Short answer. Going on Crusade was too costly and time consuming, and it was very risky for European monarchs to travel hundreds of miles or more to fight strangers in far away lands when their immediate neighbors or rebellious nobles might take advantage of their absence.
@@systemreactive4092 Come testify! THERE is only one GOD and that is YHWH !! If you don't testify, you testify that Allah is just a made-up MICKYMAUSE FIGURE of Muhammad! Do you testify! Do you commit unforgivable SIN in ISLAM
@Jason Stark Then I guess U don't know about allauddin khilji,Tamiur, Mohamed ghazni,ghaznavi,aurengzebd,Hyder Ali,lodhi empire,tipu sultan. Who were force converting by sword, killing, looting temple's,massacreing Sikhs Hindus Christians etc.
@Jason Stark I’m the stupid brainwashed simpleton? There’s nothing to prove to you, you already got enough arguments on you that you cannot refute on this thread, the only simpleton here is the one absorbing what’s essentially nothing but a modern revisionist narrative! Hahaha!
@Jason Stark A typical BS response of Islamists just trying to coverup what Islam is,so stop justifying it here Nd reform that stupid religion or ideology.
Ironically they could have succeeded with the original plan because Alexandria was a welcoming city to the Christians and the Sultan of Egypt was a moron
@الظلام علي actually he wasn't so dumb true, but wasn't a war focused leader. He actually Al Adil I actually tried to make good reoations and trade with the crusader states to prevent another crusade. The point is that the crusaders would have Alexandria, wgich had a very large population of christians at the time, as an easy access point and they managed to sack Constantinople, which was the most defensible city in the world. Before that, Constantinople was considered almost impossible to capture since it's surrounded by sea on three sides and thick walls on one.
I dont think it was right to have called Saladin infamous, because, if you read about his life, he was probably one of the most generous person and kind-hearted and well respected ruler of that time.
He was not kind, he wouldn't and failed to pay the ransom for many Muslims in an agreement with Richard the lionhearted, many of his nobles and militia hated him for it and he found it increasingly harder to get men to defend forts and cities. go research more. He was a respected man in his own right...but be under no illusion, he was a tyrant in many ways
There is a difference between "Don't Commit murder" and "Don't fight Wars" by this logic all Soldiers are Murders, this was the logic that the Crusaders went with, does not make them good guys especially with all the Sacking but still.
@@Userafghany but it did say that should Islam be threatened by existential threat that they should use Violence as a last resort, this is the same with the Crusades But basically almost everytime it was fuel by Political and Strategic decision Instead of Moral or Even Religious ones at least for the Men of the cloth that called them (even though they partially believed it to be), the Boots on the ground though are completely sold on the idea usually.
I am from Mansoura, in my city. The Crusaders were defeated in the Seventh Crusade, and the house in which Louis IX lived during his captivity is still present today.
My mom is also from El Mansoura ( Ghannam family) and that city has defiinitly seen a lot of wars over the centuries thats why most of the population there is blonde/green or blue eyes !
I can proudly say: My nation(Turks) routed crusader army and captured their king in Mansurah Without Turks,there would be no islam in middle east and north africa
@@harzemsahtekin4441 it is true that (turks) have a lot of heroes including alb arselan (the brave lion) and ( i have a turkish roots my self just like a lot of people in egypt masr) .. But islam wouldn't ended by a military defat prevented by the mamlukes (most of the mamlukes were turkish not all of them) islam ende in a place when people stop belive in it .. Turks have make a great job spreading islam and fighting it is enemies but also some turks were traitores and work with the Mongols juat like some arabs and africans were traitores and worked with the enemy .. May allah keep our turkish brothers in good grace and protect them from their enemies ❤️❤️
It was unattainable target from the start, you just can't hold a city in the heart of an enemy land. Without the sea all these cities were easy to isolate and take one by one.
their target was wrong as well. Had they focused on liberating Anatolia from the turkish, the romans could focus their strenghth in the south against the Ayyubids, for I believe they could even make deals with arabs, who wished to have some peace as much as the romans.
I don’t necessarily think it’s that easy to say whether major campaigns like that are “lost” or “won” considering we have no ability to do an A/B test of the alternative. I personally think you would have seen a lot more Islamic conquest, that made it further into central and Western Europe during the Middle Ages if there were no crusade and no pushback against islamism. It’s kind of like when people try to say domino theory was disproven by Vietnam. Was it? I don’t think so....who knows where things would have gone without US intervention against soviet expansion in the third world. Similarly without the crusades Islam wouldn’t have stopped and been largely contained among Arabs in the Mid East. The ottomans made it to Vienna but that’s about as far as they got because of resistance. You can’t just declare something like the crusades a useless and unnecessary war. Tell me that the Muslim siege and conquest of Jerusalem was something to let slide when it happens to NYC, London or some major city that you care about and that effects your life and livelihoods. I think if people had more of the facts they’d understand that doing nothing about the siege of Jerusalem would be like the US doing nothing about 9/11 or Israel just taking Hamas rockets without retaliating. Sounds nice, but only if you’re a weak pussy that doesn’t deserve to have a nation let alone lead it!
Also when you don’t arbitrarily cut off the timeline of the fight for the holy land somewhere in the ottoman controlled 15th century or something then the west is currently winning the war for control of the holy land. Israel and Zionism were always as much about having a friend of the western powers in that region as it was about giving the Jewish people their ancestral homeland back. As a US citizen and non-Jewish Zionist that just saw islamists getting their asses kicked by US/Israeli weaponry...were definitely winning!
If one examines the facts without any bias, one will find that Salah Uddin was a just, courageous and fair man. While King Richard executed some 3,000 unarmed prisoners, Salah Uddin allowed his captives to be freed. He allowed Richard to return home when in reality he was in a position to annihilate whatever was left of Richard’s army. Furthermore, he allowed unarmed Christians to enter Jerusalem as a gesture of good will.
***////////⚠️⚠️ Allah's prophets are named after another GOD⚠️⚠️ Has Allah forgotten his name or is he just an IDOL!⚠️⚠️//////////**** Why is it the unforgivable sin in Islam to confess " there is only one God and this is YHWH"" The Name Jesus means------------- ***"YHWH SAVES "** Elijah means------------- --------------***" MY GOD IS YHWH"*** John means ----------------------------***" YHWH has been gracious""*** Zakariya means -----------------------***""YHWH has remembered""*** *********are all prophets according to the Quran***********
I have great respect for Saladin, but he could be just as ruthless as Richard at times. After the Battle of Hattin he executed almost all Templar, Hospitaller, and Turcopole prisoners while selling the Crusader foot soldiers into slavery. In addition, the Massacre at Ayyadieh, where Richard executed 3000 captives from Acre, was prompted in part because Richard believed that Saladin was stalling for time. In addition, Saladin executed all Christian prisoners in his hands after he saw Richard's actions at Ayyadieh. Don't get me wrong, Saladin is one of my favorite historical figures and one of the greatest leaders of the 12th century, but he did have his moments.
@@loganbagley7822 Christians prisoners in he's hand? Of course the mass killings of captured soldiers isn't the right exemple to follow, but could you provide more infos about those christians? (Soldiers or citizens, women or men, any children?). Thanks.
Yeah this isn’t really true… Saladin raped and pillaged Europeans and his own people. After the kingdom of Jerusalem was founded the Muslims found that the judgement of the Franks in their royal courts was more fair than their own sheiks
I studied Humanities in a Jerusalemite school, and we played a game once imitating the events of the 3rd crusade. I played Seif Adin, Salah Adin (mentioned in the video as Saadin)'s brother. It was fairly easy to demoralize and split apart the various crusaders. I can imagine the European infighting having doomed these campaigns more often than not.
1.Saladin did not sacked Jerusalem or Acre like you tried to give the impression at 4:00 . 2.First crusade was very well equipped as was the 7th crusade.
He also incorrectly portrayed that the 4th Crusade sack was due to poor negotiation on the Romans side. This is ridiculous, the Romans hated the crusaders pillaging their lands and invading their capital demanding a ridiculous deal from someone they exiled was always a plan for the Latins to exploit.
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva the Latin massacre was far more justified than the 4th Crusade but our Catholic textbooks sell it as they woke up one day unprovoked. The reality is Crusaders would r*pe and help themselves to any Greek countryside and would drunkenly bully merchants and trash the place just do the Latins could break their promises and blame the Byzantines for every failure in the crusades. Meanwhile Italian merchants are gouging they populous and putting all the locals mercilessly out of business and into poverty due lopsided trade deals which culminated in Latin leadership in Constantinople beating down the Greeks even more. There was a revolt when this reached boiling point and the Romans were sick of these foreigners ruining their lives and country while draining their economy by hosting the crusades under the lie of doing “God’s work”. Bohemond betrayed the Crusade for his own ambitions in the First and Fourth Crusade shows God was never in the front of the leader’s minds
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva the Romans had their Italian holdings forced to convert and many forced to flee from Latin/Papal intervention and that’s fine? Constantinople does the same thing and people.... lose their minds.... The Latin Massacre was an atrocity but it was the eviction from the Capital more than annihilation of an Empire.
1. Saladin actually planned to Sack Jerusalem, as that was a standard Practice at the time but his Brother talked him out of it so he basically asked for "Ransom" of the City's Latin Population. (Saladin was really average for the time was not as kind as he is portrayed.)
@@forickgrimaldus8301 Sadly, everyone, including many christian historians and Saladin's greatest enemy Richard I disagree with you. His brother talked him out of it? Can't believe the Bullshit you people can come up with. Sacking third Holiest city in Islam would tarnish his reputation. Whatever the reason, he didn't sack Jarusalem and that's way better than crusaders who sacked the city that was supposed to be the most holiest place for them.
@@stayrospaparunas3062 Reference to the main character of the first Assassin's Creed, Altair Ibn La'ahad (meaning "The bird, son of no-one, also Altair is the name of one of the stars in a constellation that I forgot the name)
Some of the most notable Muslim victories during the Crusades include: -Battle of Hattin (1187): This was a decisive victory for the Muslim forces led by Saladin against the Crusader army led by King Guy of Jerusalem. The Crusader army was largely destroyed, and many of its leaders were captured or killed, including King Guy. -Siege of Jerusalem (1187): Following the victory at the Battle of Hattin, Saladin was able to capture Jerusalem, which had been held by the Crusaders since 1099. The city was taken without bloodshed, and Saladin allowed the Christian inhabitants to leave unharmed. -Battle of Ain Jalut (1260): This was a major victory for the Muslim forces led by Qutuz and Baybars against the Mongol army led by Hulagu Khan. The Mongol advance into the Middle East was halted, and the Muslim forces were able to establish a more secure position in the region. These victories were significant in terms of the impact they had on the Crusades and the balance of power in the region. They also played a role in shaping the history of the Middle East and the relationship between the Muslim and Christian worlds.
The battle of Ain Julut was not led by Khulagu Khan, Khulegu left one of his generals(Khetbukha) with a vanguard of his army. It was a loss, but it was definitely not the majority of the mongol army and only a mere vanguard
I still.feel.that it was very tough for the crusaders to pull this against the mighty Muslims in those days...Muslims were prior victorious in those days only Mongols were able to put them away but again Muslims were very quick on their feet to regain what they lost it was their nature of somewhat never giving up
Muslims were past the prime by the time of crusades (I mean prior to the rise of the ottomans or the Timurids), the Abbassids and Cordoba were nowhere near the peak of the their power; even the seljuk turks may not have been as powerful as they were under alp Arslan
I think internal decisions in Europe. Eventually Kings realized they needed their best men to fight wars back at home and so they started pushing back on the crusaders. That's not to say they universally failed. They were able to reconquer what is modern day Spain and Portugal from the Moores and the Tectonic order had some success in Eastern European.
Truth is they failed miserably. The resultant push back = Ottomans ruling up to Venice Austria. Almohads ruling up to the border of France. If you then think, well we colonised more land since then. Then you definitely haven't considered the push back which will happen at some point. Best thing is to just live in peace. Treat everyone fairly and equally.
@@king_panda1387 it did. The visigods in the north of spain were only able to take back the iberian peninsula because crusades formed of many european countries helped them reconquer the territory. How else do you think three northern visigod kingdoms could take back a whole peninsula from enemies much superior to them?
Part of the failure of the crusades in the Holy Land was due to the sheer geographic distance that the Christians had to operate from, especially considering the logistical problems faced by medieval armies. Most of the crusaders hailed from faraway places like France, England, and the Holy Roman Empire. The Holy Land is much closer to the Muslim power bases of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and Arabia, which made things much easier for the Islamic armies.
Well, on the other hand, trying to convince the Armenians who had just fled the highlands after getting sacked, first by the Romans, and then by the Turks, to do their dirty work instead would have been a bigger recipe for disaster
Crusaders come from whole Europe even from Byzantium crusades even starts just to reestablished the old mighty Byzantine Empire on its knee which was scattered after arab victories after victories and the conquest of 2/3 of Rome. Thus Byzantine Empire aided crusaders everytime while crusaders state received constant knights,soilders,levy and goods from Italian states like Papal states and venice.
Also, because the Islamic Army defeated most of their rivals (ie. the Fatamids), and could move their troops to defend Jerusalem. They also had many Jewish mercenaries due to their tolerance of the Jews.
The ironic part ist that the raiding of Constantinople weakened the Byzantine Empire so much that it wasn't able to hold Anatolia anymore which led to the downfall of its empire and the rising of the Ottoman Empire a few hundred years later. The Ottomans later invaded Eastern Europe, reached Vienna and threatened all of Christendom before they were struck back by the united efforts of the remaining Christian countries.
What propaganda is this? The ottomans took over the balkans not eastern europe. Not to mention that Bulgarians,Serbians,Greeks,Croats,Bosnians and Albanians were all fighting against ottomans in the balkans since day 1. It was never going to last anyway.
in addition the first crusade was a surprise attack actually, this is why it was a success, catching the Muslim states at a glimpse of weakness, later they unified.
Philip II didn’t die in the Third Crusade, although he did return to France after the siege of Tyre. In fact, he both outlived Richard I and paved the way for France as we know it today by crushing both England and the Holy Roman Empire in 1214 during the Anglo-French War. He was given the title Augustus for his exceptional rule.
Another thing that contributed to the failure was the international struggles in Europe. These kingdoms weren't exactly united and had dynastic rivalries and disputes over successions. Things like crop failures, plagues were larger concerns for European kingdoms. Their home problems became larger problems than places further away from them.
Expecially because they were seen as invaders also by the Copts (egyptians Christians) that were well deal,as the jews, by Saladin, the catholics weren't so tolerant, being conquered by these crusaders wasn't as being conquered by,f.e., Alexander
@@anplusdre His point is that the Europeans had problems at home with which they had to deal with, taking their attention away from the Middle East and to Europe. He didn't say that Middle Easterners couldn't have similar problems.. If you're already living in the Middle East, you can deal with the problem while staying where you live. But for Europeans, these problems meant they had to look away from the Middle East and focus on their home soil.
@@finalfrontier001 honestly it was a miracle that the Kingdom of Jerusalem survived until the 13th century. To me it was a hella last stand against the Muslims in their home region
@@bokonoo77 imagine controlling somewhere 116 years not being able to convert the local people. That was the main problem with crusades they too savage and brutal and offered nothing return.
Politics and intrigue. The Crusaders hated each other almost as much as they hated their Saracen enemies. After the First Crusade, it was no longer about liberating the Holy Land, it was about establishing your own states and becoming kings. There's also other things as well, like bad decisions [Hattin] and bad luck or divine intervention [whichever you prefer] with the sudden death of Emperor Frederick.
Nur-ad-din Zangi Battles Siege of Edessa(1144) Siege of Edessa(1146) Battle of Bosra Siege of Damascus(1148) Siege of Harran Siege of Banyas Battle of Banias Siege of Ca’Ber Battle of Inab Battle of Lake Huleh Battle of Aintab Battle of Harim Crusader İnvasions Of Egypt Battle of El Babein Battle of Ba’rin Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Byzantine Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Antioch
@@jonas5490 It made the crusaders look like a hero and Saladan as a decent opponent. There was still certain propaganda language used to demonize Muslims.
It was something to be at for peasants. Better to go on a bloody adventure to the other side of the world than to live an entire life slaving away with backbreaking farm labour in the same place as a serf.
I had also read that some of the first crusades, whıch choose the land path through anatolia, were drastically weakened by the guerilla tactics driven by small groups of horseback archer turcomans. highly armored crusades are extremely slow, whereas horseback archers are indeed quite fast. european armies are typically infantary, whereas nomadic armies are always mounted. and yes, their high-tech bows and arrows can pierce armor.
Why do you say nomadic? The Middle East is where civilization and sedentarism started. Why do westerners employ this word willy nilly whenever they speak of Muslims?
@@nas8318 those nomadic Turkic people were not fully müslims back then. They used to be tengriists. Gradually they were converted to islam because, you know, semitic religions are contagious like a virus.
Matthew 5:43-44 says, "But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you". Violence will only cause more violence.
How can Christ be God and be ignorant on the Day of Resurrection, as he said {As for that day and that hour, no one knows about it, not even the angels who are in heaven. Nor the Son but the Father.” (Mark 13:32) Did Mary, peace be upon her, know what was in her womb while she was pregnant? He was her Creator. he is a prophet he is a prophet he is a prophet It is possible to ask whether Mary, peace be upon her, as you know, is pregnant. He who is in her .womb is her creator Hear what you say about this th-cam.com/video/XFaI0N6AcjM/w-d-xo.html ً Christ did not say that He is God, but they are the ones who fabricate lies. God sends messengers and He is the One who created everything and then to evil mankind. They made it the number of God three four five . 7- Christ denied his divinity and testified to them that he was just a prophet . when 10:40 Whoever receives you, accepts me, accepts me, accepts me, and accepts the one who sent me 10:41 Whoever greets a prophet in the name of a prophet is an ungodly prophet who accepts him, and whoever kisses a righteous man in the name of a righteous ungodly person accepts him. John 7:28 And Jesus called out while he was teaching in the training temple 7:29 I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me 8:26 I have many things to say and judge concerning you, but this one that he sent me is true, and what I heard from him, I say this to the world. 8:27 They did not understand that He was telling them about the Father {8:28} And Jesus said to them, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, you will understand that I do nothing of myself, but speak these things as the Father taught me.” 8:29 And he who sent me is with me, and the Father has not left me alone, because I always do what pleases him lok 24:19 And he told them what they are. They said: Jesus of Nazareth, a mighty prophet, did and said before God and all the people. This is what God Almighty said in the Qur’an God Almighty says 163 Indeed, We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], as We revealed to Noah and the prophets after him. And we revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, the Descendants, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the book [of Psalms]. 164 Of some messengers We have already told thee the story; of others We have not;- and to Moses Allah spoke direct;- 165 Messengers who gave good news as well as warning, that mankind, after (the coming) of the messengers, should have no plea against Allah: For Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise. 166 But Allah beareth witness that what He hath sent unto thee He hath sent from His (own) knowledge, and the angels bear witness: But enough is Allah for a witness. 167 Those who reject Faith and keep off (men) from the way of Allah, have verily strayed far, far away from the Path. 168 Those who reject Faith and do wrong,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any way- 169 Except the way of Hell, to dwell therein for ever. And this to Allah is easy. Please, I bear witness that there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and that Jesus is the servant of God and His Messenger, and His word which He bestowed upon Mary and a spirit from Him
@Silmarillion Tolkien they were. The white citizens of the new continents call themselves “natives” although they’ve been there only for few centuries. Why can’t the people I mentioned in my previous comment be natives too considering they lived there for a very long time.
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva the crusaders were Catholic Latins, not Orthodox Greeks, and Latindom had never been in the Middle East before the crusades.
King Richard had the men to take Jerusalem, he had to turn back because his brother John was threatening to steal his throne away from him in the kingdom of England
@@uvuvwevwevweosas4459 this Caucasian girl and her father in California found out they were related to Obummer through a “dna wheel chart’’ They decided to do one on Obummer only to discover that all former president are related except for the 8th president Martin van buren. How come you can’t find any videos of this on TH-cam? That’s because YT censored truth. Bitchute.com and altcensored.com thank me later.
@@kerriwilson7732 haha. Wrong, not all humans can be trace to Noah. 85% of humans are Blood RH positive. It’s origins can be trace from Africa to Asia. The other 15% is rh negative which was traced to the border of Spain and France. This blood type grew from 1% to 15% during Europeans colonization of other continents. That 15% bloodline could possibly be the ones who’s running this satanic world...
2:12 Wrong, Crusaders did not take Jerusalem from Seljuk Turks, but from the Fatimids, because in 1098 Fatimids attacked Jerusalem with catapults and after a 6-week siege, the Seljuk garrison withdrew from the city.
Nine hundred and twelve years have passed since the Europeans of northern and western Europe mounted the first crusade against the Muslims who were Arabs , Turks , Kurds and Afghan/Pathan. One siege will provide readers with the flavour of what happened in the 11th century AD. By November 1098 thousand of brutal frankish warriors ( called Franj by their victims ) accompanied by a motley of old men , women and children with the Star of Bethlehem shining in their eyes surrounded the city of Ma'arra on the banks of the Orentes river . The defenders were not an armed and trained Garrison.............. 11th December saw the situation become desperate as the Franj scaled the walls and the citizens took shelter in the tallest buildings . The town notable made contact with Behemond , the commander of the assailants . He promised to spare the lives of the citizens of ma'arra if they surrendered and laid down their arms . The desperate defenders agreed and waited all night in fear and trumbling. At dawn the Franj arrived and the carnage began . The Arab chroniclers wrote " For 3 days they put the people to the sword killing tens of thousands and taking many more prisoners " The Frank chronicler's account is spine chilling. Rudulph of Caen writes : " In Ma'arra our troops boiled pagan adults in cooking pots , they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled "............ On 13th January 1099 , hundreds of Franj bearing torches roamed the alley ways of Ma'arra setting every house alight . The city walls had already been dismantled stone by stone. Evidence : " Crusade still lives on " Deccan Chronicle ( Indian newspaper ) December - 2-2007 . Sunday suppliment page - 2 Author : Akhilesh mithal This is crusade. This barbarian atrocities still continuing in the name of first world war , second world war , colonial plundered , atomic bombings , dirty bomb, blockades , sanctions ...... Beware of this crusade. Always, This is brutal .
It also failed because of the sheer distance between Jerusalem and Europe. The amount of coordination in logistics, armies and many other components. Also, the Crudaders were fighting in unfamiliar lands.
The crusades would have been a success if they had started retaking Asia minor making its way down to Syria and finally in jerusalem. That is what the Macedonians and kind of what the Romans did and they were successful. But starting with the levant makes supplying the newly conquered cities difficult.
That's true, but if they did that they would give way too much power to the Byzantines, which wouldn't be a smart move, considering that they absolutely hated the Byzantines and even destroyed their capital.
@@strangergelt5182 By just establishing an alliance of crusader states in Asia Minor maybe during the 1st or 2nd crusade would greatly aid and supply the subsequent campaigns. They didn't necessarily have to give those lands back to the Byzantines as demonstrated by blatantly ignoring their oaths to the Byzantine emperor that they shall AID on taking back their rightful lands and not take it for themselves.
The Byzantines did capture a big part of Territories after the first crusade (komnenian restoration ) l think that the Byzantine wouldn't allow the crusades to capture Asia minor ( pillaging sacking etc major cities ) because it was territory of the eastern Roman empire some years later
@@julesbrags1661 Crusader states didn’t have the power to maintain states in Anatolia. This is the Komnenos Byzantine Empire we’re talking about who at their height Vassalized the principality of Antioch and Allied with Jerusalem. Their success and very existence relied on Byzantine Aid and support. It’s no surprise once the Byzantines got weak(and then destroyed) so did the Crusader States.
When the First Crusaders entered Anatolia, only the Anatolian part of the Great Seljuks faced them. They did not receive any help from the Great Seljuk Empire and the Danishmends Turks. They were also defeated with forces that were very few in number compared to the Crusaders. However, as a result of their knowledge of the crusaders and their war systems, with military aids taken from both the Great Seljuks and the Danishmends they succeeded in defeating the crusader armies in the crusade of 1101 and the 2nd crusade . If Barbarossa could had left Anatolia during the 3rd Crusade with his original army, he would have given great support to the crusaders. but he couldn't. In fact, despite his large army, the Seljuks had worn out his army before he drowned in the river. Anyway, after this failure expedition, no Crusader army face to go through Anatolia to Middle East. The biggest blow to the existence of the Crusaders was retaking of Jerusalem by the Kharawasmian Turks in 1244. The battle of Hattin and the battle of La Forbie coused the defeat of the Crusader army the extent of destruction. After Crusaders left from The Middle East, the expeditions we call the crusades, that is the Vatican itself led, were made in Europe. The last crusade in this sense was the Battle of Varna in 1444. First, the Christian armies came, took the some parts of Middle East and stayed for about 200 years. After that, Muslim Turks, on the other hand, took places in Europe as far as Germany and stayed in the region up to Vienna for 500 years. Now, everybody, where they're starting to act first, continues to live in that places. We are just trying to understand the structure, meaning, causes and consequences of ancient wars and campaigns. As humanity, we must find ways to prevent ancient wars from recurring in the modern world we live in and causing millions of innocent people to die.
The 4th crusade was the beginning of the end for Constantinople. It set back western civilization 300 years & allowed the Turks free rein in the former eastern Roman Empire.
Have you ever considered that maybe the Pope was not only behind that sacking in 1204, but the epic betrayal by Big Nick Ducas at Manzikert in 1071? The entire Christian East was toppled after just those 2 events!
Western civilization? Muslims translated Greek to Western Europe, so Greeks and Byzantines are not the West but East, Christianity is from the East! Nothing is from the West! Jesus, "your God" came from the East.
That does not apply here though. That's because that is not the definition of insanity, that is just what Albert Einstein was believed to have said at one point. Definition of insanity: "mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior." We can all just throw random quotes around: “I have tried 99 times and have failed, but on the 100th time came success.” - Albert Einstein "If at first you don't succeed try, try and try again." - Robert The Bruce “I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.” - Thomas Edison
@@markburke1396 It is first crusade worked cuz Muslims did not ahve garriosn were not aware of such organisation was comming their way. Crusadres cheatted in first after that Muslims have been ready ever since then.
During the Second Crusade, some 3,000 French knights were starved in southwest Anatolia after the war. The Seljuk soldiers, whom they fought yesterday, were dying of hunger, and the food and drink aid was given to 3,000 French knights who were left in the enemy's territory. The French soldiers changed their religion and became Muslims after a while.
I almost can’t watch these crusade videos as much as I love them. So frustrating and disappointing realizing how the Christian kingdoms let their own self interests and greed ruin their missions.
@Fazan ali all the more reason for the frustration by those who favor the crusaders’ cause. The first crusade was successful in large part to the enthusiasm and belief in the cause. Once greed, brutality and self interest entered the equation is when the effort was slighted. Of course the Muslim forces were indeed strong, they were United where as you can’t fully say the crusaders were. This is again hand in hand with the fact the crusaders had travel long distances from their homelands.
@@saqlainbhat5104 ugh, if only allies didn't betray the arabs and put their own lands... instead of hijaz, a wahabi islam and a radical kingdom nejd came, they support terrorists so westerns are the reason
The 1st crusade was not made by peasants as the video says. The People’s crusade (which came right before) was the one made by peasants and common folks. The 1st crusade was made mainly by knights, nobility, and men at arms.
Effectively the first wave was lead by Peter the ermit, a bunch of fanatical peasants that sacked and destroied a lot of countries, ending massacred somewhere (Anatolia? I don't remember)
"My Kingdom is not of this world " "I AM the Way the Truth and the Life " "Take up your cross and follow Me" .. unfortunately their swords were in the shape of a cross and without any accessible Bible barring selective hierarchical word of mouth, they followed the way of the sword.
King: "Hey Pope! I have a bunch of peasants who may go and fight. We just give them weapons" Pope: "And you have a good plan?" King: "Best plan ever. We just tell them to attack. What could go wrong?"
Yes,he won 17 battles,Saladin won 8 battles but he lost 8 battles 😂😂😂 Saladin was joke,Nur-ad-din real Warrior Nur-ad-din Zangi Battles Siege of Edessa(1144) Siege of Edessa(1146) Battle of Bosra Siege of Damascus(1148) Siege of Harran Siege of Banyas Battle of Banias Siege of Ca’Ber Battle of Inab Battle of Lake Huleh Battle of Aintab Battle of Harim Crusader İnvasions Of Egypt Battle of El Babein Battle of Ba’rin Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Byzantine Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Antioch
I read in a book once that one of the main reasons that the crusaders lost was because the muslim cavalry was so powerful, it wiped out most of their main troops, which influenced a lot of European countries to reinforce their cavalries and infantries.
Because they were 3rdWorld eddy yachts trying to invade the dominant power. Like North Korea trying to invade America. Now they had holy war juice, that got them a little. But in the end they failed.
The impression I have had is weight of numbers. Crusaders always had limited numbers where as the local populations were far more capable of recruiting more soldiers quickly. Crusaders had heavier Armour but, that wasn't enough.
How can Christ be God and be ignorant on the Day of Resurrection, as he said {As for that day and that hour, no one knows about it, not even the angels who are in heaven. Nor the Son but the Father.” (Mark 13:32) Did Mary, peace be upon her, know what was in her womb while she was pregnant? He was her Creator. he is a prophet he is a prophet he is a prophet It is possible to ask whether Mary, peace be upon her, as you know, is pregnant. He who is in her .womb is her creator Hear what you say about this th-cam.com/video/XFaI0N6AcjM/w-d-xo.html ً Christ did not say that He is God, but they are the ones who fabricate lies. God sends messengers and He is the One who created everything and then to evil mankind. They made it the number of God three four five . 7- Christ denied his divinity and testified to them that he was just a prophet . when 10:40 Whoever receives you, accepts me, accepts me, accepts me, and accepts the one who sent me 10:41 Whoever greets a prophet in the name of a prophet is an ungodly prophet who accepts him, and whoever kisses a righteous man in the name of a righteous ungodly person accepts him. John 7:28 And Jesus called out while he was teaching in the training temple 7:29 I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me 8:26 I have many things to say and judge concerning you, but this one that he sent me is true, and what I heard from him, I say this to the world. 8:27 They did not understand that He was telling them about the Father {8:28} And Jesus said to them, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, you will understand that I do nothing of myself, but speak these things as the Father taught me.” 8:29 And he who sent me is with me, and the Father has not left me alone, because I always do what pleases him lok 24:19 And he told them what they are. They said: Jesus of Nazareth, a mighty prophet, did and said before God and all the people. This is what God Almighty said in the Qur’an God Almighty says 163 Indeed, We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], as We revealed to Noah and the prophets after him. And we revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, the Descendants, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the book [of Psalms]. 164 Of some messengers We have already told thee the story; of others We have not;- and to Moses Allah spoke direct;- 165 Messengers who gave good news as well as warning, that mankind, after (the coming) of the messengers, should have no plea against Allah: For Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise. 166 But Allah beareth witness that what He hath sent unto thee He hath sent from His (own) knowledge, and the angels bear witness: But enough is Allah for a witness. 167 Those who reject Faith and keep off (men) from the way of Allah, have verily strayed far, far away from the Path. 168 Those who reject Faith and do wrong,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any way- 169 Except the way of Hell, to dwell therein for ever. And this to Allah is easy. Please, I bear witness that there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and that Jesus is the servant of God and His Messenger, and His word which He bestowed upon Mary and a spirit from Him
Before watching, I think the reason is the heavy armor, how someone wear so much clothes and metal in the middle east and expect to live not even win a war, the heat will burn them alive 😅. Second thing is the fact that they have to fight al the way many nations until finally reach Jerusalem. The third thing Muslim were highly advanced in medieval ear, science and knowledge in many aspect compared to the European at the time. Also there is many things considering tax and army and other.
@FutureIsDarkFeaturoid strongest how? Europeans didn't send massive armies to fight Crusades, mostly of them were peasants, artisans, nobleman's and their men...
As common knowledge has it, every subsequent sequel never manages to recapture the spirit of the original and usually ends up being just a cheap cash grab. As true for movies, as true for crusades.
The Venetians had trasported the Crudaders to Constantinople and since the Crudaders were unable to pay the prize of the transport requested, the Venetians profited from the looting of the city by the angry Crusaders to participate
wrong, actually and ironically the son of the disposed emperor Issac Angelos, Alexios Angelos asked the Crusaders to divert to Constantinople to restore his father and he would pay for the transport, when they went there and did sack the city, Alexios got assassinated, you got it half right since the crusaders did capture the city of Zara for Venice to repay for transport
Quran ALRADY told us they will take the land Till they cause fitnah in the land and we will enter the masjid just like how we did at the first time Quran 17:4-7
Saladin was a genius in his time and definitely several centuries ahead of time in terms of the way he ruled and his understanding of how to deal with the fragile and multi-ethnic situation in the Levant. He was well respected by the nobility in Europe and apparently he and King Richard sent gifts back and forth.
They failed because of their love for this world and hate for death while their enemies were people who had no desire for this world and had a love for death and martyrdom
How can Christ be God and be ignorant on the Day of Resurrection, as he said {As for that day and that hour, no one knows about it, not even the angels who are in heaven. Nor the Son but the Father.” (Mark 13:32) Did Mary, peace be upon her, know what was in her womb while she was pregnant? He was her Creator. he is a prophet he is a prophet he is a prophet It is possible to ask whether Mary, peace be upon her, as you know, is pregnant. He who is in her .womb is her creator Hear what you say about this th-cam.com/video/XFaI0N6AcjM/w-d-xo.html ً Christ did not say that He is God, but they are the ones who fabricate lies. God sends messengers and He is the One who created everything and then to evil mankind. They made it the number of God three four five . 7- Christ denied his divinity and testified to them that he was just a prophet . when 10:40 Whoever receives you, accepts me, accepts me, accepts me, and accepts the one who sent me 10:41 Whoever greets a prophet in the name of a prophet is an ungodly prophet who accepts him, and whoever kisses a righteous man in the name of a righteous ungodly person accepts him. John 7:28 And Jesus called out while he was teaching in the training temple 7:29 I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me 8:26 I have many things to say and judge concerning you, but this one that he sent me is true, and what I heard from him, I say this to the world. 8:27 They did not understand that He was telling them about the Father {8:28} And Jesus said to them, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, you will understand that I do nothing of myself, but speak these things as the Father taught me.” 8:29 And he who sent me is with me, and the Father has not left me alone, because I always do what pleases him lok 24:19 And he told them what they are. They said: Jesus of Nazareth, a mighty prophet, did and said before God and all the people. This is what God Almighty said in the Qur’an God Almighty says 163 Indeed, We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], as We revealed to Noah and the prophets after him. And we revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, the Descendants, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the book [of Psalms]. 164 Of some messengers We have already told thee the story; of others We have not;- and to Moses Allah spoke direct;- 165 Messengers who gave good news as well as warning, that mankind, after (the coming) of the messengers, should have no plea against Allah: For Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise. 166 But Allah beareth witness that what He hath sent unto thee He hath sent from His (own) knowledge, and the angels bear witness: But enough is Allah for a witness. 167 Those who reject Faith and keep off (men) from the way of Allah, have verily strayed far, far away from the Path. 168 Those who reject Faith and do wrong,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any way- 169 Except the way of Hell, to dwell therein for ever. And this to Allah is easy. Please, I bear witness that there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and that Jesus is the servant of God and His Messenger, and His word which He bestowed upon Mary and a spirit from Him
@ozymandias nero nulifidian "Jewish were closer to Christians" as if the Europeans never mistreated the Jews for 1000 yrs and also don't forget how Christian Germany killed millions of jews in ww2.
Perhaps the reason is also that Muslims are very strong because they have a real and just cause and they respect their religion and beliefs Unlike the Crusades, which were covered by the cross and the Christian religion, but had expansionist and purely economic goals.
it was simply the christians getting back at the muslims, who had done the same things the christians did to muslims during the crusades to christians before the crusades. do remember the levant was christian before the muslims forcefully took it and forced conversion. not condoning the crusades, but remember to look at things from the other perspective.
The real religious reason is only hatred between Catholics, Orthodox and Muslims just came in the way because they provided protection for the Orthodox living in the lands they conquered.
"Why did the crusade fail again?" Me every time when a crusade happens in Crusader Kings 3. I only donate some gold to the cause just not to get excommunicated. The AI is incredibly stupid, they split into multiple groups of only 1000 men and they get completely destroyed by death stacks of 20 000 enemy troops.
my brother from another mother, just send part of your troops and have lead the sieges on important places like Jerusalem, the score will count towards you and when the Crusade is won you get Jerusalem, don’t do it with the Pope’s troops because it will fail
i'm glad you at least mentioned the crusades of northern and eastern europe. The ONLY reason norse paganism is mainly associated with scandinavia is because it was the very last area of europe to be christianized. And up UNTIL the reign of Charlemagne it hadn't been VERY bloody. But the christianisation of northern europe was very much a barbaric and bloody one. And i'm not refering to the berzerkers. medieval christians proved to be far more willy to shed blood in the name of conversion, than any norse pagans were to defend it/keep it
It was just a stupid teenager king brainwashed by Jesuits to become a great soldier of Christendom. Instead of killing the moor as he wanred, he caused the decline of the Portuguese empire.
@@paki_baloch Did they? I pretty sure they capture the spice, slave, and silk trade from the muslim world with the conquest of the Indias and the spice isles of Malaka.
In the movie Kingdom of Heaven, Jeremy Irons character Tiberias said it best to Balian and to the audience, "First, I thought we were fighting for God. Then I realized we were fighting for wealth and land. I was ashamed."
Main reason was always pride and wealth both Muslims and Christians failed acting for their real norm and goals. Using God for their own selfish goals. Ive been researching more of both sides and how the leaders acted, you will be more dissapointed if you read more. But crusaders attacking and raiding Constantine is a next level dissapointment and shame I guess.
"Then I realized we were fighting for wealth and land." That's Every War in the history of Ever. "I was ashamed" More people should be. It might put an end to war.
@@timothybrown8424 It's not a question of fair, it's a question of fact. The causation doesn't vary. The narrative varies. The propaganda varies. The causation doesn't. The root causation is always the same, and that root is power. Land and wealth is the means to keep score.
No they were not. The crusades brought back transcripts from the middle east that later sparked the renaissance. The crusades also brought wealth to Europe cuz it was its only trade route with the East and this led to West Europe being as wealthy as muslim world in 13th century.
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva totally not equal, the first ( Louis ) attacked my country trying to invade it, and got defeated, the other ( the Last Emir of Granada ) was living in his home country for 800 years of his ancestors living there, and got expelled and the Muslims in Iberia was having the Famous Spanish Inquisitions ( Catholic killing and boiling ) as only they are not Catholics !! big difference bro !
@@00Abrams00 You invaded 'your' country Egypt and prosecuted Christians there. Saint Louis was trying to free a christian country invaded by muslims that were prosecuting them.
Wrong map at the beginneing of the video : Nicaea and all Anatolia were ruled by the seljuks and Nicaea was "delivered" during the 1st crusade. Only one christian king died during the 3rd crusade, the french king just returned to his country before the end of the crusade. They're not talking about crusades in Portugal and Baltic crusades that were very successfull ...
Crusades are the real reason of extremism and hatred between religions. They slaughtered every place where they heard Adhan (Muslim call for prayer). Meanwhile muslims showed mercy on them and their King. Remember Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam and Salahuddin Ayyubi they showed mercy meanwhile you killed everything that used to breath. I'm a muslim and my nation has a christian past and history. Christianity is a beautiful religion and we muslims respect it. Where I live in Kosovo we have no religious hate. But Christians call muslims terrorists and portray them in a bad way meanwhile Chiristians destroyed everything they had in the past and that is very bad.
@@kasadam85 it is mate the narrative of the video is more Christian friendly, anyways not a point to argue on just that the guy dismised all the atrocities commited by crusaders
Short answer. Going on Crusade was too costly and time consuming, and it was very risky for European monarchs to travel hundreds of miles or more to fight strangers in far away lands when their immediate neighbors or rebellious nobles might take advantage of their absence.
@@tomolo2619 you are quit crazy,aren't you?
@@tomolo2619 time to take your medication
@@tomolo2619 Allah has 99 names, and each names has their own meaning, I recommend you to silence if you don't know anything about Islam
@@systemreactive4092 Come testify! THERE is only one GOD and that is YHWH !!
If you don't testify, you testify that Allah is just a made-up MICKYMAUSE FIGURE of Muhammad!
Do you testify! Do you commit unforgivable SIN in ISLAM
@@tomolo2619 I heard that before btw whatever you said
8th Crusade be like : "Nah that Jerusalem is hard to capture, let's just take some random land in north Africa".
Trust me jerusalem will fall very easy now...
@Jason Stark Then I guess U don't know about allauddin khilji,Tamiur, Mohamed ghazni,ghaznavi,aurengzebd,Hyder Ali,lodhi empire,tipu sultan. Who were force converting by sword, killing, looting temple's,massacreing Sikhs Hindus Christians etc.
@Jason Stark
Lmao the entire religion of Islam is founded upon an aggressive “caliphate” slaughter doctrine please calm your revisionist bullshit down
@Jason Stark
I’m the stupid brainwashed simpleton? There’s nothing to prove to you, you already got enough arguments on you that you cannot refute on this thread, the only simpleton here is the one absorbing what’s essentially nothing but a modern revisionist narrative! Hahaha!
@Jason Stark A typical BS response of Islamists just trying to coverup what Islam is,so stop justifying it here Nd reform that stupid religion or ideology.
3rd Crusade: "Man, what a disaster! We need a new plan of attack."
4th Crusade: "I got an idea..."
If you can't beat the heathen then let's beat the heretic
disaster? well they reclaimed much of the lost territory, I wouldn't call this a disaster.
@Cris javier lol , it was the popes call
Ironically they could have succeeded with the original plan because Alexandria was a welcoming city to the Christians and the Sultan of Egypt was a moron
@الظلام علي actually he wasn't so dumb true, but wasn't a war focused leader. He actually Al Adil I actually tried to make good reoations and trade with the crusader states to prevent another crusade.
The point is that the crusaders would have Alexandria, wgich had a very large population of christians at the time, as an easy access point and they managed to sack Constantinople, which was the most defensible city in the world.
Before that, Constantinople was considered almost impossible to capture since it's surrounded by sea on three sides and thick walls on one.
I dont think it was right to have called Saladin infamous, because, if you read about his life, he was probably one of the most generous person and kind-hearted and well respected ruler of that time.
Chivalrous to put it shortly.
Infamous from the view of the crusaders probably
@@TWISTEDxJOKERII the christians and muslims alike respect saladin for his piety and generosity
He was not kind, he wouldn't and failed to pay the ransom for many Muslims in an agreement with Richard the lionhearted, many of his nobles and militia hated him for it and he found it increasingly harder to get men to defend forts and cities. go research more. He was a respected man in his own right...but be under no illusion, he was a tyrant in many ways
as a turk guys we are outstanding warrior your grantfathers knows our
I like how near the end when it zooms out there is a massive Mongol empire that just spawned out of nowhere
lol yea
It's all fun and games until Mongolia starts claiming China, Korea, Central Asia, parts of Russia and Iran
Yeppp and the Mamaluks defeated them too.. TOUGH and tactical warriors or mujahedeen 💯💯
Jack J no I don't see it
@@VAPOURIZE100 then mongols slaughter and conquered the Muslims. 😐
Bible said : "Love your enemies.."
Crusaders :"Not before the 9th invasion. "
Bible : "Turn the other cheek"
Crusader : "let's spread this sentence to our prey so they don't resist when we massacre them"
There is a difference between "Don't Commit murder" and "Don't fight Wars" by this logic all Soldiers are Murders, this was the logic that the Crusaders went with, does not make them good guys especially with all the Sacking but still.
Also Quran
@@Userafghany but it did say that should Islam be threatened by existential threat that they should use Violence as a last resort, this is the same with the Crusades But basically almost everytime it was fuel by Political and Strategic decision Instead of Moral or Even Religious ones at least for the Men of the cloth that called them (even though they partially believed it to be), the Boots on the ground though are completely sold on the idea usually.
@@forickgrimaldus8301 well said
I am from Mansoura, in my city. The Crusaders were defeated in the Seventh Crusade, and the house in which Louis IX lived during his captivity is still present today.
My mom is also from El Mansoura ( Ghannam family) and that city has defiinitly seen a lot of wars over the centuries thats why most of the population there is blonde/green or blue eyes !
The heroes of mansura have all of respect
I can proudly say:
My nation(Turks) routed crusader army and captured their king in Mansurah
Without Turks,there would be no islam in middle east and north africa
@@harzemsahtekin4441 it is true that (turks) have a lot of heroes including alb arselan (the brave lion) and ( i have a turkish roots my self just like a lot of people in egypt masr) .. But islam wouldn't ended by a military defat prevented by the mamlukes (most of the mamlukes were turkish not all of them) islam ende in a place when people stop belive in it .. Turks have make a great job spreading islam and fighting it is enemies but also some turks were traitores and work with the Mongols juat like some arabs and africans were traitores and worked with the enemy .. May allah keep our turkish brothers in good grace and protect them from their enemies ❤️❤️
I think that many people in your city still carrying some crusade gens in there blood. Such as white skin and blue eyes.
It was unattainable target from the start, you just can't hold a city in the heart of an enemy land. Without the sea all these cities were easy to isolate and take one by one.
their target was wrong as well. Had they focused on liberating Anatolia from the turkish, the romans could focus their strenghth in the south against the Ayyubids, for I believe they could even make deals with arabs, who wished to have some peace as much as the romans.
Also Don't forget their greed.they had a achance for peace and yet they f**ked around
Historians: you lost
Crusaders: I didn’t lose, I simply failed to win
Lmao Oversimplified America civil war reference
I don’t necessarily think it’s that easy to say whether major campaigns like that are “lost” or “won” considering we have no ability to do an A/B test of the alternative. I personally think you would have seen a lot more Islamic conquest, that made it further into central and Western Europe during the Middle Ages if there were no crusade and no pushback against islamism. It’s kind of like when people try to say domino theory was disproven by Vietnam. Was it? I don’t think so....who knows where things would have gone without US intervention against soviet expansion in the third world. Similarly without the crusades Islam wouldn’t have stopped and been largely contained among Arabs in the Mid East. The ottomans made it to Vienna but that’s about as far as they got because of resistance. You can’t just declare something like the crusades a useless and unnecessary war. Tell me that the Muslim siege and conquest of Jerusalem was something to let slide when it happens to NYC, London or some major city that you care about and that effects your life and livelihoods. I think if people had more of the facts they’d understand that doing nothing about the siege of Jerusalem would be like the US doing nothing about 9/11 or Israel just taking Hamas rockets without retaliating. Sounds nice, but only if you’re a weak pussy that doesn’t deserve to have a nation let alone lead it!
Also when you don’t arbitrarily cut off the timeline of the fight for the holy land somewhere in the ottoman controlled 15th century or something then the west is currently winning the war for control of the holy land. Israel and Zionism were always as much about having a friend of the western powers in that region as it was about giving the Jewish people their ancestral homeland back. As a US citizen and non-Jewish Zionist that just saw islamists getting their asses kicked by US/Israeli weaponry...were definitely winning!
@@logicalconceptofficial Agreed, Thanks to President Trump to recognise Jerusalem as capital of Israel. God bless Israel and America!
Saladin go brrrrr
Fun fact: there is a town in Belgium called "Turkish Village". This name given them cause they never send soldiers to crusades.
🤣🤣
Sure?
@Ash. Bl. no because we were in the way of crusades and mostly blocked big christian armies
😂😂😂😂
True love = the love of God!
*God himself went to the cross for you out of love for you as a human being*
Philippians 2:5-8
If one examines the facts without any bias, one will find that Salah Uddin was a just, courageous and fair man. While King Richard executed some 3,000 unarmed prisoners, Salah Uddin allowed his captives to be freed. He allowed Richard to return home when in reality he was in a position to annihilate whatever was left of Richard’s army. Furthermore, he allowed unarmed Christians to enter Jerusalem as a gesture of good will.
your comment is shit old) when somone is following islam as he should, he can't be wrong.
***////////⚠️⚠️ Allah's prophets are named after another GOD⚠️⚠️ Has Allah forgotten his name or is he just an IDOL!⚠️⚠️//////////****
Why is it the unforgivable sin in Islam to confess " there is only one God and this is YHWH""
The Name Jesus means------------- ***"YHWH SAVES "**
Elijah means------------- --------------***" MY GOD IS YHWH"***
John means ----------------------------***" YHWH has been gracious""***
Zakariya means -----------------------***""YHWH has remembered""***
*********are all prophets according to the Quran***********
I have great respect for Saladin, but he could be just as ruthless as Richard at times. After the Battle of Hattin he executed almost all Templar, Hospitaller, and Turcopole prisoners while selling the Crusader foot soldiers into slavery. In addition, the Massacre at Ayyadieh, where Richard executed 3000 captives from Acre, was prompted in part because Richard believed that Saladin was stalling for time. In addition, Saladin executed all Christian prisoners in his hands after he saw Richard's actions at Ayyadieh. Don't get me wrong, Saladin is one of my favorite historical figures and one of the greatest leaders of the 12th century, but he did have his moments.
@@loganbagley7822 Christians prisoners in he's hand? Of course the mass killings of captured soldiers isn't the right exemple to follow, but could you provide more infos about those christians? (Soldiers or citizens, women or men, any children?). Thanks.
Yeah this isn’t really true… Saladin raped and pillaged Europeans and his own people. After the kingdom of Jerusalem was founded the Muslims found that the judgement of the Franks in their royal courts was more fair than their own sheiks
I studied Humanities in a Jerusalemite school, and we played a game once imitating the events of the 3rd crusade. I played Seif Adin, Salah Adin (mentioned in the video as Saadin)'s brother. It was fairly easy to demoralize and split apart the various crusaders. I can imagine the European infighting having doomed these campaigns more often than not.
Liar
And Jerusalem is mostly european now
it's like when you are playing basketball and get it in from super far away and then try again 8 times but never replicate the success
bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhh
Lol
@@crescent8418 hey
@@micahistory hey
😳
1.Saladin did not sacked Jerusalem or Acre like you tried to give the impression at 4:00 .
2.First crusade was very well equipped as was the 7th crusade.
He also incorrectly portrayed that the 4th Crusade sack was due to poor negotiation on the Romans side. This is ridiculous, the Romans hated the crusaders pillaging their lands and invading their capital demanding a ridiculous deal from someone they exiled was always a plan for the Latins to exploit.
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva the Latin massacre was far more justified than the 4th Crusade but our Catholic textbooks sell it as they woke up one day unprovoked. The reality is Crusaders would r*pe and help themselves to any Greek countryside and would drunkenly bully merchants and trash the place just do the Latins could break their promises and blame the Byzantines for every failure in the crusades. Meanwhile Italian merchants are gouging they populous and putting all the locals mercilessly out of business and into poverty due lopsided trade deals which culminated in Latin leadership in Constantinople beating down the Greeks even more. There was a revolt when this reached boiling point and the Romans were sick of these foreigners ruining their lives and country while draining their economy by hosting the crusades under the lie of doing “God’s work”. Bohemond betrayed the Crusade for his own ambitions in the First and Fourth Crusade shows God was never in the front of the leader’s minds
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva the Romans had their Italian holdings forced to convert and many forced to flee from Latin/Papal intervention and that’s fine? Constantinople does the same thing and people.... lose their minds....
The Latin Massacre was an atrocity but it was the eviction from the Capital more than annihilation of an Empire.
1. Saladin actually planned to Sack Jerusalem, as that was a standard Practice at the time but his Brother talked him out of it so he basically asked for "Ransom" of the City's Latin Population. (Saladin was really average for the time was not as kind as he is portrayed.)
@@forickgrimaldus8301 Sadly, everyone, including many christian historians and Saladin's greatest enemy Richard I disagree with you. His brother talked him out of it? Can't believe the Bullshit you people can come up with. Sacking third Holiest city in Islam would tarnish his reputation. Whatever the reason, he didn't sack Jarusalem and that's way better than crusaders who sacked the city that was supposed to be the most holiest place for them.
Knowledgia: Why did the Crusades fail?
Me: Heh, because of Altaïr, obviously.
Yeahhhh
You are a man of culture as well
@@Knowledgia Ah, you flatter me! Keep up the good work!
Ποιός είναι ο Altaïr?
@@stayrospaparunas3062 Reference to the main character of the first Assassin's Creed, Altair Ibn La'ahad (meaning "The bird, son of no-one, also Altair is the name of one of the stars in a constellation that I forgot the name)
Some of the most notable Muslim victories during the Crusades include:
-Battle of Hattin (1187): This was a decisive victory for the Muslim forces led by Saladin against the Crusader army led by King Guy of Jerusalem. The Crusader army was largely destroyed, and many of its leaders were captured or killed, including King Guy.
-Siege of Jerusalem (1187): Following the victory at the Battle of Hattin, Saladin was able to capture Jerusalem, which had been held by the Crusaders since 1099. The city was taken without bloodshed, and Saladin allowed the Christian inhabitants to leave unharmed.
-Battle of Ain Jalut (1260): This was a major victory for the Muslim forces led by Qutuz and Baybars against the Mongol army led by Hulagu Khan. The Mongol advance into the Middle East was halted, and the Muslim forces were able to establish a more secure position in the region.
These victories were significant in terms of the impact they had on the Crusades and the balance of power in the region. They also played a role in shaping the history of the Middle East and the relationship between the Muslim and Christian worlds.
Battle of field of blood
Second battle of antioch
Battle of Damietta
The battle of Ain Julut was not led by Khulagu Khan, Khulegu left one of his generals(Khetbukha) with a vanguard of his army. It was a loss, but it was definitely not the majority of the mongol army and only a mere vanguard
Battle of la forbe
Hulugu turned back before the Mamluk victory against the Mongols. Had he not, a different outcome in the battle would be quite possible.
@@Demaybe1661 thing is, mongols came back and baibar still defeated them...
“Fate and history conspired to make me what I am today.” - Saladin
ha, I guess it was for killing and betraying all his family and friends.
@@mexicoxv2236 if he did that why the fuck dud he killed the guy who killed his sister
*The ETERNAL GOD would do anything for you!!*
Even out of love for you he went to the cross as a human!!
Philippians 2:5-8
@@jaimealvarez1596
Stop the cap 🧢🧢🧢
@Jaime Alvarez Salah Al dinn made that nobody
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Holy Blood
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Confusion Tendency
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Jerusalem Crusaders
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Constantinople is Breakable
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Muslim Wind
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Stone Sea
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Egyptian Ball Run
Christians' Bizarre Adventure: Tunision
😂😂😂man that's the best comment I found in this video
so this is where Vin Diesel gets his inspiration for the Fast n Furious franchise
Is this a jojo reference!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!
Ah I see. You are a man of culture as well.
No no no...
I still.feel.that it was very tough for the crusaders to pull this against the mighty Muslims in those days...Muslims were prior victorious in those days only Mongols were able to put them away but again Muslims were very quick on their feet to regain what they lost it was their nature of somewhat never giving up
it was words battles back then modern battle with guns thanks and jets we sufferd a lot of casualties from israel
Not israel we suffered because of disunity and will continue until we unite.
Didn’t the Mongols become muslims at the end? like 3/4 of their empire became muslims
Muslims were past the prime by the time of crusades (I mean prior to the rise of the ottomans or the Timurids), the Abbassids and Cordoba were nowhere near the peak of the their power; even the seljuk turks may not have been as powerful as they were under alp Arslan
*The ETERNAL GOD would do anything for you!! Even out of love for you he went to the cross as a human!!* Philippians 2:5-8
I think internal decisions in Europe. Eventually Kings realized they needed their best men to fight wars back at home and so they started pushing back on the crusaders. That's not to say they universally failed. They were able to reconquer what is modern day Spain and Portugal from the Moores and the Tectonic order had some success in Eastern European.
Erm think Spain and Portugal retaken had nothing to do with Crusaders.
Truth is they failed miserably. The resultant push back = Ottomans ruling up to Venice Austria. Almohads ruling up to the border of France.
If you then think, well we colonised more land since then. Then you definitely haven't considered the push back which will happen at some point.
Best thing is to just live in peace. Treat everyone fairly and equally.
@@king_panda1387 almohads?
@@king_panda1387 it did. The visigods in the north of spain were only able to take back the iberian peninsula because crusades formed of many european countries helped them reconquer the territory. How else do you think three northern visigod kingdoms could take back a whole peninsula from enemies much superior to them?
Coping mechanism
Part of the failure of the crusades in the Holy Land was due to the sheer geographic distance that the Christians had to operate from, especially considering the logistical problems faced by medieval armies. Most of the crusaders hailed from faraway places like France, England, and the Holy Roman Empire. The Holy Land is much closer to the Muslim power bases of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and Arabia, which made things much easier for the Islamic armies.
Well, on the other hand, trying to convince the Armenians who had just fled the highlands after getting sacked, first by the Romans, and then by the Turks, to do their dirty work instead would have been a bigger recipe for disaster
Crusaders come from whole Europe even from Byzantium crusades even starts just to reestablished the old mighty Byzantine Empire on its knee which was scattered after arab victories after victories and the conquest of 2/3 of Rome.
Thus Byzantine Empire aided crusaders everytime while crusaders state received constant knights,soilders,levy and goods from Italian states like Papal states and venice.
Muslims simply had stronger, better equiped armies than the backwards Europeans.
lach of unity
Also, because the Islamic Army defeated most of their rivals (ie. the Fatamids), and could move their troops to defend Jerusalem. They also had many Jewish mercenaries due to their tolerance of the Jews.
The ironic part ist that the raiding of Constantinople weakened the Byzantine Empire so much that it wasn't able to hold Anatolia anymore which led to the downfall of its empire and the rising of the Ottoman Empire a few hundred years later. The Ottomans later invaded Eastern Europe, reached Vienna and threatened all of Christendom before they were struck back by the united efforts of the remaining Christian countries.
The Polish king especially defeated the Ottomans.
It looks like western Europe will need saving again.
History really does repeat itself.
Vlad Tepes: Am I a joke to you?!
....even then, the problem was with catholic teritories, not christians!!!!
What propaganda is this? The ottomans took over the balkans not eastern europe. Not to mention that Bulgarians,Serbians,Greeks,Croats,Bosnians and Albanians were all fighting against ottomans in the balkans since day 1. It was never going to last anyway.
i think the sheer enthusiasm and momentum of the first one was just never matched again
The Baron's Crusade came very close but it lacked visible leadership.
Also the first one faced a extremely divided Muslim world. Some Muslim emirs gave presents to the crusaders for crushing their rivals.
@Çağlar Özgür Doesn’t matter anyways Christianity won
in addition the first crusade was a surprise attack actually, this is why it was a success, catching the Muslim states at a glimpse of weakness, later they unified.
@@TyranyFighterPatriot yeah
Thanks
Philip II didn’t die in the Third Crusade, although he did return to France after the siege of Tyre. In fact, he both outlived Richard I and paved the way for France as we know it today by crushing both England and the Holy Roman Empire in 1214 during the Anglo-French War. He was given the title Augustus for his exceptional rule.
Another thing that contributed to the failure was the international struggles in Europe. These kingdoms weren't exactly united and had dynastic rivalries and disputes over successions. Things like crop failures, plagues were larger concerns for European kingdoms. Their home problems became larger problems than places further away from them.
Lots of internal struggles between Nilfgaard, Redania, Kaedwin and Temeria.
you think that only occur on europe? you think the region the try to conquer not having such problem?
@@anplusdre No one said that
Expecially because they were seen as invaders also by the Copts (egyptians Christians) that were well deal,as the jews, by Saladin, the catholics weren't so tolerant, being conquered by these crusaders wasn't as being conquered by,f.e., Alexander
@@anplusdre His point is that the Europeans had problems at home with which they had to deal with, taking their attention away from the Middle East and to Europe. He didn't say that Middle Easterners couldn't have similar problems..
If you're already living in the Middle East, you can deal with the problem while staying where you live. But for Europeans, these problems meant they had to look away from the Middle East and focus on their home soil.
Sabaton had not been invented yet.
The first one succeeded though. Sequels rarely live up to the original.
@@endurovro First succeded cuz the Muslims were not ready. When they were ready never could win again.
@@finalfrontier001 honestly it was a miracle that the Kingdom of Jerusalem survived until the 13th century.
To me it was a hella last stand against the Muslims in their home region
@@bokonoo77 imagine controlling somewhere 116 years not being able to convert the local people. That was the main problem with crusades they too savage and brutal and offered nothing return.
@@finalfrontier001
savages? That is a very interesting thing to say from someone who praises pedophile..
As usual
Excellent video
Politics and intrigue. The Crusaders hated each other almost as much as they hated their Saracen enemies. After the First Crusade, it was no longer about liberating the Holy Land, it was about establishing your own states and becoming kings. There's also other things as well, like bad decisions [Hattin] and bad luck or divine intervention [whichever you prefer] with the sudden death of Emperor Frederick.
the kingdom established by the crusades was keep for a century, after that the times were different,
How did Frederick the death of a cruciferous war and what was his role in it and why Germany named the Sagbati Union of Soufati on his name
Cause James Bisonette didn't fund them.
😂😂 a fellow history matters subscriber i see
dammit,I hate it when I don't get an inside joke
@@who41683 I feel like an idiot,I already know him lol but haven't watched him in weeks
@@IDK-ue1gy its a good one too. Made me laugh.
@@zainkhan69420 👍
Nur-ad-din Zangi Battles
Siege of Edessa(1144)
Siege of Edessa(1146)
Battle of Bosra
Siege of Damascus(1148)
Siege of Harran
Siege of Banyas
Battle of Banias
Siege of Ca’Ber
Battle of Inab
Battle of Lake Huleh
Battle of Aintab
Battle of Harim
Crusader İnvasions Of Egypt
Battle of El Babein
Battle of Ba’rin
Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Byzantine
Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Antioch
Üste çıkmış
May Allahu subhanahu Place him in Highest paradise!
Roach spotted.
ما شاء الله
A great hero of Islam
May Allah grant him Jannah
@@jackhakken I see a skunk here, who find it hard to digest.
Crazy how Hollywood doesn't depict these losses
Hollywood has barely made any of these movies. What are you talking about? Go spew your propaganda somewhere else
Hollywood has depicted the crusades once , don't be silly now
Kingdom of heaven and its not one sided movie it showed saladin as a decent person
@@WhiteBoyTariq you certainly don't know tour history of Hollywood
@@jonas5490 It made the crusaders look like a hero and Saladan as a decent opponent. There was still certain propaganda language used to demonize Muslims.
Ah yes, Medieval Europe's favorite pastime.
Lol, is this from History Matters?
Lad's holiday in antioch fellas?
-20 year old English squire
@@Akirashiro407 Yup
It was a bad response to 300 years of Muslim conquest in Europe and beyond.
A well planned reconquest of Spain 300 years earlier, following a buffering of Byzantium to retake Turkey- Egypt.
We like to romanticize about these times but the truth is that they were some horrible times to be alive.
Yeah, like how 3 Kingdom romanticized by Chinese. It was cool until I learnt history was not written in ink but blood.
@AileDiablo What about the roaring 20's?
It was something to be at for peasants. Better to go on a bloody adventure to the other side of the world than to live an entire life slaving away with backbreaking farm labour in the same place as a serf.
@@kingstarscream320 too bad those peasants murdered, ravaged and raped their way through continental Europe just to go to the holy land.
@@AsiaMinor12 We’ve all had crazy summers while young
ITS THE FAMILY OF SALAHUDDIN AYUBI THAT HOLD THE KEYS TO YOUR HOLY CHURCHES IN JERUSALEM AND MAINTAIN THEM.
Stoopids
thanks for the great video :))
Man of never defeated.. Shalouddin Ayubi
Also Khaled Ibn Waleed
Not really richard the lionheart defeated saladin multiple times
But ibn walid certainly was undefeated
Salah Al-Din never lost a *war*
Khalid Ibn Al-Waleed never lost a *battle*
@@yousef.al-assaf salahadin lost all battles against the lionheart And Baldwin 4 a 16 year old boy king
The Crusades are one more example that conquering territory and holding on to that territory are very different tasks.
I had also read that some of the first crusades, whıch choose the land path through anatolia, were drastically weakened by the guerilla tactics driven by small groups of horseback archer turcomans. highly armored crusades are extremely slow, whereas horseback archers are indeed quite fast. european armies are typically infantary, whereas nomadic armies are always mounted. and yes, their high-tech bows and arrows can pierce armor.
You hear excuses. They lost fair and square.
Why do you say nomadic? The Middle East is where civilization and sedentarism started. Why do westerners employ this word willy nilly whenever they speak of Muslims?
@@nas8318 those nomadic Turkic people were not fully müslims back then. They used to be tengriists. Gradually they were converted to islam because, you know, semitic religions are contagious like a virus.
@@samboy90 you know the crusades were shit when the 4th one sacked a holy christian city lmao
well they won the first crusade
Matthew 5:43-44 says, "But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you". Violence will only cause more violence.
How can Christ be God and be ignorant on the Day of Resurrection, as he said {As for that day and that hour, no one knows about it, not even the angels who are in heaven. Nor the Son but the Father.” (Mark 13:32) Did Mary, peace be upon her, know what was in her womb while she was pregnant? He was her Creator. he is a prophet he is a prophet he is a prophet
It is possible to ask whether Mary, peace be upon her, as you know, is pregnant. He
who is in her .womb is her creator
Hear what you say about this
th-cam.com/video/XFaI0N6AcjM/w-d-xo.html
ً
Christ did not say that He is God, but they are the ones who fabricate lies. God sends messengers and He is the One who created everything and then to evil mankind. They made it the number of God three four five
.
7- Christ denied his divinity and testified to them that he was just a prophet
.
when
10:40 Whoever receives you, accepts me, accepts me, accepts me, and accepts the one who sent me
10:41 Whoever greets a prophet in the name of a prophet is an ungodly prophet who accepts him, and whoever kisses a righteous man in the name of a righteous ungodly person accepts him.
John
7:28 And Jesus called out while he was teaching in the training temple
7:29 I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me
8:26 I have many things to say and judge concerning you, but this one that he sent me is true, and what I heard from him, I say this to the world.
8:27 They did not understand that He was telling them about the Father
{8:28} And Jesus said to them, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, you will understand that I do nothing of myself, but speak these things as the Father taught me.”
8:29 And he who sent me is with me, and the Father has not left me alone, because I always do what pleases him
lok
24:19 And he told them what they are. They said: Jesus of Nazareth, a mighty prophet, did and said before God and all the people.
This is what God Almighty said in the Qur’an
God Almighty says
163
Indeed, We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], as We revealed to Noah and the prophets after him. And we revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, the Descendants, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the book [of Psalms].
164
Of some messengers We have already told thee the story; of others We have not;- and to Moses Allah spoke direct;-
165
Messengers who gave good news as well as warning, that mankind, after (the coming) of the messengers, should have no plea against Allah: For Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.
166
But Allah beareth witness that what He hath sent unto thee He hath sent from His (own) knowledge, and the angels bear witness: But enough is Allah for a witness.
167
Those who reject Faith and keep off (men) from the way of Allah, have verily strayed far, far away from the Path.
168
Those who reject Faith and do wrong,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any
way-
169
Except the way of Hell, to dwell therein for ever. And this to Allah is easy.
Please, I bear witness that there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and that Jesus is the servant of God and His Messenger, and His word which He bestowed upon Mary and a spirit from Him
3rd crusade: we will take constainople
Turks: ok Jerusalem is mine
Turks: *conquers Jerusalem and constainople*
*4th crusade
@@aliadilegelen2736 wtf!!
@@aliadilegelen2736 lol
Turks will one day spread genes and conquer world 🐺
@@thesecond4767 keep dreaming
What made you think that Saladin was "infamous"?
@Silmarillion Tolkien so killing local Muslims & orthodox and taking their land, which never belonged to you, make you a righteous person?
@Silmarillion Tolkien they were.
The white citizens of the new continents call themselves “natives” although they’ve been there only for few centuries.
Why can’t the people I mentioned in my previous comment be natives too considering they lived there for a very long time.
@Silmarillion Tolkien why weren't they native . They were in the arabian peninsula. They were arabs so of course they are native
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva the crusaders were Catholic Latins, not Orthodox Greeks, and Latindom had never been in the Middle East before the crusades.
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva salauddin Ayubbi just destroyed the main crusader army . When they surrendered they were let go and not harmed
King Richard had the men to take Jerusalem, he had to turn back because his brother John was threatening to steal his throne away from him in the kingdom of England
Every United States president are related and their bloodlines traces back to prince John and his witchcraft mother.
@@aintyourfriend5734 every person in the world is related & their bloodlines trace through Noah.
@@aintyourfriend5734 Obama lol ?
@@uvuvwevwevweosas4459 this Caucasian girl and her father in California found out they were related to Obummer through a “dna wheel chart’’
They decided to do one on Obummer only to discover that all former president are related except for the 8th president Martin van buren. How come you can’t find any videos of this on TH-cam? That’s because YT censored truth. Bitchute.com and altcensored.com thank me later.
@@kerriwilson7732 haha. Wrong, not all humans can be trace to Noah. 85% of humans are Blood RH positive. It’s origins can be trace from Africa to Asia. The other 15% is rh negative which was traced to the border of Spain and France. This blood type grew from 1% to 15% during Europeans colonization of other continents. That 15% bloodline could possibly be the ones who’s running this satanic world...
(First crusade) 1:16
(Second crusade) 2:45
(Third crusade) 3:40
(Fourth crusade) 5:04
(Fith crusade) 7:38
(Sixth crusade) 8:26
(Seventh crusade) 9:45
(Eighth crusade) 10:32
(Ninth crusade) 11:43
2:12 Wrong, Crusaders did not take Jerusalem from Seljuk Turks, but from the Fatimids, because in 1098 Fatimids attacked Jerusalem with catapults and after a 6-week siege, the Seljuk garrison withdrew from the city.
Wait a second, you didn’t mention the crusades against the Ottomans, which by the way ended up in disastrous failures to
He also forgot to mention the Albigensian Crusade, which was somewhat a success
or the crusades launched by USA in Iraq and Afghanistan.
@@kadduponka3565 🤣🤣🤣 where are them now ? Shhh Taliban may kill you for this 😂
@@kadduponka3565 Also the crusade that ultimately installed a Western military base which is called Israel
there were also the northern crusades
King Edward I: Ninth time’s the charm!
The rest of the Western Christian world: *Aw, shit. Here we go again…*
Eastern Roman Empire seeing a bunch of crusaders outside the gates of Constantinople:
*ahh shit. here we go again....*
Nine hundred and twelve years have passed since the Europeans of northern and western Europe mounted the first crusade against the Muslims who were Arabs , Turks , Kurds and Afghan/Pathan.
One siege will provide readers with the flavour of what happened in the 11th century AD.
By November 1098 thousand of brutal frankish warriors ( called Franj by their victims ) accompanied by a motley of old men , women and children with the Star of Bethlehem shining in their eyes surrounded the city of Ma'arra on the banks of the Orentes river . The defenders were not an armed and trained Garrison.............. 11th December saw the situation become desperate as the Franj scaled the walls and the citizens took shelter in the tallest buildings . The town notable made contact with Behemond , the commander of the assailants . He promised to spare the lives of the citizens of ma'arra if they surrendered and laid down their arms .
The desperate defenders agreed and waited all night in fear and trumbling. At dawn the Franj arrived and the carnage began . The Arab chroniclers wrote
" For 3 days they put the people to the sword killing tens of thousands and taking many more prisoners "
The Frank chronicler's account is spine chilling. Rudulph of Caen writes :
" In Ma'arra our troops boiled pagan adults in cooking pots , they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled "............
On 13th January 1099 , hundreds of Franj bearing torches roamed the alley ways of Ma'arra setting every house alight . The city walls had already been dismantled stone by stone.
Evidence : " Crusade still lives on "
Deccan Chronicle ( Indian newspaper ) December - 2-2007 .
Sunday suppliment page - 2
Author : Akhilesh mithal
This is crusade. This barbarian atrocities still continuing in the name of first world war , second world war , colonial plundered , atomic bombings , dirty bomb, blockades , sanctions ......
Beware of this crusade. Always, This is brutal .
Crusades never getting old since they started
such cool name.
Selahaddin eyyübi:Lmao no.
😂😂
Us army is a coward just like their ancestors
It also failed because of the sheer distance between Jerusalem and Europe. The amount of coordination in logistics, armies and many other components. Also, the Crudaders were fighting in unfamiliar lands.
it failed because they couldn’t hold it
@@johnnyboy3410 pretty hard to hold a city in the heart of a giant empire, which to boot, is thousands of kilometers away
The crusades would have been a success if they had started retaking Asia minor making its way down to Syria and finally in jerusalem. That is what the Macedonians and kind of what the Romans did and they were successful.
But starting with the levant makes supplying the newly conquered cities difficult.
That's true, but if they did that they would give way too much power to the Byzantines, which wouldn't be a smart move, considering that they absolutely hated the Byzantines and even destroyed their capital.
@@strangergelt5182
By just establishing an alliance of crusader states in Asia Minor maybe during the 1st or 2nd crusade would greatly aid and supply the subsequent campaigns. They didn't necessarily have to give those lands back to the Byzantines as demonstrated by blatantly ignoring their oaths to the Byzantine emperor that they shall AID on taking back their rightful lands and not take it for themselves.
@@julesbrags1661 Yeah, that's actually true. I agree
The Byzantines did capture a big part of Territories after the first crusade (komnenian restoration ) l think that the Byzantine wouldn't allow the crusades to capture Asia minor ( pillaging sacking etc major cities ) because it was territory of the eastern Roman empire some years later
@@julesbrags1661 Crusader states didn’t have the power to maintain states in Anatolia. This is the Komnenos Byzantine Empire we’re talking about who at their height Vassalized the principality of Antioch and Allied with Jerusalem. Their success and very existence relied on Byzantine Aid and support.
It’s no surprise once the Byzantines got weak(and then destroyed) so did the Crusader States.
When the First Crusaders entered Anatolia, only the Anatolian part of the Great Seljuks faced them. They did not receive any help from the Great Seljuk Empire and the Danishmends Turks. They were also defeated with forces that were very few in number compared to the Crusaders. However, as a result of their knowledge of the crusaders and their war systems, with military aids taken from both the Great Seljuks and the Danishmends they succeeded in defeating the crusader armies in the crusade of 1101 and the 2nd crusade . If Barbarossa could had left Anatolia during the 3rd Crusade with his original army, he would have given great support to the crusaders. but he couldn't. In fact, despite his large army, the Seljuks had worn out his army before he drowned in the river. Anyway, after this failure expedition, no Crusader army face to go through Anatolia to Middle East.
The biggest blow to the existence of the Crusaders was retaking of Jerusalem by the Kharawasmian Turks in 1244. The battle of Hattin and the battle of La Forbie coused the defeat of the Crusader army the extent of destruction. After Crusaders left from The Middle East, the expeditions we call the crusades, that is the Vatican itself led, were made in Europe.
The last crusade in this sense was the Battle of Varna in 1444. First, the Christian armies came, took the some parts of Middle East and stayed for about 200 years. After that, Muslim Turks, on the other hand, took places in Europe as far as Germany and stayed in the region up to Vienna for 500 years.
Now, everybody, where they're starting to act first, continues to live in that places. We are just trying to understand the structure, meaning, causes and consequences of ancient wars and campaigns.
As humanity, we must find ways to prevent ancient wars from recurring in the modern world we live in and causing millions of innocent people to die.
The 4th crusade was the beginning of the end for Constantinople. It set back western civilization 300 years & allowed the Turks free rein in the former eastern Roman Empire.
Have you ever considered that maybe the Pope was not only behind that sacking in 1204, but the epic betrayal by Big Nick Ducas at Manzikert in 1071? The entire Christian East was toppled after just those 2 events!
Christianity was the downfall of europe
@@atsstaaatsssatss4501 Not even remotely true.
Western civilization? Muslims translated Greek to Western Europe, so Greeks and Byzantines are not the West but East, Christianity is from the East! Nothing is from the West! Jesus, "your God" came from the East.
@@am.b5688 what a stupid comment, greek civilization is literally the father of western civilization
.
Crusades in real life: Failures and Embarassments
Crusades in CK2 & CK3: *Boss music plays*
Aztecs with Boats: *End Game Boss music plays*
Christian's didn't act like Christian's are supposed to act.
@@ricksand2 ok
@@erikku4739 Mongol : *Praise to Genghis Khan*
@@MasonGreenWeed Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə Ə
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
That does not apply here though. That's because that is not the definition of insanity, that is just what Albert Einstein was believed to have said at one point. Definition of insanity: "mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior."
We can all just throw random quotes around:
“I have tried 99 times and have failed, but on the 100th time came success.” - Albert Einstein
"If at first you don't succeed try, try and try again." - Robert The Bruce
“I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.” - Thomas Edison
One time they even thought, "Maybe if we tried this with only children..."
@@markburke1396 It is first crusade worked cuz Muslims did not ahve garriosn were not aware of such organisation was comming their way. Crusadres cheatted in first after that Muslims have been ready ever since then.
They are religious fanatic, reason are not their main strength honesty. I mean, if you can reason with them, they won't be one in the first place 😁
@@backpackpepelon3867
The time period of this was over 700 years ago. Whoever they were, they're dead now.
During the Second Crusade, some 3,000 French knights were starved in southwest Anatolia after the war. The Seljuk soldiers, whom they fought yesterday, were dying of hunger, and the food and drink aid was given to 3,000 French knights who were left in the enemy's territory. The French soldiers changed their religion and became Muslims after a while.
I'd rather have a honorable enemy then a fake friend
And one of the French Slaves stabbed Zengi, soo.
probably to survive
thats like giving them energy so they can beat them again
Looks like Muslims did the "love your enemies" better than the crusaders ever could
I almost can’t watch these crusade videos as much as I love them. So frustrating and disappointing realizing how the Christian kingdoms let their own self interests and greed ruin their missions.
@@beauty_hacks3596 if they had stayed committed to the cause and United ideally the number of successful crusades would be higher surely.
@Fazan ali all the more reason for the frustration by those who favor the crusaders’ cause. The first crusade was successful in large part to the enthusiasm and belief in the cause. Once greed, brutality and self interest entered the equation is when the effort was slighted. Of course the Muslim forces were indeed strong, they were United where as you can’t fully say the crusaders were. This is again hand in hand with the fact the crusaders had travel long distances from their homelands.
And also stupidity from the pope.
Still world calls us terrorists 🥺
@@saqlainbhat5104 ugh, if only allies didn't betray the arabs and put their own lands... instead of hijaz, a wahabi islam and a radical kingdom nejd came, they support terrorists so westerns are the reason
The 1st crusade was not made by peasants as the video says. The People’s crusade (which came right before) was the one made by peasants and common folks. The 1st crusade was made mainly by knights, nobility, and men at arms.
Effectively the first wave was lead by Peter the ermit, a bunch of fanatical peasants that sacked and destroied a lot of countries, ending massacred somewhere (Anatolia? I don't remember)
Once again another great video
God does not want to make war on another country. This is Satanic crusaders. Not Holy war.
"My Kingdom is not of this world "
"I AM the Way the Truth and the Life "
"Take up your cross and follow Me" .. unfortunately their swords were in the shape of a cross and without any accessible Bible barring selective hierarchical word of mouth, they followed the way of the sword.
I very enjoyed,
Great job,
From Egypt,
saladin The king of Egypt 🇪🇬and Syria🇸🇾 💙
Also upper libya the levent ,hejaz and half of yemen
@@paki_baloch yes 💙
@Deja Vu salauddin is a kurd so maybe he's from iraq as kurdistan is also in Iraq and turkey
@Deja Vu
يجمعنا دين الله
الشام 🇸🇾 عاصمة بني أمية
العراق عاصمة بني العباس. 🇮🇶
مصر عاصمة الأيوبية والفاطمية.🇪🇬
💙💙
@Deja Vu hmm
King: "Hey Pope! I have a bunch of peasants who may go and fight. We just give them weapons"
Pope: "And you have a good plan?"
King: "Best plan ever. We just tell them to attack. What could go wrong?"
Essentially a vassal swarm in eu4
The 18218 th crusade: "this time I feel lucky"
Naw the last one was in 2002 when we invaded iraq and tryed to bring a two party . system . Just left Afghan last week after 20 years .
@@estebahnquantum9350 Yup, just off by about 2,449 miles lol.
@@estebahnquantum9350 who's we? Lol. USA is a atheist country. Christianity is no longer the religion of the west.
الحمدلله الذى نصر دينه الاسلام
صدق وعده
ونصر عبده
واعز جنده
وهزم الاحزاب وحده
وقدمنا إلى ما عملوا من عمل فجعلناه هباء منثورا ) .
Thank you SO MUCH for providing captions
Nuraddin Zangi Great Warrior who destroyed County of Edessa
Yes,he won 17 battles,Saladin won 8 battles but he lost 8 battles 😂😂😂 Saladin was joke,Nur-ad-din real Warrior
Nur-ad-din Zangi Battles
Siege of Edessa(1144)
Siege of Edessa(1146)
Battle of Bosra
Siege of Damascus(1148)
Siege of Harran
Siege of Banyas
Battle of Banias
Siege of Ca’Ber
Battle of Inab
Battle of Lake Huleh
Battle of Aintab
Battle of Harim
Crusader İnvasions Of Egypt
Battle of El Babein
Battle of Ba’rin
Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Byzantine
Nur-ad-din’s Campaign of Antioch
@@scourgeofgodattila579 what matters is they both were muslims you racist . Don't hate him because Salauddin Ayubbi was a kurd
Distance man. Goddamn Distance not to mention man power
It's because they didn't have pancakes for breakfast. Pancakes give you a lot of energy and they were just lazy because of lack of pancakes.
@@jirikurto3859 No, they forgot to eat orange slices in between battles to regain their strength.
@Jak Blogger maybe dude you should learn about knights.
@@jirikurto3859 Not to mention MILK! WITHOUT IT THEIR SKIN MELTED!
@Jak Blogger Huh? Cause arabs today are more disciplined than German and Scandinavian people right? Lol
Infamus Salahudin? He was kind hearted king!
No he wasn’t he was evil
He was kind unlike the barbarian europeons
Nah not really lol
@@sit-insforsithis1568give source
@@sit-insforsithis1568 said by a kid living in the 21st century, even his enemies respect him
I read in a book once that one of the main reasons that the crusaders lost was because the muslim cavalry was so powerful, it wiped out most of their main troops, which influenced a lot of European countries to reinforce their cavalries and infantries.
Because they were 3rdWorld eddy yachts trying to invade the dominant power. Like North Korea trying to invade America. Now they had holy war juice, that got them a little. But in the end they failed.
The impression I have had is weight of numbers. Crusaders always had limited numbers where as the local populations were far more capable of recruiting more soldiers quickly.
Crusaders had heavier Armour but, that wasn't enough.
@@bradclifton5248
Wearing heavy armor in the dessert
How can Christ be God and be ignorant on the Day of Resurrection, as he said {As for that day and that hour, no one knows about it, not even the angels who are in heaven. Nor the Son but the Father.” (Mark 13:32) Did Mary, peace be upon her, know what was in her womb while she was pregnant? He was her Creator. he is a prophet he is a prophet he is a prophet
It is possible to ask whether Mary, peace be upon her, as you know, is pregnant. He
who is in her .womb is her creator
Hear what you say about this
th-cam.com/video/XFaI0N6AcjM/w-d-xo.html
ً
Christ did not say that He is God, but they are the ones who fabricate lies. God sends messengers and He is the One who created everything and then to evil mankind. They made it the number of God three four five
.
7- Christ denied his divinity and testified to them that he was just a prophet
.
when
10:40 Whoever receives you, accepts me, accepts me, accepts me, and accepts the one who sent me
10:41 Whoever greets a prophet in the name of a prophet is an ungodly prophet who accepts him, and whoever kisses a righteous man in the name of a righteous ungodly person accepts him.
John
7:28 And Jesus called out while he was teaching in the training temple
7:29 I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me
8:26 I have many things to say and judge concerning you, but this one that he sent me is true, and what I heard from him, I say this to the world.
8:27 They did not understand that He was telling them about the Father
{8:28} And Jesus said to them, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, you will understand that I do nothing of myself, but speak these things as the Father taught me.”
8:29 And he who sent me is with me, and the Father has not left me alone, because I always do what pleases him
lok
24:19 And he told them what they are. They said: Jesus of Nazareth, a mighty prophet, did and said before God and all the people.
This is what God Almighty said in the Qur’an
God Almighty says
163
Indeed, We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], as We revealed to Noah and the prophets after him. And we revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, the Descendants, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the book [of Psalms].
164
Of some messengers We have already told thee the story; of others We have not;- and to Moses Allah spoke direct;-
165
Messengers who gave good news as well as warning, that mankind, after (the coming) of the messengers, should have no plea against Allah: For Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.
166
But Allah beareth witness that what He hath sent unto thee He hath sent from His (own) knowledge, and the angels bear witness: But enough is Allah for a witness.
167
Those who reject Faith and keep off (men) from the way of Allah, have verily strayed far, far away from the Path.
168
Those who reject Faith and do wrong,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any
way-
169
Except the way of Hell, to dwell therein for ever. And this to Allah is easy.
Please, I bear witness that there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and that Jesus is the servant of God and His Messenger, and His word which He bestowed upon Mary and a spirit from Him
Before watching, I think the reason is the heavy armor, how someone wear so much clothes and metal in the middle east and expect to live not even win a war, the heat will burn them alive 😅.
Second thing is the fact that they have to fight al the way many nations until finally reach Jerusalem.
The third thing Muslim were highly advanced in medieval ear, science and knowledge in many aspect compared to the European at the time.
Also there is many things considering tax and army and other.
You clearly do not understand the time well after the first crusade the christian had the same technological level as the muslims
As for going to the holy land they didnt
They could make a deal with the byzantines or just sail and the byzantines are the only one blocking other than the turks
Now finally clothes and metal was a semi problem as they also gave crusaders an advantage
@FutureIsDarkFeaturoid strongest how? Europeans didn't send massive armies to fight Crusades, mostly of them were peasants, artisans, nobleman's and their men...
Great video brother
Hagia Sofia ⛪️ Now become Islamic Mosque 🕌
لنا عودة ياقدس
No
@@savereyy8177 لنا عودة.. قريبا يا قدس
لنا العودة فاتحين
مثل ما فعل اسلافنا صلاح الدين الأيوبي
💙🇪🇬
مؤكد يا سيدي فالأرض تقف مع اصحابها ولو بعد حين
It will fall back to Christian hands ✝️
As common knowledge has it, every subsequent sequel never manages to recapture the spirit of the original and usually ends up being just a cheap cash grab. As true for movies, as true for crusades.
For reals. None of the original characters or story lines even made it to nine. Just a cash grab
Saladin: "Trust me , you're not that guy.... Absolutely"
Richard beat Saladin in every battle though.
@@JetConvoy you say that but Richard is the one who retreated back to Europe and Saladin kept Jerusalem and won
8th crusade : nothing
Saladin in grave : Assalamualaikum!
I remember there was an issue in Constantinople's markets against Venetians, they were exiled, and as a vendetta, Venice invaded Constantinopla.
The Venetians had trasported the Crudaders to Constantinople and since the Crudaders were unable to pay the prize of the transport requested, the Venetians profited from the looting of the city by the angry Crusaders to participate
wrong, actually and ironically the son of the disposed emperor Issac Angelos, Alexios Angelos asked the Crusaders to divert to Constantinople to restore his father and he would pay for the transport, when they went there and did sack the city, Alexios got assassinated, you got it half right since the crusaders did capture the city of Zara for Venice to repay for transport
As a muslim the victory makes me proud , but this was centuries ago , now let us be in peace ❤️
Peace how??? sunnah.com/muslim/54/101
Quran ALRADY told us they will take the land
Till they cause fitnah in the land and we will enter the masjid just like how we did at the first time
Quran 17:4-7
@@thegame1939 christian spread by sword fact. Islam spreas in peace fact. U cant debate. No one ever won christian schoolar. Omegalul
Im from philippines. When spanish came. Convert or die. Ignorant. 🤣🤣🤣
@@julkifle I am atheist and I know for a fact Islam spread by sword and Christianity spread by greed.
Saludin was a great person and warrior as well.
Saladin was a genius in his time and definitely several centuries ahead of time in terms of the way he ruled and his understanding of how to deal with the fragile and multi-ethnic situation in the Levant. He was well respected by the nobility in Europe and apparently he and King Richard sent gifts back and forth.
@@jawoo2228 saladin lost to richard the lion heart in two battles
@@pooroldman5089 yet Richard lost the crusade and Saladin kicked him back to Europe
They failed because of their love for this world and hate for death while their enemies were people who had no desire for this world and had a love for death and martyrdom
How can Christ be God and be ignorant on the Day of Resurrection, as he said {As for that day and that hour, no one knows about it, not even the angels who are in heaven. Nor the Son but the Father.” (Mark 13:32) Did Mary, peace be upon her, know what was in her womb while she was pregnant? He was her Creator. he is a prophet he is a prophet he is a prophet
It is possible to ask whether Mary, peace be upon her, as you know, is pregnant. He
who is in her .womb is her creator
Hear what you say about this
th-cam.com/video/XFaI0N6AcjM/w-d-xo.html
ً
Christ did not say that He is God, but they are the ones who fabricate lies. God sends messengers and He is the One who created everything and then to evil mankind. They made it the number of God three four five
.
7- Christ denied his divinity and testified to them that he was just a prophet
.
when
10:40 Whoever receives you, accepts me, accepts me, accepts me, and accepts the one who sent me
10:41 Whoever greets a prophet in the name of a prophet is an ungodly prophet who accepts him, and whoever kisses a righteous man in the name of a righteous ungodly person accepts him.
John
7:28 And Jesus called out while he was teaching in the training temple
7:29 I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me
8:26 I have many things to say and judge concerning you, but this one that he sent me is true, and what I heard from him, I say this to the world.
8:27 They did not understand that He was telling them about the Father
{8:28} And Jesus said to them, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, you will understand that I do nothing of myself, but speak these things as the Father taught me.”
8:29 And he who sent me is with me, and the Father has not left me alone, because I always do what pleases him
lok
24:19 And he told them what they are. They said: Jesus of Nazareth, a mighty prophet, did and said before God and all the people.
This is what God Almighty said in the Qur’an
God Almighty says
163
Indeed, We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], as We revealed to Noah and the prophets after him. And we revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, the Descendants, Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the book [of Psalms].
164
Of some messengers We have already told thee the story; of others We have not;- and to Moses Allah spoke direct;-
165
Messengers who gave good news as well as warning, that mankind, after (the coming) of the messengers, should have no plea against Allah: For Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.
166
But Allah beareth witness that what He hath sent unto thee He hath sent from His (own) knowledge, and the angels bear witness: But enough is Allah for a witness.
167
Those who reject Faith and keep off (men) from the way of Allah, have verily strayed far, far away from the Path.
168
Those who reject Faith and do wrong,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any
way-
169
Except the way of Hell, to dwell therein for ever. And this to Allah is easy.
Please, I bear witness that there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God, and that Jesus is the servant of God and His Messenger, and His word which He bestowed upon Mary and a spirit from Him
"This is another crusade"
pope this is the 7th week in a row you've call for another crusade
Saying it was a failure is a bit over the top, they wanted jerusalem, and they got it for over 100 years.
@ozymandias nero nulifidian yes, at the jewish hands..
@@lazarus961 But for how long this time?
@ozymandias nero nulifidian you mean Muslims
@ozymandias nero nulifidian why the followers of islam are called Muslims
@ozymandias nero nulifidian "Jewish were closer to Christians" as if the Europeans never mistreated the Jews for 1000 yrs and also don't forget how Christian Germany killed millions of jews in ww2.
Why did The Crusades Fail?
Spain: Hold my reconquista
Where in the name of black moors there was an ethnic cleansing of Iberian muslims and history was fabricated systematically
after 700 hundred years of trying wow success
@@bard001 just like my love life 💕
@@giarivers1511 XD I see simpus
@@binsuleim6055 dream on, enjoy your desert.
Perhaps the reason is also that Muslims are very strong because they have a real and just cause and they respect their religion and beliefs
Unlike the Crusades, which were covered by the cross and the Christian religion, but had expansionist and purely economic goals.
it was simply the christians getting back at the muslims, who had done the same things the christians did to muslims during the crusades to christians before the crusades. do remember the levant was christian before the muslims forcefully took it and forced conversion. not condoning the crusades, but remember to look at things from the other perspective.
@@Hannibalian
And Roman Empire Conquest of North Africa is justified?
The real religious reason is only hatred between Catholics, Orthodox and Muslims just came in the way because they provided protection for the Orthodox living in the lands they conquered.
th-cam.com/users/shortsJdRsDm07w-0?si=RCETk_RBX3rOQ8xK
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 real & just by killing innocent ppl , typical Muslim
after 3 crusades, the crusaders wanted to try something new and decided
why not attack fellow christians?
Peak bruh moment right there
If you can’t beat the Muslims why not join them 😂
They'll never see it coming!
@@stanleylee5358 true that 😂😂😂
Ayy my favourite history channel
"Why did the crusade fail again?"
Me every time when a crusade happens in Crusader Kings 3. I only donate some gold to the cause just not to get excommunicated. The AI is incredibly stupid, they split into multiple groups of only 1000 men and they get completely destroyed by death stacks of 20 000 enemy troops.
😂😂😂
Thats so true
my brother from another mother, just send part of your troops and have lead the sieges on important places like Jerusalem, the score will count towards you and when the Crusade is won you get Jerusalem, don’t do it with the Pope’s troops because it will fail
i'm glad you at least mentioned the crusades of northern and eastern europe. The ONLY reason norse paganism is mainly associated with scandinavia is because it was the very last area of europe to be christianized. And up UNTIL the reign of Charlemagne it hadn't been VERY bloody. But the christianisation of northern europe was very much a barbaric and bloody one. And i'm not refering to the berzerkers. medieval christians proved to be far more willy to shed blood in the name of conversion, than any norse pagans were to defend it/keep it
Portugal tried a crusade on Morocco after the reconquista also
It was just a stupid teenager king brainwashed by Jesuits to become a great soldier of Christendom. Instead of killing the moor as he wanred, he caused the decline of the Portuguese empire.
Well they did fail miserably
@@josecipriano3048 i mean it still count tho
@@paki_baloch Did they? I pretty sure they capture the spice, slave, and silk trade from the muslim world with the conquest of the Indias and the spice isles of Malaka.
@@MM-jl6el we are talking about the crusades not the others.
The Templars had to rush home to start their World Banking System.
lol
it clearly worked wonders though
Bro stop giving excuses
In the movie Kingdom of Heaven, Jeremy Irons character Tiberias said it best to Balian and to the audience, "First, I thought we were fighting for God. Then I realized we were fighting for wealth and land. I was ashamed."
Until you realize that is actually for both reason
Main reason was always pride and wealth both Muslims and Christians failed acting for their real norm and goals. Using God for their own selfish goals. Ive been researching more of both sides and how the leaders acted, you will be more dissapointed if you read more. But crusaders attacking and raiding Constantine is a next level dissapointment and shame I guess.
"Then I realized we were fighting for wealth and land."
That's Every War in the history of Ever.
"I was ashamed"
More people should be. It might put an end to war.
@@piperar2014 It's not fair to simplify EVERY war in that matter. Sure, most times the victors get the spoils, but the causations varied.
@@timothybrown8424 It's not a question of fair, it's a question of fact. The causation doesn't vary. The narrative varies. The propaganda varies. The causation doesn't. The root causation is always the same, and that root is power. Land and wealth is the means to keep score.
thank youu! very well explained
The way I see it, the crusades were a huge waste of everyone's time and energy smh🤷🏾♂️
Nah, they were not cus that created the Deus vult meme.
No they were not. The crusades brought back transcripts from the middle east that later sparked the renaissance. The crusades also brought wealth to Europe cuz it was its only trade route with the East and this led to West Europe being as wealthy as muslim world in 13th century.
@@nightprowler6336 *Cries in Orthodox Christianity*
@@ls200076 if u know jackshit about history, the Crusades built Orthodox Christian churches in Middle East. I was baptized in one of them.
They were certainly not a waste they got venice some sweet trade deals
Saint Louis (Louis IX) was actually a wise king.
@loay gaming Yes he was, at a point that he was often asked in foreign courts to settle affairs. ;)
He 's kown as louis the devil in the east
My Favorite Crusader king of all, totally defeated and get imprisoned, that what we call ( the Happy Ending )
@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva
totally not equal, the first ( Louis ) attacked my country trying to invade it, and got defeated, the other ( the Last Emir of Granada ) was living in his home country for 800 years of his ancestors living there, and got expelled and the Muslims in Iberia was having the Famous Spanish Inquisitions ( Catholic killing and boiling ) as only they are not Catholics !!
big difference bro !
@@00Abrams00 You invaded 'your' country Egypt and prosecuted Christians there.
Saint Louis was trying to free a christian country invaded by muslims that were prosecuting them.
Wrong map at the beginneing of the video : Nicaea and all Anatolia were ruled by the seljuks and Nicaea was "delivered" during the 1st crusade.
Only one christian king died during the 3rd crusade, the french king just returned to his country before the end of the crusade.
They're not talking about crusades in Portugal and Baltic crusades that were very successfull ...
he spoke about the crusades in iberia and the baltics being successfull at 3:17 go check it out
You're right they talked briefly about it but reducing the crusades and their outcome to what happened in the middle east feel wrong to me.
Crusades are the real reason of extremism and hatred between religions. They slaughtered every place where they heard Adhan (Muslim call for prayer). Meanwhile muslims showed mercy on them and their King. Remember Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam and Salahuddin Ayyubi they showed mercy meanwhile you killed everything that used to breath. I'm a muslim and my nation has a christian past and history. Christianity is a beautiful religion and we muslims respect it. Where I live in Kosovo we have no religious hate. But Christians call muslims terrorists and portray them in a bad way meanwhile Chiristians destroyed everything they had in the past and that is very bad.
When Christianity was spreading love in blood
Remember these are reconquests
Crusades were originally done to defend the christians of the levant
@@lvl1_feral_druid Im sure they are still spreading their so called love with modern crusades
Whoever thinks crusades are over is just dreaming they are happening in front of our eyes today but a different strategy this time
@@lvl1_feral_druid „was“ as in the US christians bombing civilians to this day?
Kings and generals's narration sounds so neutral. Never did it felt like they are taking sides.
this isn't kings and generals though
@@zjotheglorious he meant that Knowledgia is being a bit biased towards christians
@@fuzailhasan7856 which isn't true imo
@@fuzailhasan7856 How does neutrality mean bias? LMAO
@@kasadam85 it is mate the narrative of the video is more Christian friendly, anyways not a point to argue on just that the guy dismised all the atrocities commited by crusaders
Man I love this channel
Love u salah uddin . .those crusaders were animals...they murdered whole Jerusalem population