Is Windows Pro Edition Worth It?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 812

  • @ThioJoe
    @ThioJoe  ปีที่แล้ว +112

    Thanks to DeleteMe for Sponsoring! Get your personal information removed from the web and search results by visiting ⇨ joindeleteme.com/ThioJoe

    • @GdShard5
      @GdShard5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi

    • @Imtitled
      @Imtitled ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hello Sir

    • @Loamfy3
      @Loamfy3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi

    • @Cart1416
      @Cart1416 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi

    • @_SJ
      @_SJ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This comment is 2 days ago 🤔❤️

  • @mr_biscuit
    @mr_biscuit ปีที่แล้ว +479

    I got my pro key off the side of an old windows 7 computer my school threw out in a dumpster years ago lol. Still works for windows 11 to this day.

    • @joe_j
      @joe_j ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I got mine from my hp8440p,came pre installed, tied to my Microsoft account

    • @CyberHive05
      @CyberHive05 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Thats brill 😅 I just got mine of good old github 💀

    • @DigvijaySingh-se2ll
      @DigvijaySingh-se2ll ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How do I get mine i mean my laptop has genuine windows 10 and i want to update to 11 but i don't know if my key will passed on or not, so do i make this work

    • @CyberHive05
      @CyberHive05 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@DigvijaySingh-se2ll it will be passed on. All keys work if they are updated via official windows updates

    • @mr_biscuit
      @mr_biscuit ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Digvijay Singh The key will pass on. If my windows 7 key works, your windows 10 key will as well. Its a free update.
      Just make sure you are signed into the same Microsoft account you were using for win 10 or are using the same computer when you update to windows 11. If you are just updating though windows update it will also just automatically work.

  • @richardkarsdorp3386
    @richardkarsdorp3386 ปีที่แล้ว +264

    9:00 FYI there is a small thing you might wanna know. Hyper-V is a layer 1 hyper visor like VMware ESXi (not VMware Workstation or player) while virtual box is a Layer 2 hyper visor like VMware Workstation. There is a small performance difference between the 2 because a layer 1 vm speaks directly to the hardware while a layer 2 first goes through the main OS before having the hardware connected to the VM

    • @tpkowastaken
      @tpkowastaken ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That's very useful, thank you!

    • @AncientLamp
      @AncientLamp ปีที่แล้ว +3

      so you recommend hyper-V rather than VirtualBox or VMware workstation for better performance?

    • @aurastrike
      @aurastrike ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@AncientLamp That means HyperV is literally the best of the three by a significant longshot, *not just in performance*

    • @s.i.m.c.a
      @s.i.m.c.a ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@AncientLamp not better performance, but less overhead - if it is important for you. The recommendation is to get Proxmox on separate PC (:

    • @tpkowastaken
      @tpkowastaken ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AncientLamp hyper-v is for better performance. As going through another layer slows things down.

  • @yuvalne
    @yuvalne ปีที่แล้ว +287

    as someone who does IT, I think the two editions are really well named. Home edition is definitely the home edition - it's a great fit for the vast majority of people to use at home. Pro edition genuinely is pro - it's meant for businesses or for definite power user that just can't do with the home edition.

    • @SuperNGLP
      @SuperNGLP ปีที่แล้ว +16

      As someone else who does IT, I also think so.
      I really like his approach to the topics. Everyone gets picked up from knowing nothing to „I understand what this thing does and what I could use it for.“.
      My thoughts always went „you could have added X and Y and technically Z is not that simple you need to think about B…“ No. He explains enough for everyone to get into the topic and explore the rabbit hole themselves and learn more.
      This could really spark an interest in IT in many people. Maybe some day, thanks to videos like this, we can stop asking: „did you try and restart the device?“

    • @topcomp1066
      @topcomp1066 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I think we all remember the edition hell with 7

    • @deathbringer2000
      @deathbringer2000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@topcomp1066 I'm living it. Stuck on 7 pro, and I *really* want Ultimate. Anytime Upgrade won't work, so I'm stuck with pro.

    • @dustinmalpass
      @dustinmalpass ปีที่แล้ว

      ​​@@deathbringer2000 7 pro is probably the best windows 7 edition, at least back in the day. I don't know of any exclusive feature making Ultimate worth going out of your way to upgrade
      If I'm missing something, please let me know.
      I usually install pro on old PC repairs, I may consider doing ultimate if u have a point I can get behind

    • @no_name4796
      @no_name4796 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      As someone who also does IT, i just use linux as most people who do IT and want to mantain their sanity do

  • @danielrhouck
    @danielrhouck ปีที่แล้ว +118

    One feature I really like about pro (from several years ago; this may be different now) which I recommend people be really careful about before enabling: the ability to indefinitely delay Windows Updates. You should regularly install these updates, but I donʼt want my computer to randomly reboot itself over night; Iʼve lost more data to Windows Update closing programs when I wasnʼt looking than I have to malware.

    • @rend43
      @rend43 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You can delay it in windows 11 home wdym for like 6 months even

    • @danielrhouck
      @danielrhouck ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@rend43 Huh, okay. I last used it in the 8 or 10 era, and you needed to do something special (group policy?) to make it not restart overnight when you werenʼt looking.

    • @isosk1229
      @isosk1229 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It definitely got better even in windows 10 with time, the last time I've been forced to update windows was probably 4 years ago. But yes, it was horribly annoying in the beginning

    • @flizzycat
      @flizzycat ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn't that self-restarting thing fixed like 5 years ago and more? I know there was a lot of drama about that when Windows 10 came out

    • @danielrhouck
      @danielrhouck ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@flizzycat I donʼt use Windows regularly anymore but I thought I used it more recently than that and had issues. Could be wrong.

  • @Terraphice
    @Terraphice ปีที่แล้ว +34

    RDP, Hyper-V, Sandbox, etc. are all worthwhile for more advanced users. Hyper-V can be enabled with a registry change and a command line input, but the others are truly locked behind Pro.

    • @mrenesshs7698
      @mrenesshs7698 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Vnc, QEMU KVM, a lot of sandbox type etc. You should use Linux. I use arch BTW

    • @Terraphice
      @Terraphice ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@mrenesshs7698 VNC is not the same thing as RDP. RDP is actual virtualization, and is generally faster with less delay. VNC just mirrors the display.
      QEMU and particularly KVM are fine on Linux, yeah. But quite a lot of things are *not* fine on Linux, and so having a level 1 hypervisor on Windows is very useful. Windows Hypervisor is considered the best emulation software available Windows wise, and second only to bare metal. Even more efficient than QEMU.
      I do use Linux. I have a dual-booting laptop with Windows 11 and Endeavour (An Arch distro.) w/ KDE Plasma, I have many Linode servers running Arch, a Bash Bunny 2 w/ Debian running bare-metal, a few VMs of various OSes (including Arch running on my iPhone, Fedora on my Windows PC, etc.), and OtherOS running some Ubuntu flavor on my PS3.

    • @mrenesshs7698
      @mrenesshs7698 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Terraphice Use Xrdp?

    • @mrenesshs7698
      @mrenesshs7698 ปีที่แล้ว

      (I don't know is there any rdp server for wayland)

    • @Terraphice
      @Terraphice ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrenesshs7698 XRDP is also fine, a bit slower than a regular RDP client because it's using an X-Server to relay the graphics as if it was VNC, but oh well. It doesn't have a Wayland fork that I know of.

  • @platterjockey
    @platterjockey ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I've been using the pro versions ever since Windows 2000. I may not use all of the features, but it's always nice to know they're there if I need them. And, since i'm a builder, i've always gotten the OEM versions.

  • @makhauser42
    @makhauser42 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    As the Wintel engineer, I still have gone with Pro upgrade, but also tell people to consider the upgrade only if they _really_ need some extra features, mostly people don't use OS to the extinct of doing command line or fine configuration stuff. Also, is good to see Windows 11 has gone further than Windows 10, but still not convinced to use this so-called graphical enhancement over the previous version.
    This video puts everything properly and clearly, kudos. Just to add, VNC could be _really_ annoying either it is Real, Tiger, or whatever. It works, sure. Until it doesn't

    • @makhauser42
      @makhauser42 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tpkowastaken thanks, I will give it a try at some point. It took me ages (like 10 years) or so to come back to Windows from Debian, so the last one was XP, and still tried to made it look like earlier versions to keep it simpler. When you have some stuff at work, you just want to relax at home. Unfortunately, too tired for having it for a hobby again, but hope that will change (probably, not)

    • @BakrAli10
      @BakrAli10 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tpkowastaken what is "performance mode in task manager"?

  • @pyp2205
    @pyp2205 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    While I do use Windows 11 Home at home, I use Windows 10 Pro for Workstations (it's pretty much the same as pro edition) in my cybersecurity class. But I might consider getting pro, because some things in pro edition seem pretty cool and useful to have. Like a remote desktop or a sandbox environment.

    • @AlanDike
      @AlanDike ปีที่แล้ว

      With the ability to run a full vm using something like vmware player, sandbox.. while cool.. isn't really much more useful. Honestly, do a vm, before you tinker take a checkpoint, then when you're done revert to checkpoint and boom.. same function, slightly more involved. With vmware player and some of the other free options out there, I don't really see the advantages.

    • @pyp2205
      @pyp2205 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlanDike Well I actually use VMware workstation player and Virtual box, because I personally don't really like Hyper-V. And like you mentioned, the features VMware player and Virtual box has to offer is good enough for what I do.

    • @AlanDike
      @AlanDike ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pyp2205 I tend to lean hyper-v just due to performance since it's a tier 1 vs a tier 2 hypervisor like vmware player or virtualbox... If I'm actually testing things though, in general it's in kvm/qemu on my workstation and most likely doesn't involve windows in the virutalization at all...

    • @pyp2205
      @pyp2205 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lawrencedoliveiro9104 Well on my drive, I did actually dual boot a Linux system. But I had to reimage the drive soon after because it got corrupted after running sfc. But I remember for a lab where we either use linux, windows, or both to have a AAA server to authenticate logins into a switch (pretty much the login credentials are saved in the server instead of the switch).
      But I agree, Linux gives the workstation stuff you need. In fact when I work with personal servers, I prefer to use Linux because I'm not paying thousands of dollars to have a server run with Windows. There's a bunch of things out there for Linux like web consoles that make it easy to manage and use.

    • @CyberNoah
      @CyberNoah ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just use virtual machines for my classes.

  • @tadams587
    @tadams587 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The group policy editor is why I have windows 11 pro. There are numerous settings that tend to reset themselves upon updating to the next windows update build. Windows explorer view settings are among them. Although at the moment I have yet found a way to stop one of the “allow apps” setting from resetting at the bottom of the Windows location settings window, via updating to a new build.

    • @mattbosley3531
      @mattbosley3531 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can find instructions online to add the group policy editor to Windows Home.

    • @asdfssdfghgdfy5940
      @asdfssdfghgdfy5940 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattbosley3531it's not reliable though and it doesn't always work. For whatever reasons it wouldn't enable on work computers that had Home.

  • @LandonEmma
    @LandonEmma ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hyper-V is also essentially for almost every AI program, I tried to make ai art with this one full app but it wouldn’t load and when I looked it up it required hyper-v all their other methods did too, so keep that in mind.

  • @dotdotmod
    @dotdotmod ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Compared to older windows pro versions, the exclusive features are actually pretty cool, so definitely worth the extra cost if you ask me!

    • @im1random263
      @im1random263 ปีที่แล้ว

      People actually pay money for Windows?

    • @dotdotmod
      @dotdotmod ปีที่แล้ว

      @@im1random263 I'm no purist, but I'd rather buy an actual Product key than scamper the web looking for one that works.

    • @tomasplunksnis1087
      @tomasplunksnis1087 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@im1random263 I have the same question. Like who tf pays hundreds of dollars for an OS with ads?

    • @deproocho
      @deproocho ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tomasplunksnis1087 enterprises

  • @adfjasjhf
    @adfjasjhf ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I'd love to see a full video for Sandboxie. I always wanted to check it out but I always used VM instead

    • @FlyboyHelosim
      @FlyboyHelosim ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RogerDBDbgee A sandbox and a virtual machine are really for two different purposes, so can't really say one is better than another.

    • @seinodernichtsein8710
      @seinodernichtsein8710 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yess please

  • @jasonjenkins-ferris
    @jasonjenkins-ferris ปีที่แล้ว +4

    PLEASE do a Sandboxie dedicated vid! Looks like there have been lots of changes since many Sandboxie yt vids were made.

  • @5H4D0WOfficial
    @5H4D0WOfficial ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thio single handedly gonna make me get the Pro Edition 💀

  • @Biaanca5036
    @Biaanca5036 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another reason someone would want Remote Desktop support instead of some 'free' third party option is that Stylus pressure works over it.
    I have a Huion tablet and sometimes I wanna use Krita or Blender and 3dsmax over a remote connection with pen pressure and an active stylus. Microsoft Remote Desktop can do this

  • @digital_sorceress
    @digital_sorceress ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I do pro because I have a windows domain in my home - I don't technically NEED one but I used to be a network admin professionally and I guess I got used to managing Active Directory domains and also, it kind of lets me keep some of those old skills fresh in my head.

    • @AlDunbar
      @AlDunbar ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm retired and in that same boat, and kind of miss the environment and features like remote desktop

    • @digital_sorceress
      @digital_sorceress ปีที่แล้ว

      @D R I personally don't really use group policies - I do have a windows server 2022 I built specifically to run al lthe time - I was tempted to use a really small form factor - like a nuc with some kind of usb enclosure for the drives to minimize power use but settled on a medium ryzen 5 with built in graphics and a modest case and power supply
      I've done the thing with active directory replication and 2 domain controllers in a forest at home in the past but indeed I did not want to keep them both on all the time so I ended up turning one off and only powering it up to replicate occasionally and take backups - but it actually got really iffy being left so far behind so I demoted that to a member server and really If I didn't want to burn the license I'd probably rebuild that old server as a straight win 10 machine so I could hook it up to backblaze without paying commercial (server) rates etc...

  • @SUPER7X
    @SUPER7X ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:37 As a UCB senior about to graduate in 5 days, this got a laugh out of me. I would hope Berkeley has my information lol.

  • @Marenthyu
    @Marenthyu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sandbox and Hyper-V. Absolute must.

  • @philosoaper
    @philosoaper ปีที่แล้ว +3

    always used pro and will continue to do so... I've lost count of the times I've tried fixing friends computers and ran into obstacles due to them being various home editions

  • @seanmartinflix
    @seanmartinflix ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I always get pro. if I can help it. My laptop came with home I'm not gonna go out go out of my way But anytime I do a new build it's pro. more features easier to get rid of unwanted futures. Always grate stuff.

  • @Povilaz
    @Povilaz ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As someone who "doesn't" use Microsoft Activation Scripts, I can say that Windows Pro edition is definitely worth it :)

    • @yousefslimani99
      @yousefslimani99 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠

  • @NoEgg4u
    @NoEgg4u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Remote Desktop is a fantastic program. I know of no other remote control software that works the same way.
    For example:
    -- You do not need a code, from the remote computer. As long as you have login credentials on the remote computer, you can login to that remote computer, with no assistance.
    -- When you login to that remote computer, that remote computer's screen locks. So no one at the remote location can see what you are doing.
    -- Whatever was running under your login at the remote computer will be sent to your local screen.
    -- You can choose to have the audio stay with the remote computer, and only have the video displayed on your local computer. This was a great feature for me, because I have a laptop feeding a DAC (digital to analog converter box, for music).
    I am using a short USB cable between the laptop and the DAC, because long USB cables will diminish the sound quality (long story). There is a reason that no long USB cables exist.
    But with a short USB cable, I could not have that laptop next to me (or on my lap). It had to be next to my DAC box.
    I ran an Ethernet cable from a laptop that I keep next to me, to the laptop that is connected to my DAC.
    Using remote desktop, I can control that computer as if it was the one next to me. And the digital audio feed remained with the remote laptop, feeding my DAC. That audio option was a remote desktop option -- one that I have not seen with any other remote control software.
    Also, I am averse to installing 3rd party software. In this day and age, it is hard to trust any closed source software. Nearly all of them seem to phone home (in a manner of speaking). Many of them nag you to upgrade. Some will not work if you cannot contract their permission server (which I have no need to do, because my laptop has no need to be on the internet (all of my music in on its internal SSD)).
    Remote Desktop took care of everything. It is a wonderful remote control program, included with Windows, that does not go through any 3rd party systems somewhere on the internet. If your computers are on your own local network, then your remote control session never sees the internet.

  • @dantevortex
    @dantevortex ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm running a dual CPU system. Windows Home cannot detect a second CPU. Pro can.
    Just another little detail.

  • @Gustavo_St
    @Gustavo_St ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazingly useful! Thank you!

  • @TwinShadow_Fox
    @TwinShadow_Fox ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Minor word of caution for those using TeamViewer, mainly those with accounts... I got caught in this because I do a lot of remoting to my PC when I'm in my bed sometimes and didn't have a wireless mouse or anything to use, so used TeamViewer for a while as it worked well, until they decided to lock me out. Found out they suspected me of using it in a commercial environment, but they wouldn't listen to me that my use-case is only at home through my phone and they wanted me to fork over all sorts of personal information, and I was having none of that. I basically got completely locked out of using TeamViewer because of that crap.
    Some other alternatives would probably be AnyDesk or even Parsec to some degree. Those could work alright for basically the same purpose that TeamViewer does.

    • @ElJohnerino
      @ElJohnerino ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Same. I suspect they might just do that anyway to try and pry a subscription out of people. I seem to recall they've been an utter dick to deal with by lots of people. So screw teamviewer in my experience, have used realvnc for exactly your use case for many years problem free.

    • @MorbidDesire860
      @MorbidDesire860 ปีที่แล้ว

      When I'm trying to control my PC from bed or outside, I just use Chrome Remote Desktop

    • @benjamintan2733
      @benjamintan2733 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think for free account, Team Viewer only allow a maximum of 2 hours per day, and you are limited to a few different ID connection.

    • @McGWilliums
      @McGWilliums ปีที่แล้ว +3

      rustdesk all the way! you can even host your own servers for the connection between your pc and remote

    • @shadowtheimpure
      @shadowtheimpure ปีที่แล้ว

      Parsec is my tool of choice for that.

  • @wixlogo
    @wixlogo ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The sandboxie plus program seems awesome! A video on it would be amazing!

  • @MartinRepairs
    @MartinRepairs ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting topic would to cover is tunneling (putty). Open a connection from eg. work to your home server and connect via vnc to that work computer. Sometimes you dont have access to work router, but this way you can connect to your work computer... There are security risks...

  • @nevrynkinori3627
    @nevrynkinori3627 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The group policy editor was one of the most annoying things missing from Win10 Home. So lucky it can be restored.

  • @Simon_Hawkshaw
    @Simon_Hawkshaw ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Many thanks for this great advice.

  • @metalnep
    @metalnep ปีที่แล้ว

    My favourite free remote desktop solution is Parsec. It does Windows, Mac, and Linux, and it's super easy to use. No faffing around setting stuff up.

  • @athemalive
    @athemalive ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey Thio, TeamViewer actually uses the same technology as other VNC clients but they made it properiatry.

    • @bikeny
      @bikeny ปีที่แล้ว

      I was using TeamViewer a few years ago and then they started blocking me because they felt I was using it in a business. I was using my laptop to connect to my home computer. At this point, I use Google Remote Desktop.

    • @Stormy_69
      @Stormy_69 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was doing the same, connecting to my home PC from work or even from my laptop. When they mis-defined this as commercial activity and demanded a license I switched to NoMachine. Does the job for me 😉

  • @LMacNeill
    @LMacNeill ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I use Parsec to remotely access my Windows 10 Pro desktop machine, because it's incredibly low-latency, and acts very much as though you're sitting right there at the keyboard. It does have a couple of quirks -- if there's no monitor attached to your computer it won't work, and if there's no mouse attached it will not let your local mouse remotely-control the machine's mouse-cursor. So it's no good for "headless" machines. But it's so low-latency that you can actually play videos or even games on your remote computer as if you're sitting right there. (It requires a very good GPU to do this, BTW.). So it might not work for everyone, but it's a very good alternative to Remote Desktop, nonetheless.

  • @xanderplayz3446
    @xanderplayz3446 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Keep up the good work!

  • @Nikioko
    @Nikioko ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For my last computer, I bought a System Builder version of Windows 7 Professional, 12 years ago. And on my new computer, I just installed Windows 11 Pro and activated it with the same key. So, I paid exactly 0 € for Windows 11 Pro on my new computer.

  • @Jenci
    @Jenci ปีที่แล้ว +8

    At the last part, you forgot to mention Anydesk as remote desktop.

    • @igorthelight
      @igorthelight ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably the best one in terms of simplicity and usefulness ;-)

    • @koenigderbloecke9112
      @koenigderbloecke9112 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@igorthelight And for scamming Scammers :)

  • @XtrAMassivE
    @XtrAMassivE ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Home is perfectly fine for home use, Professional is a must in a proper business, mostly because of Active Directory.

  • @Jon717
    @Jon717 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm using Windows 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC 2021 on my laptop and regular Enterprise edition on my desktop. Didn't have to spend a single penny. Thanks massgravel.

  • @jase_allen
    @jase_allen ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've used the Pro-Edition at home since Win XP.

  • @yousefslimani99
    @yousefslimani99 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm using windows 10 pro edition and I don't know windows pro can let you using these special features, until now!

  • @Sunsper
    @Sunsper ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Talking about the Remote Access alternatives, there's also RustDesk, an open-source virtual desktop software!

    • @igorthelight
      @igorthelight ปีที่แล้ว

      And AnyDesk ;-)

    • @Sunsper
      @Sunsper ปีที่แล้ว

      @@igorthelight AnyDesk is NOT open-source. Lame!

  • @Mahmoud-Alharazeen
    @Mahmoud-Alharazeen ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anydesk is a great alternative for remote desktop and even TeamViewer
    You can set it to auto start with the computer
    Make password for it so you can get un intended access
    Settings to optimize latency which do make a difference in slow connections
    Block user's input so that the controlled pc peripherals won't interfere with you
    And you can run it without installing it

  • @TheRattail
    @TheRattail ปีที่แล้ว

    You don’t need in alternative for group policy editor. You can get it on home edition by just putting two line in command prompt. You can find the two lines really quick online and then you have the real local group policy editor

  • @Lofote
    @Lofote ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Funny, that you first use Group Policy Editor (which is a domain thing primary, as it applies to "domain groups", it is literally made to manage policies for groups of users or groups of computers, it is in the name), and domains - the absolute most important thing in a business - only very late o:O ... Let me tell you: in a company network, domains are a must. There is just no other option. There it is not just "worth it", it is necessary. Unless the IT guy wants to administrate every PC on its own which makes absolutely no sense at all.
    Pro stands for "Professional" which means "Business". (In fact for WIndows Vista "Pro" was named actually "Vista Business", but for Win7 they went back to "Professional" naming scheme).

  • @5H4D0WOfficial
    @5H4D0WOfficial ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey Thio, Would you be able to cover the Windows Security 'LSA Protection Off' Warning Bug. There is action I can take. I got it recently, and I don't know what to do 😶‍🌫️

    • @aavvaallooss2
      @aavvaallooss2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are not alone. Same here since 1 or 2 days ago

    • @ThioJoe
      @ThioJoe  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hm not sure i’ll have to look it up

    • @AaronShenghao
      @AaronShenghao ปีที่แล้ว

      It supposed to be fixed with a new patch, my BF’s computer is fixed, but mine still isn’t.😅

    • @5H4D0WOfficial
      @5H4D0WOfficial ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ThioJoe Thanks ❤

  • @danman32
    @danman32 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is one major difference between RDP and the other options: RDP is a virtual desktop/session, the others mirror your console, the console being where you are with physical display/keyboard/mouse.
    There's pros and cons for each. Windows workstations only allow one active session at a time, so if you RDP into a machine that already has someone logged in at the console, you'll kick them off the console. If you are logging in as the same account they were on, you'll take over their session virtually. If a different account, their session will suspend much like it would with Switch User.
    This can cause problems if you want to share a screen with someone, though you can use Quick Assist with them.
    The alternatives, at least for most, only let you share the console with the other user if someone is already logged in. But then you are sharing the screen with them which could be what you want.

    • @danman32
      @danman32 ปีที่แล้ว

      @D R you can't just "install" RDP to home edition, it isn't a separate product. It can be hacked to enable it though, but it's just that, a hack.

    • @𰻝
      @𰻝 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can also configure RDP to allow concurrent sessions, instead of it kicking people off.

    • @danman32
      @danman32 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@𰻝 on Windows 10/11?

  • @im1random263
    @im1random263 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best feature of Windows Pro is that you can completely disable automatic updates or what I prefer get a notification whenever there's a new update and then you can decide when you want to start it. And with MAS is doesn't makes a difference if you choose Pro or Home.

  • @writerpatrick
    @writerpatrick ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pro is better suited to networking. It seems easier to connect to other computers using it.
    I got mine for free (at least free to use) from the Insider Preview program when they made it free for IP members at it's release so it didn't cost me anything more than the Home Edition.

  • @benexe1123
    @benexe1123 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great exokanations of the Windows Pro features and alternatives to it

  • @CabomBaby1923
    @CabomBaby1923 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    (For nerds)Windows Pro has also built in msg in terminal so basicly it can message anybody of anything in a messagebox and can be used for pranks

  • @Chalisque
    @Chalisque ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The only machine I've bought where I had the option I chose Home, and wish I'd gone Pro, though that machine is really just for music and media, so doesn't really need Pro. I have a few refurb Thinkpads which all have pro, and I definitely prefer it.

    • @Chalisque
      @Chalisque ปีที่แล้ว

      @enrique amaya I do, and I'm not, but I don't get the relevance of your reply.

  • @rayani5383
    @rayani5383 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never knew windows pro has a virtual machine, THANK YOU

  • @terraincognita2973
    @terraincognita2973 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would reccomend sunshine + moonlight for the remote connection.

  • @danman32
    @danman32 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I probably would have not minded home edition in the past if it included RDP "server".
    But Sandbox which I only found out about a few months ago is handy.

  • @kozmizm
    @kozmizm ปีที่แล้ว

    being able to turn off autmatic updates wasn't mentioned, but that's one of the most useful features when working from home. You don't wan't windows doing an update during work hours

  • @KaneLivesInDeath
    @KaneLivesInDeath ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Windows 11 Pro is worth it for Bitlocker, especially if it's a laptop/tablet.
    While most Windows mobile devices have Bitlocker enabled on Windows Home edition, it's usually limited and you can't edit it too much unless it's a Pro device.

    • @UmVtCg
      @UmVtCg ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Depends on where you take your laptop and what you store on it

    • @njpme
      @njpme ปีที่แล้ว

      Laughs in Filevault 😂

  • @TheGrinningViking
    @TheGrinningViking ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Windows 10 LTSB is the only version even vaguely worth it, and you still need to get in there and forcibly disable as much of the monitoring as you can.

    • @ivebeenmemed
      @ivebeenmemed ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Literally what I said. I run 2021 on my main laptop.

    • @xorgfx-y4l
      @xorgfx-y4l ปีที่แล้ว

      this but LTSC 2021

  • @Brommes
    @Brommes ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im using linux mint .. no need to choose between "we will read and listen to everything you do" or "we will read and listen to everything you do"

    • @GSBarlev
      @GSBarlev ปีที่แล้ว

      Wait, are you throwing shade at Microsoft or Canonical?

  • @LolligePro
    @LolligePro ปีที่แล้ว

    Parsec is also a good remote desktop software
    i mainly use it to play local games with my friends remotely

  • @TheAndreyCraft
    @TheAndreyCraft ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was choosing between buying windows 11 pro key for 30$ or windows 11 pro key + life license on all office programs for 60$. I chose 30$ cause I don't need office anymore, I'm not a student

  • @100realspaghettios
    @100realspaghettios ปีที่แล้ว

    i didn't even realise deleteme was the sponsor until the sponsor segment ended

  • @l.i.archer5379
    @l.i.archer5379 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I used GPEdit to lock in my Windows version to 10, build 22H2, and never lets it upgrade itself to Windows 11.

  • @NicoleMay316
    @NicoleMay316 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I upgraded to Windows 10 Pro just a bit before Win11 came out. Needed HyperV, and the rest seemed interesting too. 3rd party virtual machine programs weren't running the best, but HyperV has been pretty good after disabling Windows Hello.
    Getting a new laptop next month for school, and I'm gonna be buying a black market Windows 10 Pro key. I don't need pro on the laptop, but it's nice to have and costs like an extra $6 now. :P

    • @AlexKurisu
      @AlexKurisu ปีที่แล้ว

      >buying a black market Windows 10 Pro key
      Imagine actually buying Pro keys instead of using KMS activators

    • @Anxiemon
      @Anxiemon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@enriqueamaya3883 what does religion have to do with this?????

  • @catt9853
    @catt9853 ปีที่แล้ว

    man, no Parsec mentions? it's so good!

  • @nicolasaudy6250
    @nicolasaudy6250 ปีที่แล้ว

    For remote Desktop I use Parsec.
    For remote gaming I use Sunshine/Moonlight.

  • @TheSamdroidOnline
    @TheSamdroidOnline ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Thank you.

  • @KolejowySzynszyl901
    @KolejowySzynszyl901 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have 3 systems on emachines E520
    1. Windows 7 home basic
    2. Windows 7 professional
    3. Windows 7 home premium

  • @JeffRyman69
    @JeffRyman69 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can buy a grey-market Windows 10 or 11 Pro OEM version pretty cheap. However, if you ever need to reinstall, it may not work and you may need to buy it again. However, my prebuilt desktop came with Windows 7 Pro and I paid through the MS Store for the upgrade to Pro for my Windows 10 laptop. Also, if you buy the cheap OEM Pro version, you may have to jump through some hoops to get Home to upgrade. Once upgraded, be sure to make an image backup to avoid having to buy another cheap grey-market copy.

  • @Longjumping-War2484
    @Longjumping-War2484 ปีที่แล้ว

    If your needs are barebones, then Home is fine. Check your e-mail, type a letter, print a page, watch TH-cam, etc. If you do more than that, like, Entertainment, Gameplay, Programming, Video & Photo editing, than Pro is a must, no question. If you spend less than an hour or two a day on your computer, then home is for you. Funny thing is the "Hour or two" people are usually the one's who've bought those ready made computers with the OS pre-installed anyway, so depends on how much you spent to which version you get.

  • @jackcollazo
    @jackcollazo ปีที่แล้ว

    TheoJoe, youve just saved me $100. Thank you! As always, you the man!

  • @motherchuckair404
    @motherchuckair404 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I already have the best Windows edition ever, IoT Enterprise LTSC.

    • @xorgfx-y4l
      @xorgfx-y4l ปีที่แล้ว

      based

    • @Proferk
      @Proferk ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess you could, but I wouldn't run a enterprise operating system on my home computer

    • @pepeshopping
      @pepeshopping ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s the SAME code, just less default apps and features.

    • @motherchuckair404
      @motherchuckair404 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pepeshopping the only notable features that are left out is the ms store and uwp apps like camera and calculator.
      open source alternatives exist for the uwp apps except games.

  • @pemadamzz
    @pemadamzz ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo pretty cool! From a home user before to a Pro user after getting my father's old laptop, at least i can run virtual machines without 3rd party software

  • @Arik_Cool
    @Arik_Cool ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got Windows Pro for free because I had an old Windows 7 Professional key lying around. Saved myself 100 bucks!

  • @robertbyers
    @robertbyers ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like it if you could do a separate in-depth review of Sandboxie Plus in a future video.

  • @Grosserracker
    @Grosserracker ปีที่แล้ว

    Keeping in mind the pro license was cheaper, and that it only cost like 4-5€, you shouldn't worry and just take it.
    Nowadays, there's so many windows licenses flying around

  • @MegasXLR
    @MegasXLR ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm on Education 10 and have most of these features nice :)

  • @MrDormant
    @MrDormant ปีที่แล้ว

    I took advantage of my schools store all the way back in 2012-14. I have several keys all pro and edu edition. As well with win server from 12-19. But the server keys I’ll never use in the real world just for messing around.

  • @NidraxGaming
    @NidraxGaming ปีที่แล้ว

    Another alternative to RDP/TeamViewer/VNC is the Chrome Remote Desktop

  • @asdfssdfghgdfy5940
    @asdfssdfghgdfy5940 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even if you are a small business, please buy computers with pro on them trust me, it will save you money in the long run. My boss expanded the business slightly (still only 5 machines) and I had to inboard everything and set it up how she liked it. She probably paid me more to mess around with the home computers than if she got pro where it would have taken me a tenth of the time.

  • @jouldalk
    @jouldalk ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey @ThioJoe, isn't there a way to add Microsoft Group Policy Editor to a windows 10 home pc via the command line? Or something like that... Not install a third party alternative but really bringing in the same tool that is in the pro version.
    Does that ring a bell?

  • @Hyooman
    @Hyooman ปีที่แล้ว

    If I ever go back to windows, this is good to know

  • @roobscoob47
    @roobscoob47 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks TJ~

  • @mrbasalt8553
    @mrbasalt8553 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chrome Remote Desktop is a good alternative also!

  • @imqqmi
    @imqqmi ปีที่แล้ว

    I still have a stack of pro volume licenses from windows 7/8 days when I was a network admin so I just install Windows 10 with that key on all of my systems (currently 4). As long as I can still upgrade to newer windows versions I'll probably never run out of licenses. Unfortunately Windows seems to be increasingly more of an advertising platform but I digress.
    I like the network sharing feature in pro better. And I'm a developer so experimenting with sandboxes etc is handy.
    Isn't there a limitation in Home for the number of discrete processors you can run and amount of memory? Yes, home 64 cores and 128GB ram, pro 128 cores, so if you want to use an amd thread ripper or intel xeon with lots of cores you'd better get pro. I'm still at 24 cores (13900K) so no problems there.

  • @Psyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
    @Psyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Virtualbox vs hyper-v are different and you can't just compare them because virtual box is a type 2 hypervisor when hyper-v is type 1

  • @haroldflower8008
    @haroldflower8008 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think joining your workstation to a windows server domain is reason enough to get pro. never know when you might want to set up a home server

  • @benjamintan2733
    @benjamintan2733 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh, for those power users, Windows Home only support up to 128GB RAM. So, let's say if you use a Threadripper or Xeon (or Extreme Core), and you install more than 128GB RAM, your Windows Home won't utilised RAM beyond 128GB. Just a heads up.

  • @itstheV01D
    @itstheV01D ปีที่แล้ว

    i should say, windows sandbox is *_not 100% isolated_* from your main pc. not including the obvious things like network. when i changed my windows 10 media files to have the windows 11 sounds and then i opened sandbox, the VM had windows 10 *_with_* windows 11 sounds.

  • @VOLTRONDEFENDER4440
    @VOLTRONDEFENDER4440 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like pro since it has a option for remote control from other devices

  • @_potat0580
    @_potat0580 ปีที่แล้ว

    In windows 10 home I have some of these features, for exemle: Remote Desktop or Group Policy Editor.

    • @fcfcth
      @fcfcth 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You can connect to another PC using Home, but the PC you connect to must have Pro

  • @DavidGoben
    @DavidGoben ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Windows Pro form 11 is not as apparent on the surface as Windows Pro for XP was, where after using Pro with everything being more capable and option-loaded, even File Explorer, it was actually difficult to go back and use XP Home edition (of course, by Update 3 for XP, Home edition was basically the Pro edition, where all of Pro's obvious 'surface' features were added to Home). Having said that, as a System's Administrator, PRO edition is an absolute must-have for security. It is incredible the security hacks even trusted team members innocently try doing, which used to introduce a virus across our network.

  • @jayscaptures
    @jayscaptures ปีที่แล้ว

    Chrome RDP makes a good alternative for the remote desktop feature. It is a simple tool, similar to Windows Quick Assist.

  • @CodaBroda
    @CodaBroda ปีที่แล้ว

    The official Remote Desktop app on mobile is actually really decent; it’s worth the extra few bucks for a Pro license on a reliable key shop. Sometimes the Pro is the same price as Home or even cheaper, at least in my case when I bought it years ago

    • @𰻝
      @𰻝 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just get it for free

  • @muddyexport5639
    @muddyexport5639 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @Techkomsan
    @Techkomsan ปีที่แล้ว

    What is your current Windows Pro or Home?

  • @JacobP81
    @JacobP81 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:20 Windows Sandbox is cool. I wish I had that. Not paying $100 for it.

  • @iiakito8582
    @iiakito8582 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never needed to buy a Windows Key since 2014 because I installed the technical preview from Win10 Pro. (I had Win7 Ultimate)
    Even got Win11 Pro for free because of that.
    The Key is linked to my Microsoft Account so I can reactivate my system as many times as I want.

  • @thatrandomperson8832
    @thatrandomperson8832 ปีที่แล้ว

    my school have fast computers, with Intel Core i5 10505, 16 GB Ram, 512 GB SSD storage, and of course, the pro edition of Windows 11.

  • @jobersi10
    @jobersi10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey ThioJoe, Another great video! I just have a question. Do you know any Remote Desktop app that has native Bluetooth keyboard and mouse support for iPad, to connect to Windows? Have a nice Saturday!

  • @truesyner2009
    @truesyner2009 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    another difference is that the Pro edition supports upto 2TB "RAM" and the Home supports upto 128GB. It doesn't matter to most people as literally no one gets above 128GB of RAM.