This lens came with my 70D a few years ago and I automatically discounted it as a cheap kit lens, preferring more expensive lenses that I own. Thing is, I kept coming back to it despite myself for its versatility. If I only want to have one lens its often this. And that's what happened when I went on holiday recently including in my travels a friend's wedding in exotic Goa. I intended just to take some snapshots, there was a professional on hand for formal photos. I didn't even take a flash even though it was outdoor and at night. The lens surprised the heck out of me! IS is really really good. Dynamic range brilliant (Indian weddings are colourful!) and to my greatest surprise, because of the happy marriage of IS, wide open aperture and fairy lights I discovered that bokeh and out-of-focus is just creamy creamy creamy delicious. As distortion and CA are controlled in camera I have new respect for this lens and have returned its to its rightful place at the front of the cupboard.
I've got to say Christopher,I've watched quite a few of your reviews now and they really are quite superb. I love the consistency in your testing methods which allows us to go back to previous reviews to compare. I like that you provide us with all the detail about the equipment and I like how you summarise it at the end all in a video that is not overblown with irrelevant dribble. Well done
I recently took a tour boat to see Pictured Rocks National Seashore in Michigan. I brought 3 lenses on the trip for my Canon 90D. A 70-300 zoom, a 17-50 zoom, and this Canon 18-135. I only wanted to bring one lens on the boat tour. You guessed it, the 18-135 was perfect. The light was lousy that day but I added a bit on contrast and saturation in processing, so the colorful rocks turned out beautiful.
This lens came with my Canon 800D. I tried filming with this lens, if you want a smooth zoom in and out this lens is not for you. Also this lens can only be used in bright places unless you use a tripod. Many times i find myself complaining about the lens in dark settings.
Christopher - you're awesome! I cannot tell you how impressed I am with the thoroughness and clarity of your reviews. They are absolutely outstanding. Watching your videos give me great confidence while searching for lenses and enhancing my photography skills.
Hello Chris, Thank you for your great work. I especially like your comparison of the lenses to simular lenses in the end of the video. That's a really nice addition.
Thanks Christopher a lot for all your reviews. I've been using 18-55 lens for one year and want to change to another simple lens, do you think a should buy this 18-135 lens as a replacement?
Thank you Christopher, I have a 5D Markii, I just ordered the 80D mostly for Videos, I was planning to use my Canon L lens, didn't think of zoo noise, so I just purchased this and will give it a test drive. Another nice part of Amazon, I can always return if it does not work out for me. You have a great voice and good information, thanks again.
A very great review Christopher as always!!! I've watched this video several times to compare to other camera lenses. We hope you get to test the Canon 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM NANO very soon. AND the Canon 70-300mm NANO lens. Those are the one's I'm very anxious to see. Thanks.
Loong awaited review, thanx! CA can be fixed with software as mentioned, and the same for barrel distortion (Lightroom). This is a great walkaround lens for still pics & video use.
Hi Chris... I just purchased nearly the same lens, marked as 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. At 100€, it seemed like a bargain, particularly since I had in mind the good marks you gave to the STM version. Note that there's neither the STM nor the USM designation on mine, and all of the reviews I find here on TH-cam refer to one or the other of these two versions. How likely is it that the optics perform in the same way? For a lens with the same optical references, when a manufacturer makes changes to motorization or other electronics, do they typically retain the same optical characteristics? Thanks for your reviews! They are great, and I have learned a lot.
Just to add to the weirdness, in case anybody is actually interested in this, I connected my 50D and launched the EOS Lens Registration Tool. It showed my new lens as needing to be added (which I had already seen in the camera itself), but it shows it not as an EF-S but as an EF lens. There is no equivalent EF-S lens in the entire list. Physically, the lens is labelled EF-S, and it has the the little blocking pin that prevents it from being mounted on an a full-frame EF mount. (I tried to put it on my 6D, and no-go.). So, given that the EOS Lens Registration Tool sees it only as an EF lens, I really am curious as to whether or not this lens is equivalent to its EF brother except for the labelling and blocking pin. After running the tool, the camera shows that it now has the correction data, but it describes the lens as EF-S. It sounds like some kind of commercial trick. 🙂
Hi Chris, thanks for brilliant review. I have a question - is there a two versions of this lens? I want to buy one but I see the picture and it's different from what you have here. I found the same with your lens too, but it cost around 30$ more. Which one should I buy? Thanks.
Why does everyone keep asking me that question? They're different lenses for different uses. The 18-135 is a superzoom lens, the 55-250 a telephoto zoom lens
Just randomly Googled "18-135mm review" so was a shock to see Western Avenue at 0:53 and then more of Cardiff in general! Thanks for the review. (Penarth)
It’s super sharp on my R6 mark II which crops adapted Canon EF-S lenses. I imagine it will perform the same on the R7 which has a higher pixel density. It’s just ok on my 90D but better than the older MKI EF 24-105mm (L) f/4. I’ve heard the better pairing on the 90D is the Mark II EF 24-70mm f/2.8.
Bought it used as a Allrounder, didnt get a good oppertunity to test it fully from the picture Quality but from the feel of it, it feels solid. Not Cheap or high premium, just solid with good weight.
Hi, Chris, whenever I wanted to buy a lens, I looked at your reviews, you do an excellent job. I also followed your comments with a lot of interest so as not to ask questions that have already been asked, so I would like to ask you something, because you kind of contradicted yourself. In terms of quality, which is sharper, 18-55mm STM or 18-135mm STM?
favorite lens for me. However, I find that I must test longer zoom range lenses at more FL because decentering can crop up within a fairly narrow range. Also, both sides of the image need to be examined because that is how decentering or tilted optics will become noticeable. A more difficult problem to cope with soft corners.
Hey Chris, great review. I am getting the Canon 700d and am in between the Sigma AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC HSM OS Lens for Canon and the 18-135 that you have reviewed. Your verdict on A: The 700D that comes with the 18-135 or B: Get the 700D body only plus the Sigma 18-200mm lens. Thanks!
I'm going to buy the canon 70d with a kit lens. Do you think I should pay the extra money for this 18-135 or stick with the 18-55mm? I'm not sure if the 18-55mm will have decreased video quality?
Hello Chris, thanks a ton for this extremely useful video. It's quite hard to find standardised videos. If you wouldn't mind my asking, how would you rate this lens against the 24-105 Mark I ? It seems that the 18-135 ATM is sharper than the 24-105 M I, but I'm finding that hard to digest.
Super late late late reply. I have both, the 24-105 L is just a bit sharper, but you barely notice it (the toughness and low light capabilities are the big pluses of this lens, besides that you can use it with FF of course). I own several other lenses and I never could let the 18-135 stm lens go. Even when I seldom use it now and shifted to RF full frame cameras. My favorite lens of all time.
Hey Christopher, I'm clueless with cameras, just bought a used rebel xti for 100 bucks online. How does this camera stand today? Did i overpay for it considering it came out in 2006? Should I look into buying new lens for it? or is it too old? Thanks! looking forward to hearing back from you.
hello Christopher! I am in a bit of a dilemma. I am looking for a lens such as this for almost silent autofocus for video and I have a canon rebel t4i. Will this lens fit my camera and work well? Thanks so much.
Thank you for the videos. I had a 60D with 18-200 mm IS kit lens. It was a lemon and after 3 repairs went back. Now I am looking to replace it with the credit note under extended warranty. My question: which is a better lens? The 18-200 IS or the 18-135 STM IS? I loved the pictures that I got with the 18-200 - it really served all my needs from macro to zoom, in particular was great for close proximity action shots of the niece and nephew and it seemed to focus very fast. Unfortunately they no longer include it as part of the kit, and it is $700 Canadian on its own. I wish I had not brought the camera back and lived with its glitches! Thanks for any advice...
...I am planning on buying a 70D, since my experience in testing the t5i Rebel with the 18-135 STM yielded abysmal photos...may have been a bad camera - was an open box, but got spoiled by my 60D
Christopher Frost Photography thanks for your feedback! It's good to know the new kit lens holds its own against the very adequate but large and heavy 18-200 which suffered from severe lens creep issues! Thanks again for the great work!
Hi Chris, thank you so much for doing this review. I've got a question for you..since I'm planning to upgrade from my kit lens to a good walk around zoom, would you recommend this over Canon's 15-85mm? Both seem to have variable apertures with the new STM lens having a bit more reach. For me, sharpness and image quality is a priority and can't seem to make up my mind. Please help..
I'm planning to go to tokyo this summer. Considering that I will be taking portraits and zoomed pictures, will it be better to get the ef-s 18-135mm or this 28-135mm one? I'm new to photography and I don't know much.
Hello Chris, I currently own a 550D and 70D, having just sold on my older 450D with 18-55mm kit lens v1 I am looking for something to replace he older kit lens with something better. Either the Canon 18-135mm STM or the slightly older 15-85mm USM ( now £ 150 ). Should I go for the Canon 15-85mm or do the bad distortions from his lens favour the Canon 18-135mm instead.
I have the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens and every one I watch say how great the lens is well I think that they need there heads looking at I took peoples advice in getting the lens with the camera and after about four months I regret getting the lens as over short distances it is real good but for more than 20 feet you are better with the sigma 18-200MM it is much better quality and a way greater distance I feel that the lens does not have what I am looking for it will work within what I get from a 50 mm Lens and not a true canon design it works on some of the creative options so I will use it as a portrait lens only. I think that people have done a quick inspection and told people what they would like to hear Yours truly Jack Boyd
hi Chris, ive got a 55-250mm lens but am thinking of replacing it with this 18-135mm as i dont necessarily need a super zoom but do want a wider lens with a bit of zoom capability. do you think its a good choice ? please advise. thanks for the videos they are very helpful end enjoyable.
Thank you for this review! You are the best when it comes to lens review. Will 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM go well with my EOS M6 ii??? will it perform better than my kit lens 15-45mm?? for photography not video.
Hello Chris. I have some doubts about two lens I have ponder in my mind several times. One is the Canon EF-S 18-135 VS Canon EF 24-105. I know that some times expensive lens doesn't mean best quality. From your review of the Canon EF 24-105mm I gather it's not really good quality lens image just because it's an L lens. Thanks for your help!
Hello there! I got this lens after watching this great review. I'm using this for video but I seem to be having a couple of issues with this lens. 1. The focus ring takes forever to focus, it's very slow to focus & 2. It gets out of focus really easily by itself, I'll tap something on the touch screen of the camera and it goes out of focus.. I'm really frustrated with this and in thought of selling it now... Seems great for photography, or maybe as a video auto focus lens on a canon, but I'm not sure if its good for manual video work. Did you have anything similar happen with your focus?
I've just purchased one... I think you are too much gentle. In my opinion it is a bad lens. The corners are indecent. It's not good for landscapes... perhaps it's good for a week end with the family, or other easy situations.
Thank you dear for all your reviews, I think you are the best reviewer on youtube. I have the old version of this lens, is the old version same sharpness and contrast as STM?
Christopher Frost Photography- First of all I really enjoy your videos... You are awesome! If you strictly look at Image Quality, is the 18-135 STM way better than the 18-55 STM? Money is an issue but I'm willing to spend a bit more on 18-135 if it is a significant difference... Again, love your videos!
Christopher Frost Photography Wow! Quick Response! You are even more awesome now! :) I should probably say that I currently own your nifty Canon 60D as well along with two lens: the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM & the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II... I don't really use the telephoto and I find myself not having enough room to back up with the prime lens... I definitely need a lens with a smaller focal length but finding one on a budget is difficult... Any suggestions?
I am planning to buy a canon 80D, would you recommend the 18-135mm STM with it ? I am new in photography, I would like something that is good all around, I also plan on having a 50mm 1/8 lens for my videos... is it a good idea ? :-)
GeniusPanda It has a Canon's new AF motor called the "Nano USM drive" in it. I wanted to see how that worked, and also if the optics are really the same as compared to the STM version.
Why is this lens so much sharper in picture mode than in video mode? I have it too and I can't seem to get sharp video from it. My videos are definitely noticeably soft even when the focus is dead on. I saw it here too. Do you happen to know why that's the case?
RYSE You're doing something wrong, if your lens is sharp for still images but soft for video work. This lens is more than sharp enough for any kind of 1080p video work. Try adjusting the sharpness settings on your camera
That can't be it. I have a pretty good understanding of my camera and I shoot with cinestyle so naturally the sharpness is lower although it's still pretty sharp in picture mode. Could you perhaps take a look at one of my videos (This isn't a shameless plug :p) and tell me if you think it should be sharper or not? Maybe it's a compression thing.
Hi Cristopher, this is an awesome review. I just wonder what lens would be better for landscspe in terms of sharpness: this or the 18-55mm IS STM? Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
Hi Christopher, I currently own a canon eos rebel t4i with a 18-55m lens and I would like to buy a lens to do landscape pictures since im going to Peru next month and would like to take pictures of the wildlife, nature and the landscape. Which will be the best lens in the Price range of 250-350, the Canon EF-S 18-135mm or another one?
which lens should i buy for my canon 70d-canon 18-135mm or 18 to 200mm . I am a travelling photographer . Please suggest me a lens . thanks for this video it was quite help full.
Hi can you use this lens to canon M200, I have a camera M200 but I don’t know what lens is better to get, can you please recommend me some some the best lens for my camera, thank you God bless.
Hey Chris; İ have a question for you? So i just bought my Canon 200d with the kit lens 18-55 III and i am looking for another lenses. İ made 2 option which one should i choose?I want lens for any cases. 1- Sigma 17-50 2.8 2- Canon 18-135 stm and Canon 50 mm 1.8 stm or do you have any other option for budget lenses.I trust your opinions please help me! :)
Depends what you want. If you're happy with the 18-55 zoom range then get the Sigma lens, to increase the quality of your pictures. If you want to get portrait pictures, get the 50mm f/1.8. If you want more telephoto reach, get the 18-135mm
New to photography, and I recently purchased this lens used. The end piece of the lens seems to be a bit wobbly, is this normal? It seems to take pictures well, I just wasn't sure if any component on the lens should seem loose.
hey Chris!.. I'm looking forward for your review on Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens, a kit lens for full frame 6D camera and its comparison with other kit lens EF 24-105 L lens. Thanks.
Thanks for the review if you would need to make a choice. I have canon m5 If looking at lens quality, would you go for EFS 18-135mm or EFM 18-150mm? would really appreciate if you help out with your opinion. Thanks ahead :)
Hello Chris, Thanks for your excellent review both of 18-135mm STM and USM! Which one would you suggest me to buy between them? By the way, I would like to upgrade soon from my old Pentax K200 to Canon T6s or T6i with one of those lenses.
Hey, @Christopher, I was looking upgrade from my 18-55mm kit lens to a 18-135mm kit lens, do you think it's gonna be great or its just not needed. I have a SL2. Or could you please do a comparison of both these lens STM specially.
I have a Canon EOS 550D with EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. The one without STM. I want to upgrade to a sharper lens that's also more capable of shooting in low light. What would you recommend? What is the best
hi i have DSLR Canon 700D. i want to buy lens which i can zoom very far.. it this lens is good for me or would u suggest which one lens is better? thanks...
+Vanessa2775 I have the 700D with the 18-135 lens and i love it, i find the wide angle of 18mm is great for landscapes, and the big zoom of 135mm is great if you cant get close to what your trying to photograph, i find f/3.5 is a big enough aperture and ive gone all they way up to f/36 with it, ive gotten some amazing photos, landcape portrait and marco with it, but Christopher is correct, there are lots of lenses with zoom higher than 135mm, but generally you lose the wide angle, but i think Tamron do a 18-200mm lens however i dont know the price, for a lens not costing to much i HIGHLY recomend the 18-135mm :)
Nice informative vid! Just subscribed...This lens came with my 7d so I guess like you said this lens is not good for portrait shots. So what's best do you recommend for portraits then???
Hi Chris, I need your help, what would you choose mostly for video, the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 OS or this kit lens? I am getting the 70D and I am in doubt. Thanks in advance!
Hmm, that's tricky, the Sigma gives you f/2.8 but the Canon lens is build for video much better. If you need f/2.8 then go for the Sigma, but in every other case the Canon is better for video
Does anyone know if this lense falls back on itself when pointed up? I have been considering buying this kit lense with the 70D but ... I have a Canon 18-200 IS 3.5-5.6 kit lense that came with my 60D. I love it but when I zoom in and point up in the sky the lense falls back (zooms out) all by itself. It is very loose. It makes it very hard to astro photography (as you want to zoom in and focus on star then zoom out again).
Thx for another excellent review. Any chance you will do a review of the Sony EP Z 18 - 105mm G zoom lens and how it compares? Just a note for Sony e mount users about STM lenses, they won't function without a Commlite or Metabones type adapter if you cross platform it with a Sony e mount camera.
I'm considering the buying a 70d or 60d to replace a 100d. Have you considered upgrading your 60d? The 60d is about 475USD versus 700USD for the 70d. The thing I like most about the 70d is the autofocus system. What are your thoughts?
Hi Chris,thanks for your analyzing.I want to ask some question. It's seem like that there's not a big difference of photo sharpness between 15-85& 18-135 STM, and the photo quality as well. So which one will you recommend me to choose?
Hi Chris! I just saw your review regarding Canon 18-135 STM lens and must say that it very precise and comprehensive. I have a question to you, if you could help me here. I have Canon 450D and bought in 2009 now I was thing to purchase Canon 18-135 mm IS-STM lens. What do you think is it worth to purchase or not and will it work with 450D, will I get some benefit from STM, though I know 450 dont shoot movies and STM works for videos. I will appreciate your kind response.
I love how the video just ended so abruptly. No outro. You'd said your words and boom. Video ended. Love it.
This lens came with my 70D a few years ago and I automatically discounted it as a cheap kit lens, preferring more expensive lenses that I own. Thing is, I kept coming back to it despite myself for its versatility. If I only want to have one lens its often this. And that's what happened when I went on holiday recently including in my travels a friend's wedding in exotic Goa. I intended just to take some snapshots, there was a professional on hand for formal photos. I didn't even take a flash even though it was outdoor and at night. The lens surprised the heck out of me! IS is really really good. Dynamic range brilliant (Indian weddings are colourful!) and to my greatest surprise, because of the happy marriage of IS, wide open aperture and fairy lights I discovered that bokeh and out-of-focus is just creamy creamy creamy delicious. As distortion and CA are controlled in camera I have new respect for this lens and have returned its to its rightful place at the front of the cupboard.
Which lens are u referring to bro?
@@BharadwajMadiraju The Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM, literally being reviewed in this video.
thank you for this!
@@BharadwajMadiraju 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I just ordered one for my 90D 😉
This is the #1 lens I use! I absolutely love it. It takes exceptional pictures on my Canon 70D.
I've got to say Christopher,I've watched quite a few of your reviews now and they really are quite superb. I love the consistency in your testing methods which allows us to go back to previous reviews to compare. I like that you provide us with all the detail about the equipment and I like how you summarise it at the end all in a video that is not overblown with irrelevant dribble.
Well done
I couldn't agree more!
You have some of the best lens reviews on youtube man, seriously :)
haha it’s fun seeing my home town in your videos and recognising exactly where the photos and videos were taken!
Ive seen many many reviews of lenses but your reviews are the best. Straight to the point with good samples and smart data. Thank u very much.
Dam you sold me on this lens! Buying an 80D with this lens.
Again a quality review by Christopher as always. Well Done! :)
I recently took a tour boat to see Pictured Rocks National Seashore in Michigan. I brought 3 lenses on the trip for my Canon 90D. A 70-300 zoom, a 17-50 zoom, and this Canon 18-135. I only wanted to bring one lens on the boat tour. You guessed it, the 18-135 was perfect. The light was lousy that day but I added a bit on contrast and saturation in processing, so the colorful rocks turned out beautiful.
You do good reviews, factual and to the point unlike so many others.
This lens came with my Canon 800D. I tried filming with this lens, if you want a smooth zoom in and out this lens is not for you. Also this lens can only be used in bright places unless you use a tripod. Many times i find myself complaining about the lens in dark settings.
Christopher - you're awesome! I cannot tell you how impressed I am with the thoroughness and clarity of your reviews. They are absolutely outstanding. Watching your videos give me great confidence while searching for lenses and enhancing my photography skills.
Hello Chris, Thank you for your great work. I especially like your comparison of the lenses to simular lenses in the end of the video. That's a really nice addition.
Thanks Christopher a lot for all your reviews. I've been using 18-55 lens for one year and want to change to another simple lens, do you think a should buy this 18-135 lens as a replacement?
you should
John Stott! That's a delightful surprise tucked away in the video. God bless!
Thank you Christopher, I have a 5D Markii, I just ordered the 80D mostly for Videos, I was planning to use my Canon L lens, didn't think of zoo noise, so I just purchased this and will give it a test drive. Another nice part of Amazon, I can always return if it does not work out for me. You have a great voice and good information, thanks again.
A very great review Christopher as always!!! I've watched this video several times to compare to other camera lenses. We hope you get to test the Canon 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM NANO very soon. AND the Canon 70-300mm NANO lens. Those are the one's I'm very anxious to see. Thanks.
Loong awaited review, thanx!
CA can be fixed with software as mentioned, and the same for barrel distortion (Lightroom). This is a great walkaround lens for still pics & video use.
Hi Chris... I just purchased nearly the same lens, marked as 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. At 100€, it seemed like a bargain, particularly since I had in mind the good marks you gave to the STM version. Note that there's neither the STM nor the USM designation on mine, and all of the reviews I find here on TH-cam refer to one or the other of these two versions. How likely is it that the optics perform in the same way? For a lens with the same optical references, when a manufacturer makes changes to motorization or other electronics, do they typically retain the same optical characteristics?
Thanks for your reviews! They are great, and I have learned a lot.
Just to add to the weirdness, in case anybody is actually interested in this, I connected my 50D and launched the EOS Lens Registration Tool. It showed my new lens as needing to be added (which I had already seen in the camera itself), but it shows it not as an EF-S but as an EF lens. There is no equivalent EF-S lens in the entire list. Physically, the lens is labelled EF-S, and it has the the little blocking pin that prevents it from being mounted on an a full-frame EF mount. (I tried to put it on my 6D, and no-go.). So, given that the EOS Lens Registration Tool sees it only as an EF lens, I really am curious as to whether or not this lens is equivalent to its EF brother except for the labelling and blocking pin. After running the tool, the camera shows that it now has the correction data, but it describes the lens as EF-S. It sounds like some kind of commercial trick. 🙂
Hi Chris, thanks for brilliant review. I have a question - is there a two versions of this lens? I want to buy one but I see the picture and it's different from what you have here. I found the same with your lens too, but it cost around 30$ more. Which one should I buy? Thanks.
Get the STM version, or the new USM version (if you can afford it - it's expensive)
EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM vs EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM?
Why does everyone keep asking me that question? They're different lenses for different uses. The 18-135 is a superzoom lens, the 55-250 a telephoto zoom lens
Christopher Frost Photography thanks for the reply! which one is good on blurring the background? And better quality photo?
The 55-250 will give you slightly more out of focus backgrounds. As for 'better quality photo' - watch my reviews, and you'll see :-)
Just randomly Googled "18-135mm review" so was a shock to see Western Avenue at 0:53 and then more of Cardiff in general! Thanks for the review. (Penarth)
Please do a re-review of this lens with the Canon R7!
It’s super sharp on my R6 mark II which crops adapted Canon EF-S lenses. I imagine it will perform the same on the R7 which has a higher pixel density. It’s just ok on my 90D but better than the older MKI EF 24-105mm (L) f/4. I’ve heard the better pairing on the 90D is the Mark II EF 24-70mm f/2.8.
that was some very detailed and clearly explained review.. ! great work
Please Review the NEW 18-135mm USM!!!!
yeah,
I also want to see the difference between the two
It’s way better.
@@alloneword154 why?
fadanyiellaklova. It’s more sharp and quieter. Better color.
@@alloneword154 Its louder, not quieter.
I fecking love your accent!
Bought it used as a Allrounder, didnt get a good oppertunity to test it fully from the picture Quality but from the feel of it, it feels solid. Not Cheap or high premium, just solid with good weight.
Hi, Chris, whenever I wanted to buy a lens, I looked at your reviews, you do an excellent job. I also followed your comments with a lot of interest so as not to ask questions that have already been asked, so I would like to ask you something, because you kind of contradicted yourself. In terms of quality, which is sharper, 18-55mm STM or 18-135mm STM?
Thank you for this video. It was very helpful for me and I think for other people too. Great job!
I have the older non STM version. Is it worth upgrading just for image quality? I am not interested in video just for taking pictures.
favorite lens for me. However, I find that I must test longer zoom range lenses at more FL because decentering can crop up within a fairly narrow range. Also, both sides of the image need to be examined because that is how decentering or tilted optics will become noticeable. A more difficult problem to cope with soft corners.
Thanks for making me cry from happiness.
! Cool :-)
I know I’m 8 years late but would you recommend this for Sports Photography ?
Hi Chris I am looking for a better zoom lens for my M50 and trying to decide on the 18-135 or 15-85 any pointers please or other options 😀
Perfect - thanks again Christopher - love your vids.
Hey Chris, great review. I am getting the Canon 700d and am in between the Sigma AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC HSM OS Lens for Canon and the 18-135 that you have reviewed. Your verdict on A: The 700D that comes with the 18-135 or B: Get the 700D body only plus the Sigma 18-200mm lens. Thanks!
I didn't really like the Sigma lens, I'd much prefer the Canon. Check my review of the Sigma lens for more infoz
Love it! Another great video
Subsribed I like the way you explain nice clear and understandable thanks !
I'm going to buy the canon 70d with a kit lens. Do you think I should pay the extra money for this 18-135 or stick with the 18-55mm? I'm not sure if the 18-55mm will have decreased video quality?
The 321 Show If they're the STM versions then they're both fine for video, but I'd say the 18-135 is worth the extra money
Great Review! Would love to also see the 18-55 STM and 55-250 STM
Thanks! I've done the 18-55 already.
I love this lens It rarely leaves my camera.
Hello Chris, thanks a ton for this extremely useful video. It's quite hard to find standardised videos.
If you wouldn't mind my asking, how would you rate this lens against the 24-105 Mark I ? It seems that the 18-135 ATM is sharper than the 24-105 M I, but I'm finding that hard to digest.
Super late late late reply. I have both, the 24-105 L is just a bit sharper, but you barely notice it (the toughness and low light capabilities are the big pluses of this lens, besides that you can use it with FF of course). I own several other lenses and I never could let the 18-135 stm lens go. Even when I seldom use it now and shifted to RF full frame cameras. My favorite lens of all time.
very good reviews, very informative
Hey Christopher, I'm clueless with cameras, just bought a used rebel xti for 100 bucks online. How does this camera stand today? Did i overpay for it considering it came out in 2006? Should I look into buying new lens for it? or is it too old? Thanks! looking forward to hearing back from you.
Sounds like a good deal for an old camera. Take a look at my kit lens upgrade video if you're thinking of a new lens :-)
how do you go up to to the high aperture when the lens is only 3.5-5.6? great video thanks
hello Christopher! I am in a bit of a dilemma. I am looking for a lens such as this for almost silent autofocus for video and I have a canon rebel t4i. Will this lens fit my camera and work well? Thanks so much.
+dominicanbeauty82 All Canon mount lenses made since 1987 will work on your Canon APS-C digital SLR camera (except EF-M lenses)
Thank you for the videos. I had a 60D with 18-200 mm IS kit lens. It was a lemon and after 3 repairs went back. Now I am looking to replace it with the credit note under extended warranty. My question: which is a better lens? The 18-200 IS or the 18-135 STM IS? I loved the pictures that I got with the 18-200 - it really served all my needs from macro to zoom, in particular was great for close proximity action shots of the niece and nephew and it seemed to focus very fast. Unfortunately they no longer include it as part of the kit, and it is $700 Canadian on its own. I wish I had not brought the camera back and lived with its glitches! Thanks for any advice...
...I am planning on buying a 70D, since my experience in testing the t5i Rebel with the 18-135 STM yielded abysmal photos...may have been a bad camera - was an open box, but got spoiled by my 60D
jennifer brouse They're quite similar lenses, I slightly prefer the 18-135 though, it's a little smaller and sharper
Christopher Frost Photography thanks for your feedback! It's good to know the new kit lens holds its own against the very adequate but large and heavy 18-200 which suffered from severe lens creep issues! Thanks again for the great work!
Good review. Not a ringing endorsement of this lens.
Hi Chris,
I absolutely prefer your review. How are the chances of review of the new 18 - 135 IS USM and a comparism to the STM version?
I'll keep an eye out for it but they're eye-wateringly expensive right now, and from what I hear, the optics are the same as the 18-135 STM
Thank you for this rewiev! You help me to make my choice). Today i bought same 18-135 STM lens.
Hi Chris, thank you so much for doing this review. I've got a question for you..since I'm planning to upgrade from my kit lens to a good walk around zoom, would you recommend this over Canon's 15-85mm?
Both seem to have variable apertures with the new STM lens having a bit more reach. For me, sharpness and image quality is a priority and can't seem to make up my mind. Please help..
I'm planning to go to tokyo this summer. Considering that I will be taking portraits and zoomed pictures, will it be better to get the ef-s 18-135mm or this 28-135mm one? I'm new to photography and I don't know much.
What lens do you think would be best for quality and focus? I have a Canon t5.
is this lens good for filming things such as youtube videos?
Im filming with this lens :) I like it, it's super quiet.
Of course specially for handheld videos
Yes. It’s AF is almost silent.
Hello Chris, I currently own a 550D and 70D, having just sold on my older 450D with 18-55mm kit lens v1 I am looking for something to replace he older kit lens
with something better. Either the Canon 18-135mm STM or the slightly older 15-85mm USM ( now £ 150 ). Should I go for the Canon 15-85mm or do the bad distortions
from his lens favour the Canon 18-135mm instead.
I have the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens and every one I watch say how great the lens is well I think that they need there heads looking at I took peoples advice in getting the lens with the camera and after about four months I regret getting the lens as over short distances it is real good but for more than 20 feet you are better with the sigma 18-200MM it is much better quality and a way greater distance I feel that the lens does not have what I am looking for it will work within what I get from a 50 mm Lens and not a true canon design it works on some of the creative options so I will use it as a portrait lens only.
I think that people have done a quick inspection and told people what they would like to hear
Yours truly Jack Boyd
+jack boyd I think the more likely problem is that you don't know how to use your camera (seriouly - no offense intended)
hi Chris, ive got a 55-250mm lens but am thinking of replacing it with this 18-135mm as i dont necessarily need a super zoom but do want a wider lens with a bit of zoom capability. do you think its a good choice ? please advise. thanks for the videos they are very helpful end enjoyable.
Definitely need re-review!
Sir please guide which lens I should buy. Either canon 18-135mm or canon 18-200. And which of these two lens is better in picture quality.
Thanx
Hi, great reviews. Congrats!
Thank you for this review! You are the best when it comes to lens review. Will 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM go well with my EOS M6 ii??? will it perform better than my kit lens 15-45mm?? for photography not video.
Hello Chris. I have some doubts about two lens I have ponder in my mind several times. One is the Canon EF-S 18-135 VS Canon EF 24-105. I know that some times expensive lens doesn't mean best quality. From your review of the Canon EF 24-105mm I gather it's not really good quality lens image just because it's an L lens. Thanks for your help!
+Thiago De Almeida Get the 18-135 STM, unless you have a full-frame camera
Hello there! I got this lens after watching this great review. I'm using this for video but I seem to be having a couple of issues with this lens. 1. The focus ring takes forever to focus, it's very slow to focus & 2. It gets out of focus really easily by itself, I'll tap something on the touch screen of the camera and it goes out of focus.. I'm really frustrated with this and in thought of selling it now... Seems great for photography, or maybe as a video auto focus lens on a canon, but I'm not sure if its good for manual video work. Did you have anything similar happen with your focus?
+Iacovos Argyrides Try another lens and see if you have the same problems first - it might just be you're needing a little more practice.
I don't have the same problem with my other lenses just with this one. I'm suspecting it's the STM
I've just purchased one... I think you are too much gentle. In my opinion it is a bad lens. The corners are indecent. It's not good for landscapes... perhaps it's good for a week end with the family, or other easy situations.
The video is 10 years old mate, I’m sure this was a great lens when it was released in 2012 😂
Thank you dear for all your reviews, I think you are the best reviewer on youtube. I have the old version of this lens, is the old version same sharpness and contrast as STM?
+Qudor Eng I haven't tested the old version - but this newer one is meant to be noticeably sharper
+Christopher Frost Photography thank you Chris for replay
Excellent video... good job!
Christopher Frost Photography- First of all I really enjoy your videos... You are awesome! If you strictly look at Image Quality, is the 18-135 STM way better than the 18-55 STM? Money is an issue but I'm willing to spend a bit more on 18-135 if it is a significant difference... Again, love your videos!
Thanks! It's not really a very significant difference, but the 18-135 is a little sharper.
Christopher Frost Photography Wow! Quick Response! You are even more awesome now! :) I should probably say that I currently own your nifty Canon 60D as well along with two lens: the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM & the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II... I don't really use the telephoto and I find myself not having enough room to back up with the prime lens... I definitely need a lens with a smaller focal length but finding one on a budget is difficult... Any suggestions?
Your video is soo clear and I purchased the canon T5i camera with this lense and my videos aren't as clear. Can you please offer some suggestions?
Nia Nicole Check your focus
Christopher Frost Photography
ok thanks. I use the autofocus button in EOS utility. Should I be checking the focus someplace else?
I am planning to buy a canon 80D, would you recommend the 18-135mm STM with it ? I am new in photography, I would like something that is good all around, I also plan on having a 50mm 1/8 lens for my videos... is it a good idea ? :-)
Mikail Music : I just bought the 80d. Which lenses did you buy?
Chris, I would love your advise. Would you upgrade from this to a Sigma 17-50mm f.2.8? Thank you,
Any chance we'll be getting a review on the new Nano USM version?
If I can hire one, yes. But really, apparently, the optics are the same
Christopher Frost Photography Awesome! I see.
what's the difference then? thank you.
GeniusPanda It has a Canon's new AF motor called the "Nano USM drive" in it. I wanted to see how that worked, and also if the optics are really the same as compared to the STM version.
Why is this lens so much sharper in picture mode than in video mode? I have it too and I can't seem to get sharp video from it. My videos are definitely noticeably soft even when the focus is dead on. I saw it here too. Do you happen to know why that's the case?
RYSE You're doing something wrong, if your lens is sharp for still images but soft for video work. This lens is more than sharp enough for any kind of 1080p video work. Try adjusting the sharpness settings on your camera
That can't be it. I have a pretty good understanding of my camera and I shoot with cinestyle so naturally the sharpness is lower although it's still pretty sharp in picture mode. Could you perhaps take a look at one of my videos (This isn't a shameless plug :p) and tell me if you think it should be sharper or not? Maybe it's a compression thing.
+RYSE You could PM a link. First though, try another lens and see if you're getting the same results
Never mind. I have a 50mm 1.8. Same results.
+RYSE Canon DSLRs have intentionally blurred videos. You have to use Magic Lantern firmware or Canon Cinema series camera to get real FullHD quality.
Hi Cristopher, this is an awesome review. I just wonder what lens would be better for landscspe in terms of sharpness: this or the 18-55mm IS STM?
Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
Hmm, not sure - have a look at my video review of the 18-55 - my guess is it would be a tiny bit sharper but they'll both perform in a similar way
Hi Christopher, I currently own a canon eos rebel t4i with a 18-55m lens and I would like to buy a lens to do landscape pictures since im going to Peru next month and would like to take pictures of the wildlife, nature and the landscape. Which will be the best lens in the Price range of 250-350, the Canon EF-S 18-135mm or another one?
which lens should i buy for my canon 70d-canon 18-135mm or 18 to 200mm . I am a travelling photographer . Please suggest me a lens . thanks for this video it was quite help full.
watch his video on superzooms compared (including both those lenses)- i think the 18-135 was the sharpest in his opinion
M Dat I have both but the 18-135 is a better lens plus a better auto focus system.
Hi can you use this lens to canon M200, I have a camera M200 but I don’t know what lens is better to get, can you please recommend me some some the best lens for my camera, thank you God bless.
which one will be better for canon eos 60D ?? Canon EF-S 18-135mm IS STM or Canon EF-S 18-135mm IS ???
Hey Chris;
İ have a question for you?
So i just bought my Canon 200d with the kit lens 18-55 III and i am looking for another lenses.
İ made 2 option which one should i choose?I want lens for any cases.
1- Sigma 17-50 2.8
2- Canon 18-135 stm and Canon 50 mm 1.8 stm
or do you have any other option for budget lenses.I trust your opinions please help me! :)
Depends what you want. If you're happy with the 18-55 zoom range then get the Sigma lens, to increase the quality of your pictures. If you want to get portrait pictures, get the 50mm f/1.8. If you want more telephoto reach, get the 18-135mm
New to photography, and I recently purchased this lens used. The end piece of the lens seems to be a bit wobbly, is this normal? It seems to take pictures well, I just wasn't sure if any component on the lens should seem loose.
Thank you for this best review
amazing review! thank you so much
another great review. thanks!
Enjoyed this video but I'm curious how Canon's new 18-135mm USM is compared to the STM version new review please?
I will sometime, but I've heard it's optically almost the same
hey Chris!.. I'm looking forward for your review on Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens, a kit lens for full frame 6D camera and its comparison with other kit lens EF 24-105 L lens. Thanks.
Thanks for the review
if you would need to make a choice.
I have canon m5
If looking at lens quality, would you go for EFS 18-135mm or EFM 18-150mm?
would really appreciate if you help out with your opinion.
Thanks ahead :)
On image quality alone, I think the 18-135 is very slightly better
how does the 18-135 STM compare to the 18-55 STM in terms of image quality?
It's a little less sharp (but it has a far longer zoom range)
Hello Chris,
Thanks for your excellent review both of 18-135mm STM and USM!
Which one would you suggest me to buy between them?
By the way, I would like to upgrade soon from my old Pentax K200 to Canon T6s or T6i with one of those lenses.
Take a look at my review of the USM lens. In my opinion, might as well go for the STM version
Hey, @Christopher, I was looking upgrade from my 18-55mm kit lens to a 18-135mm kit lens, do you think it's gonna be great or its just not needed. I have a SL2. Or could you please do a comparison of both these lens STM specially.
That'll be a nice upgrade. Check out my reviews to see about image quality
I have a Canon EOS 550D with EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. The one without STM.
I want to upgrade to a sharper lens that's also more capable of shooting in low light. What would you recommend? What is the best
The only really good one that would work also on full frame is the Tamron 24-70 VC USD
Christopher Frost Photography Thanks! I'll go check that one out!
hi i have DSLR Canon 700D. i want to buy lens which i can zoom very far.. it this lens is good for me or would u suggest which one lens is better? thanks...
+Vanessa2775 There are lots of lenses that zoom further than 135mm. The Canon 55-250mm STM is excellent - although, it won't give you a wide angle
+Christopher Frost Photography thanks for replying :-) your videos really help me :-)
+Vanessa2775 I have the 700D with the 18-135 lens and i love it, i find the wide angle of 18mm is great for landscapes, and the big zoom of 135mm is great if you cant get close to what your trying to photograph, i find f/3.5 is a big enough aperture and ive gone all they way up to f/36 with it, ive gotten some amazing photos, landcape portrait and marco with it, but Christopher is correct, there are lots of lenses with zoom higher than 135mm, but generally you lose the wide angle, but i think Tamron do a 18-200mm lens however i dont know the price, for a lens not costing to much i HIGHLY recomend the 18-135mm :)
+Jack Ashby wow thankyou for telling me about this. This information really help me :-) im so buying this...
+Vanessa2775 your most welcome :)
Nice informative vid! Just subscribed...This lens came with my 7d so I guess like you said this lens is not good for portrait shots. So what's best do you recommend for portraits then???
The Canon 85mm f/1.8 is really good :-)
Christopher Frost Photography What about the 17-55? is it good for portrait shots? BHP photo told me that it takes detailed and sharp shots.
Hi Chris, I need your help, what would you choose mostly for video, the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 OS or this kit lens? I am getting the 70D and I am in doubt.
Thanks in advance!
Hmm, that's tricky, the Sigma gives you f/2.8 but the Canon lens is build for video much better. If you need f/2.8 then go for the Sigma, but in every other case the Canon is better for video
Hi, is the 18-135mm lens better to have than 2 lenses, 24mm and 50mm?
Great video Chris, love it a lot.
Please your advise for me choosing Tamron 18-200mm; 18-270mm; or Canon 18-135mm; 55-250mm?
Please help me to choose.
The Canon STM lenses are quite superior
Does anyone know if this lense falls back on itself when pointed up? I have been considering buying this kit lense with the 70D but ...
I have a Canon 18-200 IS 3.5-5.6 kit lense that came with my 60D. I love it but when I zoom in and point up in the sky the lense falls back (zooms out) all by itself. It is very loose. It makes it very hard to astro photography (as you want to zoom in and focus on star then zoom out again).
Thx for another excellent review. Any chance you will do a review of the Sony EP Z 18 - 105mm G zoom lens and how it compares? Just a note for Sony e mount users about STM lenses, they won't function without a Commlite or Metabones type adapter if you cross platform it with a Sony e mount camera.
+Vikingdescendent Don't cover Sony lenses, I'm afraid! My next target is the Fuji X system.
I'm considering the buying a 70d or 60d to replace a 100d. Have you considered upgrading your 60d? The 60d is about 475USD versus 700USD for the 70d. The thing I like most about the 70d is the autofocus system. What are your thoughts?
Charlie Chao I did indeed upgrade to the 70D. It's considerably nicer than the 60D in my opinion!
Hi Chris,thanks for your analyzing.I want to ask some question. It's seem like that there's not a big difference of photo sharpness between 15-85& 18-135 STM, and the photo quality as well. So which one will you recommend me to choose?
If you watch until the end of the video, you'll see! :-)
Hi Chris! I just saw your review regarding Canon 18-135 STM lens and must say that it very precise and comprehensive. I have a question to you, if you could help me here. I have Canon 450D and bought in 2009 now I was thing to purchase Canon 18-135 mm IS-STM lens. What do you think is it worth to purchase or not and will it work with 450D, will I get some benefit from STM, though I know 450 dont shoot movies and STM works for videos. I will appreciate your kind response.
It'll work great. I can't tell you how much better it is than the original 18-135 lens, though, although the build quality is better.
I must say thanks for your quick response. Thanks again.
Chris one more question, will STM work with (2009) 450 or not while shooting pics? Sorry to bother you. Regards.
arnolds77
STM works with any camera. It just gives an extra help to people shooting video
great video again! Thank you