Bjorn Borg records 41 straight matches won in Wimbledon (Roger Federer also won 5 straight titles before losing to Nadal in the final of 2008 but had one walk over and only reached 40 match wins in a row) Highest winning percentage in matches going to 5 sets - 81.8% (27-6) Career win/lose record all matches - 83.1% (639-130) Won 3 Grand Slams without losing a set (shared with Rafael Nadal, Richard Sears and Tony Trabert) 89.81% win/lose record in Grand Slams (141-16) Grand Slam Tournament won with less games lost - 32 games in French Open 1978 3 consecutive Channel Slams (French Open + Wimbledon) 1978-1980 92.73% win/lose record at Wimbledon (51-4) 88.9% match record in Grand Slam five set matches (24-3) Borg held the record for most consecutive match wins in Davis Cup (33) until 2016 when Cypriot Marcos Baghdatis reached 36 straight match wins in Davis Cup singles matches. Borg also held the record as the youngest Grand Slam champion after his win at the French Open 1974. Seven years later fellow Swede Mats Wilander broke that record winning his first French Open and 1986 Boris Becker won Wimbledon and broke Wilanders record.
Rod Laver is 5th, since he won Calendar Slam in 1969, which was already an open era! I believe he won Wimbledon too year prior...he has 5 slams in open era, that's why he didn't make this cut!
Overall there are 8 men with career slam achieved, on top of the 5 already mentioned from open era, there are also british Fred Perry, american Don Budge (another person with Calendar slam other than Laver) and Roy Emerson...There are more women that achieve multiple career slams, than men however and it's worth mentioning! Steffi Graf did each 4 times and the only one to achieve it this many times, Serena and Court 3 times each like Novak, then comes Martina and Chris with 2 each, Helen Wills Moody won each slam that she ever played at least 4 times too like Steffi but she never played AO even once that's why hers doesn't count but i can guarantee you she would have at least 3 career slams! Marias Sharapova, Billie Jean King and 3 american players from 50's - Doris Hart, Maureen Connoly and Shirley Fry Irvin all achieved it only once!
To Novak's, Rafa's, Andre's, Steffi's, Serena's, Martina's and Maria's credit they all did it only 3 different surfaces as opposed to everyone else, who ever did it at least once! So 7 people out of 18 ever achieved it on hard, grass and clay! Other 11 did it, when 3 of the 4 slams were played on grass and one on clay!…
So lucky, he won the RG when Alcaraz got injured Everyone knows that alcaraz had better chances against Novak and he proved it when he defeated him in Winbeldon, despite Alcaraz plays better on clay and Novak played better in grass What a luck for Novak
I have lived through watching and closely following tennis over 5 decades, GOAT debate is meaningless, particularly if it is based purely on titles.Only thing that was constant was court dimensions and net height.I personally think the best tennis was played during 1995 till 2007. Also Sampras's greatness is very under reported. If tennis needs to survive, they should stop making lighter rackets, stiffer strings and slower courts,Else the big 3 era that we all saw last 2 decades will be the last of it's kind.
Nadal has as many FOs as anyone not in the big 3 have total slams. Take those away and he would still be tied for 5th most slams. Nothing wrong with that and most tennis professionals would kill for the success he has had on non clay surfaces.
@@ElizabethPertovt Weak era? From the start of 2003 federer competed against 2x grand slam champion hewitt 2x grand slam champion safin grand slam champion roddick who was the became number 1 in 2003 lol From 2005-2007 nadal was literally federers toughest competition lol they battled back in forth in grand slam tournament and atp masters lol so how did roger had easy path? lol nadal from 2005-2007 was a 3x grand slam champion 9x atp masters champion all type of courts lol 2x wimbledon grand slam finals appearance (he just got beat by federer) 2x hard court quarter finals grand slam appearance , he was obviously playing at a high peak level and obviously in his prime facts not opinion lol yours is only your stupid butthurt opinion trying too hard to talk down on federers achievement Even roddick alone grand slam champion 5x grand slam finals apperances 10x grand slam semi finals apperances 18x grand slam quarter finals appearances and was constent top 10 from 2003-2010 was way better than the new gen weak era opponnent of djokovic that went to the grand slam finals once in a blue moon the top 20 in new gen era are inconsistent as it changes everytime unlike the top 20 of federers opponent in his era that was always consistent in top 20 rankings facts not opinion
@@ElizabethPertovt Novak won only 1 slam back in 2008 when federer and nadal was still younger and still on top of their game even in 2011-2014 when federer was 30+ old out of prime novak won only 6 slams and from 2015-2023 this is where djokovic won his 16 slams against new gen weak era 100÷23×16 = 69.56 70% of his slam titles and his longest number 1 record was achieved against new gen weak era, facts not opinion, this is just a proof that novak was the real weak era champ
Federer won many slams between 2003-2007 when Nadal was very young and dominant on clay only ,Djoker was also young ...when Rafa starts winning on other surfaces and Novak got real prime after turning out 23 , Federer badly struggled which shows that if Novak and Rafa had aged as much as Federer then Federer would have been limited to 10 slams
Djoko 24 and counting
24 and counting...
Djoko has almost won 1/10 of all Slams played since 1968!
Bjorn Borg records
41 straight matches won in Wimbledon (Roger Federer also won 5 straight titles before losing to Nadal in the final of 2008 but had one walk over and only reached 40 match wins in a row)
Highest winning percentage in matches going to 5 sets - 81.8% (27-6)
Career win/lose record all matches - 83.1% (639-130)
Won 3 Grand Slams without losing a set (shared with Rafael Nadal, Richard Sears and Tony Trabert)
89.81% win/lose record in Grand Slams (141-16)
Grand Slam Tournament won with less games lost - 32 games in French Open 1978
3 consecutive Channel Slams (French Open + Wimbledon) 1978-1980
92.73% win/lose record at Wimbledon (51-4)
88.9% match record in Grand Slam five set matches (24-3)
Borg held the record for most consecutive match wins in Davis Cup (33) until 2016 when Cypriot Marcos Baghdatis reached 36 straight match wins in Davis Cup singles matches. Borg also held the record as the youngest Grand Slam champion after his win at the French Open 1974. Seven years later fellow Swede Mats Wilander broke that record winning his first French Open and 1986 Boris Becker won Wimbledon and broke Wilanders record.
What a beast, and the guy retired early Lol
Roger blowing the 16-1 lead is just hilarious, novak the GOAT
Interesting to see how only four players have won all slams at least once (The big 3 and Agassi)
Rod Laver is 5th, since he won Calendar Slam in 1969, which was already an open era! I believe he won Wimbledon too year prior...he has 5 slams in open era, that's why he didn't make this cut!
Overall there are 8 men with career slam achieved, on top of the 5 already mentioned from open era, there are also british Fred Perry, american Don Budge (another person with Calendar slam other than Laver) and Roy Emerson...There are more women that achieve multiple career slams, than men however and it's worth mentioning! Steffi Graf did each 4 times and the only one to achieve it this many times, Serena and Court 3 times each like Novak, then comes Martina and Chris with 2 each, Helen Wills Moody won each slam that she ever played at least 4 times too like Steffi but she never played AO even once that's why hers doesn't count but i can guarantee you she would have at least 3 career slams! Marias Sharapova, Billie Jean King and 3 american players from 50's - Doris Hart, Maureen Connoly and Shirley Fry Irvin all achieved it only once!
To Novak's, Rafa's, Andre's, Steffi's, Serena's, Martina's and Maria's credit they all did it only 3 different surfaces as opposed to everyone else, who ever did it at least once! So 7 people out of 18 ever achieved it on hard, grass and clay! Other 11 did it, when 3 of the 4 slams were played on grass and one on clay!…
23 for Djokovic
24 😉
@@Amanda-ut7gx yes sir. I was so sad Serbia lost in the basketball World Cup earlier but this made my day.
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
🏆🏆🏆🏆 and counting...
@@baba34g34you should be sad serbia loses everything😂. VAMOSS RAFA!
So lucky, he won the RG when Alcaraz got injured
Everyone knows that alcaraz had better chances against Novak and he proved it when he defeated him in Winbeldon, despite Alcaraz plays better on clay and Novak played better in grass
What a luck for Novak
When Nole get 23rd GS?
today! 11/06/2023
@@arthurlimarocha6772 indeed!
Roland garros 2023. French open
24
Excellent
Hope that Djokovic will win 25 more grand slams
1st to comment. I wonder if we will ever see n tennis champion triangle like this in the next tennis era?
probably not lol.
Always might be wrong but over 60GS shared by 3 guys (and still more probably to come with djoko's form) we won't see that back
@@romainth6392 alcaraz is going to win a lot of gs but not as much as 22
@@xpto41 nope. Max 6-7
@@iz2043You're crazy. Alcaraz will win 20+ grand slam titles easily.
@@bazingacurta2567 no f way hes getting 20.
Djokovic 24
When Nole get 25th GS?
Djo❤
How many have used peds ?
Unfortunately none were left for anyone else because Nadal snorted them all
I have lived through watching and closely following tennis over 5 decades, GOAT debate is meaningless, particularly if it is based purely on titles.Only thing that was constant was court dimensions and net height.I personally think the best tennis was played during 1995 till 2007. Also Sampras's greatness is very under reported. If tennis needs to survive, they should stop making lighter rackets, stiffer strings and slower courts,Else the big 3 era that we all saw last 2 decades will be the last of it's kind.
25 and counting
Just LOOK at how skewed RAFA's slams are.. LOL
Nadal with a couple more Wimbledons and people wouldn't be saying shit
@@dave7573 yeah but he doesn't ?🤔
Nadal has as many FOs as anyone not in the big 3 have total slams. Take those away and he would still be tied for 5th most slams. Nothing wrong with that and most tennis professionals would kill for the success he has had on non clay surfaces.
There's nothing to "LOL" about here!
Federer himself said that winning FO might be his greatest victory
24 for Djokovič the best player in world
AO was still playing on grass before 1988
Djokvic and nadal only overtakes when roger retired and the competition was weak gen era
It’s Roger that had the weak era and proven
@@ElizabethPertovt Weak era? From the start of 2003 federer competed against 2x grand slam champion hewitt 2x grand slam champion safin grand slam champion roddick who was the became number 1 in 2003 lol From 2005-2007 nadal was literally federers toughest competition lol they battled back in forth in grand slam tournament and atp masters lol so how did roger had easy path?
lol nadal from 2005-2007 was a 3x grand slam champion 9x atp masters champion all type of courts lol 2x wimbledon grand slam finals appearance (he just got beat by federer) 2x hard court quarter finals grand slam appearance , he was obviously playing at a high peak level and obviously in his prime facts not opinion lol yours is only your stupid butthurt opinion trying too hard to talk down on federers achievement
Even roddick alone grand slam champion 5x grand slam finals apperances 10x grand slam semi finals apperances 18x grand slam quarter finals appearances and was constent top 10 from 2003-2010 was way better than the new gen weak era opponnent of djokovic that went to the grand slam finals once in a blue moon the top 20 in new gen era are inconsistent as it changes everytime unlike the top 20 of federers opponent in his era that was always consistent in top 20 rankings facts not opinion
@@ElizabethPertovt Novak won only 1 slam back in 2008 when federer and nadal was still younger and still on top of their game even in 2011-2014 when federer was 30+ old out of prime novak won only 6 slams and from 2015-2023 this is where djokovic won his 16 slams against new gen weak era 100÷23×16 = 69.56
70% of his slam titles and his longest number 1 record was achieved against new gen weak era, facts not opinion, this is just a proof that novak was the real weak era champ
Federer won many slams between 2003-2007 when Nadal was very young and dominant on clay only ,Djoker was also young ...when Rafa starts winning on other surfaces and Novak got real prime after turning out 23 , Federer badly struggled which shows that if Novak and Rafa had aged as much as Federer then Federer would have been limited to 10 slams
"Weak era" 😂😂😂 3-0 in finals at Wimbledon
24