Navigating Genesis With Dr. Hugh Ross | The Holy Spirit

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 406

  • @Hugo-h3l
    @Hugo-h3l 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

    When somebody knows a little about science, he may become atheist, but when somebody knows a lot about science, he runs back to God.

    • @OscarRaphael-i4e
      @OscarRaphael-i4e 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No matter how much you know you will still die nothing you know will make you live forever you can’t take your wealth or your knowledge with you everything is left behind.

    • @amyhenningsgard8618
      @amyhenningsgard8618 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@OscarRaphael-i4eI think you retain your knowledge in the next life. Especially your knowledge of The Lord Jesus Christ.

    • @theway77744
      @theway77744 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@OscarRaphael-i4eThe question is what happens when you die.

    • @OscarRaphael-i4e
      @OscarRaphael-i4e 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ ask a dead human because dead humans don’t ever tell a single lie it’s the living that tells lies about dead human,

    • @theway77744
      @theway77744 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@OscarRaphael-i4e Nope, rely on the Bible.

  • @APLACE4JOY
    @APLACE4JOY 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Glory to GOD!
    Always good! Thank you, Dr. Ross!

  • @stevespanos75
    @stevespanos75 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The Truth exists, but hard to recognize. Dr. Ross is a necessary injection of Truth. Food for our Spirit. My Blessings on Him.

  • @kingofthemultiverse4148
    @kingofthemultiverse4148 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I thank God for Dr.Hugh Ross, he is such a brilliant and humble man of God, he has helped strengthen my faith in the Word of God, may God abundantly bless him and his ministry.

  • @chrisnoren777
    @chrisnoren777 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    As a Christian Hugh Ross blew my mind about creation. ❤

  • @davidcloyd1296
    @davidcloyd1296 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Hugh Ross is the best! Btw, churches that allow q&a remind me of the dialogue we see in the Bible between Jesus and the people. I think it’s a good idea to allow q&a in church therefore.

    • @rjhinnj
      @rjhinnj ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is actually Biblical design for church life and practice. 1 Corinthians 14 gives us the blueprint… “EVERYONE has a word, a song, etc….” Unfortunately, men’s traditions have created a clergy/laity divide putting clergy above people… not Gods design. Giftings and function instead of personalities and positions.

    • @davidcloyd1296
      @davidcloyd1296 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rjhinnj good word,, plus, remember those two lady’s in Acts who approached the good preacher who only knew the baptism of John, but not the Holy Spirit?,,, they corrected him and set him straight.

    • @Terrylb285
      @Terrylb285 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We just need to make sure the staff can accurately answer the questions being asked

    • @bradleybunk6463
      @bradleybunk6463 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they don’t have to know it all, a humble “I don’t know but let’s read and learn it together” is all that should be expected.

  • @HiFatherElisha
    @HiFatherElisha ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Thank you Dr. Hugh Ross and Coastal Church for making this happen. I'm in awe listening to this. Such presentations of the greatness of the world we live in just makes me surrender, bowing in reverence before our Loving Creator Jesus.

  • @manuaiipondraken8376
    @manuaiipondraken8376 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Wow. I just learn a lot about biblical Creation and how it is complemented by scientific research. Powerful staff. Thank you Dr Ross.

    • @jasonstclair1329
      @jasonstclair1329 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sadly he gets it wrong , consistently.

    • @johnward4262
      @johnward4262 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@jasonstclair1329 what does he get wrong? Are you a Young Earth Creationist? What are your degrees in science?

    • @YeshuaisnotJesus
      @YeshuaisnotJesus ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @johnward4262
      Science doesn't prove god, Science disproves god.

    • @manuaiipondraken8376
      @manuaiipondraken8376 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@YeshuaisnotJesus Science does not prove or disprove God. Where did you get that from?

    • @YeshuaisnotJesus
      @YeshuaisnotJesus ปีที่แล้ว

      @manuaiipondraken8376
      Really, evolution disproves the creation story. So does geology.
      DNA disproves Adam and Eve.
      We are apes. Nothing can change that. Where does god say he changed Eve's chromosomes.

  • @teunvandesteeg7836
    @teunvandesteeg7836 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I am Dutch and I am very glad I 'discovered' Dr. John Ross. God thanks there are other very intelligent persons who are christian and scientist at the same time. In the Netherlands unfortunately many people loose their faith. Therefor it is very important to listen to scientists like Hugh Ross.

    • @aldegondavanrompuy6927
      @aldegondavanrompuy6927 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I agree, I'm from Belgium and through Dr. Ross my faith was restored and boosted.
      Amazing, this man, a True gift from our Lord. Greetings

    • @lacyron
      @lacyron 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      His name is Hugh Ross, and not John Ross. After reading your whole comment I see at the end you call him by his real or known name of Hugh Ross. Where did you get the name "John" from?

    • @bjornelerium9007
      @bjornelerium9007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm dutch and I discovered Dr Ross today 😂 But I need to study his hypothesis about the connection between science and bible first, to give A objective opinion. But I believe in a creator.

  • @SandraLopata
    @SandraLopata 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you so much Dr. Ross for blessing us with your many years of study, research and obedience to the Holy Spirit .Blessings.

  • @benliftin4awhile
    @benliftin4awhile 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Why isn’t this everywhere? It needs to be everywhere.

    • @renatafnedab3003
      @renatafnedab3003 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Because that would be too much like Right fir the Truth to get out to everyone 💯👍🏽🤷🏽‍♀️. We know that the Real truth never gets the recognition it should. But I love this and am thankful this happened to come to my recommendation section.❤️👍🏽🎉💯

    • @benliftin4awhile
      @benliftin4awhile 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@renatafnedab3003 amen! I’m glad you saw it too! Have a blessed day!

    • @corning1
      @corning1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TH-cam wants to hide it. I’ve been here 17 years and have searched countless men like Lennox etc and have just found this man. They want him suppressed. He’s very scary for them.

    • @corning1
      @corning1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They want this hidden.

    • @corning1
      @corning1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I have never heard of this man for 17 years here… while searching endless debates. I wonder why?

  • @MichelAgaibi
    @MichelAgaibi 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    God bless you Dr. Ross

  • @briansturdy592
    @briansturdy592 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Thank you Hugh Ross for expressing how our Heavenly Father in HIS Great Wisdom and Fore thought designed our solar system with the very unique needs for our life on Earth and for providing our Lord Saviour and Best friend JESUS. ☝️

  • @ruthcampfield2431
    @ruthcampfield2431 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Stop the negative criticism please. This man knows what he is talking about.

    • @adriel6421
      @adriel6421 ปีที่แล้ว

      If he knew what he is talking about, he would understand he does not know. If he try to bring people to Jesus by what the world call wisdom, then he is stumbling and do not understand.
      He is building on things that will not stand, he build false converts built on "science falsely so called", not
      "built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone" (Ephesians 2:20). Every other way we build will not be abel to stand.
      1 Timothy 6:20-21
      O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
      1 Corinthians 3:18-19
      Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world,
      let him become a fool, that he may be wise.
      For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written,
      He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
      1 Corinthians 1:17-31
      For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel:
      not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
      For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness;
      but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
      For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
      Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world?
      hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
      For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God,
      it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
      For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:
      But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;
      But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
      Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
      For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh,
      not many mighty, not many noble, are called:
      But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise;
      and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
      And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not,
      to bring to nought things that are:
      That no flesh should glory in his presence.
      But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom,
      and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:
      That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.
      Romans 16:17-18
      Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and
      offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
      For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly;
      and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
      Matthew 11:25-26
      At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth,
      because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.
      Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight

    • @botchvinik8668
      @botchvinik8668 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What "negative criticism" are you referring to? I haven't seen any.

  • @sivoyager
    @sivoyager 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is absolute mindblowing.. i dont understand much about astrophysics but i thank God.. for Jesus Christ.. God Bless you all.. God Bless Dr Ross

  • @ruthcampfield2431
    @ruthcampfield2431 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This is so awesome. Praise our LORD👏

    • @CleanCT-
      @CleanCT- 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amen!

  • @rpminc1974
    @rpminc1974 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hugh Ross is an amazing man of God !!

  • @tonussi
    @tonussi ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks Hugh Ross!!!! ❤

  • @blancaromero7706
    @blancaromero7706 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    We need you on Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson!!!🙏🙏🙏

    • @icrushtheenemy1047
      @icrushtheenemy1047 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Him and Peterson would destroy the internet

  • @danthemanx999
    @danthemanx999 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    It's amazing that we live in a Goldilocks zone of a solar system in a Goldilocks zone of a galaxy in a Goldilocks zone of a local cluster in a Goldilocks zone of a universe.

    • @kingofthemultiverse4148
      @kingofthemultiverse4148 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly man, and Dr.Ross would agree with you in a heartbeat, whether we're old or young earth creationists, we can all agree that there is an intelligent and all-powerful creator who has left enough evidence of his existence.

  • @amyhenningsgard8618
    @amyhenningsgard8618 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love you in Christ Jesus, brother Dr. Ross! You’re a God send. 🙏🏻📖✝️🌹

  • @CN-ds3vc
    @CN-ds3vc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I follow John C Lennox and Steve C Meyer but when I started to listen to this man, I was blown away by the deep and extraordinary knowledge guided by the Holy Spirit. I hope that the most amount of people would see this person, this is a God send.

  • @edbrackeen5979
    @edbrackeen5979 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Dr Ross,
    I have great respect for your knowledge and wisdom.
    And I hope you will take this to heart.
    God created The earth and Adam and Eve about 6000 years ago and declared that his creation was very good.
    The genealogy bears this out in both Matthew and Genesis.
    We must take a firm stand for God's literal word.

    • @shanli2693
      @shanli2693 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exodus 20:11 "For *in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is,* and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it."

    • @jasonstclair1329
      @jasonstclair1329 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are correct! Sadly he teaches his ignorance to many people who haven’t done their own homework.

    • @ronaldwhitt6137
      @ronaldwhitt6137 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The young earth view is not the only creationist view, actually it’s only been a predominant view among evangelicals for about 50 years. A much more traditional view is the understanding that there is an undefined time gap between v1 and v2 of Genesis. This gap view also harmonizes many other biblical texts. Truly, linguistically v2 can be translated “but the earth became formless and void” and so it was in earlier versions of the KJV. The gap also explains when the angelic fall happened and how the earth became in the state of judgement due to Satan’s actions. I know that many young earth people militate against the gap. I encourage you to read “the gap,is not a theory”

    • @ronaldwhitt6137
      @ronaldwhitt6137 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jack Langford is the author of The Gap is not a Theory

    • @edbrackeen5979
      @edbrackeen5979 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ronaldwhitt6137 it is as if people think God needed more time and don't realize God is timeless and eternal.

  • @MutsPub
    @MutsPub ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you.

    • @theguyver4934
      @theguyver4934 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just like biblical and historical evidence proves that jesus and his apostles were vegatarians biblical and historical evidence also proves that the trinity, atonement, original sin and hell are very late misinterpretations and are not supported by the early creed hence its not a part of Christianity I pray that Allah swt revives Christianity both inside and out preserves and protects it and makes its massage be witnessed by all people but at the right moment, place and time
      The secred text of the Bible says ye shall know them by their fruits
      So too that I say to my christian brothers and sisters be fruitful and multiply
      Best regards from a Muslim ( line of ismail )

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@theguyver4934 You are not even remotely close to what Scripture states.
      The standard Arabic word for God is “Allah.” Arabic speaking Christians, Jews, and Muslims use the word Allah. The word for God in Spanish it’s “Dios,” in German it’s “Gott,” in French it’s “Dieu.” All of these may or may not be referring to “Yahweh” the specific God of the Bible.
      1) Both the Old and the New Testament had already been in circulation for hundreds of years prior to the writing of the Quran which took 22 years starting from 610 AD. and was completed in 632 AD.
      2) The Quran states that, “Allah's word is written and can not be changed.”
      3) The Quran states that Allah takes credit for both the Hebrew Torah (Old Testament) and the Christian Gospel (New Testament).
      4) If the Bible is true. Then, the “QURAN IS FALSE,” because the Bible specifically teaches there is but one God whose Hebrew name is “Yahweh.” The Jewish God Yahweh is obviously NOT the god of the Quran!!
      5) If the Bible is false. Then, the “QURAN IS FALSE,” because Allah stated that he is responsible for the Torah and the Gospel (Bible).
      6) Either way, the “QURAN IS FALSE,” as per Allah's words that “cannot be changed.”
      This is the Islamic dilemma.
      There is simply no getting around this!
      7) The Quran was written hundreds of years “after” the Bible and contains references to more than fifty people and events directly from the Bible.
      Is that a Coincidence? NO .
      8) The Tora and the Gospels are both very clear that there is but one God Yahweh!
      It is not Allah of the Quran!
      You can't escape this “Islamic dilemma” no matter what word gymnastics you try!
      Allah of the Quran is a man made false god no different than Thor or Zeus!

  • @DonWilliams-gl3lj
    @DonWilliams-gl3lj ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Outstanding. Thank you

  • @fernandoformeloza4107
    @fernandoformeloza4107 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Can agree with a lot of what he says. Just started to see Hugh Ross's videos, will see more

  • @Glathgrundel
    @Glathgrundel หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm an atheist and when my daughter was in the last few year of High School, she fell in with a group of christian kids.
    They were OK at first, but soon started trying to indoctrinate her into their faith/cult.
    She asked me about christianity and I answered all of her questions honestly, including about the discrepancies and hypocricies in the bible.
    She asked me my opinion about it all, though since I'm a lifelong atheist, she already knew my stance on superstitions and organised religion.
    Even though she moved away from it initially, she still stayed in contact with the few more open minded ones on social media (I think she was into one of the boys in the group) and I didn't mind that as she's quite level headed.
    After about a year, I found out that the rest of the christian clique had been putting the evangelical hard-word on her and she was considering getting BAPTISED, of all things.
    I could see that she was in serious danger of becoming drawn into a cult, so as a parent I felt it my duty to steer her clear of them.
    I talked her into breaking away from their group and getting rid of her bible, which I didn't even know she owned until she mentioned the baptisement thing.
    She finished High School and lost contact with the group and hasn't heard from them in the seven years since, completing her college education and moving in with her current partner Amanda.
    I dread to think what would have happened if she had gone down that rabbit-hole, but I believe that she would have figured out what it was all about pretty quickly ... she's a smart girl and not easily fooled by superstitious nonsense.

    • @galileog8945
      @galileog8945 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Kids like to do the opposite of what their parents do. I became an atheist at 15, just to piss off my Christian mother.

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Is Joe 38 chapter excellent example of biblical divine biblical divine revelation thank you

  • @ilmaariola8916
    @ilmaariola8916 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you Dr. Ross.

  • @madtinfoilhatter3684
    @madtinfoilhatter3684 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I absolutely love listening to Dr. Ross… it always amazes me to hear other perspectives on how the truth of our Lord and savior was reveled through witnessing his amazing design… I to had a similar revelation when studying the human body… the most amazing machine on the planet

  • @angielentz8092
    @angielentz8092 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This, Mr. Dr. Hugh Ross, He Is Like An Angel From Heaven. These Angels Will Probly Be Teaching Classes In Heaven Too.

  • @RayLopez-g2e
    @RayLopez-g2e 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderful creator, wonderfully made creatures.

  • @jonschlottig9584
    @jonschlottig9584 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love Dr. Ross. God bless.

  • @francoisBonin-phils
    @francoisBonin-phils ปีที่แล้ว +3

    its Fabulous , thanks a lot for this wonderful work.

  • @gdvhfghhg3412
    @gdvhfghhg3412 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is best video I’m going to ever encounter by far

    • @jasonstclair1329
      @jasonstclair1329 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look for someone who teaches creation science without invoking evolution to explain it. Sadly Hugh is unable to read the Bible without messing it up.

    • @mikeconley3068
      @mikeconley3068 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does he get wrong? Is he actually wrong or just opposes your viewpoint?

    • @aldegondavanrompuy6927
      @aldegondavanrompuy6927 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hallo, you have to see them all!! I have to warn you, it becomes an addition! The more you see and discover, the more you wanna know and see and hear over and over again... It makes you happy too...

  • @annamarienatale7409
    @annamarienatale7409 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a powerful podcast creation I have two people here at Arbor Terrace that I’ve been praying for and speaking with, and they are both Atheist it gives me some substance to share with him. Thank you for sending it hope I can use it to share with him. Love you, dear sister Anna.

  • @rac7773
    @rac7773 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love Dr. Ross. 😊

  • @christinefarrall9391
    @christinefarrall9391 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I live in Australia. My brother is a scientist and I might try to send him this video if I can find him. God Bless.

  • @The-DO
    @The-DO ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God Bless!

  • @shirleychen7412
    @shirleychen7412 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Follow me faith ! (The way, The truth, and The LIFE.)😊❤

  • @Twilisfriend
    @Twilisfriend 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hugh Ross Christian oh boy, this oughta be good I can’t wait to listen

  • @Shusterr
    @Shusterr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The subject matter of Apologetics ought to be shared more commonly , to bring greater awareness in every church, around the world.

  • @ronaldwhitt6137
    @ronaldwhitt6137 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I see quite a few comments from young earth people. Understandable given how prevalent that view is among reformed theologians. Young earth is relatively new view, being popularized over the last 50 years. Traditionally, biblical creationists viewed Gen 1 as having an undefined time gap between v1 and v2. Linguistically, v2 can be translated “but the earth became formless and void’ and so,it is in older versions of the KJV and other translations. The gap view harmonizes many other biblical texts as well as explaining the time of the angelic fall. V2 finds the earth in a state of judgement and the 6 literal days of God’s creative work restores the earth to be the perfectly habitable planet it is. I know many of the young earth people militate against the gap view. I encourage you to read “the gap,is not a theory” by Jack Langford before you reject the gap out of hand

    • @xfilesseasonteneponeandsix8346
      @xfilesseasonteneponeandsix8346 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you thank you thank you! 100 percent truth. The sons of God were here before humans. There was a flood before Adam and Eve

    • @SimonBrisbane
      @SimonBrisbane 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Personally I remain undecided. My view is that the main thing is that the main thing remains the main thing. That is, Jesus is God. He intentionally died for our corruption and disobedience. He rose to life again on the third day to establish His supremacy over death. If we turn away from our selfish ways and accept Jesus as Lord and thank him for bearing the punishment we deserve, we will be raised again to eternal life and be adopted as God's children, living in His presence and goodness for eternity. That is the main thing. Ultimately, while very interesting, nothing else matters. So I love hearing of these schools of thought and the debates and science. But I have nothing vested in any position apart from being a redeemed sinner who looks forward to the day where he can see his master face to face. May no one who calls the,selves a believe elevate anything else to the level of importance of the cross and Jesus crucified. To do so would be idolic herecy.

  • @highpointsights
    @highpointsights 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I downloaded one off his early Reasons to Believe documents. 20 + years ago.

  • @Night_Crew_Artist
    @Night_Crew_Artist 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dr Ross, you are on the right track. Hopefully one day, you'll realize that the creation account told in Genesis is indeed fact. After all Jesus quoted it as such.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
      Sunrise to sunset
      Sunset to next sunset
      Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
      We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
      Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
      The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hour.
      What your are talking about is Ken Ham's thoughts, not the Bible

    • @jollyrancher521
      @jollyrancher521 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@djsarg7451 William Wilson's Old Testament Word Studies says: "A day; it is frequently put for time in general, or for a long time; a whole period under consideration . . . Day is also put for a particular season or time when any extraordinary event happens.”

  • @edgargutierrez1844
    @edgargutierrez1844 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dr.Ross has been the most theist convincing man on earth.

  • @9jmorrison
    @9jmorrison 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Science is an important tool in the confirmation of my faith in Jesus Christ.

  • @Gods-bad-boy
    @Gods-bad-boy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Right on!!! What chuch is this?

  • @Vincent-ov1nr
    @Vincent-ov1nr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The dry time as opposed to the green time.

  • @MilfredTillman
    @MilfredTillman ปีที่แล้ว +5

    thank you sir question how can we have a picture of the milky way galaxy, unless someone was outside of the galaxy to photograph it ??????

    • @jakereimer2836
      @jakereimer2836 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They use observatories and satellites

    • @randilund2558
      @randilund2558 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jakereimer2836They say…!!!

    • @luisitooyos4528
      @luisitooyos4528 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Milky Way Galaxy photo shown was just a representation of what it might look like through mathematical or scientific computations on the bearings and coordinates of observable astronomical objects viewed from observatories and high-power telescopes.

    • @SamytheGreek
      @SamytheGreek 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It can't be done, no one said that it was a picture, they map the galaxy as best they can and put together a composite.

  • @djsarg7451
    @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you:
    Psalm 19:1 : The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
    Romans 1:20" For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God."

  • @cBetweenTheLines
    @cBetweenTheLines 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it’s beautiful to see how many warriors God has and how different they all are.

  • @Terrylb285
    @Terrylb285 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s funny how when it comes to Genesis ,people tend to set aside hermeneutical disciplines and rely on there western modern day understanding,thinking that they can infallibly come to the right interpretation based on something that was written thousands of years ago to a difference culture of whom the scriptures were written to.Dr Ross does a great job interpreting Genesis.

    • @kingofthemultiverse4148
      @kingofthemultiverse4148 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Are you being sarcastic? or do you really mean Dr.Ross is interpretatiing Genesis right?

    • @Terrylb285
      @Terrylb285 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kingofthemultiverse4148 I think exegetically an old earth interpretation is supported better biblically. And Gods creation (science) both go hand in hand . I think Dr Ross does an excellent job in letting the text speak for itself.

  • @pietervanzyl3339
    @pietervanzyl3339 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dr Ross, do you perhaps have a presentation explaining CERN?

    • @markb3786
      @markb3786 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CERN is a town where the LHC resides. LHC is a particle accelerator. We have particle accelerators in New York, Tennessee, Illinois and California. Maybe more. That is what comes to mind off the top of the head

  • @OscarRaphael-i4e
    @OscarRaphael-i4e 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We know whatever science says religion will send their people to give their different ideas just to keep their own beliefs.

  • @lennon_richardson
    @lennon_richardson 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You make a strong argument for the existence of God but I didn’t understand how this suggests Jesus as lord and savior.

    • @thilinagamage2569
      @thilinagamage2569 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This alone does not explain that. This basically explains diesm. He was assuming people in the audiance to have that extra knowledge and evidences for theism. Basically it is that, this God is personal and intervenes his creation, that's how Jesus comes into the picture.

  • @thomashummer7774
    @thomashummer7774 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The universe was created in just 6 days. Literal days. "...and there was evening and there was morning..." And God rested on the 7th day. There are profound mysteries about the person and nature of the infinite God of creation that we, as finite creations of His, cannot and will not ever understand. So when we try to use what is finite to try and explain what is infinite, we run the very real risk of error. So this is what has been done here. If you discount the historical accuracy of the first 11 or even the first 3 chapters of Genesis, you disqualify the truth of the entire Bible. God bless each one. The Word of God is the final authority. Live its profound and often mysterious truths. Love each other and our amazing God, with all your hearts souls minds and strength.

    • @botchvinik8668
      @botchvinik8668 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "universe created in 6 literal days" strikes me as utterly absurd.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
      Sunrise to sunset
      Sunset to next sunset
      Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
      We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
      Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
      The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hour.
      The Bible does not teach what you wrote you are quoting Ken Ham, not the Bible

    • @botchvinik8668
      @botchvinik8668 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@djsarg7451 How does "on the 7th day God rested" equate to the 7th day having not yet ended? What i mean is, who's to say it has a finite end point? If so, what does that imply, that God will resume His works after the end of day 7?

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to? Day 7 started after the creation of Eve and continues to today.

    • @botchvinik8668
      @botchvinik8668 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@djsarg7451 You didn't answer my question! All you did is deflect and ask me a question. Read my comment/question again and, if you can, give an answer.

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the field of biblical APOLOGETICS MAKE A
    COMPARISON BETWEEN THE BIBLICAL AGE OF
    JERICHO AND BIBLICAL AGE OF THE EARTH IN
    THE CHRISTIAN TEACHING OF THE SIX DAYS
    OF GENESIS. THANK YOU!

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
      Sunrise to sunset
      Sunset to next sunset
      Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
      We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
      Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
      The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hour.
      The Bible does not teach what you wrote you are quoting Ken Ham, not the Bible.

  • @peterstoll8366
    @peterstoll8366 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did Dr Hugh Ross mention the firmament as described in the Bible - or did I miss it?

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Biblical Hebrew has no word for universe, in the Bible “heaven and the earth” is always used to talk about the complete universe. “Firmament” is used in the King James Version. Why are you using an old (1500) translation? Modern translations do not use this: Genesis 1:7 “And God made the expanse and separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were above the expanse.” This is talking about what we now call the water cycle. Next, we are to use all of scripture when studying the Bible. Job 38 also writes about creation and helps us understand the darkness and water cycle.

  • @kaptaink1959
    @kaptaink1959 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the oxygen increase is interesting. does Dr Ross go into this in depth somewhere else?

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He has books on this topic. Improbable Planet: How Earth Became Humanity's Home

  • @marcomclaurin6713
    @marcomclaurin6713 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've made an observation that has been overlooked wich points to the accuracy of Scripture in my video 'Begining of understanding '
    I claim transmutation by electrical process of genetically superior creatures (Seraphim)
    My icon is a seraph kneeling for example and my channel is dedicated to giving examples of this

  • @adriel6421
    @adriel6421 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Psalm 14:2
    The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men,
    to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.
    Jeremiah 29:13
    And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.
    1 Corinthians 15:1-4
    Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you,
    which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
    By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you,
    unless ye have believed in vain.
    For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received,
    how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
    And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures
    1 John 1:8-10
    If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
    If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins,
    and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
    If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
    Romans 3:19-26
    Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law:
    that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.
    Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight:
    for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
    But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested,
    being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
    Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all
    and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
    For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
    Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
    Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood,
    to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past,
    through the forbearance of God;
    To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness:
    that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
    Isaiah 1:18
    Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord:
    though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow;
    though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
    Romans 10:9-11
    That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus,
    and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead,
    thou shalt be saved.
    For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness;
    and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
    For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
    John 3:15-18
    That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
    For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,
    that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
    For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
    He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already,
    because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
    John 3:3-7
    Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee,
    Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
    Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old?
    can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
    Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit,
    he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
    That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
    Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
    Romans 5:1-2
    Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
    By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
    John 14:6
    Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
    Galatians 1:3-5
    Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ,
    Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world,
    according to the will of God and our Father: To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
    Romans 10:17
    So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
    Jeremiah 6:10
    To whom shall I speak, and give warning, that they may hear? behold, their ear is uncircumcised,
    and they cannot hearken: behold, the word of the LORD is unto them a reproach; they have no delight in it.
    Zechariah 1:3
    Therefore say thou unto them, Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Turn ye unto me,
    saith the LORD of hosts, and I will turn unto you, saith the LORD of hosts.
    Be ye not as your fathers, unto whom the former prophets have cried, saying,
    Thus saith the Lord of hosts; Turn ye now from your evil ways, and from your evil doings:
    but they did not hear, nor hearken unto me, saith the Lord.
    Zechariah 7:11-12
    But they refused to hearken, and pulled away the shoulder,
    and stopped their ears, that they should not hear.
    Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law,
    and the words which the Lord of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets:
    therefore came a great wrath from the Lord of hosts.
    John 6:63
    It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you,
    they are spirit, and they are life.
    Matthew 13:15
    For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing,
    and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes,
    and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart,
    and should be converted, and I should heal them.
    Isaiah 55:6-7
    Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:
    Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts:
    and let him return unto the Lord, and he will have mercy upon him;
    and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.
    Romans 12:2
    And be not conformed to this world:
    but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind,
    that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
    James 1:25
    But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein,
    he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
    John 8:31-32
    Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word,
    then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth,
    and the truth shall make you free.

  • @Metysja1960
    @Metysja1960 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just wondering why everything in the universe rotate in disc form and not like a ball.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is not easy to visualize the universe. The universe is three space and one time dimensions. The three space dimensions are on the “surface” of the one-time dimension. The universe is expanding, space and time are expanding. It has been expanding since its creation. The Bible gives up a good word picture: Isaiah 40:22 “He stretches out the heavens like a canopy and spreads them out like a tent to dwell in” The Bible is the only Holly Book to tell us the universe expanding. Jer. 51:15 as it is the word of God.

  • @highpointsights
    @highpointsights 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What has JWST added to the cosmic scene?

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It has confirmed: . We now know that creation event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago. Thus to deny the existence of a Creator is an error.

  • @rjhinnj
    @rjhinnj ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hugh says what I say to atheists all the time; the possibility of an intelligent Creator and of intelligent design MUST be included in your presuppositions of the study of the universe and of life's existence, otherwise you are EXCLUDING this possibility, thus invalidating true scientific analysis and discovery, introducing presupposed bias.

    • @Terrylb285
      @Terrylb285 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rule number 1 for the atheist scientists.There is no God .If they discover something that suggests otherwise,see rule number 2 .The rule of number 2 is ,see rule number 1

  • @pamelavelasco7975
    @pamelavelasco7975 ปีที่แล้ว

    IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION HOW WAS ST JOHN ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE DRAGON. THANK YOU.

  • @stevefrei2588
    @stevefrei2588 ปีที่แล้ว

    Something you didn't know...
    God said, "If men gain the knowledge to question nature and wish to look closely at that which is too deep to see, ponder this riddle for it contains the hidden wisdom of my creation.
    Place the numbers 1 through 19 on six straight lines that intersect in such a way that adding any five numbers that form a straight line in the resulting pattern will equal 46."
    This is the number of the Kesbel, the principle part of the sacred oath named Beka, the oath of a Key that God revealed to Enoch before the great flood. It has been kept in secret since then by the ancient and secret brotherhood of the generations of the sons of Man for proof against the lies of those who seek our destruction.

    • @JGBSolutions
      @JGBSolutions ปีที่แล้ว

      What is the key for?

    • @stevefrei2588
      @stevefrei2588 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JGBSolutions to call upon the archangel Michael to complete his mission.

    • @malware_in_tn9008
      @malware_in_tn9008 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All of this is from the Book of Enoch, and despite my wanting there to be a historical record from Enoch, it is doubtful that this actually is, which is why it is non-canonical and not in most Bibles.
      Elsewhere in the Bible, we are told not to swear oaths at all, yet the Book of Enoch contradicts that in the same section where this code reference appears.

  • @jerryweatherby1171
    @jerryweatherby1171 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you reconcile "yom" (if it must indeed be a long period of time) with "evening and morning" in Genesis 1?

    • @Terrylb285
      @Terrylb285 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      OEC reconcile Yom as long period of time marked by an evening and morning same as YEC both believe in a literal 6 day creation just don’t agree which Yom definition is used.

    • @jerryweatherby1171
      @jerryweatherby1171 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Terrylb285 yes, that’s pretty obvious. The POSSIBLE meanings of “yom” is given as adequate support for an old earth, but less obvious is the support which the possible (actual linguistic) meaning(s) of “evening and morning, the second day” etc., give to an old earth. It seems as if we are to believe that Ross has done his due diligence in his exegesis of the text without the benefit of a plenary exposition of the entire passage. The immediate context of “yom” (one of the cardinal rules of interpretation) is “evening and morning”. How, exactly, does “evening and morning, the second yom”, etc., help us understand “yom” to mean “a very long, indeterminate length of time?”

    • @Terrylb285
      @Terrylb285 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jerryweatherby1171 Evening and morning in the Hebrew language means something was started and finished. There is no evening and morning for the seventh day we are still in it it .Heb 4.

    • @jerryweatherby1171
      @jerryweatherby1171 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Terrylb285 There are several widely (I would say universally) accepted principles of hermeneutics. Not the least of which is the principle that says that the simplest meaning is often the preferred meaning unless the simplest meaning would put the meaning of the text in violation or conflict with the other principles of hermeneutics. Since we are talking about the meaning of Hebrew words, isn’t it also possible that the simplest interpretation is that “yom” means a literal 24 hour period and “evening and morning “ mean literally evening and morning? Are there principles of hermeneutics that you can think of which would make it imperative for us to reject the simplest meaning in favour of some other meaning? If so, what principles would cause us to accept an alternative? To suggest that a sufficient cause (a possible meaning) is indeed a necessary cause (proof of the intended meaning) would be very poor reasoning.

    • @Terrylb285
      @Terrylb285 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jerryweatherby1171 yes the plain reading of the text that the earth is stationary and the sun revolves around the earth ,that view was held for almost 1500 years and it took the church almost 100 years to admit that there plain simple reading of the text was incorrect and corrected by scientific observation.

  • @dennishibbard9808
    @dennishibbard9808 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THE ANSWER to WHY In Hebrew and Greek and Demonstrably with a Piece of Paper without Writing or Manipulation in order to Acts 15:14-17

  • @Quick-n-eg쿠이크앤이지
    @Quick-n-eg쿠이크앤이지 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If we are made in the image of God, then it might be possible to turn other planets to become like earth by God's inspiration. The future generations will need to be educated in science and religion (faith). How can God give inspiration to pagans or to those who do not know Elohim?

  • @ciscodealmeida8541
    @ciscodealmeida8541 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Seven Mighty Elohim are the “seven Spirits of God” named in Revelation and the “morning stars” that sang together in the beginning, as the LORD revealed them to his servant Job. There are also five Elohim who surround the white fire core of the Great Central Sun. In the order of hierarchy, the Elohim and Cosmic Beings carry the greatest concentration, the highest vibration, of Light that we can comprehend in our state of evolution. They represent, with the four beings of nature, their consorts and the elemental builders of form, the power of our Father as the Creator

  • @xarqman
    @xarqman 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the Bible we have paul that contradicts Jesus! Have u looked into this ?
    Thank you for your work!

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We seem to ignore the fact that without the ATOMS
    Components NEUTRON AND ELECTRON AND PROTON
    Designed via the Intellectual INTELLIGENCE of the CREATOR there would be obviously NOTHING IN EXISTENCE TODAY!! We should place emphasis
    on the fine tuning of the ATOM?????

  • @VincentJayapaul
    @VincentJayapaul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So,for,this,message,was,not,telecosted,and,this, message,of,a, astrophysics,appears, suddenly,and,this,message,of,the,cosmic,beginning,is,really,a,creation,of,yeshua,ahmeshia,with,a, supernatural,spectacular, design,and,this, astrophysicst,comes,along,chuckmisler,andjohnhaggy, hallelujah,amen,

  • @John777Revelation
    @John777Revelation ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Regarding OoL research, virtually everything that the OoL scientists appear to be doing is Intelligent Design (i.e. use of Mind/Conscious/Intelligence); then claiming Methodological Naturalism (i.e. non-use of Mind/Conscious/Intelligence).
    *_”In biology, abiogenesis … or the origin of life (OoL) is the natural (i.e. non-intervention of consciousness or mind) process by which life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. The prevailing scientific hypothesis is that the transition from non-living to living entities on Earth was not a single event…”_* (Wikipedia)
    *_”This more traditional concept of natural things that can still be found today implies a distinction between the natural and the artificial, with the artificial being understood as that which has been brought into being by a human consciousness or a human mind.”_* ( Wikipedia)
    In order for OoL experiments to be a valid explanation for abiogenesis, then only “Prebiotically Relevant Chemistry” must be applied in the experiments. Investigator Interference or Intervention through the use of man-made chemicals, processes, equipment, etc. invalidates experiments from being considered pre-biotically relevant (i.e. before biology like the human mind) when explaining abiogenesis.

    • @BabyBugBug
      @BabyBugBug 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Precisely. It is ironic.

  • @Monjagetitonya
    @Monjagetitonya หลายเดือนก่อน

    lol! To correct an astrophysicist.. you mean November! 😉

  • @JohnDelong-qm9iv
    @JohnDelong-qm9iv 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about the great flood?

    • @UniteAgainstEvil
      @UniteAgainstEvil 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He believes it was a local flood.

    • @stefansekulic7903
      @stefansekulic7903 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The purpose of the flood was to wipe out the sinners. The oldest civilisations are in the Middle East where the flood took place. So there's no need for God to flood the entire globe if the ones he wanted to destroy were concentrated in one area.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hugh as a book on the Flood coming out soon.

  • @quintongengan3244
    @quintongengan3244 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dr Hugh Ross, I hope you know that the SUN IS NOT A STAR, GEN1.

    • @stefansekulic7903
      @stefansekulic7903 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is it,genius? Do you think a shooting star is a star?

  • @dominiqueubersfeld2282
    @dominiqueubersfeld2282 ปีที่แล้ว

    Navigating Trump Indictment With Dr. Hugh Ross | The Holy Spirit

  • @botchvinik8668
    @botchvinik8668 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But the Bible (New Testament) doesn't say/teach that "Jesus raised himself bodily from the dead". That's not possible. It was God who raised Jesus from the dead. That's what the Bible clearly tells us. It's also in complete harmony with what Jesus himself taught.

  • @aku7598
    @aku7598 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So you believe first human Adam with farming activities. Farming started 10,000 years ago prior to hunter-gatherering.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the last ice age the was very small scale farming and yes some only hunter-gatherering. What you are writing about is not farming but agriculture. Agriculture started in Mesopotamia, just as the Bible states.

    • @aku7598
      @aku7598 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @djsarg7451 Mesopotamia was just recently history, 10,000 years. Yes, Bibles is only telling stories about 10,000 ago. Old and New Stone Age do not exist in the bibles. But everywhere we know, there existed such humans from finding of archaeology.

  • @rajaknowles2287
    @rajaknowles2287 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Genesis is Literal a child can understand it.
    In six days God created the Heavens and The Earth.

    • @stefansekulic7903
      @stefansekulic7903 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No it was written that way in order to be understandable to the average person.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
      Sunrise to sunset
      Sunset to next sunset
      Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
      We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
      Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
      The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hour.
      The Bible does not teach what you wrote you are quoting Ken Ham, not the Bible.

  • @robertwessels9827
    @robertwessels9827 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just wondered if you have seen The Mazzaroth?

  • @douglascutler1037
    @douglascutler1037 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Genesis. Creation Story. The earth has liquid oceans BEFORE the creation of the sun . . . . whaaaa . . . . . . ?

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do not understand the words correctly. The Bible says "let there be light" This says nothing about creating the sun. The sun is back in Gen 1:1. The Bible tells you "darkness was on the surface of the Earth". It gives us the correct frame of reference, on earth above the ocean waters. Let there be light is telling us that the atmosphere went from opaque to transparent. The Book if Job as tells us about he dark clouds on early earth. Biblical Hebrew a small vocabulary than English. In biblical Hebrew, there is no word for universe. Instead, the Hebrew phrase that is translated “the heavens and the earth” is used to refer to the universe-the entirety of physical reality. The phrase is used thirteen times in the Old Testament, always referring to all matter, energy, space, and time the universe. We now know that event was 13.787 ±0.020 billion years. This has been checked, proven and measured with many tools and they all agree. It is not just space that came to be 13.787 billion years ago, but time also. The universe is finite and expanding. Just as the Bible stated thousands of years ago. To deny the existence of a Creator is an error.

  • @ees988
    @ees988 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍

  • @johncass3641
    @johncass3641 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still, no discussion of Evolution as proposed by Darwin?????????????????????

    • @stefansekulic7903
      @stefansekulic7903 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's wrong, what's there to discuss?

    • @johncass3641
      @johncass3641 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stefansekulic7903 For as long as you bend to a false authority, you will never know the truth.

  • @DustyMcFarland
    @DustyMcFarland 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hugh Ross teaches an old earth.. the earth is not that old

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
      Sunrise to sunset
      Sunset to next sunset
      Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
      We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
      Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
      The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hour.
      The Bible does not teach what you wrote you are quoting Ken Ham, not the Bible.

    • @DustyMcFarland
      @DustyMcFarland 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@djsarg7451 I studied Hugh Ross as well. You are quoting a lot of what he said. I know because I studied his material fervently and even would type out transcripts several pages long of his explanations on the physics of the universe because I also believed he was right. Though it's good to show to skeptics the argument of fine tuning, I still disagree with billions of years. The bible describes in Genesis Yom, but it explains that they had morning and evening. It's referring to the sense of 24 hour time period. Just because God rested on the 7th day doesn't mean the 7th day has to continue forever. The 8th day He can still be resting, and the 9th.. So on. I really don't like arguing with fellow believers about science and issues that aren't very detrimental to true doctrine, or at all. But the evidence for a young earth is overwhelming. All the things geologists say about the grand canyon and other processes taking millions of years can be refuted. There's marine fossils all through the strata of the GC for one example, with no channelling or erosion between layers that supposedly formed over millions of years. It happened as a deposit of lime sand etc. of the flood of Noah. They try to date stats with the current timeline of how fast sediment is deposited but currently it's very slow, but during catastrophic processes like a flood it's ALOT faster. Ex. Mount St. Helens eruption in 1980 deposited 600 feet of ash and elements forming small mountains that today are rock and have flora on them. We also find soft tissue in many fossils of dinosaurs. T rex, triceratops, even fish that are supposedly over a hundred million years old. All different studies all confirm they aren't as old as we thought. If sin came through Adam, and death through sin, why then are there dino fossils showing many ailments like arthritis, tumors, and various diseases, when we know those qualities are a result of a fallen world. Because they didn't live millions of years before Adam. Do you believe evolution to?

  • @berglen100
    @berglen100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul earlier NT than other written stories he knew OT (after woke from Saul ) he was reveled inside his woke unseen by flesh all OT allegories and psrables with dark sayings happen yesterday's, today's and tomorrow's so Paul was also written stories about the OT timelessness hide in TIME in TiMES 1The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem.2Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity. So ONE Unseen Spirit wrote all by awaken minds.

  • @jennifermeador171
    @jennifermeador171 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So...we're all supposed to work for SIX LONG, unspecified lengths of times & then rest for ONE LONG, unspecified length of time!? NO...."YOM" means a literal 24 hour period in Genesis 1, as our Creator RESTED on the 7th Day from the work that He had MADE over six 24 hour days, & we are to do the same (six days work/one day rest & worship - & it's STILL the 7th DAY Sabbath, as it was NEVER changed in Scripture & our Creator NEVER changes nor would He change a Commandment!!). Read & TEST all things according to Scripture!!

    • @nsnowman
      @nsnowman 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No, Yom means any part of the day, one 24 hour day, or 1 long period of time. That's literally what it means in Hebrew. You can still honor the 6 God-days of creation by resting on the 7th day of the week. I hope you realize that God's view of time is very different than ours right? He is eternal and literally created time. Not sure where the disconnect is but maybe pray for better understanding!

    • @stefansekulic7903
      @stefansekulic7903 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What's that got to do with anything? The average human lives 70-80 years so the command work six days and rest on the seventh is applied to humans not God.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
      Sunrise to sunset
      Sunset to next sunset
      Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
      We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
      Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
      The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hour.
      Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 ask you to?
      The Bible does not teach what you wrote you are quoting Ken Ham, not the Bible.

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Regarding the 6 days of GENESIS. There was the evening
    And then there was morning.
    I assume the evening brought DARKNESS and morning
    brought LIGHT
    NOW LET US TAKE A VERY PRECISE LOOK AT WHAT THE
    SCRIPTURE IS SAYING
    God called the LIGHT THE DAY Genesis 1::5
    God never said the darkness was to be referred to as the
    DAY Ther. efore in six segments of LIGHT AND
    NOT IN DARKNESS. DID GOD CREATE

    • @ermasale4618
      @ermasale4618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's nothing in scripture that the six segments of the LIGHT were of equal LENGTH nor does scripture state
      THE MEASUREMENT FOR EACH. PERIOD OF LIGHT
      There is no MEASUREMENT given for PERIOD
      Between evening and the morning
      The scripture gives absolutely no MEASUREMENT
      Of each light called the DAY

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
      Sunrise to sunset
      Sunset to next sunset
      Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
      We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
      Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
      The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hour.
      Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 ask you to?
      The Bible does not teach what you wrote you are quoting Ken Ham, not the Bible.

  • @ciscodealmeida8541
    @ciscodealmeida8541 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ya you see dark energy, i see light energy, so it depends on your sight development

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    01 Genesis = Creation, Evolution and Entropy. 010

  • @Twilisfriend
    @Twilisfriend 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jesus always referred to what was written as the starting point for all things-anything based otherwise is the beginning of erosion and deception

  • @Shytot-1
    @Shytot-1 ปีที่แล้ว

    While we are on the subject of fairy tales, can we discuss the brand of porridge the three bears were eating? then perhaps we could look into the breed of cow Jack exchanged for the beanstalk beans. It's been well known for a long time that the three little pigs were Gloucestershire Old Spots, so we don't need to go there.

    • @rjhinnj
      @rjhinnj ปีที่แล้ว

      … another skeptic refusing scientific methods, analysis and results, coming to the table with presuppositions of bias and skepticism, denying scientific discovery that is presented and the evidence it reveals. Keep eating your warm porridge to your own peril.

  • @oldseer7610
    @oldseer7610 ปีที่แล้ว

    There now exists two distinctly opposing understandings of biblical Creation. No others are possible. The universe contains only 2 things that everything can be derived from, material nature and spiritual nature. No other interpretations are possible but these two
    Discovery: Biblical creation is not the creation of a material universe. The things of creation are metaphors for spiritual nature not material nature. Over time and experience Old Seers have found spiritual interpretations to be correct. Material creation is incorrect.

  • @YeshuaisnotJesus
    @YeshuaisnotJesus ปีที่แล้ว

    If god has spoken, why is the world not convinced?

    • @SamytheGreek
      @SamytheGreek ปีที่แล้ว

      They'd sooner throw rocks at Him. its not for everyone.

    • @YeshuaisnotJesus
      @YeshuaisnotJesus ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SamytheGreek
      Mythology is for everyone or no one.

    • @rjhinnj
      @rjhinnj ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s called willful ignorance and unbelief; it’ll be to your own destruction

    • @YeshuaisnotJesus
      @YeshuaisnotJesus ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rjhinnj
      Ah yes, the creationist hate. You gotta love the ignorance of creationists.

    • @MaxPowers-so4rr
      @MaxPowers-so4rr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Explain the fastest growing church in Iran, India, Africa ect. I pray as a sweeping rain Jesus takes hold of stone cold hearts, shattering them to the will of Yeshua YHWH and the Holy Spirit!

  • @johnpinckney7269
    @johnpinckney7269 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr. Ross is simply wrong about Day 4. He wants to interpret the text to mean the sun and moon were already in existence before day 4 and just revealed. But "let there be" is a statement of creation, look at day 1. Let there be light, light was created, and every other time the phrase is used it means creation. "and God made two great lights...", doesn't get clearer than that. Dr. Ross needs to do this to have many years in each day, otherwise, the plants of day 3 die.

    • @luisitooyos4528
      @luisitooyos4528 ปีที่แล้ว

      God did not create the light because He Himself is the Light. When God said "let there be light", He allowed light to penetrate the thick layer of atmosphere of the earth from opaque to translucent through His supernatural ways and chain of events.

    • @johnpinckney7269
      @johnpinckney7269 ปีที่แล้ว

      The light of Genesis 1 is the stuff composed of photons it is part of the universe like water and dirt. Genesis 1 has a clear reading. Evening and morning have no meaning for day-ages. all the best
      @@luisitooyos4528

    • @shanli2693
      @shanli2693 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exodus 20:11 "For *in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is,* and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it." It sure sounds like literal 24 hour days. This would also refute the gap theory.

    • @johnpinckney7269
      @johnpinckney7269 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, Hugh Ross is just a mess. @@shanli2693

    • @SamytheGreek
      @SamytheGreek ปีที่แล้ว

      On a flat Earth?@@shanli2693

  • @theaardee
    @theaardee 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WHILE THESE GUYS WASTE TIME DEBUNKING GOD THEY CAN HAVE THEIR ANSWER ONCE THEY HUMBLE THEMSELVES AND REACH OUT. AND THEY WILL BE ANSWERED. GOD CERTAINLY IS A PERSONAL GOD. THAT SIMPLE. LET US PRAY....

  • @christol1981
    @christol1981 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why do U say U believe in God & his word, then U turn right around & deny a global flood? U say it was only evil people who were drowned, but the righteous on the earth did not drown? Well, that is totally absurd. IF that were true, why did all the animals go to where Noah was at and get on the ark? Why didn't they just go & hang out with the "good" people who didn't get drowned? Also, U make a liar out of God because he said in MORE THAN 1 PLACE that he was going to destroy ALL flesh upon the earth and ALL LIVING CREATURES and that he would destroy ALL that had breath on the earth! I believe when he says "ALL" he means all. The only exception was Noah, but we already know that from the word of God. Noah & his family were the only people that did not have their genome corrupted by the fallen angels. Everyone else had corrupt DNA and that is why they were drowned out, not to mention the fact that the fallen ones were corrupting the whole earth & filling it with violence.

    • @djsarg7451
      @djsarg7451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The flood is about people, not animals. God would not need to kill penguins, as mankind at the time had never even seen a penguin. This would be true for many animals. 2 Peter 2:5 "if he did not spare the ancient world when he brought the flood on its ungodly people".

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Leviticus 20:15,16,23 is the info given in the
    verse REASON FOR CONFUSION EXPERIENCED
    Among the evolution ist who believe that
    People evolved from the animal kingdom?
    While I have your ear and your attention I have
    One more thought about CREATING THE WORLD
    JOB 38:4&7 AND IN PSALM 19 DID GOD PUT THE
    SCIENCE OF SOUND INTO THE WORKS OF THE
    CREATION? REMEMBER GOD DIRECT ED THE
    ACCURATE AND VERY PRECISE USE OF THE
    SOUND EFFECTS TO SHOW ARMY MEN HOW TO
    BRING DOWN THE WALLS OF JERICHO!
    TODAY SOLDERS BREAK STEP WHEN CROSSING
    BRIDGE TO. PREVENT BRIDGE FROM COMING
    DOWN! When aircraft. especially JET'S.
    BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER THE NEARBY
    BUILDINGS SHAKE RATTLE AND THE.
    GLASS WINDOWS CRACK OR SHATTER!
    Question. Is. Did GOD use sound effects
    While CREATING the WORLD?
    Thank you for your time and consideration!