Instant Deck Tech: 8 Snap (Modern)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 178

  • @Chapterhouse86
    @Chapterhouse86 6 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Oh damn! This deck looks so sweet, a control deck with 8 of my favorite creatures! Please make it into a video Seth!
    One small correction with something you said in the video. You said something like being able to cast 12 Cryptic Commands, but since both Snapcaster and Torrential Gearhulk exile the card being flashed back, the max of any one spell we can cast in a game is 8. However, the deck looks amazingly fun!

    • @primedialga
      @primedialga 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      so... we need pull from eternity

  • @maciek19882
    @maciek19882 6 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    You can't 12 cryptic. It is exiled after flashing back

    • @BloodyScythe666
      @BloodyScythe666 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wonder if Seth knows how Flashback works.

    • @sebastianrodriguez9451
      @sebastianrodriguez9451 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      he means u have 12 cryptics in the deck... not like u can play 12 cryptics..

    • @testthewest123
      @testthewest123 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Even this is not true, since if you draw the 8 creature "cryptics" you actually have 0. If you draw one, you only have 2. Speaking of 12 cryptics the way Seth did is just wrong.

    • @KitsuneAshlynn
      @KitsuneAshlynn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Not with that attitude!

    • @derekbrothers2334
      @derekbrothers2334 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can cast it 8 times

  • @AppaTheBizon1228
    @AppaTheBizon1228 6 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    darn, was expecting 4x Snapcaster and 4x Dire Fleet Daredevil

    • @omegagaming609
      @omegagaming609 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's a gearhulk in the thumbnail -_-

    • @danielgehring7437
      @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Omega Gaming
      12 Snap!

    • @Zerachael1337
      @Zerachael1337 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you blame him for not knowing what the creature looks like? It's hardly ever played in real competitive modern lists. Gideon is just better for the slot and mana.

    • @stormcrow1685
      @stormcrow1685 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Evan Tamol just like LSV

  • @the_snakelicious
    @the_snakelicious 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You should call Torrential by his real name, Fatcaster Mage. Oboro also enables that trick of bouncing it with colorless mana and replaying it to get two blue mana. Also, definitely play this!

  • @couchpotatoe91
    @couchpotatoe91 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just love the fact that this deck refuses to play anything at sorcery speed except a single batterskull xD

  • @GerBessa
    @GerBessa 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Snap = Squirtle
    Hulk = Blastoise

  • @tomjackal5708
    @tomjackal5708 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can't believe someone took that joke about your opponent playing 8snap and made it a deck

  • @Nether2342
    @Nether2342 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pssh get on my level. 16 snap with snapcaster mage, direfleet daredevil, goblin darkdwellers, and torrential gearhulk is where it's at.

  • @projektjohnny
    @projektjohnny 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    You cant go wrong with mono blue and nothing but counters XD

  • @clauderodrigue6461
    @clauderodrigue6461 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Should be izzet 12 snap with direfleet daredevil. Coward.

    • @VoidPrincessNoire
      @VoidPrincessNoire 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Why not 16 snap with goblin dark dwellers?

    • @AL-sw6im
      @AL-sw6im 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      why not 20 snap with snapback?

    • @stormcrow1685
      @stormcrow1685 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Claude Rodrigue just like LSV’s deck :P

  • @jaymo3ny
    @jaymo3ny 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems like Baral would shine in this deck with all the counter shenanigans. A four of dismember seems really risky especially against agro and burn.

  • @kiowaharrell
    @kiowaharrell 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Hold the phone this is a European tournament deck... didn't think Jace and bloodbraid would change the meta that badly

  • @chrisb8698
    @chrisb8698 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i was going to comment on the 12 cryptics thing, but i actually read the comments before posting...

  • @BentTimeAndSpace
    @BentTimeAndSpace 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wasn’t expecting that non-gaming sponsor in the beginning. Nice work

  • @willrybaltowski7114
    @willrybaltowski7114 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oboro is also useful against Jund opponent's who cast Kolaghan's Command during your draw step. Bounce the land to your hand and keep the card you drew that turn

  • @Level_1_Frog
    @Level_1_Frog 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    On paper, this deck looks so sweet. I'd be curious to see it in action, because it looks super fun.

  • @bretttrimble1173
    @bretttrimble1173 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Need this in video form, might have to make this looks super sweet.

  • @joshuataylor9508
    @joshuataylor9508 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like the idea of the deck. The only card I'm not sold on is think twice. Chart a Course seems better with the plan of the deck. Otherwise it seems solid

  • @TheEpik3YearOld
    @TheEpik3YearOld 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Add mission briefing for 12snap

  • @SaferCloud88
    @SaferCloud88 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been a while sonce I saw a deck with Rewind. That card is So Sweet !!

  • @kotge91
    @kotge91 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks sweet, where is disrupting shoal ??

  • @danielgehring7437
    @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, Seth, you should get a comp of one of those wallets and tell us how it goes. Those things look sweet.

  • @prdamico
    @prdamico 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks great, can not wait for dominaria to shake things up and diverisfy the meta even more, then a core set added in later on, modern is looking like the best thing out there, course I still love pauper and edh !

  • @moneyforshort
    @moneyforshort 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This seems like a perfect Seth deck.

  • @WeskersPlayhouse
    @WeskersPlayhouse 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How many more decks can we make whose names work with this naming convention? cause I love it

  • @gustavowadaslopes2479
    @gustavowadaslopes2479 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh. Those rigid wallets seem cool.

  • @moseskarunia
    @moseskarunia 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Hey bro, how did you lose the game?"
    "I cast 8 dismembers with a monoblue deck"
    "What?"

  • @alexprofanter1659
    @alexprofanter1659 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WB Planeswalker pox would be cool

  • @ryandietrich8604
    @ryandietrich8604 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make videos of this, it looks sweet.

  • @keithbarlow9701
    @keithbarlow9701 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do you find the deck lists for these small tournaments (including the small Japanese tournaments)?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mostly here: www.hareruyamtg.com/en/deck/search.aspx

  • @grizzlymanverneteil4443
    @grizzlymanverneteil4443 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Draw go is back! Play it!

  • @alasanof
    @alasanof 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can you cast twelve cryptic commands if they're exiled after you cast them from the graveyard?

  • @RockStar5656
    @RockStar5656 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Snapcaster and Phatcaster FTW!!

  • @peewee130946
    @peewee130946 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I run 2 gearhulks in my modern deck 4 unfortunately isn’t that great it dies to artifact destruction. Also note you can remand a spell back to your hand from gearhulk

  • @Count_Isouard
    @Count_Isouard 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks awesome!

  • @natebianco7912
    @natebianco7912 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Seth you should do commercials!

    • @SomeFreakingCactus
      @SomeFreakingCactus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You know, now that you say it, he does sort-of give off that same vibe a lot of successful podcasters give off.

    • @stormcrow1685
      @stormcrow1685 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nathan Bianco YES!!!

    • @natebianco7912
      @natebianco7912 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kyle Hart ya totally! I’d buy that wallet now!

  • @mlgdolphinlord4253
    @mlgdolphinlord4253 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super sweet I hope you play it

  • @anonymoususer69
    @anonymoususer69 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The ole snapcaster and fatcaster

  • @BubblyBatty
    @BubblyBatty 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the ridge wallet hold foils?

  • @brendanfleming1769
    @brendanfleming1769 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Deck looks cool

  • @Dynavolt-ol1gb
    @Dynavolt-ol1gb 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks sweet!

  • @michaelchronister9246
    @michaelchronister9246 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Seth, I know this deck tech is old but I think you should revisit it and maybe play it on steam or something. With some of the new cards in the format, like commence the endgame, search for azcanta (not sure if it was legal during the original video) and other cards I can't think of right now, this deck could be actually good

  • @凜川-v1e
    @凜川-v1e 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about place one Mythical Teaching in this deck?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could be sweet, probably need black mana though.

  • @jormungardwe
    @jormungardwe 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are in mono blue with dissmembers and you are not using darkslick shores ore sunken ruins like merfolk do?

    • @josht2136
      @josht2136 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Claudio Cavalcante Bomfim Júnior was thinking the same; then you can run black cards in sb like a damnation. Well, maybe not damnation since it’s 2BB, but something.

  • @_Niffum
    @_Niffum 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should make a 12 caster deck and add the red flat caster

  • @stewartmorris9771
    @stewartmorris9771 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is amazing!

  • @xWholeGrain
    @xWholeGrain 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aren't the cryptics exiled after snapcaster? Isn't 12 impossible?

  • @Zarundar
    @Zarundar 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd like to see this in action. I wonder how it'll do against a competitive mtgo field.

  • @shangman589
    @shangman589 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Woohoo! Another new sponser! :D

  • @VoidPrincessNoire
    @VoidPrincessNoire 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    He can totally play 12 Cryptic Commands, he just needs to cycle them back in the graveyard with PSY-Framelord Omega :P

  • @SomeFreakingCactus
    @SomeFreakingCactus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Huh! New sponsors!
    Neat!

  • @Veon97
    @Veon97 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh Yeah, MORE CONTROL! Play this!

  • @awfulunicorn
    @awfulunicorn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about UR 12 SNAP with dark dwellers ?

    • @devinanni8117
      @devinanni8117 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheAwfulUnicorn instant speed

    • @awfulunicorn
      @awfulunicorn 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      8 SNAP and 4 dwelly bois?

  • @goat666db
    @goat666db 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rewind!!! 😵❤️

  • @samueldionne9675
    @samueldionne9675 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    8-rack, 8-whack, 8-snap...
    I'm sure I'm missing some, but what do you think will be the next 8-deck?

  • @Charles-jj2su
    @Charles-jj2su 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Play this!

  • @bengardner8639
    @bengardner8639 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now we just need 4x Dire Fleet Daredevil for 12 Snap.

  • @moongarn5676
    @moongarn5676 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:05 Uhhh, I think you got the math a bit wrong there Seth. It's only 8 cryptics in a game at most. Since after you flashback with snaps or gearhulk it gets exiled.

  • @kinkajuu1
    @kinkajuu1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    UNEXPECTED TRON!

    • @Jesin00
      @Jesin00 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm pretty sure he said he's recorded it and it'll be released on schedule.

  • @avizueta
    @avizueta 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does torrential gear hulk hit ancestral vision?

    • @danielgehring7437
      @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Drew the RN
      Yes! AV cannot be played _for_ it's mana cost (since it doesn't have one); effects that allow you to play it without paying the mana cost entirely dodge that restriction.

    • @MrKyGuy
      @MrKyGuy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It actually doesn’t, sad to to say. Ancestral is a Sorcery, and Torrential only hits Instants.

    • @danielgehring7437
      @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah, shit. My bad. Got wrapped up in the theoretical and forgot to read the friggin' type line.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're right about how Torrential works though!

  • @Aritic440
    @Aritic440 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks fun

  • @FIREWARRIOR46
    @FIREWARRIOR46 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You cannot play 12 cryptics even theoretically bc flashback exiles the card from the graveyard.

    • @peewee130946
      @peewee130946 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dominic Kearney technically it’s more than 12 since you can remand a spell from s gearhulk back to your hand

    • @FIREWARRIOR46
      @FIREWARRIOR46 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      jacob blackman okay... but then your flashback spell isnt actually even resolved so... not the best play....

    • @SomeFreakingCactus
      @SomeFreakingCactus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Technically, you could add Pull from AEther.

    • @SomeFreakingCactus
      @SomeFreakingCactus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or play against Eldrazi & Taxes.

    • @peewee130946
      @peewee130946 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dominic Kearney actually it is the best play if your opponent goes do nothing pass the turn you can cast gearhulk flashback a cryptic and remand your cryptic. Which basically replaces remand for cryptic and a random draw that’s actually really good

  • @Ruueookkv
    @Ruueookkv 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play this!!!

  • @ShuckCreations
    @ShuckCreations 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now green and white need an 8 deck.

  • @StrandedData
    @StrandedData 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the 8 ____ decks. Really wanna see you play this

  • @starmorpheus
    @starmorpheus 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Woah a sponsor that isn't card kingdom!

  • @felixcarle2217
    @felixcarle2217 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    no Vedalken Shackles??????? :(

  • @Haustinj
    @Haustinj 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wanna see this deck.

  • @DarkApocalyptiaX
    @DarkApocalyptiaX 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    No Narset?

  • @ablemcman
    @ablemcman 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not enough snaps! Add Jace Vrynn Prodigy and follow the 12 Snap Program!

  • @sensei9767
    @sensei9767 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Splitting your counters is pretty normal in controldecks.

  • @elambruce7491
    @elambruce7491 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why not 12 snap with that red dude?

    • @raulperez2308
      @raulperez2308 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Elam Bruce ain't got flash

    • @TheRealWormbo
      @TheRealWormbo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because it's hard to cast in a mono-blue deck. Also it can't cast your own spells and you don't know if your opponent even has anything relevant it could hit.

    • @danielgehring7437
      @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheRealWormbo
      Yeah but if you opponent has nothing relevant to cast you're winning anyway.

    • @TheRealWormbo
      @TheRealWormbo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dire Fleet Daredevil can only cast instant and sorcery spell, i.e. likely a whiff in decks built around permanents.

    • @danielgehring7437
      @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheRealWormbo
      But that's great for us? If they're really playing Stompy with no tricks whatsoever it's going to be easy for us to take the board and never give it back with our infinite Ambush Vipers. Seriously now, when was the last time you built a deck and said "You know what this deck definitely doesn't need? More Lightning Bolts."
      Addendum - I'm not saying DFD is a great card or that it somehow makes/breaks the deck. I just figure we're already all-in on the plan, might as well play something that doesn't scoop to Scavenging Ooze.

  • @StoicheiaSage
    @StoicheiaSage 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    New way to build Modern decks: Get two redundant cards with a powerful effect, run 4 of each, find a word in both their names or just pick a word in the stronger one, and call it 8 ----.

  • @SuFFoK8iNG
    @SuFFoK8iNG 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mono blue...... man after my heart lol

  • @zacharybosley1935
    @zacharybosley1935 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm all for monoblue

  • @benblatz8558
    @benblatz8558 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could also add phantasmal

  • @qbpie
    @qbpie 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can only cast 8 Cryptics, not 12. Snapcaster and Gearhulk exile afterward.

  • @Alexhandre13
    @Alexhandre13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait, there's a card named Piracy Charm? I need it for my pirate deck!

  • @anthonymoua2678
    @anthonymoua2678 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    play it!

  • @Zaulked
    @Zaulked 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vedalken Shackles?

  • @sensei9767
    @sensei9767 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This needs blinkstuff to snap your snapcasters.

  • @natek5168
    @natek5168 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love piracy charm.

  • @ecpracticesquad4674
    @ecpracticesquad4674 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can't cryptic 12 times... Both Gearhulk and Snapcasters exile the spell after it's played.

  • @Kajemby
    @Kajemby 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the deck, but if you cast dismember off torrential, I don't think you'll lose life, as you cast it for free. Or am I wrong in that? As far as I can tell you'd cast 2 dismembers for 4 life off torrential gearhulk!

    • @danielgehring7437
      @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kajemby
      You are correct.

    • @Kajemby
      @Kajemby 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Daniel Gehring hooray! First for everything lol

  • @BloodyScythe666
    @BloodyScythe666 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was tricked by the thumbnail! Thought it was 8 Turtles like Calcite Snapper!
    Now I'm disappointed.

  • @ozfan6
    @ozfan6 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    While I like the deck in concept, similar decks have existed in the past with different win cons, and the problem is that it can't really answer decks like humans or affinity that flood the board. Just too bad against aggro to be playable while being questionable in having better matchups than other control decks.

    • @mk1533
      @mk1533 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ozfan6 This deck is missing the secret 1 of: Engulf the Shore. You can have another in the sideboard. It is instant, can clear your opponents board and return your snaps. With only 5 islands it can leave your hulk in play often uncontested.

  • @singedlesurfeurincurve5396
    @singedlesurfeurincurve5396 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Small japanese tourmament ? Never mind

  • @projektjohnny
    @projektjohnny 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please make a video!!

  • @saniwada
    @saniwada 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love control but I can never take a mono blue control list seriously...please play this deck and prove me wrong seth.

  • @lancergt1000
    @lancergt1000 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uhhh, I don't really get the advantage of sticking to mono-blue instead of splashing red/black/white in this kind of deck.

    • @SilverAlex92
      @SilverAlex92 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      A significantly better manabase, with strong utility lands, and almost everything is untaped and painless. Also mono-color with cantrips gives you a very very very consistent deck. You could splash white (imo the strongest splash color), and this would gain you paths over dismember, supreme veredict, and strong sideboard cards, at the cost of your mana base and a bit of consistency, and deck synergy. I dont think there is a strictly better option, however one cant deny that path is most of the times a stronger card than dismember.

    • @danielgehring7437
      @danielgehring7437 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nathanael Eugene
      Seth has a documented phobia of Blood Moon.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Upside if less painful mana. Downside is more painful Dismembers.

  • @letsgobrandon6992
    @letsgobrandon6992 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Needs to be 12 snap with direfleets

  • @ryanchevere5165
    @ryanchevere5165 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play itttt

  • @MovesMcgee1
    @MovesMcgee1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes please. Video

  • @azuraflame1
    @azuraflame1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Play this

  • @DonovanPresents
    @DonovanPresents 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    decks like this are why people don't like/trust mono blue decks. Piracy Charm is a cool edition, though!

  • @taylorbruning6144
    @taylorbruning6144 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck w archmages charm

  • @user-tr7di5sw2c
    @user-tr7di5sw2c 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    lets do UR 12snap!

  • @stormcrow1685
    @stormcrow1685 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. LSV just played this
    2. Daredevils?

  • @EMPCraft
    @EMPCraft 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually you CANT cryptic 12 Times in a Game, because gearhulk and snap do Exile The cryptic. And also why Not 3-4 sunken hollow. You have so many Basics that its probably almost Always untapped, and IT saves you 4-6 Life a Game.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, having some black mana makes sense.

  • @theodorwittwenmacher3793
    @theodorwittwenmacher3793 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey seth it's a german name so maybe it was a small german tournament