i bough this on black friday for 850 , i have a C1 and its been golden for all my gamming , im not used to gamming in a smaller tv or monitor , but it does run smooth , COD , OW and marvel rivals at 120 is nice. sadly its not 4K , but i dont know the difference , im just an old dad gaming .
The LG tvs do have amazing input response but this is on another level. I know what you mean about the 4K. When the screen is 27” the difference isn’t hugely noticeable.
do you feel any difference between 240 and 480hz? i have an 4k 32inch 240hz display and it's really fast already, i wonder if it's worth going down a resolution just for the extra speed. i kinda got used to this big boy now and it's no comparison on the detail level between 1440p and 4k. i was on 1400p IPS display for more than 8 years already, for me one of the biggest investments was this oled 4k 240hz monitor hands down.
yeah there's def a difference between 240 and 480hz oled, but I wouldn't get a 480hz unless you play competitive fps games that can get 480hz like val, cs2, etc.
Looking at the PS5 sitting next to a Sony OLED. Why don't they build their own Desktop OS and make it perfect for every dorm room in the world because you can buy a PS5 to game, game PC, or be productive?? And suddenly a Sony Cell phone integration makes sense and now you're a really obvious ecosystem competing with Apple.
PG27AQDP if you need Black Frame Insertion at 120hz and 240hz (for better motion clarity at lower resolutions) but you'll increase latency slightly. Sony M10s if you prefer the design and stand (I'm going to switch for this reason to the Sony) The BFI mode is useful for single player games more than online games or games where you can't get past 120hz/240hz on your system and you want to improve the visual motion clarity. So yeah it comes down to very specific features or design choices, if cost is a concern once again just get the ASUS! If you don't need BFI and the cost between the two doesn't matter to you, I'd go with the Sony for superior design.
I've tried both and it basically comes down to if you value pg27aqdp's feature set and their 3 year warranty more. I will say the asus one did give me a lot of problems tho, but I think it might've just been my unit.
I just checked. It's a little bit cheaper on Amazon already 😊 amzn.to/4ijR7h0
i bough this on black friday for 850 , i have a C1 and its been golden for all my gamming , im not used to gamming in a smaller tv or monitor , but it does run smooth , COD , OW and marvel rivals at 120 is nice. sadly its not 4K , but i dont know the difference , im just an old dad gaming .
The LG tvs do have amazing input response but this is on another level. I know what you mean about the 4K. When the screen is 27” the difference isn’t hugely noticeable.
0:04, Skean the British Streamer Raging after he got killed in CSGO
Lol 😂 classic rage quit...I couldn't have done it better myself
I found a bug that hdr has blown out highlights. If you turn vrr off then back on it fixes it.
3:45 The M10s has no HDR tone mapping support for the PS5, the M9 ll does. Any noticeable differences.
Does the low latency button on the menu make a difference ? Whether off or on? I cant tell much of a difference. I just want to make sure it works
I might get one (SONY) other than ASUS PG27AQDP if it's not gonna deliver it ASAP since I live in the UK
do you feel any difference between 240 and 480hz? i have an 4k 32inch 240hz display and it's really fast already, i wonder if it's worth going down a resolution just for the extra speed. i kinda got used to this big boy now and it's no comparison on the detail level between 1440p and 4k. i was on 1400p IPS display for more than 8 years already, for me one of the biggest investments was this oled 4k 240hz monitor hands down.
yeah there's def a difference between 240 and 480hz oled, but I wouldn't get a 480hz unless you play competitive fps games that can get 480hz like val, cs2, etc.
Looking at the PS5 sitting next to a Sony OLED. Why don't they build their own Desktop OS and make it perfect for every dorm room in the world because you can buy a PS5 to game, game PC, or be productive?? And suddenly a Sony Cell phone integration makes sense and now you're a really obvious ecosystem competing with Apple.
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP or the Sony inzone M10S?
PG27AQDP if you need Black Frame Insertion at 120hz and 240hz (for better motion clarity at lower resolutions) but you'll increase latency slightly. Sony M10s if you prefer the design and stand (I'm going to switch for this reason to the Sony)
The BFI mode is useful for single player games more than online games or games where you can't get past 120hz/240hz on your system and you want to improve the visual motion clarity.
So yeah it comes down to very specific features or design choices, if cost is a concern once again just get the ASUS!
If you don't need BFI and the cost between the two doesn't matter to you, I'd go with the Sony for superior design.
I've tried both and it basically comes down to if you value pg27aqdp's feature set and their 3 year warranty more. I will say the asus one did give me a lot of problems tho, but I think it might've just been my unit.
A GRAND for monitor. .unless yer a professional would anyone buy it...
Yeh it's a pricey one...but...it's very good!
And you get 0 benefits when playing on console lmao. Unless you game on a pc and play like val or cs, you aren't making use of 480hz.