HYPR-RX
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Check out the new Devil Skins swappable backplates and more from PowerColor! bit.ly/416GViO
Did AMD just launch a secret weapon with HYPR-RX? What is HYPR-RX, how do you use it, and what does it do?
Test system specs (ResizeBAR/SAM ON):
CPU: Ryzen 7800X3D amzn.to/3Hkf7Qi
Cooler: Corsair H150i Elite amzn.to/3VaYqeZ
Mobo: ROG Strix X670E-a amzn.to/3F9DjEx
RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30: amzn.to/41XRtkM
SSD: Samsung 980 Pro amzn.to/3BfkKds
Case: Corsair iCUE 5000T RGB amzn.to/3OIaUsn
PSU: Thermaltake 1650W Toughpower GF3 amzn.to/3UaC8cc
Monitor: LG C1 48 inch OLED amzn.to/3nhgEMr
Keyboard: Logitech G915 TKL (tactile) amzn.to/3U7FzA9
Mouse: Logitech G305 amzn.to/3gDyfPh
What equipment do I use to make my videos?
Camera: Sony a6100 amzn.to/3wmDtR9
Camera Lens: Sigma 16mm f/1.4 amzn.to/36i0t9t
Camera Capture Card: Elgato CamLink 4K amzn.to/3AEAPcH
PC Capture Card: amzn.to/3jwBjxF
Mic: My actual mic (AT 3035) is out of production but this is a similar mic (AT 2020) amzn.to/3jS6LEB
Portable Mic attached to camera: Rode Video Micro amzn.to/3yrT0R4
Audio Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 3rd Gen: amzn.to/3wjhlad
Greenscreen: Emart Collapsable amzn.to/3AGjQXx
Lights: Neewar Dimmable USB LED amzn.to/3yw4frD
RGB Strip Backlight on desk: amzn.to/2ZceAwC
Sponsor my channel monthly by clicking the "Join" button:
/ @danielowentech
Donate directly to the channel via PayPal:
www.paypal.com...
Disclaimer: I may earn money on qualifying purchases through affiliate links above.
Check out the new Devil Skins swappable backplates and more from PowerColor! bit.ly/416GViO
I see it now needed to update :D Time to test in starfield. fram gen wouldbe cool to have tho.
After giving these a look I'm curious if adding more plastic to the back impacts the heat dissipation from the built in backplate. I mean I doubt it makes a significant difference but I don't see how it would make no difference, perhaps PowerColor would be kind enough to send you one to test 🤣.
Thats assuming they are even using the back plate in the first place on these models?
You should do more of this testing with FORTNITE ... that covers ALL THE BASES .. including DLSS (and XeSS too I think)
Daniel, we need benchmark of the performance with hypr-rx on/off
Shadow of the Tomb Rader, Borderlands 3, and Fortnite.
Daniel flying around the screen makes for a great video! And thanks for explaining some of this stuff. I updated the driver for my card last night and wasn't sure what all of this stuff is supposed to do.
but the Daniel at 8:35 forgot how to fly...XD
I actually jumped into Fallout 4 to see if Hyper RX would work with 'older' titles and- HOLY WHOAH, it actually FIXED the mouse lag in the game. FO4 always felt sluggish with the 1050ti, A380, pre-Hyper RX Radeon 7600 with the mouse movement. Jeez, they actually managed to make FO4 feel SNAPPY.
Can you test the anti lag+ and compare it to nvidia reflex?
That would be a fun video to try to make.
What's this Anti Lag+ supported games list? 9 out of 12 games are single player games. I can totally understand why it would be benefitial for Overwatch, Apex Legends or Fortnite but Ghostwire Tokyo??
Oh and both Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Borderlands 3 are on both lists you showed.
will it work with the pro drivers??
I feel like AMD should contract a company to create a small sandbox UE5 game that has all their technologies integrated and maybe even with early access so it’s easy to test the features in a best-case-scenario
you're asking things that AMD like to avoid the most.
Should have been Bethesda but I can't imagine starfield with all it's current issues being on ue5
Are you all too young to remember what AMD and nvidia demos were? Literally both of these companies used to create these demos to showcase their latest tech.
True. It should be easy to develop a tech demo game engine that relies heavily on VCache of the X3D CPUs. CPUs love when all the data is in the cache, so that they don't have to look into system RAM. Similarly, for Radeon specific features, like dual issue capability for a subset of common instructions. They could make it open, like theirs GPUOpen, so that modders could play with that fictional, but plausible engine. We could even be getting some indie games, designed for AMD/Radeon hardware. AMD should go into PR blitz mode, because their hardware is good, but it seems like they don't provide low level support for developers. Which is not true, but is not known to public.
This is not a bad idea at all, take this like 😃.
Pretty impressive MS latency reduction, if it reaches similar results across other titles.
Dude, I swear on my balls I just saw Daniel heart your comment in real time, wtf.
@@technologicalelite8076what the
@@technologicalelite8076
It is not impressive, Nvidia's Reflex lowers the MS latency by 50-70%.
@@xRlly I don't care how good Reflex is if I'm purchasing an AMD card :)
AMD needs to make Anti-Lag+ available on RDNA1/2/Vega/Polaris GPUs. Nvidia Reflex works on Nvidia GPUs as old as Maxwell. Not to mention, AL+ will make or break FSR3 in terms of input latency.
freesync is the best anyway, just stick to that
@@tubaeseries5705They are not mutually exclusive. Freesync is just adaptive refresh rate, it doesn’t serve to reduce latency, especially if you are GPU bottlenecked…
@@tubaeseries5705 what does one have to do with another lol
freesync is about reducing tearing, al+ is about reducing the latency between your command on the keyboard and the game actually responding to that command on your screen
@@rodrigoferreiramaciel4815 freesync reduces latency because it presents frame as soon as it's rendered, anti lag tries to do the same by adjusting delays between render cycles, it doesn't modify game or whatever, it only controls rendering frames to display the most recent one as soon as possible, anti lag+ also tries to increase performance by using fsr if needed so frames are rendered more consistently and always ready
Anything NV does AMD is like “we can do it slightly worse but more widely available”
And with time nvidia is forgotten just what happened with physx or gsync, the same was done cheaper and for everyone.
@@PREDATEURLT I have an AMD gpu, but you're coping really hard. NVIDIA will always be around and be ahead of AMD in consumer, enterprise, and professional work environments.
@@PREDATEURLT Jeesh. And what exactly happened to physx and g-sync? I have a fresh g-sync monitor right now. And hundreds of games have modern revision of physx
@@PREDATEURLTphysx wasn't forgotten, it became the default physics for unreal engine lol
@@PhilosophicalSock Physx became something that nvidia doesn't control as their own, and native gsync makes like 10% of all new monitors with hardware sync, everything else is something way cheaper with gsync compatibility.
It's a shame it's only on RDNA 3 cards. Maybe it will be supported on other gpus, I remember that super resolution was originally only supported on 5000 and 6000 gpus.
I believe amd said they might think about doing that
It more than likely will trickle down. The money making current gpus get the cool new features first
It´s not a shame, AMD wants you to buy a RX7000, thats called marketing!
@@G4ns4nactually is available for older cards too
My guy! Congrats on the shout-out from Digital Foundry! Just goes to show you are fast establishing yourself as an important component in the overall gaming/hardware info sphere.
Keep up the good work, man! I honestly don't know how you keep up with it. I think I'm probably much less busy with my life in general and yet you are making a TH-cam channel I couldn't hope to keep up with in my spare time.
Awesome!
I’ve been trying this new driver with RX and immediately Starfield started crashing a bunch lol.
That game already on its crutches don't bother lol
@@gtx1650max-qI'm like 6 hours in I've had a share of bugs but honestly no crashing. I've only started crashing after installing the DlssFG mod
@@cash_banooca17are you trying to do dlss frame generation on a radeon gpu?
@@cash_banooca17 Third party mods are an absolute NO NO for me this is a "triple A" game I should not be relying on modders to make it better.
@@NoodlesTBogratThen you don't like Bethesda games then
I don't understand why hyper-rx can't work on rdna 2 wish it would
Pretty Good Technology From AMD, I Hope it'll come to the 6000 Series at some point too. They changed it to be able to use Anti Lag and Boost at the same time, but with the RSR it would be so cool.
Is it possible tho? Or like Nvidia DLSS 3 available in RTX 40 hardware. Can this be in RDNA 2 or something needs RDNA 3 hardware ?
When will HYPRX come to rx 6900xt
Back in the day we used to play games at native resolution with decent performance. I miss those days.
Hoping to see this in 6000 series too
Really glad AMD is adding more features! Makes me even more happy I've switched to AMD and got my 7900xt. Keep up the good work Daniel :)
Really enjoying your gpu comparison, even tho I already have a good card, just watching because of curiosity ^_^
I have the MSI Radeon RX 7900XTX Gaming Trio Classic. Been working great so far.
Lots of people sleep on the 7900xt.
98% of ppl just watch out of curiosity and addiction, tbh.
Daniel! You just got quoted on digital foundary’s pc tech review of starfield!
Great stuff! AMD is reducing it's "fine wine" effect. Why lock Antilag+ to RX 7000 GPUs? Reflex works on GTX cards...
I want to mention. FSR3 has it's own latency reduction methode. Anti-lag and Anti-Lag + comes ON TOP of that. Anti lag + is only for 7000 series and above.
I honestly find it quite an imposition to be forced to fine-tune the graphics settings like a Formula 1 car in every game.
Then you are lazy and should play on Consoles. PC gaming is all about tweaking and freaking out. Ping me, This Is The Way.
Then buy the best graphics card on the market every generation so you don't have to worry about tweaking settings.
The thing is that different people prefer different stuff for different games, so it is up to each of us to enable the features we want to get better performance.
And without those features we'd just be stuck to only the raw performance of the card (or at least what the drivers offer for each GPU).
PC gaming has always been about tuning. Though, you can play on lower specs if you don't want to tune stuff yourself.
@@xlr555usa This has nothing to do with laziness. I've been tinkering with PCs since the mid-90s. To me, it sounds more like the marketing people are once again pumping it up to something it's not.
@@thegutlessleadingthecluele7810 so you are not buying the Amd Hyper Whizbang features? It is all smoke and mirrors?
So you buy a top-tier card from their last generation (6900 XT or 6950 XT) and you get the middle finger. I have a 6900 XT. Thanks AMD! 😒
haha, all i read is like BOOST, SUPER, ANTI LAG. Then im like.. GAMING!!! X!!! and turned off :P Its the marketing words of nothing. Its words for kids back in the 80`s to attract em. HYPER! SUPER X BOOST GAMING EXPERIENCE!!! YEAAAAH AMD TRANSFORM!!!!!
everything all-in-one is absolute trash.
you get almost zero control this way.
the only thing this update really brought, is anti-lag+ which is supported in less than 0.1% of games....
great..... thanks for nothing
Hey man please help
I got a new GPU and SSD. GPU instillation went perfect. Ssd not so well. I wanted to install windows onto my ssd so my pc would boot faster and I don't want to accidentally override my Hdd and loose and my files so I unplugged my HDD while I install windows. I then plug it back in and it doesn't show up. Can you please help I've tried everything and I don't want to lost all my files or pay someone $50 to fix it.
Thanks
I waited 8 freaking months to buy the 7800 xt but they were not giving ANY INFOS for so long
so in the end i bought a 3080 3 months ago for 420 dollars
Sometimes AMD reminds me konami where they are not sharing enough infos
Maybe in the next generation i'll go for team RED
But they lost a client for being too slow and not transparent enough
well next gen they are possibly out of the high end so for me at least... I am stuck with Nvidia and I will upgrade as I would had my 3080 for 4 years by then ( Got it on release for MSRP here in the UK so £650 )
months is nothing youre just impatient
@@clark85 I had the 1060 for 6 years what are you talking about
More like you lost a good gpu
Bro, months is not nothing@@clark85
😥 sad cant use hyperRX on 6800XT , meanwhile all Nvidia GPU supports Nvidia's Reflex
@@blue-lu3iz just need a good anti lag to be able to at least come close to Nvidia reflex ( apex , Fortnite, valorant, cs ) you know why bro
This looks like quite a nice thing from AMD, the only issue I see is that they yet again overcomplicate things for the user, by naming things the same with asterisks so you need a glossary before finding the right options or what it means. Simplification is king also automation.
Moded Drivers by amernimezone allow Hyperx for older gpu
It's a shame that AntiLag+ is only available for RDNA3.
Right the wag they where saying it was like oh it will be coming to rdna 2 and older no not the case it's crazy that at gamecon I think it was that's how they hyped it up
This means more Nvidia cards to me personal. AMD is too dumb to win my money with their fuqed up GPUs mess.
You made it on a DF Starfield video!! As a floating head too :D
I mean with AMD you have all these cool stuff, but are you sure what they do and if they work properly? Even back before switching to Nvidia Radeon chill sometimes worked sometimes not. Ok Nvidia has an old control panel but it is easy to use and their stuff works.
Very informative video anyway, thank you Daniel, you are my daily GPU/tech news favorite deliverer. Greetings from Italy ☀️
Hyper-RX on RDNA 3 only, it's just a gimmick to sell more cards, right ? what would prevent it from running on RDNA 2 ?
Time and resources. New gen is priority of course later olds
Latency reduction here mainly comes from FSR here doesn't it? Which is just a downscaling option... nothing spectacular here.
This is exacly what I was thinking.
really expect the rdna3 lock for anti-lag+ is temporary to sell or has a good reason because even nvidia didn't lock reflex/reflex+
I just checked the numbers you got compared to AMD's own charts and its a 40% difference compared to AMD's 20% (from anti lag off to anti lag + on) so its actually better than their advertising though that likely depends heavily on PC and monitor spec so AMD's results is probably closer on average. And of course without an LDAT we have no idea if that monitor is accurate.
Daniel Owen Pic is my new mouse cursor.
Can anyone explain why Anti Lag+ can't be supported by 6000 GPUs?
Not enough time to do old gens yet
The best floating man in gpus.
when is the 7950XTX coming out?
Sitting here watching this screaming at my tv "Fortnite!!! Fortnite is on both lists!!! Competitive shooter!!!" I know you work long days so no hate. Though it would be nice to see it tested across the gpus.
Same.
Finally an answer to Reflex ? If it's good, I'm probably upgrading to an AMD
Also, talking about Boost, I think they're talking about « camera movement » because it should also work with controllers. It reminded me of how FSR works in Zelda Tears of the Kingdom where the resolution drops whenever you move the camera. So it's not JUST mouse movement, it's also basically right joystick movement I guess.
Yup, you're right. Just tested right now in GTA 5, moving my controller's right analog stick is causing Radeon Boost to kick in and lower the render resolution.
@@MultiYippeetested on cyberpunk last night on a 7800 XT and the Boost would make the game micro stutter, i assume its because it's quickly lowering and highering the resolution in real time in fast paced scenarios. I also get around 100+ fps on Ultra Preset and around 60+- on Ultra Ray Tracing both without Boost . Normal Ultra looked better to me tho.
I wanted a the newer Red Devil design, but sadly I can't really justify the 600 USD for the 7800 XT upgrading from the 6750 XT I just paid 620.00 at launch for, because the 6800 XT was 1,299.00 :( Maybe 8800 XT will be my next jump? :) First cup of coffee, so not sure if what I said made sense.
Makes sense, I would enjoy the 6750 and forget about it. Like phones, things improve incrementally so no sense second guessing a purchase. I’m going to enjoy my amd gpu till it’s an impediment then I’ll buy another. Nice to see amd going strong, we need competition in the gpu space.
I was thinking about doing the same jump if the 7800XT was closer to the 6950XT but it's almost the same, my 6700XT is doing well enough still.
Hopefully rumors about there not being high end RDNA4 parts aren't true otherwise the only considerable upgrade would be the 7900XT or XTX.
previously you couldn't activate boost plus RSR and it was a huge deal since boost never got upscaled unless the game had FSR, which was rare to see together. so this is a HUGE step for AMD as now you can upscale the Boost effect, and youre always seeing an upscaled to max resolution image, instead of boost being noticable. it's actually a huuuge step for AMD and AMD users. some games look better with RSR than FSR, i hope we can choose. RSR usually has very little ghosting if none. just bad ant-aliasing.
I turned off everything except the Anti-Lag. The boost feature was GARBAGE on MW II. I’ll play with it some more but flipping it on was no bueno
So Nvidia's Reflex latency reducer works on all Nvidia GPUs and AMDs Anti-Lag+ only works on their latest and greatest?
All the AMD technology names sound like they are trying to sell me into a Ponzi scheme
The reason why RSR kicked in is you re using a resolution lower than the one you have in the monitor, when you have FSR enabled you don't need to go into a lower resolution
Unrelated but can you benchmark Cyberpunk before and after it’s update to system requirements? It would be really cool to see on maybe a lower and higher end pc
It’d be nice if panning the camera allowed asynchronous projection, similar to what’s used for VR to keep frame rate high (even if the game isn’t rendering super fast).
Boost does not work very well for CyberPunk 2077 least on my RX 7700 XT. In Cyberpunk 2077 it makes the UI text and elements super blurry anytime you move, took me 2-3 hours of tinkering till I realized it was this feature doing it. It seems to work without any noticeable image quality effect on StarField though.
DO NOT Use this feature with Cyberpunk 2077, something about how the game Renders also causes anything with transparency maps i.e Hair to look extra artifacted or "Noisey" with Boost turned on.
I'm hyped about this button as my 3080 is replaced
What did you get?
@@danielowentech a 4080 zotac gaming amp extreme airo expensive but will last a few years hopefully against the slew of nanite and lumen!!
@@neilstack4194 yeah, 4080 is a great GPU other than the price! Lol
Anti Lag and Anti Lag + and Boost and RSR aka FSR at Performance all this non-sense that makes game look like a butter cream.
Yeah its responsive in real time but image will be blurry/muddy
Non of the cards are real 4k cards anyway, even AMD had said you need good base FPS for FG to look good, so that is at least 45~55FPS on native 4K + RT but when you put that FSR on it aint native any more...FG alone brings you to 60~72FPS and that is with low to medium RT at 4K native on a 7900xtx lol
Grats on 150k!
My dude, you need to think of a channel name now haha DOTECH!
AMD PC graphics = clown forever. nVidia create clown technology for marketing, and AMD follow in nVidia footsteps 👏
@danielowentech just got a shout-out from Digital Foundry!
You have the RX 7800 XT??? So the take home message is AMD are doing the same as Nvidia > using software to cover for the lack of improvement in the newer cards. Would be nice if somebody would tell us what they think 7900 users ignore this 7800 users only on starfield 7600 & 7700 users need this on 4-5 games.
There is a profile button for performance mode but causing a little instability on 6950 xt new build, 7800x3d, no overclocking yet.
Id seen multiple hyper rx video notifications pop up but I couldn't take any of them seriously until the man himself offers the common man the wisdom of the gods(haha)
Hi. Do you think the RX 7600 is a good gpu for 1080p high gaming? Will it support hypr-rx? In my country the rx 6700 XT costs $100 more, so the 7600 is the best gpu I can afford.
How about the 6800 non x? Should last you a fair bit
@@afiq358 It's in stock only in one shop and costs almost $300 more
EDIT: Lol problably you meant 6700, it's almost the same price as 6700 XT
Ya tiene Hyper X integrado, ayer lo probé y está bastante bien, poseo una RX 7600
Wondering the same thing. I do think it's worth to get 7600 for the new features. AMD said something like they'll try to implement it on RX 6xxx cards, but it's not guaranteed. It must be something with these new cards we don't know yet - I think 7600 will age better than let's say 6650 XT that's reaaally close to 7600.
In my country, prices are crazy too, people are selling used 6700 XT at prices of almost brand new, even damaged ones... They bought all 6600 XT in past 2 weeks - new and used like they were fresh bread rolls lol, and they now cost the same as 7600. 6650 XT similar prices, I'm afraid 7600 will go up because of all this lol. But looks like it's not that popular card.
I think I'll just buy the cheapest 7600 (MSI) this weekend...
Really i don't understand Nvidia, AMD or Intel. Why they don't make frame generator independent of games. I mean built in in the driver. GPU knows what is rendering and how much fps it has on output. especially Nvidia when they made hardware AI support to frame generator and they still need support from game developers. Then for what they putted physicals cores on it? It is a nonsense.
do some blender benchmark viewport performance, on AMD cards (HIP, HIP-RT)
yeah idc about radeon boost seems like another version of motion blur and I hate that crap big reason I don't like FSR etc because it blurs images and crap.
edit: and them taking this long for FSR3 might just have nvidia already having a DLSS4.0 around the corner...
TBH I don't get it with any of these technologies. It all sounds like 'cheating' to get better FPS. Just give me native everything and sufficient GPU grunt to cope :) Maybe if these features were exposed to the game menus it'd make more sense. You set a target FPS (default pulled from current monitor refresh rate), game runs a benchmark which includes turning those hyper features on and off as well as upping and downing quality settings and then makes one or two recommendations to closest meet the FPS target - with explanation whether it's faking (upscaling) the resolution or faking entire frames. All the marketing terms are way too confusing
AMD diddn't give me, the Gaming on Linux Nerd the same Button :-( but thats ok i think they do excellent open source driver development (but please don't become lazy)
i mean fall is just around the corner, FSR 3 coming soon. even if it's not that great, i don't care as long as there are improvements over FSR 2.
i would say and hope for FSR 3 support for starfield but the game is so CPU bound that having FSR on makes zero difference lol.
I've been using it for the last 2 days, and it's pretty neat. The latency is way lower, especially with antilag+
You have a 7000 series?
Isnt the latency lower just becasue RSR is kicking in automaticaly in those games? Can you use antilag + just on its own?
@@Matt-iq7ciRSR doesn't kick in unless you're playing a game in fullscreen at a lower resolution than your screen resolution (for example, if your screen is 1080p, but you're playing in 720p fullscreen).
Do you need a Ryzen for these features to work, or is Intel fine?
@@KelilaHaven it works with Intel and ryzen
Daniel not about hypr-rx but connected. I have noticed on some youtube channels that on n
ew games such as rachet and clank, that direct storage is overloading the graphics card and causing the frame rate to drop 20 - 30 fps which is defeating the whole point of direct storage. I have a rx 6800 if I crossfire/mgpu two cards do you think this will sort out the graphics bottleneck?
Just ordered a 7800xt to replace my 3070, I know it’s not much more of an upgrade but I really do need that extra vram 8gb just isn’t enough
Ello…the top of your noggin is chopped off….it’s driving me nuts, noticed it a few videos back and I can’t stop staring at it….…..reminds me of a terrible flat top haircut I got back in high school ;)
As an Nvidia user, AMD Drivers UI is so much better than Nvidia. Not even close.
Daniel explaining Hyper-RX in Hyper flying mode. Great work❤.
Finally well explained. I was indeed confused about that marketing dog$hit. Thanks!
impressive drop but i wish they can do better than nvidia its at 8ms -16ms with 33ms drop vs amd 23ms from 39ms....RT games not gonna benefit any improvment with amd method, thanks owen, your testing helps a lot folks in their decision making and difference and expectation of fsr3 disappointing results coming soon that it only benefit less intensive games that not use RT settings
mmm neat but ill be honest i have a 240 hertz monitor downgraded to 120 because the panel was better and now i mostly game at 60 fps to keep run the pc cooler on hot days so the likelyness of me being bothered by frame generation latency is incredibly low maybe it is due to be gaming for litteraly 10 years on a 82945g express family chipset at 15-22 fps i guess my brain has become a slideshow aswel XD
I just saw Digital Foundry mention your findings in their Starfield PC video! Awesome!
I am not impressed. I'm actually rather annoyed by how AMD implements things. I wish they did a better job of showcasing new tech.
AMD are messing up their own hardware further releasing this half baked software to go with an extremely inefficient FSR 3, that saves next to no power from FSR 2. I mean, this is just a mess of software.
Damn Q1 can be up to April 1st of 2024 before we see FSR 3.0?
No that's for frame generation on the driver level. Fsr 3 and frame generation on per game implementation will be available this month or next month. The Q1 is for the feature that would all FSR3 and frame gen to work on any dx11 or dx12 game through drivers. Frospoken and immortals will be first to support fsr 3 end of this month
Another useless feature from AMD. All this hype for one-click activation of fsr (if all goes well) and anti lag. With actual quality settings increasingly hidden from users. The radeon boost is a piece of crap. I want to see if those who speak well of it will be among those who criticise nVidia's dlss or the frame generator.
ALT-SHIFT-L brings up a few dots in the upper left corner in shadow of the tomb raider. Is there a setting to change it to numbers? Another great video by the way!
Daniel, do you have dx11 app trouble? For example, god of war stutter like hell on any driver after 23. 5. 2.
Anti Lag+ looks good but I'm really not a fan of automatically enabling FSR/RSR and Boost.
Automatically downgrading picture quality through settings players cannot tweak in-game is a bad idea, some people will wonder why their IQ is so bad and not know why.
You can disable both from the Hypr-RX suite so that compatible games only use boost and anti-lag+
@@nicholasprotopapa6502 That's better, but I'm willing to bet significant percentage of people will never even touch HyprRX, hell I'm seeing people who are happy with how Starfield is running because they didn't notice the game actually renders at 50-65% of resolution, and that stuff is in-game. It should be turn-on instead of turn-off, apart from Anti-Lag+.
While all these individual technologies are great, I don't like any kind of software that tries to manage that for me. I like to have full knowledge and awareness of all applied settings.
That's also why I've never used GF Experience with "optimal settings". Maybe this is useful for less tech-savvy people, but then do they really need it anyway?
Oh look, AMD doing the same thing like Nvidia, locking features for only a certain GPU generation
Ok all these names and technologies are getting confusing both with NVD and AMD. Its getting hard with all these combinations and then you got to add in whatthdgameswill support
Would have been great to see Anti-lag+ on its own without enable Hyper-RX and FSR. Can the lag be reduced significantly at native resolution without additional AMD trickery.
I tryed it guys on my rx 7900xtx, input its ok, the upscaler is dogshit and i would never use that ever, u guys with 6700xt and up donr bother upgrade
AMD saw that Nvidia has been charging us 500$ a generation for software and figured, hey man, I can do that too...
What only on RDNA 3?!?
If it was NVIDIA, this would be followed by a rage 😂
I hope Cyberpunk and Witcher 3 get this on release the only two games that cause any problems for my 7900xt when maxing out all the Ray Tracing.
its great all these options are available, but im at a point where i just keep everything off and just keep everything stock. i dont want my resolution reduced just to have something else pushed higher. just so many "if this, get that" type of options that can get convoluted.
Anti Lag+ works on a 780M integrated gpu but does not work on higher
End card like rx6800 series cards
what a bummer, just got a laptop with 680m couple months ago
Lmao
They need to copy Nvidia to sell the 7000 series
They would be easier to sell if difference between 6800XT nad 7800XT wasnt less than 5% lol@@9999titanium
Nice, can't wait until GloriousEggroll bundles them up in Proton 8D
What I get from this video is that FSR 3 is useless on nvidia cards because they can't use antilag+ ...is that right ?
I tested this out on my 7900 XTX and I am pretty amazed, in Red Dead Redemption 2 I tried comparing FSR 2 Quality (at 4k) and putting the ingame resolution to 2k which then would be upscaled to 4k by RSR and I was amazed to see a 10-20 FPS increase (sometimes even 30). I tried it in the Last of Us Part 1 and the same thing happened there, 10-20 FPS increase compared to using FSR 2 Quality. On my 28 inch monitor the games look basically identical with only (very) little decrease in image quality but honestly I couldn't tell much of a difference when focusing on the game and not intentionally looking for any differences. This surprises me a little bit because AMD says on their website that FSR gives better performance but so far (at least for me) that's the other way around.
I heard that using hyper rx in a game with fsr 2 will automatically utilize fsr 2 instead of rsr. Not sure if this is true tho.
Hyper X uses FSR 2 when it's available it will only use RSR if you turn off FSR and lower the in game resolution. And yeah I tested it with my XTX as well and it does look pretty good with FSR but looks crappy with RSR.
@@alfredolopez1396 yes, if theres FSR then that is automatically being used but I am still amazed that there's a higher FPS gain for very little change in image quality
@@100500daniel agreed but the good thing is that nowadays most games have FSR implemented so at this point I will keep on using this to see how it feels, so far very promising signs
Do you need a Ryzen for these features to work, or is Intel fine?
the metic is saying that you have to wait 1.6 frames for latency input. while without it you wait 3+ frames. Also Hyper-RX actually improves latency when using the feature itself over using each feature on it's own. Please do a GTA5 Boost+RSR video to see how it looks :O game changing for online play
So this is decreasing latency frame times to help eliminate ghosting effect seen in fsr2 and coming soon fsr3? Is that correct or did I misunderstand it?
(Sorry, im still new to this.)