Excellent performance by Ravi Sir. simple..simple..simple. nice to hear. really informative. perfect wordings. സാറിന്റെ ക്ലാസിലെ കുട്ടികളോട് ഇപ്പോൾ ശരിക്കും അസൂയ തോനുന്നു. lucky guys...!
വിജ്ഞാനത്തിൻ്റെ ഒരു ഭാണ്ടാവുമായി നമ്മളെ ബോധവാന്മാർ ആക്കാൻ സാർ ഒരുപാട് കഷ്ടപ്പെടുന്നു , നർമവും, കഥകളും ചേർത്ത് ഒട്ടും ബോർ അടിപ്പിക്കതെ ഇത്ര സമയം നമ്മളെ ഒരുപാട് കാര്യങ്ങൽ പറഞ്ഞു മനസ്സിലാക്കി തന്ന സാറിന് നന്ദി...🙏🏽
To thrisha commenter, ദൈവം എന്ന വാക്കിന്റെ അർത്ഥം എല്ലാം വെളിപ്പെടുത്തി തരുന്ന പരിശുദ്ധമായ " അറിവ് " എന്നാണ്. അതില്ല എങ്കിൽ മനുഷ്യൻ എന്ന വാക്ക് പോലും ഇല്ല.
Sir, You are a real blessing of Keralites... keep rocking... let the rest of Indians be heard in their languages too.. let the darkness be driven out...
The object of life is development; and everything that lives has an inalienable right to all the development it is capable of attaining !! Thank you very much Mr. Ravi Sir.
When i see your vedio regarding brain functioning i feel motivation by the help of that motivation i can do many good things so i am thankfull to you looooot of yhanks
അമ്മ എന്ന വാക്ക് എവിടെ നിന്ന് തലച്ചോറിന് കിട്ടി. അങ്ങനെ കിട്ടിയ ഭിക്ഷയായി കിട്ടിയ അറിവുകളുടെ ആകെ തുകയെയാണ് ദൈവം എന്നു പറയുന്നത്. സ്വയം ദൈവമാകുന്നവർക്ക് അത് മനസ്സിലാകില്ല.
Dear Ravichandran Sir, what is the logical and rational plausibility of our assumption that physical objects which are made up of atoms (it is self-evident that atoms don't have any self-awareness!) , for example, a stone(or inorganic material) of certain mass(Kg), when subjected to evolutionary forces of magnitude of certain Newtons(N) for trillion, trillion, trillions of years or even infinite time , the stone will become 'self aware' in such a way that now the stone is able to 'think', 'aware', and 'reason' about even 'its' own existence and 'its' surroundings, able to grasp the laws of physics, mathematics, able to involve in logical reasoning, able to draw logical conclusions, etc.?
Not stone, but complex molecules of carbon. We call it organic matter. No Scientist will ever claim that stone (inorganic material) will evolve in such a way that it will eventually become self-aware. But if you think it over in a different way, when ultimately the artificial intelligence emerges, it may not contain an ounce organic material. So ultimately the inorganic material may become self-aware.
പ്രിയപ്പെട്ട രവിചന്ദ്രൻ സാർ, സ്വയമേവ ചിന്താശേഷിയില്ലാത്ത, യാതൊരു ബോധമോ(consciousness) ആത്മാവബോധമോ(self-awareness) ഇല്ലാത്ത അചേതന ഭൗതിക പദാർത്ഥങ്ങൾ കോടിക്കണക്കിന് വർഷങ്ങളെന്നല്ല, അനന്തമായ കാലയളവ് ലഭിച്ചാൽ പോലും അന്ധമായ പ്രകൃതി ശക്തികളുടെ പ്രവർത്തനത്തങ്ങളാൽ, ബോധവും ആത്മാവബോധവുമുളള, ഭൗതിക ശാസ്ത്ര നിയമങ്ങളും ഗണിതശാസ്ത്രവും ഗ്രഹിക്കാൻ ശേഷിയുളള, യുക്തിബോധമുളള, തന്റെ ചുറ്റുമുളള പ്രപഞ്ചത്തെക്കുറിച്ച് അവബോധമുളള, മറ്റുളളവരിൽ നിന്ന് ചിന്തയിലും ആലോചനയിലും വ്യതിരിക്തത പുലർത്തുന്ന, സ്വന്തം അസ്തിത്വത്തെക്കുറിച്ച് പോലുംചിന്താശേഷിയുളള മസ്തിഷ്കമായി, തികച്ചും യാദൃശ്ചികമായി രൂപാന്തരപ്പെട്ടു- എന്ന നമ്മുടെ നിഗമനം- എത്രത്തോളം യുക്തിഭദ്രവും സംഭവ്യവുമാണ് ? @ ദൈവത്തിനും മരണാനന്തര ജീവിതത്തിനും ആർക്കും നിഷേധിക്കാനാവാത്ത, യുക്തിപരമായ(Rational) തെളിവുകൾ. വീഡിയോ കാണുക:
100% യുക്തിഭദ്രവും സംഭവ്യവുമാണ്. അതുകൊണ്ടാണല്ലോ അചേതനവസ്തുക്കളാല്‍ താങ്കള്‍ എന്ന സചേതന വസ്തു ഉണ്ടായിരിക്കുന്നത്, അങ്ങനെ ഉണ്ടാകുന്നതിന് യാതൊരു മാന്ത്രിക പ്രതിഭാസത്തിനും പങ്കില്ലതാനും. ഇനി താങ്കള്‍ ഒരു മാന്ത്രിക പ്രതിഭാസം ആണെന്ന് താങ്കള്‍തന്നെ അവകാശപ്പെടും എന്നുണ്ടോ?
Susan George- Let us examine the hypothesis that atoms from big- bang explosion through random evolution given enough TIME (13 billion years) can produce an organized universe as we see today with billions of stars &galaxies with billions of animals and plants. Let us examine this with an analogy of ‘Typing Monkeys’ . Attempts have been made to support evolution of universe by appealing to mathematics to justify long ages. For example, Nobel prize winner, George Wald, wrote, "Time is the hero of the plot. Given enough time anything can happen - the impossible becomes probable, the improbable becomes certain." Thomas Huxley ("Darwin's Bulldog") used this technique in Oxford, in 1860, while debating Samuel Wilberforce. He stated that if monkeys randomly strummed typewriter keys for a long enough time, then sooner or later Psalm 23 would be printed out. Huxley used this argument to demonstrate that universe and life could have originated by chance. Julian Huxley (1887-1975) repeated this analogy to 'prove' that long periods of time could allow impossible evolution to occur. In his analogy, given enough time, monkeys randomly typing on typewriters could eventually type out the complete works of Shakespeare. Stephen Hawking used the monkey story in 1988. He proposed that if there was a horde of typing monkeys, then "very occasionally by pure chance they will type out one of Shakespeare's sonnets." When all these outlandish statements were made no evolutionary scientist or mathematician who knew better raised a single objection. So as a result, these statements have convinced many people that 5 billion years is enough time for life to evolve on Earth. This trick has been very convincing because most people have difficulty comprehending very small and extremely large numbers. For example, how long would it take someone to count to 1 billion, non-stop? (Answer on the bottom ) . Just how logical is this monkey story? In simple terms, if every square foot of the earth's surface was covered with monkeys randomly typing on typewriters, at the rate of ten characters per second (about 5 times the realistic speed) they could not do the job. Even if they typed non-stop for 30 billion years there would not be the slightest chance that one of them would type even a single five word sentence of 31 characters, with spaces and punctuation in the correct place. The probability for them to achieve this is less than one chance in a trillion. Richard Dawkins also appeals to the monkeys to convince his readers that evolution by natural selection is plausible. He believes that a thousand such monkeys could type Shakespeare's sentence, "Methinks it is like a weasel." However, the probability of them typing this six-word sentence (including spaces), is one chance in 10 raised to 39. It has been calculated that it would be statistically impossible to randomly type even the first 100 characters in Shakespeare's "Hamlet". If the monkeys typed only in lower case, including the 27 spaces in the first 100 characters, the chances are 27 raised to 100. (ie. one chance in 10 raised to 143.). OR If each proton in the observable universe were a typing monkey (roughly 10 raised to 80 in all), and they typed 500 characters per minute (faster than the fastest secretary), around the clock for 20 billion years, then all the monkeys together could make 5x10 raised to 96 attempts at the characters. It would require an additional 3x10 raised to 46 such universes to have an even chance at success. Recently, the reality of this last statement has been so damaging to the support for Darwinian evolution, that many evolutionists have taken up the "additional universes" scenario as a way out. They change the analogy and invent an unimaginably large number of universes that are all full of monkeys. They believe that under these new conditions, sooner or later one of the monkeys will succeed. There is a second counter-argument to the mathematical impossibility of evolution. It suggests that when a monkey types the correct key it stays, but when an incorrect key is hit it is 'rubbed out'. This reasoning is based on the assumption that evolution has proceeded in a positive direction, always upwards. As evolution isn't always positive (ie. devolution can also occur & how 2nd law of thermodynamics works here?), this argument is not valid. A third counter-argument considers what is called cumulative selection. In it, the monkeys type in stages, stopping to check their work, saving what is close to the target sentence. This process is repeated until the monkey's random typing reproduces the sentence. This description of evolution is also false because evolution never has anything to aim at. As per evolution nature is purposeless,random and blind. Life shambles forward, surging here, shuffling there, the small advantages accumulating on their own until something novel appears on the broad evolutionary screen - an arch or an eye, an intricate pattern of behaviour, the complexity characteristic of life. Returning to the mathematics, Michael Behe estimates the probability of just getting the 30,000 gene pieces required for blood clotting in the right sequence as 10 raised to minus 18. To get the genes plus the clotting activator working together by chance has the probability of 10 raised to minus 36. Fred Hoyle estimates the following probabilities for chance, random arrangement of amino acids:- • 10 raised to minus 19 for a ten amino acid polypeptide • 10 raised to minus 20 for a functional enzyme • 10 raised to minus 130 for the histone H4 molecule • 10 raised to minus 40,000 for all of life's 2,000 enzymes This last value (10 raised to minus 40,000) shows the probability that a very, very tiny part of evolution could have happened. This probability is more unlikely than the monkey's chance typing (viz 10 raised to minus 143) which have been used to 'prove' evolution. Bear in mind that Mathematical Zero is 10 raised to minus 50. Any value smaller than this is relegated by mathematicians to the realm of 'never happening'. No matter how large the environment one considers, universe and life cannot have had a random beginning.. To sum up this mathematical analysis of the monkey analogy, the monkeys could not succeed. Therefore, if the monkeys couldn't succeed, the analogy predicts that evolution of universe from protons,electrons ,quarks, anti quarks could not have succeeded by chance. Time then, actually destroys the assumptions of evolution. ANSWER - To count to 1 billion, non-stop, would take between 30 & 200 years, depending on the counting speed.
Abu Faa'iza As you said the overworked monkey analogy is so wrong. I don’t believe the mumbo jumbo of religion, but the presence of a creator is true. I agree with Ravichandran 99.99 percent. But on that fundamental point I disagree.
ആരാണ് പറഞ്ഞത് യാദൃച്ഛികമായി രൂപപ്പെട്ടതാണെന്ന്..? പരിണാമംത്തേക്കുറിച്ച് കൂടുതൽ പഠിക്കു.... മനുഷ്യൻ എന്തിനുവേണ്ടി ഏത് കാലത്ത് ചിന്തിക്കാൻ തുടങ്ങിയത് എപ്പോഴാണെന്ന് തിരക്കി നോക്ക്....
പുതിയ ശാസത്ര വിജ്ഞാനങ്ങൾ പൊതു സമൂഹത്തിന് എത്തിക്കുന്നതിൽ നന്ദിയുണ്ട് സർ, പക്ഷെ ഒരു കാര്യം സൂചിപ്പിക്കട്ടെ എന്റെ അഭിപ്രായത്തിൽ പ്രഭാഷണം ഒരു കലയാണ് അതിന്റെ ഒരു ഒഴുക്ക് കിട്ടുന്നില്ല, ഒരു നല്ല ക്ലാസ് ആണെന്ന് പറയാം, പക്ഷെ രവി ചന്ദ്രന്റെ എഴുത്ത് ഒരു സംഭവം തന്നെയാണ് അതാണദ്ധേഹത്തിന്റെ മേഖല.
Sir, sometimes you say science agrees with an argument of equality ( means whoever do the action gets the same result) . My point is: - not all persons who has become lymph in an accident feel the pain. This means the theory is wrong but this must the problem of week mind. (A strong mind can give strong automation and week mind self automation is regeted by brain.) for those of this kind of persons need self deceiving techinic.
മസ്തിഷ്ക സാവിശേഷത അറിവിന്റെ വെളിച്ചതിലാണ്. തലച്ചോറിൽ ഭിക്ഷയായി കിട്ടിയ അറിവിനെ കരു പിടിപ്പിച്ചു കഴിയുമ്പോൾ മാത്രമേ മൃഗത്തിൽ നിന്നും വെത്യസ്തമായ സവിശഷത മനുഷ്യനു കിട്ടുന്നുള്ളു. ആ അറിവാണ് ദൈവം 🙏 അറിവ് തലച്ചോറിന്റെ സൃഷ്ടി ആണെന്ന് പറഞ്ഞു നടക്കുന്നവരുടെ ലക്ഷ്യം ഒന്നു മാത്രം. ദൈവം ഇല്ല എന്നു സാധുകരിക്കണം. ദൈവം എന്ന വാക്കിന്റെ അർത്ഥം വെളിപ്പെടുത്തുന്നവൻ എന്നാണ്. യുക്തി വാദികളും അതറിയുന്നില്ല മത വാദികളും അറിയുന്നില്ല. രവിചന്ദ്രൻ സംസാരിച്ച ഓരോ അക്ഷരങ്ങളും ദൈവരംസം ആണ്. അക്ഷരം എന്നാൽ നാസമില്ലാത്തത് എന്നർത്ഥം. 1000 രൂപ ഉണ്ടെങ്കിൽ ഉണ്ടാക്കാൻ പറ്റില്ല. ഉണ്ടാക്കണമെങ്കിൽ ഉള്ളിൽ അറിവ് പ്രേകസിക്കണം. അല്ലെങ്കിൽ കണ്ണിൽ നോക്കി കുരങ്ങ് ഇരിക്കുന്നത് പോലെ ഇരിക്കും അത്ര മാത്രം. ശരീരം ആട്ടി കളിക്കുന്ന കളി അല്ല, അറിവിന്റെ കളി. അറിവിന്റെ കളി അറിയാവുന്നവർ അധികം ശരീരം ഇട്ട് ഉലക്കില്ല. ഇല്ലാതിരുന്ന അവസ്ഥയിൽ നിന്ന് ഉണ്ടായി വന്ന അറിവിനാണ് മനുഷ്യൻ തന്നെ ദൈവം എന്നു പേരിട്ടത്. ( ലോകത്തിൽ ആദ്യം ഉണ്ടായ പുസ്തകം irgwedham ആണെന്നും ഈജിപ്ടിലെ മരിച്ചവരുടെ പുസ്തകം ( Book of the dead)ആണെന്നും പറയുന്നു. ആ അറിവും ഭാഷയും ഉണ്ടാക്കിയതാരാ? The book of dead ന് 15000വർഷം പഴക്കമുണ്ടെന്ന് പറയുന്നു. മാസ്‌തിഷ്കം മൂന്നു പാർട്ട്‌ ആണ്. For brain, mid brain, hind brain. Fore brain ഭാഗമായി seribrum, thalamus, hipothalamas എന്നി ഭാഗങ്ങളും ഉണ്ട്. ഇവിടെയാണ് ശരീരത്തിന്റെ എല്ലാ ഇച്ഛകർമങ്ങളും അറിവിന്റെ വെളിച്ചത്തിൽ നടക്കുന്നത്. ഇതിന് സഹായികളായി Pons, medulla oblomgata, Limpic system, seribellam Hipothalamasumayi ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട master gland എന്നറിയപ്പെടുന്ന piturory gland, endocrine chemical Cordination neurons messengers, spinal cord Nervous system, ശരീരം മുഴുവൻ വ്യാപിച്ചു കിടക്കുന്ന periferel nervous system. ഉള്ളിൽ ഇരുന്ന് ഒരാൾ prompt chaithane ശരീരം കർമ നിരതമാകുന്നത്. അത് അറിവാണ്. അറിവിനെ ആത്മാവ് എന്നു പറയുന്നു. അറിവുകളുടെ ടോട്ടൽ തുകയെ ദൈവം, പരമാത്മാവ് അള്ളാഹു, സ്വർഗസ്ഥനായ പിതാവ് എന്നൊക്കെ പറയുന്നു. ഇത് എവിടെ ഇരിക്കുന്നു എന്നു ചോദിച്ചാൽ തലച്ചോറിലെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ 2 പാർട്ടായി ഇരിക്കുന്നതിൽ മെമ്മറി ഡിസ്‌കിൽ ഇരിക്കുന്നു. കാടു കയറേണ്ട വല്ല കാര്യവും ഉണ്ടോ? ആ വലിയ മേശരിയെയാണ് അറിവ് എന്നു പറയുന്നത്.
തലചോറിൽ അറിവായിരിക്കുന്ന 3 വരകൾ ചേർത്ത 3 angles എടുത്ത് പേപ്പറിൽ വരക്കുമ്പോൾ അരൂപിയായ തൃക്കോണത്തിൽ നിന്നും രൂപമുള്ള ത്രികോണം ഉണ്ടാകുന്നു. അതിനെകുറിച്ചുള്ള അറിവ് തലച്ചോറിൽ ഇല്ലാത്തവനോട് മട്ടത്രികൊണം വരയ്ക്കാൻ പറഞ്ഞാൽ വരക്കുമോ? തലച്ചോറുണ്ടല്ലോ.
MIRROR BOX’:-Nobel Prize for Dr. Vilayannur Ramachandran Undoubtedly Dr. Vilayannur Ramachandran must get Nobel Prize for the discovery of ‘Mirror Box’ as 80% of the phantom pain patients would be getting relief and for saving them from suicide due to excruciating pain from phantom limbs. If every organ is represented in the BRAIN MAP and as long as amputated organs are not deleted from the brain Map, the problem of phantom pain exists for every organ. But a Pandora’s Box is waiting to be opened!!!. The so called tried and tested medical practices like the removal of uteruses, diabetes amputees, appendicitis operation, and organ transplanting will be debunked at one stroke. If rationalists are taking this up as a campaign they will be doing a great service to humanity (remember 100% of organ recipients have to live on Immunosuppressant drugs to avoid body rejecting the implanted organs). VISION and BRAIN- Homunculus fallacy & infinite regress… Dr. Vilayannur says ‘‘analogously, the brain creates symbolic descriptions. It does not re-create the original image, but represents the various features and aspects of the image in totally new terms-not with squiggles of ink, of course, but in its own alphabet of nerve impulses. These symbolic encodings are created partly in your retina itself but mostly in your brain.’’ OBJECTS ARE WHERE I SEE THEM, NOT IN MY HEAD/BRAIN Further to the above statement, most contemporary metaphors for the activity of the brain are derived from computers and internal representations in brain are commonly conceived of as ‘virtual reality’ displays. Following words are used to describe computer analogy of brain’s activity like:- Program, processing data & information,system,message, self consciousness like a software program, neural hardware, encoding, computation, stored memories, wiring, genetic codes, cross-wiring, circuits, instructions, blueprint, templates, default settings etc. As per Dr. Vilayannur, Our visual perceptions are a ‘simulation’ (a form of virtual reality) of the real world that is ‘made by, and exists within, the brain’. The idea of visual experiences as simulations inside brain leads to strange consequences that are not explained by any scientists in the world so far. If my brain is analogous to a computer, when I look at the sky and stars, the sky I see is inside my skull (monitor). So my skull should be beyond the sky and stars !!!. But actually they(sky&stars) are where I see them , miles and miles away, not in my head-------
please note there never was a time when there is no creation. It is impossible to contract language to one because there never was a time when there is no languages , what we can say is grammatic Perfection of certain languages happened.
ആത്മാവ്, soul എന്നു പറയുന്നത് സാധനമല്ല. രണ്ടു മണിക്കൂറിൽ കൂടുതൽ നിങ്ങൾ സംസാരിച്ച വാക്കുകൾ തന്നെയാണ്. അവരവരെ അവരവർ ആക്കി നിലനിർത്തുന്നത്തേതോ അതാണ് ആത്മാവ് അഥവാ അറിവ
Vilayanurinte speeches muzhuvanayum kelkkanam...He never denied the Idea Of "Brahman" or Eastern (Indian) philosophical findings .In fact i think he believes in it .PS : Sabhyamaya comments Athu -ve aayalum Delete cheyyathirikkanulla manyatha pratheekshikkunnu.
yes very excellent speech but there are lot of contradictions for example he explained language emerged from nothing or without source,this is great blunder,the source of our languages is human being our brain,vocal cards,noise etc etc,could languages emerge without living beings?100 percent i agreed evolutions but there are some limitations too.....but one thing wherever there is a creation,there should be a creator....i donot believe in religions but i do believe in god the one who created our universe......
MIND IS WHAT BRAIN DOES? Attempts to explain a human brain which has 100 billion neurons and each neuron having 1,000 to 10,000 contacts with other neurons, in terms of different brain regions firing neurons (light-up) and electro-chemical activities using X-ray, MRI, EEG , CAT scans and galvanic skin response (GSR) test are like trying to understand a Computer by grinding it up and analyzing its component elements, such as copper, germanium and silicon. But in this process of reduction, the structure and the programmed activity of the computer vanishes, and chemical analysis will never reveal the circuit diagrams; no amount of mathematical modeling of interactions between its atomic constituents will reveal the computer’s programs or the purposes they fulfilled. Only excuse is the hypothesis that the emerging properties arising out of mixing various components give rise to new components or phenomenon like consciousness (sometimes life itself), i.e. billions of brain neurons whose interactive states exceeds the number of elementary particles in the known universe should randomly converge at a single place to evolve an organ or organs which are as complex as brain.(it need immense guts to say that human eye has 50 defects). IS THE BRAIN REALLY NECESSARY? Even hardcore Atheist like Francis Crick who shared in a Nobel Prize for the discovery of the structure of DNA, states this way, ‘‘Almost all the molecules in our bodies, with the exception of DNA, the genetic material, turn over (renew) in a matter of days, weeks, or at the most a few months. How then is memory stored in the brain so that its trace is relatively immune to molecular turnover?’---For decades, the most popular theory has been that memory must depend on changes in connections between nerve cells, the synapses. Yet attempts to locate memory stores have proved unsuccessful over and over again. The British neurologist John Lorber found that some people with extreme hydrocephalus were surprisingly normal , which led him to ask the provocative question: ‘Is the brain really necessary?’ .He scanned the brains of more than six hundred people with hydrocephalus, and found that about sixty had more than 95 per cent of the cranial cavity filled with cerebrospinal fluid. Some were seriously retarded, but others were more or less normal, and some had IQs of well over 100. One young man who had an IQ of 126 and a first-class degree in mathematics, a student from Sheffield University, had ‘virtually no brain’. His skull was lined with a thin layer of brain cells about a millimeter thick, and the rest of the space was filled with fluid. Any attempt to explain his brain in terms of a standard ‘connectome’ would be doomed to failure. His mental activity and his memory were still able to function more or less normally even though he had a brain only five per cent of the normal size. Erik Kandel, who won the Nobel Prize in 2000 for his work on memory in the sea slug, Aplysia, drew attention to some of these problems in his acceptance speech: ‘‘How do different regions of the hippocampus and the median temporal lobe . . . interact in the storage of explicit memory? We do not, for example, understand why the initial storage of memory requires the hippocampus, whereas the hippocampus is not required once a memory has been stored for weeks or months. We also know very little about the recall of explicit (declarative) memory . . . These systems properties of the brain will require more than the bottom-up approach of molecular biology’’. Explaining a supercomputer just by studying its components:-TELL TALE BRAIN Analogous to a computer with a TV tuner card, human brain has hardware and software part. The hardware part is different regions of brain.( occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes, amygdala, Brocas,Wernicke’s area - etc) Comparing our brain to a computer, on the hardware part, the pictures on the computer screen depends on hundreds of electronic components of the set and the energy that powers it, and also on the invisible transmissions it receives through the electromagnetic field. A skeptic who rejected the idea of invisible influences might try to explain everything about the pictures and sounds in terms of the components of the set - the wires, transistors, and so on - and the electrical interactions between them. For example by a defect in some of the transistors, or loose contacts in electrical circuits - affect the pictures by changing their color or distorting their shapes; while mutations of components in the tuning circuit cause the set to jump from one channel to another, leading to a completely different set of sounds and pictures. Through careful research he would find that damaging or removing or cross-wiring some of these components affected the pictures or sounds the set produced, and did so in a repeatable, predictable way.(in human brain it is utilized for anesthesia & manifested in various strange forms like phantom limbs, synesthesia, agnosia, Capgras syndrome, alien-hand syndrome ,sleep, Apotemnophilia ,autism, telephone syndrome, Tran sexuality). This discovery would reinforce his materialist belief. But this does not prove that the evening news report is produced by chemical interactions among the TV set’s components. Can we say which website Mr.X browsed yesterday by looking at a damaged component? He would be unable to explain exactly how the set produced the pictures and sounds. The underlying premise of Dr. Vilayannur’s book pivots around this hardware part of brain. Dr. Vilayannur’s description of working of brain as orchestrated & compartmentalized interaction between different brain areas is only a hardware part. The brain areas of animals also light up (fire neurons) when they see, hear or having any emotions. The only specialty which makes human brain unique is its large size-proportionate to its body and the immense number of mirror neurons. Lighting up of different brain areas denotes only a drop in the ocean. The software part is the underlying genetic program on which all the micro, macro and nano components of the body functions and comes into force whether you are studying memory, perception, art, or consciousness. Genetic programs are explicitly analogous to computer programs, which are intelligently designed by human minds to achieve particular purposes. Programs are purposive, intelligent and goal-directed. The ‘genetic program’ implies that plants and animals are organized by purposive principles that are mind-like, or designed by minds. Using the word ‘genetic program’ is another way of smuggling intelligent designs into chemical genes. Saying lesions in the left angular gyrus of brain eliminates abstract skills like reading, writing, and arithmetic is same as saying some fungus on a particular component caused the computer to crash, but do we know the machine language -software- which gave the left angular gyrus the ability to read & write ? . Materialists have always accused vitalists or theists of trying to explain the mysteries of life in terms of empty words, such as ‘vital factors’ and ‘souls’ that ‘explain everything and therefore nothing’. But the vital factors in their Atheist guises have exactly this characteristic. How does a marigold grow from a seed? or How does a zygote grow into a trillion celled baby in 9 months? because it is genetically programmed to do so. How does a spider instinctively spin its web? Because of the information coded in its genes. How does weaver bird builds its nest? That is the default setting encoded as instruction and messages in the DNA and so on-------
Cloningiloode ore pole (physical and inteluctual) aayi (same as he) human production start cheythal ideham parayunnathokke njan angeekarikkam..idhehathinte total darsanathinulla marupadiyanu ith..
Mirror neurons. My name is Maximums Desmus Williams. Commander of an Army. Loyal servant to the true Emperor. Father of an murdered child, husband of an murdered wife. I will have my vengeance this life or next. An Oscar winning movie dialogue. How you are going to address such psychological problem in your forthcoming Mirror Neurons
PURPOSELESS ,BLIND RANDOM MUTATIONS & GENETIC PROGRAMS: We often hear whenever there is a deleterious (harmful) mutation in the evolutionary process, there is a ‘program’ or ‘mechanism’ to remove it. The question is ,if everything is formed by ,purposeless , random and blind forces of natural selection, who has made this correcting ‘program’ or ‘mechanism’ which literally brings order out of chaos ? .This question is also relevant to the evolution of English language from no words to 8 lakh words - language was not evolving on its own, but it was evolved and moulded by intelligent conscious human beings(Typing monkeys analogy & Evolution:-It would be statistically impossible if every square foot of the earth's surface was covered with typing monkeys to randomly type even the first 100 characters in Shakespeare's "Hamlet” . If the monkeys typed only in lower case, including the 27 spaces in the first 100 characters, the chances are 27 raised to 100 (ie. one chance in 10 raised to 143). Or if each proton in the observable universe were a typing monkey (roughly 10 raised to 80 in all), and they typed 500 characters per minute (faster than the fastest secretary), around the clock for 20 billion years, then all the monkeys together could make 5x10 raised to 96 attempts at the characters. It would require an additional 3x10 raised to 46 such universes to have an even chance at success.) & picture of Trivandrum city with pan shops evolving in to metro city(TVM city was not evolving on its own, it was evolved and moulded by intelligent conscious human beings) .This ‘mechanism’ is no way different from Theist’s viewpoints that organisms are organized by purpose, order ,program & mind like principles. How come an evolutionary mechanism with RANDOMNESS as one of its principal dogmas, selects (without any consciousness!) and stick only with 4 nucleotides ATCG. (Adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine) for billions of years - which are present in all organisms including plants and animals. While permutations and differences exist between species, this basic structure has existed unchanged for billions of years. Even the most ardent defenders of the materialistic theory smuggle purposive, organizing principles into living organisms in the form of selfish genes or genetic programs. In Dawkins’s words, ‘‘DNA moves in mysterious ways. The DNA molecules are not only intelligent; they are also selfish, ruthless and competitive, like successful Chicago gangsters’’. The selfish genes “create form,” “mould matter”. The dominant paradigm of modern biology, although materialistic, is remarkably similar to vitalism (theism), with ‘programs’ or ‘information’ or ‘instructions’ or ‘messages’, playing the role formerly attributed to souls. Computer programs are intelligently designed by human minds for particular purposes, and act upon through the electronic machinery of a computer. The computer is a machine, but the program is not. Any way Dr. Vilayannur is humble enough to state ‘‘the question of how neurons encode meaning and evoke all the semantic associations of an object is the holy grail of neuroscience, whether you are studying memory, perception, art, or consciousness’’ But Mr.Ravichandran has already jumped in to the conclusion that everything regarding mind is what brain does. His statement about phantom limb that if consciousness is there, why the brain is being tricked can be compared to inducing hypnotic blisters by touching a man’s arm with a pencil by telling him that it is a lighted cigarette. Soon afterwards, the skin reddened and a blister appeared where the cool pencil had touched on the skin. This is the power of belief, which is mind over matter or placebo effects (some utilize it & others exploit it). To say that consciousness is an illusion does not explain consciousness: it presupposes it. Illusion is a mode of consciousness
എന്തൊക്കെയാ പറയുന്നത് കൈ ഇല്ലാത്ത കൈക്കു എങ്ങിനെയാ വേദന ഉണ്ടാവുന്നത്,, കൈക്കു വേദന ഇല്ലെങ്കിൽ വേദന വരുന്ന കൈക്ക് ( വേദന വരുന്ന ഭാഗത്ത് ) എന്തിനാ മരുന്ന് പുരട്ടുന്നത്, ബ്രെയിനിന് ( തലക്ക് ) അല്ലേ പുരട്ടേണ്ടത്
ഏത് മണ്ടത്തരത്തെയും ന്യായികരിക്കാനുള്ള അവസ്ഥയാണ്‌ ഈ സ്വതന്ത്ര യുക്തിവാദം എന്നാക്കരുത് നാച്ചുറൽ സെലെക്ഷൻ എന്ന് പറയുമ്പോൾ സ്വാഭാവികമായി ഉണ്ടാവുന്ന, പ്രകൃതി പരമായ മരങ്ങൾ എങ്ങിനെ ആ മാറ്റത്തിനു മാറ്റം സംഭവിക്കാൻ പാടില്ല അത് സ്വാഭാവികമായും തുടർന്നു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കണം, അങ്ങിനെ ഈ പരിണാമ വാദം പറയുന്നത് പോലെ തുടർന്നു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കുന്നില്ല എന്നതിന്റെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ തെളിവാണ് വ്യത്യസ്ത, വിവിധങ്ങളായ ജീവികൾ തന്നെ അതെങ്കിലും തിരിച്ചറിയുക, ഉദാഹരണം, ഏക കോശം ബഹു കോശം അങ്ങിനെ പൊതു പുർവീകർ, അതിൽ നിന്നും മനുഷ്യൻ, ചിമ്പാൻസി കുരങ്ങ് ഇങ്ങനെ വേർ പിരിഞ്ഞു വന്നതാണെങ്കിൽ, നാച്ചുറൽ സെലെക്ഷൻ പ്രകാരം അതേ അവസ്ഥ ഇപ്പോഴും തുടരണം, അങ്ങിനെ തുടരുന്നില്ല എന്നതാണ് പരിണാമ യുക്തി സ്വതന്ത്ര വാദമെന്ന ഇത് പോലുള്ള മണ്ടത്തരം, പൊതു പുർവ്വേകർ എവിടെ ഒന്നിച്ചു നശിച്ചു പോയി, ഇപ്പോൾ എന്തേ പരിണാമിച്ചു പുതിയ ജീവി ഉണ്ടാകാത്തത്,,സംഭവികാത്തത്, അപ്പോൾ ലക്ഷ കണക്കിന് വർഷം, ലക്ഷകണക്കിന് ആയ ജീവിയുണ്ടല്ലോ അപ്പോൾ അത് പരിണമിക്കുന്നത് അറിയില്ല, അങ്ങിനെയുള്ള ഭൂലോക മണ്ടത്തരത്തെ ഇത് പോലുള്ള മണ്ടത്തരം കൊണ്ട് വെളിപ്പിക്കൽ, മുൻപ് ഇദ്ദേഹത്തിന്റെ അഹം എന്ന മറ്റൊരു വിഡിയോ ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നു പുച്ച എലിയെ ഓടിക്കുന്ന, എലി മാളത്തിൽ ഒളിക്കുന്ന, എലിക്കു ഞാൻ എന്ന ബോധം ഉണ്ടെന്നൊക്കെ പറഞ്ഞു ഇപ്പോൾ അത് മാറ്റി, ഒര് മൃഗത്തിനും, മനുഷ്യൻ അല്ലാത്ത ജീവിക്കു ഞാൻ എന്ന ഭാവം ഇല്ലാ മൃഗങ്ങൾക്കു അത് തീരെ ഇല്ലാ അത് റ്ഗാന്നെയാണ്‌ മനുഷ്യൻ അവയിൽ നിന്ന് പരിണമിച്ചു വന്നില്ല എന്നതിന്റെ ഒര് തെളിവ്,, എന്തൊക്കെയോ പറയുക എന്നിട്ട് അത് കെട്ട് ചിലർ ഇല്ലായിരുന്നുവെങ്കിൽ എന്നൊക്കെ പറയുക,
I admire your knowledge, intelligence, oratory and articulation. However, certain points on certain subjects are rather weak. For example, regarding astrology you question whether the stars and solar bodies were sitting silent and waiting for years till the emergence of human beings, to cast their bad or good effect upon them. The said stars and other bodies were simply remaining there without any intention or plan, as such. Perhaps they were like a magnet and when the iron came later, they must have left their impact. After all, they were not living and intelligent creatures.
I dont believe in that Vilayinur Hypothesis about color and smile and all.A Multcolor'd picture alos causes "Aha" in the mind and while coming to smile,after seeing a jagathy comedy,i dont feel threatened. All are his personal hypothesis and never proven objectively.Ravi should refrain from quoting any scientists personal views about how the brain works.
സലാം,
ഇത്തരം അറിവിനായി താങ്കളുടെ പരിശ്രമത്തെ ഹൃദയങ്കമായി അനുമൊദിക്കുന്നു.
അറിവിനു നന്ദി മാഷെ.
mohammad saleem thanikokke ariv nedan ee viddiye mathramano kandath ??
Razak P thankal valiya budhimananallo
+Razak P ഇത് ആണ് ഒരു യഥാർത്ഥ പമ്പരവിഡ്ഢിയുടെ പ്രതികരണരീതി
Razak P viddi ninde vappa
@@razakp9401 then what do you think!! u are a genius!!!😒😒
Excellent performance by Ravi Sir. simple..simple..simple. nice to hear. really informative. perfect wordings. സാറിന്റെ ക്ലാസിലെ കുട്ടികളോട് ഇപ്പോൾ ശരിക്കും അസൂയ തോനുന്നു. lucky guys...!
Hassainar Thaikkaden yes brother
ravisarinte classil padikan kaxhiyunnathu oru bhagayam anu
Hassainar Thaikkaden mm athe
വളെരെയധികം നന്ദി രേഖപ്പെടുത്തുന്നു.
ഇത്രയും മനോഹരമായ ക്ലാസ് സമ്മാനിച്ചതിന്.
വളരെ നല്ല പ്രഭാഷണം... കുറെ കാര്യങ്ങൾ പഠിക്കാനുണ്ട്.....
വിജ്ഞാനത്തിൻ്റെ ഒരു ഭാണ്ടാവുമായി നമ്മളെ ബോധവാന്മാർ ആക്കാൻ സാർ ഒരുപാട് കഷ്ടപ്പെടുന്നു , നർമവും, കഥകളും ചേർത്ത് ഒട്ടും ബോർ അടിപ്പിക്കതെ ഇത്ര സമയം നമ്മളെ ഒരുപാട് കാര്യങ്ങൽ പറഞ്ഞു മനസ്സിലാക്കി തന്ന സാറിന് നന്ദി...🙏🏽
You are great. ദൈവമില്ല എന്ന് സർ തന്നെ പഠിപ്പിച്ചില്ലായിരുന്നെങ്കിൽ
ഞങ്ങൾ സാറിന് വേണ്ടി ഒരമ്പലം പണിതേനേ.. salute you sir
To thrisha commenter,
ദൈവം എന്ന വാക്കിന്റെ അർത്ഥം എല്ലാം വെളിപ്പെടുത്തി തരുന്ന പരിശുദ്ധമായ " അറിവ് " എന്നാണ്. അതില്ല എങ്കിൽ മനുഷ്യൻ എന്ന വാക്ക് പോലും ഇല്ല.
@@mkjohnkaipattoor6885 mandatharam
One of the best of C Ravichandran Sir :) There are a lot of stuffs.
Grab a pen and paper before you start watching.
Highly recommended.
രവിചന്ദ്രൻ സർ ഇഷ്ട്ടം..... പ്രസംഗം എല്ലാം മരണമാസ്സ് 👌👌👌
excellent speech....he is able to explain complex things in a very simple way unlike so called intellectuals..
മനുഷ്യ, നിങ്ങളുടെ ഭിക്ഷയാണ് ഇത്തരം അറിവുകൾ 🙏
Very knowledgeable man...very articulate too.
Sir, You are a real blessing of Keralites... keep rocking... let the rest of Indians be heard in their languages too.. let the darkness be driven out...
I am so happy to listen to your speeches repeatedly since they are empowered to strengthen me.
The object of life is development; and everything that lives has an
inalienable right to all the development it is capable of attaining !!
Thank you very much Mr. Ravi Sir.
Truly informative, thank you.
great speech!!very informative,scientific and realistic...!!!
expecting more books ravi sir.you are creating new trend of reading.
nice presentation...
Sheethal Thomas I noted that almost speech commented by u..cngrats
കേൾക്കാൻ ബോർ ആയി തോന്നുന്നു എങ്കിലും കേൾക്കാൻ ഉള്ള കാര്യം തന്നെ ആണ് സാറിന് അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങൾ 👍👍👍
When i see your vedio regarding brain functioning i feel motivation by the help of that motivation i can do many good things so i am thankfull to you looooot of yhanks
thank you so much dear ravichandran sir.as usual very informative sir.you are a real pearl of kerala.we admire you great ravi sir.
Thank you very much, sir :)
Great speech. Very informative
Verry nice
Thank you ravi sir!
very useful one..
great speech...
അത് തരിപ്പില്‍ ഇട്... :)
Mirror neurons study by Ramachandran is great. It will unite the world. No divisions of country, caste, region, religion, etc., etc., etc.,
very informative. thanks
great speech
thank you so much
keep it up
Excellent speech
superb
Great Speech Sir....
അമ്മ എന്ന വാക്ക് എവിടെ നിന്ന് തലച്ചോറിന് കിട്ടി.
അങ്ങനെ കിട്ടിയ ഭിക്ഷയായി കിട്ടിയ അറിവുകളുടെ ആകെ തുകയെയാണ് ദൈവം എന്നു പറയുന്നത്.
സ്വയം ദൈവമാകുന്നവർക്ക് അത് മനസ്സിലാകില്ല.
very nice presentation
CONGRATULATIONS...Mr.RAVICHANDRAN.C.
Dear Ravichandran Sir, what is the logical and rational plausibility of our assumption that physical objects which are made up of atoms (it is self-evident that atoms don't have any self-awareness!) , for example, a stone(or inorganic material) of certain mass(Kg), when subjected to evolutionary forces of magnitude of certain Newtons(N) for trillion, trillion, trillions of years or even infinite time , the stone will become 'self aware' in such a way that now the stone is able to 'think', 'aware', and 'reason' about even 'its' own existence and 'its' surroundings, able to grasp the laws of physics, mathematics, able to involve in logical reasoning, able to draw logical conclusions, etc.?
Not stone, but complex molecules of carbon. We call it organic matter. No Scientist will ever claim that stone (inorganic material) will evolve in such a way that it will eventually become self-aware.
But if you think it over in a different way, when ultimately the artificial intelligence emerges, it may not contain an ounce organic material. So ultimately the inorganic material may become self-aware.
Happy life thankal paranjathu onnu malayalathil parayamo.please onnarayana please.
പ്രിയപ്പെട്ട രവിചന്ദ്രൻ സാർ, സ്വയമേവ ചിന്താശേഷിയില്ലാത്ത, യാതൊരു ബോധമോ(consciousness) ആത്മാവബോധമോ(self-awareness) ഇല്ലാത്ത അചേതന ഭൗതിക പദാർത്ഥങ്ങൾ കോടിക്കണക്കിന് വർഷങ്ങളെന്നല്ല, അനന്തമായ കാലയളവ് ലഭിച്ചാൽ പോലും അന്ധമായ പ്രകൃതി ശക്തികളുടെ പ്രവർത്തനത്തങ്ങളാൽ, ബോധവും ആത്മാവബോധവുമുളള, ഭൗതിക ശാസ്ത്ര നിയമങ്ങളും ഗണിതശാസ്ത്രവും ഗ്രഹിക്കാൻ ശേഷിയുളള, യുക്തിബോധമുളള, തന്റെ ചുറ്റുമുളള പ്രപഞ്ചത്തെക്കുറിച്ച് അവബോധമുളള, മറ്റുളളവരിൽ നിന്ന് ചിന്തയിലും ആലോചനയിലും വ്യതിരിക്തത പുലർത്തുന്ന, സ്വന്തം അസ്തിത്വത്തെക്കുറിച്ച് പോലുംചിന്താശേഷിയുളള മസ്തിഷ്കമായി, തികച്ചും യാദൃശ്ചികമായി രൂപാന്തരപ്പെട്ടു- എന്ന നമ്മുടെ നിഗമനം- എത്രത്തോളം യുക്തിഭദ്രവും സംഭവ്യവുമാണ് ?
@ ദൈവത്തിനും മരണാനന്തര ജീവിതത്തിനും ആർക്കും നിഷേധിക്കാനാവാത്ത, യുക്തിപരമായ(Rational) തെളിവുകൾ. വീഡിയോ കാണുക:
100% യുക്തിഭദ്രവും സംഭവ്യവുമാണ്. അതുകൊണ്ടാണല്ലോ അചേതനവസ്തുക്കളാല്‍ താങ്കള്‍ എന്ന സചേതന വസ്തു ഉണ്ടായിരിക്കുന്നത്, അങ്ങനെ ഉണ്ടാകുന്നതിന് യാതൊരു മാന്ത്രിക പ്രതിഭാസത്തിനും പങ്കില്ലതാനും. ഇനി താങ്കള്‍ ഒരു മാന്ത്രിക പ്രതിഭാസം ആണെന്ന് താങ്കള്‍തന്നെ അവകാശപ്പെടും എന്നുണ്ടോ?
Susan George- Let us examine the hypothesis that atoms from big- bang explosion through random evolution given enough TIME (13 billion years) can produce an organized universe as we see today with billions of stars &galaxies with billions of animals and plants. Let us examine this with an analogy of ‘Typing Monkeys’ .
Attempts have been made to support evolution of universe by appealing to mathematics to justify long ages. For example, Nobel prize winner, George Wald, wrote, "Time is the hero of the plot. Given enough time anything can happen - the impossible becomes probable, the improbable becomes certain." Thomas Huxley ("Darwin's Bulldog") used this technique in Oxford, in 1860, while debating Samuel Wilberforce. He stated that if monkeys randomly strummed typewriter keys for a long enough time, then sooner or later Psalm 23 would be printed out. Huxley used this argument to demonstrate that universe and life could have originated by chance.
Julian Huxley (1887-1975) repeated this analogy to 'prove' that long periods of time could allow impossible evolution to occur. In his analogy, given enough time, monkeys randomly typing on typewriters could eventually type out the complete works of Shakespeare.
Stephen Hawking used the monkey story in 1988. He proposed that if there was a horde of typing monkeys, then "very occasionally by pure chance they will type out one of Shakespeare's sonnets."
When all these outlandish statements were made no evolutionary scientist or mathematician who knew better raised a single objection. So as a result, these statements have convinced many people that 5 billion years is enough time for life to evolve on Earth. This trick has been very convincing because most people have difficulty comprehending very small and extremely large numbers. For example, how long would it take someone to count to 1 billion, non-stop? (Answer on the bottom ) .
Just how logical is this monkey story? In simple terms, if every square foot of the earth's surface was covered with monkeys randomly typing on typewriters, at the rate of ten characters per second (about 5 times the realistic speed) they could not do the job. Even if they typed non-stop for 30 billion years there would not be the slightest chance that one of them would type even a single five word sentence of 31 characters, with spaces and punctuation in the correct place. The probability for them to achieve this is less than one chance in a trillion.
Richard Dawkins also appeals to the monkeys to convince his readers that evolution by natural selection is plausible. He believes that a thousand such monkeys could type Shakespeare's sentence, "Methinks it is like a weasel." However, the probability of them typing this six-word sentence (including spaces), is one chance in 10 raised to 39.
It has been calculated that it would be statistically impossible to randomly type even the first 100 characters in Shakespeare's "Hamlet". If the monkeys typed only in lower case, including the 27 spaces in the first 100 characters, the chances are 27 raised to 100. (ie. one chance in 10 raised to 143.). OR If each proton in the observable universe were a typing monkey (roughly 10 raised to 80 in all), and they typed 500 characters per minute (faster than the fastest secretary), around the clock for 20 billion years, then all the monkeys together could make 5x10 raised to 96 attempts at the characters. It would require an additional 3x10 raised to 46 such universes to have an even chance at success.
Recently, the reality of this last statement has been so damaging to the support for Darwinian evolution, that many evolutionists have taken up the "additional universes" scenario as a way out. They change the analogy and invent an unimaginably large number of universes that are all full of monkeys. They believe that under these new conditions, sooner or later one of the monkeys will succeed.
There is a second counter-argument to the mathematical impossibility of evolution. It suggests that when a monkey types the correct key it stays, but when an incorrect key is hit it is 'rubbed out'. This reasoning is based on the assumption that evolution has proceeded in a positive direction, always upwards. As evolution isn't always positive (ie. devolution can also occur & how 2nd law of thermodynamics works here?), this argument is not valid. A third counter-argument considers what is called cumulative selection. In it, the monkeys type in stages, stopping to check their work, saving what is close to the target sentence. This process is repeated until the monkey's random typing reproduces the sentence. This description of evolution is also false because evolution never has anything to aim at. As per evolution nature is purposeless,random and blind. Life shambles forward, surging here, shuffling there, the small advantages accumulating on their own until something novel appears on the broad evolutionary screen - an arch or an eye, an intricate pattern of behaviour, the complexity characteristic of life.
Returning to the mathematics, Michael Behe estimates the probability of just getting the 30,000 gene pieces required for blood clotting in the right sequence as 10 raised to minus 18. To get the genes plus the clotting activator working together by chance has the probability of 10 raised to minus 36.
Fred Hoyle estimates the following probabilities for chance, random arrangement of amino acids:-
• 10 raised to minus 19 for a ten amino acid polypeptide
• 10 raised to minus 20 for a functional enzyme
• 10 raised to minus 130 for the histone H4 molecule
• 10 raised to minus 40,000 for all of life's 2,000 enzymes This last value (10 raised to minus 40,000) shows the probability that a very, very tiny part of evolution could have happened. This probability is more unlikely than the monkey's chance typing (viz 10 raised to minus 143) which have been used to 'prove' evolution.
Bear in mind that Mathematical Zero is 10 raised to minus 50. Any value smaller than this is relegated by mathematicians to the realm of 'never happening'. No matter how large the environment one considers, universe and life cannot have had a random beginning.. To sum up this mathematical analysis of the monkey analogy, the monkeys could not succeed. Therefore, if the monkeys couldn't succeed, the analogy predicts that evolution of universe from protons,electrons ,quarks, anti quarks could not have succeeded by chance. Time then, actually destroys the assumptions of evolution.
ANSWER - To count to 1 billion, non-stop, would take between 30 & 200 years, depending on the counting speed.
Abu Faa'iza As you said the overworked monkey analogy is so wrong. I don’t believe the mumbo jumbo of religion, but the presence of a creator is true. I agree with Ravichandran 99.99 percent. But on that fundamental point I disagree.
ആരാണ് പറഞ്ഞത് യാദൃച്ഛികമായി രൂപപ്പെട്ടതാണെന്ന്..? പരിണാമംത്തേക്കുറിച്ച് കൂടുതൽ പഠിക്കു.... മനുഷ്യൻ എന്തിനുവേണ്ടി ഏത് കാലത്ത് ചിന്തിക്കാൻ തുടങ്ങിയത് എപ്പോഴാണെന്ന് തിരക്കി നോക്ക്....
I had suffered from Dejavu. But still I do not have words to express. I do enjoy or suffering I do not know
പുതിയ ശാസത്ര വിജ്ഞാനങ്ങൾ പൊതു സമൂഹത്തിന് എത്തിക്കുന്നതിൽ നന്ദിയുണ്ട് സർ, പക്ഷെ ഒരു കാര്യം സൂചിപ്പിക്കട്ടെ എന്റെ അഭിപ്രായത്തിൽ പ്രഭാഷണം ഒരു കലയാണ് അതിന്റെ ഒരു ഒഴുക്ക് കിട്ടുന്നില്ല, ഒരു നല്ല ക്ലാസ് ആണെന്ന് പറയാം, പക്ഷെ രവി ചന്ദ്രന്റെ എഴുത്ത് ഒരു സംഭവം തന്നെയാണ് അതാണദ്ധേഹത്തിന്റെ മേഖല.
I do understand what is mirror neurons
great
Thanks.
Onnum illaayimayil ninnaanu ellaam undaayathu...👍👍👍
Alla
Science makes God unnecessary
Thanks sir
TH-cam recommended!
Super
Good
Good enough.
i like
nice talk
1:22:25 😁😁🥰🥰
👍👏
1:21:12 അത് തരിപ്പിലിട് (vibration mode)
ഹ... ഹാ സൂപ്പർ
Excellent Sir.
Seriya😆😆
ഫോട്ടോഷോപ്പിൻ BJP😂(dialogue കലക്കി)
Idheham parayathathayi onnumilla ennu thonnunnu
Sir, sometimes you say science agrees with an argument of equality ( means whoever do the action gets the same result) . My point is: - not all persons who has become lymph in an accident feel the pain. This means the theory is wrong but this must the problem of week mind. (A strong mind can give strong automation and week mind self automation is regeted by brain.) for those of this kind of persons need self deceiving techinic.
👍👍👍👍
excelend
nice
The perceiver is perceived
Free will നെ കുറിച്ച് രവിചന്ദ്രൻ സംസാരിക്കുന്ന വീഡിയോ ഉണ്ടെങ്കിൽ ലിങ്ക് ഷെയർ ചെയ്യാമോ. 🙏
മസ്തിഷ്ക സാവിശേഷത അറിവിന്റെ വെളിച്ചതിലാണ്.
തലച്ചോറിൽ ഭിക്ഷയായി കിട്ടിയ അറിവിനെ കരു പിടിപ്പിച്ചു കഴിയുമ്പോൾ മാത്രമേ മൃഗത്തിൽ നിന്നും വെത്യസ്തമായ സവിശഷത മനുഷ്യനു കിട്ടുന്നുള്ളു.
ആ അറിവാണ് ദൈവം 🙏
അറിവ് തലച്ചോറിന്റെ സൃഷ്ടി ആണെന്ന് പറഞ്ഞു നടക്കുന്നവരുടെ ലക്ഷ്യം ഒന്നു
മാത്രം. ദൈവം ഇല്ല എന്നു സാധുകരിക്കണം.
ദൈവം എന്ന വാക്കിന്റെ അർത്ഥം വെളിപ്പെടുത്തുന്നവൻ എന്നാണ്.
യുക്തി വാദികളും അതറിയുന്നില്ല മത വാദികളും അറിയുന്നില്ല.
രവിചന്ദ്രൻ സംസാരിച്ച ഓരോ അക്ഷരങ്ങളും ദൈവരംസം ആണ്.
അക്ഷരം എന്നാൽ നാസമില്ലാത്തത് എന്നർത്ഥം.
1000 രൂപ ഉണ്ടെങ്കിൽ ഉണ്ടാക്കാൻ പറ്റില്ല. ഉണ്ടാക്കണമെങ്കിൽ ഉള്ളിൽ അറിവ് പ്രേകസിക്കണം.
അല്ലെങ്കിൽ കണ്ണിൽ നോക്കി കുരങ്ങ് ഇരിക്കുന്നത് പോലെ ഇരിക്കും അത്ര മാത്രം.
ശരീരം ആട്ടി കളിക്കുന്ന കളി അല്ല, അറിവിന്റെ കളി.
അറിവിന്റെ കളി അറിയാവുന്നവർ അധികം ശരീരം ഇട്ട് ഉലക്കില്ല.
ഇല്ലാതിരുന്ന അവസ്ഥയിൽ നിന്ന് ഉണ്ടായി വന്ന അറിവിനാണ് മനുഷ്യൻ
തന്നെ ദൈവം എന്നു പേരിട്ടത്.
( ലോകത്തിൽ ആദ്യം ഉണ്ടായ പുസ്തകം irgwedham
ആണെന്നും ഈജിപ്ടിലെ മരിച്ചവരുടെ പുസ്തകം ( Book of the dead)ആണെന്നും പറയുന്നു.
ആ അറിവും ഭാഷയും ഉണ്ടാക്കിയതാരാ?
The book of dead ന് 15000വർഷം പഴക്കമുണ്ടെന്ന് പറയുന്നു.
മാസ്‌തിഷ്കം മൂന്നു പാർട്ട്‌ ആണ്.
For brain, mid brain, hind brain.
Fore brain ഭാഗമായി seribrum, thalamus, hipothalamas എന്നി ഭാഗങ്ങളും ഉണ്ട്. ഇവിടെയാണ് ശരീരത്തിന്റെ എല്ലാ ഇച്ഛകർമങ്ങളും അറിവിന്റെ വെളിച്ചത്തിൽ നടക്കുന്നത്.
ഇതിന് സഹായികളായി
Pons, medulla oblomgata,
Limpic system, seribellam
Hipothalamasumayi ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട master gland എന്നറിയപ്പെടുന്ന piturory gland, endocrine chemical
Cordination neurons messengers, spinal cord
Nervous system,
ശരീരം മുഴുവൻ വ്യാപിച്ചു കിടക്കുന്ന periferel nervous system.
ഉള്ളിൽ ഇരുന്ന് ഒരാൾ prompt chaithane ശരീരം കർമ നിരതമാകുന്നത്.
അത് അറിവാണ്.
അറിവിനെ ആത്മാവ് എന്നു പറയുന്നു.
അറിവുകളുടെ ടോട്ടൽ തുകയെ ദൈവം, പരമാത്മാവ്
അള്ളാഹു, സ്വർഗസ്ഥനായ പിതാവ് എന്നൊക്കെ പറയുന്നു.
ഇത് എവിടെ ഇരിക്കുന്നു എന്നു ചോദിച്ചാൽ തലച്ചോറിലെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ 2 പാർട്ടായി ഇരിക്കുന്നതിൽ
മെമ്മറി ഡിസ്‌കിൽ ഇരിക്കുന്നു.
കാടു കയറേണ്ട വല്ല കാര്യവും ഉണ്ടോ?
ആ വലിയ മേശരിയെയാണ്
അറിവ് എന്നു പറയുന്നത്.
good
sr enthinaa ella prabashanathilum mooku choriyunhe mookunenthaa kuyapam
+richurazal rasheed മൂക്കിന് ചൊറിച്ചിൽ...അല്ലാതെന്താ കുഴപ്പം?
Gd one
അത് തന്നെയാണ്
സർവ്വം ബ്രഹ്മമയം എന്നു പറയുന്നത്.
തലചോറിൽ അറിവായിരിക്കുന്ന 3 വരകൾ
ചേർത്ത 3 angles എടുത്ത് പേപ്പറിൽ വരക്കുമ്പോൾ അരൂപിയായ തൃക്കോണത്തിൽ നിന്നും രൂപമുള്ള ത്രികോണം
ഉണ്ടാകുന്നു.
അതിനെകുറിച്ചുള്ള അറിവ് തലച്ചോറിൽ ഇല്ലാത്തവനോട് മട്ടത്രികൊണം
വരയ്ക്കാൻ പറഞ്ഞാൽ
വരക്കുമോ?
തലച്ചോറുണ്ടല്ലോ.
1:08:30, Ethu birds anu, spell it plz
Bowerbird
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowerbird
അറിവില്ലാത്ത വാക്കുകളാല്‍ ഉപദേശത്തെ ഇരുളാക്കുന്ന ഇവന്‍ ആരാണ്
MIRROR BOX’:-Nobel Prize for Dr. Vilayannur Ramachandran
Undoubtedly Dr. Vilayannur Ramachandran must get Nobel Prize for the discovery of ‘Mirror Box’ as 80% of the phantom pain patients would be getting relief and for saving them from suicide due to excruciating pain from phantom limbs. If every organ is represented in the BRAIN MAP and as long as amputated organs are not deleted from the brain Map, the problem of phantom pain exists for every organ. But a Pandora’s Box is waiting to be opened!!!. The so called tried and tested medical practices like the removal of uteruses, diabetes amputees, appendicitis operation, and organ transplanting will be debunked at one stroke. If rationalists are taking this up as a campaign they will be doing a great service to humanity (remember 100% of organ recipients have to live on Immunosuppressant drugs to avoid body rejecting the implanted organs).
VISION and BRAIN- Homunculus fallacy & infinite regress…
Dr. Vilayannur says ‘‘analogously, the brain creates symbolic descriptions. It does not re-create the original image, but represents the various features and aspects of the image in totally new terms-not with squiggles of ink, of course, but in its own alphabet of nerve impulses. These symbolic encodings are created partly in your retina itself but mostly in your brain.’’
OBJECTS ARE WHERE I SEE THEM, NOT IN MY HEAD/BRAIN
Further to the above statement, most contemporary metaphors for the activity of the brain are derived from computers and internal representations in brain are commonly conceived of as ‘virtual reality’ displays. Following words are used to describe computer analogy of brain’s activity like:- Program, processing data & information,system,message, self consciousness like a software program, neural hardware, encoding, computation, stored memories, wiring, genetic codes, cross-wiring, circuits, instructions, blueprint, templates, default settings etc.
As per Dr. Vilayannur, Our visual perceptions are a ‘simulation’ (a form of virtual reality) of the real world that is ‘made by, and exists within, the brain’. The idea of visual experiences as simulations inside brain leads to strange consequences that are not explained by any scientists in the world so far. If my brain is analogous to a computer, when I look at the sky and stars, the sky I see is inside my skull (monitor). So my skull should be beyond the sky and stars !!!. But actually they(sky&stars) are where I see them , miles and miles away, not in my head-------
please note there never was a time when there is no creation. It is impossible to contract language to one because there never was a time when there is no languages , what we can say is grammatic Perfection of certain languages happened.
💪🏽👌🏼
ആത്മാവ്, soul എന്നു പറയുന്നത് സാധനമല്ല.
രണ്ടു മണിക്കൂറിൽ കൂടുതൽ നിങ്ങൾ സംസാരിച്ച വാക്കുകൾ തന്നെയാണ്.
അവരവരെ അവരവർ ആക്കി നിലനിർത്തുന്നത്തേതോ അതാണ് ആത്മാവ് അഥവാ അറിവ
Vilayanurinte speeches muzhuvanayum kelkkanam...He never denied the Idea Of "Brahman" or Eastern (Indian) philosophical findings .In fact i think he believes in it .PS : Sabhyamaya comments Athu -ve aayalum Delete cheyyathirikkanulla manyatha pratheekshikkunnu.
സ്റ്റഡിയിങ് ബ്രെയിൻ ഈസ്‌ ultimate സ്പിരിറ്റുമാലിറ്റി
Nice information indeed - after all human being invented the god and god concept - canatarajan
നികുഞ്ജ പക്ഷിയുടെ ഇംഗ്ലീഷ് എന്താണ്
vilesh k Bower bird...
@@anoopparameswaran6359 😀
Arun ne kandappo iphone ormavanathar like adiku
yes very excellent speech but there are lot of contradictions for example he explained language emerged from nothing or without source,this is great blunder,the source of our languages is human being our brain,vocal cards,noise etc etc,could languages emerge without living beings?100 percent i agreed evolutions but there are some limitations too.....but one thing wherever there is a creation,there should be a creator....i donot believe in religions but i do believe in god the one who created our universe......
MIND IS WHAT BRAIN DOES?
Attempts to explain a human brain which has 100 billion neurons and each neuron having 1,000 to 10,000 contacts with other neurons, in terms of different brain regions firing neurons (light-up) and electro-chemical activities using X-ray, MRI, EEG , CAT scans and galvanic skin response (GSR) test are like trying to understand a Computer by grinding it up and analyzing its component elements, such as copper, germanium and silicon. But in this process of reduction, the structure and the programmed activity of the computer vanishes, and chemical analysis will never reveal the circuit diagrams; no amount of mathematical modeling of interactions between its atomic constituents will reveal the computer’s programs or the purposes they fulfilled. Only excuse is the hypothesis that the emerging properties arising out of mixing various components give rise to new components or phenomenon like consciousness (sometimes life itself), i.e. billions of brain neurons whose interactive states exceeds the number of elementary particles in the known universe should randomly converge at a single place to evolve an organ or organs which are as complex as brain.(it need immense guts to say that human eye has 50 defects).
IS THE BRAIN REALLY NECESSARY?
Even hardcore Atheist like Francis Crick who shared in a Nobel Prize for the discovery of the structure of DNA, states this way, ‘‘Almost all the molecules in our bodies, with the exception of DNA, the genetic material, turn over (renew) in a matter of days, weeks, or at the most a few months. How then is memory stored in the brain so that its trace is relatively immune to molecular turnover?’---For decades, the most popular theory has been that memory must depend on changes in connections between nerve cells, the synapses. Yet attempts to locate memory stores have proved unsuccessful over and over again.
The British neurologist John Lorber found that some people with extreme hydrocephalus were surprisingly normal , which led him to ask the provocative question: ‘Is the brain really necessary?’ .He scanned the brains of more than six hundred people with hydrocephalus, and found that about sixty had more than 95 per cent of the cranial cavity filled with cerebrospinal fluid. Some were seriously retarded, but others were more or less normal, and some had IQs of well over 100. One young man who had an IQ of 126 and a first-class degree in mathematics, a student from Sheffield University, had ‘virtually no brain’. His skull was lined with a thin layer of brain cells about a millimeter thick, and the rest of the space was filled with fluid. Any attempt to explain his brain in terms of a standard ‘connectome’ would be doomed to failure. His mental activity and his memory were still able to function more or less normally even though he had a brain only five per cent of the normal size.
Erik Kandel, who won the Nobel Prize in 2000 for his work on memory in the sea slug, Aplysia, drew attention to some of these problems in his acceptance speech:
‘‘How do different regions of the hippocampus and the median temporal lobe . . . interact in the storage of explicit memory? We do not, for example, understand why the initial storage of memory requires the hippocampus, whereas the hippocampus is not required once a memory has been stored for weeks or months. We also know very little about the recall of explicit (declarative) memory . . . These systems properties of the brain will require more than the bottom-up approach of molecular biology’’.
Explaining a supercomputer just by studying its components:-TELL TALE BRAIN
Analogous to a computer with a TV tuner card, human brain has hardware and software part. The hardware part is different regions of brain.( occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes, amygdala, Brocas,Wernicke’s area - etc)
Comparing our brain to a computer, on the hardware part, the pictures on the computer screen depends on hundreds of electronic components of the set and the energy that powers it, and also on the invisible transmissions it receives through the electromagnetic field. A skeptic who rejected the idea of invisible influences might try to explain everything about the pictures and sounds in terms of the components of the set - the wires, transistors, and so on - and the electrical interactions between them. For example by a defect in some of the transistors, or loose contacts in electrical circuits - affect the pictures by changing their color or distorting their shapes; while mutations of components in the tuning circuit cause the set to jump from one channel to another, leading to a completely different set of sounds and pictures. Through careful research he would find that damaging or removing or cross-wiring some of these components affected the pictures or sounds the set produced, and did so in a repeatable, predictable way.(in human brain it is utilized for anesthesia & manifested in various strange forms like phantom limbs, synesthesia, agnosia, Capgras syndrome, alien-hand syndrome ,sleep, Apotemnophilia ,autism, telephone syndrome, Tran sexuality). This discovery would reinforce his materialist belief. But this does not prove that the evening news report is produced by chemical interactions among the TV set’s components. Can we say which website Mr.X browsed yesterday by looking at a damaged component? He would be unable to explain exactly how the set produced the pictures and sounds. The underlying premise of Dr. Vilayannur’s book pivots around this hardware part of brain. Dr. Vilayannur’s description of working of brain as orchestrated & compartmentalized interaction between different brain areas is only a hardware part.
The brain areas of animals also light up (fire neurons) when they see, hear or having any emotions. The only specialty which makes human brain unique is its large size-proportionate to its body and the immense number of mirror neurons. Lighting up of different brain areas denotes only a drop in the ocean.
The software part is the underlying genetic program on which all the micro, macro and nano components of the body functions and comes into force whether you are studying memory, perception, art, or consciousness. Genetic programs are explicitly analogous to computer programs, which are intelligently designed by human minds to achieve particular purposes. Programs are purposive, intelligent and goal-directed. The ‘genetic program’ implies that plants and animals are organized by purposive principles that are mind-like, or designed by minds. Using the word ‘genetic program’ is another way of smuggling intelligent designs into chemical genes. Saying lesions in the left angular gyrus of brain eliminates abstract skills like reading, writing, and arithmetic is same as saying some fungus on a particular component caused the computer to crash, but do we know the machine language -software- which gave the left angular gyrus the ability to read & write ? .
Materialists have always accused vitalists or theists of trying to explain the mysteries of life in terms of empty words, such as ‘vital factors’ and ‘souls’ that ‘explain everything and therefore nothing’. But the vital factors in their Atheist guises have exactly this characteristic. How does a marigold grow from a seed? or How does a zygote grow into a trillion celled baby in 9 months? because it is genetically programmed to do so. How does a spider instinctively spin its web? Because of the information coded in its genes. How does weaver bird builds its nest? That is the default setting encoded as instruction and messages in the DNA and so on-------
Cloningiloode ore pole (physical and inteluctual) aayi (same as he) human production start cheythal ideham parayunnathokke njan angeekarikkam..idhehathinte total darsanathinulla marupadiyanu ith..
So the human brain is conditioned already.
Mirror neurons.
My name is Maximums Desmus Williams. Commander of an Army. Loyal servant to the true Emperor. Father of an murdered child, husband of an murdered wife. I will have my vengeance this life or next. An Oscar winning movie dialogue. How you are going to address such psychological problem in your forthcoming Mirror Neurons
PURPOSELESS ,BLIND RANDOM MUTATIONS & GENETIC PROGRAMS: We often hear whenever there is a deleterious (harmful) mutation in the evolutionary process, there is a ‘program’ or ‘mechanism’ to remove it. The question is ,if everything is formed by ,purposeless , random and blind forces of natural selection, who has made this correcting ‘program’ or ‘mechanism’ which literally brings order out of chaos ? .This question is also relevant to the evolution of English language from no words to 8 lakh words - language was not evolving on its own, but it was evolved and moulded by intelligent conscious human beings(Typing monkeys analogy & Evolution:-It would be statistically impossible if every square foot of the earth's surface was covered with typing monkeys to randomly type even the first 100 characters in Shakespeare's "Hamlet” . If the monkeys typed only in lower case, including the 27 spaces in the first 100 characters, the chances are 27 raised to 100 (ie. one chance in 10 raised to 143). Or if each proton in the observable universe were a typing monkey (roughly 10 raised to 80 in all), and they typed 500 characters per minute (faster than the fastest secretary), around the clock for 20 billion years, then all the monkeys together could make 5x10 raised to 96 attempts at the characters. It would require an additional 3x10 raised to 46 such universes to have an even chance at success.) & picture of Trivandrum city with pan shops evolving in to metro city(TVM city was not evolving on its own, it was evolved and moulded by intelligent conscious human beings) .This ‘mechanism’ is no way different from Theist’s viewpoints that organisms are organized by purpose, order ,program & mind like principles. How come an evolutionary mechanism with RANDOMNESS as one of its principal dogmas, selects (without any consciousness!) and stick only with 4 nucleotides ATCG. (Adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine) for billions of years - which are present in all organisms including plants and animals. While permutations and differences exist between species, this basic structure has existed unchanged for billions of years. Even the most ardent defenders of the materialistic theory smuggle purposive, organizing principles into living organisms in the form of selfish genes or genetic programs. In Dawkins’s words, ‘‘DNA moves in mysterious ways. The DNA molecules are not only intelligent; they are also selfish, ruthless and competitive, like successful Chicago gangsters’’. The selfish genes “create form,” “mould matter”. The dominant paradigm of modern biology, although materialistic, is remarkably similar to vitalism (theism), with ‘programs’ or ‘information’ or ‘instructions’ or ‘messages’, playing the role formerly attributed to souls. Computer programs are intelligently designed by human minds for particular purposes, and act upon through the electronic machinery of a computer. The computer is a machine, but the program is not. Any way Dr. Vilayannur is humble enough to state ‘‘the question of how neurons encode meaning and evoke all the semantic associations of an object is the holy grail of neuroscience, whether you are studying memory, perception, art, or consciousness’’ But Mr.Ravichandran has already jumped in to the conclusion that everything regarding mind is what brain does. His statement about phantom limb that if consciousness is there, why the brain is being tricked can be compared to inducing hypnotic blisters by touching a man’s arm with a pencil by telling him that it is a lighted cigarette. Soon afterwards, the skin reddened and a blister appeared where the cool pencil had touched on the skin. This is the power of belief, which is mind over matter or placebo effects (some utilize it & others exploit it). To say that consciousness is an illusion does not explain consciousness: it presupposes it. Illusion is a mode of consciousness
But evolution is not without order . Evolution is based on a order of selection of favourable traits in an organization
www awarology.org
The science of consciousness
Free download all books
photo shpile BJP anu...
എന്തൊക്കെയാ പറയുന്നത് കൈ ഇല്ലാത്ത കൈക്കു എങ്ങിനെയാ വേദന ഉണ്ടാവുന്നത്,, കൈക്കു വേദന ഇല്ലെങ്കിൽ വേദന വരുന്ന കൈക്ക് ( വേദന വരുന്ന ഭാഗത്ത് ) എന്തിനാ മരുന്ന് പുരട്ടുന്നത്, ബ്രെയിനിന് ( തലക്ക് ) അല്ലേ പുരട്ടേണ്ടത്
നിനക്ക് കാര്യം മനസിലായില്ല. Vr headset വച്ചു ആക്ഷത്തുന്നു വീഴുന്ന വീഡിയോ കണ്ടു നോക്ക്. You can feel ഇതു
ഏത് മണ്ടത്തരത്തെയും ന്യായികരിക്കാനുള്ള അവസ്ഥയാണ്‌ ഈ സ്വതന്ത്ര യുക്തിവാദം എന്നാക്കരുത് നാച്ചുറൽ സെലെക്ഷൻ എന്ന് പറയുമ്പോൾ സ്വാഭാവികമായി ഉണ്ടാവുന്ന, പ്രകൃതി പരമായ മരങ്ങൾ എങ്ങിനെ ആ മാറ്റത്തിനു മാറ്റം സംഭവിക്കാൻ പാടില്ല അത് സ്വാഭാവികമായും തുടർന്നു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കണം, അങ്ങിനെ ഈ പരിണാമ വാദം പറയുന്നത് പോലെ തുടർന്നു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കുന്നില്ല എന്നതിന്റെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ തെളിവാണ് വ്യത്യസ്ത, വിവിധങ്ങളായ ജീവികൾ തന്നെ അതെങ്കിലും തിരിച്ചറിയുക,
ഉദാഹരണം, ഏക കോശം ബഹു കോശം അങ്ങിനെ പൊതു പുർവീകർ, അതിൽ നിന്നും മനുഷ്യൻ, ചിമ്പാൻസി കുരങ്ങ് ഇങ്ങനെ വേർ പിരിഞ്ഞു വന്നതാണെങ്കിൽ, നാച്ചുറൽ സെലെക്ഷൻ പ്രകാരം അതേ അവസ്ഥ ഇപ്പോഴും തുടരണം, അങ്ങിനെ തുടരുന്നില്ല എന്നതാണ് പരിണാമ യുക്തി സ്വതന്ത്ര വാദമെന്ന ഇത് പോലുള്ള മണ്ടത്തരം, പൊതു പുർവ്വേകർ എവിടെ ഒന്നിച്ചു നശിച്ചു പോയി, ഇപ്പോൾ എന്തേ പരിണാമിച്ചു പുതിയ ജീവി ഉണ്ടാകാത്തത്,,സംഭവികാത്തത്, അപ്പോൾ ലക്ഷ കണക്കിന് വർഷം, ലക്ഷകണക്കിന് ആയ ജീവിയുണ്ടല്ലോ അപ്പോൾ അത് പരിണമിക്കുന്നത് അറിയില്ല, അങ്ങിനെയുള്ള ഭൂലോക മണ്ടത്തരത്തെ ഇത് പോലുള്ള മണ്ടത്തരം കൊണ്ട് വെളിപ്പിക്കൽ,
മുൻപ് ഇദ്ദേഹത്തിന്റെ അഹം എന്ന മറ്റൊരു വിഡിയോ ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നു പുച്ച എലിയെ ഓടിക്കുന്ന, എലി മാളത്തിൽ ഒളിക്കുന്ന, എലിക്കു ഞാൻ എന്ന ബോധം ഉണ്ടെന്നൊക്കെ പറഞ്ഞു ഇപ്പോൾ അത് മാറ്റി, ഒര് മൃഗത്തിനും, മനുഷ്യൻ അല്ലാത്ത ജീവിക്കു ഞാൻ എന്ന ഭാവം ഇല്ലാ മൃഗങ്ങൾക്കു അത് തീരെ ഇല്ലാ അത് റ്ഗാന്നെയാണ്‌ മനുഷ്യൻ അവയിൽ നിന്ന് പരിണമിച്ചു വന്നില്ല എന്നതിന്റെ ഒര് തെളിവ്,, എന്തൊക്കെയോ പറയുക എന്നിട്ട് അത് കെട്ട് ചിലർ ഇല്ലായിരുന്നുവെങ്കിൽ എന്നൊക്കെ പറയുക,
Dr സാകിർ നായ്ക്കിനോട് ചോദിക്കു
KUNHIPA Kunhu aa poorimonte peruparayalle plsss
He is an asshole..
ദുഷ്‌ടര്‍ക്കു പ്രകാശം തടയപ്പെട്ടിരിക്കുന്നു;
അവരുടെ ഉയര്‍ത്തിയ കരം ഒടിക്കപ്പട്ടിരിക്കുന്നു
Supppprrrrr supppprrrrr suppprrrrrrrrrrrrr
1:24 Goorka in Kitchen ,......., Hahaaaaaaaaa
don't show the audience
Why
100%
👍👍
തലയുടെ തല തലവൻ തന്നെയാണ്. അത് അറിവാണ്.
തലചോർ അല്ല, മനസ്സിലായില്ലേ?
Brain ile neurons some sort of chemical reactions athanu think cheyan ulla kazhiv tharune.Thaangale pole ullavar mind heartil anennu parayunvar anu.🥴
Ettavum vivaramulla oru vellam kori kudamudakkunnavan
I admire your knowledge, intelligence, oratory and articulation. However, certain points on certain subjects are rather weak. For example, regarding astrology you question whether the stars and solar bodies were sitting silent and waiting for years till the emergence of human beings, to cast their bad or good effect upon them. The said stars and other bodies were simply remaining there without any intention or plan, as such. Perhaps they were like a magnet and when the iron came later, they must have left their impact. After all, they were not living and intelligent creatures.
What you said is simply a very simple form of superstition.
Susan George ha ha how u came to know about it
I dont believe in that Vilayinur Hypothesis about color and smile and all.A Multcolor'd picture alos causes "Aha" in the mind and while coming to smile,after seeing a jagathy comedy,i dont feel threatened. All are his personal hypothesis and never proven objectively.Ravi should refrain from quoting any scientists personal views about how the brain works.
😁😄😄😄😄😄😄
അപ്പോൾ ഈ ഫ്രീ വിൽ ഒക്കെ ഒരു കോമഡി ആണോ 🤔