ironically when the Russian tzar called to divide the "sick man of Europe" before WW1 he did not know that the Russian Empire will fall before the Ottoman
Ottomans in fact caused the fall of Tzarist Russia by joining WW1 and holding the straits against the allies. Making them unable of sending aids to Russia.
@@arda213 Which does not make me happy. I have sentimental feelings towards the good old Russian Empire of the early 20th century. It was a European country with good economic prospects. And then everything ruined by communists, so many lives lost, not only in Russia, but all over the world in WW2 etc., we suffer from it to this day
@@omarsener8491 Of course not everything was OK. But instead of gradually improving things people wanted quick results and let radical leftists come to power. And of course the Tzarist regime carries much blame because it was so inadequate it got into WW1 for some stupid reason and could not recognize the threat from within. Suffice to say that the person who was in power, tzar himself could not protect his own family from being killed. Least he could do is send them to another country.
@@winterbalm It was actually exposed in 1926 that Russian Empire made ımperial plans over the Ottoman Empire. I mean, even if we did not declare war on them, they were want our land. Frankly, I have some sympathy for Nikolai. The man did not even intend to ascend the throne, but I think he wanted to be a son worthy of his father and became an autocrat. İf only the Russians and Turks had never fought with each other.
The weirdest part for me as a Bulgarian is that we battled the Ottomans in 1913, then became allies with them in 1914 to 1918. History sure has its surprises.
nations don't have constant friends or enemies, just constant intetests Bulgarians are relatives of Turks after all Turkic people who speak a Slavic language
@@hasantan3852 Because they were not Russians anymore, they were communists, and couldn't care less who the Russian Empire or the Russian people loved or hated
@@ulfekenberg6463 Yes, officially at this time they are. But if you research their history you will find out that they descended from Bulgars in Central Asia
Ottoman Empire had no choice to be neutral in ww1, Britain already targeted Ottoman lands and empire tried to be ally with Britain even gave Cyprus as a gift but had no chance
Before 1878 Berlin conference, Ottomans gave the administration of Cyprus to the UK. Before world war 1 begins, UK declared annexation and Ottomans became silent. So it's a gift
@@daprodigy3353 britain rented it and atatürk thinked they will be neutral in the war but when the time comes they will attack.Sorry for my bad grammar
@@funinukeguy2804 Yes, but surely all out Swiss like neutrality could not just guarantee their independence but also give them leverage in trade deals with all major powers (like Iran) since the oil that was within the empire, they didn't need 'victory'
@@arealphantom2859 I meant likef they just let the war go they would have been politically isolated(maybe only with the soviets(If they even win)) And with many minorities and Imperial ambitions in the reigon the ottomans would have been destroyed in the coming years At least by fighting they had a chance at a victory and relevance
@@pyrusheliosmk2204 Bro, 57 years will make no difference. And there were even Byzantine states that later took Constantinople back, so it didn't really fall.
Ottomans : i never thought i would die fighting side by side with a catholic Austria-Hungary : what about side by side with a friend Ottomans : aye , i think i can do that
Well, the entante were busy with the bulk of their troops occupying Germany, so they couldn't force the Turkish partition. So you can thank Germany for that.
@@yusufardagures5490 kayi boyundan bahsediyor ne selcuklusu kucuk bir oba buyuyup birinci dunya savasina kadar ayakta durmayi basardi diyor. sacma sapan cevaplar uydurmayin
@@Tekir-Kedi Kanka Osmanli kurulmadan kurulmadan önce Moğol impratorluğu zaten yıkılmıştı. Altın Ordu ve İlhanlılar ortaya çıktı. İkiside müslüman oldu. Yani Doğu da hayla İlhanlılar vardı ama eski Moğol sorunu yoktu o zamanlarda Anadolu Selçuluklu hem o kadar gücsüz değildi, hem de İlhanlılar müslüman oldukları için eskisi gibi katliamlar olmuyordu. Selçuklu'nun yıkilması nın sebebi; Devletin başinda onu yöneten kimsenin olmamasıydı.
@Kokoro Shimamura no. They still keep fighting in 16 oct. İtaly has weak army. They cant go any further, they only has cost line. The other parts are controlled by Ottoman empire.
At the beginning of the 20th century, during the dawn of the era of automobiles/engines, "oil" became the most important thing and surpassed every other commodity produced in history such as gold-diamond-coal-iron-cotton-sugar etc. No matter whom Ottomans joined with, Britain and France had focused on its lands in Arabia.
@@abdurrahimberisha4821 Arabs revolted against the seculer government. As an Arab, I would do the same if that thing happened again. The only reason why turks and arabs lived together was religion and turks just changed the caliphate into germanic(fascist) secular country. This is unacceptable.
At the beginning of World War I, the Ottoman Empire was victorious. It won in Gallipoli, Gaza and Kut al-Amara. And invaded Egypt and the Caucasus. But after the outbreak of the Arab Revolution, things changed. Half of the Ottoman forces were occupied, leading to the Ottoman Empire's eventual defeat.
@B Whit he just noted that! The reason for those victories was because of the Arab revolt. Siege of Jerusalem for example would had been won by the Turks if the Arabs wouldn’t had betrayed them
@B Whit Arabs revolted because they were provoked by their British masters, Brits sweet tongue charmed Arabs so they revolted and allied with UK. We were fighting against thousands of Arabs as we were also fighting against UK to defend our lands in Middle East.. its not a lie, thats how UK won in Middle East. Still we stopped their advance at Qut-ul Amare, we didn't let them invade Istanbul by winning Battle Of Gallipoli, which was one of the most bloodiest battle in WW1, its also known as being one of the battle which ''melee fight'' was heavily involved, altough Brits had higher technology compared to us, nor their technology and their body strenght saved them from being crushed, our technology wasn't big as their so we kicked them out with our arm's strenght so we actually blocked UK to reach their causes. However when our allies lost the war, we also lost it since we weren't able to fight against almost all of the world by ourselves lmao. And ANZACS were just puppets tho, they got humiliated at Battle Of Gallipoli.. still they should be thankful to us cause of having that Battle against us. Cause after Gallipoli, Australians relaized they were used by UK and they should stand as a one nation, not as slave for UK.
Turks lost a empire but not their people.....turky is also one of the strongest countries soo they lost something but not everything like other empires
aisha time to take a bath with adult Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses). Sahih Bukhari (6:298)
@Some Weeb the UK, France, austria, and russia all still own their homelands and the first 3 are highly developed so I feel like "lost almost everything" is an exaggeration
@Some Weeb but you contrasted turkey to them as if Turkey was in a better position when its more comparable to Russias situation then the UK, France, or Austria
Sultan Süleyman killed his innocent son Shahzade Mustafa( a great warrior, a leader, son of Mahidevran Sultan) and Sultan Selim got the throne by tricks ( son of Hürrem Sultan, alcholic) This was the beginning of the big collapse..
@@kasadam85 Indeed statistics would be helpful. But the interesting thing has always been how cultural (widespread) sth is e.g. Cultural Anthropology. Individuals are being brought up n affected by a culture especially in the past. Without having researched the subject, i have started coming across men from Turkey n all of them seem to love alcohol. After many cases i stopped believing they were just individual cases.
@АбдульзефирThe Ottomans did because during the reign of Mehmed IV in the WW1 he sided with the Germany( which lost the war and Then suddenly Fell apart🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄) And also The Turks fought fiercely and successfully defended the Gallipoli Peninsula against a massive Allied invasion in 1915-1916, but by 1918 defeat by invading British and Russian forces and an Arab revolt had combined to destroy the Ottoman economy and devastate its land, leaving some six million people dead and millions
Istanbul is one of my 3 favorite cities in the world that I have visited; been to 49 USA states and 56 countries. When I talk to people there discussing history, their view was they did not lose World War 1; they were just on the wrong side.
cult Book Sunan Ibn Majah Hadith No 537 It was narrated that 'Aishah said: "I often scraped it (semen) from the garment of the Messenger of Allah with my hand."
@@soleimanghaznavi2599 nice cult to follow Ibn 'Abbas said: "The Messenger of Allah [SAW] said: 'Whoever changes his religion, kill him.'" Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Reference : Sunan an-Nasa'i 4059 In-book reference : Book 37, Hadith 94 English translation : Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4064
@@vetabeta9890 Yea so does the British and French too but they don't have their own empires anymore except for a few overseas territories like the US has.
more like an idiot that literally called that to happen :D u can't be weak and act strong and face formidable enemies, if u had any political awareness, u would have just let them fight and weaken themselves .
A lion? Lions fight in small numbers against bigger numbers. Ottomans are just numbers. Winning by outnumbering the enemy. Turks are no lions, they are wolfs. Wolfs are opportunists and cunning
@@turkiyekapitalistpartisi You are showıng your manners, wıth this answer. You show your morality to every people. It SHOWS YOUR QUALİTY. I KNOW EXPECTING BARBARIANS TO SPEAK LIKE A HUMAN IS A EMPTY HOPE...
@@yorgundemokrat4841 Barbarian? Öcalan, whom you call barbarian, and those who follow him are the ones who plundered and massacred their own villages and people. We have forgotten neither Madımak nor the villages you plundered, the people you massacred and killed. We have not forgotten anyone and we will certainly ask for your account.
@Emirhan Bayraktar are you dumb ? In the first Balkan war a single ship defeated the whole Ottoman navy and they took Salonika. In the second Balkan war, Serbia would've fallen if Greece didn't attack Bulgaria
this is kind of misleading. They have reformed late but the acceptable time period in history. However, their priority was military because they were losing every war that they did (especially with Russians) so they couldn't form enough production facilities to compete with the west.
I couldn't see any top comments saying this, so. The austrians and russians always fought eachothers through their history, or from the 15-16th century. So I always find it ironic how they went down together. And also that Russia was historic allied to Austria, but cuz of the crimean war, not so much I guess. three giants all went down the sinking ship with their arch-nemesis (Russia had fought both France and UK fairly recent).
The fact that Constantinople was given back Turkey is profound to me. A historically greek/roman city and the capital of western civilization for a thousand years willingly handed back to the turks instead of given to greece.
I guess back then, Turks were ready to go to war again even after the independence war. Mustafa Kemal and his companions already drew the national borders for the R. of Turkey (which is called Misak-i Milli / National Oath) Threcountry was totally exhausted after the war but they stood still on the talks and never stepped back. One of my countrymen can put a light better to this topic but afaik, the talks in Lausanne were faltered at a point and Turks started to get ready for the war again. After that, the allies stepped back and accepted the terms.
They wouldn't give it to Greece, because if they did Greece would have been a superpower! They wanted to keep Constantinople as a neutral place amongst Western Europe and of course away from Russia.
Wrong. The main reason it was GIVEN to the Turks was because of Russian/British/French distrust of each other. Particularly France and Britain did not want Russia to take it or have influence in the Mediterranean and the Russians felt the same about the westerners. Having one side gain influence in the bosphorous would have meant war amongst each other and so they decided to agree to let the Turks have it and keep it "neutral". Make no mistake, if either Russia or the west wanted to occupy it, possibly given it to Greece and control it through Greece or outright annex it at the time, they could have. But it wasn't as important anymore since the discovery of other routes and the Americas and wasn't worth the effort or going to war over. But Russia especially could have taken it easily but that would have meant more war with the west.
There is nothing that the Turks should be ashamed or sad about. They built one of the greatest and longest empires in the world, but this is how things go ... Rise and growth, stability, prosperity, then stagnation, sooner or later fall. This thing would have happened. This is the nature of things, but what they should be proud of is the great legacy they left for human civilization.
I wouldnt call it a "great" legacy for human civilization. The Ottoman Empire focused mainly on war and the taxation of the people it occupied. Do you know what that Empire built in the places it conquered? Mosques and prisons. Thats it. Maybe a few hamams (Turkish public baths) here and there too but mainly Mosques and prisons. And from those Mosques, many of them were just converted Churches. The food is good though, although its not certain which ones were really theirs and which were just adopted from local cuisines like Arabic, Byzantine, Persian etc.
Although little mentioned in the video, it was the betrayal of the Arabs that dealt the biggest blow to the Ottoman Empire. I have not harbored anger at any nation we fought in or before the WW1, but the Arab world is still paying the price for their betrayal.
@@123soistes7 @123soistes Your comment made my day friend. I think that you mentioned 19. division not the 9th. As long as your source remains wikipedia, you will continue to make such erroneous and embarrassing comments. The 19th division is the division led by Mustafa Kemal. And If you read Mustafa Kemal's memories of Tripoli and Palestine before Gallipoli, you will find out what he thinks about the Arabs and you will understand that he would never command a squad of Arabs. There are 4 sources on the site where you copied your stupid claim. Hundreds of sources written about Gallipoli do not say a word about the Arabs. Even our primary schools teach enough history to deal with internet historians like you.
The Biggest betrayal was from the Monarchs itself , you can't blame them for wanting to get away from a corrupt and ignorant system refusing Reforms , they didn't understand what times they were living in , they thought it's still the middle ages.
You sound Racist, and what's maybe even worse; the ottomans are the ones that took away the Arabs lands, and when the Arabs fought back, you say they batrayed them, hypocritical😅. you weren't supposed to take it in the first place. Besides the ottomans in those place we're many sufis grave worshippers, and when Muhammed Ibn Abdul wahhab made the true Islam popular again, Allah gave him victory b@@klmxyz5520
The ottoman empire is one of the most underrated empires in the West I'm happy that we're finally learning how powerful this empire was because you TH-cam channels like this and others history is very important especially history that affects all of us today from Europe to Asia the Anatolia the steps the lavon Egypt North Africa West Africa England the North Sea empire India ... Listening in the United States alot of African-Americans think that they were the only slaves and then no one had it worse than them people are finally learning that's not true
There was no slavery in Ottoman empire in the understanding of Western mind, nothing close to what the African Americans experienced for hundreds of years, no physical torture, rapes, killings, lynchings etc. They mostly worked as house aides.
Their fate was sealed long before the Balkan Wars with the ideas of the ''nation-state'' that were promoted during the French Revolution. The Ottoman Empire was a religious state. That meant that all Muslims had the same rights no matter where they were from. Thus if you were a Christian, even if you were an ethnically Turk Christian, you still had less rights than all the Muslims, no matter if they were ethnically Turks or not. The ideas of the nation-state spread primarily in the Balkans were Christians were the majority. All these countries became independent in the 19th century. The Arabs and the other Muslims had fewer reasons to rebel since they had the same rights as the Turks and other Muslims. When Germany unified and took the role of Russia as the major threat to the Great Powers of Europe, the Ottoman Empire lost all of it's use for the British. The only reason that this empire was actually allowed to exists until 1922 was to contain the Russian expansionism in the Mediterranean. From the moment Russia became a secondary threat, the future of the Ottomans was sealed.
There is something good in everything. How do you know that the sultans after Mustafa would’ve been great? I mean Selim the second was a son of Suleiman the Magnificent, the best sultan. Yet he turned out to be one of the worst sultans. So there is no guarantee that Mustafa’s descendants would’ve have been just as good as Mustafa. Some great sultans came in history and were the descendants of Selim the second so maybe the empire wouldn’t have lasted as long as it had if Mustafa had become sultan.
@@numanbaran8607 why do you generalise all monarchies? I’m no Turk but Ulu Hakan Abdulhamid ii extended the empires life for another 30 years. He built railroads, hospitals, military academies, schools, as well as paying 90% of the empires debt until he was overthrown by the young Turks in 1908, a group who only brought destruction to the empire and surprise surprise have the same thinking like you, in that monarchies shouldn’t have all power, only for the young officers like Enver Pasha to do the same and fk the empire into death
2:07 - “or C.U.P.” Wow, wow, wow, calm down, just… ya know what, no questions asked… But jokes aside a great, easy-to-understand, and fun informational video. Keep up the great work! :D
Osman's dream from Caroline Finkel is a good book on the overview of the whole empire timeline but it was outdated in several aspects which are not unexpected as more studies have been published since the book publication. One of to date book on the overview of the empire late period is The Cambridge History of Turkey Volume 4. Turkey in the Modern World.
This was a very accurate presentation of Ottoman collapse. Just one little addition to it could be the enlargement of the Turkish map shown at the end, one more time (to reach today's borders) with annexation of Hatay - in the Syrian Border in 1938.
Good and brief video, nevertheless there is ONE BIG MAJOR MISUNDERSTANDING: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's war was NOT the "War of Independence"! Turkey was never a colony or under the rule of any foreign power. It was the WAR OF LIBERATION from allied occupation. So Ataturk liberated the state of Turkey from an illegitimate foreign occupation. Thats why the correct terminology must be Liberation over Independence. I suggest contacting to Turkish academics or reading some informative articles before proceeding to create such good video. Good content nevertheless.
@Ghost Ghost says who? "Ghost ghost"? Why don't you go back to your little shadow and hide yourself? Why bother commenting? You're a "ghost" and good ghosts are invisible
@Ghost Ghost He formed the Grand National Assembly and thus a functional government. He founded new Turkish Army and formed a General Staff and thus allowed a organised force to fight and liberate Turkey. He successfully commanded decisive battles such as Dumlupinar and won the war. He was opposed to the Young Turks and a long enemy of Enver Pasha and the CUP. He called them murderous cruel idiots in 1926. He was responsible for the Ottoman State dissolving, but the Ottomans were a sick disgusting dead empire that willingly surrendered to the Allies. He replaced it with a free, democratic and fair republic. Kressenstein, Falkenhayn and Cemal Pasha lost in the Syrian Front. Kemal came and won at the Battle of Aleppo successfully halting British Advances.
Ottoman is like the good old veteran of the team he was once the best in the game then he stopped following the upgrades and the meta and launched a ranked game
@@adwans1491During Ottoman era, there was peace at the North Africa, Middle East and Balkans over 500 years. Now, look at those lands where the British came to mandate! For 100 years, all you can is tear and blood! Is that remarkable enough?
1 part that was missed is why the arabs revolted. Because they were played by the British to revolt in exchange for power and have a Arab state which is now Saudi Arabia
It’s sad but this war on balkans have started always War wars since Illyrian/Rome/Byzantine /Otoman and lately waiting ww3 after ex-Yugoslavia fall apart.
The loss of balkan territories did hurt the ottomans bureaucrats more it did when they lost all other territories because the ruling elite overwelmingly where from the balkans.
@@turkishemir5735 well that's just wrong is so many ways as Turks is ethnicity in itself not a religion ! PLZ Stop Destroying History (JK) :D it's amazing to see that at least half of the Elite Rulers to Modern Ottoman Empire are from Balkans while the people who actually built the empire are not there anymore that gives you alot about the flexibility this empire had and how it lasted 600 years many would argue about it's expansions but it's the only thing that gave this empire another 200 years it was gonna end 2 Centuries if it weren't for Balkan nationalities saving it in all fronts Economically & Military and in turn heavily rewarded and were at the top of the empire .. it's one of the very few empires which favored Meritocracy in the hierarchal system above else excluding the last 100 years ( with the brief period of Sultan Abdelhamid II ).
they need to wash adult fluid 🤢🤮 Narrated `Aishah: I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet (ﷺ) and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them. Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 232 In-book reference : Book 4, Hadith 99
Any empire in the caucuses which existed always had the same type of territorial extender like Byzantine empire , Ottoman Empire like both empire contain the norther strip of Northern Africa ,israel/Palestine and Lebanon , turkey and some land in balkans
yeah good point. It seems that these are the natural borders of those empires. They dont go for more provinces, maybe also to italy (there are ottoman attempts on italy as well), but not more. They dont try something radical, like annexing iran or expanding to the southern regions of africa.
Turkey history timeline 🇹🇷 Göktük Khaganate - Oghuz Yabgu state - Great Seljuk 1071 war of Malazgirt 1071 First beylik period started. 1075 Rum Sultaned was faunded 1096 first crusade 1145-1149 second crusade 1189-1192 third crusade 1202 Battle of Basian 1220 Rum Sultaned golden age 1228 Rumi came Anatolia 1238 Yunus Emre was born 1245 war of Kösedağ 1243 Second beylik period 1248 Rum Sultaned civil war 1299 Ottoman beylik was faunded 1308 Rum Sultaned was fell 1336 Janissary quarry was established 1401 Ankara war 1402-1413 Ottoman civil war 1453 Conquered of Constantinapol 1448 III. Vlad was killed 1513 Piri Reis drew the world map 1517 Mamluk sultaned was fell 1523-1536 Ottoman golden age 1526 battle of Mohac 1529 First siege of Vienna 1538 Preveza naval battle 1550-1656 period of the reign of women 1558 Suleymaniye mosque was opened 1565-1579 Sokullu Mehmet Pasha period 1575 Selimiye mosque opened 1622 The first sultan who descended with a rebellion in the Ottoman Empire, Osman the Second 1656-1683 Köprülüler period 1683 Second siege of Vienna 1718-1730 Tulip age 1821-1832 Greek revolution 1826 II. Mahmut removed the Janissary Hearth 1828 Modern Turkish nationalism was born 1839 Tanzimat edict 1856 Islahat Edict 1876 first Constitutionalism 1908 second Constitutionalism 1912 first Balkan war 1913 second Balkan war 1915 Provisional Government of West Thrace was faunded 1915 Provisional Government of West Thrace was fell 1914-1918 WW1 1919-1923 Turkish war of Liberation 1920 The Assembly was established 1921 The first constitution has been accepted 1923 Ottoman was fell 1923 Republic of Turkey was faunded 1923-1938 Atatürk revolation 1924 İslamic calighate was finished 1924 Constitutional amendment 1928 The Arabic alphabet was removed and the Latin alphabet was adopted 1939 Hatay joined Turkey 1945 WW2 1946 Transition multi-party life 1950 Turkey, South Korea sent troops to fight in Korea 1960 military coup occored 1961 Constitutional amendment 1974 Cyprus operation 1980 military coup occored 1982 Constitutional amendment 1983 Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus was faunded 2014 President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Turkey was 2015 Aziz Sancar received the Nobel Prize 2020-2021 Corona 2020 Eastern Mediterranean problem
@@kormosta no, it is independence. You know there were puppet state of Ottoman Sultanate. Liberation is capturing states , Independence is the self-existence of states and their acceptance by other states.
@@loseyourself5023 Atatürk denen diktatörün ikinci dünya savaşıyla alakası yok, dönemin başkanı İsmet İnönü'nün denge politikası sayesinde girdik. Her fırsatta Mustafa Kemal'i övmeye yer aramanız çok utanç verici.
@@beratakceylan5546 İsmet İnönü’nün tarafsızlık politikası Atatürk döneminden beri vardı. Savaş 1939da başladı evet ama naziler Atatürk doneminde de yukseliyordu. ( bir daha başka insanlar değerlerine laf etme bence yoksa onlarda senim değerlerine laf edebilir )
@@loseyourself5023 evet evet ismet baya iyi iş çıkardı O kaos ortamında savaş halinde olan 2 süper gücü birbirinden ayıran toprağı elinde tutupda tarafsız kalmayı becermiş olması baya ilginç
Your videos are helpful. I am planning to take notes from this kind of videos and learn about world politics. Thank you for the video. I wish if I could meet you in person and talk over a cup of coffee.
The 3 pashas executed the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians in 1915 after the hamidian massacres in some 20 years earlier. Turkey refusing to sign treaty of sevres also denied the Republic of Armenia of its rightful territory.
While the Ottomans were fighting with Russia, they realized that there were Armenians in the Russian army. The Armenians took arms and money from the Russians and wrote a letter to Talat Pasha, who was the interior minister at that time, and wrote that if the Armenians were not given autonomy, they would get it by fighting. Talat Pasha told the Armenians that we live together equally. My assistant is an Armenian, this general is an Armenian. I cannot give you land. You will unite with Russia. Thereupon, the Armenians began to kill the Kurds and the Turks, Talat Pasha sent them to Syria.
3:41 the reasons for the Balkan states wanting independence are more complex.....but basically they wanted to get rid of the Ottomans after 3 1/2 centuries of oppression
1:24 Macedonia didn't exist at the time of the ottoman empire. 3:58 The balkan league aimed to liberate their peoples from ottoman rule. It was not only about Macedonia, but also about Epirus, Thrace, Thessaly, etc. 5:26 "romania ... borders of their new macedonian possessions" - romania had no macedonian possessions. It didn't participate in the first balkan war. no mention of the armenian genocide? I find this video quite informative but unprecise in the details.
"liberate" You can't liberate something that didn't exist.. the real word is to conquer Ottoman lands and create new countries there.. ofc you can fool many around the world because those countries themselves were created by the most powerful countries in propagandas (the West).. however if you read the real history far from the stupidity and lies of nationalism, you will realize that it was nothing but conquering Ottoman lands and provinces to create countries under the Western and Russian influence
@@branis96 If people consider themselves not free (as demonstrated by all the uprisings), you can talk about liberating them. I agree with you that some of it was conquering territory and there was pressure from western powers (the creation of Albania is the most flagrant example).
@Umer Farooq Turkey would've been another Iran if it weren't for Atatürk. Also, it was more of a reset rather than destruction. Fundamentalism turns a wonderful religion like islam into a 6th century Arabia.
The actual downfall begun with Selim 1..The quick defeat of memluks and mass arabic land gains effected the empire culturally and created instability. Overextension is a real thing !
Most ironic part is Ottomans and Habsburgs were rival for 300 years and they died while they fighting in same side of ww1
@Вхламинго They fought together in Galicia.
@@marybee1594 Thats why those people you speak about have there language and culture preserved today.
@@marybee1594 cringe
@@marybee1594 cringe
We would still fight for Germans
ironically when the Russian tzar called to divide the "sick man of Europe" before WW1 he did not know that the Russian Empire will fall before the Ottoman
Ottomans in fact caused the fall of Tzarist Russia by joining WW1 and holding the straits against the allies. Making them unable of sending aids to Russia.
@@arda213 Which does not make me happy. I have sentimental feelings towards the good old Russian Empire of the early 20th century. It was a European country with good economic prospects. And then everything ruined by communists, so many lives lost, not only in Russia, but all over the world in WW2 etc., we suffer from it to this day
@@omarsener8491 Of course not everything was OK. But instead of gradually improving things people wanted quick results and let radical leftists come to power. And of course the Tzarist regime carries much blame because it was so inadequate it got into WW1 for some stupid reason and could not recognize the threat from within. Suffice to say that the person who was in power, tzar himself could not protect his own family from being killed. Least he could do is send them to another country.
@@winterbalm It was actually exposed in 1926 that Russian Empire made ımperial plans over the Ottoman Empire. I mean, even if we did not declare war on them, they were want our land. Frankly, I have some sympathy for Nikolai. The man did not even intend to ascend the throne, but I think he wanted to be a son worthy of his father and became an autocrat. İf only the Russians and Turks had never fought with each other.
@@omarsener8491 so.
The weirdest part for me as a Bulgarian is that we battled the Ottomans in 1913, then became allies with them in 1914 to 1918. History sure has its surprises.
nations don't have constant friends or enemies, just constant intetests
Bulgarians are relatives of Turks after all
Turkic people who speak a Slavic language
The weirdest part of the Turks,Turks fighted against Russians over 400 years and after the Great war,Russians supported Mustapha Kemal and Turks
@@hasantan3852 Because they were not Russians anymore, they were communists, and couldn't care less who the Russian Empire or the Russian people loved or hated
@@winterbalm I'm pretty sure that the Bulgarians are slavic
@@ulfekenberg6463 Yes, officially at this time they are. But if you research their history you will find out that they descended from Bulgars in Central Asia
Ottoman Empire had no choice to be neutral in ww1, Britain already targeted Ottoman lands and empire tried to be ally with Britain even gave Cyprus as a gift but had no chance
It wasn't given as a gift...
Before 1878 Berlin conference, Ottomans gave the administration of Cyprus to the UK. Before world war 1 begins, UK declared annexation and Ottomans became silent. So it's a gift
@@daprodigy3353 britain rented it and atatürk thinked they will be neutral in the war but when the time comes they will attack.Sorry for my bad grammar
@@pyth4701 atatürk?! Wtf
there's no ottoman lands they are all stolen.
Like all empires , centuries to built , a few years to fall.
Not few years. Ottomans were in decline for about 200 years.
@@-Shadow__Rider- Yes, but they could have survived a bit longer if they were a neutral power.
@@arealphantom2859 not exactly
It was their last chance at any victory as the entente refused their
Alliance proposal
@@funinukeguy2804 Yes, but surely all out Swiss like neutrality could not just guarantee their independence but also give them leverage in trade deals with all major powers (like Iran) since the oil that was within the empire, they didn't need 'victory'
@@arealphantom2859 I meant likef they just let the war go they would have been politically isolated(maybe only with the soviets(If they even win))
And with many minorities and Imperial ambitions in the reigon the ottomans would have been destroyed in the coming years
At least by fighting they had a chance at a victory and relevance
It's pretty damn amazing that a state founded in the middle ages survived until the age of electricity
The Byzantine Empire lasted double the years the Ottomans had. So, not that impressive.
@@auto952 it lasted longer, but definitiv not double.
@@pyrusheliosmk2204 Here you are:
Byzantine: 330-1453 = 1,123 years
Ottoman: 1299-1922 = 623 years
1,123/623 = 1,8
So, 1,8 times aka almost double.
@@auto952 Byzantines didn't lasted 1123 years. You must count the 57 years of Latin rule.
@@pyrusheliosmk2204 Bro, 57 years will make no difference. And there were even Byzantine states that later took Constantinople back, so it didn't really fall.
Ottomans : i never thought i would die fighting side by side with a catholic
Austria-Hungary : what about side by side with a friend
Ottomans : aye , i think i can do that
That's is 100 % coming from lotr when Legolas speak to gimli
@@samuelmargueret9626 NOOOOOO WAYYYYYYY.......
Mongrels and heretics , how lovely.
cringe
@@firefromfire4429 who’s the heretic
7:06 Germany is winning! We should join!
Similarly in WW2, Germany is winning, luckily Turkey didn't join!
Kekw
Well that happens only once
@Вхламинго lol they were winning in the east... West not so much.
Turkey was like "Yeah.. we've seen this movie before"
:(
The fact that the Turks were not puppet after WW1 and fight for their independance is a win for sure.
Ottoman Empire collapsed midle 1700’s when imposible to outnumber
this + nationalist ideology is why you still see today Atatürk portraits in many businesses and households in Turkey
@UC2gK2vhREh8L2qc4dKqPlkQ LOL, that butthurtness.
The west tore ottomans apart. They could have done so much earlier too as the ottomans were weak for a very long time.
Well, the entante were busy with the bulk of their troops occupying Germany, so they couldn't force the Turkish partition. So you can thank Germany for that.
I find it very hard to believe that a small tribe smaller than a city state that ran away from the Mongol invasions survived until post ww1
They did not ran away from Mongols. It was not the cause to leave middle asia.
Yusuf they were escaping to anatolia from mongol tribes
@@Tekir-Kedi Selçukluya küçük kabile diyor ve tek sebep moğollar değildi ilk başta Orta Asya'yı terk etmek için.
@@yusufardagures5490 kayi boyundan bahsediyor ne selcuklusu kucuk bir oba buyuyup birinci dunya savasina kadar ayakta durmayi basardi diyor. sacma sapan cevaplar uydurmayin
@@Tekir-Kedi Kanka Osmanli kurulmadan kurulmadan önce Moğol impratorluğu zaten yıkılmıştı.
Altın Ordu ve İlhanlılar ortaya çıktı. İkiside müslüman oldu. Yani Doğu da hayla İlhanlılar vardı ama eski Moğol sorunu yoktu o zamanlarda Anadolu Selçuluklu hem o kadar gücsüz değildi, hem de İlhanlılar müslüman oldukları için eskisi gibi katliamlar olmuyordu. Selçuklu'nun yıkilması nın sebebi;
Devletin başinda onu yöneten kimsenin olmamasıydı.
The moment Italy invaded Libya balkan league declared war
@Kokoro Shimamura no they decalred war to the Ottomans during the war.
Their war with Italy ended on 18 October 1912. But the war with the Balkans started on 8 October 1912. Nice logic.
@Kokoro Shimamura no. They still keep fighting in 16 oct. İtaly has weak army. They cant go any further, they only has cost line. The other parts are controlled by Ottoman empire.
@Kokoro Shimamura also the other 3 is declared war to Ottoman empire after 3 second when Montenegro decalred war.
I just meant they were waiting for distraction
At the beginning of the 20th century, during the dawn of the era of automobiles/engines, "oil" became the most important thing and surpassed every other commodity produced in history such as gold-diamond-coal-iron-cotton-sugar etc.
No matter whom Ottomans joined with, Britain and France had focused on its lands in Arabia.
if arabs hadent revolted and empire had reformed the outcome woud have been very diffrent
@@abdurrahimberisha4821 thats a big "IF"...
@@abdurrahimberisha4821 Arabs revolted against the seculer government. As an Arab, I would do the same if that thing happened again. The only reason why turks and arabs lived together was religion and turks just changed the caliphate into germanic(fascist) secular country. This is unacceptable.
@@basedgigachadmuslim4544 where was your Allah when British and French colonized u lol
@@rohansensei5708hmmm, are you a christian? if you are, it will become a paradox lol.
At the beginning of World War I, the Ottoman Empire was victorious. It won in Gallipoli, Gaza and Kut al-Amara. And invaded Egypt and the Caucasus. But after the outbreak of the Arab Revolution, things changed. Half of the Ottoman forces were occupied, leading to the Ottoman Empire's eventual defeat.
@B Whit he just noted that! The reason for those victories was because of the Arab revolt. Siege of Jerusalem for example would had been won by the Turks if the Arabs wouldn’t had betrayed them
@B Whit Arabs revolted because they were provoked by their British masters, Brits sweet tongue charmed Arabs so they revolted and allied with UK. We were fighting against thousands of Arabs as we were also fighting against UK to defend our lands in Middle East.. its not a lie, thats how UK won in Middle East. Still we stopped their advance at Qut-ul Amare, we didn't let them invade Istanbul by winning Battle Of Gallipoli, which was one of the most bloodiest battle in WW1, its also known as being one of the battle which ''melee fight'' was heavily involved, altough Brits had higher technology compared to us, nor their technology and their body strenght saved them from being crushed, our technology wasn't big as their so we kicked them out with our arm's strenght so we actually blocked UK to reach their causes. However when our allies lost the war, we also lost it since we weren't able to fight against almost all of the world by ourselves lmao.
And ANZACS were just puppets tho, they got humiliated at Battle Of Gallipoli.. still they should be thankful to us cause of having that Battle against us. Cause after Gallipoli, Australians relaized they were used by UK and they should stand as a one nation, not as slave for UK.
@@rogerthat186 mongol have you ever asked yourself why we revolted ?!
@Kokoro Shimamura It wasn't less u dumb lmao
@B Whit Gallipoli Victory> Your whole Victory :))
What a shame “great britain” hahaha
Such a sad story .
From tents to superpower to a modern Empire to a decline .
Turks lost a empire but not their people.....turky is also one of the strongest countries soo they lost something but not everything like other empires
aisha time to take a bath with adult
Narrated 'Aisha:
The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).
Sahih Bukhari (6:298)
@Some Weeb the UK, France, austria, and russia all still own their homelands and the first 3 are highly developed so I feel like "lost almost everything" is an exaggeration
@@ALLAHwithdaughterALLAT what is happening?????😑😑😑
@Some Weeb but you contrasted turkey to them as if Turkey was in a better position when its more comparable to Russias situation then the UK, France, or Austria
Sultan Süleyman killed his innocent son Shahzade Mustafa( a great warrior, a leader, son of Mahidevran Sultan) and Sultan Selim got the throne by tricks ( son of Hürrem Sultan, alcholic)
This was the beginning of the big collapse..
That's true but it wouldn't be right to judge the past from a show.
I think Turks have a good relationship with.. alcohol (not ironic, just sth frequently observed)
@@geoousp There are statistics based on that of course but alcohol consumption is more about the person then followed by the culture.
@@kasadam85 Indeed statistics would be helpful. But the interesting thing has always been how cultural (widespread) sth is e.g. Cultural Anthropology. Individuals are being brought up n affected by a culture especially in the past. Without having researched the subject, i have started coming across men from Turkey n all of them seem to love alcohol. After many cases i stopped believing they were just individual cases.
@@geoousp Alcohol is great unless it's exaggerated anyway. I hope you're right.
I never thought my Great great great grandsons destroyed the ottoman after I and Suleiman extended it
lol
You can thank the young Turks for that.
So u created this account only to write this comment, right?
@@eliegeorges No
@АбдульзефирThe Ottomans did because during the reign of Mehmed IV in the WW1 he sided with the Germany( which lost the war and Then suddenly Fell apart🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄)
And also The Turks fought fiercely and successfully defended the Gallipoli Peninsula against a massive Allied invasion in 1915-1916, but by 1918 defeat by invading British and Russian forces and an Arab revolt had combined to destroy the Ottoman economy and devastate its land, leaving some six million people dead and millions
Istanbul is one of my 3 favorite cities in the world that I have visited; been to 49 USA states and 56 countries. When I talk to people there discussing history, their view was they did not lose World War 1; they were just on the wrong side.
What are your other 2 favourite cities?
@@umeriqbal5406 He said it.
cult
Book Sunan Ibn Majah
Hadith No 537
It was narrated that 'Aishah said:
"I often scraped it (semen) from the garment of the Messenger of Allah with my hand."
@@ALLAHwithdaughterALLAT Quit irrelevant Mr.Lucifer.
@@soleimanghaznavi2599 nice cult to follow
Ibn 'Abbas said:
"The Messenger of Allah [SAW] said: 'Whoever changes his religion, kill him.'"
Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
Reference : Sunan an-Nasa'i 4059
In-book reference : Book 37, Hadith 94
English translation : Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4064
It was so sad that our brothers was about to fail at that time. Those times were against all turkic people. Uzbeks and turks are brothers🇺🇿🇹🇷
Yes yoldaş, we are brothers for life. 🇺🇿🇹🇷
All Turks brother,not uzbek not turks
🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇷🇹🇲🇺🇿(🇵🇰🇱🇺🇲🇳)
I was glad that it has fallen.
@@juliomiguelgamba2119 i am not surprised that you are glad Ottomans fell. Because, you were so afraid of Ottomans.
at least the Ottomans lasted Longer than the Mongols British French and Spanish Empires The Russian Empire and the United States.
The US still exists
@@vetabeta9890 Yea so does the British and French too but they don't have their own empires anymore except for a few overseas territories like the US has.
The United States is not an empire.
@@sreyno01 It used to be.
Indeed
An Empire like a lion fighting 5 major enemies at one time.
more like an idiot that literally called that to happen :D
u can't be weak and act strong and face formidable enemies, if u had any political awareness, u would have just let them fight and weaken themselves .
Bu devlet Allahın adını yüksek tutmak için var idi
A lion?
Lions fight in small numbers against bigger numbers. Ottomans are just numbers. Winning by outnumbering the enemy.
Turks are no lions, they are wolfs. Wolfs are opportunists and cunning
@@nestormakepontos9700 well a lot of people think the ottoman empire was any good for anyone that they ruled.
Not lion fighting but a overconfidence which ditroyed them
As a Türk, thank you for tell history of us to other people.
AS A TURK YOU MUST BE ASHAMED
@@yorgundemokrat4841 As a Kurd, im son of a bitch.
@@turkiyekapitalistpartisi You are showıng your manners, wıth this answer. You show your morality to every people. It SHOWS YOUR QUALİTY. I KNOW EXPECTING BARBARIANS TO SPEAK LIKE A HUMAN IS A EMPTY HOPE...
@@yorgundemokrat4841 Barbarian? Öcalan, whom you call barbarian, and those who follow him are the ones who plundered and massacred their own villages and people. We have forgotten neither Madımak nor the villages you plundered, the people you massacred and killed. We have not forgotten anyone and we will certainly ask for your account.
@@yorgundemokrat4841 k*rd
Interesting fact:
The army of Bulgaria was bigger that the ones of Serbia ,Montenegro and Greece combined during the first balkan war.
Prussia of the Balkans. Too bad when they attacked Serbia in 1913, they got defeated by the Greeks in the south and then Romania joined as well
yes, but they didnt have a bigger navy, which only greece had one
Another fun fact: Bulgaria at the start of ww1 had a larger Army than the United States of America did
@Emirhan Bayraktar are you dumb ? In the first Balkan war a single ship defeated the whole Ottoman navy and they took Salonika. In the second Balkan war, Serbia would've fallen if Greece didn't attack Bulgaria
@@ottogreece6173 no if Romania and Turkey didn't attack Greece and Serbia would have fallen
If only the Ottomans reformed much earlier like the Japanese.
this is kind of misleading. They have reformed late but the acceptable time period in history. However, their priority was military because they were losing every war that they did (especially with Russians) so they couldn't form enough production facilities to compete with the west.
Which lead to their downfall (along with many other things)
Ottoman follow german style based on millitary and latter attaurk follow france stlye
Japan was lucky didn't have many rivals
That would be impossible, the European power would never allow that to happen
You did your homework well on a complicated period in Balkan history, nice work!
[Ottoman Empire falls]
Greeks, Bulgarians, Armenians, Albanians, Serbs, Romanians, Arabs, Assyrians, Kurds: *Oh no! Anyway...*
This was the balkan countries wet dream that came true.
Jesus Christ every comment is the most unoriginal shit
@@Daniel-fj9ik the so called dream was sped up by Turks themselves, in the 1908 revolution
Albanians were always together with the turks
🇦🇱❤🇹🇷
@@muhammedm9077 no
“If the world was an Empire it’s capital would be Istanbul“ -Napoleon Bonaparte
@@quraishvlogs3471 stfu
Constantinople
@@quraishvlogs3471 no Jerusalem
@@alcidesfigueira cope and seethe.
@@Leo7s1822 israelisoul...
Very emotional final words...Thanks for your effort.I love this channel.
Thank you so much for watching!
@@Knowledgia I watch the last part over and over again btw.Thank you.
Qormuyosun yaziyo armenia qenocid neden tesekur ediyosun bunlara!!!
@@МусаАлиев-м5ц Nere diyor?
@@kasadam85 7 :52 bak orda armenia soyiqrim yaziyo
Just started reading "a peace to end all peace" this video was a great primer thanks
How is everything now that you’ve read it?
I couldn't see any top comments saying this, so. The austrians and russians always fought eachothers through their history, or from the 15-16th century. So I always find it ironic how they went down together. And also that Russia was historic allied to Austria, but cuz of the crimean war, not so much I guess. three giants all went down the sinking ship with their arch-nemesis (Russia had fought both France and UK fairly recent).
Russia never did go down
I’m so blessed that my country has such a rich history, thank you for making this.
@Charbel El hachem Are you ok?
@Vf5fttft Drxrxtx if they really stole everything then people who couldn't avoid that from happening is even more pathetic, Lmao.
What history?Comparing to Syria and Iraq (Mesopotamia)? 1000 years ago there were no Turks in the middle east
@Vf5fttft Drxrxtx sob all day as you like.
@@syrianatheist817 History isn't only about middle east. What's your point? Lol
The fact that Constantinople was given back Turkey is profound to me. A historically greek/roman city and the capital of western civilization for a thousand years willingly handed back to the turks instead of given to greece.
I guess back then, Turks were ready to go to war again even after the independence war. Mustafa Kemal and his companions already drew the national borders for the R. of Turkey (which is called Misak-i Milli / National Oath) Threcountry was totally exhausted after the war but they stood still on the talks and never stepped back. One of my countrymen can put a light better to this topic but afaik, the talks in Lausanne were faltered at a point and Turks started to get ready for the war again. After that, the allies stepped back and accepted the terms.
It was not given. They just couldnt take it by force.
@@nazeemsultan123 they had already taken it by force. look up occupation of Constantinople 1918
They wouldn't give it to Greece, because if they did Greece would have been a superpower! They wanted to keep Constantinople as a neutral place amongst Western Europe and of course away from Russia.
Wrong. The main reason it was GIVEN to the Turks was because of Russian/British/French distrust of each other. Particularly France and Britain did not want Russia to take it or have influence in the Mediterranean and the Russians felt the same about the westerners. Having one side gain influence in the bosphorous would have meant war amongst each other and so they decided to agree to let the Turks have it and keep it "neutral".
Make no mistake, if either Russia or the west wanted to occupy it, possibly given it to Greece and control it through Greece or outright annex it at the time, they could have. But it wasn't as important anymore since the discovery of other routes and the Americas and wasn't worth the effort or going to war over. But Russia especially could have taken it easily but that would have meant more war with the west.
From a medieval superpower to a modern falling empire
Finally, it turned into the Supreme Republic that united all Anatolian Turkishness.
Democracy destroys empires.
@@kaanxdxsure buddy
There is nothing that the Turks should be ashamed or sad about. They built one of the greatest and longest empires in the world, but this is how things go ... Rise and growth, stability, prosperity, then stagnation, sooner or later fall. This thing would have happened. This is the nature of things, but what they should be proud of is the great legacy they left for human civilization.
er, well, there's the little matter of the Armenian genocide.
@@NewsRedial they'll deny it till rhe day they die, it's pathetic and disgusting
I wouldnt call it a "great" legacy for human civilization. The Ottoman Empire focused mainly on war and the taxation of the people it occupied. Do you know what that Empire built in the places it conquered? Mosques and prisons. Thats it. Maybe a few hamams (Turkish public baths) here and there too but mainly Mosques and prisons. And from those Mosques, many of them were just converted Churches. The food is good though, although its not certain which ones were really theirs and which were just adopted from local cuisines like Arabic, Byzantine, Persian etc.
@@moesirwan4307 never would have happend if they stayed out of the war
@@alexanderballa6152 don't make excuses
The fall of the ottoman empire aktually started in the 1800s, not 1900. Starting with the loss of its afrikan territories.
Hayi Ottoman began to collapse after the 1st siege of Vienna
@@selim2939 nope the 2nd
@@kubilaysahin5253 dude it started to collapse after the 1st vienna war and the 2nd vienna war made the situation worse
@@selim2939 no
@@kubilaysahin5253 I live in Turkey and I have a history class here and I'm studying history.
Although little mentioned in the video, it was the betrayal of the Arabs that dealt the biggest blow to the Ottoman Empire. I have not harbored anger at any nation we fought in or before the WW1, but the Arab world is still paying the price for their betrayal.
@@123soistes7 @123soistes Your comment made my day friend. I think that you mentioned 19. division not the 9th. As long as your source remains wikipedia, you will continue to make such erroneous and embarrassing comments. The 19th division is the division led by Mustafa Kemal. And If you read Mustafa Kemal's memories of Tripoli and Palestine before Gallipoli, you will find out what he thinks about the Arabs and you will understand that he would never command a squad of Arabs. There are 4 sources on the site where you copied your stupid claim. Hundreds of sources written about Gallipoli do not say a word about the Arabs. Even our primary schools teach enough history to deal with internet historians like you.
You mean how Ottomans betrayed Libya, but you expect loyalty from other peoples group lol
The Biggest betrayal was from the Monarchs itself , you can't blame them for wanting to get away from a corrupt and ignorant system refusing Reforms , they didn't understand what times they were living in , they thought it's still the middle ages.
You sound Racist, and what's maybe even worse; the ottomans are the ones that took away the Arabs lands, and when the Arabs fought back, you say they batrayed them, hypocritical😅.
you weren't supposed to take it in the first place.
Besides the ottomans in those place we're many sufis grave worshippers, and when Muhammed Ibn Abdul wahhab made the true Islam popular again, Allah gave him victory
b@@klmxyz5520
The ottoman empire is one of the most underrated empires in the West I'm happy that we're finally learning how powerful this empire was because you TH-cam channels like this and others history is very important especially history that affects all of us today from Europe to Asia the Anatolia the steps the lavon Egypt North Africa West Africa England the North Sea empire India ... Listening in the United States alot of African-Americans think that they were the only slaves and then no one had it worse than them people are finally learning that's not true
There was no slavery in Ottoman empire in the understanding of Western mind, nothing close to what the African Americans experienced for hundreds of years, no physical torture, rapes, killings, lynchings etc. They mostly worked as house aides.
Their fate was sealed long before the Balkan Wars with the ideas of the ''nation-state'' that were promoted during the French Revolution. The Ottoman Empire was a religious state. That meant that all Muslims had the same rights no matter where they were from. Thus if you were a Christian, even if you were an ethnically Turk Christian, you still had less rights than all the Muslims, no matter if they were ethnically Turks or not.
The ideas of the nation-state spread primarily in the Balkans were Christians were the majority. All these countries became independent in the 19th century. The Arabs and the other Muslims had fewer reasons to rebel since they had the same rights as the Turks and other Muslims.
When Germany unified and took the role of Russia as the major threat to the Great Powers of Europe, the Ottoman Empire lost all of it's use for the British. The only reason that this empire was actually allowed to exists until 1922 was to contain the Russian expansionism in the Mediterranean. From the moment Russia became a secondary threat, the future of the Ottomans was sealed.
Yes in regards to the nation state ideas you should check out the Turkish revolution of the Young Turks.
Define ''less rights'' Christian Turks lived peacefully and worked just like others
Lie deceitful lies spread by the enemies of the ottomans.
LiES
@@masyaf897 Delusional.
@@zackamor8043 Why would anyone wish to check out a war criminal organization's barbarism?
You're disgusting.
Good job man they are fantastic videos about history of ottoman empire
Continue you are the best👍
That was really interesting to watch, thank you for making this.
Love ottoman Empire from Hungary
Great video,what a history of empires, always repeat itself,over and over again!
So who’s next ? greeting From México 🇲🇽 Republic do Mexique.🇲🇽
Maybe a Mexican Empire
If Suleiman didn’t killed Mustafa, it could have last a little longer.
This is an amateurish and fairytale comment
There is something good in everything. How do you know that the sultans after Mustafa would’ve been great? I mean Selim the second was a son of Suleiman the Magnificent, the best sultan. Yet he turned out to be one of the worst sultans. So there is no guarantee that Mustafa’s descendants would’ve have been just as good as Mustafa. Some great sultans came in history and were the descendants of Selim the second so maybe the empire wouldn’t have lasted as long as it had if Mustafa had become sultan.
@@raysy_0620 This is the problem with monarchies! A republic with a benevolent dictator or an educated democracy is much better.
@@numanbaran8607 why do you generalise all monarchies? I’m no Turk but Ulu Hakan Abdulhamid ii extended the empires life for another 30 years. He built railroads, hospitals, military academies, schools, as well as paying 90% of the empires debt until he was overthrown by the young Turks in 1908, a group who only brought destruction to the empire and surprise surprise have the same thinking like you, in that monarchies shouldn’t have all power, only for the young officers like Enver Pasha to do the same and fk the empire into death
@@revivalist355 uh what’s a commeny?
7:40. as far as I know, the battle of Galipoli was fought on the European side of the Dardanelles, not on both sides. excluding the naval part.
The French landed on the Asian side at Kum Kale but almost all fighting was in the European side.
@@rahmiilkilic it was inconclusive at kum kale
Yeah, I'm pretty sure the British and ANZAC landed at Suvla Bay on the European side
2:07 - “or C.U.P.” Wow, wow, wow, calm down, just… ya know what, no questions asked…
But jokes aside a great, easy-to-understand, and fun informational video. Keep up the great work! :D
From Byzantine Empire to Yugoslavia a huge time period. Ottomans were one of the histories legends that no longer exists.
Osman's dream from Caroline Finkel is a good book on the overview of the whole empire timeline but it was outdated in several aspects which are not unexpected as more studies have been published since the book publication. One of to date book on the overview of the empire late period is The Cambridge History of Turkey Volume 4. Turkey in the Modern World.
Turkey in modern world has a shit economy...
Great work! You guys are my favorite Animated History channel!!
This was a very accurate presentation of Ottoman collapse. Just one little addition to it could be the enlargement of the Turkish map shown at the end, one more time (to reach today's borders) with annexation of Hatay - in the Syrian Border in 1938.
Well that is turkish history after the the ottoman collapse
Love Turkiye from Albania 🇦🇱❤🇹🇷
Love this channel history accountings. My day is better. :)
But me unfortunately i dont understand well
Would u help me to get it
Omgosh my closed caption subtitles are incorrectly translated in Vietnamese. I dont know, the Channel owner should correct that maybe?
Amazing video Knowledgia! as always
Many experts say that the Ottoman Empire would have fallen decades before WWI had the European countries agreed on that
It fallen when Turkey decided to Westernize.
More like exactly when arabs rebelled. Arabs ruined every chance of Ottoman empire surviving shame.
true at least from 1830's upwards
I am half Mongolian and half Turkish. Thanks for this video. 🇲🇳🇹🇷🇲🇳🇹🇷
Proper altaic
This channel's videos have only gotten better over time!
Nice presentation. Iam impressed. Well done... !
Wow what a great video! Love your videos! Keep it up! Greetings from Alanya :)
Thanks for this video.
We are stil there ⭐🌙
Good and brief video, nevertheless there is ONE BIG MAJOR MISUNDERSTANDING: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's war was NOT the "War of Independence"! Turkey was never a colony or under the rule of any foreign power. It was the WAR OF LIBERATION from allied occupation. So Ataturk liberated the state of Turkey from an illegitimate foreign occupation. Thats why the correct terminology must be Liberation over Independence. I suggest contacting to Turkish academics or reading some informative articles before proceeding to create such good video. Good content nevertheless.
@Ghost Ghost says who? "Ghost ghost"? Why don't you go back to your little shadow and hide yourself? Why bother commenting? You're a "ghost" and good ghosts are invisible
@Ghost Ghost Ah yes the sound of 0 education and research.
@Ghost Ghost He formed the Grand National Assembly and thus a functional government. He founded new Turkish Army and formed a General Staff and thus allowed a organised force to fight and liberate Turkey. He successfully commanded decisive battles such as Dumlupinar and won the war.
He was opposed to the Young Turks and a long enemy of Enver Pasha and the CUP. He called them murderous cruel idiots in 1926.
He was responsible for the Ottoman State dissolving, but the Ottomans were a sick disgusting dead empire that willingly surrendered to the Allies. He replaced it with a free, democratic and fair republic.
Kressenstein, Falkenhayn and Cemal Pasha lost in the Syrian Front. Kemal came and won at the Battle of Aleppo successfully halting British Advances.
Good point
nicely pointed! in Turkish we name it as "salvation war"
So detailed and insightful. Thanks a lot.
Ottoman is like the good old veteran of the team
he was once the best in the game then he stopped following the upgrades and the meta and launched a ranked game
Mom: "Is everything okay? I heard you sobbing."
Me: *wipes tears* "Yes, mom. Everything is ok."
Im just astonished you can afford to watch youtube videos with the state of Turkeys economy
@@shgalagalaa My subscription is ending this month. Good bye cruel world...
It is pretty remarkable that the Ottomans lasted 6 and a quarter centuries
In 1760 ottoman Empire collapsed what was NexT was just going to where mongols came from
Maybe they will last longer if they win world war 1.With massive oil in middle east.They can reform faster with lot of money
They can easly last longer ıf Abdulhamid the second can stay 10 more year.
How is this remarkable?
@@adwans1491During Ottoman era, there was peace at the North Africa, Middle East and Balkans over 500 years.
Now, look at those lands where the British came to mandate! For 100 years, all you can is tear and blood!
Is that remarkable enough?
Great video today keep it up your doing amazing job
It’s a shame that Greece didn’t take control of Constantinople. It was their city to begin with, they should have taken it back.
Gücü yeten gelsin alsın 🇹🇷
Well, now you know how the Palestinians feel.
awesome video!
1 part that was missed is why the arabs revolted. Because they were played by the British to revolt in exchange for power and have a Arab state which is now Saudi Arabia
It’s sad but this war on balkans have started always War wars since Illyrian/Rome/Byzantine /Otoman and lately waiting ww3 after ex-Yugoslavia fall apart.
@Dood yes it is. All the Illyrian names we still have them til this day
@@A1Ferati no you,evidence of ilyrian language doesn't exist
@ illyrians spreak Romans and Greeks.
Small Montenegro declared war against ottoman empire 😀 well hats down, thats a courage indeed 🤣 greetings to all positive people here
Lol much courage
@o in that situation they were allies, but if you go deeper through history of these small country you will notice how they are brave 😀
one cannon would’ve been enough to destroy montenegro
@@goldencalf8441 check history, even much bigger forces couldnt conquire this small nation
great content!
It failed to reform and the constant internal unrest as well as the exterior threats brought it down
The loss of balkan territories did hurt the ottomans bureaucrats more it did when they lost all other territories because the ruling elite overwelmingly where from the balkans.
The founders of the republic also originated from the Balkans.
@@turkishemir5735 you just destroyed history
@@valery2711 We call them White turks
@@turkishemir5735 well that's just wrong is so many ways as Turks is ethnicity in itself not a religion ! PLZ Stop Destroying History (JK) :D it's amazing to see that at least half of the Elite Rulers to Modern Ottoman Empire are from Balkans while the people who actually built the empire are not there anymore that gives you alot about the flexibility this empire had and how it lasted 600 years many would argue about it's expansions but it's the only thing that gave this empire another 200 years it was gonna end 2 Centuries if it weren't for Balkan nationalities saving it in all fronts Economically & Military and in turn heavily rewarded and were at the top of the empire .. it's one of the very few empires which favored Meritocracy in the hierarchal system above else excluding the last 100 years ( with the brief period of Sultan Abdelhamid II ).
I really love your videos about Ottoman Empire ! Greetings from Turkey by the way ❤️❤️❤️
He should mention all the crimes that the ottomans did against the Balkan populations
they need to wash adult fluid 🤢🤮
Narrated `Aishah:
I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet (ﷺ) and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 232
In-book reference : Book 4, Hadith 99
@@Ραφαήλ-ΝικόλαςΤσαλισκάνης why should he? European powers did more crimes against humanity than Ottomans. But nobody speaks about them.
@@ALLAHwithdaughterALLAT You virgin
@@ALLAHwithdaughterALLAT Whats disgusting about cleaning dirty clothes, would you just carry on wearing those dirty clothes?🤮🤮🤮
Your channel is awesome 🎉
What an honor. No one else in the world has fought and survived so many nations at the same time. God is with us.
France fought 8 countries at the same time in napoleon time. Still the ottomans empire was great.
There were all radical terrorists
but france wasnt weak @@khoushaltilluck1523
The last words and song is very good :')
Any empire in the caucuses which existed always had the same type of territorial extender like Byzantine empire , Ottoman Empire like both empire contain the norther strip of Northern Africa ,israel/Palestine and Lebanon , turkey and some land in balkans
yeah good point. It seems that these are the natural borders of those empires. They dont go for more provinces, maybe also to italy (there are ottoman attempts on italy as well), but not more. They dont try something radical, like annexing iran or expanding to the southern regions of africa.
@@metehanerkan7572
I mean Ottomans went all the way into Eritrea...
@@briaormead4239 yeah but they never populated there
What a fucking great video , it's simple your videos are just incredible i have litteraly no words .... Keep Going on dude
GENOCIDE HAPPENED in 1915
Along with the Armenian Genocide, a similar mention of the Greek Genocide would have been greatly appreciated.
who cares about greeks or armenians , ahahahahahaha
@@korayx752 Apparently not you lol xD
Thanks. You make history fun to learn.
Turkey history timeline 🇹🇷
Göktük Khaganate - Oghuz Yabgu state - Great Seljuk
1071 war of Malazgirt
1071 First beylik period started.
1075 Rum Sultaned was faunded
1096 first crusade
1145-1149 second crusade
1189-1192 third crusade
1202 Battle of Basian
1220 Rum Sultaned golden age
1228 Rumi came Anatolia
1238 Yunus Emre was born
1245 war of Kösedağ
1243 Second beylik period
1248 Rum Sultaned civil war
1299 Ottoman beylik was faunded
1308 Rum Sultaned was fell
1336 Janissary quarry was established
1401 Ankara war
1402-1413 Ottoman civil war
1453 Conquered of Constantinapol
1448 III. Vlad was killed
1513 Piri Reis drew the world map
1517 Mamluk sultaned was fell
1523-1536 Ottoman golden age
1526 battle of Mohac
1529 First siege of Vienna
1538 Preveza naval battle
1550-1656 period of the reign of women
1558 Suleymaniye mosque was opened
1565-1579 Sokullu Mehmet Pasha period
1575 Selimiye mosque opened
1622 The first sultan who descended with a rebellion in the Ottoman Empire, Osman the Second
1656-1683 Köprülüler period
1683 Second siege of Vienna
1718-1730 Tulip age
1821-1832 Greek revolution
1826 II. Mahmut removed the Janissary Hearth
1828 Modern Turkish nationalism was born
1839 Tanzimat edict
1856 Islahat Edict
1876 first Constitutionalism
1908 second Constitutionalism
1912 first Balkan war
1913 second Balkan war
1915 Provisional Government of West Thrace was faunded
1915 Provisional Government of West Thrace was fell
1914-1918 WW1
1919-1923 Turkish war of Liberation
1920 The Assembly was established
1921 The first constitution has been accepted
1923 Ottoman was fell
1923 Republic of Turkey was faunded
1923-1938 Atatürk revolation
1924 İslamic calighate was finished
1924 Constitutional amendment
1928 The Arabic alphabet was removed and the Latin alphabet was adopted
1939 Hatay joined Turkey
1945 WW2
1946 Transition multi-party life
1950 Turkey, South Korea sent troops to fight in Korea
1960 military coup occored
1961 Constitutional amendment
1974 Cyprus operation
1980 military coup occored
1982 Constitutional amendment
1983 Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus was faunded
2014 President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Turkey was
2015 Aziz Sancar received the Nobel Prize
2020-2021 Corona
2020 Eastern Mediterranean problem
500 year 5 war ok dude
@@tassfurkann hepsini yazamadım biraz daha eklerim.
You forgot greek revolution
''Cyprus Operation'' nice...
Missing a few Genocides...
If only sultan abdul hamid was there the ottomans would've never fell
Can you make a video about Turkish War Of Indepence?
Its Not indepence day,its liberation day
@@kormosta no, it is independence. You know there were puppet state of Ottoman Sultanate. Liberation is capturing states , Independence is the self-existence of states and their acceptance by other states.
@@syche1423 there was an independent government in ankara besides the puppet ottoman government.
I watched hard to understand
Thanks for great video!
Who ever decided to not to join side in World war 2 has saved Turkey millions of lives and resources..... MashAllah
Atatürk and İsmet İnönü
@@loseyourself5023 Atatürk denen diktatörün ikinci dünya savaşıyla alakası yok, dönemin başkanı İsmet İnönü'nün denge politikası sayesinde girdik. Her fırsatta Mustafa Kemal'i övmeye yer aramanız çok utanç verici.
@@beratakceylan5546 İsmet İnönü’nün tarafsızlık politikası Atatürk döneminden beri vardı. Savaş 1939da başladı evet ama naziler Atatürk doneminde de yukseliyordu. ( bir daha başka insanlar değerlerine laf etme bence yoksa onlarda senim değerlerine laf edebilir )
@@loseyourself5023 evet evet ismet baya iyi iş çıkardı
O kaos ortamında savaş halinde olan 2 süper gücü birbirinden ayıran toprağı elinde tutupda tarafsız kalmayı becermiş olması baya ilginç
@@GhostLeviathan_ evet her babayiğidin yapabileceği bir şey değil ne yazık ki bazı Türkler bu insanların değerini bilmiyor
It was impressive nobody can deny that at the height of its power!
And it may return 😳
@@lukelewis4698 don’t really see that one happening, not if it keeps angering its neighbors with such an aggressive foreign policy
It's pretty overated tbh
@@rickdalton7690 less overrated than Byzantium and Rome at least
@@bigbrothersinnerparty297 Nope not one bit
allahu akbar☝🏻☝🏿☝️
?
@@augustus5481 👉🏻🗡️???
@ white milkshake shut up🤟🏻🤷🏻♂️🤭🤣😎
@@PixelPulseQuests a horse sht in the street was that allah?
Your videos are helpful. I am planning to take notes from this kind of videos and learn about world politics. Thank you for the video. I wish if I could meet you in person and talk over a cup of coffee.
Atam sağolsun..🖤
Kemal mi?
@@Nothing-rp6ni ayn
@@MertYorulmaz0 tamam
@@Nothing-rp6ni ok bb
@@Nothing-rp6ni Kemal sevmeyen Türkiye'de yaşayan bir arap ya da Pakistanlısın herhalde
Lovely videos! Greetings from Greece!
May God bless our successor, Abdul Hamid, Osman, Suleiman al-Qanooni, and our Turkish brothers greet you from Iraq 🇮🇶🖤🇹🇷
Roaches.
❤❤❤
@@VergiliosSpatulasstfu and start eating your bananas 🍌🍌🍌🦍🦍🦍🦍🦍
❤❤❤
@@VergiliosSpatulasmad
I love your channel
🇹🇳🇹🇷 Tunisie & Turkey 🥰
The 3 pashas executed the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians in 1915 after the hamidian massacres in some 20 years earlier. Turkey refusing to sign treaty of sevres also denied the Republic of Armenia of its rightful territory.
While the Ottomans were fighting with Russia, they realized that there were Armenians in the Russian army. The Armenians took arms and money from the Russians and wrote a letter to Talat Pasha, who was the interior minister at that time, and wrote that if the Armenians were not given autonomy, they would get it by fighting. Talat Pasha told the Armenians that we live together equally. My assistant is an Armenian, this general is an Armenian. I cannot give you land. You will unite with Russia. Thereupon, the Armenians began to kill the Kurds and the Turks, Talat Pasha sent them to Syria.
@Blade dude dont reply..nobody likes them
@@CengizNokerthey didn’t just send them away, they killed 1.5 million people
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 🇹🇷
3:41 the reasons for the Balkan states wanting independence are more complex.....but basically they wanted to get rid of the Ottomans after 3 1/2 centuries of oppression
The Ottomans began to fall since the independence of Greece and the Egyptian army coup against them
1:24 Macedonia didn't exist at the time of the ottoman empire.
3:58 The balkan league aimed to liberate their peoples from ottoman rule. It was not only about Macedonia, but also about Epirus, Thrace, Thessaly, etc.
5:26 "romania ... borders of their new macedonian possessions" - romania had no macedonian possessions. It didn't participate in the first balkan war.
no mention of the armenian genocide?
I find this video quite informative but unprecise in the details.
"liberate"
You can't liberate something that didn't exist.. the real word is to conquer Ottoman lands and create new countries there.. ofc you can fool many around the world because those countries themselves were created by the most powerful countries in propagandas (the West).. however if you read the real history far from the stupidity and lies of nationalism, you will realize that it was nothing but conquering Ottoman lands and provinces to create countries under the Western and Russian influence
@@branis96 If people consider themselves not free (as demonstrated by all the uprisings), you can talk about liberating them. I agree with you that some of it was conquering territory and there was pressure from western powers (the creation of Albania is the most flagrant example).
Nobody calculated with greatest leader of 19th Century . Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Father of Turks.
20th*
@Umer Farooq He was the saviour, caliphate was a walking corpse. Being secular doesn't mean being anti islam.
@Umer Farooq Thats exactly Why we love him so much.Islam is cancer of the world and worst possible thing that can happen to a nation.
@Umer Farooq You can have your shariah Islam in Sahara desert. Turkey is not a place for radical Islamists.
@Umer Farooq Turkey would've been another Iran if it weren't for Atatürk. Also, it was more of a reset rather than destruction. Fundamentalism turns a wonderful religion like islam into a 6th century Arabia.
The exact period I was looking for and the exact information about the period haha thanks
The actual downfall begun with Selim 1..The quick defeat of memluks and mass arabic land gains effected the empire culturally and created instability. Overextension is a real thing !
America seems fine
Well, the lands in the balkans weren't the most stabe either. Still Mustafa Kemal won the war unlike the Ottoman Sultan so Respect