FYI, AMPV is NOT a turretless Bradley. Two very different platforms with different capabilities. AMPV can take quite the hit with a full level armor kit. Even better than a Bradley despite the Bradley already being tough.
AMPV is based on the Bradley, the two are nearly indistinguishable besides the bigger capacity in the back for troops and gear, they literally have the same armor and everything
@@yeahmonkey8595 Hull is based but larger and different. It is also new not refurbished like some think. Also, I don't think the armor is identical. They have made advancments in materials.
@@rickjames18 yeah, they have made advancements but that doesn’t mean they changed it, there is no reason to really change the armor much because it can already stop older Russian 30mm APDS or AP rounds which is all they really have right now,
@@yeahmonkey8595 That is true but they did say they made changes to the protection package. That would mean composite armor, passive/active systems, etc. I can't say for sure. The hull is different.
Two huge things .... finally picking up the advances that Sweden/Finland have known about for years (the NEMO 120mm mortar turret and the wheeled 155mm Archer). One of the massive costs the Army has run into year after year is ignoring (in a way) what our allies are doing and spending vast sums in research/development trying to reinvent the wheel when it hasn't been necessary. Secondly, putting a ATGW on the up-gunned Stryker. Finally, our mid-weight infantry (dragoon) units will have a fighting chance against the swarms of Russian/Chinese armor they may end up encountering. 30mm is a solid weapon, but it will not do what a Javelin or Spike can. Now .... if they can just find a company that can build barracks that won't become infested by mold within 3 years or who's AC units won't break down during the hottest parts of the Georgia summer.
Pfft... Archer is basically UFO , compared with anything that russia currently has , and I'm not even worry that they can produce something similar in the future, sonny boy Jim!
@@Kohagaan or something with greater range, faster firing and cheaper and firing guided charges ..... in Ukraine it can be seen that if you have the opportunity to hit every single target in a given area, you can prove to attack or perfectly defend the position you want ... in the beginning it was the Nazis who used drones and they bombarded the Russians with artillery and now it is Russia that is decimating with artillery, drones, bombs and everything else.. the Russians will learn from this war and adapt themselves to create new machines similar to archer or even better as it always happens
@@db4423 do you think ONLY russia will learn? The better question is, can they learn? Where is T14 Armata? What about SU-57 ? You know the T90M , the tank without analog in the west? Well, it is scrap metal in the Ukraine's fields.
I love the way that a British company has grown globally and is a mainstay of refitting and upgrading for the American army as well as many other defence systems missiles aircraft it’s become huge
The Archers is long running radio soap on BBC Radio 4, which started in 1950, much more lethal at short range, probably is against the Geneva Convention.
So you have this new turret called the: ''Rafael Samson MK II 30mm turret''. And it's capable of carrying two ATGM's internally/inside the turret; which can be extended upwards. And then you somehow end up mounting an armored box on the rear of the turret with two extendable ATGM's inside.. Very odd, why not have these be extendable from inside the turret as it is designed to be?
This actually makes me confident that the Army and the USMC are moving in the right direction. Distributed, proven platforms that can be dropped off on an island and tele-operated from anywhere in the world.
Lmao at 12:29 the crayon eater is standing on directly on the front bumper of the Rogue Fires nemesis vehicle... the bumper clearly marked with "NO STEP" in capital letters. Unfortunately marines can't read.
Not suggesting the Archer is bad but it's ironic he talks about the on the move shooting with the mortar system right next to the Archer when the RCH 155 is a wheeled howitzer that can shoot on the move as well.
Not sure why they're advertising that 30mm cannon, when BAE Systems, with the French and German partners, are finalizing a 40mm --- the socalled CT40 cannon --- with new cannon mechanics and new explosive shells they say to be 4 times more powerful than a regular 30mm cannon... with the CT40 cannon to be fitted on the Ajax & other similar French/German light armored vehicles. It's stupid for giant defense BAE Systems to be, again, showing how good/modern this 30mm is, when the company is working on a much more powerful & revolutionary cannon on top of a Bradley like vehicle for the French, German, and British military... th-cam.com/video/SKKWujqscrQ/w-d-xo.html
Even at the supermarket and better to do it there is the police who want to know everything you are doing, what you buy, where you go to think with you and not with everyone, who likes ugly dirty better a rich man and look at what he buys and what he does so as to know his habits and you policeman will do it and I look rich and intelligent and the others will always be poor, If I see what book you buy and I like you, I buy your book and I want to know everything you do...... The 🌎
You must come from a lovely country that needs no military or military alliances for protection. Or maybe you just live in a world where there are no bad actors looking to expand their territory of control or kill off rival nations/ethnicities/minority/religious populations sounds amazing.
The M113 is a deathtrap. Hard pass. It has zero features that would deal with the changes in combat for the last 60 years. It was garbage in 1961 and still is. The Exposed Javalin on the side has me laughing, they are putting modern systems in a 1960s pick up truck (battle wagon) That is insulting. I see the issue here they are putting new tech on lacking platforms even the RCV with the drone launcher is lame. It is over kill for the task. Drone vehicle should be a armored disposable vehicle heavily armed to hit the enemy suiciding into place soldier should not go. Not a stand off weapon system. Stryker is not resistant enough to madern weapons. The turret system is sweet though especially with a 30mm and ATGM that is shelters from the elements and fragmentation. Rouge platform with Nemisis seems like a great idea but how do you no fry the electronics package with missile firing over them? So many other cool things there where is the video on them?
FYI, AMPV is NOT a turretless Bradley. Two very different platforms with different capabilities. AMPV can take quite the hit with a full level armor kit. Even better than a Bradley despite the Bradley already being tough.
AMPV is based on the Bradley, the two are nearly indistinguishable besides the bigger capacity in the back for troops and gear, they literally have the same armor and everything
@@yeahmonkey8595 Hull is based but larger and different. It is also new not refurbished like some think. Also, I don't think the armor is identical. They have made advancments in materials.
@@rickjames18 I believe the AMPV is going to be the base for the M2A4E1 Bradley that’s likely going to be acquired soon!
@@rickjames18 yeah, they have made advancements but that doesn’t mean they changed it, there is no reason to really change the armor much because it can already stop older Russian 30mm APDS or AP rounds which is all they really have right now,
@@yeahmonkey8595 That is true but they did say they made changes to the protection package. That would mean composite armor, passive/active systems, etc. I can't say for sure. The hull is different.
Two huge things .... finally picking up the advances that Sweden/Finland have known about for years (the NEMO 120mm mortar turret and the wheeled 155mm Archer). One of the massive costs the Army has run into year after year is ignoring (in a way) what our allies are doing and spending vast sums in research/development trying to reinvent the wheel when it hasn't been necessary. Secondly, putting a ATGW on the up-gunned Stryker. Finally, our mid-weight infantry (dragoon) units will have a fighting chance against the swarms of Russian/Chinese armor they may end up encountering. 30mm is a solid weapon, but it will not do what a Javelin or Spike can. Now .... if they can just find a company that can build barracks that won't become infested by mold within 3 years or who's AC units won't break down during the hottest parts of the Georgia summer.
About time the Bradley is modified to be Modular compared to what it was before.
Modularity is king.
I always get confused with BAe systems they do so much keep forgetting it’s actually a British company
4:40 I had such a good laugh ... the man has quite a talent for standup comedy and good jokes
Pfft... Archer is basically UFO , compared with anything that russia currently has , and I'm not even worry that they can produce something similar in the future, sonny boy Jim!
@@Kohagaan or something with greater range, faster firing and cheaper and firing guided charges ..... in Ukraine it can be seen that if you have the opportunity to hit every single target in a given area, you can prove to attack or perfectly defend the position you want ... in the beginning it was the Nazis who used drones and they bombarded the Russians with artillery and now it is Russia that is decimating with artillery, drones, bombs and everything else.. the Russians will learn from this war and adapt themselves to create new machines similar to archer or even better as it always happens
@@db4423 do you think ONLY russia will learn? The better question is, can they learn? Where is T14 Armata? What about SU-57 ? You know the T90M , the tank without analog in the west? Well, it is scrap metal in the Ukraine's fields.
I love the way that a British company has grown globally and is a mainstay of refitting and upgrading for the American army as well as many other defence systems missiles aircraft it’s become huge
BRAVO...👍 & Thank you..✌✌
I like the Archer
The Archers is long running radio soap on BBC Radio 4, which started in 1950, much more lethal at short range, probably is against the Geneva Convention.
Check out the RCH-155
👍👍👍🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
AUSA needs yo expand like Rheinmetall and build production plant to manufacture... Like Ukraine... Lots of metal to smelt boys!
So you have this new turret called the: ''Rafael Samson MK II 30mm turret''. And it's capable of carrying two ATGM's internally/inside the turret; which can be extended upwards. And then you somehow end up mounting an armored box on the rear of the turret with two extendable ATGM's inside.. Very odd, why not have these be extendable from inside the turret as it is designed to be?
your editing skills are top-notch! Love the visuals!
This actually makes me confident that the Army and the USMC are moving in the right direction. Distributed, proven platforms that can be dropped off on an island and tele-operated from anywhere in the world.
Lmao at 12:29 the crayon eater is standing on directly on the front bumper of the Rogue Fires nemesis vehicle... the bumper clearly marked with "NO STEP" in capital letters.
Unfortunately marines can't read.
Careful buddy, many can and they all destroy the enemy. Semper Fi and Happy Birthday Marines!
AMV looks like a Sherman.
Not suggesting the Archer is bad but it's ironic he talks about the on the move shooting with the mortar system right next to the Archer when the RCH 155 is a wheeled howitzer that can shoot on the move as well.
So BAE made a Bradley with a 30mm cannon. The AMPV is a turretless Bradley and they put a turret back on it.
Not sure why they're advertising that 30mm cannon, when BAE Systems, with the French and German partners, are finalizing a 40mm --- the socalled CT40 cannon --- with new cannon mechanics and new explosive shells they say to be 4 times more powerful than a regular 30mm cannon... with the CT40 cannon to be fitted on the Ajax & other similar French/German light armored vehicles.
It's stupid for giant defense BAE Systems to be, again, showing how good/modern this 30mm is, when the company is working on a much more powerful & revolutionary cannon on top of a Bradley like vehicle for the French, German, and British military...
th-cam.com/video/SKKWujqscrQ/w-d-xo.html
@@kiabtoomlauj6249or even the 50mm cannon.
The bigger they are the slower they are.
I wis I could go.
Why is the Swedish guy with uniform in every booth filmed?
You wasnt supposed to notice that. Stay where you are.
Сейчас не кому не интересно стал танк БТР Бмп Сейчас дрони и без плотники решает
Yeah... another apc.
Even at the supermarket and better to do it there is the police who want to know everything you are doing, what you buy, where you go to think with you and not with everyone, who likes ugly dirty better a rich man and look at what he buys and what he does so as to know his habits and you policeman will do it and I look rich and intelligent and the others will always be poor, If I see what book you buy and I like you, I buy your book and I want to know everything you do...... The 🌎
How do they get money to make all this shit
were the 'baby killing' technologies exhibited here!
You must come from a lovely country that needs no military or military alliances for protection. Or maybe you just live in a world where there are no bad actors looking to expand their territory of control or kill off rival nations/ethnicities/minority/religious populations sounds amazing.
@@sittingbull22322 But you didn't answer his qs. He was looking for baby killing tech. I myself have heard of plenty of that tech being in this fair
i don't think ham-as were invited
The M113 is a deathtrap. Hard pass. It has zero features that would deal with the changes in combat for the last 60 years. It was garbage in 1961 and still is. The Exposed Javalin on the side has me laughing, they are putting modern systems in a 1960s pick up truck (battle wagon) That is insulting. I see the issue here they are putting new tech on lacking platforms even the RCV with the drone launcher is lame. It is over kill for the task. Drone vehicle should be a armored disposable vehicle heavily armed to hit the enemy suiciding into place soldier should not go. Not a stand off weapon system. Stryker is not resistant enough to madern weapons. The turret system is sweet though especially with a 30mm and ATGM that is shelters from the elements and fragmentation. Rouge platform with Nemisis seems like a great idea but how do you no fry the electronics package with missile firing over them? So many other cool things there where is the video on them?