What to Expect from the Su-27 Flanker in War Thunder

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 440

  • @from_George_with_luv
    @from_George_with_luv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

    I hope the at least pull the brs apart to like 13.7 at least because compression is still present way too much at 10.0 to 12.3

    • @theycallmetray396
      @theycallmetray396 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      11.0 is good rn

    • @CorneliusTheWizardDog
      @CorneliusTheWizardDog 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Oh yeah, ever played 9.7/9.3? No downtiers, no even tiers, only up tiers every. Match.

    • @from_George_with_luv
      @from_George_with_luv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@CorneliusTheWizardDog hahaha
      Yeah I’ve suffered plenty in my 3.2k hours of this game
      F104a
      The f3h the mig 19 and all the other good planes that suffer
      The matchmaker is fucking nuts at those brs

    • @from_George_with_luv
      @from_George_with_luv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@theycallmetray396 I mean the downtiers are nice and you get some good matches but then 12.0 comes along every few games and you are forced to fight a mig29 or an f16a in the f4e or other worse aircraft

    • @theproceedings4050
      @theproceedings4050 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@from_George_with_luvmuch less the bad planes... The Mig 21 f-13 is literally unplayable.

  • @garrettobrien5197
    @garrettobrien5197 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    You should make a video comparing the AIM-120 R-77 PL-12 MICA Etc. Their strengths and weaknesses and which of these would be the best at what

  • @donnym3415
    @donnym3415 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Can't wait for the SU-27, possibly one of my top 3 russian/Soviet aircraft

  • @mo_2464
    @mo_2464 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    I hope that Britain doesn't get another harrier next update

    • @agustinf1372
      @agustinf1372 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Most probably a grippen

    • @theycallmetray396
      @theycallmetray396 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Part of me hopes they do 😈

    • @zablinker
      @zablinker 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Give them a rank 6 instead

    • @iiiiil4552
      @iiiiil4552 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I hope they don’t get anymore modern stupid commonwealth things

    • @smokingsnek4497
      @smokingsnek4497 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@iiiiil4552what top tier commonwealth does britain have at top tier

  • @thatoneguy1741
    @thatoneguy1741 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The most beautiful aircraft ever designed and it is not debatable

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      eh x-32 looks way better by a long shot

    • @LewisB3217
      @LewisB3217 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s butt ugly

    • @Skoodelly
      @Skoodelly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's pretty debatable lol

    • @tartzmir7934
      @tartzmir7934 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ferrous3262 the F-35's orphan brother

  • @dankaloww1067
    @dankaloww1067 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The Su-35 Irbis Radar is almost rear facing, Since it can swivel it can keep a target locked upwards of 120 Degrees to the left and right, you can semi go cold with it, and notch fight an opponent. Also the Radar can lock an F-16 sized target (3m Square) up to 350km away, that is also because the radar is a further evolution of the Mig-31 Zaslon Radar which if any of yall know about, its a terrifying Radar to go up against and the range is absurd. It can lock onto bombers almost 500km away.

    • @mullayho1759
      @mullayho1759 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So it is an ESA radar that can swivel?

    • @Skoodelly
      @Skoodelly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For some reason I doubt that it can lock a bomber from 500kms away

    • @dankaloww1067
      @dankaloww1067 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Skoodelly The Radar is a further development of the Zaslon radar found on the Mig-31, Its an extremely Powerful PESA and its huge.
      The Mig-31 could already see 500km away and lock onto bombers at 500-450km away. The Irbis is better then the Zaslon in terms of power output and features.

    • @dankaloww1067
      @dankaloww1067 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mullayho1759 The most powerful PESA Radar in the world in terms of fighter mounted. 500km range, and can Lock onto targets and track up to 120 Degrees to the left and Right. I personally do not know why no other nation uses Radar Swivel mounting systems, you would never have to break lock with it.

    • @Skoodelly
      @Skoodelly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dankaloww1067 Just saying that I really doubt the russians made an airborne radar that can see and engage things 500kms away for some reason but time will tell (not it wont)

  • @Samura69420
    @Samura69420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    I hope gijin doesn't disappoint us 😔

    • @Indexium
      @Indexium 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      they will. they literally always do.

    • @donnym3415
      @donnym3415 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@Indexium just because your right....
      Yeah probably:(

    • @brecibros2469
      @brecibros2469 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Indexium even though the last few updates have been amazing in both gameplay experience and content, yeah gajin is doing such a terrible job.

    • @MG101
      @MG101 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Truly a gijin moment

  • @No1harris_98
    @No1harris_98 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Tbf I’d love to see the flanker added into WT at some point as it’s such a sexy looking aircraft. (The SU-27 is one of those vehicles I’ve been wanting for a while now.)

  • @TheDAWinz
    @TheDAWinz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    flanker posting flanker posting lets goooo

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      WE ARE FLANKER POSTING

  • @Blanchboi
    @Blanchboi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just a few things:
    1.) The Su-27 wouldn't go after the Su-17M4. The Su-24 and Su-34 go there since they're attack vehicles. I would expect the Su-27 to go right after the SMT while the Su-33 would go after the Yak-141.
    2.) China got the F-16A MLU the same patch that the F-16s came to the game, so there isn't much stopping them from putting the J-11 into the Chinese TT if the Su-27 comes as well. China of course wouldn't need a J-11 (the MLU getting AMRAAMs would do just fine), but I wouldn't say Gaijin would limit China.

  • @IllustriousUnknown416
    @IllustriousUnknown416 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Very nice and well researched video.
    Note: There's actually 2 major types of Su-27S: an "early" type from 1985 and a "late" from 1987. Their only practical differences ingame would be the amount of countermeasures. External changes are the presence of an antiflutter counterweight on the fins (similar to what the F-15 has on the very top of its own rudder fins) and a smaller tailboom (with less chaff/flare dispensers and less ECM equipement) on the earlier variant.
    Also, there's a small batch Su-30M2 that Gaijin could eventually bring as premium or event vehicle. This variant is based on the Chinese (or Indian?) export version and it's very similar to the Su-30SM, but without the canards. In real life there's only about 20 of them in service with the Russian Air Force and are all alocated for training.

    • @ashrodrigues3571
      @ashrodrigues3571 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I want to understand the enemy

    • @Deemi2920
      @Deemi2920 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats a big note

    • @macmac0712
      @macmac0712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Su-30M2 is based off chinese Su-30MKK and are from Knaapo company, Su-30SM, MKI, MKA, MKM, etc (the canard tvc ones) are from iapo company

  • @clue997
    @clue997 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Editing is really nice in this Lee, keep it up

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thanks man! I'll do my best!

  • @Loudward__
    @Loudward__ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I am really enjoying these! Keep it up!

    • @leo32406
      @leo32406 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why do i see you everywhere

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad to hear it! This was a LOT of work

    • @zaneyboi
      @zaneyboi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      real@@leo32406

  • @Kryoic
    @Kryoic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I’ve been saying this for a while lol just like the F-16 and MiG-29 releasing together, the F-15 and Su-27 have to release together. Then later on maybe the F/A-18 Hornet and the Su-33 Flanker D.

    • @pocketwingman
      @pocketwingman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      its really hard to compare the two realistically, the su-33 actually had worse flight performance than the su-27. canards were added to help with wing area at low speed for carrier landing, but outside of that the canards on the 33 actually hindered it. additionally, the acceleration was worse and the extra thrust given by the engines was only meant to be used for carrier launches
      the MiG-29K or early Su-27 would be a much more realistic counter to an F-18

  • @ImLoreYT
    @ImLoreYT 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Obviously us brits getting the typhoon next patch (im delutional)

    • @Timotij777
      @Timotij777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      gaijin said you would but later, they said it is to early for it rn]

    • @agustinf1372
      @agustinf1372 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      England could get the southafrican Grippen
      Or just enjoy your aim-120 in the Tornado

    • @adillakandi.r
      @adillakandi.r 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah they would get another harrier

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mmmmmmmm glueless

  • @evangalinsky2499
    @evangalinsky2499 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    Very surprised you didn't mention the R-27EA at all. It's an R-27ER with an active seeker instead of semi-active. While less maneuverable, its essentially the in-between of the R-77 and 77-1. At least in flight performance anyway, it is a fairly rare missile, so it's seeker is relatively unknown in it's specs, but it's suspected to be the same as the standard R-77, as they were around the same time.

    • @TheDAWinz
      @TheDAWinz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      it was never built

    • @evangalinsky2499
      @evangalinsky2499 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheDAWinz yes it was. They're just ER's with swapped seekers. There's only a couple hundred of them.
      But also, even if it wasn't, that's hasn't stopped Gaijin before.

    • @unskilledwarthunderplayer4011
      @unskilledwarthunderplayer4011 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@TheDAWinznot that it really matters considering we have the F16AJ,Yak141,the Ho229 etc

    • @skyress2103
      @skyress2103 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@unskilledwarthunderplayer4011it does matter since those planes still use real missiles. But if they decided to add it I think instead of R-27EA, R-27EP would be interesting even though it doesnt have any place in the current META

    • @Excal500
      @Excal500 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It never left the paper phase, its entirely unrealistic to add.

  • @cl3matis
    @cl3matis 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    as with the f15 vid, i officially give this my "has good music" stamp of approval
    also thats a nice outro
    br decompression when gaijoobles gib me

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm glad to recieve your stamp of approval

  • @spolachs1251
    @spolachs1251 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Me still hoping that we will get the R-27P/EP missile soon (its a air-air passive radar homing missile and yes it has been mass produced, it was designed to either shoot down AWACS or very powerful Radar Fighters, the F-14 would definitely attract this missile).

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      where did u get info that it was mass produced ? most of the time i discuss abt it people say it was cancelled or just had prototypes. can you send me a link or tell me where i can find info about it.

    • @evangalinsky2499
      @evangalinsky2499 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      "passive", so what you mean to say is it's an air to air anti radiation missile. Got it.

    • @Scorchluck
      @Scorchluck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@hemendraravi4787 The missiles have been mass-produced since 1986. There is little information about it in the western part of the net, since the R-27P/EP was banned from sale to other countries until 2004.

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Scorchluck where can i find more info about this ?

    • @Scorchluck
      @Scorchluck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hemendraravi4787 I could not find information on the volume of production - in 2020, there was an article on the website of the Tactical Missile Armament Corporation about all variants of the P-27, but apparently the missile has now been discontinued (or rather removed from modernization), and the article has disappeared. Google remembers it, but the link is empty. In 2019, the last modernization of the R-27P and R-27R missiles was carried out to the R-27P-1 standard with a combined guidance head - a passive radio head leads the missile on the main segment of the path, along with the datalink of the aircraft, and on the final segment the active radio head in the missile itself is triggered. There was an article about this in "Izvestia" dated May 29, 2019 - "The old men are going into battle: fighters will be armed with missiles for duels" ("В бой идут «старики»: истребители вооружат ракетами для дуэлей") about this modernization, I don't know if I can give a link to the site in the comments. Taking into account the fact that the R-27P was laid down as the main missile for modernization, it can be assumed that at least for 2019 it was in industrial quantities.

  • @Shadoweye12
    @Shadoweye12 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Khibiny is actually an Electronics Warfare pod that's attached to the end of each wing tip on the Su-27 series aircraft (from what I understand, in exchange for carrying 2 less R-73/4s), not an RWR sensor.
    Though how much the Khibiny matters is debatable since it's unknown if War Thunder is gonna simulate Electronic warfare in game.

  • @pouletbidule9831
    @pouletbidule9831 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    1:57 well that aged beautifully 😭😭

  • @dilldoe1991
    @dilldoe1991 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What to expect: it to be better than the f15

  • @timschmidt1641
    @timschmidt1641 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    love this new format keep going😍

  • @jaek_898
    @jaek_898 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    su33 my beloved

  • @yuanfurbax
    @yuanfurbax 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Gaijin should start focusing on Rank 8 ground, I want the
    Germany: KF51, Leopard 2A7, PzH2000
    Ussr: T-90M, T-14

  • @rm2569
    @rm2569 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I think china might get the j10 before the j11. Depending on weather the M2Ks get MICA's they might also get the Taiwanese M2K as a stopgap instead.

    • @thatoneguy1741
      @thatoneguy1741 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me when I just finished the France air grind for the mirage two months ago 💀💀💀💀💀 I was hoping for a Taiwanese m2k but I got impatient and said fine I’ll get it myself 😂

    • @stormjet814
      @stormjet814 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thatoneguy1741i feel that

    • @sooryan_1018
      @sooryan_1018 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      J10 is more modern than J11, despite J11 being better in most aspects (depends on the variants, but yes)

  • @notafrog2040
    @notafrog2040 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Su-37 terminator would be interesting to see eventually. Idk

    • @bigboi5962
      @bigboi5962 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FirstDaggeryak 141 was never armed either

  • @WevoTee
    @WevoTee 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    YES PLEASE do the Gripen next. I've only looked through wiki pages to see and have my own predictions about what's to come, but I'm so excited to see all of these powerful aircraft come to war thunder. I love learning so much from this game and these videos, thank you!

  • @TransportSupremo
    @TransportSupremo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Great stuff, gripen and rafale would be great videos to do

  • @DreamyReme
    @DreamyReme 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Classic Gaijin, America only getting a Mid 70s Jet and Russia possibly getting an early 2000's Jet

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      this has never happened

    • @LewisB3217
      @LewisB3217 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ferrous3262 it happens all the time, especially with ground

    • @areyou0k98
      @areyou0k98 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ferrous3262Russia with 90s-2000 missile while america still stuck with 70s missiles lol.

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@areyou0k98 he said jets not missiles his statement is wrong use has the f16c block 50 from the 2000s

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LewisB3217 ground rb wasn't mentioned no need to bring it up Russia and America both got a jet from the 2000s in the same patch mig29smt and f16c

  • @ramenramen1001
    @ramenramen1001 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Only problem with the r77 aim120 theory is that gaijin stated that they want to add all fox 3 missiles to almost every country at the same time (-Germany as they have nothing capable of carrying one)

    • @hrpuff
      @hrpuff 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      F4F ICE could carry Aim120s for Germany I think, but its still a F4

    • @shinobu2394
      @shinobu2394 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      whats the 3rd they want to add? pl 12?

  • @FullAfterburner
    @FullAfterburner 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    F15C and SU27PU would be great because they are pretty comparable aircraft. They will probably add the F15A and the SU27S first tho

    • @arflash_
      @arflash_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The F-15A will definitely not be enough to fight the Su-27S. Should we add the F-15 then only C

    • @FullAfterburner
      @FullAfterburner 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @arflash_ well. The S can't use R77's. I have no clue what they will do. I'm just ready to grind the next aircraft. Got Germany, USA, France, and USSR. There are more nations but I'm too lazy to grind that shit. Hopefully something crazy comes for Christmas. C and the PU/30 would be awesome

    • @Likeaworm
      @Likeaworm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m betting su27m and f15c

    • @arflash_
      @arflash_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Likeaworm Su-27M? There seems to be no such thing, I only know the Su-27SM

    • @TheDAWinz
      @TheDAWinz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@arflash_ SU-27M got renamed into the SU-35

  • @Tjecktjeck
    @Tjecktjeck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    IMO AIM-120/R-77/MICA tier missiles should be intoruced on bricks like Tornado ADV, Mirage F1 etc... Highly capable platforms with OP missiles will break high BR gameplay even further unless major changes to matchmaker are made.

    • @SimplyShar_
      @SimplyShar_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mirage F1 can’t even carry MICA’s

    • @Tjecktjeck
      @Tjecktjeck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SimplyShar_ Not the ones in game, but F1 MF2000 can. I see no bad in adding export versions, IMO it makes more sense than prototypes.

  • @theannoyinghistorian1812
    @theannoyinghistorian1812 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:48, I just had a heart attack when that r-73 went for your teammates

  • @spray916
    @spray916 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    RAAAAAH FLONKER!!!! J-11B RAAAAH. I doubt see it anytime soon. Probably the Su-27SM first.

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      btw the j11b can use pl12 n r77 n r27er right ?

  • @FirstDagger
    @FirstDagger 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You also totally missed the Su-35S Flanker-E. Also Su-34 is more like an F-111, Su-30 has been used in F-15E like roles.

  • @Loudward__
    @Loudward__ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Correction: Su-30 / Su-27PU is Flanker-G, Flanker-C is the Su-27UB trainer

  • @gerardoavina7457
    @gerardoavina7457 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    For the f15 to exist it needs the mig25 to exist also

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      F-15A vs MiG-25PD
      F-15C vs MIG-31BM

    • @gerardoavina7457
      @gerardoavina7457 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@STRYKER1467 yes

  • @binglinzhang995
    @binglinzhang995 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Su27sk is not a downgraded version, along with all other su-27 variants exported to China, you can find plenty of documents proving this fact.

  • @arcticiceberg9945
    @arcticiceberg9945 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This will go great as a counter part to the f-18 hornet when that comes next patch!

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      WRONG!!! Eagle

    • @arcticiceberg9945
      @arcticiceberg9945 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@GeneralLee2000 WRONG hornet

    • @andrewm8924
      @andrewm8924 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      dude i’d hate to see him if they add the hornet instead of the eagle lol

    • @areyou0k98
      @areyou0k98 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      F-18 with aim 7Ps/ 9Ms

    • @LegionsTyphoon
      @LegionsTyphoon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@andrewm8924i just want the F-15 already so I can retire this fucking F-4E already lmao

  • @areyou0k98
    @areyou0k98 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm surprised you didn't include that the su-27 was built off of stolen f-15 diagrams lol, that always triggers su-27 stans when they hear that haha.

  • @GumMonster1
    @GumMonster1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a R-27EA and EM with active radar seeker head they will probably give to later Su-27 instead of R-77.

  • @mab2187
    @mab2187 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Flankers ah man, can't wait for them.

  • @AlphaJulietBravo1
    @AlphaJulietBravo1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’d definitely like them to try to introduce the naval version at the same time
    Or bring it in whenever the Hornet shows up because Hornet also has insane (for the game) missile load capability

    • @numbawan9527
      @numbawan9527 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah, su-33 needs a different modeling. Gaijin will introduce it separately. Cause they are lazy and greedy AF.

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Regular Hornet counter for me would be MiG-29K ( Actually KR is Russian variant )
      I think it's made on a whole new base that is MiG-29M's base...
      It has similar or same radar as SMT does...
      And more pylons... so 2x ER's and 6x R-73's or R-77's
      And god knows what else

  • @TabiTheCat
    @TabiTheCat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    remember when they stopped finishing cockpitmodels? I do.

  • @pestomystic
    @pestomystic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pretty good video. Su-30 had R-77 capability and was erroneously referred to as the Su-27PU, it was actually the T10-PU5.
    The Su-30S and SM followed shortly after, M being capable of multirole, and would be the analogue to the F-15E, not the Fullback.

  • @Krelp
    @Krelp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loving these types of videos lee

  • @agustinf1372
    @agustinf1372 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I hope we can do the cobra maneuver properly with it

    • @luuk341
      @luuk341 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And then die horribly because you dump literally all your speed.

    • @agustinf1372
      @agustinf1372 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@luuk341yes

    • @lucinator8582
      @lucinator8582 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Youd probably have to do the maneuver with full real controls and no damping, as that would act as if its aoa limiter was turned off

    • @michaelstodovski2219
      @michaelstodovski2219 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@luuk341 Not unless you time it correctly.
      Cobras have worked for me in the J-35 often.

    • @tu7765
      @tu7765 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@michaelstodovski2219dranken pilots created the cobra maneuver

  • @sopkogamesstudio
    @sopkogamesstudio 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    respect for having slovakia mig29 skin

  • @levgorlov3566
    @levgorlov3566 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I mean the j-11 was already on the leak list; which is looking to be mostly correct

  • @combobreak6894
    @combobreak6894 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    6er's is gonna go crazy

  • @thelettuceconsumer
    @thelettuceconsumer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This sheer number of new yachts from just one aircraft is incredible

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ??

    • @LewisB3217
      @LewisB3217 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hemendraravi4787 it’s a joke about the Russians stealing money from their military programs (still happens today)

  • @RedTail1-1
    @RedTail1-1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't care if it would end up just F-15 vs Su-27. Raise the BR when adding new aircraft. Jump straight to 13.0 this time. I swear if the F-15 shows up at 12.3 or 12.7

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      f15 is probably 12.7.

    • @fpsxk
      @fpsxk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@hemendraravi4787I ain't gonna play if the F15 insta strike me from 999km away

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fpsxk thats not how it works brother. the f16c at 12.3 can do the same shit the f15 can do , f16c can carry 6xaim120 , smt can also carry 6xr77 , so f16c will have the exact same range as the f15. the only advantage the f15 has is that it can probably carry more missiles , but it depends on gaijin if they limit it to 4 missiles then it can only carry 4x aim120 + 4xaim9m. su27 is harder to balance , earliest variant can carry 4xr73 + 6xr27er , and the one that can carry r77 will be ablet to carry 6xr77+ 4x r73. the problem is not r77 but the combo of r77+ r27er + r73. su27 will get the missile with the longest range (r27er) and it will also get arh missile (r77) and plenty of close range missile (4xr73). imagine 2xr27er + 4xr77 + 4xr73. or 2xr27er + 2xr77 + 2xr27et + 4xr73.

    • @fpsxk
      @fpsxk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hemendraravi4787 I ain't reading that 🔥🥶🥶💯

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fpsxk just explaining that aim120s for f16c is the same as aim120s for f15 , both will have the same range.

  • @wg4112
    @wg4112 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I hope the j11 comes at the same time. I dont want to have to wait months to get a chinese flanker like the german mig 29

  • @callsignsparty6503
    @callsignsparty6503 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I mean honestly the USSR should get the Mig-25, thats what caused the west to overreact and build the F-15. Even more so, since the pilot who defected to Japan onboard his Mig-25 just passed away very recently, it'd be a great nod to him

  • @perennialE
    @perennialE 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love my Su-34

  • @malteborjesson1209
    @malteborjesson1209 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Will you do this kind of video with the Gripen aswell?

  • @jager8148
    @jager8148 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Project wingman mentioned :DDD

  • @VectorGhost
    @VectorGhost 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    F-15 Eagle STOL/MTD would be a cool aircraft to add

    • @FirstDagger
      @FirstDagger 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was never armed.

  • @nighthawk2174
    @nighthawk2174 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Note that chart you used is accurate for the flanker but it uses the Soviet estimate for the eagle which underestimates the eagle somewhat. I’d recommend to go get the rate charts from the eagles performance manual and overlay them. If you want them I can give you a link.

  • @ckingc05
    @ckingc05 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I was really watching the MiG-29 gameplay thinking, "Have I seen this before?" Took me 5 minutes to realize that it was from your stream. And since the Yak Line is kind of a Naval Line and there's nothing else really to add (expect maybe the 130), do you think the Su-33 would go after the 141?

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      su27k/su33 could go there

    • @Arrozconpanne
      @Arrozconpanne 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      MiG 29K could also get added

    • @СергейНикольский-я2ц
      @СергейНикольский-я2ц 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yak-141M probably with 6 missiles instead of 4(including r-73 and r-77)

    • @ISt0leYaCheese
      @ISt0leYaCheese 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mig29k/su27k

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hahaha, yeah that's why I was playing the MiG-29. And yeah, I expect the Su-33 and MiG-29K to go after the Yak-141

  • @Hurin170
    @Hurin170 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the F-15P(een) strikes again! but the glorious flanker will win 💥💥

  • @mahkibrown6071
    @mahkibrown6071 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    make it a series

  • @starliner2498
    @starliner2498 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope we get the Su-30MKI, it has some interesting loadout options

  • @Tech-Savvy1
    @Tech-Savvy1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about a video on a somewhat possible Eurofighter Typhoon?

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'll make one next year, it's been denied this update.

    • @Tech-Savvy1
      @Tech-Savvy1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @GeneralLee2000 Ok, but as of my knowledge they are making a new top-tier British jet fighter? Maybe a Canadian CF-18 Hornet or something 🤔.

  • @Deathsmile69
    @Deathsmile69 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I cant wait to use this video in march, when its added

    • @agustinf1372
      @agustinf1372 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      December*

  • @blackjack8697
    @blackjack8697 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Theres only 1 issue with the no r77 statement, hijinks has said that when 90s ers fox 3a come to the game, they are going to give them to every nation

    • @robanson32
      @robanson32 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In the video he suggested these would come to the Mig-29 SMT and Yak -141 which could carry the R-77 but not as many

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@robanson32 smt can carry 6xr77 aswell. but it wont be able to carry r73s , while the flanker can carry 4 more including 6 r77s.(atleast the normal base variants)

    • @blackjack8697
      @blackjack8697 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They could also just give the Su 27 the R27EA

    • @hemendraravi4787
      @hemendraravi4787 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@blackjack8697 not much information is known about r27ea , many are saying that it got cancelled and research moved on to r77. funnily the r27ea would have more range than r77/aim120/mica/pl12/derby. we may get it in game but it would be too op. so i dont think we will get it.

    • @Skoodelly
      @Skoodelly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hemendraravi4787 I heavily doubt that it would have more range than the amraam, even more so the fucking MICA

  • @DanY-mj4gl
    @DanY-mj4gl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    as someone who grinded british and german air trees, i have to say i am quite jealous of american and russian players getting all these nice new things

  • @_cyantist
    @_cyantist 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    idk where talk of the backwards facing radar in the Su35 came from. there was plans to add one to the Su57 but it didn’t make it into the production model because of cost reasons

  • @dahriman6285
    @dahriman6285 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the chat in the first match ☠

  • @appa609
    @appa609 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The J-11's should have been discussed here. Some of the very best modern Flankers are J-16's and J-11D's

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I said the same thing and lee replied saying that there are way to many Chinese versions they it should have its own video

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'm gonna make a dedicated video for Chinese flankers at some point, I said in the video that I was focusing on the Russian ones in this video.

  • @jovanhardianto4658
    @jovanhardianto4658 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    7:55 Why does that F-16C have no name?

    • @TheDAWinz
      @TheDAWinz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      probably a disconnected player

  • @oliver72252
    @oliver72252 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    another one of Lee's skitzo posting (i love it)

  • @autumnrah
    @autumnrah 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gripen video would be pretty good, might help Sweden mains not get their hopes up for having "the best fighter"

  • @angrystalin
    @angrystalin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I disagree, I think China will absolutely get their Su-27/J-11 (and eventually the Su-30/35). Partly because when Heavy fighters come to WT it will likely be a 3-way between the F-15, Su-27 and typhoon much like Apex added the Tornado, 16, and 29. Also another thing to keep in mind: Gaijin is super lazy, they would rather reskin a already modelled Su-27 to save money and dev time and give it to China than model, skin and give China it's giga cracked out J-10 and it's ordnance.

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ... Germany got their MiG-29 a patch later, which is what I expect to happen with China as well. That's what I said in the video too. Russia has Su-27 for a patch, then China gets theirs. In the meantime the MLU and the J-8F can get their fox 3s

  • @kenoby2330
    @kenoby2330 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah, this aged well (su 27 sucks in dogfights, it really does so hard)

  • @DownHereInChile
    @DownHereInChile 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about the Su-27M/Su-35 (early)? Single seat Flanker with canards + modified airframe, but no TVC.

  • @lookerbeegaming4821
    @lookerbeegaming4821 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    idk about and i like all this new stuff gaijin is adding but. im still waiting for my mig-31 fox hound to come since i remeber a bunch of people including me asking for it when the mig 23 was added. i would love to missle joust like those f-4's launching their long range radar missles from 8km away or just be a better f-14. though i can only dream

  • @EdgeR2
    @EdgeR2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    F-15 detected---wait

  • @hmshood9212
    @hmshood9212 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope we have the Su-37 too

  • @viperguide4351
    @viperguide4351 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    where did u got that mig29 skin, looks fire

  • @HJ7A
    @HJ7A 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is no one gonna talk ab the mig 23 bro was actually being a bot

  • @TheArcticFoxxo
    @TheArcticFoxxo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've found that the ru. version of the wikipedia article for the Su-27 and MiG-29 is MUCH better, though apart from that any more technical source is best

  • @Shizwiz
    @Shizwiz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is absolutely no need for more power creep to frustrate players. There are whole BR ranges that are literally unplayable thanks to undertiered all-aspect missile slingers and legacy BR placements, the game forces you into playing only a few vehicles to be able to fully enjoy the game and not suffer in the process. Of course, there is always the possibility of decompression to ease this pain to some degree but I don't believe the devs are competent enough to acknowledge this.

  • @simonwoodall6863
    @simonwoodall6863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If they give Russia a flanker and not China, they better add the J10

  • @STRYKER1467
    @STRYKER1467 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why did you put the SU-33 13.0 but the SU-27S 12.7 ? You do realize the SU-33 is not able to use any BVRAAM missiles ?

  • @DustyBustty
    @DustyBustty 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good

  • @dipchit_dino6587
    @dipchit_dino6587 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hopefully we get new pilot models too

  • @pandoranbias1622
    @pandoranbias1622 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man it would have been so broken to just 20km nuke people with R-27ETs

  • @michaelmckeever2734
    @michaelmckeever2734 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gaijin still owes China the J-10 before they give it the J-11

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nah j-11 isn't ugly

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ferrous3262blasphemy

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jaek__ the c variant is the only one that is pleasant to look at

  • @Jaeger_89
    @Jaeger_89 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Regardless of added content, it's imperative that the BR ceiling climbs at least to 13.0.
    It's gonna be a smelly pile of shit if they just shove those missiles at 12.3...

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      12.7, take it or leave it!!!

  • @fedimiki
    @fedimiki 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Slovakia MiG-29S camouflage oh yeaaaah

  • @chonc9576
    @chonc9576 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:46 look at the ingame chat

  • @thegremoryscurse7688
    @thegremoryscurse7688 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hi generallee can you also explain the Japanese missiles if it wear to come to the game for example the aam-4 missile

    • @AZ-dj1ni
      @AZ-dj1ni 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Air to air missile - 4?

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The AAM-4 is a very advanced radar missile that's about conteporary with late AMRAAM C versions, and is too good to come for now.

    • @thegremoryscurse7688
      @thegremoryscurse7688 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GeneralLee2000 ohhh ok thank you for clearing it up bcs I wasn't sure if those missiles are good yk but so does that mean if the F15j comes for Japan would we get the amraam A and b with aim9ms?
      And also lol sorry for the big questions but did Japan ever have aim9xs on its F15j and mitsubishi f2?

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thegremoryscurse7688 most likely AMRAAM A/B yes, and no, the Japanese never used the 9X. They'd have the AAM-3 and 5 instead after we move past the AIM-9M. They never used the 9M, but the AAM-3 is too good for now

    • @thegremoryscurse7688
      @thegremoryscurse7688 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GeneralLee2000 oh ok thank you for clearing it up to me I understand now so that means the Japanese won't aim9ms or 9xs unfortunately but ok hopefully we get a good missile still and at least we'll be able to use amraam A and B for now, thank you generallee it means alot I learned alot today.

  • @Kilimanjarooo
    @Kilimanjarooo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    blud forgot the su37 terminator

    • @GeneralLee2000
      @GeneralLee2000  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like I said, I didn't do EVERY variant, just the ones that I reasonably expect ingame.

  • @SkinkUA
    @SkinkUA 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it appeared to me in my sleep

  • @LarySeeAircraft
    @LarySeeAircraft 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My predictions for this update are:
    🇺🇸 F-16c gets sparrows removed and Aim120 replacement
    🇺🇸 AV8B with Aim120
    🇺🇸 New aardvark
    🇷🇺 SU24(aardvark equivalent)
    🇨🇳 J10
    🇸🇪 Gripen
    🇮🇹 Hugury subtree for air with Mig-29 (maybe a gripen as well)
    🇫🇷 another mirage 2000
    🇯🇵 Japan F2

  • @jordanharvey5739
    @jordanharvey5739 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Algorithm boost + hoping we get flankers to fight in our Eagle 🗿

  • @PraecipeWrit
    @PraecipeWrit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make video on Gripen, Rafale and Typhoon.

  • @Olympion53
    @Olympion53 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    URAAAAAA FLANKER

  • @spacemane_official
    @spacemane_official 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about mig29m ovt?