East Aurora Police: facebook.com/EAST.AURORA.POLICE.DEPARTMENT/ Auditing Erie County: P1 - th-cam.com/video/2DM8BaTSE34/w-d-xo.html P2 - th-cam.com/video/KSPL7_0KjKI/w-d-xo.html P3 - th-cam.com/video/fkjcnuVlWgE/w-d-xo.html Patrick Welch Stephen Cartwright Submit your video: forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6 Help me launch attorney-shield.com Become a founding member! About the app: th-cam.com/video/p6tBMHB-Lcw/w-d-xo.html LackLuster Media LLC PO Box 514 Chester, WV 26034 Best Dashcam - amzn.to/45fVYsW MERCH - www.youtube.com/@LackLusterMedia/store Gimbal - amzn.to/45tZyzd Camera 1 - amzn.to/3x1gn3L Camera 2 - amzn.to/3slCrbD Radar/Laser Detector - amzn.to/3P10Wnt - - Other Channels - - The Odd Side: th-cam.com/channels/TSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw.html LackLuster Clips: th-cam.com/channels/tj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w.html - - Social - - Facebook: facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official Twitter: twitter.com/DaleHillerYT DISCORD: discord.gg/SUcPuym IG: instagram.com/lackluster_media/ TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official Project1983.org I receive commissions from featured links on verified purchases, at no cost to you.
@shroompicn-shrooman that made me upset too, he had no business telling her his name and what he thought he did, he never harassed cadets, I saw that video. So sad
I know you have to play both sides Lackluster (and I LOVE your content and 100% support you)...but this one...this one i cant get behind unfortunately. This is a senior center, they have a different standard and level of discretion to uphold. The true motive behind 1A audits isnt just to create change and transparency, but to hold certain government agencies more accountability. In my opinion this is one of the audits that just misses the mark completely and to produce this video is supporting the negative of the 1A community. Please keep doing what your doing, but consider focusing what im sure is hours of production time bringing to light the true issues with government, not just an ass hat looking for a law suit which is very evidently what is happening here. I often hear "collecting content for a story" but whats the story here, other than walking around with a camera clearly alarming people who are not trained to handle this. I get it...most if not all 1A auditors are not real "journalists"...journalism is more than a camera and the balls to put yourself in this situation. Journalism is meant to be both creative and productive. When it becomes destructive, then we need to reexamine the whole movement...just my two cents but this one (and there have been a few others) was a step back for me, not forward....cheers though to all you do generally and keep it coming!
If an armed citizen put his hands on a cop like that, there would immediately be an arrest and criminal charges. The same thing not happening when the situation is reversed is unacceptable.
Absolutely correct. If he would have physically reacted, as most people do when grabbed by strangers for no reason, the cops most likely would have escalated the situation. They were fishing imo.
The difference is that citizens can't utter the phrase " for officer safety" . When a cop says that whatever the law is doesn't matter and whatever happened is determined by the police. You can not believe your lying eyes.
@@markmixon1121 "The difference is that citizens can't utter the phrase " for officer safety" ." Setting aside the pedant response to that, they can utter the equivalent. Namely, "for citizen safety" and under the law, common law, etc. citizens have the right to use force for their safety.... in theory. Unfortunately, to what I presume you mean, we agree. Namely that the legal system will protect cops like this but citizens doing the exact same thing for the exact same given excuse will be treated infinitely more harshly.
In fairness, this guy was just making an ass of himself. Do this at a post office. A police station. A courthouse. Anywhere else. But not a SENIOR CENTER. There's no "government". There's no authority. Old folks can go have a meal, meet with friends, be with peers while caregivers run errands or even go to work. There's just no reason to be there, bothering people. Yes. I'll concede it. He has THE RIGHT. But goddamn. Doesn't he have a mother? Manners aren't LAWS. But generally, you should exercise THOSE as frequently as you exercise YOUR RIGHTS.
HIPAA laws need to be studied by these people. They don’t comprehend the law. The basic of basic versions is it’s their responsibility to keep that information private
I'd like to see that whenever people say they can't film due to HIPAA, the auditor says, "Oh, so you openly admit to violating HIPAA by displaying personal health info in public areas?"
@@The1JHorton If you want to be specific, PHI is Protected Health Information as it applies to HIPAA, which I've been formally trained on before. It never ceases to amaze me how many people don't know the laws that apply to them.
This is EXACTLY why we should record. The door was closed..... It you cant remember if a door was open or closed, maybe you should be admitted to the senior center you are managing.
"We're not going to talk about anything until the body cams are off" just another reason these things should be recording continuously while worn. You can stick a terabyte SD card, have a high res mode and a low res mode. But there's no reason you couldn't record a whole 8 hour shift.
The problem with what you're saying is police officers would have their shifts recorded. This would lead to less "bad" cops employed and would be counterproductive to the goal.
And that is the funny thing that everyone seemed to overlook. Right of the bat, she lied to the police when the status of the door had been captured from the initial moments Dan Walked in. Prefacing the complaint on a lie.
6:00 The lady thats telling him what rooms are "forbidden" and that "he will be arrested if you enter this room" says she doesnt even work there... a true Karen
I noticed that too. She works for the private non-profit next door. But she doesnt work for the gov. But she’s acting liking she’s the boss of the building. She even says “i dont work here”. 6:00 she needs to be fired.
Goodluck. These good old boys are so in bed with each other the only way anything like that would ever happen is state/federal intervention, and as we all know they're so busy doing nothing or being used in personal political vendettas (on both sides) that it will take nothing short of a miracle for that to happen.
HIPAA applies to the record keeper. It's basically the sworn oath of the record keeper to ensure the information in their care is kept private. If it's laying out in plain sight, the violation is against the record keeper.
"We not going to talk about anything until our body cams are off." - Police officer --- This sounds like law enforcement is hiding their activities but I thought they keep telling the public that they want to be open and transparent ?
Only until they want to make up stories to get someone arrested or to get their stories straight so they tell the same lie. Otherwise they want to tell the public they have full transparency.
Anyone who says they're open and transparent typically isn't. If they were they wouldn't need to say it, nor would they be put into a position to bring it up. It's also strange to see these buzzwords being used for something that's considered standard for the US. It's like that co-worker who constantly demands praise for doing what they're being paid to do.
@@wingatebarraclough3553 It seems the public is having their rights stripped away to tend to the emotional well-being of a super-class of humans, cops. Collectively speaking, our rights are being traded to sooth the ego of narcissists. AKA: we have "battered woman syndrome."
We get to assault you for officer safety! I didn’t see him touch you! There was nothing wrong! Bad answer! Tell that to a judge that’s not in league with the department! We’ll see!
True. There is, in fact, no crime from the citizen recording HIPPA info, but there most definitely is from the employees leaving it out to be recorded.
@@daverobson3084 I am always amazed at officials claiming HIPPA violations. They don't seem to understand that they are incriminating themselves. The level of ignorance on this topic is ridiculous.
@@warrenwinston9803 I had a second in command supervisor, AND privacy officer, for an EMS service I used to work for tell me that I could tell a police officer anything that they wanted to know about a patient I had treated because the officer" was conducting an investigation" so, therefore, HIPPA did not apply I said " I'm pretty sure that isn't right." He asked if I though that I knew more about HIPPA than he did. My answer was" Before this moment I would have said no, but now I'm not so sure.". Then I told him he should probably call the company lawyer and see if the cop didn't need a court order/subpoena to get any info beyond the mere fact that we transported and treated the patient. He did so and, low and behold, the lawyer said the officer needed a subpoena.
Amen, hopefully that would make them a little more polite .usually works when you hit them in their wallet .sad part is some cops are just sadistic assholes they enjoy abusing people. and there is allot of videos out there to prove it. Politics aside policing in the U.S. is a big problem. needs to be dealt with . the system meant to protect us from them has been twisted to benefit them. why because they feed the system . it would go broke in 6 months if we all asked for a jury trial .
The law system is messed up. The frauditor should have been sent to prison and pay fines. How would you like it if some clown kicked your door down and recorded your home and told everyone your home address. Think about it.
@@MitchellJBridges The guy wasn't at these ladies homes.. he was at a public building funded by taxpayer money.. The frauditor as you call him didnt kick the door down. He entered the building legally as he's allowed to do. He didn't do anything illegal. I get it, you don't like people who do what he does but end of the day it comes down to the law.
It’s completely accepted as gospel, when it is used in bad faith 99% of the time. Zero cops have ever been hurt by anyone with a camera when the cop knows them and has interacted with them. The cop even used the citizens first name and told a (false reporting) Karen his full name. He wasn’t in fear, he was pissed because he hates this part of his job (accountability),
The way he pushed the guy as he charged him and said, "Get out of my way!" was pathetic. It was an obvious attempt at excusing his assault of a citizen.
@@5urrea7definitely not reaching. Although I don’t see anything wrong with drinking, smoking, or anything of the sort, it’s not needed as a professional working as a public servant.
If you have Privacy Act information out in the open, that is YOUR problem, not the citizen's. If I were in the HR department, I'd seriously be considering her termination.
…except she claimed the simple sign-in sheet was protected by HIPAA…so it’s unclear if there was any data which needed to be protected from public view in the first place. Fire her for gross incompetence and unprofessional demeanor…
It is a special place in the brain these people have that I don’t have. It’s the place where it’s ok to lie in hopes people will get in trouble and or arrested. It also makes sense of the public cameras are different then the cameras that are on in their office every hour of everyday they work.
Is going hands on not a use of force? Should it not be documented? Surely escalating the level of force with no crime occurring surely has to be a policy violation. *Surely.
Imagine being the public receptionist sitting at the public reception desk of a public building and it scares you that the public keeps walking in expecting you to do your job.
And, according her own account, having top secret HIPAA documents openly for all to see on the counter and on her desk. Besides that, the list of visitors, openly displayed, is also a violation of private data protection.
Eh while I don't like cops and know what the guy is doing is completely legal, it is genuinely disturbing to have someone in the room filming you. Like I would be disturbed if everytime I left my home there were cops standing outside "patrolling" the space outside my home every single day
The guy taking the video shouldn't be annoying people just for the sake of annoying them just because he can. Go annoy the cops and take pictures of the police station, or town hall.
They could have just ignored him. He wasn't doing anything illigal or strange. If you're afraid of a camera you shoulden't have a public position.@@DM-mc1xn
Same, I had to go back when she said "I will have him arrest if he goes passed theses doors" like she works there. Which was prior to her saying the aa meeting and her shaking.
For this officer to claim harassment is boarder line slander. He said him self his first experience with an auditor and independent press member was at “Police Academy”! With that being said it shows that these “Law Enforcement” are not being trained for interaction with citizens. They are not being trained in constitutional law.
The LT literally wrote "First Amendment Auditor" & "Hands on officer" He had no intentions on taking Erie's statement or even take the complaint serious. That should be enough to win this lawsuit.
“HIPPA”… 😂 that strictly for healthcare professionals and if you don’t want people’s private medical information available to the public, maybe don’t leave it laying out in a public area on a desk?
Just to clarify it is not just for health care professionals but also "covered entities" that is anyone who stores, transmits or handles protected information. I worked for a non profit that helped people find jobs and we had to take the same precautions of nothing on desks, computers not facing public areas, walls etc. we had people's medical restrictions and even drug test information. It is completely on the organization to put up those precautions as stated no responsibility falls in any random person because they can see that information.
11:03 Listen to the absolute frustration in his voice that this man is within the law and he cant arrest him. It takes a real pathetic person to be that driven by ego
Good thing you conducted this investigation. I got some tips and leads that this facility was leaving private information out in the view of the public. ❤️
@@alliecollin1748 HAPPY F%CK THE COPS DAY, Search Eric Brandt, he got 12yrs for threatening a judge etc in a angry rant after they illegally arrested - kidnapped him around 100 times for petty BS - retaliation for crap like sidewalk chalk etc.. Basically he got 12yrs for hurting the judges feelings...
Please keep us up to date on Dan's lawsuit... and thank-you to any/all auditors, cop watchers, Constitutionalists, etc... who are giving up so much of their time to expose the rot that has spread throughout our local, state and federal governments.
Do they understand that HIPPA only applies to people working there not the public. If you have material that is supposed to be confidential it is the employees responsibility to make sure it stays confidential.
What is tragic and comical at the same time is that the lady does not realize that if there is private information on the disk, it is she who is breaking the law, not him who is filming.
Of COURSE PDs will never hold themselves accountable. Thanks for always highlighting these important interactions and the follow ups that auditors make.
This entire incident was “ Swatting”, and the police love to play along. Interesting how that cop said that Dan Harrassed all the rookies in the academy. I’d bet that he didn’t harrass even one. Liars are gonna lie.
And, in general, said laws are pretty straightforward. Protect the information from those that do not have a need to view the information. They clearly spell out who is responsible for protecting the information, and it is most surely not the general public.
The way that office was set up was clearly for the public to stand at that counter. Plenty of materials, sign-in log on the clipboard, all facing the counter where members of the public would stand. Wouldn't be that way if it was a restricted area.
Whats wrong is most cops can't handle it when a citizen knows they're rights and the cops cant use they're corruption against these citizens. I love the video's lackluster. Keep fighting the good fight, brother
When a cop tries and tell someone about changing a public building to private is going to far. The cops can't be a person making a complaint and not allowed to get soneone trespassed or solicit a trespassed. For this very reason The Brady List is very good.
Be real. He wasn't there to take pictures. He was there to provoke this response. Fine. I support that. But be man enough to do it as the police station. I'll defend that all day long. But a SENIOR CENTER? Just let good, decent folks be.
@deggree Not to mention all the money that gets spent on bs artworks and things of that nature. I'm all for making sure the buildings look presentable but bust and statues and massive portraits aren't cheap.
What video are you guys watching. They didn’t escalate. Didn’t overreact. A slight boo boo from an very new cop. Not perfect but very responsible on everyone except one slip up upon which cop walked away.
Legislation should make it a criminal offense to mute or stop a video camera during a call for service and interactions with the public. Bodycams are being used more and more in courtrooms as evidence and muting, blocking, and/or stopping a bodycam is destruction/suppression of evidence. Muting, blocking, and/or stopping a bodycam should be considered that the cops are hiding something from transparency and accountability - either conspiring, malfeasance and/or other criminal activity. People need to contact their legislators and demand this. If the police have nothing to hide, then they shouldn't have a problem with this.
Any government employee/representative that calls the police to have someone's constitutional rights violated based on HIPAA should be included in the lawsuit. Members of the public are not subject to HIPAA laws, and these people absolutely know that.
Make sure you contribute to every possible suit. Most won't bother filing because there is little point. It costs money, takes significant time and then you run into qualified immunity meaning the case gets dismissed and there is no recourse. A good number never get to a hearing since the municipality will offer a settlement, often with an NDA. And those that do make it to trial still have to win. And then the award is paid by those with the deepest pockets, the taxpayers. I am personally aware of over a dozen suits won in the past year totalling well over a million dollars. I am unaware of a single significant change made in policy or policing due to these suits. People letting stuff slide? That would be the police who refuse to hold each other accountable to the laws. My preference would be to allow citizens access to grand juries to seek criminal indictments against public employees. The citizen should post a minimal bond to deter frivolous and meritless charges. Upon indictment the citizen should be allowed to choose a private prosecutor to pursue the case at taxpayer expense. We pay for every criminal prosecution already, only police are rarely charged or prosecuted for most crimes. We also pay for the civil awards when, our employees, acting with our authority, on our behalf, cause injury, violation or harm to a member of the public. We can pay to let citizens seek criminal justice. Empower the people to police the police because the government will not hold itself accountable to the law, only the people can do that. Now, do you think people would let as much stuff slide if they actually had a real means to achieve justice and equal protection under the law? The biggest benefit to allowing private prosecution of police is that it doesn't pit the individual against the full resources of the state, the taxpayers. Instead it puts the resources of the people to work for the protection of the people against agents representing the people. It evens the playing field. It puts police on notice as individuals that they are responsible for their actions and choices, they will be held criminally liable for their indiscretions and abuses. Many say this would neuter police,. Officers would be too worried about being charged or sued if they mess up so they simply wouldn't do anything, ( Uvalde, Parkland??). I say, police will be certain of their cause and grounds. Officers won't make unnecessary arrest or use unnecessary force. Officers will be more respectful and careful while following the same laws we all follow. And ultimately, it will still be up to a jury as to whether they CHOOSE to convict an officer or give immunity by a not guilty verdict ( jury nullification). Most citizens sitting on a jury will give the officer some benefit of the doubt, a bit of reasonable leniency for their job. But if it is an arrogant, entitled, emotionally unstable officer who abuses their position, the people need that officer off the job, a criminal conviction would do that without arguing with the union or worrying about employment contracts and pensions. The bonus, a criminal conviction all but removes any immunity, immunity doesn't cover criminal acts. So get the criminal conviction and no QI to stop the civil suit. The downside to a suit is that you cannot really go after the individual. Colorado for example claims to have abolished QI but what they really did was to indemnify the officer and limit individual liability to $25,000. Even if a person were to win a big judgement against an officer, so what. The money still needs to be collected. Most officers will transfer assets to others and spend there cash on defending themselves. When a judgement is awarded there is nothing to collect on. A person can spend years going back to court to get new court orders and forfeitures. Think of OJ in the wrongful death suit. He lost, was ordered to pay like $20 million. I don't know what the Brown family has collected but it isn't anywhere near the full amount. And yes, the judgment made things tough for OJ but not that tough. There are reasons people let stuff slide, you should be asking yourself what those reasons are and finding your own answers before you start complaining about it. Not an insult. From your comment I took it that you believe more should, or everyone should be filing suits. But I'm not sure why you think that is a good idea. Do you think it will cause change? Do you think police will behave differently? Do you think one person getting a chunk of taxpayer money will make the world better? Exactly why should we want people to file suits? So they can take on the system individually out of their own pocket to help us all? Personally I don't see civil suits as productive. I don't see criminal prosecutions as THE solution. But I do believe it would put more weight on the individual officer to act as a reasonable and responsible individual, accountable for their own actions( just like every other person). I think cops would learn to control their tempers, lose their egos and respect the rights of everyone. Police would not blindly follow orders or interpret laws so literally. They would hesitate to arrest or use force unless necessary. Officer safety would no longer make sense or be applicable. And above all else, we the people would not feel so helpless, frustrated and angry when police act unlawfully and abusively. We would know, we don't have to fight outside of the law, we don't have to just take it and let it slide. We would have legal recourse, actual protection under the law, a path to equal justice within the system. The alternative is vigilante justice outside of the system, outside of the law. I think we are seeing more and more that people are getting close to abandoning hope/faith in the system and are ready to start acting outside of the system. If we don't change the system soon, we won't have to change it. Just some thoughts.
@@eshootziscrs2868 people take the settlement because if you lose or are awarded less than the settlement you have to pay attorney fees for the city. Considering the jury could give you $1 most attorneys advise you to take most settlement offers if there's no actual injury. You don't know if your jury will be bootlickers, ACAB, or normal people somewhere in between
No one never goes in that office but there is a list of people that signed that sheet. There was a man in the office when he got there and a man walked in the office while the cops was there.
karen says ill have him arrested if he goes past here. 2 minutes later she says i don't work here i don't wanna give my name. why tf did she even get involved?
She also uses the word "forbidden": "He is forbidden to go in this area. I forbid him to go into this room. If he goes in here I want him arrested & trespassed." The way she speaks shows she's a tyrant. She lacks people skills & should not be working in a customer service position that has a lot of interaction with the public.
The double standard that was shown in the complaint process should make the person investigated this sick to his stomach for Lieing and saying it’s ok if his coward officers assaulting a citizen.
If they have personal "healthcare information" left out in the open they deserve to at least be investigated and fined if found in violation of HIPAA laws, and maybe even shut down or prosecuted.
Exactly, If there were PHI sitting out in public view, that would be the facility that was breaching the law. A name and a sign in time is not protected healthcare information.
Why do they get so bent out of shape over recording and with the chick covering up the sign in logs? She works the desk, she should know anyone can request sign in logs
"I want him arrested if he goes here!" 2 mins later : i dont actually work here. Maam, do you or do you not have rhe authority to tell him where he can and can not go in a public building?
Damn!Taxpayers pay for the public servants civil training & then pays the lawsuits when they fail to retain the same said training!Talk about a carch 22!🤔🤦🏿♂️🤨😒😔
![⭐️( ลอยกระทง 2024 ) Ver. แดนซ์ Remix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rMWOLhgXUHc/mqdefault.jpg)
East Aurora Police: facebook.com/EAST.AURORA.POLICE.DEPARTMENT/
Auditing Erie County:
P1 - th-cam.com/video/2DM8BaTSE34/w-d-xo.html
P2 - th-cam.com/video/KSPL7_0KjKI/w-d-xo.html
P3 - th-cam.com/video/fkjcnuVlWgE/w-d-xo.html
Patrick Welch
Stephen Cartwright
Submit your video:
forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6
Help me launch attorney-shield.com
Become a founding member!
About the app: th-cam.com/video/p6tBMHB-Lcw/w-d-xo.html
LackLuster Media LLC
PO Box 514
Chester, WV 26034
Best Dashcam - amzn.to/45fVYsW
MERCH - www.youtube.com/@LackLusterMedia/store
Gimbal - amzn.to/45tZyzd
Camera 1 - amzn.to/3x1gn3L
Camera 2 - amzn.to/3slCrbD
Radar/Laser Detector - amzn.to/3P10Wnt
- - Other Channels - -
The Odd Side: th-cam.com/channels/TSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw.html
LackLuster Clips: th-cam.com/channels/tj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w.html
- - Social - -
Facebook: facebook.com/lacklustermedia.official
Twitter: twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
DISCORD: discord.gg/SUcPuym
IG: instagram.com/lackluster_media/
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official
Project1983.org
I receive commissions from featured links on verified purchases, at no cost to you.
6:44 Nice that they DOX him to the lady working there .🙄
TICK TOCK TYRANTS… Accountability is coming whether you want it or not and there is absolutely nothing you can do to stop the flood coming… TICK TOCK…
TICK TOCK TYRANTS… Accountability is coming whether you want it or not and there is absolutely nothing you can do to stop the flood coming. Tick tock…
@shroompicn-shrooman that made me upset too, he had no business telling her his name and what he thought he did, he never harassed cadets, I saw that video. So sad
I know you have to play both sides Lackluster (and I LOVE your content and 100% support you)...but this one...this one i cant get behind unfortunately. This is a senior center, they have a different standard and level of discretion to uphold. The true motive behind 1A audits isnt just to create change and transparency, but to hold certain government agencies more accountability. In my opinion this is one of the audits that just misses the mark completely and to produce this video is supporting the negative of the 1A community. Please keep doing what your doing, but consider focusing what im sure is hours of production time bringing to light the true issues with government, not just an ass hat looking for a law suit which is very evidently what is happening here. I often hear "collecting content for a story" but whats the story here, other than walking around with a camera clearly alarming people who are not trained to handle this. I get it...most if not all 1A auditors are not real "journalists"...journalism is more than a camera and the balls to put yourself in this situation. Journalism is meant to be both creative and productive. When it becomes destructive, then we need to reexamine the whole movement...just my two cents but this one (and there have been a few others) was a step back for me, not forward....cheers though to all you do generally and keep it coming!
If an armed citizen put his hands on a cop like that, there would immediately be an arrest and criminal charges. The same thing not happening when the situation is reversed is unacceptable.
Absolutely correct. If he would have physically reacted, as most people do when grabbed by strangers for no reason, the cops most likely would have escalated the situation. They were fishing imo.
The difference is that citizens can't utter the phrase " for officer safety" .
When a cop says that whatever the law is doesn't matter and whatever happened is determined by the police. You can not believe your lying eyes.
If they lived
@@markmixon1121 "The difference is that citizens can't utter the phrase " for officer safety" ." Setting aside the pedant response to that, they can utter the equivalent. Namely, "for citizen safety" and under the law, common law, etc. citizens have the right to use force for their safety.... in theory.
Unfortunately, to what I presume you mean, we agree. Namely that the legal system will protect cops like this but citizens doing the exact same thing for the exact same given excuse will be treated infinitely more harshly.
In fairness, this guy was just making an ass of himself. Do this at a post office. A police station. A courthouse. Anywhere else.
But not a SENIOR CENTER. There's no "government". There's no authority. Old folks can go have a meal, meet with friends, be with peers while caregivers run errands or even go to work.
There's just no reason to be there, bothering people. Yes. I'll concede it. He has THE RIGHT. But goddamn. Doesn't he have a mother? Manners aren't LAWS. But generally, you should exercise THOSE as frequently as you exercise YOUR RIGHTS.
"we're not going to talk about anything until our BWC are off."
that is more than enough for me as a potential juror to convict on conspiracy.
That is conspiracy.....
the minute I heard that, I would seek as much money as possible for the plaintiff
Yep
That's why there'll be a settlement. Unless this auditor has the strength of character to let this go to trial
this is 100% why WE THE PEOPLE need to investigate them!!! no more of this we investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing
HIPAA laws need to be studied by these people. They don’t comprehend the law. The basic of basic versions is it’s their responsibility to keep that information private
I'd like to see that whenever people say they can't film due to HIPAA, the auditor says, "Oh, so you openly admit to violating HIPAA by displaying personal health info in public areas?"
@@The1JHortonwell put!
@@The1JHorton If you want to be specific, PHI is Protected Health Information as it applies to HIPAA, which I've been formally trained on before. It never ceases to amaze me how many people don't know the laws that apply to them.
@@The1JHorton Part of HIPPA is keeping aholes with cell phones out of areas where info is.
You beat me to it! 💯❤ percent correct!
Thanks Dan for making these lying Karens uncomfortable.
Blows my mind that public servants lie knowing that they’re being recorded and will testify to that information to law enforcement. Insane!
Sadly government officials are aloud to lie.
And criminal…
Because they know to a certainty there will be no repercussions from their illegal action. Why would they care? 😅
This is EXACTLY why we should record. The door was closed..... It you cant remember if a door was open or closed, maybe you should be admitted to the senior center you are managing.
😂😂😂 for real yo. She lied
"We're not going to talk about anything until the body cams are off" just another reason these things should be recording continuously while worn. You can stick a terabyte SD card, have a high res mode and a low res mode. But there's no reason you couldn't record a whole 8 hour shift.
How about upload to a cloud based server in a read-only format? You don't need an SD card.
The problem with what you're saying is police officers would have their shifts recorded. This would lead to less "bad" cops employed and would be counterproductive to the goal.
The door was open, I saw it on the video. I hope your lawsuit prevails and you get a huge settlement.
Scoundrels!
And that is the funny thing that everyone seemed to overlook. Right of the bat, she lied to the police when the status of the door had been captured from the initial moments Dan Walked in. Prefacing the complaint on a lie.
not to mention that warm greeting he got when he entered the room.
6:00
The lady thats telling him what rooms are "forbidden" and that "he will be arrested if you enter this room" says she doesnt even work there... a true Karen
She also stated “I will have you arrested” this hyena is super entitled or so she thinks.
@@mr.duanesharpe🤣😂🤣😂✌️
I noticed that too. She works for the private non-profit next door. But she doesnt work for the gov. But she’s acting liking she’s the boss of the building. She even says “i dont work here”. 6:00 she needs to be fired.
Has anybody idntified that lady (and i use that term loosely).
she should be put in jail
Cartwright is doing a fantastic job training new officers how to earn the hate.
Earning it every single day.
Ps I got attorney shield back in January
WHEN WE LAUNCHING ll?
The people NEED to know! 😊
The door was absolutely OPEN it's on CAMERA 😂😂😂😂
That woman lied her ass off about him opening the door.
Air the video of the door being open and the cameraman walked through.
@robertschwartzman195 he showed that in the video
She should be charged.
I never understand in these videos why cops spend so much time talking to people when they could just watch the video footage.
@@michaelfremarek4159guy is still recording them for YT so he’s not offering to show them
Lawsuits don’t do anything. The criminal charges need to be pursued!
Goodluck. These good old boys are so in bed with each other the only way anything like that would ever happen is state/federal intervention, and as we all know they're so busy doing nothing or being used in personal political vendettas (on both sides) that it will take nothing short of a miracle for that to happen.
EXACTLY
lol You know the Police and the Prosecutor are both in the Executive branch.
@@wadestanton 18 USC § 242, 18 USC § 1918, 5 CFR 2635.702…….lol you know something else? 28 USC 1361.
@@18U.S.C.242 Yes
HIPAA applies to the record keeper. It's basically the sworn oath of the record keeper to ensure the information in their care is kept private. If it's laying out in plain sight, the violation is against the record keeper.
Plain view doctrine.
"We not going to talk about anything until our body cams are off." - Police officer
--- This sounds like law enforcement is hiding their activities but I thought they keep telling the public that they want to be open and transparent ?
Only until they want to make up stories to get someone arrested or to get their stories straight so they tell the same lie. Otherwise they want to tell the public they have full transparency.
That right there is conspiracy to pervert justice, a felony.
conspiring is always best done privately.
Anyone who says they're open and transparent typically isn't. If they were they wouldn't need to say it, nor would they be put into a position to bring it up. It's also strange to see these buzzwords being used for something that's considered standard for the US. It's like that co-worker who constantly demands praise for doing what they're being paid to do.
Blue mafia
The "Officer Safety Cult" strikes again.
Uvalde
@@wingatebarraclough3553 It seems the public is having their rights stripped away to tend to the emotional well-being of a super-class of humans, cops. Collectively speaking, our rights are being traded to sooth the ego of narcissists. AKA: we have "battered woman syndrome."
Well said! 😆 You’re SO RIGHT!!!
That reception lady was going to bash the cop with a gun. Also, why is the supervisor there alone if they are so concerned about the officer safety
you better carry a pocket full of acorns
The lady lied to the police and the police lied in their report, all the liars should be fired and sued!
And sent to prison for twenty years.
That “officer safety” phrase is use a lot when police don’t know what else to say.
just make sure you have a pocket full of acorns
@@MichaelGhost Your comment makes me feel unsafe.
@@MichaelGhostsince that day acorns make
Me tremble! Ptsd
@@babyblueLEGEND You feeling unsafe by his comment makes me feel unsafe.
We get to assault you for officer safety! I didn’t see him touch you! There was nothing wrong! Bad answer! Tell that to a judge that’s not in league with the department! We’ll see!
They are such self-serving cowards.
What do you expect from witches?
I like this auditor he is not pushover, cops needs to be held accountable.
If they have sensitive medical information plainly visible, then THEY are the ones in violation of the HIPAA laws, not the guy filming.
Nobody was filming
@@traphuntnstuff8096 sick technicality broski 🤡
???????@@traphuntnstuff8096
But she saw it on tic tok
@@jm74784 😂
He didn't touch him, but he was moved for officer safety... must have been magic.
"People don't just come in here filming"
Cop- "Unfortunately he does" 😂😂
Hipa documents shouldn’t be laid out in plain sight
Also this didn't a doctor's office or hospital, hence any HIPAA information should not be in the office to begin with
True.
There is, in fact, no crime from the citizen recording HIPPA info, but there most definitely is from the employees leaving it out to be recorded.
@@daverobson3084 I am always amazed at officials claiming HIPPA violations. They don't seem to understand that they are incriminating themselves. The level of ignorance on this topic is ridiculous.
they aren't & if they are, that's not being HIPAA compliant
@@warrenwinston9803
I had a second in command supervisor, AND privacy officer, for an EMS service I used to work for tell me that I could tell a police officer anything that they wanted to know about a patient I had treated because the officer" was conducting an investigation" so, therefore, HIPPA did not apply I said " I'm pretty sure that isn't right." He asked if I though that I knew more about HIPPA than he did. My answer was" Before this moment I would have said no, but now I'm not so sure.". Then I told him he should probably call the company lawyer and see if the cop didn't need a court order/subpoena to get any info beyond the mere fact that we transported and treated the patient. He did so and, low and behold, the lawyer said the officer needed a subpoena.
When Dan says he will file a complaint, watch that officer’s reaction. He doesn’t care because he knows nothing will come of it. Zero accountability.
and the lietenant, when served. no real reaction.
he knows it's not coming out of his pocket.
Oh so true. Cops believe they are above the law. Very seldom held accountable for the misdeeds if ever.
My mother used to say to me and my brother (we were thick as thieves)…one lies and the other swears to it.
Now I get it.
Mom was absolutely right. God bless your Mother.
Every penny of that settlement should come out of the cops salaries.
Send the karens
Amen, hopefully that would make them a little more polite .usually works when you hit them in their wallet .sad part is some cops are just sadistic assholes they enjoy abusing people. and there is allot of videos out there to prove it. Politics aside policing in the U.S. is a big problem. needs to be dealt with . the system meant to protect us from them has been twisted to benefit them. why because they feed the system . it would go broke in 6 months if we all asked for a jury trial .
The law system is messed up. The frauditor should have been sent to prison and pay fines. How would you like it if some clown kicked your door down and recorded your home and told everyone your home address. Think about it.
@@MitchellJBridges The guy wasn't at these ladies homes.. he was at a public building funded by taxpayer money.. The frauditor as you call him didnt kick the door down. He entered the building legally as he's allowed to do. He didn't do anything illegal. I get it, you don't like people who do what he does but end of the day it comes down to the law.
@@MitchellJBridgeswtf are you talking about
Did anyone actually beleive the Lt. would hold Cartwright accountable? LOL. That's not how "The Thin Blue Line" works.
They will investigate themselves but we know the rest.
i just threw my blue kine flags away.....i dont support cops anymore......so corrupt just like govt
If the Lt. did, now, that would have shocked me.
He 100% became a cop because he spent his entire time in school getting picked on for being a weirdo
Just came down for the dog & pony show
Good job for following through Dan, a lot of ppl don’t!
Yeah, “officer safety” IS a catch all that cops use to justify their own misconduct
It’s completely accepted as gospel, when it is used in bad faith 99% of the time.
Zero cops have ever been hurt by anyone with a camera when the cop knows them and has interacted with them.
The cop even used the citizens first name and told a (false reporting) Karen his full name.
He wasn’t in fear, he was pissed because he hates this part of his job (accountability),
It's actually a federal law right up there with qualified immunity.
The way he pushed the guy as he charged him and said, "Get out of my way!" was pathetic. It was an obvious attempt at excusing his assault of a citizen.
No that was the cop trying escalate and wanted him to push away or something of the sort.
OFFISUH SAFETUH
here little piggy... bend over! i got's some of that occifer safety for ya! @@elijahshott3931
That lady has a t-shirt that says "Can't have Christmas cheers with out my Christmas beer" on at work, this is so professional!
You’re really reaching there bud
@@5urrea7definitely not reaching. Although I don’t see anything wrong with drinking, smoking, or anything of the sort, it’s not needed as a professional working as a public servant.
Maybe a bit tasteless seeing as they were so concerned about their AA meeting 🤷🏽♂️
@@dustinduarte8959and?
If you have Privacy Act information out in the open, that is YOUR problem, not the citizen's. If I were in the HR department, I'd seriously be considering her termination.
…except she claimed the simple sign-in sheet was protected by HIPAA…so it’s unclear if there was any data which needed to be protected from public view in the first place. Fire her for gross incompetence and unprofessional demeanor…
Unprofessional, ignorant, rude public employees earning the hate!
It is a special place in the brain these people have that I don’t have. It’s the place where it’s ok to lie in hopes people will get in trouble and or arrested. It also makes sense of the public cameras are different then the cameras that are on in their office every hour of everyday they work.
Is going hands on not a use of force? Should it not be documented? Surely escalating the level of force with no crime occurring surely has to be a policy violation.
*Surely.
Imagine being the public receptionist sitting at the public reception desk of a public building and it scares you that the public keeps walking in expecting you to do your job.
How is that case against Forest, MS progressing? I'd love to see you get a win!
And, according her own account, having top secret HIPAA documents openly for all to see on the counter and on her desk. Besides that, the list of visitors, openly displayed, is also a violation of private data protection.
Just like to say I am loving the patreon app..GBTHV
GBTHV
Eh while I don't like cops and know what the guy is doing is completely legal, it is genuinely disturbing to have someone in the room filming you. Like I would be disturbed if everytime I left my home there were cops standing outside "patrolling" the space outside my home every single day
The only unfortunate is how long the police have gone unchecked and unchallenged. They freak out when a citizen talks to them the way they deserve
These women shouldn't be working for the public.
Nor the cops.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN?
The guy taking the video shouldn't be annoying people just for the sake of annoying them just because he can. Go annoy the cops and take pictures of the police station, or town hall.
They could have just ignored him. He wasn't doing anything illigal or strange. If you're afraid of a camera you shoulden't have a public position.@@DM-mc1xn
@@DM-mc1xndidn’t do anything illegal so who cares, cry about it
She says: "I actually don't work here", so how could she be a complainant for a trespass?
That perplexed me when I heard it.
Same, I had to go back when she said "I will have him arrest if he goes passed theses doors" like she works there. Which was prior to her saying the aa meeting and her shaking.
When she said : "I'm literally shaking right now" I realized I had entered the MEME zone.🤣@@kona1420
It is called being a bootlicking Karen.
“We’re not talking about any of this until our body cams are off.” That tells me all I need to know.
Holy moley! He’s a supervisor and doesn’t understand how process service works?!?!
Officer safety is for coward!
Uvalde
Exactly @@wingatebarraclough3553
have a pocket full of acorns
Officer safety…..REMEMBER THE CHILDREN OF UVALDE……WAS THAT OFFICER SAFETY….
Typical tyrannical behavior. Been doing it for so long, they think they are lawful, even when aren’t! Earning the hate!
Dan is always so great in adjusting his attitude accordingly to the attitude he receives. BRING OUT THE FEELINGS POLICE
Dan speaks so calmly.
For this officer to claim harassment is boarder line slander. He said him self his first experience with an auditor and independent press member was at “Police Academy”! With that being said it shows that these “Law Enforcement” are not being trained for interaction with citizens. They are not being trained in constitutional law.
The LT literally wrote "First Amendment Auditor" & "Hands on officer" He had no intentions on taking Erie's statement or even take the complaint serious. That should be enough to win this lawsuit.
It doesn’t matter if Lieutenant Welch is A, B, C or D any one of them makes him unfit for the job
Glad they went straight to a lawsuit instead of IA
She needs to be charged for lying on a police report
She was reported and will be transferred somewhere else.
Charged by who?
See the problem?
C word gets away with lying and abusing others every day.
I really hope she's charged
More like-she should be fired!
“HIPPA”… 😂 that strictly for healthcare professionals and if you don’t want people’s private medical information available to the public, maybe don’t leave it laying out in a public area on a desk?
It's HIPAA.
Well, these women are cry bullies.
*HIPAA
Hippapotamus
Just to clarify it is not just for health care professionals but also "covered entities" that is anyone who stores, transmits or handles protected information. I worked for a non profit that helped people find jobs and we had to take the same precautions of nothing on desks, computers not facing public areas, walls etc. we had people's medical restrictions and even drug test information. It is completely on the organization to put up those precautions as stated no responsibility falls in any random person because they can see that information.
GREAT!! GOOD JOB DAN, I AM SO IMPRESSED AND THEY KNOW YOU ARE NOT EFFING AROUND
Im glad he's filing a lawsuit .....
11:03
Listen to the absolute frustration in his voice that this man is within the law and he cant arrest him. It takes a real pathetic person to be that driven by ego
Good thing you conducted this investigation. I got some tips and leads that this facility was leaving private information out in the view of the public. ❤️
A space cannot be converted to a private space in a public building once members of the public are allowed in that space.
HFTCD ✌🏻
Abolish Qualified Immunity
Overturn Terry v Ohio
HFTCD.....please...let me know what that means?? 🙏 Been looking everywhere 💕
@@alliecollin1748 HAPPY F%CK THE COPS DAY, Search Eric Brandt, he got 12yrs for threatening a judge etc in a angry rant after they illegally arrested - kidnapped him around 100 times for petty BS - retaliation for crap like sidewalk chalk etc.. Basically he got 12yrs for hurting the judges feelings...
Job well done by this auditor he full of knowledge and know the laws👌 he act very polite and professionally
"Officer Saftey" means the cops are saying that they are wrong for their actions in the first place.
she was so mad about 1 guy filming she called 2 MORE TO COME FILM
the camera guy is out of his place
Please keep us up to date on Dan's lawsuit... and thank-you to any/all auditors, cop watchers, Constitutionalists, etc... who are giving up so much of their time to expose the rot that has spread throughout our local, state and federal governments.
Imagine having a gun on your hip 24/7, having qualified immunity and feeling harassed by an unarmed individual
The blue cowards are very afraid of free citizens. They calm down the second they have us shackled.
In fairness, the guy did have a camera, which is an un-objective witness that can't be manipulated. The truth is a corrupt cop's worst enemy.
Or even worse......scared 😂😂😅😅😂
@@electricfil response of the day! 😂😂
They are cowards and losers who peaked in high-school. Their genuinely just pathetic people.
Do they understand that HIPPA only applies to people working there not the public. If you have material that is supposed to be confidential it is the employees responsibility to make sure it stays confidential.
Absolutely! They should know that if they were paying attention to their HIPAA training.
By the way, it’s HIPAA, nor HIPPA.
Auditing Eerie County is a great auditor!
What is tragic and comical at the same time is that the lady does not realize that if there is private information on the disk, it is she who is breaking the law, not him who is filming.
No accountability, suing is the only way to bet corruption in Local governments.
Of COURSE PDs will never hold themselves accountable. Thanks for always highlighting these important interactions and the follow ups that auditors make.
Transparency and scrutiny, is what all tyrants should fear…
This entire incident was “ Swatting”, and the police love to play along. Interesting how that cop said that Dan Harrassed all the rookies in the academy. I’d bet that he didn’t harrass even one. Liars are gonna lie.
Police are always excellent investigating themselves and finding no wrongdoing.
I don't think America should be allowed to use the phrase "home of the free, land of the brave" anymore.
Can't agree more. Same with thr protect and serve. Those 2 phrases being used by statist thugs enrage me.
😢
as long as the majority believes it, it's true.
Land of the free cops
Agreed
It is amazing that no one knows the HIPAA laws! I hope he wins his lawsuit!
And, in general, said laws are pretty straightforward. Protect the information from those that do not have a need to view the information. They clearly spell out who is responsible for protecting the information, and it is most surely not the general public.
The way that office was set up was clearly for the public to stand at that counter. Plenty of materials, sign-in log on the clipboard, all facing the counter where members of the public would stand. Wouldn't be that way if it was a restricted area.
Biggest threat to American safety "A man with a camera"
Acorns
@@mr.duanesharpepeople inside their own homes doing nothing wrong. These 3 are the biggest threats
its certainly the biggest threat to a cops job.......
Yes it is, but it's legal
@@thepubliceyeIt's not though.
They will never hold themselves accountable!
Whats wrong is most cops can't handle it when a citizen knows they're rights and the cops cant use they're corruption against these citizens. I love the video's lackluster. Keep fighting the good fight, brother
Last I checked, a government facility isn't a medical facility.
Doesn't mean they won't have medical records or stuff that would fall under HIPPA
All of them are pathological liars. It's incredible. All of then should be fired and charged.
Hold them accountable 😊
The cowardice of reflexively claiming “officer safety” never ceases to amaze. You’d think they’d be ashamed to be afraid of everything.
Men don't become cops now a days. Betas do
As self proclaimed heroes but there heart pumps puppy pee
When a cop tries and tell someone about changing a public building to private is going to far. The cops can't be a person making a complaint and not allowed to get soneone trespassed or solicit a trespassed.
For this very reason The Brady List is very good.
Brady list is a joke. Fridays with Frank is proof. Brady list cop doing traffic stops on camera.
We should change that term walk of shame to walk of ignorance.
Thank you LL for showing Dan's adventure with this embarrassing police department. I enjoy both of your channels. Great work!
We're forced to pay taxes under threat of arrest to pay for public buildings ,then they get upset when we want to take a picture of them.
This is one of the greatest articulations of this egregiously ridiculous behavior I’ve ever seen.
Be real. He wasn't there to take pictures. He was there to provoke this response.
Fine. I support that. But be man enough to do it as the police station. I'll defend that all day long.
But a SENIOR CENTER?
Just let good, decent folks be.
@Shodan8285 how could you know these are "good, decent folks"? Does it make your complaint more valid? No. Quite the opposite. ❄️
@deggree
Not to mention all the money that gets spent on bs artworks and things of that nature. I'm all for making sure the buildings look presentable but bust and statues and massive portraits aren't cheap.
What video are you guys watching. They didn’t escalate. Didn’t overreact. A slight boo boo from an very new cop. Not perfect but very responsible on everyone except one slip up upon which cop walked away.
Legislation should make it a criminal offense to mute or stop a video camera during a call for service and interactions with the public. Bodycams are being used more and more in courtrooms as evidence and muting, blocking, and/or stopping a bodycam is destruction/suppression of evidence. Muting, blocking, and/or stopping a bodycam should be considered that the cops are hiding something from transparency and accountability - either conspiring, malfeasance and/or other criminal activity. People need to contact their legislators and demand this. If the police have nothing to hide, then they shouldn't have a problem with this.
Any government employee/representative that calls the police to have someone's constitutional rights violated based on HIPAA should be included in the lawsuit. Members of the public are not subject to HIPAA laws, and these people absolutely know that.
Props for filing the suit. I've been noticing too many people letting shit slide.
Make sure you contribute to every possible suit.
Most won't bother filing because there is little point.
It costs money, takes significant time and then you run into qualified immunity meaning the case gets dismissed and there is no recourse.
A good number never get to a hearing since the municipality will offer a settlement, often with an NDA.
And those that do make it to trial still have to win. And then the award is paid by those with the deepest pockets, the taxpayers.
I am personally aware of over a dozen suits won in the past year totalling well over a million dollars.
I am unaware of a single significant change made in policy or policing due to these suits.
People letting stuff slide?
That would be the police who refuse to hold each other accountable to the laws.
My preference would be to allow citizens access to grand juries to seek criminal indictments against public employees.
The citizen should post a minimal bond to deter frivolous and meritless charges.
Upon indictment the citizen should be allowed to choose a private prosecutor to pursue the case at taxpayer expense.
We pay for every criminal prosecution already, only police are rarely charged or prosecuted for most crimes.
We also pay for the civil awards when, our employees, acting with our authority, on our behalf, cause injury, violation or harm to a member of the public.
We can pay to let citizens seek criminal justice.
Empower the people to police the police because the government will not hold itself accountable to the law, only the people can do that.
Now, do you think people would let as much stuff slide if they actually had a real means to achieve justice and equal protection under the law?
The biggest benefit to allowing private prosecution of police is that it doesn't pit the individual against the full resources of the state, the taxpayers. Instead it puts the resources of the people to work for the protection of the people against agents representing the people.
It evens the playing field. It puts police on notice as individuals that they are responsible for their actions and choices, they will be held criminally liable for their indiscretions and abuses.
Many say this would neuter police,. Officers would be too worried about being charged or sued if they mess up so they simply wouldn't do anything, ( Uvalde, Parkland??).
I say, police will be certain of their cause and grounds. Officers won't make unnecessary arrest or use unnecessary force. Officers will be more respectful and careful while following the same laws we all follow.
And ultimately, it will still be up to a jury as to whether they CHOOSE to convict an officer or give immunity by a not guilty verdict ( jury nullification).
Most citizens sitting on a jury will give the officer some benefit of the doubt, a bit of reasonable leniency for their job. But if it is an arrogant, entitled, emotionally unstable officer who abuses their position, the people need that officer off the job, a criminal conviction would do that without arguing with the union or worrying about employment contracts and pensions.
The bonus, a criminal conviction all but removes any immunity, immunity doesn't cover criminal acts. So get the criminal conviction and no QI to stop the civil suit.
The downside to a suit is that you cannot really go after the individual.
Colorado for example claims to have abolished QI but what they really did was to indemnify the officer and limit individual liability to $25,000.
Even if a person were to win a big judgement against an officer, so what. The money still needs to be collected. Most officers will transfer assets to others and spend there cash on defending themselves. When a judgement is awarded there is nothing to collect on. A person can spend years going back to court to get new court orders and forfeitures.
Think of OJ in the wrongful death suit. He lost, was ordered to pay like $20 million. I don't know what the Brown family has collected but it isn't anywhere near the full amount.
And yes, the judgment made things tough for OJ but not that tough.
There are reasons people let stuff slide, you should be asking yourself what those reasons are and finding your own answers before you start complaining about it.
Not an insult. From your comment I took it that you believe more should, or everyone should be filing suits.
But I'm not sure why you think that is a good idea. Do you think it will cause change? Do you think police will behave differently? Do you think one person getting a chunk of taxpayer money will make the world better?
Exactly why should we want people to file suits?
So they can take on the system individually out of their own pocket to help us all?
Personally I don't see civil suits as productive. I don't see criminal prosecutions as THE solution. But I do believe it would put more weight on the individual officer to act as a reasonable and responsible individual, accountable for their own actions( just like every other person).
I think cops would learn to control their tempers, lose their egos and respect the rights of everyone.
Police would not blindly follow orders or interpret laws so literally.
They would hesitate to arrest or use force unless necessary. Officer safety would no longer make sense or be applicable.
And above all else, we the people would not feel so helpless, frustrated and angry when police act unlawfully and abusively. We would know, we don't have to fight outside of the law, we don't have to just take it and let it slide. We would have legal recourse, actual protection under the law, a path to equal justice within the system.
The alternative is vigilante justice outside of the system, outside of the law.
I think we are seeing more and more that people are getting close to abandoning hope/faith in the system and are ready to start acting outside of the system.
If we don't change the system soon, we won't have to change it.
Just some thoughts.
@@eshootziscrs2868 Yay anarchy. XD
@@eshootziscrs2868 people take the settlement because if you lose or are awarded less than the settlement you have to pay attorney fees for the city. Considering the jury could give you $1 most attorneys advise you to take most settlement offers if there's no actual injury. You don't know if your jury will be bootlickers, ACAB, or normal people somewhere in between
No one never goes in that office but there is a list of people that signed that sheet. There was a man in the office when he got there and a man walked in the office while the cops was there.
karen says ill have him arrested if he goes past here. 2 minutes later she says i don't work here i don't wanna give my name. why tf did she even get involved?
The entitlement of a middle aged white woman cannot be understated enough.
She said she’s shaking at the thought of cameras, probably shaking from alcohol withdrawal and is actually there for the AA meeting..
Yeah, she really needed a drink.
She also uses the word "forbidden": "He is forbidden to go in this area. I forbid him to go into this room. If he goes in here I want him arrested & trespassed." The way she speaks shows she's a tyrant. She lacks people skills & should not be working in a customer service position that has a lot of interaction with the public.
The double standard that was shown in the complaint process should make the person investigated this sick to his stomach for
Lieing and saying it’s ok if his coward officers assaulting a citizen.
Maybe tyrants will learn not to be tyrants if we the people hold them accountable. Great work Dan and Lack. 👍👍
Dan from IC is a serious auditor and is no joke, He does follow up and will go the extra mile to make them accountable! 👌
If they have personal "healthcare information" left out in the open they deserve to at least be investigated and fined if found in violation of HIPAA laws, and maybe even shut down or prosecuted.
Exactly, If there were PHI sitting out in public view, that would be the facility that was breaching the law. A name and a sign in time is not protected healthcare information.
Why do they get so bent out of shape over recording and with the chick covering up the sign in logs? She works the desk, she should know anyone can request sign in logs
"I want him arrested if he goes here!"
2 mins later : i dont actually work here.
Maam, do you or do you not have rhe authority to tell him where he can and can not go in a public building?
This is the exact reason I say , "No such thing as a good cop"
Facts
What did the “good” cop say to the dirty cop? Absolutely nothing. Every time.
Or Politian's in most cases.
Good job keep going!!!!!!!!!!!!
Damn!Taxpayers pay for the public servants civil training & then pays the lawsuits when they fail to retain the same said training!Talk about a carch 22!🤔🤦🏿♂️🤨😒😔
They were never going to retain anything. Look at em.
We live in the "good ol' U.S of A we Don't and Never have had feels police when are these public servant's going to learn that.
Karen putting on a show 😂
They are not acceptable!