Yes, masks still work
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ค. 2024
- Patreon: / drwilsondebunks
I rarely read TH-cam comments these days, so if you want me to see your comment, here is how you can contact me directly and I will be glad to respond to you when I can: Email: dr.wilson.debunk@gmail.com
Facebook (direct message): / docwilsondebunks
Fairly comprehensive review of airborne transmission that includes a section on mask-wearing: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/s...
Randomized trial in a community setting shows that masks work: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/s...
Masks can filter aerosols: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
High-speed camera video: • High speed camera capt...
Review of non-pharmaceutical interventions and influenza: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Masks help prevent sick people from expelling influenza particles: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Two studies demonstrating the effectiveness of face masks against spread of SARS-CoV-1: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Not so strong but relevant study about face masks and pre-symptomatic spread: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Cloth masks are better than no protection against influenza: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Small observational study showing that masks are effective: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Quantification of viral shedding of several viruses with or without a mask: www.nature.com/articles/s4159...
Quantification of influenza viral shedding with 3 different kinds of masks vs. no mask: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Reviews of mask wearing against SARS-CoV-2: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Large meta-analysis showing that face masks are effective: www.thelancet.com/journals/la...
Visual analysis of aerosol/droplet spread with or without a mask: aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063...
Systematic review concluding that face mask use is particularly important against COVID-19: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Country-wide comparison of face mask usage vs. COVID-19 deaths per capita: www.ajtmh.org/downloadpdf/jou...
A narrative review of face masks concluding that they should be used: www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2...
RCT of mask use against influenza shows that adherence to mask wearing is effective: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Meta-analysis on mask use shows the nuance of this topic:
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Randomized controlled trial with small sample size but significant effects of mask usage: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
![[UNCUT] ฝันรักห้วงนิทรา | EP.3 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zVXAFD1OLZg/mqdefault.jpg)
RCTs may not actually be the best source of evidence for determining whether masks confer protection. “Strictly speaking, they're correct that there's no statistically significant effect,” said Ben Cowling, an epidemiologist at the University of Hong Kong whose research is cited in the Cochrane review. “But when you look at the totality of evidence, I think there's a pretty good indication that masks can protect people when they wear them.”
In particular, Cowling said, mechanistic studies-like those conducted with mannequins-do offer strong evidence that respirators cut down on the passage of viral particles.
Huang, the Penn biostatistician, is among others who argue that, in many RCTs examining mask use, the sample sizes are just too small. Even if masks are effective, that may not show up as a statistically meaningful result. “When the effect is moderate, or small, we really need a large sample size to find a significant difference,” said Huang. Many of these RCTs, she said, simply weren’t large enough to find some potentially meaningful signal.
And even if the effect is modest, during peak periods of a pandemic, small advantages can have a large impact by reducing the number of sick patients seeking hospital care at the same time. “From a public health perspective," said Cowling, "reducing the reproductive number by even 10 percent could be valuable."
For a complex issue like masks, Trish Greenhalgh is among other researchers who suggest that an RCT may be an imperfect tool. “I'm not against RCTs,” said Greenhalgh, a physician and health researcher at the University of Oxford. “But they were never designed to look at complex social interventions."
Greenhalgh is an influential figure in the evidence-based medicine movement-her book How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine and Healthcare is in its sixth edition-but she has at times been critical of what she characterizes as an overreliance on RCTs. Greenhalgh characterized some of her colleagues as, in effect, RCT hardliners-focused on RCTs at the expense of considering other kinds of evidence. In that mindset, she said, “it seems that an RCT, however bad, is better than an observational study, however good."
Cochrane’s own leadership seems to share some of those concerns. In November 2020, when Jefferson’s team published an earlier version of their review, Cochrane published an accompanying editorial, warning policymakers to move cautiously with the results, and not to interpret them as definitive evidence that masks and respirators don’t work. Instead, the group wrote, “there may never be strong evidence regarding the effectiveness of individual behavioral measures.”
Mr copy and paste is back 😂😂 ask anyone wearing mask why they are doing so... they'll say to protect themselves.. they walk around the street, woods open areas with it on and not availing of the lovely fresh air... Thankfully barely anyone wears them anymore.. oops must mean we are all antimaskers haha
@@ruthlesstruthful The risk of catching covid outside was always VERY low (we knew this right away) so yeah wearing one outside was unnecessary
@@richvid9814 yet they did it anyway. Forced complying businesses to close even when there was no safety risk. That's the problem with these "leaders" you give them an inch and they take a mile. Why did they (cops) patrol parks and beaches and treat everyone like criminals when common sense dictated the risk was crazy low for outside transmission?
@@Mark_Jacobson81 ...because those people were going to eventually end up inside and we did not have a vaccine yet, The hospitals were being overrun.
@@richvid9814 Propaganda spam bot has been detected! Alert!
- Won’t require more than one shot
- Won’t require more than one booster
- Gain of function is a conspiracy theory
What doctor said "Won’t require more than one shot" and when was that said?
@@markvalery8632j&j vaccine was one shot
@@rjbiker66 I had completely forgotten about that type of vaccine since hardly anyone got that in the USA. Thanks.
@@markvalery8632Yeah hardly anyone was injured from it.
@@GoGrowGoGrow What is "it" in your statement?
Source control is the way that masks are used in hospitals, TB patients wear the mask. Infectious patients wear masks.
For immunocompromised patients the potential source of infection are the healthcare workers, hence they wear masks and other PPE.
Irrespective of the efficacy of masks in source control there’s one underlying assumption and that is asymptomatic transmission. The U.K. government statement when introducing mask mandates was to assume that you are infected & infectious even without symptoms. Obviously there’s a lag between being infected and showing symptoms such as coughing and sneezing, for measles this is two to four days before the defining rash develops, but the child will be unwell 2-4 days before the rash thanks to the innate immune system. Has the viral load of asymptomatic people been assessed?
Check out "Safety, tolerability and viral kinetics during SARS-CoV-2 human challenge in young adults"
Keep wearing your masks like good boys. Lol
There should've been a study of the homeless. They live tragic lives that typically make them vulnerable however in the case of a virus outbreak they might do better because of the fact that they're usually breathing outside air. I don't know if any such studies were conducted but if they were and there was a measurable reduction in infection rates and or favorable outcomes once infected it would at least serve to prove the benefit of ventilation. In short, open a window.
Clown......you don't understand any of this do you. Where is your evidence or indeed any governments evidence that wearing masks stop the spread of claimed infections? An assertion and assumptions are not enough. What papers and studies are you relying on to assert these claims? For me I start with Neil Orrs study for the RCS in 1976 over 6 months regarding post operative infection where surgeons either wore or did not wear masks.
You were wearing a mask for years.
If you don't know if you are sick or not after three years. No mask you wear is protecting anyone in society.
In 1918 they knew masks do nothing to prevent viral transmision.
How do we go backwards 100 years later?
You can question almost every study.
3:34 "Assessing the efficacy in a community setting". I think you meant to say "effectiveness". Efficacy studies ask: Does the intervention work under ideal conditions? Effectiveness studies ask: Does the intervention work in real-world practice? As such, one would be assessing the effectiveness and not efficacy in a community, since the community is not an ideal condition but a real-world condition.
thanks, i just learned something.
Dr. Wilson doesn’t care about real world science and facts. Scientists are clever” he claims. So they developed contrived useless trials to try to prove their point. He’s book smart, but brain dead.
The misuse of technical terms and the lack of details in this guys bs is all you need to notice to recognize this is not a serious science channel but actually a blatant propaganda channel.
The efficacy was marginal and the effectiveness Was nil.
@@davesears9681yeah he did make one mistake but unlike the medical criminal Kohn Campbell who seems to have a lot of confidence in the dumbness of his own audiences he is not lying
7:40 I don't think you really answered the objection. If most of your breath comes out of the sides of the mask, how can most water droplets be filtered out by the mask?
Bruhh please stop 😭 he just want some points to justify people who wearing mask and to Justify his false narrative.. don't be soo rude by asking cross questions. Don't ask anything questions, you aren't helping
@someone 😶🌫️ I do not see how my comment was rude. The Independent video seemed to be a serious objection to the effectiveness of masks. I am only asking for a better refutation.
@@josephpostma1787 try to read my comment which i posted yesterday..u can find that from newest comments
Water droplets are much heavier than air and go straight towards your mask that then catches them. They do not go sideways like the gases.
@Thorman In the video clip, the droplets do come out of the sides. I do think the n95 has this problem.
At 2:22, the sneezing video comparison omits showing a more typical non-masked sneeze - into an elbow, handkerchief, or hands. Also, the Cochrane review found that hand washing has some effect, and masks probably don't, so that suggests that transmission by contact is more common.
Total Bollox, ACE 2 receptors are in the eyes too, no one mandated goggles.
The virion sized particles are miniscule and go straight through the standard mask.
Before I retired from the military I used to teach Chem, Bio, Rad, and Nuclear protection/survival. I added mask as an example in my contamination avoidance presentation. I was always in shock after years of COVID on how many people didn’t understand contamination avoidance vs 100% protection when it came to the mask.
lol..sure you did..abundant supply of masks made out of old shirts I take it
@@georgesockett3316 who are you replying to? Odd comment they seems not related to the post
@neverforget1971 i bet you don't cover your mouth and nose or even look away when sneezing in an elevator full of people
@@neverforget1971 Lol. Why are you trolling? And the only people who run and scream are those you try to speak to irl
@@neverforget1971 I mean they really should...at least to avoid your "love"
Hello! In an earlier video you stated that with a mask a lower dosage of droplets will be released thus if someone was infected their symptoms would be lessened. I compare it to drinking a little poison and getting ill or more poison and dying. Well my friends son is a PA and told him that no matter the amount exposed you will get the same degree of symptoms. What is the correct answer if any?
The correct answer is don’t trust incompetent doctors like Dr. Wilson.
With this Virus, your friend's son may be right. Some people's immune system handles covid better than others.
So if two people would get the equal amount of virus the same Way, they might react very differently.
+1 for what ytcomms said.
also, to use your poison analogy ...... there would need to be varying critical mass of poison to 1) have sufficient reaction that a person would note symptoms, 2 become ill, 3) become severely ill, 4) become critically ill, 5) become dead. For each different poison those critical masses are different........and every human is entirely unique ( and variable in terms of immune readiness).
This all suddenly becomes way too difficult to estimate with any accuracy & certainty or confidence for any single individual or event.
So we have to go with averages based on research data for certain parameters - which in this case might include: number of people, age, comorbidities, activities, environment type/size, temperature, humidity, ventilation, proximity, duration, mask type etc etc (I'm winging it here, I haven't read all the links posted in the description yet)
"Well my friends son is a PA and told him that no matter the amount exposed you will get the same degree of symptoms. "
You're both a bit wrong. There are strong indications that you'd need a minimum viral dose to get infected. After that, the symptoms will rely mainly on personal characteristics, as the virus has now infected you and is multiplying so fast that it doesn't matter all that much whether 1 million or 10 million viral particles gained entry.
What would a Personal Assistant know?
So what does this good doctor think about Matt Hancock's messages and his "follow the science" approach?
I think he like to shut the hell up whenever it comes to stuff that doesnt suit his narrative
Cochrane Study was good. The US did not do a RCT on masks. In the OR, masks are worn to prevent droplets. However the virus will still spread unless you're wearing a gas or respirator rated for poisonous gases. I was trained to work in contaminated environments.
Only one human challenge study on covid-19 has been done, and it didn't involve masks.
Ref: Safety, tolerability and viral kinetics during SARS-CoV-2 human challenge in young adults (nature medicine 31 March 2022)
@@gribbler1695 What is a human challenge study ?
@@andymullarx6365 In this case, when we purposely infect people with the virus. It would not be allowed if we didn't have a vaccine or other countermeasures, for what is a potentially deadly virus.
experimental study where one group of living humans is deliberately infected or exposed to the disease or microbe to see if the treatment has an effect or not @@andymullarx6365
it's possible that masks make a small difference. The Bangladesh mask study, probably among the best we have, shows a small effect at best and "Yes, masks still work" is big claim with very little evidence.
True.
It is next to impossible to deduce which amount of the reduction of covid cases was based on masks and which amount on better personal hygiene, social distancing, and other changes in one's behavior - note that in the mentioned paper The Impact of Community Masking on COVID-19: A Cluster- Randomized Trial in Bangladesh, it was only the intervention group which was given advice and warnings against the pandemia, not the control group.
See: "In fact, we found that our intervention increased the likelihood of physical distancing, presumably because individuals participating in the intervention took the threat of COVID-19 more seriously." - undoubtedly, they did.
Thankyou
I don't think there has been a study on using N95s properly fitted along with other mitigating options like certain types of mouthwash and nasal applications. It would be interesting to see the results of such a study. It would need to be a controlled one of course, properly executed and funded by unbiased parties.
Many studies I have read about clearly shows significant efficacy of N95s. But yes, the number of clinical trials are pathetically few given the importance of the matter.
Because teh szienze has spoken :')
Kneel to your god of science as he pulls it all from his ass.
@@johnwalsh8827
@@johnwalsh8827 clinical trials are not enough. you need real world community studies, the real world does not live in a lab with perfect access to all the money you could need.
What is the Covid-related mortality for non-elderly persons with no comorbidities???
No body knows the mortality rate as no body Joe’s the infection rate. Also no body worth their salt cares about mortality rate from COVID because what really matters is the total number dead and the total who suffered severe consequences. 25 % of those who passed away had no comorbidities.
The least effected group the children 45 k hospitalized , 10 k in ICU an additional 9k had severe complication called MIS- C . Add to this long COVID . All these can be easily saved via vaccine. So any idea why antivaxers are so cruel that they don’t want these children and adults saved ?
@@Sceince007 Look what I just discovered! Muritaipet (AKA Nazitaipet) has 2 other accounts named *'Science01'* and *'Science 02'* to support himself during fights. He probably has a third one named *''Linda Ward'* too.
How does it work ? Let's say you are roasting him or he doesn't have any confidence in what he says, he will switch to one of these two accounts and reply to himself, and reply to the opponen
0
AGAINST WHAT?! THE WORK AGAINST?! what's wrong with this guy
He is not half as dumb as you ?
Against many respiratory illnesses ?
Understanding context can help you when you read things like titles, and even more!
@@Sceince007 yes, but none of them viral.
@@philo3479 none of them viral ? Do you mean to say masks do t work against viruses ?
@@philo3479 I read many posts from you , of any body want examples of complete ignorance yet shamelessness they should read your absolutely dumb posts . Any way clown masks do work for viruses and if you implied size then it’s really astonishing that after three years of pandemic one can be so ignorant about how masks work . Hint - nothing to do with size but two other physicists related factors involved 🙂
Off topic .. the FBI director is now saying the virus was quite likely a consequence of a lab leak. Please debunk him as otherwise everyone who asked questions about the origin of the virus might also think their other questions deserved a better response than your scorn and insults.
I mean the debunk is in all other agencies, institutional experts, and independent experts disagreeing with or saying there is no evidence for that claim.
@@xavier6foot8
Well ... not all of them exactly. Any number of people are saying it's a possibility.
Of course, if it isn't the case it will just remain an enormous coincidence that the virus emerged naturally in a location not far from a laboratory known for its research into SARS corona virus.
I await the usual scolded cat reaction you sensitive virus/vaccine maniacs reserve for anyone who dares to raise any doubts before the cult.
Hahaha panic stations 🤣 ‘plz “debunk” him quick before the truth spreads’ you folk are too spineless to face reality
Wrong. F sit.
I have a video, a very quick one of a doctor who put 5 masks on top of each other, then took off his reading glasses and breathed through all the masks, in no time at all his glasses steamed up, all he said was, make your own minds up, so I did..
That all depends on how you define "work"
Try watching the video.
@@gavcarl what does "work" mean in relation to the content of this video to you?
@@gavcarl Propaganda spam bot has been detected! Alert!
It works great as a means of identifying compliant sh eep
Wearing a surgical mask (or for most people a piece of cloth) for a respiratory virus.
Aye, okay 'Doctor' Dan.
The covey narrative has fallen apart so much that these science martyrs like Dr Wilson are forced to try and find the most irrelevant and obscure studies to try and prove a point. It's like trying to argue that masks work if you take the best masks with the best masking practices in perfect settings to make the case and "prove" that masks work when in reality that's just cherry picking and irrelevant in every day existence.
@@Mark_Jacobson81 early on there was a research article published using hamsters to prove that masks works.
I did not really care about the results because they designed the work to prove what they wanted to prove to start with ... I just felt sorry for the graduate students whose task it was to Design, make and fit the masks on their laboratory hamsters.
At least not laboratory rats who have longer noses and would probably take off masks even faster.
Faster than school kids. Some still use them on the streets of NYC, some don't. I just saw a small charter school class cross the street yesterday with their teachers.
Absolutely Keith. These people are cult members. A laughing stock. The reason we wear masks in the OR is to avoid spittle or cough droplets contaminating the surgical field and the wound to prevent bacterial contamination. Period.
@@philo3479 you also do not want blood to squirter into your face ... doctors often use transparent plastic splash guards over the eyes and those are not for viruses
Let's see how many times the propaganda spam bot CNCmachiningisfun spams the same propaganda comment today!
It is not my fault that it sux to be you!
@@CNCmachiningisfun CNCmachiningisfun is a propaganda spam bot with no actual argument!
@@JK_JK_JK
Hi, kok sukkah.
@@CNCmachiningisfun Hi, propaganda spam bot with no actual argument!
@@JK_JK_JK
Get a life, kok sukkah!
Thanks for the video :)
What was the No 1 reason people thought they were wearing masks during covid ??
Oops.
To reduce the spread of Covid in asymptomatic people. Sorry if that is too confusing for you to understand. Hard to do Minion memes on TH-cam for you.
@@gavcarl - funny we were told at the time it was to stop us catching covid 🦠
I see yr good with hindsight 🤓
@@gavcarl Try again, propaganda spam bot.
5:06 *_"Study limitations : Our study has several limitations. The distinct appearance of project-associated masks and increased mask-wearing in intervention villages made it impossible to blind surveillance staff to study-arm assignment.[...] Even though surveillance staff were plain-clothed and were instructed to remain discreet, community members could have recognized that they were being observed and changed their behavior"_*
At 8 min you bring up droplets/gas. the vapor coming out of the gentlemen"s mask is water vapor. By definition a droplet. I am a practicing physician with over 30 years experience, with an entering degree. In real life masks make little to no deference. Wear one if you like.
The problem was the ridiculous nature of the rules. Having kids were masks during cross country. golf and tennis. In a local doctors office there was a posting as to the effect of distancing on disease transmission. I looked at it and laughed, they just made up numbers.
If the CDC et al had just said "this is our plan, and we will change it based on the facts on the ground" (they did have a plan, look at their website) people would have more faith.
The CDC destroyed any credibility it had with its actions.
So what is your reasoning that “In real life masks make little to no deference”. You have made a claim and yet provided no evidence or even reasons to back that up. As for the “there was a posting as to the effect of distancing on disease transmission. I looked at it and laughed, they just made up numbers”, again no presentation of the evidence so an evaluation of your claims can be made.
At no time during the pandemic with masks and social distancing did we not have record corona infections rates.
At what point do you demand results? You could have record corona infection rates with no masks and no social distancing.
If you say the spray will prevent mosquitoes and you keep getting bitten how long will you use that spray?
There is a reason it says fashion mask on the side of most face masks
They give you some computer model and you don't question it when you see the results are not as they said?
@@thedevilsadvocate5210 "At no time during the pandemic with masks and social distancing did we not have record corona infections rates"
Well you are making the classic mistake of conflating infection with disease they are not the same thing. This conflation is used by antivaxers and anti maskers to show without doubt that neither work when in fact if you have high infection and lower disease after vaccination and other non pharam measures this shows that things are working.
So how do we know that those infections did not come from those not wearing a mask? How do we know if those infections were not from close contacts such as family or same household residents?
We do know for a fact that the level of exposure to the virus effects the level of infection and thus the level disease presentation and severity.
As face masks (what ever they are made of) reduce the droplet and aerosol count we know this will effect the level of exposure and thus reduce the incidence of disease. We know this because we actually have a formula for it.
So no it is not a computer model it is just logic and reasoning that anything including a tissue that reduces the amount of aerosol and droplets expelled by an infectious individual will reduce the viral load in the air and on surfaces and thus reduce the likelihood of infections and disease severity.
You are so right. This was never even a thought in Scandinavia Kids didnt need to wear masks, Golf never closed and there was never any masks outdoor really. THe only rule was that of you cant keep 1-2 meters (it changed) then wear a mask or whenever crowded, but outdoors? No need. That said, my Gov messed up aswell. lying to the public about the vaccine effectiveness. They stated it gave you 90 % protection against infecting others, citing a Pfizer study making maybe a million people extra take the vaccine, while that showed to not be the case at all because that study did not even exist Im not dissing the vaccine effectiveness in preventing serious disease but they did lie hard to us, and they will never admitt that. The exuse? It was all new to us. This attitude from the govement hasnt changed
How's 20,000% case rise over 3 months for ya? South Korea, Japan. They like masks. They listened. Did "everything right".
It's quite clear WHY masks don't work that way. The contact with the virus happens a lot - unlike your correctly following mask protocol. So the virus wins, and not your lucky day when you wear it right for 5 minutes AND follow protocol.
@@peterpeters7534
Gotta love watching the truly "special" folks drive up alone or in pairs to busy/crowded restaurants filled with random strangers where they go in and eat, then mask back up and drive home again.
🤤
It's great that your user name promotes the vaccines 😇
@@silversun119
That name is a joke, obvs...
No different than "Trust the Science".
@@MysMystery13 🤪🤪🤪
Just wondering if any of the "varients" actually "frightened the pants" off any of you lot? 🤣
@@silversun119 I've talked hundreds of people into not getting the jabs, and numerous others that had one or two into discontinuing them.
Cry hader.
Do it now.
😭
Hey Dr Wilson, the ex British Health Secretary Matt Hancock discussed "deploying the new variant" and declared that "We frighten the pants off everyone".
What do you imagine he meant by "deploying" the variant?
It must be interesting for someone that pushes this issue as forcefully as you do to discover so many apparent lunatics are also on your side of the discussion.
It's about disseminating information, not the virus.
@@gribbler1695 "deploying the variant" means disseminating information? Is that what you're running with?
Explanations as to why places with mask mandates showed no effect on lowering transmission versus those that didn't have mask mandates....over to you peeps...
It seems that: Masks just work, we dont know how we dont know why and we sure as hell dont want to complicate this by bringing in details that would challenge the mere fact that mask do work. So if masks work, and we do know that a mask works as a mask and could potentially prevent you being infected why are even official goverments saying, We dont really know how they worked or even if they in fact worked as we intended, its eems like he N-95 worked alot better though. But that wouldnt have been practic It was a easy thing to distribute, so we went a bit overboard, but if masks had been used more strategically and in more unison (not all or nothing thing) they would definetely delivered better effect that they have been. Some countries did that better than others, those who failed miserable, seemed to wear masks all the time or not at all often in combination within the state/country thus dividing the people creating more stress and ill health.
www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/what-doctors-wish-patients-knew-about-wearing-n95-masks
Spike protein has been found in the brains of people with encephalitis (brain inflammation) and in jab-induced shingles lesions. Both mRNA and spike protein have been found in lymph nodes more than 60 days post-jab. Full-length mRNA has also been shown to circulate in people’s blood for up to 28 days post-injection, and it’s been detected in breastmilk
th-cam.com/video/cB14tw5ZqbY/w-d-xo.html
That's a Denmark study. Most western nations don't aspirate when giving muscular injection and I suspect a number of vaccines went into the vessels
For me it just made sense that if the virus is carried on spittle and we know we all spit when we just speak that putting something over your mouth so you reduce the spit and having it cover your nose so less spit reaches it was a good thing to do. After the virus mutated and turned into basically a cold I stopped wearing one for most things. I still use them when I fly or am in close contact with large groups but just banging around town I don’t bother with them.
Genuinely curious, but how deadly does a disease have to be before community masking should be mandated or encouraged? What threshold did COVID hit that other previous viruses did not. I know people wore them when sick themselves or around immune compromised people maybe, but is COVID unique in asymptomatic spread?
That is a great question. We have been hit with Virus's before but never forced to wear masks. This latest virus wasnt deadly at all or they delibrately allowed it to spread with soiled masks made from homemade cloth or something simple like a paper mask. If it was deadly the authorites would have blue hazmat bins on every sidewalk and in every business. They allowed people to put their virus soaked mask on every surface around them. This caused the virus to spread.. The Mask allowed them to know who was compliant and who was not and it allowed the virus to spread to every surface humans touch.
@@amyalewine oh exactly. Every mask should’ve been tossed after a few hours of use or washed to even have a small effect. Hanging masks on your rear view mirror, or in cup holders is doing nothing. Masks were always a way to make “essential” workers feel protected as the laptop class got to stay home. People might argue that they had to give the public something to find comfort in, when in reality it should’ve been “anything less than a fresh N95 should not be used for long durations.” Because if you don’t, when they’re shown to not help you will have lost public trust. Public health only has so many bullets before people stop trusting your interventions. They could at least come out and clarify the initial interventions so people can feel like lessons were learned and it won’t be tried/mandated again.
When the virus was serious enough that the R number mattered. Masking, social distancing and hand washing drastically dropped the number of cold and flu cases during covid but these aren't serious enough on their own to require a mandate.
The question is, how much do we value human lives and whose lives are most valuable and whose are least valuable? It's all a money equation. What value does the life have? All the rest is irrelevant. Like with abortion, it does not matter anything at all except the VALUE of the potential child by the mother. That's it. That's the only question, the only answer.
@@user-dd5eh5lu3o Value equation yes but it doesn't have to be a money value.
Let me offer some amateur anecdotal information about masks. I invested in some respirator masks early in the pandemic. 1 full face and 1 half face. I bought a variety of filters for the full face mask which is the one I wear when I leave my home. I'm semi-retired so my trips out aren't often these days and those masks have served me well. Anyhow when I got that mask I first placed the basic particle filter on and then thought I might as well use one of the premium filter types because I had bought some of those as well even though I wasn't working with all those gases and such listed on their descriptions. I'm glad I did because one day as I was going through my doffing procedure after wearing it I noticed something that I wasn't expecting. You see when I undressed I would throw all the clothes right into the washing machine and I had added bleach as a disinfectant and I would remove my mask last. Well as soon as I removed the mask I got this immediate powerful smell of bleach and I may have been standing right over the washer. I remember thinking how interesting that Inhad just had that open bottle of bleach right in front of me and didn't smell it at all. I have continued to use that mask and those filters and periodically do the smell test including placing items with strong fragrances right up close to the filter and Indont smell them. My point is that there are filters and then there are filters and just like masks, type matters, quality matters as well as using them correctly. Check your equipment do your seal checks don and doff properly and be careful about touching your face. I read the comments from all the mask deniers about keeping bee's out of your yard with a chain link fence but they don't take other factors into account such as how the tiniest particles actually travel such as piggybacking on larger particles. They also don't take into account certain mask features like non-woven electrostatically charges materials and Brownian motion of tiny particles making them more likely to cling to the fibers than just pass through in linear direction. I've done a lot of research on maks during the pandemic and I see too many people commenting on the matter who have done little or no research. I'm not a scientist and neither are most of us but the beauty of the internet is that we now have access to limitless scientific research and it's free so take advantage of it. I look at the scientific recommendations for instance for lab workers rather than focus on what healthcare workers are wearing. If the people that understand these pathogens don't mess with them without proper PPE then neither should you if you want the same level of protection. I realize that the ordinary citizen won't be tethered to a supplied air system but that BSL4 level and I know that Covid research has not been restricted to level 4. I think BSL3 is more common and I've read where some research was conducted at level 2 but I'm not sure if that makes sense. As far as I can tell BSL3 workers are mobile and not tethered or wearing the bubble suits but rely on portable filtered PAPR systems which is hepa filtration. Beyond that of course they wear gloves and presumably carry out proper donning and doffing procedures. You might not want to invest in a PAPR system but you can buy the same quality of filtration for your respirator masks and they're in ample supply now and aren't very expensive. I understand many people don't wear any masks and that's fine. It's an individual choice and I on,y go out I frequently so it's not like. somebody who is working full time or going to school. I can't imagine wearing tight fitting masks every day and trying to work like that. Anyhow I'm glad that the public has access to quality affordable PPE should they choose to use it. I wouldn't rely on a cloth or surgical mask unless my only concern was not to spread it. As far as preventing getting it N95'masks and their international counterparts would be the minimum I would consider.
I feel you are probably a good candidate for that solo mission to mars
Man, where I live, we were wearing masks only when there were elders around. Apart from that we didn't give a fuck about wearing masks during Covid pandemic. We have flu season several times every year and probably our collective immune system still works. I know nobody who died because of COVID and I know a lot of people.
The reason masks don't work is that they accumulate water droplets and concentrates the aerosol virus, then distribute them at droplets which have greater infection potential than aerosols.
The droplet vs aerosol issue has been debated and studies for years, and the conclusion is masks are not appropriate for respiratory viruses.
Keep hands clean. Change the mask. SARS-CoV-2 doesn't last long when ensnared in cloth or more sophisticated masks because of an electrostatic effect which aids bursting of the virus particle. I dare not imagine the state of your underwear!
@@DC-wt2vi You have quite a few mistakes in your sentences. Electrostatic masks require a synthetic layer to generate the charge. That layer only generates charge when it is dry. This rules out paper and cotton mask that don't even have a charged layer. Now, your at the N95 masks that I have been wearing since they were invented. They only stay dry when they have an exhale valve. Guess who banned the exhale valve for projecting particles further than normal breathing? The same scientists that created the varus.
@@DC-wt2vi So, you end up with a wet mask that harvests millions of varus particles on the surface directly from the air. How long does it take someone to adjust that mask with their hand? The cloth and paper masks aren't even filters. They are sponges soaked in varus. There is a reason why the real world testing is always opposite of what Dr wilson says occurs in the models. They have to cover their arse for screwing this on up beyond recognition.
Can you do a video on boosters please and if ppl should get them if they’ve already had COVID? I’m unsure if I should get a booster since I’ve had COVID. Help!
UK have ended boosters for anyone under 50 otherwise healthy and if you haven't had a Vax before.
Immunity acquired from a Covid infection provides strong, lasting protection against the most severe outcomes of the illness, according to research published Thursday in The Lancet - protection, experts say, that’s on par with what’s provided through two doses of an mRNA vaccine.
Infection-acquired immunity cut the risk of hospitalization and death from a Covid reinfection by 88% for at least 10 months, the study found.
“This is really good news, in the sense that protection against severe disease and death after infection is really quite sustained at 10 months,” said the senior study author, Dr. Christopher Murray, the director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington
Yes, you should get maximum protection. Immunity from your previous infection is not a long time and should not be relied on.
@@TheseNuts2 neither is protection with the Vax so what keep getting jabbed? Over and over ?
Get boosted as much as pizor marketing tells you. Nothing can go wrong.
Is that an excuse to stalk people in Mars and literally scream at them to put your mask on? 😒
The Cochrane review paper has over 300 pages and few people bother to read it. I did. (I am a PhD scientist working in biotech for 20+ years.) The paper cited mostly publications from before 2020, which are not direct related to covid19 (speaking of evidence based medicine!). The few papers it cited from post 2020 are showing or at least suggesting efficacy of n95 masks for preventing covid19. There are many many more papers from original clinical trials showing efficacy of n95 against covid. The results are somehow excluded by the review for whatever reasons. I have read some of the original papers too. I personally trust the original papers more than the reviews and the meta analyses (review on review), which are subject to interpretation bias and potentially something much darker. If the "anti-maskers" are skeptical about the CDC and the FDA, they surely should be skeptical about the Cochrane review. Plus the Cochrane review did not say that n95 mask is not effective against covid19.
I’m sure I could learn a lot from you and if you’re in the field and say masks are effective, then I’m not going to doubt you in the slightest. My question is if masks are effective at mitigating the spread of viral or respiratory droplets, why weren’t Americans encouraged to wear masks prior to 2020? Specifically during virulent flu seasons of the past? It seems like we would have seen people wearing masks during peak winter months, even back in the 90s for instance. It also seems that masks would have been required in crowded places during prior flu outbreaks such as bird flu in 2004.
@@tbc9096 I think that you raise an important question. Cold and flu viruses are always present and being spread. If masks work, then they save lives, since people can die from severe cold and flu. The reason that mask mandates are not permanent, lifelong mandates, is because people judge that the cost outweighs the benefits - the cost being lower quality of life. Reasonable people can disagree about the cost versus the benefit for using masks during a pandemic too.
@@Mike-ip6je Salient point. I’m all for people
wearing them by choice and if they feel it benefits them via colds, allergies, etc. To each their own. For better or for worse, it’ll still be common even a few years from now to occasionally see a masked person, although I think it’ll be more during winter and spring.
They did not say n95's were not effective. They also did not say they were.
No, clearly you aren’t listening to what is being said. Go to 6:56 on the video. It’s only a ten minute clip anyway. Anything that helps mitigate the virus should be used. Nothing is 100%. Let’s please be reasonable.
Thanks!
You're welcome.
Found it!
You are not stupid.
I repeat, you are NOT stupid.
@@OfficialDebunkTheFunk- Yur insights are amazing.
@@jedadruled984 So dumb you fall for a bot.
He is stupid isn't he
Wow, quite the echo chamber on this channel. TMHS 526: The Science And Safety Of Surgical, Cloth, And N95 Masks. Masks work as well as a suit of armor does in protecting against getting gored by a unicorn.
Very true except that there isn't even a unicorn here to fight off.
@Ben Samuel can we isolate and purify Chlamydia bacteria?
The more salient issue is that there is a large contingent of “freedom loving” ppl who can’t be bothered to wear masks because they don’t care about anyone other than themselves.
I’ll wear one in a medical setting but that’s it.
15 different studies done with thousands of people findings say Not really hand washing is better. Stop the BS
I'll side with freedom..every time. To defend against hysteric contingent who don't care about anyone but themselves and their neuroses
by all means wear a mask, i think he should be wearing a mask in the video and that everyone who is afraid or feels compelled to wear a mask SHOULD wear a mask. the problem i have is the VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE DO NOT USE THEM CORRECTLY!
Well done, great comments!
bot comment
Is this a politics channel or a science channel? Serious question.
It's a propaganda channel.
@@davesears9681 agreed, but Mr Wilson is on a loop, still running propaganda from 2021 like nobody is paying attention
He’s like one of those forgotten Japanese WW2 soldiers on a pacific island, still fighting in a war that had ended decades earlier
@Jason great comparison lol. Yes he's like a robot basically. It's actually gotten past the point of annoying to where it's almost entertaining now.
@@davesears9681 haha yeah, I wonder when he’ll pivot to a new topic. Climate change maybe?
It’ll be hilarious if he’s still trapped on covid island this time next year. And bets on when he pivots?
@Jason he will pivot to gender science that's the next wave of this style of propaganda.
Chuck Norris doesn't wear a mask. If Chuck Norris comes into contact with coronavirus, the coronavirus will have to be quarantined for 14 days
🤣
Good one!
Hahaha! Oh man always loved a good Chuck Norris joke.
Fwiw…. We do things all the time that typically have relatively small protective consequences … like vitamins, statins, low dose aspirin, organic food, throwing out expired food, going to the gym, wearing seat belts, buying home insurance, praying…. Etc.
Wearing a helmet while driving? Shooting down hobby balloons? Carrying a gun? The little things.
Praying can be very useful ... as long as you believe in it. Might be better than some antidepressants.
We need to keep our face nappies fresh folks. Let's stop putting them back into our pockets after use. Lol
So according to him Phauci must be an idiot because in the beginning he said masks don't work and told us not to wear masks. When called out on it he said he only said that because he was afraid people will take N95s from medical personnel. So not only did he lie to us but he put us all in danger by telling us not to wear them AND basically called us thieves for assuming we would take their N95s. If he lies about something as simple as that what else does he lie about??
@@MM-qp4pd
I understood Fauci to say that people would creat a shortage of n95 by buying and hoarding masks…. Like they did with toilet paper … but maybe you have a quote where he is concerned about people stealing masks … or maybe you are lying?
Regarding lying… I do not perceive our nation as being particularly concerned about lying….. I could provide examples if you wish…. Like that the Mexicans will pay for the border wall
Regarding what Fauci said about masks…. That was very early on in the pandemic…. And what he correctly said was that masks were not needed/appropriate at that time when total covid infections were less than 1000. Clearly, if you are saving masks for health care workers…. You are saving them because you think health care workers need them… and they would only need them if they work
It seems your rebuttal is focused on droplet transmission, what about airborne? This is the primary way SARS-COV2 spreads and yet you don't address it. Edited, removed the word aerosol as I am a bampot.
"Airborne" *is* aerosol.
Aerosols are airborne particles, you bampot. Learn the definitions of words before you use them in a sentence.
Prove that assertion. You can't. There is zero evidence for it. It is just an idea implanted in yours and others heads.
Thanks! Right on the heals of an anti-mask Slate article misrepresenting the Cochran review.
So according to him Phauci must be an idiot because in the beginning he said masks don't work and told us not to wear masks. When called out on it he said he only said that because he was afraid people will take N95s from medical personnel. So not only did he lie to us but he put us all in danger by telling us not to wear them AND basically called us thieves for assuming we would take their N95s. If he lies about something as simple as that what else does he lie about??
@@MM-qp4pd Ignorant bull. Out here in the real world we remember that Fauci and other CDC and Orange Mussolini advisors explicitly stated there was a need to prioritize N95s to healthcare workers. Fortunately we have Google and can see lies for what they are.
I love DR Wilson his previous video he was shi++$ng on Vit D which is a hormone our body needs. I guess he feels well are deficient in LNP and MRNA polysorbate 80 formaldehyde Mercury chicken DNA Monkey DNA Aluminum Mouse DNA. Thanks to Covid we learned that One can be a PhD or MD and still be a complete IDIOT 😂 😂 LoL 😆🤣
@@nadineblack8102 he's not just an idiot but also cruel and disgusting. These people get off on being cruel. Booksmart doesn't equal goodness. Look at all the Dr.Mengeles in the world and nurses and personel who allowed him to do what he did. And the doctors who promoted cigarettes for decades, prescribed oxicontin unnecessarily, prescribed thalidomide etc. Luckily there are also good people and doctors who arent like this. They understand karma.
You should be concerned of the overall area of the hair on your head. How much sticks to that filter. How many contaminant are you hosding and hosting and spreading to patients
Thanks Doc, good for the brain, good for humanity
Thanks so much for what you do!
7:42
The reason you can see the "breath" of that person coming out is because the expelled gas at body temperature (mainly water vapor) quickly condenses when exposed to cold outside temperatures to form liquid particles. You're looking at liquid particles, not just a gas! The same particles in the form of "droplets" and "aerosols" that carry the viruses, like you correctly say later. These particles are small enough to escape the mask, even if a part of them is retained. "They behave like tiny droplets of liquid", what do you mean by that? If you have a violent stream of gas being expelled from your body, via coughing or sneezing, the liquid droplets, being so microscopic, behave almost like gas particles and can even escape through the pores of the mask, not to mention the sides of the mask.
I see your point........but the fact remains that its still a gas, right up to the point it spills out from the side of the mask, meeting cold air and condensing. As a gas it cannot support transport of shedding virions, only droplets & (to a lesser extent) aerosols can do this.
Yes, I understand that the violence/velocity of a sneeze/cough could force some of the droplets out through the sides of a mask, but how much? probably not much......and the energy disipation in the mask will probably prevent those escaped droplets going far enough to be a significant risk.
@@fifthoarsmanoftheacropolis4173 It's not just a gas, otherwise you wouldn't be able to see it. Gas particles can not transport viruses by themselves, in the sense that they can not attach to them, but a gas stream can transport viruses, regardless of whether they are encapsulated in aerosol particles. Even so, an aerosol particle can have such microscopic dimensions that allow it to escape the mask fabric. In addition, the particles that are trapped in the masks can be progressively pushed out by subsequent sneezes and coughs.
@@bird_up3082 Water vapour molecules are too small to carry virus particles.
@@christopherrobinson7541 I'm not talking about molecules. I'm talking about liquid particles carried by water vapour, like aerosols. Molecules can not carry the virus by themselves because they are too small to attach to it, but a violent stream of gas molecules, such as that caused by coughing and sneezing, can push the virus out regardless of whether it is trapped in a droplet.
@@bird_up3082 can you grasp that H20 gas, liquid water and solid ice are the same thing - but in different states? That video clip shows H2O (along with other gases) being exhaled. The body is very warm, warming the breath exhaled, the mask is warmed by that breath. But as soon as it escapes the sides of the mask it suddenly cools which starts to change the physical state of that H20 from gas into liquid/vapour, before dissipation.
This cannot support/transport virus.
I get your point about droplets with virus being propelled by the rapid breath expulsion of coughs/sneezes......and yes there is potential for small amounts of that virus to escape sideways from the mask edges, by which point it will have lost its kinetic energy and fall with gravity. Can aerosols pass through the pores in the mask? Yes, that's possible. But you need to take into account 1) at the microscopic level the edges of those pores are not smooth & perfect - they are deliberately fibrous to maximise surface area without compromising air flow, & to catche edges of droplets passing through 2) masks are generally multi-layered and the pores are unlikely to be in alignment & are often different materials/textures, changing the pore size, shape & pattern. 3) when we encounter infections one of the first innate immune responses is increased mucous production, to trap any microbes in respiratory tract. Mucous is inherently sticky, which helps masks to snag expelled droplets. 4) any droplets with virus getting through a mask will have lost their momentum and fall with gravity, aerosols may be circulated with air movement in ventilated spaces......but these are far less of an issue than visible globs of mucous sneezed several meters without a mask .
Are masks perfect?.....no of course not, but the video shows clips of sneezes/coughs both with & without masks & the difference in spray is clear to see.
Surgeons have worn masks forever and no one says a thing until THEY have to wear it? So when you get sick and have to go in for surgery, I suppose you don't want your surgeon wearing one and getting all in his way and making things all stuffy for him while he's doing surgery on you?
That's not the reason surgeons wear masks.
@David Jones it is. But another example would be scientists who work with pathogens. Masks are required or do you want an Ebola outbreak?
@@sithwolf8017
@David Jones so scientists shouldn't wear masks while handling pathogens? Lol you're the stupid one here.
@@DavidJones-ke6kt They wear masks in order to protect themselves against any blood splashing on them also, but they also go to very great lengths to not spread infectious agents to someone who will be recovering from surgery. The scrubbing and the gloves all that. But that doesn't really answer the question. Suppose there's a surgeon who'd prefer to risk it because the mask makes him less comfortable during what is sometimes, extremely long procedures. Often 5, 8 hours and even longer. 16 hours is not unheard of.
Where is andrew Kaufman 😂
I love how all the crazy covidians try to call me anti-science 😂. That’s like someone calling you anti-foodie because you wouldn’t eat their mouldy bread 🥖
Except you are anti science! Problem is your arrogance blinds you like every other member of _Monstrum Pestilentia._ How sad you can't even see it.
@@sithwolf8017 ohhh anti-science? Says you who keeps denying the scientific data behind the latest revelation of how great natural immunity is Vs the Vax 😂 your absolutely raging that science butthurt you .. literally came back to bite you in the butt... All that muck you posted about no such thing as natural immunity.. btw you still haven't got back to me as to why the vac failed to stimulate Mucosal immunity and what importance mucosal immunity has in the event of a respiratory illness... Hooray for natural immunity and following the science 😜😜😜🥳🥳🥳🍼👶
@@sithwolf8017 you ran and hid behind a girls account last time I caught you out so don't even think about your red herring responses bringing up polio, rabies , and smallpox 😂😂 or any of them likes.
Answer my statement regarding natural immunity in covid instance and mucosal immunity or run with your tail between your legs shitwolf
@@sithwolf8017 I'm not arrogant. I was a covidian early on until i did some digging and realised the whole thing was SUPER unscientific. Why do you think i keep saying that everything they said turned out to be horsepoop. What happened to herd immunity? Masks? Lockdowns? Side effects? Virus origin and 50 other things. I love science in fact, and have done for 20 years at least. Learning about universe, chemistry and physics was literally life changing, but this covid thing has been absurd. I used to laugh at my friend who early on called it medical Tyranny but now i think he's spot on.
@Ruthless Truthful not until you answer my question of why does disease still exist if natural immunity is superior to vaccines? Shouldn't our immune system have eradicated all disease in the hundreds of thousands of years we've existed?
You try to prove the efficacy of a mask with particles 10.000 times bigger than viruses and then you completely ignore the fact that a breath holds about 3 liters while the mask holds less than 300ml. Most of every breath simply leaves the mask unfiltered through gaps.
While it is true that by wearing a mask you won´t sneeze or cough someone in the face, it won´t make a difference in any setting that keeps you on your spot for more than 5 minutes, like public transport, offices, recreational settings etc.
Also, most people don´t wear their masks like a puppet in a lab. The masks in such labs are glued to the face of the puppets. Most people do not even care about the nose bridge or even deliberately leave that as open as possible for easier breathing.
MASKS ARE USELESS, they don´t change anything on the population level, which makes mask mandates useless and illegal.
If someone is able to wear his maks perfectly he is free to do so
Btw: Your argument essentially is that they did not say masks are useless, so maybe they still are useful. No, that´s not how it works and you should know that. They found no evidence that masks are useful. It´s the same thing as if I would say "I find no evidence that you are able to fly when you walk off the visitor's platform on Empire State" Sure, you could say that MAYBE you would still be able to fly, but I offer you a year´s salary if based on this, you would actually try.
I've studied a bunch about air filtration, primarily home cleaners and vaccumes that use HEPA filters. HEPA filtration is pretty amazing. I mean, it was used to prevent nuclear contamination in the 40s during the manhattan project. But I have seen countless tests in labs using aerosols that use a proxy virus. I have seen the data that these machines can reduce the viral load in the air. I know from real world experience that the air is easier to breathe (i suffer from moderate asthma), there is less dust, and my allergies reduce drastically. I have experienced the same with an n95 mask. Not just that. There is a reason carpenters and construction workers use respirators: it keeps out the dust, mold, fiber glass and other shit that gives you cancer, out of your lungs. Hell, a whole country has been wearing them since 1919 to reduce transmission of the flu, it's called japan. I'm sorry, it's not that big of a deal. Grow up and put on your cheap health insurance policy.
7:35 🔴🔴 wai wai wai wait i can't understand something please explain.. basic physics
Like that guy demonstrated the gas coming out from those side because of the pressure towards the mask surface right ? Yes the virus which hits the surface of the mask will strict but what about the virus which pussed back because of the gas which already been bouncing back ? Isn't that gonna carry the viruses which didn't touch The GRASS! " sorry i mean didn't touch the mask right¿
Then let's talk about the viruses which is already on the mask and which passes through the mask, so past researches (long before COVID 19) shown the minimum size of things which the mask N95 can filter is .3 microns because the size of the pores in N95 is 0.1 -0.3 which is made of non-woven polypropylene fiber it's gonna stretch a bit when you sneeze or cough or inhale or exhale that's in research they proved the minimum size which they can filter is .3 microns , when you look at the COVID 19 size it's 0.06 microns to 0.14 microns..
So 0.06 - 0.14 can be filter by .3 ? 💀
Yeah it gonna filter few but if you look at the amount of virus which gonna pass through it's nothing.
Looks like instead of using mask your ur hands to cover ur face while sneezing or coughing and sanitiz it after that lol
and like u said they are liquid kinda thing right? It can't be pass through like when it got squeezed¿ I don't know just curious. And i the people who uses normal mask.. aaa i don't even wanna talk about them.
Before anyone who gonna comment here "Anti mask " let me tell that i was not until yesterday
I was thinking it protects spreading without even analysing it because of the media and educated people like this guy.
I'm not Anti mask or anything I just came to understand mask is use less and I'm not gonna protest u or make fun of you if u wanna wear.
I extremely disappointed on myself for being stupid for these years and i feel bad for forcing other others to wear mask and gets angry about them if they're not. It's okay to do faults without knowing we have to accept the truth and fact instead of trying to prove something which is not just to make ourselves comfortable.
Recent research proved that wearing mask causes only less or no effect on this COVID -19 wave.
U can understand when the research results tells less near by no.
Lot of scientists and doctors are apologizing for being wrong it's really awesome only this will make us grow stop searching for comfort and accept the facts, this is a greatest lesson in my life for everyone too.. let's learn and grow together
All this COVID 19 spreading is like wave it's not like ducking short gun shooting 🔫 guys these are airbones it can even linger in the air for hours it will be floating around anywhere even one or couple of covids enter ur body u are affected.
Also researchs proved for many people it won't show any symptoms (i got covid on the first wave i didn't have any symptoms) many of you guys who never had covid may had and i may got cured without even noticing cause of your immune and many others encountered just fever for 1 or 2 of days not even flu and got cured.
I'm not talking about vaccines is bad.
Yup. Anti-maskers ARE idiots!
@@someone90000 you have grown a lot the last 3 years like myself!
You ever listen to Vinay Prassad? I’d highly highly recommend him. Much more over than this guy.
Leaving a like and a comment to help the algorithm. Content much appreciated.
Why not put a little more effort in your comment next time ? This is pathetic
They work fine they just dont prevent you from getting sick or getting anyone else sick.
🤠💜
Look what I just discovered! Muritaipet (AKA Nazitaipet) has 2 other accounts named *'Science01'* and *'Science 02'* to support himself during fights. He probably has a third one named *''Linda Ward'* too.
How does it work ? Let's say you are roasting him or he doesn't have any confidence in what he says, he will switch to one of these two accounts and reply to himself, and reply to the opponent to make him feel _"Look, you have so many people against you, we are stronger!"_
Isn't the Cochrane group the gold standard of meta analyses? Why this they drop the ball so hard on the vitamin D one?
They are the gold standard, don't listen to a youtuber over them.
You may want to actually READ what they write, rather than listening to what certain people tell you.
@@stevebryan2446 So, you agree then that ivermectin does not work, and neither does vitamin D.
@@TheseNuts2 that's vitamin C, jee jee.
@user-mv5lj8qr6g Yes, I agree Ivermectin doesn't work and I don't know anybody who says vitamin D cures covid. I am not anti-vax, despite Funky Brewster's new definition of that word.
Masks work great in theory. People don't wear masks without constantly removing and touching them. All I can say is schmoots.
They dont even have any desired effect in reality either even if used ideally. Neil Orr, Study for RCS in 1976. On the web
@@user-tq1qd3iu2t Okay, RFK Jr. That was sarcasm. What is your red line? Vaccines or war?
@@louboudreau1948 Bit of a leap in the conversation. Seems they want us to have both. i can only refuse the jabs. I can't stop the banker war mongers.
Hey Dan, how did COVID get into the wild?
Lab leak or natural evolution.
Deliberate release.
We don’t know
@@Greekbasil some of us do.
You can try, but the youtuber will never admit being wrong about anything.
@@rexmentula1089
Yes, it is a shame that your sort NEVER admit to being wrong!
*_"More than 170 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms"_*
That is not a scientific journal. Could you read your sources before throwing this garbage?
These poor mask wearing phesants don't like studies like that 🤣
@@TheseNuts2 So y ou accuse something of not being true because it doesn't coincide with the narrative those in power have every incentive to lie about?
True that a properly fitted N95 or better may reduce breathing in/out virus laden microdroplets. But none of the guidlin3s or mandates(the point of all of this discussion) ever required these high quality masks. Apples and Oranges. Also as others have pointed out, source control of a cough or sneeze is nearly impossible with a casually worn daily mask. In other words, not really effective in the moment most needed. It's these limitations and the various situational and environmental parameters that make the required use of masks little more than theater. I propose that the false sense of security of mask guidelines puts vulnerable ppl at risk. It's too complex an issue to really be used as a PH mandate or guideline. Can they help reduce viral shedding/inhaling? Sure. Do they remove enough virions to make a difference in practice? Doubtful. User beware.
You didn't pay attention to the video, did you.
@@DC-wt2vi The video just says masks work in theory.
@@DC-wt2vi What's it like being a stenographer for big pharma?
Dr. Wilson, sir thank you for your numerous u_tube endeavors which have served to enlighten your English speaking audience around the world. Especially your videos involving key topics associated with COVID-19. To follow, my humble perspective regarding your video presentation associated with masks. Sir it may benefit the layperson if you add to the video tag/title " source control " for that is predominantly the context of your video. It would also be more transparent to your audience, had your animated sample clips of a slow motion sneeze ( depicting exhaled particles ) were expanded in view to include the entire length of the mask during a sneeze event. A better overall view depicting how particles can escape from the top, bottom & sides of a mask would yield a clearer visual picture of the extent of particles escaping into the surrounding airspace. The manner of expelled particles via a host's oral cavity & the full extent of particle introduction into the environment ( which is relative to the use of a cloth or surgical / procedural mask ) would be better represented with the entire mask in focus, nevermind that both types of masks are being worn properly. Note, airborne transmission has often been attributed to infectious droplet nuclei produced by the desiccation of suspended droplets, which was thought to occur only for tuberculosis & a few other pathogens. Thus, surgical masks have consistently been recommended for " source control " against most respiratory infections originating within a human host. However with all due respect, it's important to mention that the efforts of various disciplines to include the field of aerosol science has advanced greatly over a decade's time together with a focus on the role of a infectious aerosol associated with respiratory pathogens over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. And in some cases infectious aerosols represented within particles & composed of potentially pathogenic viruses, could pose an additional harm by being suspended in the air for a duration of time. The evolution of science was clearly demonstrated with the WHO's tragic delay with their adoption of the true manner & nature of SARS-CoV-2's dissemination. In short, the annals of medical canon were slow to adopt the peer reviewed data of aerosol scientists. Dr. Wilson, your focus is on the effectiveness of masks as " source control " & with that, it is fair to say that the proper use of a mask is instrumental in the utility of any mask for " source control ". In addition, as a scientist with a deep understanding of the use of masks & their functions, it would benefit your audience if you took the time to point out that the term " masks " includes an array of face coverings that yield different " source control " properties via their respective materials. Or better said, disposable face coverings consists of both masks & respirators. Dr. Wilson, you rightly mention confounding variables in association with the effectiveness of masks but you overlooked one common variable among those who donn a mask. A statement of utility to highlight that the use of any mask is highly dependent on it's fit together with any facial hair that could impede the proper fit of that " mask ". For facial hair together with beards are indeed a popular facet of today's society. Although your video was indeed a response to a Cochrane review ( community source control ), at some point it would have been a benefit to your audience had you taken the opportunity to expand on the idea " Yes, masks still work " by delineating a superior " source control " face covering that can take on a dual purpose with the addition of " respiratory protection ". Thus, as a learned scientist perhaps a mention that a high quality " respirator " together with it's engineered material properties, are face coverings which represent a higher class of manufacturing & source materials. Thus a " respirator " makes for a better " source control " face covering with the added benefit of protecting the wearer when the elevated circulation of a highly contagious respiratory pathogen threatens public health. Overall your analysis of the Cochrane study was accurate & your clarifications were appreciated for they safeguard the public's health. Thank you Dr. Wilson for sharing your professional knowledge & unbiased opinions.
You're still in the denial phase, the anger phase will come next, and finally... Acceptance you are WRONG
Yeah I’m in denial. So what?
But he isn't wrong, is he? Check the sources of the video.
@@Skidzo19 he is wrong though. You're also in the denial phase it seems
@@Will-vs5kp If you think he is wrong, please quote what he said, and explain why you think it's wrong.
@@Will-vs5kp I'll take your lack of a response as an admission that you could not find anything wrong in the video. Thanks.
Wonderful video! Thank you so much for this!
By staying healthy you deny the pharmaceutical industry the profit it expect to harvest from your disease. Now you know why they seek to destroy Natural Medicine And nutritional Knowledge. Yaa Right DR Wilson Vit D is bad for you. You need to be injected with LNP MRNA aluminum And a whole lot of other toxins. Yep that's what we need to do to remain healthy. Lol lol 🤣🤣🤣. We don't need the hormone Vit D. Lol 😂😂😂
Thank you for the confirmation bias Dr Dan! Now I don't feel like such a dweeb when being triple masked at my son's softball game! I TRUST THE SCIENCE!
*Vote Blue 2024*
I see Fauci's words were deleted.
The world over has said they don't.
Your PhD was clearly for a quota.
Tom Jefferson, an Oxford epidemiologist would disagree after a recent study.
Your move Dan
From the CDC 2023 "Cotton masks or surgery masks are not going to Protect from viruses."
"Cotton masks or surgery masks are not going to Protect from viruses."
That thing is a misleading quote, paste it in search bar for fact check. You failed, as usual.
You have to use a genuine search engine. Not the main one that has a biased agenda.
@@NathansHVAC Which do you recommend?
@@DC-wt2vi double duck followed by the word go.
Meaning they don't protect the wearer. This does not mean they can't reduce virus being exhaled from an infected person.
Took a while for some to give up the flat earth theory too. The guy will get there sooner or later.
Aha, the main point is: hold your breath....
Good review. I realized that it is harder to study the effect of masks in the community than I originally thought. Did people keep them on, and for how long, who else was in the room, how many were infected, did they all wear masks appropriately, what was the ventilation like, were people breathing heavily, did people take masks on/off all the time, etc. So many complicating factors. However, it's clear from the video that 'source control' is obviously the main goal. Thank you!
A good (or bad) example was the study done in Denmark pretty early in the pandemic: supermarket personnel wearing a mask during working hours and then measure infection rates. Not much different (actually, a little lower, but not significantly so, but this could easily be due to the low numbers of infections overall at that time in Denmark anyway), but the study did not check how well they wore their mask, and whether they also worse their mask outside of the supermarket setting. Which meant you had mostly young people hopefully doing what they were supposed to do while at work where they have very limited close contact with people (there were distancing rules in place, too) and then going home where they likely lived in close quarters with others without wearing a mask.
@@Marco-it2mr - "Masks are a key measure to reduce transmission and save lives.
Wearing well-fitted masks should be used as part of a comprehensive ‘Do it all!’ approach including maintaining physical distancing, avoiding crowded, closed and close-contact settings, ensuring good ventilation of indoor spaces, cleaning hands regularly, and covering sneezes and coughs with a tissue of bent elbow.
Depending on the type, masks can be used for either protection of healthy persons or to prevent onward transmission, or both."
@@frogsong100yawn
Just wondering if any of the "varients" actually "frighten the pants" off any of lot? 🤣
@@frogsong100 The problem is human nature. In my observation, almost nobody wore masks or socially distanced correctly. Never going to happen...
I know quite a bit more about masks than most people.
I use them for work, I have a selection of full-face respirators, half-mask respirators, disposable N95s, and N99s, a whole swathe of different types of 40mm filters, and several CBRN suites.
MASKS WORK JUST FINE. Just like they have been doing for nearly a century. In fact they are getting better every year.
The problem with these epidemiological studies of people en masse, is that they only highlight one thing ... people are not trained in PPE, how infection works, and how to use masks.
For example.
Joe Rando wears a mask religiously.... outside the house.
His kids dont wear masks.
Every night he comes home, the family unit sits on the couch, and if any family member is infected, they will all get infected.
And please note that children in school certainly appeared to be the number 1 vector during the start of the pandemic. Asymptomatic kids were the rats in the ghetto spreading the plague as it were.
In this instance, Joe Rando is measured as "evidence that masks dont work".
Proving that "people who wear masks" get covid, does not equate as "masks failed to stop the spread". I could write a study on the failings of mask use and why people use them wrong and then get infected. Giving a person a rifle does not make them a soldier. Giving someone a mask does not mean they CBRN certified.
The mask study, conducted by a team of Canadian researchers, found that nurses who wore high-tech N95 masks were infected by influenza only slightly less often than those who wore common surgical masks, Perl and Srinivasan say.Oct 1, 2022
PPE needs PPE training! If people aren't wearing them correctly, changing them often, and not constantly touching them! It's a disaster.
And masks only catch larger droplets! Droplets do not linger, as they're not aerosol. Masks do not prevent the aerosols. (Regardless of worn correctly or not)
Don’t you get it? They work but they’re also rather pointless because of some of the reasons you mentioned, like kids.
So technically yes they “work” on a specific individual basis for a specific amount of time but for 100 different reasons it’s not going to stop people getting Covid, eventually. If you lived alone, worked alone and didn’t associate with others and masked up constantly you may be able to avoid a Covid infection but what percentage of the population are we talking here? 1-5?% max. The main point is that at a society level they don’t do much at all.
We're doomed.
@@MysMystery13 I don't know if they do or not however when evaluating the effectiveness of masks one must consider the mask type and quality as well as how and when they're being used. These studies can indeed be flawed because of those factors. When the examples of droplet versus aerosol are raised measured against the mask density for instance there is a simplistic view expressed by some that a mask trying to block a virus particular is like trying to keep bee's out of one's yard by installing a chain link fence. What that analogy doesn't take into account however is that some masks have special characteristics that others do not and that the tiniest virus particles move in a fashion that larger ones don't. You might hear for example that the filtration of a premium filter is listed to trap particles down to .3 microns in size and that the virus is smaller than that so therefore the filter is useless however some droplets are larger than that and the tiniest virus particles move in a manner effected by Brownian motion. In other words they are so tiny that they effected by the slightest interference like a mild breeze for instance. That causes them to move in a very non-linear fashion. Imagine it bouncing to and fro in all directions. What that does is to make it more likely to be trapped by a good filter rather than just pass through. Some experts say that it's not the tiniest particles that are the concern and not those larger than .3 microns but the particles that are in between those sizes. The other thing to consider is the mask type such as an N95 compared to a cloth mask or a surgical mask. The N95 has an electrostatic charge whereas the others do not which creates a clingier material to trap particles and it's made with non-woven fabric which is also preferred to woven fabric.
@@andymullarx6365 At the microscopic level, the mask holes appear as tunnels, and microfilaments from broken or irregular threads project into the gap. Multiple layers present even more chances of stopping aerosols and droplets.
In a decade, when portable Condensing Particle Counters won’t cost half a year’s salary, the general public will be able to measure filtration real-time with a handheld device and these debates will seem quaint.
It's amazing the human race thrived for so long isnt it to the point that they now have programes like this to kill us off.
Thank you for all the facts. You have eased my mind in so many ways.
You are also an excellent speaker
True to every word.
Before finding you, the others have a way of stating information in a way that is intimidating
Vaccinated and masking.
Again, thank you, you are making a difference in our crazy world.
Much appreciated
S
vaccinated even though it doesn't prevent much...... good job. Even after all of the lies you trust this stuff. Even after Pfizer admitted that they never tested the vaccine efficacy regarding transmission which was the entire basis for the vaccine passports. My 84 year old grandfather in law hasn't worn a mask the entire pandemic. My 89 year old grandmother who can barely walk a without her walker and barely goes out came to my cousins wedding which was a group of around 80 people with no mask. You're a coward. Stay inside and never come out because who knows what disease is next. If you are so afraid why do you even do anything in life because who knows what's around the corner?
@Levi Mora happy your family is healthy
That does not give you the right to judge me to my face. Just state your own thoughts in general
I am thankful for Dr Wilson
I work in the medical field with patients
Live and let live
@@levimora3025
You science haters are funny, in a sad and pathetic sort of way.
Grow up!
@@sparkle.s Live and let live. Yeah, because the medical comunity isnt like treating symptoms and not causes. Im sure youre a good person and i have nothing against you, but medical commies (doctors) kill people with their so called treatments and i had to figure out my own goddamn cure becuse medical idiots didnt. The cure was breathing and cold exposure to get rid of autoimune disorder. Not one f*cking single doctorb ever mentioned that, and been doing this for 3 years now, i have not had 1 single cold or anything 100 % healthy every single minute of the day(very different from before). So yeha, no wonder people are telling doctors to F**k of all around the world. Remeber your Hipocratic oath, not many do that anymore. Do no harm! Youre all like that Doctor Nick from Simpsons. The pressure you docs will feel if you dont start living up to your responsiblities will be devastating to your income and everytthing you hold dare, so start helping people now, or people will help doctors stop injuring them. Start using HRV with your patients, look into breathing for all illnesses and for godsakes, take a cold shower and tell your patients to do it too. Stop the lying and charades
Your videos needs pet(s). Then you could be like “I’m Doctor Wilson, a PhD microbiologist, and this is Jake Wilson, and he’s a cat.”
I wear a mask because I am very sensitive to pollen and pollution not to mention I have a chronic cough and just don't want to be coughing on people. It's kinda nasty really. I have bad sinuses and lots of post nasal. ENT says surgery is the only way out. So I will cough for months on end and it's horrible. Just don't want to be coughing on people and spitting on them. My mask cuts down on crap irritating my mucus membranes as well. That's why I also use a very good hepa filter in the house to get all the dander, pollen, dust etc. I also once burned my lungs pretty bad while cleaning my tub -- I used too much bleach and the fumes burned my lungs and they hurt and I was in terrible coughing bad way for like 4 or 5 days. I should have probably gone to the doctor. I totally fucked that one up. Should have worn a proper mask for the job. I also do art and use spray fixative (artists will know what that is) and I can't breath that in, either. So a mask is used. Also allergic to furry animals and pets. Can't have those around or visit friends who have them :( I turn into an oozing sputum itch fest. Ever feel intense itching in both ears so like you wanted to shove a baby bottle brush in there to scratch it? That's what it was like. Using a mask has helped SOOO much. Allergy season doesn't disable me anymore. I save money on lipstick (whoo and not eating it off my lips anymore, it's quite waxy and nasty), people won't judge my face as much (introverts unite) and when it's cold, my breath keeps my nose warm and thus it doesn't end up all runny. (Cold air is dry and makes your nose produce mucus to stay wet, hence those runny snot noses in winter). And then of course there's the ninja in me who enjoys people not knowing what I look like. It's kind of neat to be a little anonymous. I don't wear surgical ones, though. I don't find they help keep out pollen or dander etc. it gets right in. I also like being different . Now that everyone isn't wearing a mask, you're all the sheep and I'm the unique one :)
If you want help tell us about which masks best protect the wearer
Great explanation. Thanks
No, masks didn't work.
There are multiple graphs of multiple countries showing the times where it was or not mandatory to wear masks and the number of cases throughout time, and in the big majority of the cases no conclusion could be made, in fact, in some instances, cases went up when it was mandatory to wear masks! This type of analysis is much more precise than the cherry picked studied you picked with small populations... But you don't wanna show that because you're not honest and don't want to concede or show any middle ground.
One of the biggest confounders in cherry-picked observational mask studies is previous immunity to available variants. NYC was praised in the summer of 2020 for having some of the lowest SARS-2 infection rates in the US, which was attributed to its stringent mitigation policies including masking. No one praising NYC for low infection rates even stopped to look at the fact that NYC got SLAMMED by the Wuhan variant in March and April of 2020 while most of the US was only reading about SARS-2, and that there was no new variant available until November. So, OF COURSE NYC couldn't have a big breakout of infection in the summer of 2020, even if everyone actually went around breathing and coughing into other people's mouths, because the city was already at h3rd immun1ty to the only available variant. Fast-forward to December 13, 2021: NY Governor Kathy Hochul implemented a mask mandate, and NYC had j4b apartheid barring the unj4bb3d from public indoor spaces, and what happened? Omicron blew through NYC faster than anywhere in the country; some zip-codes were surpassing 50% positivity some days in early January 2022.
Let's see:
A study of an outbreak aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt, an environment notable for congregate living quarters and close working environments, found that use of face coverings on-board was associated with a 70% reduced risk of infection.38
In a study of 124 Beijing households with > 1 laboratory-confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, mask use by the index patient and family contacts before the index patient developed symptoms reduced secondary transmission within the households by 79%.39
A study examining SARS-CoV-2 secondary attack rates among eight public K-12 school districts in Massachusetts (70 schools with >33,000 enrolled students) during the 2020-21 school year found an unadjusted secondary attack rate of 11.7% for unmasked versus 1.7% for masked interactions.40
A retrospective case-control study from Thailand documented that, among more than 1,000 persons interviewed as part of contact tracing investigations, those who reported having always worn a mask during high-risk exposures experienced a greater than 70% reduced risk of acquiring infection compared with persons who did not wear masks under these circumstances.41
During July 15-August 31, 2021, when Delta was the predominant strain circulating in the U.S., about one in five K-12 public non-charter schools open for in-person learning in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona, experienced a school-associated outbreak. Outbreaks were three and a half times more likely (adjusted odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.8-6.6) in schools without mask mandates.42
In a nationwide analysis of data collected during July 1-September 4, 2021, U.S. counties without school mask requirements experienced larger increases in pediatric COVID-19 case rates (18.53 per 100,000 per day more cases) after the start of school compared with counties with school mask requirements.43
@@Marco-it2mr Of course, these observational studies are done mostly by people who already believe that masks work, so we have no reason to believe that confounders were properly taken into account. You do understand that there is a tight correlation between population density, existing health demographics (obesity and diabetes), and "left of center" politics that is quicker to restrict liberty?
How about the confounder that places already hit hard by available variants are more likely to mask in reaction to their local epidemic, but mask after substantial natural immunity to the available variants has been had?
All of these anecdotal/observational studies are a small, finite fraction of all comparisons that could be made, and are mostly selected by people who believe in masking, a priori, or want people masked regardless, so that "people take C seriously". It's hard to imply that there is an emergency going on when there are no physical signs of it that most people can see.
@@johnsheehy4192 Unexpectedly, these studies are handwaved away, because they give the "wrong" answer to you. You come with all kinds of complaints that *are not relevant for several of the studies I listed.*
"It's hard to imply that there is an emergency going on when there are no physical signs of it that most people can see"
I really, really, really wish I could have dumped you in one of the hospitals during the peak of the pandemic. I know some ER doctors and nurses who will gladly smash your head in if you dare talk like this to them. Months on edge, massive overwork, and often getting really sick themselves - and then they get idiots like you trying to argue there was no emergency going on.
@@Marco-it2mr No citations. Also no mention of natural immunity nor any mention of covid deaths...... cases don't concern me. what concerns me is mortality which is still less than 1% globally.
Look at the mechanical evidence, look at the physics. Vinay Prasad doesn't even acknowledge that in the past 3 years with 10000000000000000000 interactions between humans *AT LEAST ONE* may have sneezed into a mask as they walked by someone, breathed into a mask as they came into a room and left. It is IMPOSSIBLE that masks NEVER made a difference ANYWHERE. This now becomes a question cost/benefit and how often it helps and the costs of mask are very low, but I wish at least ONE of the anti-maskers would be honest and admit that some mask must have worked somewhere. This is absolutely 100% true.
If you sneezed into a mask you are still pushing out billions of virus particles.
Masks cannot prevent viral transmission.
Masks are for macro particles not micro particles.
Wishing that a mask worked somewhere is not a reason to mandate there use.
Couldn't you just wave your hand and knock those deadly droplets down to the ground?
I'm sure that worked somewhere
Call up some mask manufacturers and ask them will their masks stop, help, prevent coronavirus and you won't find one that will say yes..
There is a reason for that. That's why you have to say things like. I'm sure masks worked somewhere
No masks cannot prevent viral transmission. That's what they would have to do to be beneficial in a viral pandemic.
LOL at that slow-mo video of the guy sneezing with no mask. Who sneezes like that, Aquaman? Pennywise in the sewer? Such an absurd visual. Plus, isn't this negated by sneezing into your arm? Very dumb.
Never jabbed. Never masked. Never social distanced. Worked all the way through this “pandemic”. Oh.. and never got covid… “the most dangerous disease in history”.
So you’re saying that all the people who claim to have been infected, or who claim they knew people who got ill, very ill indeed or who died from SARS-CoV-2 infection are lying simply because it didn’t happen to you? Wow!
Who ever said it was the most dangerous disease in history? That goes to smallpox my friend, by pure numbers at the very least. You're just lying because you think from experience that it never happened to you means it never happened at all? Get over yourself, you're not the only human on Earth.
"Never jabbed. Never masked. Never social distanced. - - - and never got covid...."
Yeah, that is because you were protected from your own idiocy by the intelligent people around you.
@@sososoprano1 --- _So you’re saying that all the people who claim to have been infected, or who claim they knew people who got ill, very ill indeed or who died from SARS-CoV-2 infection are lying simply because it didn’t happen to you? Wow!_ ---
He claims that they are weak and sick from their lifestyle. But not because they didn't wear masks or got vaccinated.
@@CNCmachiningisfun -- _Yeah, that is because you were protected from your own idiocy by the intelligent people around you._ ---
So explain how these "intelligent people", around him, got sick themselves in the first place ?
I have an autoimmune disorder and have been aggressively masking, laying low, only doing curbside, not dining out. I've gotten every available booster offered to the immune vulnerable group. I haven't caught it, at all. It's really frustrating to see how many people died or caught long covid. It never had to be like this.
And my favorite masking situation was when I was running around a pond in a Buff and a couple yelled and laughed at me, then immediately got the face-full of gnats I was avoiding. Sometimes it's about inhaling bugs, you know?
No actually you are a bot designed to shift opinion.
"Aggressively masking." That says a lot.
You describe hiding in your home. Yes, you do. "Laying low, only doing curbside, not dining out." So presumably not shopping, not traveling, not seeing friends. Certainly not working; perhaps you work from home?
And of course you got "every available booster." And brag that you haven't caught it, "at all."
Here's the thing(s):
1. How long do you intend to continue the hermitude? Five years? A decade? Forever?
2. Maybe you did "catch it." I've seen unvaccinated people who were never sick, yet are +ve for antibodies.
3. The majority of those who caught it - and transmitted it - were immunized. And masking. They just weren't hiding.
4. And yet? "It never had to be like this." Were you going to support those who "laid low" and didn't go to work? Right.
5. Nearly everyone eventually caught covid. You probably will, too. Then you'll be eating crow w. your chicken soup.
6. Despite your "frustration" at seeing "how many people died?" Most did not, in fact, die.
7. Nor did most contract "long covid." I have a practice in post-viral syndromes. Some viruses have long recoveries. We all know someone who lost a year of college to "mono," yet no one talks of "long Epstein-Barr virus." Hmm.
8. The image of you running around in a mask - while out in nature? Is positively psychiatric.
@@Lionforaday thank you for a dose of reason on this ridiculous channel. Masking was 90% theater from 2021 on.
I got 2 autoimmune disorders after my jabs. Also not scientific 🧪 . +55y.
You're not helping the "mask forever" cause. They got a face full of gnats. You got a life sentence.
Saw you over at Dr Bob....thanks for everything you’re doing!
Dr. Wilson, I appreciate that you have the Night Angel trilogy in the background!
I think its a bit unfair to consider a person questioning the validity of the mask effectiveness during a pandemic as " anti-maskers." Source control is a great concept but in practice we are not seeing community mask usage making much if any difference. Many countries tried and were as over run as any other country. The bottom line is this entire paper and the issue at large meaning practical application in a community. Those confounding issues you bring up are great examples of that there is no likelihood that the mask at the end of the day makes any difference. in the community. which is the point. None of this is meant to imply a lab worker properly wearing a mask during a known time of possible exposure would not reduce risk.
Agree 100%. Same as them calling people who have been injured or are just wary of government overreach, big pharma etc "anti-vaxxers". Total lunacy. I've had two jabs unfortunately but I deeply admire all of the previous vaccines because they've stood the test of time. We know the safety profile. It's like saying that people who fear to fly with an airline with the world's worst safety record hate aviation and hate pilots.
@@Mark_Jacobson81 I cant ever understand how thinking people cant see the nuance in this . I reeks or politics. Sadly. I consider myself an advocate of science. I grew up in an academic household and have many family members in science and academia. atmospheric chemistry, biostatistics, biology, mathematics, geophysics, computer science, computer engineering and nuclear engineering. our daily lives are full of discussion and debate. I'm the least educated in my family but I'm not dumb. I just took another path in early life into the artistic world. but here I am, wondering how educated ppl can't discern the difference between reasoned apprehension and cult like denial. I'm left with few options. primarily it appears to me to be designed to generate support in media and to deflect criticism of the science that got us here. Then there is conflict of interest. Some are fearful of being seen as not 100% behind the party line. Call it political or career protection or whatever. I find it hard to believe an PhD can't see there is any reasonable position between 100% for or 100% against supporting a theory. After all, mask effectiveness regarding covid is still really a theory, given the scientific debate we are currently witnessing. Any academic claiming victory is fooling themselves and no other...
The mask were used to spread the Virus. REAL Science will show that the damp worn mask transfered the virus to every surface they touched. I watched people take their mask off to eat food at resturants while putting the mask on the same table that everyone touches that eats at that table. If the virus was deadly and they wanted to stop the virus they would have mandated a certain type of mask created for a virus while having Blue hazmat bins in every store or street corner to discard the virus soaked masks. The mask caused many to develop bacterial pnuemonia as well due to contamination from the mask. This will be the biggest science blunder in the last 100 years.
All I know is, study or no study, from a purely anecdotal personal perspective, I have been getting far fewer colds or flu’s when I wore a scarf around my neck and lower half of my face while riding a city bus and subway during my daily commutes. This was way before Covid, and in a very densely populated city (San Francisco.) It’s insane to say “masks don’t work” when the particles of virus flying around a space being blocked is a thing. Sure, it totally makes a difference how you wear your mask (over your nose, tight or not.) But that doesn’t mean masks don’t work. I used to hate seeing people walking around wearing a mask under their nose. Those masks won’t work, of course!
You are correct Masks do work, but getting 7 billion people to use them correctly may be a stretch. You keep forgetting we are suppose to get colds, how virus' die out. This is how biology works. Sadly when the virus is generated in a lab as this one probably did, it becomes more difficult.
@@indianoutlaw5702 I’m forgetting nothing. But when you live in an extremely densely populated city and ride public transportation you go from getting a cold twice a year to getting sick on a near constant basis. So that’s not fun or normal and it wears and tears at your system. So thanks for the lecture about how it’s normal to get sick, but I can’t afford to move out of this godforsaken sh*thole, so I’ll keep on wearing my frikken mask thanks
@@indianoutlaw5702 "You keep forgetting we are suppose to get colds, how virus' die out. This is how biology works."
So, you state, notably with great confidence, something that is wrong. This is NOT how biology works.
There's also nothing in biology that would explain why a supposedly engineered virus would behave different from a non-engineered virus in terms of how biology works...
Its insane to claim there are particles of viruses flying around. Prove it cos no one else has yet in 100 years.
At 5:05, the set of three bar graphs could possibly be more unhelpful. There are too many casual observers, who would look at the two pairs of bars on the right, see that the light blue bar represents how treatment resulted in a lower percentage of something bad, but the left-hand pair shows treatment associated with a higher percentage - and assume that's bad, too.
This could have been avoided easily, with the same method grocery stores present 15% fat ground beef as "85% lean." Just graph the other part of the sample group. It's not difficult or deceptive.
Dr. Wilson, next time please include in frame the text that explains such ill-considered visual presentations.
Here why people should not believe a word of what SHITwolf says:
-Shitwolf: *_"dude I've explained anion exchange chromatography in child's terms"_*
-Me: *_"Show me WHERE you wrote that, show me."_*
-Shitwolf: no more reply on that
-Me: *_"You didn't right ? You were just plainly lying like usual."_*
-Sithwolf, still not replying to that and few replies later: *_"so why did you lie about the chromatography purification paper? "_*
-Me: exposing his lie: *_"Here why people should not believe a word of what Shitwolf says[...]"_*
-Sithwolf, proceeds to edit his first message and then poops us another lie : *_"here's what I wrote in my original post clown. So who is lying now?"_* 🤥 🤔
-Me: Adding that last quote to the whole thing
-Sithwolf: *_"Copied from my comment regarding virus purification via chromatography which I edited BEFORE GM1221 decided to lie about me"_*
-Me: *_"I saw the original dum dum. And it wasn't. Besides, ANYBODY could have destroyed me simply by showing it to me, if it was true"_*
Nice
Three points which I think people on the street would struggle with understanding the use of masks... One is that they would say they or someone they knew wore masks and still got covid / a cold. As you were pointing out, it's likely the are misunderstanding that it's more about preventing infection *from* people who are wearing masks and have an illness, rather than stopping *you* getting infected when you have a mask on. It helps, but it's not a cure all.
A second issue is that people still struggle to wear masks properly. They let their nose hang out or take it off for hours at a time in a risky environment, like an indoor, poorly ventilated and cramped restaurant, or at a gym, or inside public transport, or a nightclub, or other high risk areas. A mask won't protect you (or others) if it's not worn correctly, or not worn at all.
Finally, people do have concerns when wearing masks. It can make it a little bit harder to breath, though sometimes that's more a psychological rather physical limitation from the mask. There is a cost involved. Someone has to pay for a mask. If budgets are tight it can seem like it is not worth the hassle or expense of buying them. It also means that people may need to speak up while wearing a mask. It can muffle your voice and also redirects sound to you, so your own voice sounds louder to you than to other people. But those are just minor problems, compared to getting sick or worse. :-(
"A second issue is that people still struggle to wear masks properly. "
Things I've seen include taking the mask off to have a proper sneeze...
Did you say wearing it in a restaurant. O my. Many words small brains hey
@@maraisleroux2717 If you aren't at a fast food restaurant, it's kind of standard to order and wait for several minutes, a great time to be masked. Also when you pay your bill, you don't normally need to put stuff in your mouth at that time and are walking past other tables. Another fantastic time to use a mask. Use some common sense.
@@elbee2324 and some of us are so dumb we don't even know that we are dumb. Scary thing is one can be so dumb that one think you are smart. Only countries with strict coved rules covid is a problem. In Africa we are doing very fine. Stats and out
th-cam.com/video/2S4VEIgFrgs/w-d-xo.html
As always, data rules. Thank you