UNDER THREAT?? -- 2023 Toyota Sequoia Capstone vs. Chevy Tahoe High Country: Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 792

  • @schmick125
    @schmick125 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    Excellent comparison!!! My 2018 Tahoe with 70k mikes is falling apart. Hard shifting and problems with the 4WD, horrible radio, etc. I think Toyota is a higher quality vehicle over time.

    • @hassantariq2971
      @hassantariq2971 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I have a 2018 Rav 4 with almost 200k miles on it and runs like new. I plan to do 500k miles on it. Toyota beats all American companies in reliability. Very trustworthy!

    • @barrak2k059
      @barrak2k059 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That sucks
      My 2018 Tahoe has 80k miles and it drives fine😅😅

    • @donaldindividual-1
      @donaldindividual-1 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      In 2009 Toyota didn’t need a government bailout like Chevy , Dodge, Ford did, there’s a reason for that.

    • @kevinokonta1030
      @kevinokonta1030 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@donaldindividual-1 Toyota isn’t an American company 🤷🏾‍♂️

    • @schmick125
      @schmick125 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@kevinokonta1030 and non union. I believe they simply make a better vehicle.

  • @darriontunstall3708
    @darriontunstall3708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    I love both of them, but I would pick the Toyota Seqouria

    • @davidchurchill1651
      @davidchurchill1651 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The critical technology the Sequoia does not have is the hands free foot trunk activation!!! The Chevy Tahoe has way better technology which is the foot trunk activation!!! The Sequoia is phony/fraud/fake/joke/piece of crap!!!!!!!

    • @mahmudalhasan3129
      @mahmudalhasan3129 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where can I find it or to preordered?

    • @v6wells
      @v6wells 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not me the Tahoe

    • @logan9758
      @logan9758 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah the third row and cargo area is a joke

  • @nathanielharbin7775
    @nathanielharbin7775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    I’m a Toyota fan but man,, you can’t beat the sound of a V8.. that Tahoe sounded amazing!

    • @leivaandre
      @leivaandre 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wish Toyota went with at least a v6 for their hybrid

    • @JMian
      @JMian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      sound is gas money

    • @kromahj
      @kromahj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It about gas now tho

    • @testtesting2868
      @testtesting2868 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@JMian What is MORE money is the cost to replace the battery and the twin turbos.

    • @SubhanKhan-nt8fy
      @SubhanKhan-nt8fy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@testtesting2868 Toyota is way ahead when it comes to reliability and resale value. I’ll probably sell Sequoia after 7-8 years for 33% of the original MSRP before its time for batteries to go out. With Chevy after 8 years you are looking at 18-24% of original MSRP

  • @anthonycunningham4598
    @anthonycunningham4598 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Overall reliability plays a huge factor!

    • @tego5370
      @tego5370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That's why, the clear winner is Sequoia for most people, especially if you will be purchasing rather than leasing. The Sequoia resale value is also much better than the Tahoe, their resale value sink faster than the titanic.

    • @cab9191
      @cab9191 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tego5370 not necessarily. The new hybrid powertrain is brand new tech. Only time will tell if it is truly a reliable motor.

    • @stevenbaksh5545
      @stevenbaksh5545 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      These vehicles are too new we will have to wait and see

    • @algil820
      @algil820 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Tough call , I’d prefer the TRD Sequoia ..just cause I think it looks better. And the resale value on the Toyota will be over 6-10k difference in 6 years ..

    • @Youtubeuser1aa
      @Youtubeuser1aa 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They’re both going to be bad

  • @kevinr5187
    @kevinr5187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +147

    Man they blew it when it comes to the 3rd row seat on the Sequoia. I was expecting so much more.

    • @cyberImperfection
      @cyberImperfection 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      *Yeah, I feel you. I was expecting a swimming pool in the 3rd row 'that is dedicated for kids.'*

    • @nacho-man1063
      @nacho-man1063 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Terrible engineering. The cargo space is so limited.
      Third row seat must come out or flat down.

    • @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix
      @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That never stopped the previous tahoe fr selling so good. It had a solid rear axle but didnt have the cargo shelf or slidng 3rd row to make things better, amd you sat with your knees in your chest. GM knew a solid axle was better for towing, hauling and offroad, but they buckled amd switched to an independent rear, which has really bad negative cambet whem loaded so the inside of the rear tires will wear bad. I don't see the big deal with the sequoias storage.

    • @kevinr5187
      @kevinr5187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix You have a good point. But modern times call for method's and techniques.

    • @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix
      @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@kevinr5187 Thanks. These independent suspension were made for soccer moms and people who will never see more than a gravel road, or never tow more than a small uhaul trailer. What made the previous gen tahoe/Yukon/suburban so good at towing and hauling was its solid axle. It ate into the cargo space and the third row was absolutely horrible. Everyone else had independent suspension and you could see the back wheels leaned in at the top (negative camber) even hauling small loads or having people in the 3rd row. Toyota offers a better designed 3rd row and cargo area, and a lower lifting point to load cargo than anyone else, and the cargo shelf keeps things level from the tailgate to the rear seats. Its as good as you can really do for a solid axle, let alone with a battery as well. I for one would prefer the solid axle for towing and hauling, and especially offroad where the suspension travel and articulation will keep the wheels in contact with the ground more so than an independent suspension, which will lift wheels over even the smallest obstacles. It isn't for everyone, but in my opinion the new Tahoe/Yukon is the best looking and the new interior is very well done. The sequoia will the best for towing, hauling, and offroading. For me thw Sequoia is better, but I would like a non-hybrid option.

  • @nikchans
    @nikchans ปีที่แล้ว +13

    You guys rock. You must consider adding some kind of maintenance cost over years to these comparisons for users like me to get full understanding

  • @romairoblackstock5100
    @romairoblackstock5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Well despite the 2023 Toyota Sequoia's flaws it is indeed a very competitive entry in this segment as reflected by the scores obtained in the comparison. I am interested to see how sales and market share will be affected by Sequoia's introduction in the upcoming model year.

    • @naveenthemachine
      @naveenthemachine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I expect poor sales for the sequoia. Plus the reason to even get a big suv like this is for more interior space. That’s really really lacking… and i can’t stress the really enough

    • @DCuerpoJr
      @DCuerpoJr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@matthewalexis The Sequoia has never been a best seller. The most Sequoias sold in a year was 45,000 back in 2005 (it’s first model year). That’s less than the Chevy Tahoe’s worst sales year of 73,000 in 2012. GM owns 70% of the large SUV segment in North America because they make superior family haulers that can also tow nearly as much as a full-size pickup truck.

    • @pemainmobile8007
      @pemainmobile8007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@naveenthemachine why u so facking care ? u cant even afford this car , even genesis with the cheapest one u still cant afford ones

    • @CramerCrew
      @CramerCrew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@DCuerpoJr the GM’s aren’t very reliable! We have had so many problems with our suburban premier and we’ve only had it a year and a half. I will gladly give up some of that space for the reliability of a Toyota

    • @ForgivenSheep3
      @ForgivenSheep3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CramerCrew what year suburban ?

  • @manimalworks7424
    @manimalworks7424 2 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Definitely Toyota Sequoia. Never again in my life I will buy GM. My last suv from GM lasted only 38k miles before the engine completely broke down. Replaced the engine, then traction control broke. Fixed that then steering rack and pinion locked up. You want trouble? Go buy GM junk.

    • @alhassangangu4357
      @alhassangangu4357 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Look like you had a nasty relationship with a baaad person. I am glad you got out of that nightmare.

    • @manimalworks7424
      @manimalworks7424 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alhassangangu4357 indeed!

    • @wisecarrental2821
      @wisecarrental2821 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I wont a Gm anymore. They are junk vehicles that need constant replairs

    • @franciscomedinav
      @franciscomedinav ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Come on man!! 38K????? I'm sorry to say this : it cannot be!!!! I have a 2012 Nissan Rogue that has 220K and still running!!!!!!

    • @manimalworks7424
      @manimalworks7424 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@franciscomedinav I know. Hard to believe. It was only 43k miles when I traded in. So many problems.

  • @EpticityOG
    @EpticityOG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    A Sequoia will have better resell value than a Tahoe so you can always trade it in sell it for a newer model, plus it would most likely give you less mechanical issues as time goes on too, I would choose the Sequoia

    • @wmupilot89
      @wmupilot89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You know that for fact? The 6.2 is tried and tested, while Toyota's new hybrid is brand new.

    • @mybro727
      @mybro727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Basically just another Toyota fan speculating based off a reputation for reliability that the Toyota Tundra has already proven to be outdated and out of touch with reality.

    • @ryany9696
      @ryany9696 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Da Vee Day! how long is long-term?

  • @karatekick66
    @karatekick66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Great review. I’m going Tahoe. More space and the 2nd and 3rd row seats fold flat. Sequoia with the batteries you need to do other work and attachments to get a flat bed. That’s a HUGE draw back.

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks!

    • @leivaandre
      @leivaandre 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is the MPG difference for both?

    • @dimav975
      @dimav975 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also Sequoia has part-time(

    • @tego5370
      @tego5370 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      More space won't matter, when you are left stranded on the road.

    • @system9625
      @system9625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where is the rear seat entertainment system on the Sequoia. I can't believe after the redesign Sequoia still doesn't offer a rear independent suspension. That's why there's no room in the third row.

  • @oliverpuselja9505
    @oliverpuselja9505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    The Toyota build quality and interior is a step above the Tahoe. Also, the reliability and re-sale is something the Tahoe can not compete. However, the Tahoe is so much more practical than the Sequoia with tons of cargo space. Sequoia 3rd row seats is a disaster and wish they just made it a 2 row SUV with more cargo space.

    • @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix
      @Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That didn't stop the previous tahoe from selling so well. It had a worse 3rd row because it had a solid axle. At least Toyota came up with a shelf system to make a flatter load surface. Toyota actually took a step back and went to a solid axle, which is better for towing and give better suspension articulation. Independent rear has really bad negative camber when its loaded. The downside of the solid axle is you lose fold flat 3rd row. I personally don't need that much space. For my wife and 3 kids. What I don't like is that they did away with thw roll down back glass and the sliding 2nd row. The sloding 3rd row is nice bit I'd rather have a sliding 2nd row or both.

  • @brokeduece1691
    @brokeduece1691 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    If buying new, I'm buying the Tahoe. It makes the better mall crawler and road trip suv. Toyota is catering the Sequoia to a very small offroader/overlander group.

    • @cornbread70s4
      @cornbread70s4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed…even though the resale value is higher w Toyota….Chevy has more room, competitive tech and better styling in my opinion (outside of the halogen taillights)

    • @HD_Kerino
      @HD_Kerino 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cornbread70s4 bro what you can’t say that for the new vehicles coming out, looking at the resale value of new Japanese cars compared to one that older with the same miles, the new one is cheaper. American cars have always had very high resale values, with a 2009 Jeep Wrangler with 200k on the dash is still worth 17k!

    • @brokeduece1691
      @brokeduece1691 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everyone compares resale value to MSRP and thinks Toyota has the best resale value. But you must look at actual sold price compared to resold price. Toyota does not give discounts, while you can get $7-10k off a Chevy. With that in consideration, Chevy actually has the better resale value.

    • @Ruva226
      @Ruva226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Them Tahoes (imo) are plain and slip through my mind.. especially with fleet ones. I’d personally want to drive a car people will look at. I’m not solid on this but wouldn’t people get a tax cut bc it’s a hybrid? Anyways I’d get the Toyota new.. and if I wasn’t solid with it - trade it in w that resale value and get a depreciated Tahoe 🤷🏽‍♂️

    • @wrzl1675
      @wrzl1675 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL what LOL SMH
      Actually they’re making an SUV that can tow more and get superior mpg over the competition while delivering great all weather capabilities and comfort (Lexus Interior).
      Nobody goes 4wheeling in any of these land yachts regardless of manufacturer. Hell, 98% of 4WD’s that come into my shop have ever seen anything worse that a gravel driveway, including Jeep Rubicon’s

  • @tego5370
    @tego5370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I would go with the Toyota. Looks more luxurious inside and out. On top of that it is much, much, much, much more reliable than the Tahoe.

    • @lanardfletcher1422
      @lanardfletcher1422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It looks more luxurious?!?!?.....The Toyota??

    • @me24680
      @me24680 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lanardfletcher1422 yes, the Toyota

    • @maxmx767
      @maxmx767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hahahahahahaha Stop it.
      I own a Suburban and my wife a Toyota and she doesn’t even want to drive it anymore 🤣🤣

    • @lanardfletcher1422
      @lanardfletcher1422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maxmx767 Yeah I dont see it either. The new Tahoes/ Suburbans/ Silverados are absolutely stunning imo. The interiors are elegant and sophisticated and they have road presence that you just cant ignore. Aside from the TRD Pros, the new Sequoias look a little cheesy to me. The infotainment center lacks any continuity in its design and the outside......well, it just looks Japanese. Not bad, but not exciting. It looks responsible. Lol

    • @maxmx767
      @maxmx767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lanardfletcher1422 Facts

  • @MansaX
    @MansaX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    That's crazy that customers have to pay to use remote start.

    • @omeraslam2121
      @omeraslam2121 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes but that's EVERY brand now

    • @kamotekamote3002
      @kamotekamote3002 ปีที่แล้ว

      You also have to pay for your fart

    • @yomammasaidso
      @yomammasaidso ปีที่แล้ว

      I know, a regular remote start costs around $400 and the Toyota subscription is around $80.

    • @AAhmad3449
      @AAhmad3449 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@omeraslam2121 no it’s not

    • @omeraslam2121
      @omeraslam2121 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AAhmad3449 if you buy a new vehicle with modern tech, remote start is built into subscription services
      Toyota, bmw, Honda, Mercedes, and VW
      Even Ford and chevy are going the mix

  • @matthewherold9532
    @matthewherold9532 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My wife and I purchased a 2022 Tahoe High Country 4x4 with the 3.0 Duramax Diesel. We traded in our 2017 Mercedes GLS 450. We absolutely love our Tahoe and we are happy with our choice. We average 19MPG city and get about 28-29 MPG on the freeway. The third row on the Sequoia was a deal breaker for us. When we have the in-laws in town, we need the 3rd row space. With more passengers, comes more luggage. The Tahoe is able to do both. And the sliding second row helps tremendously. We have owned an Escalade ESV in the past, and I can tell you these new GM suvs have come a long way. GM understands the market most. Our Tahoe rides better than our Mercedes, soaking up bumps extremely well. We are excited to have this vehicle in the family for years to come. And those making decisions based on resale value, keep in mind, the sequoia does not hold its value as well as other Toyota/Lexus models. We feel the Tahoe will hold its looks better as well. Look at a 5 year old Sequioa vs a 5 year old Tahoe. The GM vehicles look much better. Just my opinion

    • @timgilbert2127
      @timgilbert2127 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had two tahoes once you get over 80000 miles you better trade ‘em

    • @logan9758
      @logan9758 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I prefer the prior gen sequoia over the Tahoe because of the tahoes more cramped 3rd row (due to the solid rear axle) and highlander like interior space
      However I much prefer this gen tahoe over the sequoia for the exact same reasons

  • @tubqhe
    @tubqhe ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Toyota legendary reliability. 30 years from now it will still hold it's value and ride solid. I love what you do for me toyota!

    • @trewright1482
      @trewright1482 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Who wants to keep a car for 30 years??

    • @danielmeador1991
      @danielmeador1991 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just wait till that hybrid breaks plus it’s based on the new tundra which is so bad it’s not even recommended by consumer reports

  • @mikesowell7969
    @mikesowell7969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Both very nice but I’m going with the Toyota. Toyota quality is much better than GM. GM is still having the lifter failure problems with 6.2 & 5.3 engines.

    • @bourbonbill
      @bourbonbill 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Toyota is having turbo failures on its new engine so probably equal issues

    • @mybro727
      @mybro727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Of course the mention of GM’s V8 lifter issues except they are being fixed at dealerships and affected customers sent on their way. Unlike Toyota, GM has fully addressed that issue with a solution that seems to work. On the contrary, new Toyotas are needing brand new engines dropped in them after weeks or months of sitting at the dealer waiting for parts. Turbocharger actuator failures that require the entire cab to be removed from the bed in order to fix. 1 wastegate failed 12 hours after the owner drove his new Tundra off the lot. Brake sensor failures, plastic trim on seats prematurely cracking. Interior trim curling and peeling off the doors on higher Platinum trim levels. Toyota fans are weird for still trying to hang on to an outdated reputation of unwavering reliability even when it clearly no longer applies. The lack of quality on the 2022 Toyota Tundra is abysmal. *What a joke.*

    • @lordsknight4516
      @lordsknight4516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bourbonbill Toyota has better reliability no matter which way you try and slice it. If I'm paying 70k-90k for a vehicle of this class, I want my vehicle to last a long time, and have good resale value which Toyota has both. This engine for Toyota in new in the line up so I would expect it to have issues that they will need to fix. GM does not have an excuse. Hey but look at the bright side, in a few years everything will be geared more towards electric vehicles... GM does lead in that arena!

    • @mikesowell7969
      @mikesowell7969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lordsknight4516 Yeah that’s what I want. A $70,000 suv with know lifter issues & have the dealership mechanic fix it & put it back together hoping he did it all correctly. 🤣
      I’ll stick with the Toyota quality.

    • @kevinli8552
      @kevinli8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This size of SUV with a tiny tiny cargo space, that's a joke, loll

  • @thebionicpig
    @thebionicpig 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Absolutely NO-ONE can rival your comparison videos!!

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks! We appreciate that!

    • @jaycho6747
      @jaycho6747 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Throttle House has entered the chat. 😂

  • @wmupilot89
    @wmupilot89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I feel you should of given Chevy/GMC at least a half a point for having engine options including a diesel... People like options. Also, the diesel would have better fuel economy than the Toyota. How do those fuel mileage numbers add up in a cold environment?

    • @ReginaAnnRod
      @ReginaAnnRod 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We’re actually looking into buying and SUV and the diesel option (I believe) still wasn’t as good as the Sequoia’s fuel economy.

    • @agloriousbear1535
      @agloriousbear1535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@ReginaAnnRod we just got our Tahoe with the diesel and it gets between 26 and 29 mpg

    • @martymcalister5582
      @martymcalister5582 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      THE TOYOTA ENGINE BEATS THEM ALL BUT MAYBE THE DIESEL AND THATS $8000 MORE AND CONSUMERS REPORT SAID THE GM WAS THE # 1 MOST TROUBLED VEHICLES ON THE MARKET. CHINA/GM NO THANKS
      3

    • @stevieray1828
      @stevieray1828 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Americans like more options, Japanese want perfection

    • @JiggaJ1979
      @JiggaJ1979 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Working as a tech for GM I’d get a Toyota, can’t get parts for either but within 7000 miles the lifters are going go bad causing a engine noise and misfire. It’s really ridiculous on what the customers have to go through driving these pieces of shit. The 5.3 the 6.2 is flat out trash. Haven’t seen too many issues with the diesels but the only reason for is because they are rare and we don’t hardly see them.

  • @chevyman5783
    @chevyman5783 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I would still choose the Tahoe but the sequoia did step up

    • @yomammasaidso
      @yomammasaidso ปีที่แล้ว

      Depending on the Tahoe, it actually has better features than Toyota.

  • @terrifuller
    @terrifuller 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So slightly bias but in a weird way. I have a 2022 High Country Tahoe (fully loaded) but before this, I’ve only owned Toyota 4Runners and one Toyota Corolla. So I’m a Toyota girl. BUT, I noticed you all kept giving points to Toyota for every tiny thing but wouldn’t really give a point to the Tahoe when it exceeded something the Toyota did. Didn’t think the points system was fair, BUT another thing to keep in mind on the Seqouia are the interior colors. For $80k people are going to be looking at that and want a luxury feel. The capstone has two tones interiors (black and white/half and half on the seats) whereas the high country is one solid colors for the seats, dash, etc. Seems small but when you see it side by side 99% of people will not want the dual colors on the seats for a luxury vehicle. Some will, most won’t.

    • @ryany9696
      @ryany9696 ปีที่แล้ว

      while I'm in that 1%

  • @geosch9956
    @geosch9956 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    For opinion on ride comfort, was that solely on front passenger seats on straight roads? Because Sequoia has solid axial with heavy battery at the rear, I would expect rear to swing with so much more body roll at every corners. All these can potentially make rear passengers feeling very uncomfortable (car sick).

  • @deepresident7896
    @deepresident7896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I would take the Tahoe it looks better and I really love the 6.2 liter motor

    • @kromahj
      @kromahj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That toyota look way better then the tahoe. The tahoe just have good cargo space. Even the interior, toyota look way better

    • @kevinr5187
      @kevinr5187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kromahj IMO the Toyota grill looks better than the Tahoe, but a Yukon grill looks better than the Toyota. To me the Toyota interior looks like something off of the old Speed Racer cartoon. Looks cheap and plastic.

    • @leonchea8235
      @leonchea8235 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sequoia hand down for many good reasons: reliability, environmental friendly, better MPG, better off road capabilities, better resale value down the road and more towing capacity plus a few thousands cheaper.

  • @riduandunia6591
    @riduandunia6591 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Longevity and dependableness. If I’m financing my auto, I don’t want to be stuck with repair bills too.

    • @Blessedtruly3000
      @Blessedtruly3000 ปีที่แล้ว

      I own a fleet of GMC/Chevy And never had a problem at all. I keep my trucks serviced

  • @ShinobiTekken
    @ShinobiTekken 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Turbo failures + Part-time transfer case + Folded 3rd tow not being even with floor = deal breakers

    • @dimav975
      @dimav975 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1000%

  • @Blackpanther_risen
    @Blackpanther_risen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great comparison but I would give the Toyota another full point for historically being the most reliable, dependable & durable so…..Sequioa wins 😂

    • @danielmeador1991
      @danielmeador1991 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol loses for new engine with a long history of problems

  • @raphaeljarvis2687
    @raphaeljarvis2687 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Both vehicles are great but I’ll pick the Sequoia

  • @mytime007
    @mytime007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For the last 8 months i was planning on getting the Sequoia , Now i think i will have to stick with the tahoe. Just torn between the Tahoe or EV Silverado once it is released. The Sequoia just does not have enough room behind the 3rd row, but I like the mileage on Sequoia. You never stated the tahoe mileage but I figure it should be the same as the tahoe i have now at around 15 mpg .

    • @wongchai807
      @wongchai807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Get thr sequoia

  • @CramerCrew
    @CramerCrew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Love the comparison video! The Sequoia wins hands down for me! We can't wait to purchase one!

  • @jayman7101
    @jayman7101 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep in mind, we live in California and most states likely won’t have a Market Adjustment problem.
    Watched hundreds of hours of videos. Primarily of the Sequoia Capstone, Jeep GC-Summit Reserve, Jeep Wagoneer (outside Ugly, Inside OMG NIIIICE), and Audi Q7 55 Prestige Quattro.
    We were pre-Approved for 120k with cash down payment of 30k + trade I valued at 12k
    We test drove each vehicle a couple times each.
    The Toyota Dealerships tried to Screw us HARD! ALL
    of them. We were in discussion with 4 dealerships. Because the capstone and Platinum Editions were hard to find, I wanted a call as soon as one arrived.
    While my wife LOVED the Capstone a LOT and wanted either a capstone or Platinum in blue, all the dealership applied a “‘market adjustment” to the tune of 25k. This fee was “Just because” fee due to supply low and popularity. I refused to pay that bullshit fee. They would not even budge on the MA. We Walked.
    BEWARE OF TOYOTA OVERCHARGING.
    GMC Is Garbage.
    Jeep is a gold vehicle Wagoneer was nice but was ugly as shit outside. Inside was solid awesomeness.
    The ride was in its own class of smoothness.
    Well, they would not budge on the Inflated price either. We walked.
    The AUDI dealership not only kicked the Market Adjustment but also came down a a lot on the sticker price. The ride is amazing, perks of an Audi owner is great, power is awesome, and luxury beyond belief. Smooth ride and internal features are great.
    We ended up buying the Audi. We have had the vehicle for two months now and don’t regret it at all.

  • @MichaelFrancis222
    @MichaelFrancis222 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I think the tahoe has an advantage because of the rear room space.

    • @issavibez394
      @issavibez394 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only advantage is it breaking down

  • @cosmo7969
    @cosmo7969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The Toyota is a win for me. Love the white interior looks more luxurious.

  • @melissacoogler724
    @melissacoogler724 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish Toyota/Lexus would listen to consumers and make something comparable to the Suburban/Yukon XL/Escalade ESV. I hate my GM SUV but I am giving up a ton of space to go back to Toyota or Lexus.

  • @isactoriguevara6030
    @isactoriguevara6030 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I’ve always loved both, but I think I’m going with the Tahoe. Especially with that big 6.2 naturally aspirated V8. Great video!

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks!

    • @issavibez394
      @issavibez394 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ok so u want more repairs it doesn't look nearly as good as Sequoia

    • @tonyabailey1028
      @tonyabailey1028 ปีที่แล้ว

      I want the Tahoe so bad but I'm so scared with all of the talk about the lifters and stuff and I get a discount on Toyota and lexus

  • @papagen00
    @papagen00 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tahoe for me hands down. Seen both parked side by side in Yosemite last week. Tahoe was much easier on the eye especially in light gray (white?) color! Not a fan of new Japanese car design.

  • @nicolep7241
    @nicolep7241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    CHEVY.

  • @redlineperformance7765
    @redlineperformance7765 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    i would recommend capstone vs denali but anyways this is an amazing video

  • @shannonbrown8139
    @shannonbrown8139 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Seem like the sequoia is a more complex system that I wouldn’t feel comfortable working on if and when I ever need to replace a part

    • @trewright1482
      @trewright1482 ปีที่แล้ว

      100% agree. Chevy sells a TON of these vehicles and should be more affordable to repair.

  • @yungnachty4474
    @yungnachty4474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Toyota needs to bump the build quality of the Sequoia and also offer an XL version that has a longer wheel base. If they did that, they would be the number 1 by lightyears.

  • @MJ-cg8vp
    @MJ-cg8vp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video as always! I was hoping see those two in comparison!!

  • @go4384
    @go4384 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Push button gear shifting is a huge revolution. I can’t tell you how many times that shifter has gotten in my way over the years, plus it has at times shifted due to something pushing on it which isn’t safe.

    • @RSI77
      @RSI77 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, it’s like leaping into the year 1956 in a Chrysler….

    • @issavibez394
      @issavibez394 ปีที่แล้ว

      More electronics failing yup

  • @jrodriguez2973
    @jrodriguez2973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Toyota Sequoia all the way

  • @khanfauji7
    @khanfauji7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This was a much needed comparison. Nicely Done ✅

  • @Sunjib12345
    @Sunjib12345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hi Can Confections I Would Love To See a Comparison Between 2022 Audi Q5 Prestige Or 2022 Mercedes-Benz GLC 300

    • @ivanlowjones
      @ivanlowjones 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can Confections?🤔

  • @thejoshman1234
    @thejoshman1234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Beautiful Kentucky scenery and beautiful vehicles! Awesome video guys.

  • @andrepaden4801
    @andrepaden4801 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Both are great. I’ll take High county 👍

  • @jefferybaxter1225
    @jefferybaxter1225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hello gentlemen. Good comparison video between the 2022 Chevy Tahoe and the new generation 2023 Toyota Sequoia. These two are BIG BEASTS for sure. In terms of vehicle of choice I would choose the Chevy Tahoe. That would be the chosen vehicle primarily due to being more spacious for interior storage up front, passenger space and space behind the third row seats. Like what was demonstrated in the video a more premium audio system. I also like the fact that it has quad exhaust tips which are exposed and it's good to hear acoustic sounds from the V8 engine. That V8 growling sound is the signature sound everybody wants to hear when driving a big full size SUV. In a upcoming comparison video it would be good to see the 2023 Toyota Sequoia go up against the Ford Expedition. I assume you guys are probably having the thought process of making a video between those two vehicles. For what I'll say next might be asking for too much, but I'll mention it anyway. Is it possible for in the near future a three way comparison video gets made for the first time? If so, it would be great to see for sure. If possible it would be nice to see the Chevy Tahoe, Ford Expedition and Jeep Wagoneer going up against each other. Or another three way comparison would be Jeep Wagoneer, Ford Expedition and Toyota Sequoia. In general the three way comparison videos wouldn't be for full size SUVs only. Can be for the smaller mid-size and compact size SUVs as well. If a three way comparison video can't be made I would understand due to the fact that it'll be a very time consuming process. I mentioned it because no other You Tube car reviewer channel did a three way comparison video before. If you guys can do it your channel would be the first to do so.

  • @Aschoolbusandsimulatorfan2219
    @Aschoolbusandsimulatorfan2219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I gonna perfur Brand-new Chevrolet Tahoe.

  • @jermainedouglas7301
    @jermainedouglas7301 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Seqouia needs an extended version now

  • @LarryWebb-gv8dz
    @LarryWebb-gv8dz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like them both but I would choose the Tahoe

  • @ferencvad8251
    @ferencvad8251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    One thing, an important one, wasn’t considered between the Chevy and the Toyota. While Chevy will need maintenance and repairs more frequently (depending on the driving style too) Toyota will run for 200 k miles and plus, without any major repairs and issues. Now that’s a very important point and an easy decision based on their reliability, which will serve your family longer and better.

    • @cab9191
      @cab9191 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not necessarily. This hybrid powertrain with twin turbos is brand new and never before seen. Only time will tell if it meets Toyota’s standard for reliability.

    • @JoshJourney1
      @JoshJourney1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you keep up with maintenance for the chevy, I'm pretty sure it can hit 200k or over just like the old ones.

    • @trewright1482
      @trewright1482 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would be concerned with the new Hybrid V6 from Toyota. Brand new and haven’t worked out the bugs. Mind you that is the only option for Power in the Toyota. Chevy sells a TON of the V8s and are basically Bulletproof and have been around a long time making parts fairly cheap.

    • @cab9191
      @cab9191 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@trewright1482 I went with an expedition haha

    • @trewright1482
      @trewright1482 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cab9191 nice vehicle. I got a 2023 Tahoe Premier. I about went with the Expedition as I about didn’t find a Tahoe

  • @franciscomedinav
    @franciscomedinav ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm planning to get a Toyota Sequoia 2023 for $66,000. For the long term. I'm the type of guy that uses a car until it lasts. I'm 46. This is my automobile until I die!!! 😎😎😎

  • @davegrant8187
    @davegrant8187 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There's a couple features of the Sequoia that have been overlooked. First, the steering radius in the Seq is nuts. I watched a Tahoe parked in front of me pull a shity (Uturn), hit the opposing sidewalk, back up, and then proceed. I followed him but turned into the inside lane. Secondly is the airbag controlled rear suspension. Regardless of your cargo weight or tow load that vehilce is level. You wont see the front end popped up because they have a heavy trailer. Dead level. The other advantage is being able to drop down the rear for towing hook ups and ability to drop the truck for parking limits. I have the first year G2 2008 sequoia. Best truck ever, country driven, livestock pulling, 580,000k no major repairs. Drives new. I expect that even though it's a new model, the reliability will be equal to what I've experienced. Too bad I don't need one.😁

    • @plmn93
      @plmn93 ปีที่แล้ว

      This Sequoia's turning radius is a foot wider than the Tahoe...3 feet wider in TRD trim.

  • @abdulsatarasilzay87
    @abdulsatarasilzay87 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For expensive vehicles specially with GM products the problem is the maintenance and resale value in that case I will definitely trade my 2019 chevy suburban for the new Sequoia.

  • @perezsykes3803
    @perezsykes3803 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Would love to see a comparison between the Sequoia and Expedition 🙂🙂

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Noted... Thanks

    • @wmupilot89
      @wmupilot89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarConfections Sequoia v Expedition v Yukon would be the best.. fyi

    • @originalpointsf6339
      @originalpointsf6339 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarConfections Compare with Yukon Denali so it’s top vs top

    • @originalpointsf6339
      @originalpointsf6339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarConfections expedition is outdated no point testing it!

    • @originalpointsf6339
      @originalpointsf6339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarConfections i think it’s a terrible vehicle, 2nd row don’t slide, 3 row is no room, no cargo space, material quality is very Toyota, ride quality, problem with the turbo, roof is low, probably noiser in the real world than the GM, cheap plastics

  • @marcushammonds7115
    @marcushammonds7115 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The optional bench 2nd row in the Tahoe and the lack of room both in the 3rd row seating and trunk are complete L’s for the Sequoia that can’t be overcome.

  • @romanpanmei2647
    @romanpanmei2647 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Tahoe = Elegance
    Sequoia = Reliability

  • @limitedreach4446
    @limitedreach4446 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Competition is always great! Both are great.

  • @sittingduck02
    @sittingduck02 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My first car was a 1987 Chevy caprice. Loved it at beginning for its size, muscle and comfort…until its engine cracked into half, literally, @ 80k miles.
    I love the looks & spcs of thirst new Cadillac lineups but hesitate to get one, I learned my lesson.

    • @Vmh1717
      @Vmh1717 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol same here. Loved that car

  • @slip718
    @slip718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The Sequoia is easily the winner for me. It inherits the rock solid build quality of all Toyota trucks and the interior is generations ahead of all the cheap plastic in the Chevy. I wish it had independent rear suspension and ANY subscription service is absurd at this price point but the savings at the pump offset that. I’m looking forward to test driving one.

  • @blackstallion132
    @blackstallion132 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would buy the Sequoia. I love the styling and design shape of it.

  • @Ozzy4555
    @Ozzy4555 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I guess we can ignore the various problems GM has had with their transmissions and engine lifters sticking. Terrible powertrain and electronics. Reliability should be considered. I bet the sequoia will outlast the GM.

    • @AC-ir3od
      @AC-ir3od 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It shares many of the same components with the land cruiser so yes it will outlast the gm.

    • @huey8431
      @huey8431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I totally agree with you. Had my new Denali Yukon bought back under lemon law with all the issues I have. No more American cars for me.

  • @theone5404
    @theone5404 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't give a damn about the extra horse power when I have a family. Give me the power from the hybrid on saving gas. Forget that shit. These vehicles need to drink less gas.

  • @andrewmagyar9418
    @andrewmagyar9418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    So I'm in the market for either one of these, and I really like how you did the point system for each feature. You went in increments of .5 which is completely fine, until you got to the trunk space. The Tahoe didn't have a life changing massive increase and you bumped it up 1.5 points. I lost interest in the video right after. I get you don't want to be biased towards one company over the other. But you cant just bump up extra points when one company is falling behind, it makes you lose creditability as a reviewer.

    • @CarConfections
      @CarConfections  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The reason for that was .5 points for each configuration (behind 3rd, 2nd and 1st rows). Sometimes one SUV will will one and not the other but in this case the Tahoe sweep all 3 categories. Thanks for watching 👍

    • @Joe-rabbit
      @Joe-rabbit 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thought so too!

    • @richardoaks3597
      @richardoaks3597 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarConfections something you should consider when reviewing cabin space is that there is no standard followed by manufacturers when it comes to rating their front, mid and rear leg room etc. so when they report their leg room you can’t really know for sure how they measured.
      Maybe you could ask the manufacturers going forward how they measure their leg room? That would be nice to know.

  • @user-nq6dg9od5p
    @user-nq6dg9od5p ปีที่แล้ว

    The Sequoia greatly outperforms the Tahoe, and even horses and machine power outperforms the Tahoe, your friend from Saudi Arabia.

  • @repjayxiong
    @repjayxiong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sequoia has quality and longevity behind it. I'm sticking with the Toyota.

  • @muhammadbabar86
    @muhammadbabar86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would choose Tahoe with diesel engine with better fuel economy.

    • @leonchea8235
      @leonchea8235 ปีที่แล้ว

      Diesel is more expensive than gas so end up the ssme

  • @jessekuchinski1172
    @jessekuchinski1172 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I don't understand how so many can lay 83k down for a tahoe. That's insane

  • @BryanG830
    @BryanG830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Both very beautiful SUVs. I've always been a Chevy fan. I will stick with the Tahoe. But that Sequoia is looking hella fine. The only Toyota's I do like are the SUVs and trucks. I don't like the sedans or the crossovers from Toyota.

    • @nitahandorf1547
      @nitahandorf1547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I drove 2000 Toyota Sienna I sold it to a friend and still running.
      I drove a 2005 RAV4 and sold it. Then drove 2008 Sienna sold it and still running.
      Drove 2015 Highlander sold it and still running
      Drove 2018 Highlander still driving it, but ready to get the 2023 Sequoia.
      Point is: personally I’ve been satisfied and happy with Toyota, they have good quality of vehicles.
      I followed all the schedule factory maintenance, fortunately I never have any major issues of all my Toyota cars.

    • @kevindownes9474
      @kevindownes9474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      that's probably cuz toyota's suv's and trucks are all american made and designed

    • @danielmeador1991
      @danielmeador1991 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kevindownes9474 so are the gm full size suvs all made in Arlington Texas

  • @erickfernandorubio9048
    @erickfernandorubio9048 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can add the fact that the 2023 high country comes with the optional super cruise, giving it the slight advantage

  • @jongreen2600
    @jongreen2600 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review Gents... I love the 6.2 V8 but the interior styling, ventilated second row seats and gas mileage make the Toyota my choice.

  • @jacure123
    @jacure123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'll take one with the better gas mileage and tq. Plus, that sequoia is a beauty.

  • @Otterom
    @Otterom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They are somewhat similar in some aspects the chevy independent rear suspension and naturally aspirated V8 are what makes they chevy the better and more reliable truck

  • @cornbread70s4
    @cornbread70s4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome review guys!!! Appreciate this channel….long time subscriber here…

  • @wrzl1675
    @wrzl1675 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I’ve owned and do own a Tahoe and while they’re a good truck they leave quite a bit to be desired. They’re always way behind the tech curve. Engine and power train is great with the 6.2, had no real big issues. BIG problems, interior rattles over time was absolutely maddening and electrical issues have been just as crazy. The independent rear suspension makes for almost luxury car ride but absolutely SUCKS for towing, with only 5800 lbs behind it it feels like the back tires are flat when at highway speeds.
    Can’t wait to park a Sequoia in the driveway! Thank god Toyota understands that not all buyers want an SUV that’s actually a commuter car/station wagon.

    • @chrisd5383
      @chrisd5383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly! I’m buying mine to tow a 5000lb boat and 4500lb enclosed trailer while being able to haul 8 of us to the lake.

    • @nacho-man1063
      @nacho-man1063 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with you, American vehicles rattled, always on service repairs, tons of recalls, value drops significantly and much more.
      Toyota and Lexus it is as good it gets.

    • @QuietStormX
      @QuietStormX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Update

  • @chickenwarrior9991
    @chickenwarrior9991 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Tahoe still looks way classier inside and out. But I’d go for the sequoia based on powertrain, reliability and off road potential

    • @testtesting2868
      @testtesting2868 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait until the battery and turbos need maintenance. Costly.

    • @DeeeBeee123
      @DeeeBeee123 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look up tahoe z71

  • @Tully3674
    @Tully3674 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Xlnt video! When you think Chevy, perception is being inexpensive (but not value). When you think Toyota, perception is value and reliability (even though Chevy has terrific reliability the past 12+ years). Until GM emphasizes its reliability for their marketing, GM will stay strong in the middle third of the county, Toyota will remain dominant on the west coast and southeast region, and the northeast (not very populated), will be 60/40 Chevy. If I had to choose, I'd go Sequoia because I keep my cars for 12-15 years.

  • @sergioterrones8724
    @sergioterrones8724 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm just curious as to how long that battery will last on that Sequoia 🤔.

    • @trewright1482
      @trewright1482 ปีที่แล้ว

      Curious indeed!

    • @chrisbean4610
      @chrisbean4610 ปีที่แล้ว

      Prob 10 years but who really knows at this time in batteries newer to some of these vehicles

    • @danielmeador1991
      @danielmeador1991 ปีที่แล้ว

      5-8 years

  • @nipex69
    @nipex69 ปีที่แล้ว

    Had a Tahoe 2021 High Country. Bad quality. Dashboard rattle and noise all over .... Sold it. Thanks for the review.

  • @clubtc05
    @clubtc05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I would choose the Sequoia, mainly because of Toyota history of reliability.

    • @weirdshibainu
      @weirdshibainu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except this engine is experiencing waste gate turbo issues

  • @Tommaso77777
    @Tommaso77777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would have liked to see all the RELIABILITY Numbers listed, & their significance in the determination!

  • @happychildhood8806
    @happychildhood8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How much market value will they have in 5 to 10 years? I'm assuming the Sequoia will cost double compared to Tahoe. Sorry, GM but no question what truck is better.

    • @Rainy_Day12234
      @Rainy_Day12234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The new v6 Toyota engine isn’t going to have the same lifespan as the former v8.

  • @LarryWebb-gv8dz
    @LarryWebb-gv8dz หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you remove the center console in either one of these vehicles ?

  • @jajahmal8780
    @jajahmal8780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Definitely would go with the new Sequoia!!

  • @juanettalyons7915
    @juanettalyons7915 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im a Tahoe Woman....I am researching the Tahoe's now and im really leaning towards the Tahoe High Country model.

    • @tormundgaint1022
      @tormundgaint1022 ปีที่แล้ว

      The value will go down and it will start breaking down in 4 years… that is GMC

    • @Blessedtruly3000
      @Blessedtruly3000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tormundgaint1022 I have had 11 gmc trucks as fleet for my company and they still
      Run strong.. years range from 10
      Tears ok and newer and I have never had ANY problems.. I have 3 Denali… 4 Tahoe and 3 suburban and I am a Chevy girl .. but this Sequoia is cute ..

  • @lindadevine9513
    @lindadevine9513 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Test drove the Tahoe unbelievably comfortable

  • @robertbasta7239
    @robertbasta7239 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just got my Toyota sequoia and I love it ❤

  • @jeeshhseej9347
    @jeeshhseej9347 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tahoe with the magni ride with adaptive air ride is 2nd to none. The one thing GM has over the car market is their suspension there is literally no one even close right now.

  • @stacyestesmonroe4312
    @stacyestesmonroe4312 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Sequoia is beautiful and Toyota has an outstanding record of reliability so I will go with it.

  • @mikepivero3133
    @mikepivero3133 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've had them both iand the Toyota almost 250,000 miles on it has no major issues I replaced so many things on Chevy with not even that many miles on it. It's not even close and quality and longevity.

    • @naveenthemachine
      @naveenthemachine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Longevity yes but remember the Tahoe outsells the sequoia by many many miles.

    • @romairoblackstock5100
      @romairoblackstock5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@naveenthemachine Um well dah the previous gen Sequoia was so old I wouldn't buy it either. I am excited to see how sales would pan out with the redesign though.

    • @andybub45
      @andybub45 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@naveenthemachine When it breaks people buy another one... the Tahoe is a leasemobile. This comes from someone who had a 1st gen Tahoe, which was great. New Chevy vehicles have no sense of quality.

    • @mybro727
      @mybro727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@romairoblackstock5100 the previous Tahoe was old too, and it still outsold the Sequoia 2 to 1 and it wasn’t even close. This new Sequoia is mechanically identical to the new Toyota Tundra that’s been experiencing some major unreliabilities with it’s hybrid V6 and serious quality issues.

    • @greendusk93
      @greendusk93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      people seem to forget that the Sequoia has a new unproven engine. The new Tundra's reliability is already down. This new engine will probably not have that classic toyota reliability which is a shame.

  • @shaktishaker
    @shaktishaker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You forget the most important part. RELIABILITY

  • @nitahandorf1547
    @nitahandorf1547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Based on your evaluations contrast and compare, I think I will get the Sequoia.

  • @v6wells
    @v6wells 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tahoe the best

  • @jo77716
    @jo77716 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Toyota Sequoia is By far more Superior.
    Now when the hell are they going to make a vehicle to compare to the Suburban!??! We need a SEQUOIA XL ASAP!!!!

  • @wc4201
    @wc4201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Sequoia looks far better and Toyotas build quality is far superior to Chevrolet however I need to see how the new motor does long term before I’m going to drop 80k on it. The TRD Pro Sequoia is the way to go.

  • @huey8431
    @huey8431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I choose Toyota. I have owned a Yukon xl and Yukon xl Denali. Both purchased new and had engines cease at 100k among other problems :(

  • @Chrissers2010
    @Chrissers2010 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice comparison. Thank you!

  • @paaparkraray6988
    @paaparkraray6988 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think Toyota wins in some areas which were not emphasized. 1 Reliability, 2 Holding value, I think that is a big one, 3 More power with better economy. I like the V8 more than V6, but with chevys quality and reliability issues I would refrain from buying it.

  • @russellfrench1173
    @russellfrench1173 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tahoe all the way! Have one ordered. Chevy has always been reliable for me with very few issues. Can’t beat the room in a Tahoe!

  • @panchovillaz8004
    @panchovillaz8004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Toyota for me is perfect 😍😁😅😅😆 Toyota gives extra life in miles.