Is Banning Dog Breeds Will Fix The Misuse or Abuse of Dog Breeds?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- What is your opinion?
Is banning the dogs will slove the problem?
As a trainer I feel it's the humans who created this problem and now putting on the dogs.
Now, even after banning them... they will find other dog breeds and misuse them.
All dogs has their own characteristics... but that doesn't mean they can't be a good pet dog.
It's all depends on the Pet owners and has to own the following responsibilities
1. Select the right breed for your family not just by looks
2. Invest on learning and training the dog ( Behavior Training)
3. Give the physical exercise and mental exercise
4. Be ready mentally ( You won't give up on your children then not on your dog )
Yes for now banning will help for now... but in some time you will see good dog breeds becoming bad.
In my dog training experience I have not got bitten by a Pitbull or a Rottweiler but got bitten by Labs and Golden Retrievers
Food for thought
Happy Parenting 😊
You are right, it's not a dog's fault, but, at the same time, there are so so sooo many people who just buy dangerous breeds without any experience and they don't know how to treat/train them, and yes, all the dog lovers will hate this statement but govt can't look after or ensure that everyone who buys a dog is a responsible person, it's impossible, at the same time, again i say, it's the owner's fault, not the breed's, but if a pitbull is charging towards you with the intention of mauling you down, we all know how that ends, these breeds are so stubborn they just don't stop mauling, whereas if a poorly trained labra or a retriever decides to bite you, it's less dangerous, way less, so this is a very good decision for someone imo, especially as someone who has seen many pitbull attacks near me, once a pitbull tore off an old lady's pinky finger near my area, once a pitbull almost killed a kid, people had to severely injure that pitbull just to make him stop mauling that kid and mind you that kid was playing in the park peacefully, the dog just launched a sneak attack on that kid, now again, it's the owner's fault, not the dog's, but you cannot deny the fact that dangerous/aggressive breeds are like the term says, dangerous in wrong hands. As someone who has seen a lot of dog attacks around me i totally agree with the decision of banning them, tho imo there is an alternative, implement a license requirement for people who wanna adopt pitbull rots etc, the license should be given on the basis of a person's experience with dogs, like how many dogs they've looked after in the past and their experience etc but ig that'll be a big hassle for govt to implement a whole new sector and again this sector itself can be misused, it is sad tho, because of irresponsible owners a dog gets banned but like i said, as someone who has seen very dangerous pitbull attacks near me, I'm afraid i agree with the decision.
But government cannot watch how owners are training or misusing their dogs.
Those breeds which got banned have more aggression in them naturally and at the same time they are way more powerful compared to other breeds. These breeds do not even have fear.
I've see rottweiler attacking a man, lot of peoples were beating him but still he was fearless and was not leaving that man.
Such incidents give lifetime trauma to humans or other animals, injure them severely, and worst case death is also possible.
As you are dog trainer I can understand your feelings towards dogs, even i like almost every dog breed but this is correct decision.
Whatever you train the dogs, there is always a chance that dogs can go haywire.
Stop domesticating dogs or any animal for that matter, leave them to live their natural life.
Stray dogs are dying of hunger and these so called pet lovers are buying costly breeds who are not suitable for Indian climate and have expensive breed just because they love to show off their dog not because they're animal lover.
Bhai apke tarah trainer koi nahi rakhta sab showoff karte achi tarah se behave karna bhi nahi sikahte thats why itne incident ho rahe hain.....i own a Scarlet macaw and Hyacinth macaw both r macaws but breed wise scarlet is very moody and single person preferring bird ..but hyacinth r gentle giants,they can get along with all of my family members both r males but i trained both that even if they see a unknown person they dont get frightened or start attacking...that training takes time and parrots r way more intelligent than dogs...they can perform many complex tasks which dog fails so ur attention and proper training is required i dont keep them as my babies for showoff because hyacinth r very costly in India...but i train them properly....if u have pets its ur responsibility that ur pet doesnt harms nybdy or create a ruckus in public space...most dog owner they dont want to understand this point...even some dont value human life... that's bad i am saying or typing these things because i am a macaw owner from last 29 yrs....its a vast experience with such amazing and beautiful birds that r creation of God...i know these beautiful birds will outlive me and thats another responsibility for finding them a good and caring owner...bit still i feel privileged and much blessed to have their presence in my home..
Definitely a valid point. Just like a misguided kid misbehaves and you cannot ban all kids to solve the problem, this isn't a solution for dogs as well. Law makers should dig deep into the matter and find reliable solutions rather than cutting down the tree and feeling safe. But who cares? 😢
Stray dogs are dying of hunger and these so called pet lovers are buying costly breeds who are not suitable for Indian climate and have expensive breed just because they love to show off their dog not because they're animal lover.