Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman empire spend their entire lives fighting each other yet they died fighting side by side, talk about the perfect love story 🥰.
it was Middle Ages, crazy times ... Croatia was first line of defense against Muslim invasion. Other European countries sent financial support once in a while, but in really it was strong fighting spirit of Croatians that helped in surviving the onslaught.
If it weren't for the Europeans, Constantinople would have been returned to Greece, Greeks would still be in the Pontus, Trebizond, Sinope, West Anatolia, Iconium and Cappadocia; Antioch to the Syrians and Eastern Anatolia to the Georgians and Armenians.
@@SuchIsLife424 why do you say that ?, thats not true , the empire was relatively strong even in its last moments , greece was wimpy and relied on powers such as britain to maintain independence , without russia , the ottomans would still have control over many domains, the europeans made things worse for it
@@AliAhmed-ni9ry Britain was ally of the ottomans as well. The same as French. And Germans. And Egyptians. And no the empire wasn't strong at that point, it was crumbling.
Correction, Mahmud II is not Selim III's brother he is actually Mustafa IV's little brother. Selim III was their elder cousin. Selim III was barren, that's why he treat his cousins nicely and paid attention for their education for future of empire. His revolutionist movements were so important and gave breath to empire but his military movements were not popular amongst traditionalist jannisaries. During Russia war, jannisaries started uprising, he didn't want a civil war and gave the throne to his cousin. It didn't go well, jannisaries killed many new military corp members and it badly effected continuing war. One of Selim III's officer Alemdar Pasha gathered an army from surviving new military corp members and did a counter revolt. He supressed jannisaries and reached royal palace. Selim III was living in semi-imprison in palace and educating his younger cousin Mahmud II. Once Selim III loyalists reached palas ungreatful Mustafa IV gave order to execution of his older cousin Selim III and his younger brother Mahmud II. They killed Selim III but palace servents saved Mahmud II. Alemdar Pasha deposed Mustafa IV and crowned Mahmud II. Later jannisaries killed Alemdar Pasha and tried make Mustafa IV sultan again but this time Mahmud II executed his big brother. Later he destroyed Janniseries. It was a necessary action but a deep blow to Ottoman army, in the end even Kavalalı became more powerful than Ottoman army. If Selim III's revolutionist movements accepted everything could be different. Selim III's mind was ahead of the its time, he was the last hope of empire. His tragic murder was sealed Ottoman's fate.
I completely agree with what you have stated. Selim 3 was the second "Genç Osman" in my opinion. Because he knew what to do. He tried to implement some cruical reforms, he failed and paid it with his life at the end. Generally Selim 3 's efforts are overlooked because Mahmut the 2. is a bigger reformist. However it was Selim to educate and raise Mahmut. Nizam ı cedid was a great idea. It defeated Napoleon and the British in Egypt. It is so sad how Selim failed despite his great efforts and died at the end.
@@animationzone2351 no, he was the last caliph. Sultanate abolished after turkish independence war. He was chosen as caliph by parliament but one year later because of some old order supporters, caliphate abolished as well.
I was confused, in some videos that I saw the makers said him as (Sultan) Abdul majeed 2 and in some videos they said Caliph Abdul majeed 2. But now I know that he was Caliph not sultan
@Вхламинго I remember Ottoman advance until the capital city which is Tebriz, however I am unable to remember any big invasions from Savafids. Oh yeah because it didn't happen. Next.
🇹🇷 5:52 Ireland🇮🇪 will always be thankful for what he did for us during the great starvation, helping us slir more to survive than "the famine" queen Victoria🏴 who did very little during & after which made is lose millions.
@TheKingimport i believe it was 10000 silver pounds, to avoid insult to the British queen who sent 2000 he sent 1000. But he made a promise & wanted to keep to his word so sent the rest in a different way (as you mentioned yourself), he had to do it in a way the British wouldn't know so he avoided ports like dublin, cork, Galway, etc. & sent it to a lesser checked port in drogheda. It's that reason that Ireland showed its gratitude by putting a cresent moon on the coat of arms of drogheda & it's that reason i badly want to visit Turkey 🇹🇷
@TheKingimport absolutely, I'm itching to go back to travelling alpng with my son & partner & Turkey🇹🇷 is on my top 5 to visit. Wanna be my tour guide?🤣
@TheKingimport well Ireland🇮🇪 hasn't been a part of the uk🇬🇧 since 1922, only a part of the north is but that is soon to change. The deal made as a result of brexit between London🏴 & Brussels🇧🇪 has made the north of Ireland reuniting with the republic very likely especiallysince majority in the north voted to stsy in the EU🇪🇺. The remaining 3 parts (Scotland🏴, Wales🏴 & England🏴) are likely to become seperate countries aswell, independence from England🏴 has become a madure subject discussed in Scotland🏴 & Wales🏴. If you set a flight for Ireland🇮🇪 sometimeafter this shit we're dealing with is over, I'll gladly be your guide😁
@Achaean It should be mentioned that Greeks used to be given privileged treatment from the Ottomans with many of their priests sent all throughout the Balkans to preach. That's why their Slavic and Romanian Orthodox counterparts were mistrustful of Greeks.
Thank you for the video! I must confess that I lacked the big and the full picture of the period. My nation (Bulgaria) was part of the Ottoman Empire at that time but the truth is that at school we are mostly taught about the developments on Bulgarian soil during the Ottoman rule. Hence, I had never heard about the Turkish-Egyptian conflict for instance. Thank you once again.
1876 - April Uprising 1877 - Battle of Shipka 1878 - Bulgaria is free Yes, 5 Centuries of Ottoman Yoke are behind us. Let us never repeat the mistake from the past! Unity and Freedom!
@@alexandrupreda1994 I am thankful that you sincerely helped us in this war. But why did you need to backstab us in 1913 when we were fighting Greece and Serbia!?!?!
Yes ever since the early 18th century it started falling far behind its two powerful neighbours Russia and Austria/Austria-Hungary, the two empires certainly played a large role in crippling the ottomans throughout the 18th and 19th centuies.
Abdulhamid 2nd improved health care school and many other things the ottoman empire had been in debt which cost millions of pounds but abdulhamid by the end of his reign lowered it to about a tenth
@Kokoro Shimamura he didn't lose wars the parliament did they never let abdulhamid do anything and if you don't believe me you cn find it on trt, ilm film and many other sites
Correction: Napoleon didn't style himself as the liberator of Egypt from the Ottoman Empire. In fact, he did everything to get Ottoman approval for his Egyptian Campaign, which he didnt get. And initially he was spreading the rumor that he had the sultans backing. He styled himself as the liberator of Egypt from Mameluke ill governance and tried to show great respect to the Sultan.
One of the reasons for the weakening of the Ottoman Empire is the lack of allies in Europe. While states such as Austria and Russia could find allies in their wars with the Ottoman Empire, the Ottoman Empire was alone outside the Crimean War. States such as the Holy Germanic Austria, Russia, Poland, and Venice joined forces against the Ottoman Empire.
@@Thunderworks nah spain was weaker than ottoman in 1500s and france has nothing in 1600s. Qing china is superior than all of europe and equal to ottomans in this area
@@mohamedsamak5023 I made one history video a year one in my channel but only about the years 1803-1818 with the war he had against the first saudi state
@@funtime4981 I made one history video a year one in my channel but only about the years 1803-1818 with the war he had against the first saudi state...
@@axiosw0774 yeah but u must say that genocide happened, u cant hide history it just happened even germans dont hide holocaust happened, japaneese dont hide nanking genocide so why are u hiding, everyone knows it happened u cant hide it, there are ottoman documents and photos about it, if u will hide history u will never learn bc we learn from history
@@iwantsomecheesburgers Why on earth would you assume I'm a denialist? I said Georgia the country that the guy above is - is a denialist country despite wanting to claim sympathy for being subjugated for his people, same as Israel - denialist country despite being a subject to the holocaust the very definition of genocide which was written after the Armenian genocide, but they want power they want to be the only recognized people that suffered by injustice. I can't like both of these countries, they are fake and deduct dirty politics, in case of Georgia, they did not learn their historical lesson I question myself whether I can even call that nation a Christian, just and democratic nation
Ottoman power faded in the late 16. century however the actual decline happened after the failures of vienna and zenta the empire never became the same again after those defeats... medieval Ottomans were absolute beasts though literally snatched everyone except for the Timurids
@@papazataklaattiranimam Vehabi savaşındaki katkısı dışında hayır pahalıya mal oldu kavalalı isyanı...ama sultanlarda iyi yönetemedi durumu söz verip tutmazsan olacağı o
as a citizen of turkey i assure u we didnt declare war on russia 4:22. in fact we demand a compensate for ottoman's burnt fleet and they percived it as an insult and declared war on ottoman
Yes indeed. Mehmet (Mohammed) Ali was a smart men, that managed to suppress the revolt in egypt with his small army of Albanians and than to convince the egyptians to join his side.
The Ottomans and the Safavids did not form a single alliance throughout their history to confront a common enemy like Russia, for example .. (If Turkey and Iran were united against Russia in the Caucasus, the Russians would have been permanently expelled to their original borders outside the Caucasus region) said one of the Western historians The enmity between the Ottomans and the Safavids greatly harmed both parties, I do not know what this hostility and stupidity made them not ally with each other even though they are Turks ... the Romans and Persians allied against Muslims despite the difference in ethnicity and religion, as well as the Christians despite their different sects, they allied themselves against Muslims
After a bloody history during selim I time they never wanted to get engaged on anything again although iran is ruled by ethic turks but shia - anyway long history.
1300's: *Ottomans join the server* 1400's: *Ottomans purchase Deagle and goes mid and kills Byzantine* 1500's: *Ottomans kill 2 more enemies, planting the bomb at A site* 1600's: *Holy League rushes A and ambushes Ottoman, they fail but Ottoman health is low.* 1700's: *Ottoman holds out against 4 enemies, taking down 2. Bomb timer is close.* 1800's: *Ottoman gets flanked and one tapped from behind* 1900's: *Ottomans left the server.*
The Wallachian uprising was actually started by Greek rebels. The general plan was that the Greeks would defeat the Ottomans in the south, the mixed army would defeat the enemy in the north. After this, the armies would unite in Macedonia and march to Constantinople and then Asia. Yes, that was the ACTUAL plan!!! Could you imagine if it actually worked?
I might make a few mistakes and correct me if I am wrong, Tudor Vladimirescu made a pact with Alexander Ipsilanti to revolt together and aid the romanian army, but due too russian influence, Ipsilanti didin't sent any support, thus romanians revolution was defeated by the turks.
@_𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜_ well, you misread what I said. Romanians only wanted independence, not campaings to Constantinopole and Asia Minor. I can't speak however on behalf of the greek movements, they might have wanted it.
British :No fight but they had to leave because they didn't want to face 200.000 turkish army. Check "chanak crisis" French :they briing some lejyoners but they got defeated by turkish gerilla fighters. İtaly:thsy occupied some provinces but they didn't touch the People so People didn't rebel against them. They waited greek turkish fights result. After greece get destroyed in Sakarya battle they left. Armenia :they got defeated. İt was easy. Plus turkey captured 40. 000 rifles from them. 1 Day after Kars treaty, Red army occupied them Greece :they real dangerous enemy. they didn't fight in ww1 unlike turkey. They had more ammuniton. More machine Guns but they still got destroyed. Btw turkey ıraq border still wasnt clear after lausanne treaty. Turkey wanted mosul but british didn't want to loose the oil there. Eventually turkey had to gave up in 1926. 3 years after lausanne treaty.
Little remarks otherwise a great vid: 0:50 napoleon's navy was sunk by that of The British Empire so that was one of the reason too that he left Egypt 3:36 mention of Greek arvanites.and serbian revolt but not the one from Ali Pacha of yannina that war was from 1820-1822
@@None-do2qn well the ottoman tried their best , but the Greeks prevailed. Just because someone hasn't converted to islam , it doesn't mean the ottomans were very kind to their non Muslim subjects.
@@nazmakhan178 lol the ottoman ruled them for 400 years. If they wanted they would easily made them Muslims by force converting. They didn’t and now they are lying about oppression! Christianity was spread by sword by Romans. Ottomans were merciful or else half of Europe would be Muslim. How would they resist?
This is supposed to end at 1900 yet it does not show the unification between the principlality of Bulgaria and eastern Rumelia of 1885 which triggered the serbo-bulgarian war, and it shows some Greek and Serb revolts but it does not show the Bulgarian revolt of 1876 which triggered the ruso-turkish war of 1877-1878.
Many people who evaluate the Ottoman Empire in 1700-1900 missing a very important detail. This big mistake is that the Ottoman-Russian wars are viewed only as a 1v1 war. This is completely wrong. Russia had a tremendous influence over orthodoxes within the Ottoman borders. The Russian army, when the war started, Occupying Ottoman vassal romanian principalities without any resistance and gain a solid position in the north of the Danube River. While all this was happening, the Ottoman army had to divide its troops to fight the Bulgarian and Serbian rebels while trying to reach the front. Moreover, although Russia has a great manpower advantage. This only applies to the 1877-1878 battle. Although the actors changed, Russia could always find allies against the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was able to find these allies only once. (Crimean War) I give you a few links to review the status of the both sides in these wars. Russo-Turkish war (1686-1700) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1686%E2%80%931700) Russo/Austrian-Turkish war (1735-1739) imagine 2v1 just after nader shah destroyed ottomans in the east (1730-1735 Persian-Ottoman war) Look: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman%E2%80%93Persian_War_(1730%E2%80%931735) Russo-Turkish war (1768-1774) = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1768%E2%80%931774) Even egytp ruler supported russia against constantinople. Russo-Turkish War (1787-1792) = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1787%E2%80%931792) Austro-Turkish War (1788-1791) = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austro-Turkish_War_(1788%E2%80%931791) Russo-Turkish war (1806-1812) = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1806%E2%80%931812) When war started ottomans were tried to supress serbian rebellion started in 1804 and during the war janissaries and mustafa IV dethroned reformist sultan Selim III and killed him. And during this war brits declared war on otttoman empire in 1807. = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Turkish_War_(1807%E2%80%931809) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1877%E2%80%931878) My aim is not to belittle the Russian victories. I'm just trying to give people a different perspective.
The Russian empire also had a very big muslim minority , the Russian Tatars and the Turkic peoples in Central Asia ( Kazakhs , Turkmens , Uzbeks etc ) , so they had the same problem as the Ottomans.
To be fair the ottomans were like 15 countries and conscripted men from all over the empire which is why they took so many losses in battle but still won in the early days of their empire.
@@javier6926 My friend, the peoples you are talking about fought in the Russian army and saved Russia's ass in many battles. Especially in the Napoleonic Wars, the Tatars prevented the defeat of the Russians.
@@javier6926 Kazakhs or kazan tatars far from warzone and subjuguated. Also after 1783 can you show me crimean tatar rebellion during ottoman-russia war ?
@@jg2213 Conscription system wasnt active in 18th ceuntry bro. Ottoman army consisted of rebel janissaries. Ottomany army had contcripts effectively in world war I.
its not about saving them, its about keeping the balance of power and they preferred a weak ottoman empire than a strong new Empire forced by Mohamed Ali for example, and they kept the Russians at check when they were winning alot !
@@00Abrams00 You're right of course. Especially after the Vienna Congress of 1815 the Great Powers were strongly opposed to any revolutionary movement. If you think about it, the world as we know it today(States in the basis of Ethnos) is a recent phenomenon.
List of the Ottoman sultans: Osman I (1299-1324) Orhan (1324-1362) Murad I (1362-1389) Bayezid I (1389-1402) Interrum (1402-1413) Mehmed I (1413-1421) Murad II (1421-1444) and (1446-1451) Mehmed II (1444-1446) and (1451- 1481) Bayezid II (1481-1512) Selim I ( 1512-1520) Suleiman I magnificent (1520-1566) Selim II (1566-1574) Murad III (1574-1595) Mehmed III (1595-1603) Ahmed I (1603-1617) Osman II (1618-1622) Mustafa I (1617-1618) and (1622-1623) Murad IV (1623-1640) Ibrahim (1640-1648) Mehmed IV (1648-1687) Suleiman II (1687-1691) Ahmed II (1691-1695) Mustafa II (1695-1703) Ahmed III (1703-1730) Mahmud I (1730-1754) Osman III (1754-1757) Mustafa III (1757-1774) Abdul Hamid I (1774-1789) Selim III (1789-1807) Mustafa IV (1807-1808) Mahmud II (1808-1839) Abdul Mecid I (1839-1861) Abdulaziz (1861-1876) Murad V (1876) Abdul Hamid II (1876-1909) Mehmed V Resad (1909-1918) Mehmed VI Vahedettin (1918-1922) Abdul Mecid II (1922-1924) as caliph
Sultan Abdulhamid ii, a great ruler he was, against all odds extended the empires life for another 30 years... until the revolution and everything went to waste.
@Kokoro Shimamura really you mean reducing the empires debt by 90%??? The ottomans had 250billion liras of debt but when he was overthrown it was almost finished...
It's so annoying that ottomans who once the whole europe trembled before them was shattered like this in the last 100 years of it though it's the nature of all empires 👍
@@arthasmenethil7208 romans dont exist anymore. Romans will never return considering modern politics. Over 50-100 years no one will care about the empires of the old. Im not trying to be pessimistic but man just get over it. Everything will change. And in 200-300 years almost no one more will even remember roman history. Like bruh get over 476. Romans them self caused their fall. Like every empire, corruption is every empire’s enemy.
You have forgotten to mention the Convention of Constantinople, signed between the Kingdom of Greece and Ottoman Empire on 2 July 1881 according to which the region of Thessaly and Arta Prefecture (a prefecture within the region of Epirus) were ceded to the Kingdom of Greece. Nice presentation though.
@@zenitelab2482 Well the name of the city from Constantinople to Instanbul was officially changed, under a law which was enacted by the Turkish government, on 28 March 1930. So the Convention of Constantinople to which i am refering to is historically correct (i hold a B.A in History), since the Convention was signed in 1881 before 1930 (even the Treaty of Constantinople in 1913 is known in History as such). For instance the Instanbul Convention of 2011 which guaranteed human rights against domestic violence and violence against women is known as the Convention of Instanbul because it was obviously signed after 1930.
As much as the palaiologos have their issues, the Byzantine restoration after the Latin Empire is every bit as much a continuation of the previous byzantine empire as well as establishing a new Byzantine dynasty. The Palaiologos family were high Byzantine aristocracy before the Latin empire, with Michael VIII Palaiologos (who restored the Byzantine empire in 1261) being a descendant of the Doukas, Komnenos and Angelos Byzantine dynasties. Like Michael’s great-grandfather was the previous Byzantine emperor Alexios Angelos, his grandfather Alexios Palaiologos was the heir-apparent. In an alternate history of no Latin empire, Michael Palaiologos would still have been emperor. The fourth crusade deserves its flak, but it in no way “ended” the byzantines, that claim rests solely with the ottomans.
@@flamingmuffin666 bruh you saying the palaiogos family was competent? hell no. they ruled a dead empire. they lost land to the bulgars and crusaders. then the ottomans put the final nail on the coffin. like even if the ottomans didnt succeed byzantium would fall anyway to some other power. before 1204 they were strong. after that they just stopped being strong. also ottomans and byzantium had a treaty but the byzantines broke it. so they caused it them self. blame byzantium and the crusaders. not the ottomans
@@flamingmuffin666 The Angelos were the Dynasty on the Throne when the Empire ended. The Laskaris who had support from the last Emperor then ruled the Nicean Empire, to say the Palaiologos would have been Emperors otherwise is simply unfounded, false and ignores the families in power. In the 60 years from the fall to the capture. The Culture, Government, Dynasty And ethnicities of the Byzantine People changed. The direct line of continuation from the Roman Empire had ended and the self identification as Hellenes begins to commonly appear. Constantinople is never restored having only a fraction of its population, the Byzantine Senate was not restored, feudalization of the Pronoia would be near complete and the Empire restricted to Greek only lands with a fraction of the Byzantines pre 4th territory. Furthermore Trebizond, Epirus and Bulgaria had legitimacy and claims to the Empire, you only recognize Nicaea cause they took Constantinople. The Roman Empire of the Pre4th would never return.
@Вхламинго Some govermental systems didnt functioned like the early times but the main Ottoman story is they didnt developed fast like Europeans. They stuck at 17-18th century. So thats why Ottomans collapsed in a very short summary.
@Вхламинго Thats what i am talking about. They didnt catch up level of the west, so they couldn't compete with them and lost so many wars because of this.
they were the first to use gunpowder weapons giving them a huge advantage against European powers however when they modernized the ottoman empire was late to do that and thus were no longer as strong as the once were
Greece paid a hefty price for its independence, Thousands died in order to take back some of what rightfully theirs to begin with. However even today as we speak Turkey is desperately trying to revive old empty aspirations of a new empire, by been a recalcitrant neighbour, to some countries around it.
Literally all countries would love to boost their influence as much as they can in anywhere they can. Some countries are capable of it and some aren't, it's as simple as that. Many countries paid a hefty price to get independence from the British but the video isn't about them, even if it was about them I doubt you'd have a problem with that.
You forgot to mention the brutal manner in which the Ottomans stopped the Bulgarian April Uprising of 1876. This brutality served as grounds for the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878.
Basically it was the Egyptian regular - almost in European standards troops that almost ended the greek revolution but they couldn't keep their gains with most of their fleet destroyed although stubbornly enough some garrisons was refusing to handle their forts to the new greek government and they had to be forced out, creating an diplomatic crisis between Britain and France - since French troops were involved in those operations - the French was supposed to be there as " advisors" for the greek regular army and peacekeepers in the area that is roughly now days central Greece and by no way to move in Peloponnese ( Morea ) 😉
The nineteenth was a century of loss for Muslims. As early as in 1808 the Serbs were encouraged to revolt, and by 1830 a Serbia state had been established. In 1821 it was the turn of Greece, encouraged by the music of Byron's poetry, to demand freedom from the Ottomans. Greece became independent in 1833. In the Caucasus, Russia moved into Turkish penumbra. In 1839 Britain occupied Aden to consolidate her control over the sea routes to the jewel in her crown. By 1877 Bulgaria had been given autonomy, Crete won similar terms in 1898(and joined Greece on 1913). The weakness of Constantinople(Istanbul) had gone to the heart. It was in huge external debt and it revenues were being scanned by lenders.
No mention of the Hamidian Massacres (1894-1896) that left up to 300,000 Armenians dead, 50,000 orphaned, the destitution of 546,000, the destruction of 2,493 Armenian villages, the residents of 456 of which were forcibly converted to Islam (~150,000 people), and the desecration of 649 churches and monasteries, of which 328 were converted into mosques. All you said was “Problems with Armenia and its neighbors began in the 1890s and only grew with time as the Ottoman Empire was pushed and more in the direction of urgent defense over its dwindling power and territory...” I know most of your creators are ethnically Turkish but can you try and remain factual and not white wash history please.
@@kristaporkhach What the fuck do you mean bro, you are the person who is providing this thing into youtube comments and I am the one asking for sources, things you say is bullshit and It shows that you have no proof, you are just here to make propaganda? Thats not how things works "Just look at google bc you are a troller" bro you are saying that this is real so that means this is based on a SOURCE, why should I get into a deep re search If you dont have a proof?
I mean it's only a 12 min video! He couldn't give you the ENTIRE Ottoman history! If you all want a video with your info in it why not make your own? Thank you sir for effort and time you give up to make all these. Thank you
At the battle of navarino , you forget to mention that the sultan also called the governor of Algéria for help, because after losing the battle france took the opportunity to occupy algeria, because Algeria Lost all it's fleet during that battle, and couldn't defend itself
The Ottomans were late to understand the new trends of nationalism . For instance when the Greeks revolted 200 hundred years ago, the ottoman thought of this as a Russian plan to cause an insurrection of the Rum(Roman) community of the Empire. Essentially the spiritual subjects of the Patriarch of Constantinople. That’s why he was hanged after its outbreak.
I mean apparently they could of had a 30 year break against russia but violated that agreement.. perhaps if they didnt do that they could of managed to reform and modernize a bit more.
Peter the Great had dreamt of winning Constantinople back for Christianity and Tsar Alexander I called the city " The key to the door of my house " In 1853 Nicholas I made the remark to the British ambassador in St Petersburg that echoed through the next century " We have a sick man on our hands, a man gravely sick " he said referring to Turkey, and wanted European powers to divide the Ottoman empire by mutual agreement and turn Constantinople into a free city. Russian insults provoked students of Turkeys madrassas(Taliban of their time) to come on to the streets, and Abdulmejid obtained a Fatwa to declare war on Russia on 4 October 1853. Britain and France determined to keep Russia out of what would become their prize, joined Turkey in what is famous as the Crimean war. By 1856 the alliance had defeated Russia and Abdulmecid(Caliph of Muslim world) presented himself with a new palace, deserting Topkapi. There was however a price to a seat on the same table as England and France. In 1856, for the first time since 1453, church bells were permitted to ring, by the authority of an imperial decree, in Constantinople. Many Muslims declared it a day of mourning.
"The famous 19th century Russian thinker Nikolai Danilevski once divided human societies into “civilization creators” and “civilization destroyers”. He listed the ten greatest unique civilizations in chronological order: Egyptian, Chinese, Ancient Semitic (Assyrian, Babylon, Phonoecia, Chaldea), Indian, Persian, Grecian, Roman, neo-Semitic (Arab), and Germano-Roman (European) and had the following to say about them: “[B]eside these positive... civilizations there have also periodically appeared in the , ages of humanity certain transitory actors like the Huns, Mongols, and Turks, whose candles have suddenly flared up and gone out, passing quickly into history. After completing their task of destruction, of assisting in the deaths of moribund civilizations and scattering their remains, they return to their previous insignificance and disappear. We may call them the negative actors of history.” Not only among the intellectuals, but throughout the West there has been no end of things said about the cultural vandalism of the Turks. “In the Balkan Peninsula, with his every step, the Turk has trampled underfoot the products of thousands of years of culture.”" Taner Akçam - "Turkey’s test of civilization" ahvalnews.com/hagia-sophia/turkeys-test-civilization
In my opinion, what is more interesting is that the reasons of Ottoman stagnation and decline are largely based on the problems of the time it was established: 1. When the Ottoman Empire was founded, the Islamic world was just entering the dark age in scientific terms. Because the Mongols burned the Baghdad library and killed the Muslim scientists. When the books disappeared, scientific knowledge disappeared after a single generation. This resulted in only religious education in madrasahs instead of teaching science and religion together. Fearing science, the clergy formed. 2. During this period, Europeans in Andalusia translated Islamic works into their own languages. Thus, before science disappeared, it began to spread throughout Europe during the Renaissance. Thus, Europe scientifically began to exit from the dark age. Soon Spanish Kingdoms destroyed Andalusia. Thus, schools that teach science in the Islamic world could never develop again until modern times(Selim III). 3. Geographical discoveries and colonization enriched Europe economically. The change of trade routes weakened the Ottoman Empire economically. These led to a decline in military technology and internal economic revolts. Thus, the Ottoman Empire began to lose wars. In the early period, only Turks had rebelled against the Ottoman government. (Jalalli rebellions) The nationalism that emerged with the French Revolution and the arming and provocation of the Christians in the Ottoman by foreign countries such as Russia caused the first great Christian revolts in the Ottoman Empire. Because the Ottoman was tolerant of Christians, there had been no major Christian revolts before. The difficulty of the Ottoman Sultan in suppressing the rebellions and the loss of land prepared the ground for the Young Turk uprising. The Sultan was overthrown by a coup. However, partial democracy and the Young Turk government were not enough to suppress the uprisings either. The Ottoman empire fell apart.
That's bullshit lol. Scientific knowledge came from classical greek and roman ideas, not islam, that's why it's called renaissance because it's the rebirth of classical ideas. This all happened because Greek scholars escaped byzantine to Italy after it fell.
@@Nothing_serious Is that what they taught u in ur fancy schools That the world didn’t acquire any knowledge except from Greece So Ancient Egypt, babylon, china, Andalucia & Abbasyiad Caliphate were just jokes!!!! Dude wake up…. Ur Civilization began since 1600s before that ur only source of information was the bible fairytales!!!
Vex was always a game I saw on the shelf when I worked at Blockbuster & I always wrote it off. Seems like I would've liked it back in the day, & even now.
1815 was the Second Serbian uprising! Not mentioning the First Serbian Uprising of 1804 - 1813 that was way more spread with large liberated territories is a huge mistake, particularly since the Ottomans lost many troops in that battlefield and were forced to move out of the area. Also some interesting battles were fought on that front like Battle of Mišar, Battle of Ivankovac, Battle of Čegar Hill which are overlooked here...
Greco Turkish war os 1897 over Crete. Many thanks to the weasel countries of Britan, France, Germany, Austria, Hungary and Italy who supported the Ottomans. Crete is soul of Greece and the repository of its culture. Crete is Greek..always and forever.
The Ottoman Empire crumbled on it own. Greece, Serbia, Montenegro, and Bulgaria could have taken huge chunks out of modern day Turkey of the established world powers didn't stop us.
What? The Greeks made huge inroads into western anatolia in WW1. The British never gave us the supoort they promised. The Greeks were active in WW2 and was significant in the front agaisnt Hitler and Mussolini. Where was Turkey in WW2?
During this period the Europeans experienced advancements in science, industry, and art. Why didn't that happen concurrently in the Ottoman Empire? Was it a lack of innovation in finance & legal institutions?
Because of constant wars and disputes. Ottomans were far ahead of europe in terms of science and medicine but they stagnated. Also western propaganda brought nationalism thus people focused on having their own country instead of important stuff like science and technology
You missed the reunification of Bulgaria in 1885, plus you consider southern Bulgaria (Eastern Rumelia) to be part of the Ottoman empire, but it was semi-autonomous from 1878 to 1885, when they joined Bulgaria. Also, you missed a ton of events from the Balkans, mainly in Serbia, Bosnia and northern Greece (Macedonia)
No unification of Bulgaria? Also the province 9f sanjack was part of Austria Hungary till 1908 when Austriia anexed Bosnia and left sanjack to the Turks
So true....and also I made one history video a year one in my channel but only about the years 1803-1818 with the war he had against the first saudi state
Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman empire spend their entire lives fighting each other
yet they died fighting side by side, talk about the perfect love story 🥰.
yeah Austria ... mainly using Croatian soldiers to fight there war.
Austria also used Croatians in war with Sweden, which is disgusting.
That's very sad🥺❤️
it was Middle Ages, crazy times ... Croatia was first line of defense against Muslim invasion. Other European countries sent financial support once in a while, but in really it was strong fighting spirit of Croatians that helped in surviving the onslaught.
@@zoranznidaric4518 İs Croatia first line or bulgarians and serbs ? I think it was second one
Sick man of Europe: Ottoman Empire
Sick man of Asia: Qing Dynasty
@IboSx IboSx shut up China has fallen many times ignorant fool
@IboSx IboSx speak for yourself I doubt most Arabs like Chinese
@IboSx IboSx culture and manners? Have you seen their make up and hygiene based products commercials?
@@uberjoe-08 Cool
@IboSx IboSx "manners" 🤣
1500 : the strong man 💪
1600 : the arrogant man 😎
1700 : the lazy man 😴
1800 : the sick man 🤕
1900 : dead man 🥺💔💔
🥲
@@papazataklaattiranimam whsttd
@मै हिन्दू लंड पुजारी शिवलंड your videos are sick 👌👌
2021: ой, мама, шика дам!🇹🇷🎤🎶🎺🎸
@i'm about to Turkey live and sing.
History: How many wars and conflicts do you want to have with Russia?
Ottomans: Yes
Same goes for Austrian-Ottoman wars
If it weren't for the Europeans, Constantinople would have been returned to Greece, Greeks would still be in the Pontus, Trebizond, Sinope, West Anatolia, Iconium and Cappadocia; Antioch to the Syrians and Eastern Anatolia to the Georgians and Armenians.
Yep
@@SuchIsLife424 why do you say that ?, thats not true , the empire was relatively strong even in its last moments , greece was wimpy and relied on powers such as britain to maintain independence , without russia , the ottomans would still have control over many domains, the europeans made things worse for it
@@AliAhmed-ni9ry Britain was ally of the ottomans as well. The same as French. And Germans. And Egyptians. And no the empire wasn't strong at that point, it was crumbling.
The irony is that the Ottomans outlasted the Russian and Austria-Hungarian Empires-if only by a couple years
@Kokoro Shimamura cuz you have never been attacked by every side
@@ozankuram2921 crimean war, the russian also helped the turks during turkish war of independence, without the russian you wouldn't be free right now
@@SousukeAizen421 ok boomer 😂
@@SousukeAizen421 this is the same shit as saving if usa did not sell weapons to allies, they would not stand longer.
@@SousukeAizen421 we've fought against 5 superpowers and won. Of course i was gonna be free
Correction, Mahmud II is not Selim III's brother he is actually Mustafa IV's little brother. Selim III was their elder cousin. Selim III was barren, that's why he treat his cousins nicely and paid attention for their education for future of empire. His revolutionist movements were so important and gave breath to empire but his military movements were not popular amongst traditionalist jannisaries. During Russia war, jannisaries started uprising, he didn't want a civil war and gave the throne to his cousin. It didn't go well, jannisaries killed many new military corp members and it badly effected continuing war. One of Selim III's officer Alemdar Pasha gathered an army from surviving new military corp members and did a counter revolt. He supressed jannisaries and reached royal palace. Selim III was living in semi-imprison in palace and educating his younger cousin Mahmud II. Once Selim III loyalists reached palas ungreatful Mustafa IV gave order to execution of his older cousin Selim III and his younger brother Mahmud II. They killed Selim III but palace servents saved Mahmud II. Alemdar Pasha deposed Mustafa IV and crowned Mahmud II. Later jannisaries killed Alemdar Pasha and tried make Mustafa IV sultan again but this time Mahmud II executed his big brother. Later he destroyed Janniseries. It was a necessary action but a deep blow to Ottoman army, in the end even Kavalalı became more powerful than Ottoman army. If Selim III's revolutionist movements accepted everything could be different. Selim III's mind was ahead of the its time, he was the last hope of empire. His tragic murder was sealed Ottoman's fate.
I completely agree with what you have stated. Selim 3 was the second "Genç Osman" in my opinion. Because he knew what to do. He tried to implement some cruical reforms, he failed and paid it with his life at the end. Generally Selim 3 's efforts are overlooked because Mahmut the 2. is a bigger reformist. However it was Selim to educate and raise Mahmut. Nizam ı cedid was a great idea. It defeated Napoleon and the British in Egypt. It is so sad how Selim failed despite his great efforts and died at the end.
I have a question is Abdul majeed 2 was Sultan or not? (Abdul majeed 2 not Abdul majeed 1)
@@animationzone2351 no, he was the last caliph. Sultanate abolished after turkish independence war. He was chosen as caliph by parliament but one year later because of some old order supporters, caliphate abolished as well.
Yes
I was confused, in some videos that I saw the makers said him as (Sultan) Abdul majeed 2 and in some videos they said Caliph Abdul majeed 2. But now I know that he was Caliph not sultan
1:29 "I like you, Selim" ... "I like you too, Napoleon" - middle schoolers or empire rulers?
Just kidding, Napoleon must have at least appeared to be in high school at this point.
Human beings
We all have that annoying neighbor
for the Ottomans, the Russian Empire was their Ned Flanders
@Вхламинго All they did was hit and run back, harsh geography and uninterested Ottoman sultans saved Persia from annexation.
@Вхламинго I remember Ottoman advance until the capital city which is Tebriz, however I am unable to remember any big invasions from Savafids. Oh yeah because it didn't happen. Next.
@Вхламинго and failed in almost all of it lol. They were, quit crying about historical facts Russian nationalist man child.
What goes around comes around. Ottomans got the taste of their own medicine
@Вхламинго cry
this video is sick man!
Sick like the Ottomans!
@@mauriciogonzalez3334
Sick like you
Knowledgia has problems with history 😂😂😂Italy never was ottoman
@@nestororiginal2344 The martyrs of Ontrato?
@@jjdelft3216 Otranto*
🇹🇷 5:52 Ireland🇮🇪 will always be thankful for what he did for us during the great starvation, helping us slir more to survive than "the famine" queen Victoria🏴 who did very little during & after which made is lose millions.
🇮🇪🇹🇷
@TheKingimport i believe it was 10000 silver pounds, to avoid insult to the British queen who sent 2000 he sent 1000. But he made a promise & wanted to keep to his word so sent the rest in a different way (as you mentioned yourself), he had to do it in a way the British wouldn't know so he avoided ports like dublin, cork, Galway, etc. & sent it to a lesser checked port in drogheda.
It's that reason that Ireland showed its gratitude by putting a cresent moon on the coat of arms of drogheda & it's that reason i badly want to visit Turkey 🇹🇷
@TheKingimport absolutely, I'm itching to go back to travelling alpng with my son & partner & Turkey🇹🇷 is on my top 5 to visit.
Wanna be my tour guide?🤣
@TheKingimport well if you come here to Ireland give's a shout & I'll show ya around 😁, show real eye catching stuff unlike what tour sites suggest 🤣
@TheKingimport well Ireland🇮🇪 hasn't been a part of the uk🇬🇧 since 1922, only a part of the north is but that is soon to change. The deal made as a result of brexit between London🏴 & Brussels🇧🇪 has made the north of Ireland reuniting with the republic very likely especiallysince majority in the north voted to stsy in the EU🇪🇺. The remaining 3 parts (Scotland🏴, Wales🏴 & England🏴) are likely to become seperate countries aswell, independence from England🏴 has become a madure subject discussed in Scotland🏴 & Wales🏴. If you set a flight for Ireland🇮🇪 sometimeafter this shit we're dealing with is over, I'll gladly be your guide😁
One tiny mistake in the video. For a few years, the capital of greece was nafplio in morea and not athens :-)
But just for a minute but still you're right!
@Achaean It should be mentioned that Greeks used to be given privileged treatment from the Ottomans with many of their priests sent all throughout the Balkans to preach. That's why their Slavic and Romanian Orthodox counterparts were mistrustful of Greeks.
It was Nafplion because it had relatively few non-Greeks,unlike Athens.
Thank you for the video! I must confess that I lacked the big and the full picture of the period. My nation (Bulgaria) was part of the Ottoman Empire at that time but the truth is that at school we are mostly taught about the developments on Bulgarian soil during the Ottoman rule. Hence, I had never heard about the Turkish-Egyptian conflict for instance. Thank you once again.
Well, the egypt governer that revolted was still turk
@@alihaydar728 he was Albanian
@@alihaydar728 Albanian
So are Ottomans shown as Good guys or bad guys ?
1876 - April Uprising
1877 - Battle of Shipka
1878 - Bulgaria is free
Yes, 5 Centuries of Ottoman Yoke are behind us. Let us never repeat the mistake from the past!
Unity and Freedom!
Don't you don't you should thanks Romania for Plevna battle? and olso give Cadrilater as a reword?
@@alexandrupreda1994 I am thankful that you sincerely helped us in this war. But why did you need to backstab us in 1913 when we were fighting Greece and Serbia!?!?!
@Huseyin Ucar I agree to some degree.
@_𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜_ When... ?
@_𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜_ Go learn history please
The problem was simple : lack of money and technology. And having border with world's largest (Russia) and second largest( Austro-Hungary) army.....
Where s nazi germany?
@@mrhatman675 they did not exist at the time
Yes ever since the early 18th century it started falling far behind its two powerful neighbours Russia and Austria/Austria-Hungary, the two empires certainly played a large role in crippling the ottomans throughout the 18th and 19th centuies.
Abdulhamid 2nd improved health care school and many other things the ottoman empire had been in debt which cost millions of pounds but abdulhamid by the end of his reign lowered it to about a tenth
@Kokoro Shimamura he didn't lose wars the parliament did they never let abdulhamid do anything and if you don't believe me you cn find it on trt, ilm film and many other sites
I’ve watched every video on the Ottoman Empire as part of your series. Can’t wait for the next video!
Correction: Napoleon didn't style himself as the liberator of Egypt from the Ottoman Empire. In fact, he did everything to get Ottoman approval for his Egyptian Campaign, which he didnt get. And initially he was spreading the rumor that he had the sultans backing. He styled himself as the liberator of Egypt from Mameluke ill governance and tried to show great respect to the Sultan.
Turk citizens; "Mustafa Kemal Pasha, We are in danger ".
Mustafa Kemal (ATATURK) Pasha; "No, we are the danger".
One of the reasons for the weakening of the Ottoman Empire is the lack of allies in Europe. While states such as Austria and Russia could find allies in their wars with the Ottoman Empire, the Ottoman Empire was alone outside the Crimean War. States such as the Holy Germanic Austria, Russia, Poland, and Venice joined forces against the Ottoman Empire.
The question is why couldn’t they find allies especially exploiting the catholic Protestant rift
the asnwer is: due to religion
@@adamsnow4979
And the darkest days of the Ummah started...😢
Ikr 😭
Then Mustafa Kemal saved turks
@@ozankuram2921 the person who wasnt muslim at all and did everything to make islam bad
@@hamdaanchalky7724 if islam would be good Ottoman Empire would not collapse. Islam is a poison.
@@hamdaanchalky7724 I wish Atatürk didnt save the Turks. They dont know what freedom is.
its pretty amazing to see foreign sources with unbiased history hat of to you guys.
A little correction: The "C" letter in Abdulmecid is pronounced "J" as that's how it works in Turkish so the name is Abdulmejid not Abdulmesid.
Yea its funny how these youtubers cant open up google translate,write the name and click on text to speech.What kinda history enthusiast do that?
@@efecelik8931
Efe Jelik?
Kakali Mukherjee Ch
@@kakalimukherjee3297 chelik
1453-1600 : The strongest in the world 💪
1600-1700: Top 10
1700-1800: Mr. Stark I dont feel so good..
1800-1900: 😵
1600-1700 Is also strongest in the world of maybe second place.
1700-1800 top 3 or 5
1800-1900 top 10
1900-1922 total disaster
It wasnt the strongest in 1500
@@huyganisto5090 No, the strongest in the world in the 1600s was France, and before that, it was Spain.
@@Thunderworks nah spain was weaker than ottoman in 1500s and france has nothing in 1600s. Qing china is superior than all of europe and equal to ottomans in this area
@@Thunderworks and after that it was Britain
The Europeans helped the Ottomans against Muhammad Ali, to keep both weak and divided.
True
True
@@mohamedsamak5023 I made one history video a year one in my channel but only about the years 1803-1818 with the war he had against the first saudi state
@@funtime4981 I made one history video a year one in my channel but only about the years 1803-1818 with the war he had against the first saudi state...
....they are already divided since they were fighting each other in the first place
7:25 That's what they told the Georgians, yet they subjugated them, and then robed the churches, so...
That's why your nation recognized the Armenian genocide? Your nation is a double faced state, don't you dare to complain about turks
@@axiosw0774 yeah but u must say that genocide happened, u cant hide history it just happened even germans dont hide holocaust happened, japaneese dont hide nanking genocide so why are u hiding, everyone knows it happened u cant hide it, there are ottoman documents and photos about it, if u will hide history u will never learn bc we learn from history
@@iwantsomecheesburgers
Why on earth would you assume I'm a denialist? I said Georgia the country that the guy above is - is a denialist country despite wanting to claim sympathy for being subjugated for his people, same as Israel - denialist country despite being a subject to the holocaust the very definition of genocide which was written after the Armenian genocide, but they want power they want to be the only recognized people that suffered by injustice. I can't like both of these countries, they are fake and deduct dirty politics, in case of Georgia, they did not learn their historical lesson
I question myself whether I can even call that nation a Christian, just and democratic nation
Georgia is still a Christian country with their own language and culture ,so subjugation ain't so bad
And ironically a Georgian man ended up becoming the most powerful man person in the entire Soviet Union.
Ottoman power faded in the late 16. century however the actual decline happened after the failures of vienna and zenta the empire never became the same again after those defeats... medieval Ottomans were absolute beasts though literally snatched everyone except for the Timurids
Kavalalıyı seviyor musun?
Timurid ottoman same race why they will go against each other?
@@DakhniURDU
Conflict of interest
@@papazataklaattiranimam Vehabi savaşındaki katkısı dışında hayır pahalıya mal oldu kavalalı isyanı...ama sultanlarda iyi yönetemedi durumu söz verip tutmazsan olacağı o
@@nenenindonu kökeni de belli değil🥲göç olmuş arnavutlaşmış diyenler var dolu
as a citizen of turkey i assure u we didnt declare war on russia 4:22. in fact we demand a compensate for ottoman's burnt fleet and they percived it as an insult and declared war on ottoman
Russia always being difficult.
Nice video overall, but you should have included the unification of Bulgaria and Eastern Rumelia in 1885
Mohament Ali was one of the Greatest of his era and should be know more in the west. He was the Winning guy
Yes indeed. Mehmet (Mohammed) Ali was a smart men, that managed to suppress the revolt in egypt with his small army of Albanians and than to convince the egyptians to join his side.
@@albinh.3149 true...I made a video about his war in arabia...I should make one for later times
@@LuanZeqiri1 Would be nice mate....gonna watch ur other vid now.
@@albinh.3149 yeah hope you like it mate
Mohamed Ali WAS the winning guy.
He only was.
The Ottomans and the Safavids did not form a single alliance throughout their history to confront a common enemy like Russia, for example .. (If Turkey and Iran were united against Russia in the Caucasus, the Russians would have been permanently expelled to their original borders outside the Caucasus region) said one of the Western historians
The enmity between the Ottomans and the Safavids greatly harmed both parties, I do not know what this hostility and stupidity made them not ally with each other even though they are Turks ... the Romans and Persians allied against Muslims despite the difference in ethnicity and religion, as well as the Christians despite their different sects, they allied themselves against Muslims
After a bloody history during selim I time they never wanted to get engaged on anything again although iran is ruled by ethic turks but shia - anyway long history.
Safavids did not exist in 19th century!
@Kokoro Shimamura ok indian no one invited you. And both sunni and shia live peacefully side by side!
The Persians where shia that’s why
@@oza801weren’t the safavids ethnic kurds who were turkified and then persianized?
1300's: *Ottomans join the server*
1400's: *Ottomans purchase Deagle and goes mid and kills Byzantine*
1500's: *Ottomans kill 2 more enemies, planting the bomb at A site*
1600's: *Holy League rushes A and ambushes Ottoman, they fail but Ottoman health is low.*
1700's: *Ottoman holds out against 4 enemies, taking down 2. Bomb timer is close.*
1800's: *Ottoman gets flanked and one tapped from behind*
1900's: *Ottomans left the server.*
@@parcalosca which is?
Great video. Btw Abdul-Mecid is pronounced "Abdul-Mejeed" just so you know. :)
That's right for some reason C is pronounced J in the Turkish language.
@@EngineerEg ch
It's always sad watching an empire slowly crumble. .. just as the Byzantine before them. History repeats itself
Byzantines lasted much longer than the ottomans though.
@Hell Fire they were “Romans” by name. The bulk of the empire and its main component were Greek genetically, culturally and linguistically though.
@@obabas80 byzantine is italian
Love your documentaries so much. Keep it up guys
Great video man
The Wallachian uprising was actually started by Greek rebels. The general plan was that the Greeks would defeat the Ottomans in the south, the mixed army would defeat the enemy in the north. After this, the armies would unite in Macedonia and march to Constantinople and then Asia. Yes, that was the ACTUAL plan!!! Could you imagine if it actually worked?
I might make a few mistakes and correct me if I am wrong, Tudor Vladimirescu made a pact with Alexander Ipsilanti to revolt together and aid the romanian army, but due too russian influence, Ipsilanti didin't sent any support, thus romanians revolution was defeated by the turks.
That would had never worked. U would have been crushed.
@@albinh.3149 Yeah, I know
@_𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜_ well, you misread what I said. Romanians only wanted independence, not campaings to Constantinopole and Asia Minor. I can't speak however on behalf of the greek movements, they might have wanted it.
@_𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜_ why are you so attacked anyways, it wasn't even my comment to begin with
Nice video! You’re such an inspiration!
Seven nation army couldn't hold me back
British :No fight but they had to leave because they didn't want to face 200.000 turkish army. Check "chanak crisis"
French :they briing some lejyoners but they got defeated by turkish gerilla fighters.
İtaly:thsy occupied some provinces but they didn't touch the People so People didn't rebel against them. They waited greek turkish fights result. After greece get destroyed in Sakarya battle they left.
Armenia :they got defeated. İt was easy. Plus turkey captured 40. 000 rifles from them. 1 Day after Kars treaty, Red army occupied them
Greece :they real dangerous enemy. they didn't fight in ww1 unlike turkey. They had more ammuniton. More machine Guns but they still got destroyed.
Btw turkey ıraq border still wasnt clear after lausanne treaty. Turkey wanted mosul but british didn't want to loose the oil there. Eventually turkey had to gave up in 1926. 3 years after lausanne treaty.
@@sktt1488 greece had more weapons yeah nice jokr
Little remarks otherwise a great vid:
0:50 napoleon's navy was sunk by that of The British Empire so that was one of the reason too that he left Egypt
3:36 mention of Greek arvanites.and serbian revolt but not the one from Ali Pacha of yannina that war was from 1820-1822
Where exactly is the word "Arvanites" mentioned ?
Are you drank lad?
The 200th anniversary of the Greek War of Independence is this on this year
@J May same happen to you. Already Greeks selling their ports to China. If Ottoman Empire oppressed you then you would be Muslim now not Christian
Congratulation to the brave Greek souls who lost their lives by ottoman atrocities.
@@None-do2qn well the ottoman tried their best , but the Greeks prevailed. Just because someone hasn't converted to islam , it doesn't mean the ottomans were very kind to their non Muslim subjects.
@@nazmakhan178 lol the ottoman ruled them for 400 years. If they wanted they would easily made them Muslims by force converting. They didn’t and now they are lying about oppression! Christianity was spread by sword by Romans. Ottomans were merciful or else half of Europe would be Muslim. How would they resist?
@@None-do2qn I think you need to watch this- th-cam.com/video/5AkAGc5nOXw/w-d-xo.html
and this- th-cam.com/video/8prwEJkJ3Ds/w-d-xo.html
respect for making such a great video
This is supposed to end at 1900 yet it does not show the unification between the principlality of Bulgaria and eastern Rumelia of 1885 which triggered the serbo-bulgarian war, and it shows some Greek and Serb revolts but it does not show the Bulgarian revolt of 1876 which triggered the ruso-turkish war of 1877-1878.
Yes, when Bulgaria and Eastern Rumelia united in 1885, Serbia attacked Bulgaria!
@@ЖивкоХристов-и5н
Sultan Hamid was legit fool
Bulgars take east rumelia from us,serbs attacking bulgars and Abdul watch all this🤣
@@harzemsahtekin4441 Serbs hate Bulgarians
Bruh...you never cease to amaze me with knowledge....BLESS
I love how nobody notice that France take algeria
Cos nobody cares about Algeria lool
when corruption meets oppression, the days are counted
Omg its as correct as laws of nature
Congratulations
Correct- bravo!
The way the dahiyas treated the Serbs in the Sanjak of Smederevo also contributed greatly to the so called first uprising that began in 1804.
can u please provide info about the track playing at 5:17 ? regards
Many people who evaluate the Ottoman Empire in 1700-1900 missing a very important detail.
This big mistake is that the Ottoman-Russian wars are viewed only as a 1v1 war.
This is completely wrong.
Russia had a tremendous influence over orthodoxes within the Ottoman borders. The Russian army, when the war started, Occupying Ottoman vassal romanian principalities without any resistance and gain a solid position in the north of the Danube River.
While all this was happening, the Ottoman army had to divide its troops to fight the Bulgarian and Serbian rebels while trying to reach the front. Moreover, although Russia has a great manpower advantage.
This only applies to the 1877-1878 battle.
Although the actors changed, Russia could always find allies against the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was able to find these allies only once.
(Crimean War)
I give you a few links to review the status of the both sides in these wars.
Russo-Turkish war (1686-1700) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1686%E2%80%931700)
Russo/Austrian-Turkish war (1735-1739) imagine 2v1 just after nader shah destroyed ottomans in the east (1730-1735 Persian-Ottoman war) Look:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman%E2%80%93Persian_War_(1730%E2%80%931735)
Russo-Turkish war (1768-1774) = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1768%E2%80%931774) Even egytp ruler supported russia against constantinople.
Russo-Turkish War (1787-1792)
= en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1787%E2%80%931792)
Austro-Turkish War (1788-1791)
= en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austro-Turkish_War_(1788%E2%80%931791)
Russo-Turkish war (1806-1812) = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1806%E2%80%931812)
When war started ottomans were tried to supress serbian rebellion started in 1804 and during the war janissaries and mustafa IV dethroned reformist sultan Selim III and killed him.
And during this war brits declared war on otttoman empire in 1807. = en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Turkish_War_(1807%E2%80%931809)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Turkish_War_(1877%E2%80%931878)
My aim is not to belittle the Russian victories. I'm just trying to give people a different perspective.
The Russian empire also had a very big muslim minority , the Russian Tatars and the Turkic peoples in Central Asia ( Kazakhs , Turkmens , Uzbeks etc ) , so they had the same problem as the Ottomans.
To be fair the ottomans were like 15 countries and conscripted men from all over the empire which is why they took so many losses in battle but still won in the early days of their empire.
@@javier6926 My friend, the peoples you are talking about fought in the Russian army and saved Russia's ass in many battles. Especially in the Napoleonic Wars, the Tatars prevented the defeat of the Russians.
@@javier6926 Kazakhs or kazan tatars far from warzone and subjuguated. Also after 1783 can you show me crimean tatar rebellion during ottoman-russia war ?
@@jg2213 Conscription system wasnt active in 18th ceuntry bro. Ottoman army consisted of rebel janissaries.
Ottomany army had contcripts effectively in world war I.
A nicely informative video. I liked it.
These videos must take so much effort. Mad props, they're amazing.
Awesome as always
And thanks for this video and plz make video on mughal empire
I love your channel
The Byzantine sends their regards
You mean Eastern Romans
@@babulburel547 you mean the hellens
Kosem sultan
@@ghostofathens6600 yep. But, I will annoy you by saying 'Hellens' by their Latin name 'Hellas'.
1vs all. Gj
Great video today keep it up your doing amazing job
It is impossible to find another empire so "historically lucky" than the Ottomans. The European powers saved them so many times. 1840, 1853, 1878...
What about china in the 19th century
its not about saving them, its about keeping the balance of power and they preferred a weak ottoman empire than a strong new Empire forced by Mohamed Ali for example, and they kept the Russians at check when they were winning alot !
@@00Abrams00 You're right of course. Especially after the Vienna Congress of 1815 the Great Powers were strongly opposed to any revolutionary movement. If you think about it, the world as we know it today(States in the basis of Ethnos) is a recent phenomenon.
@@sivalingampriya2526 The Chinese experienced unimaginable misfortunes in the 19th Century so I don't consider them lucky.
Its really comedic, hearing these words from Greek user.
List of the Ottoman sultans:
Osman I (1299-1324)
Orhan (1324-1362)
Murad I (1362-1389)
Bayezid I (1389-1402)
Interrum (1402-1413)
Mehmed I (1413-1421)
Murad II (1421-1444) and (1446-1451)
Mehmed II (1444-1446) and (1451- 1481)
Bayezid II (1481-1512)
Selim I ( 1512-1520)
Suleiman I magnificent (1520-1566)
Selim II (1566-1574)
Murad III (1574-1595)
Mehmed III (1595-1603)
Ahmed I (1603-1617)
Osman II (1618-1622)
Mustafa I (1617-1618) and (1622-1623)
Murad IV (1623-1640)
Ibrahim (1640-1648)
Mehmed IV (1648-1687)
Suleiman II (1687-1691)
Ahmed II (1691-1695)
Mustafa II (1695-1703)
Ahmed III (1703-1730)
Mahmud I (1730-1754)
Osman III (1754-1757)
Mustafa III (1757-1774)
Abdul Hamid I (1774-1789)
Selim III (1789-1807)
Mustafa IV (1807-1808)
Mahmud II (1808-1839)
Abdul Mecid I (1839-1861)
Abdulaziz (1861-1876)
Murad V (1876)
Abdul Hamid II (1876-1909)
Mehmed V Resad (1909-1918)
Mehmed VI Vahedettin (1918-1922)
Abdul Mecid II (1922-1924) as caliph
Sultan Abdulhamid ii, a great ruler he was, against all odds extended the empires life for another 30 years... until the revolution and everything went to waste.
@Kokoro Shimamura really you mean reducing the empires debt by 90%??? The ottomans had 250billion liras of debt but when he was overthrown it was almost finished...
Wow, the production quality of these videos is insane.
It's so annoying that ottomans who once the whole europe trembled before them was shattered like this in the last 100 years of it though it's the nature of all empires 👍
annoying ? Literally the worst empire in history . ROMA INVICTA!
@@arthasmenethil7208 romans dont exist anymore. Romans will never return considering modern politics. Over 50-100 years no one will care about the empires of the old. Im not trying to be pessimistic but man just get over it. Everything will change. And in 200-300 years almost no one more will even remember roman history. Like bruh get over 476. Romans them self caused their fall. Like every empire, corruption is every empire’s enemy.
@@arthasmenethil7208 byzantine is greek. Not roman. They were greek and they conquered by romans.
here is your daily compliment
*Youre Doing Great*
6:14 he flies like a butterfly and stings like a bee
I would assume that was a big inspiration for the boxer to take that name, but... It still sounds so weird to hear it. lol
ottomans: i discovered muskets!
rest of the world: **stares in subatomic laser rifle**
You have forgotten to mention the Convention of Constantinople, signed between the Kingdom of Greece and Ottoman Empire on 2 July 1881 according to which the region of Thessaly and Arta Prefecture (a prefecture within the region of Epirus) were ceded to the Kingdom of Greece. Nice presentation though.
İstanbul, Not Constantinople ... oH wrong video :d
@@zenitelab2482 Well the name of the city from Constantinople to Instanbul was officially changed, under a law which was enacted by the Turkish government, on 28 March 1930. So the Convention of Constantinople to which i am refering to is historically correct (i hold a B.A in History), since the Convention was signed in 1881 before 1930 (even the Treaty of Constantinople in 1913 is known in History as such). For instance the Instanbul Convention of 2011 which guaranteed human rights against domestic violence and violence against women is known as the Convention of Instanbul because it was obviously signed after 1930.
@@ΠαναγιώτηςΚαλλίνικος-λ9ω As a Turk I've to say that you're right. Don't mind the ultranationalistic people who can't stand to this fact you mention.
@@kasadam85 I mean konstaniyye was also a thing
@@e.a9751 that's Constantinople in English
Nice video
I have a strange fascination with the byzantines, so this is cathartic in some ways.
Don’t hate the Ottomans they just killed a declining Empire of Nicaea.
Hate the Crusaders who destroyed the Roman Empire and ruined Constantinople.
Byzantium died in 1204. Ottomans made a pretty good empire too. Blame Venice. Not the ottomans
As much as the palaiologos have their issues, the Byzantine restoration after the Latin Empire is every bit as much a continuation of the previous byzantine empire as well as establishing a new Byzantine dynasty. The Palaiologos family were high Byzantine aristocracy before the Latin empire, with Michael VIII Palaiologos (who restored the Byzantine empire in 1261) being a descendant of the Doukas, Komnenos and Angelos Byzantine dynasties.
Like Michael’s great-grandfather was the previous Byzantine emperor Alexios Angelos, his grandfather Alexios Palaiologos was the heir-apparent. In an alternate history of no Latin empire, Michael Palaiologos would still have been emperor.
The fourth crusade deserves its flak, but it in no way “ended” the byzantines, that claim rests solely with the ottomans.
@@flamingmuffin666 bruh you saying the palaiogos family was competent? hell no. they ruled a dead empire. they lost land to the bulgars and crusaders. then the ottomans put the final nail on the coffin. like even if the ottomans didnt succeed byzantium would fall anyway to some other power. before 1204 they were strong. after that they just stopped being strong. also ottomans and byzantium had a treaty but the byzantines broke it. so they caused it them self. blame byzantium and the crusaders. not the ottomans
@@flamingmuffin666 The Angelos were the Dynasty on the Throne when the Empire ended. The Laskaris who had support from the last Emperor then ruled the Nicean Empire, to say the Palaiologos would have been Emperors otherwise is simply unfounded, false and ignores the families in power.
In the 60 years from the fall to the capture. The Culture, Government, Dynasty And ethnicities of the Byzantine People changed. The direct line of continuation from the Roman Empire had ended and the self identification as Hellenes begins to commonly appear.
Constantinople is never restored having only a fraction of its population, the Byzantine Senate was not restored, feudalization of the Pronoia would be near complete and the Empire restricted to Greek only lands with a fraction of the Byzantines pre 4th territory.
Furthermore Trebizond, Epirus and Bulgaria had legitimacy and claims to the Empire, you only recognize Nicaea cause they took Constantinople.
The Roman Empire of the Pre4th would never return.
Almost the best video of the series.
There is a word of an historian. The Ottomans did not declined, Europe went too fast forward.
@Вхламинго Some govermental systems didnt functioned like the early times but the main Ottoman story is they didnt developed fast like Europeans. They stuck at 17-18th century. So thats why Ottomans collapsed in a very short summary.
@Вхламинго Thats what i am talking about. They didnt catch up level of the west, so they couldn't compete with them and lost so many wars because of this.
they were the first to use gunpowder weapons giving them a huge advantage against European powers however when they modernized the ottoman empire was late to do that and thus were no longer as strong as the once were
Probably the best video name on this channel.
Greece paid a hefty price for its independence, Thousands died in order to take back some of what rightfully theirs to begin with. However even today as we speak Turkey is desperately trying to revive old empty aspirations of a new empire, by been a recalcitrant neighbour, to some countries around it.
Literally all countries would love to boost their influence as much as they can in anywhere they can. Some countries are capable of it and some aren't, it's as simple as that.
Many countries paid a hefty price to get independence from the British but the video isn't about them, even if it was about them I doubt you'd have a problem with that.
@TheKingimport ok and?no one invited them in with war they cane with war they left
@Ali İhsan Sabis turks have always been the aggressor in this relationship
Selim was impressively capable ruler, and as usual he was deposed by the Janisaries.
Abdülmecid " turkish" pronounced Abdulmajed.
Hi, good video. In 1885 Bulgaria expanded as it unified with Eastern Rumelia. Keep up with the good work!
You forgot to mention the brutal manner in which the Ottomans stopped the Bulgarian April Uprising of 1876. This brutality served as grounds for the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878.
@TheKingimport he’s just brainwashed. He probably cries over the Armenian “genocide” to this day.
@Fact: Islam is wrong your username already shows you’re a joke.
Well Explained🎉🎉
the ottomans in greece be like: i won, but at what cost
Basically it was the Egyptian regular - almost in European standards troops that almost ended the greek revolution but they couldn't keep their gains with most of their fleet destroyed although stubbornly enough some garrisons was refusing to handle their forts to the new greek government and they had to be forced out, creating an diplomatic crisis between Britain and France - since French troops were involved in those operations - the French was supposed to be there as " advisors" for the greek regular army and peacekeepers in the area that is roughly now days central Greece and by no way to move in Peloponnese ( Morea ) 😉
The nineteenth was a century of loss for Muslims. As early as in 1808 the Serbs were encouraged to revolt, and by 1830 a Serbia state had been established. In 1821 it was the turn of Greece, encouraged by the music of Byron's poetry, to demand freedom from the Ottomans. Greece became independent in 1833. In the Caucasus, Russia moved into Turkish penumbra. In 1839 Britain occupied Aden to consolidate her control over the sea routes to the jewel in her crown. By 1877 Bulgaria had been given autonomy, Crete won similar terms in 1898(and joined Greece on 1913). The weakness of Constantinople(Istanbul) had gone to the heart. It was in huge external debt and it revenues were being scanned by lenders.
No mention of the Hamidian Massacres (1894-1896) that left up to 300,000 Armenians dead, 50,000 orphaned, the destitution of 546,000, the destruction of 2,493 Armenian villages, the residents of 456 of which were forcibly converted to Islam (~150,000 people), and the desecration of 649 churches and monasteries, of which 328 were converted into mosques.
All you said was “Problems with Armenia and its neighbors began in the 1890s and only grew with time as the Ottoman Empire was pushed and more in the direction of urgent defense over its dwindling power and territory...”
I know most of your creators are ethnically Turkish but can you try and remain factual and not white wash history please.
Where are the links bro, i cant see any sources?
@@vapingcat5406 I didn't source any links, google is free bro.
@@kristaporkhach So a guy comes here, he talks random shit and doesnt even have a proof?
@@vapingcat5406 Calling a massacre “random shit” is kind of inconsiderate don’t you think? Google is free dude, stop trolling.
@@kristaporkhach What the fuck do you mean bro, you are the person who is providing this thing into youtube comments and I am the one asking for sources, things you say is bullshit and It shows that you have no proof, you are just here to make propaganda? Thats not how things works "Just look at google bc you are a troller" bro you are saying that this is real so that means this is based on a SOURCE, why should I get into a deep re search If you dont have a proof?
I mean it's only a 12 min video! He couldn't give you the ENTIRE Ottoman history! If you all want a video with your info in it why not make your own? Thank you sir for effort and time you give up to make all these. Thank you
The sick man of America: The History of United States (2020 - 2030)
The sick man of America happens to be the most powerful 😉
@@renaudli5834 bruh just wait till 2035
@@exineptias What will happen in 2035? Do you have an idea? Me neither.
@@renaudli5834 i have an idea and eve historians have some ideas about the future of the 3rd world power
@@exineptias An idea is not a fact.
1 st view very nice keep it up
If the ottomans were not oppressive genociders and were actually a secular free religion state , they could have survived.
@Shaban Ahmad Never said that they were Islamic. But yes they discriminated religion and committed atrocities against other religions.
At the battle of navarino , you forget to mention that the sultan also called the governor of Algéria for help, because after losing the battle france took the opportunity to occupy algeria, because Algeria Lost all it's fleet during that battle, and couldn't defend itself
The Ottomans were late to understand the new trends of nationalism . For instance when the Greeks revolted 200 hundred years ago, the ottoman thought of this as a Russian plan to cause an insurrection of the Rum(Roman) community of the Empire. Essentially the spiritual subjects of the Patriarch of Constantinople. That’s why he was hanged after its outbreak.
It was russian plan,lol
Mahmut II did not ascend to the throne by hisself, he was enthroned by Alemdar Mustafa Pasha, who was the supporter of Selim III and his reforms.
The ottomans just couldn't catch a break.
It came around.
@Kokoro Shimamura personally I think it started in the early 1700s, the Europeans had simply outpaced them both economically and militarily
@@danirey425 Very true.
I mean apparently they could of had a 30 year break against russia but violated that agreement.. perhaps if they didnt do that they could of managed to reform and modernize a bit more.
Peter the Great had dreamt of winning Constantinople back for Christianity and Tsar Alexander I called the city " The key to the door of my house " In 1853 Nicholas I made the remark to the British ambassador in St Petersburg that echoed through the next century " We have a sick man on our hands, a man gravely sick " he said referring to Turkey, and wanted European powers to divide the Ottoman empire by mutual agreement and turn Constantinople into a free city. Russian insults provoked students of Turkeys madrassas(Taliban of their time) to come on to the streets, and Abdulmejid obtained a Fatwa to declare war on Russia on 4 October 1853. Britain and France determined to keep Russia out of what would become their prize, joined Turkey in what is famous as the Crimean war. By 1856 the alliance had defeated Russia and Abdulmecid(Caliph of Muslim world) presented himself with a new palace, deserting Topkapi.
There was however a price to a seat on the same table as England and France. In 1856, for the first time since 1453, church bells were permitted to ring, by the authority of an imperial decree, in Constantinople. Many Muslims declared it a day of mourning.
Taliban of their time? What?
"The famous 19th century Russian thinker Nikolai Danilevski once divided human societies into “civilization creators” and “civilization destroyers”. He listed the ten greatest unique civilizations in chronological order: Egyptian, Chinese, Ancient Semitic (Assyrian, Babylon, Phonoecia, Chaldea), Indian, Persian, Grecian, Roman, neo-Semitic (Arab), and Germano-Roman (European) and had the following to say about them: “[B]eside these positive... civilizations there have also periodically appeared in the , ages of humanity certain transitory actors like the Huns, Mongols, and Turks, whose candles have suddenly flared up and gone out, passing quickly into history. After completing their task of destruction, of assisting in the deaths of moribund civilizations and scattering their remains, they return to their previous insignificance and disappear. We may call them the negative actors of history.” Not only among the intellectuals, but throughout the West there has been no end of things said about the cultural vandalism of the Turks. “In the Balkan Peninsula, with his every step, the Turk has trampled underfoot the products of thousands of years of culture.”"
Taner Akçam - "Turkey’s test of civilization"
ahvalnews.com/hagia-sophia/turkeys-test-civilization
damn thats racist af
The turks didn't destroy civilizations
Based
Lol. Are you quoting a freaking Anarcho-communist. That's ridiculous.
It was an empire of darkness, as in lack of everything that is light, shiny and beautiful. Am empire that lived continuingly in a dark age.
Don't have time to watch just came to drop the like, I will see it another day.
In my opinion, what is more interesting is that the reasons of Ottoman stagnation and decline are largely based on the problems of the time it was established:
1. When the Ottoman Empire was founded, the Islamic world was just entering the dark age in scientific terms. Because the Mongols burned the Baghdad library and killed the Muslim scientists. When the books disappeared, scientific knowledge disappeared after a single generation. This resulted in only religious education in madrasahs instead of teaching science and religion together. Fearing science, the clergy formed.
2. During this period, Europeans in Andalusia translated Islamic works into their own languages. Thus, before science disappeared, it began to spread throughout Europe during the Renaissance. Thus, Europe scientifically began to exit from the dark age. Soon Spanish Kingdoms destroyed Andalusia. Thus, schools that teach science in the Islamic world could never develop again until modern times(Selim III).
3. Geographical discoveries and colonization enriched Europe economically. The change of trade routes weakened the Ottoman Empire economically.
These led to a decline in military technology and internal economic revolts. Thus, the Ottoman Empire began to lose wars. In the early period, only Turks had rebelled against the Ottoman government. (Jalalli rebellions)
The nationalism that emerged with the French Revolution and the arming and provocation of the Christians in the Ottoman by foreign countries such as Russia caused the first great Christian revolts in the Ottoman Empire. Because the Ottoman was tolerant of Christians, there had been no major Christian revolts before. The difficulty of the Ottoman Sultan in suppressing the rebellions and the loss of land prepared the ground for the Young Turk uprising. The Sultan was overthrown by a coup. However, partial democracy and the Young Turk government were not enough to suppress the uprisings either. The Ottoman empire fell apart.
That's bullshit lol. Scientific knowledge came from classical greek and roman ideas, not islam, that's why it's called renaissance because it's the rebirth of classical ideas. This all happened because Greek scholars escaped byzantine to Italy after it fell.
@@Nothing_serious Is that what they taught u in ur fancy schools
That the world didn’t acquire any knowledge except from Greece
So Ancient Egypt, babylon, china, Andalucia & Abbasyiad Caliphate were just jokes!!!!
Dude wake up…. Ur Civilization began since 1600s before that ur only source of information was the bible fairytales!!!
@@Nothing_serious greek schoolars in renaiannce is soooo limited.. Wake up from greece fantasy
@@Nothing_serious very ignorant comment to make. Do you have references to support your statement and prove that the op is incorrect?
Vex was always a game I saw on the shelf when I worked at Blockbuster & I always wrote it off. Seems like I would've liked it back in the day, & even now.
1815 was the Second Serbian uprising! Not mentioning the First Serbian Uprising of 1804 - 1813 that was way more spread with large liberated territories is a huge mistake, particularly since the Ottomans lost many troops in that battlefield and were forced to move out of the area. Also some interesting battles were fought on that front like Battle of Mišar, Battle of Ivankovac, Battle of Čegar Hill which are overlooked here...
Thankx we got this chennal alot of information about the past events
Greco Turkish war os 1897 over Crete. Many thanks to the weasel countries of Britan, France, Germany, Austria, Hungary and Italy who supported the Ottomans. Crete is soul of Greece and the repository of its culture. Crete is Greek..always and forever.
@Вхламинго 😵
@kıpçak asilzadesi 😒
Please explain. How does Crete have nothing to do with the rest of Greece past or present.
The Ottoman Empire crumbled on it own. Greece, Serbia, Montenegro, and Bulgaria could have taken huge chunks out of modern day Turkey of the established world powers didn't stop us.
What? The Greeks made huge inroads into western anatolia in WW1. The British never gave us the supoort they promised. The Greeks were active in WW2 and was significant in the front agaisnt Hitler and Mussolini. Where was Turkey in WW2?
During this period the Europeans experienced advancements in science, industry, and art. Why didn't that happen concurrently in the Ottoman Empire? Was it a lack of innovation in finance & legal institutions?
Because of constant wars and disputes. Ottomans were far ahead of europe in terms of science and medicine but they stagnated. Also western propaganda brought nationalism thus people focused on having their own country instead of important stuff like science and technology
Capitulations
@@deltaeins1580 Thats a lie dummie 😂😂😂
You missed the reunification of Bulgaria in 1885, plus you consider southern Bulgaria (Eastern Rumelia) to be part of the Ottoman empire, but it was semi-autonomous from 1878 to 1885, when they joined Bulgaria. Also, you missed a ton of events from the Balkans, mainly in Serbia, Bosnia and northern Greece (Macedonia)
0:18 neden toprakları yanlış göstermişsiniz
Nasi yanlış
Bulgaria after 1885 was larger than presented ,with territory south of the balkan mountain as well.Great video
Just started TH-cam and found this video. Here before it was out for even a minute :)
No unification of Bulgaria? Also the province 9f sanjack was part of Austria Hungary till 1908 when Austriia anexed Bosnia and left sanjack to the Turks
I feel like the videos could have been a bit longer , as it missed out on key points like the League of prizren...
So true....and also I made one history video a year one in my channel but only about the years 1803-1818 with the war he had against the first saudi state
Indeed, the League of Prizren was one of the key points why the 1st balkan war broke out in 1912.
@@albinh.3149 I mean , the league was in 1878... 1912 was a different story with the same intentions 😬
@@MH-jg6vk The League was formed in 1878.
The balkan war broke out in 1912.
The league was one of the main reasons why it broke out.