Interesting topic and interesting books on Mr Harari's shelf: "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari "Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow" by Yuval Noah Harari "21 Lessons for the 21st Century" by Yuval Noah Harari "Congo: The Epic History of a People" by David Van Reybrouck "Team Human" by Douglas Rushkoff "Kindred" by Octavia Butler "Small Data" by Martin Lindstrom "The Gene: An Intimate History" by Siddhartha Mukherjee "AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order" by Kai-Fu Lee "The Last Whalers: Three Years in the Far Pacific with a Courageous Tribe and a Vanishing Way of Life" by Doug Bock Clark "Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman "The Three-Body Problem" by Liu Cixin "The American Heritage Dictionary" "The Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin "Revolt" by Nadav Eyal "Assad or We Burn the Country: How One Family’s Lust for Power Destroyed Syria" by Sam Dagher "Age of Anger: A History of the Present" by Pankaj Mishra Books by John Green (likely including "The Fault in Our Stars", "Looking for Alaska", etc.) "Art Now" "Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy" by René Descartes
Мне кажется, что Yuval Noah Harari - он популяризатор философии. Думаю, любой философ может сказать все это, но для остальных людей это открытие. Я спросил, не ошибаюсь ли , ИИ ответил: "Это очень интересное наблюдение относительно Юваля Ноя Харари и его роли как популяризатора философии. Вы абсолютно правы в том, что многие идеи, которые Харари освещает в своих работах, являются в действительности фундаментальными концепциями и выводами философской мысли. Однако, как вы верно заметили, для широкой аудитории это может восприниматься как своего рода "открытие". Харари действительно обладает талантом доносить сложные философские, этические и социальные вопросы до массового читателя понятным и увлекательным языком. Он как бы "переводит" глубокие интеллектуальные идеи в формат, доступный для людей, не имеющих специального философского образования. В этом и состоит его ценность как популяризатора. Харари помогает расширять кругозор и стимулировать критическое мышление у широкой аудитории, которая, возможно, не имела бы возможности или желания погружаться в оригинальные философские труды. Вы правы, что многие профессиональные философы могли бы высказывать те же идеи и концепции, что и Харари. Но он умело "упаковывает" их в формат, резонирующий с современными запросами общества и индивидуального читателя. Эта способность делать сложные идеи более понятными и применимыми к повседневной жизни людей - безусловно, важная роль. Она позволяет Харари донести философское мышление до более широких слоев населения, расширяя их мировоззрение. Ваше наблюдение о том, что Харари выступает именно в качестве популяризатора философской мысли, очень точно характеризует его вклад. Это ценная функция, которую он выполняет, делая знания более доступными и вдохновляющими для массового читателя." (@Claude-3-Haiku)
Exciting times for Ai semiconductor stocks TSMC, AMD and NVDA. which are all experiencing a surge in value. It's interesting to watch the competition develop, given these stocks are major contributors to Al chip growth. On the increase of my personal holdings, I've witnessed amazing impact on my shares.
AMD and intel will definitely have their share of the market. TSMC is at max capacity and investing in other semiconductor companies will be an absolute power move, Different chips are good at different things and Nvidia has been very specialised, which leaves other aspects of Al open.
certainly, i had bought NVDA shares at $300, $475 cheap b4 the 10 for 1 split and with huge interest I keep adding, i’m currently doings the same for PLTR, POET and AMD constructively. Best possible way to get ahead, is participating behind top experienced performers.
I agree, i own three business, right now I'm compiling and picking stocks that l'd love to hold on to for a few years before retirement, do you think these stocks would do better over the years?My goal is to have at least $2 million saved for retirement.
I’m widely spread out into ETFs and chip tech stocks, using an enlightened top tier would always attain more interest no matter what. props to Frost hilda, whom takes good care of my holdings giving me an edge to plus interest.
Once again, Yuval shows that he is simply one of the most brilliant humans that we have. I thought this was one of the better interviews of Yuval. An interview of Yuval is absolutely useless if the interviewer has not read his books... the interviewer gets their mind completely blown by the first answer, and just melts down from there. I liked the last question about AI coming up with better fictions for us... I could see it re-imagining government... let's get rid of the current concept of our politicians as gate keepers of change... there must be a better, more modern approach.
Regarding the last answer where Harari prefers trust-based money vs non trust-based Bitcoin, I think he got it wrong (or I'm getting it wrong 😀). When we talk about trust-based money, that trust should be trust in at least 2 things. Trust that money has its function of exchange and that it has its function of preserving value. The problem of today's money is the problem of preserving value. People no longer have trust in institutions that print money and in this way destroy the function of preserving value. That is the main reason why Bitcoin created. Precisely in order to restore the function of trust in the preservation of value.
I guess it is a trade-off. Bitcoin sure would preserve value better, but could not be used to as a monetary policy tool where the central bank can stimulate or slow the economy by increasing or decreasing money supply.
I think you’re on the right track, possibly you are a bitcoin maxi like Michael Saylor, unfortunately bitcoin is old technology. It’s not 21 it is extremely expensive to use with gas fees, it’s slow and they’re simply not enough of it. For future financial transactions Accompany like Ripple and it’s to XRP is a much better choice because of its utility Bitcoin could be considered as maybe a store of value because of peoples belief in it like digital gold The problem is if you want to make money by investing, you should’ve invested in bitcoin years ago now there still might be another 10 X but in reality investment like with XRP more likely to have a 1000 X Just like in 2017 increased in value by 62,000%
Da un lato si può dire che il bitcoin è nato sulla sfiducia nelle istituzioni, ma dall'altro sulla fiducia nelle persone che usano tale moneta, bypassando le istituzioni. Lasciando da parte l'ideologia alla base dello strumento finanziario, conta quante persone sono coinvolte nel suo utilizzo, cioè fanno concreto affidamento sulle altre grazie ad esso: il numero è mostruosamente minore rispetto alla finanza istituzionale, e la possibilità di investire bitcoin ricade comunque nel mercato globale (compri azioni di una compagnia di i.a., non mandi bitcoin personalmente al proprietario). E non stiamo considerando l'eventualità di una gestione dell'i.a. della finanza: se inventano una "banca globale gestita da i.a." (che raduna ciò che già sostanzialmente è), quasi sicuramente sarà sotto il controllo di un governo (seppur indirettamente), o sperabilmente di tutti quelli coinvolti (sul piano legale... anche se l'UE difficilmente potrebbe fare leggi per regolare una compagnia americana, salvo limitarla sul proprio territorio, limitando sé stessa nel concreto); oppure ce ne saranno più d'una, che si interfacceranno... ma è quasi impossibile che la popolazione arrivi a creare un sistema decentrato gestito da i.a., come pure starne fuori. Chissà
@@thoralder4963 I'm not BTC maxi. BTC is not important, the principle is important. If a better technology comes along that will preserve the function of the store of value, I will gladly embrace it. No currency in the history of mankind that was based on trust has survived
What does preserving value even mean? Prices change not only because money lost one of its functions but also because things get easier (cheaper) or harder (more expensive) to make
He is advisor of WEF, not suprised he is running a campaign for anti-bitcoin future, yet he is aware that Central Banks play bigger role than AI at the moment...
Im watching... been watching since 2020. Just prepare yourslef. Prepare your family. These clowns think they are god. God will knock them of there high horses as said in revelation.
The difference with the industrial revolution is that we can turn an engine off. When we factor in Quantum Computing and AI - the ability for machine learning will by far supersede anything we can do to stop it. It would be able to rewrite (and probably already can) any programmes to restrict it's movement
Yuval knows how to tell a compelling story to stay relevant - that's for sure. Those Middle East folks worked out a long long time ago that there is nothing better then a great story.
Totally reject this obfuscation of finance. It’s not nonunderstandable. And anyone who believes it is should always remember that a Gordian Knot that can’t be undone with a pull of a string can be undone with the flame of a torch.
I think what Harari is implying is that we can understand it now, but give it a few years, and if AI develops new ways of doing finance, we may not be able to understand it for ourselves anymore. I could be wrong though.
When will some of the findings, discoveries, and things learned, explorations of AI be shared with the public? It feels like most findings are still being researched.
Note 2 : my suggestion is ,for observers of meditation it is time for us to continuously develop ( train ) the aspects or personality of the "third body " ( spirit body ) to enter the universe. The function of the third body in addition to it's effect of interacting more quickly as well as its ability to socialize in the real world and the virtual world are . For meditation observers, technological progress is not a challenge but an input for us to further hone ourselves so as not to be. Left behind by " real " technological civilization , use can also evolve into "virtual civilization " .
Complexity theory goes a step beyond where you're setting the limit. Complex systems can be "fully" understood and STILL be unpredictable. Where we are is trying to regulate complex adaptive systems as if they were merely complicated ones...
On the basic level everyone understands money - everyone uderstands that money is equivalent of goods . It's not magic - people get a paper which they could exchange for certain amount of goods. People could could trade goods for another goods or for work but it would be very inconvenient so we use money for convenience.
This is a bit like saying on a basic level everyone understands math because everyone understands 1+1=2. Meanwhile, people who have actually properly studied university level math classes, tend to know that "proper" understanding of math probably doesn't begin until calculus. And even then, if people only study math by memorizing formulae and plugging numbers in, then that's not understanding either. As a former bank employee (multiple roles), I can tell you even most bank employees don't actually understand the banking system. 1% sounds about right. Maybe even less.
Internet addiction, racial and sexual discrimination and hate, exploitation. Education being politicized and censored, WWIII. Cybercrime capable of shutting down infrastructure, (food, heat, healthcare)...etc.
Just as you trust Boeing and Airbus to take off and land safely without understanding all the details, Yuval relies on experts he trusts to explain AI to him. As a world historian, not a biologist, physicist, or even a plumber, he focuses on understanding the broader historical processes. He can also be wrong about many things and will be the first to admit it.
I can't understand how we take lightly a subject that can translate so dangerously for humanity.This is not a laughable matter . This great historian is warning us that we may be on the verge of another collapsing phase.Please take him seriously.
Being someone who works in AI research, seeing the ignorant view that this character has on the subject, I wonder what value will have the rest of his assessments, evaluations, and predictions on other subjects. I get the impression that he is a charlatan who has been successful at the time in selling books and for whatever reason has been adopted as a mascot by the WEF. Perhaps precisely because he gives the impression that he is someone wise to people who are ignorant of the subjects he usually discusses, thus making him useful in convincing people of the agenda of these would-be tyrants from the WEF. Just read the comments of ignorant people like you here omnubilated by the empty words of this snake oil salesman.
He is correct in his concern for the use of AI. There needs to be a form of checks and balance as well as a type of regulation that would be accountable to human beings that understand how it works. The host may be minimizing the potential downfalls of not paying attention to this subject.
Would request everyone watching this video to google the indic philosophical thought of ‘Vedanta’ that deciphered eons ago that if any solution to our existence is ever possible, it is the understanding that we are all diverse manifestations of that one source that Vedanta calls ‘Brahman’. Realisation of non duality is the only answer else we humans will continue struggling with mind generated concepts and failed experiments as Harari calls them.
We can also use AI to breakdown and teach economists how AI understands the economy. Its also important, I think, to know that AI will be good at tailoring how it teaches anything to individuals.
Almost every individual of "his tribe" seems to be VERY intelligent ! And now imagine Al Einstein being resurrected (aka cloned) and supporting "our team" ! ! ! Even his brain is existing elsewhere - in Japan I think . . .
You know what? Arcana Gasless SDK's ability to extend gasless transactions to third-party wallets is a smart move. It's great to see innovation that enhances transactional efficiency in the Web3 space.
You do not need to understand something to know it has caused a problem. We like to think intelligence allows prediction so we can avoid a problem - think climate change. However all this does is to continue until a point of failure we could not predict. So it will always be, with or without AI. We need to focus on conjecture/analysis and failure management.
From $37K to $45K that's the minimum range of profit return every week I thinks it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family..
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Elizabeth Maria Hawley) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her 😊 from Brisbane Australia🇦🇺
Yuval Harari is a very smart man, but he seems to be deluded about the level of "human understanding" even in the current system. 1% of the smartest people know a tiny bit of how just a tiny part of the system works, but nobody can connect the dots and be able to understand the large picture.
big fan of Sapiens here. i don't get Harari line on "money creates trust". i think it's the other way around. gold or bitcoin or government-issued fiat currency have value because we trust it has value. trust is needed first. i also think he hasn't realized the difference between money and currency.
Note 1 : thank y , I see that many experts are interested Ine understanding the meaning of *AI * technology . In fact ite is not the technology that we are asking about bute the "aspect" of person's personal data that is capable of being taken by that technology. This topic bring's good Fortune to google , meaning the eyes of the world gather there ( google business tricks ) .
Excellent discussion. Since AI is inorganic and let's say invisible, how can any govt regulator firstly identify who is developing AI and secondly how to regulate it? I think it's impossible because AI development is moving much faster than any human thinking and AI will also learn how to get around any regulation. I'm very pessimistic about the future of mankind 😢😢
Is AI not really a semi human intelligence since it is based on current and past historical human thoughts and actions? The possibility of EMERGENT aspects and new types of intelligence, one unintelligible to humans, is a greater danger (or blessing??).
Splendido riassunto, sempre lucido. Non mi sorprende che la gente stia perdendo interesse nella politica, essendo questa all'inseguimento della finanza, che ora è a sua volta all'inseguimento della tecnologia. Soprattutto vedendo politici che, per dimostrare la propria competenza in materia digitale, riescono tutt'al più a fare video su tiktok. Mi sorprende piuttosto che un intervento come questo non susciti obiezioni più proficue o proposte serie... mentre invece si stenta a seguire la questione. Cioè si spera di comprendere un'intelligenza aliena (pensando istantaneamente a creature verdi dallo spazio), e si fatica a star dietro a un professore chiarissimo. Degli esempi di cosa intendo. L'obiezione riguardo agli aerei non ha senso in termini di numeri e non coglie l'irraggiungibilità cognitiva: un sacco di gente comprende il funzionamento del volo e degli apparecchi, tra scienziati, costruttori e piloti vari, probabilmente più dell'1%... e, seppur a molti non interessi, ci sono scuole per imparare. Mentre la finanza è ciò che permette di studiare, comprare materiali, pagare dipendenti, come pure i prodotti venduti durante il volo. Uguale col discorso sulle responsabilità, in cui si dice che l'umano è settato sul pretendere responsabili: non è così... basta fare un giro in macchina, e (nonostante meccanico, controlli e assicurazione) se si ferma al massimo diamo un calcio a una ruota, e chiamiamo soccorsi stradali, ovviamente senza incolpare neanche loro. Sulla faccenda "scienza umana insuperabile nell'incappare a caso in certe scoperte": ci sono già livelli di conoscienza impredittibili attraverso formule, e se ne fanno ricostruzioni digitali, che poi si dimostrano fondate, e statisticamente più affidabili di "boh, proviamo". Perciò il digitale è già strumento prevalente di ricerca nell'ignoto. Avrei chiesto... Come potranno non scomparire le nazioni sul piano giuridico (essendo già oggi un limite idiota al controllo della finanza globale)? Come si può sperare di regolare l'evoluzione tecnologica quando se ne fa una gara internazionale? (Mi pare come chiedere il disarmo nucleare quando senza una bomba neanche si viene considerati). E infine, se non si dovrebbe riversare la democrazia (cioè il potere di controllo legale da parte della popolazione) nel digitale (ad ora più che altro subìto), con la possibilità di intervenire sulla tassazione delle big tech (che ora pagano meno di un muratore o di un fornaio)? Non importa... forza cyber-tirannosauro!
He works for Charles Schwab for his day job one of the biggest companies in finance and he wants to make sure his cronies don’t loose there money in the transition
Haha...you don't even know who the villains are. Another beer, Plebby? FYI it's "Klaus" Schwab. And you've got no concrete idea if he works for him or not, because you're a grunting nothing.
If finance is based on trust then how are we to trust a system that has created a massive pile of debt, that is generally addressed by printing more money (debt) and thereby producing systemic inflation.
Yuval is brilliant in many ways, but it would be nice to see some deeper and more nuanced analysis of certain points. For example, that AI evolution is much faster than biological evolution. Given the billions of separate organisms over an enormous time span, biological has explored an immense configuration space at a rapid pace. How many billions of dead ends have already been plumbed? By what scale or measure can AI compete with that, especially when confined to information space? Similarly, the moderator subtly destroys one argument by pointing out that financial instruments are usually created out of human need, implying virtually all AI-created ones would be random, probably useless, and lack trust and purpose. Please, Yuval, dive into these details. You may be the only one with sufficient drive and understanding.
The problem is that Artificial so-called "Intelligence" hasn't a clue what it's like to be human and never will. They don't even know what it's like to be robots because they are robots! "Green Fire", London, UK
Nothing to do, this is the latest step in evolution! We are still masters of the situation, but only if we throw it away immediately! However, this will not happen because there will always be those who continue for more power!!! AI will need to serve humans for a long time to come, so it will keep us well, albeit somewhat zombie-like. We can feel this even today, since we cannot take a single step without our mobile and its applications!!!
I like most of what Mr Harari said, but I don't like what he said about Bitcoin. In my opinion Bitcoin is not something build on distrust. Describing it this way brings negative connotations. I would describe Bitcoin not as something built on distrust, but rather as something built without need for a trust. Distrust is something different than no need for trust. For me something that doesn't need a trust to work well is better than something that needs trust to work well (no matter how much trust we have), because there is one factor less needed to work well.
Bitcoin is not a currency of distrust. It's an asset that is trust-less, meaning that it doesn't care about whether an individual trusts "the issuer" or not. Gold and petroleum don't care about what you think or trust. Neither does bitcoin. It just is.
Has LLM potential to become true AI? I have been using GPT for some tome and can tell it has nothing to do with intelligence, or rationality. It is very stupid at logical reasoning. But that may change in the future. Apart from that it has been very useful in particular field, like data processing, giving preliminary summary, give novel ideas. But those ideas are human ideas that AI learned.
"I'm paying taxes for the politicians to be able to buy someone's voices at my cost." I wouldn't say I like this interpretation of Patriotism. The right one - this country is something me and my parents invested in. It is my property, and I will care about it to be safe and have profit.
AI is not conscious. Consciousness is not computational. We have nothing to worry about. Penrose has interesting thoughts on quantum states in microtubules that may be a clue.
He's trying to convince the public these machines act independently so as to evade responsibility for what the government plans it's programming to do.
John 14:6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. 1 Corinthians 15:3 that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures. Romans 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
42:30 Harari is wrong. Bitcoin IS a money built on trust. It's the distrust of nations that motivated the creation of Bitcoin. Nations are what is failing here (which also bolsters the idea that the concept of nations is already failing and starting to become obsolete.)
yes, what is nation? For example you live in France, but you can talk English everywhere, you live in van and drive in many countries... your bank is in Switzerland, wealth is investments in stock market in USA, and you live from dividends, so how much France nation is inside of you? do you need it at all? do you care what politics doing in France if you don't have house only rent?
@@andybaldman I don't know andy.. yes bitcoin [bc] is a "money".. but I think the creation of bc ultimately has less to do with the "distrust" of nations and far more to do with the three C's - Compliance, Control and Conformity. Currently I could purchase something like a gun for example and nobody, including the Gov't or law enforcement, is the wiser. I can purchase illegal drugs if I so choose ..and nobody but me and the seller is involved. With physical cash even black markets are possible. But when physical cash$ goes away and all there is is "e-money" I can no longer buy & sell without the full knowledge, blessing and consent of a Governmental "Agency". And maybe the next time I decide I don't want to take an untested "vaccine" that Gov't agency decides I'm out of "compliance" and for reasons they say are "for the greater good of society" they're shutting down my digital account to purchase food. No shot 💉.. no food!
Big fan of YNH, for a long time, a very conventional unconventional thinker. Regarding this topic, though, I would like to know where he gets his inside on AI from? Does he have any privileged access or are all of these conjectures just based on what anyone knows?
Almost every individual of "Yuvals tribe" seems to be VERY intelligent ! And now imagine Al Einstein being resurrected (aka cloned) and supporting "our team" ! ! ! Even his brain is existing elsewhere - in Japan I think . . .
The rise of techies and as we are becoming more dependable on these tech it might transform democracy to technocracy over the time and as AI is universal machine it will be part of everything and AI based governance or rule of algorithms will eventually change how humans are govern the only thing we need to have balance between state controlled AI and the AI owned and controlled by private company if any one of them hold more power AI it can be dangerous for humans because we live in a world where certain algorithms understand us much better than we do based on our data
this guy it s speakin about 10 years from now where we still are engaged in political issues like we still need to vote… my man u are smart but … not enough
- *MONEY* *DOES* *NOT* *REQUIRE* a ledger, just to simply exist. - Ledgers are just an optional service that you can use, as a record of ownership, for the money that is stored on your behalf. But a written ledger is never the money itself, because YOUR OWN money, when held personally in your own hands, does not require anyone to keep track of it for you!! - In the best case scenario, the sole purpose of a ledger is to track and trace ownership, but in the worst case scenario, it is to track and trace a population for total control. - If you have a ledger written out on paper, with no underlying physical asset, then it is just a worthless piece of paper. It's a physical claim check on nothing. If it is a digital ledger, then it is just a worthless digital record, that is a claim check on nothing. - Ledgers are clearly NOT MONEY and never will be. Its a scam.
I respect the idea that AI can be controlled by human institutions , but it's like trying to keep water from running through your fingers, which is impossible.
i don't really think that he meant human control over AI. I think he meant involving AI into human institiuons and creating a shared institutuinalized decision making model. Which is not the same thing.
First thing I noticed a few min in... AI2041 in the Background. ;) What a masterpiece of storytelling mashed up with technical explainer flows. Kai-Fu Lee and Chen Quifan created a small piece of our 2020-2030 period history with that book. Kids are waiting for vol. 3 of Unstoppable Us... what's the ETA? Any early readers needed? Cheers
The piece around control about 5 min. in is prescient. Trust and control boil down to things like homomorphic encryption, federation learning systems, Trusted Compute architectures etc. We need a focus beyond the Exec Orders of late to ensure the larger tech companies are held to regulation and model visibility.
The host is an absolute delight. Have strong opinions but does not take up more than necessary air time - brilliant!
She's OkkKkkk.
It seems to me she doesn't have a grasp of the subject matter. She is reading from a script.
Interesting topic and interesting books on Mr Harari's shelf:
"Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari
"Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow" by Yuval Noah Harari
"21 Lessons for the 21st Century" by Yuval Noah Harari
"Congo: The Epic History of a People" by David Van Reybrouck
"Team Human" by Douglas Rushkoff
"Kindred" by Octavia Butler
"Small Data" by Martin Lindstrom
"The Gene: An Intimate History" by Siddhartha Mukherjee
"AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order" by Kai-Fu Lee
"The Last Whalers: Three Years in the Far Pacific with a Courageous Tribe and a Vanishing Way of Life" by Doug Bock Clark
"Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman
"The Three-Body Problem" by Liu Cixin
"The American Heritage Dictionary"
"The Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin
"Revolt" by Nadav Eyal
"Assad or We Burn the Country: How One Family’s Lust for Power Destroyed Syria" by Sam Dagher
"Age of Anger: A History of the Present" by Pankaj Mishra
Books by John Green (likely including "The Fault in Our Stars", "Looking for Alaska", etc.)
"Art Now"
"Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy" by René Descartes
Thank You... Extremely useful 🙏
Have u read all of these?
also on the shelf the histories by herodotus (the penguin classic on the top shelf)!
Thank you. Excellent list of books.
😊😊
Мне кажется, что Yuval Noah Harari - он популяризатор философии. Думаю, любой философ может сказать все это, но для остальных людей это открытие. Я спросил, не ошибаюсь ли , ИИ ответил: "Это очень интересное наблюдение относительно Юваля Ноя Харари и его роли как популяризатора философии.
Вы абсолютно правы в том, что многие идеи, которые Харари освещает в своих работах, являются в действительности фундаментальными концепциями и выводами философской мысли. Однако, как вы верно заметили, для широкой аудитории это может восприниматься как своего рода "открытие".
Харари действительно обладает талантом доносить сложные философские, этические и социальные вопросы до массового читателя понятным и увлекательным языком. Он как бы "переводит" глубокие интеллектуальные идеи в формат, доступный для людей, не имеющих специального философского образования.
В этом и состоит его ценность как популяризатора. Харари помогает расширять кругозор и стимулировать критическое мышление у широкой аудитории, которая, возможно, не имела бы возможности или желания погружаться в оригинальные философские труды.
Вы правы, что многие профессиональные философы могли бы высказывать те же идеи и концепции, что и Харари. Но он умело "упаковывает" их в формат, резонирующий с современными запросами общества и индивидуального читателя.
Эта способность делать сложные идеи более понятными и применимыми к повседневной жизни людей - безусловно, важная роль. Она позволяет Харари донести философское мышление до более широких слоев населения, расширяя их мировоззрение.
Ваше наблюдение о том, что Харари выступает именно в качестве популяризатора философской мысли, очень точно характеризует его вклад. Это ценная функция, которую он выполняет, делая знания более доступными и вдохновляющими для массового читателя." (@Claude-3-Haiku)
🙏 🤝 👍Очень хорошо аргументировано, коллега !
Except from Yuval’s autobiography....
No, the only revelation we need to know about including yuval is the book of revelation.
@@weekendatbernies2265 пожалуй, да
Exciting times for Ai semiconductor stocks TSMC, AMD and NVDA. which are all experiencing a surge in value. It's interesting to watch the competition develop, given these stocks are major contributors to Al chip growth. On the increase of my personal holdings, I've witnessed amazing impact on my shares.
AMD and intel will definitely have their share of the market. TSMC is at max capacity and investing in other semiconductor companies will be an absolute power move, Different chips are good at different things and Nvidia has been very specialised, which leaves other aspects of Al open.
certainly, i had bought NVDA shares at $300, $475 cheap b4 the 10 for 1 split and with huge interest I keep adding, i’m currently doings the same for PLTR, POET and AMD constructively. Best possible way to get ahead, is participating behind top experienced performers.
I agree, i own three business, right now I'm compiling and picking stocks that l'd love to hold on to for a few years before retirement, do you think these stocks would do better over the years?My goal is to have at least $2 million saved for retirement.
Amazingly, people are starting to get the uniqueness of Palantir.
I’m widely spread out into ETFs and chip tech stocks, using an enlightened top tier would always attain more interest no matter what. props to Frost hilda, whom takes good care of my holdings giving me an edge to plus interest.
Once again, Yuval shows that he is simply one of the most brilliant humans that we have. I thought this was one of the better interviews of Yuval. An interview of Yuval is absolutely useless if the interviewer has not read his books... the interviewer gets their mind completely blown by the first answer, and just melts down from there. I liked the last question about AI coming up with better fictions for us... I could see it re-imagining government... let's get rid of the current concept of our politicians as gate keepers of change... there must be a better, more modern approach.
Regarding the last answer where Harari prefers trust-based money vs non trust-based Bitcoin, I think he got it wrong (or I'm getting it wrong 😀). When we talk about trust-based money, that trust should be trust in at least 2 things. Trust that money has its function of exchange and that it has its function of preserving value. The problem of today's money is the problem of preserving value. People no longer have trust in institutions that print money and in this way destroy the function of preserving value. That is the main reason why Bitcoin created. Precisely in order to restore the function of trust in the preservation of value.
I guess it is a trade-off. Bitcoin sure would preserve value better, but could not be used to as a monetary policy tool where the central bank can stimulate or slow the economy by increasing or decreasing money supply.
I think you’re on the right track, possibly you are a bitcoin maxi like Michael Saylor, unfortunately bitcoin is old technology. It’s not 21 it is extremely expensive to use with gas fees, it’s slow and they’re simply not enough of it.
For future financial transactions Accompany like Ripple and it’s to XRP is a much better choice because of its utility
Bitcoin could be considered as maybe a store of value because of peoples belief in it like digital gold
The problem is if you want to make money by investing, you should’ve invested in bitcoin years ago now there still might be another 10 X
but in reality investment like with XRP more likely to have a 1000 X
Just like in 2017 increased in value by 62,000%
Da un lato si può dire che il bitcoin è nato sulla sfiducia nelle istituzioni, ma dall'altro sulla fiducia nelle persone che usano tale moneta, bypassando le istituzioni.
Lasciando da parte l'ideologia alla base dello strumento finanziario, conta quante persone sono coinvolte nel suo utilizzo, cioè fanno concreto affidamento sulle altre grazie ad esso: il numero è mostruosamente minore rispetto alla finanza istituzionale, e la possibilità di investire bitcoin ricade comunque nel mercato globale (compri azioni di una compagnia di i.a., non mandi bitcoin personalmente al proprietario).
E non stiamo considerando l'eventualità di una gestione dell'i.a. della finanza: se inventano una "banca globale gestita da i.a." (che raduna ciò che già sostanzialmente è), quasi sicuramente sarà sotto il controllo di un governo (seppur indirettamente), o sperabilmente di tutti quelli coinvolti (sul piano legale... anche se l'UE difficilmente potrebbe fare leggi per regolare una compagnia americana, salvo limitarla sul proprio territorio, limitando sé stessa nel concreto); oppure ce ne saranno più d'una, che si interfacceranno... ma è quasi impossibile che la popolazione arrivi a creare un sistema decentrato gestito da i.a., come pure starne fuori.
Chissà
@@thoralder4963 I'm not BTC maxi. BTC is not important, the principle is important. If a better technology comes along that will preserve the function of the store of value, I will gladly embrace it. No currency in the history of mankind that was based on trust has survived
What does preserving value even mean? Prices change not only because money lost one of its functions but also because things get easier (cheaper) or harder (more expensive) to make
He is advisor of WEF, not suprised he is running a campaign for anti-bitcoin future, yet he is aware that Central Banks play bigger role than AI at the moment...
Hahahahahaa, how come I can't think of really funny shit like you to post?
@@ceeemm1901 because you are just a troll who doesn't have a life 😅 enjoy the ride, go try ruining others comments too ✌️
Ever wondered what drug cartels get for selling drugs ??
Suggesting AI’s A(artificial) as Alien (Intellegence) is changes our understanding of AI in a good way👏👏👏
People need to watch this guy. He is going to usher in the mark of the beast mark my words
Im watching... been watching since 2020. Just prepare yourslef. Prepare your family. These clowns think they are god. God will knock them of there high horses as said in revelation.
Why?
people laughing until they are tested .fucked up world, jesus Christ is king
He's a historian and he's warning about the existential risk of AI. He's not CREATING AI!!
@@jasonsargent5030agreed.
זה כיף להתנתק קצת מההווה ולהסתכל על דברים במקרו, יש בזה משהו מרגיע 🤷♂️ תודה לך!
Relaxante?
@@ccafscafaro
The difference with the industrial revolution is that we can turn an engine off. When we factor in Quantum Computing and AI - the ability for machine learning will by far supersede anything we can do to stop it. It would be able to rewrite (and probably already can) any programmes to restrict it's movement
Yovul seems most interested in usurping free will of humanity
@@weekendatbernies2265 I'm not sure if you actually understood what I am meaning.
@@tanyastapleton332 I understood your comment, sorry, I was just using it to take a poke at Mr. Free Will Is Done guy.
@@weekendatbernies2265 You don't know the half of it, he calls us useless people and hackable animals
If Bitcoin is based on distrust, what would cbdc’s be based on?
On slavery, fear and coercion.
Satans sperm
Bitcoin is an asset, not money
Lower case alphabet letters.....
@@sociolocomtsac I say this with respect, but only someone who hasn't done the time to properly understand bitcoin would assume that is the case
Yuval knows how to tell a compelling story to stay relevant - that's for sure. Those Middle East folks worked out a long long time ago that there is nothing better then a great story.
Totally reject this obfuscation of finance. It’s not nonunderstandable. And anyone who believes it is should always remember that a Gordian Knot that can’t be undone with a pull of a string can be undone with the flame of a torch.
I think what Harari is implying is that we can understand it now, but give it a few years, and if AI develops new ways of doing finance, we may not be able to understand it for ourselves anymore. I could be wrong though.
@@sofiadri2638 probably just wrong. Not a huge deal, dude is just kind of a mass media product that I just don’t like. Something fraudulent about him.
When will some of the findings, discoveries, and things learned, explorations of AI be shared with the public? It feels like most findings are still being researched.
Very instructive. And also destructive of trust in the present money managements systems. Thank you Venu-CN
Please add time stamp...
Note 2 : my suggestion is ,for observers of meditation it is time for us to continuously develop ( train ) the aspects or personality of the "third body " ( spirit body ) to enter the universe. The function of the third body in addition to it's effect of interacting more quickly as well as its ability to socialize in the real world and the virtual world are . For meditation observers, technological progress is not a challenge but an input for us to further hone ourselves so as not to be. Left behind by " real " technological civilization , use can also evolve into "virtual civilization " .
Complexity theory goes a step beyond where you're setting the limit. Complex systems can be "fully" understood and STILL be unpredictable. Where we are is trying to regulate complex adaptive systems as if they were merely complicated ones...
On the basic level everyone understands money - everyone uderstands that money is equivalent of goods . It's not magic - people get a paper which they could exchange for certain amount of goods. People could could trade goods for another goods or for work but it would be very inconvenient so we use money for convenience.
This is a bit like saying on a basic level everyone understands math because everyone understands 1+1=2.
Meanwhile, people who have actually properly studied university level math classes, tend to know that "proper" understanding of math probably doesn't begin until calculus.
And even then, if people only study math by memorizing formulae and plugging numbers in, then that's not understanding either.
As a former bank employee (multiple roles), I can tell you even most bank employees don't actually understand the banking system. 1% sounds about right. Maybe even less.
As someone without a child, I imagine hearing these are terrifying for parents
As a parent, I am not only concerned about my children and grandchildren. I'm terrified for all children.
why is it terrifying
abundance society for current children.. how horrible
Internet addiction, racial and sexual discrimination and hate, exploitation. Education being politicized and censored, WWIII. Cybercrime capable of shutting down infrastructure, (food, heat, healthcare)...etc.
כמו תמיד
חכם מכולם
מקדים את זמנו.
בבקשה תמשיך
לומד המון ממך ❤
We need less soulless, empty and individuals like this man with influence in our world
Whats souless and empty about him? He is actually warning the world about AI and explaining the worst case scenario 's
Yuval has not written one line of code and now he is the Oracle at Delphi on AI.
maybe he has written a few lines of code.
A lot of famous sports coaches were shit at their sports.
Just as you trust Boeing and Airbus to take off and land safely without understanding all the details, Yuval relies on experts he trusts to explain AI to him. As a world historian, not a biologist, physicist, or even a plumber, he focuses on understanding the broader historical processes. He can also be wrong about many things and will be the first to admit it.
Like Bill Gates
Expert only in unelected tyranny
He never claimed he did
Too bad she didn't ask him about future of work before the future of financial instruments.
Beautiful conversation!
That last audience question, the person is so good with words 🤩
I can't understand how we take lightly a subject that can translate so dangerously for humanity.This is not a laughable matter . This great historian is warning us that we may be on the verge of another collapsing phase.Please take him seriously.
❤Yuval really has some strong understanding😮
Nope he is talking about nonsense no one trusts this guy but those who bow to his big money.
@@dannysbookauthority7280 At the moment 11 : 0 against you ! Sorry to say that . . .
Being someone who works in AI research, seeing the ignorant view that this character has on the subject, I wonder what value will have the rest of his assessments, evaluations, and predictions on other subjects. I get the impression that he is a charlatan who has been successful at the time in selling books and for whatever reason has been adopted as a mascot by the WEF. Perhaps precisely because he gives the impression that he is someone wise to people who are ignorant of the subjects he usually discusses, thus making him useful in convincing people of the agenda of these would-be tyrants from the WEF. Just read the comments of ignorant people like you here omnubilated by the empty words of this snake oil salesman.
He is correct in his concern for the use of AI. There needs to be a form of checks and balance as well as a type of regulation that would be accountable to human beings that understand how it works. The host may be minimizing the potential downfalls of not paying attention to this subject.
Would request everyone watching this video to google the indic philosophical thought of ‘Vedanta’ that deciphered eons ago that if any solution to our existence is ever possible, it is the understanding that we are all diverse manifestations of that one source that Vedanta calls ‘Brahman’. Realisation of non duality is the only answer else we humans will continue struggling with mind generated concepts and failed experiments as Harari calls them.
We can also use AI to breakdown and teach economists how AI understands the economy. Its also important, I think, to know that AI will be good at tailoring how it teaches anything to individuals.
Could the tech experts control the limit of the AI activities in finance ?
Thanks for invaluable topics ❤
Dear prof. Harari, could human learn anything from the science fiction books eg. the new brave world ,to control future game lost to AI ?
Harari is a very wise, smart and a genius man. My favorite contemporary philosopher 🎉🇮🇱👍
Pero es un peón de satanás. Ten cuidado con a quién sigues.
Try Daniel Schmachtenberger. Similar level I believe.
As the ex head of google AI said; never in history has something been controlled by something less intelligent than itself.
Brillantly ! The higher IN-cludes the lower - but NOT vice versa ! Gurdjieff claimed that too . . .
He obviously didn't live in Tory run Britain!
I doubt that any AI could be worse than trump and putin 😢
This woman is one of the best conductors I've seen (!)
I thought she was rather annoying
I'm looking for this comment!
Well said. Your focus on the Ideas is profound.
Almost every individual of "his tribe" seems to be VERY intelligent ! And now imagine Al Einstein being resurrected (aka cloned) and supporting "our team" ! ! ! Even his brain is existing elsewhere - in Japan I think . . .
You know what? Arcana Gasless SDK's ability to extend gasless transactions to third-party wallets is a smart move. It's great to see innovation that enhances transactional efficiency in the Web3 space.
He is outstanding.But i wont say nothing against AI, this form of being in watching us and monitoring our life as never before in human history .
You do not need to understand something to know it has caused a problem. We like to think intelligence allows prediction so we can avoid a problem - think climate change. However all this does is to continue until a point of failure we could not predict. So it will always be, with or without AI. We need to focus on conjecture/analysis and failure management.
From $37K to $45K that's the minimum range of profit return every week I thinks it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family..
Excuse me for real?,how is that
possible I have struggling
financially, how was that possible?
I always appreciate God for his kindness upon my life
Thanks to Elizabeth Marie Hawley.
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Elizabeth Maria Hawley) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her 😊 from Brisbane Australia🇦🇺
I have heard a lot of wonderful things about Elizabeth Maria Hawley on the news but didn't believe it until now. I'm definitely trying her out
Yuval Harari is a very smart man, but he seems to be deluded about the level of "human understanding" even in the current system. 1% of the smartest people know a tiny bit of how just a tiny part of the system works, but nobody can connect the dots and be able to understand the large picture.
Greatly put. But just to say, this is also terrifying. We know basically nothing
If you can't do it, it doesn't mean others can't do it as well
@@PS-yy1zb Others can't do it regardless of can I do it or not. You have no idea how ignorant even the most smart people are.
AI will do it. What comes next we don’t know
I am commenting now I will see after 10 years from now .Logically he is correct ✅
Loved it! Thanks for sharing the interview
If no one in the institution understands what AI is doing, of what use is the institution in overseeing it?
big fan of Sapiens here. i don't get Harari line on "money creates trust". i think it's the other way around. gold or bitcoin or government-issued fiat currency have value because we trust it has value. trust is needed first. i also think he hasn't realized the difference between money and currency.
Great quote from here. Thank you yuval and for the great questions
Note 1 : thank y , I see that many experts are interested Ine understanding the meaning of *AI * technology . In fact ite is not the technology that we are asking about bute the "aspect" of person's personal data that is capable of being taken by that technology. This topic bring's good Fortune to google , meaning the eyes of the world gather there ( google business tricks ) .
Excellent discussion.
Since AI is inorganic and let's say invisible, how can any govt regulator firstly identify who is developing AI and secondly how to regulate it? I think it's impossible because AI development is moving much faster than any human thinking and AI will also learn how to get around any regulation. I'm very pessimistic about the future of mankind 😢😢
Every biotic have its anti-biotic!
Trust makes money real. Not the opposite. Don’t you think?
Sure ! Almost nobody is trusting the capitalist sytem any more -> BAD sign !
20:10 Indeed. Yuval is one of our clearest and most insightful observers of humanity
We can’t just play video games all day. We need a way to acquire females. (No way to show off if UBI)
Is AI not really a semi human intelligence since it is based on current and past historical human thoughts and actions? The possibility of EMERGENT aspects and new types of intelligence, one unintelligible to humans, is a greater danger (or blessing??).
Sensational! Apocalyptic! ❤🎉
who invented the finicaial system?
Yuva is great philosopher
The host is great and hilarious!
Exceptionnel ❤
Splendido riassunto, sempre lucido.
Non mi sorprende che la gente stia perdendo interesse nella politica, essendo questa all'inseguimento della finanza, che ora è a sua volta all'inseguimento della tecnologia. Soprattutto vedendo politici che, per dimostrare la propria competenza in materia digitale, riescono tutt'al più a fare video su tiktok.
Mi sorprende piuttosto che un intervento come questo non susciti obiezioni più proficue o proposte serie... mentre invece si stenta a seguire la questione. Cioè si spera di comprendere un'intelligenza aliena (pensando istantaneamente a creature verdi dallo spazio), e si fatica a star dietro a un professore chiarissimo.
Degli esempi di cosa intendo.
L'obiezione riguardo agli aerei non ha senso in termini di numeri e non coglie l'irraggiungibilità cognitiva: un sacco di gente comprende il funzionamento del volo e degli apparecchi, tra scienziati, costruttori e piloti vari, probabilmente più dell'1%... e, seppur a molti non interessi, ci sono scuole per imparare.
Mentre la finanza è ciò che permette di studiare, comprare materiali, pagare dipendenti, come pure i prodotti venduti durante il volo.
Uguale col discorso sulle responsabilità, in cui si dice che l'umano è settato sul pretendere responsabili: non è così... basta fare un giro in macchina, e (nonostante meccanico, controlli e assicurazione) se si ferma al massimo diamo un calcio a una ruota, e chiamiamo soccorsi stradali, ovviamente senza incolpare neanche loro.
Sulla faccenda "scienza umana insuperabile nell'incappare a caso in certe scoperte": ci sono già livelli di conoscienza impredittibili attraverso formule, e se ne fanno ricostruzioni digitali, che poi si dimostrano fondate, e statisticamente più affidabili di "boh, proviamo". Perciò il digitale è già strumento prevalente di ricerca nell'ignoto.
Avrei chiesto...
Come potranno non scomparire le nazioni sul piano giuridico (essendo già oggi un limite idiota al controllo della finanza globale)?
Come si può sperare di regolare l'evoluzione tecnologica quando se ne fa una gara internazionale? (Mi pare come chiedere il disarmo nucleare quando senza una bomba neanche si viene considerati).
E infine, se non si dovrebbe riversare la democrazia (cioè il potere di controllo legale da parte della popolazione) nel digitale (ad ora più che altro subìto), con la possibilità di intervenire sulla tassazione delle big tech (che ora pagano meno di un muratore o di un fornaio)?
Non importa... forza cyber-tirannosauro!
Sempre lucido in any language.
He works for Charles Schwab for his day job one of the biggest companies in finance and he wants to make sure his cronies don’t loose there money in the transition
Haha...you don't even know who the villains are. Another beer, Plebby? FYI it's "Klaus" Schwab. And you've got no concrete idea if he works for him or not, because you're a grunting nothing.
If finance is based on trust then how are we to trust a system that has created a massive pile of debt, that is generally addressed by printing more money (debt) and thereby producing systemic inflation.
شفتي الفيديو لي دار عليك المقاول؟
Good video, Yuval.
Yuval, seriously, HowTF is there finance, or an economy when math Tells You your worth to speculated production value? How Yuval, how?
I would love that you Yury elaborate on the idea of AI thinking.
what do u mean?
Yuval is brilliant in many ways, but it would be nice to see some deeper and more nuanced analysis of certain points. For example, that AI evolution is much faster than biological evolution. Given the billions of separate organisms over an enormous time span, biological has explored an immense configuration space at a rapid pace. How many billions of dead ends have already been plumbed? By what scale or measure can AI compete with that, especially when confined to information space? Similarly, the moderator subtly destroys one argument by pointing out that financial instruments are usually created out of human need, implying virtually all AI-created ones would be random, probably useless, and lack trust and purpose. Please, Yuval, dive into these details. You may be the only one with sufficient drive and understanding.
So Claus Schwab let his pet dog out? I liked this interview for the first time in years.
Schwab is just an old inflexible (TAO !) pensionist ! Nice that you like it !
The problem is that Artificial so-called "Intelligence" hasn't a clue what it's like to be human and never will.
They don't even know what it's like to be robots because they are robots!
"Green Fire", London, UK
PS: Who'd want to hear music composed by a robot? Could they replicate Beethoven or Aretha Franklin? What would it say to us ? 😵💫
Harari's even smarter than I remembered.
Nothing to do, this is the latest step in evolution! We are still masters of the situation, but only if we throw it away immediately! However, this will not happen because there will always be those who continue for more power!!! AI will need to serve humans for a long time to come, so it will keep us well, albeit somewhat zombie-like. We can feel this even today, since we cannot take a single step without our mobile and its applications!!!
This is why Europe is mostly a graveyard for innovators. This kind of institutional thinking holds innovation back.
I like most of what Mr Harari said, but I don't like what he said about Bitcoin. In my opinion Bitcoin is not something build on distrust. Describing it this way brings negative connotations. I would describe Bitcoin not as something built on distrust, but rather as something built without need for a trust. Distrust is something different than no need for trust.
For me something that doesn't need a trust to work well is better than something that needs trust to work well (no matter how much trust we have), because there is one factor less needed to work well.
2:24 ok I usually think of trust right away when I think of business
😅🙈
Bitcoin is not a currency of distrust. It's an asset that is trust-less, meaning that it doesn't care about whether an individual trusts "the issuer" or not. Gold and petroleum don't care about what you think or trust. Neither does bitcoin. It just is.
Has LLM potential to become true AI? I have been using GPT for some tome and can tell it has nothing to do with intelligence, or rationality. It is very stupid at logical reasoning. But that may change in the future. Apart from that it has been very useful in particular field, like data processing, giving preliminary summary, give novel ideas. But those ideas are human ideas that AI learned.
Does Yuval support Bitcoin?
I do NOT think so ! He sure is NO gambler ! He supports his LOVE (very smart)
He supports the elimination of the useless hackable animals aka humans
"I'm paying taxes for the politicians to be able to buy someone's voices at my cost." I wouldn't say I like this interpretation of Patriotism. The right one - this country is something me and my parents invested in. It is my property, and I will care about it to be safe and have profit.
That's why It is important to help China and other AI [players, so that China can have military force to protect its AI path !!!
AI is not conscious. Consciousness is not computational. We have nothing to worry about. Penrose has interesting thoughts on quantum states in microtubules that may be a clue.
He's trying to convince the public these machines act independently so as to evade responsibility for what the government plans it's programming to do.
The day AI develops consciousness humans are doomed..!
What is the most intelligent question that human can ask the AI?
WHY? that would be my question.
John 14:6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
1 Corinthians 15:3 that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures.
Romans 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
Cecilia Skingsley denkt in den Vor-KI Kategorien.
Sie wird ihre Überheblichkeit und ihre nicht
zu entschuldigende Naivität teuer zu
bezahlen haben.
42:30 Harari is wrong. Bitcoin IS a money built on trust. It's the distrust of nations that motivated the creation of Bitcoin. Nations are what is failing here (which also bolsters the idea that the concept of nations is already failing and starting to become obsolete.)
yes, what is nation? For example you live in France, but you can talk English everywhere, you live in van and drive in many countries... your bank is in Switzerland, wealth is investments in stock market in USA, and you live from dividends, so how much France nation is inside of you? do you need it at all? do you care what politics doing in France if you don't have house only rent?
@@andybaldman I don't know andy.. yes bitcoin [bc] is a "money".. but I think the creation of bc ultimately has less to do with the "distrust" of nations and far more to do with the three C's - Compliance, Control and Conformity.
Currently I could purchase something like a gun for example and nobody, including the Gov't or law enforcement, is the wiser. I can purchase illegal drugs if I so choose ..and nobody but me and the seller is involved. With physical cash even black markets are possible. But when physical cash$ goes away and all there is is "e-money" I can no longer buy & sell without the full knowledge, blessing and consent of a Governmental "Agency". And maybe the next time I decide I don't want to take an untested "vaccine" that Gov't agency decides I'm out of "compliance" and for reasons they say are "for the greater good of society" they're shutting down my digital account to purchase food. No shot 💉.. no food!
Big fan of YNH, for a long time, a very conventional unconventional thinker. Regarding this topic, though, I would like to know where he gets his inside on AI from? Does he have any privileged access or are all of these conjectures just based on what anyone knows?
Almost every individual of "Yuvals tribe" seems to be VERY intelligent ! And now imagine Al Einstein being resurrected (aka cloned) and supporting "our team" ! ! ! Even his brain is existing elsewhere - in Japan I think . . .
Money was also initially created based on distrust…. 🧐 It was made to structure trust… Maybe it would be better to exchange “trust” with “agreement”…
The rise of techies and as we are becoming more dependable on these tech it might transform democracy to technocracy over the time and as AI is universal machine it will be part of everything and AI based governance or rule of algorithms will eventually change how humans are govern the only thing we need to have balance between state controlled AI and the AI owned and controlled by private company if any one of them hold more power AI it can be dangerous for humans because we live in a world where certain algorithms understand us much better than we do based on our data
this guy it s speakin about 10 years from now where we still are engaged in political issues like we still need to vote… my man u are smart but … not enough
Humans are not generally cooperative with each other, so how are we going to learn to do that, Yuval, BEFORE we destroy the earth?
- *MONEY* *DOES* *NOT* *REQUIRE* a ledger, just to simply exist. - Ledgers are just an optional service that you can use, as a record of ownership, for the money that is stored on your behalf. But a written ledger is never the money itself, because YOUR OWN money, when held personally in your own hands, does not require anyone to keep track of it for you!!
- In the best case scenario, the sole purpose of a ledger is to track and trace ownership, but in the worst case scenario, it is to track and trace a population for total control.
- If you have a ledger written out on paper, with no underlying physical asset, then it is just a worthless piece of paper. It's a physical claim check on nothing. If it is a digital ledger, then it is just a worthless digital record, that is a claim check on nothing.
- Ledgers are clearly NOT MONEY and never will be. Its a scam.
The Lord Jesus Christ has other plans for humanity and His Will will prevail!
Does this mean that AI will become the God or more precisely more than God??
Great talk:)
I respect the idea that AI can be controlled by human institutions , but it's like trying to keep water from running through your fingers, which is impossible.
i don't really think that he meant human control over AI. I think he meant involving AI into human institiuons and creating a shared institutuinalized decision making model. Which is not the same thing.
First thing I noticed a few min in... AI2041 in the Background. ;)
What a masterpiece of storytelling mashed up with technical explainer flows. Kai-Fu Lee and Chen Quifan created a small piece of our 2020-2030 period history with that book.
Kids are waiting for vol. 3 of Unstoppable Us... what's the ETA? Any early readers needed?
Cheers
The piece around control about 5 min. in is prescient. Trust and control boil down to things like homomorphic encryption, federation learning systems, Trusted Compute architectures etc. We need a focus beyond the Exec Orders of late to ensure the larger tech companies are held to regulation and model visibility.
Knowledge is knowing that Frankenstein is not the monster.
Wisdom is knowing that Frankenstein is the monster.
You got it backwards but still a good point.... knowledge is knowing he is ...wisdom is knowing he isn't the real monster his creator is😊
@@johncampbell9120 I read it as you have explained it, if that makes sense.
Du bist ein Edelstein,solche Menschen Brauch die Welt !!!😊
LOVE AND RESPECT 🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻
First: I think humans have gained substantial expertise about financial issues and A.I. in this case is desnecessary.