Oldest Quran Manuscripts at Al Aqah Heritage Village, Fujairah… #2024 #travel #travelvlog #heritagevillage #heritage #museum #fujairah #quran #manuscript
The Quran - The word of Allah Almighty was memorised by our prophet and his companions. Every generation has, in every city, a Hafiz - a muslim who has memorised the Qur'an (literally means one who guards)
But the problem is this the Qurans which the Sahabah compiled after memorising from the prophet were burnt by Uthman who created his own quran so different that Ibn Masud refused to use it in prayer. What you memorise today is not the Uthman Quran but a standardized version of Hafs. This Quran was standardized in 1924 by the scholars in Al Azar University.
@@fedesetrtatio1 what are you yappin bro there are 7 different ways arabs read the Quran and all what uthamn may allah be pleased with him did was standardize one for all arabs
@@trickzclipz5910 7 different way or 7 different dialects. I have never heard of anybody reading something seven different ways. But the problem is what are you reading with your 7 different "ways", Mohammads quran or Uthmans quran. You would never know because Uthman burnt all the originals. Those compiled by the Sahabah.
@@fedesetrtatio1 i did make a mistake by not calling them dialects and i admit to that. However, all 7 dialects are valid so it honestly doesn't matter. Also, I'm sure someone more knowledgeable than I can tell you which exact dialect the prophet peace be upon him read the quran in (i think he read it in all 7 but that might just be my brain misremembering. Again, im just a layman), and Allah knows best.
@user-mv2vo2kr4f the oldest manuscript are less than 100 hijri. Some of these are from 900 hijri. The problem with this title is that some people will think that the oldest manuscripts came 900 years after hijra. Thats my point
The new testament has approximately 83,680 words whereas the Qur'an has 77,430. Its only a little difference. The truth, the Gospels aren't worthy enough to memorise
“Ismail bin Ibrahim narrated from Ayub from Naf’i from Ibn Umar who said: ‘Verily among you people one would say that he has found the Quran while he is unaware of what the total quantity of the Quran was, because most of the Quran has been lost. Rather one should say that verily he has found the Quran that has appeared.’” (Fadhail al-Quran, by Qasim bin Salam (d. 222 A.H.), Volume 2, p. 135)
Ibn Hajar writes: وقد أخرج بن الضريس من حديث بن عمر أنه كان يكره أن يقول الرجل قرأت القرآن كله ويقول إن منه قرآنا قد رفع “Ibn ad-Durays has narrated a report of Ibn ‘Umar that he used to dislike the person who said, ‘I have recited the whole of the Qur’an.’ He (Ibn ‘Umar) used to say, ‘But (the reality is) a part of the Qur’an has been abrogated.’ Fath al-Bari, Vol. 9, pp. 65 Dr. Sa‘d bin ‘Abdullah al-Humayyid comments on this particular narration: و يفهم من كلام ابن عمر لضى الله عنه: أنه في رأيه أن الآيات المنسوخة بعد نسخها تسمى كذالك قرآناً أو باعتبار ما كان “And it appears from the words of Ibn ‘Umar that in his opinion even the abrogated verses could also be called Qur’an after their being abrogated or (they could be so called) by the way what they once were.” Sunan Sa’eed bin Mansoor Vol. 2, 433
Imam al-Alusi helps explain the issue: أجمعوا على عدم وقوع النقص فيما تواتر قرآنا كما هو موجود بين الدفتين اليوم، نعم أسقط زمن الصديق ما لم يتواتر وما نسخت تلاوته … وعليه يحمل ما رواه أبو عبيد عن ابن عمر قال: لا يقولن أحدكم قد أخذت القرآن كله وما يدريه ما كله قد ذهب منه قرآن كثير ولكن ليقل قد أخذت منه ما ظهر “Verily they (i.e. people of Sunnah) have agreed on there being no loss in the Qur’an as is continuously reported like we today find between the two bindings. Yes during the time of (Abu Bakr) as-Sidiq the part which was not reported continuously and was (rather) abrogated was dropped (out of the official mushaf)…and to this relates that which is reported by Abu ‘Ubayd from Ibn ‘Umar, who said: ‘None of you should say that he has taken the whole of the Qur’an; how could he know what all of it was! A lot of the Qur’an has passed him by! Let him say instead: I have taken of the Qur’an that which became apparent.’ Tafseer Ruh al-M’ani Vol. 1, pp. 26 If we connect the dots, we see that: 1. Ibn Umar himself testified that the Qur'an was preserved and this is agreed upon. 2. It is understood that no part of the Qur'an is missing rather the lost part in reality are abrogated. Read the hadith you sent, it says 'kathir' kathir means a little or not the total. Everyone and ibn Umar understood the abrogated verses are the ones that aren't in the Qur'an. You truly are ignorant, keep trying 😂. Why do you disbelievers only grab one thing and don't look at the rest. You aren't looking for truth you are actually trying to bring doubt upon the Muslimeen, shameful. Muslims don't be affected by these people, they have no affect on Islam, not one bit!
@@chibicretster 11:1 Alif Lām Ra. This is a Book whose verses are perfected, then fully explained, from One Who is All-Wise, All-Aware. 2:106 - We do not cancel any verse nor let it be forgotten instead We bring something better than it or else something similar. Perfection does not need abrogation or something better. Contradiction.
@@lahleholivia7398 first from the beggining there were many scribes who wrote verses and at the same time many companions memorized verses so it was preserved with two ways so even if all the writings had burned there were many companions who memorized all quran who can write again( btw today there are millions of ppl who memorize all quran) second cancel or change means when there is a new prophet something change for example Allah changed something from judaism through Jesus(pbuh) and changed something from christianity(original one) through Muhammed (pbuh)
The parchment on which it is written could be old but the inscription on them cannot be older than the late 7th to the 8th Century. Remember Allah gave Prophet Uthman the authority to burn all the original Qurans and produce his own.
Please refrain from speaking with ignorance what you are referring to is the burning of qurans with different qiraats this has no impact on the actual meaning whats so ever rather it was made as a mercy from Allah swt as it made it easier for different dialects amongst the arabs the recite the quran. It was only later on that when the quran was compiled in Uthmans time that some were burnt as islams reach had spread far to the point that when two muslims recited the different qiraat they thought one of them had recited wrong and so in order to prevent a division in the ummah Uthman burnt the over versions in order to stop ignorance form dividing the muslims.
@@rizwanmubarak6508 That in the English language is called sarcasm my friend. I called Uthman a prophet because it seems Muslims have no problem with him messing around with the Quran. Who gave him the authority to re-write the Quran and destroy the originals.
@@rizwanmubarak6508 The earliest Quran of Abu Bakr, Masood, and Kaab was all in the Quraysh dialect and in the form of its original Rasm. There was no qiraat business then too. Aahruf and Qiraat are a later invention to cover up but in the end, made it more confusing. Why did he burn these originals compiled by the Sahabah? All of them objected to his impunity.
@@fedesetrtatio1 ?? Please quote your sources because Quran was never written by the Prophet pbuh who was illiterate and the first time the Quran was compiled was under the leadership of Uthman which was Islam began to become far more established beyond the Arabian peninsula. Also the Prophet pbuh taught these different Qiraats to different Arab tribes so i dont know where this info is coming from.
For you haters of Islam. Remember the Quran is still in its original form and does not change because its the final revelation from God to man kind. Its the exact same message from all the messengers of God. We so called Muslim's mmay change BUT THE QURAN DOES NOT NOR WILL IT!
Only the Quran claims to be the final revelation. Only the Quran says Mohammed was prophet. Nowhere outside of the Quran were either of these prophesied. And.. only Muslims believe that the Quran is in its original form. You're not providing facts, your telling us what Muslims believe to be facts.
Go to birmingham (uk), there's a manuscript from the time of the prophet when he was alive. Go to turkey, there's another, go to russia, there's another. Do your research before commenting illiterate sh*t
ALHAMDULILAH. This speacial gift of being a Muslim having truth i can not thank ALLAH S.W.T. enough. So proud to be Muslim.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Mashallah
Alhamdulillah.
The Quran - The word of Allah Almighty was memorised by our prophet and his companions. Every generation has, in every city, a Hafiz - a muslim who has memorised the Qur'an (literally means one who guards)
But the problem is this the Qurans which the Sahabah compiled after memorising from the prophet were burnt by Uthman who created his own quran so different that Ibn Masud refused to use it in prayer.
What you memorise today is not the Uthman Quran but a standardized version of Hafs. This Quran was standardized in 1924 by the scholars in Al Azar University.
Your lyes fool no Muslims. But t=your lord the devil thanks you and awaits you.@@fedesetrtatio1
@@fedesetrtatio1 what are you yappin bro there are 7 different ways arabs read the Quran and all what uthamn may allah be pleased with him did was standardize one for all arabs
@@trickzclipz5910 7 different way or 7 different dialects. I have never heard of anybody reading something seven different ways. But the problem is what are you reading with your 7 different "ways", Mohammads quran or Uthmans quran. You would never know because Uthman burnt all the originals. Those compiled by the Sahabah.
@@fedesetrtatio1 i did make a mistake by not calling them dialects and i admit to that. However, all 7 dialects are valid so it honestly doesn't matter. Also, I'm sure someone more knowledgeable than I can tell you which exact dialect the prophet peace be upon him read the quran in (i think he read it in all 7 but that might just be my brain misremembering. Again, im just a layman), and Allah knows best.
SubhanAllah ❤
Machaallah
EVERY word, EVERY letter REMAINED the same from the instant it was revealed by Allah. No different versions, different books, different authors...
😮😮😮😮😮
i think there is one even older in bermingham that dates back to the time of the prophet peace be upon him and abo bakr
This quran may be old. But its nowhere near the oldest
@@user-mv2vo2kr4f my problem is with the title saying its the oldest
@user-mv2vo2kr4f the oldest manuscript are less than 100 hijri. Some of these are from 900 hijri. The problem with this title is that some people will think that the oldest manuscripts came 900 years after hijra. Thats my point
Yes the oldest one we have is 'mashaf e usmani'
Millions of muslims have the quran memorised. Has anyone memorised the Bible? No one, not even the pope !!!
Ummmm the Bible is like 10 times longer
@@Assad-lj4svand changed many times.
@@Nightstar3242 forsure. Corrupt people put the Bible together
The new testament has approximately 83,680 words whereas the Qur'an has 77,430. Its only a little difference. The truth, the Gospels aren't worthy enough to memorise
@@kb4432 Yes and there's 783,000 words in the entire bible. That's why it was written down, so people didn't have to memorise it.
“Ismail bin Ibrahim narrated from Ayub from Naf’i from Ibn Umar who said: ‘Verily among you people one would say that he has found the Quran while he is unaware of what the total quantity of the Quran was, because most of the Quran has been lost. Rather one should say that verily he has found the Quran that has appeared.’” (Fadhail al-Quran, by Qasim bin Salam (d. 222 A.H.), Volume 2, p. 135)
Ibn Hajar writes:
وقد أخرج بن الضريس من حديث بن عمر أنه كان يكره أن يقول الرجل قرأت القرآن كله ويقول إن منه قرآنا قد رفع
“Ibn ad-Durays has narrated a report of Ibn ‘Umar that he used to dislike the person who said, ‘I have recited the whole of the Qur’an.’ He (Ibn ‘Umar) used to say, ‘But (the reality is) a part of the Qur’an has been abrogated.’
Fath al-Bari, Vol. 9, pp. 65
Dr. Sa‘d bin ‘Abdullah al-Humayyid comments on this particular narration:
و يفهم من كلام ابن عمر لضى الله عنه: أنه في رأيه أن الآيات المنسوخة بعد نسخها تسمى كذالك قرآناً أو باعتبار ما كان
“And it appears from the words of Ibn ‘Umar that in his opinion even the abrogated verses could also be called Qur’an after their being abrogated or (they could be so called) by the way what they once were.”
Sunan Sa’eed bin Mansoor Vol. 2, 433
Imam al-Alusi helps explain the issue:
أجمعوا على عدم وقوع النقص فيما تواتر قرآنا كما هو موجود بين الدفتين اليوم، نعم أسقط زمن الصديق ما لم يتواتر وما نسخت تلاوته … وعليه يحمل ما رواه أبو عبيد عن ابن عمر قال: لا يقولن أحدكم قد أخذت القرآن كله وما يدريه ما كله قد ذهب منه قرآن كثير ولكن ليقل قد أخذت منه ما ظهر
“Verily they (i.e. people of Sunnah) have agreed on there being no loss in the Qur’an as is continuously reported like we today find between the two bindings. Yes during the time of (Abu Bakr) as-Sidiq the part which was not reported continuously and was (rather) abrogated was dropped (out of the official mushaf)…and to this relates that which is reported by Abu ‘Ubayd from Ibn ‘Umar, who said: ‘None of you should say that he has taken the whole of the Qur’an; how could he know what all of it was! A lot of the Qur’an has passed him by! Let him say instead: I have taken of the Qur’an that which became apparent.’
Tafseer Ruh al-M’ani Vol. 1, pp. 26
If we connect the dots, we see that:
1. Ibn Umar himself testified that the Qur'an was preserved and this is agreed upon.
2. It is understood that no part of the Qur'an is missing rather the lost part in reality are abrogated.
Read the hadith you sent, it says 'kathir' kathir means a little or not the total. Everyone and ibn Umar understood the abrogated verses are the ones that aren't in the Qur'an.
You truly are ignorant, keep trying 😂. Why do you disbelievers only grab one thing and don't look at the rest. You aren't looking for truth you are actually trying to bring doubt upon the Muslimeen, shameful. Muslims don't be affected by these people, they have no affect on Islam, not one bit!
@@chibicretster 11:1 Alif Lām Ra. This is a Book whose verses are perfected, then fully explained, from One Who is All-Wise, All-Aware.
2:106 - We do not cancel any verse nor let it be forgotten instead We bring something better than it or else something similar.
Perfection does not need abrogation or something better. Contradiction.
@@lahleholivia7398 first from the beggining there were many scribes who wrote verses and at the same time many companions memorized verses so it was preserved with two ways so even if all the writings had burned there were many companions who memorized all quran who can write again( btw today there are millions of ppl who memorize all quran) second cancel or change means when there is a new prophet something change for example Allah changed something from judaism through Jesus(pbuh) and changed something from christianity(original one) through Muhammed (pbuh)
Ignore these people, they just all hate muslims
The parchment on which it is written could be old but the inscription on them cannot be older than the late 7th to the 8th Century. Remember Allah gave Prophet Uthman the authority to burn all the original Qurans and produce his own.
Please refrain from speaking with ignorance what you are referring to is the burning of qurans with different qiraats this has no impact on the actual meaning whats so ever rather it was made as a mercy from Allah swt as it made it easier for different dialects amongst the arabs the recite the quran. It was only later on that when the quran was compiled in Uthmans time that some were burnt as islams reach had spread far to the point that when two muslims recited the different qiraat they thought one of them had recited wrong and so in order to prevent a division in the ummah Uthman burnt the over versions in order to stop ignorance form dividing the muslims.
Also Uthman was not a Prophet but rather a companion of the Prophet :)
@@rizwanmubarak6508 That in the English language is called sarcasm my friend. I called Uthman a prophet because it seems Muslims have no problem with him messing around with the Quran. Who gave him the authority to re-write the Quran and destroy the originals.
@@rizwanmubarak6508 The earliest Quran of Abu Bakr, Masood, and Kaab was all in the Quraysh dialect and in the form of its original Rasm. There was no qiraat business then too. Aahruf and Qiraat are a later invention to cover up but in the end, made it more confusing. Why did he burn these originals compiled by the Sahabah? All of them objected to his impunity.
@@fedesetrtatio1 ?? Please quote your sources because Quran was never written by the Prophet pbuh who was illiterate and the first time the Quran was compiled was under the leadership of Uthman which was Islam began to become far more established beyond the Arabian peninsula. Also the Prophet pbuh taught these different Qiraats to different Arab tribes so i dont know where this info is coming from.
Without lies, islam dies
yes ik that why it not dying boomer
For you haters of Islam. Remember the Quran is still in its original form and does not change because its the final revelation from God to man kind. Its the exact same message from all the messengers of God. We so called Muslim's mmay change BUT THE QURAN DOES NOT NOR WILL IT!
Only the Quran claims to be the final revelation. Only the Quran says Mohammed was prophet. Nowhere outside of the Quran were either of these prophesied. And.. only Muslims believe that the Quran is in its original form. You're not providing facts, your telling us what Muslims believe to be facts.
And still no complete quran from Muhammads time anywhere in existence.
Go to birmingham (uk), there's a manuscript from the time of the prophet when he was alive. Go to turkey, there's another, go to russia, there's another. Do your research before commenting illiterate sh*t
Wdym?
@@A_Liner There is no complete quran from Muhammads time anywhere in existence. Everyone knows that.
There are 3. UK, Russia,turkey. Do some research
@@ferdraun Name them?