@@SherrieAllcornNot necessarily... Most likely Judge Whyte will deny a retrial and send it to Appeals Court. Ashley will still serve her Sentencing in December.
I think they waited to see if she would be convicted first, and once she was convicted, they then would bring the allegations out of the juror in order to try to get a new trial... pure manipulation!!
@@LegendFromDaOX_23 their was a lot of exculpatory evidence left out of trial including the letter Ashley wrote and the text messages of Doug admitted to everything in the letter. Eva testified to the bullet hole in the ceiling and the fist size holes in the walls. Doug's own cousin showed support for Ashley. The cornor and the Pathologists both testified for the defense. And the lead detective lie multiple times on the case. Doug violated the restraining multiple times. And even the neighbor saids that Doug was on her property!
@@tyreseforren6721There was also alot of stuff left out against Ashley that the defense fought to keep out the judge was very fair in this trial and very cautious
At this point they’re grasping at straws. Why are they not vetting the jurors before the trial? Ashley 100% murdered her husband. She just wanted a child, NOT a husband.
If there was misconduct then proper actions should take place. But she is convicted and still should be sentenced. Many convicted felons request a new trial. But they were still sentenced.
@@Deepwld10 but in this case their was a lot of exculpatory evidence kept out and theirs still things coming out about this case as we speak that we didn't even know about!
@@tyreseforren6721disagree. Nothing was kept out except self serving statements and self reporting evidence. Much like Amber Heard and her "mountain of evidence".
@@tyreseforren6721where are you getting this nonsense? First you say there was all this imaginary exculpatory evidence they kept out and now detectives are lying. SMH
The Juror lied about being the victim of a crime, and being involved in DV courts and finally about being in a dispute with a significant other about custody of a minor child. Basically it means she acted in prejudice being on a jury for a trial that involved all 3 of those elements.
@@tyreseforren6721 Evidence the judge didn't allow in has nothing to do with the defense motion against the state and jurors. Also, the court didn't allow evidence from family court where the judge in those proceedings said there wasn't and " iota of evidence." To Ashley claims.
@@tyreseforren6721 1st. I don't understand your argument here. This women is convicted. The issue right now is jury misconduct. 2nd information about him firing a gun was put into evidence by the defense.
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
This attorney clearly has to much time on his hands and clearly getting paid most people who do not understand law and there perception is different from attorney is mind blowing weren't there 12 jurors who found her guilty ask one of the alternative jurors what there verdict would have been quilty
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
Regardless of all that, Ashley "conveniently" "fled" to the bedroom where there just so happened to be a loaded gun, easily accessible in a bag in an empty room. If she was so frightened of him, as she claimed, then why would she allow herself to be alone with him while her mother "conveniently" took her daughter to the park at the same time Doug was coming to the house?
@@glennatwwhat about the letter she wrote and the Google searches she made? What about the corner and Pathologists both testified for the defense? What about Doug's own cousin showed support for Ashley!? What about Doug's Daughter Eva testified to the bullet hole in the ceiling and the fist size holes in the walls?
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
STOP putting jurors on trial or jurors will learn to find excuses to NOT serve on trials. Its the LAWYERS who have started to place legal knowledge unto jurors. It is the LAWYERS who have placed more and more "obligations" on jurors. Dont blame juries for verdicts you dont like! The SOLE purpose of a jury is to listen to the evidence NOT disclose their personal life no matter what the lawyers think they "should" disclose! Stop manipulatng the laws, the jurors, and diminishing the victims' rights!
Dont waist time or money she was clearly a danger to the public . Just cause she danced doesnt mean she not guilty . She clearly did it . Leave it now. Its getting a joke killers getting away
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
hope no bail is granted if the decision is to retry this case. I would consider that this juror could have been more of a perfect match for Benefield' trial because of her experience.
I think she needs new lawyers in order to have a chance. The fact that they didn’t talk her out of testifying make me lose respect for them. Or at least coach her on how to not seem like she’s lying.
Ashley Benefield she clearly fits the criteria for persecution delusion...She's not bad, she's sick...Why has no one pointed this out? Why there is no capable person around her? I'm so disappointed...
Hi from uk I can't listen to all this when is she being sentenced? Or is this arguments to fet a new trial so the judge is thinking about it before he hands her a sentence please anyone tell me 😂 thanks
@@waynefoote3781 no! He biased against poor sweet Ashley. She's innocent even the corner and Pathologists testified for the defense. And the lead detective lie multiple times!
She definitely should get a new trial. This will be reversed. What is wrong with jurors? It's so incredibly frustrating for everyone. They should implement a huge fine on jurors that lie. Retrials are costly. They should help pay for it, especially if they caused it.
@@waynefoote3781 Did you listen to this motion hearing? It’s obvious she didn’t get a fair trial. It’s truly unbelievable why this juror lied. Infuriating, should not have happened.
Regardless of the jury nonsense, she murdered the man.
Judge would have to do retrial
@@SherrieAllcornNot necessarily... Most likely Judge Whyte will deny a retrial and send it to Appeals Court. Ashley will still serve her Sentencing in December.
I think they waited to see if she would be convicted first, and once she was convicted, they then would bring the allegations out of the juror in order to try to get a new trial... pure manipulation!!
Defence is just a pain in the rear if I have to watch another trial with his voice I'm sure I will lose the will to live 😂😂
I agree the defense knew about this and just sat on it hoping for NG
This lawyer and his client can’t stop acting like they are the victims in this case. I don’t know which one is worse.
I think that's what lawyers are supposed to do lol
@@LegendFromDaOX_23 their was a lot of exculpatory evidence left out of trial including the letter Ashley wrote and the text messages of Doug admitted to everything in the letter.
Eva testified to the bullet hole in the ceiling and the fist size holes in the walls.
Doug's own cousin showed support for Ashley.
The cornor and the Pathologists both testified for the defense.
And the lead detective lie multiple times on the case.
Doug violated the restraining multiple times.
And even the neighbor saids that Doug was on her property!
@@tyreseforren6721There was also alot of stuff left out against Ashley that the defense fought to keep out the judge was very fair in this trial and very cautious
A new trial with the same outcome. Waste of money. Let her rot in that prison cell.
🎯🎯🎯
Agree
At this point they’re grasping at straws. Why are they not vetting the jurors before the trial? Ashley 100% murdered her husband. She just wanted a child, NOT a husband.
If I expect the process to be fair for me, it has to be fair for her. Where are you all missing that logic?
I hope the judge grants a remedy, because you can't have a juror like this and have a fair trial.
If there was misconduct then proper actions should take place. But she is convicted and still should be sentenced. Many convicted felons request a new trial. But they were still sentenced.
@@Deepwld10 but in this case their was a lot of exculpatory evidence kept out and theirs still things coming out about this case as we speak that we didn't even know about!
@@tyreseforren6721disagree. Nothing was kept out except self serving statements and self reporting evidence. Much like Amber Heard and her "mountain of evidence".
@MissaPality Exactly
This is all BS she
Is guilty !!!
🎯🎯🎯
Agree
No way is she getting a new trial! Sentence delayed but will just be a little longer waiting on the denial of this motion
A jury of her peers found her guilty. That’s it, that’s all.
😉👏🎯⚖️
Evidently not 😂
Agree
@@reneearnett8761 the lied detective lied multiple times on the case and and now the jury too!😮
@@tyreseforren6721where are you getting this nonsense? First you say there was all this imaginary exculpatory evidence they kept out and now detectives are lying. SMH
Guilty
The Juror lied about being the victim of a crime, and being involved in DV courts and finally about being in a dispute with a significant other about custody of a minor child. Basically it means she acted in prejudice being on a jury for a trial that involved all 3 of those elements.
Uggg who cares!? This "woman" is guilty!
@@DT-ml7ob Alleged. Does not mean it's true.
@@Deepwld10 not about the jury but their was a lot of exculpatory evidence kept out of trial.
@@tyreseforren6721 Evidence the judge didn't allow in has nothing to do with the defense motion against the state and jurors. Also, the court didn't allow evidence from family court where the judge in those proceedings said there wasn't and " iota of evidence." To Ashley claims.
@@tyreseforren6721 1st. I don't understand your argument here. This women is convicted. The issue right now is jury misconduct. 2nd information about him firing a gun was put into evidence by the defense.
She's guilty.
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
She'll kill again. Lori Vallow
@@wildmercuryfilms...you think it's ok to kill someone. out of all the crimes listed here, what would you wish the least on your child?
@@wildmercuryfilmsJust b/c a person believes she is guilty does not mean they believe everything you listed is okay. SMH
On tax payers money. She is guilty as charged. Don’t need another trial.
This attorney clearly has to much time on his hands and clearly getting paid most people who do not understand law and there perception is different from attorney is mind blowing weren't there 12 jurors who found her guilty ask one of the alternative jurors what there verdict would have been quilty
I hope she doesn’t get away with the murder of her husband because of this . I watched the trial and she is clearly guilty, completely selfish
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
@@wildmercuryfilmsthat never happened.
Regardless of all that, Ashley "conveniently" "fled" to the bedroom where there just so happened to be a loaded gun, easily accessible in a bag in an empty room. If she was so frightened of him, as she claimed, then why would she allow herself to be alone with him while her mother "conveniently" took her daughter to the park at the same time Doug was coming to the house?
@@glennatwagree 💯
@@glennatwwhat about the letter she wrote and the Google searches she made?
What about the corner and Pathologists both testified for the defense?
What about Doug's own cousin showed support for Ashley!?
What about Doug's Daughter Eva testified to the bullet hole in the ceiling and the fist size holes in the walls?
I’ve been waiting for her October 22nd sentencing!! Come on.
Same here.... I even put it on my calendar.
@@glennatwme too!
I did the EXACT same thing! 😂😂
Her attorney is so annoying that his points are getting lost...very counterproductive
My issue is why does this hault her to be sentenced? Many convicted felons request a new trial but they are still sentenced.
Any juror who lies should be given 10 days in jail
Just waste of money.
Clear. She shoot him. All because of greed. Jealous. And not shear the daughter. I
English, please.
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
@@wildmercuryfilmsthe trial wasn't about punching out a dog it's about Ashley punching out his life...
@@annebosworth7048 but it makes self defense more believable and the corner and the Pathologists testified for the defense
@@tyreseforren6721 she set him up no doubt about that too many lies her on the stand was fake not believable
STOP putting jurors on trial or jurors will learn to find excuses to NOT serve on trials. Its the LAWYERS who have started to place legal knowledge unto jurors. It is the LAWYERS who have placed more and more "obligations" on jurors. Dont blame juries for verdicts you dont like! The SOLE purpose of a jury is to listen to the evidence NOT disclose their personal life no matter what the lawyers think they "should" disclose! Stop manipulatng the laws, the jurors, and diminishing the victims' rights!
Flimsy argument on the defense.
Not it's not that clearly violates Ashley right to a fair trial.
In fact free Ashley and throw out the whole case
Dont waist time or money she was clearly a danger to the public . Just cause she danced doesnt mean she not guilty . She clearly did it . Leave it now. Its getting a joke killers getting away
Waste
False. So: You think it’s Okay to punch out the family dog in front of Ashley? You think it’s OKAY to shoot a gun in the air inside the house during an argument? You think it was OKAY for Doug to assault his First Wife, which the First Wife wrote messages about? You think it’s OKAY to punch holes through the drywall during fights?
@@wildmercuryfilms you think murders ok ??
@@wildmercuryfilmsSo he punched the dog and got into a tussle with his first wife. That makes her judge, jury and executioner?? Get a life!
@@wildmercuryfilmsshe's guilty
The defense attorney was very strange and ill-equipped to handle that trial. The jury got it right.
Are you serious the prosecutor lied multiple times and even admitted that they don't know nothing about DV and child custody cases.
@@tyreseforren6721This was not a DV trial but a murder trial. Fully stated by Judge Whyte at the beginning of the Trial.
This attorney is absolutely ridiculous.
What a waste
I completely agree!! totally ridiculous!
@@waynefoote3781Ashley innocent! 😇
They an agenda against her.
Don’t do it
This is boring! ridiculous and beyond boring, wait! did I mention I was bored!
Ashley's Byers is innocent! 😈
This defense lawyer 🙄 always making it complicated.
🎎 judge just let the lawyers get home with stop arguing about five bloody minutes either way
You must be new to trials. Judge has control over ‘his’ courtroom. You can’t let attorneys run the courtroom!
The juror lied and they all know it. Simple questions and if she didn’t understand, which is unlikely, she could have asked for guidance.
If they don't understand simple questions then what are they doing on a jury.
Then what makes you think their gonna make credible judgement!?
Our system's a joke.
I can't believe Ashley in prison with all the exculpatory evidence including the the evidence that didn't come into trial!😢
hope no bail is granted if the decision is to retry this case. I would consider that this juror could have been more of a perfect match for Benefield' trial because of her experience.
Who is the Juror? Name?
What was the lie?
I think she needs new lawyers in order to have a chance. The fact that they didn’t talk her out of testifying make me lose respect for them. Or at least coach her on how to not seem like she’s lying.
You r what u r...period. she is not for Hollywood. Terrible a actress
Ashley Benefield she clearly fits the criteria for persecution delusion...She's not bad, she's sick...Why has no one pointed this out? Why there is no capable person around her? I'm so disappointed...
Judge cant sleep at night knowing the ballerina is in prison?
She’s guilty no get out of jail for her
So they’ll have to release her on Bond if a new trial is ordered?
Hi from uk I can't listen to all this when is she being sentenced? Or is this arguments to fet a new trial so the judge is thinking about it before he hands her a sentence please anyone tell me 😂 thanks
Deny, deny, deny
she should get a new trial but she def did it
I ❤this judge
WHY? Is he considering Marrying HER??? What a complete JOKE!!
Who?
@@tyreseforren6721 Get with the program!
@@waynefoote3781 who's gonna marry who though?
@@tyreseforren6721 I was inferring that the judge might have an interest in Ashley. in a joking way.
@@waynefoote3781 no! He biased against poor sweet Ashley.
She's innocent even the corner and Pathologists testified for the defense.
And the lead detective lie multiple times!
What?!?
She definitely should get a new trial. This will be reversed. What is wrong with jurors? It's so incredibly frustrating for everyone. They should implement a huge fine on jurors that lie. Retrials are costly. They should help pay for it, especially if they caused it.
WHY?
@@waynefoote3781 Did you listen to this motion hearing? It’s obvious she didn’t get a fair trial. It’s truly unbelievable why this juror lied. Infuriating, should not have happened.
That Judge hates his job
@@DeniseSmith-rp2qn lol…I would too.
Sound is awful
The judge got his knickers in a knot over who is going to make the opening statements and winding up statements
This woman should have been found not guilty.
She’s innocent.
Haha ok 😂😂😂
So innocent she was found guilty. 😂
Their was a lot of exculpatory evidence left out of trial
I think she is innocent.
Innocent of Murder? Hardly.
It doesn't matter what you think as she is now a convicted felon awaiting her sentencing in jail. We know Ashley hates being there.
She targeted Doug. Researched him before they met. She wanted $ and a child.
She should have gotten 2nd degree and LWOP.
Theirs was a ton of exculpatory evidence left out of trial
My goodness call her by her name. Ballerina is not her f.... name
So journalism and marketing aren't your thing. Just think beyond the headline.
Most people don’t want to remember her name.
Ballerina is guilty....