Sigma Male vs Omega Male The Lone Wolf vs The Omega
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ธ.ค. 2022
- Sigma and Omega males are on opposite ends of the social dominance hierarchy, so people may assume that their personalities also oppose each other. Whilst there are some differences between the two, there are also many similarities. Sigma and Omega males share more traits than you would think, especially with how far apart they are on the hierarchy.
Both Sigma and Omega males are essentially personality types in the socio-sexual hierarchy, which ranks men from least socially dominant to most socially dominant. Sigma males are placed at the top alongside Alpha males, while Omega males are at the bottom of the hierarchy. None of the social dominance archetypes should be seen as bad despite the ranking system, so don’t worry too much about where you place. We’re just here to talk about two different archetypes and how they compare with one another.
There are a few different interpretations of what a Sigma or Omega male is like, but overall - Sigma males are seen as lone wolves with a mysterious air, whilst Omegas are seen as quirky and introverted. Both can be hard to understand - Sigmas have a complex nature and don’t often share their thoughts, whereas Omegas usually adopt interests that are more niche so it can be difficult to relate to them.
Thanks for stopping by the Relentless Man channel where we teach you how to be a high-quality man. We approach this by starting with self-awareness and developing a positive psychology mindset. This shift in thinking can help you with interpersonal skills and verbal communication in all areas of your life. This makes your masculine energy unstifled, drastically improving your well-being and entrepreneurial mindset.
Subscribe - bit.ly/3OOkrgX - แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต
Introverts who care about success are Sigmas , introverts who don't care about success are the Omegas 😊
I just did a 20 question test thought I was a Sigma but I'm a Omega male.
Im probably both omega and sigma in some ways, i have no interest of being a leader, but i only do so when necessary
After watching this, I'm still not really sure which one I am. They both describe how I prefer to live my life and pursue my endeavors, but still not really sure which one I am regarding relationships. I'm married but I married a little later in life than most of my peers, when I eventually found the right woman. Both types fit my personality and the one thing I'm certain of is, I definitely don't like being center of attention and I don't like following other people.
The difference I think is Sigma can challenge Alpha 1 on 1 while Omega is self decisive and just leave without challenging Alpha. Both not challenge for the leadership but Sigma is just for the skill of it for own development.
I am mostly an Omega, but on a good day when feeling good, I’m a Sigma.
The simplest way to explain differences in a tangible way would be to see if you can find a Sigma male that is also a good therapist/counselor. It is a difficult trait and skill for a Sigma to be a counselor. I say this because it isn't in their nature to be overly compassionate or caring, but if it is their "job" could they? It isn't about better or worse, but adaptable skills and a good and simple tool in the real world to spot the difference. The being a lone wolf thing is overestimated, imo, because survival is a symbiotic thing where you have to rely on others, when needed to survive. The issue becomes when either a Sigma or Omega become overreliant on that. It is a good check to remember that. A simple example would be having to use both your hands for a task but also needing a light. The proper thing to do would be to either acknowledge this before hand and prepare a setup in advance or to ask for help. Both are good skills to have depending on what you need. I personally have found that being too stubborn and only relying on your own internal thoughts is not always wise, or safe, and sometimes will get you killed. Look at the Oceagate sub creator that thought his carbon fiber shell was superior to titanium and reinforced skill. That way of thinking is a flaw, but is often talked about as a trait so many think is a highlight and a coveted skill. It CAN be, but it can also be fatal. Train yourself to know the difference and accept you don't know everything. It's a self-actualization of a limitation you can improve on. That isn't a bad thing because you aren't God. You often hear the quote about it being better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardner in a war. The truth is to to ask the question of what makes the person thinks your are in a garden to begin with? The world, people and nature is constantly trying to kill you, and people and organizations actually actively try to do this daily. It's stupid and silly to view it any other way. It is why trust and character judgement is maybe the best skill anyone can develop. I'm not sure where that puts me, but I don't care honestly. Lead when needed, follow when needed, adapt when needed and pay attention. I could care less how that makes me appear to anyone. If you could be content (not necessarily happy), but content being the only person alive, could you live with that? I could, but it is stupid to think it wouldn't get lonely.
The way I see it is:
Omega -> ASD
Sigma -> ASPD
Being Sigma means being alone. It’s hard for me to find the “One” most people just disappoint me. It’s hard to find people I can relate to, I’m not bitching but it can get a little to lonely.
Many sigma guys do remain alone and single. Don't let these definitions hinder you though. They aren't rules set in stone.
You can view finding "The One" as an annoying task or you can view it as an exciting challenge. You're right that you will be disappointed a lot when trying to find a good girl. That means you have high standards. That's a good thing!
Take a look at your lifestyle as a neutral outside observer might see it. What could you do differently to meet more potentially great girls and find one that would be a great match for you? Then decide if you are willing to make that change.
In my definition a sigma is seldom lonely and does not dismiss people. I think a sigma accepts everybody but needs nobody. A romantic relationship will only last as long as the sigma’s partner continues to fancy him. When she doesn’t he will walk away but not unkindly. She will get a good settlement and he will retain loving memories.
Look at the "law of vibration". No need to look for anyone. They'll come to you.
It is my assesment that I am perfectly where I am alone or not. I dont trust anybody, and I wont let my emotions fusterate me. What I feel and whats real is a skill as we age. So a man thinks so he is, if I say am lonely then I project that sentiment. But I rebel, I tell myself the truth, am sexy as they come, am healthy, wealthy, and wise. Am funny, and tell yourself who you are and you will be that much closer to being that within the truth of it, no ego.
I agree, I feel more sigma than omega, although I don't really care. I'm usually quite polite with other people, most of all if I see they're in trouble, but I don't feel the need to be supportive, I just need to see myself able to support. And I think this selfish trait is what distinguish sigmas from omegas.
I don't feel the need to be in a relationship but I feel the need to see myself able to have one. Still the same trait.
But I also feel the need to be self sufficient alone whilst still able to exit my comfort zone and acting the exact opposite by breaking my own rules every time I need to confirm them.
A very wise man once told that any way that has an heart could be tested as many times as you want and it will still be having an heart. This is the main reason I break my own rules still considering them rules.
Some videos about sigmas make them seem to hate other people, I don't hate anybody, I just prefer to be with myself but I'm able to give love and compassion, eventually keeping them for who I think they're deserved.
Sometimes I end up thinking the best way for a sigma could be a polyamory where little things are compensated by being supported by more than just one person in a life.
I'm omega and happy to be so.
I just have one thing to say...
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO💀💀‼‼
I am alone and mysterious keep to myself I can follow leadership rolls but prefer not to and I don't need to play a popularly contest tenacity is the name of the game for me I get my interests met
I guess it is not that easy to fit only to one of them. I'm as honest i can be to myself but i have to say i'm 80% Omega / 20% Sigma. It's very interesting to explore yourself more and more like this. I'm very happy about the fact i'm not a Alpha. I don't like the attention and i don't want to stick arround with ppl who are not loyal and worthy. All of us will find only a few real honest and loyal Friends in life, the alpha is the only one who is stupid enough to keep haters next to him and get stabbed in the back only for his stupid status. He could avoid this up front but he would be nothing without his status. It's pretty sad if you think about it in my opinion. 🤔
its all bullshit anyway
I find it amusing how everyone seems to think Alpha males are top of the pecking order. They always come across as insecure dumbasses to me. Imagine spending all your life trying to impress others, defending your macho image and constantly enduring the bullshit of others. Like you I'd describe myself as mainly Omega with a splash of Sigma. I do what I want, when I want and on my terms. I couldn't give a flying fcuk about what others expect of me. They can keep their pecking orders, ranks and social status to themselves because I'm too busy and too happy being me living my life.
I‘m 100% an Omega male
Sorry to hear that.
You know what they say. Good guys finish last. Especially today.
@@omathitis8498 We don't care :P We do our own thing
@@omathitis8498 Omegas aren't 'nice guys.' Didn't you listen to the video? They're 100% independent, non-conformist, confident and not afraid to reject women. They don't care about the hierarchy bullshit. That puts them on top of the pecking order. The Alpha male is actually just an over-confident beta. He needs validation, needs to prove himself and craves attention. That's weak shit.
1Samuel 16:7 But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.
Omega is the best
why?
@@nicedoppy2077 Because they're free of all the hierarchy bullshit. They don't need validation, pecking orders or social structure. They are true independents.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx Ok. thanks for share your p.o.v. on this matter...
I clicked on this video to find out if I fit Sigma or Omega and, I still can't tell, but it doesn't matter anyhow - I like both.
People do not talk about this, but the social heirarchy is also dependent on your physical appearance. If you're short, unless you're that very rare exception like Wolverine in the X-Men comics who is a Sigma, you're going to be an Omega male, through no choice of your own. And society is going to treat you as such, to where you will have no choice but to develop Omega male traits.
You make a good point. Physicality does have a big impact on how you are perceived but it can be overcome.
Well, if you care so much about appearance and how people treat you based on that, then you are neither Sigma nor Omega. A beta, perhaps.
Ah I see. Could be true. So, there is no chance for a 1.70 to be a Sigma?
@@barssuer239 Sigma is also the way you carry yourself. If you've got the personality of a king maker vs a king then you can call yourself a sigma.
@@danielg9174 I see, creating a king you mean, right?
That helps thanks
It didn’t help me. I want to say am in the middle. It like a 50/50 between the two and i can’t be the only one that feels like this. I must be even rarer 😂. Any answer?
50/50 is quite common I think. Dylan Geick and gay adult star Blake Mitchell are perfect examples.
Is it possible to transform from one to other?
Now i am more confused
I feel i have 50% of each
Thank you... That's what I got from these descriptions. They both seem to fit.
@@RCon25 you must be super rare
Maybe in my middle age I'm definitely a Sigma; but with Omega tendencies.
In my life, I've actually turned down more relationships than I've kept. There's just so many interesting people in the world. If I ever deemed my mate too "complicated" I moved on.
My current relationship has been steady for 30 years now. We're still content with each other. There have been flings on my end, but not in the last 20 years. We're still not married either civilly, nor by the church. I always figured that if we ever were, we'd file for a divorce the next day.
BTW, Alphas annoy the Hell outta me. If they'd stay in their lanes, I'd be ok with them...but they're alphoids and will always be, "habitual line-stepper's" as Charlie Murphy[RIP] once said, describing Rick James[RIP] (another annoying alphoid). Makes me feel, "warm inside" to put an alphoid in his place (outta mine). Other than that, everyone else can do what they want as long as it doesn't cramp my thing.
Sigmas are the rarest trait yet 90% of men claim they're sigma 🤣
Lmfao ok steve 🤣🤣
I don't fit anywhere, I am alien 😂😂😂
After going through half of your video, i only could conclude the differences, one made it to the top, one didn't.
Though onerous, I automatically take charge of things if it is warranted. Giving emotional support, however rewarding, requires extra effort on my part. I wonder if this may be due to military leadership training and my cultural upbringing.
This isn't uncommon and it could be in part from your military background and upbringing. It sounds like since you take charge when needed but struggle with the emotional support, maybe the difference is that the emotional support side isn't at critical and doesn't require your intervention so you don't feel the need to put in the additional effort there (whether right or wrong).
Does this sound accurate or am I off-base with understanding your situation?
Sigmas dont jump around hobbies looking for excitement, they dig in and unravel the truth they are about depth, they want to know how something works with an insatiable thirst for knowledge about whatever interests them, they have an inbuilt sense of fairness and truth, integrity is huge to them, they see things others can't see and can read people in a glance, they never hate because they understand fully without bias and can forgive because they know why somebody hurt them seeing the flaw in character, they don't hold grudges they learn the lesson and leave forever, they set life goals and will never give in no matter what is thrown at them, the mental determination in sigmas is unbreakable, they feel rock steady godlike in an isolated way, in no way is it arrogance though its often perceived that is, they hold an internal belief and connection to the universe they can see and analyze things like a sixth sense, all archetypes have similarities it is the god-given unique traits that decide what we are on the ground floor of being.
This rendition of the archetypes are what I would use to describe them.
Lowest man on the totem pole is the strongest because he holds everyone above him up
Omegas aren't weak, they're the polar opposite.
Why do Americans say "could care less"?
Just think about it, it makes zero sense.
In the UK we say "couldn't care less", because that makes actual sense.
Good point!
It's English, bruh. Most of it doesn't make sense.
It irritates me too. 'Could care less' means they do care. As you said, the correct phrase is 'couldn't care less', meaning you care the least amount possible (i.e you don't care at all.)
The I is silent in the "could care less" as we here across the pond say
@@bageerabethea5187 The word 'I' is irrelevant; what matters is the fact that they say 'could' when they should be saying 'couldn't.' For the grammatically challenged the word 'couldn't' is a contraction of the words 'could' & 'not.'
I thought i am a sigma. But I'm between the two
Same.
To sum it up, Sigmas are Clint Eastwood in steroids, while Omegas are Steve Carrell in steroids.
?
The fact that Omegas are at the bottom of the hierarchy ironically means they're on top of it. Their self-confidence is off the scale but they don't have any need to boast about it. They just don't give a shit about Alphas and their pecking order bullshit, they don't simp like Betas, they don't need others like Deltas and they don't need to impress from the side lines like Sigmas. Sigmas are cool but Omegas are arguably cooler because they totally reject any pressures and expectations placed on them by society. They are non-conformists and natural renegades. They are the true lone wolves.
You don't understand the types well. Betas are not necessarily simps. Sigmas are not trying to impress from the sidelines at all. What you described is a Sigma. Omega males are similar to Sigmas but by comparison are less ambitious and competitive, more friendly, spontaneous, impulsive and less of a long-term planner. I was a bit confused which one I was but I am an INTJ and the planning part sealed the deal.
I just can't fit myself anywhere. I thought I was an omega but I'm really not introverted. I could be a beta or a gamma. Probably not alpha or sigma
I am not a male still watching this but i love all Alpha, Sigma and Omega's personality 😀😀
I'm glad you enjoy the content!
@@relentlessman thank you for this amazing content. I really enjoyed it very much 💜💜
i consider myself ass a ligma male
Even tho sigma is on the top of the ranking and omega is at the very very bottom, try not to look at omega as bad. It just means if your omega, your weak and uncool. But again, its not a competition
Kind of but there are so many nuances to these terms we use. One great trait that omegas tend to have is their easygoing life view. They can fun easier and can let go. Pros and cons.
The friends of sigma males are bad ass.😁
I bet 95% of the male population things they're a sigma.. But you're probably an Omega.
Could be true. Before "being a sigma male" became popular, I would bet the majority of American males considered themselves alpha.
No both men think they are alphas but probably are betas. Too many men are insecure
Real sigma males are dominating the world right now
Yeah I’m one of ‘em. I considered myself sigma based on the quiet loner thing but after taking a quiz and watching this video I’m starting to accept that I’m an omega.
segma == omega .. thats it
@@plowe6751 what is the real diffrenet ? how you can tell that segma not omega ?
@@plowe6751 haha maybe, but do you think all sigmas are successful as in youtube shows?
@@plowe6751 haha i agree with you
Omega lol another beta
Omega males are often very attractive, with masculine face features and fit bodies.
I'll be Omega
Why are we letting people tell us who we are? You can't define me!.... completely.
is this a serious video? lol
Sure, it's quite old school, but still valuable. Today we call this psychology, shifted into a more scientific setting, away from spirituality and esoterics, but it's, in it's essence, still the same topic.
I really seem to be a mix of both.
I also seem to have Zeta traits too.
Their main differences are two:
a) Sigma males can be leaders when it's necessary. Omegas can never lead.
b) Sigmas are dominant while omegas are submissive.
not necessarily.
Omegas aren't submissive. They are 100% independent. They reject any form of hierarchy. They carve their own path through life. That's not being submissive.
Not true at all. I lead when necessary. I also don’t like being submissive.
@@kevinhougesen1473 Then you are not omega.
@@Apopateus You clearly don't understand what an Omega male is.
This is just astrology for lonely guys
Maybe you’re on to something…
And here you are.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx yeah I watched a bit of the vid cause it’s funny to get in the headspace of guys like you every now and then. Makes me realize it could always be worse haha
@@wesleytwiggs7687 You're trying WAY too hard.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx not sure what that even means but alright.
@penguinz0