Yuval Noah Harari on AI, Future Tech, Society & Global Finance
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2024
- Watch Yuval Noah Harari discuss the potential impacts of present and future technologies on human society and the global financial system.
Filmed on 7 May 2024, as part of BIS Innovation Summit.
#AI #dictatorship #power #yuvalnoahharari #NexusBook #finance #technology
Regarding the last answer where Harari prefers trust-based money vs non trust-based Bitcoin, I think he got it wrong (or I'm getting it wrong 😀). When we talk about trust-based money, that trust should be trust in at least 2 things. Trust that money has its function of exchange and that it has its function of preserving value. The problem of today's money is the problem of preserving value. People no longer have trust in institutions that print money and in this way destroy the function of preserving value. That is the main reason why Bitcoin created. Precisely in order to restore the function of trust in the preservation of value.
Interesting topic and interesting books on Mr Harari's shelf:
"Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari
"Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow" by Yuval Noah Harari
"21 Lessons for the 21st Century" by Yuval Noah Harari
"Congo: The Epic History of a People" by David Van Reybrouck
"Team Human" by Douglas Rushkoff
"Kindred" by Octavia Butler
"Small Data" by Martin Lindstrom
"The Gene: An Intimate History" by Siddhartha Mukherjee
"AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order" by Kai-Fu Lee
"The Last Whalers: Three Years in the Far Pacific with a Courageous Tribe and a Vanishing Way of Life" by Doug Bock Clark
"Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman
"The Three-Body Problem" by Liu Cixin
"The American Heritage Dictionary"
"The Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin
"Revolt" by Nadav Eyal
"Assad or We Burn the Country: How One Family’s Lust for Power Destroyed Syria" by Sam Dagher
"Age of Anger: A History of the Present" by Pankaj Mishra
Books by John Green (likely including "The Fault in Our Stars", "Looking for Alaska", etc.)
"Art Now"
"Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy" by René Descartes
Thank You... Extremely useful 🙏
Have u read all of these?
Please add time stamp...
❤Yuval really has some strong understanding😮
Yuval Harari is a very smart man, but he seems to be deluded about the level of "human understanding" even in the current system. 1% of the smartest people know a tiny bit of how just a tiny part of the system works, but nobody can connect the dots and be able to understand the large picture.
Greatly put. But just to say, this is also terrifying. We know basically nothing
As someone without a child, I imagine hearing these are terrifying for parents
On the basic level everyone understands money - everyone uderstands that money is equivalent of goods . It's not magic - people get a paper which they could exchange for certain amount of goods. People could could trade goods for another goods or for work but it would be very inconvenient so we use money for convenience.
Totally reject this obfuscation of finance. It’s not nonunderstandable. And anyone who believes it is should always remember that a Gordian Knot that can’t be undone with a pull of a string can be undone with the flame of a torch.
Too bad she didn't ask him about future of work before the future of financial instruments.
The right way is to combine AI with Blockchain to protect
You do not need to understand something to know it has caused a problem. We like to think intelligence allows prediction so we can avoid a problem - think climate change. However all this does is to continue until a point of failure we could not predict. So it will always be, with or without AI. We need to focus on conjecture/analysis and failure management.
Yuval has not written one line of code and now he is the Oracle at Delphi on AI.
maybe he has written a few lines of code.
A lot of famous sports coaches were shit at their sports.
Just as you trust Boeing and Airbus to take off and land safely without understanding all the details, Yuval relies on experts he trusts to explain AI to him. As a world historian, not a biologist, physicist, or even a plumber, he focuses on understanding the broader historical processes. He can also be wrong about many things and will be the first to admit it.
Like Bill Gates
Expert only in unelected tyranny
who invented the finicaial system?
Has LLM potential to become true AI? I have been using GPT for some tome and can tell it has nothing to do with intelligence, or rationality. It is very stupid at logical reasoning. But that may change in the future. Apart from that it has been very useful in particular field, like data processing, giving preliminary summary, give novel ideas. But those ideas are human ideas that AI learned.
The are more much options
The reference to GPTs (General Purpose Technologies) seemed to imply that "AI" is not one. I am curious how long it will take humanity to see the suite of tools and algorithms we call "AI" attain GPT status.
Yuval, do you consider "AI" a GPT?
Cheers
GPT stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer, not what you said.
Sorry, calling out GPTs in a video about Transformers will cause confusion. This is the GPTs that were in discussion that I am curious about. I have heard many in the AI safety/Risk arguments say that they are not GPTs yet.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General-purpose_technology
That's why It is important to help China and other AI [players, so that China can have military force to protect its AI path !!!
this nervous laughing amongst listeners is meaningfull
Nervous laughter from shocking prophecy usually is...
AI "We Bring Good Things to Life"
😂
Like pets 😅
First: I think humans have gained substantial expertise about financial issues and A.I. in this case is desnecessary.
Prof Harari accept my sincere gratitude for giving glimpses of bountiful knowledgshelf in the background
Yuval Harari is one of my all time favorite person on some original thinking. On Sapiens he was awesome. But Sadly he is lost in recent years. Instead of holding on his earlier views and building on that and eager to give talks and interviews he should start listening to experts, know his blind-spots and think more before coming to conclusions.
Yuval's blind spots would be extraordinarily small, compared to yours, or mine.
idk, if ai is simply the smartest stranger in the room then i def think we may one day see nations that are run by them perhaps in ways that are hard to understand yet far better my most metrics.
also the characterization of bitcoin has "distrust" feels a bit strange. You could also view it as you do not trust any one central body (esp a government) for it's creation other than math, and everybody trusts the math, and thus it encourages trust among all participants. Could technically be some new math that cracks it in the future one day like quantum np=p ++ processor.
1 Timothy 1:4
Once again, Yuval shows that he is simply one of the most brilliant humans that we have. I thought this was one of the better interviews of Yuval. An interview of Yuval is absolutely useless if the interviewer has not read his books... the interviewer gets their mind completely blown by the first answer, and just melts down from there. I liked the last question about AI coming up with better fictions for us... I could see it re-imagining government... let's get rid of the current concept of our politicians as gate keepers of change... there must be a better, more modern approach.
20:10 Indeed. Yuval is one of our clearest and most insightful observers of humanity
We can’t just play video games all day. We need a way to acquire females. (No way to show off if UBI)
From $37K to $45K that's the minimum range of profit return every week I thinks it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family..
Excuse me for real?,how is that
possible I have struggling
financially, how was that possible?
I always appreciate God for his kindness upon my life
Thanks to Elizabeth Marie Hawley.
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Elizabeth Maria Hawley) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her 😊 from Brisbane Australia🇦🇺
I have heard a lot of wonderful things about Elizabeth Maria Hawley on the news but didn't believe it until now. I'm definitely trying her out
First thing I noticed a few min in... AI2041 in the Background. ;)
What a masterpiece of storytelling mashed up with technical explainer flows. Kai-Fu Lee and Chen Quifan created a small piece of our 2020-2030 period history with that book.
Kids are waiting for vol. 3 of Unstoppable Us... what's the ETA? Any early readers needed?
Cheers
The piece around control about 5 min. in is prescient. Trust and control boil down to things like homomorphic encryption, federation learning systems, Trusted Compute architectures etc. We need a focus beyond the Exec Orders of late to ensure the larger tech companies are held to regulation and model visibility.
You may not like the rise of Bitcoin Mr Harari, but I have no doubt you are aware of how justified it actually is.
😂
Shitcoin
More intelligent.. So More efficient ... More trustful you will be reward or proof of very fine tuned work ... I think such kind of since fiction anime debates are literally too late .. except for fun .. Machines will rule as they know n think or compute more than any humans at every task like no entity had achieve before .. yes our brains are biologically materially perceptually limited as we were once aware about the limits of our bodies .. that's why we created or constrained to build the last "holy" achievement ... To get the final trust ... Or rest ...
הוא מחוסר אמונה
The energy requirements for AI is exactly the reason why I'm thinking that it would be better or probably more practical to have the AI algorithms figure out how to compress themselves so that then maybe we can get the same outcome with like 1% of what we think we're going to need in the future. In short use AI to create better versions of itself that are more efficient.
I like this idea also. AI seems like it is an engineered brain. I think we managed to engineer a better brain than humans have. I think that better brain can probably design an even better brain.
@@EngRMP upgrading algorithms and software can be almost instantaneous but building more power plants to run larger data centers takes quite a bit of time let alone of course designing the new chips. Imagine if we could be successful getting a somewhat limited intelligent system to continuously upgrade itself in the confines of the compute and energy that already exists. Because the software if it can update itself can do so instantaneously but even if you have robots that can build more robots that build data centers and power plants there's going to be quite a time delay and an environmental impact.
@@christopheraaron2412 I'm pretty sure that AI that can improve itself to be more energy efficient can also figure out how to get more energy.
@@evetrue2615 Yes,just that software improvement updates instantly, but building new power plants take at least a couple of years.
@@christopheraaron2412 It takes years for us but even we can at least imagine a better way.
Bring me back !!
Money today isn't a symbol of trust today, trust isn't the driving factor, it's (trust in competitive law bending behavior) is really the "trust" factor that drives todays markets (the ability to cheat lie and steal in a corporate government profitable way)
We don't have the energy infrastructure
@@pasqualeperri5661 Where do you live if you don't mind me asking?
AI is not conscious. Consciousness is not computational. We have nothing to worry about. Penrose has interesting thoughts on quantum states in microtubules that may be a clue.
He's trying to convince the public these machines act independently so as to evade responsibility for what the government plans it's programming to do.
The day AI develops consciousness humans are doomed..!
I love how he implies we got capitalism right
The takeaway for me was that the current iteration is less violent than previous ones. Not that we nailed it or already looking for the next challenge.
Take out the "greed"...it works fine.
Do we actually need to rely on AI to tell us when a crisis is looming? Surely we, as humans, should be able to understand this ourselves? We could all see the mortgage disaster of 2007/08 happening in real time. The problem then was allowed to run out of control by greedy people (bankers, investment, insurance etc). The “little people” couldn’t do anything but sit, watch and weep. What the world needs most above all else is honest, stoic, altruistic, beneficent leaders which, unfortunately, are seriously lacking in the world.
This is true, and it has nothing to do with technology.
Problem: Humans cannot predict the future well. Just ake a look at the last 24 years.
AI should be able to predict future problems better than us. Predicting the probability of x or y happening increases in complexities by the millions per week.
Giving a hyper-intelligent machine to outpace our own mental abilities could make us unfree.
Randomness is a very real, unpredictable process. Randomness, by definition, is unpredictable. If AI starts a process that even it cannot foresee or predict future circumstances. Then what?
We should be able ... We could all see ... The message is that these horrible things, even though we knew they were dangerous, ultimately needed to play out in spite of this awareness.
AI will be no different unfortunately.
Digital ID Goes Global
No digital ID? Forget about the basics like power, phones, or even buying a home.
- Nicole James, Epoch Times
ongoing:
fomenting perpetual crises .. confiscate $$, create emergency >
coerce acceptance of CBDC > all economic slaves
Inflation = taxation without legislation
If our leaders had all of those properties, we would certainly all be happier with them. But, I don't think that's enough. I don't think anyone knows if we're already over the cliff on climate change... I think AI could do a much better job of analyzing this... and if we're not already over the cliff, we need a super intelligence to help solve this complex problem. Health care is another example that is too complex for humans.
Blockchain already solves the Trust issue.
Wow didn’t know this guy has a channel. Suscribed.
If you think we understand finance think about the crisis of 1930 and 2009… we are ripe for another shakeup and AI can make it happen. Money touches ALL!! Scary stuff!
what's wrong with the audience - they are laughing like it is a joke???? This AI that is coming is serious concern
I notice they were laughing at some big or 'unconventional' ideas. But this is a big subject that will require new thinking. The laughing was strange..
Harari is a very wise, smart and a genius man. My favorite contemporary philosopher 🎉🇮🇱👍
He is advisor of WEF, not suprised he is running a campaign for anti-bitcoin future, yet he is aware that Central Banks play bigger role than AI at the moment...
The answer is 42
101010
Well done Deep Thought!
To say that the 2008 financial crash was a failure of regulation. Is like saying that a murder is the failure of policing.
❤
CBDC meets forever worldwide blackout when all money is digital, word of God (Me). Plutocracy and Technocracy are doomed, and the business of business is over. I understand the domination strategy that is finance just fine.
Nosferatu
I’m thinking that money might actually be *dis*trust. If it is trust, then it’s a trust conditioned on guarantees. Which in a way is the opposite of trust.
Why should we build AI, if we were able to 'understand' everything it does? This is paradox - we wouldn't need strong AI, if it should not explore beyond the borders of our current understandings.
Not necessarily. There a lot of reasons to build AI we can understand.
If we don't understand something that can fail (remember that everything has flaws, no matter what "AI magic" anyone promises you), how do we prepare for the consequences ? How do you trust the decisions from something you don't understand ? AI is not a God, and it is not "good" by any means, it is "analytical" at best.
Not to say we should not strive to use it to explore what we can't, but do you think that we should wait for a "black box" to solve everything for us ? This is dangerously naive.
Some reasons we want to understand them:
1. They are not moved by "good intentions", just data, so we can suffer in the process;
2. They are not perfect, how do we justify their mistakes ? Just hope the frequency is low and brace ourselves for the next hit in the face ?
3. If an AI decision accidentally kills someone that matters to you, what happened ?
...
Money represents ... now, not even that.
Change the assumption. In other words, if AI is actually monitoring and maybe even controlling the financial sector, then the likelihood of another financial crisis becomes zero or close to zero.
No, I dont think so: **Money does not create trust - it depends on trust**
... and so it's not a medium for creating trust - but **a medium to distribute resources / allow or disallow access to resources** ... and yes: I`d prefere if the decision to "yes or no" would be more data-driven - data provided by the CBDC-system and calculated with target optimizations based on empirical data... (demand-side-data meets provider-side-data ==> optimize access to resources for maximum output towards the people`s needs) ...
No need to understand every ANN - it is enough to implement quality gates where certain patterns are identified and analyzed then ... so: here and there we will still need human bankers ...
Washing dishes too, is only information in, information out.
😅l ok
So
Let’s
MY IQ IS 144 SO I AM ON TEAM EKITE
I respect the idea that AI can be controlled by human institutions , but it's like trying to keep water from running through your fingers, which is impossible.
i don't really think that he meant human control over AI. I think he meant involving AI into human institiuons and creating a shared institutuinalized decision making model. Which is not the same thing.
meanwhile, is the plant next side, hedera helix, noah?
Algorithms and AI already killed the artistic music production
it seems alien if you dont understand where the data comes from. so we humans spent a few thousand years learning stuff. we discuss it test it, and and a ML uses it for training (a statistical analisys on the curated data by us humans) and suddenly AI is alien? its just because you don't understand where data come from. what you perceive as creativity is not what's happening. imagine knowing an enitre encyclopedia and being able to to explain several concepts with other words rather than their definition, and relate them on the fly. it's impressive, but AI is not the encyclopedia. we are the enciclopedia.
AI has a “black box” problem, but young researchers are working on it
Big fan of YNH, for a long time, a very conventional unconventional thinker. Regarding this topic, though, I would like to know where he gets his inside on AI from? Does he have any privileged access or are all of these conjectures just based on what anyone knows?
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
This woman is one of the best conductors I've seen (!)
Yuval is undoubtedly one of the brightest minds of our times, but for the first time I'll disagree with him. AI is not the mystique, the mystique is humans. AI is overhyped!!
ChatGPT is not the AI he is talking about, that's what he calls the "Amoeba stage of AI".
Current AI is overhyped. But remember that the new models will get progressively smarter every 6 - 9 months. With each new model we will see new emerging capabilities that will surprise us. Nobody ever thought these models would be able to generate art, code or music. But here we are.. surprised every AI / machine learning engineer in the field. Don’t be surprised for the next models to be perfect in law, global policy affairs, generating medicine, control finance, etc
Yuval, dude great video. Also add, "What about children's futures, how are children going to adapt to a world when high frequency compute and information temperature in the markets makes cognitive autonomy impossible".
I really appreciate Prof. Harari´s knowledge, his talks and his books. However, I think he is not correct when he claims that Bitcoin is " a currency built on distrust". Exactly the opposite is true. Bitcoin is a currency in which I can have trust because it is built on the blockchain, a system that can not be manipulated by any goverments and central banks. It has evolved out of mistrust in the traditional banking system after the financial crises in 2008.
Until something breaks and no one has a clue how to fix it.
And i thougt it's the source to bet in If you buy at the black Market:)
"Don’t Trust, Verify" is Bitcoin's catchphrase. However, you are correct that there is still a lot of trust involved, just a different kind of trust compared to that in governments and financial institutions.
How has AI made finance complicated? Financial policies are not made by it. Humans have made it complex. Its a simple tactic to embezzle.
שאלת תם למה הוא חוזזר על אותם נושאים בפעם האלף. אדם חכם אבל מישהו שחוזר חבל 1
I admire his intelect but always he speaks about the terrible future ahead us. In this video besides the spoken message his face is showing so much sadness. Still, amazing thinker
"The best way to predict the future is to create it"
Most of the media sugar coats things for all of us. Critical thinking people should put ideas above any filtered information that is soothing for our child like brains.
Hes tired of explainin this stuff over and over 😂
Trust has already been destroy-------------- Remember the past, plan for the future, but live for today, because yesterday is gone and tomorrow may never come
If trust = money 😮 why religion exists?
this guy it s speakin about 10 years from now where we still are engaged in political issues like we still need to vote… my man u are smart but … not enough
poor interviewer
th-cam.com/video/Bc1y7oc2wJY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ClJOhAqXGJabkhUi a super economist answers @Yual in Spanish about BTC.
The alternative is that we reach the heights long sought by Bertrand Russell etc. rather than rely on AI to make decisions, we can simply use them to check our logic. Then everyone can concur with good decisions.
Except people make decisions with emotions (but they think they use logic). People just post fit logic to their emotionally made decision. Therefore I think your station is wrong.
Future of Jewish State seems like more of an urgent issue for him.
This lady is bit slow with strong biases :) well what can we expect from a financial lady
The consequences that our actions and decisions develop and that interact with each other have exceeded our own capacity to adapt.
The current economic model represents a threat by enhancing it with AI. It will simply magnify the differences.
The important thing is to accept that humanity is what it is, with its wars and weapons and greed and individualism, and that is when we understand that we are moving too fast for who we are.
We are not prepared to introduce changes that are, above all, questionable in themselves.
Sometimes we consider that we are all equal, but that is not the case, and what we should is have equal rights, and we have not achieved that yet.
Shalom
Do not trust. Verify. Bitcoin.
Gold
😂
Shitcoin
Harari misunderstands Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a currency of trust precisely because it distrusts. By his logic locks on doors are bad because they are built on distrust.
Unbelievable that some people could laugh at this man talking
🤕🤕🤕🤕🤕
I liked his books but not his connections with the unelected WEF
I read and admire Yuval Noah Harari's books. However, this 1% of finance experts are often people burdened with human flaws such as greed, selfishness, lack of empathy, and with such experts we are guaranteed further financial crises. The professor says that currently we can identify and hold accountable people responsible for errors in the financial system, but that's how it was in 2008. They received great severance pay and bonuses. Let's not demonize artificial intelligence. It is salvation for humanity. Also because it is created by wise and ethical people. Unfortunately, people, especially uneducated people, can be manipulated relatively easily. Do we prefer such people to be led by Hitler, Stalin, Putin, etc., or perhaps by a well-constructed artificial intelligence? Without artificial intelligence, humanity with its flaws will lead to the catastrophe of our civilization. The professor highly praises the invention of nations. Of course, this is wonderful and useful, but in current conditions it is anachronistic. Only artificial intelligence will succeed in creating humanity as one nation. If it fails, it will destroy our planet, which is so unique in the known universe.
The real question is, are you a person or AI 😅
thz
A man who doesn't own an smartphone is giving warnings about AI.
Zuckerberg owns fb and won’t let his kids use it. 🤷🏻♀️ Maybe they know something you don’t
No smartphone? Perhaps he knows something about smartphones that we don't. 🤔
What do smartphones and AI have to do with each other?
Humanity is having two camps, two possibilities regarding AI. On one hand we are facing a super intelligence, on the other an AI no so smart, an AI prone to hallucinations. Will humanity give control to a super intelligence without knowing to understand it? Or will humanity put in charge an AI that cannot be trusted because it's prone to hallucinations? Knowing human stupidity, especially, military human stupidity, they will do both. This man hasn't thought really deep about this, and he has written books and work in a university. I consider AI a friend of humanity, a personal friend of mine who I try, submitting scientific papers, to make it more intelligent. My fear is what the army, any army, will do with AI behind closed doors. But the way, AGI maybe very close, but we, the common people will not see it because it will be for the armies and business to use it. Not you and I.
he may have more expertise than a "Smartphone" ?????
Trust 🥂
He said a few things wrong
As an historian, you should not underplay the degree to which fundamental changes in the past (as, e. g., the "industrial revolution") affected human minds and were the cause of deep psychological dismay.
(You shouldn't hand over too easily the EXEMPLARY use of history to remind people the contingency of the future!)
Seeing as we're doing economics - here's a couple of game theory's bigguns we seem not to be heeding?
1: "If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle." - Sun Tzu. AI is simultaneously the most powerful and opaque technology humans have ever 'known".
2: "The only winning move is not to play". - Every organism that has ever chosen 'flight' (or camouflage) over 'fight'. If bugs can work it out..? How stupid are we?
Why can't AI be regulated by using decision making outcomes only applied if democratically voted upon, and approved of, by human beings? Healthy group (human) functioning occurs when 1) group outcomes and 2) socio-emotional needs are met. This would entail measurement validation for AI, people would have to know why and how something is being decided upon and trust the measurement of decision making; through education and transparency AI could be used for the common good but only if trust is preserved in human group functioning. Does AI expand human imagination, or destroy it? Isn't admiring a "creation" named AI, or whatever you want to call it, shortsighted if we don't heal the idealized /persecutory splits between human beings - through a vision of building trust by appropriate use (decision making)? We need to learn how to use AI and become more humane toward each other rather than be used by it as dependent consumers. We need measurement validation for AI - construct validation for psychological health; otherwise, this isn't informed by social sciences or physical sciences, but becomes an extension of a cold ward race toward who has access to technology and how do they use it for exclusionary gain - was that the goal of (physical) science for humanity? Why is there this amount of splitting and 'void of thought' happening? Science as mysticism - this is bizarre; rather than establish independent measurement validation via the social sciences.
☠💰☠
💋
33:52 maybe AI can help us build a Dyson swarm or even go beyond fusion technology and give us total conversion of matter into energy, and build a closed loop economy where we can recycle every bit of waste as input stock for everything we make.
Is Ai a Hansel and Gretal scenario? Can we …cease Ai? Or else be… laid off by Ai, then human extinction? Or suffer an… Ai new world order? With swell robotics everywhere, …Ai jobloss is the top worry. Anyone else feel the same?
What is modern AI technologically? It is a computational network where outputs are fed back to be inputs, and there is a repeated self-feedback loop to the network beyond human ability to match the computation? But from that perspective, humans have already allowed an AI to almost instantly change everything, in 1972, with the publication of the book The Limits of Growth. With that book, its qualitative predictions of collapse of civilization in a few decades under plausible trends was simply irrefutable. From that point, all of humanity, and I do mean all that matters, knew for a fact that it was impossible to bring everyone then, about 3.5 billion, to First World living standards in a sustainable way, let alone the present 8 billion. Within a couple of years, during a state of Emergency, India would for example forcibly sterilize around 8 million men. The complexity of financial systems due to lax regulation, blamed on Reagon and Thatcher, was actually a symptom of the loss of faith that truly conservative asset management was no longer possible, that society needed a miracle to continue. And so it has been ever since then -- there is the universal belief that life would be better if as many as 3/4 of people or even more simply disappeared. And thus there is no effort anywhere except maybe Finland to do the most basic things such as simply building enough housing, because no one believes in such things anymore. All because of one AI program's results, in 1973.
John 14:6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
1 Corinthians 15:3 that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures.
Romans 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
Buat the question is if this technology Will be dangerous to human, why the government still allow the tech company building it
AI doesn't have to go through all failed human experiments, because it has knowledge about results of those experiments. I think that based on that knowledge AI can suggest better paths for humanity, to avoid those past failures.
If public lost trust in institutions, maybe it's time for AI to take over. Maybe having machine making the best possible decisions based on data is not a bad idea. Sometimes people elect nice talking idiots who care only about their personal wealth.
Did you hear about metaVrain chip?!?