March 3, 2024 | Hugh Ross, Astrophysicist // Guest Speaker

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มี.ค. 2024
  • #conduitchurch #worship #Jesus #God #Franklin #Tennessee #churchonline #mission #oldearth #theflood #dimensions #creation #genesis #youngearth
    To be a conduit of Jesus to the community in front of us and the world around us. Conduit Church has a campus in Franklin, Tennessee.
    Join us every Sunday for Conduit Livestream at 11:00am CST, and you can also join us in person at 9am, 11am or 5pm.
    Please let us know if you have a prayer request, leave a comment for us below and if you want to take the next step in finding out more about Conduit. Please fill out this form: conduit.churchcenter.com/peop...
    __
    Subscribe to our Conduit Church TH-cam channel to see more messages:
    / conduitchurch
    __
    Visit Conduit Church website:
    www.conduitchurch.com/
    __
    Follow Conduit Church on Instagram:
    conduit.chu...
    __
    Follow Conduit Church on Facebook:
    / conduitchurch
    *Get the CHURCH CENTER app for all the latest events and info. Download in your app store and search Conduit Church

ความคิดเห็น • 219

  • @jony3775
    @jony3775 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    As a student of science, but raised ‘Christian’, my faith was always weak and conflicted. Hugh’s teachings completely unlocked my heart, now I’m a born-again Holy Spirit filled weapon for the Most High. I’ve seen/participated/received so many miracles since then..! 🎉🎉 Thank you, Hugh!!!❤ God is AMAZING and so GOOD!!

    • @howardpalys6929
      @howardpalys6929 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Watch the videos of Aron Ra for a REAL education on evolution.

    • @howardpalys6929
      @howardpalys6929 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hugh Ross has his head up his ass.

    • @hisnameisiam808
      @hisnameisiam808 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@howardpalys6929 lol ah yes, snail to whale evolution. Gotta love fairytales! Jesus loves you! ❤️

    • @howardpalys6929
      @howardpalys6929 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Evolution is a fact as well as a theory, fossils, genetics especially beneficial mutations, meteorology, geology, paleontology, dendochrontology, anthropology, archeology, zoology, mythology, chemistry, physics and pretty much every science sreams evolution.

    • @hisnameisiam808
      @hisnameisiam808 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@howardpalys6929 can science be wrong or the facts be misinterpreted?

  • @joelharris3389
    @joelharris3389 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Truth zingers are like a BOLT of lightning. It is so refreshing to hear one present his point of view without huge sponsor dollar strings.

  • @e.a.p3174
    @e.a.p3174 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I followed Dr Ross for more than 30 years,and read many of his books. I learned a lot and my faith is stronger than ever

  • @s.d.melcher
    @s.d.melcher หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Dr. Ross is amazing. Love his scientific approach to all Biblical topics. Thank you! All glory to God!
    ✨💖💪✝️🕊️💖✨🕊️

  • @almirgallardo2723
    @almirgallardo2723 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    What a great revelation!!! Thank you Lord God for this new information that you revealed to us through the speaker. To God be the Glory!!?

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Just be careful not to make the age of rocks your god instead of having your feet firmly planted on the Rock of Ages!
      Ross puts great trust in the age of rocks.
      Hunt down the creation websites to check the counter points to Ross' argument regarding the interpretation of Genesis 1. Don't just take his word - critically examine it in the light of GOD's word!

  • @eldin14
    @eldin14 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    His answers to the questions ASTOUNDED ME.

  • @user-xj2tj4yn8y
    @user-xj2tj4yn8y หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Finally, someone is talking about my thoughts 12 years ago... I brought this point of being on the 7th day that covers until now and my teacher didn't take my point. Thank you brother Ross.

    • @Mr196710
      @Mr196710 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Time to seek different teachers. This gent has been speaking on these topics since the 1980s.

    • @user-xj2tj4yn8y
      @user-xj2tj4yn8y หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @Mr196710 I'm from bundok part of Philippines, never heard about this, just reading my Bible when this thought came to me. It's amazing how The Holy Spirit works.

  • @timothyjonathan8301
    @timothyjonathan8301 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great calmness.
    Beautiful information and knowledge depth.

  • @terryoquinn8199
    @terryoquinn8199 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Dr. Ross , I truly enjoy your explanations as they make sense to my mind and much more context and background information is available . I just found this channel and seek out new videos all the time ! I’m also interested in getting some of your books , very informative as well . Again , thank you !

    • @eldin14
      @eldin14 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Don't let this remain book learning only...his answer to the first question SHOULD compel you to give your heart and soul to Christ- like he did. Do not procrastinate to enjoy sin longer. God may reject YOU for your laziness towards His mercy bringing you this man's teachings.

  • @binhanh296
    @binhanh296 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I came to my faith for about a year, truly believe in God, and have a desire to read the Bible, the story somehow feel so natural for me, and when I finished chapter 2, I got the feeling we're are still in the seventh day of creation. Great to have someone have the same idea 😊😊😊

    • @smgibv4393
      @smgibv4393 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its better to stay true to the bible than to your feelings. Listen to Ken Hams take on this from AnswersinGenesis.

  • @cindyreeves5048
    @cindyreeves5048 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    How in the world is this my first time hearing this man?

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Perhaps you've rejected the young earth creation story as clearly told in the bible. Even right here in this video Ross confesses that there were 6 days of creation - then he goes off the rails to bend the texts to fit in with the big bang tale. You make your bed - you have to sleep in it. Choose well.
      So by the way re-read Exodus 20:8-11 carefully - again and again - and examine the context in which it appears.

    • @MrRenaton28
      @MrRenaton28 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I heard few weeks ago and tought the same thing.. but all happens in Gods time and the time has come for us.

    • @greenguitarfish
      @greenguitarfish 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If you want to know about Ross, get the book Refuting Compromise
      A biblical and scientific refutation of ‘progressive creationism’ 
(billions of years) as popularized by astronomer Hugh Ross
      by Dr Jonathan Sarfati.
      Ross plays a game, and pretends to exude humility and sincerity, but he is proud, puffed up and arrogant. He deludes himself, and is greatly deceived, and deceives far too many who should know better. He obviously thinks he is some kind of gnostic. He writes a book titled "Why the universe is the way it is" as though he has all the answers.
      Ross is a Trojan horse to the church. He rejects the creation account, and contaminates scripture with Big Bang secular philosophies that directly contradict scripture. He rejects the global flood and says it was just a local flood, and believes there was death before Adam's sin, which is an attack on God’s goodness and character. Very serious !
      He claims there were "pre-adamites". (people who supposedly lived and died before Adam). His faith is in Big Bang, and he has constructed a religious cult that conforms to it. Scriptural meaning is twisted to accommodate it. Don't be so easily deceived, people...Gods word warns of these types in the last days.

    • @stevearcus2963
      @stevearcus2963 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I think he has been off the radar with illness. I use to follow him alot in the past, and he does look a lot older now. Wiser too maybe.

  • @ty2124
    @ty2124 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Good man Dr Ross and thank you and God bless you and yours.

  • @vickiebruckner2993
    @vickiebruckner2993 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Excellent ♥️

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Jesus becomes the word thought and emotion = Holy Spirit which is also in you.❤❤❤2:20

  • @jefffischer8661
    @jefffischer8661 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This has helped me start to understand the six days of creation, like many Christian’s I struggled with young earth vs old earth.

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So why did you reject the biblical timeline?

  • @ronkeene2068
    @ronkeene2068 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you Sir, the mystery is always unfolding into the purpose of Gods great plan. There is much more man does not understand that can be reasoned . Fascinating! God in fact and he has a great love for all his creation.🙏🏻❤️❤️❤️

  • @alpaomegaministries7040
    @alpaomegaministries7040 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At last, I heard a scientific and theologically sensible presentation of creation with an eschatological perspective. Thank you Hugh.

  • @susannemedina7955
    @susannemedina7955 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    In the scriptures it says that God divided the light from the dark before He spoke the sun into existence. That tells me there was some form of light that was intermingled with darkness. Doing this dividing made way for the creation of the greater light or the sun. It was God making way for the sun--a greater light. John the Baptist came out of the wilderness. The wilderness represented the former light that was given by Moses'writings including the law and by the prophets and kings such as David who were anointed by the Holy Spirit. But the true light got mixed up with man's sinfulness, false gods of the heathen and even God's own chosen people's straying. John shouted, " Make Way for the Lord! "He exhorted men to repent! He wanted them on a higher road with all the stones-- the stumbling stones-- cast away to prepare the way for the Messiah. He washed them in baptism from their former ways. And then the greater Light came... The son of God, the Light of the world that lighted every man. John was called the most righteous man that ever lived. But the Son of man was Righteousness! The Truth had dawned and It would experience an eclipse and then shine on for eternity. This is my prayer: "Lord let me separate the Light from the darkness and fully experience the eclipse of your death that I might pass from darkness to Light and walk in the Light as you are in the Light and have fellowship with You, Your blood cleansing me from all sin." Amen.

  • @Chazd1949
    @Chazd1949 6 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Hey Dr. Ross - I really like that term you applied to yourself at the beginning of the lecture - I'm also a "think-a-holic" and that gives me an idea for the name for the apologetics group that we're hoping to start as a replacement of the now discontinued local RTB chapter.

  • @kuruvitusiva4968
    @kuruvitusiva4968 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    God Bless you Dr.Ross
    Interesting when you mention about the 8% oxygen....
    May be its related to the 8 people in the flood...that's why I'm here today

  • @howardpalys6929
    @howardpalys6929 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I congratulat DR Hugh Ross on his olympic level mental gymnastics.

    • @petermichaelw
      @petermichaelw 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      *it seems you forgot your attachment*

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    3:53❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    13:28

  • @johnbullard902
    @johnbullard902 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Should be ‘testing science with the bible’

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    7:24 ❤❤❤amen❤❤❤

  • @RalphWLundvall
    @RalphWLundvall 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Appreciated the presentation. Commenters: The measure you use will be measured back to you. A law like gravity.

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    14:19❤❤❤amen

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    19:18❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    5:52❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    10:56❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2:07❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    14:43❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    3:34❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    11:10

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    8:22❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    7:48❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    0:43❤❤❤

  • @juliusschutte786
    @juliusschutte786 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Moral of the story, God never needed 6 days to create the heavens and the earth. He could have done it in 6 seconds, why?, because He speaks things into existence. If time does not exist, eternity can’t be measured. So God in His infinite wisdom did it in six, 24 hour days to quantify it for our benefit.

    • @IronMatt
      @IronMatt หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      God did it just the way He said He did. Trust God, not man's great ideas.

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IronMatt "God did it just the way He said He did." That is exactly correct.
      The Earth is 4.5662 +/- 0.0001 billion years old.
      God Created physics. Physics is ubiquitous.
      Does the Sun revolve around the Earth? - Nope.
      Yet, the Church taught that nonsense until the 19th century!
      God's Word certainly hasn't changed.
      What caused the Church to stop teaching that falsehood?
      Is there a word for word translation from Ancient Hebrew to any modern language? - Nope.
      All translations are thought for thought at best.
      You want to argue about what someone has told you what the Bible states in the English language, with their individual bias, with little to no science experience, ignoring the Hebrew?
      Do we need to wait another 19 centuries to finally dispel your folklore theology?
      Does the Sun revolve around the Earth?
      But, but, God said so.
      NO HE DID NOT.
      That was man's great idea!
      "Trust God, not man's great ideas."
      Maybe you should listen to yourself?

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Yup! 6 normal, human understandable days - not billions of years as Dr Ross makes out.

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That is eisegesis.

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@kevinrtres Opinions are like belly buttons, everybody has one.
      1) Young Earth creationism has simply failed every empirical test that mainstream science demands.
      2) There are no serious peer reviewed science papers indicating that the Earth is young.
      3) There are no scientists studying “young Earth creationism” in any secular research center in the world.
      4) Why? Because the Earth is 4.5662 +/‐ 0.0001 billion years old.
      5) All three of these indicate that the universe came into existence billions of years ago.
      a) The “Sloan Digital Sky Survey”
      b) The “Two Degree Deep Sky Survey”
      c) The “WMAP,” which is the most accurate map of the radiation left over from the Creation event.
      6) Here are independent measures for the date of rock.
      a) 2 Uranium dates:
      ‐ Uranium -235 decays into “lead” -207
      ‐ Uranium -238 decays into “lead” -206
      b) 1 Thorium date.
      ‐ Thorium -232 decays into “lead” -208
      c) ALL 3 of these listed dates for “lead” come to the same result; 4.5662 +/- 0.0001 billion years. Therefore, the Earth is ~4.5662 +/- 0.0001 billion years old.
      7) None of this is a salvation issue.
      8) The Bible remains the inerrant word of God.

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    0:14❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    20:32❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    9:39

  • @valeriopalazzotto5699
    @valeriopalazzotto5699 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I am the first to comment!🙂

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    12:59❤❤❤❤

  • @mmast7554
    @mmast7554 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He forgets that the lights were after the earth and recent discoveries are putting into question about the big bang

  • @petetumas6513
    @petetumas6513 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    One question, Dr. Ross: why would YHVH even bother with Genesis 1-12? You know God believes His Word is Accurate. Hmm... Fine Tuning is His Truth

  • @julesverne2509
    @julesverne2509 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Now, I know why I never catch any fish. They are running from my sinful nature. Cuz I knew I'm an amazing fisherman. That really does explain it.

    • @julesverne2509
      @julesverne2509 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Before you keyboard warriors get all upset I was just making a joke not criticizing Hugh.

    • @stevenandrushko8380
      @stevenandrushko8380 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lol

    • @djharris90
      @djharris90 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@julesverne2509I caught that and you're funny.😂

  • @fredwilliams4787
    @fredwilliams4787 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If Adam had not sinned, he would have continued to live in a perfect earth. God said it WAS very good. The Earth would not have run down. God put man on the Earth to live forever, which is why we are told in scripture that the Times of Restitution of ALL Things is coming, on the earth. The old world social order gives way to Christ's kingdom.

  • @eugenelindsey1523
    @eugenelindsey1523 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Does the crater pattern on the moon explain the timing of the flood when the depths open up?

  • @jeffreycrippen7276
    @jeffreycrippen7276 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How does old earth theology explain that death didn't occur until the fall of man - after creation ended?

  • @Eclectifying
    @Eclectifying 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I appreciate this presentation and Dr. Ross’ attitude. I object to what he said at the end about creeds. Why elevate Catholic creeds to the level of “essential Christian doctrine“? Nevertheless, he made a good point about Christian history regarding the age of the Earth, etc..

  • @JordanMarilyn
    @JordanMarilyn หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the book that he was handing out that he said answered the flat earth/round earth debate (since he chose not to answer the question publicly).

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dr. Ross PhD has addressed the flat Earth nonsense publicly, multiple times.
      39:40 - Rescuing inerrancy.
      You could not figure that out on your own?

  • @larryclemson5033
    @larryclemson5033 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I learned the Gap theory in Bible School in the 80's - It never made sense to me. He totally debunks it! Wow - that was great!

  • @throckmortensnivel2850
    @throckmortensnivel2850 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why would it take God a long time to create the universe? He spoke it into existence. How long could that take? Why did he have to rest? Better yet, what was he doing for the eternity before creating the universe? Sitting around? Playing solitaire? When did God create the angels? Did he create them before creating the universe, or after? Why did he create Satan? What was the point of doing that?

  • @askbrettmanning
    @askbrettmanning หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The earth is young.

    • @IronMatt
      @IronMatt หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes. We don't have to compromise. Huge Ross is a nice guy and a brother in Christ, but he's wrong on the age of the earth.

    • @jony3775
      @jony3775 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Truth=truth. God cannot lie. Science is fact. Bending science to fit a mis-translation of Hebrew into some bizarro story only chases away rational people to an eternity in hell. To say God’s science (yes, He created it!) is a lie and is to accuse Him of being a liar. I urge you to be cautious here. The far greater creation miracle and the greater love is shown through how God meticulously prepared this world for His man.

    • @IronMatt
      @IronMatt หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jony3775 God's word is the Authority. Science is actually not "fact", there are facts involved in science, but science changes all the time. Some aspects of science are facts, but what's called "historical science " is unproovable and, at best, a theory. The Christian has to weigh scientific theories against God's word, which is the authority , not the other way around. That's my whole point. If we have to jump through hoops to make the bible match what we accept as scientific facts, they may not actually be facts, then we are in error.
      The plane reading of scripture brings about the young earth model and the rest of the bible lines up with that model.

    • @Mary-uz2tz
      @Mary-uz2tz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@jony3775Fact? Depend on the honesty of the scientist. Also upon what they started their suppecision. A false premise will lead to a false "fact."

    • @jony3775
      @jony3775 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Whatever helps you sleep at night, Mary…

  • @paulparadise6059
    @paulparadise6059 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Try testing it with faith! And shake the dust off at the reprobate fools (Psalms 14:1 & 53:1)

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน

      "reprobate fools"?
      Shame on you!

  • @user-gr3oo5ux9x
    @user-gr3oo5ux9x 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What about the other saviour God stories that are identical to the Jesus Christ story? there were 15-20 of them

  • @user-gr3oo5ux9x
    @user-gr3oo5ux9x 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What about the other christianties very different from the Pauline Christianity stuff

  • @user-xq2ew9yy1x
    @user-xq2ew9yy1x หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hugh Ross might be a wrong teacher as others said it but I believe that he is a believer of the Lord Jesus Christ. He believes in his birth through virgin Mary, his life, death, and resurrection and he hopes for Christ's second coming. So don't be surprised if you find him in heaven.

    • @jsf1949
      @jsf1949 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Churches everywhere have Christmas nativity set featuring the first two people to question the virgin birth.
      Think of it! How scandalous: Mary and Joseph were the first two to question the virgin birth. They must have had the Hebrew Biology 101! Wow! Even backwards, Wow!

  • @user-gr3oo5ux9x
    @user-gr3oo5ux9x 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Many manifestations seems very convincing yet none of them actually exist.seems very convincing yet only in the dreamstate still.

  • @sisoeff
    @sisoeff หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Water above and water below" - means we are in the watery abys.
    The universe is drop of water in the boundless light.
    You are the reflection of the light locked in the drop.

  • @LindseyMinakerMusic
    @LindseyMinakerMusic หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Christians are not hard to find in Canada!! Oh my hahaha there are churches on every other street corner and many many Christians, including myself!! :) However, probably in comparison with the US, this would be somewhat true! :)

    • @Mr196710
      @Mr196710 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He was speaking of when he grew up. I suspect he is much older than you.

    • @e.a.p3174
      @e.a.p3174 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Church attendance is very low in Canada. We also have governments who are hostile to Christianity.

    • @Mary-uz2tz
      @Mary-uz2tz หลายเดือนก่อน

      Church attendance does not equate Christianity. Many are merely bench warmers, Laodicean whom God will spew from His mouth

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Go examine how many of those "Christian" churches have succumbed to the rainbow madness.

  • @michaelcamilleri8554
    @michaelcamilleri8554 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So how much time did God spend creating the trillions upon trillions of planets in the universe ? Personally I have no problem with the 24 hour day

  • @johnbullard902
    @johnbullard902 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The title of this presentation says it all in a nutshell about Old Earth Creationism--- ‘science’-- in your minds-- is the ultimate arbiter of Truth. Wherever ‘science appears to be at odds with the bible, it is the bible which must give way.
    The gymnastics and gyrations you go through in your efforts
    to ‘save’ the bible from itself are the result.

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Absolutely!

    • @eldin14
      @eldin14 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You didn't listen to his answers to the first two questions did you. For Shame! Blind and deaf...

  • @philipbuckley759
    @philipbuckley759 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    on the seventh day....a long period, of time, so since then no work has been done....are you enjoying your sabbath....

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน

      God "rested" from His Creation. Right?
      How many thousands of years ago was that?
      We are still in the 7th day.
      Why do you need to twist and distort the text?

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime หลายเดือนก่อน

    01 Genesis = Creation, Evolution and Entropy. 010

  • @dandjmcfetridge3687
    @dandjmcfetridge3687 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Richard Dawkins enjoys hymns n Christmas carols. He just can't accept the virgin birth. I've been praying for him n others for a few yrs.

  • @amandanield5380
    @amandanield5380 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    yeah and on that note about the world being flooded but it wasn't the WHOLE world as we know it. you got to consider how many people there even were on the planet at that time. if you give a generous guesstimation (coz the book doesn't name everyone or number how many kids they all had) there would only have been somewhere between 3-4000 people. that's not even enough to fill the smallest sports stadium, so a world flood in perspective of that isn't really that big, after all when we hear the words world wide flood today we imagine a flood that literally engulfs the whole planet coz we now have a population that covers the planet but not back then there weren't enough people for God to need to do that.

    • @templecreek9230
      @templecreek9230 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Your numbers are laughable! If you actually gave it some thought by looking at the genealogies you would see how ridiculous your numbers are. God went to great effort in Genesis to describe a worldwide flood that covered the whole earth. All land animals and all humans save those on the ark were killed. If you cannot understand this from the text in Genesis then that is your reading comprehension problem. Ross spews numbers as truth that are purely speculative verging on indefensible. He is a liar, and a dishonest deceiver.

  • @malcolmscrivener8750
    @malcolmscrivener8750 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    He doesn’t believe the Genesis six days of creation .

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Nailed it! He makes careful low bend to acknowledge it - then proceeds to thrash the word of God to fit the big bang in there.

    • @no_way00000
      @no_way00000 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ya. He missed out d Hebrew word "Yom" as a literal day of 24 hours.

    • @rickpolson6651
      @rickpolson6651 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      He does absolutely believe in the six Biblical days of creation and the current continuing 7th day or yom. He doesn't believe in forcing the wonders of creation into a very erroneous and unnecessary interpretaion of 144 hours. These are long days.

    • @malcolmscrivener8750
      @malcolmscrivener8750 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@rickpolson6651He’s not teaching what the Bible says .
      “ And the evening and the morning was the first day “ etc etc etc .

  • @jacqueboyce3176
    @jacqueboyce3176 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    wonderful talk, thank you. While “day” may mean a period,Genesis does not just say “day” but “evening came and morning came the first ( second, third etc) day”. You reveal the order is correct so can it not be possible that God created on each 24 hour day in succession , the earth and universe, “where it would have been if X number of millions of years had passed” each time? I see miracles of God today witnessing to God’s ability to do this - a leg growing in one second four inches longer at the prayer of another - not slowly as the witness told me, but in one instant it was short and one second later it was four inches longer. Prophets in thee Bible were transported in an instant WITHOUT PASSING THROUGH THE SPACE INBETWEEN, (often called bi-location) - Habakuk with the stew to Daniel: Philip from the road with the Ethiopian chariot and next instant in Susa: Elijah, taken from one place to another and who had to be sought by his prophetic brothers. When Padre Pio was taken in an instant to North Africa, saved a soldier’s life and was returned in a second back to Italy he was asked how he did this feat ( one of many in his life). He said, “I am where God Wills me to be, here in the monastery one moment and the next He will me elsewhere.” This explains the mystery of Jesus’ virginal birth, God willed Jesus to be in His mother’s womb until full gestation and the next instant to be in the manger - hence not passing the space inbetween and so the seal of virginity was not broken.

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mary was pregnant for 9 months. That destroys your whole argument.
      Why do you seem to think that a 13.8 billion year old Created universe is any less miraculous than one Created in 144 hours?
      To God, infinity is less than a wink.
      God Created "time." - Right?

  • @johncollins8304
    @johncollins8304 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Look at all 66 (sic) books of the Bible, and interpret them all literally.."
    Except -- you should say -- John 6, where Jesus says repeatedly in different ways that we have to gnaw on his body. This is when the proto-protestants first appear and walk away from such a "hard saying." Read it.

  • @BolzGue
    @BolzGue หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    How does Hugh Ross explain the fact that death was in the world before sin? This would be the case if fossil records were dated to the time before Adam and Eve. This contradicts Rom. 6:23. No Sin, No Death!
    I guess, when people try to marry evolution and creation, then the whole biblical teaching flies up in their faces.

    • @ImogeneRichards
      @ImogeneRichards หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I applaud your desire to defend the bible record and wholeheartedly agree,that it is a sure,truthful reference on whatever subjects it touches on.
      Personally, i have found i have to take great care not to do two things.
      1.To not take well corroborated scientific truths,as automatically being adversarial to the bible.
      What is called science,is in truth,the attempt to uncover truth,about reality.It is a gradual progressive process,but it is,whether its practioners believe in god or not,a methodical search for uncovering truths regarding how god builds a universe, it is not my enemy.
      People within it may try to distort or mess with things within that body of knowledge,but,the truths are there,and it is up to people who love truth,whether they're god fearing or not,to call out when it is straying from that grand goal of pursuit of truth.
      Fundamentally though, clear scientific truths will only add to the bible account, no matter what people may try to do.
      We have no reason to fear science itself.
      2.I must,
      use the bible correctly.
      This takes much effort,but i find it helps by being careful not to take things out of context,its so easy to focus on a verse in order to prove my own thought or point of view,,and to ignore the previous verses,or chapter, which set that verse in the proper context.
      Another thing ive learned,is to also collect all the rest of points the bible may make about that same subject matter,in the other bible books,this gives a clearer view of gods flawless thinking on the given subject.
      I learnt this way of careful study,from great god fearing men,who more than a century ago used these methods to get clear views of bible truths.
      It is easy for us to misunderstand what god is saying,and we dont want to stumble those who already doubt him.
      3.Be patient,things aren't always quickly apparent.
      In Rom chapters 5,6, god is using Paul to address the matter of where human sin and death originated from,he was not making a statement regarding death in reference to all living things.In fact the whole theme of the bible,is written regarding this grand purpose that god has for mankind,and how it will be achieved.
      In chapter 5 he specifically address the origin of human death,as being the fatal decision Adam made in Eden,and the consequences this has for all of us.
      God reveals his response to this dire situation ie,supplying a ransom that will pay the price of bondage, and release mankind from this situation they are stuck in.Sin brings death,just as night follows day.
      In some of gods final words to mankind in Rev:21:4 god paints a picture of all things he will remedy,or reverse for mankind,outcry,mourning,pain and death, are the things he promises to reverse for mankind.
      When he sent his chief representative,Jesus,you will recall he resurrected and cured people,not pets or cattle,as a way to demonstrate to those people,and to us,the things which he would do at a future time globally.He further stated there would be a grand ressurection of humans in John:5:28,29.
      So,we can see the picture that is forming right?
      Nowhere does the bible suggest that animals did not expire before Adam,or that they only started dying, after the fall.
      The ransom was provided to remove humans from endlessly being born into a dying race, it is a provision only for those made in gods image.
      I personally thought that the gentleman who gave this talk,is a man who sincerely loves the book of creation,and the bible,and he gave a very reasonable,compelling talk.
      My hope,is that as people who are in awe of this amazing creator,as i believe you are,that together we can learn and grow from each other.

    • @johnbullard902
      @johnbullard902 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imogene is ‘exhibit B’ (I was going to say exhibit A, but I guess Hugh holds that position) of the mental gymnastics people will go through to explain away the clear teaching of scripture.

  • @templecreek9230
    @templecreek9230 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bible - This is the inerrant Word of God from the creator of all things.
    Hugh Ross - Buy my books and they will tell you the truth about the things that God got wrong in his eyewitness testimonies.

  • @ourfamilylucu
    @ourfamilylucu 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Aren't we supposed to be testing science with Scripture? If you're using science to.test Scripture you're already admitting that your actual religion and the foundation of your life is science, not the Bible. Christian syncretism is alive and well in the West.

    • @mauriceeustache
      @mauriceeustache 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What you are saying has no sense. God gave us intelligence and that results in science. When you use science to prove the truth of the Bible you are doing what God wants us to prove. God doesn't need to avoid challenge... Because He & hos word IS TRUE... He challenges us in many passages to prove his word... He's not afraid of putting his word to proof...
      Blessings from Caracas, Venezuela... God bless Dr Hugh Ross... God & His word IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE... GLORY TO OUR ONLY GOD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST!

    • @mattwilson4580
      @mattwilson4580 วันที่ผ่านมา

      God does not want us to be ignorant of the marvels he has created. Pointing out that we are finally capable of understanding the observational proof of creation, through His Word written well before anyone had any clue about the science we know today, is not replacing the Bible with science. In fact it’s a maturing of faith and equipping to go out and disciple to people.

  • @frang8750
    @frang8750 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He shoukd meet Elon Musk teach him what he can prove science and God exists together.

  • @johncollins8304
    @johncollins8304 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "When you read church history... "
    "To be deep in history is to cease to be protestant." 19th century Anglican convert John Cardinal Newman.

  • @lyndagatlor5736
    @lyndagatlor5736 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sun moon luminaries not yet created on day one so the light on day one was the Creator himself

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Hebrew word for Create is "bara."
      It is only used 3 times in Genesis 1
      a) In the beginning - "the heavens and the Earth" :all physical reality. That would include the star(s), moon, etc.
      b) Day 5 - Nephesh animals.
      c) Day 6 - Man (Adam/Eve)
      Why do you make God a grow lamp to be switched on and off?
      You cannot have "evening" or "morning" without a star.
      The Earth rotates.
      The sun does not rise nor set.
      Verse 16 "clearly" does not state Creation, nor does it use the word "bara."
      You are reading into the text and completely distorting its meaning to satisfy your personal belief.
      That is eisegesis.
      The Hebrew word for made (asah) in Genesis 1:16 is in the “verb form” that denotes completed action.
      Genesis 1:16-18 are parenthetical statements that indicate that the sun, moon, and stars had been made sometime in the past.
      A parenthetical statement is one that explains or qualifies something.
      They did not have past tenses in Ancient Hebrew.
      They only had perfect and imperfect tenses.

    • @lyndagatlor5736
      @lyndagatlor5736 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @MutsPub Sun moon luminaries not yet created on day one so the light on day one was the Creator himself Gen1:14-19 The sun was created on the fourth day. Rev 22:5....states there is no need of the sun in the new holy city, for the Lord God will shine upon them,...I am thinking this is the same as on day one of creation. It clearly says the luminaries were created on the fourth day, not the first day, or the second, or the third. There are all kinds of places we could disagree and since you are arguing grammar of which I know none; I will not comment further

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lyndagatlor5736 You cannot equate Rev 22 (FUTURE) which is the "NEW" Creation to the past.
      Quote from you, "since you are arguing grammar of which I know none; I will not comment further"
      Got it.

  • @philipbuckley759
    @philipbuckley759 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this one seems to have speculative ideas....after a while one has to say, enough....next...

  • @johnosborne7637
    @johnosborne7637 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The creation day was 24 hours, you are wrong

  • @ecanet
    @ecanet 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I greatly admire and respect this man. However, but there is no need to check scripture with science, instead we need to be checking science against scripture.

  • @markhamilton669
    @markhamilton669 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He totally ignored the firmament..

  • @johncollins8304
    @johncollins8304 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "God gave us 66 books." Incorrect: the number is 73. You have the EVISCERATED BIBLE. Luckily the heretical Catholic priest Luther didn't have it all his own way otherwise your bible would be even smaller:
    "Luther’s first German translation was missing 25 books (i.e., Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Esther, Job, Ecclesiastes, Jonah, Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach (i.e., Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Matthew, Luke, John, Acts, Romans, Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation."

  • @mmbon7748
    @mmbon7748 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Testing God's Word with "science so called"? Shouldnt it be the other way around. What are u really worshipping?

    • @IronMatt
      @IronMatt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This program was a Huge Loss of my time. God did it just the way He said that He did.

  • @philipbuckley759
    @philipbuckley759 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we are in the seventh day, of creation....why do these well educated come up with such stuff...

  • @JuergenBertram-ps7sy
    @JuergenBertram-ps7sy 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Dr Hugh Ross seduces through his 'Progressive Creationism', but is responded to in a biblical and scientific fashion in Dr Jonathan Sarfati's book :
    'Refuting Compromise !'
    once and for all !😢

    • @walkergarya
      @walkergarya 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No, ALL of creationism is utterly refuted by science. There is NO evidence for any creationism.

    • @Mario_Sky_521
      @Mario_Sky_521 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@walkergarya Instead of making blanket assertions it would have been nice if you could have given an example from the video. I guess you couldn't match grey matter with Dr Ross....right??

    • @walkergarya
      @walkergarya 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Mario_Sky_521 Why would I need to match my "grey matter" with the Fraud Hugh Ross? Creationism is a fairy tale. There is no evidence for any god, no evidence for magical creation.

  • @noobsaibot5285
    @noobsaibot5285 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Test failed

  • @thomasmears7763
    @thomasmears7763 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hugh Ross is just one more unbelieving believer. Is he smart? Absolutely, but I see now why Yehovah said in His Word that not many smart, not many rich...
    I see Mr. Ross as just one more wolf in sheep's clothing. I don't many times see him in a fine wool suit, so a better description might be, the Pied Piper leading a flock of sheep down a broad smooth path.
    A very wise man once told me that "sincerety is no guarantee for truth."

    • @jony3775
      @jony3775 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You couldn’t be more blind or wrong. Be cautious about who you attack.

  • @user-pq5sm5rr9b
    @user-pq5sm5rr9b 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The simplest reference to a miracle, for atheists at least, is our planet. There are just too manny coincidence's to be a goincidence. like the sun being where it is the moon likewise the rotatiin of the earth, you could, write abook with them all. It's quite stupid realy, as they can't even use the word miracle, because of its meaning!

  • @howardpalys6929
    @howardpalys6929 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    testing Genesis with science, Genesis fails miserably.

    • @kevinrtres
      @kevinrtres 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yup! Especially when the science is god. Making the age of rocks your god instead of worshiping the Rock of Ages.

    • @howardpalys6929
      @howardpalys6929 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      God and science are opposites, Science is real, testible, God isn't.

  • @gregorybyrne2453
    @gregorybyrne2453 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    What is science but man trying to explain God's creation.

  • @user-gv3co8cd2s
    @user-gv3co8cd2s 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why do you say that God gave us 66 books when it’s known it’s 88 books but The Vatican removed the other books

  • @johncollins8304
    @johncollins8304 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can't say the G word? Ok, but you're allowed to say that looong phrase ending in 'agent'? So say 'Special Agent'.😁

  • @templecreek9230
    @templecreek9230 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why does every fool that believes in a flat earth seem to have a Bass Pro Shop or John Deer hat?

  • @petermichaelw
    @petermichaelw 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    NO, he simply puts the Bible against HIS understanding and changes it to fit his limited view.
    Evening and morning do not speak to a long period of time.
    Moses reinforces this in Exodus, referring to the miraculous fact that God created the world in 6 days. If it actually took billions of years then 1, Moses is lying and 2, his point is invalid about making a single day holy.
    Do you think our God would desire to find a population of humans who would follow him, so he waited billions of years for things to arrive? No way. He is following the Godless explanation for things and forcing the Bible to fit.
    He should write fiction books. Great imagination, but entirely his creation.
    How Sir, did the water arrive here? You know the best explanation "science" has is that icy meteors / asteroids landed, melted and voila, an inconceivable amount of water.
    Then to say that the fossil record does anything other than support the young Earth? You again put the Godless explanation above the Bible.

    • @poundtrader1414
      @poundtrader1414 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @templecreek9230
      @templecreek9230 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hubris Ross is a wolf. He IS a writer of fiction masquerading as truth. He is a self proclaimed thinker. He is a deluded proclaimer of untruths. He may be a son of Satan. He most certainly is a liar and a charlatan! Do not have this liar in your church! Pray for this conman!

  • @michaelstanley4873
    @michaelstanley4873 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I am very surprised that Dr Hugh Ross is so blind to basic Bible facts. The Bible is clear that God created the world 🌎 in 6 literal days and Rested the 7th day and blessed it. Exodus 20 and Dueteronomy 5 , the Ten Commandments! Six literal days to labor and do all your work, the 7th day , Saturday is the Lord's day, the Sabbath day. See also Luke 4 : 16 and Acts 17.Also the Bible clearly teaches a world wide flood. Dr Hugh Ross needs to put the Plain Truth of God's sacred word first! Instead he first clings to flawed evolutionary beliefs of millions and billions of years and then he tries to forced the Bible, God's words to fit in it. Like trying to put a round peg in a square hole, it will never fit. Thank God for His blessed Sabbath day of rest. It started in Genesis, He made it clear by the falling of the mana and Isaias 66 said it will last for all eternity. May God/ Jesus help Dr. Hugh Ross to read and accept the Holy Word of God As Is Instead of twisting it as he has done for years to suit or please his 🌎 worldly scientist friends 🙏!May God help him! May God help us all to follow Jesus all the way to the new heaven and the new 🌎 earth! Hallelujah! In Jesus Most Precious and Most Wonderful and Most Beautiful and Most Blessed and Most Holy name way way Way above All other names 🙏 Amen 🙏!!!!!!!

  • @Rosiedelaroux
    @Rosiedelaroux หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rubbish

  • @mahmoudkabi9984
    @mahmoudkabi9984 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the beginning God ( not Jesus) created the heavens and earth. This clearly means that there is only One Creator, One God, doesn't it? Therefore, calling Jesus God or son of God is such a horrendous mistake , fallacy and belief, unfortunately , so money subscibe to. The Truth about creation and the ultimate destiny of these heavens and earth are to find in the only True and undistorted religion : Islam.
    Study Islam and unravel the Truth. Islam acknowledges Judaism and christianity and gives irrefutable accounts about the messages conveyed by the messengers of each of those two religions, but at the same time, Islam addresses the fallacies, refutes the tenets of wrong beliefs and gives countless pieces of pure scientific pieces of evidence regarding how everything , by Allah's WILL, sprang to existence and how it will swing back to its end. And on the DAY of Reckoning every soul shall its commensurate reward or chatisement shall have! Study Islam!

    • @zorot3876
      @zorot3876 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can you follow a man who had eleven wives yet kept sex slaves and had sex with a nine year old?

    • @MakeYourOwnProps-gs8ij
      @MakeYourOwnProps-gs8ij หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Continue reading the very next verse Genesis 1:2 clearly states ‘and the spirit of God hovered over the waters. ‘The Holy Spirit part of the Triune God was also present during creation. This already debunks your theory. But lets carry on reading Genesis 1:26 ‘let us create man in OUR image’ 1 God with 3 forms hence the use of the plural ‘OUR’ Jesus is indeed the son of God, and is God in his own right. John 1:1 in the beginning was the WORD and the word was with God and the word was God.’ Jesus is the word of God. Even if I didnt want to believe the Bible about who Jesus was, I certainly wouldn’t believe a man that came 500 years AFTER Jesus lived over the 12 disciples who lived & ate with Jesus and went on to die horrific deaths declaring and prophesying all over the world that Jesus is the son of God who died for our sins and was resurrected 3 days later.

    • @mahmoudkabi9984
      @mahmoudkabi9984 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MakeYourOwnProps-gs8ij
      Keep on believing in your trinity doctrine which , obviously enough, falls apart and got debunked by previous Christians who convincingly chose to embrace Islam . By your logic,then, Adam should be a much worthier of worship god than Jesus as Adam was born from neither a man or a woman. Do some bias-free research and seek to find the truth and if you forbear then you have got wind of Islam and may you not direly regret not to have sought to unravel the truth!

    • @zorot3876
      @zorot3876 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem is that Muhammad was a false prophet. We know this from the stuff he wrote such as giving seven versions of how we were created:-
      Quran 3:59 - He created him from dust . .
      Quran 11:61 - . . He ˹is the One Who˺ produced you from the earth . .
      Quran 15:26 - Indeed, We created man from sounding clay moulded from black mud.
      Quran 16:4 - He created humans from a sperm-drop, . .
      Quran 19:67 - . . We created him before, while he was nothing?
      Quran 21:30 - . . And We created from water every living thing.
      Quran 96:2 - Created humans from a clinging clot.
      He was also immoral, having sex with a 9 year old. Being such a great lusty guy, Allah allowed him to have many more wives than ordinary Muslims and when he lusted after his adopted son Zayd's wife, of course Allah let him have her too. Quran 33:37.

    • @JTesoro21
      @JTesoro21 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Why aren't there any actual geographical places mentioned in Koran? What's in the building at Mecca? Why isn't anyone allowed to examine the black rock? But Muslims must go there without even knowing what it is? Did you know the fastest growing Christian population is in Iran? Why is Jesus mentioned in the Koran more than Mohammed? What's Allah's name? Does Allah love us?

  • @imnewtothistuff
    @imnewtothistuff หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This guy is sooo wrong, on so many things, right from the beginning. It's so bad, I'm gonna make my own video!
    just for starters, he misquoted Gen.1:1 !! ...God created the HEAVEN, singular. not heavens, plural. Think about it, the 'first' heaven, where Gods throne is, ALWAYS existed, it never had a beginning. the 'second' heaven, space, is what God created in Gen 1:1. The 'third' heaven, our atmosphere, where the birds fly, was created later. So, if you can't even get Gen 1:1 right, how can you believe anything else he says? It also means there were no clouds ABOVE the deep and no solid mater under the deep. I wouldn't listen to anything this guy says. He has NO clue what he is talking about.

    • @hombrepobre9646
      @hombrepobre9646 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should be ashamed of yourself or delete your comment, get a Bible and read the sentence and find out that you didn't read the bible or has no idea what you're talking about. be careful sometimes to avoid embarrassment because of ignorance.

    • @hombrepobre9646
      @hombrepobre9646 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Copilot
      The first sentence of the Bible, found in Genesis 1:1, is a profound declaration:
      “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”
      This powerful opening sets the stage for the entire biblical narrative, emphasizing the divine act of creation. 🌎📖

    • @imnewtothistuff
      @imnewtothistuff หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hombrepobre9646
      The first sentence is a statement.

    • @davidrichards2113
      @davidrichards2113 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are nit picking! Tell me you never made a verbal slip in your life!

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      FWIW ‐ From the Hebrew for Genesis 1:1:
      (Bereshit bara Elohim et hashamayim ve'et ha'aretz.)
      a) Bereshit bara Elohim (Hebrew):
      - “In the beginning God (Elohim) Created”
      b) et hashamayim ve'et ha'aretz (Hebrew):
      "the heavens and the earth".
      (*) This specific phrase ("the heavens and the earth") is a “merism,” a figure of speech indicating the two stand NOT for "heavens" and "earth" individually, but "everything" (i.e., the Universe).
      This phrase ("the heavens and the earth") is used 9 times in the Old Testament, always referring to the totality of physical reality.
      It is not about the Earth.
      It is about the Universe.
      The equivalent word for our English word "Universe" simply did not exist in the Biblical Hebrew Language.
      Thus, “universe” is not found anywhere in the Old Testament Hebrew text.
      Perhaps it is you that should humble thyself?

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    5:30❤❤❤

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    12:09

  • @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r
    @rtistic_Cosmic_translat3r หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    16:50❤❤❤