being a small species might be worse as you'd constantly need to worry about large predators, while being big you would only need to worry about food and water and at that height you could see food and bodies of water from a very long distance which would be an advantage against competitors
Thank you again for another great video RR! TBH, I think you have a great job at covering a wide variety of Sauropod and Theropod Species. However, moving on to another family of extinct reptiles for a little while is something I would prefer. This includes Pelycosaurs (Mammal-like Reptiles or Basal Synapsids), Therapsids (Protomammals or Stem Mammals), Choristaderans (a completely unique and long-lasting reptile lineage), Parareptiles (among the most ancient yet succesful reptile families), Thalattosaurs, Placodonts, Saurosphargids, Helveticosaurids, and earlier groups of Pterosaurs.
If you did want to do more dinos, you could look into Neovenatorids, Proceratosaurids, Masiakasaurs, Eustreptospondylus, Microraptorosaurs (include a possibly venemous species) Halzkaraptorines (small aqautic dromeosaurs with duck-like bodies and diets of small fish or aquatic insects), Sauropodomorphs/Prosauropods, Herrerasaurs (includes Daemonosaurus, Tawa, Chindesaurus, Caseosaurus and the Herrerasaurids), or other basal Saurischians from the Triassic like Eodromeus and Alwakeria.
great tale - thank you! Mo - obosaurusor MoABosuarus? I love Utah spent lots of time there - people who live there say MoA(H) bosaurus. No offence meant please.
diplodocus, argentinasaurus, or supersaurus, n i think being a bigger species would be more risky cs you have to be more dependent on more resources to stay healthy n grow
Nice 👍
being a small species might be worse as you'd constantly need to worry about large predators, while being big you would only need to worry about food and water and at that height you could see food and bodies of water from a very long distance which would be an advantage against competitors
Thank you again for another great video RR! TBH, I think you have a great job at covering a wide variety of Sauropod and Theropod Species. However, moving on to another family of extinct reptiles for a little while is something I would prefer. This includes Pelycosaurs (Mammal-like Reptiles or Basal Synapsids), Therapsids (Protomammals or Stem Mammals), Choristaderans (a completely unique and long-lasting reptile lineage), Parareptiles (among the most ancient yet succesful reptile families), Thalattosaurs, Placodonts, Saurosphargids, Helveticosaurids, and earlier groups of Pterosaurs.
If you did want to do more dinos, you could look into Neovenatorids, Proceratosaurids, Masiakasaurs, Eustreptospondylus, Microraptorosaurs (include a possibly venemous species) Halzkaraptorines (small aqautic dromeosaurs with duck-like bodies and diets of small fish or aquatic insects), Sauropodomorphs/Prosauropods, Herrerasaurs (includes Daemonosaurus, Tawa, Chindesaurus, Caseosaurus and the Herrerasaurids), or other basal Saurischians from the Triassic like Eodromeus and Alwakeria.
Proceratasaurus, might be a good topic for the next episode.
great tale - thank you! Mo - obosaurusor MoABosuarus? I love Utah spent lots of time there - people who live there say MoA(H) bosaurus. No offence meant please.
diplodocus, argentinasaurus, or supersaurus, n i think being a bigger species would be more risky cs you have to be more dependent on more resources to stay healthy n grow
Diabloceratops would be a great idea for a video.
I love raptors
I got another great dinosaur for you: Supersaurus!
Give it a try?
У тебя хорошие видео. Может тебе зделать видео про Entothyreos.
hi