The Real Reason Tesla Developed The Megapack System!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ส.ค. 2022
  • The Real Reason Tesla Developed The Megapack System!
    Last video: Why Tesla Solar Is About To Take Over!
    • Why Tesla Solar Is Abo...
    ► Patreon: / theteslaspace
    ► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
    ► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
    ► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / @thespaceraceyt
    ►You can use my referral link to get 1,500 free Supercharger km on a new Tesla:
    ts.la/trevor61038
    Subscribe: / @theteslaspace
    Welcome to the Tesla Space, where we share the latest news, rumors, and insights into all things Tesla, Space X, Elon Musk, and the future!
    Instagram: / theteslaspace
    Twitter: / theteslaspace
    Business Email: tesla@ellify.com
    #Tesla #TheTeslaSpace #Elon
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 209

  • @curtiswfranks
    @curtiswfranks ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Just a little note: A megawatt-hour is a multiple of the joule and thus should not be written with the division sign, which would be megawatts per hour. Not a big deal, but thought that I would offer that up in case you care. :)

    • @zackscriven1
      @zackscriven1 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      We care!

    • @kkitzhaber
      @kkitzhaber ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes! Please use correct units of measure.

    • @spaceman081447
      @spaceman081447 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @Curtis Franks
      RE: "Not a big deal, . . ."
      It IS a big deal, especially in an article involving science & engineering issues. You beat me to it; thanks a lot!

    • @charlic2
      @charlic2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why not place these vertically? Cover with solar panel, place them adjacent lying, all to save on footprint

    • @1bdollars
      @1bdollars ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@charlic2 placing vertically makes them very hard to maintain or replace. The inconvenience far outweighs the benefits

  • @ruben34
    @ruben34 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Quick corretion:
    It is MWh and kWh, not MW/h.
    Watt is power, power multiplied by time is energy, so, kilowatt x hour = kWh

    • @huibu8987
      @huibu8987 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thx.
      Many do these basic mistakes.

  • @GET2222
    @GET2222 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Correction: The purpose of TESLA Megapack is to replace peeker plants. Within 90 days from start to finish, tesla mega pack can purchased and installed for $40 million and replace a peeker plant and predict when the grid will need energy before the grid does preventing a single black out or brown out. Energy is on demand and delivered within milliseconds.
    Peeker plants cost between $700M to $900M and takes between 6 & 7 years to build and then needs a lot of maintenance and talk hours to ramp back up with rolling brown outs and black outs.

    • @richaw42
      @richaw42 ปีที่แล้ว

      Peaker? Handles peak power demands.

    • @barracuda861
      @barracuda861 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      MTG should listen to this channel. She is afraid her AC, dryer, or fridge won't work with green energy. She said when the sun goes down it will be dark.

    • @GET2222
      @GET2222 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@richaw42 exactly. Peaker plants can take hours to come online, meanwhile, there’s a black out until it back online. My brother in-law works at one of the largest peaker plants in the Midwest. The KOCH Brothers own it. It’s a $4.5 billion peaker plant. TESLA mega packs were originally designed to mitigate peaker plants all together. Tesla instituted this in Australia years ago now when they were having crazy issues. Basically to Australia we will have a megapack installed within 100 days or it’s free (tesla finished it in 90 days). It balanced the grid supporting it in milliseconds and it was smarter than their actual grid where it began predicting and anticipating surges. Blew away everyone’s expectations saving them hundreds of million of dollars.

    • @GET2222
      @GET2222 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richaw42 peaker plants can’t scale power quickly. Peaker plants are actually really dumb. They take tons of man hours just to keep them working. Their software is terrible and the work can be very very manual.

    • @HansKeesom
      @HansKeesom ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@GET2222 It was so succesfull they made it a lot bigger

  • @bkinstler
    @bkinstler ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for this piece in particular - it’s a big help to be able to explain Tesla’s mission with clear, concise summaries like this one. Good work.

  • @ramshambo2001
    @ramshambo2001 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Wonder why they don't put solar panels over the battery packs? Would think the shade would be good for thr batteries and increase capacity

    • @barracuda861
      @barracuda861 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well I see the one account doesn't get you. But I'm going to try. I think, like you. I would make the Battery packs sit below ground, and the panels over and closer around to help shade them. It would put less strain on the cooling system. And below ground level will keep the sun from hitting all sides. I hope I was close, with a little of mine added.

    • @Legalize.Raping.Russian.Broads
      @Legalize.Raping.Russian.Broads ปีที่แล้ว

      @@barracuda861 You are so simple minded and uneducated, I hope for society’s sake that you are no older than 12-13 years old.. because if you are 13 years old (or older) than I feel extremely bad for your parents along with the public school system..
      Please tell me that you are indeed a very young and ignorant preteen.

    • @lengould9262
      @lengould9262 ปีที่แล้ว

      Washing the solar panels might negatively affect the megapacks.

    • @gregripp
      @gregripp ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lengould9262 They are designed for the outdoors.

    • @lengould9262
      @lengould9262 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gregripp I know, but still a consideration likely to outweigh the miniscule potential benefit of PV on the surface area. Watertight access mandoors good for decades are not to be trifled with.

  • @yairmazza2135
    @yairmazza2135 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You're an amazing TH-cam channel. Thank you for the high quality content.

  • @altair1405
    @altair1405 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    using the energy we produce in more or less the same second since we can produce it and not storing it is so mind boggling to me

    • @steneox2392
      @steneox2392 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s not even seconds, it’s instant, microseconds!

  • @alexl314
    @alexl314 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's not MW/h, it's MWh (unit of energy is a unit of power times unit of time)

    • @spaceman081447
      @spaceman081447 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Alex Lifshitz
      RE: "It's not MW/h, it's MWh (unit of energy is a unit of power times unit of time)"
      You beat me to it; thanks a lot!

    • @brettbolen
      @brettbolen ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah. it bugs me too.

  • @DimaZheludko
    @DimaZheludko ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Please, never divide Megawatts by hours, ok? 7:23

  • @energyeve2152
    @energyeve2152 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing ^_^ always enjoy the great productions!

  • @damitcam
    @damitcam ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I think the megapack will serve its purpose so will it will cause competition which is only a good thing

  • @sanjayraval3165
    @sanjayraval3165 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Exceptional video & amazing way to explain what MEGA PACK means to TESLA!
    Thanks for your time & efforts

  • @johnpoldo8817
    @johnpoldo8817 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for the technical description of peaker plants. I always thought the main utility had a simple standby generator, but now know better. To replace a peaker plant, a solar (or wind) farm and mega pack is needed.

    • @scottsuhr2919
      @scottsuhr2919 ปีที่แล้ว

      The grid needed peaker plants before the green revolution. For the exact same reasons: to take care of peak usage that the big power plants either didn't have the capacity for, or when demand increased suddenly. California has more flexible capacity than it needs, because of over building of these peaker plants (we don't need more peakers BECAUSE of solar.) A bigger source of our deficiency is because we, without planning, turned off San Onofre rather than pay to replace a defective (brand new) heat exchanger.

  • @testbild9652
    @testbild9652 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It is MWh and kWh. NOT MW/h or kW/h !!!

  • @raysolpv
    @raysolpv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THE ONE TO LEAD THE INNOVATION 👍👍

  • @user-nc6dp4tx6z
    @user-nc6dp4tx6z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good information about Tesla's Megapack . I like it 👌

  • @altair1405
    @altair1405 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    u can't do good energy trading without storing the energy

  • @Iceworm72
    @Iceworm72 ปีที่แล้ว

    I drove by the Soldotna Alaska MegaPack installation this last weekend.

  • @erikbarsingerhorn4485
    @erikbarsingerhorn4485 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The image @05:01 is not a peaking plant, it is a blast furnace!

    • @spaceman081447
      @spaceman081447 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Erik Barsingerhorn
      RE: "The image @05:01 is not a peaking plant, it is a blast furnace!"
      Good catch! That implies that the entire presentation is a "green" propaganda piece, which is not particularly surprising since the channel is called The Tesla Space.

  • @jimparr01Utube
    @jimparr01Utube ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So great to see practical (and green) solutions implemented quickly. Very important.
    Now the US Government REALLY, REALLY needs to put up the funds to ruggedize the electrical grid against both rolling blackouts and EMP/solar-flare attacks (perfectly practical and not expensive on the amalgamated budget).
    Then the US would have a vastly increased probability of withstanding many natural and other disasters without scenarios like occurred in Texas a while back.
    It is now obvious that the rapidly increasing frequency of unseasonal and extreme weather events due to climate change is a SERIOUS challenge. We need (globally) to ensure we insure our collective future against this trend.

  • @benwatson5211
    @benwatson5211 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    LFP will solution will be short lived. Sodium Iron batteries are looking at being about 1/4 the price. CATL have move to the production phase for this chemistry...

    • @altair1405
      @altair1405 ปีที่แล้ว

      because we have a real battery shortage we can produce max LFP and max sodium ion batteries and there is still more demand for those batteries than production
      sodium ion has a bad wh/l even compared to LFP --> sodium ion is good for energy storage and not that good for vehicles

    • @chrisheath2637
      @chrisheath2637 ปีที่แล้ว

      The chemistry doesn't really matter - it's the scaling up to huge amounts that will create a sustainable future. All types that ramp to scale ( at reasonable cost etc.) can be used in one application, or another...

  • @alwaysfaithfully6
    @alwaysfaithfully6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would love to have a conversation with Elon, thank you in advance

  • @donpasulka
    @donpasulka 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video!

  • @goldviper5280
    @goldviper5280 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    another great video. Really like what you are saying here and what Elon is doing.

  • @Reelmoana
    @Reelmoana ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tesla 💙🥤

  • @GB-ob5zx
    @GB-ob5zx ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not sure you covered the full math of gas vs battery. So with batteries the utilities will have 4 hours to repair a downed electrical system. What am I missing. Does bigger pack just mean more batteries in a box?

  • @CHOPSHOPX
    @CHOPSHOPX ปีที่แล้ว

    As a Tesla investor and hopefully a soon owner I love this company and this channel. I live in South Florida on the east coast and have seen the explosion of Tesla's on the road. The Florida turnpike now has Tesla Superchargers at every rest stop. Florida Power and Light (FPL) which is Next era Energy (NEE) uses alot of solar and nuclear power but I haven't seen any thing Tesla. Maybe this will change Solar power and Nuclear power are the best, the wind mills kill to many birds and are eye sores, it would be nice to see them go the way of the Dodo bird.

  • @asmael666
    @asmael666 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It ist GW*hr, not GW/hr

  • @vwasson6725
    @vwasson6725 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One more step closer to green as we can get technology!!!! Go Tesla Go!!!! Hey, you there on the sidelines. When are you going to get started? There's plenty of business out here for you too.

  • @94.13.productions.
    @94.13.productions. ปีที่แล้ว

    Making these is so much fun

  • @frodekleppe3884
    @frodekleppe3884 ปีที่แล้ว

    A really great video on a somewhat boring topic. Well do

  • @howardjohnson2138
    @howardjohnson2138 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @rodwanker4517
    @rodwanker4517 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    grid level flow batteries like those built by ESS Tech of Wilsonville, OR are cheaper, longer lasting and more eco friendly than lithium-iron batteries.

  • @Speedy03101985
    @Speedy03101985 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For short term energy storage battery system like the megapack will have a very important role. However, for long time storage like summer/winter, they will be much to expensive and will have to many drawbacks. Other systems will take this role

  • @matthewhuszarik4173
    @matthewhuszarik4173 ปีที่แล้ว

    The problem with Li-ion batteries for energy storage is the limited number of full cycles. For small amounts of immediate reserve they may make since, but for long term storage there are far better solutions.

  • @JS-oy6nn
    @JS-oy6nn ปีที่แล้ว

    Can’t wait to see a mega pack catch on fire 🔥 should be quite a sight.

    • @arielhermoso4262
      @arielhermoso4262 ปีที่แล้ว

      JS. 5 : Maybe a built in fire retardant system was installed...

  • @ryansweeney9508
    @ryansweeney9508 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    MUSK DO BUSINESS WITH SCOTLAND!!!!!

  • @MM-fe9mz
    @MM-fe9mz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seems odd Tesla is building the mega pack factory in California instead of Texas.
    Would be curious to hear the real story of the Nevada factory, definitely hasn't expanded like initially planned. Seems workers dont want to live there or some kind serious underlying issue

  • @1987moto
    @1987moto ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't these containerised mega packs be stacked vertically kinda what we see in ports/harbour.probably this might be due to cable layout,cooling layout, structual integrity,ease of access.
    if so, How about repurposing retired coal power plants to stack mega packs which offers floor area of 25*30 mtrs comes with a total height of 70metres max, with over 10 floors.

  • @ChrisSmith-tc4df
    @ChrisSmith-tc4df ปีที่แล้ว

    LFP isn't a new chemistry, but it's decades old having been used as new-fangled replacements for PbA in telcom applications.

  • @albuslee4831
    @albuslee4831 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the Discord memebers Humor level seems to be world class.

  • @LifeMyWay007
    @LifeMyWay007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not understanding the Megapack "Upgrades" 30% more power, 64% more weight, 100% more price.
    Are they changing the Chemistry? (edit - yup I posted question before finishing the video)
    Doesn't the Software Throttle the Output as required, why would you need to have separate units for 0.8MW or 1.9MW output? Or is the "Duration" line there for people who have no idea what they are looking at, but still curious?

  • @jamesfuntravels
    @jamesfuntravels ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The problem that I see is that you make the terrible case for the peeker plant but the batteries in the Megapack don't just appear from thin air or by magic. You have to dig up all the materials to the make the batteries from the ground and use electricity to make them. So, is one really better than the other?

    • @lostchild2003
      @lostchild2003 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dug by toddlers digging with their bare hands right?

  • @Jam-In-With-Ben
    @Jam-In-With-Ben ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi

  • @sambhudas8529
    @sambhudas8529 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clean and green energy to safeguard the earth

  • @sterling1395
    @sterling1395 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is all great and dandy, and I love the idea of storing power, but we have to remember something, environmental impact cannot be the argument. The environmental impact made to mine all of the rare earth elements that go into the battery pack is insane. I believe just the loader alone needed to move the earth required to mine all the lithium burns something like 18,000 gallons of diesel in a 12 hour shift. Then you double or triple a quadruple that for all of the other heavy equipment involved, and then don’t forget all of the semi‘s on the road that are required to move the material, and the ships required to ship it from other nations to here. That is just one shift on one day, there are two shifts every day, seven days a week, 350 days a year. To say the battery pack is a green alternative is just shortsighted. Is it a great idea? Of course. It is absolutely something that we should be doing, but it cannot be argued for in the idea of fundamentalism. Need to be argued for in the idea of maintenance, uptime, the humane impact that it has on the power grid, and other things like that. Environmentally, batteries are absolutely terrible for the environment, and something to remember is that amongst the thousands of cells inside of these giant batteries if one goes bad, then the whole battery is crippled.

    • @andyfeimsternfei8408
      @andyfeimsternfei8408 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are so right, it is so much more environmentally friendly to drill oil halfway around the world, fight trillion dollar wars to secure it, transport it to refineries to use massive amounts of energy to refine gas and diesel, transport it in tractor trailers to pump into an ICE vehicle to burn a 10% efficiently or 20% in a peaker plant.

  • @toddmarshall7573
    @toddmarshall7573 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:18 "...the total energy capacity is 730 MW/Hr...": Why the slash ( / ) ???

  • @FarmtheSunUSA
    @FarmtheSunUSA ปีที่แล้ว

    The Tesla Semi can pull 82,000 lbs. Seems that the weight of the megapack is over the load limit.

  • @Comin_at_U_Live
    @Comin_at_U_Live ปีที่แล้ว

    What about those container sized liquid batteries.

  • @pineallapis
    @pineallapis ปีที่แล้ว

    LFP Rules!!

  • @squashduos1258
    @squashduos1258 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why don’t they put a roof above the mega packs and have solar above the mega packs?!! Faster transfer and less loss of energy into the mega packs as well…just a thought….

  • @stevedebbiemoore
    @stevedebbiemoore 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just wondering if I can fit one in my back garden😂

  • @United_Wings
    @United_Wings ปีที่แล้ว

    GG

  • @bobdeverell
    @bobdeverell ปีที่แล้ว

    Your article is focused on 'peaker' power and grid regulation. While this is an important economic contributor, it is not the key reason holding up widespread use of renewable power. You must determine the % availability you require from an electric grid.
    (eg. %99, %99.9, %99.999)
    Then:
    You must estimate the amount of storage needed to cover the worst case outage profiles.
    (for example how often will the wind calm for say 1 week. It is once per 1 year, one in 50 years or 1 in century etc).
    Most countries face weather events when the wind does not blow or the sun is cloudy for up to 4 or 5 days. Therefore for a %100 renewable system, the grid must contain sufficient storage to sustain a 4 -5 day outage if we are to dispense with all fossil fuel back-up. Else we raise our costs by duplicating generation.
    I cannot see anyway of using todays best Megapak technology to bridge a 24 hour outage at anything but a colossal cost. The idea is simply risible.
    The implication of this is that fossil fuel generation to back up solar and wind results in unnecessarily high energy costs.
    If we want to reduce costs we need to phase out all public wind and solar generation and use a more rational and cost-effective way to generate electricity.

  • @farvision
    @farvision ปีที่แล้ว

    LOL 3:54 cooling ON GAS!!! OOPS! !

  • @zdme4864
    @zdme4864 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Put that mega pack where the sun don’t shine! ( sorry I could not resist the childish temptation to troll you ) !
    This was a great clear explanation of the mega pack product and opportunity for Tesla to become a utility… with the optional opportunity to also pay us for power individually from power walls and solar panels and sell back power to the grid profitably ( as I understand it is now being offered with consumer authorized software that allows Tesla to access power during peak grid demand ).

  • @cmilkau
    @cmilkau ปีที่แล้ว

    As the old spec was a 4h pack, it would have been better to compare with a 4h pack, no?

  • @KingLarbear
    @KingLarbear ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to see a stackable version because it would take up less space

    • @shanebirt1
      @shanebirt1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would probably be too heavy to do that. Plus the packs themselves are so large that most of them can only be hauled 1 high on a flat bed trailer anyways.

    • @jmattoxriskpro
      @jmattoxriskpro ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m sure its possible. Generally space is not constrained enough to bring out cranes to stack them and make maintenance more difficult

    • @timsteinkamp2245
      @timsteinkamp2245 ปีที่แล้ว

      Especially on a hillside. I have a property that goes from 100 ft to 200 ft. I'm wondering if you would need to install a steel girder or base or use concrete. Many hillsides can do a two stack with a maintenance on opposite ends. On top of that add a tiny home. :-)

  • @rowland5951
    @rowland5951 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tesla Energy the amazon web services equivalent to Tesla.

    • @altair1405
      @altair1405 ปีที่แล้ว

      i would say that dojo as a service is the equivalent to aws
      but aws made amazon profitable so its not really the same

  • @MattRaphael
    @MattRaphael ปีที่แล้ว

    The wind does always BLOW. Otherwise it isnt wind

  • @oscarholman
    @oscarholman ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone explain to me that renewables plus storage without subsidies is cost effective with fossil fuels without a carbon tax?
    Unless you can prove this, these solutions won’t be implemented in any meaningful way where it counts.
    In the developing world.

  • @jamesdillon3320
    @jamesdillon3320 ปีที่แล้ว

    HEY!! Just think if a "mini commune" got together on a piece of "cheap land " with no services and a bunch of "tiny homes" with adventurous and hard working members, with residents "way smarter than me'!! They could power the whole community with wind and solar!! They could power water creation and filtering along with "electrical incineration of human waste"!! Just think of the instant affordable scaling that could take place!! Affordable land within commute of a small or medium sized city!! All travel would be sustained with power created by the residents and their EV's, which would act as further storage of the off-grid power supply!! Something to ponder!! GIDDYUP!!

    • @timsteinkamp2245
      @timsteinkamp2245 ปีที่แล้ว

      Human waste is not pollution and does not need to be incinerated. Just put it back in the ground. I mean what are you eating that makes it so toxic? Recycle it even macerate it and fertilize your flower garden. Drill a well for water. So much water is wasted flushing it down to the sewer plant. Sewer pipes are so large people use it for garbage.

    • @doorwhisperer
      @doorwhisperer ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timsteinkamp2245 Sewer pipes are large for a reason

    • @timsteinkamp2245
      @timsteinkamp2245 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@doorwhisperer Sewer pipes were sized when toilets flushed with multi gallons of water along with showers and faucets. With low flow water fixtures it is hard to get enough water to clean the sewer pipes. I'm no expert on it.

  • @lengould9262
    @lengould9262 ปีที่แล้ว

    Obviously designed to validate the whole renewable energy concept.

  • @crewser004
    @crewser004 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wait, rain water is poisonous?

    • @blizzy78
      @blizzy78 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends on the quantity.

    • @EtherFox
      @EtherFox ปีที่แล้ว

      Not always or absolutely. Definitely don't drink rainwater in a metro areas prone to smog. That's about it, narrator/writer was just being alarmist.

  • @toddmarshall7573
    @toddmarshall7573 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:12 "...all rain is poison now in case you haven't heard...": My body just went into convulsions. It's been drinking rainwater for nearly 20 years now...unfiltered and untreated in any way. Should I call 911?

    • @runeoveras3966
      @runeoveras3966 ปีที่แล้ว

      «Rainwater almost everywhere on Earth has unsafe levels of ‘forever chemicals’, according to new research.
      Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large family of human-made chemicals that don’t occur in nature. They are known as ‘forever chemicals’ because they don’t break down in the environment.
      They have non-stick or stain repellent properties so can be found in household items like food packaging, electronics, cosmetics and cookware.
      But now researchers at the University of Stockholm have found them in rainwater in most locations on the planet - including Antarctica. There is no safe space to escape them.»
      So: I would not drink rainwater.

  • @brendanpells912
    @brendanpells912 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question. Why didn't Musk use a combination of wind turbines, solar panels and megapacks to power the SpaceX site at Boca Chica? Why did he have a 250MW gas-fired power station instead? Using batteries to stabilise the energy grid just shows how fragile the grid is, but that's what happens when they're built by private utility companies rather than state-owned.

    • @jmattoxriskpro
      @jmattoxriskpro ปีที่แล้ว

      Focus

    • @brendanpells912
      @brendanpells912 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jmattoxriskpro Focus. As in he has more important things to think about? Given that Tesla solar panels and megapacks are an established products I don't see why it would be a diversion. He doesn't have to do anything other than authorise the budget. Maybe it's the likely cost that put him off.

    • @timsteinkamp2245
      @timsteinkamp2245 ปีที่แล้ว

      First understand that 50% of 11 Western States are controlled by the Federal Government and I think they own all the land around there. Getting the state to do things takes years and private companies make decisions. I suppose every building could be covered in panels but even his Giga factory is not "covered". Does this power plant also power the island there?

    • @brendanpells912
      @brendanpells912 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timsteinkamp2245 C'mon, this is Texas. If they don't mind SpaceX incinerating endangered species, I don't think they'd object to a few square miles being covered in solar panels. Electricity is also easily transmissible, so the solar farm doesn't have to right next to Boca Chica

  • @lucidmoses
    @lucidmoses ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is an issue with replacing the peaker plant with mega packs. That is, peaker plants generate electricity. mega packs do not. So you have to build more electricity plants on top of storage via mega packs. Mega packs are more like other storage devices, pumped hydro for example.

    • @julianbroughton
      @julianbroughton ปีที่แล้ว

      I think grid surplus during low demand hours will be enough to cover supplimenting peak hours (about 6hrs).

    • @lucidmoses
      @lucidmoses ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julianbroughton If that was the case, they would never use peaker plants.

    • @julianbroughton
      @julianbroughton ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lucidmoses the problem was always storage. Battery tech wasn't good enough until recently. Also it was too expensive. The grid isn't constantly at its max output. Also everything that's producted isn't used. For instance at night when people are sleeping there is a surplus of electricity that isn't being used that will be lost bc there isn't storage. Now the real question is that surplus enough to cover peak hours?

  • @hectorkeezy1499
    @hectorkeezy1499 ปีที่แล้ว

    Elon,as usual, made the Ultimate splash. When He fixed the problem in Australia. No cure, No pay. As far as I know,they havent demanded thier money back.🇩🇰🐶🙋🏻‍♂️💫👩🏻‍🚀

  • @shimmy1984
    @shimmy1984 ปีที่แล้ว

    3rd

  • @cmilkau
    @cmilkau ปีที่แล้ว

    Chemical battery cells are great for storing energy for a few hours. For longer storage, they are way too expensive, even if prices come down significantly. Also we probably don't have the capacity to make that many batteries and get that much material. For shorter storage, there are also cheaper alternatives (with even lower capacity but also lower cost per MWh).

    • @yvanpajevic9680
      @yvanpajevic9680 ปีที่แล้ว

      WRONG! TESLA IS CHANGING ALL OF THIS! THAT'S WHY MOST OF US ARE WATCHING THIS!

  • @tranthiaoyen431
    @tranthiaoyen431 ปีที่แล้ว

    đẳng cấp excellent💐💐🌹🌹🌻🌻🍇🍈🍉🍊🍋🍌🥭🍎🍏🍐🍑🍒🍓🫐

  • @gregripp
    @gregripp ปีที่แล้ว

    WIND TURBINE!!! Not windmill. Unless you're milling grain.

  • @dougmartin8641
    @dougmartin8641 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Peeker power plants are generally natural gas turbines driving a generator. They are relatively inexpensive to construct, inexpensive to operate (natural gas bing relatively cheap until late), very responsive (turbines react in seconds not minutes or hours) and have relatively clean exhaust (just CO2).
    Renewables are cheap to implement initially. As renewables become predominant energy storage becomes essential. The size and scope of the energy storage element is what will drive up the cost of a green power system.
    Green energy is the direction we must go both domestically and globally. Tesla’s power packs are a great solution available at the right time.

    • @timsteinkamp2245
      @timsteinkamp2245 ปีที่แล้ว

      So gas is relatively clean just CO2 but not quite green enough? I agree we most likely have man influenced global warming but how much is from cloud seeding or other nefarious things being done to our environment by different warring countries? I mean they (bad guys) do it then blame it on the people driving their cars. We maybe scapegoats in a process that will never be solved.

  • @cmilkau
    @cmilkau ปีที่แล้ว

    What is so effin hard about getting power and energy units right? It's a 1 minute lookup. *hits all those slashes with a mace. repeatedly.*

  • @MarkXHolland
    @MarkXHolland ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tesla aren't going to produce a 25k car while they have virtually unlimited demand for their current models at higher prices. If they did so, waiting times would get silly.

    • @blizzy78
      @blizzy78 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The demand is not only virtual, it is real 😄

    • @BingChlilling
      @BingChlilling ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they can‘t produce it yet, because the 4680-Batteries are not scaled up yet + the 25k car wouldn‘t be at Launch 25k, because the production lines for the car are not ramped up but it would get cheaper over time

    • @billweberx
      @billweberx ปีที่แล้ว

      $25K needs to be adjusted for inflation. There may never be an actual $25K car from Tesla. Inflation never sleeps.

    • @MarkXHolland
      @MarkXHolland ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blizzy78 I didn't say the demand was virtual, I said it was virtually unlimited. 😋

    • @altair1405
      @altair1405 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      why $25k car if u can have $25k just for fsd ;)

  • @VAMobMember
    @VAMobMember ปีที่แล้ว +3

    OK, so why don’t we put the Megapacks in a multistory buildings
    Idling to take less land. In places with high population density like LA or SD that would free up land for other use. You could even put the Megapacks under solar panels.

    • @4literv6
      @4literv6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or solar panels/solar flowers on top of the megapacks, which are on top of empty parking garages in every city everywhere around the world to run those energy hog buildings. They should be super smart and adapt the megapack to be in a shipping sized container and then they could be easily moved anywhere around the entire world that can handle shipping containers. 👍🏻

    • @backacheache
      @backacheache ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I am sure you could, and it wouldn't be much more than a software configuration to tell it to keep the lights and elevators running in an emergency giving them a valuable second job

    • @_TheDudeAbides_
      @_TheDudeAbides_ ปีที่แล้ว

      Try that with your battery pack company and you can tell us how it was.

    • @billweberx
      @billweberx ปีที่แล้ว

      Who pays for the building? How much longer will installation take if you have to build a building first? It's not like their putting them in high cost real estate locations.

    • @chrisheath2637
      @chrisheath2637 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      40 tons each ? I suspect that's a specially designed building...

  • @tombalabomba03
    @tombalabomba03 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really, like a barrel of water? Now I understand :D this content isn't at all regurgitated and stretched out with redundant info :D

  • @xDrywall
    @xDrywall 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    😐 A megapack?! 😏🍷/ Johnny Depp

  • @gunselicetin9231
    @gunselicetin9231 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol, he made a shiny UPS. Ok...

  • @micahimpanis3713
    @micahimpanis3713 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Low capacity and resource intensive compared to LFTR.

  • @thekinarbo
    @thekinarbo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey, Mr windmill dude, how much lithium will be required replace all coal, gas and nuclear power plants?
    Also, without human intervention, the longterm trend is for CO2 to gradually diminish. Plants begin to die when CO2 is at .015 percent of the atmosphere. Assuming we reach zero CO2 emissions, what do you suggest we do when CO2 reaches 150ppm or .015% of the atmosphere?
    CO2 never has and never will drive changes in climate. You've swallowed the kool-aid. Search "Jim jones and kool-aid" if you want to know what that phrase means.

  • @jimjam36695
    @jimjam36695 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is making the LFP batteries for the California Mega Pack factory? ...To my knowledge, Tesla has not manufactured any LFPs.

  • @sahngcobo
    @sahngcobo ปีที่แล้ว

    why governments wont get this ...

  • @nerdwatch1017
    @nerdwatch1017 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Again I’ll say this is why we should still have the infrastructure to be able to use both fossil fuels or natural gas but with much investment in capturing the co2 & methane that basically nothing is released but the energy made!! Why’ll also having the green energy infrastructure like Solar & wind!! Which will be better used when some kinda deal can be made between Musk with his solar products and the home building industry that can set up all future homes to be built with the solar roof and the normal gear but not the gear for an electric car!! Those with those electric cars can then afford to have that gear installed!! This deal needs to get done when smart leadership like the last 4 years before 1/20/21 sadly with these kind of democratic leadership they won’t want to make this happen because they rather enjoy taking much more in taxes so this kind of idea won’t happen because to many people enjoy the $ the get in this type of home price’s!! With the right & Smart leadership this plan can get done!! & with having every roof being a solar roof!! Then it will largely benefit everyone especially those in the middle to lower class who can save much money of there electric bills as well as selling energy. Also with lower taxes and no inflation and the prices of goods and gasoline down to there all time lows we will be better off then how we have been in the passed!! Lastly as for other energy sources we should have better designed windmills & be made in the USA safer and better & cleaner!! Along with access to Nuclear energy also!! Along with water damns geothermal energy!!! And then when we figure out the technology needed then we can have large scale solar platforms in space capturing true solar energy that can be transmitted down to earth!!!

    • @berringtonfox5628
      @berringtonfox5628 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great... I'm thinking more and more of using Megapack as a viable alternative for my factory needs.
      Kudos to Elon Musk and his talented team!

    • @spaceman081447
      @spaceman081447 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Nerd watch 101
      RE: ". . . smart leadership like the last 4 years before 1/20/21 . . ."
      If you think that Trump was "smart leadership," then I feel sorry for you.

  • @howardjohnson2138
    @howardjohnson2138 ปีที่แล้ว

    PLEASE learn how to properly pronounce the name of the state of NEVADA. Thank you

  • @Random-em7oz
    @Random-em7oz ปีที่แล้ว

    First

    • @shimmy1984
      @shimmy1984 ปีที่แล้ว

      asfd!

    • @Random-em7oz
      @Random-em7oz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shimmy1984 what?

    • @shimmy1984
      @shimmy1984 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Random-em7oz yes exatly

    • @shimmy1984
      @shimmy1984 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Random-em7oz zackly!!!🥵

    • @Random-em7oz
      @Random-em7oz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shimmy1984 stop it. And Go listen to some Andrew Tate

  • @Comin_at_U_Live
    @Comin_at_U_Live ปีที่แล้ว

    CO2 is plant fertilizer and necessary to keep plants & trees alive. CO2 is not a greenhouse gas in fact it is heavier than air and immediately sinks to the ground where plants and trees can remove from the atmosphere and store the carbon so it can be used later.. earth's atmosphere currently has only 403ppm at ground level which is barely enough to keep trees alive. In fact anyone growing plants commercially needs to release huge amounts of CO2 into the growing rooms in order to get plants to grow at their best and healthiest. They grow faster taller, stronger, and more productive. Many plants grow best with CO2 levels of 1500ppm .. before the great meteor impacts on earth the ice core samples show much higher CO2 levels and huge plants and trees, animals and humans were not just bigger too but lived much longer than we do today.. heck not just bigger plants but even the milipedes and dragonfly wings were 6 foot.. think of the giants in the olden times and people living hundreds of years.. so yeah We need more CO2 and they know this or their solution wouldn't just be a tax on humanity.. what a scam. If co2 was any real problem we would all be planting trees not paying a tax to the rich elite for breathing "their" air.. fuck them

    • @timsteinkamp2245
      @timsteinkamp2245 ปีที่แล้ว

      You said it. The people are brainwashed and it will be like getting them out of a cult. You know how they are so smart and you can't tell the kids anything. That is the real crime of humanity, being able to control their minds. They are so afraid they allow the government to keep secrets from them for security from death I guess. They blindly go into a fascist control of their lives. Then we have the Evangelicals and they just sit back waiting for Jesus to come save them or be raptured. Good Lord.

  • @ryansweeney9508
    @ryansweeney9508 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A WOULD love Elon musk to do business with SCOTLAND!! Because SCOTLAND is the leading on wind and hydro in EUROPE so what Scotland is missing is THIS !!!!!!!

    • @billthebuilder1579
      @billthebuilder1579 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love Scotland. Making my third visited in October from Chattanooga, TN USA

    • @jmattoxriskpro
      @jmattoxriskpro ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m sure you guys can buy some.

  • @jasongooden917
    @jasongooden917 ปีที่แล้ว

    they should put them in an underground facility instead of taking up so much land

    • @jmattoxriskpro
      @jmattoxriskpro ปีที่แล้ว

      Good thing these are not lithium ion

  • @rodmartin-nl8ns
    @rodmartin-nl8ns 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nar won't work solar works 8hr macks 16 hrs required batteries will not last

  • @barracuda861
    @barracuda861 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the near future they will probably put a unit in space that will be like a large sail. It will collect sunlight and send it back to earth using microwave, or a tethered cable.

  • @R0bobb1e
    @R0bobb1e ปีที่แล้ว

    Could the MegaPacks go underground? That way they wouldn't be using valuable surface space...

    • @EtherFox
      @EtherFox ปีที่แล้ว

      You'd have to develop additional (expensive) infrastructure to do it. You can't just bury them, they can't be submerged and need to be accessed occasionally for maintenance/repair.

    • @billweberx
      @billweberx ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a tiny space compared to the massive field of solar panels it's supporting. Also, it would be a huge overhead to installations that isn't needed. Finally, you would have to provide a large cooling system to exhaust the heat.

    • @jmattoxriskpro
      @jmattoxriskpro ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m guessing you have never driven across the US :) the space is negligible

    • @altair1405
      @altair1405 ปีที่แล้ว

      that sound like a loot of fun for maintenance

    • @R0bobb1e
      @R0bobb1e ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jmattoxriskpro Well, no, I have not driven across the US, give I live in Australia and have done so since I was 7. I hear what you're saying though. Australia has a LOT of landmass too. I realise they wouldn't take up a lot of space, I was more thinking about inner city substations and things like that, where you would have the panels on top of buildings everywhere and then the power would be accumulated in 'bunker' or whatever you want to call it...

  • @tylerharry6319
    @tylerharry6319 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You guys should really stop cutting in mid segment to talk about ads/sponsorships. Its the equivalent of those annoying fuckin ads that pop up in the middle of an article youre reading online.

    • @blizzy78
      @blizzy78 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In other words, gimme everything for free? Get outta here.

  • @iihoipoiii
    @iihoipoiii ปีที่แล้ว +3

    please use the word methane instead of natural gas it is methane pumped from gas fields not a natural phenomena

    • @svenhodaka9145
      @svenhodaka9145 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Please don’t say “Methane pumped from gas fields”.
      Methane is a naturally occurring hydrocarbon that can be extracted and separated from other natural gases such as ethane, propane, butane, etc. (and several others). It is generally under pressure when produced and is compressed to transport safely in pipelines. Methane and other natural gases have a high energy value and are very useful to society to prevent people from freezing to death and provide cleaner alternatives to burning wood, coal, charcoal, or animal dung for cooking. (which helps prevent people from starving to death). Some day in the future society may shift their dependency away from hydrocarbons (including natural gas) when renewable sources of energy become developed and stored at a large enough scale to supply society’s demands.
      I’m glad Tesla is leading the way in this transition but during this transition I encourage you to show respect for hydrocarbons. You can help by reducing your personal consumption. It’ll take some personal sacrifices but I’m sure you’re up for it😉.

    • @EtherFox
      @EtherFox ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ....
      "Natural gas (also called fossil gas or simply gas) is a naturally occurring mixture of gaseous hydrocarbons consisting primarily of methane in addition to various smaller amounts of other higher alkanes."

    • @EtherFox
      @EtherFox ปีที่แล้ว

      The very definition of natural gas is gas that naturally occurs, and consists primarily of methane. Iiihoipoiii, you you need to stop talking and quit pretending to understand science when you don't even understand the basics of basics.

    • @billweberx
      @billweberx ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Natural gas includes more than methane. Their not the same thing. It IS natural gas being pumped from gas fields.

  • @matthewhuszarik4173
    @matthewhuszarik4173 ปีที่แล้ว

    Megapac is a technological dead end. LiFeP and Na-Ion are much better choices for fixed installations.

  • @thekinarbo
    @thekinarbo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The atmosphere needs more CO2, not less.
    If the kool-aid is in your mouth spit it out now!

  • @robertcozart6067
    @robertcozart6067 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just stop screwing around and develop Nuclear powrr

  • @-Iam-1.
    @-Iam-1. ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your whole video is misleading. Combine cycle natural gas plant produces energy and the tesla mega pack does not. Even though a mega pack is efficient but only when energy is already produce. 15 years warranty is not very long a combiny cycle plant last up to 80 years or more producing energy.... what about the contamination generated by extracting the lithium and other rare earth mineral used to produce batteries systems and solar panels that contaminates more than any fossil fuel power plant.
    Like you said the mega pack pulls already existing power from the grid which comes either from nuclear or gas power plant in the case of texas....
    When that mega is able to produce energy let me know.
    And by the way combine cycle gas plants use to be at 24 % efficiency now they are upward 45 to 54 % way more than solar and wind

    • @timsteinkamp2245
      @timsteinkamp2245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It seems the only thing that matters is CO2. That dreaded carbon dioxide that works great in beer kegs.

    • @-Iam-1.
      @-Iam-1. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timsteinkamp2245 did you know plants needs CO2 to grow crops ? if we do what they want it would had an unintendent effect on world wide crop production

  • @andreaskraut6960
    @andreaskraut6960 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good informatin. But please, before making your next video, educate yourself about Power (MW) and Energy (MWh) and never ever spell it like MW/H or MW/Hr or GW/Hr. Such units do not exist and that speeling causes nausea.

  • @jasongooden917
    @jasongooden917 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rain is poison? where the heck do you live?