Instant Deck Tech: Bridgevine (Modern)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 183

  • @GrabnarDaCzar
    @GrabnarDaCzar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Leyline actually is super important for the sideboard which is why there are 4. If opponent can easily sacrifice a creature like an opposing Neonate, we lose bridge. So Leyline makes it so creatures opponent control don't die, but are exiled instead.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Good call.

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Dying" not meaning simply getting destroyed or sacrificed and leaving the battlefield tripped me up so many times. People should be told more often that "dying" in MTG lingo is heavily dependent on going to the graveyard.

  • @mrbreeze3954
    @mrbreeze3954 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everything with vengevine is simply perfect, I need to see you playing this deck!

  • @Piratesaregay12322
    @Piratesaregay12322 6 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    His name is napaulm, it's a play on napalm. Not NA Paul M.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The capitalization of the N and P threw me off :)

    • @kelvinliu-huang5955
      @kelvinliu-huang5955 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wasn't sure if you were trolling us haha

    • @kevinbaudin9557
      @kevinbaudin9557 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mark Jake it can be a joke on "applepie" too. Cause 314.
      Napaulmpie, double joke.

    • @dpr_8714
      @dpr_8714 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Another classic lol

    • @TheMattmatic
      @TheMattmatic 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love the smell of NA Paul M in the morning.

  • @Rayce96
    @Rayce96 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck is so amazingly cool. It feels really powerful too

  • @Zach0451
    @Zach0451 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    PLAY IT

    • @Janshevik
      @Janshevik 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      probably he will. It has Grisly salvage in it

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      He should replace Blood Moon with Fulminator Mage though.

  • @elpokitolama
    @elpokitolama 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I faced it a few weeks ago. This is terrifyingly good.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It seems like it could do some really powerful things with the right draw.

    • @elpokitolama
      @elpokitolama 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      MTGGoldfish oh boy, and even with the wrong ones...

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Léo N. This is the cars that leave meren hated. I can reanimate about 5 creatures each turn if allowed.

    • @kelvinliu-huang5955
      @kelvinliu-huang5955 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cool idea, though it seems like a (maybe?) slightly faster Dredge that dies to a stiff breeze. In addition to everything that hits Dredge, it also folds to the opponent killing their own creature (blocking, removal, Fulminator, Ballista, Neonate, etc.), regular board wipes (whereas only Anger or Terminus works on Dredge), Explosives, D-Sphere, Pulse, Echoing Truth, Runed Halo, Ratchet Bomb, etc.

  • @datlad35960
    @datlad35960 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    oooo this looks aweomse. I wanna see the goodness!

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm kinda shocked that Bridge from Below is legal considering how broken it is in Legacy.

    • @joshuastiebel8806
      @joshuastiebel8806 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its only good because cabal therapy/dread return are legal in legacy

    • @Ruinah
      @Ruinah 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here's something to watch in the meantime - th-cam.com/video/TS7RQx8ZgOM/w-d-xo.html

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh, right, it's Dread Return that was banned in Modern. Guess I got the two mixed up.

    • @Ruinah
      @Ruinah 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      BrewBrewBrewTheDeck If Dread Return were unbanned in Modern, we'd be one step closer to Oops All Spells being possible...

  • @reidparker1213
    @reidparker1213 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    "Blood Moon to kind of just jank out some wins because we can" XD

    • @tomjackal5708
      @tomjackal5708 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Tri-Game Wizards with only one swamp

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I played the deck some today and it's good but the Blood Moon makes zero sense so I replaced them with Fulminators and they performed much better. Especially since they synergize with the creatures-dying plan.

    • @ettorevolterrani2989
      @ettorevolterrani2989 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Guess what, a deck with 3 basics suffers from bloodmoon, incredible

  • @singedlesurfeurincurve5396
    @singedlesurfeurincurve5396 6 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Bone picker may be really good in the deck cause of all thoses XX mana creature who dies while enter the battelfield and its only one mana so you easily trigger Vengevine

    • @AP4rk3C4r
      @AP4rk3C4r 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Singed le surfeur incurvé I was going to say the same thing.

    • @singedlesurfeurincurve5396
      @singedlesurfeurincurve5396 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      AP4rk3dC4r yeah turn one delver of secret with death touch not that bad

    • @TheMattmatic
      @TheMattmatic 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It'd be cool if someone FINALLY found a deck where Bone picker can work. Love that card - in theory.

    • @Drak8492
      @Drak8492 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wow that's a great idea! I agree. I think shave the 2 delve creatures and 2 endless ones to make space for the 4 bone pickers. Liliana seems sick in this deck too!

    • @elizakleinman1332
      @elizakleinman1332 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's also a way to win through graveyard hate

  • @aaschmit
    @aaschmit 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have so many of these cards sitting and waiting to be combined into a nasty deck like this! Play this one, please!

  • @Buhwaa33
    @Buhwaa33 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    it's got my vote!

    • @dnthymamai
      @dnthymamai 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      how do I vote on a deck I like to see him play?

    • @Buhwaa33
      @Buhwaa33 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just like this video. And if you want a comment probably goes a long way. That's it. No website to go to, just this video.

    • @dnthymamai
      @dnthymamai 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      oh, ok! thanks

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Johnathan Wermann there is a website you can visit

  • @whiteroom533
    @whiteroom533 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    this deck looks like a lot of fun to play, and watch

  • @guillermocortes4415
    @guillermocortes4415 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    THIS ONE!!

  • @AlmostM
    @AlmostM 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This looks really sweet. Please play it!

  • @Alvikus
    @Alvikus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Leyline if the Void isn’t just for graveyard hate mainboard. It stops the “opponents creature dies” trigger on bridge. Because for a creature to die, it has to go to the graveyard. LotV is played in legacy for the same reason in bridge reanimator

  • @Fang1414
    @Fang1414 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would really like to see this played since one of our local players took it to scg open indy and did amazing with it

  • @keithbarlow9701
    @keithbarlow9701 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta play it. No question.

  • @jacobsocia3966
    @jacobsocia3966 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck is so spicy. I love it so much. Please play it.

  • @flobbershnof
    @flobbershnof 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck looks sick!

  • @int3r4ct
    @int3r4ct 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ah, bridge from below. I thought this was some random deck playing ensnaring bridge and vengevine and I couldn't figure out how the hell that would even work.

  • @ESWmovie
    @ESWmovie 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even if this doesn't get the most votes this week, you should play it anyways. I took it undefeated to a 5 round, 30 man Modern FNM. Such a blast to play!

    • @ESWmovie
      @ESWmovie 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Of note, I did not have Sibsig Muckdraggers or Liliana, so I played Hooting Mandrills and Fecundity in their place. Drawing all those cards was the stones against Jund

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sweet!

    • @napaulm314
      @napaulm314 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad the deck worked for you, have you checked out the MTG Salvation forum for the deck? Any input is greatly appreciated

  • @Icenri
    @Icenri 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd love to see this one played

  • @apanapane
    @apanapane 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This seems so spicy! Love it!

  • @averagejoebro5206
    @averagejoebro5206 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could we go sultai? Run as many x drops possible dump our bridges then flash in protean hulk to put every x drop in our deck onto the field and istantly die so we get the hulk trigger and all the x drops for a massive zombie horde?

  • @Volvary
    @Volvary 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play this. Bridge is probably one of my favorite enchants ever. Alongside Witch's Mist.

  • @anosmianAcrimony
    @anosmianAcrimony 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Bridge from Below doesn’t do *nothing* if you cast it. It provides a lot of black devotion.

    • @ironsheep0026
      @ironsheep0026 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      anosmianAcrimon You don't caste it nub cake.

    • @commiescum4516
      @commiescum4516 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      He knows you're not supposed to cast it guys...

    • @TheSimmus
      @TheSimmus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      anosmianAcrimony
      It also triggers prowess and is a 3/3 when Starfield of Nyx is in play.
      Starfield of Nyx Dredge totalley legit

  • @ernestc5641
    @ernestc5641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The blood moon seems sketchy with 1 swamp and 2 forests. That relies too heavily on looting effects.

    • @Blorblorb
      @Blorblorb 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ernest C well the plan is to cast 0 mana cards so who cares, am i wrong?

    • @ernestc5641
      @ernestc5641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Blorblorb I would usually agree, but more than half the deck heavily relies on colors that aren’t red. Half the looting isn’t red, so all fetches has to hit basics the first few turns if there is any chance of looting late game with Blood Moon out.

    • @Blorblorb
      @Blorblorb 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ernest C well yes, it's true... But the only mana intensive loot is grisly salvage, the other looters are red or have a single colored mana, so i think a blood moon is more beneficial than counterproductive in certain matchups

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I very much disagree. This deck doesn't even have mana acceleration and Blood Moon only really shines when you drop it before turn 3 even on the draw.

    • @ernestc5641
      @ernestc5641 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      So here’s what I’m imagining with the goal of T3 Blood Moon against Tron:
      T1: Fetch and/or shock and Loot which must have red and 0 mountains so must be nonbasic
      T2: Fetch basic and/or Shock most likely green and hopefully loot with small chance of Grisley
      T3: Any Land Blood Moon
      End result: most likely 1 basic and no chance to get another source of that color, so you have 18 dead cards like Lily and Grisley, shocked and fetched many times, and you just run out colorless stuff in hopes it’s enough since there’s a low chance you draw one out of 2 other basics in your deck even with looting. Tron just sits there and keeps playing lands until they have Karn mana while you also sit there trying to draw a land or swinging a few zombies a turn. They seem to actually be favored since their whole deck tries to no miss land drops if Tron fails, so Blood Moon would be counterproductive against the deck it’s supposed to shut down.

  • @GrayDescent
    @GrayDescent 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This seems super interesting. Play this.

  • @nathanwarms5687
    @nathanwarms5687 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is so cool! Please play it!

  • @mave6602
    @mave6602 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What Bridge frim Below and Lands in the same Deck? What strange constelation is this?

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Heh, yeah. Also, how come Bridge is legal in Modern? It is so absurd in Manaless Dredge in Legacy.

    • @joshuastiebel8806
      @joshuastiebel8806 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only because cabal therapy is legal in legacy

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah, Cabal Therapy isn't what makes that deck good. Dread Return is which you mentioned in your other comment. I forgot that that one was banned, not Bridge.

    • @mave6602
      @mave6602 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually the total amount of low cmc discard cards together with the best delvers (one of them is Golgari Grave Troll) and Dread Return makes the Deck rediculess. I bet they rather banned those two important cards of the Deck instead of Bridge because they feared the combo of those two can reanimate by just milling yourself while Bridge is very unique and could at least create interesting decks.
      But it would be interesting how modern would look with those two unbanned and Bridge banned. I bet there would be more reanimation decks using both cards together than Bridge Decks currently played in modern

  • @lloydlineske2642
    @lloydlineske2642 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do this one.

  • @luliby2309
    @luliby2309 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is some spicy craziness. It looks like it'll work better than the Unearth deck though.

  • @Chapterhouse86
    @Chapterhouse86 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dang! I was watching your stream when you played against this deck. It's so janky! Play it Seth!

    • @megapixzel
      @megapixzel 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      do you remember what deck it was? i want to watch it on the replay channel.

    • @Chapterhouse86
      @Chapterhouse86 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was the stream for Panglacial Bring to Light, the match starts at the 1:39:00 mark or so. I went and looked for the right stream just for you mang.

    • @megapixzel
      @megapixzel 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      many thanks

  • @nolife874
    @nolife874 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm so happy to see this here also I'm guessing there's no room for white in this deck for rally for 0 getting back all the 0 mana guys they all die and make a ton of zombies?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hmm, I could see trying it over Liliana maybe. Getting back a bunch of 0/0's seems sweet.

    • @nolife874
      @nolife874 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      MTGGoldfish yea but I guess it's a dead card without grave set up

    • @courtdando7467
      @courtdando7467 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i suppose since you never want to cast a bridge you could cut black from the deck and replace the black recursion with rally and salvage with something like cathartic reunion or maybe grapple with the past

    • @nolife874
      @nolife874 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Court Dando that does sound nice but losing black changes the sideboard alot aswell and would make layline a dead draw outside the opening hand

    • @nolife874
      @nolife874 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      picking up white also let's you run path which is removal that keeps bridge from bellow in the grave

  • @dss734
    @dss734 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please play this deck it looks too awesome!!!

  • @jacktroiano5510
    @jacktroiano5510 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:51 for combo/control, pickle part our opponent's defenses

  • @Justiferous
    @Justiferous 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Deck has 4 copies of Gristly Salvage, which means it was made for Seth to play.

  • @megapixzel
    @megapixzel 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    this seems like jank, but like good jank, i look forward to watching seth play this (even if it doesn't end up being a much a brew it'll probably be a stream deck at some point)

  • @Zalanaar
    @Zalanaar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Traverse the Ulvenwald! is a one mana creature tutor good for something? :)

    • @harrisjm62
      @harrisjm62 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      while its easy to activate delirium, I found in testing it's just not that great. The gameplan for the deck is to just go wide. It doesn't have any amazing creatures or silver bullet answers in the mainboard. It's probably best kept in the sideboard, and you can use Magus of The Moon, which is a solid tutor target. Fulminator Mage also fits the deck.

  • @PaulWeiner123
    @PaulWeiner123 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    THIS IS AMAZING

  • @cory9144
    @cory9144 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes this one please.

  • @Drak8492
    @Drak8492 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just a suggestion: Put the link to vote for the deck on the mtg goldfish website in the description box so people can just click the link there if they want to vote for the deck. Making people open a new tab and search your domain and try to figure out how to vote for the deck on their own really disuades people from actually voting or showing support for their deck.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      For Instant Deck Techs whichever one gets the most likes (with comments and subs also counting) is the winner for the week. For Against the Odds there's a link in the description to the poll (there isn't an actual poll for Instant Deck Techs).

    • @Drak8492
      @Drak8492 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      MTGGoldfish oh thankyou. Also, what do you think about adding 4 bone pickers in for the 2 delve creatures and 2 endless ones? And why not Fulminator Mage over blood moon? Can find Fulminator with gather the pack and salvage and can recurr it with the liliana.

  • @lihavnaaman6872
    @lihavnaaman6872 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    liliana heretic-iller

  • @SirDanyTheWarrior
    @SirDanyTheWarrior 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Come on Seth, let's play this and scoop to Rest in Peace.
    But when we do not... OH BOY

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean ... the SB actually has answers to RIP.

    • @SirDanyTheWarrior
      @SirDanyTheWarrior 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      How good are we at drawing sideboard cards in the format of being good at drawing sideboard cards?

  • @blackmamba0079
    @blackmamba0079 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    super deck!

  • @abelexclusa9856
    @abelexclusa9856 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This thing is nutsy... Do It!

  • @jarreldoomis3502
    @jarreldoomis3502 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You better play this.

  • @squigglygiggaly4149
    @squigglygiggaly4149 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Journey to jund! Where do I gotta send deck lists?

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      saffronolive [the symbol in email addresses] mtggoldfish.com

    • @squigglygiggaly4149
      @squigglygiggaly4149 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      BrewBrewBrewTheDeck but how exactly?

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you mean? Send an email to that address with your decklist that you wanna see featured on the channel.

  • @mirtul1
    @mirtul1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    please please please play this!!!

  • @nooneatall5612
    @nooneatall5612 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really Spicy

  • @matwhang
    @matwhang 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks awesome! Play it pls!!!!

  • @thecoolryanboy
    @thecoolryanboy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you make more budget decks

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We have budget magic every Monday, at a minimum! I'll try to slip in more here and there as they come along.

  • @TheBubble127
    @TheBubble127 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play it!

  • @RaynTheHapless
    @RaynTheHapless 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wouldn't this be better if instead of 4 of the x drop 0/0 just do the heartless summoning myr retriever combo and go infinite

    • @Kool212
      @Kool212 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because you have now added another specific card to the combo. This deck has functionally 12 of one card and 8 of the other. You have to get one of the 4 copies of heartless summoning and myr retriever in your build.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The biggest challenge with Heartless Summonings is building the deck in a way where it still works without Hearthless Summonings. Going infinite sounds super sweet though!

    • @RaynTheHapless
      @RaynTheHapless 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fair point, it seems like a fun deck but I feel like it needs to be tweaked.

  • @shotokantiger4982
    @shotokantiger4982 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I vote yes for playing it

  • @CSDragon
    @CSDragon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Blood moon because we can"
    I think that might be the most Seth thing you've ever said

  • @KnowArt
    @KnowArt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    sweeet

  • @thesquirteler4520
    @thesquirteler4520 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweeeeeeeet deck!

  • @m-hcv
    @m-hcv 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    spicy

  • @elambruce7491
    @elambruce7491 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have no idea how this might turn out but PLAY IT

  • @XxMechaxWolfxX
    @XxMechaxWolfxX 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    PLEASE PLAYU THIS

  • @ThrabenValiant
    @ThrabenValiant 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Leyline prevents the opponents creatures from dying, they get exiled instead, meaning the Bridges are safer.

  • @KILLAH2708
    @KILLAH2708 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    just voting here, to see this jank

  • @jod6191
    @jod6191 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    please play this!

  • @Jonzin4BeatzNYC
    @Jonzin4BeatzNYC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to see it in action because I can't see it working until I see it working.. Do it!

    • @napaulm314
      @napaulm314 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch the Round 11 feature match of SCG Indianapolis from a few weeks ago to see it on camera if you haven't yet. I also stream it on twitch with the same username in the video (NaPaulm314) when I get the time

  • @dpr_8714
    @dpr_8714 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PLEASE! play this deck.

  • @Viscerality
    @Viscerality 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes pls

  • @Arthur-ux9ez
    @Arthur-ux9ez 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try that with Athreos, the white black god.

  • @hellsingfan89
    @hellsingfan89 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't this just a worse version of manaless dredge from legacy/vintage?

    • @harrisjm62
      @harrisjm62 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome to Modern, everything is a worse version of Legacy.

  • @ParadiseNigh
    @ParadiseNigh 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Spiiiiice.

  • @sergiosanmuahahaha
    @sergiosanmuahahaha 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Soooo... you gonna play this right? Right?

  • @scottd.5705
    @scottd.5705 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like this deck should play claim to fame

  • @SixBeark
    @SixBeark 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quest for the gravelord is maybe a 1 mana 5/5 that ignores graveyard hate here. Even better if you go back to commune with the gods instead of gather the pack

    • @napaulm314
      @napaulm314 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hadn't considered that card, it still doesn't work through a Leyline or RiP though unfortunately. Playing Commune also makes hitting sideboard Blood Moon easier

  • @harrybenjamin8202
    @harrybenjamin8202 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    please play this

  • @surakarus
    @surakarus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Support

  • @adbirk19
    @adbirk19 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lol at first I thought ensnaring bridge.

  • @timekiller1991
    @timekiller1991 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    play this!!!!!!!!

  • @TheLacer8er
    @TheLacer8er 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play it

  • @TheQueerLeaf
    @TheQueerLeaf 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play this

  • @anosmianAcrimony
    @anosmianAcrimony 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:51 pickle

  • @tomjackal5708
    @tomjackal5708 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    >blood moon in sb
    >one basic swamp

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seth in a nutshell (even though he didn't make this one).

    • @harrisjm62
      @harrisjm62 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The deck is fine without black. There are brews that drop black entirely for Temur, or you could just go straight Gruul. It's not like you ever cast Bridge.

    • @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138
      @brewbrewbrewthedeck4138 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Uh, the deck as it is definitely isn't fine without black. Can't cast Liliana, can't cast Grisly Salvage, can't cast the Sibsig thing and can't cast your sideboard cards.

  • @TheLegalCustodian
    @TheLegalCustodian 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    DO IT

  • @danypoko9509
    @danypoko9509 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    go strange bridge deck

  • @conner5022
    @conner5022 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    P L A Y I T

  • @benwesse8682
    @benwesse8682 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Noice

  • @Richmo_
    @Richmo_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plaaaaaayiiiiit

  • @masonirby
    @masonirby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Better be careful Seth! I think @DesolatorMagic is mad that you are a more successful youtuber than him! 😂😂😂

  • @Indomakio
    @Indomakio 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I support the Bone picker idea. Also, Seth, you know you want to play this.

  • @Heftor
    @Heftor 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plaaaaaaaaaaay it!

  • @WhiteIceHawk
    @WhiteIceHawk 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So fragile... i want to see it

  • @DannyWatchUtena
    @DannyWatchUtena 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not enough blood moons. All red decks should have 4 bloodmoons

  • @pietroboni2553
    @pietroboni2553 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ultra janky

  • @zackestin1368
    @zackestin1368 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This looks like strictly worse dredge tbh.

    • @TheMattmatic
      @TheMattmatic 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      But the spice, Zack. The spice!

  • @romanespinosa4084
    @romanespinosa4084 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play it!