I love when you guys show problems with trucks other shops just show the good things no struggles. Love the videos can’t wait until I blow my tranny to come up there and get a built one form yall
i bet it has to do with the intake or exhaust runners in the head, since cummins did not use DEF till 13 yet gm and ford started in 11. only thing i can come up with.
Intresting to see. Really cant wait to see what was the issue with that stock head. Did it have valvesprings to help with the lift and duration of the new cam or was it being pushed to hard? I'm not sure what the specs are no the 188/220, but very interesting non the less!
I have also seen a bad sensor do this where it’s pegged and the ecu thinks it’s doing good but it’s the wrong value. More so in my Subaru than my 08 Cummins but the right sensors are critical.
I've had 2 2011s and ran the exact same box tuner on them completely different trucks only difference is 1 is a ca truck other is federal. I don't get it either
I don’t know what ecu your running but it could be referencing a different map than you think IV had to just change all the safety maps one at a time and it seams one reference map is the bastard file you have to find and change to suit. Yes you have to look at every file and in detail. At home with no distractions
my 2010 is low on power also. Heres my setup. Stock injectors, stock head, Aurora 4000 Turbo, Stock tranny, Stock ECM. Stock CP3. Pusher 3.5 intake, 4" turbo back exhaust, Revmax billet valve body. I did check for and fixed the boost leaks. I can't hit 600 on any dyno LOL. Whats wrong?
Not to be “ that guy “. But would the rail modifications that were done here be a safe or reliable mod for a deleted and tuned, stock turbo truck? Would it make a noticeable power increase in my situation or is it not worth tampering?
Yes, In the beginning we said we went back to the Cm2200 ecm but there were suck large gaps of time between different tests, we should have watched current footage before doing a recap
Rusty Snorkel Oh, you mean companies like H&S? What happened to them again? How long has Banks been around for again? Longer than all the morons that are getting fined and shut down.
When you pushing 1000+ hp your adding extra fuel to keep the cylinders cool, run a diesel lean at that kinda power and your burning pistons, valves and everything else. And gale banks isn’t making the kinda power these boys are making, at least not reliable power that will last for years to come... and also these dude are creating shity preloaded tunes like H&s that increase the timing till you melt down the engine, not even comparable
The struggle is real sometimes, i hate having issues with customer cars that i can't figure out! it drives me crazy! Glad to see it got hammered out!
Awesome stuff 👊🏻💪🏻
You had to send him on the way quite a few times. Glad you guys got it figured out though
I love when you guys show problems with trucks other shops just show the good things no struggles. Love the videos can’t wait until I blow my tranny to come up there and get a built one form yall
I love when they have customers on that actually have a personality. Austin seems cool
What was wrong with the stock head that was restricting the power
We'll report back once we have d&j dissect it, visually everything looks great
@@FirepunkDiesel in for this
So did you figure out the issue with head?
Figure I'd check.....any news on the head
i bet it has to do with the intake or exhaust runners in the head, since cummins did not use DEF till 13 yet gm and ford started in 11. only thing i can come up with.
Intresting to see. Really cant wait to see what was the issue with that stock head. Did it have valvesprings to help with the lift and duration of the new cam or was it being pushed to hard? I'm not sure what the specs are no the 188/220, but very interesting non the less!
I have also seen a bad sensor do this where it’s pegged and the ecu thinks it’s doing good but it’s the wrong value. More so in my Subaru than my 08 Cummins but the right sensors are critical.
I've had 2 2011s and ran the exact same box tuner on them completely different trucks only difference is 1 is a ca truck other is federal. I don't get it either
Any follow up on this? Have a 12 also and curious to what the problem may have been
About what torque was it making when it bent the rods? Im deciding where I should limit mine. Or if it's too far from my goal, if I should get rods.
Any findings from inspecting the head? I have a 2012 and I'm curious....
Did you blow anything after modifying the rail?
I was going to suggest a stand alone setup
Any ideas?? Is it a head problem with those trucks??
lol his butt dyno! good choice of words Larson lol
Did you leave the valves out of the rail???
Think I also have one of those strange ones lol
2:43 "oh...hello"
oh look again 3:43... haha
What does Larson say helping, helping...I got a special tool for that, LOL
have yall heard anything back from D@J with the head?
Like was asked below, what was wrong with the stock head that made almost 500hp difference? That’s crazy!?!?
Once D&J disassembles, pressure tests and flows it we will have more answers, visually it all looks good
Following
2:44 😂😂😂
Came by like...oh shit 😳😂
I don’t know what ecu your running but it could be referencing a different map than you think IV had to just change all the safety maps one at a time and it seams one reference map is the bastard file you have to find and change to suit. Yes you have to look at every file and in detail. At home with no distractions
Interesting. Was the 1191 pull with the new head and 06 ecm and no throttles or just the head?
Cm2200 ecm, stock rail and d&j stage 2 head
my 2010 is low on power also. Heres my setup. Stock injectors, stock head, Aurora 4000 Turbo, Stock tranny, Stock ECM. Stock CP3. Pusher 3.5 intake, 4" turbo back exhaust, Revmax billet valve body. I did check for and fixed the boost leaks. I can't hit 600 on any dyno LOL. Whats wrong?
You need bigger injectors. Fuel = power in a diesel and your turbo cools it i. Layman's terms.
@@markrich3271 I have a compound setup now and rev max 700. It’ll hit 60lbs boost on tune one. It’s scary now. lol.
Not to be “ that guy “. But would the rail modifications that were done here be a safe or reliable mod for a deleted and tuned, stock turbo truck? Would it make a noticeable power increase in my situation or is it not worth tampering?
waste of time for a stock truck
If he hit 900 before the rebuild, then there is something wrong with the rebuild or the parts used.
Follow up video after you figure out what the stock head restrictions from '10-'12 would be great. Got me curious now
Will do
@@FirepunkDiesel what was the follow up?
So it was the head?
Butt dyno never wrong !
still on 10-12 ECU ? rail ? come on guysss leaving us hangin lol
Yes, In the beginning we said we went back to the Cm2200 ecm but there were suck large gaps of time between different tests, we should have watched current footage before doing a recap
:| way to big of a single.
All the power is going out the pipe in the form of black smoke.
Cause all the big names in the industry out there would be making wayyyy more with a smoke free tune, right? lol
Rusty Snorkel Oh, you mean companies like H&S? What happened to them again?
How long has Banks been around for again? Longer than all the morons that are getting fined and shut down.
When you pushing 1000+ hp your adding extra fuel to keep the cylinders cool, run a diesel lean at that kinda power and your burning pistons, valves and everything else. And gale banks isn’t making the kinda power these boys are making, at least not reliable power that will last for years to come... and also these dude are creating shity preloaded tunes like H&s that increase the timing till you melt down the engine, not even comparable