media licensed under CC BY 2.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    By 總統府:
    www.flickr.com/photos/preside...
    www.flickr.com/photos/preside...
    Media licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    By Ministry of Defense UA:
    www.flickr.com/photos/ministr...
    Media licensed under CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    By Kremlin.ru:
    kremlin.ru/events/president/ne...
    en.kremlin.ru/catalog/persons/...
    en.kremlin.ru/catalog/persons/...
    en.kremlin.ru/events/president...
    kremlin.ru/events/president/ne...
    kremlin.ru/events/president/ne...
    kremlin.ru/events/president/ne...
    kremlin.ru/events/president/ne...

ความคิดเห็น • 585

  • @PaxHeadroom
    @PaxHeadroom หลายเดือนก่อน +381

    PrSM isn't a bad acronym, you can just pronounce it like "prism". Prism has a ring to it.

    • @boardcertifiable
      @boardcertifiable หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      It sounds magical ✨️

    • @unoriginalname4321
      @unoriginalname4321 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      By ring, do you mean an expanding ring of tungsten balls?

    • @NathanielRuzicka
      @NathanielRuzicka หลายเดือนก่อน

      PRISM is SEXY thank you!

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@unoriginalname4321buttring

    • @lagunax5645
      @lagunax5645 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      They call it the Prism missile... cuz it hits the FULL SPECTRUM~ (cue CSI Miami intro)
      (I don't know what that would actually mean in military lingo, but it sounded good.)

  • @lagunax5645
    @lagunax5645 หลายเดือนก่อน +208

    I think the bigger news from that study at the end would be the fact that Chinese support for the invasion was still in the 60s and had gone up after a full year of the Ukraine war.
    I think that tells you that whatever persuasiveness the extra information possessed, it was not as strong as the CCP's own propaganda ramp-up for possible war.
    Although that being said, with any autocratic system, you CANNOT distinguish between genuine support, and people defaulting to the answer that they think the government wants to hear (which probably deserved its own caveat when discussing this kind of data...)

    • @1999Almaz
      @1999Almaz หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Yep, i don't know about chinese laws, but in Russia you WILL get in trouble for anti-war sentiments. So you better say "hail to emperor, let's go to war" than pay some fine or even go to prison in event that "question" was actually a trap.

    • @gogudelagaze1585
      @gogudelagaze1585 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@1999Almaz Chinese netizens are free to talk shit about the Russian invasion. In fact, some of the most savage criticism I've read of Russia came from the Chinese internet. However, this was during the Kharkhiv offensive, where Russia put up a shameful display. The sentiment swung again after Ukraine's much hyped counter-offensive failed to deliver significant results.
      One thing to keep in mind is the Chinese culture, and appearing strong is VERY important. Usually, the side that manages to do that will be the popular one.

    • @1999Almaz
      @1999Almaz หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@gogudelagaze1585 That's not what i meant tho.
      I doubt Chinese citizens allowed to say "i don't want our country to invade Taiwan"

    • @gogudelagaze1585
      @gogudelagaze1585 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@1999Almaz Oh! I see. Yeah, that kind of speech probably breaks the "picking quarrels and making trouble" law.

    • @beyondEV
      @beyondEV หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@gogudelagaze1585 Not really. But i would have been better to specify "you favor invasion or diplomatic means" for reunification.
      I consider it likely the chinese people are actually more in favour of invasion than the leaders. leadership has used the carrot for a very long time, to achieve their objectives. And military expenditure in terms of gdp is actually down (SIPRI data). Strategically, now a nation strongly depending on trade, the did shift the focus away from the army. But there is little chance, anyone would actually try a full scale invasion. Having a huge paper tiger of a navy, is a mighty geopolitical tool, especially if it weaknesses are never exposed, as doesn't see actual combat. For every $ the chinese pump in their military, the geopolitical opposition put about 5-10$ into their militaries. They can keep that going, it will give them a significant long term economic advantage.

  • @user-th3bo2yp1t
    @user-th3bo2yp1t หลายเดือนก่อน +333

    Not just as signaling, a weaker russia is a weaker china.

    • @terjeoseberg990
      @terjeoseberg990 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China might be discovering that all those weapons that Russia helped them build are crap.

    • @u2beuser714
      @u2beuser714 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Elaborate please

    • @marcdc6809
      @marcdc6809 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@u2beuser714Russia now became a de facto colony of China, China gets the raw materials out and puts their industrial products in, if we could show the Russians that their current leader lost every inch of expansion in Ukraine, even loses Crimea, that would likely get the old silverbacks replaced, and if the new leaders in the Kremlin aren't fools, they'll return to the level of profitable trade with the EU and maybe even join the EU in the future. Looking forward to the answer of your question, for which I'll now get notified.

    • @user-vt2cr8qd1b
      @user-vt2cr8qd1b หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      @@u2beuser714 they are likely to provide military aid to each other

    • @1964_AMU
      @1964_AMU หลายเดือนก่อน

      A weeker Russia is a stronger China, in my opinion. China is lending money to Russia, if Russians cannot make repayments, it could trigger China paying themselves on the Cow....

  • @Navigator2166
    @Navigator2166 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

    Professor, I do know what SWIFT is, I do like glorified lecture and I am ever so grateful you have too much time on your hand. Please continue your wonderful geopolitical content. Thank you

    • @VIKING-SON
      @VIKING-SON หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Dittos like you I look forward to all of his posts, and I'm the average blue collar guy in the street. I'm also a 50's born Boomer and retired military. Even my spouse enjoys his lectures Lol 😆

    • @Navigator2166
      @Navigator2166 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@VIKING-SON Wonderful! Also, I enjoy his wry sense of humor. That can send me into hic-up laughter at the drop of the hat!
      PS: 1950 Boomer, spouse retired Lt. Commander… me, I'm just a geo-pol & History junkie!😁

    • @VIKING-SON
      @VIKING-SON หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Navigator2166 Roger that I'm retired US Army CWO 2 my spouse and I enjoy him. Like you I'm a geopolitical kind of person.
      I got that way after living in Virginia Beach for 11 years. Met some really nice Navy people there. My brother was retired Navy and worked for DOD. Thanks for the reply Navy.

    • @davidelliott5843
      @davidelliott5843 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’m just a semi-retired Brit Boomer. My generation seem to realise what we are playing with on this war (think late 1930s). Nobody else is bothered. To them, it’s just background noise. It’s not even registered on UK’s current general election campaign.

  • @mitchells7634
    @mitchells7634 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    The Columbia class submarine at 8:47 is amazing. A submarine painted with an American flag, with a Statue of Liberty on top of it, and passing by 5 more Statue of Libertys in port is amazing!

    • @AlreadyTakenTag
      @AlreadyTakenTag หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      The enemy would surrender due to the sheer amount of freedom radiating from it.

    • @Alexander_the_Wise
      @Alexander_the_Wise หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That's some C&Q: Red Alert type shit

    • @jackthompson6296
      @jackthompson6296 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Oh, they’re not statues. They’re giant robots

    • @devonwilson8306
      @devonwilson8306 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      If all our submarines don't have a Statue of Liberty on top of them moving forward are we even any better than North Korea?

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If that's not the future, I don't want it

  • @Ramschat
    @Ramschat หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    "More symbols of America" AI obligingly spams statues of liberty

  • @VIKING-SON
    @VIKING-SON หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Professor like some others I enjoy your lectures. My spouse and I are a couple of retired 50's born boomers. Who look forward to your post. Keep up the great work you're doing with expanding our knowledge through your lectures.

  • @geoffrohde2886
    @geoffrohde2886 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank God that you have "Too much time on your hands" - I am truly thankful that you are willing to spend so much of it with us! Geoff Rohde

  • @BWEEOOP
    @BWEEOOP หลายเดือนก่อน +85

    And now that the U.S has given the green light to Ukraine to use their weapons on Ruzzian territory, China is gonna get a hard first take on just how costly an invasion will be

    • @andyhughes1776
      @andyhughes1776 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China and Russia are not Iraq.
      Russia already eliminated over 600,000 Ukrainian troops that the U.S.spent 8 years training.
      All independent U S. Military experts agree that the U.S. military is in no condition to fight Russia or China.
      Heck, according to former Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe, General Richard Shirreff, the ENTIRE 32-nation "NATO is not prepared for war with Russia."
      You do know that China has 1.4 billion people upon which their military could draw from, right?

    • @js70371
      @js70371 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

    • @shammy8703
      @shammy8703 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Cope... just found this channel.
      Are all you redditors here listening to this AI cope hahahahahaha
      Losers

    • @Nino-ye8ve
      @Nino-ye8ve 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@js70371Tiwan is independent

    • @js70371
      @js70371 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Nino-ye8ve Taiwan is part of China and always will be

  • @cjaquino28
    @cjaquino28 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Well, Good Sir, these "Glorified versions of university lectures produced by a PHD who evidently has way too much free time" are more informative than most lectures in many (if not most) of the universities wanting to promote some political agenda. Your work is very much appreciated.

    • @portmoneul
      @portmoneul หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This. So much this!

  • @jamiefurnell85
    @jamiefurnell85 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I love your video's mate, very informative!

  • @mickelodiansurname9578
    @mickelodiansurname9578 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    @ 9:05 that steampunk submarine looks fantastic.... and just over a billion you say..... hmmmm (Imagines himself as Captain Nemo from 20,000 Leagues Beneath the Sea)

    • @BiggestCorvid
      @BiggestCorvid หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Fun fact, the 20,000 leagues was the distance traveled. 20k leagues is over 100,000km.
      Apologies if you already knew this, I just think it's fun for anyone else reading the comments

    • @mickelodiansurname9578
      @mickelodiansurname9578 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BiggestCorvid Well I live in Ireland, its an Island, and yeah we are surrounded by the sea, its a fairly big thing for us. Even then when the tide isn't coming in, its coming down... so water, I'm unfortunately accustomed to... although what I find odd for an Island is the tiny number of deaths from drowning we get, you'd imagine it would be higher. But all this means, is I'd have plenty of places to park my Steampunk Nuclear Submarine!
      I think its about 70k miles by the way... 20k leagues that is... 3.4 * 20k... although it is not a static SI measurement and changes depending on who you ask and what country they are from.

  • @andersgrassman6583
    @andersgrassman6583 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You are killing me William!😂 ”Peer review” will never bring quite the same thoughts as before. ”Glorifyed version of a lecture” as a description of your videos was also great. I have wondered how on earth you get time to do your regular job at the university. On the other hand, spreading an understanding of academia is important. Having close to 600’000 subscribers, with your type of content, is impressing! One can’t even come close that, counting students.

  • @Hames8
    @Hames8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I thought the concept of helping Ukraine deterring China was well-known, but I guess there are denialists.

  • @FrederickJenny
    @FrederickJenny หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Not a loose connection at all. The more we help Ukraine the more we keep the Red Dragon and the Grizzley Bear tamed.

    • @ToeShimmel
      @ToeShimmel หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Really grateful of the USA helping out in Europe. Though us Europeans need to get our shit together when it comes to the military.

    • @hungrymusicwolf
      @hungrymusicwolf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ToeShimmel Agreed, though I was as skeptical as the next guy before I really think we need a unified defense industry, or even military.

    • @diegoflores9237
      @diegoflores9237 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia winning in Ukraine deters the USA

    • @whensonzhou4174
      @whensonzhou4174 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hungrymusicwolfyet the interest of MIC, the demand for defense and the goal of the proxy war doesn't seem to coincide.
      Most in global south view it as MIC provoke a proxy war to jack up demand for defense.

    • @hungrymusicwolf
      @hungrymusicwolf หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@whensonzhou4174 ​ Yeah, most people thought Russia wasn't going to invade, most people thought Covid wasn't going to get to their country, most people are very frequently wrong.
      Stand on good principles and things will work out better than jumping from one conclusion to the next.
      We need military to defend ourselves. We have proven we don't have it right now, so we build it.
      If while doing so we find out this is a conspiracy we persecute the people doing it and destroy whatever means they used to achieve it. But that's for when we find the evidence and the means to convince a court.

  • @kiwi_commander
    @kiwi_commander หลายเดือนก่อน +135

    Honey wake up, new William Spaniel video just dropped!

    • @rositasultana3958
      @rositasultana3958 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Hahahaha! That’s Perun cue❤, but William Spaniel is a close example ❤
      Of course I clicked on the video immediately as it appeared on the banner 🎉🎉🎉

    • @klowen7778
      @klowen7778 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      LOL, 'fer sure! Thx William, excellent explanation as usual, but IMHO you really out-did yourself today! 👍

    • @nick.v.g
      @nick.v.g หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rositasultana3958 yea william and perun both are channels when they drop a vid you need to watch then and there

    • @misiknuo
      @misiknuo หลายเดือนก่อน

      Having a stupid Wifey can be advantages...

  • @Frazec_Atsjenkov
    @Frazec_Atsjenkov หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'd think that air superiority is a prerequisite for an invasion of Taiwan, whether by sea or air. So air defense should be the top priority. Air defense is also important to protect the nation against the missile threat.

  • @themuffincup
    @themuffincup หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Nice

    • @Gametheory101
      @Gametheory101  หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Nice

    • @benjamingood8511
      @benjamingood8511 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@Gametheory101Nice

    • @irBribe
      @irBribe หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Nice

    • @furinick
      @furinick หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Gametheory101 wait the original channel name was gametheory101? maybe you'd be interested in changing your @ in the google settings

    • @donaldpetersen2382
      @donaldpetersen2382 หลายเดือนก่อน

      isgood

  • @muggyate
    @muggyate หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    i just wanna say thank you for making university political science lectures so accessible. it's been a great help for me. n_n

  • @WraithMagus
    @WraithMagus หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    9:04 We're getting into Warhammer 40K territory with the "more freedom" design. Apparently, AI thinks WH40K is "more freedom." Not concerning.

    • @nowhere474
      @nowhere474 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AVE IMPERATOR!

    • @Belgand
      @Belgand 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Good, because "concern" sounds suspiciously like treason...

  • @MarleneZKaiser
    @MarleneZKaiser หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the work you do. You have a way of painting the whole picture to make it easier for us to use the information and remember what you say. You make this sound difficult and yet possible to understand if we wanted to study it as you are doing.

  • @ap80shg
    @ap80shg หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    The only signal the USA is sending right now is "We take a long time to make any decision and it normally comes 2 years too late for the biggest benefit."

    • @sparks1792
      @sparks1792 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Like how Europeans took forever to make a decision on defense spending after Crimea?

    • @steviechubbs5238
      @steviechubbs5238 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like how europeans are dragging their feet on chinese support and trade after the concentration camps were revealed?

    • @diegoflores9237
      @diegoflores9237 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia winning in Ukraine deters the USA

    • @kompatybilijny9348
      @kompatybilijny9348 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ​@@sparks1792Yeah basically. We just thought that noone would be stupid enough to actually go to war in XXI century, but we got blinded by logical thinking - or that not everyone acts logically like us.

    • @blimeycrikey
      @blimeycrikey หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No point rushing when you're hourly or gulping a fine wine.. It's a gift that keeps on giving.

  • @chrisbrandon511
    @chrisbrandon511 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Creative humor,thank you diligent soul

  • @frankgulla2335
    @frankgulla2335 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, William. Only time will tell how well your analysis will hold up, but it is entertaining in the meantime. Again, thank you.

  • @Aercusnor
    @Aercusnor หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congrats Dr Spaniel, and thanks for all the public enlightenment work 🙂

  • @michaelpierson1534
    @michaelpierson1534 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your minilectures.

  • @yyyy-uv3po
    @yyyy-uv3po หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    China be like:
    "How dare you lock your doors and install shutters to your windows? You put the entire neighborhood in grave danger!"

  • @Hodler-bp5vt
    @Hodler-bp5vt หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantasic episode as usual, great work !

  • @mariekamerdula7641
    @mariekamerdula7641 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its spot on.

  • @UncleJoeLITE
    @UncleJoeLITE หลายเดือนก่อน

    Merci, ça faisait beaucoup de lignes !

  • @daikucoffee5316
    @daikucoffee5316 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for including sailor units

  • @TheSandkastenverbot
    @TheSandkastenverbot หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In case you're wondering: the "freedom" part in "freedom distances" stands for "freedom from science education" which, coincidentally, also caused the abbreviation of nautical miles with "nm".

  • @lordcirrhosisofliver
    @lordcirrhosisofliver หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    People have been saying that US resolve on ukraine signals that US resolve will also be there for taiwan. But I think it is different: taiwan is so much more important then ukraine. Therefore any support ukraine gets will be multiplied in the case of taiwan. the taiwanese were smart, they played the long game and now TSMC is too important to the USA for the USA to possibly abandon them. I highly doubt there would be any delays like we've seen with ukraine.

    • @lachlanhudson7404
      @lachlanhudson7404 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You forget that the US signed a deal with Taiwan and Samsung to construct a semiconductor manufacturing plant in Texas to help alleviate strains on the global economy should something happen to the TSMC plants in Taiwan. A lot of Taiwanese voters were furious with Tsai Ing Wen when she signed the agreement which effectively reduces the US reliance on Taiwan.

    • @imhimdk1785
      @imhimdk1785 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea, I do T know why ppl not mentioning this more

    • @jeremyjackson7429
      @jeremyjackson7429 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      As a dual Taiwanese American citizen, I have very conflicting interests. Work culture & wages in Taiwan suck. But quality of life and cost of living in America sucks. I make more money in America, but my money goes way farther in Taiwan. I need America to completely depend on Taiwanese chips because I can't afford to retire in America.

    • @Samookely
      @Samookely 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@jeremyjackson7429 thats understandable, there’s codependency on both sides that i dont think is all too great, but when the other alternative is being ruled by CCP it’s a weird position to be in. I hope that after all this political tension recedes both countries could work out a better deal in some way, preferably without a war being declared in the first place.

  • @louisgiokas2206
    @louisgiokas2206 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "The thing that goes boom". Is that a technical term?

  • @neilwilson5785
    @neilwilson5785 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating as always.

  • @GojiMet86
    @GojiMet86 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    4:50 Arrows (which are mostly lines) on Map!
    5:23 Moar arrows (and therefore lines) on Map!
    Also, I got to glimpse President Tsai Ing-wen when she stopped by the Embassy in Midtown back in March 2023.

  • @Yezpahr
    @Yezpahr หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That peer reviewer in the distance gave me a chuckle.

  • @Katze822228
    @Katze822228 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    20:06 hahaha! Well you have become really good at making these videos interesting and entertaining.

  • @arthurarthur6083
    @arthurarthur6083 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video

  • @MDCDiGiPiCs
    @MDCDiGiPiCs หลายเดือนก่อน

    I look forward to seeing the next lines on maps. Thanks William

  • @spxram4793
    @spxram4793 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The connection was always evident. Putin visited Xi during the 2022 winter olympic in Beijing, and right after the closing ceremony, started the war on Ukraine. At the end, the russian attack capability has to be destroyed entirely - this might make Xi to switch on the remaining working part of his brain.

  • @marlenfras5490
    @marlenfras5490 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good reporting. Thank you. Strong democracy.

  • @BiggestCorvid
    @BiggestCorvid หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good video, will recommend

  • @Deltarious
    @Deltarious หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I object slightly to your remarks at 3:38 because you make an unusually (for you) large leap in logic- if the PRC wants to skip the sea landing and do air landings they have to manage to *get* to Taiwan by air first, this is not only far from a given but also would emphasise entirely different production outputs for a war, namely aircraft and SAMs, with emphasis on missile quantities in particular. So the expected domain of combat should be much more air focused than ground. What you have essentially said in your remarks is that going with an air assault skips the entire 'getting there' phase, and if that were true with no caveats it would easily be the default. Of course it's *likely* you are still correct to a significant degree- I'd expect them to be able to land a lot more people a lot more quickly by air, emphasising artillery, but I would also expect *many* more losses in the process too, enough that it is worth talking about when or if we have hit the point where it is likely *too* many to be viable

  • @sleepydragon1975
    @sleepydragon1975 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Couldn't help but laugh out loud at all the Statues of Liberty around the sub pen and on the sub!

  • @ADAMEDWARDS17
    @ADAMEDWARDS17 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Very much hoping that after 4th July 2024 and our UK General Election you will need to update your pictures of the UK Prime Minister and others! I keep seeing Boris Johnson appearing which feels a very long time ago. Fab video as always.

  • @bierbrauer11
    @bierbrauer11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I openly admit I laughed out loud at “Pier Review”. The jokes here are always right up my alley; a brand of humor my wife doesn’t appreciate nearly enough!

  • @KapitainZino
    @KapitainZino หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing video presentation William! It helped me a lot to better understand the impact of the last American military help package! Before this video I would have bet my bottom Dollar, that the Chinese people will be more concerned about possible economic sanctions! Let me see where is the „thanks“ button!

  • @iivarilappalainen9836
    @iivarilappalainen9836 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    those are some really high quality subs with ferriswheels and everything :D

  • @albertjordan3249
    @albertjordan3249 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I think that the "Columbia" from Bioshock Infinite may be leaking into your AI's depiction of the submarine :D

  • @James-ep2bx
    @James-ep2bx 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The connection is quite simple, credibility

  • @Justwantahover
    @Justwantahover หลายเดือนก่อน

    You sound so much like Serpentza! Love his voice and your's! 😅💙

  • @cyberfutur5000
    @cyberfutur5000 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I don't have a degree in international relations or something, but maybe we should just build the big art deco submarine with the amusement park and tell -winny- uhm... Mr. Ping that he can have it, if he'll forgets about taiwan and stops all the other bad stuff. He even can drive his Sub to Putin and be like " `Sub? this could have be you, Vlad, but you had to invade Ukraine... tze tze tze"

  • @ariisaac5111
    @ariisaac5111 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Mr spaniel, excellent research and analysis. However, at 8:53 I'm pretty sure you made a mistake when you said $200 billion dollars is earmarked for the Virginia class submarine building. Maybe you meant 200 million?

  • @brey6394
    @brey6394 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was possibly your funniest video yet. I kept laughing throughout it. Of course I might not have caught all of your jokes since I’m only an M.Ed. 😉😁 Keep up the great work. 👍🏼

  • @cooterhead_jones
    @cooterhead_jones หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Question: How much slack is in the U. S. economy today so that, if the weapons industry went full ahead, we could supply Ukraine, Taiwan, and the US with a superfluity of howitzer shells? How could the industry achieve that if our capacity is there?

    • @johnlynch1353
      @johnlynch1353 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      We currently do not have the excess production to produce howitzer on that scale. I believe the military contractors are saying it’ll take 1 to 2 years to build the factories so that we can have that excess capacity, but they want assurances from the US government that they will buy what produced in those factories in one to two years once they’re complete before they’re willing to invest and build them now.

    • @cooterhead_jones
      @cooterhead_jones หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@johnlynch1353 Based upon that explanation, then we don’t have the slack. I was thinking more along the lines of expanding production, not by building new plants, but by going to extra shifts in the existing plants as we would do if we were on an actual war footing.
      I didn’t come to this question on my own. I recall Milton Friedman’s saying that the US’s success in WWII was a direct result of what he referred to as “slack” in the economy prior to that war which did not exist for us in the 1970s-80s.

    • @benjones4365
      @benjones4365 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cooterhead_jones Interesting question. The problem in Europe as I understand it, is the lack of cotton. They have enough for current production but not expansion.
      The US get it from other sources, but I wonder if the US have enough for expansion?

    • @Nala15-Artist
      @Nala15-Artist หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cooterhead_jones Pretty much all factories are running 24/7 nowadays, anything else is unprofitable.

    • @cooterhead_jones
      @cooterhead_jones หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Nala15-Artist Scary

  • @dalehartley2821
    @dalehartley2821 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hardly a loose connection.

  • @jacklu8752
    @jacklu8752 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    William Spaniel is endlessly entertaining.

    • @jacklu8752
      @jacklu8752 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Especially his semi-monotone.

    • @jacklu8752
      @jacklu8752 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He should be required to do a daily video.

  • @robertsaget6918
    @robertsaget6918 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The thing about missile ranges provided by the defense industry is that those are the public numbers. The actual max effective range is classified & likely a larger window. However, that would also not stop development of a missile that can exceed the public range of 499km.
    Also a fun thing to think about for anyone not in the know is that mil maps are in KM, which for ground based troops have grid squares being 1 KM. When you hear 499 KM you can think 499 grid squares.

  • @brianflynn5491
    @brianflynn5491 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Good video

  • @ncdave4life
    @ncdave4life หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great, insightful video, William!
    One nit: 8:50 I don't think a Virginia class sub costs $200 Billion. 😉

  • @jeremygair4007
    @jeremygair4007 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's clear PrSM will go further than 499km

  • @wesdowner5636
    @wesdowner5636 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Agreed - ATACMS is one of the best acronyms EVAH! 😊

  • @3PSQWERTY
    @3PSQWERTY หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    8:53 Is Lady Liberty the periscope on the sub?

  • @wattorockscr
    @wattorockscr หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait a minite.....not a single line in this episode????
    I feel robbed....😢
    😂😂😂
    Keep up the good vids, I really enjoy them!!!

  • @MrTdg2112
    @MrTdg2112 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As for Chinese Legitimacy, economic basis for that may not be so much true as it used to be. As evidence see their Covid response strategies. During Covid the regime took actions that did drastic harm to their economy. I had a quick conversation with Wang Yu-Chi (long story, wife knows his wife, we both like PC historical wargames, somehow we always end up having dinner whenever I'm visiting in-laws), and he isn't so confident China is deterred by economic factors anymore. Usually his comments on Geo-Politics are super careful, but he was adamant about his belief that economics wasn't going to matter much anymore to China's invasion plans and intentions. And for once, arguing wouldn't get him to back down.

  • @krakhedd
    @krakhedd หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wiliiam, there is *NO WAY* an air invasion works without troops securing a large region first; the *ONLY* chance the Chinese have is to blockade and starve out Taiwan (:: will be easy to break, especially as China is dependent upon US Navy-guaranteed shipping lanes for their own survival and there is no way around this as the Chinese cannot patrol these routes themselves). It would not be like Hostomel; it would be an utter slaughter. There's no physical way, shy of 100s of thousands of aircraft *all at once*, to get enough troops through the air to even start to secure one area

    • @anotherbacklog
      @anotherbacklog หลายเดือนก่อน

      Drones saturating air defense maybe?

    • @whensonzhou4174
      @whensonzhou4174 หลายเดือนก่อน

      don't know what this the world need US navy to protect trade narrative comes from, sounds arrogant as hell... if anything, U.S. navy will be more effective at blokcade than protection, aka a potential threat to world trade, it's a strategy of deterence not defense.
      They can't even safeguard redsea from the Houthi

  • @mandr3w
    @mandr3w 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice videos

  • @drsteiner12
    @drsteiner12 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello Dr. Spaniel,
    I feel like this topic was rather obvious, considering how Russia has previously said about their relationship “being limitless” and the fact China is observing Western support for Ukraine as a basis for Western response for potential Taiwan invasion.
    However, your drill down into the topic is as informative as usual. Thank you!

  • @admoest1678
    @admoest1678 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope politicians study your video's. Very-very interesting.

  • @W_Bin
    @W_Bin หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is incredible is the contrast between sales to Taiwan and sales to Ukraine. Over decades. This needs explaining.

  • @M1903a4
    @M1903a4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It occurs to me that there is an excellent test range for 1000km PrSM launches located just west of Russia.

  • @heylolp9
    @heylolp9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    SWIFT is an easy acronym
    Something With International Funds Transfers

  • @ronigbzjr
    @ronigbzjr หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very deep analysis ✌️💪

  • @GoldEzmoreth
    @GoldEzmoreth หลายเดือนก่อน

    Prism is a dope acronym tho

  • @TheBluetwo26
    @TheBluetwo26 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He-hey, William used a Jersey Quarter for the cost benefit analysis bit, just like how it takes 136 quarters (and 1 dime) in New Jersey with NJ tax to pay for both of his books on the War in Ukraine, links are in his video description.

  • @gerhardphann
    @gerhardphann หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Very good point. 👍 But, you talk about costs and benefits for China. China wants Taiwan no matter what it costs.

    • @geoffgill5334
      @geoffgill5334 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But

    • @triadwarfare
      @triadwarfare หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They want it, but they want a guarantee that they can win. The Taiwan Strait crisis proved that China is incapable of taking Taiwan at that time.
      Opening an invasion means that if they fail, they will not have a window to try again, as it will turn China to a pariah state and its immediate neighbors will stop dealing with them.

    • @gerhardphann
      @gerhardphann หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're right.

    • @1999Almaz
      @1999Almaz หลายเดือนก่อน

      Doubt, i bet they want monopoly on microelectronics market and that's not possible if Taiwan destroys all TSMC factories. All they would get (if invasion will be successful and that's a big IF) is island full of ruins

    • @beyondEV
      @beyondEV หลายเดือนก่อน

      They also want the Amur region back. Actually, that's probably more important to them, as it has more tangible strategic benefit. But there not up for election every 4 years and can absolutely afford to play the long game. Russia is not their friend. Temporary ally, but more like a sacrificial pawn.
      But right now, they benefit from the war. They are not giving aid to Russia. The sell at high price and buy resources at low price.

  • @chsgs9009
    @chsgs9009 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    8:53 Did you mean 200million or 200billion? Because if it's the latter, that will be one hell of a submarine

  • @markcepeda8144
    @markcepeda8144 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Prigo told the truth about the false justifications for the invasion stay strong Ukraine!!!😊

  • @DavidPerez-ic1vx
    @DavidPerez-ic1vx หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting :)

  • @purplepumkinater5465
    @purplepumkinater5465 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Commenting for engagement cause I love your work but can't afford the book🇰🇿

  • @MakeYourLifeUnforgettable
    @MakeYourLifeUnforgettable หลายเดือนก่อน

    As an Australian, this is the key reason why I'm following all that is happening in Ukraine....because we want to deter China.

  • @Vinzmannn
    @Vinzmannn 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I thought the Churchill saying went:"odredireidodradidei"

  • @theduckcompany
    @theduckcompany หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    9:08 That's not a ferris wheel, its a F R E E D O M wheel.

  • @rositasultana3958
    @rositasultana3958 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh, no lines on maps today 😢 but it doesn’t mean that I didn’t watch it twice in a row ❤

    • @cooterhead_jones
      @cooterhead_jones หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Always lines. Always a choosing and a setting aside. If the lines aren’t there, the lines are there.

  • @dominuslogik484
    @dominuslogik484 หลายเดือนก่อน

    prSM is a perfectly fine acronym. its just prism rather than attack'em so it might be less of a pun but Prism is a cool weapon name.

  • @bearcubdaycare
    @bearcubdaycare หลายเดือนก่อน

    But time well spent, from your viewers' perspectives

  • @chisank
    @chisank หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Spaniel!!!!

  • @fosty662
    @fosty662 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hello Mate

  • @martinlye2748
    @martinlye2748 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I still think America's soft power ( trade ) will work best but the one child policy will denture the Chinese from attacking and losing valued children.

    • @prlostinshadows
      @prlostinshadows หลายเดือนก่อน

      They haven't had a one child policy for a very long time

    • @martinlye2748
      @martinlye2748 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@prlostinshadows How old are the military men ?

  • @twistsnakeanklesvids261
    @twistsnakeanklesvids261 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You mentioned Abrahms, can those actually be used effectively in Taiwan? I thought I remembered something about those being too heavy and wide for their terrain and bridges.

  • @delldell191
    @delldell191 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👋👋👋Wonderful

  • @michall6376
    @michall6376 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You didn’t ask about what SWIFT does, you asked about how it works. I know what it does but i responded ’no’ to your survey because I have no idea how exactly they make the international transfers, not because I don’t know that the transfers are made.

  • @blakebrown534
    @blakebrown534 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They tested PrSM from Vandenburg out over the the Pacific in a maximum range test and they claim it went 499km then 'lost communication'

  • @edwinjoy3932
    @edwinjoy3932 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The caption should be How Helping western military industrial complex Deters Beijing.

  • @lidarman2
    @lidarman2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @6:11, that looks like a giant pencil.

  • @andrewlotz3276
    @andrewlotz3276 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hehe. Even more freedom on the sub. Well done.

  • @nineseven420empire3
    @nineseven420empire3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can not get insurance in a war zone, for cargo ships. Without imports of oil, coal, food, feralizer, ect. Chania is done for. Without exports it loses the need for 1/2 the workforce and runs out of $$$$ fast.

  • @PeanutsDadForever
    @PeanutsDadForever หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for your great videos. 🇦🇺👴🏻

  • @MrSplodez
    @MrSplodez หลายเดือนก่อน

    39% of people admitted they don't know what swift does and 60% quickly googled it before answering the poll