Does Remote Viewing Work? | HOW TO BE A PSYCHIC SPY | Derren Brown
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- Derren meets psychologist, Dr Carr, who is apparently able to see places across time and enter the mind of another human using his ‘remote viewing’ ability. Will Dr Carr be able to see through Lauren’s eyes and find out where she is?
#DerrenBrown #RemoteViewing #Psychologist
Welcome to the official Derren Brown TH-cam channel. Be sure to subscribe and catch all the amazing moments of magic, suggestion, psychology, misdirection & showmanship!
Subscribe For More Derren Brown: / officialderren
Derren Brown is a British mentalist, illusionist and author. Since his television debut with Derren Brown: Mind Control in 2000 he’s produced multiple series and specials, winning two Laurence Olivier Awards. Derren doesn’t claim to possess any supernatural powers and his acts are often designed to expose the methods of those who do. He often claims his impossible effects are merely achieved through "magic, suggestion, psychology, misdirection, and showmanship".
Follow The Man Himself:
Facebook: / derrenbrown
Twitter: / derrenbrown
Instagram: / derrenbrown
Website: derrenbrown.co.uk/ #DerrenBrown #DerrenBrownMiracle #DerrenBrownShowman
It’s incredibly interesting to me that 10 to 15 years ago the world was generally so very skeptical, whereas today the general consensus is much more swayed to a consciousness existing independently to the physical body.
100 % real
Yeah, I don't understand what that's about.
@@enekaitzteixeira1070this could be why:
th-cam.com/play/PL1mr9ZTZb3TViAqtowpvZy5PZpn-MoSK_.html&si=aZwRbs_AvHqQrEPm
Proof that humanity is finally growing up, spiritually.
There is a need to bring remote viewing to the general public in order not only to help people to develop their psychic ability but also to become acquainted with it in order to then start understand several projects that we have that speaks about our origins who are we and what we are doing here in this planet.
Remote viewing, for most people, *is* vague impressions. The remote viewer's job is not to interpret or name things (for example, numbers are almost impossible to remote view) but to explain the experience. You may even "see" things associated with the object and the experience of the object as well.
To give you an example: there was a remote viewing exercise to identify an object the presenter had hidden.
My impressions were something that was both very smooth and very jagged. At one point I drew a star-like/flower-like shape. And I kept getting the color red for some reason.
My conscious mind kept wanting to interpret something that was both smooth and round as a rock. This is why you try not to interpret, only describe the impressions.
The object the presenter had was not red at all. It was completely silver. What was it? An apple core-er. A circle and inside the blades that wedge apples ray out like the rays of a sun from the circle in the middle. I can only assume I saw red as a signal of apples (although apples of course come in green, pink, yellow, and the inside is usually beige/cream).
Was I being a "charlatan" for seeing these things in the privacy of my house trying to remote view and not being able to correctly interpret what the impressions were? No. That's what low-skilled remote viewing looks like.
This test was definitely not rigged in his favor. There was stuff EVERYWHERE: red telephone booths, the maze-like streets and cobblestones, etc. By the way, Derren put "Gurgle" on the "failed words" list, but fountains do gurgle so... The viewer said "church-like" perhaps because he kept getting the impression of "statue" and his conscious mind associated statues with a church. If you keep seeing a bowl-like shape and water, your conscious mind will try to make sense of that. Both fountain and boat make sense in that regard.
So everyone saying that remote viewing is fake because he was vague: no, he definitely remote viewed. He may not be the most skilled, but he obviously got some accurate impressions. And his target was fantastically overwhelming with hustle and bustle and zillions of things that he was obviously picking up impressions on. Maybe next time, don't pick such a busy area, and perhaps someone with a bit more skill and training.
I saw another video where a woman accurately described a concealed image of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field as "circles of spinning energy" and "a spinning cylinder", but because she didn't come out and say "galaxies photographed by the NASA'S Hubble Space Telescope" the guy cackled that he had debunked remote viewing.
The other guy drew a rectangle with wheels and mentioned death. He should have just explained his impressions: rectangles (the solar panels on the telescope), wheels (the galaxies), and dying (in this case, dying stars in novae)...instead he tried to sound smart by interpreting the experience and his brain said hearse, which made him look stupid unfortunately.
Remote viewing isn't about naming things or interpreting them for many people. It's a sensory experience, not a dot-matrix print-out.
Remote viewing is fake for all people. No person claiming to have the ability has been able to prove it. Unless they are talking about being able to see the remote control for the tv. I bet a 'remote viewer' looses their tv remote like the rest of us and gets annoyed about not being able to find it.
So from what you are saying Bleda, it would be more like the viewer gets an impression of what he sees and his conscious mind will try to translate the feeling into words. Is that correct?
It is a little bit like dreams for example if I am scared from something happening in my life I dream with lions surrounding me. So my mind tries to translate the feelings into symbols that carry that feeling to me. So that is why you mentioned the viewer shouldn't name the thing itself but mostly describe how it feels.
Bleda-- right on. Thanks for writing this long comment explaining the truth. I agree with you.
Remote viewing is nothing more than a parlour trick, used to extract money from the vulnerable. It can't be demonstrated under controled experimentation, It is Pseudo-science.
@@MrRecklessryan idiot so is the existente of earth and its creatin also pseudo science
Would Darren accept proof of remote viewing based on a single experiment? If not why does he dismiss it on the basis of such, even though actual scientific experiments point to a statistically significant effect?
Look into the 'scientific studies' the participants had knowledge of the locations before hand due to terrible scientific methods.
@@goldenwombat2159 Not really.
Brown is definitely part of the disinformation on RV.
@@goldenwombat2159 No they did not , stop talking bullshit
The military use it with great success
@@pussygalore731 great success hahahah
What would be a more convincing experiment is have the same lady at the same time view that fountain. Have four remote viewers and four non remote viewers in separate buildings with different hosts and see what each of their answers are.
Everybody can learn that because of one thing - we all have energetic body/soul. Scientists, journalists tries to portray this ability like something you can only be BORN WITH . They portray this as extraordinary thing that only a small percentage of human population can use - but thats bull_hit.
Everybody can do this thru meditation
Real Bull_hit is that this "remote viewing is real", 😂😂😂😂
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information:
"Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
well, yes, but as with anything, some people can do better, its called tallent.
Any proof mate, if not keep your bullshit to yourself
Cube, word!?👽
what's my name Sherlock?
It is real. Skeptics included. Still real even if you decide to exploit your disbelief in it. Still real. It is a tool in a tool belt, another sense for your senses, you are free to use or never use.
Swing and a miss
I learned to do remote viewing from a book. I could repeat conversations people did in private and believe I was about 80% accurate. I did not abuse people but used RV to assist in tneir lives and I worked on unsolved murder cases.
Wow nice one bro. Remote hearing that’s one haven’t heard about.
What's the book please ?
yes love to know which book, thanks
@@sirinemhjKGB Book of Alien Races
By the way the whole thing is staged and its revealed at the end, just so you know.
to be honest remote viewing requires you to not have any doubts or basically to remove your "analytical overlay" which he clearly does not since shows plenty of self-doubt therefore self-sabotage.
Exactly. More than this, there is a ton of front loading. There is no target number or other "anchor". He almost collects TOO much data, which could just be cold reading. Stuff like this is just disinformation trash.
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information:
"Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
@@newhope5729 so the US military allowed psuedo science to run for 20 year's ??
@@koolkukumbur388 Nope, they researched on it and after they completely eliminated every single strand of this thing, they left it in 1995 because it's practically useless!
@@newhope5729 after 20 year's and millions of dollars ???
Gosh! The military sure has money to waste.
Derren Brown tried his best to debunk this but he couldn't. Remote Viewing is well documented and well respected Statistician Jessica Utts came to the same conclusion when she was hired by the Government to look over these studies. Also, the Government had a remote viewing program that was funded for 23 years and Jimmy Carter even talked about a Medium that helped find a downed plane. His picture of the fountain and horse sculpture was close. The woman was very impressed but looked like she was a Derren shill that was supposed to debunk it but couldn't.
All of the government funded esp and remote viewing projects took place during the Cold War. It was typical for the USA and the soviets to lie about what kind of things they had accomplished in order to mislead each other. The fact that this stuff is so “well documented” is evidence of its falsehood. The real black projects were all kept very secret.
Just think about if your enemy could send psychic soldiers to check out all of your secret bases... it’d be terrifying. That was the whole point.
If it was legit, it wouldn’t have been in the papers at the time and you probably still wouldn’t know about it now.
th-cam.com/video/YrwAiU2g5RU/w-d-xo.html
But he said like every word you could possibly think of during the hour and a half so he could have made anything fit no matter where she actually was. That's the main point that shows that its BS.
You need to practice critical thinking skills. I have a bridge to sell you
I plan on going to the Monroe institute to learn Remote Viewing but I just never have the time with work and family
If we can basically die every night and go off travelling to other worlds and dream hop etc… then more than likely with the right abilities, the right environment and the right training it is highly probable that remote viewing is totally legit.
We dream our dreams into reality during the day
Except dreams take place in our mind, not in objective reality like “remote viewing” is supposed to.
@@thedevilhimself8521 No because on rare occasions my consciousness, I floated outside my body and saw this light appeared.
And I got sucked into it I was in the dream world.
@@yeahman147 what??
@@jameswatson5807 I have a bridge to sell you
This didn’t show the strict Controlled Remote Viewing protocol ...
It's actually a sad attempt to discredit something. The Governments of the world have research and belief in.
Yes.. he is a showman.. he is paid to discredit real phenomena and make it look retarded... thats how he makes his buck.. dirty money. He is really a harlot...
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information:
"Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
@@jaco9286 hmm. Interesting that it says there's 3 comments here and here we have just one from the comment. If you listen to Darren he mentions a controlled environment so basically it's not legit one way or another: Basically for creating an environment conducive to whatever narrative is required to portray.
@@mitchconnerandsometimesjlotoo you must remote view the other comments
I understand the skepticism around remote viewing, so it took some time to get to this point. The "uncomfortable truth" in the research into the field is where the meta-analysis of all controlled experiments carried out at the Stanford Research Institute showed an effect higher than chance for successfully identifying characteristics in a remote viewing session. Or to put it more directly; in order for the "hits" to be purely lucky guesswork, you're looking at a one time probability of around 10 billion to one. So the point is, here you have a single example, and in this example it admittedly appears quite unremarkable. But when you take all controlled experiments, there is a significant effect measured. What that effect is exactly no one can say for sure, however the fact that there is an effect is grounds for further research. Also, the Stanford studies didn't follow this model of filling out hundreds of pages for a single target. Each target you were judged independently based on 4 possible targets, meaning there was a clear 1/4 chance of the judge matching your picture to the target with a lucky guess, and most submissions were on a single sheet of paper so no "cherry picking" was possible. The important thing to remember is that this effect wasn't a large effect, but it was a statistically significant effect nonetheless.The lady who did the meta analysis did an interview about her work as a statistician for SRI. Her name is Dr. Jessica Utts, shes a professor of statistics at University of California Urvine and you can find the video by searching her name. I'll still listen to anyone who can change my mind :)
Derren is an asset... his job is to discredit real phenomena to keep the masses stupid. You are quite correct.. plus I would add that many of us are starting to have these abilities 'switch on'... I am one of those people... I am not an expert but I have begun to have these remote viewing experiences occur, as well as other experiences that could be considered 'psychic' and precognition which is the phenomena I experience most prolifically... sometimes with data coming in very very fast... and way too many for them all to be merely coincidence. In fact, I have repeatedly predicted the future based on information that has come to me... many many many times and have stored all of the evidence of that because at the end of the day it proves God and that is the very thing they do not want to occur.
I believe remote veiwing is hypnotism combined with understanding the five sences. Probably some psycology as well.
@@helenwalker2986 How does it prove God ?
I have experienced remote viewing and I am an atheist.
bad news everyone, magic isn't real and neither is remote veiwing
There is definitely something profound to remote viewing or the supernatural.
He is not doing Remote Viewing. He is not an expert. Derren Brown does a great diservice to the art of true remote viewing. He should have done his research. To the critics .. do your research.
I guarantee Derren wouldn't have tested Ingo Swann when he was alive.
Knowledge-- I agree with you. Thank you for your comment.
any proof that isnt say so? like a remote viewer on here since there is apparently so many of them, id be happy to have one remote view me as proof but apprently none can
@@flawlesswill1987 I have 2 people remote view me, I can tell you it works 100%. But the guy in this video is a bullshitter.
rather than calling it a tool, you'd be better off calling it like any other skill.... and i dont necessarily mean like being able to play AN instrument. more like being to play MANY with very little practice. or being able to create in a variety of mediums. being bilingual (or multi??) being able to play chess and win....
the key is your willingness to pursue and learn something. if you pick up a violin and make a terrible sound you're probably going to laugh and say NOPE! not for me! but what if you laugh and say What other sounds can this thing make?!
i don't think you'll ever get far if you doubt yourself, regardless of whatever task you have set before. i say if you have doubts give it a try anyway. it's not like you have anything to lose. we're all made of electricity, sending out our own little frequencies. some people are easy to read by default. like, you know your kid is going to steal a cookie when you're not looking. but then you take it further and consider the bond that twins have. even some animals can predict when their owner is coming home - and not because they are conditioned to their routine or the sound of the car engine.
my favorite thing to do is guess the next song. and i dont mean on the radio. if i think of a particular song it WILL play (i listen to some pretty random and obscure music. nothing mainstream where you'd say "they play that all the time!"
i also have the ability to think of someone and they will contact me within the next 48 hours or i will get some kind of news about them. and it's only strange because they're people i rarely interact with. unfortunately that's not always fun. I was thinking about Kirtie Alley they day before she died. and Right before Meatloaf died I had just bought the Bat out of Hell CD on a whim. I was enjoying it immensely... until i got the news that evening that he too had passed away.
and i don't believe that is unique to me. i am 100% certain everyone has these experiences only to write them off as coincidences. i guess some people have a LOT of coincidences lol
but if you are determined to poke holes in things then don't even bother. just don't accuse bing crosby of lip-syncing because you can't carry a tune in a bucket.
"I can see something round-ish, or possibly square-like. It may be a square or a roundabout. Something that has a shape. And there are people. There's a church-like structure within 10 miles of this place. And I can sense a river. Definitely a river somewhere near the centre of the city. I can see shops. And there are taxis. And buses. I see pigeons. There is some kind of building or statue or tree. There's a tower of some kind, or a tall construction. Am I close?"
"Yes! I was looking at a statue on a roundabout! OMG!"
Have you ever read anything by ingo swann
Haha this is the exact reason why I came to the comments
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information:
"Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
I can predict whether a coin toss is heads or tails. Throw the coin. Don't let me see. I feel like it is kind of like a tail. But with some sensation of a head. Yes, definitely I feel like it is head-like. Also I am getting a clear image of a tail. So it could be that I am receiving a message that it is a tail. But I could be wrong. I am not always right you know.
What was it?
"It was a head."
Do you think I pretty well described what it was?
"Yes, you did say it was head-like. That you felt the sensation of a head."
How well would you say I predicted the result of the coin toss. 50%?
"Better than 50%. More like 60% or 70%."
Thank you.
Lmao
Head was my first guess too. Woohoo. And I have absolutely Zero training.
All atoms in our universe are connected. Some have the gift, some do not. It's NOT a perfect science for the current state of human conciousnous/awareness. However, once you witness it, it is hard to discredit the capabilities of the human mind.
All correct except *all have the gift it's a human sense
As a kid, in France, we had a Sunday tv show where the host would interview kids. There was always one who said he/she was coming from a very remote village, completely unknown. The host would then go “oh yes! I know the place very well! There is a big road, right? With houses around it? Yes! And trees! Cars park along that road.That is near the cafe at the corner! Not very far from the church!” Basically describing every little town in France. But the kids were always surprised and amazed. 😂😂😂
I just saw that FB ad again. Now I remember why I hardly go on Facebook anymore
Girl: stares at artsy fountain for hour and a half
Dr. Carr: "I sensed art and a fountain."
Darren: "See, guys? This is total nonsense."
He also said he saw a hundred other things. Those 99 others were all completely wrong. But you think the one guess that happens to be similar is magic.
PT Barnum was right; there’s a sucker born every minute
art and a water fountain in london? thats pretty much anywhere in the main part of london
@@flawlesswill1987 Yes, but he could have sent him to another country and tricked him entirely. He didn't, and the remote viewer got hits.
@@benjaminmesa1089 because hes naming things found in any city lol its like me saying i see leafs twigs and old wood in a forest
@@flawlesswill1987 No, not true, because there really isn't much else in a forest. However, in a city, it can be all kinds of things. "I see books everywhere . . . I am on a lot full of cars . . . Ect."
I had a very adept spiritual teacher and if I did something he didn't like when he wasn't around, he would pull me up about it and admonish me over it. He knew exactly what I had done and he was nowhere near there physically.
What was his name?
Actually we have several soldiers with documented awards for remote viewing. Our CIA natural science division operated for 20 years. It was funded year by year based on mission success for all 20 years. It finally came to an end due to dogma vs. Science. The natural science division was ran by a pretty decent physicist. Ya, it's real and it's cool. Younger physicists believe, so should you.
Timmy No thumbs need more info on this
THANK YOU!! I'M INTERESTED IN THIS!!
Pfff lol. Woo woo. Sigh. Some people are desperate to believe anything.
Humans. Ending something that works for years because “science” said its imposible
@@MikiMannikin yeah maybe it “works” to entertain some people, indulge their imaginations or alternatively delusions, but it’s good they know better now than to let it suck funding just for people who are too gullible or sick to know any better.
at 1:25 he gets to hear loud traffic.
well the give away was she was going somewhere ... chances are she'd still be near some kind of traffic
Sorry but Rving works....but the process here isn't really remote viewing. It should be done in extremely clean conditions....IE there is a target, here are the coordinates- 8 digit. no other clues.....view the target. results should be analysed thoroughly, should get viewer to view multiple times….multiple viewers.
this is not RVing
This is preloaded viewing at its worst.
How is derren not laughing his fucking head off
He might just find it interesting but the man is talking bullocks
well, for starters this isnt remote viewing.
not even slightly
@@skutterbuster666 is there another method or something?
Remote viewing is a real skill and just like any other skill, you have to develop it. It's work and knowledge first and foremost.
I love your channel! ❤
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information:
"Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
That’s great. Will you prove This ability under laboratory conditions.
@@786Kay786 They can't do it, 🤭🤭 Cause it's fake, 🤭🤭🤭
The real charlatan is Derren himself....
I believe we ALL have the ability to remotely view. Its simply a matter of a state of mind and how the individual reaches that state.
YES I DO THIS .
I'm really serious how's it going with that I'm on day 3 never don't before in my life but wow
Remote viewing is real, it might not be as practical as we want it to be at the moment, but anybody who really does his research will find plenty of evidence for remote viewing and not only...
What else is there besides remote viewing?
@@purpose6113 psychic phenomenon, ESP, psychometry ; telekinesis . . .
Us psychics know what is real and what isn't. I must say, I am slightly offended at some of the comments here that argue that remote viewing isn't real, when in fact it is. But what can we do? These kind of 'magic' stuff, as people would call it, can't exactly be explained by science yet. But those who are fimiliar with it would know these stuff exist.
What you can do is prove it. Have a remote viewer publicly demonstrate how they can ‘see’ things more frequently than a non-viewer. It would be so easy ie. have them answer multiple choice questions about what object is being seen. If they get a higher success rate than chance, it works. Nobody has done that though.
I'm very much interested in psychology in general. Could you, if you don't mind, explain what is/are your abilities? I would much appreciate it
Stay off those drugs; they’re not doing you any favors.
@@calvin3005 yes they HAVE done that. Your comment shows how little you know about the topic. It doesn't take much searching to find the proof. The Rhine Institute has researched it and shown it's a true ability. In fact I've "remote viewed" my entire life but my ability wasn't something I learned from anyone. I do it spontaneously. How, I don't know. I wish I could explain it. I've always given credit to God since He made me.
@@ThePromoModel dont be ridiciolous... “ they have” haha hear that all the time, who are they?
I wouldn't say its about "entering a person's body" to see what theyre seeing. Ive done this several times and even for a new friend in another country, explaining in great detail items they had in their room, specifically their closet. It totally freaked them out. Do not confuse new age occultic with true gifts. It would be easy to debunk and debate on though, thats for sure
I think when he saw a boat it was the bus going by behind her..like a blur..looked like sailing maybe bc of the water...fountain.
I know it works because I did it myself. It doesn’t seem possible and I wouldn’t even try to explain it Amazing technique.
I can confirm this is real and that everyone can do it. I just did my first blind remote viewing like 10 minutes ago and I can assure you my mind was blown like an effing supernova. I'm still trying to calm myself down 😃😃
YESSSSS!!! Amazingggggg!!!
🙄
I'm really trying to learn
How do you learn?
I also do it. Describing the photo that a friend choose without telling me nothing. Was the first time that i do it...and everything that i write was correct......imagine what you mind can do. In my process...she choose a photo and then in another paper she write a radom number. She give me the random number, and me in another paper start to write de code number...when i was writting it...i recibe information...like a description ( green plants in front, a big brick color in the center like a big montain...street signs and electricity pole, cement) and the picture was about a bigg restaurant with brick color, with green plants in front, and
The street sign and a lamp electricity pole. ( And this was my first try)
it's somewhere IN LONDON, there is a stone building nearby. perhaps also something that the public are able to go inside...
If that's all you have to do to become a remote viewer, I think I'll start referring to myself as one.
exactly lol i see water.... in london with a giant river?
Yes, and of course Brown didn't edit the video just as he wanted either!
Spiritual and metaphysical arts practitioner here... Born with gifts and abilities, never lost connection... There is a whole lot more, with high accuracy, yet this one thing seems to be the only topic of what they think is useful... Is it possible they don't really know who and or what is roaming around the continental US, and what We can do? Do they really not know? They don't... They don't really see...
Bro what's with the extra periods at the end of your sentences? One is all you need.
im sorry but in central london - arches/ old buildings/ cathedrals are very common. most of this is barnam statements nothing specific. why not tell her something specific like if she asks somebody for them time get him to describe the person who she asked, and what their response was - what the person looked like/ accent etc - ie something VERY SPECIFIC,
We also have to consider that he is under pressure in the situation so he won't be as accurate.
Why cant these remote viewers find missing children
My remote viewing abilities are kicking. I’m intrigued but also anxious. The things I see are disheartening. It just happens as soon as I get in a meditative state. I am also telepathic.
What have you seen?
@@Seekingtruth-mx3ur well many things actually too many to list. But last night I saw horses with men on them a group on them with a Canadian flag 🇨🇦 I couldn’t see much as my visions are 2 toned but I did see the flag waving in the air. Another vision I received was of that at a place called Skinwalker Ranch. And in that vision I saw an inter-dimensional being and they were letting me know that they are there doing a great work. They revealed how they looked to me. And then I also have received some images of children that were being hurt those by far the hardest images for me to experience.
@@Seekingtruth-mx3ur I work on it more and more every night and I’m getting better and better
@@Nicolesrecoverycorner hello how can i learn remote viewing?
@@Nicolesrecoverycorner Hi friend, A Canadian here. Do you have any control within your dreams.
Can you fly around at will?
Is there always the same theme or concept surrounding the dream?
Are you seeing things in Color or Black and White?
Are any people recognizable? Or total strangers??
I myself have Lucid dreaming whereby I am in remote unknown places and fly around at will but Never know what to do so get bored and wake myself up.
Sometimes with a slight headache. I suppose if I were to train myself or something ?
I would be able to "remote view" what ever eventually I want??
I am NOT astro projecting and can pull myself out of anywhere by Will, I wonder how I can master this??
Oh and I also can pass through objects and or people if I want.
It's very strange...
The dudes cold reading and fishing for agreement.
Not true, and it would be a complete waste of time, Derren Brown didn't know the location at the time of viewing.
@@PatMcDonaldMrTinker he doesnt mean darren hes talking about the liar
Derren is an awesome skeptic. Love him for exposing frauds
You think he exposed somebody here? The word the guy said the most was WET and flowing water... She was staring at a fountain... He also said boat, which clearly has to do with water but the host listed that as a "miss" 😂... I'm not saying it's real or not, but I am saying it'd be pretty ignorant to just dismiss the fact the things he said the most, were dead on.
What a load of bollocks, thank you Derren for debunking idiots and frauds.
***** I did.
H Boogie Indeed!
Sebastin Otis So you believe this nonsense do you?
I think my son with Asperger's has this gift. I think he gets it from me .
Dana Newton he doesn’t, neither do you. 😌
A lot of people can do this, but it's not done by the individual, there is a supernatural force needed to carry this out, Dr Carr clearly displays this when he raises his hands to summon this force.
A remote viewer will try to interpret what are photo negatives to fit his session. Pre-programming and time work against him because we assume time works properly from Lauren's POV and Dr. Carr's. Carr launches himself into a trance but also uses space inside the room. He seems to have no feel how space works in his linear movements because what a RV master uses is a 360 eye as if operating from within a orb.
It would have been easier for Dr. Carr to simply guess what Lauren was wearing on her trip. Abstracts are as big as whatever it was that he eventually rendered.
A lot of time, RV masters will see other people looking at them throughout the day. Mostly, a RV master will have to clear his mind of heavy visuals, colorful art, shapes or things that move oddly like lava flow. Personally, I try to not sketch because it limits the detail of what I actually see.
The discerning mind works to read other persons on many levels, not just what they think or convey through speech. Any language spoken is contextual but to do a real time read of another person a color coded keyboard would have to be used to group syntax. A Synesthete for example would be able to assign spoken words to his color coded palate for quick documentation.
I suggest you watch Third Eye Spies documentary if this interest you.
What I've been noticing about remote viewing is that vision is always sketchy, evidence is weak, and interpretations are vague. Not a true science. Human intuition is an extremely rare phenomenon. Proponents always brag about the rare incident where it "worked," ignoring all the times it didn't.
I believe remote viewing works . Practice makes perfect . .
We where all born with God like powers in his image etc. . . You just need to tap into them from an early age and practise . . Telepathy. Telekinesis. Remote viewing . The brain is a powerful tool.
When you have faith and belief in yourself and truly no yourself , God is within us , the God gene has proven that , every element of the universe is us . . Our planet and us all contain the same stuffs. . All from the universe. Tap into that and accept that . . Feel it . . See it. . Smell it . . Enjoy it . . Be the best you can be.
@@tinajennings1202 so Tina is a godess then i guess
He's not disproving it, the guy was probably a beginner like myself it's not clear vision it's very blurry, a table can look like a bed for example
Yep! If you are a split it does work! I can still do it to this day.
Not a good example of remote viewing and remote viewing is used in the military. The main issue is to quieten the mind. The best remote viewing is not 100% hence why they use at least 5 remote viewers. Also blind targets are best to stop our conscious mind butting in and adding false information.
The Case of ESP (1983). It's on TH-cam.
Por favor podrian ayudarme a encontrar a mi hijo Harold? Hace 10 años se fué de mi lado 😭y no sé dónde está, dónde vive ni trabaja 🙏🙏
Trust me, seeing though another's eyes is very real. I have ..
As someone who has this ability I can confirm it's very real
Elaborate
@@jhenealika2255 what's to elaborate, I can connect with a person, see them their house and locations, objects etc through an esp ability called remote viewing, I actually had to google it because I found out I could do it..
Outside of that I'm currently working on checking out the planet from the outside
Are you available
@@magicklife9812 I dont have anything coming in yet, im just going around researching
Remote viewing or so we like to call it ..I just wish this reality wasn't filled with so many disconnected souls .
I just woke up to my phone buzzing. But didn’t open my eyes but I was looking at my phone buzzing. Clear as day. So I think to do this you must by totally unaware or unconscious of where you currently are. I slowly opened my eyes but shut them quickly to see if my vision matched what I seen with eyes closed, and it seemed like it did. But then I fully opened my eyes and I was the opposite way the phone was behind my back. I’ve done this many times while half asleep.
Me too!
@@feliceharper7633 man I don’t remember this lol
3:44 PM 11/13/2022 Picked a random video online about remote viewing. Dont know whats in video didnt watch it. Its kind of like a zener card test. So what I would do is I would be the viewer and one person would be the sender. Its part of mind to mind commuincation thing (forgot term). I didnt need another person to do this though I can do this myself. This has to be overwatched by like a judge person to call this out. For my examples I would use the Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Security Agency (Feds have power and resources to do this unlike lower tier branches/groups). They would be the judge. Someone would send me information like telepathy and I would see the image in my head or hear voices in my head or some weird hallucation at the time. I would write this down for my answers too. Its kind of like a double blind evaluation. Telepathy works both ways. I can also be the sender and send this to another "psychic" and they would be the viewer. Thats working with another psychic or remote viewer to do this. What I would do myself working solo is I would call out events or people/places on my own. Im not against other people like me that can do this. I would do this myself calling it out. Like in a zener card test I knew what the next card was. I didnt need the sender to look at the next card in the deck and send it to me. I already knew what was next.
HE IS DEFINITELY NOT THE BEST IN THE WORLD BUT HE IS REASONABLE AT THE ART'S AND LETTERS
So by this programmes logic he would have been wrong anyways if every place in London fits the description. Then why have him view London?
he should've done this with joe mcmoneagle. he was actually in the cia program. and he did that japanese tv show finding missing ppl...wild
50 /60 % ay . From a genuine doctor/specialist teacher of the art of RV , MY CONCLUSION impressed , NOT REALLY.
Now waiting for Derrens entertainment, i mean experiment 😅
Imagine a remote viewer confirming that someone is slandering you
I see Lauren in a place where there are people nearby, and buildings, and a sky overhead. There are roads nearby and vehicles.
Thats a general look at London though, stone, fountain and church. He could name anything in London and he would be correct. lets see him do it in like Los Vegas or somewhere in Australia or something. Its dumb
Not all Australia is desert, the East Coast is actually beautiful.
I can do this easily. I need to install TeamViewer. I don't need any paper. Just some MB's on the Phone
Derren Debunked!!
Where's the second part to this? I'd really like to watch it.
Do you do it to im on day 3
When they do it with me, then i’ll believe it! An hour of words and drawings which you could relate to anything!
skepticism is a very limiting mindset.
Of course it works.
There is only one mind and there are no partitions.
I am online finding videos of this because I am Astro traveller.
I am not sure where I am from but I am also a remote viewer who is really trying to expand his view & knowledge on this subject
But he couldn't stop his hair from falling out or turning grey
1:13 I love the ring tone!
The very first thing that popped into my mind was the word animal/animals then I had to quit because I'm driving home lol
On a purely physics-based level, technically we're all connected by the same electro-magnetic bonds of molecules, so technically we're all connected on that level.
It's sad that in a modern society some people still think this sort of thing works and is real.
Cynicism has it's place ONLY when you understand what you're talking about.
Eddie Lives "David Goslin, of the American Institute for Research said, "There's no documented evidence it had any value to the intelligence community." Read this:" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing#Decline_and_termination
And David Goslin is the end all on the subject case closed.....
What if I told you that once upon a time I used to meditate a lot, like 2 to 4 hours a day and one day I was asleep, I got a phone call from a friend, the phone rang and woke me up. When I awoke I had this vivid flash in my head of a location I've never been to. When I answered the phone my buddy said he needed a ride. before he could tell me where he was I said ok and hung up. I drove to a place about 10 miles away and there he was. 20 years latter he still talks about that, He was tripped out about it. I didn't consciously do that, it just happened. If that could happen to me it's not a stretch to think that people could actually deliberately do it. I do however have reservations about my tax dollars going into such a project.
Eddie Lives I would say you were either lying or you had convinced yourself of a story that is only half true. Like all these supernatural powers or paranormal sightings, there is absolutely no evidence for any of it except anecdotal.
So then I'm either a liar or hallucinating, and that is where we part ways.
Was the first time that i do it...and everything that i write was correct......imagine what you mind can do. In my process...she choose a photo and then in another paper she write a radom number. She give me the random number, and me in another paper start to write de code number...when i was writting it...i recibe information...like a description ( green plants in front, a big brick color in the center like a big montain...street signs and electricity pole, cement) and the picture was about a bigg restaurant with brick color, with green plants in front, and
The street sign and a lamp electricity pole. ( And this was my first try)
That was so vague a description you can't possibly not hit with some of them.
yea and even derren always tells people about the % while even just guessing. and that usaully around 40-50% anyways
Why do you feel when someone stares at you? Start here
Dr, Carr is fantastic with his ability and his teachings t his students
Dr. Carr drew the clock tower outside his window, lols. How he missed that red double decker bus is a mystery.
Weather this individual can remote view is the real question, weather it’s real and some can do this is not in question, as many of these ppl have been put through many tests to be confirmed as legitimate, and were used to a high rate of success for things most of us will never know
It's pretty much the same concept of cold reading. Put out a lot of words that could be interpreted however the person wants then the "viewer" leads them to the conclusion he/she want's.
I think I can do this too. Kind of
I think he was way way way off course. I can sit here and 'randomly' draw stick type figures and curves/ circles and get a 50/50 chance of being correct of the viewed target..hope he has another job and I can't understand why the military would want his low grade services.
@2:35 "I may be way offee hee tee hee "
yep. I think derren thinks so too
The response from about 3:20 is typical of psychic narrative, using words like "perhaps", "possibly", maybe, seemed to be, Some kind of, etc etc.. Astrologists and fortune tellers use exactly the same techniques.
This and all other psychic realms are frankly utter tosh. Sadly, they attract people who consider a single success, however vague, as an immediate and conclusive confirmation of truth and their 'talents'.
So DR Carl perhaps you might try and remote view Argatha the so called mythical place inside the North of our Planet..that the Bhuddists and Admiral Bird talk about...and how interesting that the Great magnificent Beautiful Fallen Angels and followers .(that hate our guts!!)..spoke about building his palace/Kingdom in the sides of the NORTH?..well how curious is that?as above so below..what if?
I can send my guide in, I see through his eyes and I have images
I did it yesterday the girl that was missing in Houston high way and a square I looked at map it was a square 69 is darkness and white it flips
Why the creepy music
I can see perfect when I view 100 percent accurate when I view I see just like seeing with my eyes open I can control where I move around. I didn't go to any school to learn I meditate this is my second year meditating on my own I've been to other realms who's intrested giving me a job?
Stop with the spooky music. There’s heaps of remote viewing out there, it’s cool.
It's Fake!
This remote viewing is pseudoscience, and there's no evidence to support it, here's some information:
"Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s upon the declassification of certain documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program that had started in 1975 and was sponsored by the U.S. government, in an attempt to determine any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any actionable intelligence information."
@@newhope5729 no evidence? Have you actually looked? Or did you just take one wiki paragraph and decide the case was closed. Jeez! Have you heard of Scientism?
@@andycochrane4131 Bruh, something which is as effective with 1 in a million probability is practical useless for me..... Though, maybe You find it useful, 🤭 Go ahead with your superstitions, 🤭
@@newhope5729 why don’t you steel man the issue? I have.
@@newhope5729 The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.
Nikola Tesla
Just thought I’d add that.
I think Derren's shows are amazing and I feel weird that the first comment I am posting about your work is kind of negative! But I think this video was not a good experiment because you need more data. He did get a fountain but then again yes he had five pictures.+ the things he said during the the 1.5 hours were not his conclusion? so are irrelevant?. Check out Stanford, Princeton and James Randy's experiments on remote viewing and make your own mind up ppl! BTW Derren you are awesome!Cheers
2:11 this is what I do.. this guy may not be legit but I have my own experiences
This guy’s results weren’t that impressive, but there are A LOT of examples from the Stanford Research Institute experiments & those conducted with the CIA which are insanely specific & accurate, & given the specific conditions of those experiments (where there’s no way they would’ve been able to know the locations in advance or infer any details about the locations from what they were told about the experiment), I found their drawings VERY convincing. Like, I literally cannot imagine a world in which these would’ve all been coincidences when there were a bunch of them & they were all astonishingly location-specific, including identifying the labels of file folders about top secret programs located in the underground of a secure secret government facility which even the experimenters didn’t know was within a few hundred feet of the exact coordinates they gave the subject
did alex jones tell you all that? he's so wise
Guys Darren is completely aware that remote viewing is 100% real but he doesn’t want to admit it if you don’t believe me then go on the internet and type targeted remote viewing and then I can guarantee you will believe it’s real because I was just like you but then I got every answer right