Could you imagine the improvements with a time machine showing where Fords work was heading? They would simply treat the GTs from the future like Ferrari & make them something even more untouchable like the Lemans races.
The 1967 sounded the best hands down. The 2017 doesn't even compare with the cool factor the other 2 have. It may be faster, but it's just a plastic looking wannabe.
Absolutely. 2006 isn't exactly known for it's beautiful vehicles. Ford could have belly flopped it hardcore, but they stuck the landing. It's timeless and gorgeous.
Especially the rolling race with a long geared disadvantige 😩 A friend drives a 1963 race Cobra with a 4.7 - maybe the same engine. That thing is insanly fast
I had an honour to be driven in 69 Corvette Stingray, that my host dad used to do when he got retired..Before he got into RC airplanes, he restored old muscle cars back to factory settings, from as good as could be found at junkyard.. He said while he was really into it, he's bbq's at his house would mean whole street parked with beautifully restored muscle and classic American cars.. I think I would actually drull if I saw that.. He haad that car and 1940Bently.. I got to say, even while driving thrpugh Califonia, where you an see almost any kind of car, people wer lokking and giving thumbs up when seeing that vet. That was a good day! Miss you Al.
@@relight6931 Im so glad you have that awesome memory. :) That being said my uncle had a 69 Stingray and Ive had a C6 and a C7 and both those ride so much better IMO. Smoother and more comfy. Its the little things, road noise, handling that do it for me. Old muscle cars do look amazing though and are still fun to drive.
I attribute that to the raw driving experience. No tech at all, the driver is the tech. I feel that way about my 66 Mustang. I have driven $200k cars but they are just so smooth, it takes some of the fun out of it. Of course my 66 isn't as fast by any metric of those vehicles, but it fun trying to battle traction.
To be fair, 13.9s for a 1/4mile in 1967 must've been absolute rocket-ship levels of performance, and is a respectable time today! Huge kudos to Dana and the Museum for letting these old cars go full bore. Of the three, the 2006 shape is my favourite.
The tries on the 2006 one are terrible for grip (they hard compounds for long lasting road use) they did a tire change somewhere on a drag race track the card did 10.5 seconds 1/4 with just tires changed.
@@ericreimer6627You forget the abysmal conditions that this test was performed in. All the old magazine drag times from seemingly stock cars were usually performed on a proper drag strip and more often than not with a little souped up cars. Count in the old tires on the GT40 and it is not hard to see that under similar conditions the GT40 with its tiny 289 engine would be right among much more powerful 427 Vettes at least.
The driver of GT 40, Dana, is so cool, all the respect and applause to him. To see someone like him in a drag race with such sharks is a full joy. Thank you for the video
Depends on what standard we apply.. sure compared to a Camry but performance cars in the 90s were running 13s/12s… today 12s/11s is more inline. My daily driver runs 11.5 and it’s an SUV.
@@randytaylor1258 the car tested was the road going version the mk3 lowest power version of the engine , restrictive exhaust to meet noise standards on public roads much heavier less aerodynamic bodywork for american headlamp standards, carpets and sound deadening , this version (6 built) was never intended for racing
Considering its age, the GT40's 1/4 mile wasn't too dissimilar to some of today's performance mid-size cars with around 300bhp, like an Audi S3 or Merc A35. That's not too shabby from the Ford. And talking about the GT40, let's just sit back and take in its looks. It's absolutely stunning.
He wasn't pushing it to its full potential as the original times for a 67 with the 289 were 12.30s @ 113 mph. The best looking of the 3 in this comparison ❤
Indeed, if I could have any of them, it would be the original. The others are great, sure, but the GT40 is legendary. There is no comparison. Not for me, anyway.
I have to say that the 2nd Gen did an amazing job of taking the style of the GT40 and refining it without losing the character of the GT40. A truly beautiful tribute to a car with an amazing history.
@@SpeedDemon88X- Maybe when the tank was empty, but the 2016 GT ate C6 and C7 Vettes regularly. I know....I've watched them race live at the track. At Lime Rock Park in 2019 I watched the GT take 1st and 3rd place with a Porsche 911 RSR in between! The 2 factory Vettes in the race never threatened. Two weeks later at Road America it placed 1st and 2nd, again with no Corvettes in sight. Best re check your info source as it is dead wrong! 🤠 🏁 🏆
Please do more of the generation drag races Carwow because seriously, they are some of the best ones we've seen! Huge props to the people behind this one.
@@MrMuz99 if carwow didn’t have a picanto, i10, 20 and 30 then I probably would’ve comment something else, what car should they drag race next and I will comment that everyday for you?
@@matthewnorman9803 - I see suggestions for much more interesting cars than a Getz. Carwow owns cars now, do they? Here was me thinking they were loaned all their vehicles, unless Mat buys them himself. The car is nothing special, yet people keep banging on about it.
despite being obviously the slowest can you imaging the feeling this guy had at 5:40 ? im sure its unbeatable, the roar, the rawness and the direct, mechanical feeling must be way better than some modern 0-60 time
It’s important to note that the first gen went through a lot of changes and had about four different engines a 4.2l making 355, the 4.7l making 390, the 4.9 making 425, and a 7.0l making 485 and a load more torque. All naturally aspirated as well which was pretty impressive in the 60’s.
@@Dr.Ian-Plecthe missed one, the one he missed was this MkIII which was the only road legal GT40, which had a 289ci SBF which produced 306hp/310PS. They only made a handful of them, well technically, a handful plus 2 lol...7 MkIII's were produced for the road, but because it looked so different from the "original" GT40, most people who wanted a road going GT40 actually just bought MkI's and got them secondhand legal lol. This one is absolutely the slowest, but, I believe besides the "J" model GT40's are actually the rarest.
@@johnnygeorgopoulos4072 I appreciate the info, thanks. I only made the comment as the stats for 310 were on the screen, I don't know anything of the history, not my field! Thanks again.
All of these cars are timeless classics, however the 2006 GT holds a dear place in my heart. I worked with Roush during its development as was able to "ride-along" for some of the diagnostics testing my company was contracted for. I remember the 1st to 2nd shift happening at almost 70 mph accompanied with the large rear tires breaking loose as second gear wound its way towards almost 100 mph. All of this taking place on the I-94 Freeway which ran through Allen Park and Dearborn! WOW, such a cool idea for a video, a big thanks to everyone involved with this effort and carwow for posting it.
The clicks of the shifts on that 06 GT are such a brilliant auditory experience. That whole car is one of the greatest ever. A true homage to a legend.
It’s like seeing an old Shelby Cobra in traffic. It doesn’t matter how fast it is… the sound, smell and presence alone are worth the price of admission.
@@gpaje well, yeah, obviously, but the original gt40 really was a super car in its day, and I'd happily drive one now if i could afford it! I'm stuck with a 1.6 mk1 ford focus, and a 2kw ebike (the ebike is much more fun, unless its raining) 😊
@@snakerbproblem on this channel since 4 years. Always suprised that nobody in the comments usually calls this problem out. The exhaust mics are always so bad
Great video ! Thank you. Would have liked to see a 66 GT 40 with a 427 ! Would have been alot quicker and definitely would have won the sound check , lol !
I’d love for them to get a hold of a superformance GT 40 that’s a replica of the 60s race cars because that 427 would absolutely throw down some serious numbers even by today’s standards.
The 427 in the superformance I believe is just a replica of the original 427 side oiler, I think it makes right at 500 horsepower and less than 500 torque. It's not like a modern Windsor based 427 that revs is 7K and makes big numbers. But they do offer the coyote in the superformance cars which is pretty cool.
@@samuelriester1419 they actually have a couple options. Many of their “427“ engines are a punched out Roush. But they do offer a legitimate FE side oiler. That’s what I would like to say. Because that would be what an original 427 radar would be using.
Those three names are associated with the car through their contributions to motorsport in the 60s. Peter Brock was a designer of the Shelby Daytona Coupe, which competed with the Ford GT40 at the time. The other two were racing drivers and both raced the Ford GT40 in endurance races such as Le Mans.
I would like to see an old Ford Pantera up against the old GT40. I like the older versions better because of the engines. Especially the GT40 with the 351 Windsor.
I don't know if this would be even remotely possible but I would love to see a classic cars drag race! For example a '60s drag race, a '70s drag race, etc.
Check out Dream Car Garage. It was an old show on Speed channel. Most importantly they compared seven classic muscle cars in a variety of tests. It was very cool. The Owner of Legendary Motor Cars was one of the hosts. It might be on his channel as well. Good luck!
If my knowledge of the Ford GT40 is correct, Bob Bondurant was one of the drivers along with Ken Miles Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon in 24HRS of Le Mans. Peter Brock is also a driver who drove GT40. Mario Andretti was one of the people who helped with so called ''SCARIER'' version of GT40 (mark IV if i am not mistaken) I loved the history of Ford GT. Just pure American Muscle with British Twist (Courtesy to Caroll Shelby & Shelby American) to it. Dominated the lanes for FOUR YEARS before Porsche took control of 24 HRS of Le Mans. So legendary. THANK YOU FOR THE VIDEO, AND THANK YOU, KEN MILES, BOB BONDURANT, CHRIS AMON AND BRUCE MCLAREN !!
@@zed2653 American Peter Brock was the designer of the Cobra Daytona Coupe and also ran Shelby's Driving School. He was not, however, a driver and never competed driving any of the Shelby American cars.
That 13.9 sec 1/4 mile for the original 67’ GT is actually very impressive, I mean sure we all knew it would get dusted by the newer generations, but for it’s time that 1/4 run would’ve been considered hyper car territory, and it certainly hasn’t lost any ponies under the bonnet considering it is still on par with alot of modern day turbocharged 4 cylinder performance cars with similar hp. And it sure is a looker, what a car, old is gold as they say.
One of the coolest things that happened for me while working for Ford in Dearborn was meeting Camilo in the parking lot of Building 2 adjusting the engine oil level in his Ferrari.
I remember going to the Peterson a few years back and in the Vault, all three of these beauties were parked next to each other as the finale at the end of the vault tour. Had to be one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen.
Great test, shame they couldn't run a 427 Gt40 though, the MK3 was the tamest of the gt40's and I feel the earlier more race derived cars would have given the later cars a run for their money 👍
I think the one I would like to own the most is the 2006 GT. Of course the original GT40 is the most beautiful and the original one, but in reality you can't use that really on the streets, to go cruising a weekend in the alps or so. Too expensive, too fragile, it's a priceless antique. The 2017 GT is the most advanced and obvously fastest, but I think the 2007 one captured the spirit of the GT40 the best. Both in looks and in concept. Manual transmission, big supercharged V8, proper old school supercar. Probably the most fun to drive (save the original GT40 probably but that's priceless...)
All generations are wonderful. The first generation is history and victory. The second generation is a commemoration of the victory of the first generation with the development of manufacturing in the world of cars. The third generation, in my opinion, is a response from Ford that it can build a fast supercar.
You couldn't expect the old one this guy had to keep up with just a 289. The original racing ones had big blocks in them, too bad one of those weren't there.
Considering the value attached to the original GT40, you can't blame him for taking it easy on the ol girl. In original trim, a 289 equipped '40 clocked a 12.38 @ 113 mph with proper tires.
Gotta be the original. They get progressively less cooler the newer they are. One is a Legend, the other a modern classic and the last some turbo V6 that turned up
The new Ford GT is so awesome man, the looks and the stance just gloss over the fact that it’s no V8… sounds great still, very competitive on the race track aswell
@@sashoxxx very shortsighted and dismissive take. I doubt it shares that many parts with the F150 engine. These are amazing machines and manufacturers won’t be able to make cars like these much longer..but keep hating
I'll quote the short details on the powertrain just to be more specific: "The engine shares many components with the F-150's 3.5 L V6 engine including the cylinder heads, block and dual fuel system. Notable differences include larger turbochargers, an aluminum intake manifold, a custom dry sump lubrication system, unique camshafts and higher strength rotating and timing drive components." It's literally an engine out of an F150's engine bay, with modified intake, camshafts, dry sump system and bigger turbos. It really does share MOST of the parts from the F150 and the Explorer, heck even the heads are the same. Look, I don't want to be "the hater", and there is something you just said which is absolutely true, and hits hard .. indeed manufacturers won't be able to make cars like these for much longer, and that's deeply hurting me and many other petrol heads. In that regard this is an amazing car in all aspects. Absolutely better than any soulless battery "car". BUT. I'll just go back to the original point of my comment - this is a "supercar" which has an F150 engine and asks for a MILLION bucks on the market. They banked on the name, and not on actually being special and rare. It's not even particularly fast on the 1/4 mile. It's not very quick on track either, especially compared to many other, *much* cheaper non-"supercars", that do way better in every department. That doesn't sit well with me, it's just a phony. That's what I meant, and I stick by it. Good investment, but not for the good reasons.
@@sashoxxx - Sorry, but the 5.4 liter supercharged V8 in the GT is only loosely based on the production engine in the F-150. It is a purpose built and designed engine that is actually quite different than the stock unit. Suggest you read up on just what went into this very potent and reliable power plant!
You give me the choice I am driving home in the original, great sound, incredible looks, pure raw mechanical feel, absolute closest to the real racing car. I could listen and watch it do laps all day.
The original was years before my time, but I did get to experience a few on the track at Road Atlanta in 2017 at the vintage racing weekend they call The Mitty and it was an absolute thrill! The early GT40 is my all time favorite race car!!!!!
While I appreciate and admire the two more modern cars, I have to say, that I'm an old car guy. You can't beat the sounds and smells of vintage cars. Then there is the thrill of the risk factor. Never completely certain the car will make it to the next destination, but doing the journey anyway, because what's life without the gamble.
Huge respects to the Petersen museum. They've never been hesitant to bring these artifacts to the track.
And all of them are equally legendary.
Could you imagine the improvements with a time machine showing where Fords work was heading? They would simply treat the GTs from the future like Ferrari & make them something even more untouchable like the Lemans races.
I was thinking the same thing. I'm so glad the Peterson Museum lets their cars be taken out and driven instead of just sitting around gathering dust.
huge respect to the 11-99 CHP license border to not get tickets when speeding in CA
Yeah. Fortunately they're car guys, not snobbish car hoarders.
Respect to the gt40 driver. He nailed that fast start and was going through the gears pretty quick in such an old valuable car
Yeah, He sure brought his Game!
Yeah, excellent job there.
The 1967 sounded the best hands down. The 2017 doesn't even compare with the cool factor the other 2 have. It may be faster, but it's just a plastic looking wannabe.
@@JDashRiderNaturally Aspirated V8 always sound good at high rpm under load.
And while he was quietly sweltering in the cabin, too!
That ‘67 is absolutely gorgeous.
That 2nd gen GT is one of the most timeless and beautiful cars I’ve seen.
Yeah. I love the latest one and think it looks more exciting, but the previous just looks so artful and beautiful!
and it sounds so good!
DeTomaso Pantera wins I think
They’re all incredible.
Absolutely. 2006 isn't exactly known for it's beautiful vehicles. Ford could have belly flopped it hardcore, but they stuck the landing. It's timeless and gorgeous.
The 1967 GT held itself remarkably well for something so “antique like”!
It’s the nearest to a racing car that was barely usable on the road compared to the other two relatively civilised car
Especially the rolling race with a long geared disadvantige 😩
A friend drives a 1963 race Cobra with a 4.7 - maybe the same engine. That thing is insanly fast
famous for winning against all the european brands in races especially ferrari
Guy gave it the beans, which you don't often see with the older museum pieces
Given that the original car would cost 3 million dollars
I’ll bet that older GT40 is still the most exhilarating to drive. Old cars just have an amazing feel to them that you can’t replace.
Nah its the 2nd gen which is best of the three
I had an honour to be driven in 69 Corvette Stingray, that my host dad used to do when he got retired..Before he got into RC airplanes, he restored old muscle cars back to factory settings, from as good as could be found at junkyard.. He said while he was really into it, he's bbq's at his house would mean whole street parked with beautifully restored muscle and classic American cars.. I think I would actually drull if I saw that..
He haad that car and 1940Bently.. I got to say, even while driving thrpugh Califonia, where you an see almost any kind of car, people wer lokking and giving thumbs up when seeing that vet. That was a good day! Miss you Al.
@@relight6931 Im so glad you have that awesome memory. :) That being said my uncle had a 69 Stingray and Ive had a C6 and a C7 and both those ride so much better IMO. Smoother and more comfy. Its the little things, road noise, handling that do it for me. Old muscle cars do look amazing though and are still fun to drive.
It feels like a boat
I attribute that to the raw driving experience. No tech at all, the driver is the tech. I feel that way about my 66 Mustang. I have driven $200k cars but they are just so smooth, it takes some of the fun out of it. Of course my 66 isn't as fast by any metric of those vehicles, but it fun trying to battle traction.
Shout out to Dana for not being afraid to drive the GT40 properly. Usually these classics get driven a little more gingerly.
To be fair, 13.9s for a 1/4mile in 1967 must've been absolute rocket-ship levels of performance, and is a respectable time today! Huge kudos to Dana and the Museum for letting these old cars go full bore.
Of the three, the 2006 shape is my favourite.
Yeah a 13.9s is right around the 1/4 mile time of a 2024 Subaru WRX. That’s not bad at all for being almost 60 years old
A 13.9 is roughly what a big block Corvette would run when stock. Certainly fast, but there were definitely faster cars available.
The tries on the 2006 one are terrible for grip (they hard compounds for long lasting road use) they did a tire change somewhere on a drag race track the card did 10.5 seconds 1/4 with just tires changed.
@@ericreimer6627You forget the abysmal conditions that this test was performed in. All the old magazine drag times from seemingly stock cars were usually performed on a proper drag strip and more often than not with a little souped up cars. Count in the old tires on the GT40 and it is not hard to see that under similar conditions the GT40 with its tiny 289 engine would be right among much more powerful 427 Vettes at least.
@@kevinerbs2778 this is just a street grip race. I'm sure if you put drag radials on all of them they'd improve their drag race times...
The driver of GT 40, Dana, is so cool, all the respect and applause to him. To see someone like him in a drag race with such sharks is a full joy. Thank you for the video
Cheers to Dana and the Petersen Museum, he absolutely made up for the last race by going nearly full beans on the Ford GT :)
Petersen Museum? That museum must've been one of the most famous ones.
four beans :-)
@@purwantiallan5089sarcastic? If not, that's the biggest car museum in California and overall one of the biggest in the world
@@coolmendotdot2 I caught that too 😂
To be honest, a 13.9 quarter mile time in a car of this vintage is astounding. That's fairly rapid even by today's standards.
Its pretty decent, but I think I could beat it in my 4x4 F150 supercrew
Depends on what standard we apply.. sure compared to a Camry but performance cars in the 90s were running 13s/12s… today 12s/11s is more inline. My daily driver runs 11.5 and it’s an SUV.
@@enigma9789 LOL 🤡🤡
Not Even Close@@enigma9789
@@VL1975 central texas, come on out.
I was not expecting 13.9 at the 1/4. That’s very impressive for such an old car!
It would be quicker than that with some better tires.
It's tuned for road raing not drag racing, hence the very tall first gear.
The 1/4 mile in MkII 7.0 would have been quicker.
I have a soft spot for the 1960s cars. The 2nd Generation GT is a great looking car.
@@randytaylor1258 the car tested was the road going version the mk3 lowest power version of the engine , restrictive exhaust to meet noise standards on public roads much heavier less aerodynamic bodywork for american headlamp standards, carpets and sound deadening , this version (6 built) was never intended for racing
I was shocked at that too, a car from the 60's. People don't appreciate just how fast that is!
Considering its age, the GT40's 1/4 mile wasn't too dissimilar to some of today's performance mid-size cars with around 300bhp, like an Audi S3 or Merc A35. That's not too shabby from the Ford. And talking about the GT40, let's just sit back and take in its looks. It's absolutely stunning.
GT40 1966 on Stock Trim even can go faster on quarter mile against the Tesla Plaid, Dacia Logan, and the R33GTR.
I was legit looking for this comment, remarkable performance considering its a car from the 50s
@@purwantiallan5089 What?
He wasn't pushing it to its full potential as the original times for a 67 with the 289 were 12.30s @ 113 mph. The best looking of the 3 in this comparison ❤
@@purwantiallan5089😅sarcasm 💯
That first model is a timeless classic!
It looks gorgeous!
I respected the second generation when it came out because they kept the classic look, unlike a lot of 2000s cars
@@mrsnezbit2219especially the 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
all 3 of them are timeless classics lets be real
Indeed, if I could have any of them, it would be the original. The others are great, sure, but the GT40 is legendary. There is no comparison. Not for me, anyway.
I have to say that the 2nd Gen did an amazing job of taking the style of the GT40 and refining it without losing the character of the GT40. A truly beautiful tribute to a car with an amazing history.
I think the 2nd gen one is by far the best looking one. New one just looks like another Ferrari/Lamborghini
@TheJeep1967 - You have Camilo Pardo to thank for that. He was the Chief Designer of the 2nd gen GT and did an outstanding job on it!
@@ckmoore101except worse it looks hideous like an angry birds pig the previous gts look muscular and athletic in comparison
I agree. A great tribute
Second one is still the best in my opinion. Perfect blend of retro and modern.
100% agree. They messed with the rear too much on the GT - why change perfection.
@@SpeedDemon88X what’s your point? My comment was based out of these three… 🤔😂 Z06 looks boring as fuck.
Best car ever made in the history of automobiles. IMO
@@SpeedDemon88X- Maybe when the tank was empty, but the 2016 GT ate C6 and C7 Vettes regularly. I know....I've watched them race live at the track. At Lime Rock Park in 2019 I watched the GT take 1st and 3rd place with a Porsche 911 RSR in between! The 2 factory Vettes in the race never threatened. Two weeks later at Road America it placed 1st and 2nd, again with no Corvettes in sight. Best re check your info source as it is dead wrong! 🤠 🏁 🏆
It definitely looks better than the z06 but the c6 z06 definitely punched above its weight for the price. You're both right@@JBFlytography
Please do more of the generation drag races Carwow because seriously, they are some of the best ones we've seen! Huge props to the people behind this one.
If you get popular can you please change your comment to "we need a Hyundai Getz"
I wish people would stop going on about the Hyundai Getz. 😴
@@MrMuz99 if carwow didn’t have a picanto, i10, 20 and 30 then I probably would’ve comment something else, what car should they drag race next and I will comment that everyday for you?
According to BABVVO and TEBBVO sadly soon all gas cars will be forbidden in EU and USA!
@@matthewnorman9803 - I see suggestions for much more interesting cars than a Getz. Carwow owns cars now, do they? Here was me thinking they were loaned all their vehicles, unless Mat buys them himself.
The car is nothing special, yet people keep banging on about it.
despite being obviously the slowest can you imaging the feeling this guy had at 5:40 ?
im sure its unbeatable, the roar, the rawness and the direct, mechanical feeling must be way better than some modern 0-60 time
It’s important to note that the first gen went through a lot of changes and had about four different engines a 4.2l making 355, the 4.7l making 390, the 4.9 making 425, and a 7.0l making 485 and a load more torque. All naturally aspirated as well which was pretty impressive in the 60’s.
What about the 310 stated?
@@Dr.Ian-Plecthe missed one, the one he missed was this MkIII which was the only road legal GT40, which had a 289ci SBF which produced 306hp/310PS.
They only made a handful of them, well technically, a handful plus 2 lol...7 MkIII's were produced for the road, but because it looked so different from the "original" GT40, most people who wanted a road going GT40 actually just bought MkI's and got them secondhand legal lol.
This one is absolutely the slowest, but, I believe besides the "J" model GT40's are actually the rarest.
@@johnnygeorgopoulos4072 I appreciate the info, thanks. I only made the comment as the stats for 310 were on the screen, I don't know anything of the history, not my field!
Thanks again.
Would have been more fun if they had of used the big block 427 for this comparison.
@@MovieMuscleYes that 427 would have been a very close race.
Racing driver Sam should be a permanent host in these videos, I just love the chemistry between Mat and Sam!
agreed, so much better than yianni
No need for yianni when we've got Sam
@@CGCTV It's not a competition.
both gender fluid white men
He has never been a host though 🙄
0:12 Ho looks like Ken Miles, a bit. Coincidence?
What if he is a rebirth of Ken
All of these cars are timeless classics, however the 2006 GT holds a dear place in my heart.
I worked with Roush during its development as was able to "ride-along" for some of the diagnostics testing my company was contracted for.
I remember the 1st to 2nd shift happening at almost 70 mph accompanied with the large rear tires breaking loose as second gear wound its way towards almost 100 mph.
All of this taking place on the I-94 Freeway which ran through Allen Park and Dearborn!
WOW, such a cool idea for a video, a big thanks to everyone involved with this effort and carwow for posting it.
Jammy git 😂
The clicks of the shifts on that 06 GT are such a brilliant auditory experience. That whole car is one of the greatest ever. A true homage to a legend.
Good God! The aura is something else with that first gen 40. The elegance, the beauty & the curves 😍
the second one is the perfect blend of retro and modern
It's a masterpiece, fo sure.
I love the 05-06 GTs. Definitely my dream car
@@matthewszymczak5356i remembered alot about the 2006 Ford GT from GT5 too.😊
Agreed 👌
And I’m pretty sure those ones were setting half/1mile records modded ofc
Back in 2005 the ‘05 GT was my dream car when I was 13 years old, and today it still is my favorite car ever. I just love it.
Keep in mind that the original GT40 was not a drag car, it was a road racing endurance car.
Fair play to Dana for giving it full beans when he thought you only asked for 4 beans.
😂
That sound inside the original GT40... pure emotion.
What a trio. The Ford GT is one of the most iconic cars of all time. What a treat!!!!
Respect for bringing the old Ford to the dragrace! Great to see all 3 of them in action.
The two newer versions are impressive, but the original is so visceral, plus I imagine it is by far the most intimidating.
It’s like seeing an old Shelby Cobra in traffic. It doesn’t matter how fast it is… the sound, smell and presence alone are worth the price of admission.
47yrs later and only 2.9seconds improvement? Old school engineers are the true 🐐
The original 1967 one still looks the best ! ❤
All of these cars have aged like fine wine and kept up extremely well
The original 1967 GT40 is absolutely stunning! What an amazing beauty
Probably one of the best looking drag races ever done by Carwow!
Yes
The original did really well considering its nearly 60 years old!
True, but they are only drag racing. Around the road course I think the times would be much much different.
@@gpaje well, yeah, obviously, but the original gt40 really was a super car in its day, and I'd happily drive one now if i could afford it! I'm stuck with a 1.6 mk1 ford focus, and a 2kw ebike (the ebike is much more fun, unless its raining) 😊
The OG GT40 is such a beauty..
Interesting sound comparison. From the outside the new GT sounds the best but from the inside the original GT40 just sounds so epic!
Despite 1966 Ford GT40 only had 305bhp, still it has one of the all time best sounds.
I’ve noticed that their mics don’t do a good job picking up the exhaust sounds.
@@snakerbproblem on this channel since 4 years. Always suprised that nobody in the comments usually calls this problem out. The exhaust mics are always so bad
Hell no 17+ sounds like garbage. 05/06 and the gen1 sound leagues better
@@ranware9071I would quite say “garbage”
i have never heard a twin-turbo v6 sound this good
Sounds like a BMW.
awww there I was, hoping for a 427 GT40
This is one race where I didn’t care about the times they ran. Three of the most beautiful cars in American Supercar History.
Shelby Daytona coupe is number 2 only behind the original gt40
Shite compared to Ferrari
That's a very healthy outlook towards these wonderful racers! 🤠👍🏁
Ferrari is scared of all 3 😆
Yes Lamborghini Aventador is afraid of new one 😂
they don't have to worry because they know the word evolution which doesn't even exist for ford 😅
Well, two of them, yes.
(None f1) Ferrari*
All that unlimited Ford money just to be trounced by Porsche
You gonna give it full beans?
Yeah I’m gonna give it 4 beans!
😂😂
Sub 14 for a car from the 60's is still unreal. Today we are so used to 10 second quarter miles people don't appreciate how well the original one did.
and it did that while spinning off the line!
True.....and its running on old biased ply tires.
It's a beautiful car that has no problem turning heads over half a century later.
Pedigree matters!
The 2nd gen is literally my favorite car of all time, but I also love the 1st and 3rd gen. Ive been dying for this video.
Great video ! Thank you. Would have liked to see a 66 GT 40 with a 427 ! Would have been alot quicker and definitely would have won the sound check , lol !
I’d love for them to get a hold of a superformance GT 40 that’s a replica of the 60s race cars because that 427 would absolutely throw down some serious numbers even by today’s standards.
Bone-crushing torque.
@@randytaylor1258 exactly
The 427 in the superformance I believe is just a replica of the original 427 side oiler, I think it makes right at 500 horsepower and less than 500 torque. It's not like a modern Windsor based 427 that revs is 7K and makes big numbers. But they do offer the coyote in the superformance cars which is pretty cool.
@@samuelriester1419 they actually have a couple options. Many of their “427“ engines are a punched out Roush. But they do offer a legitimate FE side oiler. That’s what I would like to say. Because that would be what an original 427 radar would be using.
this was a race of road cars and i'm pretty sure the 427 never made its way into any of the original gt40 road cars.
Those three names are associated with the car through their contributions to motorsport in the 60s. Peter Brock was a designer of the Shelby Daytona Coupe, which competed with the Ford GT40 at the time. The other two were racing drivers and both raced the Ford GT40 in endurance races such as Le Mans.
Ken miles should be honored too right?
He literally gave his life to it so I’d consider honoring him appropriate
It cant be the same peter brock as the aussie v8 supercars racing driver that drove for holden could it?
Nope. The one that signed the car is American
@rs1502 ahhh right. Yeah me being Aussie thats what confused me a bit lol
I would like to see an old Ford Pantera up against the old GT40. I like the older versions better because of the engines. Especially the GT40 with the 351 Windsor.
I don't know if this would be even remotely possible but I would love to see a classic cars drag race! For example a '60s drag race, a '70s drag race, etc.
Check out Dream Car Garage. It was an old show on Speed channel. Most importantly they compared seven classic muscle cars in a variety of tests. It was very cool. The Owner of Legendary Motor Cars was one of the hosts. It might be on his channel as well. Good luck!
The 67 GT40 is one of the most beautiful cars ever! 2nd iteration was also amazing but the 3rd one is just "another supercar".
it won't be just "another supercar" in 50 years. the Gen gamma generation will pay 5x the price for it.
@@lightflix It still has an F150 engine. The older vehicles are truly special, the new one is a massive expensive joke.
@@sashoxxxthe 289 Windsor - also used in trucks. 5.4 Modular - also used in trucks.
If my knowledge of the Ford GT40 is correct,
Bob Bondurant was one of the drivers along with Ken Miles Bruce McLaren and Chris Amon in 24HRS of Le Mans.
Peter Brock is also a driver who drove GT40.
Mario Andretti was one of the people who helped with so called ''SCARIER'' version of GT40 (mark IV if i am not mistaken)
I loved the history of Ford GT. Just pure American Muscle with British Twist (Courtesy to Caroll Shelby & Shelby American) to it. Dominated the lanes for FOUR YEARS before Porsche took control of 24 HRS of Le Mans. So legendary.
THANK YOU FOR THE VIDEO, AND THANK YOU, KEN MILES, BOB BONDURANT, CHRIS AMON AND BRUCE MCLAREN !!
Don't forget Carroll Shelby
Assume you are referring to Peter Brock, the Australian driver and not Peter Brock, the American designer of the Cobra Daytona Coupe.
@@ShilupTushka - Shelby had retired from driving by the time these machines were built.
@@Loulovesspeed look at the signature. that isnt the australian peter brock's sig
@@zed2653 American Peter Brock was the designer of the Cobra Daytona Coupe and also ran Shelby's Driving School. He was not, however, a driver and never competed driving any of the Shelby American cars.
I find the mid generation to be one of the most iconic supercar designs of all time for me personally. Love it.
That 13.9 sec 1/4 mile for the original 67’ GT is actually very impressive, I mean sure we all knew it would get dusted by the newer generations, but for it’s time that 1/4 run would’ve been considered hyper car territory, and it certainly hasn’t lost any ponies under the bonnet considering it is still on par with alot of modern day turbocharged 4 cylinder performance cars with similar hp.
And it sure is a looker, what a car, old is gold as they say.
One of the coolest things that happened for me while working for Ford in Dearborn was meeting Camilo in the parking lot of Building 2 adjusting the engine oil level in his Ferrari.
xDDD
Huge respect to the gent in the GT40, he really did work that car 👍🏼
Sam, Yanni and Mat are still the best trio of all time. Fun, humour and some good drivers
Indeed. Their banter and chemistry is similar to Clarkson, May and Hammond.
Sam is the guy that design the ford GT right?
@@fuzzynutter8344 Clarkson, May and Hammond come from very similar journalism backgrounds so thats why that works
@@mochiyoon1771no, racing driver sam helped design the 720s I believe
@@tristancleymans4293 ok
Put 3 F1 driver through them all on the same track, same day
Now please upload the entire 13.9 second onboard video of the GT40! Music to my ears!
The GT series are some of the best looking cars out there - they have such an iconic and beautiful design.
By far my favorite video. Also my favorite car model😅 but overall fav here
The incline of performance over the generations is amazing to see
Yep, particularly the thought of a V6 engine capable of beating much larger displacement V8s easily! Never would have thought that back in the 60s!
I remember going to the Peterson a few years back and in the Vault, all three of these beauties were parked next to each other as the finale at the end of the vault tour. Had to be one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen.
Im not a big fan of the 2006 bersiom but absolutely love the other 2
The interior engine sound in the original is something to die for... ❤🔥
Man who woulda guessed that the fastest car would win
60s American muscle cars can never be topped. They’re just so beautiful and sound amazing (The GT40 definitely won the sound check)
I agree on that one
Built in slough, England 😅
"I'll give it four beans". Love this guy!
I’ll give it as many beans as I can! Hahaha
You forgot about the GT90.
5.9L quad turbo V12
720hp.
One of the coolest cars ever. Wish they took off.
@Andrijko85 - The GT90 was never more than a concept car while all the GTs in this video were actually built, competed in and won races.
It was a concept car that never made it to production
Great test, shame they couldn't run a 427 Gt40 though, the MK3 was the tamest of the gt40's and I feel the earlier more race derived cars would have given the later cars a run for their money 👍
I don't think the results would have been much different.
@@littleshopofelectrons4014 Considering it goes from 300ish horsepower to almost 500hp, the results would definitely be different.
My same thougths
@@rustler08yeah if the results don’t change from that someone is rigging the tests. 😂 I want to see that race as well.
I’m pretty sure the 427 side oiler they used was over 500 hp in race trim.
I think the one I would like to own the most is the 2006 GT.
Of course the original GT40 is the most beautiful and the original one, but in reality you can't use that really on the streets, to go cruising a weekend in the alps or so.
Too expensive, too fragile, it's a priceless antique.
The 2017 GT is the most advanced and obvously fastest, but I think the 2007 one captured the spirit of the GT40 the best. Both in looks and in concept. Manual transmission, big supercharged V8, proper old school supercar. Probably the most fun to drive (save the original GT40 probably but that's priceless...)
All generations are wonderful. The first generation is history and victory. The second generation is a commemoration of the victory of the first generation with the development of manufacturing in the world of cars. The third generation, in my opinion, is a response from Ford that it can build a fast supercar.
Kudos to the guy racing a work of art!! It’s beautiful 😍
It's so satisfying seeing these cars being driven once in a while, and not strictly stuck in a museum forever.
Man pedal will always be the winner in my eyes
Props for risking that older gt, appreciate when someone lets their cars live a little even if it could cost a lot to fix.
very cool though a shame the old GT wasn't the 7.0L 🙂
You couldn't expect the old one this guy had to keep up with just a 289. The original racing ones had big blocks in them, too bad one of those weren't there.
Car performance down the years has improved massively but for looks the older cars are just way better IMO.
i agree
Nico Yazawa also prefer the 1966 GT40 unlike the 2016 Ford GT. (Cover Star from FORZA MOTORSPORT 6)
And in terms of sound
The results were as expected, but this was still so exciting to watch!!
As a person that bought a 2006 Ford GT & still own it to this day, this episode was absolutely amazing 😊
Cool test. I think if the GT40 had the 427, it would have faired better.
Not by much. These aren't dragsters. They were made to win at LeMans, not a drag race.
@spitfireman3 My opinion too
they have a 13.2 1/4 time recorded out of that 427…. definitely would have been a difference. if it could hook
Considering the value attached to the original GT40, you can't blame him for taking it easy on the ol girl. In original trim, a 289 equipped '40 clocked a 12.38 @ 113 mph with proper tires.
With the original 7.0 l. big-block or this 3.2 l. small-block?
@@randytaylor1258the big block would Def be faster than that. Alot faster than the one in this video
The v6 GT SOUNDS LIKE A Straight pipe GTR
This is the ULTIMATE DRAG RACE!! Thats freakin crazy you got all these together to race!
DARG!
DAAAAARG!
carwow makes alot on car sales make this happen
Gotta be the original. They get progressively less cooler the newer they are. One is a Legend, the other a modern classic and the last some turbo V6 that turned up
From what I see, performance and aesthetics are inversely proportional.
The 2005 GT will always be the best in my opinion.
The new Ford GT is so awesome man, the looks and the stance just gloss over the fact that it’s no V8… sounds great still, very competitive on the race track aswell
Still has an F150 engine, while asking over a million bucks on the market. Which is pathetic to say the least.
@@sashoxxx very shortsighted and dismissive take. I doubt it shares that many parts with the F150 engine. These are amazing machines and manufacturers won’t be able to make cars like these much longer..but keep hating
I'll quote the short details on the powertrain just to be more specific: "The engine shares many components with the F-150's 3.5 L V6 engine including the cylinder heads, block and dual fuel system. Notable differences include larger turbochargers, an aluminum intake manifold, a custom dry sump lubrication system, unique camshafts and higher strength rotating and timing drive components."
It's literally an engine out of an F150's engine bay, with modified intake, camshafts, dry sump system and bigger turbos. It really does share MOST of the parts from the F150 and the Explorer, heck even the heads are the same.
Look, I don't want to be "the hater", and there is something you just said which is absolutely true, and hits hard .. indeed manufacturers won't be able to make cars like these for much longer, and that's deeply hurting me and many other petrol heads. In that regard this is an amazing car in all aspects. Absolutely better than any soulless battery "car". BUT. I'll just go back to the original point of my comment - this is a "supercar" which has an F150 engine and asks for a MILLION bucks on the market. They banked on the name, and not on actually being special and rare. It's not even particularly fast on the 1/4 mile. It's not very quick on track either, especially compared to many other, *much* cheaper non-"supercars", that do way better in every department. That doesn't sit well with me, it's just a phony. That's what I meant, and I stick by it.
Good investment, but not for the good reasons.
@@sashoxxx - Sorry, but the 5.4 liter supercharged V8 in the GT is only loosely based on the production engine in the F-150. It is a purpose built and designed engine that is actually quite different than the stock unit. Suggest you read up on just what went into this very potent and reliable power plant!
The 1st 2 are the best looking classics👌🏻😮💨
You give me the choice I am driving home in the original, great sound, incredible looks, pure raw mechanical feel, absolute closest to the real racing car. I could listen and watch it do laps all day.
The original was years before my time, but I did get to experience a few on the track at Road Atlanta in 2017 at the vintage racing weekend they call The Mitty and it was an absolute thrill! The early GT40 is my all time favorite race car!!!!!
While I appreciate and admire the two more modern cars, I have to say, that I'm an old car guy. You can't beat the sounds and smells of vintage cars. Then there is the thrill of the risk factor. Never completely certain the car will make it to the next destination, but doing the journey anyway, because what's life without the gamble.
We needed the 7.0 gt40 😩😩
To me, I'm hands down for the original. I have a huge love feeling for it and it hasn't changed over all the years.
Would be proper interesting to see how a MKII GT40 would do against this lot, even if it meant using a replica
@speedophile7353 - Absolutely agree here. The GT MKIII with 310hp vs. a 550hp and 657hp car is ridiculous. Should have been a MKII for sure!
5:40 best scene of it allllll I want the total onboard vid of the old one... that guy is a hero driving a car like that the way he did.... hell yeah
It’s interesting to see that the first 2 GT‘s almost have no dust behind them and the new model has a huge swirl behind it because of all the aero.
2016 FORD GT also has nearly 2½ times more bhp than 1967 version. The 2016 Ford GT has 620bhp.
The GT Era was amazing !