You lift the carpet on the most obscure and masked topics. Thank you for providing facts and information to aid in our knowledge. Never again can the terms such as barbaric and war mongering be applied to Islam without taking into consideration the ranks of other religions. FACTS are FACTS. Alhamdilollah brother Paul, you help bring the light of knowledge, information and truth. May Allah Subhana wa Taala bless.🌿 PS Thank you for sharing the book and references.
the faithless built no civilizations & Islam is the only preserved faith so humanity as a whole testifies Islam is true. atheism has no virtue & tool under marxism tyranny. building least, maiming most... not a good record. atheism is pushed by dajjal's ppl, like how paul taught lawless man worship so his farisi money $ changers can pay rulers like lobbies do today, making christianity more lawless so the farisis can rule a destructured disunited ppl, thats why the so called new atheism should really be called neo con atheism.
While Surah Fatiha teaches us to be the middle path, to not be restrictive and tyrannical like the yeahood or loose and lawless like the nasara but united and balanced under justice and Tawhid. Have knowledge and act upon it! As Malik Shabazz aka Malcolm X said, ONeness of Lord to = Oneness of Man! Islam taught the west race equality and halted marxism tyranny! reflect on aipac lobby with the left & right the left used to de-structure family with fake science & marxism and right for their structure bigotry in group level. so its a 2 wings of a bird, one to destructure you & another to structure tyranny...
Only reason they preach "love" these days is because they have no institutional power at the moment. Let them get a sniff of the old power and you'll see their true colours. They'll wipe out millions like before.
@@samboy90 If you mean Muslims by saying (like before), I wish you could specify when and where? Believe me, do not embarrass yourself, you will not find, even they did not revenge the massacre of Jerusalem, but tolerance.
@@smith6696 Just because you really want them not to exist doesn't mean they cant or actually dont exist. Truth is often bitter and hard to accept but it is the truth.
@@smith6696 Nearly all religions and beliefs systems throughout human history have some concept of hell or divine punishment for bad behaviour. Hell does exist whether you like it or not.
For decades, Islam was portrayed as on the top of the list. How would we know the facts w/o this presentation? Who would find this book & read before today? Allah bless you Sir Paul.
Maybe because there is no internet at that time? 🤔 Not a joke,because good readers have reliable resource,other person who try to spread lie,will fail...
@@khozabenhamid9745 Top ten reasons why Islam is NOT the religion of peace: 10. Muhammad nicknames his weapons. 9. Muhammad commands in his Quran that adulterers and adulteresses should receive a hundred lashes. 8. Muhammad in his Quran permits husbands to beat their wives. 7. Muhammad in his Quran commands that the hands of male or female thieves should be cut off. 6. Muhammad assassinates poets and poetesses. 5. Muhammad in his Quran commands death or the cutting off of hands and feet for fighting and corrupting the land. 4. Muhammad aggressively attacks Meccan caravans. 3. Muhammad in his Quran promises sensuous Gardens for martyrs dying in a military holy war. 2. Muhammad unjustly executes around 600 male Jews and enslaves the women and children. 1. Muhammad launches his own Crusades. In the following verse, Muhammad uses the Arabic word qital (root is q-t-l), which means warring, fighting, or killing: 9:29 Fight [q-t-l] those among the people of the Book [Christians] who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden and do not profess the true religion, till they pay the poll-tax out of hand and submissively. (Fakhry) The two most interesting clauses in this violent verse are (1) People of the Book (Christians in this verse late in Muhammad’s life) are to be attacked if they do not profess the true religion: Islam. This leaves the door wide open for terrorists today to attack and fight Christians because they do not adhere to Islam; (2) Christians must pay a tax for the "privilege" of living under the "protection" of Islam-submissively or in humiliation. The historical context of Sura 9:29 finds Muhammad preparing for a military expedition against the Byzantine Empire in 630, two years before his ordinary death of a fever in 632. Indeed, some scholars regard Sura 9 as the last sura to be revealed from on high. Therefore, it sets many policies for Muslims today, and is often interpreted as abrogating or canceling previous verses, even peaceful ones. Muhammad heard a rumor that the Byzantines amassed an army some 700 miles to the north in Tabuk (northern Arabia today) in order to attack Islam, so he led an army of 30,000 holy warriors to counter-strike preemptively. However, the Byzantines failed to materialize, so Muhammad’s belief in the false rumor was misguided and his expedition was fruitless, except he managed to extract (extort) agreements from northern Christian Arab tribes that they would not attack him and his community. An army of 30,000 soldiers from the south must have deeply impressed the northern tribes, so they posed no real threat to Islam. They are the ones who paid the "protection" tax mentioned in Sura 9:29 (and so do tribes and cities after Muhammad’s death). Therefore, Muhammad’s forced tax was aggressive and hence unjust, not defensive and hence just. Muhammad’s military expedition qualifies as an Islamic Crusade long before the European ones. After all, in 638, only six years after Muhammad’s death, Muslim armies conquer Jerusalem. Today, Muslims should never again complain about European Crusades, unless they first come to grips with their own. What the ten reasons mean for us today These ten aspects of violence that have burrowed into the hemorrhaging heart of early Islam have eight implications for us today. The first three are theological; the rest are practical. The theological implications are as follows: First, as each reason in this article has hinted at and the links explain more thoroughly, Christ never, ever engaged in such violence. For example, he never assassinated opponents, whipped adulterers, cut off the hands of thieves, or launched his own Crusades (what the Medieval Europeans did is not foundational to Christianity). Christ expresses the love of God. Therefore, Christians and all fair-minded persons have the right to question whether the true God would reveal the Quran when it contains such violent verses that conveniently support Muhammad’s violence, whereas the New Testament does not have such violence. Second, Muslims believe that the New Testament is corrupted, whereas the Quran is inerrant. Even if we assume only for the sake of argument that these claims are true (but they actually are not), then why would reasonable seekers of the truth prefer the "pure" but violence-filled Quran over the "corrupted" but peaceful New Testament? Before Muhammad is allowed to throw around unsubstantiated charges about alleged New Testament corruption, he and his Quran must pass a down-to-earth test regarding his dubious, violent practices. But he and it fail the test badly, as this demonstrates, whereas Christ and the New Testament pass with a perfect score. Therefore, if Muhammad is so wrong about down-to-earth matters like whipping adulterers and cutting off the hands of thieves and beating wives, then he is likely wrong about unresearched accusations of New Testament corruption-and factually he is wrong. Third, since Muhammad who claims divine guidance is so wrong about practical matters, why should we believe him about theoretical matters like the deity of Christ and the Trinity, both of which he denies? Clearly, he was not divinely guided in practical matters because the true God would not degrade religion by endorsing such gruesome violence six hundred years after Christ came-the historical span is critical. Christ and the New Testament do not have even one example of such violence. Again, if Muhammad first fails the down-to-earth test, then he likely fails the theological or theoretical test-we have no reason to believe him in such high doctrines, especially since he was no theologian and his revelations are now empirically suspect.
@@jacobsenh7383 no sword found in Al-Quran and most sentence are for self defense... But more than 120 times found in bible... One of phrase in bible, sell coat to buy a sword?? Even an ex-christian confirn it...his name Yusoff Estee.. And funny claims from you about my prophet..since when name Muhammad is translate as weapon? Do you think it was my prophet command all what you claims?? Wow!!! You looks so desperate on make claims that already been told in other post..and do you think I haven't check your claims??? You even change the meaning in 9:29... Wow!! Do you only think Christian ?? How about jewish? Arab who idol a pagan god like you?? Haven't they been asked to pay jizyah?? Even in modern day,any citizen or settler have to pay tax..didn't your teacher teach you???
I love your book recommandations, I started reading C Meyer's Return of the God Hypothesis. Will definitely read War and Peace in Islam too, many thanks Paul for sharing deep knowledge !
What knowledge ?This is based on ignorance of the religions and history .A secular state going to war is not a religion. Hitler was anti Jewish and Christian and killed both.It was about power and race.
💰🐪🤺The Armies of JIHAD always talking about WARS to Force Political Submission, instead of Human Rights, this to justify its own GENOCIDES, while camouflaged as "religion"; Bye bye Armies of JIHAD! ⚖🌍🕊 🆚️ 💰🐪🤺
One day I was watching a video of a lady who reverted to Islam and she mentioned about "Blogging Theology" channel... I looked up for ur channel and now I am a big fan of u. Very educational and informative!
Christianity based on the Bible is loving & kind but the Roman pagans who is coerced to "convert" By the Emperor Constantine because it is in fashion & useful at that time turned it into a monster & so the Roman Catholic church as they turned into, killed & tortured millions
This is the reason why Hindus were the most persecuted civilization in the world 😔😔😔. Indic or Sanatan Dharma have very beautiful philosophy, " Vashudhaiva Kutumbakam" means Whole world is our family". But When other religions of people entered in Bharatvarsha In the name of exploring culture, they backstabbed Hindus and started exploiting them. Britain is the prime example of lootings of Sanatan Civilization.
@@engineeringmarvel6275 Brits who arrived for trade, were invited by local Rajas of princely states to protect them against their enemy Rajas.... Brits used it nicely to gain power and occupy the whole country. No use blaming them, because, mistake was from Indian rulers side.
@@Shrikrushna05 whose poor situation? The princes or rajas were all looking to only their throne's safety, they wanted their as... s to be on it as long as possible.. Lack of unity, failure of fore thought on part of Rajas were perfect situation for Brits. Not all Rajas or Ranis were like that. There was one Rani Channamma of Kithoor in Karnataka who died fighting the British, as they refused to acknowledge her adopted son as successor to the throne. They gave a grand name ' Doctrin of lapse' for that. It so happend that her husband, and her biological son died inquick succession, she adopted a boy to make him the prince. It was in 1824. India was pretty messed up those times.
11:20 i've already known the answer before I watch the video 😀..my people experience the horror of 350 year enslavement from the "religion of love", million lost their life in the name of Jesus
@@thedstorm8922 which makes me thinking as to why every prophet are said will reject their own people ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many works in your name?’ in my case, my ancestors were crucified and skinned alive in the name of Jesus..I'm sure Jesus himself will wash his hand after knowing all atrocities done by the religion of love
It’s a great work Paul. There’s is a lot of good and beneficial info out here but many people lost focus to be informed to oneself to have a better understanding of things. Just keep helping a lot of us in way.
@@rohithm3508 l believe that actually you didn’t watch the video posted by Mr. Paul Williams originally and all the information provided by the historians . I reckon to watch it first and learn all the facts mentioned by them. Thank you
@@rohithm3508 l am glad for your hard work, time and effort for research. No doubt about those people who massacred masses of people and they caused more harm than benefit to mankind. But l believe that those nations who fight against this kind of ideologies are imposing their ideology ( democracy) by changing governments or forcing a kind of sanctions and only more misery to ordinary people. This kind of people what so ever ideology proclaim they are only interested for their own beliefs and close to them.
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@isseabdirahmanweheliye9010 Child, tell me what do you think I don't know about the New Testament, the part of the Bible which is for christians. Don't tell me avbout other part, is IRRELEVANT for christians, the most advanced religion. TEACH ME, IF YOU CAN. Can you??? Prove it! Otherwise, it is clear that you are ignorant and a big mouth.
@@dannicu2029 bro you need read more about war and whos behind of it and why War happen..for what ? ..for better knowledge you better find someone who really have knowledge about war in Christianity and muslim..dont just Google it..you might not understand and our understanding is limitless...be positives brother..if you really want to know the truth, hopefully God show you the way..
@@banqkaiqai5567 If you imagine that you understand reality better than I do, I am waiting for you to explain to me what war is like. CAN YOU??? YOU CANN'T! I know that I know and you have no idea. And not only do you know nothing, but you don't even understand anything. Let me explain to you, AGAIN: in Islam there are commandments to kill the different: "kill all who do not obey Allah"; "kill the apostates," etc. In Christianity there are NO such commandments. And then there is a difference in MOTIVATION between the wars of Islam and those of Christianity. Islam IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATES war through commandments that are the essence of Islam, but Christianity, as an ideology, does NOT do such a thing. Learn to think, you are a little weak in mind.
@user-tk6mm1us6l I think you didn't read you bible book there's order to kill children and r a p e women 🤣 Islam my religion and the religion of peace .☪️☪️☪️ Go cry and what you want to say
Christian are weird, when they talk about forgiveness, salvation or everything that nice coating are all related to jesus but then when talk about all the killing, punishment, tragedy are all pushed to the father, according to them isn't they are them same? Why there are seperation here?
It is difficult to combine capitalism with the commandments of Christ... But Zionism was able to convince the Christian that the enemies of greed are the enemies of Christ.
@@marwand.a.z9840 where do I talk about capitalism? But If you want to talk about capitalism, if I am not mistaken they already put capitalism into Christianity, just like making Christmas as the day most day of capitalism ,? The supposed day of jesus become the day of materialism
@@ugetuget8864 It is not the fault of them as Christians, but because the Bible contradicts the nature of human beings, which bears good and evil. The Qur'an says.. Who forgives and makes reconciliation his reward will be from ALLAH... So he put the matter in your hands asking for punishment or forgiven with guarantee reward .
Christianity is not just. Thousands of years people were killed because of this hard laws and went to hell. But than after unjust thousands of years people basically have nothing to do 🤣...
Salāmu-alaykum brother Paul, jazāka Allāhu khayran for sharing many historic facts about religions. I was quite surprised by the result. I'm a Muslim, but I almost automatically was going to answer 'ISLĀM'.....because that's what we've been fed with. One other thing, thank you for sharing the book titles and links for further reading. I was going to ask you how to get these books. Jazāka Allāhu khayran again.
Academic estimates around 90 000 000-1.2 billion people have died as the result of Islam and it’s continuous war of religious expansion since the 7th century to the current day across three continents. That’s 1400 years of a single religion being at war with all other faiths and peoples. In The Indian Sub-Continent alone, Islamic raids, invasions & conquest account for the majority of these deaths committed against innocent Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Sikhs and Parsees. The bloody expansion of Islam from the 7th century through to the 17th century has left a swathe of death, slavery, oppression and discrimination, destruction of native religions, art and architecture of the rich and sophisticated cultures it conquered. It unsuccessfully tried to conquer Europe on several occasions but was fortunately repelled although with much loss of life. Islam’s last gasp of ‘world wide conquest” was the Ottoman Turk’s pogroms against the Greeks and Armenians from 1910 - 1923, including the death of 1.5 million Christian Armenians during WWI in the Armenian Genocide and 300 000 Syrian-Assyrian Christians also being murdered. These are inconvenient truths that very few people like to acknowledge, especially Moslems and gullible & uneducated Westerners who have bought into the ridiculous Islamophobia, Muslim Victimhood and “Religion of Peace” blither .
You have read our history brother, don't listen to western lies. Their history is full of lies and u still see it today lol Maybe 80% of our wars were against Christians and the fire worshippers (Perse civilisation). Especially we were weak and fought the biggest empires and won. Defended our lands against crusaders and still defending it. We have strict rules of wars and we fought and fight only armed people. kids,women,elders, religious people, we don't cut trees or destroy people's houses, places of worship..etc (ofc, there were some soldiers who went against the rules and were punished and others not..) We let it to Allah swt. At least, we try our best. While u have Richard coeur de lion roasting civilian muslim & jews palestinians and eating them... Christians are barbaric and they still the same under the so called "democracy and human rights" lol Check the last 100 years how many millions were killed by secular-christian countries (WW1 , WW2 , dirty wars in latine america, Middle east and africa) in the name of demotrashy and human rghts^^ How many coups and civil wars they provoked .. how many country they manipulate, how many country they sabotage economically, culturally and politically. How many people were divided by their "divide and conquor" & u can see it with actual Palestine .. it's the west. They are ready to do anything for ressources and money. The Money worshippers. They can never compare themselves to us. Not even comparable.
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@ibnmianal-buna3176torical context matters. If suppose, Ukrainians are told no longer to defend their families, faiths, or homelands, what would you do if you were being terrorized? If you were a Christian being fed to the Roman lions, would you stand there and “turn the other cheek?” Which Christian turns the other cheek? Only two that I met in my long life. If you were being hunted down in Palestine for daring go love Allah and follow His methods of prayer, and take care of your family, would you walk away? But people like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler, and daily serial killers kill thousands of innocents because they have revenge on their minds-and are bloodthirsty. At least in the Bible there are just as many peaceful verses as there are verses on incest, rape-marriage, murdering those who worship a different god, Jesus telling his people to “sell his garments” to buy a sword when necessary -and God in the Bible destroying entire populations and Lut type of communities of Lot for disobeying His commands. If you were a practicing Jew during Holocaust or centuries of European abused even upon Jewish ghettos forced upon the Jews, would you “turn the other cheek” or fight for your rights as a human, (which Spanish Islam allowed people to do, say, work, or speak). If you were a black sibling in America, would you say “thank you kindly,” for the rapes of your mother and sisters and the lynchings of black brothers innocent of the alleged crimes? If you were a dark Italian living in America, would you stand by and watch your brother and family be slaughtered and scapegoated because you were expected to be from the “mafia” that stupid movies like to show? If you were a Native America, would you really be attending the “Thanksgiving “ /funeral ceremonies of your people as extremist-pious Christian’s sat eating and roasting a Pig or Hog that Jesus himself would never have eaten? Describe your definition of violence and peace, and clarity shall come yo you, too. If you were a hardworking Chinese or Asian immigrant working hard on building railroads and restaurants, and the terrorists of religion came knocking you down, would you say, “Thanks! Buddha told me to be calm and still.” Even Buddha believed in a One God referred to in the I-Ching and parts of Confucius writings if you dare read the larger sections. Perpetrators of violence often want to point their one finger like a gun or sword trigger, (three fingers pointing back at them eerily), expecting their latest victim to sit there like a duck, deer, cat, or dog or their elderly parent they never bothered to respect -but general logic says that people can defend themselves, their Faiths, their Families, and their rights to property and life. Quran teaches again and again that “Allah has made life sacred, except for Just Cause.” And, “There is no compulsion in Religion,” (which atheists think they follow, but hate Muslims to dare go with their credo). Imagine if all the people…including Natives, followed Quran or their own religions-and imagine how many more Natives…and Jews…and Blacks…and Japanese…and Muslims would still exist! First examine the context within the frame of history. Then examine why such and such was said by Divine Source. In practice, let’s also examine which communities have historically “loved their neighbors as thyself” and which have forced religions on people’s throats.
Great work Paul @BloggingTheology ! Anyway could we use your video and translate it for Indonesian audience here? It would be a huge contribution for the country's Muslim population. We will definitely credit you as the original owner of the content. Looking forward to your respond, thanks
@@bumblebee-qh3sbdid you watch Mahabharat for only action 😅 it is more than that you can learn many things from there but I know you will not focus on that part cause you are a certified hater or spammer 😅😂
Peace be upon you Paul and thank you for bringing important subjects to all those who take interest. Christians or Christianity being peaceful is somewhat perplexing. Were the Crusaders not Christians? They spilled a hell lot of blood.
Yes.... it is perplexing and I'm a Christian believer too. So your question is excellent. I struggle to understand but to me the answer is the "nature of man."
@@johnbrzykcy3076 Thanks John. Your answer reminds of a verse from the Holy Qur'an. If remember correctly, it should be chapter 30 verse 30. Have a nice day.
@@davidzack8735 peace to you David. The subject is war I think not reason for war. That Muslims did not allow pilgrimage is highly questionable. When Muslim Iberia was overrun, the Jews did not stay behind, they followed the Muslims. Thanks for the response, David is from Abraham as I am from Isaac. 👍
The Life of this World Compared to the Hereafter! Heaven as per Christ! Sadducees Ask About the Resurrection Matthew 22: 23 The same day Sadducees came to him, who say that there is no resurrection, and they asked him a question, 24 saying, “Teacher, Moses said, ‘If a man dies having no children, his brother must marry the widow and raise up offspring for his brother.’ 25 Now there were seven brothers among us. The first married and died, and having no offspring left his wife to his brother. 26 So too the second and third, down to the seventh. 27 After them all, the woman died. 28 In the resurrection, therefore, of the seven, whose wife will she be? For they all had her.” 29 But Jesus answered them, “You are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 31 And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God: 32 ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead, but of the living.” 33 And when the crowd heard it, they were astonished at his teaching. Islamic Jenna! 1. 72 Huris plus the earthly wives also! heavenly virgins, are a variety of celestial being that, according to Islamic scriptures, serve as a key attraction of Heaven or Jannah Houris are mentioned in Qur'anic text as a reward for believing men in the afterlife. According to the Quran, once in Jannah, believers are wed to virgin houris who have "full grown", "swelling" or "pears-shaped" breasts. The Quran provides a physical and personal description of the houri and denotes them as awards to believers. A hadith graded Sahih (authentic) details the number of houris that will be awarded to martyrs Orthodox Muslim theologians such as al-Ghazali (1058 - 1111 CE) and al-Ash'ari (874 - 935 CE) have discussed the Houris as being rewards and pleasures found in heaven. Al-Ghazali, in particular, refers to a hadith that describes heaven as a slave market where there will be "no buy and sale, but... If any man will wish to have sexual intercourse with a woman, he will do at once."The same hadith is quoted by Ibn Kathir, in his Qur'anic Commentary, the Tafsir ibn Kathir[6]. The houris are also described graphically by Qur'anic commentator and polymath, Al-Suyuti (died 1505), who, echoing a Sahih hadith[7] from Ibn Majah,[8] wrote that the perpetual virgins will all "have appetizing vaginas", and that the "penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal."[9] The sensual nature of the houri awarded to believers are also confirmed by the two Sahih collections of hadith, namely Sahih Bukhari[10] and Sahih Muslim,[11] which state that the houris will be virgins so beautiful and pure that there flesh will, in effect, be transparent: "the marrow of the bones of their legs will be seen through the bones and the flesh"[12]. "The believers", another hadith in Bukhari continues, "will visit and enjoy them [the houris]".[13] . Who is right.....Jesus or Muhammad.....! 1. Sex is the greatest attraction in Islam Conduct Jihad and have plenty of women in this life! If you die in war, next instant you are with 72 Huris!!! Is it really true....or are you taken for a ride? Remember, in Islam God never ever spoke to any human being! Islam depends on the words of one Stranger! Who manhandled an innocent man at Hira cave and pressed him severely without any provocation! Can you put your complete trust in the words of a total Stranger.... You decide!
I wasn't in the least surprised. As a Christian and seeing how the devil works it all fits. The deciding line between good and evil runs through the heart of every human being
@@francisjones4199 Are you a Muslim or a Christian? I invite you to Islam. On the subject of GOD and worship: Jesus and the Muslim are ALREADY on the same side. UNFORTUNATELY, Christianity / Christians are AGAINST Jesus. The Muslim worships whom Jesus worships. UNFORTUNATELY, misguided by false teachers, Christianity is 🚩 AGAINST Jesus. The Bible testifies 🔥 Jesus gave the Trinity-DESTROYING testimony that THE FATHER IS THE ONLY TRUE GOD but YOU Christians testify that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit (The Trinity) is the true God. John 4:21-22 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, *WORSHIP THE FATHER* . Ye worship ye know not what: *WE* know what *WE WORSHIP* : for salvation is of the Jews. Have another look: *WE WORSHIP* (The Jews INCLUDING ME - Jesus) “And this is life eternal, that they might know *YOU THE ONLY TRUE GOD* , and Jesus Christ, whom *YOU* have sent.” John 17:3 John 20:17: “Jesus saith unto her, ...I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and TO MY GOD, AND YOUR GOD.” Have another look! ".... *TO MY GOD and YOUR GOD* " ME and YOU 👉 *WE* *WE WORSHIP* THE ONLY TRUE GOD - THE FATHER who is THE GOD OF ME (Jesus) and YOU 👉 *OUR GOD* And Jesus answered him, THE FIRST OF ALL the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord *OUR GOD* is one Lord Mark 12:29 Jesus teaches: “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and *HIM ONLY* shalt thou serve” Luke 4:8. Notice the words: “HIM ONLY.” Jesus did not say “US only,” or “Him and I only.” How could he possibly i it more clear than that? Jesus told to worship ONLY THE FATHER - who is THE GOD of Jesus too.
thank u for simplifying the information for us, I'm learning english , and I find it difficult sometimes to understand what u what to say , jazakallah khairan PAUL👍🤲
@@davidzack8735 did you get anything from insulting the prophet the whole summer ?? David , your life is limited , nobody knows the the time that we are going to die in, maybe tomorrow , or today ,or the next minute ! everything is clear , the path of the truth is clear , now , you have the key to choose , wich gate do u want to enter , hell or heaven ? there is no other choice ! peace. 🕊
Never trust statistics. As most of the wars with historical written records were between European countries and these would be grouped in the "Christian" column, I would expect the largest number to be there. We should also not forget that WW1 and 2 had more deaths (military and civilian) than most previous wars put together. The whole topic is far more complex than presented here.
No it's not complex at all. Religion has been used to justify political agenda and wars have been a very good tool to establish power and wealth. The western media outcries and vile portraiture of Islam that it is millitant and this and that, should look in the mirror. Instead want us to think that it's complex and somehow only deaths in wars involving islamic rulers were very bad.
@@shaikhahmed7929 yeah, yup is simple, Islamic came with peace ,only defend and had to do war when they came for it, for some ruler , some Islamic ruler is accepting Islam by peace but still using old method way of rules, but not in Islamic way. And not many were bad ruler, some came and give freedom and good leadership, and another one about world war, there some complicate history in our part of nation been delete by the European but they do it for wealth yeah but also but also for Christianity, how they do I it is not the same as Islamic way of doing war. Total damn evil of how people of Christianity torture us down for your own benefit ,force people from Islamic believe that had good term with other and had friendly peace of mind to devastated way of life, how they do it? .... my heart will break if i heard it more, own still now a day missionary came to back of the jungle wanna force ingenious people and brainwash them in front of muslim? Well we still said, what the heck you do, but we mind our business, is up to them anyway, ... you know what they make ? Some outsider even asking why we give ingenious people a cloth? Hey ..they got satellite tv earlier than , then I found out that our part of empayar is the biggest contributions in wealth in Otthoman Empayar and they seem to knew about it, and start hit here with war agenda , whe I learn about it, they aim really most heinous religious crime and now they wanna said that they the pious one, even my friend from Poland said Britain is barbaric and I wonder the triggered came. Muslim people became to peaceful and became to nice to trust them that we think is religious but is a total scam, I still like Japanese still even they do came here and do war, atleast they knew better and straightforward... then Hiroshima came , for than more than 300 year we war with outsider what you think how much we lost and we were hold Islamic way of life with many wealth technology, herbalism and art,..all that gone and been take by others name, how I knew about this, we found our book guide in Maritime in US army, a book about our long lost history with some Canadian family, and then we make a whole history real life time around the Islamic history that different than world teaching. Seem complicate with long word right? But simple....is happened because wealth (people who not believe God who do this,) and the Christianity thing, ..then came communism effected civil war between the nation, family killed family not even think so I believe atheism came into action of influence. Now today you guys ,Christian and atheism wanna put a needle to contribute civil war in the nation even make new doctrines and devided more simple thing? I feel I like how Japan closed the door but still doing fine until American came with warship? Come on guys... we do our own thing but why they wanna but in so much, is so simple right?
And another thing, few years ago I heard about European wanna some our material here but forcing with , uuuhummm... so think about it... war? Yeah is simple ...
Actually, if the "standards" in categorizing wars like you mentioned above were to be applied on all wars disregard of religions, almost all of the wars that involved Islam can be categorized as caused by political factors instead of religion factors. There were very few wars that the real and sole cause of the conflict was religion, like the crusades, or wars during early Islam. Even the wars during the first and second caliphs of Islam could be attributed to the meddling of the Persian empire at the time that started to see the united Arabs as a threat to them by using their proxy states. So in a nutshell, by using the same definition that you may want to apply to refute the statistics, that would make it even less wars that could be attributed directly to Islam.
@@yadashare9014 you not understand, it is involved Christian... for you to said political , you know very much that church rule as monopoly in govern also, don't ever say it is not. You do not know about oriental school ? Huhuhuhu .... for you to say it not while it is. Lots of you still wanna ditch it like that while we already see it through?
There is only one most violent religion! The one and only religion which advises its followers to conduct holy war to bring the whole world under its fold! The last 1400 years of its history is the clear evidence! Right from inception its goal was to conduct raids, war and violence in order to forcefully spread it and impose it! The same religion attacked Jerusalem, Europe and India with sole intention of imposing that religion! Balkan wars! Eastern Europe suffered so much for centuries! India suffered so much for centuries! Its own female population suffered for centuries! Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists all suffered under them! What God of Bible foretold almost 4000 years ago, got fulfilled in history till date and also getting fulfilled right before our eyes! Genesis 16: 7 And the angel of Jehovah found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur. 8 And he said, Hagar, Sarai’s handmaid, whence camest thou? and whither goest thou? And she said, I am fleeing from the face of my mistress Sarai. 9 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands. 10 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, I will greatly multiply thy seed, that it shall not be numbered for multitude. 11 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son; and thou shalt call his name Ishmael, because Jehovah hath heard thy affliction. 12 And he shall be as a wild ass among men; his hand shall be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell over against all his brethren. 13 And she called the name of Jehovah that spake unto her, Thou art a God that seeth: for she said, Have I even here looked after him that seeth me? 14 Wherefore the well was called Beer-lahai-roi; behold, it is between Kadesh and Bered.
@@truthprevails5173 lol 2 billions muslim then should wage war on u because u told them to? doesnt make sense, u want us to kill u? but why do u want to die? dnt u want to live life..
@Khorasan They don't because, if they do, then they are digging their own grave, purging more than a quarter of humankind. The west will kiss goodbye to their leniency.
@@slinc129 but wts the point of war the west wants us to wage? like just why, invading countries is not enought for them? its gonna be a graveyard for humanity
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029 certainly, Islam urges for jihad or holy war that's essentially required first for your personality that's looking under the influence of anger and hatred. Plz restore balance and talk as a sensible man that only on issues or subject of differences based on rationality and logic.
@@naturegirl4803 I'm just appealing to reason. Does it seem irrational to you what I said ??? The old man, like many others like him who tries to convince that Islam is either superior or at least other religions are inferior, has an ambiguous presentation that falls prey to exactly those who do not know how to think. He casts the stigma of violence on other religions, although the wars in the geographical area of those religions were POLITICALLY motivated (NO religious ideology), the religion being ONLY a pretext. The difference I pointed out is that ONLY Islam preaches war in its very teachings. NO other religion does such a thing. So it is essential that we do NOT confuse the destruction caused by religious pretexts (all religions, except Islam) with those caused by religious ideology (Islam).
@@dannicu2029 if you were rational, you won't raise these questions after watching his video showing history of wars and the real perpetrators. The other doubt you have of superiority of Islam over other religions..... Islam never denounces other religions but preaches its own and truth of nature that lies in laws of nature and stresses upon the one omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient Who is creater of whole universe. Other religion believers accept Islam as a superior ideology of life but person like me or Paul or any brainy accept Islam as a absolute truth after assessing the true nature of things. History tells that man fought war as you spoke rightly, for the cause of his self conceived goodness e.g. territory, influence, descendents, wealth, resources, power and so on based on self preservation. And still be predicted to be on for such grounds. But Islam has fixed the causes of war to be waged on certain grounds in holy book, Quran. because God knows that if sustainence of peace be left on human being, he will show only his self preservation imminent in physical laws and will fight for the vested interests as mentioned above but the divine guidance came for higher purpose of his life and controlled him in the vicinity of guidelines of war as war is important to stopcorruption, cruelty or lawlessness in state or country and to support poor, destitute and innocent. Moreover, any kind of violence or chaos is forbidden in Islam. This is the ideological stand in Islam immensely needed to any lawful society or country.
@@naturegirl4803 It seems that you do not have the minimum ability to use the brain. Well, I just explained to you that, with the exception of Islam, religion did NOT determine wars. But they had POLITICAL motives and religious PRETEXTS. If they had religious motives, we would have found in the ideology of those religions urges or obligations to start and wage wars with other believers. You can find such a thing ONLY in Islam. To say that Islam is superior to other religions is high-class nonsense. Islam is hundreds of years behind Christianity, it is a primitive and false religion. If you had the ability to think rationally, about life you would understand that this is the case. If the Qur'an were the word of God, as Muslims claim, then it would be without error. But the Qur'an is full of mistakes. Therefore, it is not the word of God, but the word of Muhammad. You say that Islam does not denounce other religions. Are you blind or have perception problems? Well, the video in question does just that, casting a stigma on religions for events that are NOT the effects of religions. You must first learn that religion MEANS the ideology, the teachings, NOT the practices of self-declared believers such as those who waged FALSE religious wars (crusades, for example, that were REALLY politically motivated: the struggle for resources). You either have no idea about Islam, or you have the impression that we are idiots. You say that Islam is only peace and goodwill. All smart people know Islam is a religion of violence, lust, murder, pedophilia, lie, etc. Let's see about incitement to murder, for the beginning: Sahih Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to FIGHT AGAINST people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah." Sahih Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'." Sahih Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to BURN all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, BURNING THEM ALIVE inside their homes." Sahih Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and JIHAD in His cause..." Sahih Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: JIHAD in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!" Sahih Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'"Sahih Bukhari (52:260) - "...The Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, KILL him.' " Sahih Bukhari (83:37) - "Allah's Apostle never KILLED anyone except in one of the following three situations: (1) A person who killed somebody unjustly, was killed (in Qisas,) (2) a married person who committed illegal sexual intercourse and (3) a man who fought against Allah and His Apostle and deserted Islam and became an apostate." See also Sahih Bukhari (83:17) Sahih Bukhari (84:57) - [In the words of] "Allah's Apostle, 'Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then KILL him.'" Sahih Bukhari (89:271) - A man who embraces Islam, then reverts to Judaism is to be KILLED according to "the verdict of Allah and his apostle." We will continue with pedophilia, rape, lust, sex slavery, etc. ALL PREACHES BY ISLAM. NO OTHER RELIGION DOES THIS.
NO RELIGION, except Islam, caused deaths for PURELY ideological reasons. Please be smart and differentiate between pretext and ideology. This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@BloggingTheology what about isis??!? what about Jewish and Isreal. what about mass killings of Buddhists and Jains by Hindus?! I don't trust this data
@@dannicu2029 not really, all religions have done this except Buddhism and jainsim. that statement of jihad became popular after they wanted to cause chaos in the middle east for oil. watch out what will happen in the next big natural resources which are phosphate mines in Morocco. (I'm sure they will make another war there) by the way, Quran was not written till 6th century. Muslims didn't know much about their religion. look for aramaic readings of Quran, there's no mention of 72 virgins.
The Mugals wete muslims according to Wiki.when they arrived in India the population was 200 million ..by the time they left the population declined to 120 million ...ie Islam killed 80 milliom Hindus ???. I dont see this here
Subhan'Allah, the truth is an amazing thing when we live in a world where literally everything is being turned on its head. La hawla wala quwata illa bè Illah.
Christian will never lost the war even in the near future if any one attack on Christian nation. Christian' s countries has won so many wars on retaliation.
Islam did not have to kill as many people as christianity. Treat non muslims like third class citizens, paying big jizya, and countless female slaves and male slaves as soldiers, and call it "islamic tolerance". It was in the interest of muslim rulers to kill or convert their dhimmi subjects, they were a huge source of state treasury through jizya. Money rules first ignorant muslims not Allah for most of them and most muslims too.
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029 that’s why Islam gave birth to Saladin , Omar bin Abdul aziz, tipi sultan , etc. name me one person in western civilization who went bankrupt trying to help his enemies and feed them when enemy soldiers were hungry but still fighting him ? Pathetic , name me one person among your kind who was half a man a Salauddin
@@bigdaddy7729 Child, this is NOT the point. Read again what I said, otherwise I can think you are stupid. It is NOT about an etic code. In Islam ideology it is ABOUT COMMAND TO MURDER OTHERS THAN YOU.
@@dannicu2029 sakauddin was following Islam , so was Hassan bin and Hussein bin Ali , it’s like me magnifying on priests in church and saying that’s Christianity , or what jaianese did in Nanking and claim that’s bhuddism . One of the sign of stupidity is they think they know better than known scholars , this guy here give you scholarly point of view and proofs , I asked you if you think Islam is evil show me better guys Europe has produce than salauddin , Hussein bin Ali, or the Sufi ruin etc but you try to divert. All the worst dictators in Islam combined can’t hold a candle to killings of Stalin and Churchill , both Christians. That is my point .
The question of the most violent religion has been definitively answered. Danish researcher Tina Magaard, Ph.D. concluded that Islam is the most warlike religion. After three years analyzing the original texts of ten different religions, Tina Magaard concluded that the Islamic texts stand out by encouraging terror and fighting "to a far larger degree than the original texts of other religions. The texts in Islam distinguish themselves from the texts of other religions by encouraging violence and aggression against people with other religious beliefs to a larger degree.” The largest religious genocide in history occurred due to the Islamic conquest of India. Forty million Hindus were killed.
Not gonna forget...those Christians just think that crusade just against muslim but didnt they learn that they also got northen crusades against pagans
There is only one most violent religion! The one and only religion which advises its followers to conduct holy war to bring the whole world under its fold! The last 1400 years of its history is the clear evidence! Right from inception its goal was to conduct raids, war and violence in order to forcefully spread it and impose it! The same religion attacked Jerusalem, Europe and India with sole intention of imposing that religion! Balkan wars! Eastern Europe suffered so much for centuries! India suffered so much for centuries! Its own female population suffered for centuries! Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists all suffered under them! What God of Bible foretold almost 4000 years ago, got fulfilled in history till date and also getting fulfilled right before our eyes! Genesis 16: 7 And the angel of Jehovah found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur. 8 And he said, Hagar, Sarai’s handmaid, whence camest thou? and whither goest thou? And she said, I am fleeing from the face of my mistress Sarai. 9 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands. 10 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, I will greatly multiply thy seed, that it shall not be numbered for multitude. 11 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son; and thou shalt call his name Ishmael, because Jehovah hath heard thy affliction. 12 And he shall be as a wild ass among men; his hand shall be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell over against all his brethren. 13 And she called the name of Jehovah that spake unto her, Thou art a God that seeth: for she said, Have I even here looked after him that seeth me? 14 Wherefore the well was called Beer-lahai-roi; behold, it is between Kadesh and Bered.
❤❤Peaceful Islam has the best heavenly rewards. For dead Male muslims in jannah: ❤Quran 78:33.Allah promised muslim men will get young voluptuous big breasted women. ❤Sahih Sunan Ibn Majah 4337: Messenger of Allah promised "In heaven, Allah will marry each man to 72 wives-2 transparent houris virgins & 70 females taken fr hell.All will hv nice organs.And he will hv ever-erect male penis part." ❤Sahih Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2562 Messenger said:"The least of the people of Jannah is the one with eighty thousand (virgin boys) servants and seventy-two wives." ❤Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2536 "Believer shall be given the sex strength of 100 men for intercourse in jannah." ❤Quran 47:15.Allah promised rivers of alcohol to drink & drink ❤Quran 36:56-58: Muslim man will recline on couches with their virgins ❤There will be markets with pics of men & women.If any man desires any of them, he can enter the pics and hv sexual relations with them.
Yes... the misconceptions about Islam seem to multiply. But so do the misconceptions about Christianity. Who can help us to correct those misunderstandings? Peace
leads me to the question why do so many Muslims pay a lot of money to human trafficker to go live with the dangerous Christians. They even cling to US planes. When was the last time a Kath. Christian blew up a Protestant church ? Goggle "mosque dead" you get 59.300.000 hits . Please Muslims stay in your save islamic countries the west is too dangerous.
Wow this is a brilliant research done by u brother Paul . Really appreciate ur work. Whole heartedly I pray to Allah that He reward u with the highest rank in Jannah. Ameen.
Thank you for showing and introduce to us alot of information and give us more knowlage and evidnace in basically every video , and I will give it a try and check the books that you mention .
Innocent dies unfairly in deprivation and destitution in the hands of tyrants while the tyrants die in dignity and in great comfort. That tells us, justice is delayed to a supreme court where all will be dealt with swiftly. We can easily conclude Paradise is not cheap nor is Hell unnecessary! (Bediüzzaman Said Nursi)
I thought Hinduism is not a religion. Just yesterday a Hindu told me that even if s person a Christian they still can be Hindu. They told me that Hindu is a way of life and not religion. I'm so confused, which one is the truth?
Assalamu alaikum Mr. Paul I hope this academic work took into account genocides For example we find The Cambodian genocide It was the systematic persecution and killing of Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge under the leadership of Pol Pot (an athiest)... Resulted in the deaths of 1.5 to 2 million people from 1975 to 1979, nearly a quarter of Cambodia's 1975 population....
@@salmaa2871 Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says. Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages , which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.
@@salmaa2871 ad hominem at its finest Not just attacking the author..but it's readers, hence the book is a joke... without any actual academic reason to it, nor providing any alternative academic data. Conclusion : useless comment
@@rohithm3508 first of all the calculation of casualties are done by those scholars who said Iraq have chemical weapons.you don’t listen to your news maybe your hellery former foreign minister of America admitted in e mails leakage scandal that IsIS was made by CIA of America. In the era of Sadam Hussain that region was quite peaceful no suicidal attacks. Where ever in Asia christens soldiers reached conspiracies were also formed. Muslims blood was everywhere. Syria was also peaceful until christens soldiers were at their home. More than twenty years had passed Muslims are still waiting the solid proof against osama bin Ladin. Mula Ummar also asked solid proof against osama. If American had provided it to Mula ummar they didn’t needed the war. Osama could be handed over to them. As I have already told christens directed a full drama of terrorism in which ten million Muslims are killed. Where ever in Muslim region christens forces put their feet blood of Muslims falling not only in that region but around also
@@masha3352 There was some violence in Indonesia too. The Sultan of Aceh was a good ottoman vassal. But no there was not so much violence that is why indonesians are the most normal people in the muslim world. They give their muslim kids hindu names till today and have preserved their heritage and do not deny their ancestors.(I am not hindu). Anywhere else see what happened.
Salaam brother. I was actually discussing this subject online a few days ago. As expected, the people rushed to defend their ideologies with nuance while not granting such rights to others.
First time I heard numbers about this. How clever of the author simply to count. Well, these are the facts. Impossible to run away from them. These figures should be known by the world in order to exercise some necessary reflection. Even I was surprised, I was prejudiced, biased. Ignorance can be a terrible thing. 👍🏽😘
These facts are known , unfortunately due to subjective, prejudice, ignorance of the country govt and education system doesn't want the the ppl to know . Individual ppl need to educate themselves
@@mukulrayhan9683 that region afghanistan,pakistan and bangladesh are muslim before the mughal came to india.. please learn your own history..before mughal there are Delhi empayer sultanate that most of them are from aghan region..if not because of muslim sultanate than your region will be on fire because of monggol violence..look at the past picture of your comunity that mosly half naked people and still in five thousand year of lifestyle.that why your people being rules by modest muslim during that day..
Here in Malaysia we have our very own history how the Portuguese came with the intention to "trade for our spices" where they brought like 18 ships of men forces and they brought their priests along..you know the rest of the story 💁🏻♀️
They didn’t just spilled blood but forced nd succeeded in changing the ideologies of ppl. For example before the colonialism movement off Europe the islamic world had little racism nd was extremely diverse in colors nd races but after the colonialism the hate for darker skin colors increased dramatically. They stamped ppl with their ugly habits.
@@davidzack8735 they never talked about Muhammad’s skin color the expression they used in Arabic doesn’t mean white it means bright there r deference between the two. From the description of my great grandmother she would always emphasize on how arabs before the colonialism where always marrying ppl of deferent races nd colors her being Indonesian but when the colonialism started the practice stopped. Ppl who where black or had a black family members where treated badly by the English army.
@@davidzack8735 “an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor does a non-Arab have superiority over an Arab and a person of lighter skin has no superiority over a person of darker skin or vice versa”
@@davidzack8735 so they continued the slave trade after the 1860’s? Where is the proof. Also where is the proof that he pointed to a black man and said that’s what the devil looks like
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
Nice to see a fellow brit keeping theological tradition alive and well! I'd be interested in seeing these figures but with some degree of quantitative population generalisation e.g. taking into account deaths per practitioner of said ideology and as percentage of world population means at each respective loci in time or something along those lines
Oh no this is going to upset alot of ppl 😢 but they will simply ignore it because they don't have time to do own research so they will it a lie and sleep on it like it never existed 😴
NO RELIGION, except Islam, caused deaths for PURELY ideological reasons. Please be smart and differentiate between pretext and ideology. This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@Aquacrystal78 Show me in the New Testament the command to the catholics to kill protestants or vice-versa. And then we can discuss about religious war. Otherwise, it is ONLY a political war, with religious PRETEXT. FALSE RELIGIOUS WAR. Get the point?
@@Aquacrystal78 This is RELIGIOUS MOTIVATED WAR: QUR’AN - Surah At-Tawbah, 9-29: “FIGHT those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [FIGHT] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” Etc.
Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says. Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages , which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.
@@mohammadhooksit thats true in some area😆....but the reality is different.... In this graph most of the time it shows killing of other nation not internal conflict.... People of indian sub continent hardly invaded other nation...if you read the history of indic people you will see they were in battle most of the time.....they were busy fighting each other😆.....every king of indian sub continent had to spent 80% of there wealth fighting with other kingdom of the sub continent..... Some king tried to invade foreign land but had to back up bcz there own home land was Being fucked up 😆😆😆so thats why there is so few kiling of indic people....but if you count internal conflict of indic people they will be in very high place....atleast 2million people died in battle of kalinga alone....and there was Kamasutra.... So you know 😐😐😐😂😂😂
To those people who says christianity is a peaceful religion. My question is: Name one christian country in medieval period or before that which was tolerant to other religious group? The answer: None
Christianity a peaceful religion? How many cultures Christianity destroyed? Everything in South America, everything on European, Russian area and keep counting.
Ikr , Christian churches give clear chit that non Christian land is no man land and Christian can not have sin plundering no man land and making slave to non Christian pagans
That was mainly a political issue not a war for religious reasons Most wars are for ideological reasons not religious WW2 was because of Fascism USA wasn’t founded as religious state neither Russia
Im surprised i must say. I thought any religious civilisation would allow their teachings to control their moral compass a lot more. But what I’m not surprised at is the section of civilisation in second place. I pray for more peace, love and understanding in this world. God is great 🙏
they do. but schism turns them hostile to each other. hence sectarian violence that leads to religious discord. and 3 biggest creeds of Abrahamic religion experienced it all the same. there were inter-same_faith conflicts (i.e inter-Judaism conflict, inter-Christian conflict, inter-Islam conflict) and i can't speak about Christianity since I'm not even a Christian. but seemingly, in the context of inter-same_faith conflict, every muslim belligerents in such conflicts holds a bottom line that helps keep the toll low. and it was _Shahadah._ the Prophet ﷺ condemns any muslims who killed anyone who are clearly reciting shahadah. and by extension, the Prophet ﷺ also condemns muslims who killed a _Mu'ahid_ (a person who is granted the pledge of protection by the Muslims) in the time of conflict. that is something we don't know whether other religious civilization's jurisprudence also have something in common.
AFAIK, this statistics are across 2K years , religious civilizations existed for most of those, but "atheist civilization" should have only lasted for about 2 centuries.
@@alex17252 European stole money from Afriac and asia, america and then put that money into research thus your have developed your science and technologies. You democracy yes but morality? What a joke.
@@alex17252 Stop your fairy tales. You did not make rich those colonised countries. You colonised rich peaceful countries. Whenever christian countries attack any other countries you say christianity has nothing to do with it but we know European history.
@@davidzack8735 We should report this channel for giving Christianity a bad image. This guy doesn't even give references to any of his claims, he just utters whatever comes to his mind. How do we report the channel?
@@madrobin742 report to your daddy !! This guy does not say anything without backing up by works of scholar or historians. So even your dad won’t listen to your complaints
Does the author take into account the size of earths population at the time of killings? What was the number of people living during Djingis Kahns and Kublai Kahns wars? What was the world population 1939 - 1945? Deaths relative population?
Exactly my argument. Moreover, people died of misery due to religion, for example casteism in India. How did they count these numbers ? The book is written by islamic scholars. Of course they will try to save their religion.
Yes many many problems in doing this cherry picked statistical analysis with many factors which severely skew the interpretation and even the categorising of the statistics here. Clearly this was done with a very strong pro islam bias to get more people on board to this chameleon of a religion.
Yes, the author takes that in consideration, he takes into account earth population and the percentage of every civilization throughtout history (0-2008). Read it, it's only one section of the book, the whole study is only about 20 pages or so.
Sorry Nad ,,,, Japanese are not Buddhist rather majority follows Shintoism and the Nanjing peoples ( Northern China) are Taoists and Confucius etc.........The Buddhists centre is South and East Asia.......
@@dexter-ks7rz "Religion in Japan manifests primarily in Shinto and in Buddhism, the two main faiths, which Japanese people often practice simultaneously" from Wikipedia
_Not surprising, According to Matthew 10:34 - jesus says; Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. _*_I did not come to bring peace, but a sword._*_ And according to Luke 22:36 - jesus says; But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; _*_and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one_*
I THINK the Crusade's are stil going on mass killings from the army of the Crusade's who are NATO NAVO and VN so what does Turkije have to do there as a NATO member .... Please see this Allahu Alem
What about non-war killings... resulting from unjustified prosecutions.. likes in prosecutions Black African in slave industries by European Christians, prosecutions of indigenous and aboriginals peoples during European Christians colonialisation periods and so on?
@@abd-co7le Do you know for slaves there is law in Islam ? A slave girl cannot be force for physical relationships . Children of slave mother has equal rights their fathers property. The reason there are some Muslims slave become great kings in India ,Spain and others countries . Muslims are differ from others.
@Jesus Christ Is Alive The Atlantic slave trade was one of the darkest periods of history lasting from the 15th century to the 19th century..all done by people who brutalised the Africans on the plantations then went to Church on Sunday...the legacy of this barbarity is still with us today..I would advise you to check out Christian role in this slave trade including the Ku klux Klan who used the Cross as their symbol...right now evangelical Christians in USA use their vote to oppress black people in USA and also to de humanise migrants and Muslims...you simply cannot ever say Christians are peaceful..all evidence is against your notion!
There are some biases in this list. 1. there are younger and older religions. 2. population density has a high variability. Thus a smaller number of deaths may hide the proportional violence of a religion in its time. Further we have to note that religions evolve thus they can not really be compared to their older issues.
There are even more potential sources of errors like different levels of technology, hegemony, varying population density, casus belli, cultural influences predating said religions, availability of historic records, economic necessity etc etc. There are so many vague and uncertain variables. How can anyone read this 'study's' abstract and think 'yeah that sounds perfectly scientific and reasonable'? Either he really doesn't understand these big red flags or he wants it to be true because it supports his own bias, I don't know what is worse
Yup i pointed out a lot of these problems, as well as the problem that you have to know whether the violence was a result of the religious doctrine or coincedental.
The atrocities which the Hindus of India did to Muslims at the time of the partition of India were ghastly and hideous. Eight million Muslims decided to migrate to Pakistan when they were in fear for their lives as a result of the barbaric attacks launched against those Muslims who decided to stay in India. Only three million of them managed to reach the Pakistani borders. The other five million were killed on the way. They were attacked by well organized Hindu militia. These were well known to the Indian government, and indeed were controlled by some highly placed officials in the Indian government itself. Those five million Muslims were slaughtered like sheep. Their bodies were left along the roads after many of them were disfigured in a way which was no less horrendous than what the Tartars of old did in Baghdad. The most horrible single incident was that involving the train which carried no less than 5,000 Muslim employees from different parts of India on their way to Pakistan. It was agreed at the time when the partition agreement was made that any government official who wanted to migrate to Pakistan would be allowed to do so. The train carried all those thousands of employees. It had to travel through a tunnel at the Khaybar Pass close to the borders, but when the train came out of the tunnel, it carried no living soul. Its cargo was nothing other than the dead bodies of all its passengers, having been torn to pieces. What happened was that those same Hindu militia stopped the train inside the tunnel and killed all its passengers. The train was allowed to proceed only when this most ghastly massacre was over.
The atrocities of muslims to the Hindus for hundreds of years have no comparison to what you say. And the British on purpose fueled communal tensions to partition India for their interests. And i see how muslims treat muslims within Pakistan itself. I think China must do to Pakistanis what it is doing to the terrorists in Xinjiang and deislamize vicious desi muslims. No hindu has come to conquer foreign lands and force them. Even when they did they gave those lands a superior culture. Indonesian muslims are not ashamed of their hindu ancestors but desi muslims and their fake two nation theory and self denial is incredibly psychotic. Hindus have made their own mistakes but to compare it to your mughal idols, it is such a bad joke. I am not from the Subcontinent, but I have been to Pakistan, which was created "to save muslims of India from hindu tyranny" and I saw what an islamic paradise it is. If you ask indian muslims whether they will endure Hindutva oppression or make hijra to Pakistan, they will never ever go to Pakistan. I met with old pakistani muhajirs in Pakistan, more than their 90s. One lady told me she deeply regrets for her "hijrah". Had she known what Pakistan would become she would have taken the pains to go to Makkah and Madinah even though she was a toddler when partition happened. And not only millions of muslims but millions of sikhs and hindus forcibly left their homes in Pakistan from India.
The amount of ignorance is staggering in this comment. The islamic conquest of India was one of the bluddiest in history, they came here swinging sword first and went on to kill convert r@pe enslave the millions and millions of Hindus, they destroyed 40000 temples, they are the reason Bharat was carved into 3 countries. They were the first to start the violence during partition, They started the direct action day. They did the moplah massacre. They did the kashmiri hindu genocide. They killed and converted hindus in Malabar. And after the partition hindu population of Pakistan went from 20% to 2%. And look at the muslim population in india, the are breeding like rabbits thus becoming 3rd largest muslims population with over 200 millions. Clearly shows which side is violent so stfu with your biased agenda and start studying history instead of kurand.
I think something to consider might also be the fact that civilizations with high levels of large massacres might also be related to the density of population in which those civilizations exhist and the high level of military competition and technological advancement that ensues. China and Western Europe and India being well reknown for relatively high densities of population throughout history thus capable of larger war scales
I believe associating killing with religion is a mistake to begin with. Even though we as Muslims could be tempted with these stats but we shouldnt fall under the same mistake. Killing “ in most of these cases” was Bi-product Of human tyranny and greed. With exception of very few cases/ incidents ( at least from my knowledge in Islam) killing was a direct execution of our interpretation of Islam. With all respect to the author I believe we shouldn’t allow the bad perception on Islam as a violent religion take us into these subjective arguments. In short , if a Muslim kills human that doesn’t by default means that Islam kills. The association is not that simple .. l
Wow.... excellent comments you made. And I agree with you. Although I'm not Muslim, your observations can apply to any religion because, as you said, "tyranny and greed" are the strong influence for violence. So I would say that we should not correlate much of historical violence with any generalized statement such as "Islam kills" or "Christianity kills", etc. Thanks so much for your views. I wish more Muslims would read your comments. Peace of God to you...
Dan NICU you don’t have to be sorry but you should instead learn a bit more about Islam and a bit more about other religion to find that your claim is easily refuted. Ignorance is a problem my friend
@@BARBARANOU Your ignorance is a problem, indeed. Islam is nothing else but a religion of Satan (called Allah). ONLY Satan urges men to kill others men. Satan in disguise is Allah. you can try, IF you can, to prove my claims are wrong. Try, please.
Christian will never lost the war even in the near future if any one attack on Christian nation. Christian' s countries has won so many wars on retaliation.
Interesting findings. I am not a Christian, Jew nor an atheist, but as an academic empirical researcher (in social sciences), I would like to comment on these findings from a scientific/academic perspective. The findings are indeed interesting. But in my opinion, they are interesting as they raise the need to dig deeper and try to understand why certain areas e.g. Europe/Soviet Union, countries or civilizations have caused or initiated the most of amount of wars or the most violence; but not to draw conclusions about which religion is the most violent as the video sometimes makes. In my humble opinion, the findings suffer from many limitations to draw conclusion about which relgion is the most violent as the catchy title of the video asks. First, it is difficult, yet very important to identify the "real/true" motive behind a violent act such as a war. In other words, it is important to understand whether it was due to material motives, ideologocal motives other than religions, or religious motives. If the motive such as the motives behind WWI were not religious, then it would be very misleading and unfair to claim that a religion is violent because of that. What makes it even harder is that often, violent acts were often undertaken under the name of religion but for purely material motives, which would also make the conclusion and judgement on the religion itself misleading and unfair. Second, I find it very important to control for certain factors/variables especially power e.g. political power, economic power, military power or even the size of the population, or at least to show their distribution (as it was done for the number of deaths causedl) before drawing any conclusions. This is because, especially back in the days, often the ones with the most power were the most violent and aggressive; simply because they are more powerful. It is more common for a big and powerful country to invade a smaller and weaker one rather than the other way round. Thus, the reason for countries/regions with certain religions not to be violent might not be due to their religion being less violent, but because they did not have much power to do so. The question is, if they had as much power, would they be less violent? May be a better way to try to answer the question of the video is to study how the different religions or atheism were spread or have become dominant in their regions e.g. how did Christianity become the dominant religion in Europe/USA, how did Buddhism become dominant in some parts of Asia and how did Islam become dominant in the Middle East? Is it by using violent or non-violent measures? I also find such empirical evidence without a deeper study of each religion's books/scriptures and doctrines lacking meaning and highly limited to answer the question the video is asking. I truly appreciate the effort done though.
The last one is not index civilization (as some are reading) 😅 but indic civilization i.e. Indian religion( Hinduism Sikhism etc.) and this small killing(major goes to partition done by Britishers) was due to continuous invasion by islamic and Christian forces from West despite a history longer than combined of Christianity and Islam both.
It's also the reason why Hinduism and Sikhism have largely been confined to India and the immediate surrounding area. But we should not fool ourselves into thinking that followers of these religions cannot be violent, even what's happening today contradicts that idea. Also, Indic religions are not older than Islam
WW2 wasnt started by christians. Even reason behind GEW waas nationaism, not christianity. Slavery and colonialism has been done too a lot by marxists and muslims.
The Nazis were Christians, the Crusaders were Christians, the killers of Native Americans were Christians, the Spanish Inquisition were Christians, and the Americans were mostly Christians, and their crimes were in Iraq, Vietnam, and Japan.
the people who caused those are just misguided. they either misinterpreted the teachings of christianity, or got blinded by satan. muslims are very aware of what their quran says. and they kill kill kill.
You lift the carpet on the most obscure and masked topics. Thank you for providing facts and information to aid in our knowledge. Never again can the terms such as barbaric and war mongering be applied to Islam without taking into consideration the ranks of other religions. FACTS are FACTS. Alhamdilollah brother Paul, you help bring the light of knowledge, information and truth. May Allah Subhana wa Taala bless.🌿 PS Thank you for sharing the book and references.
❤️🙏
@@BloggingTheology thank you
the faithless built no civilizations & Islam is the only preserved faith so humanity as a whole testifies Islam is true. atheism has no virtue & tool under marxism tyranny. building least, maiming most... not a good record. atheism is pushed by dajjal's ppl, like how paul taught lawless man worship so his farisi money $ changers can pay rulers like lobbies do today, making christianity more lawless so the farisis can rule a destructured disunited ppl, thats why the so called new atheism should really be called neo con atheism.
While Surah Fatiha teaches us to be the middle path, to not be restrictive and tyrannical like the yeahood or loose and lawless like the nasara but united and balanced under justice and Tawhid.
Have knowledge and act upon it!
As Malik Shabazz aka Malcolm X said, ONeness of Lord to = Oneness of Man!
Islam taught the west race equality and halted marxism tyranny!
reflect on aipac lobby with the left & right the left used to de-structure family with fake science & marxism and right for their structure bigotry in group level.
so its a 2 wings of a bird, one to destructure you & another to structure tyranny...
Seems you are on your path to enlightment👍
The strange thing is that those who claim absolute love and tolerance are bloodier than others
You don't. It's just chatting
Only reason they preach "love" these days is because they have no institutional power at the moment.
Let them get a sniff of the old power and you'll see their true colours. They'll wipe out millions like before.
@@samboy90
If you mean Muslims by saying (like before), I wish you could specify when and where? Believe me, do not embarrass yourself, you will not find, even they did not revenge the massacre of Jerusalem, but tolerance.
@@marwand.a.z9840 friendly fire -_-
@@fulan4263 Where did you attack me... I guess he's someone else 🙂
this is why hell and justice must exist
@@smith6696 Just because you really want them not to exist doesn't mean they cant or actually dont exist.
Truth is often bitter and hard to accept but it is the truth.
@@All_SportGG Damn bro 😂
@@smith6696 Nearly all religions and beliefs systems throughout human history have some concept of hell or divine punishment for bad behaviour. Hell does exist whether you like it or not.
@@All_SportGG Smart, mate! May Allah bless you, Sir. 😎
@@All_SportGG 👍👍👍
i can see this video getting reccomended years later now. And it would be one of kind since it not only is intressting but also very knowledgable.
It's a very educational and useful video. Thanks a lot brother Paul
My pleasure!
For decades, Islam was portrayed as on the top of the list. How would we know the facts w/o this presentation? Who would find this book & read before today? Allah bless you Sir Paul.
🤦♀️🤣😂OMG
Maybe because there is no internet at that time? 🤔
Not a joke,because good readers have reliable resource,other person who try to spread lie,will fail...
@@khozabenhamid9745
Top ten reasons why Islam is NOT the religion of peace:
10. Muhammad nicknames his weapons.
9. Muhammad commands in his Quran that adulterers and adulteresses should receive a hundred lashes.
8. Muhammad in his Quran permits husbands to beat their wives.
7. Muhammad in his Quran commands that the hands of male or female thieves should be cut off.
6. Muhammad assassinates poets and poetesses.
5. Muhammad in his Quran commands death or the cutting off of hands and feet for fighting and corrupting the land.
4. Muhammad aggressively attacks Meccan caravans.
3. Muhammad in his Quran promises sensuous Gardens for martyrs dying in a military holy war.
2. Muhammad unjustly executes around 600 male Jews and enslaves the women and children.
1. Muhammad launches his own Crusades.
In the following verse, Muhammad uses the Arabic word qital (root is q-t-l), which means warring, fighting, or killing:
9:29 Fight [q-t-l] those among the people of the Book [Christians] who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden and do not profess the true religion, till they pay the poll-tax out of hand and submissively. (Fakhry)
The two most interesting clauses in this violent verse are (1) People of the Book (Christians in this verse late in Muhammad’s life) are to be attacked if they do not profess the true religion: Islam. This leaves the door wide open for terrorists today to attack and fight Christians because they do not adhere to Islam; (2) Christians must pay a tax for the "privilege" of living under the "protection" of Islam-submissively or in humiliation.
The historical context of Sura 9:29 finds Muhammad preparing for a military expedition against the Byzantine Empire in 630, two years before his ordinary death of a fever in 632. Indeed, some scholars regard Sura 9 as the last sura to be revealed from on high. Therefore, it sets many policies for Muslims today, and is often interpreted as abrogating or canceling previous verses, even peaceful ones.
Muhammad heard a rumor that the Byzantines amassed an army some 700 miles to the north in Tabuk (northern Arabia today) in order to attack Islam, so he led an army of 30,000 holy warriors to counter-strike preemptively. However, the Byzantines failed to materialize, so Muhammad’s belief in the false rumor was misguided and his expedition was fruitless, except he managed to extract (extort) agreements from northern Christian Arab tribes that they would not attack him and his community. An army of 30,000 soldiers from the south must have deeply impressed the northern tribes, so they posed no real threat to Islam. They are the ones who paid the "protection" tax mentioned in Sura 9:29 (and so do tribes and cities after Muhammad’s death). Therefore, Muhammad’s forced tax was aggressive and hence unjust, not defensive and hence just.
Muhammad’s military expedition qualifies as an Islamic Crusade long before the European ones. After all, in 638, only six years after Muhammad’s death, Muslim armies conquer Jerusalem. Today, Muslims should never again complain about European Crusades, unless they first come to grips with their own.
What the ten reasons mean for us today
These ten aspects of violence that have burrowed into the hemorrhaging heart of early Islam have eight implications for us today. The first three are theological; the rest are practical.
The theological implications are as follows:
First, as each reason in this article has hinted at and the links explain more thoroughly, Christ never, ever engaged in such violence. For example, he never assassinated opponents, whipped adulterers, cut off the hands of thieves, or launched his own Crusades (what the Medieval Europeans did is not foundational to Christianity). Christ expresses the love of God. Therefore, Christians and all fair-minded persons have the right to question whether the true God would reveal the Quran when it contains such violent verses that conveniently support Muhammad’s violence, whereas the New Testament does not have such violence.
Second, Muslims believe that the New Testament is corrupted, whereas the Quran is inerrant. Even if we assume only for the sake of argument that these claims are true (but they actually are not), then why would reasonable seekers of the truth prefer the "pure" but violence-filled Quran over the "corrupted" but peaceful New Testament?
Before Muhammad is allowed to throw around unsubstantiated charges about alleged New Testament corruption, he and his Quran must pass a down-to-earth test regarding his dubious, violent practices. But he and it fail the test badly, as this demonstrates, whereas Christ and the New Testament pass with a perfect score. Therefore, if Muhammad is so wrong about down-to-earth matters like whipping adulterers and cutting off the hands of thieves and beating wives, then he is likely wrong about unresearched accusations of New Testament corruption-and factually he is wrong.
Third, since Muhammad who claims divine guidance is so wrong about practical matters, why should we believe him about theoretical matters like the deity of Christ and the Trinity, both of which he denies? Clearly, he was not divinely guided in practical matters because the true God would not degrade religion by endorsing such gruesome violence six hundred years after Christ came-the historical span is critical. Christ and the New Testament do not have even one example of such violence. Again, if Muhammad first fails the down-to-earth test, then he likely fails the theological or theoretical test-we have no reason to believe him in such high doctrines, especially since he was no theologian and his revelations are now empirically suspect.
@@jacobsenh7383 no sword found in Al-Quran and most sentence are for self defense... But more than 120 times found in bible... One of phrase in bible, sell coat to buy a sword??
Even an ex-christian confirn it...his name Yusoff Estee..
And funny claims from you about my prophet..since when name Muhammad is translate as weapon? Do you think it was my prophet command all what you claims?? Wow!!! You looks so desperate on make claims that already been told in other post..and do you think I haven't check your claims??? You even change the meaning in 9:29... Wow!! Do you only think Christian ?? How about jewish? Arab who idol a pagan god like you?? Haven't they been asked to pay jizyah?? Even in modern day,any citizen or settler have to pay tax..didn't your teacher teach you???
@@khozabenhamid9745 Don’t argue with this Jahil, pray for him to receive peace and guidance.
Haters are going crazy in the comments because the truth is hurt😏
Exactly who cares tho😏 let them burn😂😂😂😂😂
And the fact doesn't care about you feelingr
@Og Vexzy 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭
@Og Vexzy can you tell how beautiful ?? Just give one example ?
Ali Sina
"Islams biggest enemy is the Quoran .If people learn what is in that book,Islam will be finished."
Namaste! Thank you. Good to share with our brothers and sisters.
I Am your new subscriber, thank you for sharing this book Paul... best regard. 👍🙏
Welcome aboard!
so a new mobile as a subscriber!!!
@@abdulrahiman7435 😂
I love your book recommandations, I started reading C Meyer's Return of the God Hypothesis. Will definitely read War and Peace in Islam too, many thanks Paul for sharing deep knowledge !
What knowledge ?This is based on ignorance of the religions and history .A secular state going to war is not a religion. Hitler was anti Jewish and Christian and killed both.It was about power and race.
@@wendymitchell8245 Pretty much atheism then?
💰🐪🤺The Armies of JIHAD always talking about WARS to Force Political Submission, instead of Human Rights, this to justify its own GENOCIDES, while camouflaged as "religion";
Bye bye Armies of JIHAD!
⚖🌍🕊 🆚️ 💰🐪🤺
@@williamgarayua5878 SAVE PALESTINE
FREE FREE PALESTINE...
One day I was watching a video of a lady who reverted to Islam and she mentioned about "Blogging Theology" channel... I looked up for ur channel and now I am a big fan of u. Very educational and informative!
Christianity based on the Bible is loving & kind but the Roman pagans who is coerced to "convert" By the Emperor Constantine because it is in fashion & useful at that time turned it into a monster & so the Roman Catholic church as they turned into, killed & tortured millions
I used to be a hindu then became an atheist but neither hinduism nor atheism made any sense to me. Researched and accepted islam, Alhamdulillah !!
@@DhruvS89I’m seeei g you everywhere Abdul
Very "educative" if you're used not to check what you hear.
@@DhruvS89Well your name is Dhruv Rathee 😂
Indic civilization is the least violent of all, HINDUS are the most peace loving people of the world. 👍👍👍
You are absolutely correct. I am an Inian.
This is the reason why Hindus were the most persecuted civilization in the world 😔😔😔. Indic or Sanatan Dharma have very beautiful philosophy, " Vashudhaiva Kutumbakam" means Whole world is our family". But When other religions of people entered in Bharatvarsha In the name of exploring culture, they backstabbed Hindus and started exploiting them. Britain is the prime example of lootings of Sanatan Civilization.
@@engineeringmarvel6275 Brits who arrived for trade, were invited by local Rajas of princely states to protect them against their enemy Rajas....
Brits used it nicely to gain power and occupy the whole country.
No use blaming them, because, mistake was from Indian rulers side.
@@athensmajnoo3661 😂😂😂 Taking unjust benefits of someones poor situation is in the Blood of British.
@@Shrikrushna05 whose poor situation?
The princes or rajas were all looking to only their throne's safety, they wanted their as... s to be on it as long as possible..
Lack of unity, failure of fore thought on part of Rajas were perfect situation for Brits.
Not all Rajas or Ranis were like that.
There was one Rani Channamma of Kithoor in Karnataka who died fighting the British, as they refused to acknowledge her adopted son as successor to the throne. They gave a grand name ' Doctrin of lapse' for that.
It so happend that her husband, and her biological son died inquick succession, she adopted a boy to make him the prince. It was in 1824.
India was pretty messed up those times.
11:20 i've already known the answer before I watch the video 😀..my people experience the horror of 350 year enslavement from the "religion of love", million lost their life in the name of Jesus
My people experienced that for 130 years without counting the constant failed attacks
@@thedstorm8922 which makes me thinking as to why every prophet are said will reject their own people
‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many works in your name?’
in my case, my ancestors were crucified and skinned alive in the name of Jesus..I'm sure Jesus himself will wash his hand after knowing all atrocities done by the religion of love
@@wartab6318 exactly ugh so horrific and disgusting 😤🤦♀️
The calamities from the"churches conflicts" in england itself was.... 🔥🔥🔥
@@amalianurlatifah8703 exactly that was like horror movie 😂
It’s a great work Paul.
There’s is a lot of good and beneficial info out here but many people lost focus to be informed to oneself to have a better understanding of things.
Just keep helping a lot of us in way.
@@rohithm3508 l believe that actually you didn’t watch the video posted by Mr. Paul Williams originally and all the information provided by the historians .
I reckon to watch it first and learn all the facts mentioned by them.
Thank you
@@rohithm3508
I advise you to do the homework and search for other evidences in the library so can help you to understand history.
@@rohithm3508 l am glad for your hard work, time and effort for research.
No doubt about those people who massacred masses of people and they caused more harm than benefit to mankind. But l believe that those nations who fight against this kind of ideologies are imposing their ideology ( democracy) by changing governments or forcing a kind of sanctions and only more misery to ordinary people. This kind of people what so ever ideology proclaim they are only interested for their own beliefs and close to them.
These historic statistics are like hidden treasure. Salute for exploring it and share it
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029 Sir you need to read your bible more often
@@isseabdirahmanweheliye9010 Child, tell me what do you think I don't know about the New Testament, the part of the Bible which is for christians. Don't tell me avbout other part, is IRRELEVANT for christians, the most advanced religion. TEACH ME, IF YOU CAN. Can you??? Prove it! Otherwise, it is clear that you are ignorant and a big mouth.
@@dannicu2029 bro you need read more about war and whos behind of it and why War happen..for what ? ..for better knowledge you better find someone who really have knowledge about war in Christianity and muslim..dont just Google it..you might not understand and our understanding is limitless...be positives brother..if you really want to know the truth, hopefully God show you the way..
@@banqkaiqai5567 If you imagine that you understand reality better than I do, I am waiting for you to explain to me what war is like. CAN YOU??? YOU CANN'T! I know that I know and you have no idea. And not only do you know nothing, but you don't even understand anything. Let me explain to you, AGAIN: in Islam there are commandments to kill the different: "kill all who do not obey Allah"; "kill the apostates," etc. In Christianity there are NO such commandments. And then there is a difference in MOTIVATION between the wars of Islam and those of Christianity. Islam IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATES war through commandments that are the essence of Islam, but Christianity, as an ideology, does NOT do such a thing. Learn to think, you are a little weak in mind.
Islam ...without a doubt
With my respect what's your religion 😮
@user-tk6mm1us6l I think you didn't read you bible book there's order to kill children and r a p e women 🤣
Islam my religion and the religion of peace .☪️☪️☪️
Go cry and what you want to say
Let me guess you didn't watch the video 😂😂
😂😂😂
The Spanish and the Crusaders……
So glad to have brother Paul show us this important literature! JazakAllah khair
Paul, thanks for all your video... 🌻🌼
Christian are weird, when they talk about forgiveness, salvation or everything that nice coating are all related to jesus but then when talk about all the killing, punishment, tragedy are all pushed to the father, according to them isn't they are them same? Why there are seperation here?
It is difficult to combine capitalism with the commandments of Christ... But Zionism was able to convince the Christian that the enemies of greed are the enemies of Christ.
@@marwand.a.z9840 where do I talk about capitalism? But If you want to talk about capitalism, if I am not mistaken they already put capitalism into Christianity, just like making Christmas as the day most day of capitalism ,? The supposed day of jesus become the day of materialism
then they blame ibliss
@@ugetuget8864 It is not the fault of them as Christians, but because the Bible contradicts the nature of human beings, which bears good and evil. The Qur'an says.. Who forgives and makes reconciliation his reward will be from ALLAH... So he put the matter in your hands asking for punishment or forgiven with guarantee reward .
Christianity is not just. Thousands of years people were killed because of this hard laws and went to hell. But than after unjust thousands of years people basically have nothing to do 🤣...
Salāmu-alaykum brother Paul, jazāka Allāhu khayran for sharing many historic facts about religions. I was quite surprised by the result. I'm a Muslim, but I almost automatically was going to answer 'ISLĀM'.....because that's what we've been fed with. One other thing, thank you for sharing the book titles and links for further reading.
I was going to ask you how to get these books. Jazāka Allāhu khayran again.
Academic estimates around 90 000 000-1.2 billion people have died as the result of Islam and it’s continuous war of religious expansion since the 7th century to the current day across three continents. That’s 1400 years of a single religion being at war with all other faiths and peoples.
In The Indian Sub-Continent alone, Islamic raids, invasions & conquest account for the majority of these deaths committed against innocent Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Sikhs and Parsees.
The bloody expansion of Islam from the 7th century through to the 17th century has left a swathe of death, slavery, oppression and discrimination, destruction of native religions, art and architecture of the rich and sophisticated cultures it conquered.
It unsuccessfully tried to conquer Europe on several occasions but was fortunately repelled although with much loss of life.
Islam’s last gasp of ‘world wide conquest” was the Ottoman Turk’s pogroms against the Greeks and Armenians from 1910 - 1923, including the death of 1.5 million Christian Armenians during WWI in the Armenian Genocide and 300 000 Syrian-Assyrian Christians also being murdered.
These are inconvenient truths that very few people like to acknowledge, especially Moslems and gullible & uneducated Westerners who have bought into the ridiculous Islamophobia, Muslim Victimhood and “Religion of Peace” blither .
You have read our history brother, don't listen to western lies. Their history is full of lies and u still see it today lol
Maybe 80% of our wars were against Christians and the fire worshippers (Perse civilisation). Especially we were weak and fought the biggest empires and won. Defended our lands against crusaders and still defending it.
We have strict rules of wars and we fought and fight only armed people. kids,women,elders, religious people, we don't cut trees or destroy people's houses, places of worship..etc (ofc, there were some soldiers who went against the rules and were punished and others not..) We let it to Allah swt. At least, we try our best.
While u have Richard coeur de lion roasting civilian muslim & jews palestinians and eating them...
Christians are barbaric and they still the same under the so called "democracy and human rights" lol
Check the last 100 years how many millions were killed by secular-christian countries (WW1 , WW2 , dirty wars in latine america, Middle east and africa) in the name of demotrashy and human rghts^^ How many coups and civil wars they provoked .. how many country they manipulate, how many country they sabotage economically, culturally and politically. How many people were divided by their "divide and conquor" & u can see it with actual Palestine .. it's the west. They are ready to do anything for ressources and money. The Money worshippers.
They can never compare themselves to us. Not even comparable.
And the evidence piles up !
Well done again sir !
Viva blogging theology !
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029 Which Quran verse says to engage in forced conversions and fight all non-Muslims?
@@ibnmianal-buna3176torical context matters. If suppose, Ukrainians are told no longer to defend their families, faiths, or homelands, what would you do if you were being terrorized? If you were a Christian being fed to the Roman lions, would you stand there and “turn the other cheek?” Which Christian turns the other cheek? Only two that I met in my long life.
If you were being hunted down in Palestine for daring go love Allah and follow His methods of prayer, and take care of your family, would you walk away?
But people like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler, and daily serial killers kill thousands of innocents because they have revenge on their minds-and are bloodthirsty.
At least in the Bible there are just as many peaceful verses as there are verses on incest, rape-marriage, murdering those who worship a different god, Jesus telling his people to “sell his garments” to buy a sword when necessary -and God in the Bible destroying entire populations and Lut type of communities of Lot for disobeying His commands. If you were a practicing Jew during Holocaust or centuries of European abused even upon Jewish ghettos forced upon the Jews, would you “turn the other cheek” or fight for your rights as a human, (which Spanish Islam allowed people to do, say, work, or speak).
If you were a black sibling in America, would you say “thank you kindly,” for the rapes of your mother and sisters and the lynchings of black brothers innocent of the alleged crimes?
If you were a dark Italian living in America, would you stand by and watch your brother and family be slaughtered and scapegoated because you were expected to be from the “mafia” that stupid movies like to show?
If you were a Native America, would you really be attending the “Thanksgiving “ /funeral ceremonies of your people as extremist-pious Christian’s sat eating and roasting a Pig or Hog that Jesus himself would never have eaten?
Describe your definition of violence and peace, and clarity shall come yo you, too.
If you were a hardworking Chinese or Asian immigrant working hard on building railroads and restaurants, and the terrorists of religion came knocking you down, would you say, “Thanks! Buddha told me to be calm and still.” Even Buddha believed in a One God referred to in the I-Ching and parts of Confucius writings if you dare read the larger sections.
Perpetrators of violence often want to point their one finger like a gun or sword trigger, (three fingers pointing back at them eerily), expecting their latest victim to sit there like a duck, deer, cat, or dog or their elderly parent they never bothered to respect -but general logic says that people can defend themselves, their Faiths, their Families, and their rights to property and life.
Quran teaches again and again that “Allah has made life sacred, except for Just Cause.” And, “There is no compulsion in Religion,” (which atheists think they follow, but hate Muslims to dare go with their credo).
Imagine if all the people…including Natives, followed Quran or their own religions-and imagine how many more Natives…and Jews…and Blacks…and Japanese…and Muslims would still exist!
First examine the context within the frame of history. Then examine why such and such was said by Divine Source.
In practice, let’s also examine which communities have historically “loved their neighbors as thyself” and which have forced religions on people’s throats.
British+cristen) itself killed 1.1 billion Indians lol 😂😂... In India We 100s invasion so think of data again
Great work Paul @BloggingTheology ! Anyway could we use your video and translate it for Indonesian audience here? It would be a huge contribution for the country's Muslim population. We will definitely credit you as the original owner of the content. Looking forward to your respond, thanks
Thanks, yes you have my glad permission to translate it. Thanks for asking.
@@BloggingTheology Mr. Paul, I hope to use your content in near future. I'm glad to know that you are okay with it. Thanks much 😊
@@pinkycorn5745 👍
Brother Paul. will hit 100k subscribers soon GOD willing. Go brother Paul we support you!!
❤️🙏
This shows that Hinduism is basically the most peaceful religion in the world❤
nope they did their share of violence
Mahabharata, most peaceful war in history
Don't use peaceful kinds of words it is owned by one of the most hypocritical religion of the world 😅
@@bumblebee-qh3sbdid you watch Mahabharat for only action 😅 it is more than that you can learn many things from there but I know you will not focus on that part cause you are a certified hater or spammer 😅😂
@@AYAM.M for e.g.?
Peace be upon you Paul and thank you for bringing important subjects to all those who take interest.
Christians or Christianity being peaceful is somewhat perplexing. Were the Crusaders not Christians? They spilled a hell lot of blood.
Yes.... it is perplexing and I'm a Christian believer too. So your question is excellent. I struggle to understand but to me the answer is the "nature of man."
@@johnbrzykcy3076 Thanks John. Your answer reminds of a verse from the Holy Qur'an. If remember correctly, it should be chapter 30 verse 30. Have a nice day.
@@davidzack8735 peace to you David. The subject is war I think not reason for war. That Muslims did not allow pilgrimage is highly questionable. When Muslim Iberia was overrun, the Jews did not stay behind, they followed the Muslims. Thanks for the response, David is from Abraham as I am from Isaac. 👍
The Life of this World Compared to the Hereafter!
Heaven as per Christ!
Sadducees Ask About the Resurrection
Matthew 22: 23 The same day Sadducees came to him, who say that there is no resurrection, and they asked him a question, 24 saying, “Teacher, Moses said, ‘If a man dies having no children, his brother must marry the widow and raise up offspring for his brother.’ 25 Now there were seven brothers among us. The first married and died, and having no offspring left his wife to his brother. 26 So too the second and third, down to the seventh. 27 After them all, the woman died. 28 In the resurrection, therefore, of the seven, whose wife will she be? For they all had her.”
29 But Jesus answered them, “You are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 31 And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God: 32 ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead, but of the living.” 33 And when the crowd heard it, they were astonished at his teaching.
Islamic Jenna!
1. 72 Huris plus the earthly wives also!
heavenly virgins, are a variety of celestial being that, according to Islamic scriptures, serve as a key attraction of Heaven or Jannah Houris are mentioned in Qur'anic text as a reward for believing men in the afterlife. According to the Quran, once in Jannah, believers are wed to virgin houris who have "full grown", "swelling" or "pears-shaped" breasts.
The Quran provides a physical and personal description of the houri and denotes them as awards to believers. A hadith graded Sahih (authentic) details the number of houris that will be awarded to martyrs
Orthodox Muslim theologians such as al-Ghazali (1058 - 1111 CE) and al-Ash'ari (874 - 935 CE) have discussed the Houris as being rewards and pleasures found in heaven. Al-Ghazali, in particular, refers to a hadith that describes heaven as a slave market where there will be "no buy and sale, but... If any man will wish to have sexual intercourse with a woman, he will do at once."The same hadith is quoted by Ibn Kathir, in his Qur'anic Commentary, the Tafsir ibn Kathir[6].
The houris are also described graphically by Qur'anic commentator and polymath, Al-Suyuti (died 1505), who, echoing a Sahih hadith[7] from Ibn Majah,[8] wrote that the perpetual virgins will all "have appetizing vaginas", and that the "penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal."[9]
The sensual nature of the houri awarded to believers are also confirmed by the two Sahih collections of hadith, namely Sahih Bukhari[10] and Sahih Muslim,[11] which state that the houris will be virgins so beautiful and pure that there flesh will, in effect, be transparent: "the marrow of the bones of their legs will be seen through the bones and the flesh"[12]. "The believers", another hadith in Bukhari continues, "will visit and enjoy them [the houris]".[13]
.
Who is right.....Jesus or Muhammad.....!
1. Sex is the greatest attraction in Islam
Conduct Jihad and have plenty of women in this life!
If you die in war, next instant you are with 72 Huris!!!
Is it really true....or are you taken for a ride?
Remember, in Islam God never ever spoke to any human being! Islam depends on the words of one Stranger! Who manhandled an innocent man at Hira cave and pressed him severely without any provocation! Can you put your complete trust in the words of a total Stranger....
You decide!
Wolves in sheep clothing are not sheep.
Thanks!
Many thanks soo maal!
I wasn't in the least surprised. As a Christian and seeing how the devil works it all fits.
The deciding line between good and evil runs through the heart of every human being
@@rohithm3508 Islam isn't even close.
@@rohithm3508 Who said anything about Hitler?
@@rohithm3508 Yes, I know. What's your point?
I gave this a thumbs up for informing me of these facts but really it should have been a thumbs down because of these facts.
God is great 🙏
Dear Francis. God is not great. God is the greatest.
@Francis. It was not my intention to ridicule your comment. Just to clear the sky. 😊
@Paul. I enjoy your uploads. Keep them coming! New subscriber :)
@@scabraw i understand. No offence taken.
God is my only judge.
God is great 🙏
@@francisjones4199
Are you a Muslim or a Christian?
I invite you to Islam.
On the subject of GOD and worship:
Jesus and the Muslim are ALREADY on the same side. UNFORTUNATELY, Christianity / Christians are AGAINST Jesus.
The Muslim worships whom Jesus worships.
UNFORTUNATELY, misguided by false teachers, Christianity is 🚩 AGAINST Jesus. The Bible testifies 🔥
Jesus gave the Trinity-DESTROYING testimony that THE FATHER IS THE ONLY TRUE GOD but YOU Christians testify that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit (The Trinity) is the true God.
John 4:21-22
Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, *WORSHIP THE FATHER* .
Ye worship ye know not what: *WE* know what *WE WORSHIP* : for salvation is of the Jews.
Have another look:
*WE WORSHIP*
(The Jews INCLUDING ME - Jesus)
“And this is life eternal, that they might know *YOU THE ONLY TRUE GOD* , and Jesus Christ, whom *YOU* have sent.”
John 17:3
John 20:17: “Jesus saith unto her, ...I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and TO MY GOD, AND YOUR GOD.”
Have another look!
".... *TO MY GOD and YOUR GOD* "
ME and YOU 👉 *WE*
*WE WORSHIP*
THE ONLY TRUE GOD - THE FATHER who is THE GOD OF ME (Jesus) and YOU 👉 *OUR GOD*
And Jesus answered him, THE FIRST OF ALL the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord *OUR GOD* is one Lord
Mark 12:29
Jesus teaches: “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and *HIM ONLY* shalt thou serve” Luke 4:8. Notice the words: “HIM ONLY.” Jesus did not say “US only,” or “Him and I only.” How could he possibly i it more clear than that? Jesus told to worship ONLY THE FATHER - who is THE GOD of Jesus too.
thank u for simplifying the information for us, I'm learning english , and I find it difficult sometimes to understand what u what to say , jazakallah khairan PAUL👍🤲
@@amuthi1 yes , what's the problem my friend ???
are u afraid ??
@@amuthi1 why??
@@davidzack8735 did you get anything from insulting the prophet the whole summer ??
David , your life is limited , nobody knows the the time that we are going to die in, maybe tomorrow , or today ,or the next minute !
everything is clear , the path of the truth is clear , now , you have the key to choose , wich gate do u want to enter , hell or heaven ? there is no other choice !
peace. 🕊
@@yangwang9460 he chose logic and heart over mere fear
@@rohithm3508 we shouldn't accuse islam (as a whole religion) because we had seen a man who has a beard committed a crime
Never trust statistics. As most of the wars with historical written records were between European countries and these would be grouped in the "Christian" column, I would expect the largest number to be there. We should also not forget that WW1 and 2 had more deaths (military and civilian) than most previous wars put together. The whole topic is far more complex than presented here.
No it's not complex at all. Religion has been used to justify political agenda and wars have been a very good tool to establish power and wealth.
The western media outcries and vile portraiture of Islam that it is millitant and this and that, should look in the mirror. Instead want us to think that it's complex and somehow only deaths in wars involving islamic rulers were very bad.
@@shaikhahmed7929 yeah, yup is simple, Islamic came with peace ,only defend and had to do war when they came for it, for some ruler , some Islamic ruler is accepting Islam by peace but still using old method way of rules, but not in Islamic way. And not many were bad ruler, some came and give freedom and good leadership, and another one about world war, there some complicate history in our part of nation been delete by the European but they do it for wealth yeah but also but also for Christianity, how they do I it is not the same as Islamic way of doing war. Total damn evil of how people of Christianity torture us down for your own benefit ,force people from Islamic believe that had good term with other and had friendly peace of mind to devastated way of life, how they do it? .... my heart will break if i heard it more, own still now a day missionary came to back of the jungle wanna force ingenious people and brainwash them in front of muslim? Well we still said, what the heck you do, but we mind our business, is up to them anyway, ... you know what they make ? Some outsider even asking why we give ingenious people a cloth? Hey ..they got satellite tv earlier than , then I found out that our part of empayar is the biggest contributions in wealth in Otthoman Empayar and they seem to knew about it, and start hit here with war agenda , whe I learn about it, they aim really most heinous religious crime and now they wanna said that they the pious one, even my friend from Poland said Britain is barbaric and I wonder the triggered came. Muslim people became to peaceful and became to nice to trust them that we think is religious but is a total scam, I still like Japanese still even they do came here and do war, atleast they knew better and straightforward... then Hiroshima came , for than more than 300 year we war with outsider what you think how much we lost and we were hold Islamic way of life with many wealth technology, herbalism and art,..all that gone and been take by others name, how I knew about this, we found our book guide in Maritime in US army, a book about our long lost history with some Canadian family, and then we make a whole history real life time around the Islamic history that different than world teaching. Seem complicate with long word right? But simple....is happened because wealth (people who not believe God who do this,) and the Christianity thing, ..then came communism effected civil war between the nation, family killed family not even think so I believe atheism came into action of influence. Now today you guys ,Christian and atheism wanna put a needle to contribute civil war in the nation even make new doctrines and devided more simple thing? I feel I like how Japan closed the door but still doing fine until American came with warship? Come on guys... we do our own thing but why they wanna but in so much, is so simple right?
And another thing, few years ago I heard about European wanna some our material here but forcing with , uuuhummm... so think about it... war? Yeah is simple ...
Actually, if the "standards" in categorizing wars like you mentioned above were to be applied on all wars disregard of religions, almost all of the wars that involved Islam can be categorized as caused by political factors instead of religion factors. There were very few wars that the real and sole cause of the conflict was religion, like the crusades, or wars during early Islam. Even the wars during the first and second caliphs of Islam could be attributed to the meddling of the Persian empire at the time that started to see the united Arabs as a threat to them by using their proxy states. So in a nutshell, by using the same definition that you may want to apply to refute the statistics, that would make it even less wars that could be attributed directly to Islam.
@@yadashare9014 you not understand, it is involved Christian... for you to said political , you know very much that church rule as monopoly in govern also, don't ever say it is not. You do not know about oriental school ? Huhuhuhu .... for you to say it not while it is. Lots of you still wanna ditch it like that while we already see it through?
Wow shocking facts. Thank Allah SWT for Islam - a gift to mankind.
There is only one most violent religion! The one and only religion which advises its followers to conduct holy war to bring the whole world under its fold!
The last 1400 years of its history is the clear evidence! Right from inception its goal was to conduct raids, war and violence in order to forcefully spread it and impose it!
The same religion attacked Jerusalem, Europe and India with sole intention of imposing that religion!
Balkan wars! Eastern Europe suffered so much for centuries!
India suffered so much for centuries!
Its own female population suffered for centuries!
Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists all suffered under them!
What God of Bible foretold almost 4000 years ago, got fulfilled in history till date and also getting fulfilled right before our eyes!
Genesis 16: 7 And the angel of Jehovah found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur. 8 And he said, Hagar, Sarai’s handmaid, whence camest thou? and whither goest thou? And she said, I am fleeing from the face of my mistress Sarai. 9 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands. 10 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, I will greatly multiply thy seed, that it shall not be numbered for multitude. 11 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son; and thou shalt call his name Ishmael, because Jehovah hath heard thy affliction. 12 And he shall be as a wild ass among men; his hand shall be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell over against all his brethren. 13 And she called the name of Jehovah that spake unto her, Thou art a God that seeth: for she said, Have I even here looked after him that seeth me? 14 Wherefore the well was called Beer-lahai-roi; behold, it is between Kadesh and Bered.
@@truthprevails5173 your deception doesn't work anymore
@@truthprevails5173 lol 2 billions muslim then should wage war on u because u told them to? doesnt make sense, u want us to kill u? but why do u want to die? dnt u want to live life..
@Khorasan They don't because, if they do, then they are digging their own grave, purging more than a quarter of humankind. The west will kiss goodbye to their leniency.
@@slinc129 but wts the point of war the west wants us to wage? like just why, invading countries is not enought for them? its gonna be a graveyard for humanity
Thanks a lot Paul for academic enlightenment which is truly needed in rational world of debates. ❤️
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029 certainly, Islam urges for jihad or holy war that's essentially required first for your personality that's looking under the influence of anger and hatred. Plz restore balance and talk as a sensible man that only on issues or subject of differences based on rationality and logic.
@@naturegirl4803 I'm just appealing to reason. Does it seem irrational to you what I said ??? The old man, like many others like him who tries to convince that Islam is either superior or at least other religions are inferior, has an ambiguous presentation that falls prey to exactly those who do not know how to think. He casts the stigma of violence on other religions, although the wars in the geographical area of those religions were POLITICALLY motivated (NO religious ideology), the religion being ONLY a pretext. The difference I pointed out is that ONLY Islam preaches war in its very teachings. NO other religion does such a thing. So it is essential that we do NOT confuse the destruction caused by religious pretexts (all religions, except Islam) with those caused by religious ideology (Islam).
@@dannicu2029 if you were rational, you won't raise these questions after watching his video showing history of wars and the real perpetrators. The other doubt you have of superiority of Islam over other religions..... Islam never denounces other religions but preaches its own and truth of nature that lies in laws of nature and stresses upon the one omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient Who is creater of whole universe. Other religion believers accept Islam as a superior ideology of life but person like me or Paul or any brainy accept Islam as a absolute truth after assessing the true nature of things.
History tells that man fought war as you spoke rightly, for the cause of his self conceived goodness e.g. territory, influence, descendents, wealth, resources, power and so on based on self preservation. And still be predicted to be on for such grounds.
But Islam has fixed the causes of war to be waged on certain grounds in holy book, Quran. because God knows that if sustainence of peace be left on human being, he will show only his self preservation imminent in physical laws and will fight for the vested interests as mentioned above but the divine guidance came for higher purpose of his life and controlled him in the vicinity of guidelines of war as war is important to stopcorruption, cruelty or lawlessness in state or country and to support poor, destitute and innocent. Moreover, any kind of violence or chaos is forbidden in Islam. This is the ideological stand in Islam immensely needed to any lawful society or country.
@@naturegirl4803 It seems that you do not have the minimum ability to use the brain. Well, I just explained to you that, with the exception of Islam, religion did NOT determine wars. But they had POLITICAL motives and religious PRETEXTS. If they had religious motives, we would have found in the ideology of those religions urges or obligations to start and wage wars with other believers. You can find such a thing ONLY in Islam. To say that Islam is superior to other religions is high-class nonsense. Islam is hundreds of years behind Christianity, it is a primitive and false religion. If you had the ability to think rationally, about life you would understand that this is the case. If the Qur'an were the word of God, as Muslims claim, then it would be without error. But the Qur'an is full of mistakes. Therefore, it is not the word of God, but the word of Muhammad. You say that Islam does not denounce other religions. Are you blind or have perception problems? Well, the video in question does just that, casting a stigma on religions for events that are NOT the effects of religions. You must first learn that religion MEANS the ideology, the teachings, NOT the practices of self-declared believers such as those who waged FALSE religious wars (crusades, for example, that were REALLY politically motivated: the struggle for resources). You either have no idea about Islam, or you have the impression that we are idiots. You say that Islam is only peace and goodwill. All smart people know Islam is a religion of violence, lust, murder, pedophilia, lie, etc. Let's see about incitement to murder, for the beginning:
Sahih Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to FIGHT AGAINST people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah."
Sahih Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'." Sahih Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to BURN all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, BURNING THEM ALIVE inside their homes." Sahih Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and JIHAD in His cause..." Sahih Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: JIHAD in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!" Sahih Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'"Sahih Bukhari (52:260) - "...The Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, KILL him.' " Sahih Bukhari (83:37) - "Allah's Apostle never KILLED anyone except in one of the following three situations: (1) A person who killed somebody unjustly, was killed (in Qisas,) (2) a married person who committed illegal sexual intercourse and (3) a man who fought against Allah and His Apostle and deserted Islam and became an apostate." See also Sahih Bukhari (83:17) Sahih Bukhari (84:57) - [In the words of] "Allah's Apostle, 'Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then KILL him.'" Sahih Bukhari (89:271) - A man who embraces Islam, then reverts to Judaism is to be KILLED according to "the verdict of Allah and his apostle."
We will continue with pedophilia, rape, lust, sex slavery, etc. ALL PREACHES BY ISLAM. NO OTHER RELIGION DOES THIS.
Thanks for doing this, Paul. It has been on my bucket list, but just cant make it real
rissc.jo/books/War-Peace-Islam.pdf
NO RELIGION, except Islam, caused deaths for PURELY ideological reasons. Please be smart and differentiate between pretext and ideology. This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@BloggingTheology what about isis??!?
what about Jewish and Isreal.
what about mass killings of Buddhists and Jains by Hindus?!
I don't trust this data
@@dannicu2029 not really, all religions have done this except Buddhism and jainsim.
that statement of jihad became popular after they wanted to cause chaos in the middle east for oil.
watch out what will happen in the next big natural resources which are phosphate mines in Morocco. (I'm sure they will make another war there)
by the way, Quran was not written till 6th century.
Muslims didn't know much about their religion.
look for aramaic readings of Quran, there's no mention of 72 virgins.
Thanks for sharing❤
Jazakallah for the online copy. I'll probably finish reading it in a few days.
Please share with me the link for the book.
@@husseinissackhassan924 it's in the video description
pls stop killing the hindus, jews, atheists and christians they dont deserve it.
Your channel is a blessing and treasure of knowledge, by the Will of Allah🖤 JazakhAllahu khaira!
The Mugals wete muslims according to Wiki.when they arrived in India the population was 200 million ..by the time they left the population declined to 120 million ...ie Islam killed 80 milliom Hindus ???.
I dont see this here
@@basdeo666 but they put forth a common ignorant statement moguls were so peacefuls if not they would converter whole India to Islam.
@@sk-pg8zd they couldn't convert because Indian rulers gave resistance.
Subhan'Allah, the truth is an amazing thing when we live in a world where literally everything is being turned on its head.
La hawla wala quwata illa bè Illah.
Christian will never lost the war even in the near future if any one attack on Christian nation. Christian' s countries has won so many wars on retaliation.
@@TheVoice1616 What about Afghanistan defeat???
Islam did not have to kill as many people as christianity. Treat non muslims like third class citizens, paying big jizya, and countless female slaves and male slaves as soldiers, and call it "islamic tolerance". It was in the interest of muslim rulers to kill or convert their dhimmi subjects, they were a huge source of state treasury through jizya. Money rules first ignorant muslims not Allah for most of them and most muslims too.
Thank you… good job
MashaAllah, as always, insightful Paul.
Great episode should be translated to many languages so people can see the truth, maybe the whole world should know this. Great work brother Paul
The whole world must know about this. It will shut up alot of mouths...except the ignorants. The positive is, they would publicly stand out.
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029 that’s why Islam gave birth to Saladin , Omar bin Abdul aziz, tipi sultan , etc. name me one person in western civilization who went bankrupt trying to help his enemies and feed them when enemy soldiers were hungry but still fighting him ? Pathetic , name me one person among your kind who was half a man a Salauddin
@@bigdaddy7729 Child, this is NOT the point. Read again what I said, otherwise I can think you are stupid. It is NOT about an etic code. In Islam ideology it is ABOUT COMMAND TO MURDER OTHERS THAN YOU.
@@dannicu2029 sakauddin was following Islam , so was Hassan bin and Hussein bin Ali , it’s like me magnifying on priests in church and saying that’s Christianity , or what jaianese did in Nanking and claim that’s bhuddism . One of the sign of stupidity is they think they know better than known scholars , this guy here give you scholarly point of view and proofs , I asked you if you think Islam is evil show me better guys Europe has produce than salauddin , Hussein bin Ali, or the Sufi ruin etc but you try to divert. All the worst dictators in Islam combined can’t hold a candle to killings of Stalin and Churchill , both Christians. That is my point .
This is going to be interesting.
Brother/ sister .I suggest u to change u r d p .bcuz it resembles the. One eye of dajjal.
@@syednuman9557 the pp reprents the genocide of turkistani or xinjiang muslims by ccp chinese communist party
The question of the most violent religion has been definitively answered. Danish researcher Tina Magaard, Ph.D. concluded that Islam is the most warlike religion. After three years analyzing the original texts of ten different religions, Tina Magaard concluded that the Islamic texts stand out by encouraging terror and fighting "to a far larger degree than the original texts of other religions. The texts in Islam distinguish themselves from the texts of other religions by encouraging violence and aggression against people with other religious beliefs to a larger degree.” The largest religious genocide in history occurred due to the Islamic conquest of India. Forty million Hindus were killed.
Facts!
bro cant handle the truth
The crusade for sure the most violent during jerusalem invasion, alongside with mongols during invasion of baghdad.
Not gonna forget...those Christians just think that crusade just against muslim but didnt they learn that they also got northen crusades against pagans
@@curiosity-educationalchann1041 also in Africa and America
@@curiosity-educationalchann1041 exactly 😤🤨
@@davidzack8735 false assumptions 😤
There is only one most violent religion! The one and only religion which advises its followers to conduct holy war to bring the whole world under its fold!
The last 1400 years of its history is the clear evidence! Right from inception its goal was to conduct raids, war and violence in order to forcefully spread it and impose it!
The same religion attacked Jerusalem, Europe and India with sole intention of imposing that religion!
Balkan wars! Eastern Europe suffered so much for centuries!
India suffered so much for centuries!
Its own female population suffered for centuries!
Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists all suffered under them!
What God of Bible foretold almost 4000 years ago, got fulfilled in history till date and also getting fulfilled right before our eyes!
Genesis 16: 7 And the angel of Jehovah found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur. 8 And he said, Hagar, Sarai’s handmaid, whence camest thou? and whither goest thou? And she said, I am fleeing from the face of my mistress Sarai. 9 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands. 10 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, I will greatly multiply thy seed, that it shall not be numbered for multitude. 11 And the angel of Jehovah said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son; and thou shalt call his name Ishmael, because Jehovah hath heard thy affliction. 12 And he shall be as a wild ass among men; his hand shall be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell over against all his brethren. 13 And she called the name of Jehovah that spake unto her, Thou art a God that seeth: for she said, Have I even here looked after him that seeth me? 14 Wherefore the well was called Beer-lahai-roi; behold, it is between Kadesh and Bered.
Amazing book recommendation👍🏽 Thank you
Very good research Paul.
So many people choosing to remain ignorant. Thanks for this video.
❤❤Peaceful Islam has the best heavenly rewards. For dead Male muslims in jannah:
❤Quran 78:33.Allah promised muslim men will get young voluptuous big breasted women.
❤Sahih Sunan Ibn Majah 4337: Messenger of Allah promised "In heaven, Allah will marry each man to 72 wives-2 transparent houris virgins & 70 females taken fr hell.All will hv nice organs.And he will hv ever-erect male penis part."
❤Sahih Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2562
Messenger said:"The least of the people of Jannah is the one with eighty thousand (virgin boys) servants and seventy-two wives."
❤Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2536
"Believer shall be given the sex strength of 100 men for intercourse in jannah."
❤Quran 47:15.Allah promised rivers of alcohol to drink & drink
❤Quran 36:56-58: Muslim man will recline on couches with their virgins
❤There will be markets with pics of men & women.If any man desires any of them, he can enter the pics and hv sexual relations with them.
Thank you Paul for this very informative data. It definitely dispels a lot of misconceptions about violence in Islam.
Yes... the misconceptions about Islam seem to multiply. But so do the misconceptions about Christianity. Who can help us to correct those misunderstandings? Peace
leads me to the question why do so many Muslims pay a lot of money to human trafficker to go live with the dangerous Christians. They even cling to US planes.
When was the last time a Kath. Christian blew up a Protestant church ?
Goggle "mosque dead" you get 59.300.000 hits . Please Muslims stay in your save islamic countries the west is too dangerous.
@@SheikhAlladeen and goole 'what is the fast growing religion in the world" the answer is Isam .
@@zaidabaig9571 now MBS is become a ex Muslim
@@exmuhammadsheikhofficials3447 He was not practicing Islamic teachings at no time.
Wow this is a brilliant research done by u brother Paul . Really appreciate ur work. Whole heartedly I pray to Allah that He reward u with the highest rank in Jannah. Ameen.
Peace be upon you.... ❤
Jazak Allahu Kairoon...
May Allah reward you..
Thanks for sharing the link
Great find bro
Thank you for showing and introduce to us alot of information and give us more knowlage and evidnace in basically every video , and I will give it a try and check the books that you mention .
Thank you so much for this information and for all your efforts on this blog! May God reward you in both worlds!
Innocent dies unfairly in deprivation and destitution in the hands of tyrants while the tyrants die in dignity and in great comfort. That tells us, justice is delayed to a supreme court where all will be dealt with swiftly.
We can easily conclude Paradise is not cheap nor is Hell unnecessary! (Bediüzzaman Said Nursi)
Hinduism is not even mentioned in this unwanted list. Most peaceful religion is evident without doubt.
I thought Hinduism is not a religion. Just yesterday a Hindu told me that even if s person a Christian they still can be Hindu. They told me that Hindu is a way of life and not religion. I'm so confused, which one is the truth?
Also thank you for "translating" to understandable English.
love your work. keep it up ❤️
Thank you! Will do!
Assalamu alaikum Mr. Paul
I hope this academic work took into account genocides
For example we find The Cambodian genocide
It was the systematic persecution and killing of Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge under the leadership of Pol Pot (an athiest)...
Resulted in the deaths of 1.5 to 2 million people from 1975 to 1979, nearly a quarter of Cambodia's 1975 population....
Best to check in the book, link in description
this book is a joke. created by clowns for the clowns whom are dumb deaf n blinded!!! thoth comes to my mind. lool
@@salmaa2871
Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says.
Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages , which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.
@@salmaa2871 ad hominem at its finest
Not just attacking the author..but it's readers, hence the book is a joke... without any actual academic reason to it, nor providing any alternative academic data.
Conclusion : useless comment
@@salmaa2871 I would love to know what brought you to such understanding resulting that statement?
Which is the most violent religion today who had killed 3 to4 million Muslims in Iraq , Afghanistan and Syria.
@@rohithm3508 first of all the calculation of casualties are done by those scholars who said Iraq have chemical weapons.you don’t listen to your news maybe your hellery former foreign minister of America admitted in e mails leakage scandal that IsIS was made by CIA of America. In the era of Sadam Hussain that region was quite peaceful no suicidal attacks. Where ever in Asia christens soldiers reached conspiracies were also formed. Muslims blood was everywhere. Syria was also peaceful until christens soldiers were at their home. More than twenty years had passed Muslims are still waiting the solid proof against osama bin Ladin. Mula Ummar also asked solid proof against osama. If American had provided it to Mula ummar they didn’t needed the war. Osama could be handed over to them. As I have already told christens directed a full drama of terrorism in which ten million Muslims are killed. Where ever in Muslim region christens forces put their feet blood of Muslims falling not only in that region but around also
Show me a Muslim country which wasn't invaded by force. Even Makkah was captured by the prophet himself hy surrounding it through a huge army.
Indonesia
Philippine.
@@masha3352 There was some violence in Indonesia too. The Sultan of Aceh was a good ottoman vassal. But no there was not so much violence that is why indonesians are the most normal people in the muslim world. They give their muslim kids hindu names till today and have preserved their heritage and do not deny their ancestors.(I am not hindu).
Anywhere else see what happened.
islam exists in india before invasion lol
Thank you very much Paul. You are doing things of a lot of benefit. May Allah be with you always and reward you with the best
Salaam brother. I was actually discussing this subject online a few days ago. As expected, the people rushed to defend their ideologies with nuance while not granting such rights to others.
I think it's the Christians. World War 1 and 2 was caused by Christians
Proud to be a Hindu. The most Peaceful & yet more ancient religion.
First time I heard numbers about this. How clever of the author simply to count.
Well, these are the facts. Impossible to run away from them. These figures should be known by the world in order to exercise some necessary reflection.
Even I was surprised, I was prejudiced, biased. Ignorance can be a terrible thing.
👍🏽😘
@@amuthi1 the Mughals ruled India for 350 years and 82% of the country was still Hindu.
Didn't sound like a bloodthirsty bunch to me.
@@chains84 Mughals not only ruled India but also Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. All of those country were non- Muslim. Now you do your math.
These facts are known , unfortunately due to subjective, prejudice, ignorance of the country govt and education system doesn't want the the ppl to know . Individual ppl need to educate themselves
@@mukulrayhan9683 that region afghanistan,pakistan and bangladesh are muslim before the mughal came to india.. please learn your own history..before mughal there are Delhi empayer sultanate that most of them are from aghan region..if not because of muslim sultanate than your region will be on fire because of monggol violence..look at the past picture of your comunity that mosly half naked people and still in five thousand year of lifestyle.that why your people being rules by modest muslim during that day..
@@mukulrayhan9683 I learn your history in my A level study bro..
A peek at the total death-toll distribution chart is really an eye-opening.
@@amuthi1 🤔🤔🤔 does it also count the number of indian muslim "killed by cow"
@amuthi1 Your out of luck. Some facts are simply unheard of in the West. I think you Hindus must make your story known more loudly.
Here in Malaysia we have our very own history how the Portuguese came with the intention to "trade for our spices" where they brought like 18 ships of men forces and they brought their priests along..you know the rest of the story 💁🏻♀️
They didn’t just spilled blood but forced nd succeeded in changing the ideologies of ppl. For example before the colonialism movement off Europe the islamic world had little racism nd was extremely diverse in colors nd races but after the colonialism the hate for darker skin colors increased dramatically. They stamped ppl with their ugly habits.
@@davidzack8735 they never talked about Muhammad’s skin color the expression they used in Arabic doesn’t mean white it means bright there r deference between the two. From the description of my great grandmother she would always emphasize on how arabs before the colonialism where always marrying ppl of deferent races nd colors her being Indonesian but when the colonialism started the practice stopped. Ppl who where black or had a black family members where treated badly by the English army.
@@davidzack8735 “an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor does a non-Arab have superiority over an Arab and a person of lighter skin has no superiority over a person of darker skin or vice versa”
@@davidzack8735 so they continued the slave trade after the 1860’s? Where is the proof. Also where is the proof that he pointed to a black man and said that’s what the devil looks like
@@davidzack8735 show it
Salute you sir for your honesty and sharing all this knowledge with us
I love your honesty ❤️❤️❤️❤️.
You don't care about the consequences rather performing your Godly Duty and showing the Truth. 🌺🌸🌼🌸🌺🌸🌼🌸🌺🌼🌸
This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029 he a brain donor?
@@dannicu2029 btw just curious can you tell me where it says that.
@@DDRSOMEONE Says what? Be specific. Tell me what you don;t understand.
@@dannicu2029 where it says where war is ideologically motivated in islam.
Nice to see a fellow brit keeping theological tradition alive and well!
I'd be interested in seeing these figures but with some degree of quantitative population generalisation e.g. taking into account deaths per practitioner of said ideology and as percentage of world population means at each respective loci in time or something along those lines
Very interesting sir. If only your video has Indonesian subtittle I could share to more audience here.
I have just added them.
@@BloggingTheology ok I will check it
May Allah reward u 4 your effort. AamiinX3
Oh no this is going to upset alot of ppl 😢 but they will simply ignore it because they don't have time to do own research so they will it a lie and sleep on it like it never existed 😴
NO RELIGION, except Islam, caused deaths for PURELY ideological reasons. Please be smart and differentiate between pretext and ideology. This old man is a poor brain donor. Or he's a bastard. ONLY FOOLS CONFUSE THE IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATED WAR OF RELIGION WITH THE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WAR BUT WHICH USES RELIGIOUS PRETEXTS. IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED WAR IS SPECIFIC TO ISLAM, ALL OTHER CIVILIZATIONS USED ONLY RELIGIOUS PRETEXTE. NO other religion has an ideology that forces believers to war. But Islam has an ideology that OBLIGES its believers to wage wars of conquest and conversion to Islam of believers of other religions. It's called Jihad.
@@dannicu2029
What about Protestant Vs Catholic Wars??
Jihad means to struggle.Even you do Jihad everyday to wake up.
@@Aquacrystal78 Show me in the New Testament the command to the catholics to kill protestants or vice-versa. And then we can discuss about religious war. Otherwise, it is ONLY a political war, with religious PRETEXT. FALSE RELIGIOUS WAR. Get the point?
@@Aquacrystal78 This is RELIGIOUS MOTIVATED WAR:
QUR’AN - Surah At-Tawbah, 9-29: “FIGHT those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [FIGHT] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” Etc.
Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says.
Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages , which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.
@@rohithm3508
So old testament is not god words. Christianity begins from the new testament.
Thanks good wishes an congratulations from the core of my heart.
Man....we people of indian sub continent are the most peace loving people😦....truly.... Wasn’t expecting that😄💖
@@mohammadhooksit thats true in some area😆....but the reality is different.... In this graph most of the time it shows killing of other nation not internal conflict.... People of indian sub continent hardly invaded other nation...if you read the history of indic people you will see they were in battle most of the time.....they were busy fighting each other😆.....every king of indian sub continent had to spent 80% of there wealth fighting with other kingdom of the sub continent..... Some king tried to invade foreign land but had to back up bcz there own home land was Being fucked up 😆😆😆so thats why there is so few kiling of indic people....but if you count internal conflict of indic people they will be in very high place....atleast 2million people died in battle of kalinga alone....and there was Kamasutra.... So you know 😐😐😐😂😂😂
@@jamilurrezachowdhury6586 thats y we still are second most populated country after so many killings😂😂😂
Not anymore.
@@leodarksam6230 wadyumean?
@@jamilurrezachowdhury6586 well, it's not true , Indian develop many advanced math, science, medicine because they was very stable than others ,
To those people who says christianity is a peaceful religion.
My question is: Name one christian country in medieval period or before that which was tolerant to other religious group?
The answer: None
Christianity a peaceful religion? How many cultures Christianity destroyed? Everything in South America, everything on European, Russian area and keep counting.
And europe used to be hellenistic and pagan, but christianity forced it upon them
Ikr , Christian churches give clear chit that non Christian land is no man land and Christian can not have sin plundering no man land and making slave to non Christian pagans
That was mainly a political issue not a war for religious reasons
Most wars are for ideological reasons not religious
WW2 was because of Fascism
USA wasn’t founded as religious state neither Russia
Thank you so much for the book ...Mr Paul...
Im surprised i must say. I thought any religious civilisation would allow their teachings to control their moral compass a lot more. But what I’m not surprised at is the section of civilisation in second place.
I pray for more peace, love and understanding in this world.
God is great 🙏
they do. but schism turns them hostile to each other. hence sectarian violence that leads to religious discord. and 3 biggest creeds of Abrahamic religion experienced it all the same. there were inter-same_faith conflicts (i.e inter-Judaism conflict, inter-Christian conflict, inter-Islam conflict)
and i can't speak about Christianity since I'm not even a Christian. but seemingly, in the context of inter-same_faith conflict, every muslim belligerents in such conflicts holds a bottom line that helps keep the toll low.
and it was _Shahadah._ the Prophet ﷺ condemns any muslims who killed anyone who are clearly reciting shahadah.
and by extension, the Prophet ﷺ also condemns muslims who killed a _Mu'ahid_ (a person who is granted the pledge of protection by the Muslims) in the time of conflict.
that is something we don't know whether other religious civilization's jurisprudence also have something in common.
AFAIK, this statistics are across 2K years , religious civilizations existed for most of those, but "atheist civilization" should have only lasted for about 2 centuries.
Thank you dear sir
But christian will say christianity had nothing to do with what European did to the world.
Oops 🤭
@Magma budiman Our khaiph ruled with justice and kindness. You will never find any genocide done by any Muslim ruler.
Exactly. European violence got nothing to do with Jesus and his laws
@@alex17252 European stole money from Afriac and asia, america and then put that money into research thus your have developed your science and technologies. You democracy yes but morality? What a joke.
@@alex17252 Stop your fairy tales. You did not make rich those colonised countries. You colonised rich peaceful countries. Whenever christian countries attack any other countries you say christianity has nothing to do with it but we know European history.
Thank you so much for the link to read the book. May Allah reward you, ameen!
Qur'an
(2:256) There is no compulsion in religion.
( 18:29) Whoever wills-let him believe. And whoever wills-let him disbelieve”
@@davidzack8735 whatever helps you sleep buddy.
@@davidzack8735 We should report this channel for giving Christianity a bad image. This guy doesn't even give references to any of his claims, he just utters whatever comes to his mind. How do we report the channel?
@@davidzack8735 Do we need to learn Quran from islamophobia idiot? Who gave you the authority to teach Quran to Muslim?
@@madrobin742 report to your daddy !! This guy does not say anything without backing up by works of scholar or historians. So even your dad won’t listen to your complaints
@@davidzack8735 polytheistic Christians use taqqiya to pretend they worship one not 3
Does the author take into account the size of earths population at the time of killings? What was the number of people living during Djingis Kahns and Kublai Kahns wars? What was the world population 1939 - 1945? Deaths relative population?
exactly, my question
Read the book to find out
Exactly my argument. Moreover, people died of misery due to religion, for example casteism in India. How did they count these numbers ?
The book is written by islamic scholars. Of course they will try to save their religion.
Yes many many problems in doing this cherry picked statistical analysis with many factors which severely skew the interpretation and even the categorising of the statistics here. Clearly this was done with a very strong pro islam bias to get more people on board to this chameleon of a religion.
Yes, the author takes that in consideration, he takes into account earth population and the percentage of every civilization throughtout history (0-2008). Read it, it's only one section of the book, the whole study is only about 20 pages or so.
Oh God, I hope this will not upset a certain Religion/Civilization and cause them to wage another retaliatory war!
The reason why he mentioned Buddhism in ww2 was because of Japan involvement just search the mass acare of Nanjing.
Sorry Nad ,,,, Japanese are not Buddhist rather majority follows Shintoism and the Nanjing peoples ( Northern China) are Taoists and Confucius etc.........The Buddhists centre is South and East Asia.......
@@dexter-ks7rz "Religion in Japan manifests primarily in Shinto and in Buddhism, the two main faiths, which Japanese people often practice simultaneously" from Wikipedia
Buddhism was carried outside of India by monks wielding swords. The genocide of the Rohinga is led by buddhist monks also.
Amazing work!
Every time you point a finger in scorn-there are three remaining fingers pointing right back at you. Good job Christians
_Not surprising, According to Matthew 10:34 - jesus says; Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. _*_I did not come to bring peace, but a sword._*_ And according to Luke 22:36 - jesus says; But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; _*_and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one_*
@@Matthew13-14 saying to cause genocide is parable?
When get caught , say it just a parable!!
@@davidzack8735 4 gospels which are not in harmony with each other
@@gamezsolution2566 that contradict each other
He was right? It was a prophecy.
@@davidzack8735 why they are 4 and not one.!?
I THINK the Crusade's are stil going on mass killings from the army of the Crusade's who are NATO NAVO and VN so what does Turkije have to do there as a NATO member .... Please see this Allahu Alem
What does Allah most high
Do to people who hide truth OR erase IT because of inconviniance ....
@@mehdimouhmy1882
Like day comes after night and night comes after day . Look at the history you will find your answer.
@@shahidachoudhury6925
I was not asking !?
I know (Allahu Alem),do you know.....!?
excellent work 👍🏼
What about non-war killings... resulting from unjustified prosecutions.. likes in prosecutions Black African in slave industries by European Christians, prosecutions of indigenous and aboriginals peoples during European Christians colonialisation periods and so on?
see underneath '7th-19th c arab slave trade' rug its all conveniently tallied up underneaththere
@@abd-co7le
Do you know for slaves there is law in Islam ?
A slave girl cannot be force for physical relationships .
Children of slave mother has equal rights their fathers property.
The reason there are some Muslims slave become great kings in India ,Spain and others countries .
Muslims are differ from others.
@Jesus Christ Is Alive The Atlantic slave trade was one of the darkest periods of history lasting from the 15th century to the 19th century..all done by people who brutalised the Africans on the plantations then went to Church on Sunday...the legacy of this barbarity is still with us today..I would advise you to check out Christian role in this slave trade including the Ku klux Klan who used the Cross as their symbol...right now evangelical Christians in USA use their vote to oppress black people in USA and also to de humanise migrants and Muslims...you simply cannot ever say Christians are peaceful..all evidence is against your notion!
@@uhuru1713
Do you know who is a Christian?
There are some biases in this list.
1. there are younger and older religions.
2. population density has a high variability.
Thus a smaller number of deaths may hide the proportional violence of a religion in its time.
Further we have to note that religions evolve thus they can not really be compared to their older issues.
There are even more potential sources of errors like different levels of technology, hegemony, varying population density, casus belli, cultural influences predating said religions, availability of historic records, economic necessity etc etc. There are so many vague and uncertain variables. How can anyone read this 'study's' abstract and think 'yeah that sounds perfectly scientific and reasonable'? Either he really doesn't understand these big red flags or he wants it to be true because it supports his own bias, I don't know what is worse
Yup i pointed out a lot of these problems, as well as the problem that you have to know whether the violence was a result of the religious doctrine or coincedental.
The atrocities which the Hindus of India did to Muslims at the time of the partition of India were ghastly and hideous. Eight million Muslims decided to migrate to Pakistan when they were in fear for their lives as a result of the barbaric attacks launched against those Muslims who decided to stay in India. Only three million of them managed to reach the Pakistani borders. The other five million were killed on the way. They were attacked by well organized Hindu militia. These were well known to the Indian government, and indeed were controlled by some highly placed officials in the Indian government itself. Those five million Muslims were slaughtered like sheep. Their bodies were left along the roads after many of them were disfigured in a way which was no less horrendous than what the Tartars of old did in Baghdad.
The most horrible single incident was that involving the train which carried no less than 5,000 Muslim employees from different parts of India on their way to Pakistan. It was agreed at the time when the partition agreement was made that any government official who wanted to migrate to Pakistan would be allowed to do so. The train carried all those thousands of employees. It had to travel through a tunnel at the Khaybar Pass close to the borders, but when the train came out of the tunnel, it carried no living soul. Its cargo was nothing other than the dead bodies of all its passengers, having been torn to pieces. What happened was that those same Hindu militia stopped the train inside the tunnel and killed all its passengers. The train was allowed to proceed only when this most ghastly massacre was over.
The atrocities of muslims to the Hindus for hundreds of years have no comparison to what you say.
And the British on purpose fueled communal tensions to partition India for their interests.
And i see how muslims treat muslims within Pakistan itself.
I think China must do to Pakistanis what it is doing to the terrorists in Xinjiang and deislamize vicious desi muslims.
No hindu has come to conquer foreign lands and force them. Even when they did they gave those lands a superior culture.
Indonesian muslims are not ashamed of their hindu ancestors but desi muslims and their fake two nation theory and self denial is incredibly psychotic.
Hindus have made their own mistakes but to compare it to your mughal idols, it is such a bad joke.
I am not from the Subcontinent, but I have been to Pakistan, which was created "to save muslims of India from hindu tyranny" and I saw what an islamic paradise it is. If you ask indian muslims whether they will endure Hindutva oppression or make hijra to Pakistan, they will never ever go to Pakistan.
I met with old pakistani muhajirs in Pakistan, more than their 90s.
One lady told me she deeply regrets for her "hijrah". Had she known what Pakistan would become she would have taken the pains to go to Makkah and Madinah even though she was a toddler when partition happened.
And not only millions of muslims but millions of sikhs and hindus forcibly left their homes in Pakistan from India.
The amount of ignorance is staggering in this comment.
The islamic conquest of India was one of the bluddiest in history, they came here swinging sword first and went on to kill convert r@pe enslave the millions and millions of Hindus, they destroyed 40000 temples, they are the reason Bharat was carved into 3 countries.
They were the first to start the violence during partition,
They started the direct action day.
They did the moplah massacre.
They did the kashmiri hindu genocide.
They killed and converted hindus in Malabar.
And after the partition hindu population of Pakistan went from 20% to 2%.
And look at the muslim population in india, the are breeding like rabbits thus becoming 3rd largest muslims population with over 200 millions.
Clearly shows which side is violent so stfu with your biased agenda and start studying history instead of kurand.
Unfortunately the killers demand that they are the most innocent people. Irony!
I think something to consider might also be the fact that civilizations with high levels of large massacres might also be related to the density of population in which those civilizations exhist and the high level of military competition and technological advancement that ensues. China and Western Europe and India being well reknown for relatively high densities of population throughout history thus capable of larger war scales
I believe associating killing with religion is a mistake to begin with. Even though we as Muslims could be tempted with these stats but we shouldnt fall under the same mistake. Killing “ in most of these cases” was Bi-product Of human tyranny and greed. With exception of very few cases/ incidents ( at least from my knowledge in Islam) killing was a direct execution of our interpretation of Islam. With all respect to the author I believe we shouldn’t allow the bad perception on Islam as a violent religion take us into these subjective arguments. In short , if a Muslim kills human that doesn’t by default means that Islam kills. The association is not that simple ..
l
Wow.... excellent comments you made. And I agree with you. Although I'm not Muslim, your observations can apply to any religion because, as you said, "tyranny and greed" are the strong influence for violence. So I would say that we should not correlate much of historical violence with any generalized statement such as "Islam kills" or "Christianity kills", etc.
Thanks so much for your views. I wish more Muslims would read your comments. Peace of God to you...
the point is to refute Islam as the most violent religion as accused by many non muslims..
Sorry, but Islam is the ONLY religion that urges to war. Islam preaches war. NO other religion does that.
Dan NICU you don’t have to be sorry but you should instead learn a bit more about Islam and a bit more about other religion to find that your claim is easily refuted. Ignorance is a problem my friend
@@BARBARANOU Your ignorance is a problem, indeed. Islam is nothing else but a religion of Satan (called Allah). ONLY Satan urges men to kill others men. Satan in disguise is Allah. you can try, IF you can, to prove my claims are wrong. Try, please.
ALHADOLILLAH thank you soo much for sharing. Great examples 🙏🙏💕💕🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Christian will never lost the war even in the near future if any one attack on Christian nation. Christian' s countries has won so many wars on retaliation.
Interesting findings. I am not a Christian, Jew nor an atheist, but as an academic empirical researcher (in social sciences), I would like to comment on these findings from a scientific/academic perspective.
The findings are indeed interesting. But in my opinion, they are interesting as they raise the need to dig deeper and try to understand why certain areas e.g. Europe/Soviet Union, countries or civilizations have caused or initiated the most of amount of wars or the most violence; but not to draw conclusions about which religion is the most violent as the video sometimes makes.
In my humble opinion, the findings suffer from many limitations to draw conclusion about which relgion is the most violent as the catchy title of the video asks.
First, it is difficult, yet very important to identify the "real/true" motive behind a violent act such as a war. In other words, it is important to understand whether it was due to material motives, ideologocal motives other than religions, or religious motives. If the motive such as the motives behind WWI were not religious, then it would be very misleading and unfair to claim that a religion is violent because of that. What makes it even harder is that often, violent acts were often undertaken under the name of religion but for purely material motives, which would also make the conclusion and judgement on the religion itself misleading and unfair.
Second, I find it very important to control for certain factors/variables especially power e.g. political power, economic power, military power or even the size of the population, or at least to show their distribution (as it was done for the number of deaths causedl) before drawing any conclusions. This is because, especially back in the days, often the ones with the most power were the most violent and aggressive; simply because they are more powerful. It is more common for a big and powerful country to invade a smaller and weaker one rather than the other way round. Thus, the reason for countries/regions with certain religions not to be violent might not be due to their religion being less violent, but because they did not have much power to do so. The question is, if they had as much power, would they be less violent?
May be a better way to try to answer the question of the video is to study how the different religions or atheism were spread or have become dominant in their regions e.g. how did Christianity become the dominant religion in Europe/USA, how did Buddhism become dominant in some parts of Asia and how did Islam become dominant in the Middle East? Is it by using violent or non-violent measures?
I also find such empirical evidence without a deeper study of each religion's books/scriptures and doctrines lacking meaning and highly limited to answer the question the video is asking. I truly appreciate the effort done though.
Very true
The last one is not index civilization (as some are reading) 😅 but indic civilization i.e. Indian religion( Hinduism Sikhism etc.) and this small killing(major goes to partition done by Britishers) was due to continuous invasion by islamic and Christian forces from West despite a history longer than combined of Christianity and Islam both.
Not much discussion around this though the facts overall are interesting.
It's also the reason why Hinduism and Sikhism have largely been confined to India and the immediate surrounding area. But we should not fool ourselves into thinking that followers of these religions cannot be violent, even what's happening today contradicts that idea. Also, Indic religions are not older than Islam
The answer is Christianity. World war1and2Slavery and colonialism just to name a few
WW2 wasnt started by christians.
Even reason behind GEW waas nationaism, not christianity.
Slavery and colonialism has been done too a lot by marxists and muslims.
Christianity did not cause WW1 and WW2. You are so stupid
Islam has had a ton of slaves in their history as well, that parts almost equal
The Nazis were Christians, the Crusaders were Christians, the killers of Native Americans were Christians, the Spanish Inquisition were Christians, and the Americans were mostly Christians, and their crimes were in Iraq, Vietnam, and Japan.
the people who caused those are just misguided. they either misinterpreted the teachings of christianity, or got blinded by satan. muslims are very aware of what their quran says. and they kill kill kill.