Snape shouldn't have been alive, right? Snape is killed before the whole Nagini thing. So, unfortunately, the fact that Nagini lived has nothing to do with Snape's death. Neither should Voldy! When Voldemort tried to kill Harry along with his parents, and the Killing Curse backfires, we learn that because he has a Horcrux, remains as a bodyless soul. So when Nagini was alive in the apocalyptic parallel universe, Voldemort should have become the same as he had been during 1981-1991, as a bodyless soul living in snakes or rats. Besides, I think someone would still have killed Nagini, and Harry should not have died! Harry simply cannot be killed by Voldemort, by the protection of Voldemorts blood, which is actually Harrys. Harry would have gone to King's Cross Station again, and returned again!
I actually thought it fits his character because few times in books he errupted in anger even to his friends, but we can blame it on part of Voldemort’s soul in him. The more I think of it the more rubbish this is.
ondrej kosik but can you really blame him? during order of the pheonix, he witnesses cedric’s death, voldemort coming back and his consequences are that his name is being slandered. it also doesnt help that the dursleys are worse than ever.
ondrej kosik you cant compare him as an adult to how he was when he was 16. harry lost a lot then which is a perfectly good reason to get angry easily. he would NEVER want his kids to experience what he had with the death of his parents, friends, sirius, and other people he looked up. also harry would never want them to experience life with the dursleys. and it would make no sense to blame the part of his voldermorts soul in harry because it was destroyed the night in the forest. all around this book/screenplay was horrible and completely contridicts certain facts J.K. Rowling created in the original 7 books
Yozora Sky, but he’s a Hufflepuff. They’re described to be humble, willing to help others, and wanting to play fair. Becoming a Death Eater for such a petty reason would be considered unfair to not just the Hufflepuffs, but the wizarding community as a whole.
And Cedric was disrespected by being forced into this mess and being turned into a death eater of all things Might as well spit and do the Cha Cha Slide on his grave while you're at it
We’re all clear on one thing here: Harry Potter has 7 books. Period. What happened after Deathly Hallows? They all lived happily ever after and Cedric stayed dead. Thank you very much.
Honestly, Smith could be the Hufflepuff that goes dark for a short period of time, enchants Cedric’s body to scare the Durmstrang boys, and un-enchant him. That would be a likely storyline. No Cedric becoming a Death Eater, no disrespect to Hufflepuff BTW, but if any Hufflepuff were to go Dark easily, it would be Zacharias Smith.
Princess Moonlight EXACTLY! Cedric is Modest, Good-Looking, Smart, Athletic, Loyal and Kind-Hearted. So there wouldn’t even be a way for him to become a Death Eater for gods sake.
Cedric in the goblet of fire: “Take the cup Harry, take the cup, just take it.” Cedric in the trash book: “Oh you won? Man, I really wanted to win, I guess I’ll just become a death eater🤷
Yes! Cedric's main characteristics are fair-mindedness and loyalty. He's the embodiment of Hufflepuff values. Then the Cursed Child basically says that because some kids sabotage his chance at winning a tournament, he decides to become a Death Eater and _kill Neville Longbottom!_ It's completely out of character for him.
The "I wish you weren't my son" line was exactly when I closed the book and returned it to the store. Now, I'm glad to learn it's great for me to have dropped it, and it's worst than I imagined.
Yeah, and plus, didn’t Voldemort want to be the one to kill Harry, so even if he did (which shouldn’t ever happen since he was like the nicest person at Hogwarts, Harry still would have killed Voldemort anyways.
My Main 3 problems with it: 1 - it wasn't written by JK Rowling, her publisher forced her name onto it to make more $$$ 2 - The person who wrote it did not read the Harry Potter books properly, there are non stop plot holes and inconsistencies. 3 - JK Rowling had a lot of the Harry Potter story that she had to keep out of the books, as her publisher told her it would make the books too long. But she has since released a lot of those missing parts onto her website. One part being her back story on time turners. She goes into detail about why it is not possible to go back in time more than 5 hours.
Hey, say what you will about her content and motives but there's no denying her work is captivating and exciting! XD I'd personally really love to see Rowling actually write "The Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore by Rita Skeeter". It would allow her to play with a bunch of fun ideas but using the unreliable author she could avoid having to screw with canon. I love that she's taken fictional books *from* the original story and actually writing them, I think that's an awesome idea, I hope she does more of it.
They did Cedric dirty. We can't forget him telling Harry to take the Cup in the GOF Maze scene in the film because he'd saved him. "You saved me, take it!" And also before that in the book prior, POA, Cedric wanting a rematch when he won that Quidditch match because he felt he won unfairly when the Dementors attacked Harry, causing him to fall off his broom. He absolutely would NOT have become a death eater for losing a tournament or even been upset about it.
I almost died when he said “you expect me to believe that Voldemort had sex”. I feel like that’s me when I discovered that in the tale of the three brothers that the third brother had to get a wife, and have a kid while in the invisibility cloak to hide from death. Moral of the story: the third brother had some insane game
On the subject of Amos Diggory, I should point out that, in Goblet of Fire, Amos specifically told Harry that he *DID NOT* blame Harry for Cedric’s death, and even refused to accept the tournament prize money when Harry offered it to them. So no, having him suddenly decide that he *DOES* blame Harry in Cursed Child just doesn’t fly.
They really thought Harry, who used an UNFORGIVABLE curse (granted against a death eater) on someone because he spit on Minerva, would treat her that way.
Harry knows what it's like to grow in an abusive household, why on earth would he be like Vernon Dursley to his son?!?! Also Cedric, a Hufflepuff as a Death Eater?? At this point might aswell just obliviate ourselves to think that this book doesn't exist
a lot of times children that grow up in an abusive home tend to be abuse parents because that is the way they were brought up and that was what they learned, im not saying that harry is abusive to his kids because he also knew what it meant to have real friends and have people love and care about him.
No, Obliviate won't help, you can't forget something that's so much worse than an unforgivable. Even being stuck in Azkaban with the Dementors seems to be too cheerful when compared to reading this thing.
Why did they even choose Cedric to be one of the villains? It works for Pettigrew because he depended on powerful people to protect himself, but Cedric being a death eater is impossible.
This book is complete rubbish. Harry Potter, the boy who was abused for ten years of his life, Harry Potter, the boy who grew up with no parents, would never, ever ever ever ever talk to his son like that. Not even as a joke. Not to mention the Mcgonagall thing. He cast a fricken unforgivable curse for her!!!!!
Audible Garbage u remember when Harry was yelling at lupin for leaving his son OF COURSE HARRY WOULD NEVER TALK LIKE THAT this book is a complete rubbish
*Not written by JK Rowling.* Time travel is back and the story focuses on it rather than Harry solving a mystery like the 7 books. Harry who lived with Petunia and Vernon for years tells his son he doesn't want him, how terrible. Harry acts like a jerk to McGonagall. Polyjuice is brewed by new kids faster than HERMIONE could in the old books. Voldemort who doesn't understand or want love, made love to Bellatrix with no explained utilitarian reason. He doesn't seem to gain anything from it. None of the new characters develop enough, and the old characters don't face trials in adulthood. Harry Potter world's best Auror investigates NOTHING. Hufflepuff Cedric is humiliated enough to become a DEATH EATER. *See Austin McConnell's videos for proposed rewrites and the comments on that video for feedback.*
@@xtzyshuadog Sex is actually one of the basic desires. Sex has nothing to do with wanting love or closeness. Animals have sex and then kill each other. This whole voldy wouldn't have sex because he can't feel love bull is just that bull. I am not in the least bit surprised that he would have been having sex with her. She was in love with him. Wouldn't mess with her own husband. It made sense to me.
melissa craig It’s out of character though. Voldemort thought he would be immortal, why would he have “love”, the chemical need to reproduce, and frick. When humans love each other it usually means they find each other fit to bear offspring, at least at the basic most animalistic level. And if Voldy just wanted sex for fun and pleasure, then idefk
@@rice2meatu The just for fun and pleasure part is what I'm getting at. Not everyone who has sex or even have kids together love each other. More often then not they don't care about each other at all. Sex is actually considered a basic human need. I wouldn't classify it as out of character. We never get into sexual urges in the Harry potter world. So we don't know how he felt about it to say it was out of character. We do know that people get drunk and Shit in the Harry potter world. So for all we know bellatrix got him Shit faced and took advantage of him. This part is the least shocking as far as I'm concerned.
Reasons why Harry would NEVER be rude to his son: 1- He grew i an abusive household hating every single aspect of it. yep, that should do to explain why the writers never even opened a HP book
Unfortunately, a lot of people who grow up in abusive households (not all of them, of course) also "learn" from it and, as much as they suffered, think it's the normal way to treat children. But I also think Harry wouldn't be that kind of person.
@@שרלילה-ג6כ yes you're right, but people like that always seem to hate the idea of family. But Harry always wanted to have a family of his own, and also the compassion he showed towards his friends and others throughout the entire series is pretty evident he would not be a negligent dad.
Did his time under the Weasley’s roof mean nothing? Molly considered Harry to be like a son and went out of her way to do nice things for Harry. Even if he grew up in an emotionally abusive household, that doesn’t change that he was compassionate towards people and that he actually had a family that didn’t treat him like the plague.
and harry but with his uncle aunt and cousin edit: he also had to deal with his mum and dad dying him being a mf wizard oh and an fully grown adult trying to kill him and will continue to try and kill him every year
But draco wasnt?? Draco wasn’t abused like Harry, he actually was the opposite. He was spoiled, and given everything???? Yes Lucius made Draco hate muggles but why arent yall hating on his mother? She was the same. If this was real life, he would be considered racist. So yes, y’all should stop making Draco the victim, when he wasnt.
On pottermore, it says that the minister for magic is still Kingsley, not Hermione. So even Rowling herself doesn’t seem to care about the eighth book very much
Agreed, and he always viewed himself as somekind of god, far above everyone else. Too far above anybody else to lower himself to them (pun intended). "I, who has stretched the limits of magic, who has gone further than anyone before me ever dared to." (i remember him stating something like that)... If anything, it would have been more believable to me if he had magically created some "child" of him somehow using Dumbledore's powers. even though it's canon that magic can't be stolen. But with some smart wrtitng they might have gotten away with that, some form of dark magic that is able to mimick/recreate another's ability/talent or whatever
Love is not necessary to sire a child. If I try hard I could imagine a version were Tom Riddle sired a child by accident at some point or he could have seduced a woman to get something he wanted but not Voldemort after splitting his soles so many times. But if he sired a child when he was young it would be older then Harry.
Eadig 1 that would make sense because reading would take around 50 hours 2 that’s kinda stupid why would you make a story about something you barely know like if you only saw the movies you would know nothing about some details that may be important like spew you would know nothing about it
Me before reading the Cursed Child: Oh I heard they brought back time turners! Maybe they will save Fred! Me After: *Calls The Ministry Of Magic* Hello? I think we finally found something more trashier than Umbridge.
Bro should I read it is it worth reading because I already bought it and now I think maybe it will ruin the 7 books nice story so tell me should I read it is it worth reading
Book Cedric: Oh, wait. I won that Quidditch match because my opposite Seeker got attacked by Dementors? Can we have a do-over, please? CC Cedric: I lost the tournament? Welp. Time to become a Death Eater.
But you see... Cedric's great great great grand uncle's friend's son's aunt's great great great nephew's second cousin 1st removed's great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grand father in law is salizar slytherin's secretary's neighbor's dentist. So it was obvious that he would become a death wizard if he had any reason to.
There is one good thing about reading this book, it made me love the original books even more and i was able to create my own imagination of harry’s future.
Thank you so much for your work on this video. I hadn't planned to read this book and now after this video there is NO WAY I will read this book. I have just finished reading all seven of the books for the first time and loved them all and to have them ruined by this one book would anger me so much so I appreciate you saving me the trouble. While I understand people can be affected by the circumstances that they endure in life, it seems hard to believe that Harry, Ron and Hermione would change that drastically and so completely different from the original canon. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said all Rowling saw was the check they sent her and she signed off based on that. This book sounds like it would ruin all the love that I have for Harry Potter after reading the books. Thanks again for your hard work.
you are far too kind . Severus Snape would never say "I am proud that Harry has named his son after me." That scene was nonsensical fan service. Amos being annoyed with Harry is also nonsense. He didn't blame Harry in the goblet of fire and is almost never mentioned after the Goblet of Fire. It's melodramatic nonsense
Harry would NEVER be that rude to his son! The last movie (deathly hallows 2 I think) Harry was so caring toward his son! I feel like Rowling didn't even read this! I'm a bit mad now...🙄😒
Didn't the epilogue of Deathly Hallows show Harry specifically say that he would be alright with Albus being in Slytherin? Since Snape had been a Slytherin? Then in this book it just becomes such a point of contention between them that it didn't make sense.
Omg yes! He was like " sometimes I wish you weren't my son " and it's like what the actual heck is this.. and then he threatened Mcgonagall and separating Albus and Scorpius.... even though they are best friends..
Meagan Henscheid in deathly hallows 2, “Albus Severus Potter, You we’re named after two headmasters of hogwarts. One of them is a slytherin, and he’s the bravest man I’ve ever known.
Harry is literally the most humble guy ever but he was also that parent: ”james, when I was your age i was entered in a life or death tournament where I in fact did almost die like five times, so I don't see what's the big deal about doing your own laundry.” Or is that just me
Even if Rowling hadn't destroyed all Time-Turners in the books, there's a much more simple reason why the Time-Turner plot doesn't work. In Prisoner of Azkaban, it's made quite clear that the rules of time aren't like in Doctor Who with separate timelines. There is one timeline, that always exists and was always going to exist, and incorporates anyone who will change time in the future. For that reason, wizards who travel back in time can't actually CHANGE anything, they can only cause what always happened the first time. Dumbledore already knew, when he suggested that Harry and Hermione use the Time-Turner, that Buckbeak had escaped. First version of Harry was being attacked by Dementors and saw a mysterious figure who looked like his father warding them off. Second version tries to get closer to see who it was that saved him the first time, and then realises it was actually he himself. Nothing different happens the second time than the first time, it's just a different perspective. And that's an important thing to have, because otherwise they could just reverse time and change it whenever anything bad happens. How was this not flagged up?
And here's another one... one of the most important messages of the series is that 'it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow up to be'. Giving Voldemort a kid in the first place is stupid, but if they were going to absolutely insist on that it would be far more consistent with the message of the original books to actually give her a redemption. If Delphi is destined to be evil just because of who her parents were (I presume she's the titular 'Cursed Child', although it never quite says) that completely defeats the most important message of the original story.
Exactly, thank you! I was shocked to see that this wasn't talked about anywhere. Time turners just take you back in time, not to a parallel universe/alternate reality!
You seem to be forgetting that in that same book Hermione mentioned that mcgonagall told of accounts that the past HAS BEEN Changed but it always end disastrously, the same thing reiterated on pottermore.
@@Thegravedigger0 I haven't forgotten, and I know Hermione said that. The exact quote is 'Loads of them have ended up killing their past or future selves by mistake', and it's unclear how that works. If you kill your past self, it's a complete paradox because then you'd never have lived to go back in time and cause that to happen. Killing your future self is a bit more possible, but then you'd question, if you knew it would result in your death, why you'd go back in time in the first place (perhaps it was in attempting to prevent their own deaths that these people died in the first place). The way Hermione says it, she's simplifying it to make Harry understand that he can't meddle, so the precise veracity of how it works can't be inferred from her words. Nevertheless, it's made extremely clear from the way it's written that there is one single timeline. And the content of the books takes precedence over what is on Pottermore if there's a clash.
Sorcerer’s Stone: I’m the first book and I’m a great introduction to the magical world Chamber of Secrets: I was the first sequel and proved Rowling could keep a good story even in a sequel; I also started setting up the Horcrux storyline Prisoner of Azkaban: I added new, finer details into the magical world as well as introducing Sirius Black Goblet of Fire: I had a good mystery and epic twist at the end; I also had good pacing- and of course, I brought Voldemort back to set up later plots Order of the Phoenix: I, though being the longest book in the series, had a lot of details and new parts added into the series; I also introduced the prophecy that becomes crucial later on- furthermore, I give huge insights into Harry’s mind and the isolation he feels Half-Blood Prince: I brought Harry and Dumbledore closer together, as well as revealing more about Voldemort; I added a new part to Draco Malfoy’s character; I have the very emotional death of Dumbledore; and I set up the entire plot for Deathly Hallows Deathly Hallows: I am the phenomenal series finale, with an amazing balance between emotional character development and action-packed magical duels; the characters go on a great adventure to destroy the Horcruxes, eventually killing Voldemort and ending his terrible reign once and for all Cursed Child:
Cursed Child: i iz de biggg gae and ezzz noooooot canoooooon i is fanfic oooooo herminee is blecc lololololololol cadricc becom deth eatr and kirr nuvile XDXDXDXDXD
Excellent breakdown. I remember checking out the synopsis when this came out and laughed...and ignored it. The thing that sticks out in my head is that all of the idiotic nonsense in the play happens DIRECTLY after the end of the 19 Years Later scene in which a Father comforts his son, tells him of the bravest man he ever knew, and gives him the tidbit about the sorting hat before hugging him and helping him on the train. The play should never have been made with the story that they tossed together. Also, Rowling almost certainly is under contractual obligation to NOT denigrate the material. Otherwise someone in r/l obliviated her.
Things wrong with Cursed Child: -2 time-turners (thought they all got destroyed, J.K Rowling did it to avoid plot holes, what happened) -Voldemort had a kid (self-explanitory) -Harry is a mean jerk (wasn't he a loyal and humble dude-?) -Harry brags a lot (if he couldn't do it once because of the trauma, why can he suddenly talk about it all day) -Ron became like Fred and George (i mean he could've but that doesn't mean that you can delete his entire personality) -Cedric became a death-eater (but he wanted Harry to win so how does this add up) -Voldemort won (so you're telling me that nobody else could've killed Nagini or the question of why did Cedric kill Neville) -Albus is a brat (uh Albus didn't exist in the 7 books so I don't have a fact against it, I just don't like how bratty he is) -Hermione being Minister of Magic (movie Hermione? I can see that but books Hermione? Ehh sorry book Hermione but no) -"You'll go to Askaban, just like your mother" (it makes it sound like Bellatrix is alive and the fact that Bellatrix and Voldemort are together is so wrong, Bellatrix was one of his loyal followers who basically did everything Voldemort wanted, not Voldemort's girlfriend) -Trolley lady being a bad person (let's be real, she was one of the most wholesome characters in the whole series) -Delphi breaking into Hogwarts (until the world's best security is as weak as leaving the key in the lock, I won't believe it) -Harry being able to look into the future (pretty sure Harry became the 3rd illegal time turner) -The fact it's canon (what the duck) -The fact that it exists (pretty sure it terrified a good portion of the potterheads) These are not my points, these are MovieFlame's so don't come for me, I just agree with him-
Also that Snape is alive when they go back in the first place. Voldemort would have still killed him thinking that he was the master of the elder wand.
Just pretend it doesn't exist, ok? Make yourself think the trio scene at the end of the war in Deathly Hallows is the end of Harry Potter. Forget 19 years later scene, and forget this shitty fanfiction. Makes you a lot happier :-)
3 reasons why nobody should like Cursed Child: 1. THEY MADE CEDRIC A DEATH EATER EVEN THOUGH HE HELPS HARRY WITH THE EGG 2. IT RUINS TIME TRAVELLING 3. ISN'T THERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE ANY TIME TURNERS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DRACO HAS LONG HAIR IN THE CURSED CHILD? man, who is he? he looks like he’s a Kung Fu master. Harry’s mark on his forehead here is cringeworthy. Ginny looks like she’s mcgonagall’s age AND A KAREN, Ron looks like he was never before a Weasley and Hermione, i- theory: Harry is the cursed child
@@mikerodgers8453 That was only during the play, I think if they make a movie it will be the original cast. But the Cursed Child is just fucking fanfiction. Even the 8 movies are more canon than this shit.
Palpatine having a kid is definitely weird and I'm not a fan of it, but at the very least I'll give them that it's not massively inconsistent with his character. For Voldemort on the other hand, it absolutely is. I mean, his two main defining traits are 1) his complete inability to have any sort of connection with other people, or even to really understand them, and 2) his absolute obsession with living forever. Both of those would leave him with absolutely no reason to need or want to have a child.
There's NO reason for harry to be repossessed by Voldemort or even any such evil thing that resembles Voldywart in the slightest, so I don't get why they thought this would have made any sense. Voldy is GONE from his body, no traces whatsoever. The only thing that would have made sense is if there was a horcrux left unchecked.
@Gngiu I was under the impression that ron prob matured quite a bit actually esp with Hermione there to straighten him out, and Harry and the others would have made sure Ron wasn't doing anything stupid as well before the wedding. Even this unforgivable curse of a fanfiction/play referenced Ron being less of a man cuz he wasn't married to Hermione in the alternate timeline. This whole book was a bad dream/nightmare that never should have existee.
Gilderoy in the second book: arrogant, snobby, a show off, prideful, has to be the best. Harry in the “book that shall not be named”: arrogant, snobby, a show off, prideful, has to be the best… looks like someone got there characters confused when writing the “book” and I’ll give you a hint *John Tiffany, Jack Thorne*
*Not written by JK Rowling.* Time travel is back and the story focuses on it rather than Harry solving a mystery like the 7 books. Harry who lived with Petunia and Vernon for years tells his son he doesn't want him, how terrible. Harry acts like a jerk to McGonagall. Polyjuice is brewed by new kids faster than HERMIONE could in the old books. Voldemort who doesn't understand or want love, made love to Bellatrix with no explained utilitarian reason. He doesn't seem to gain anything from it. None of the new characters develop enough, and the old characters don't face trials in adulthood. Harry Potter world's best Auror investigates NOTHING. Hufflepuff Cedric is humiliated enough to become a DEATH EATER. *See Austin McConnell's videos for proposed rewrites and the comments on that video for feedback.*
I love how they completely forget that Cedric was literally fine with Harry winning the Tournament based on their friendship and respect for one another...Doesn't that have Death Eater written all over it?
I was even surprised that they wrote Cursed Child in the first place. I was content with the ending of Deathly Hallows where Voldermort dies .Harry and Ginny get married have three kids. Ron and Hermione get married and have two kids. They live happily ever after. There shouldn't be anymore to it then that.
There’s one thing I would add though: Developing the characters. We barely see much of Rose or James (Lily and Hugo are acceptable because they’re younger and just getting used to Hogwarts) and I think that it’d be cool to see how the Golden Trio struggle with parenthood/adulthood. Like someone said: it’s a *Harry Potter* book. It’s got his name in it. He should still be a very important character whose constantly learning from new experiences. But I do like that they kinda skipped to fourth year. They probably could’ve done it better, but it’s ironically original. It shows that life at Hogwarts isn’t always an adventure or that the students don’t have to constantly deal with threats. Some years, Hogwarts is just.. Hogwarts
Author : wrote the curse child Harry : sectusempra! Ron : bloody hell what is that? Hermione : if u dont mind im going to bed before both of you *authors* come up with another stupid idea to get us killed, or worse, e x p e l l e d Draco : my father will hear about this!
Harry: What’s this rubbish? Ron: What the bloody hell was that all about? Hermione: Pathetic! Luna (to the writers): Wrackspurts got you? Draco: My father will hear about this! Dumbledore: There will come come a time, where you choose what’s right, over what’s easy.
The handful of good things in Cursed Child are the newer ideas; Draco reflecting on his childhood jealousy, The children of the Trio not all being friends (I wish they had explored Rose and Albus' strained friendship more), Albus being in the shadow of his father's legacy while his siblings are more in line with what people expect. Even Scorpius' crush on Rose could've been an interesting way to show how the reputation of Slytherins had improved post-voldemort. Everything the sucks about Cursed Child are the things that are aiming to "recapture the magic" of the original story. Let's face it, the only reason the time-turners are here is so we can revisit a bunch of scenes and locations from the original story. If the writers had let Cursed Child fully focus on the the next generation, and what's going on in the present day, we could've had something really great. (Also, I actually really like the Blanket Scene. In my most generous reading of it, Harry was trying to recreate what Molly did for him in his 6th year; give him an old family heirloom to show Albus that he's a truly loved part of the family. But because Harry has been so closed off about his past, Albus doesn't fully understand the significance and just thinks he got a shitty gift, while his Gryffindor Siblings got better. But again, the writing rushes past this scene, so it's really easy to brush it off as Al being bratty. Again, it all comes down to the crappy writing that cares more about the past than the current day, which is a great metaphor for where the HP franchise is now, tbh.)
It's an accurate but ur statement that there is no bias is... wrong. His review is his personal opinions, his personal review, therefore, loads of bias. Although the bias is accurate, its still bias lol.
I just did my first read through of this… or at least I tried to. After two hours of my life that I’m never getting back I am both laughing and screaming at this plot, so terribly to the point where I’ve stopped reading and don’t plan to continue. The ONLY and I mean ONLY logical and redeemable character in this is Scorpius. Every other character I despise and I think their choices are illogical and infuriating. I came into this book knowing that there were some issues with it not following canon, so I was prepared for that. What I was NOT prepared for however was the characters. I’m debating on whether I’m in a parallel universe or if the writers just got the characters so terribly wrong. It’s sad how much I have to say about them when I only finished a third of this sad excuse of a Harry Potter story, so I’ll skip over it so I don’t further infuriate myself. As a lover of storytelling (be it movies, books, stage plays, etc.), it is with great sorrow that I have to say a Harry Potter story was the first story I’ve ever hated so much I was unable to continue it. I give it a generous 0/10
**Me thinking What The Original Characters would React To this** Hermoine- "Stop Stop Stop! Your Going to Take someones Eye Out" " How Pathetic" Harry potter- "Whats This Rubbish?" Ron- "Whats this supposed to mean?"
Cedric in the movie: No matter who wins, i will still congradulate them! Cedric in Cursed Child: lol i will become a death eather because i lost a tournament
Radcliffe wound be so fucking DISAPPOINTED in the hot summer trash Book given he spent most of his young life bringing out the character we've all come to know and care, Daniel made you be Bias for Harry so the cursed child is another Horcrux
@@elliottsimms3363 Right? I just thought it would have been cool to see some growth in a character that was, for the most part, completely one-dimensional. We could have a confrontation between Dudley and his parents with Dudley maybe being afraid and then not allowing them to see their grandchild because of how they treated Harry, ultimately leading to Petuna finally putting aside her hate for magic to be a part of their lives. The kid could have his own mini-adventure, maybe team up with Harry's kids against whatever new beastie or dark wizard is terrorizing the school, tying in a bunch of old characters and their 'where are they now' stories while watching trough the eyes of a completely new character, all leading to Harry and Dudley meeting again. Nice, heartfelt, simple.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
Check out our review of the actual Cursed Child play! th-cam.com/video/8AejfU72go0/w-d-xo.html
ff
Very wrong😢 book make a lot of mess
Snape shouldn't have been alive, right?
Snape is killed before the whole Nagini thing. So, unfortunately, the fact that Nagini lived has nothing to do with Snape's death.
Neither should Voldy!
When Voldemort tried to kill Harry along with his parents, and the Killing Curse backfires, we learn that because he has a Horcrux, remains as a bodyless soul. So when Nagini was alive in the apocalyptic parallel universe, Voldemort should have become the same as he had been during 1981-1991, as a bodyless soul living in snakes or rats.
Besides, I think someone would still have killed Nagini, and Harry should not have died! Harry simply cannot be killed by Voldemort, by the protection of Voldemorts blood, which is actually Harrys. Harry would have gone to King's Cross Station again, and returned again!
I have bought the cursed child book and have not read should i read it?
@@farrella.l610 It's fun to read for me, and i definitely enjoy the story, but it is not canon.
harry would NEVER be that rude to his son because he knows how much it hurts to not be loved by the family
I actually thought it fits his character because few times in books he errupted in anger even to his friends, but we can blame it on part of Voldemort’s soul in him. The more I think of it the more rubbish this is.
ondrej kosik but can you really blame him? during order of the pheonix, he witnesses cedric’s death, voldemort coming back and his consequences are that his name is being slandered. it also doesnt help that the dursleys are worse than ever.
Exactly.... I so agree with you
Bruh.. have you seen Naruto? It's the same flip of character we never expected to see
ondrej kosik you cant compare him as an adult to how he was when he was 16. harry lost a lot then which is a perfectly good reason to get angry easily. he would NEVER want his kids to experience what he had with the death of his parents, friends, sirius, and other people he looked up. also harry would never want them to experience life with the dursleys. and it would make no sense to blame the part of his voldermorts soul in harry because it was destroyed the night in the forest. all around this book/screenplay was horrible and completely contridicts certain facts J.K. Rowling created in the original 7 books
I think JK Rowling was under the Imperius curse when she approved this......
honest person ditto LOL!!!
Or maybe she was held at gunpoint to approve this
@Blaze Gamin Who knows xD
@@DriscollAlaska I don't think we'll ever find out.
Lol
Let's not forget that Cedric wanted originally Harry to win....why would he get mad when he loss?
Jellorax 👏👏👏
Cuz he was humiliated
Yozora Sky, but he’s a Hufflepuff. They’re described to be humble, willing to help others, and wanting to play fair. Becoming a Death Eater for such a petty reason would be considered unfair to not just the Hufflepuffs, but the wizarding community as a whole.
Because the writers can't have read the books especially thorough.
Imperio solves everything.
‘Thank God I died before this book was written.’
-Dumbledore, Snape, Mad eye, Sirius, Lupin, Lily, James, Fred, Tonks, Dobby.
And Hedwig
@@pappardellelover_ tf
+ Fred
@@atlas.halfblood Fred was already in the original list in the comment.
And Cedric was disrespected by being forced into this mess and being turned into a death eater of all things
Might as well spit and do the Cha Cha Slide on his grave while you're at it
Why is it called Harry Potter when it’s not even about him
"Clickbait". (Or whatever the book/play equivalent would be called.)
Muggle money
Dollar Dollar bills!!!!!
Bs that makes no sense = money somehow
Well now you can imagine Albus Potter XD
We’re all clear on one thing here: Harry Potter has 7 books. Period.
What happened after Deathly Hallows? They all lived happily ever after and Cedric stayed dead. Thank you very much.
It wasthe damn Cedric stayed dead for me😂 tbh yeah nothing happened after that
That’s what’s always gotten me. Do a continuation in the world if you want but Harry’s story is over.
Period.
And may be cedric be blessed with twilight
Honestly, Smith could be the Hufflepuff that goes dark for a short period of time, enchants Cedric’s body to scare the Durmstrang boys, and un-enchant him. That would be a likely storyline. No Cedric becoming a Death Eater, no disrespect to Hufflepuff BTW, but if any Hufflepuff were to go Dark easily, it would be Zacharias Smith.
If the real Cedric would be butthurt that he lost the Triwizard Tournament then why did he keep insisting that Harry should take the cup and win???
Well I mean Harry just saved his life so :/
Not disagreeing, it's a pile of dog shit.
omg yes i just realised that
Harry saved his life
Agree
Rubbish bullshit
Princess Moonlight EXACTLY! Cedric is Modest, Good-Looking, Smart, Athletic, Loyal and Kind-Hearted. So there wouldn’t even be a way for him to become a Death Eater for gods sake.
Cedric in the goblet of fire: “Take the cup Harry, take the cup, just take it.”
Cedric in the trash book: “Oh you won? Man, I really wanted to win, I guess I’ll just become a death eater🤷
That's like Ronaldo would become a nazi because he lost a final. There's no connection
@@MrEvol94 exactly lol
Cedric diggory logic
@@Kyranyoutubevids fr though
I consider the Potter Puppet Pals more canon than this fanfic
soooo much more canon
You re my fucking idol
ppp has more right to be canon
And James Potter and the Hall of the Elder's Crossing. At least that book makes sense. Why couldn't she approve that?
I consider AVPM more cannon than cursed child
The “Book that Shall Not be Named”.
Aka the book where Bellatrix touched the man who shall not be named's thing that shall not be named
Indrani Ranade 🤣
@@sudiptaranade2216 tmi....
Let's call it that as we do not speak it's name around here
I thought it was really good…
This was somebody else’s comment but it’s accurate: Every TRUE Potterhead would know that if Cedric lost, he would congratulation the winner
Well said,
Not somebody else's but is in the script of his video
In the book he literally wanted Harry to take the cup to win!!
Yea
Yes! Cedric's main characteristics are fair-mindedness and loyalty. He's the embodiment of Hufflepuff values. Then the Cursed Child basically says that because some kids sabotage his chance at winning a tournament, he decides to become a Death Eater and _kill Neville Longbottom!_ It's completely out of character for him.
The "I wish you weren't my son" line was exactly when I closed the book and returned it to the store.
Now, I'm glad to learn it's great for me to have dropped it, and it's worst than I imagined.
Harry potter’s reaction to that one line from the non canon cursed child book:
Harry Potter: I would never say that to my son.
Cedric would NEVER become a death eater he literally said "go you take it you saved me" to harry he wanted harry to win
Yeah, and plus, didn’t Voldemort want to be the one to kill Harry, so even if he did (which shouldn’t ever happen since he was like the nicest person at Hogwarts, Harry still would have killed Voldemort anyways.
And also cedric is a true hufflepuff
Exactly.
That line can infer that Cedric could know what was going to happen...
maybe under the imperious curse?
Main 3 problems:
1- timeturners just don’t make sense
2- how can voldemort have a daughter
3- changing the depiction of harrys and cedrics characters
*changing the depiction of literally every character
*One main problem:
The book.
@@vkohli17 I wanted to say that too xD
@@vkohli17 yes
My Main 3 problems with it:
1 - it wasn't written by JK Rowling, her publisher forced her name onto it to make more $$$
2 - The person who wrote it did not read the Harry Potter books properly, there are non stop plot holes and inconsistencies.
3 - JK Rowling had a lot of the Harry Potter story that she had to keep out of the books, as her publisher told her it would make the books too long. But she has since released a lot of those missing parts onto her website. One part being her back story on time turners. She goes into detail about why it is not possible to go back in time more than 5 hours.
Cedric became death eater?
They made a Hufflepuff a death eater?
Writers were smoking some strong dope Weeds.
Check how many likes you got
Nah man, if they were smoking that they'd have written some good shit
Well is better than vampire
Abhay yeah i hated that part especially. Being humiliated is not a good enough reason to turn someone to that
Bruno ya better than the bull they did write
Harry and Dracos kids becoming friends is the only interesting/nice idea from the entire book.
Also when Harry talked to Dumbledore’s portrait and they both tell each other that they love each other…
They should either continue the series properly or leave Harry's legacy alone
period
SimplyFatal well said
I think its disrespectful to the original film cast. Who literally spent their childhoods filming the movies back to back.
Yeah, Harry wants to disown his child just because he's Slytherin, what a load of rubbish, not canon at all to me, forever and ever
Pinhead did Harry not say in the final book that he wouldn’t be ashamed of Albus if he went to Slytherin?
Rita Skeeter could write better🤦♀️
Ik
Don't tempt her!
She probably wrote this, not going to lie
Hey, say what you will about her content and motives but there's no denying her work is captivating and exciting! XD I'd personally really love to see Rowling actually write "The Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore by Rita Skeeter". It would allow her to play with a bunch of fun ideas but using the unreliable author she could avoid having to screw with canon. I love that she's taken fictional books *from* the original story and actually writing them, I think that's an awesome idea, I hope she does more of it.
rita skeeter looks just like my language professor and that's mildly disturbing
They did Cedric dirty.
We can't forget him telling Harry to take the Cup in the GOF Maze scene in the film because he'd saved him. "You saved me, take it!"
And also before that in the book prior, POA, Cedric wanting a rematch when he won that Quidditch match because he felt he won unfairly when the Dementors attacked Harry, causing him to fall off his broom. He absolutely would NOT have become a death eater for losing a tournament or even been upset about it.
Agreed.
Remember the words of Hagrid too.
“There hasn’t been a single dark witch or wizard that hasn’t come out of slytherine
@@samuelhorner6200 what about quirrell?
@@samuelhorner6200 peter pettigrew
Samuel Horner You obviously are a person who despises Slytherin just for our representation in the book.
I almost died when he said “you expect me to believe that Voldemort had sex”. I feel like that’s me when I discovered that in the tale of the three brothers that the third brother had to get a wife, and have a kid while in the invisibility cloak to hide from death. Moral of the story: the third brother had some insane game
Kind of jealous that Voldemort had sex with Bellatrix of all people. She’s probably wild in bed.
Copied from Cinemasins lmao
Albus Dumbledore: Don’t pity the dead, Harry, pity the living, and above all pity the ones who bought The Cursed Child.
Pity the ones who wrote the book, the people that bought the books obviously don't know about it's story
I pity myself for purchasing the book
Me too, I hated this.
Pity the the fools who wrote this they do not know to tell the difference between a real story and fanfiction
why is hermoiny black shes white
“It’s like a crappy Fanfiction.”
.....Buddy, Fanfiction can tell better stories than this crap!
Honestly sometimes fanfic can occasionally be better than the actual books. This is not worthy of the realm of crappy fanfic honestly.
Virginia Natale Same
FACTS
So true Harry potter fanfiction is much better then the cursed child crap
That's why he called it crappy.
ok rita skeeter probably wrote this book
edit: i came back to this comment after two years of posting it and omg the replies 😭😭 i love potterheads
M Chng head canon accepted. cursed child just a doxxing campaign by skeeter
😂💖👍 best
That would make so much sense!! 😂
And then she put Rowling under the impirius curse
(Sorry for spelling)
I agree. SHe wanted som of rowlings success but didnt get it
Dumbledore said that there are things worse than death.
after seeing the horrors within this book, I agree.
😂😂😂
JK Rowling: "The scar had not pained Harry for nineteen years. All was well."
Cursed Child: NOT!
xd
Lol
lul
Cursed Child: Sike!
Well, it's the same interpretation as the scene that Dumbledore asked CALMLY
On the subject of Amos Diggory, I should point out that, in Goblet of Fire, Amos specifically told Harry that he *DID NOT* blame Harry for Cedric’s death, and even refused to accept the tournament prize money when Harry offered it to them. So no, having him suddenly decide that he *DOES* blame Harry in Cursed Child just doesn’t fly.
Madame Requiem he was under the imperious curse by delphi
The book, Cursed Child is literally cursed by 90% of the fandom.
lol 😂
haha lol
Kind of hilarious though, considering all the horrible fanfiction churned out by the fandom, which the majority of is far worse than cursed child.
i´d say 97%
Yes
They really thought Harry, who used an UNFORGIVABLE curse (granted against a death eater) on someone because he spit on Minerva, would treat her that way.
Harry was the most OOC person in cursed child than any character ever.
Harry knows what it's like to grow in an abusive household, why on earth would he be like Vernon Dursley to his son?!?! Also Cedric, a Hufflepuff as a Death Eater?? At this point might aswell just obliviate ourselves to think that this book doesn't exist
Believe me I wish my wand wasnt broken.
a lot of times children that grow up in an abusive home tend to be abuse parents because that is the way they were brought up and that was what they learned, im not saying that harry is abusive to his kids because he also knew what it meant to have real friends and have people love and care about him.
To true
@The Red Gamer and Animal lover. yea that’s why I said “I’m not saying Harry is abusive” lmao
No, Obliviate won't help, you can't forget something that's so much worse than an unforgivable. Even being stuck in Azkaban with the Dementors seems to be too cheerful when compared to reading this thing.
the cursed child: *exists*
every person whose every read harry potter: “sTop sTOp stOp, yOuR dOinG iT wRoNg”
...your going to take someones eye out is harry potter not a piece of trash
EVAN MUDD I won’t
you're*
@@silvanafelicio576 you're*
too true i hated the play totally diff from the harry potter we know and obsess over
Any second now Rowling is gonna jump out and say J.K.
Underrated comment
I mean it was all just a fun stage play until a tweet of her saying that it's canon
I fricking hope so
Twitter has ruined JKs career and I feel very bad for her now
Lmfao
Why did they even choose Cedric to be one of the villains? It works for Pettigrew because he depended on powerful people to protect himself, but Cedric being a death eater is impossible.
So, Bellatrix touched You-Know-Who's You-Know-What.
😂
Oh my-
😂
And I oop-
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Me, whose never read The Cursed Child: *asks about The Cursed Child*
Potterheads everywhere: we do not speak its name.
Same vibe bro. Never read it but heard it sucks harder than Snape's story!!!
Yeah I never read it but i saw some glimpses of it and I already hate it.
We refer to it as you-know-what
New name : You know what
I’m so sad that I’m the only one that thought it was good😕
This book is complete rubbish. Harry Potter, the boy who was abused for ten years of his life, Harry Potter, the boy who grew up with no parents, would never, ever ever ever ever talk to his son like that. Not even as a joke. Not to mention the Mcgonagall thing. He cast a fricken unforgivable curse for her!!!!!
Audible Garbage u remember when Harry was yelling at lupin for leaving his son OF COURSE HARRY WOULD NEVER TALK LIKE THAT this book is a complete rubbish
*Not written by JK Rowling.*
Time travel is back and the story focuses on it rather than Harry solving a mystery like the 7 books.
Harry who lived with Petunia and Vernon for years tells his son he doesn't want him, how terrible.
Harry acts like a jerk to McGonagall.
Polyjuice is brewed by new kids faster than HERMIONE could in the old books.
Voldemort who doesn't understand or want love, made love to Bellatrix with no explained utilitarian reason. He doesn't seem to gain anything from it.
None of the new characters develop enough, and the old characters don't face trials in adulthood.
Harry Potter world's best Auror investigates NOTHING.
Hufflepuff Cedric is humiliated enough to become a DEATH EATER.
*See Austin McConnell's videos for proposed rewrites and the comments on that video for feedback.*
@@xtzyshuadog Sex is actually one of the basic desires. Sex has nothing to do with wanting love or closeness. Animals have sex and then kill each other. This whole voldy wouldn't have sex because he can't feel love bull is just that bull. I am not in the least bit surprised that he would have been having sex with her. She was in love with him. Wouldn't mess with her own husband. It made sense to me.
melissa craig It’s out of character though. Voldemort thought he would be immortal, why would he have “love”, the chemical need to reproduce, and frick. When humans love each other it usually means they find each other fit to bear offspring, at least at the basic most animalistic level. And if Voldy just wanted sex for fun and pleasure, then idefk
@@rice2meatu The just for fun and pleasure part is what I'm getting at. Not everyone who has sex or even have kids together love each other. More often then not they don't care about each other at all. Sex is actually considered a basic human need. I wouldn't classify it as out of character. We never get into sexual urges in the Harry potter world. So we don't know how he felt about it to say it was out of character. We do know that people get drunk and Shit in the Harry potter world. So for all we know bellatrix got him Shit faced and took advantage of him. This part is the least shocking as far as I'm concerned.
Petition to have Morgan Ross rewrite the script. I am sure the whole fandom would accept it as canon.
Y. E. S
Signed
Signed by a cake. Don't mind the crumbs
I trust this man more than JK Rowling to rewrite this story
Sure! Petitions have a history of working!!
Reasons why Harry would NEVER be rude to his son:
1- He grew i an abusive household hating every single aspect of it.
yep, that should do to explain why the writers never even opened a HP book
Or even watched 5 minutes of a HP movie.
Or probably don't know what abusive means.
Unfortunately, a lot of people who grow up in abusive households (not all of them, of course) also "learn" from it and, as much as they suffered, think it's the normal way to treat children. But I also think Harry wouldn't be that kind of person.
@@שרלילה-ג6כ yes you're right, but people like that always seem to hate the idea of family. But Harry always wanted to have a family of his own, and also the compassion he showed towards his friends and others throughout the entire series is pretty evident he would not be a negligent dad.
Did his time under the Weasley’s roof mean nothing? Molly considered Harry to be like a son and went out of her way to do nice things for Harry.
Even if he grew up in an emotionally abusive household, that doesn’t change that he was compassionate towards people and that he actually had a family that didn’t treat him like the plague.
To be honest, we would probably have preferred to have a prequel about the marauders backstory then this rubbish 🚮
Or even about the founders
YOU SPEAK THE ENGLISH OF J.K. ROWLING THANK YOU!!!!
Its time to canonize some fan-fic 😌✨
@@Zero_Is_Stopping_Time yeah you right
@@naddarr1 Yes I agree
I don't think draco would be hard on his kid cause he knows what it feels like I mean he was suffering because of his bad father
and harry but with his uncle aunt and cousin
edit: he also had to deal with his mum and dad dying him being a mf wizard oh and an fully grown adult trying to kill him and will continue to try and kill him every year
But draco wasnt?? Draco wasn’t abused like Harry, he actually was the opposite. He was spoiled, and given everything???? Yes Lucius made Draco hate muggles but why arent yall hating on his mother? She was the same. If this was real life, he would be considered racist. So yes, y’all should stop making Draco the victim, when he wasnt.
He wasn't his father spoiled him but yes he probably wasn't a bad father
@@ema7246 true
@@staystaystay4669 yh, but its not like before that she didnt encourage draco to not hate muggles
Roses are red 🌹
Violets are blue 🔵
The Cursed Child is just a fanfiction ✍️
And I know that you agree too 😃
yep
@@xxjulia0xx341yep
Actually its worse than fanfiction
You are so talented
My favourite line was
Scorpius:people think I’m the son of voldemort
Albus:You can’t be you have a nose!
True
Voldemort didn't have a nose because he split his soul too much!
Seems like writers only watched movies before writing this cursed book
And the other my fav line,,
Snape: Tell Albus.. tell Albus Severus.. I'm proud he carries my name..
Hamza Ali well his daughter has a nose
*“The Cursed Child is not canon. Morgan said calmly”*
*rOwLinG diD yOu rEaLLy aPrOoVe oF tHiS bOoK?*
The movie: THE CURSED CHILD IS NOT CANNON
“Rowling did you put your name on this garbage fire?”
@@blueheartorangeheart3768 omggg lol
Yes !!!!!!!!! *as dumbledore watched proudly form his paintings his legacy lives for ever*
On pottermore, it says that the minister for magic is still Kingsley, not Hermione. So even Rowling herself doesn’t seem to care about the eighth book very much
Most probably those two peeps used crucio/imperio on her XD
Imperio is more likely
Huh? What eight book? There's only SEVEN books. Period.
@@ChiefAkatosh lol
I bet Percy Weasley becomes MOM at some point
For me one of the hardest parts to believe was Voldemort having a daughter because he was incapable of love and he only longed for power
Indeed
Agreed, and he always viewed himself as somekind of god, far above everyone else. Too far above anybody else to lower himself to them (pun intended). "I, who has stretched the limits of magic, who has gone further than anyone before me ever dared to." (i remember him stating something like that)...
If anything, it would have been more believable to me if he had magically created some "child" of him somehow using Dumbledore's powers. even though it's canon that magic can't be stolen. But with some smart wrtitng they might have gotten away with that, some form of dark magic that is able to mimick/recreate another's ability/talent or whatever
For me the fact Bellatrix is the mother makes it even stupider.
Love is not necessary to sire a child. If I try hard I could imagine a version were Tom Riddle sired a child by accident at some point or he could have seduced a woman to get something he wanted but not Voldemort after splitting his soles so many times. But if he sired a child when he was young it would be older then Harry.
Exactly 😂😂😂
I don’t think the writers even read the books. I feel like they were just going from what was in the movies.
judging from his review they didn't even watch the movies.. i think they read a synopsis of the movies.
even the movies wouldn’t give you this mess. I don’t think they even watched the movies.
Eadig 1 that would make sense because reading would take around 50 hours
2 that’s kinda stupid why would you make a story about something you barely know like if you only saw the movies you would know nothing about some details that may be important like spew you would know nothing about it
Eadig well for me since it’s garbage I don’t think they even watched the movies.
Honestly, not even the movies.
Why would JK let such a muggle write Harry Potter
Send whoever wrote that rubbish to Azkaban
LilLuniax yass!
This comment deserves way more likes
Loveness Batwell I’m confused how muggles used the imperious curse on jk
*a mudblood
"A terrible story is a terrible story, there's no fixing that"
-MovieFlame
very well said
Yep very well said
Periodttt
💅🏻 periodtt
Periodtt. 😌🤚
Me before reading the Cursed Child: Oh I heard they brought back time turners! Maybe they will save Fred!
Me After: *Calls The Ministry Of Magic* Hello? I think we finally found something more trashier than Umbridge.
This comment is hilarious
Bro should I read it is it worth reading because I already bought it and now I think maybe it will ruin the 7 books nice story so tell me should I read it is it worth reading
@@aalan2091 no
@@aalan2091 nope 🙅
@@aalan2091nope. It’s trash. Just read the 7 books/8 movies
Book Cedric: Oh, wait. I won that Quidditch match because my opposite Seeker got attacked by Dementors? Can we have a do-over, please?
CC Cedric: I lost the tournament? Welp. Time to become a Death Eater.
For real though
Definitely him, no funny business anywhere
'the best Cedric depiction ever'
But you see... Cedric's great great great grand uncle's friend's son's aunt's great great great nephew's second cousin 1st removed's great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grand father in law is salizar slytherin's secretary's neighbor's dentist. So it was obvious that he would become a death wizard if he had any reason to.
@@priangsunath3951 🤣🤣🤣
Cursed child is prolly why things in wizarding world ends at 7
It's like the one Harry Potter sequel written by a Twilight fan
The twilight shade was best🔥
Now lets pretend there's no book called 'you- know-what'
Please don’t insult twilight!!
Twilight is way better than curse child
OR 50 Shades of Gray, originally a Twilight Fanfic...
There is one good thing about reading this book, it made me love the original books even more and i was able to create my own imagination of harry’s future.
Thank you so much for your work on this video. I hadn't planned to read this book and now after this video there is NO WAY I will read this book. I have just finished reading all seven of the books for the first time and loved them all and to have them ruined by this one book would anger me so much so I appreciate you saving me the trouble. While I understand people can be affected by the circumstances that they endure in life, it seems hard to believe that Harry, Ron and Hermione would change that drastically and so completely different from the original canon. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said all Rowling saw was the check they sent her and she signed off based on that. This book sounds like it would ruin all the love that I have for Harry Potter after reading the books. Thanks again for your hard work.
you are far too kind . Severus Snape would never say "I am proud that Harry has named his son after me." That scene was nonsensical fan service.
Amos being annoyed with Harry is also nonsense. He didn't blame Harry in the goblet of fire and is almost never mentioned after the Goblet of Fire. It's melodramatic nonsense
jsa1993 I agree. Voldemort did it and Credric chose to be a part of the tournament.
Exactly
@@missxmarvel *Cedric
Zuko: That ... wasn't a good play.
Aang: I'll say.
Katara: No kidding.
Suki: Horrible.
Toph: You said it.
Sokka: But the effects were decent.
Even Ozai wouldn't like it.
This is how I describe cursed child from now on
@Teun de Heer I hate the people who say that it is just a bad play *full stop*. Like istg the story is shit but the rest of the play is great...
That's literally the only thing the show has going for it.
Jfc how old are you
Harry would NEVER be that rude to his son! The last movie (deathly hallows 2 I think) Harry was so caring toward his son! I feel like Rowling didn't even read this!
I'm a bit mad now...🙄😒
Didn't the epilogue of Deathly Hallows show Harry specifically say that he would be alright with Albus being in Slytherin? Since Snape had been a Slytherin? Then in this book it just becomes such a point of contention between them that it didn't make sense.
Meagan Henscheid it is deathly hallows 2
Omg yes! He was like " sometimes I wish you weren't my son " and it's like what the actual heck is this.. and then he threatened Mcgonagall and separating Albus and Scorpius.... even though they are best friends..
Meagan Henscheid in deathly hallows 2, “Albus Severus Potter, You we’re named after two headmasters of hogwarts.
One of them is a slytherin, and he’s the bravest man I’ve ever known.
she didnt write the book
Plot twist: the cursed child was written by both Rita skeeter. Dolores umbridge. gilderoy Lockhart. And uncle vernon Dursley.
Yes
They impersonated j k Rowling for a day and came up with this
Harry is literally the most humble guy ever but he was also that parent:
”james, when I was your age i was entered in a life or death tournament where I in fact did almost die like five times, so I don't see what's the big deal about doing your own laundry.”
Or is that just me
I agree he would say things like that but he wouldn't brag about experiences he has from the war that would have traumatized him.
His sons not called James it’s albus
@@Liam33123 he has two boys and girl: James Sirius, Albus Severus, and Lily Luna
Headcanon approves
@@Liam33123 Seriously? He has 2 sons in case you didn't know haha.
Even if Rowling hadn't destroyed all Time-Turners in the books, there's a much more simple reason why the Time-Turner plot doesn't work. In Prisoner of Azkaban, it's made quite clear that the rules of time aren't like in Doctor Who with separate timelines. There is one timeline, that always exists and was always going to exist, and incorporates anyone who will change time in the future. For that reason, wizards who travel back in time can't actually CHANGE anything, they can only cause what always happened the first time. Dumbledore already knew, when he suggested that Harry and Hermione use the Time-Turner, that Buckbeak had escaped. First version of Harry was being attacked by Dementors and saw a mysterious figure who looked like his father warding them off. Second version tries to get closer to see who it was that saved him the first time, and then realises it was actually he himself. Nothing different happens the second time than the first time, it's just a different perspective. And that's an important thing to have, because otherwise they could just reverse time and change it whenever anything bad happens. How was this not flagged up?
And here's another one... one of the most important messages of the series is that 'it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow up to be'. Giving Voldemort a kid in the first place is stupid, but if they were going to absolutely insist on that it would be far more consistent with the message of the original books to actually give her a redemption. If Delphi is destined to be evil just because of who her parents were (I presume she's the titular 'Cursed Child', although it never quite says) that completely defeats the most important message of the original story.
Exactly, thank you! I was shocked to see that this wasn't talked about anywhere. Time turners just take you back in time, not to a parallel universe/alternate reality!
Some how we are more sensible then AUTHORS. That's should give us a red flag about these guys
You seem to be forgetting that in that same book Hermione mentioned that mcgonagall told of accounts that the past HAS BEEN Changed but it always end disastrously, the same thing reiterated on pottermore.
@@Thegravedigger0 I haven't forgotten, and I know Hermione said that. The exact quote is 'Loads of them have ended up killing their past or future selves by mistake', and it's unclear how that works. If you kill your past self, it's a complete paradox because then you'd never have lived to go back in time and cause that to happen. Killing your future self is a bit more possible, but then you'd question, if you knew it would result in your death, why you'd go back in time in the first place (perhaps it was in attempting to prevent their own deaths that these people died in the first place).
The way Hermione says it, she's simplifying it to make Harry understand that he can't meddle, so the precise veracity of how it works can't be inferred from her words. Nevertheless, it's made extremely clear from the way it's written that there is one single timeline. And the content of the books takes precedence over what is on Pottermore if there's a clash.
Sorcerer’s Stone: I’m the first book and I’m a great introduction to the magical world
Chamber of Secrets: I was the first sequel and proved Rowling could keep a good story even in a sequel; I also started setting up the Horcrux storyline
Prisoner of Azkaban: I added new, finer details into the magical world as well as introducing Sirius Black
Goblet of Fire: I had a good mystery and epic twist at the end; I also had good pacing- and of course, I brought Voldemort back to set up later plots
Order of the Phoenix: I, though being the longest book in the series, had a lot of details and new parts added into the series; I also introduced the prophecy that becomes crucial later on- furthermore, I give huge insights into Harry’s mind and the isolation he feels
Half-Blood Prince: I brought Harry and Dumbledore closer together, as well as revealing more about Voldemort; I added a new part to Draco Malfoy’s character; I have the very emotional death of Dumbledore; and I set up the entire plot for Deathly Hallows
Deathly Hallows: I am the phenomenal series finale, with an amazing balance between emotional character development and action-packed magical duels; the characters go on a great adventure to destroy the Horcruxes, eventually killing Voldemort and ending his terrible reign once and for all
Cursed Child:
Cursed Child: i iz de biggg gae and ezzz noooooot canoooooon i is fanfic oooooo herminee is blecc lololololololol cadricc becom deth eatr and kirr nuvile XDXDXDXDXD
Cursed child: i am albus severus potter and the most unlikeable brat ever
Its really a cursed child.
cursed child: i am galleon
The cursed child: and im (beat) I don't know ejfjbakdlllwkxbjxjekfhaz
Excellent breakdown. I remember checking out the synopsis when this came out and laughed...and ignored it.
The thing that sticks out in my head is that all of the idiotic nonsense in the play happens DIRECTLY after the end of the 19 Years Later scene in which a Father comforts his son, tells him of the bravest man he ever knew, and gives him the tidbit about the sorting hat before hugging him and helping him on the train.
The play should never have been made with the story that they tossed together.
Also, Rowling almost certainly is under contractual obligation to NOT denigrate the material. Otherwise someone in r/l obliviated her.
Things wrong with Cursed Child:
-2 time-turners (thought they all got destroyed, J.K Rowling did it to avoid plot holes, what happened)
-Voldemort had a kid (self-explanitory)
-Harry is a mean jerk (wasn't he a loyal and humble dude-?)
-Harry brags a lot (if he couldn't do it once because of the trauma, why can he suddenly talk about it all day)
-Ron became like Fred and George (i mean he could've but that doesn't mean that you can delete his entire personality)
-Cedric became a death-eater (but he wanted Harry to win so how does this add up)
-Voldemort won (so you're telling me that nobody else could've killed Nagini or the question of why did Cedric kill Neville)
-Albus is a brat (uh Albus didn't exist in the 7 books so I don't have a fact against it, I just don't like how bratty he is)
-Hermione being Minister of Magic (movie Hermione? I can see that but books Hermione? Ehh sorry book Hermione but no)
-"You'll go to Askaban, just like your mother" (it makes it sound like Bellatrix is alive and the fact that Bellatrix and Voldemort are together is so wrong, Bellatrix was one of his loyal followers who basically did everything Voldemort wanted, not Voldemort's girlfriend)
-Trolley lady being a bad person (let's be real, she was one of the most wholesome characters in the whole series)
-Delphi breaking into Hogwarts (until the world's best security is as weak as leaving the key in the lock, I won't believe it)
-Harry being able to look into the future (pretty sure Harry became the 3rd illegal time turner)
-The fact it's canon (what the duck)
-The fact that it exists (pretty sure it terrified a good portion of the potterheads)
These are not my points, these are MovieFlame's so don't come for me, I just agree with him-
Facts
Also that Snape is alive when they go back in the first place. Voldemort would have still killed him thinking that he was the master of the elder wand.
Who ever had the time to read this you are a legend and who ever wrote I pray for your thumbs
That's a lot of things!
Wow that's a lot
So basically they ruined the storyline of 7 books with one book
Underrated comment.
It is
Just pretend it doesn't exist, ok? Make yourself think the trio scene at the end of the war in Deathly Hallows is the end of Harry Potter. Forget 19 years later scene, and forget this shitty fanfiction. Makes you a lot happier :-)
What book? There aren't any books except the first 7.
Exactly what I was thinking
3 reasons why nobody should like Cursed Child:
1. THEY MADE CEDRIC A DEATH EATER EVEN THOUGH HE HELPS HARRY WITH THE EGG
2. IT RUINS TIME TRAVELLING
3. ISN'T THERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE ANY TIME TURNERS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cedric Also said to Harry inte the maze ”you have it”, when he clearly could got it id he wanted to.
No, it make sense
He got a bit embarrassed, so he turns completely evil. Doesn't that make sense?
Kevin Prehm no it’s doesn’t actually.
@@ohlookitscorn. r\whoosh
@@ohlookitscorn. bruh, are you inept or something
Can you not read sarcasm
I am so mad at the writers for making Harry a terrible person.
DRACO HAS LONG HAIR IN THE CURSED CHILD? man, who is he? he looks like he’s a Kung Fu master. Harry’s mark on his forehead here is cringeworthy. Ginny looks like she’s mcgonagall’s age AND A KAREN, Ron looks like he was never before a Weasley and Hermione, i-
theory: Harry is the cursed child
Omg Ginny looking like a Karen 😂
I don’t understand WHY they made hermionie black. I’m not racist I just don’t understand it.
@@mikerodgers8453 I am not racist either. But they literally changed Hermione's race in the cursed child
@@rhea-jb3pn I am still confused why they even changed her race. Like what went through their head.
@@mikerodgers8453 That was only during the play, I think if they make a movie it will be the original cast.
But the Cursed Child is just fucking fanfiction. Even the 8 movies are more canon than this shit.
So Harry Potter and Star Wars were both like “oh you remember that super evil ugly guy that was trying to kill everyone? Yeah they had a kid.”
dont forget "you know the hero you liked? we took *creative liberties* with it"
Right?? Such cheap storytelling and not at all original and newly fresh plot.
Im WHEEZING RN😭😭
@@powerthunfischdesdonners3086 lol
Palpatine having a kid is definitely weird and I'm not a fan of it, but at the very least I'll give them that it's not massively inconsistent with his character. For Voldemort on the other hand, it absolutely is. I mean, his two main defining traits are 1) his complete inability to have any sort of connection with other people, or even to really understand them, and 2) his absolute obsession with living forever. Both of those would leave him with absolutely no reason to need or want to have a child.
Harry to Albus : "There were times i wish you werent my son"
me: WTFFF HARRY WOULD NEVER SAY SUCH THING!!
"Well spotted."
There's NO reason for harry to be repossessed by Voldemort or even any such evil thing that resembles Voldywart in the slightest, so I don't get why they thought this would have made any sense. Voldy is GONE from his body, no traces whatsoever. The only thing that would have made sense is if there was a horcrux left unchecked.
@Gngiu I was under the impression that ron prob matured quite a bit actually esp with Hermione there to straighten him out, and Harry and the others would have made sure Ron wasn't doing anything stupid as well before the wedding. Even this unforgivable curse of a fanfiction/play referenced Ron being less of a man cuz he wasn't married to Hermione in the alternate timeline. This whole book was a bad dream/nightmare that never should have existee.
@Gngiu holup
Honestly. Someone who grew up with no parents and nobody loving him would never say this to his child
Gilderoy in the second book: arrogant, snobby, a show off, prideful, has to be the best.
Harry in the “book that shall not be named”: arrogant, snobby, a show off, prideful, has to be the best… looks like someone got there characters confused when writing the “book” and I’ll give you a hint *John Tiffany, Jack Thorne*
Morgan: It feels like a crappy fanfiction
That’s offensive to fanfiction
😂😂😂😂 WHY AM I LAUGHING SO HARD AT THIS 😂🤣🤣!
So true 😂😂
Your profile photo 😓
@@POTTERS_HOME EXCUSE ME
@@sparklejumpropequeen8002 ummmm.....
This book is secretly Voldermort's 9th horcruxes
We must destroy all copies
That's why its so evil
It would be destroyed prettey quickly...😓
Quick, get the sword of Godrick Gryffindor
@@mareebee7046 I cant.......I am a ravenclaw
im sorry but this book sounds like a fanfiction by some human who was not a harry potter fan
zainab gardezi the two writers is a muggle 🙄
If the 2 writers were muggle then how did they put the imperious curse on Rowling?
And they also ship draco and harry.. ew
I know, but I like how nice Scorpius is and how him and Albus are best friends and they are both in Slytherin. thats all I like about it, though.
*Not written by JK Rowling.*
Time travel is back and the story focuses on it rather than Harry solving a mystery like the 7 books.
Harry who lived with Petunia and Vernon for years tells his son he doesn't want him, how terrible.
Harry acts like a jerk to McGonagall.
Polyjuice is brewed by new kids faster than HERMIONE could in the old books.
Voldemort who doesn't understand or want love, made love to Bellatrix with no explained utilitarian reason. He doesn't seem to gain anything from it.
None of the new characters develop enough, and the old characters don't face trials in adulthood.
Harry Potter world's best Auror investigates NOTHING.
Hufflepuff Cedric is humiliated enough to become a DEATH EATER.
*See Austin McConnell's videos for proposed rewrites and the comments on that video for feedback.*
"You can't magically create life"
Malfoy: "Hold this magic snake I just summoned"
Exactly it was summond like Hermione's birds, not created.
I love how they completely forget that Cedric was literally fine with Harry winning the Tournament based on their friendship and respect for one another...Doesn't that have Death Eater written all over it?
@Graham Evans Yeah. The guy was a few feet away from the Cup and still offered it to Harry. Idk why the writers of the play thought he’d go bad
He went bad because he got embarrassed then bullied
@@spazzingaming4517 in what timekine a wholsome hufflepuff will become death eater for being extremeky bullied
@@adenosinetriphosphate2494 Drugs
@@spazzingaming4517 he probably went bad because he remembered twilight was a thing
These two dudes must write a full parchment of, "I must never tell lies" with Umbridge's quill.
Why yes of course!
Not full never stop writing that
Ikr
@@gerrychr sorry I don't speak Dora the Explorer lover.
for once that punishment actually seems fit
Remember when Harry stabbed Voldemort's diary with the Basilisk fang. That's how a lot of Potterheads feel about this book
But still that makes more sense then this entire book
@@abhakarkumar9149OP meant that’s how potterheads felt about the cursed cursed child. They felt like they were getting stabbed
Harry Potter: himself
Tom riddle: cursed child Harry Potter.
Basilisk fang: knife
Tom Riddle’s diary: the cursed child book
498 and 3 comments? Let me fix that
In the battle of seven potters it was Dumbledore who came up with the idea to use seven Harry´s. So Harry only fought voldemort alone once.
That person who rated it 5 stars were under the imperious curse
Lol true
lmaoooo true, this is underrated
No! I love the cursed child and I am not under the imperious curse.
*reports*
@@tonyhou9246 ....
This book completely ruins the original Harry Potter series. I could probably write a fanfiction better than this stuff.
Molly Zhou this was a plot of JK and those guys to make money from us! I think it says a lot of who she is! After all! Wow just wow!
How does it ruin the series? Just pretend it doesn’t exist using your imagination young one. Boom problem solved.
I was even surprised that they wrote Cursed Child in the first place. I was content with the ending of Deathly Hallows where Voldermort dies .Harry and Ginny get married have three kids. Ron and Hermione get married and have two kids. They live happily ever after. There shouldn't be anymore to it then that.
Of course you could lol my nine year old sister who has only read books 1-3 could write better fanfiction
Molly Zhou of course you can! I can and I am only nine
It should be “Harry Potter and the pile of rubbish part 1&2”
There’s one thing I would add though: Developing the characters. We barely see much of Rose or James (Lily and Hugo are acceptable because they’re younger and just getting used to Hogwarts) and I think that it’d be cool to see how the Golden Trio struggle with parenthood/adulthood. Like someone said: it’s a *Harry Potter* book. It’s got his name in it. He should still be a very important character whose constantly learning from new experiences.
But I do like that they kinda skipped to fourth year. They probably could’ve done it better, but it’s ironically original. It shows that life at Hogwarts isn’t always an adventure or that the students don’t have to constantly deal with threats. Some years, Hogwarts is just.. Hogwarts
I've read better fanfics on wattpad than on the actual book.
Same
Same
Don't say it actual book
I don't consider it as a of Harry Potter's series even.
@@laranya5332 yes. Peridot
DAMN YESSS
Turns out Voldemort had another horcrux...
Harry Potter and the cursed child 😂
Henry Williams Oh, that'll be easy enough to destroy then
Destroy it plz
No lmao
Henry Williams BURN IT!
What a garbage bin
Author : wrote the curse child
Harry : sectusempra!
Ron : bloody hell what is that?
Hermione : if u dont mind im going to bed before both of you *authors* come up with another stupid idea to get us killed, or worse, e x p e l l e d
Draco : my father will hear about this!
No,
Draco: MY FATHER WILL DEFINITELY NOT HEAR ABOUT THIS, HE WOULD KILL ME IF I SHOWED HIM THIS!
@Ophelia Malfoy oh no
Luna: Oh, it can’t be that bad!
(buys the book and reads one chapter)
...
*where are my nargles when you need them?*
Dumbledore: Truce?
Voldemort: Truce
*Both pick their wands*
Both at same time: AVADA KE DAVRA
Harry: What’s this rubbish?
Ron: What the bloody hell was that all about?
Hermione: Pathetic!
Luna (to the writers): Wrackspurts got you?
Draco: My father will hear about this!
Dumbledore: There will come come a time, where you choose what’s right, over what’s easy.
The problems are that
1. Everybody is misprotrayed.
2. An heir to the heir of slytherin
Harry in this book acts as if he was one of the Dursleys
Ugggh that even makes it worse. This play really is RUBBISH.🤢🤮
Facts!!!
You mean Dudley
You see Vernon was actually a wizard and imperio’d Harry to act just like himself
I am starting to wonder if the writers actually read the og series.
Probably just watched the movies hahaha it’s honestly revolting
@@justmar4918 Even if you just watch the movies, you would know enough not to make such rubbish. Cursed Child is a disgrace.
They probably just searched on google, "Harry Potter Summary", and just wrote the book immediately
What went wrong with “The Cursed Child” ?
it exists
Bruno Santos I enjoyed it
400th like
BRAVO! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
harry needs to kill the book
Lmao
The handful of good things in Cursed Child are the newer ideas; Draco reflecting on his childhood jealousy, The children of the Trio not all being friends (I wish they had explored Rose and Albus' strained friendship more), Albus being in the shadow of his father's legacy while his siblings are more in line with what people expect. Even Scorpius' crush on Rose could've been an interesting way to show how the reputation of Slytherins had improved post-voldemort.
Everything the sucks about Cursed Child are the things that are aiming to "recapture the magic" of the original story. Let's face it, the only reason the time-turners are here is so we can revisit a bunch of scenes and locations from the original story. If the writers had let Cursed Child fully focus on the the next generation, and what's going on in the present day, we could've had something really great.
(Also, I actually really like the Blanket Scene. In my most generous reading of it, Harry was trying to recreate what Molly did for him in his 6th year; give him an old family heirloom to show Albus that he's a truly loved part of the family. But because Harry has been so closed off about his past, Albus doesn't fully understand the significance and just thinks he got a shitty gift, while his Gryffindor Siblings got better. But again, the writing rushes past this scene, so it's really easy to brush it off as Al being bratty. Again, it all comes down to the crappy writing that cares more about the past than the current day, which is a great metaphor for where the HP franchise is now, tbh.)
Me: **reading the Cursed Child**
Fred & George: **apparate behind me** THAT’S RUBBISH!
Fred be ded
:(
@@abovethelimits4662 He'd surely come back for such a good joke.
@@LynNorickHaile ha yes
@@abovethelimits4662 Ghost Fred
L wish there went back in time to save fred
It’s like the writers looked at the Daily Prophet and said, yeah, that’s Harry.
Lmao!! Yeah especially in the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th movie where daily prophet gets out of hand
Hahahaha I love the reference
THIS IS THE MOST ACCURATE REVIEW EVER, NO BIASES AND JUST HONEST OPINIONS.
AGREED
It's an accurate but ur statement that there is no bias is... wrong. His review is his personal opinions, his personal review, therefore, loads of bias. Although the bias is accurate, its still bias lol.
Exactly^^^
Human beings can't be unbiased if it goes beyond our basic 5 senses and involves higher level cognition.
AGREED
AGREED
I just did my first read through of this… or at least I tried to. After two hours of my life that I’m never getting back I am both laughing and screaming at this plot, so terribly to the point where I’ve stopped reading and don’t plan to continue. The ONLY and I mean ONLY logical and redeemable character in this is Scorpius. Every other character I despise and I think their choices are illogical and infuriating. I came into this book knowing that there were some issues with it not following canon, so I was prepared for that. What I was NOT prepared for however was the characters. I’m debating on whether I’m in a parallel universe or if the writers just got the characters so terribly wrong. It’s sad how much I have to say about them when I only finished a third of this sad excuse of a Harry Potter story, so I’ll skip over it so I don’t further infuriate myself. As a lover of storytelling (be it movies, books, stage plays, etc.), it is with great sorrow that I have to say a Harry Potter story was the first story I’ve ever hated so much I was unable to continue it. I give it a generous 0/10
Let's all act like this book doesn't exist
What book
the cursed child you dumb bean lol
@@byo6837 I think she was just joking
What book?
Trivekz I have no clue
**Me thinking What The Original Characters would React To this**
Hermoine-
"Stop Stop Stop! Your Going to Take someones Eye Out"
" How Pathetic"
Harry potter-
"Whats This Rubbish?"
Ron-
"Whats this supposed to mean?"
@@viktoria7958 grammar nazi
It would be insulting to not add Voldemort's reaction, so here we go:
Voldemort: Avada Kedavra!
Drako: My father is gonna here about this!
edit: Also Fred and George: "THATS RUBBISHHH"
BLLOODY HELL
Ron-"Bloody hell..."
Harry in deathly hallows: I will sacrifice myself so my friends live!
Harry in cursed child: lol I hate my son
Cedric in the movie: No matter who wins, i will still congradulate them!
Cedric in Cursed Child: lol i will become a death eather because i lost a tournament
tf was jk thinking
@@wtrpddles it was someone else who wrote that book
Perhaps Harry can change a bit when he grows up. You know, sometimes adults are different from their younger self
Radcliffe wound be so fucking DISAPPOINTED in the hot summer trash Book given he spent most of his young life bringing out the character we've all come to know and care, Daniel made you be Bias for Harry so the cursed child is another Horcrux
Let’s just say that this doesn’t count
They lived happily ever after and Voldemort was dead
I just really wanted a Harry Potter sequel to be about Dudley having a magical child.
That would be so epic
This IS amazinggg
or the marauders! (did I spell it right?)
Yes please!!
@@elliottsimms3363 Right? I just thought it would have been cool to see some growth in a character that was, for the most part, completely one-dimensional. We could have a confrontation between Dudley and his parents with Dudley maybe being afraid and then not allowing them to see their grandchild because of how they treated Harry, ultimately leading to Petuna finally putting aside her hate for magic to be a part of their lives. The kid could have his own mini-adventure, maybe team up with Harry's kids against whatever new beastie or dark wizard is terrorizing the school, tying in a bunch of old characters and their 'where are they now' stories while watching trough the eyes of a completely new character, all leading to Harry and Dudley meeting again. Nice, heartfelt, simple.
This was what Tom Riddle wrote in his diary. That´s why Harry couldn´t see anything. Tom was so embarassed about it. And rightfully so. :)
They could’ve just had Bellatrix conceive a child with her husband and make that child the villain of this book it would’ve been so much better
Good thought 👍👍
Nah bella never loved rodulphus so thats impossible
But still makes more sense
@@conserztasfia0078 Political reasons maybe?
@@NapaCat Obviously..but yeah..this idea would have been preferable...
@@conserztasfia0078 she would’ve had a child to keep the population of pure bloods to a good amount