@lendro333 The human eye can see and identify shapes accurately in contrast (black on white, white on black) when only shown the image for 1/600 second. Our eyes are not camera's and cannot be compared to a camera , we don't see in megga pixels , we don't have shutter speeds, we see a constant stream of information and our brains interpret what is important enough for us to see or ignore.@@leandrofod
After having a laptop and monitor with 144hz for the last year, I could never, ever go back to 60hz now. Even simple things like scrolling around the desktop is smooth as hell.
Yeah me too i got broke then shifted to 60hz but before im having 1440hz and 1080 monitor. I cant stand it i even lose many times on a game its different having low refresh rate shifting to hrr.
Mr Sock Muffin yah no point in buying 144 hz if on console don’t think it supports it and people who don’t see a difference from 60 to 144 prob don’t have it set to 144 because they have to set their monitor to 144 which most people forget to do or don’t know how to do
When you go 144Hz, you never go back. Since then, 60Hz looks like it's stuttering, the difference is that big. Even just moving the mouse on the desktop is much more smooth.
Isn't this still dependent on the in-game fps? For example, if someone has a 1440p triple monitor setup and only gets 70 fps due to the GPU driving 11million pixels/sec, would a 144hz monitor be noticeable?
I just find this "moving windows/mouse feels smoother" a bit funny. I mean, come on, we don't buy these kinds of monitors to do office work or move the coursor on the Windows desktooñp. No offense, but this kind of comments are completely irrelevant.
Oh yeah. You can't go back. That would mean you admit buying unnecessary shit. And it would make no sense at all to change back to an old device. Don't mind, it could be worse. There are people selling crystals that heal cancer and enough that buy them in their delusional worldview.
Reggie Beats I think he’s saying he would be so used to 144 that 60 would start looking choppy when that’s all he can get. Personally I never had that problem. I always play on my 144hz on competitive games and on my 4K 60hz on singleplayer games. 60 to 144 is not as big as a leap going from 30 to 60. I even once in a while play gta on PS4 with my friends and it doesn’t take long for my eyes to adjust to the 30 fps.
Honestly, I just put it down to this. 60 is fine for most stuff. 144 is a very nice step up. 240 is also a step up, but not near as big a step as 60 to 144 was. Though 240 is better than 144. It’s like 60 is a 6/10. 144 is a 9/10, and 240 is a 10/10
More like 60 fps is 3/10. 144hz is 9/10 and 240 is 10/10 the jump from 60 to 144 is masive is not even close there is no way you go back to plat 60 fps once you try 144 is like crazy cluncky but from 144hz to 240 hz is not really noticeable meybe a bit more but not much
@@Vagdinox I have a 240 hz monitor and I play most games at 60 fps. It’s hard to run modern games at anything above that consistently and I’d rather have a consistent frame rate instead of a jerky but high frame rate. Though on older titles, higher fps is nice for sure, especially for more esports oriented titles
The difference between 1080 and 1440 is massive as well, I'm upgrading and getting a completely new setup based around a 3080 that's going from 1080p at 144hz to 1440p at 175hz
Jeto you don’t. Even if you aren’t able to maintain it, it still updates faster. If you are only hitting around 90 FPS Mark of course you won’t get the 144hz but what will happen is you won’t have to wait 16ms for a new frame to appear. So even without a constant 144 FPS you still see new frames faster.
@@Pipsispite Right, but you'll also probably get screen tearing giving you a worse experience that just limiting it to 60fps unless you have G-sync or somthing
True, personally I can't really feel frame drops from 144fps until it goes down to like 125fps. So a decent range before you notice frame drops unlike at 60fps when you notice it even if only a few frames drop.
I recently switched from a 60hz to 120hz and the difference is huge! If you never played on a higher hz then 60 you really are missing out. Having a clear picture in the most hectic parts of a game give you an advantage.
Quick question, if I’m on a series s, 60fps capped on a game and I’m on 60hz monitor, does 144hz make the game act as a form of better fps, does it make the game smoother?
KaleidoDeer Sure, it might be alright, but then what’s the point of a super fast 240Hz monitor with G-Sync and ULMB? Do you know what ULMB stands for? Ultra-low motion blur. You’re literally simulating what the monitor’s trying to prevent. Why not just use 60Hz then?
@@eljahihamgottin4540 i dont have more than 60hz but i can tell you they're so smooth . RELALY SMOOTH SO SMOOTH ITS LIKE YOU CAN BE AIMBOT IN JUST 1 dAY
High refresh is not about skill, it is about convenience and luxury. Once you use high refresh it is really hard to go back. The changes is massive not only in games, but also UI such as dragging windows, scrolling, mouse cursor movement, and system animations.
@Ddog Kbone why don't you read about low framerate compensation (LFC). This is how both Freesync and G-Sync handle framerate below the native refresh rate of a monitor. So basically the refresh rate is doubled or tripled when it is too low for the monitor. This way they can handle framerate far below the native refresh of the display.
@@amendment2711 you'll go insano from 30hz to 144hz, give me a ballpark of where you're at like gimmie a rank in a game, say for in valorant at 30hz you shouldn't get past bronze
I think frame time consistency is much more important than maximum frame rate (even with adaptive sync technology) e.g. I have a 240hz monitor but in many games I'd rather have a consistent 120hz than a 240hz experience that fluctuates.
You are so absolutely right, John! Also ... internal world update tick-rates (may since the 1990ths (1)) have nothing to do with the display loop. The monitor refresh rates presented here and with them the benefits of them look more like a wet dream of two marketing guys(3). One from the GPU industry and the other from the helpless "AAA" gaming title factory who successfully scams their customers since years, now(2). (1) That is of course not true, if you are using DOOM as your game engine, heheheh (2) The latter one has his head in the backside of the GPU guy. Impossible to produce a good game, just Gfx and BS:) (3) Instead you are a housefly, with the brain of her ... or you simply can't come up with the reaction times needed for such equipment. addendum to (3): No, marketing mumbo jumbo like "muscle memory" or "out of eye sight" won't change how the human biology works. They just change your willpower and the content of your wallet:) Of course the quarterly numbers of GPU/Monitor manufacturers CAN hold up with the reciprocal value of the stupidity of their customers ... in Hertz!;) P.S.: Just have a look at the thumbnail of this video. Artist impression ... sure. But by one with the lack of ALL basic principles of photography, like shutter speed and exposure time. And the use of two different(the content!) frames to compare "inequality" (let's better say ... also the lack of PHOTOSHOP skills) is stand up comedian material at it's best:))))
@@dieSpinnt refresh rates definitely make a difference in gaming performance. a game feeling and playing smoother offers many advantages and is definitely not a scam.
the best mistake i ever made was getting a 144hz monitor. I was doing terrible in CoD and thought i just sucked. Yes but getting the 144hz monitor is literal game changing. all games just feel smoother and more enjoyable. Drawback is after using the 144hz monitor, going back to 60hz is unbearable. I could barely handle playing games at 30fps (come on nintendo, get with modern standards) but having 144hz makes 60hz feel absurdly slow.
@@juhno7659 nah. I has a 360 laptop with a 3080 and it was not much different to a 165. It was smooth af but it was negligable difference. 144-165hz is enough for 99% of user. Even power users. Just the elite gamer esport people will it make a difference
@@ericpeterson2960 I agree the jump is not even close to being as big as 60-144. But after trying out 300 for some time, 144 for me personally feels kinda laggy, no longer do I feel the satisfaction of its smoothness
@@juhno7659 I mean a 300hz laptop normally should be pretty beefy spec wise but make sure you were hitting those high numbers in games and also if you really want to make an accurate assumption monitor the 0.1% and frame time graphs
Actually, the reason to get a very high refresh rate monitor is to run games with vsync turned off. It allows better framerates under a heavy GPU load--in other words, your minimum framerate will be much better with vsync off, but when the framerate goes much higher than a normal monitor (usually about 60 Hz) you won't get tearing.
ROTFL! Good devilish joke;) But you should stop using the DOOM Engine from 1995, which has the world/A.I./player update loop tied to the frame display loop. BTW is this another non evidential, sponsored by "feelings" and anecdotal evidence, BS post? Since the times of machines like C64, CRTs and Oscilloscopes the SYNC-Signal is THE facility that prevents TEARING. If, like you state, your wrongly dimensioned GPU is the reason for tearing then you get OUT-OF-SYNC tearing if you switch VSYNC off(1). But thank you. Your "creative" use of logic and your misunderstanding of technical principles gave me a good laugh:) (1) To say it in other words: You don't eliminate the problem, you shift it into the realm of your ignorance
@@merosi1234 Tearing is a GPU problem. So you mean criticism is "toxic", you little F? Oh and how do your feelings contribute to the discussion? You are even worse than talking BS like the OP ... yeah, but more funny, because you troll are obviously useless:)
The fact that players with higher refresh rate win more doesn’t necessarily equate to it be better. It might mean that the people with higher refresh rate care more about gaming than people at 60hz
I think when it comes down to the Milliseconds in reaction time every little bit helps. Having your monitor refresh 240xs oer second allows you to see the enemy first
Upgrading to 144hz from 60hz does make a difference. One of the best decisions of an FPS gamer can make. Flicks and tracking aim are so much smoother as long your pc can run 144fps. I dont know about 244hz though.
Very biased and all the 144 and 240Hz players are talking shit about console and lower fps players when in reality they only win cuz of the huge advantage
@@zLusso yes yes their huge advantage being 144 and 240 hz... so whats biased exactly? cause hes literally saying 144 hz over 60 hz is really a advantage.
you propably have high response time (lower time before frames=better) I got 1msResponseT 144hz 27' and my 2nd monitor is 5msResponseTime 60hz 1440p 32'
When you hear people talk about 144hz not being worth it, you start to realize just how long ago it was where we had CRTs. I still remember switching from CRT to LCD and noticing the lagging mouse cursor etc. Now finally that's getting fixed, hopefully for ALL LCDs in the not too distant future.
For most of us watching on a 60htz monitor, (because 144 is impossible to see in real-time unless you have a 144 monitor) I think the best way to explain it is to compare 30fps to 60fps. To my eyes that's what the difference between 60 to 144 looks like. It does make a difference, not huge, but enough to make the immersion a little more realistic because at 60fps you are essentially seeing very fast microstutter, and it's something you really don't notice consciously until you see the 144.
I’ve always been gaming on an IPS 144Hz and I just wanna say if you don’t, you’re missing out on a lot. The smoothness and visual quality of the gameplay is worth every penny.
True but for single player story rich games I prefer my OLED 60hz TV. I have a 144hz monitor too for fps games so it just depends what you are playing.
@@frogdeity especially for shooter games 144 hz is much, much better than 60 hz. On slow single player games, like tlou it obviously doesn't really matter as much...
pls educate yourself you homophobic bigot before you talk my dad at microsoft says you can only see 625GB per hour where hour is the amount of apples up your ass divided by the the amount of salt on the sun
i used to play on tube tv's with my xbox in highschool and still managed to be pretty competetive, dropped at least 1 swarm a game in BO2. now about 7 years later, i'm looking at gaming monitors and it really explains how some people could just kill me every single time and i would have no chance. thank god there's an explanation
Contrary to popular belief, 16.6ms to 6.9ms reduction in frame time doesn't effect your reaction time at all. Even the best pro gamers have reaction times 10x that number. What actually helps you is motion vision. Our eyes is very good at picking up changes in vision. 144hz more than doubles the number of changes of 60hz. It triggers more signals for your brain to react. That's why people generally have better reaction times in 144hz than in 60hz. That improvement in reaction time is about 100ms which is still 10 times the reduction in frame time(16.6 - 6.9).
My monitor for some reason set itself to 60hz and i wondered for 2 days why the game felt so stuttery then i found out and put it back on 144 and it was like i experienced 144 for the first time again and it was amazingly smooth
@@autumn5592 Except that you can't, a cheap monitor like 24MP59G-P is cheaper than any 144 Hz monitor. Besides, you need quite an expensive GPU to keep up with 144 Hz, assuming you don't play eSports.
2080ti sli gets minimum 100 fps at 4K Ultra. Or settings on high for 120+. Less demanding games like overwatch or csgo it's easy frames even on 4k. 1 2080ti around 100 fps on 4k on high. Plus you don't need AA on 4k since it's res is so high it doesn't make a difference. So even more frames. And if you're gonna complain about the money it costs then I'm sorry but you can't afford high refresh 4k gaming. Stick to 1080p 144fps.
it's also good to note that going above your monitors re-fresh rate gives you a buffer, meaning that %1 and %0.1 lows don't dip below 144hz compared to say v-sync. put it this way... 180fps on a 144hz monitor actually feels smoother and has less latency then 144fps on a 144hz monitor... this is why people tell you to turn v-sync off. I personally find the best practice is to cap your framerate %20 above that of your refresh rate. even if your average framerate is 143fps %1 and %0.1 lows are always lower if even slightly. during that time even if it were 100ms where it dips to an average of 120fps. you can still feel it. this happens regardless of your hardware and how powerful it is.
i recently bought a 75hz monitor and i can see and feel a big difference from the 60hz in all those aspects you mention (smoother, more clear image etc.) i wasn't expecting this difference at all, actually i did not believe that there is so much difference in higher refresh rates. Got a monitor that has freesync that is compatible with Gsync and with the right configurations the result is so much better that a 60hz monitor. It's one of those things that you have to see with your own eyes to convince you, if i knew better i would buy a 144hz monitor for sure so my future PC could take advantage the more frames. There are now some inexpensive IPS 144hz panels totally worth it.
lmao this is true I've been playing games for over decade on playstation. Now i'm questioning myself whether there is a problem with my console, cause it feels so stuttering compare playing on my PC
@@perrylenpunsalan3846 60 and above 60 got a little difference in normal circumstances, that's why you hardly could tell the difference. Then what's the advantage of 144 over 60? When a game is in chaotic states (a lot of object, effects, etc are all render in your screen at once), you can rest easy because your game is still running smoothly because it's still above or at least 60fps If you barely got 60fps and your game enter the chaotic states, you will feel the Lag because the fps will dramatically drop a lot. That's also why the Pc mAsTEr rAcE always mention 60fps not 144fps. Because the lowest standard for a smooth graphics are 60fps not 144fps or even 200s fps.
One thing which was not mentioned is that it is possible to experience a bad stuttering feeling on some games if your PC is running at much greater fps than the monitor refresh rate as it struggles to keep up with the frames. Free sync or G sync can help with this sometimes.
of this matter, there's things more impactful than a monitor that barely changes anything in-game, and for most people, it's of no use, because their setup just allow them to use it for office work.
It does exist but at 120hz and it’s an OLED TV not a monitor. You only need a graphics card that supports HDMI 2.1 but that doesn’t exist unfortunately.
There are apps with which you can see different refresh rates side by side with and without motion blur. With motion blur even small fast movements with 60Hz look smooth to me. Also if the monitor CAN do it, it does not mean that the graphics board can deliver it. Latency is also coming from input devices, CPU stress and GPU settings. So don't get fooled!
I currently have a 75hz monitor as my main and am super keen to get my 144hz one soon! Will use the 75hz as my second,, so excited to see how it looks when gaming.
@@Joyboy078 I did and yes I can definitely see a difference! Mind you my 75hz is still a great monitor, I have them both side by side so when I drag a game to be split in both screens I can see a difference in the brightness and clarity of colours and the games feel like they run smoother if that makes sense :)
At last understood frequency for a Gamer. The part where enemy was appearing was best explained. Thank you Tech Chap. What about Televisions? Does a high refresh rate affect the Netflix?
@Kronixio For us in India (Asia) we get Satellite connection from few Dish providers or in case of smart TV - Videos via TH-cam, Netflix, Amazon Prime. Mostly TH-cam after the rules passed by Indian Government last year 😅. So a Full HD 1080p TV is sufficient.
You're getting FPS and refresh rate mixed up, and making it very confusing. Tearing is due to the GPU at low FPS, despite the refresh rate, the monitor will display ghosting @ a lower refresh rates, 'Hz' If the FPS and refresh rate are out of sync then you'll get poor visuals, Even if your GPU is displaying @ 240fps and your monitor @ 60Hz you'll get ghosting, not tearing or stuttering, A monitor @ 240Hz at 30FPS will look shite with tearing and stuttering but at least no ghosting. 60fps @ 60Hz will look OK but might not be in sync. Lets not also forget, 1Hz is 1 cycle, On-off-on, so 60Hz is effectively and comparatively, 30fps. this is why you need a 120Hz monitor, most GPUs and games play @ 60fps so the monitor at 120Hz and a GPU @ 60fps plays on the monitor perfectly, 240Hz and above is only really useful for fast 1st person shooters that you want the FPS as fast as possible, 120fps and above on a 240Hz monitor would look good. the refresh rate needs to be 2x the FPS. If your games are consistently at 60FPS then a 120Hx refresh rate monitor is ample. and if the game displays slightly more say at 70FPS then maybe set the in-game FPS limit to 60, if the game displays consistently @ 120FPS then a 240Hz monitor might be beneficial.
It's also better for your eyes..I'm an oldschool gamer these years on LCD monitors from CRT.. has slightly fecked my eyes. Good for gaming and your health! 144hz should be the new base standard.
@Nightmare bro, are u drunk. In a shooter(and it makes no matter if u camp, or fight) ur image of the monitor needs to be refreshed more times than LoL. In LoL are maybe 400 Pixels moving arround and in a shooter thousends
Until a week ago me too ^^' it feels so smooth that the first 5 minutes my brain could'nt understand what was happening xD but now it is so relaxing to play on it even in competitive games. It feels very good :) by the way i switched from a 1920x1080p 60hz to a 2160x1440p 144hz.
Me being a university student, it’s hard for me to justify the purchase of a high refresh rate monitor instead of a higher resolution monitor. With a 4K screen I can watch 4K TH-cam videos, create higher quality content, and play games with more detail if you have a good enough graphics card. A high refresh rate monitor is purely for gaming as far as my uses would go. I’m getting a laptop with a 3070, 1600p 165hz panel so it kinda has best of both worlds and I can’t wait to try it out.
Okay a simple question . I am a Casual Gamer and i do only gaming on pc , nothing like content creation or editing like that. I do like Graphics intensive games. My graphics card is 1660ti coupled with i5 9400f. So which is better for me For Display A. 144 hz 1080p B. 60hz 1440p budget kind a limited so no 1440p 144hz. Please share your valuable opinions. Thank you.
It really depends on what kind of games you play. For shooters, 1080 144 is better for sure, but with slower games like Skyrim od Witcher for example, I would consider 1440p
maybe 1080p is better, the 1660ti is a good GPU, but won't hold *that* much on 1440p (not in intensive games) I would go for a rtx 2070/5700xt ish before going for 1440p Playing 60 fps (heaviest games) on a 144hz panel is good, playing 1080p on a 1440p (in case the game gets too heavy for 60 fps 1440p) is not that good for what I've heard (never tested it myself tho)
1660 TI can do 1440p at around 60+ FPS in most games but I would go for higher refresh rate plus in most cases having a higher refresh rate is more immersive then having a sharper image plus you might not be even able to tell the difference between 1080p and 1440p (this depends on how far away you are from the screen)
The experience regards to the refresh rate and resolution really depends on the biological limitation of each individual. As those goes higher and higher, the improvements regards to experience diminishes, and possibly only a small group of people with extremely good eyes and reflexes can tell the difference. As of now, I feel 2K 144Hz is a sweet spot. You have enough resolution for details and enough refresh rate for motion. Which is kind of like a balance between the resolution and refresh rate. Otherwise going to 4K means you are most likely gonna stick with 60Hz. Or going to 240Hz means you likely gonna stick with 1080p resolution. It really comes down to Smoothness Vs. Details.
A valid compersion would be something like 60Hz AND big screen, as a 4k TV or 43" 4k monitor, or 144Hz AND small screen as a 24-27" monitor. I prefer the bigger screen.
Exactly i had 144hz for 4-5 years and i gotta say its not worth if you are not playing competitive games exclusively. For 144fps you need good GPU AND good cpu, what op forgot to mention. Playing AAA games in 144hz regardless of res is very demanding and sometimes impossible(because game engine limitations). I have now 4k 32inch good monitor and im very happy jumping from 24inch 1080p 144hz tn panel.
Got a 55hz TV at the moment, (I think anyways) gonna upgrade to a 240hz monitor since there is one on sale for 200 quid on amazon. Can't wait to see the difference.
I play on a 144hz and 1080p. I can in most games see the difference between 60hz and 144hz, while I really cant tell the difference between 1080p and 4k or 1440p
As an old school tech who knows what he is talking about this review is flawed. The reason the 60hz monitor is looking so horrible is because there was no vsync activated causing massive screen tearing. You can see a horizontal like running across the middle of the screen from left to right of the monitor that rips the scene in half. On the other hand the other monitor doesnt have a vsync problem because either vsync is enabled or screen tear is not as bad because of the faster refresh rate.
@S Pm yes, I don't have a console, so I don't know how it will perform, but I do have a gaming laptop, ROG STRIX that is 1080p, 144hz and some games do play better( COD and CS GO)
@S Pm if you are using it for casual gaming you probably shouldn't make that choice but if you are going for competitive then go for 144 or 240 if your ps can handle it tbh I can't really recommend 300hz it drops frames sometimes and is real performance heavy
Since you mentioned that you are bad at games, consider this: Try to get a bigger table, where you can rest your elbow. Use it as an anchor for aiming and dont aim with your wrist only, lower the DPI or in-game sens. When I tried it i found that i hit way more targets when aiming from my elbow, and correcting the aim a little with the wrist.
This is the first vid of yours I've come across, and I'd like to compliment you on your camera and lighting work! Not to mention great framing and background environment. Definitely subscribing.
Totally, totally agree! Went from a 144 Hz 27" monitor to a beautiful Freesync 32" VA @ 70 Hz. Loved the picture quality and Freesync worked well but I just couldn't live without the higher refresh rate. Just bought an Acer 27" 240Hz GSync monitor and it's going from a 1971 Ford Pinto to a 2019 Ferrari! I can never go back.
I got a Razer Blade 15 it has a 144Hz screen and it's night and day difference from 60Hz. (This is in games and just doing normal stuff on Windows) It spoils you, can't go back to 60Hz now again in FPS games. Now for some games 60Hz is fine but yeah highly recommended and it's worth the extra money. I've tried a 240Hz monitor and personally 240Hz is only marginally more responsive like it's so slight but it is there. Smoothness feels very very similar though I'd say to 144Hz. Even if you aren't a "hardcore" gamer and are causal 144Hz is still so much better compared to 60Hz and you'll love it.
I've considered 240 Hz monitor, but I'm too afraid that 4k 120 Hz TV for less competive games would feel too stuttery after that. I guess I should stick with 144 Hz FeelsBadman.
watching the difference of 144hz and 240hz on my 60hz monitor.
aHAHAHA OH YEA
He slowed ti down to the point where a 60hz monitor can see the difference
@@vodkawhisperer3923 NO WAY YOU WATCHED THE VIDEO?! AMAZING!
@@davethecornmerchant905 i proved that him watching it on 60hz wont have an impact because the difference is visible when its slowed down
@@vodkawhisperer3923 it is in the video WOW
"You getting a higher refresh rate screen to improve your gameplay?"
*laughs in 200 ping*
the human eye can only see 1.5dB
@@leandrofod kek
@@leandrofod Not sure about that, but I know that it can't see over 24 spaces in a username.
@lendro333
The human eye can see and identify shapes accurately in contrast (black on white, white on black) when only shown the image for 1/600 second.
Our eyes are not camera's and cannot be compared to a camera , we don't see in megga pixels , we don't have shutter speeds, we see a constant stream of information and our brains interpret what is important enough for us to see or ignore.@@leandrofod
fans here of 30 fps and 60 hz with bottleneck
After having a laptop and monitor with 144hz for the last year, I could never, ever go back to 60hz now. Even simple things like scrolling around the desktop is smooth as hell.
Its true
Yeah me too i got broke then shifted to 60hz but before im having 1440hz and 1080 monitor. I cant stand it i even lose many times on a game its different having low refresh rate shifting to hrr.
@Neckslit my bad i meant the opposite
@Neckslit u can get a quartz pink razer blade with a 240hz display :P
Do you think there Is a big diference betwen 1440p and 1080p? I have one gtx 1080, i would like to change my 1080p 144hz monitor.
Seeing it Hz my wallet🛐
Funny comment :)
Underrated joke
LOL
Bruh it's such a basic joke but I'm dying 😭😭😭
Ba dum tss.
There’s always that one kid that buys a 144hz monitor but doesn’t see any difference because he plays on console
aha
I'm that guy cause I just bought one 😐
Mr Sock Muffin yah no point in buying 144 hz if on console don’t think it supports it and people who don’t see a difference from 60 to 144 prob don’t have it set to 144 because they have to set their monitor to 144 which most people forget to do or don’t know how to do
Wouldn't he still benefit from a far lower input lag?
Is that really like that
When you go 144Hz, you never go back. Since then, 60Hz looks like it's stuttering, the difference is that big. Even just moving the mouse on the desktop is much more smooth.
Smoother 👍
To me moving the mouse and OS windows around is the biggest tell between 60 an 144. It is very noticble.
Isn't this still dependent on the in-game fps? For example, if someone has a 1440p triple monitor setup and only gets 70 fps due to the GPU driving 11million pixels/sec, would a 144hz monitor be noticeable?
I just find this "moving windows/mouse feels smoother" a bit funny. I mean, come on, we don't buy these kinds of monitors to do office work or move the coursor on the Windows desktooñp. No offense, but this kind of comments are completely irrelevant.
Oh yeah. You can't go back. That would mean you admit buying unnecessary shit. And it would make no sense at all to change back to an old device.
Don't mind, it could be worse. There are people selling crystals that heal cancer and enough that buy them in their delusional worldview.
144hz is the truth. Ever since I left 60hz, I Cannot go back.
The console peasantry will forever tarnish my soul
It doesn't have to be that way
It is actually the thing i am afraid of - that i wouldn´t be able to play gpu intensive 60fps games when i switch to 144hz monitor.
@@Morpheus-pt3wq got the freesync monitor for that
Reggie Beats I think he’s saying he would be so used to 144 that 60 would start looking choppy when that’s all he can get.
Personally I never had that problem. I always play on my 144hz on competitive games and on my 4K 60hz on singleplayer games. 60 to 144 is not as big as a leap going from 30 to 60. I even once in a while play gta on PS4 with my friends and it doesn’t take long for my eyes to adjust to the 30 fps.
Honestly, I just put it down to this. 60 is fine for most stuff. 144 is a very nice step up. 240 is also a step up, but not near as big a step as 60 to 144 was. Though 240 is better than 144. It’s like 60 is a 6/10. 144 is a 9/10, and 240 is a 10/10
More like 60 fps is 3/10. 144hz is 9/10 and 240 is 10/10 the jump from 60 to 144 is masive is not even close there is no way you go back to plat 60 fps once you try 144 is like crazy cluncky but from 144hz to 240 hz is not really noticeable meybe a bit more but not much
@@Vagdinox I have a 240 hz monitor and I play most games at 60 fps. It’s hard to run modern games at anything above that consistently and I’d rather have a consistent frame rate instead of a jerky but high frame rate.
Though on older titles, higher fps is nice for sure, especially for more esports oriented titles
@@apersonontheinternet8354 im confused? How is it hard to run modern games above 60fps with a 240hz monitor?
The difference between 1080 and 1440 is massive as well, I'm upgrading and getting a completely new setup based around a 3080 that's going from 1080p at 144hz to 1440p at 175hz
@@robertkieffer8497 I got myself a lg gp850 1440p 180hz soo damn cool
That's impossible, a human eye can only see 4GB of RAM!
Original.
Ikr
LMAO
3.75Gb*
Such a boomer
People often forget that in order to fully utilize 144 Hz, you actually need to maintain 144 fps
Jeto you don’t. Even if you aren’t able to maintain it, it still updates faster. If you are only hitting around 90 FPS Mark of course you won’t get the 144hz but what will happen is you won’t have to wait 16ms for a new frame to appear. So even without a constant 144 FPS you still see new frames faster.
@@Pipsispite Right, but you'll also probably get screen tearing giving you a worse experience that just limiting it to 60fps unless you have G-sync or somthing
True, personally I can't really feel frame drops from 144fps until it goes down to like 125fps. So a decent range before you notice frame drops unlike at 60fps when you notice it even if only a few frames drop.
@@warpigsquad literally everyone good monitor has G-SYNC, hell even laptop has G-SYNC, Both my laptop and my Main Monitor has G-SYNC enabled.
Watching this with my gtx 750 lol
where my 60hz squad at?
Well it's not that bad to be honest
@@techh9171 ikr?
Peasant! I have a 75hz monitor which makes all of the difference!
@@jordanlazarus7345 indeed it does
Here here
I recently switched from a 60hz to 120hz and the difference is huge! If you never played on a higher hz then 60 you really are missing out. Having a clear picture in the most hectic parts of a game give you an advantage.
I got a 3070 with an i7 but a 60hz monitor and I’m bouta upgrade to 240hz
Just got a 240hz for my first gaming pc
Quick question, if I’m on a series s, 60fps capped on a game and I’m on 60hz monitor, does 144hz make the game act as a form of better fps, does it make the game smoother?
@@iknowimgaywhenimsayingthis9059 probably makes the game smoother for sure.
@@EdenFL97 sweet, it almost acts as more fps?
People from the future:laughs in 1000hz
that cant be reach that lol
@@uui ouh yeah true this world has no limit tbh
Is this gamer humor? pathetic.
Marrt is this karen humor? I’m gonna tell your manger pathetic
@@TheMarrt imagine not being a gamer
boomer
1:51 he bout to get his ass whooped on that reload
Sohei BRuh
Coffin meme starts playing
Ahhaha
At 60hz the shadow didn't even show yet....
Sad 60hz players
Bruh😂😂
Best quality of life improvement after getting 144Hz: scrolling on the internet.
playing a game with motion blur and 240hz and rerendering a video
@@gdm00ns83 motion blur fucking ruins the 240hz lol making it look laggy
@@abysswinston1018 true I hate hate hate motion blur. "Simulated speed" look.
@@abysswinston1018 Try proper motion blur and not your usual crappy implementations. Per object motion blur is alright
KaleidoDeer Sure, it might be alright, but then what’s the point of a super fast 240Hz monitor with G-Sync and ULMB? Do you know what ULMB stands for? Ultra-low motion blur. You’re literally simulating what the monitor’s trying to prevent. Why not just use 60Hz then?
60hz to 144hz is like a 100 degree indoor gym full of sweaty men comparing to fresh winter air
Then 244hurtz is like the breeze in Hawaii
Hahah I blew on my computer screen to take off that hair XD
@@michaeldariopellittieri3050 and 300 hz is literally the gods breathing upon you
@@Krhiss I've never seen anything above 60 hz. My phone is 60 hz and my computer is too.
@@eljahihamgottin4540 i dont have more than 60hz but i can tell you they're so smooth . RELALY SMOOTH SO SMOOTH ITS LIKE YOU CAN BE AIMBOT IN JUST 1 dAY
"Go to an electronics store or a friend's house" sooo 2019!
Yes
Lol bang on bro
Still doing that.
@@radiergummi9602 rate it
@@abford03 rate what
meanwhile I see my teammate dying with their 144 hz monitor against the guy with having 30 fps
Lmao
High refresh is not about skill, it is about convenience and luxury. Once you use high refresh it is really hard to go back. The changes is massive not only in games, but also UI such as dragging windows, scrolling, mouse cursor movement, and system animations.
@RSheikah pretty sure he is.
A better player is a better player, and that dude playing 30 wishes he could get 144hz
blitzcaster Of course, we all know that, but what he means is that his teammate has a 144hz whilst he’s trash at the game
My monitor: 144hz
My PC: can't even get stable 60FPS
Black Friday coming up...
bummer
This is a good reason why Variable Refresh Rate such as FreeSync and G-Sync exist. High refresh rate monitor combined with VRR is a must.
@Ddog Kbone why don't you read about low framerate compensation (LFC). This is how both Freesync and G-Sync handle framerate below the native refresh rate of a monitor. So basically the refresh rate is doubled or tripled when it is too low for the monitor. This way they can handle framerate far below the native refresh of the display.
blitzcaster lmao g sync isn’t even efficient at 60fps
So you’re saying, since I’ve only ever played at about 30fps, and I win more than I lose, I’ll be a God at 144fps?
Sweet.
That’s crazy, I didn’t know all this they talking about lol. I play on 30 didn’t know it has different on regular tv vs better hz tv. Time to upgrade.
@@chokoramoja time to become Gods!
@@amendment2711 you'll go insano from 30hz to 144hz, give me a ballpark of where you're at like gimmie a rank in a game, say for in valorant at 30hz you shouldn't get past bronze
Dont say god like that
@@amendment2711 works on pc not consoles . Bought 144 hz monitors maaan lol . Looks same on console 30hz-45hz it’s cap. Pc 60hz
You dont need higher refresh rate when you have ultra instinct
LiGMA SeNSES
Only the saiyans will understand
@@The_Man_In_Red what is ligma
@@alexsvedegard ligma balls
@@zeusrem565 no only scooby doo fans understand
I think frame time consistency is much more important than maximum frame rate (even with adaptive sync technology) e.g. I have a 240hz monitor but in many games I'd rather have a consistent 120hz than a 240hz experience that fluctuates.
You are so absolutely right, John!
Also ... internal world update tick-rates (may since the 1990ths (1)) have nothing to do with the display loop. The monitor refresh rates presented here and with them the benefits of them look more like a wet dream of two marketing guys(3). One from the GPU industry and the other from the helpless "AAA" gaming title factory who successfully scams their customers since years, now(2).
(1) That is of course not true, if you are using DOOM as your game engine, heheheh
(2) The latter one has his head in the backside of the GPU guy. Impossible to produce a good game, just Gfx and BS:)
(3) Instead you are a housefly, with the brain of her ... or you simply can't come up with the reaction times needed for such equipment.
addendum to (3): No, marketing mumbo jumbo like "muscle memory" or "out of eye sight" won't change how the human biology works. They just change your willpower and the content of your wallet:)
Of course the quarterly numbers of GPU/Monitor manufacturers CAN hold up with the reciprocal value of the stupidity of their customers ... in Hertz!;)
P.S.: Just have a look at the thumbnail of this video. Artist impression ... sure. But by one with the lack of ALL basic principles of photography, like shutter speed and exposure time. And the use of two different(the content!) frames to compare "inequality" (let's better say ... also the lack of PHOTOSHOP skills) is stand up comedian material at it's best:))))
I guess if you limit it to 120hz you lose some latency which is good
well i have a consistant 240
@@dieSpinnt refresh rates definitely make a difference in gaming performance. a game feeling and playing smoother offers many advantages and is definitely not a scam.
Frame time consistency is very much to do with the game itself and not the hardware.
console gamers : "Your eyes can't see beyond 30fps"
LMAO
Neko Paw who says that unironically?
@@noahk a lot of them
Hehe and they buy themselves a PS4 Pro and think it's the shit at 60fps.
HuMaN eYe cAn sEe 1000 FpS iN tHeoRy(Actually true)
Heqrtz more, the eye doesn’t look in frames.
the best mistake i ever made was getting a 144hz monitor.
I was doing terrible in CoD and thought i just sucked. Yes but getting the 144hz monitor is literal game changing. all games just feel smoother and more enjoyable.
Drawback is after using the 144hz monitor, going back to 60hz is unbearable.
I could barely handle playing games at 30fps (come on nintendo, get with modern standards) but having 144hz makes 60hz feel absurdly slow.
lol I'm about to get a 300hz laptop, I wonder if after using it for a while, if 144 would feel bad as well
Edit: yes, 144 feels quite a lot worse lol
@@juhno7659 nah. I has a 360 laptop with a 3080 and it was not much different to a 165. It was smooth af but it was negligable difference.
144-165hz is enough for 99% of user. Even power users. Just the elite gamer esport people will it make a difference
@@ericpeterson2960 I agree the jump is not even close to being as big as 60-144. But after trying out 300 for some time, 144 for me personally feels kinda laggy, no longer do I feel the satisfaction of its smoothness
@@juhno7659 I mean a 300hz laptop normally should be pretty beefy spec wise but make sure you were hitting those high numbers in games and also if you really want to make an accurate assumption monitor the 0.1% and frame time graphs
01:52 btw ik that's not related to the video subject at all but this word means goose if you didn't know
Yeah its in Arabic
Written in Arabic اوز You mean the sound of a duck.
My monitor: 165 hz
my pc: struggling to run Minecraft at 120 fps
I mean 120fps is still 120fps but then again minecraft
Haha now add sildurs
bruh i cant get 60 fps
@Aydin Miller for what you need so much frames my dude??
@@xTomCat bruh same. That dang game.
Actually, the reason to get a very high refresh rate monitor is to run games with vsync turned off. It allows better framerates under a heavy GPU load--in other words, your minimum framerate will be much better with vsync off, but when the framerate goes much higher than a normal monitor (usually about 60 Hz) you won't get tearing.
ROTFL! Good devilish joke;)
But you should stop using the DOOM Engine from 1995, which has the world/A.I./player update loop tied to the frame display loop.
BTW is this another non evidential, sponsored by "feelings" and anecdotal evidence, BS post? Since the times of machines like C64, CRTs and Oscilloscopes the SYNC-Signal is THE facility that prevents TEARING. If, like you state, your wrongly dimensioned GPU is the reason for tearing then you get OUT-OF-SYNC tearing if you switch VSYNC off(1). But thank you. Your "creative" use of logic and your misunderstanding of technical principles gave me a good laugh:)
(1) To say it in other words: You don't eliminate the problem, you shift it into the realm of your ignorance
wow,man got owned..lolol..
@@dieSpinnt
You’re so toxic
@@merosi1234 Tearing is a GPU problem. So you mean criticism is "toxic", you little F?
Oh and how do your feelings contribute to the discussion? You are even worse than talking BS like the OP ... yeah, but more funny, because you troll are obviously useless:)
Console players be like:
"But I don't play the game in slow motion!!!"
LuL
corniel I don’t think console players care
Actually we would rather do so especially in a game like siege were Flicking and focusing when you flick is vital
@@leothewendigo4493 You can't flick on console
1. even playing field 2. 4k 60fps cant complain
Cuntsole animals are still playing at 30 fps with drops to 12 fps.
The fact that players with higher refresh rate win more doesn’t necessarily equate to it be better. It might mean that the people with higher refresh rate care more about gaming than people at 60hz
I'd also never take a study seriously that was conducted by a party profiting from certain outcomes.
I think when it comes down to the Milliseconds in reaction time every little bit helps. Having your monitor refresh 240xs oer second allows you to see the enemy first
wow ive honestly never seen a person go out of their way to type a retarted fucking comment like this
Go use a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor and you will see the difference.
You're right. But there's a reason why the people who actually care about gaming have 144hz screens, they're better.
Upgrading to 144hz from 60hz does make a difference. One of the best decisions of an FPS gamer can make. Flicks and tracking aim are so much smoother as long your pc can run 144fps. I dont know about 244hz though.
Ah yes the Triple Take with energy ammo. Good times.
Hello from the future, it's in the care package now
this aged poorly
Yea, it still is?
- the truth about high refresh rates
- video sponsored by nvidia
Yeah, i can tell how unbiased this video will be
Very biased and all the 144 and 240Hz players are talking shit about console and lower fps players when in reality they only win cuz of the huge advantage
zachary martz uh huh.
@Diego okay gay pc looser
@@zLusso XD
@@zLusso yes yes their huge advantage being 144 and 240 hz... so whats biased exactly? cause hes literally saying 144 hz over 60 hz is really a advantage.
1:51 and this how our hero died did u see that shadow on the left corner at the bottom of the screen
Why am I watching it.
*Cries in my 7year old samsung laptop😭*
I feel ur pain bro 🙏
Don’t worry buddy. You’ll upgrade eventually.
same with my 5 year old asus with intel hd 520
My Laptop is turning 11 soon an still running like a champ. Lol
My 7 yr old Asus laptop has a 120hz display and has a 670mx overclocked by 45% thanks to a custom vbios.
You get what you pay for.
I don't understand how so many people can see the difference when playing games in fast motion. I can only see the difference in slow motion
My monitor is 60 hz and its feels like 5 hz
Ur pc is shit then
you propably have high response time (lower time before frames=better) I got 1msResponseT 144hz 27' and my 2nd monitor is 5msResponseTime 60hz 1440p 32'
@@ac2987 I have I3 and 1050ti
@@paulsad7624 maybe idk
@@vorda9763 google name of monitor
"If your a gamer"
Bruh what is your demographic
you're*
@@JagsP95 Sin
@@buddz874 I suggest you go back to school and learn to read the part that says "if your a gamer"
@@JagsP95 Grammar besides, what's the demographic again?
@@JagsP95 always that one grammar nazi in the comment section
When you hear people talk about 144hz not being worth it, you start to realize just how long ago it was where we had CRTs. I still remember switching from CRT to LCD and noticing the lagging mouse cursor etc. Now finally that's getting fixed, hopefully for ALL LCDs in the not too distant future.
For most of us watching on a 60htz monitor, (because 144 is impossible to see in real-time unless you have a 144 monitor) I think the best way to explain it is to compare 30fps to 60fps. To my eyes that's what the difference between 60 to 144 looks like. It does make a difference, not huge, but enough to make the immersion a little more realistic because at 60fps you are essentially seeing very fast microstutter, and it's something you really don't notice consciously until you see the 144.
Is it worth buying a 144hz monitor when my GPU can only run games at 50-60fps?
@@emil_king8237
If your GPU can run AAA tiltes at 60fps it can definitely run competitive games at 100+ fps
WOW your room is amazing :O
I’ve always been gaming on an IPS 144Hz and I just wanna say if you don’t, you’re missing out on a lot. The smoothness and visual quality of the gameplay is worth every penny.
True but for single player story rich games I prefer my OLED 60hz TV. I have a 144hz monitor too for fps games so it just depends what you are playing.
It's really not worth it. The change is hardly noticeable.
@Frog you’re watching a 60p video lol try it irl, there’s no going back.
@@frogdeity especially for shooter games 144 hz is much, much better than 60 hz. On slow single player games, like tlou it obviously doesn't really matter as much...
@@hoodiegamer9256 I have a 144hz monitor... I game all the time with a high-end PC. There's no difference.
That's impossible, human eye can only see rgb ligthings.
pls educate yourself you homophobic bigot before you talk my dad at microsoft says you can only see 625GB per hour where hour is the amount of apples up your ass divided by the the amount of salt on the sun
@@landlockedcroat1554
tf
@@landlockedcroat1554 I work at Microsoft, Can Confirm.
Human eyes can only sit on gaming chair
i used to play on tube tv's with my xbox in highschool and still managed to be pretty competetive, dropped at least 1 swarm a game in BO2.
now about 7 years later, i'm looking at gaming monitors and it really explains how some people could just kill me every single time and i would have no chance. thank god there's an explanation
I felt that ranked 1 in 1v1s for a while but after monitors came out to the general public I feel off hard turns out we just didn’t catch up as fast
Contrary to popular belief, 16.6ms to 6.9ms reduction in frame time doesn't effect your reaction time at all. Even the best pro gamers have reaction times 10x that number. What actually helps you is motion vision. Our eyes is very good at picking up changes in vision. 144hz more than doubles the number of changes of 60hz. It triggers more signals for your brain to react. That's why people generally have better reaction times in 144hz than in 60hz. That improvement in reaction time is about 100ms which is still 10 times the reduction in frame time(16.6 - 6.9).
My monitor for some reason set itself to 60hz and i wondered for 2 days why the game felt so stuttery then i found out and put it back on 144 and it was like i experienced 144 for the first time again and it was amazingly smooth
Up untill 2020
Monitor sweet spot is 27" 1440p 144 Hz
For broke comrades,
24" 1080p 75hz is enough
Z Rus i still think acer 4k 144hz with impressive color accuracy is the real best choice for almost everyone with a lot of money
Why bother with 75hz? You can get a 144hz for the same price, so why not get the better option.
Remember, shop smart.
@@autumn5592 Except that you can't, a cheap monitor like 24MP59G-P is cheaper than any 144 Hz monitor. Besides, you need quite an expensive GPU to keep up with 144 Hz, assuming you don't play eSports.
Mircea Stan almost all 75hz monitors i’ve seen are $25 cheaper than 144hz and that is called getting ripped off lol
2080ti sli gets minimum 100 fps at 4K Ultra. Or settings on high for 120+. Less demanding games like overwatch or csgo it's easy frames even on 4k.
1 2080ti around 100 fps on 4k on high.
Plus you don't need AA on 4k since it's res is so high it doesn't make a difference. So even more frames.
And if you're gonna complain about the money it costs then I'm sorry but you can't afford high refresh 4k gaming. Stick to 1080p 144fps.
i got a laptop that was 240hz while my monitor was 60hz, my desktop feels like a slideshow now.
lmao, i used to have 60hz. I’m now on 300hz. 60 feels so laggy, like I can see the individual frames each time i move my mouse cursor.
it's also good to note that going above your monitors re-fresh rate gives you a buffer, meaning that %1 and %0.1 lows don't dip below 144hz compared to say v-sync. put it this way... 180fps on a 144hz monitor actually feels smoother and has less latency then 144fps on a 144hz monitor... this is why people tell you to turn v-sync off. I personally find the best practice is to cap your framerate %20 above that of your refresh rate. even if your average framerate is 143fps %1 and %0.1 lows are always lower if even slightly. during that time even if it were 100ms where it dips to an average of 120fps. you can still feel it. this happens regardless of your hardware and how powerful it is.
i recently bought a 75hz monitor and i can see and feel a big difference from the 60hz in all those aspects you mention (smoother, more clear image etc.) i wasn't expecting this difference at all, actually i did not believe that there is so much difference in higher refresh rates. Got a monitor that has freesync that is compatible with Gsync and with the right configurations the result is so much better that a 60hz monitor.
It's one of those things that you have to see with your own eyes to convince you, if i knew better i would buy a 144hz monitor for sure so my future PC could take advantage the more frames.
There are now some inexpensive IPS 144hz panels totally worth it.
when i got my 75 hz my 60 hz looked like stuttering, now when i got my 240 hz my 75 looked like a slide show
the truth: going above 60hz, you cant feel it after a while, BUT GOING BACK, woah mama, you feel slower than a paraplegic in a marathon
you can feel it for sure
lmao this is true
I've been playing games for over decade on playstation.
Now i'm questioning myself whether there is a problem with my console, cause it feels so stuttering compare playing on my PC
LMAOAOAOAOAOAOAO MAN SAID
Ive been playing the new cod since release at 144hz and switched down to 60hz just to try it and i honestly cant tell the difference.
@@perrylenpunsalan3846 60 and above 60 got a little difference in normal circumstances, that's why you hardly could tell the difference.
Then what's the advantage of 144 over 60?
When a game is in chaotic states (a lot of object, effects, etc are all render in your screen at once), you can rest easy because your game is still running smoothly because it's still above or at least 60fps
If you barely got 60fps and your game enter the chaotic states, you will feel the Lag because the fps will dramatically drop a lot.
That's also why the Pc mAsTEr rAcE always mention 60fps not 144fps. Because the lowest standard for a smooth graphics are 60fps not 144fps or even 200s fps.
One thing which was not mentioned is that it is possible to experience a bad stuttering feeling on some games if your PC is running at much greater fps than the monitor refresh rate as it struggles to keep up with the frames. Free sync or G sync can help with this sometimes.
There is screen tearing if you don't have g sync
The only thing I learned from this video is F2P games are also P2P at the end of the day
You meant P2W
only on PC
Faxs
of this matter, there's things more impactful than a monitor that barely changes anything in-game, and for most people, it's of no use, because their setup just allow them to use it for office work.
only for fps games
144hz is so satisfying a 144hz or 240hz is worth every penny nice vid!
I just want a dolby vison 144 htz ,hdr10 4k oled monitor that is my dream
It does exist but at 120hz and it’s an OLED TV not a monitor. You only need a graphics card that supports HDMI 2.1 but that doesn’t exist unfortunately.
Rip wallet😭🙌🙏
To display true dolby vision you need at least 4000 nits and oled is not capable of that, it would be instant burn it.
@@twistedoracle4555 nice try. OLED technology is not compatible with high refresh rates.
I want a 1000hz 10K Nits HDR MicroLed Monitor. It'll be here within 3-4 years.
There are apps with which you can see different refresh rates side by side with and without motion blur.
With motion blur even small fast movements with 60Hz look smooth to me.
Also if the monitor CAN do it, it does not mean that the graphics board can deliver it.
Latency is also coming from input devices, CPU stress and GPU settings.
So don't get fooled!
I edited the comment.
Same 🤣
@@soapmactavish5223 😂
me too why i'm here hhhhhh
Lol in Battlefield 1 with all the low settings i have 10 fps
@@kastielangel. Is it really necessary to criticize him? Besides, he could be talking about the amount of fps he gets when playing games.
I thought it wasn’t that much of an improvement to go to 144hz from years of 60hz and I was actually blown away. I literally can not go back to 60 hz
This is still needed in 2019, I’m astonished
people wanna get as much info as possible before really buying something like that
I currently have a 75hz monitor as my main and am super keen to get my 144hz one soon! Will use the 75hz as my second,, so excited to see how it looks when gaming.
@@Joyboy078 I did and yes I can definitely see a difference! Mind you my 75hz is still a great monitor, I have them both side by side so when I drag a game to be split in both screens I can see a difference in the brightness and clarity of colours and the games feel like they run smoother if that makes sense :)
@@alexandragames_ great I'm definitely buying one after our inflation pop
At last understood frequency for a Gamer. The part where enemy was appearing was best explained. Thank you Tech Chap.
What about Televisions? Does a high refresh rate affect the Netflix?
@Kronixio so sports are broadcasted at much higher fps?
@Kronixio For us in India (Asia) we get Satellite connection from few Dish providers or in case of smart TV - Videos via TH-cam, Netflix, Amazon Prime. Mostly TH-cam after the rules passed by Indian Government last year 😅. So a Full HD 1080p TV is sufficient.
0:01 yes i always laugh when i go up stairs
i can't help it it's so funny
prolly talking to friends
Lmao
That was odd lol
@@archer_ok he's got no headset or mic
@@Brian-kr7bw bruh I said that 8 months ago 😭
1:57 the bruh moment that says it all
You're getting FPS and refresh rate mixed up, and making it very confusing. Tearing is due to the GPU at low FPS, despite the refresh rate, the monitor will display ghosting @ a lower refresh rates, 'Hz' If the FPS and refresh rate are out of sync then you'll get poor visuals, Even if your GPU is displaying @ 240fps and your monitor @ 60Hz you'll get ghosting, not tearing or stuttering, A monitor @ 240Hz at 30FPS will look shite with tearing and stuttering but at least no ghosting. 60fps @ 60Hz will look OK but might not be in sync. Lets not also forget, 1Hz is 1 cycle, On-off-on, so 60Hz is effectively and comparatively, 30fps. this is why you need a 120Hz monitor, most GPUs and games play @ 60fps so the monitor at 120Hz and a GPU @ 60fps plays on the monitor perfectly, 240Hz and above is only really useful for fast 1st person shooters that you want the FPS as fast as possible, 120fps and above on a 240Hz monitor would look good. the refresh rate needs to be 2x the FPS. If your games are consistently at 60FPS then a 120Hx refresh rate monitor is ample. and if the game displays slightly more say at 70FPS then maybe set the in-game FPS limit to 60, if the game displays consistently @ 120FPS then a 240Hz monitor might be beneficial.
1:17 Wtf there's a ghost playing behind him, but the ghost do be vibin doe
😳😳
It's also better for your eyes..I'm an oldschool gamer these years on LCD monitors from CRT.. has slightly fecked my eyes. Good for gaming and your health! 144hz should be the new base standard.
but sadly it will never be, because 60hz is good enough for majority.
This changed my perspective on gaming. WOW.
Does resolution matter as much? Can you do a comparison between 60 fps 4k resolution, 240 fps 1080p resolution and the things in between?
fps always beats resolution if you're competitive
Fact is:
Higher refresh rate
=
Higher skill level
Please, dont fart and blame the dog
And Higher Frame Rate
=
Higher Chad Energy
@Nightmare bro, are u drunk. In a shooter(and it makes no matter if u camp, or fight) ur image of the monitor needs to be refreshed more times than LoL. In LoL are maybe 400 Pixels moving arround and in a shooter thousends
@@henrik_lamar thousands*
Fact is
Higher refresh rate = less money
Me: Watches the video in 2X speed.
Hmm, spending that extra dollars on 144 Hz doesn't make sense.
It is worth, believe me.
Krulcifer. r/woooosh
@@aryabrahmamaheswara7314 isn't 4k and uhd the same? 🤣
@@deadsec_xz1541 wooow you use reddit you're sooo cool! Said no one ever.
I have only experience 60hz monitor but not above that in my life
Until a week ago me too ^^' it feels so smooth that the first 5 minutes my brain could'nt understand what was happening xD but now it is so relaxing to play on it even in competitive games. It feels very good :) by the way i switched from a 1920x1080p 60hz to a 2160x1440p 144hz.
@x33mmm oups my bad ^^' i made a mistake ^^ thank you for the correction :)
Try overclocking ur 60hz monitor might get it to 70hz
@@tobias2310 Haha we have the same name xD
@@tobiasg.8532 hell yeah :D
Me being a university student, it’s hard for me to justify the purchase of a high refresh rate monitor instead of a higher resolution monitor. With a 4K screen I can watch 4K TH-cam videos, create higher quality content, and play games with more detail if you have a good enough graphics card. A high refresh rate monitor is purely for gaming as far as my uses would go. I’m getting a laptop with a 3070, 1600p 165hz panel so it kinda has best of both worlds and I can’t wait to try it out.
3:26 Oi soldier, be careful those are friendlies!
Well explained and illustrated, thank you.
Watching this on a 60hz monitor, waiting to try out 144hz tomorrow for the first time with the order of ASUS ROG STRIX XG279Q, i cant wait!
ultra wide????
@@southerncomfort8070 Like PUTIN?!
@ AHAHAHAHH you got it
I have a 144hz monitor on the way right now can't wait to try it out
You'll be disappointed for sure. The difference is hardly noticeable. Sorry you wasted your money friend.
@@frogdeity I hope you were satire cause my gameplay is very smooth now
@@henky4050 I was not satire.
I bought a 244hz monitor and then a year later I found out you have to manually change what hz it gives out
Oof 😅
244 doesnt exist. do you mean 144 or 240
@@inutero3516 we all knew what he meant bro
@@rodjerdankist1125 i still dont. did he misclick a 2 while writing 144hz or did he somehow misclick a 4 while writing 240
Okay a simple question .
I am a Casual Gamer and i do only gaming on pc , nothing like content creation or editing like that.
I do like Graphics intensive games.
My graphics card is 1660ti coupled with i5 9400f.
So which is better for me For Display
A. 144 hz 1080p
B. 60hz 1440p
budget kind a limited so no 1440p 144hz.
Please share your valuable opinions.
Thank you.
It really depends on what kind of games you play. For shooters, 1080 144 is better for sure, but with slower games like Skyrim od Witcher for example, I would consider 1440p
maybe 1080p is better, the 1660ti is a good GPU, but won't hold *that* much on 1440p (not in intensive games) I would go for a rtx 2070/5700xt ish before going for 1440p
Playing 60 fps (heaviest games) on a 144hz panel is good, playing 1080p on a 1440p (in case the game gets too heavy for 60 fps 1440p) is not that good for what I've heard (never tested it myself tho)
Go for the 144Hz. I'm sure you will never ever regret that choice.
1660 TI can do 1440p at around 60+ FPS in most games but I would go for higher refresh rate plus in most cases having a higher refresh rate is more immersive then having a sharper image plus you might not be even able to tell the difference between 1080p and 1440p (this depends on how far away you are from the screen)
The experience regards to the refresh rate and resolution really depends on the biological limitation of each individual.
As those goes higher and higher, the improvements regards to experience diminishes, and possibly only a small group of people with extremely good eyes and reflexes can tell the difference.
As of now, I feel 2K 144Hz is a sweet spot. You have enough resolution for details and enough refresh rate for motion. Which is kind of like a balance between the resolution and refresh rate.
Otherwise going to 4K means you are most likely gonna stick with 60Hz. Or going to 240Hz means you likely gonna stick with 1080p resolution.
It really comes down to Smoothness Vs. Details.
Fantastic video and demonstration. Truly. Thank you.
A valid compersion would be something like 60Hz AND big screen, as a 4k TV or 43" 4k monitor, or 144Hz AND small screen as a 24-27" monitor. I prefer the bigger screen.
Exactly i had 144hz for 4-5 years and i gotta say its not worth if you are not playing competitive games exclusively. For 144fps you need good GPU AND good cpu, what op forgot to mention. Playing AAA games in 144hz regardless of res is very demanding and sometimes impossible(because game engine limitations). I have now 4k 32inch good monitor and im very happy jumping from 24inch 1080p 144hz tn panel.
Got a 55hz TV at the moment, (I think anyways) gonna upgrade to a 240hz monitor since there is one on sale for 200 quid on amazon. Can't wait to see the difference.
I bet that was the best decision of your life
@@RelatableTom2 Yeah, much better
I play on a 144hz and 1080p. I can in most games see the difference between 60hz and 144hz, while I really cant tell the difference between 1080p and 4k or 1440p
use it on a game with high contrast and very colorful, and you'll see it very clearly.
As an old school tech who knows what he is talking about this review is flawed. The reason the 60hz monitor is looking so horrible is because there was no vsync activated causing massive screen tearing. You can see a horizontal like running across the middle of the screen from left to right of the monitor that rips the scene in half. On the other hand the other monitor doesnt have a vsync problem because either vsync is enabled or screen tear is not as bad because of the faster refresh rate.
Once you used a 144hz monitor, you're never go back to 60 hz
definitely not once you get 300 i never want to touch 60
@S Pm yes, I don't have a console, so I don't know how it will perform, but I do have a gaming laptop, ROG STRIX that is 1080p, 144hz and some games do play better( COD and CS GO)
@S Pm if you are using it for casual gaming you probably shouldn't make that choice but if you are going for competitive then go for 144 or 240 if your ps can handle it tbh I can't really recommend 300hz it drops frames sometimes and is real performance heavy
I will also get my monitor when my eyes can't even see 240
Since you mentioned that you are bad at games, consider this:
Try to get a bigger table, where you can rest your elbow. Use it as an anchor for aiming and dont aim with your wrist only, lower the DPI or in-game sens. When I tried it i found that i hit way more targets when aiming from my elbow, and correcting the aim a little with the wrist.
plz anyone tell me what is the best graphics card for 60hz monitor ??? 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
This is the first vid of yours I've come across, and I'd like to compliment you on your camera and lighting work! Not to mention great framing and background environment. Definitely subscribing.
yk, i’ve been wondering why my monitor looked so crappy whenever i would play games,, i didn’t realize i had it set to 60hz this whole time 🥲
I'm always so high when I play I am stuck at 30fps regardless.
Gi Nattak 😂😂😂
so long you do not dip below 25, your fine.
Best comment yet. You win, good sir!!!!!!
hahaha this comment has me laughing out loud over here.
I ordered my first 144hz monitor today. Until now I've only ever had 60hz standard stuff. I can't wait to try it out.
And,did you get it?What is your experience?
@@sandinkasic4373 I only ordered it today. It's supposed to arrive on Friday.
How is it?
I am feeling for gaming, it recommended 144hz refresh rate for better quality and less stutters.
144hz refresh rate is more for shooters and sport games.
@@MrMakaveli2012 Yep makes sense.
My monitor is 144hz
@@rodolfotsang4327 Welp i have a laptop on 60hz
@@SillyCat2 your laptop is 60hz? What laptop you have?
i cant wait im upgrading from 60hz to 240hz in a few days ill update to tell you my thoughts when i get it!!
Oo please tell !
Man never told us
*Watching this at 360p with my 60hz monitor*
Yeah I can definitely tell the difference
Quite concise and precise comparison!
Totally, totally agree! Went from a 144 Hz 27" monitor to a beautiful Freesync 32" VA @ 70 Hz. Loved the picture quality and Freesync worked well but I just couldn't live without the higher refresh rate. Just bought an Acer 27" 240Hz GSync monitor and it's going from a 1971 Ford Pinto to a 2019 Ferrari! I can never go back.
My monitor : i can 144Hz
My PC : i can't even stable at 60 FPS
Specs?
Ken same for me and my specs are i7-8700k and GTX 980, I can’t get more than 30fos usually, and I can’t figure out why
I use hd 7770
I got a Razer Blade 15 it has a 144Hz screen and it's night and day difference from 60Hz. (This is in games and just doing normal stuff on Windows) It spoils you, can't go back to 60Hz now again in FPS games. Now for some games 60Hz is fine but yeah highly recommended and it's worth the extra money. I've tried a 240Hz monitor and personally 240Hz is only marginally more responsive like it's so slight but it is there. Smoothness feels very very similar though I'd say to 144Hz. Even if you aren't a "hardcore" gamer and are causal 144Hz is still so much better compared to 60Hz and you'll love it.
Love your videos man 👌🏻
I have been using 240hz (1080p) for 10 days. Then I accidentally switched to 144hz and it felt like i was playing at 60hz. Never going back.
Not many games can go reach 240hz unless you're playing less demanding games like Cs:go
@@gvillanueva5317 it depends on settings and pc...
@@Gweriaa yea unless you play at low or medium settings
@@gvillanueva5317 most competive games with proper settings and a decent PC. For example, Overwatch is 300 fps with 1070 & 9700k.
I've considered 240 Hz monitor, but I'm too afraid that 4k 120 Hz TV for less competive games would feel too stuttery after that. I guess I should stick with 144 Hz FeelsBadman.