US New AMPV Combat Vehicle SHOCKED The World!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ค. 2024
- When it comes to the next generation of military vehicles, there’s an offering that represents the pinnacle of versatility, mobility and strength. This is the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle or AMPV, a new development that’s been brought in to replace a workhorse on the battlefield and stay in combat for decades to come. The AMPV has been engineered to be strong and survivable in the ever-changing world of modern warfare. Let’s take a closer look at how it does this.
For copyright matters please contact us at: ytproductionvideo@gmail.com
Video and image credit: BAE Systems, Inc.
![24 ชั่วโมง ซื้อของสีเดียว!! [Ver.2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TNPgzIMr_w8/mqdefault.jpg)
![คบซ้อน - วงL.กฮ. [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5MtesqJ0I1c/mqdefault.jpg)
“Based on the design of the Bradley.” It’s a Bradley
Lol it’s not a Bradley idoit you know nothing about armor
that doesnt even make sense.
@@frankjames7272it’s a Bradley without a turret, what does not make sense to you?
@@zaab-yaoh9302 Based on a bradley that makes it not a bradley. you contradict your own words.
@@frankjames7272 whatever keyboard warrior. I was a 19D Cavalry Scout I served on Bradley’s for 9 years, this thing is a Bradley lol. Finish your poop, wash your hands, and go about your day.
How will it survive a drone attack?
It will not.
Depends on if the US delevops easily carried/portable anti-drone equipment.
In Battletech there is an automatic rapid fire shotgun like turret that will shoot down light aerial threats. In real life that is going to have to be built.
2:45
It is personal carrier, so it won’t have any turret and it won’t carry any ammunition, so any drone attack won’t make severe damage on it
Everything shocks the world this days 😂
Just imagine what will happen when they discover electricity and magnetism! Now that would shock the world!
The only thing that should shock anyone is that we teach AI’s to lie.
you teach AI to lie.
It didnt lie to except about the shock part
a open turret hatch . . . you mean the Commander's top hatch in the AMPV doesn't have a hatch (open/close) lid . . . the AMPV could have been a tad wider & slightly higher raised hull . . . it'd have greatly increased the available space in the crew & troop compartment, that otherwise is just too cramped . . . a heavy duty 5.5 in. suspension lift for enhanced off roadability that'd have complemented the torsion bar suspension of the AMPV . . . a turretless variant of the AMPV with a heightened (raised) hull would be even better . . . a compact 360° deg rotating remote weapons station is more than enough to take on most combat situations, instead of a turret . . .
I was a Bradley mechanic sooo i guess its back to school lol
Nah, that thing is essentially a Bradley....
It's a Bradley
British vehicle (BAE AMPV) with American turret (MOOG RIWP) and Finnish mortar (Patria NEMO)
You mean a British company owns an American company which produces American designed/build vehicles based on a Bradley?
@@Schachtschabel So it IS American design after all, that's good
lets knock of the turret from the Bradley, cheap easy... ohh and paint it green.
Lol ya just ignore the video and go “hurrr durrrrr Bradley”
@@austinwhite3132yeah that pretty much accurate tho. Army wasted how many millions of dollars on strykers for the sake of modularity…just to do the same thing with a 40 year old vehicle design.
I shoked the world after 45 days strait of MRE'S, epic hard fought battle ensued but the USS TURDCUTTER prevailed, prolapsed and battle scarred but victourus...The secret weopen was the spoon for digging in trench warfare
Bradley tested on everything before Stryker brigade combat certification
So how & when did it shocked the world? Evidence? Battle history? If it delivered it's newest combat vehicle only on March 13, 2023, it means it hasn't been battle tested. How many were shipped to Ukraine or any other battlefield? If so what are the success rate of their encounters. Just asking.
Lessons learned
Every TH-cam headline reads “Shocked!” Or “Disastrous!”
They probably sell this vehicle
All those ai channels say this about every thing
I don't understand why people don't realize that this isn't a replacement for the Bradley, even though its said several times throughout the video. The Bradley is is getting its own replacement. They are basically modifying the Bradley to fit a different role that is not primarily front line combat as it has been.
US weaponry technologies and weapons designing are always the best . MVPE an example.
Untrue statement
It isnt untreu@@kevinblackburn3198
Easy big target!
Let me know an IFV/APC which is small enough for your requirements
@@PrivateSusiThe clearly superior BMP of course!!! (The troops will ride on top of it because of how terrible it is inside the vehicles)
It definitely not shocked the world.
It’s crazy what has been done with drones in war.
So how is this going to mesh with the XM30 replacement for the Bradley? How come the XM30 remains stuck at the two competitors phase? When is it going to production? Looks like a lot of overlap in capability here.
It’s a little slower than needs to be ❤
The check is in the mail.
I may have missed it but no mention of protection from IED’s.
Looks like a sturdy vehicle.
No APS equals dead meat
Repurposed Bradley and made it Modular, something the US Military is insanely slow in adapting compared to their EU counterparts, for instance, Sweden's CV90 platform.
Most important is parts share with M2
It allow to keep cost at low and still produce new parts for M2's
I am really shocked how similar it is to a Bradley. Maybe that is the shock they are talking about in the title?
Taxpayers happy hour
FBCB BFT, HMS, SINCGARS and VIC-3 are already resident in the Bradly. Nothing changed there. Only 4 troops for troop transport? Not even a squad.
Yeah the doesn’t make sense, a regular Bradley can fit like 8 dudes, that’s with a turret and internal fuel tanks…sooo wtf is on the inside taking up so much room???
Looks like an M-113 with a turreted auto cannon.
Before they add a new generation of armored vehicles, I'm really hoping the Army is taking the new battle space in mind, which includes potentially thousands of cheap drones buzzing overhead and precision missiles, which before too long some countries will be able to use to hit even moving targets. I don't see that anyone has properly addressed this or come up with any viable solution for. Right now, the war in Ukraine has shown the battle tank to be nothing more than a target for drones, and armored fighting vehicles to be nothing more than a troop concentration point that can easily be destroyed taking the troops along with it. And it's only going to get worse when everybody starts churning out millions of these drones. Right now, 1/800th of the US defense budget can create one million drones. How is armor going to stop these kind of numbers?
Just about any major or intermediate military in the world is capable of this sort of production. Building new armored vehicles is just a way to create scrap metal and dead soldiers when we look at what's on the way. As cheap as these drones are, I could easily see the US having numbers counted in the tens or even hundreds of millions. How does armor beat that or any of our current anti-drone systems? Image a swarm of a million drones coming after your army's armor all at once. Even if lasers were employed, the cost of producing enough of these super high-tech weapons to defeat this kind of threat would break the budget quickly.
They mention glorious improvements except for the tracks. Look like the same mine blowing tracks to me. Blind those lenses and infrared sighting system with paint ball gun.
Will turn into a turtle within a week in combat!
In vehicle platoons and some specialized in electronic warfare and against guided munitions, a vehicle alone and for everything is not useful. Communications intelligence and real-time analysis. Each tank needs its infantry complement, etc.
Reminds me
Of the M113
The main question, who will BAe Systems in the United States, first export customers be for the AMPV?
Because with all the international operators, of the old M113 Armoured Personnel Carrier family, BAe System must already be looking for export customers for the AMPV, in Europe and to Nato Allies especially.
As well as export customers in the Meddle East, or in South America, or in Asia and the Far East, maybe to Australia and New Zealand too, or BAe Systems hoping to sale the AMPV to the British Army as replacement for old FV-432 APC's still in service too?
Though not looking to sale the AMPV to Ukraine, while the war with Russia is still going on.
That’s just a Bradley with less steps
Gee.....how come you always shock the world..
So just the Gen 2 M113?
Shocked by how fuc____ bad it is.
Agreed
Only 4 soldiers does not seem very useful. You would think it shouold be at least a squad.
Lol. First Medical Evac vehicle that is armed with Machine Gun Turret. Yeah, I get it is intended for Vehicle and Patient defense. Then again if looks like duck, and can act like duck, it is freaking duck. Second, why would down grade the Bradley platform to make new APC base type vehicles. Yes, the M113 base version are showing their age, but it was created during a different time and phase of Mechanized Warfare. When these vehicles were basically Battle Taxi, and it variants were suppose to be kept in the rear of fighting edge of the Front. Since they were first manufactured the M113 and it variants have been pushed forward to edge of the fighting edge of the Front has expanded to what use to be the 'safe' rear areas, with new advance in Armored/Mechanized warfare. Add the advancement of employment of various Helicopter formation didn't help either. I mean having 3 or 4 Different base Vehicles for the Armored, IFV (Mechanized Infantry/Armored Cavalry), and at least APC based support vehicles makes sense. The forth being maybe Light Tank (Assault Gun/Armored Car) type vehicle to give Airborne/Air Assault/Airmobile/Light Infantry type units some extra muscle that they lost when the M551 were stood down.
Do my ears deceive me or at 8:48 does the narrator say "nucular?"
looks like junk and a drone magnet
like your mom.
In a shocking move I'm just gonna turn off channels that says the content shocks the world.
any chinese AT weapon will punch right through that
Yuck! That's what they came up with? Not also is it ugly but the armor isn't even sloped. Even back in WWII the USSR would make sloping armor for tanks as it was much better at deflecting incoming projectiles.
Seriously?? Driver way at the front?? He be the first to be killed. No protection what so ever for the drive. No protection against anti-tank mines and so on. No turret for machines gun or cannon for protection.
What do you mean "no protection against anti-tank mines"? The whole purpose of the vehicle design is aimed at improving survivability against mines, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and direct fire.
What do you mean "No turret for machine gun"? Did you watch the video? Even the mortar can be used as direct fire, but I guess you meant the general purpose vehicle which is fitted with MOOG Reconfigurable Integrated-weapons Platform. The vehicle has compatibility with over 30 different turret systems, including 30mm remote cannon. That's the purpose of armored MULTI purpose vehicle.
How old are you?12?Have you even been in a armoured vehicle lol
The U.S. Army Should've gone with the Tracked Stryker.
Low tech. Yes. MTBF is ? What? Why is it better. Ah. The old Bradley that was not up graded. FCS finally? No it has a diesel engine.
This video just gave Ukraine another weapon system to add on their Amazon wishlist. AMPVs is the game changer needed.
I like it. Good as its going to get I suppose. The Bradley is tried and true
If you want to test this new can
Sended.to ukrania.see how long will last.😂
Crap....
hey we asked for a cd player wtf is the cd player? you see where always getting screwed lol