The rendering of the dinosaurs and other prehistoric critters in these series is just superb. And David Attenborough's narration is as loving and respectful of the animals as always
I hope we could get a spinoff of prehistoric planet with prehistoric animals of the pleistocene era(Mammoths, smilodons, giant sloths, glyptodonts, macrauchenia, genyornis, wooly rhinos, elasmotherium, teratornises, gigantopithecus etc)
Note that the creature at 0:43 referred to by the narration as a 'mosasaur' has now been confirmed by Darren Naish to represent the genus Prognathodon. I will wait for Naish to finish his megathreads on the series and if there are other ambiguously referred to species that end up being named I'll reupload with corrections. Thanks to Brendan Kruger for pointing out the Prognathodon.
@QasemKarar-se5qw 😂 past dinosaur documentaries the tyrannosaurus rexes or raptors always eat the camera😂 ex truth about killer dinosaurs in 2005, t rex always eats you every scene. Same with the other theropods
Whoever directed the Masiakasaurus scene needs a promotion. For some reason this moment really felt like a real nature documentary to me, not something scripted.
Absolutely awesome. The aniimals looks so real. - This is the best Dinosaur and Prehistoric life film since " Walking With Dinosaurs" !!! - I look forward to see all episodes.
7:48 this is how every Dino documentary should be. Nothing comes close, WWD is a close second but the modern CGI, and story telling with nothing being said is like no other. The Jurassic park franchise in my opinion has ruined people’s interpretations of dinosaurs as mindless monsters. Same thing with Jaws and the stupidest modern films The Meg, have ruined sharks. I know they are movies and all, but they are animals, just like anything today
I would LOVE a prehistoric planet type show covering from the Cambrian to the Permian. I just want to see trilobites rendered with modern technology. I feel like despite being some of the most popular fossils, they are all too often excluded from Paleo media :(
since pp, at least as of the first two seasons, has focused on the very end of the cretaceous, i wouldn’t really expect to see any spinosaurus or carcharodontosaurs, since both went extinct well before then.
@@craigoreilly99 everything in pp occurs in the maastrichtian period Spinosaurs and charchsrodontosaurs went extinct in the cenomanian, which not usually is the very beginning of the late Cretaceous but also 30-40 million years before anything in pp
Fun Fact: *_Prehistoric Planet_* narrator Sir David Attenborough (b. 1926) is younger brother of late Richard Attenborough (1923 - † 2014) who played Dr John Hammond in Steven Spielberg's _Jurassic Park_(1993) and the film's sequel, _The Lost World: Jurassic Park_ (1997) !!!
Walking with dinosaurs has way better pacing and format tbh. Don't get what the point of comparison would be for JP? More accurate dinosaurs? Yeah no shit it came out 30 years later.
@@hyperboliccancers3269 that stance on walking with dinosaurs is subjective, can't say one is better than the other cause of the format. I prefer Prehistoric planets format. The only way to determine if a documentary is good is how much accurate information (for the time) it shows. Prehistoric planet gets more correct than walking with dinosaurs. I refrence the borked Rex skull, massive lioplurodon, Allosaurus being capable of even jumping, at 2 tonnes or so, that would reqiure insane legs muscles that, as far as we know, allosaurus lacked. Of coruse UTAHraptor in Europe.
@bigtreeguy7336 No. That's a pretty dumb way to evaluate documentaries. Yes, accuracy is important, but there's literally more to a documentary than juat getting "facts" right. Presentation, subject matter, format, etc are key to it being well made. Accuracy while being the most important facet is not the only one. Yes, WWD has some wonky creature design, but prehistoric planet, while being technically accurate, lacks versmilitude, thr dinosaurs look like overly padded pieces of plastic. The T.rex particularly looks like a big round lump of clay (this is especially noticable when contrasted against the tarbosaurus) and same applies to the triceratops and nanuq tbh. So while ita obvioualy technically superior I don't find them particularly life like save for the azdarchids and some of the dromeoasaurs. The WWD format is inherently more interesting as it plays to the strengths of the subject matter and allows you to explore a more diverse range of subjects and ecosystems. Copying the "earth" format doesn't work cause our knowledge of the entire world's fossile record at any given time is poor and then y//r stuck with tyrannosaurs and abelisaurs the whole show. Also PP realy seemed orverly censored and unwilling to show any sort of death or unpleasentness. Which is pretty horrible.
@@hyperboliccancers3269 To me the animals don't look like plastic tho. If you are refrenceing how tiny the scales are, then you aren't critiquing the docu, you are critiqing fossils and life, we know dinosaur scales were tiny. Millimeters in diameter, sometimes less. Format and pacing is where both my argument and your arguments will fall flat, that is a matter of opinion. I prefer the pacing and format of PP I felt like WWD spending time on 1 ecosystem an episode meant that the rest of the world got kinda ignored. This is why I say it's subjective, it turns into a "I'm right you're wrong" "No I'm right you're wrong" situation. Format is something we just have to agree to disagree. And focusing on the very end of the Cretaceous isn't inherntly worse, I could say that it's a flaw with WWD to not focus on one time frame and instead give an overview of many. It's a matter of what the goals of the show are. I prefer the deep dive into the late cretaceous. Finally, I do agree with you that the show isn't quite violent enough, the scene where this is most apperent (to me anyway) is the 2 T.rex hunting the Edmontosaurs, the poor edmonto should've had it's neck crumpeld. Although, I fail to see how many infants getting devoured at different points during the show is "pleasant". Baby tethyhadros, baby rex, baby masikasaurus, just to name the ones off the top of my head. I do think PP needs more horribleness, but I don't think it's something that makes the show inferior to other dino documentaries.
@bigtreeguy7336 No, I'm critiquing the plastic like look a lot of the dinosaurs have. I suspect it's cause they tried to give them corpulent layers of fat like so you can't see any of the musculature underneath. The movements are stiff and janky, etc. I understtand shrink wrapping was a pretty big problem for a long time but most animals aren't like dolphins or seals, covered in a layer of fat is a mammalian thing and even when you see a tiger you can see the muscles and bones move under the skin. For the level of technical skill and budget, it's a bit of a disappointment. Look to saurian if you want a look at a higher degree of versimilitude while being hyper accurate. Despite being a videogame, the models have more detail and life like quality to them while also looking more aesthetic. Take carnotaurus and how wide they made it in pp for no reason. The animal is laterally thin in reality but they made the model super wide like an ark t.rex. Opinions are not all equally valid. They are inherantly backed up by arguments, which are backed up by facts and reason. The walking with dinosaurs has the natural advantage of playing to the fossil revords strengths, showing a higher diversity of animals and being able to rely on well studied fossil formations instead of trying to pretend all these animals were actually contemporary. It feels like its trying too hard to be like other branded BBC material.
You are correct, T. horridus came before T. prorsus, but the two are morphologically separated by the nasal horn, and the Triceratops in Prehistoric Planet is representative of T. horridus in its appearance. The series is only loosely set around 66 million years ago, as Kuru kulla also appears and it is from the Barun Goyot Formation, which is dated to around 70 to 72 million years old. Tarbosaurus and Velociraptor of the Nemegt Formation also appear, which (although there might be new evidence suggesting it might be younger), at least at the time of production was dated 70 million years ago. Therefore, the Triceratops in Prehistoric Planet is almost certainly T. horridus, although it was T. prorsus in Hell Creek at the time of the K/Pg extinction.
im tired of the jurassic park line up. we get it, trex big,raptor cool. i want it to show a calm landscape allowing us to take in a new dinos look. to show the horror of being hunted by the predators and the dread of facing an adult herbivor
Thank you so much for letting me know! I spent a lot of time editing this and especially researching to identify the modern animals in particular. I can't really complain about them reuploading my other videos since it's Prehistoric Planet's content and not mine, but this one I'll flag them for. Thanks again!
Remember, these dinosaur attacks were normal in the prehistoric era they happened every day, just like animals are always be chased in the Savvanah modern day.
I love how bird-like they make them, as in you can tell they are related to our modern day birds the same way we’re related to other mammals. They have the similar phenotypes for example beaks, skin, eyelids.Too often movies and renderings just make them big lizards. Pretty neat.
How do they even know all these details about these animals? That's what I'm conflicted about when watching this series. Is it making stuff up without even telling me they don't actually know?
It depends on what dinosaur you’re referring to. Some are based of other already established dinosaur facts. Some are assumptions based on similar animals that exist or recently existed. We even have computer simulations with pretty accurate physics to try replicate or reproduce what they may have been like back in the day. Obviously with more evidence comes a better understanding, just like 30-40 years ago the thought of feathers on some dinosaurs like raptors, sounded absolutely ludicrous. But with recent evidence that changed our understanding. Same thing will probably happen in another 20-30 years, hopefully.
It's where each species was found in the fossil record! A formation is a location where fossils are present in the rock layers from a certain time period.
They are the most up-to-date depictions of any dinosaur media out there. All dinosaurs that should have feathers have them, all dinosaurs that should have been scaly are depicted this way, and most dinosaurs whose the presence of feathers is ambiguous have a mix of scales and feathers, such as Tyrannosaurus, Tarbosaurus, Qianzhousaurus and Pachyrhinosaurus.
Honestly, season two felt much better than the first season because of story new species, and better action and not a lot of speculation even though yes, speculation is good but in season one day over speculated a little bit
What also made it good for me as well was that in “Islands”, they made sure to talk about not just the typical main focus of Mesozoic media (Dinos, Pterosaurs, marine reptiles etc), and focused on all kinds of animals (as was the case in Madagascars ecosystem) allowing us to truly see what as many species in this planet as possible, just like planet earth documentary
![Prehistoric Planet [2022 - 2023] - Tyrannosaurus Rex Screen Time](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7ysZBHpD5WY/mqdefault.jpg)
The rendering of the dinosaurs and other prehistoric critters in these series is just superb. And David Attenborough's narration is as loving and respectful of the animals as always
I hope we could get a spinoff of prehistoric planet with prehistoric animals of the pleistocene era(Mammoths, smilodons, giant sloths, glyptodonts, macrauchenia, genyornis, wooly rhinos, elasmotherium, teratornises, gigantopithecus etc)
and I want to see an Entelodont in that Spinoff
That'd be awesome
It all depends on how well these Seasons do. First one did really good obviously as for the second we’ll just have to wait and see.
El paleogeno sería intesante también
Me wanna see synthoceras, sivatherium, gigantopithecus and daedon and hyeanadon
Note that the creature at 0:43 referred to by the narration as a 'mosasaur' has now been confirmed by Darren Naish to represent the genus Prognathodon.
I will wait for Naish to finish his megathreads on the series and if there are other ambiguously referred to species that end up being named I'll reupload with corrections.
Thanks to Brendan Kruger for pointing out the Prognathodon.
Would LOVE to know what species the Mongolian Titan is
@@cactusgamingyt9960 as far as I know, it's based off of some undescribed material in that locality, though I could be wrong.
We have plenty of different mosasaurs
But I wish we have tylosaurus
The production values in this show bring a tear to my eye 🥲
is it just me, or the dinosaurs seem so so so REALISTIC compared to any other dinosaurs documentaries?(such as planet dinosaur, etc)
No, it's not just you. And the reasons are simple: Time, professionals and loads of money lol
I think it's because they portrayed the dinosaurs as animals not Hollywood monster who roar every 5 seconds.
Planet dinosaur was ahead of its time mate dont disrespect it
It’s because David Attenborough is a time lord he just goes back in time with a camera crew and films them
@QasemKarar-se5qw 😂 past dinosaur documentaries the tyrannosaurus rexes or raptors always eat the camera😂 ex truth about killer dinosaurs in 2005, t rex always eats you every scene. Same with the other theropods
with this one the uncanny valley effect has been overcome for the most part. the guys who did it are masters. great work.
Whoever directed the Masiakasaurus scene needs a promotion. For some reason this moment really felt like a real nature documentary to me, not something scripted.
Absolutely awesome. The aniimals looks so real. - This is the best Dinosaur and Prehistoric life film since " Walking With Dinosaurs" !!! - I look forward to see all episodes.
Sooo the mosasaur in the very first segment of “Islands” is now confirmed to be Prognathodon by Darren Naish
Ah, the one from FFaG
Pretty easy to fix a narration.
Prehistoric planet is very realistic... A masterpiece!
1:26 the team behind the CGI needs to earn an award, that thing looks like it's really there
Those mammals looking at the snake that ate the little dinosaur was like never thought we would feel bad for the little guy.
The baby duckling velociraptors were everything!
7:48 this is how every Dino documentary should be. Nothing comes close, WWD is a close second but the modern CGI, and story telling with nothing being said is like no other. The Jurassic park franchise in my opinion has ruined people’s interpretations of dinosaurs as mindless monsters. Same thing with Jaws and the stupidest modern films The Meg, have ruined sharks. I know they are movies and all, but they are animals, just like anything today
this type of content is what I pay my internet bills for... keep growing.
OMG this is the best CGI dinosaur documentary videos i've ever seen 😍😍
I hope we get the Cambrian period reimagined, it was always one of the most interesting times for evolution.
True
Im waiting for Carboniferous and Permian 😂👍
I would LOVE a prehistoric planet type show covering from the Cambrian to the Permian. I just want to see trilobites rendered with modern technology. I feel like despite being some of the most popular fossils, they are all too often excluded from Paleo media :(
@@HindurashtraNayakSame, the Carboniferous is amazing! I'd also love to see a series that focuses more on pterosaurs
@@Spicy_Italian_Sausage trilobite 😂 such a common creatures instead I would love to see a Prionosuchus or an Anteosaurus
Awesome! I’m sad this video has so little likes! Keep up the awesome work!
I love shows like this! Always have.😁
Not gonna lie, the baby velociraptor are very cute and fluffy. Also the other baby dinos are cute.
we need as many of these as we can get while we still have sir Attenborough with us
After all, he witnessed them in real life during his youth.
4:03 this actually got me
seeing all these dinos in neat locations keeps awakening my inner Monster Hunter. i was just thinking "man that shamosuchus would make good armor"
Head: Weakness exploit 2
Chestplate: Water res 1
Gloves: Water attack 1
Coil: Botanist 2
Pants: Water res 1
These graphics are absolutely better than any dinasour movie filmmed
It was crazy that they made it years ago man damn
ngl this is my favorite dinosaur documentary ever. The graphics are just mind blowing
4:53 you know they used a rubber pig to record the sounds for Morrosaurus
I LOVE ALL DINOSAURUS SPECIES AND PREHISTORIC LIFE !!!.... THIS DOCUMENTARY IS AMAZING!!!....
16:15 The T-Rex is smiling
That's just the perspective of the camera, also that is not how you spell T. rex.
I hope and will love it if they can include some spinosaurids, carcharodontosaurids, and megaraptors in the next one!
since pp, at least as of the first two seasons, has focused on the very end of the cretaceous, i wouldn’t really expect to see any spinosaurus or carcharodontosaurs, since both went extinct well before then.
@@rh_4mhope they move to the early/middle cretaceous or even the late jurassic
Spinosaurus and carch lived late cretaceous period, not exactly with tyrannosaurus but still definitely a possible show up for the show
@@craigoreilly99 everything in pp occurs in the maastrichtian period
Spinosaurs and charchsrodontosaurs went extinct in the cenomanian, which not usually is the very beginning of the late Cretaceous but also 30-40 million years before anything in pp
What about megaraptors?
I love this part 4:51 he is so goofy
The Great Work of Unreal Enegine 5.
Watching Prehistoric Planet really helps me learn about the other dinosaurs I never seen before.
Finally my show 🦖
Man! It's like you're watching a Jurrassic Park Movies, Fantastic! ❤
Fun Fact:
*_Prehistoric Planet_* narrator Sir David Attenborough (b. 1926) is younger brother of late Richard Attenborough (1923 - † 2014) who played Dr John Hammond in Steven Spielberg's _Jurassic Park_(1993) and the film's sequel, _The Lost World: Jurassic Park_ (1997) !!!
Rajasaurus cameo calmed my soul
I still love the Volcanic look on the Isisasaurus and Rajasaurus
I was your 1,000 subscriber :)
Hope we soon get prehistoric planet focusing on Paleozoic and Cenozoic eras
CGI looks better than the flash and the new marvel movies
Did anyone else notice the small detail at 5:23? It’s so cool!
what is it
What detail
0:54 nah how tf did bro even get out there 😭
The Zalmoxes must've clung to some debris during a flood and got washed away from shore.
14:05 I remembered him from season 1… the devil toad
The visual effects look so real.
I wish to get a pre pre historic planet like before the Mesozoic period.
Prehistoric planet beats walking with dinosaurs, jurassic park and life on our planet
Walking with dinosaurs has way better pacing and format tbh. Don't get what the point of comparison would be for JP? More accurate dinosaurs? Yeah no shit it came out 30 years later.
@@hyperboliccancers3269 that stance on walking with dinosaurs is subjective, can't say one is better than the other cause of the format. I prefer Prehistoric planets format. The only way to determine if a documentary is good is how much accurate information (for the time) it shows. Prehistoric planet gets more correct than walking with dinosaurs. I refrence the borked Rex skull, massive lioplurodon, Allosaurus being capable of even jumping, at 2 tonnes or so, that would reqiure insane legs muscles that, as far as we know, allosaurus lacked. Of coruse UTAHraptor in Europe.
@bigtreeguy7336 No. That's a pretty dumb way to evaluate documentaries. Yes, accuracy is important, but there's literally more to a documentary than juat getting "facts" right. Presentation, subject matter, format, etc are key to it being well made. Accuracy while being the most important facet is not the only one.
Yes, WWD has some wonky creature design, but prehistoric planet, while being technically accurate, lacks versmilitude, thr dinosaurs look like overly padded pieces of plastic. The T.rex particularly looks like a big round lump of clay (this is especially noticable when contrasted against the tarbosaurus) and same applies to the triceratops and nanuq tbh. So while ita obvioualy technically superior I don't find them particularly life like save for the azdarchids and some of the dromeoasaurs.
The WWD format is inherently more interesting as it plays to the strengths of the subject matter and allows you to explore a more diverse range of subjects and ecosystems. Copying the "earth" format doesn't work cause our knowledge of the entire world's fossile record at any given time is poor and then y//r stuck with tyrannosaurs and abelisaurs the whole show. Also PP realy seemed orverly censored and unwilling to show any sort of death or unpleasentness. Which is pretty horrible.
@@hyperboliccancers3269 To me the animals don't look like plastic tho. If you are refrenceing how tiny the scales are, then you aren't critiquing the docu, you are critiqing fossils and life, we know dinosaur scales were tiny. Millimeters in diameter, sometimes less. Format and pacing is where both my argument and your arguments will fall flat, that is a matter of opinion. I prefer the pacing and format of PP I felt like WWD spending time on 1 ecosystem an episode meant that the rest of the world got kinda ignored. This is why I say it's subjective, it turns into a "I'm right you're wrong" "No I'm right you're wrong" situation. Format is something we just have to agree to disagree. And focusing on the very end of the Cretaceous isn't inherntly worse, I could say that it's a flaw with WWD to not focus on one time frame and instead give an overview of many. It's a matter of what the goals of the show are. I prefer the deep dive into the late cretaceous. Finally, I do agree with you that the show isn't quite violent enough, the scene where this is most apperent (to me anyway) is the 2 T.rex hunting the Edmontosaurs, the poor edmonto should've had it's neck crumpeld. Although, I fail to see how many infants getting devoured at different points during the show is "pleasant". Baby tethyhadros, baby rex, baby masikasaurus, just to name the ones off the top of my head. I do think PP needs more horribleness, but I don't think it's something that makes the show inferior to other dino documentaries.
@bigtreeguy7336 No, I'm critiquing the plastic like look a lot of the dinosaurs have. I suspect it's cause they tried to give them corpulent layers of fat like so you can't see any of the musculature underneath. The movements are stiff and janky, etc. I understtand shrink wrapping was a pretty big problem for a long time but most animals aren't like dolphins or seals, covered in a layer of fat is a mammalian thing and even when you see a tiger you can see the muscles and bones move under the skin. For the level of technical skill and budget, it's a bit of a disappointment. Look to saurian if you want a look at a higher degree of versimilitude while being hyper accurate. Despite being a videogame, the models have more detail and life like quality to them while also looking more aesthetic.
Take carnotaurus and how wide they made it in pp for no reason. The animal is laterally thin in reality but they made the model super wide like an ark t.rex.
Opinions are not all equally valid. They are inherantly backed up by arguments, which are backed up by facts and reason. The walking with dinosaurs has the natural advantage of playing to the fossil revords strengths, showing a higher diversity of animals and being able to rely on well studied fossil formations instead of trying to pretend all these animals were actually contemporary. It feels like its trying too hard to be like other branded BBC material.
15:49 Actually, that's _T. prorsus_ , as _T. horridus_ had gone extinct by 66 mya.
You are correct, T. horridus came before T. prorsus, but the two are morphologically separated by the nasal horn, and the Triceratops in Prehistoric Planet is representative of T. horridus in its appearance. The series is only loosely set around 66 million years ago, as Kuru kulla also appears and it is from the Barun Goyot Formation, which is dated to around 70 to 72 million years old. Tarbosaurus and Velociraptor of the Nemegt Formation also appear, which (although there might be new evidence suggesting it might be younger), at least at the time of production was dated 70 million years ago. Therefore, the Triceratops in Prehistoric Planet is almost certainly T. horridus, although it was T. prorsus in Hell Creek at the time of the K/Pg extinction.
@@allison0411 "T. prorsus came before T. horridus" it's actually the other way around, _T. prorsus_ is the descendant of _T horridus_ .
My bad, typo, I said you were correct so that's what I meant. Fixed.@@dweebteambuilderjones7627
What software they use to animate this series? Is incredible!
wow it is a nice documatairy
There is a dvd out by BBC called prehistoric beasts it's brilliant
I wish they would include some dino’s from the other periods, such as the Jurassic and the Triassic.
2:18 their so Adorable!!!!
Isisaurus caoming out of the groud is so CUTE !!
Truly amazing
Me gusta como mezclan los mamíferos peces insectos y lagartos actuales con los prehistoricos parece génesis, es hermoso la creación.
What about the species that were introduced to each episode order in Life On Our Planet?
I was waiting for spinosaurus and giganotosaurus, why aren't there any 😭😭😭
im tired of the jurassic park line up. we get it, trex big,raptor cool. i want it to show a calm landscape allowing us to take in a new dinos look. to show the horror of being hunted by the predators and the dread of facing an adult herbivor
Thankfully that's what this show gave us
Never knew gigantic snakes lived in dino times
where can i find the entire series? thanks
Apple TV+
7:10 why the heck are they so damn small compared to their parents they litterly the same size as their foot
That's the same with a lot of animals.
@@jacobcox4565 🤓
@@ahmedthedesperadomuhammed6232 It doesn't take a nerd to understand that babies are smaller than their parents.
@@ahmedthedesperadomuhammed6232Are you seriously triggered that some politely answered your question?
@@kade-qt1zuok chill i dont know why i got so angry about it sorry
One on the cenozoic era would be very good or one before the time of the dinosaurs
I ❤ it 😊 gread animals beautiful!
I need A DOCUMETARY LIKE THISSSSSSSSSSSSSSW
Oh how I hope for a season in the Jurassic Period…
A channel with the name prehistoric planet uploaded the exact same video.
I dont know if they asked for permission from you.
Thank you so much for letting me know! I spent a lot of time editing this and especially researching to identify the modern animals in particular. I can't really complain about them reuploading my other videos since it's Prehistoric Planet's content and not mine, but this one I'll flag them for. Thanks again!
Dame does this take anybody back to when they used to show this type of stuff all the time during the early 2000s.
If there’s a PP3, I’d like to see:
Spinosaurus
Giganotosaurus
Carcharodontosaurus
Baryonyx
Brachiosaurus
Irritator (since it has an awesome new mouth)
The series over 😢
Las mejores tomas 😎
Sería alucinante tener una máquina del tiempo como la de Back to the future, y ver eso en persona 🤖
Me encantó la aparición de mamíferos
Remember, these dinosaur attacks were normal in the prehistoric era they happened every day, just like animals are always be chased in the Savvanah modern day.
12:39 Shame-On-Suchus
This would be even better except for the cuts offs in the middle of a sentence, losing whatever information that was imparting.
0:08 we got earth eclipse
Where do you download?
I hope there's a 3rd Prehistoric Planet.
That baby sauropod melted my damn heart, wtf
I love how bird-like they make them, as in you can tell they are related to our modern day birds the same way we’re related to other mammals. They have the similar phenotypes for example beaks, skin, eyelids.Too often movies and renderings just make them big lizards. Pretty neat.
Awesomeeee
YES AUSTRORAPTOR
where can i watch it?
Apple TV+
I SUBSCRIBED FOR MORE 😮😮😮
How do they even know all these details about these animals? That's what I'm conflicted about when watching this series. Is it making stuff up without even telling me they don't actually know?
It depends on what dinosaur you’re referring to. Some are based of other already established dinosaur facts.
Some are assumptions based on similar animals that exist or recently existed.
We even have computer simulations with pretty accurate physics to try replicate or reproduce what they may have been like back in the day.
Obviously with more evidence comes a better understanding, just like 30-40 years ago the thought of feathers on some dinosaurs like raptors, sounded absolutely ludicrous. But with recent evidence that changed our understanding. Same thing will probably happen in another 20-30 years, hopefully.
Can someone ELI5 me those `formation` under the specie name?
It's where each species was found in the fossil record! A formation is a location where fossils are present in the rock layers from a certain time period.
I always knew David Attenborough was there during the dinosaur era
*era
nice
prehistoric Planet el mejor película de dinosaurios👉🏆
Why'd you do some species more than once?
I wonder how accurate these depictions are? Feathers or no feathers
These depictions are very accurate. They did their best to make these animals as realistic as they can.
They are the most up-to-date depictions of any dinosaur media out there. All dinosaurs that should have feathers have them, all dinosaurs that should have been scaly are depicted this way, and most dinosaurs whose the presence of feathers is ambiguous have a mix of scales and feathers, such as Tyrannosaurus, Tarbosaurus, Qianzhousaurus and Pachyrhinosaurus.
Shout-out to the camera man
Why would there be a field of pine saplings?
Poor soil quality on the island, or from being cleared by a fire.
Honestly, if they do the the triassic period, i wanna see the gojirasaurus(yes this is a real dinosaur, look it up if ypu want to)
Who is rewatching this masterpiece in 2024?
The music is so loud it drowns out the narration.
Yo camera man could you bring me home a simosuchus I promise I’ll take great care of it
Não entendi nada 😂😂😂 kkkkkkkk mais só as imagens da pra entender um pouco o que se passa
I find it strange that even the tiny dinosaurs are animated like massive animals with slow inert movements.
Honestly, season two felt much better than the first season because of story new species, and better action and not a lot of speculation even though yes, speculation is good but in season one day over speculated a little bit
What also made it good for me as well was that in “Islands”, they made sure to talk about not just the typical main focus of Mesozoic media (Dinos, Pterosaurs, marine reptiles etc), and focused on all kinds of animals (as was the case in Madagascars ecosystem) allowing us to truly see what as many species in this planet as possible, just like planet earth documentary
You missed an animal‼️ You didn't name the lizard that's running across the log in the "snake eats dino" scene
Nice
8:20 "Asian Version of Tyrannosaurus rex"