ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

"There's nothing magic in the blood of Christ..." | Pastor Reacts to John MacArthur

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ส.ค. 2024
  • John MacArthur makes a fundamental error in trying to draw a hard line between the importance of the blood of Christ and the death of Christ. Is this line of thinking correct according to the scriptures? * We do not desire to degrade the man, but we seek to point out the error in the things he teaches contrary to scripture. *
    HOW TO HAVE ETERNAL LIFE : • Can I Know I'll Go to ...
    SUBSCRIBE / bibleline
    LIKE / biblelinemin
    COMMENT ask us a question!
    SHARE with all your friends and family
    Do you have a Bible question? Send your question to questions@biblelineministries.org!
    Support Bibleline - www.calvaryoft...
    Bibleline is a ministry of Calvary Community Church in Tampa, Florida and is hosted by Pastor Jesse Martinez.
    LIKE THIS? CHECK THESE GUYS OUT:
    / northlandchurchstc
    (Tom Cucuzza)
    / @ingrace
    (Jim Scudder)
    / northsidechurchathens
    (Freddie Coile)
    / biblelinebroadcast
    (Yankee Arnold)
    / thekeesboerministrycha...
    (Kees Boer)
    #johnmacarthur #bibleline #blood #bloodofchrist #deathofchrist #death #dying #macarthur #jmac #orthodox #calvinist #lordship #lordshipsalvation #calvinism #tulip #reformedtheology #reformed #salvation #magic #JesusChrist

ความคิดเห็น • 653

  • @BibleLine
    @BibleLine  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Are you sure that you are going to heaven? Watch here:
    th-cam.com/video/t_6L7E_mfIw/w-d-xo.html

    • @Sherlock245
      @Sherlock245 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you loving thy neighbour rather then thumping them with hell???

    • @Sherlock245
      @Sherlock245 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From John Macarthur
      For some strange reason people have accused me of denying the blood of Christ, which is not so. I affirm that a literal Jesus Christ who was man in every respect, one hundred percent man yet God incarnate, died on the cross, shed His literal blood as a sacrifice for sin. And I believe that, and I believe that it was that sacrificial death of Christ on the cross that atoned for the sins of man, and those who believe appropriate that atonement and receive eternal life through His death and resurrection, and that's historic Christian theology.

    • @Cmedic57
      @Cmedic57 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sherlock245 You speak for John MacArthur? I watched the video and am not happy with the way he addressed this subject. He should have said, "Jesus had to die, not just spill a little blood. It was His death on the cross that gave His split blood the power to cleanse us from all sin." Had he said that, there wouldn't have been an issue. Sometimes our words fail us, but God never fails us and His words are Spirit and Life. John 6:63

    • @Sherlock245
      @Sherlock245 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Cmedic57 no words are from double doctrate. Your happiness is not truth and you are too obey Gods Word and no one better then double doctrate pastor has explain it well.

    • @Cmedic57
      @Cmedic57 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sherlock245 Not sure what you mean by "Your happiness is not truth", and find it rude and very judgmental. All I said was that the way it was presented I was not happy with because I could not agree with what he said as it seemed he misconstrued the truth he was trying to express. Found it confusing, and your reply has only confused me even more, so no help there. Sorry for bothering you, was a waste of time. Will not bother you again sir.
      P.S. I like MacArthur and follow him, but don't agree with everything he says. He is only a man, and man is not perfect, only God is. We are only supposed to put our trust in God alone, and test every spirit.

  • @trustjesus9881
    @trustjesus9881 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    "In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;"
    Ephesians 1:7

    • @Steve-og4ii
      @Steve-og4ii หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      " through His blood" is omitted in many Modern Translations. Check MacArthur's translation, the Legacy Standard Bible, most likely, it's omitted there too,I dint have one,so I can't say for sure.

    • @AbideMinistriesJesus
      @AbideMinistriesJesus หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      AMEN PRAISE JESUS ❤️✝️❤️

    • @erickanter
      @erickanter หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Steve-og4ii KJV only i am.

    • @ronniebattle1310
      @ronniebattle1310 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Jesus Encounter Ministries TH-cam channel=

  • @victorialdavis9221
    @victorialdavis9221 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

    Only through the blood of Jesus is the remission of Sin

    • @USMC199
      @USMC199 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I love this comment! Amen 🙏 ❤

    • @mycharmedunicorn8715
      @mycharmedunicorn8715 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So how were Jewish people saved before Jesus came? They were saved by repentance. We still have to do our part. Repent and sin no more. Jesus dying confirms OUR repentance.

    • @josiahrock5937
      @josiahrock5937 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@mycharmedunicorn8715 there sins were covered because of the high priest preforming the sacrifice on behalf of Israel

  • @myrrhmadelove
    @myrrhmadelove หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    1 John 1:7(b) "And the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin."

    • @dansimpson271
      @dansimpson271 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
      You removedthe condition. If you walk in the light. Why would you try to hide that part of the verse?

    • @myrrhmadelove
      @myrrhmadelove 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@dansimpson271 goodness, it wasn't intentional, I was remembering that the blood of Jesus purifies us from sin, and truly thank you for posting the whole verse, the day I posted was because I was focused on what was being said in the message. Is that a condition for Jesus blood to purify us or is that a result? of walking in the light, confessing your sin, being in fellowship with the Lord? it's amazing if you think about it. the idea that He loved us before we knew Him, gave himself up for us as a sacrifice, tasted death, defeated death, all before we ever knew Him. and that He allows us to find Him and know Him, if we are truly seeking, not just about Him, but Him, so yes, walk in the light with the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of glory!

    • @dansimpson271
      @dansimpson271 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@myrrhmadelove Thanks for the reply, it’s evident that you are wise and really seem to have the fruit of the spirit. John does say if we walk in the light. I Would say yes that is a condition. Yes it is amazing that he loved all mankind and died before any of us thought about living for him, and amen to all the rest of what you said! God provides a way! Praise be to God the father and our king Jesus!

  • @Philip__325
    @Philip__325 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    “Would you be free from your burden of sin? There’s power in the blood, power in the blood.
    Would you or evil a victory win, there’s wonderful power in the blood”🎼

  • @kingdomambassador1904
    @kingdomambassador1904 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    The BLOOD has LIFE. Only the BLOOD OF THE RIGHTHEOUS LAMB OF THE ALMIGHTY is the ONLY thing that can wash us of our sin.

    • @shivadizayin
      @shivadizayin หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ron Wyatt … the blood of Christ showed the living blood of Christ

    • @stevenrebelo1821
      @stevenrebelo1821 หลายเดือนก่อน

      John 1 : 29 kjv sins

    • @stevenrebelo1821
      @stevenrebelo1821 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Christians Have Failed 2 Understand The blood

    • @stevenrebelo1821
      @stevenrebelo1821 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kingdomambassador1904 GO BACK TO BIBLE .. THE BLOOD IS FOR FORGIVENESS OF SINS .. JESUS SAID MY BLOOD IS SHED FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS ... WE HAVE REDEMPTION BECAUSE OF THE BLOOD FOR SINS

    • @josiahrock5937
      @josiahrock5937 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They just said that​@@stevenrebelo1821

  • @kingdomambassador1904
    @kingdomambassador1904 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    The blood of animals were a foreshadowing of the SACRIFICIAL LAMB OF THE ALMIGHTY'S BLOOD.

    • @ronherrera8327
      @ronherrera8327 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bingo!

    • @orangeandslinky
      @orangeandslinky หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes! How is this hard to understand? Even people who don't believe in Christ know this is the claim of the bible.

  • @SaintDiaz
    @SaintDiaz หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    If people touched Jesus's robe and got healed, imagine the blood of Christ...

    • @gregmiell3037
      @gregmiell3037 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Their faith was in Jesus, not His robe.

    • @randomCHELdad
      @randomCHELdad หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @gregmiell3037 And your sins would not be able to be forgiven unless THE BLOOD of Jesus was spilled. For there are no Levitical priests to sacrifice your lamb, goat, or bullock to forgive sins. The blood of Jesus swallowed death in victory.

    • @TheFightingSheep
      @TheFightingSheep หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      His blood cursed that entire nation, and the land for two thousand years and counting. The curse will only be washed away with the river of blood from His enemies, neck deep, and two hundred miles long.

    • @TheReformedChief
      @TheReformedChief หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It was their faith, not touching Him. Easy to skirt the edge of idolatry.

    • @vickyannpaintingwithoils
      @vickyannpaintingwithoils หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      "For she said within herself, If I may but touch his garment, I shall be whole." - Matthew 9:21.

  • @jdlucky
    @jdlucky หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Leviticus 17:11 " For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that make the atonement for the soul." Old testament but true today in the Age of grace. Hebrews 9:12 " Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us." Kjv Praise the Lord Jesus Christ!!! Thank you Jesus!

  • @JesusismyGOD
    @JesusismyGOD หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    This Pastor Jesse guy TOTALLY GETS IT. I so enjoy hearing him speak on topics of Faith an Life. Obviously Legit Born Again and super edifying. I really enjoy his work.

  • @Jesussaves.7777
    @Jesussaves.7777 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    We are Saved by Jesus Christ's finished Work on The cross His Powerful Innocent Precious Blood was shed for all our sins past present future His death burial Resurrection paid for all our sins.
    At that very moment that we believe in Jesus Christ alone for Salvation we are saved and sealed with The Holy Spirit until the day of redemption.
    Having life forever/ eternal life/ everlasting life.
    Praise GOD
    Amen Hallelujah.❤🙏

  • @dermotlevy1490
    @dermotlevy1490 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    “Without the shedding of blood there is no remission “. ❤

  • @cyrilaspinall8152
    @cyrilaspinall8152 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    surely the b[ood of Jesus was unadultrated He was the pure lamb of God, pure in every way.

  • @WatchmanRiver
    @WatchmanRiver หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I loved the way you handled this my brother. You spoke truth but you didn’t trash this Pastor which is the way many do it today. Good video. 🙏🏻❤️

    • @JesusismySavior73
      @JesusismySavior73 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hey, look, it's brother Tom. I agree. Many seem to forget we are all the body of Christ, that we love Him, and He loves us all even more. He doesn't want us to fight.

    • @craigwatson8160
      @craigwatson8160 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hey brother Tom!!!

  • @sherrylong7774
    @sherrylong7774 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The shedding of blood is not just dying. It is a brutal death. It is the destruction of life, murder, slaughter. This is how He had to die. Not by accident or through disease. It is an intentional taking of life and He intentionally laid down his life for us. This stuns me.

  • @mikelyons2831
    @mikelyons2831 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    JM has many Augustine-Calvin influenced issues. I don't know what breaks my heart more...his Calvinistic-Lordship Salvationist theology or those that can't see thru it & nearly idolize him, believing him to be America's darling of Pastors???

  • @nikao7751
    @nikao7751 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Imagine a world where the the common man had no access to the word of God, it'd be medieval, or rather evil, thank God we can access his word for ourselves 🙏

  • @sarahs1169
    @sarahs1169 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    What about Luke 22:20
    In the same way he also took the cup after supper and said, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you."

    • @JODOUBLENY
      @JODOUBLENY หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was gonna quote the Lords supper also. We are purchased by his blood 🩸✝️💜

  • @vickyannpaintingwithoils
    @vickyannpaintingwithoils หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    John MacArthur has said many appauling things. Including you can take the mark of the beast and still be saved.

    • @maxine7088
      @maxine7088 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If John MacArthur said that, he's a total blasphemer and heretic.

    • @johntrevett2944
      @johntrevett2944 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      So a saved person that takes the mark loses salvation?

    • @vickyannpaintingwithoils
      @vickyannpaintingwithoils หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@johntrevett2944 The mark pledges allegience to the beast. They are not saved people. It's a clear choice during the tribulation. KJV Rev 14:9-11.

    • @benpyne1228
      @benpyne1228 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I believe only unsaved people will WILLINGLY receive The Mark of The Beast. Saved believers at that time will be distinguished by the fact that they refused to receive it.

    • @DonnHeather79
      @DonnHeather79 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@johntrevett2944 😮 why yes, you're pledging allengce to satan himself by taking the mark, saved or not.! Thankfully saved people won't have to face the mark though.! Only the one's left here during the tribulations will have the choice of taking the mark.

  • @Steve-og4ii
    @Steve-og4ii หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    " a propitiation through FAITH IN HIS BLOOD...Romans 3:25.

  • @user-tb5gq7kp5u
    @user-tb5gq7kp5u หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    The church of God, which He hath purchased WITH HIS OWN BLOOD ( Acts20:28).
    Thank you Pastors for exposing a false teacher under the church age.

    • @JesusismyGOD
      @JesusismyGOD หลายเดือนก่อน

      Get this soul a cookie!!

    • @MikeOzmun
      @MikeOzmun หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So because you can only think in literal and not metaphorical, he's a false teacher. smh.

    • @ginaidoma5925
      @ginaidoma5925 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@MikeOzmunThe Bible is literal.

    • @user-tb5gq7kp5u
      @user-tb5gq7kp5u หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@MikeOzmun I read my My Bible as it is written, and it is written in Acts 20:28 that Christ has purchased me with HIS OWN BLOOD. Judas MacArthur is a false teacher.. All of us who believe on the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross are aware of his false gospel. Open your eyes and study more so you won't be deceived.

    • @4truthistrue434
      @4truthistrue434 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I bet he's done a lot more for the Kingdom than many others have. Context is always key. I wouldn't be too quick to judge.

  • @christssoulwinner188
    @christssoulwinner188 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Isaiah 53:5
    King James Version
    5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

  • @elru2276
    @elru2276 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Jesus’ blood is Holy not magical.

    • @joshuascott3428
      @joshuascott3428 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its actually both Megical doesnt mean spells necesarilly it means that which influences the world through supernatural or unknown forces thus christs blood being divine in nature was thus magical and it was Holy because of the infusion of the Holy Spirit mixed with divine creation

    • @benpyne1228
      @benpyne1228 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Or: 'miraculous'--supernaturally powerful to act upon and change men and women both spiritually and physically.

  • @michaeldoti9242
    @michaeldoti9242 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Not sure. What Bible he's reading, but my Bible says without the shedding of blood. There is no remission of sins, it's his blood.

    • @4truthistrue434
      @4truthistrue434 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      21 And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled 22 in the body of His flesh through DEATH, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight.
      Its pack and parcel. The blood that is shed that led to His death is one and the same. If Jesus was to slice his hand so He bleeds out but not die, it would not be sufficient, it is His death that completes the sacrifice. So John MacArthur is correct. It is the same with any sacrificial animal, they did not cut it only for the blood to be on the Altar and for the animal to later be set free, but that animal had to die for the sacrifice to be complete. And even then it was only a cover, it didn't take the sin away.

  • @janet2243
    @janet2243 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Good video. I so agree. Jesus's blood was divine blood ( born of a virgin ) in order to save us ( and His plan ). He also had to be sinless and was. He was the perfect and ONLY possible sacrifice for our salvation.

  • @guardianmeister6650
    @guardianmeister6650 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    without the SHEDDING OF BLOOD there is no remission of sins

  • @paulgross3067
    @paulgross3067 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I think John MacArthur is trying to explain it in a way where it’s kind of confusing because scripturally it is the blood of Christ that cleanses us from all sin. Yes, he was bleeding, but he was going to die and that’s all part of it. That’s why we take the cupand the bread and remembrance of him until he comes

  • @Alrich-uo4rc
    @Alrich-uo4rc หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins... except if you're smarter than the Bible like John MacArthur.

    • @mycharmedunicorn8715
      @mycharmedunicorn8715 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So people for thousands of years prior to Jesus’s coming were never forgiven?

    • @Alrich-uo4rc
      @Alrich-uo4rc 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mycharmedunicorn8715 Those who looked forward and trusted in the coming Messiah is forgiven.

    • @4truthistrue434
      @4truthistrue434 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      21 And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled 22 in the body of His flesh through DEATH, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight.
      Its pack and parcel. The blood that is shed that led to His death is one and the same. If Jesus was to slice his hand so He bleeds out but not die, it would not be sufficient, it is His death that completes the sacrifice. So John MacArthur is correct. It is the same with any sacrificial animal, they did not cut it only for the blood to be on the Altar and for the animal to later be set free, but that animal had to die for the sacrifice to be complete. And even then it was only a cover, it didn't take the sin away.

    • @Alrich-uo4rc
      @Alrich-uo4rc 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@4truthistrue434 John Mac Arthur may have a point, but he takes it too far.
      Nobody would argue that merely cutting a goat on his ear and sprinkling its blood on the altar counts as an animal sacrifice.
      It is about death and the shedding of blood, don't downplay either one, that is how to be consistent with the whole Bible.

    • @4truthistrue434
      @4truthistrue434 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Alrich-uo4rc That is true, but the notion of this video as well as a lot of the comments here, seem to separate the two, placing emphasis on the blood while disdaining his death, when it is His death that officiates the sacrifice, making his blood significant.

  • @Matthew-cz3gk
    @Matthew-cz3gk หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    There was absolutely something special about the blood of Jesus; otherwise any person’s blood could have been used. Remember he was perfect, without spot or blemish. His blood alone was worthy and pure.

    • @Jason_Hubred
      @Jason_Hubred 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah, no. It wasn't his blood that was special. No one else could've done what Jesus did because he was (1) the Son of God and (2) the only person in the entirety of history who never sinned.

    • @Matthew-cz3gk
      @Matthew-cz3gk 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Jason_Hubred hmmm?? 🤔 And that is the reason why HIS blood was special!! Make it make sense Jason.

  • @BibleLine
    @BibleLine  หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Please subscribe, like and share this video if it helped you! We do pray for JMac in two ways: If he is not saved, then that he would trust in Christ. If he is saved, then that he would get cleared up of the muddy doctrines. Thanks! - Trent

    • @mikehenderson7170
      @mikehenderson7170 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry 1cor 1:17

    • @Smerm
      @Smerm หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes! 🙏

  • @jimkraft9445
    @jimkraft9445 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Without the shedding of blood, there is no remission of sin. Christ had to die to shed His innocent blood to save us sinners. John 3:18. John is clearly an UNBELIEVER. He preaches a perverted message of works salvation. Not the free gift by a one time faith alone apart from any works for the Gift of God. Romans 6:23. John 3:16. Faith alone. John 6:47. God said. First John 5:13.
    The gospel. First Corinthians 15:1-4. Romans 1:16. Galatians 1:6-9. Anyone who preaches any other gospel, LET THEM BE ACCURSED. And Paul said it twice.
    In his book, "Hard to be saved", He says this. It is not the words we speak but the life "we" live that determines our eternal destiny. HOG WASH. It is the sinless life that Jesus lived that determines our eternal destiny. Romans 3:26-28. First John 1:8.
    John believes and preaches that Jesus died for nothing and we can save ourselves.

    • @BibleLine
      @BibleLine  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Right on, Jim.
      - Trent

    • @mariagutierrez4721
      @mariagutierrez4721 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      💯

    • @galewollenberg786
      @galewollenberg786 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      And who are you to judge another man's servant? Rom. 14:4.

    • @jimkraft9445
      @jimkraft9445 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@galewollenberg786 I can tell false teachers, Matthew 7:15, wolves in sheep's clothing that are preaching another gospel. Not First Corinthians 15;1-4. Romans 1:16.
      Galatians 1:6-9. Though we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you, than we have preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. As we said before, so say I again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received of us, LET HIM BE ACCURSED.
      Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin.
      John plainly preaches a works based salvation. Romans 11:6. Romans 4:5-8. Romans 3:26-28.
      I do not know whether He is saved or not. But what He preaches leads people to believe a false idea. That we can save our selves and Jesus died for nothing. Galatians 2:21. I do not void the grace of God, for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ died for nothing. What a horrible thing to say. Jesus gave His life a ransom to save us. John 6:47. John 10:28-29. John 3:18. First John 5:13. These things have I written unto you that BELEVE on the name of the Son of God, that ye may KNOW YE HAVE ETERNAL LIFE.
      Romans 6:23. For the penalty for sin is death, but, (the good news) THE GIFT OF GOD IS ETERNAL LIFE. No one can earn it.
      When we add anything to the gospel of grace, we pervert the gospel and make it by man works. Not Gods work. John 6:40 and John 6:29. Matthew 7:21-23. Romans 8:9. Without the Spirit there is no salvation. With the Spirit we have eternal life. Ephesians 1:13-14. Ephesians 4:30. Acts 16:31. John 3:18

  • @JokeritWasTaken
    @JokeritWasTaken 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Ephesians 1:7 “IN WHOM WE HAVE REDEMPTION
    THROUGH HIS BLOOD, THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS, ACCORDING TO THE RICHES OF HIS GRACE;”

  • @jabberwocky8021
    @jabberwocky8021 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    OK, I was going to throw out a few scriptures but you beat me to it. That's what I get for trying to comment before the video is finished. In fact, you blew MacArthur out of the water on this one. When he says "His blood doesn't save" it just about makes me hurl my lunch. Thanks for taking this man to task Pastor Jesse!

    • @oleksandrhafurov3246
      @oleksandrhafurov3246 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks for good comment!

    • @galewollenberg786
      @galewollenberg786 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The sacrificial animals all bled to death, Jesus did not bleed to death, he suffered the death of his spirit (my God, my God , why have you forsaken me?) and then said "it is finished" then he willfully pushed his head forward and gave up his spirit.

    • @jabberwocky8021
      @jabberwocky8021 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@galewollenberg786 Who said Jesus bled to death? I have never heard anyone say that. Did I miss something?

  • @user-fe7ol8ry1j
    @user-fe7ol8ry1j หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Rev 1:5 KJV, " Unto Him that loved us and washed us from our sins in His own Blood"

  • @theguitarnoobph
    @theguitarnoobph 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    What can wash away my sin?
    Nothing but the blood of Jesus.
    What can make me whole again?
    Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

  • @NOTOFWORKS289
    @NOTOFWORKS289 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Broooooooo what??? I'm washed in his blood tho!!!!

  • @Billy-Brown
    @Billy-Brown หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    J Mac is getting further and further from scripture the older he gets
    A whole new generation coming along is going to battle this stuff again and again
    I remember posting a comment on his statement to this and it being removed a few times
    Folks unless they are willing to take a honest look at the text over what some man says they will never see the truth

  • @dougpost7186
    @dougpost7186 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Blood represents a figurative cleansing (washing), from a perfect or unspotted sacrifice. But animal sacrifices point to the human sacrifice of Christ, because it had to be a sinless human to take away sins from the rest of sinful humanity. Christ shed His literal blood and we receive the benefits - forgiveness of sins. We are not literally being washed by His literal blood, but due to the literal shedding of His blood, we receive the benefits upon accessing His grace through faith.

  • @kevinmorris4517
    @kevinmorris4517 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Levititcus 17:11 "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." The new testament verses in Hebrews show the fulfilment of this verse at the cross. The blood is what was taken from the sacrifice and sprinkled on the arc of the covenant by the high priest. It was not to be a death of strangulation or with a broken bone, it was very specific.

    • @galewollenberg786
      @galewollenberg786 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      None of you seem to be able to exegete from the original to get it correct but insist on taking all of it out of context. Oh well the apostacy of the roman church is well rooted! That cup of wine magically turns to blood.

  • @gospelgrace2693
    @gospelgrace2693 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    John MacArthur is a real piece of work! Probably one of the biggest false teacher's of our day with regard to the gospel!

    • @4truthistrue434
      @4truthistrue434 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is easy to slander someone else, But i would be careful not to judge, for in the same measure it will be measured back to you.

    • @gospelgrace2693
      @gospelgrace2693 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4truthistrue434 Exposing false teachers is NOT slander! Jesus himself exposed all false teachers in Matthew chapter 7. We are called as believers to expose all false teachers who teach another gospel other that the one that Paul preached. Please study The Book of Galatians because that is what that book is all about. If someone who has never heard the true gospel of grace hears the false message that John MacArthur propergates, that person will not be saved and will go on believing that they are saved. We are in the end times and Satan is working overtime because he know his time is near. Please, know God's Word and stop accusing me of doing something bad when I am doing what scripture teaches! God bless!

    • @Yaksonator
      @Yaksonator หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@4truthistrue434 I hear ya, but there are countless videos of him doing the very thing you are saying. All the panels he's been associated with just straight up judging an entire generation.. Constantly judging.

    • @Jason_Hubred
      @Jason_Hubred 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@Yaksonator Where is that condemned in Scripture? Jesus judged. His disciples judged. The apostles judged. Why can't we judge all of a sudden?

  • @samuelhutton1342
    @samuelhutton1342 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    John Calvin’s “Institutes of the Christian Religion is full of explanations of the necessity of the blood being shed to purchase us, and save us from Gods wrath, and that both were needed to obtain full redemption.

  • @StefParmTpa
    @StefParmTpa หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It is Jesus who saves. That is why He is called the Savior. Cleansing of His blood for our sin is one of the consequences of believing in and on Jesus as God and Savior for everlasting life. Other consequences are: we become new creatures in Christ, God becomes our Father, we become God's children, we receive the gift of everlasting life, all sins are forgiven, we receive Jesus' Righteousness, and we receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

  • @liberatingtruths777
    @liberatingtruths777 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    John MacArthur Cleary went against the clear teaching of scripture

  • @dieselsoggydog6299
    @dieselsoggydog6299 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I use to listen to and read books from John MacArthur up until 2000. He said the same thing on the radio back then, not only does MacArthur deny the shedding of the blood but MacArthur also believes that not only Christ had to die physically but Christ also had to die spiritually. Another thing is MacArthur says things real vague, so you can take what he is saying several different ways. Also, there are no Protestant Reformers who taught this heresy.

    • @soteriology1012
      @soteriology1012 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree with MacArthur on the necessity of the suffering and death of Jesus Christ. I disagree with MacArthur on the value of the literal blood of Jesus. Without the suffering and deaths of the savior the blood alone would be of doubtful value. We need both in the atonement.

    • @galewollenberg786
      @galewollenberg786 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Rom. 14:4, And who are you to judge another man"s servant?

    • @dieselsoggydog6299
      @dieselsoggydog6299 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@galewollenberg786 You should examine that verse in context an understand what it really is saying. Usually "touch not the anointed" is used. Pastors are not beyond reproach. Paul would have never corrected Peter if they are not to be judged.

    • @galewollenberg786
      @galewollenberg786 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@dieselsoggydog6299 You are the one plainly out of context having no concept of apostolic authority for Paul to correct Peter!

    • @dieselsoggydog6299
      @dieselsoggydog6299 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@galewollenberg786 Peter was an apostle also. An apostle can correct another apostle, just as one christian can correct another. These pastors that preach bad doctrine are not above reproach from others. That is the analogy I was giving, which you missed.

  • @Biblicist
    @Biblicist หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This video was fantastic! Thank you so much!

  • @kurtmanshardt9825
    @kurtmanshardt9825 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In inserting the word magic into his talk, he seemed to be equating the blood of Jesus Christ with witchcraft in a subtle or maybe not-so-subtle. Manner, this is absolute blasphemy

  • @erickanter
    @erickanter หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Without the shedding of blood there is NO REMISSION OF SIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @gregvitkow521
      @gregvitkow521 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pray first then read Chapter 9 all the way through. Maybe that'll clear it up.

  • @victorialdavis9221
    @victorialdavis9221 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Apparently, John doesn't read the Bible...

  • @kingdomambassador1904
    @kingdomambassador1904 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    He is calling out the behavior of alot believers today who misuse the "blood" like/ as if you pray over arsenic you won't die when you drink it!!
    Don't miss the lesson...Don't be disrespectful to the Blood, treating it like some ABRACADABRA thing.

    • @cotydanger4071
      @cotydanger4071 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No

    • @kingdomambassador1904
      @kingdomambassador1904 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cotydanger4071 Yes

    • @medic4christ777
      @medic4christ777 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol, what? That’s not what he was saying. Go back and listen again. He is saying we are not saved by Christs blood, because in truth, John doesn’t understand the gospel.

  • @slowdriver1393
    @slowdriver1393 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Your reaction to this one was great! I could hear the John M video myself and knew there was something wrong but i needed you to make it seem so simple to understand how he twisted it. Shame on John M. He is too educated to make these mistakes by accident. He is a deceiver. Bless you Pastor Jesse as always.

    • @JesusismyGOD
      @JesusismyGOD หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wise,wise soul.

    • @slowdriver1393
      @slowdriver1393 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JesusismyGOD right...he makes it seem so simple...lol

  • @beverlymccollum8861
    @beverlymccollum8861 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    There is no remission of sin without the shedding of blood.

  • @triskaideka13
    @triskaideka13 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Leviticus 17:11 (NIV):"For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one's life."

  • @church4thetruth684
    @church4thetruth684 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think maybe all of us people that are in the chat should pray for John MacArthur because if you can reference Jesus's blood as equivalent with other bodily fluids that he didn't want to get too graphic with... That's very scary.
    I'm going to pray for him and I would really appreciate any brothers and sisters in the Lord joining me with this
    Ty to those who do. This man really needs to see the truth

  • @timothyhodges705
    @timothyhodges705 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Without the resurrection we are still in our sin... 1Corinthians 15:12-17. Yes, Jesus is the unblemished Lamb of God. His blood most certainly was unstained; perfect. So it made the perfect sacrifice for sin, but His resurrection gives us Everlasting Life.

    • @oleksandrhafurov3246
      @oleksandrhafurov3246 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      well, yes but we can't take away an essential puzzle from the whole beautiful mysterious picture by our Lord Jesus Christ. His Blood cleaned us and it is also the Scripture, and then comes everlasting life... not without blood. So the words of John went far over the red line

  • @elizabethl3323
    @elizabethl3323 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm glad you addressed this. I've heard about it but never looked into it. Thank you for doing reaction videos. I like how you deal with scripture alone and don't resort to personal attacks like so many others do. ❤

  • @justinrae7224
    @justinrae7224 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    HIS BLOOD IS ALIVE!!! THAT'S WHY IT SAVES. Reformed Orthodox Theology is No Bueno

  • @DanielBShaw
    @DanielBShaw หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "And ye shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the bason, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the bason; and none of you shall go out at the door of his house until the morning." (Exodus 12:22) The blood of the passover lamb saved the Israelites from the destroying angel.

  • @orangeandslinky
    @orangeandslinky หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    sinless blood is what made this sacrifice perfect and the LAST payment (not just a covering) for sin. I did not know John Mac said this. Never saw this before. This is a big deal.

    • @carlcasey4177
      @carlcasey4177 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is a liar like his father the devil 👹

  • @steel9820
    @steel9820 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Man, Jesus couldn't go down to the local Stewart blood drive RV and make a blood donation!! Jesus had to pay the sacrifice with His Life!! Without the shedding of blood, means you give up your life! As a pastor, rightly dividing the Truth is one of your most important jobs! Keep at it! This a battle you might want to pass on!

  • @markh4926
    @markh4926 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I stopped listening to this guy decades ago. What Bible is he reading? "God presented Him as the atoning sacrifice through faith in His blood" I'm a student of the Word and I know this.
    As an aside, I know the pain of dying from loss of blood. I had internal bleeding, and three or four doctors gave up on me and told my brothers to prepare a funeral for me. I was dead without the transfusions and it was painful. I often think of this and wonder how much pain Christ endured before and on that cross. Thank God!

  • @Smerm
    @Smerm หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Without the shedding of blood there is no remission ( of sins )
    Hebrews 9:22
    I think of the blood painted on the doorposts by the Israelites who by doing so were passed over a foreshadowing of what was to come
    There are s many scriptures that point to the shedding of his blood and yes, Jesus paid our wage of sin which was death but the life was in his blood , his perfect sacrifice that superseded the temporary payment of the blood of animals because he was 💯 holy.

  • @MichaelAndrews-uy1gl
    @MichaelAndrews-uy1gl หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT? It took the blood of Jesus to purchase our salvation! Am I hearing this correctly? This is what is causing division among Christians. So he denies Revelation 1:5? Here it is: "And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and WASHED US FROM OUR SINS IN HIS OWN BLOOD."

  • @timbenham516
    @timbenham516 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Revelation 1:5 And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,

  • @ianbeck2840
    @ianbeck2840 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wow, you are right. I have come in contact with many people who love to attribute their doctrine more so to church history rather than to scripture in its context.

  • @b-radical4059
    @b-radical4059 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Isn’t it just simply that both the blood and the death are tied together?
    Whenever the Bible speaks about shedding blood and sacrifice- death is always connected to this type of shedding blood.
    I think the only issue arises when we westerns think “well, technically, the blood is different from the death”. But the Bible never speaks this way.
    The blood and death both speak to to sacrificial work of Jesus. No need to separate.

  • @againsteveryoneswill1923
    @againsteveryoneswill1923 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "The innocent blood of Messiah unto death is the cost exacted by lawlessness," Gregg. The shedding of blood means killing someone. If someone says you have blood on your hands, it means you are responsible for their death not that you have the actual blood on your hands. So it's an equivalency. I think this is where McArthur is coming from.

    • @medic4christ777
      @medic4christ777 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except that’s not what the Bible teaches in the subject. The Bible teaches were are cleansed, washed and literally saved by the blood of Christ. The Bible teaches that Christ’s blood is MIRACULOUS and that there is power in His blood. John MacArthur is preaching pure heresy here. Open your ears.

    • @againsteveryoneswill1923
      @againsteveryoneswill1923 หลายเดือนก่อน

      cleansed by the blood of Messiah which resulted in His death. Without the death there would be no cleansing or salvation. The shedding of the blood was the means to the death (and the conquering f death) that saves us. Sometimes there's more to the story. But of course you are free to see it how you see it I'm not trying to argue with anyone, just stating what I "see".

  • @dcjunior928
    @dcjunior928 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amen Pastor. Thank you for this video

  • @RichardM1366
    @RichardM1366 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Without blood there cannot have Salvation. Jesus shed his Holy Blood for all of our sins. He arose from the grave in total victory over death, the grave, and of course satan! Jesus Christ Reigns Forever!

  • @natalieturner664
    @natalieturner664 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Revelation 12:11 They overcame him, by the word of their testimony and the BLOOD 🩸 of the Lamb.
    1 John 5:7-8 And there are three that bear witness on each: the Spirit, the Water and the BLOOD.
    Revelation 1:5 Unto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood, hath made us kings and priests unto God, and his Father.❤

  • @kennethgreene2429
    @kennethgreene2429 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Bible simply teaches us that we are saved by the Grace of God. Because God chose us for a gift to the Son as His bride. So we are saved By God through faith in Jesus Christ.

  • @IanTanLK
    @IanTanLK หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    JM opinion on the matter obviously got twisted.
    1. He's right about the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ: it's not magical. Not a dna extra or less. It's not supernatural. Why?
    He's human. That's why. He had to be, if He's to assume the role of a Kinsman Redeemer! He's no kinsman if his blood isn't as ours.
    2. What sets his human blood apart (again, not in the sense extra supernatural) is this: innocence. It is untainted by human sin.
    His blood is innocent enough to pay for the guilty.
    3. Quoting "Without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness of sin" to mean the blood that trickles down is enough to save has failed to acknowledge the demand of the Law: death.
    Nowhere in the OT did the priests plug the wound of the animal since enough blood was shed - the animal is then released. No, the shedding drains the animals dry.
    "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man his blood will be shed; for in His own image God has made mankind." Gen 9:6
    4. Life is in the blood. Indeed.
    So life for life.

  • @brendagula6290
    @brendagula6290 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is what happens when Calvanism gets in the way. I find that hard type personalities like his lack compassion/sympathy. That's why they focus on God's sovereignty and don't know how to reconcile both God's love and sovereignty. They don't know how to reconcile God's will and man's will when it comes to salvation. I'm not knocking his other wonderful work but his Calvanism is definitely not Biblical.

  • @robertmcvicar5824
    @robertmcvicar5824 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi there I'm a Calvinist and love most of the preaching of John McCarthur but I do think it's Jesus blood that saved me. It is also his death that saves me because the life is in the blood.

  • @andrewmarshall7569
    @andrewmarshall7569 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Brother, you said it so perfectly. The shedding of blood is what causes the death, and Jesus was the final sacrifice. I'm not trying to get into a Calvinist discussion, but it has been rearing it's ugly head where I am. When I try to point them to verses like 1 John 2:2 when they say that Jesus didn't die for the world (also see John 3:16, and Revelation 3 "Behold...I stand at the door and knock, if ANYONE hears my voice"). I have read through the New Testament, and I cannot understand how people get stuck on and elevate the writings of Paul as supreme to everything else.
    I recently felt led to read each book written by the Apostle John - The one whom Jesus loved (Gospel of John, 1-3 John, and The Revelation of Jesus Christ). In 1st John, it tells us exactly how to live as Christians. We are to believe in the command of the Father, which is to love the one He sent (i.e. Jesus Christ), and Jesus Christ's command for us is to love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, and strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself. We are to be feeding, clothing, equipping the poor and less fortunate, as well as the orphans and widows. We are to be helping everyone, not building larger church buildings, but I digress.
    The thing I've noticed lately is that so many established Christian churches and their pastors are falling into error. They seem to want to cause controversy, enrich themselves, and beat their chests to say "I'm right, you're wrong" and to confuse the masses as the profound simplicity of belief/faith in Jesus Christ's finished work (1 Cor. 15:1-4, John 3, Romans 10, 1 John). The arguments these pastors, and pastor, I'm not saying this to you, are divisive, and the love of Christ is not in them. I cannot fathom how a pastor could not say that the blood of Jesus has nothing to do with salvation. The legalism some portray is mindblowing.

    • @soteriology1012
      @soteriology1012 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If Jesus was under so much stress in Gethsemane He literally sweat blood because of the task set before Him praying fervently like no other prayer ever offered up to God "If it be thy will let this cup pass from Me, nevertheless not My will but Thine be done. DO you for one moment believe there was another way for Jesus Christ to buy us back? Yet if the spilling of blood without the intense suffering for our sins and death were the issue then James Harrison th-cam.com/video/DIJ8H202QFw/w-d-xo.html is the world record blood donor @ ~ 495 gallons of blood and he really did not suffer in any real painful manner to donate all that blood. If the spilling of blood alone was the issue then Jesus could have simply filled up bottles and bottles of His blood over time then spilled it on the ground. However then exactly what meaning would that have? The blood on the doorposts in the Exodus was evidence that an animal was slain for the firstborn and it stopped dead the destroyer from coming in. Yet without the sacrifice and pain of death what good would the blood be though it would be the blood of God incarnated into a sinless human. The suffering was the propitiation and the expiation without which I really do not believe the blood had that much meaning.

  • @anthonystroman8407
    @anthonystroman8407 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you pastor Jesse because he was one of the few I'd listen to but something never seemed right about his teachings and you brought it out through the scriptures thank you and may God continue to bless you and your family.

  • @FuegoSavvy
    @FuegoSavvy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    God bless 🙏🏿✝️🔥

  • @cristobaldelacruz142
    @cristobaldelacruz142 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Blood is the only thing that covers our sins. So the blood does save us all. Jesus Christ blood that is not mine. Mine blood couldn’t save a flea on its best day.

  • @ottoadsit1241
    @ottoadsit1241 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When men like McArthur make statements like that, that truly go against scripture, you have to wonder what else he teaches that mis the mark. I know of at least two others, and I don't hardly ever listen to him. When I first saw this, I immediately thought I'd the same verse in Hebrews that you mentioned, without the shedding of blood...... I adamantly herd him say ,."if a person actually see's God's glory, he would be dead, it would kill him. I have to assume he never read the first three chapters of Ezekiel and took them seriously.

  • @lgaamr8192
    @lgaamr8192 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Clearly, Christ DID have to bleed and die And rise again. This IS what happened, therefore, it WAS necessary.

  • @thomastessier4529
    @thomastessier4529 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, this is strange, I have listened to Mr. MacArthur numerous times and have never heard him say this. But to say we are not saved by the blood of our Lord Jesus Christ is just wrong.

  • @GeneralKato
    @GeneralKato หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would also like to say hello and thank you to all my brothers and sisters in Christ in the comments section. It add so much wisdom and relevant verses of GOD's Word to the video.

  • @4truthistrue434
    @4truthistrue434 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Death of Christ is what makes His Blood significant. Innocent blood is deemed Innocent because that innocent soul died. if that soul did not die it would just be deemed as blood.

  • @ronbo30
    @ronbo30 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So did the blood of Jesus or his death save us? If it’s his blood? Then couldn’t Jesus just cut his finger for a drop of blood and we’re saved?

    • @BibleLine
      @BibleLine  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The whole process is the reason we’re saved. The way anything gets applied to us is whether or not we believe in Him or not. The point is that you can’t just leave the blood out of the picture.
      - Trent

    • @oleksandrhafurov3246
      @oleksandrhafurov3246 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its all together, but for example when casting out demons, we mention Blood of Jesus, not death... demons run as fast as they can and scream as ugly and loud as they can, hearing "Blood of Jesus"

  • @JesusIsLord777-lz7mg
    @JesusIsLord777-lz7mg หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's explicitly stated in this verse. Redeemed.. with the precious blood of Christ.
    ‭I Peter 1:18-19 NKJV‬
    [18] knowing that you were not 👉redeemed👈 with corruptible things, like silver or gold, from your aimless conduct received by tradition from your fathers, [19] but with 👉the precious blood of Christ,👈 as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.

  • @danielmorais8745
    @danielmorais8745 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    We are save Forever by faith Alone in Crist Alone trusting in his perfect blood shed on the cross to forgive our sins past presente and future..we are save by his precious blood.

  • @mikehenderson7170
    @mikehenderson7170 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pastor Jesse, Thank you so much for bringing to our attention. Let us see, what the scripture has to say. This is so important to rightly divide the word of truth. I always felt that Paul was very protective over the message of the Cross, like when when he said in 1 cor. 1:18 he did not want to confuse the importance of the blood, with any other Religious activity. Thank you!

  • @user-nr7mq5sb9w
    @user-nr7mq5sb9w หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I can't believe I fell for John MacArthur. I been deceived. I'm glad God help me open my eyes. John MacArthur is really a false teacher. Thank pastor Jesse for shedding light about this. I will never fall for these mega church pastors ever again. I'm glad I didn't go to Grace Community Church and other false churches. I feel blessed that the Lord protected me from harm. Amen praise the Lord hallelujah. God bless you Pastor Jesse Martinez. I'm glad I subscribed to your channel.😀😇🙌🙏👍🌞🌄🌈

    • @soteriology1012
      @soteriology1012 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I got burned big time for following and supporting pastors preaching less than clear gospel messages.

  • @davidvanriper60
    @davidvanriper60 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    in the O.T. the blood of those sacrifices had to be sprinkled , right?

    • @JesusismyGOD
      @JesusismyGOD หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good comment

  • @LivingWater-bs1hh
    @LivingWater-bs1hh 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    MacArthur's teaching is like a rotten apple

  • @dawn2390
    @dawn2390 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He also told people they could take the mark of the beast. Explaining its not the unpardonable sin. There are older videos out there about it with him saying it. These things need to be exposed so vulnerable people don’t believe the lies. I wish John’s avid elders and followers would have a sit down with him.

    • @LoveClassicMusic0205
      @LoveClassicMusic0205 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thank you for reminding me of this. He did indeed say it. I can't believe that he hasn't been called out for it by other pastors.
      Discernment isn't knowing the difference between right and wrong. Discernment is knowing the difference between right and almost right.

  • @seanmick3093
    @seanmick3093 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I trusted in the Lord of Jesus Christ as my personal savior into my heart through faith alone, and not of works, by accepting his free gift of salvation, by his grace on February 16, 1996, each day, I confess sins for process of sanctification, to receive Jesus Christ as your personal savior, please refer to Matthew 10:28, John 3:16-18:36, 5:24, 6:37:47, 10:27-29, 14:6, Acts 2:38, 16:30-31, Luke 15:10, Romans 1:16, 3:23, 4:5, 6:23, 10:9-10:13, Ephesians 2:8-10, and Titus 3:5. God bless the world, and thank you for sharing.

    • @seanmick3093
      @seanmick3093 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will see you in heaven.

  • @hisholiness4urfaith
    @hisholiness4urfaith หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wonder what goes on in his mind when he reads all the verses which says the opposite of his statement. It's okay if you don't understand how most of God's things works. It's not required to explain everything. God made things easier for us to just take Him at His word. It looks disturbing when someone says I know God you said it's your blood which saves but you also said it's your death and resurrection 🤔 since it doesn't make sense to me because it can't be both and I can't explain. So no I will lean unto my own understanding and those of old

  • @maxine7088
    @maxine7088 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If He hadn't bled, he wouldn't have died. He shed His blood as a sacrifice to cleanse, cover us, and forgiveness. The bleeding is what killed Him, since we can't live without blood. Good grief what is wrong with John MacArthur? There is power in the blood of Christ! I will agree that it isn't magical, it's Holy!

  • @user-fc5jz5pb5h
    @user-fc5jz5pb5h 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    John McArthur is not wrong.. Christ physical blood is always in reference to his death. It was Christ shedding his blood. Stop reading into the scripture. Stop saying what the scripture does not say. There is no case against what John McArthur is saying. He says it exactly right.

  • @amosdotl6892
    @amosdotl6892 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The blood and water and the spirit testify. Ron Wyatt saw the blood of Christ that came down from His crucifixion that anointed the ark of the covenant to seal all who believe in Him upon the mercy seat of God.

  • @markelliston5458
    @markelliston5458 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He forgets that Satan tried so hard to dilute the BLOODLINE all through the ages of mankind, since Adam and Eve. Remember that Noah and his family were the only ones “perfect” (meaning blood untainted) The perfect, and precious Blood of the Lamb, which taketh away the sin of the world. Amen Thank you father for sending us your son.

  • @Boanerges27
    @Boanerges27 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Same guy who said that you can take the mark of the beast and still be saved.

  • @AbideMinistriesJesus
    @AbideMinistriesJesus หลายเดือนก่อน

    Heresy … crazy. How many folks have purchased a MacArthur study Bible? 🤦🏻‍♂️
    What can wash away my sin?
    NOTHING BUT THE BLOOD OF JESUS!!!!
    ❤️✝️❤️

  • @gregvitkow521
    @gregvitkow521 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    MacArthur is saying it's not magical. Blood being shed is symbolic of Christ's death as our way to salvation.

  • @rhettgoslar6993
    @rhettgoslar6993 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Romans 5: 9-10. ? Are we not saved by his life not His death ? Although His blood and death is a means necessary for life , are we not saved by his life ?

    • @BibleLine
      @BibleLine  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, good scripture. We have eternal life because of Him.
      - Trent