OME MT64 vs Bilstein 6112 vs Icon 2.5 EXP
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- www.shocksurpl...
We have been saying the @bilsteinUS 6112s are not only one of the best values in aftermarket suspension but are also the sweet spot for most enthusiasts. They offer 2.6” body performance for 2.0 money, last an incredibly long time, and although they do make some compromises to keep the cost as low as it is, most of those compromises do not detract from real-world performance and, in some cases, come with some notable benefits. With the release of the @iconvehicledynamicstv 2.5 EXP and the brand new @ARB4x4Accessories MT64s, we were excited to see if ol’ faithful could keep up with the new guys on the field. As is often the case, there were no true winners here, as each shock comes with its own benefits that make them winners for different use cases, so follow along to see which option is right for you.
When will we get a real world test of MT64’s from you guys?
facebones, email kristie@shocksurplus.com with the subject 'customer service escalation' - i agree, not acceptable to be playing the 1x response a day game to get something solved.
Not sure yet, ARB keeps yanking us around, saying they want to send us a set, or letting us drive their MT64 equipped vehicle, but then ghosting us after. Our Tacomas are tied up on other suspension timelines right now, Bilstein 8112 / Fox Performance Elite are next, then maybe MT64.
Hopefully by then we get an install done on a customer vehicle and use that as the review platform.
@@ShockSurplusI’m in Iowa… you can use mine 😂
which one better MT64 or bilstein 6112 for 4runner?
Bilstein 6112 or Old Man Emu MT64 for a 4runner? #overland #toyota4x4 #offroad
Could I buy just the MT64 shock and use the 886 spring that I already have with the shock?
@shocksurplus
Is it better to run the MT64 0-2” lift option or the 2-3” option for a 2” lift on a 2019 taco.
As a rule, lift as little as possible, and clearance the larger tire, as needed. Every inch you lift, you take away from droop, start messing up your geometry, and your ability to flex.
MT64 says 2 to 3inch lift on muddify site, on ARB websites they say it provides 2.5 inch lift only.
Hands down, MT64's for the win. I have the entire front and rear suspension kit on my Taco and, when heavy, the ride is like a very well behaved Cadillac; plush where it should be and tightly controlled the rest of the time. When not loaded, my truck handles like a dang sportscar and takes turns like it's on rails. The ONLY thing that I don't like is that it costs roughly $500 anytime you want to adjust the spring/ride height to match your build. The tolerances are super tight between the coil and that beefy shock body, so getting your own tools in there just isn't in the cards and you HAVE to take it somewhere to have it adjusted; and then, of course, there's the re-alignment and all that fun crap you have to pay for as well.
Even with all that though, I would still gladly take these again any day of the week. I love the MT64's
thanks for the feedback! glad they're working out for you. very interesting about making the adjustments again
I think the MT64 is 2.8inch body.
Would you make a video about how to install the MT64 on a 3rd Gen Tacoma?
BTW, they are split into two episodes/parts, front and rear; be sure to watch both if your installing the entire suspension
@@gabrielreyes8476I don’t think they did make any videos yet on how to install the MT64. If you have any links I’d be interested!
@@71Neness Looks like my comment got split in two lol, it had the link, but here it is again. Now, they don't make an MT64 vid, BUT, this is as close as I could find. Anyone with any decent mechanical skill can follow it and it's on a Gen 3 Taco, so...
@@71Neness Only 1 small difference in the rear; if you installing the shocks in the rear as well, do know that you will not be able to mount them in the stock location. They do come with mounting hardware and will be about 1.5 inch or so off of the stock location. Lemme know if you have questions because there is no vid on that and it was a wtf surprise to me.
I would and probably should have, but I've long since installed these on my truck
What is the ride difference between MT64 and the other 2
depends on how high you set it and which spring you pick
2021 tundra, currently have 6112, but leaking oil. Will my springs fit on Icon exp? If no can I use an OME spring on the icons?
how long have you had the 6112? warranty? the Icon EXP are meant for factory springs, we wouldn't run the OME springs on there, but then again i dont think we've heard of anyone doing so.
I appreciate the explanation & your hard work.
Great video. 👍🏾
Any hope for the promised GM MT64 fitments?
What are the best coilovers and shocks for maximum comfort off road on a F-150? King?
some custom tuned fox 2.5 or king 2.5
Love this channel!🤙🔥
Which is better IRONMAN FOAMCELL PRO or MT64?
much different shocks, while they're close in body-thickness spec, internals are basically opposite end of the spectrum. What vehicle do you have and what kind of driving do you plan on with the new setup?
support@shocksurplus.com
Any real world tests of the icons on a Silverado 1500?
not specifically, but on a tundra yes, similar weight. well controlld, and you can rip offroad. hit us up with your year and what you're thinking and we can dive in - support@shocksurplus.com
Great review mate 👍
cheers, hope it helps!
What do you recommend for softer on road ride quality slow off road? Eibach stage 2 or Old man Emu? Or maybe other recommendation? I have bilstein 6112 and they are too stiff. Thank you!
I have a 4 door bronco black diamond non sasquatch.
@@carlospereira6702fox 2.0
OME is Bilstein shocks with Kings shocks.. I work for ARB
not sure what this means
@@ShockSurplus king springs*** sorry its a local aussie brand. OME is owned by ARB
😆😅🤣😂