this one isn't THAT bad, just a poorly copied homework (subscribe) JOIN MY DISCORD: / discord from Star Wars: The Acolyte #StarWars #PrequelMemes Revenge of the Sith meme The Acolyte meme
He wasnt more evil than valkorion at least sidious wanted to keep people alive so he could be perceived as a great guy through lies clouds of doubt Valkorion just wanted eat and possess every living thing and watch the universe die to see it begin again sheesh id take sidious any day
there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@NikolasAmodeoZzzzzzzZzzzzzzzZzzzzzzZzzzzzzz... so many Drones that got spewed into existence by commenting in this echo-___ber of a video of baselessly bashing & viewing oneself to a higher-pedestal and acting like everything before Disney SW was the holy-grail of the Perfect Star Wars media.
@@outrider425 no, he wouldn’t. It’s a line he uses to trick Anakin into later justifying everything he does. ‘I’m not betraying the jedi, the jedi betrayed me.’ ‘I’m not lying to Padme, it’s Obi-wan who’s trying to turn her against me.’ “From my point of view the jedi are evil.” Later in RotJ Obi-wan says: “You’ll find many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.” He’s right. We cling to our biases because of our personal perspective. We need to let go of that self-absorption and look at the larger picture to see the truth.
there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@anthonyontvDid you like your own comment? Cause I see absolutely no reason why would anyone beside yourself like that. "The ability to speak does not make you intelligent" indeed
But that's true. Are Lannister or Harkonnens are evil? Are Emhyr var Emreis or Paul Atreides are evel? No. But sw-fanatics too childish to understand that
Variations of the lines “There is no good or evil” and “right and wrong are just different points of views” have be uttered by numerous Sith throughout Star Wars Legends when trying to indoctrinate a pupil to their cause.
@@Lawrence_Talbotyup, because then it allows them to justify all sorts of heinous crimes. Have some jedi done wrong? Yes, but for every sin of the Jedi have, the sith have 100 more.
This is essentially what Kreia was used as to explore in KOTOR II. Though they did it with much more depth and class...and a fundamental understanding of how to script dialogue. The Acolyte writers are painfully bad at exposition. Even with the amount that was cut out of KOTOR II, there was so much explored about the nature of the Force. If done properly, a "Grey Jedi" philosophical exploration could make for a really good Star Wars show. But not with the current set of creatives, minus anyone associated with Andor.
"From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!" Anakin, known for his mental maturity and sound judgement of morality, successfully demonstrating how it's all based on perspective. I think that the replies here are a metaphor for something, but I'm not sure what
Honestly, at that point, it's Vader. Anakin is tragic. Vader is just an asshole. Luke doesn't achieve what he does because he turns Vader, what he achieves is bringing out the shred of Anakin that is somehow still left.
The Jedi were broken, yes, clouded by the dark side, yes, but certainly not evil. I love the moment at the end of clonenwars s5 where Yoda tells Windu and Kenobi that he's not sure rather war was ever the right thing, but that there is still a future hope for good to return.
there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
that's totally what he was arguing for & against, you totally refuted that actor... also, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@godzillazfriction Oh wow. You literally just said that real medical conditions don't exist and when someone called you out, instead of trying to actually present your argument, you just told them to sewerslide. You must be fun to hang out with. Fun fact, atheism is pretty much the only "religion" that supports nihilism, and even then, not every atheist believes it. Couple that with the fact that barely 7% of the global population is Athistic, and you have yourself a big spoonful of irony, because according to moral relativism, it is the majority and the culture that defines what is right or wrong yet you're in the vast minority. "But that doesn't apply to philosophy, only morality," I hear you say, and to that, I ask, "How do you know?" Just because you make the claim that morality is relative, doesn't make it true. You have to prove it, but that is something impossible to prove. Morality is inextricably tied to philosophy. What you are doing is assuming your philosophy is true and telling everyone else they're stupid and should k*ll themselves if they disagree, which is hilarious.
"There is no good or evil" Proceeds to literally mention a balance between good and evil not three minutes later "The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.'
Isaiah 5:20: 20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
@lolstalgic9602 There was a Phineas And Ferb Star Wars crossover at one point. Several of the Phineas And Ferb characters were cast as stormtroopers who believed the Empire was in the right, but they couldn’t justify that.
Ah yes, Star Wars is a very morally grey universe. To one side we have the guardians of peace and a group of rebels fighting to free the world of a tyrannical government, and the other side blows up planets and slaughters children.
In terms of the Star Wars films, yes. I'd agree - the "good" and "evil" is apparent. However, the EU is much more grey - especially OR era. There was an argument to be made that sith empire were actually the ones that fostered independence, free thought, and acting on your own volition. While the Republic were the ones that were conniving, working in the shadows, twisting the thoughts of the people through propaganda, limiting free thought, used "the greater good" as a way to secure positions of power for those people at the top and keep those at the bottom where they were. Jedi who think outside the box and question things are shunned, while Sith that think outside the box are encouraged to do so. So again, in the "Skywalker Era" you're right, but this isn't necessarily the case throughout the rest Star Wars. It's easy to see that polarization is an easy way to keep an audience from getting confused - it makes the product more marketable with clearly defined edges. "Black and red is the color of evil" while "Whites and Blues are the colors of good". Sidenote: Just in case someone rebuts regarding EU/Legends not being canon --- just because Disney no longer acknowledges the EU/Legends as canon, doesn't mean anything as far as I'm concerned considering Lucas and his people worked with and advised EU authors/artists all the time to uphold his vision of his story.
@@Trashman.69420"there was an argument," therefore isn't necessarily true. Do the sith foster free thought? Of course! So long as it doesn't go against them. Do they foster independence? Of course! So long as you aren't a slave, or aren't going against them. The sith are also filled with brutal political infighting, and a great number of their defeats have been self-inflicted. Does the republic have issues? Of course, as any government structure does. Have the jedi done wrong? Of course because it's made up of people. But in the comparison of sith vs jedi, nah, the sith are objectively worse, and far more evil than the jedi. The worst of the sith ate planets, the worst of the jedi sought to genocide the sith for doing stuff like eating planets. They are not the same. And I am a sith fan boy. Dark side all the way baby, we got cookies.
Don't compare Eldritch Abominations to that atrocity to the concept of writing. Even they would disgusted by it's mere presence and would mercy kill us all in order to stop us from embarrassing our species any further.
I love how both Star Wars and LotR were stories about a battle of good and evil and both were forcibly changed into another "there is no good and evil" because that's the only story Hollywood can create in 2024.
I don't like the recent star wars content but I agree with him. Like just imagine the two 18 year old kids on opposite sides of the galaxy, wanting to serve their government. One kid wants to serve the Empire, because that's what they believe is right. The other, wants to serve the Rebels, because that's what they believe is right.
@@aidenheck2944 One side is still objectively wrong since Star Wars is a work of fiction though. The Republic is supposed to be bad/evil without question. Someone wanting to serve the republic would also be evil even if they wanted to believe otherwise.
@@ryanspence5831 True, but that's no different than addressing a man by his title. "Baron" or "Duke." It isn't, however, a proper form of third person addressal.
Walton Goggins knew nothing about Fallout but didn't pretend to know things about Fallout and really understood his character and what roll he played and his perspectives as well as just respected the heck out of the source material. Amazing the difference that makes.
Well, to be fair, Walter Goggins is an actual actor who can act. Some of these people appear to have a golden ticket they got in a box of cereal or something.
He's absolutely right. When Anakin blew up the Death Star, I thought to myself: "he killed so many innocent people who were on the Death Star like Max Rebo, Darth Jar Jar, General Grievous and Optimus Prime" and that made me realize, that even though Gandalf taught him, Anakin might not be the good guy at all.
another Drone who doesn't understand anything... also, take this copied & pasted comment inside you; of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force... one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
Yes, I can truly see myself in Palpatine for I too seek out emotionally vulnerable fatherless young men and convince them into believing that the only way they can overcome their trauma is by detaching themselves from their loved ones and removing any semblance of identity or emotion until they become a tragic shadow of their former self. What a relatable and understandable character.
Lucas has a point that he is trying to convey, and you can follow his train of thought, even predict where he's going with it. The Acolyte guy is just saying words: I can't tell where he's going with it, because he doesn't know where he's going with it. There's no train of logic through it, it's just empty word salad.
I agree, this seems to be routine. Like , blowing smoke up each others butt or spewing gaseous nonsensical rhetoric about themselves . Like he had to refer to himself as being so casual about how he ..idk hangs wit it 😑 like you said empty word salad, and the rest giggle…it’s so over bloated like every jay jay seewah interview 😅
more & more baseless illogical fallacies being thrown in this echo-cham__er of a video against the 'nEw' star wars and it's actor seemingly not understanding that 'gUd & EveL' does exist...
also, of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force... one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force... one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@godzillazfriction DUDE SHUT UP NOBODY CARES. YOU READ ALL THE REPLIES OF THE USERS, YOU SOUND LIKE THOSE WOKE STAR WARS ACTORS Seriously stop everyone wants to make their own point, and just un case sorry for my bad english
@@godzillazfrictionNi- (your comment has been removed by TH-cam for violating the harrasment and cyberbullying policy, you will be able to post comments in 48 hours)
"There is no good or evil, it's truly about that balance of power." "There is no good and evil. There is only power. And those too weak to seek it." This show was made by Voldemort clearly.
of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force... one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
“There’s no good and evil in Star Wars” - a guy, referring to a simple story in which good and evil are clearly delineated as light and dark…. this isn’t game of thrones, pal . he’s spouting ideas that don’t apply cuz he thinks they make him look smart
that's a pretty ironic statement especially with the rationalization & radicalising based on a baseless assumption & beliefs of knowing Star Wars to a full extent on the matter and equating the new actor to being a or like a 'Sith' - you totally know Star Wars.
@NoshLambeaux He's been going around saying big words, clearly unaware of their meaning and just making a fool of himself. Best to ignore it. Reminds me of Kamala Harris; talks a lot, says nothing.
@@godzillazfriction? The basic difference between Jedi and Sith is that Jedi overcome their ego while the Sith embrace it. A clear distinction between good and evil that easily translates to the real world. These people are obviously narcissists, which makes them similar to the Sith mindset, which is especially ironic since they consider themselves to be the good guys, both in Star Wars and the real world.
Evil people tend to try and convince themselves there isn't good or evil. Obviously it's because they have to justify the atrocities they commit for power.
Wait, but I watched raiders of the Lost Ark and don't remember Voldemort saying anything like that. Not even when magnum PI collected all the philosophers stones and rescued all those kids from the coal mine
You know what I’ve always saw myself in Vader. He’s so kind loving. He’s so nice he saved his son from hurting himself with that lightsaber by cutting off his hand! Now that’s a loving father
the empire in star wars is analagous to the United States of America. the rebels are the vietnamese. 1977 the politics in star wars is how a democracy can fall to become an evil empire through deception the first order in disney's star wars and the empire in disney's canon are analagous to nazis though
What was the strategy again for hiring people who know nothing of Star wars to be in Star wars? It's like hiring inexperienced cooks for a restaurant because the food will be "different." No, it's gonna taste so horrible to the point where I won't be back. This whole, "bringing people who don't know about Star wars to give it a different approach" is by far the dumbest thing they could do with it Edit: the directing crew also don't know anything given the writing void of logic, disregarding all lore of Star Wars Edit 2: someone said like a vegan cooking for a BBQ 🤣🤣
The main issue isn’t really about actors who don’t know anything about Star Wars, this issue is that they’re PRETENDING to know about Star Wars when they just don’t.
Natalie Portman didn’t know much about Star Wars when she was cast, which I think is the key here. Who was in control of the franchise when she was hired?
@@mattdragon1253 yes but so did this actor here. I still think the understanding of what the franchise represents comes down to having people in charge of it that can tell you what it’s truly supposed to mean. He was told everything from Kathleen and Leslie.
This man really just said there's no such thing as good or evil, like it's not the entire basis for the SW story. I have a cone-shaped hat for him to wear, and an L for him to hold.
Bro said there no such thing as good and evil like slavery isn't evil and his ancestors suffering was justified because the "strong" plantation owners were "powerful".
"There is no good or evil" *Meanwhile Young kids get killed by Anakin Skywalker, planets get blown up out of thin air with most of the civilization just enjoying life. Palpatine makes Vader forget the milk while not telling Vader he has a son, and a whole lot more stuff happens and heroes not too heroic*
I can *kind of* see what he meant to be fair. The Republic was straight up evil at times in the Clone Wars era, what with all of their warcrimes, needless brutality, ruthlessness, and hypocrisy like the betrayal of their own code. But yeah for all intents and purposes they’re still the good guys and the Acolyte cast know literally nothing about the franchise.
meanwhile the „good guys“:indoctrinate children from birth and then use them as child soldiers in a war they shouldn’t have ever fought in the first place
You know, I understand their point of view. it just feels as though Lukas' sentiment got lost along the way and "the good guys trying/struggling to be good" became "what is good?" and "Good is a point of view, Anakin. The Sith and the Jedi are similar in almost every way, including their quest for greater power." which turned into "Don't lecture me, Obi-Wan! I see through the lies of the Jedi. I do not fear the dark side as you do. I have brought peace, freedom, justice, and security to my new Empire." ... Ohh.
That guy says “there’s no good or evil” only to contradict himself at the end by saying that “it’s about the balance of good and evil” How can there be a balance between things that do not exist?! These people are so dumb that they themselves don’t know what they’re talking about or doing, which is sad. The Dark Side has taken them so deep that this is the result.
The bi-racial milk toast enlightened actor is so right. I remember watching Kylo Ren run a lightsaber through his repentant father in cold blood to try and eradicate the last remnant of humanity inside of him and I thought "Hmm, was that good or evil." I'm sure the writers of that scene desperately wanted the audience to wrestle with the gut-wrenching ambivalence of that scene.
Glorifying witchcraft, sympathizing over the Sith, saying there is no good or evil in an attempt to convince people that the Dark Side isn’t bad…this show really reflects its creators and their weird interests
Their Marxist obsession with power dynamics is all they can think about anymore, until the only morality they have left is that you're evil because you had power before, and they're good because they took it from you. It's a worldview designed to incite revolutions, and it's been doing it for over a century. It also serves as an ironic masterclass in Sith philosophy, after all: "Peace is a lie. There is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken. The Force shall free me." -The Sith Code
It's a bad Star Wars show. Imagine watching this interview and unironically thinking that they're "glorifying witchcraft". Witchcraft isn't real little bro. God you people are not smart.
I really think ur kind of people the reason why Star Wars franchises not trying to explore the legends lore more and kept pandering to LGBTQ "woke" shit they're going now. There's so much philosophy to be explored through characters on why they chose dark side of the force over "light side"in the SW universe yet here we are getting more dumb shit
@@nothingman759No. Anakin and Darth Vader are essentially two different characters. Anakin is a flawed yet noble person. Vader is vile and murderous with a tiny bit of good left in him, but ultimately irredeemable. Edit: So a lot of people have (rightly) pointed out that Vader was redeemed. Irredeemable was not the right word. I should have just left it at “Vader did bad stuff”.
@@nothingman759anakin skywalker is the hero of the republic, darth Vader is the most feared man in the galaxy. Being the same person doesn’t mean your still the same you from 20 years ago. Split personality or not Star Wars constantly tells you this
People really don't understand lightsabres. You build your own sabre when you go from Padawan to Jedi. When you go from Jedi to master you turn it off. it happened in the og trilogy for Obi Wan in new hope and Luke at the end of Return. Also both Yoda and Sidious, who where both force masters, didn't use sabres at all. As for why everyone used sabres in the prequels, the Jedi order had "fallen", their use of the Force diminished. They where no longer a monastic order but a military one in all but name. But in the sequels, GOLD is the bestest evar!! and if one isn't good enough, just use two!
subscribe or I'm telling the Jedi High Council (they will have to inform the Senate)
I AM THE SENATE.
Before Anakin blows up the death star again
Not yet@@Metalora
ok, so who is this guy (the 1st guy) and what dose he have to do with star wars?
@discovolante6624 just a DEI hire.
“ good is a point of view Anakin”
- The most evil person in the galaxy
He wasnt more evil than valkorion at least sidious wanted to keep people alive so he could be perceived as a great guy through lies clouds of doubt
Valkorion just wanted eat and possess every living thing and watch the universe die to see it begin again sheesh id take sidious any day
Excellent point. You know it's sketchy when you purport the ideology of the villian.
there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@NikolasAmodeoZzzzzzzZzzzzzzzZzzzzzzZzzzzzzz...
so many Drones that got spewed into existence by commenting in this echo-___ber of a video of baselessly bashing & viewing oneself to a higher-pedestal and acting like everything before Disney SW was the holy-grail of the Perfect Star Wars media.
@@NikolasAmodeoalso, there's no such thing as a 'Hero' nor 'Villain' but i guess you might've known that already (sarcasm).
This is literally what Sidious would say. “Good is a point of view, Anakin.”
"Death is a concept invented by the Jedi."
@@snowblind9551 "and I don't even know how to spell it *giggles*"
@@f.b.i.agent69uwu89 D-E-A-T!!!!
Sidious would be completely right tho
@@outrider425 no, he wouldn’t. It’s a line he uses to trick Anakin into later justifying everything he does.
‘I’m not betraying the jedi, the jedi betrayed me.’
‘I’m not lying to Padme, it’s Obi-wan who’s trying to turn her against me.’
“From my point of view the jedi are evil.”
Later in RotJ Obi-wan says:
“You’ll find many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.”
He’s right. We cling to our biases because of our personal perspective. We need to let go of that self-absorption and look at the larger picture to see the truth.
"From my point of view the Jedi are evil"
"Well then you are lost!"
Anakin Skywalker balance the light side and the dark side of the force but it doesn't mean he stopped good and evil🤷
That's what sith lord would like us to think.
They unironically quote Voldemort.
LMAO
@@Pelicanzzzand Lucifer. Whether they fully know it or not.
The devil's greatest success is convincing man that evil is good. The greatest crimes are those committed in the name of "good".
They thought the Sith were just in movies.
Yeah. I remember watching anakin slaughter those children and thinking “now wait maybe there’s a debate to be had here.”
When I first saw that scene I was like "wow, that's fucked up" but then I looked deep inside myself and then said "hay yo, that's kinda relatable tho"
In a patriarchal society that may be considered bad, sure.
there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@godzillazfriction tldr
Me thinks Padme should have gone with Anakin. What is a path one cannot follow anyway?😂😠
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent."
- Qui-Gon Jinn
Yes I have also saw this repeated 200 different times on videos like this
Good job nobody loser who wants attention
@@anthonyontv ur the only loser here. spreading hate lmao
@@anthonyontvDid you like your own comment? Cause I see absolutely no reason why would anyone beside yourself like that.
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent" indeed
@@jimmy_h7911 there now I did, I made it two likes, now the question is did you like your own comment?!
Pretty sure george himself said this exact thing once, you gonna say that about him too when he's talking about his own universe he created hot shot?
Do they realize that "there is no good or evil, it's a point of view" is typically the sentences Palpatine would say ?
That is because these people ARE evil.
That’s why he’s the emperor. Because he’s smart
Actually it’s quite literally what lord Voldemort said in the first Harry Potter movie th-cam.com/video/z5aRkWu0d_k/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FJ3ULRGOQAIfJoGR
But that's true. Are Lannister or Harkonnens are evil? Are Emhyr var Emreis or Paul Atreides are evel? No.
But sw-fanatics too childish to understand that
@@baronbirman8675 Who the fuck are Lannister, Harkonnens, Emhyr van Emreis and Paul Atreides?
He's completely right, I lost count of all the times I saw myself in Emperor Palpatine, that old man is so relatable
There is no grey in Star Wars, there is no right or wrong, u pick your own side based on what you perceive as right for yourself
Ok anime profile @@anime_world6684
@@anime_world6684 what?
That man sure does love democracy
When Palpatine said to Mace Windu "I'm to weak. Please. Don't kill me" before being viciously attacked I really felt for him.
"There is no Good or Evil. There is only power, and those too weak to seek it..."
- Voldemort
'There is no good or evil'
this feels like something a villain would say.
"There is no good or evil. There is only power, and those too weak to seak it." - Voldemort, "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone".
Variations of the lines “There is no good or evil” and “right and wrong are just different points of views” have be uttered by numerous Sith throughout Star Wars Legends when trying to indoctrinate a pupil to their cause.
@@Lawrence_Talbotyup, because then it allows them to justify all sorts of heinous crimes.
Have some jedi done wrong? Yes, but for every sin of the Jedi have, the sith have 100 more.
This is essentially what Kreia was used as to explore in KOTOR II. Though they did it with much more depth and class...and a fundamental understanding of how to script dialogue. The Acolyte writers are painfully bad at exposition. Even with the amount that was cut out of KOTOR II, there was so much explored about the nature of the Force. If done properly, a "Grey Jedi" philosophical exploration could make for a really good Star Wars show. But not with the current set of creatives, minus anyone associated with Andor.
I mean Anakin literally said "From my point of view the Jedi are evil"
"From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!"
Anakin, known for his mental maturity and sound judgement of morality, successfully demonstrating how it's all based on perspective.
I think that the replies here are a metaphor for something, but I'm not sure what
THEN YOU ARE LOST!
Honestly, at that point, it's Vader.
Anakin is tragic. Vader is just an asshole. Luke doesn't achieve what he does because he turns Vader, what he achieves is bringing out the shred of Anakin that is somehow still left.
And states this while being in dark side.
Although this statement is somewhat true: while not evil, Jedi Order sucked.
The Jedi were broken, yes, clouded by the dark side, yes, but certainly not evil. I love the moment at the end of clonenwars s5 where Yoda tells Windu and Kenobi that he's not sure rather war was ever the right thing, but that there is still a future hope for good to return.
there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
It's the silent response to their "You know what I'm saying" for me
"There is no Good or Evil," Says Evil Person.
Palpatine is really just misunderstood, ya know? Totally not evil.
that's totally what he was arguing for & against,
you totally refuted that actor...
also, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@godzillazfriction bisch, how many times you gonna copypasta "gUd & EveL"?
@@Monkchelle_Kongbama oF Yu03e1F.
@@godzillazfriction you don't know how to use leet, do you?
@@godzillazfriction Oh wow. You literally just said that real medical conditions don't exist and when someone called you out, instead of trying to actually present your argument, you just told them to sewerslide. You must be fun to hang out with.
Fun fact, atheism is pretty much the only "religion" that supports nihilism, and even then, not every atheist believes it. Couple that with the fact that barely 7% of the global population is Athistic, and you have yourself a big spoonful of irony, because according to moral relativism, it is the majority and the culture that defines what is right or wrong yet you're in the vast minority.
"But that doesn't apply to philosophy, only morality," I hear you say, and to that, I ask, "How do you know?" Just because you make the claim that morality is relative, doesn't make it true. You have to prove it, but that is something impossible to prove. Morality is inextricably tied to philosophy. What you are doing is assuming your philosophy is true and telling everyone else they're stupid and should k*ll themselves if they disagree, which is hilarious.
Had no clue that actors could lack media literacy, yet here we are I guess
Lucas: Allow me to retell the story we’ve always told ourselves as humans.
The other guy: What if the world had no meaning, but in space!
I know what has no meaning and floats in space. Garbage.
Clearly the other guy was hired for his looks!
Great comment.
Getting rid of the central (and paradigmatic) moral point of the narrative reduces the story to nihilism.
"There is no good or evil"
Proceeds to literally mention a balance between good and evil not three minutes later
"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.'
There is no balance between being healthy and being a drug addict.
@@russianoverkill3715 An in-between can exist, but it is a temporary state at best - Either you relapse or you recover in the end.
@@thesecondromuluan8216 no, health doesn't have nuance, it's strictly black and white, just like the force is.
I keep expecting him to say that 1 x 1 is 2. And start talking about the periodic table.
@@russianoverkill3715 Pretty much. I'm either as healthy as I can be, or I'm not.
That argument is literally from the playbook of "Things to say right before you commit a terrible atrocity" - in both fiction and real life.
"There is no good or evil." - Satan
Isaiah 5:20:
20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Im dying with this commentary 😂
@@Atteneee_ Christ is King. JMJ
@@starkproductions6201 One of my favorite verses.
Factsss
The fact that Phineas and Ferb understood this says alot.
“Didn’t we just blow up a planet?”
“Yes, that is sort of difficult to justify. Morally.”
Wait, when did THIS happen?
@lolstalgic9602 There was a Phineas And Ferb Star Wars crossover at one point. Several of the Phineas And Ferb characters were cast as stormtroopers who believed the Empire was in the right, but they couldn’t justify that.
I really like how nervous he is. He starts off so confident and immediately realizes the whole he just dug himself in.
"From my point of view slaughtering the younglings is good, Obi Wan! I am a good person! The Jedi are evil!"
“Well then you are lost”.
Ah yes, Star Wars is a very morally grey universe. To one side we have the guardians of peace and a group of rebels fighting to free the world of a tyrannical government, and the other side blows up planets and slaughters children.
In terms of the Star Wars films, yes. I'd agree - the "good" and "evil" is apparent. However, the EU is much more grey - especially OR era. There was an argument to be made that sith empire were actually the ones that fostered independence, free thought, and acting on your own volition. While the Republic were the ones that were conniving, working in the shadows, twisting the thoughts of the people through propaganda, limiting free thought, used "the greater good" as a way to secure positions of power for those people at the top and keep those at the bottom where they were. Jedi who think outside the box and question things are shunned, while Sith that think outside the box are encouraged to do so.
So again, in the "Skywalker Era" you're right, but this isn't necessarily the case throughout the rest Star Wars. It's easy to see that polarization is an easy way to keep an audience from getting confused - it makes the product more marketable with clearly defined edges. "Black and red is the color of evil" while "Whites and Blues are the colors of good".
Sidenote: Just in case someone rebuts regarding EU/Legends not being canon --- just because Disney no longer acknowledges the EU/Legends as canon, doesn't mean anything as far as I'm concerned considering Lucas and his people worked with and advised EU authors/artists all the time to uphold his vision of his story.
@@Trashman.69420you basically quoted the church of Satan. Do what thou wilt
@@Trashman.69420"there was an argument," therefore isn't necessarily true.
Do the sith foster free thought? Of course! So long as it doesn't go against them. Do they foster independence? Of course! So long as you aren't a slave, or aren't going against them. The sith are also filled with brutal political infighting, and a great number of their defeats have been self-inflicted.
Does the republic have issues? Of course, as any government structure does. Have the jedi done wrong? Of course because it's made up of people. But in the comparison of sith vs jedi, nah, the sith are objectively worse, and far more evil than the jedi. The worst of the sith ate planets, the worst of the jedi sought to genocide the sith for doing stuff like eating planets. They are not the same.
And I am a sith fan boy. Dark side all the way baby, we got cookies.
"From my point of view the Jedi are evil" - a Sith
Originals : Genre-defining visionary
Prequels : Passionate project
Sequels : Train-wreck Triology
Acolyte : Eldrich abomimation
is Acolyte really that bad? 😬I will not watch it and haven't bothered to watch any reviews on it.
@@superdark7574 For newers, it's probably just a typical mediocore woke media. For the longtime fans, it is pretty terrible.
@@superdark7574 The hate is really overblown imo, but it's still just eh rn, the pacing is an atrocity but there are some decent moments
@@historicflame972no it’s accurate hate lmao
Don't compare Eldritch Abominations to that atrocity to the concept of writing. Even they would disgusted by it's mere presence and would mercy kill us all in order to stop us from embarrassing our species any further.
There is no good or evil only “UNLIMITED POWER!”
Palpatine was a misunderstood hero
I love how both Star Wars and LotR were stories about a battle of good and evil and both were forcibly changed into another "there is no good and evil" because that's the only story Hollywood can create in 2024.
Hollywood has become the evil.
Hollywood is so bland now, it's fitting they're obsessed with grey 😂
indoctrinated leftist moral relativists gonna do what they're gonna do I guess.
Bro really seen the "From my point of view the Jedi are evil" scene and thought to himself that's the entire Star Wars.
"Good is a point of view" - this guy's idol
Heard it from a guy that recently murdered children might I add
I don't like the recent star wars content but I agree with him. Like just imagine the two 18 year old kids on opposite sides of the galaxy, wanting to serve their government. One kid wants to serve the Empire, because that's what they believe is right. The other, wants to serve the Rebels, because that's what they believe is right.
@@aidenheck2944 One side is still objectively wrong since Star Wars is a work of fiction though. The Republic is supposed to be bad/evil without question. Someone wanting to serve the republic would also be evil even if they wanted to believe otherwise.
@@davidgray3983I like your comment
“True evil wants you to ask the question whether or not true good exists” - Marco Polo
That's a cool quote, but I can't find a source for it.
I dont agree with that quote, even a famous sailor maybe said it once
@@ProfessorFAQwhat?
@@wilton999 Ok maybe he didnt took the ship and was just an adventurer, but still
@@Ghostguy693 "Because I made it the fuck up." 💪🗿
I don't think he realizes Darth is a title, not a first name. Does he even know Vader is Anakin?
For all the actor's ignorance, Obi-Wan addresses Darth Vader as "Darth" in Star Wars
@@ryanspence5831 true
@@ryanspence5831 True, but that's no different than addressing a man by his title. "Baron" or "Duke." It isn't, however, a proper form of third person addressal.
Of course he does, Anakin was the one who blew up the Death Star killing millions of people
So Vader blew up the Death Star then?😂
This is exactly what Yoda was talking about on Infowars.
"we are all capable of doing good and/or doing evil" is not the same as "there is no good or evil"
Actor: Mom! I'm on a new tv series!
Mom: What is it about?
Actor: I don't know. Something about stars and wars.
Holy crap... Never let that guy speak again.
Walton Goggins knew nothing about Fallout but didn't pretend to know things about Fallout and really understood his character and what roll he played and his perspectives as well as just respected the heck out of the source material. Amazing the difference that makes.
john goggins, great guy
Walton Goggins is tarantino level actor, these are just street bafoons mostly
Well, to be fair, Walter Goggins is an actual actor who can act. Some of these people appear to have a golden ticket they got in a box of cereal or something.
Goggins is a legend, and seems to be a really great guy from interviews. Awesome actor. Why cant people of his caliber be in star wars?
Most good actors wouldn't touch Star Wars with a 10-foot pole.
"there's no good or evil." sounds like what an evil person/company would say lmfao.
“A thinking person questions a lot…” and that just excluded half the population.
He's absolutely right. When Anakin blew up the Death Star, I thought to myself: "he killed so many innocent people who were on the Death Star like Max Rebo, Darth Jar Jar, General Grievous and Optimus Prime" and that made me realize, that even though Gandalf taught him, Anakin might not be the good guy at all.
I... LOVE this comment. 😂
Gandalf did it for me. Great comment. Have my like good sir. 👍
I liked the bit where he said: "It's Darthin' time!"
@@VikingKong. "And then he Darthed all over the place"
another Drone who doesn't understand anything...
also, take this copied & pasted comment inside you; of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force...
one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
"The best part of star wars is that there is no good or evil."
Bro must have been watching a different galaxy far far away then.
Must've been 40k, but even then there's only no good
Harvey Dent says, "You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain" in The Dark Knight.
He's terrified stumbling through words on something he knows nothing about.
Yes, I can truly see myself in Palpatine for I too seek out emotionally vulnerable fatherless young men and convince them into believing that the only way they can overcome their trauma is by detaching themselves from their loved ones and removing any semblance of identity or emotion until they become a tragic shadow of their former self. What a relatable and understandable character.
Hang on…are the Sith actually just a cult of toxic masculinity?
*Somehow Palpatine returned.*
"There is no good or evil Harry. There is only power, and those too weak to seek it.
Based on
Exactly th-cam.com/video/z5aRkWu0d_k/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FJ3ULRGOQAIfJoGR
When someone says that the villain has a good point, but you are watching a WW2 documentary.
"EMERGENCY MEETING!"
*unmasks them* Shocker!
"Ei!"
"good is a point of view Anakin" - Sideous
Lucas has a point that he is trying to convey, and you can follow his train of thought, even predict where he's going with it. The Acolyte guy is just saying words: I can't tell where he's going with it, because he doesn't know where he's going with it. There's no train of logic through it, it's just empty word salad.
I agree, this seems to be routine. Like , blowing smoke up each others butt or spewing gaseous nonsensical rhetoric about themselves . Like he had to refer to himself as being so casual about how he ..idk hangs wit it 😑 like you said empty word salad, and the rest giggle…it’s so over bloated like every jay jay seewah interview 😅
"We can all see ourselves from Darth.. to luke."
Darth slaughtering temples of young children.." Uh, yeah sure, totally relatable."
more & more baseless illogical fallacies being thrown in this echo-cham__er of a video against the 'nEw' star wars and it's actor seemingly not understanding that 'gUd & EveL' does exist...
also, of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force...
one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@godzillazfriction gUd & EveL 2
@@godzillazfriction gUd & EveL 3
looks like someone is craving for my attention...
don't worry you can hop in my bed.
He seems like after this speech, he’d tell you he’d like you to be his new apprentice.
The people who say there's no good or evil always make exceptions for their very strict moral code.
Dam.... this George guy sure looks like he loves and understands Star Wars, perhabs they should let him try making a movie or two...
or three
Oh George… what have you done?
"There is no good or evil."
Papa Sheev: Hello!
*proceeds to do the most evil shit because he's evil*
of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force...
one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
@@godzillazfriction gUd & EveL
@@godzillazfriction DUDE SHUT UP NOBODY CARES.
YOU READ ALL THE REPLIES OF THE USERS, YOU SOUND LIKE THOSE WOKE STAR WARS ACTORS
Seriously stop everyone wants to make their own point, and just un case sorry for my bad english
@@godzillazfrictionNi- (your comment has been removed by TH-cam for violating the harrasment and cyberbullying policy, you will be able to post comments in 48 hours)
The people involved in The Acolyte have a very strange and distorted understanding of Star Wars
"There is no good or evil, it's truly about that balance of power."
"There is no good and evil. There is only power. And those too weak to seek it."
This show was made by Voldemort clearly.
The empire is literally run by a cartoon supervillain.
Palps actually achieved his goal, contrary to most cartoon supervillains, so I'd argue he is a bit better than them. ;)
From my point of view the Jedi are evil
@conser_2404 “Well then you ARE lost!”
mickey mouse?
of what it 'seems' in its seemingly surface level abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EVeL' in contrast to the Light Side & Dark Side, to which is how they correspond within the nature of the 'Force' - also, the Light Side was never mentioned during the Original Trilogy & maybe the prequel trilogy and the reason being is because the 'Force' in retaining its nature was juxtaposed in its balance against the 'Dark Side' - which in George Lucas' interpretation of the Force was that the concept of the 'Light side' that wasn't a thing in the original trilogy was supposed to be the absolute nature of the 'Force' while the 'Dark Side' was supposed to go against that very nature of the Force...
one last thing, there's no such thing as 'corruption' nor the contrived abstraction that is the dilemma of 'gUd & EveL' as well as the subset of that such as the concept of 'morality' - and there's no such as a 'Psychopath' & the other synonymous terms like it; there's no such thing as equating the essence of what a 'Human' is when putting idea of what a 'Human' should be to a high-pedestal and pinpointing that against anything that compromises the higher set of perceived standards that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what a 'Human' in essence should be ultimately determined & perceived by in its absolute of form of truth; it's how you get the subject of terms that are synonymous & antonymous such as 'Humane, inhuman(e), subhuman' & 'Psychopath' or any 'Personality Disorder' that generalises & differentiates what a 'Human' in essence is supposed to be as.
the series went so over his head that it probably went to a galaxy far far away
" anakin blew up a death star "
“There’s no good and evil in Star Wars” - a guy, referring to a simple story in which good and evil are clearly delineated as light and dark….
this isn’t game of thrones, pal . he’s spouting ideas that don’t apply cuz he thinks they make him look smart
makes me doubt hes even seen a single star wars film
"Good, GOOD!"😈
- Emperor probably
It's incredible how similiar these people are to the Sith. Fully consumed by their own ego.
that's a pretty ironic statement especially with the rationalization & radicalising based on a baseless assumption & beliefs of knowing Star Wars to a full extent on the matter and equating the new actor to being a or like a 'Sith' - you totally know Star Wars.
@@godzillazfriction Can you say something when you type next time? Thanks.
@@godzillazfrictionhey buddy... Seattle or San Francisco?
@NoshLambeaux He's been going around saying big words, clearly unaware of their meaning and just making a fool of himself. Best to ignore it.
Reminds me of Kamala Harris; talks a lot, says nothing.
@@godzillazfriction? The basic difference between Jedi and Sith is that Jedi overcome their ego while the Sith embrace it. A clear distinction between good and evil that easily translates to the real world. These people are obviously narcissists, which makes them similar to the Sith mindset, which is especially ironic since they consider themselves to be the good guys, both in Star Wars and the real world.
As Darth Bane put it, the sith are meant to be subtle, deceptive, and liars. I see these tenants in Disney everyday
he can't tell what's good vs evil, it means he can do evil things without feeling guilty
Yup i'm pretty sure Voldermort said the same thing. "There is no good or evil, there is only power and those to weak to seek it. "
If I remember my preteens..... Yessss....???? He did....???
*too
Evil people tend to try and convince themselves there isn't good or evil.
Obviously it's because they have to justify the atrocities they commit for power.
Yep, and that sentence is almost WORD FOR WORD in The Acolyte, lol.
Wait, but I watched raiders of the Lost Ark and don't remember Voldemort saying anything like that. Not even when magnum PI collected all the philosophers stones and rescued all those kids from the coal mine
I'm glad he clarified who he ment by Darth and Luke... I was stumped for a second.
You know what I’ve always saw myself in Vader. He’s so kind loving. He’s so nice he saved his son from hurting himself with that lightsaber by cutting off his hand! Now that’s a loving father
Dude, the empire is literally inspired by the Nazis 😶
the empire in star wars is analagous to the United States of America. the rebels are the vietnamese. 1977
the politics in star wars is how a democracy can fall to become an evil empire through deception
the first order in disney's star wars and the empire in disney's canon are analagous to nazis though
@@emoon42yeah,but prequalls later turned it into Reich 3. Due to do republic beign similar to Weimar republic.
Not just the nazis but the ussr and worse of all...the British
Andor understood that. Why, just why 2 years later we got this shit, that show gave us hope
@@Vilgax00the third reich IS the nazis
"There is no good or evil."
"This show is truly about that balance of power and balance of good vs. evil..."
What was the strategy again for hiring people who know nothing of Star wars to be in Star wars? It's like hiring inexperienced cooks for a restaurant because the food will be "different." No, it's gonna taste so horrible to the point where I won't be back. This whole, "bringing people who don't know about Star wars to give it a different approach" is by far the dumbest thing they could do with it
Edit: the directing crew also don't know anything given the writing void of logic, disregarding all lore of Star Wars
Edit 2: someone said like a vegan cooking for a BBQ 🤣🤣
The strategy was DiEvErSiTy.
The main issue isn’t really about actors who don’t know anything about Star Wars, this issue is that they’re PRETENDING to know about Star Wars when they just don’t.
Natalie Portman didn’t know much about Star Wars when she was cast, which I think is the key here. Who was in control of the franchise when she was hired?
@@TheRealLiarkwhen Portman was cast all they had was 3 movies, and she obviusly got informed after being accepted for the role.
@@mattdragon1253 yes but so did this actor here. I still think the understanding of what the franchise represents comes down to having people in charge of it that can tell you what it’s truly supposed to mean. He was told everything from Kathleen and Leslie.
They’re actually saying the exact same thing, George is just better at articulating it.
There are so few of us with brains left
George says the we all have good and evil inside but our actions are either good or evil. He isn't saying they don't exist.
That panel guy has given a speech worthy of a true sith lord. Manipulating you into evil.
"Only a Sith deals in absolutes"
Him: "There is no good or evil"
"You're sounding like a sith lord"
That first dude is the definition of "Derp."
No he s the choosen one
This man really just said there's no such thing as good or evil, like it's not the entire basis for the SW story. I have a cone-shaped hat for him to wear, and an L for him to hold.
Bro said there no such thing as good and evil like slavery isn't evil and his ancestors suffering was justified because the "strong" plantation owners were "powerful".
These creatures ruin every single thing they touch.
That’s literally what a villain says like all the time, even outside of Star Wars
"There is no good or evil"
*Meanwhile Young kids get killed by Anakin Skywalker, planets get blown up out of thin air with most of the civilization just enjoying life. Palpatine makes Vader forget the milk while not telling Vader he has a son, and a whole lot more stuff happens and heroes not too heroic*
From empire’s standpoint it’s good
Says theres no good and evil
3 seconds later
The balance between good and evil
You can see that guy has no idea what hes talking about
I can *kind of* see what he meant to be fair. The Republic was straight up evil at times in the Clone Wars era, what with all of their warcrimes, needless brutality, ruthlessness, and hypocrisy like the betrayal of their own code. But yeah for all intents and purposes they’re still the good guys and the Acolyte cast know literally nothing about the franchise.
you just typed the video into a comment and got upvotes. Amazing.
meanwhile the „good guys“:indoctrinate children from birth and then use them as child soldiers in a war they shouldn’t have ever fought in the first place
Evil will *always* tell you that there is no evil, just point of view. That is how evil multiplies.
"I project my sociopathy onto others because I cannot be evil if I'm no worse than anyone else." - every evil person
You know, I understand their point of view.
it just feels as though Lukas' sentiment got lost along the way and "the good guys trying/struggling to be good" became "what is good?" and "Good is a point of view, Anakin. The Sith and the Jedi are similar in almost every way, including their quest for greater power." which turned into "Don't lecture me, Obi-Wan! I see through the lies of the Jedi. I do not fear the dark side as you do. I have brought peace, freedom, justice, and security to my new Empire."
... Ohh.
Star Wars, especially the original trilogy, is THE quintessential good vs evil story of the modern day.
THIS GUY CLEARLY HAS CONFUSED HIMSELF. THANKFULLY WE ARE NOT CONFUSED. ITS GOOD V EVIL.
Isn't this the same guy who said anakin blew up the death star?
That guy says “there’s no good or evil” only to contradict himself at the end by saying that “it’s about the balance of good and evil”
How can there be a balance between things that do not exist?!
These people are so dumb that they themselves don’t know what they’re talking about or doing, which is sad. The Dark Side has taken them so deep that this is the result.
George sold his franchise and knew they were gonna do what they’re doing either way
The bi-racial milk toast enlightened actor is so right. I remember watching Kylo Ren run a lightsaber through his repentant father in cold blood to try and eradicate the last remnant of humanity inside of him and I thought "Hmm, was that good or evil." I'm sure the writers of that scene desperately wanted the audience to wrestle with the gut-wrenching ambivalence of that scene.
Glorifying witchcraft, sympathizing over the Sith, saying there is no good or evil in an attempt to convince people that the Dark Side isn’t bad…this show really reflects its creators and their weird interests
🎯
Their Marxist obsession with power dynamics is all they can think about anymore, until the only morality they have left is that you're evil because you had power before, and they're good because they took it from you. It's a worldview designed to incite revolutions, and it's been doing it for over a century. It also serves as an ironic masterclass in Sith philosophy, after all:
"Peace is a lie. There is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken.
The Force shall free me."
-The Sith Code
@SJxMusic-ji6yyThe older you get the more braincells you've started to lose... Nice.
It's a bad Star Wars show. Imagine watching this interview and unironically thinking that they're "glorifying witchcraft". Witchcraft isn't real little bro. God you people are not smart.
I really think ur kind of people the reason why Star Wars franchises not trying to explore the legends lore more and kept pandering to LGBTQ "woke" shit they're going now. There's so much philosophy to be explored through characters on why they chose dark side of the force over "light side"in the SW universe yet here we are getting more dumb shit
DEI was the greatest dark side power that Palpatine envisioned.
Somebody revoke his rights to hold a microphone
This guy literally is the evil
well he didn't kill anyone so I guess it's just that he says dumb things a lot
No he just doesn’t know anything
He’s one of those who would mindlessly follow the evil because they can’t think for themselves
@@higztv1166 That we know of.
Just one of the devils minions, there’s many of those around now. Trying to corrupt your thinking.
This is why you never ever ever sell your franchise.
They will 100% make the Jedi evil in the acolyte
they are evil.... according to the protagonists point of view lol
That mascara tells everything.
Darth killed the younglings. This fucking guy...
Part of the reason Hollywood is failing is because there’s way too many opportunities for these actors to expose themselves as idiots nowadays.
If you see yourself in Vader than you should turn yourself in now.
i see myself in anakin tho, should i turn myself for that?
That is like turning myself in to the empire. Like they care.
Or become a politician
@@nothingman759No. Anakin and Darth Vader are essentially two different characters. Anakin is a flawed yet noble person. Vader is vile and murderous with a tiny bit of good left in him, but ultimately irredeemable.
Edit:
So a lot of people have (rightly) pointed out that Vader was redeemed. Irredeemable was not the right word. I should have just left it at “Vader did bad stuff”.
@@nothingman759anakin skywalker is the hero of the republic, darth Vader is the most feared man in the galaxy. Being the same person doesn’t mean your still the same you from 20 years ago. Split personality or not Star Wars constantly tells you this
The same people saying “there’s no good and evil in SW” are the same people that call Satan a “misunderstood rebel”
bruh George Lucas originally only wanted to have red and blue lightsabre so you could clearly tell who is evil and who is good
So... No purple then?
@@Praklo273 purple wasnt supposed to be a thing it only became such because Samuel Jackson wanted a purple lightsaber lol
Well clearly he was a bigoted, how's the trans modern audience supposed to relate without rainbow coloured lightsabers?
People really don't understand lightsabres.
You build your own sabre when you go from Padawan to Jedi. When you go from Jedi to master you turn it off.
it happened in the og trilogy for Obi Wan in new hope and Luke at the end of Return. Also both Yoda and Sidious, who where both force masters, didn't use sabres at all.
As for why everyone used sabres in the prequels, the Jedi order had "fallen", their use of the Force diminished. They where no longer a monastic order but a military one in all but name.
But in the sequels, GOLD is the bestest evar!! and if one isn't good enough, just use two!
And then, funny enough, Darth Vader vs Obi-Wan gave us the only blue vs blue lightsaber battle in the series.