TESLA POWER TRANSFER UPDATE - SECOND BATTERY ROTATION
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2024
- #tesla #energy #youtube
This video displays the power transferred to facilitate the second battery rotation. The next video will be the control test for this system.
Thank you for watching, please Like, Share & Subscribe.
![โรงเรียนห้ามรัก โดนจับได้ตาย...!! [เอิร์นไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4u02Sbr556Q/mqdefault.jpg)
😢 it's hard to see how the cables are connected. Please kindly do more but start from the beginning to help us who wants to redo those connections.
REQUEST: COULD YOU PLEASE DO THE INDUCTION GENERATOR DIY THAT CAN POWER MANY LIGHTS INCLUDING A DRILL.. SUCH IS NEEDED IN MY COUNTRY RIGHT NOW.
I WATCHED YOUR DON SMITH COIL EXAMPLE. COULD YOU DO SOMETHING EASY THAT ANYONE CAN PUT TOGETHER EASY IN TUTORIAL FORM❤❤❤❤❤. THANKS 🙏, I hope to hear from you soonest than later ❤️☺️😊
Thank you for watching.
The schematic can be found in the video that I will post a link to below, the difference with this setup is 4 batteries in each bank instead of 3 batteries as shown in the schematic but each setup is wired the same as in the schematic.th-cam.com/video/lmZEvQYxoHM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FMWJJBsq7Fmlb0iq
I am unsure of which generator you are referring to, if you could supply some more information this would be helpful.
As for the Don Smith work, it’s all just trial and error, Don wasn’t the most forthcoming person and gave his information in a cryptic fashion which turned the average person away from what he was saying.
Perhaps it might be best to describe what you want to achieve and I will tell you whether I can help further.
You're doing great. Keep at it. I love your work.
Thank you for your kind words, it is greatly appreciated.
Can’t wait to see the numbers…. Excellent work…. Question are you still doing it only on the negative side and getting different results from the positive
Thank you for your comment.
I just posted the control test so everyone can crunch the numbers if unable to do the test for themselves.
A good point you make about the difference between negatives and positives, ( what!? I’m starting to write like yoda 🤣🤣) I believe there are measurable differences and what I have tested to date suggests running the load on the NEGATIVE line is more efficient and the POSITIVE line presents a higher potential voltage resulting in a higher current draw with lower run times. More testing needs to be done here also to confirm my hypothesis which is why I am attempting to employ many viewers to accelerate the testing and data collection, the more of us running the test and presenting the data the quicker we maximise this systems potential.
@@whatifididthis...1236 ✌️
Hey there! I've been following your videos with interest and will likely try this experiment soon. However, to cut down on experiment time I'm thinking of using something that sucks more amps than an LED, like a small electric motor or something. Couple of questions, and please forgive me if they've been addressed already. 1) Were the parallel batteries run down first? I might be hesitant as I might damage new-fully charged batteries that don't need a charge initially. 2) Can you provide a reference(s) to how this tech was used in the past? I'd be interested in reading about it. Thanks for all you do!
Thank you for your comment.
You can use a larger load as long as you don’t exceed a safe discharge rate for the batteries used. Batteries have a charge and discharge rate, usually these values are very different. I have used larger loads in my 12 volt tests of this concept to drain the system faster. I just posted the control test which appears to be somewhat of a slap in the face to conventional use of batteries, the LED used draws a considerable amount of power resulting in a dismal outcome for “normal” use of the power.
The batteries don’t have to be run down first. I have tested both ways, using discharged batteries and charged batteries. When I first tried this I assumed the parallel bank should be flat, so the energy has somewhere to go. One day I wanted to start a test and couldn’t be bothered draining a set of batteries and I thought what if I put charged batteries in, what will happen. From what I can tell, this is what I think happens when using full batteries. The energy is transferred to the already full parallel bank until they are completely topped off, then in line with the principals of the conservation of energy and every action must have an equal an opposite reaction the excess energy is transformed to heat. I noticed at different stages of the 275 day test that the LED would be warm and then other times it was cold. A lot more tests need to be done here.
The origin of this concept for me was the Tesla Switch. It is important that I point out what is being tested here at this point is only a fraction of what is required to make this a “Tesla Switch”, but I find that even at this most basic evaluation of the concept there appears to be something quite extraordinary.
An American company by the name of Electrodyne Corp. tested Tesla’s Switch I believe in the 60’s. From memory they tested a system that ran for 3 years running a 2kw load. I have quite a bit of information on the switching requirements but I’m still in the early days of actually testing and I need to understand properly before moving onto the next step. Let me know if you can’t find information, I have supplied this information for someone before, as long as it hasn’t been removed from the internet I can usually find it.
@@whatifididthis...1236 Thank you for your reply. I plan on using NIMH rechargeable batteries as these are said to be able to deliver higher current. I have a couple of small electric motors lying around (4V and 6V from memory) that should eat up the power within an hour or so (depending on mAh of the batteries I get). I know you've said you've tried charging already charged batteries but I am reading warnings that this can damage them. Going to play it safe and discharge them first. Also, I put together a simple circuit design on every circuit to illustrate the concept here - same battery setup, but using a 4V electric motor as load. Draw is 1.5A (motor rated for 2A) so it's running at just a fraction of it's top speed. Note: I had to add resistors to not get a "voltage shortage" warning that won't let the circuit animate, so I added the smallest available. everycircuit.com/circuit/5937395987644416/power-transfer-test
Lets go through this as figue out what is happening here.
As i commented in your previous video.
(Not to be in a rude tone but a educational point if view)
For this circuit to work as you claim it does would be violating the laws of thermodynamics. To dispute this would be like disputing the existance of gravity, as (power out = power in - losses), the existance of photons (light) leaving the led is energy taken from this system. I suspect this circuit only works due the the high internal resistances if the 4p batteries, this limits the current draw from the led making the batteries discharge slower. This over time will damage the batteres as they are overvolted while charging. A convensional setup with the correct sized resistor does last way longer. I encourage you to try a control with this said resistor.
Cant wait for you to post the resistances and amps of the led, and capacities and resistances of the batteries so i can do some calculations myself.
Thank you for your comment.
I sincerely appreciate you commenting as I am genuinely trying to understand what really is happening here. The last thing I want is to alienate a person who is trying to give perspective, whether they are correct or not isn’t t the point but the viewpoint is valuable, the difference of perspective is sometimes all that is missing from an explanation of a phenomenon.
I don’t believe this circuit in it’s presented form actually violates any laws, there is no over unity here in this form, however, there is an extremely efficient operation being overlooked and this statement in no way reflects my contempt for these laws, largely because of the fact that when you get to the base understanding of things like gravity you realise the greatest minds at one time or another have made statements like “for lack of a better explanation we believes this...”
Assume we acknowledge the laws of thermodynamics are valid, then all this does is validate this system. Power coming out of the batteries is not destroyed nor created but yet converted to other forms of energy, it is not my claim that in its present form there is over unity but that a large percentage of the power is transferred instead of creating heat. It is my claim that in a conventional sense very little energy goes to the load and majority converts to heat. It is my claim that because this system has somewhere to transfer the power it does so because it is less energy intensive keeping the energy in it’s similar/same form as opposed to the heat conversion option. The path of least resistance grasshopper! 🤣
A classic example of our education system being wrong and still chasing the narrative is the Hertz scenario, Nikola Tesla wrote to Heinrich Hertz to inform him how he was wrong, then visited him and demonstrated he was wrong and the education department ran with Hertz’s wrong evaluation and that is what we have today.
Science is not fixed, science is evolving and real science does not care what we think, it’s conclusions are determined by factual data. Not the Judge Dredd “I am the law” type of science we have today.
So here is where I stand, if every action has an equal and opposite reaction then a conventional use of electronics wastes a large amount of energy by converting it to heat because it has nowhere to go, whereas in this case it doesn’t need to create heat because it’s equal and opposite reaction is met by transferring the energy to another storage medium.
I’m happy to be wrong, but happier to be discussing the matter!
@@whatifididthis...1236 thanks for the reply. I agree science is evolving but only on the forefront of technology. but not well understood phenomenon such as thermodynamics.
This energy that is powering the led does not directly come from the transfer of power but it more like a parasitical loss, obstructing battery charging. In this case it's more part of the (losses) category if (power out = power in - losses)
Think of it like a toll. A bit of energy is used, to get the rest of the power through.
The power that isn't used charges the 4p batteries which comes with its own losses related to charging.
Assuming all other parameters are perfect (no cable/heat/charging losses) the charge rate of the 4p batteries will be (4s batteries output - led = 4p input)
This would be the general flow of power around this circuit.
There is not an overlooked section of thermodynamics in this section of science. We are just overlooking the exact reason why this works. As I have said in my previous comment I speculate it is the 4p batteries acting as a resistor, limiting current flow leading to fairly long run times.
As you cycle the batteries they will obviously deplete all their power into the led and other losses relating with charging.
@@ignited3443 I believe you are correct regarding the 4p batteries acting as a current limiting resistor, however, the difference with a resistor is this energy is transformed to heat whereas replacing the resistor with the 4p batteries allows the batteries to charge. For reference, the batteries in this video present as 34.7ohms resistance, whilst this would allow for a longer run it in no way explains the exceptional run time.
Now I am not saying there is excess energy with the system in it’s current form, I am saying the power is transferred. Naturally not all of it either as we have a natural battery internal discharge and the other losses you mention. I’m going to give an example of why I believe this is transferred and I’m using hypothetical values because I haven’t actually calculated the percentages, I’ve recorded the data and presented this in my video for the 12 volt version.
Conventional method:
I charge batteries with 100 units of power which allows an output of only 93 power units due to losses already discussed, after which I have to recharge the batteries.
Total operational load value = 93 power units.
Transfer method:
Charge batteries with 100 units of power allows an output of 93 power units.... then I swap the batteries around and run the load for another 80 power units, then I swap them again and run for 60 power units, then I swap again and run for 40 power units then I swap again and run for 20 power units and so on until the batteries require charging. So it is so easy to see with no extra power going into the system that we have operated the load for the initial 93 power units + 60pu + 40pu +20pu.
Total operation load value = 213 power units.... Houston we have a problem.
Now your books won’t give you that result but the physical world does, go figure!
Think you might be able to place DC to dc boost converters in between the load and source batteries or battery and achieve the same thing . Then just used two larger batteries or lead acid batteries. I'm thinking nickel batteries because of long life and little damage.
Thank you for your comment.
You should be able to use most DC devices in this system. One thing that has failed in the 12 volt tests was a voltage cutoff relay switch, I’m not 100% clear why, I believe it got confused with the voltages it was reading from both banks. I have used a 12 volt inverter, 12 volt to 240 volt with no issues as well as a 12 volt to 5 volt USB charger with no issues but I have not attempted to use a buck converter and need to point out this would be done at your own risk, however I encourage you to explore this as even failure is a success of its own kind.
The battery composition is important here and I have not had a lot of experience testing different batteries other than those seen in my videos. I will make sure to mention the battery compositions I have tested in the hope we can find the most efficient compositions for this system.
@@whatifididthis...1236 some version use the DC to dc buck converters and a high efficiency DC motor instead of the lights .they also included a matching generator for the motor . Creating even more energy . But that's 12 volt 24 volt lead acid battery system with 12 volt motors. So much to do so little time .and space . God's speed .
Hi, did you ever think that a load will suck all power it can (allowed by) even if it’s not needed, than batteries after the load recovers excess power drawn by not letting energy to be wasted.
At least that’s my possible explanation. Actually any load is just a shorting … I’ll be back later
Edit: it might be power factor correction, but instead of capacitor in this circuit we use battery.
We know that electric grid providers exploit at maximum households for not using power factor correction
Thank you for your comment.
I agree that a load is nothing other than a short when used in a conventional use which creates a lot of heat. I feel this circuit at this stage complies with the laws of conservation of energy because what comes out of the batteries into the LED also comes out of the LED as two or more products of energy, nothing is destroyed, some is converted to heat, some to light and the rest is transferred resulting in a net loss eventually. This is however not the Complete Tesla Switch so it does not violate any principles in this current form.
@@whatifididthis...1236 I think it might be a relation between total capacity of batteries and power extracted by the load along with few other effects including self charging from local environment, that occur in series-parallel setups. I mean swapping at certain time interval when total capacity is depleted in a very small amount might be a factor to be considered even if the set being drawn is depleted almost complete before swap if the right time interval can be calculated to avoid damage in batteries being over drawn.
@@Caesarus2011 I agree with you that the batteries should be rotated earlier, before the light is dim. With this particular setup it might be best to rotate batteries every 24 hours when needed each night.
Dear brother when you used esp32 with voltage control , then ur Tesla tr work automatically. If you want to i help you.
Thank you for your comment.
I would appreciate any help I can get as I believe I am ready to take this to the next level and I need to investigate the known methods that will help me achieve that.
tesla references handy?
Thank you for your comment.
Are you after links between Tesla and this concept?