The $1399 Sony 24mm F1.4 G Master Lens. A Stunner!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Subscribe: goo.gl/ouMuJt
Website: www.stevehuffph...
PRE ORDER the 24: bhpho.to/2OEjCrz
My Video Gear:
My #1: bhpho.to/2Beqyt4
My on the Go Camera: amzn.to/2wd5xdz
SMALL Vlog Camera that ROCKS: amzn.to/2PDCSXi
My GoTo Wide Video Lens: bhpho.to/2NicSii
My #1 Lens: bhpho.to/2BfEW4u
Canon 50 L 1.2: bhpho.to/2MtHlNd
A MUST for the Canon M: amzn.to/2P6cLXD
CHEAP but GOOD Lights: amzn.to/2P8Q9Gf
My Fave Microphone: amzn.to/2o9i5hv
Wireless Mic (do not spend more!): amzn.to/2BMRsJ4
My Camera Gear (stills):
Sony A7III: amzn.to/2BOgrf8
Most Underrated Sony Lens: amzn.to/2P76kUs
Sony 50 1.4: bhpho.to/2NfxkAl
Leica SL: bhpho.to/2B9y5cU
Bokehlicious: goo.gl/U2g63V
Voigtlander 50 f3.5: amzn.to/2BME8Er
Hasselblad X1D: bhpho.to/2nBNxVC
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W2D1 | Fall | ต่อเนื่อง ในสัปดาห์สอง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ElcO9uC_Dbk/mqdefault.jpg)
Suddenly I see 6 new videos on the new lens in my subscription feed -- all within 10 minutes! Excited about this lens. Thanks for posting!
My primary set of lenses is now Sony 24mm 1.4 GM, Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm
1.8 and Sony 135mm 1.8 GM, exellennt set of lenses, highly recommended !
Although I will like to see a better new version of the 55mm, a 60mm
allround macro lens will be very nice !
Now I need Sony to do exactly the same with a 35mm 1.4 G (small, light and weather sealed) and I will switch right away !
Now you will switch right away!
I wish Sony can make a 35mm f1.4 with this size and weight.
i hope so :)
Hell, I'd settle for a 1.8!!
How is it that literally everything you shoot on every lens looks so good?
6:02 - is that Ken Rockwell? :) I can see on his page he was there as well. I rind it really amazing that Sony invites him to their events. He's kind of a legend (the Chuck Norris of Photography) and he was always known as a Nikon guy, but Nikon never really invited him and he was there at A7III release as well. This makes me just love Sony even more as it really shows me how much they are connected to the community :)
How does it perform compared to Batis 25mm f2???
According to ur initial impressions
I just bought this lens. Love it! Cant wait to see what else sony brings out.
Nice video ! But Sony should have done a wider proposition in my opinion : 20mm for example. The Sigma Art 14mm f1.8 is great and I like it, but is too bulky and still has no competition... :/
You did an amazing video ! By the way ,I love your accent and your speed which makes me an English learner to practice my listening through your video ! 👍
I believe you mean 0.24 meters minimum focus distance not 0.24 inch.
yeah, it's around 10 inches for minimum focusing distance.
Not only did he emphasise 0.24 inches in his commentary, it’s also in his slide. Any photographer worth their salt would have definitely paused and checked their facts on such clearly outrageous claim (which is obviously a mistake). Does he really understand what any of the other stuff means?
that's really fucking close ahahah
Ramin M you’ve set a really low bar for what’s harsh. Ironically, you are now criticising me for suggesting that careless misinformation, reinforced in writing, might make us question the validity of the review.
24 is such a wonderful underrated focal length! I own a 25 Milvus and everytime I shoot with this lens I‘m blown away by its quality! However manual focus on an 1.4 is harder to focus as with an 85, so that a plus for the gmaster with its af🙂
I think the minimum focus on this is 0.24 meter - not 0.24 inches. That's actually a bit over 9 inches.
Yep, slip of the lip. 0.24 inches would be a bit crazy.
I have one pre ordered ,for my A7RIII, A7III, and A6500. Cheers
Thoughts on this vs the 25mm F2 Batis?
Love the intro. Might pick this lens up as a walk around lens. The 55mm zeiss isn't to bad but kept wanting something wider
I just got my Batis 25 f/2. This lens is super interesting though. I might return the Batis and pick this thing up
great review, can't wait to pick this lens up
Thanks for the review! Looking forward to the follow up review. One small criticism: not a fan of your transition sound effect. I find it rather distracting.
Thanks for the opinion. I don't like it either after watching it ; )
Also, it focuses as close as 0.24 meters, not inches haha
i thought i heard manny ortiz say yesterday that the Sigma is still sharper.
This lens is awesome I sold my my loxia 35 and 21
How does this compare with batis 25mm?
So the XA, are those the ultra high refractive polymers? Sony doesn't say, they just say extreme aspherical. It's probably the polymer since it's looking way lighter and smaller. BTW nice new intro!
Actually it's very expensive, not cheap
Loved the intro....😍
Huge fan Steve✌️
Awesome video, thanks!
The images I've seen from this lens have a sort of Leica feel to them, wouldn't you agree?
Beautifully sharp and contrasted.
Cheaper?? Its 1800 euro here! 1 thing is for sure, photography as a hobby is getting more and more something for the riches
Cheaper than Canon and Nikon equivalence :/ besides, this lens is for pro-sumers and professionals, there are plenty of alternative options to choose from, you don't need the best camera or best lenses in the world to be a good photographer, photography is about telling stories and capturing the right monent
A comparison with the Batis 25mm would have been more useful to me...
Any news about Sony A 7 lll S .
I ve got the 16-35 mm GM lens. Do you see any major difference that make it worth buying the 24mm as well?? I am an expert photographer due to my work that requires me to shoot constantly but I do not publish since photos contain sensitive confidential information and are only for internal use.
Only if you want that shallow DOF that the 16-35 can not give you.
@@HiFiHuff Great work Steve. Many thanks.
or mayb u need a faster lens for some astrophotography. haha. i see this len as a great add on to nightscape photography.
@@ansontow89 Sounds like a great idea but it would also be a bad idea to use company property for personal use especially after requesting the purchase of a new lens..!!
This lens is my next one 🔥🔥
Compare with Sigma 24mm f1.4
What better ?
It's better than my Zeiss 21
I just ordered the stunner.. Pain in the moneybag .. but well... its a awesome objective
Did you test with in-camera-corrections?
cheaper?....at my country that price can buy 2 zeiss 55mm 1.8 new...can buy 24mm sigma 1.4 + sony fe 85mm 1.8...
well that isn't anything new. Obviously when you watch reviewers based in North America, you should expect them to speak in terms of dollars.
Zeiss is not what he is comparing, he is comparing to sony or nikon.
Hi Sir Sorry for my question which is out of context. Please suggest me fuji X100f or Fuji Xe3. Money no prob. Please help me with this.
1008asad do you have any existing fujifilm lenses? For me it came down to if I needed to change focal lengths especially to anything greater than 50mm. Then go X-E3. But if you want the least amount of gear to lug around, then go X100F. You can get a wide and Tele converter but that's it. If you're okay with that, then you got a nice light package in X100F. I wonder how far we are to new iterations of both tho.
@@pinoyattrouble Thanks for the Response Bro. No currently im using a7riii with sony lenses. Planing to have one Fuji just cause of ken, I think i should go for x100F.
Same here actually. What are you using on your Sony? I have Fuji X100F and Tele. On Sony just have A7RIII with 55f1.8.
@@pinoyattrouble wow man our taste is quite similar Lol. On sony i have 55 1.8 and 35 2.8. Hows your experience with x100f shall i go for it?
This lens makes me actually wanna add a sony body to my kit
In my Christmas 🎄 wish list ..
Santa came early and said I had been a good boy this year and upgraded to 1635 GM 😀
Wow i can hear that focusing motor loud and clear!
Of the Canon, yes indeed.
So why is 35 mm so big?
35, 50, 85, three dslr lens copies made in a hurry.
Image quality Vs the voigtlander Ultron 21mm F1.8? A lot cheaper but obviously no AF, a bit faster...
Different. The Sony is a clinical lens, sharp corner to corner. The 21 1.8 has much more character.
@@HiFiHuff thanks so much! Got the voigt and love it. Plenty of pop!
Doooood your intro is 92% longer than it needs to be. Christ
And subsequent brreeoorrp sfx are too loud. Tone it down?
batis 25mm or this?
I'll go this, if the price of the batis does not drop significantly.
Kevin Zhao already went for Batis a month ago
Batis is great, too. It's quite hard to tell at the moment. Maybe you can get this later, compare them and then decide which one to keep.
1.4 for just an extra 100$ vs the batis 25 f2? This is no brainer, go with the 24mm GM!
Where was the wooded area shot at?
Mentioned it in the video and shown the entrance sign ; ) Muir Woods.
sell ur batis 25 asap
I liked your first look but HATE the video game sound effects.
Sony 24 mm 1,4 vs ZEISS Batis 25mm 2,0 Any thoughts ?
Zeiss is f/2, Sony is 1.4. Sony will render a cooler more clinical image. Zeiss warmer.
bo-keh
for vloging i think the batis 18 2.8 is better.
I thought Sony Sensors are stabilized...
Some of them. You can add stabilized lenses to them for more stabilization.
Sony stabilizer in body is only 3 axis. The lens will add 2 more axis.
They are but the effect is not that great IMO. They are the worst for video stabilizing of any camera with 5 Axis. Not sure why.
0.24 inch minimum focus distance? LoL, apparently you don't know much about macro photography with DSLR. BTW, number of aperture blades doesn't have so much to do with the bokeh, if bokeh is bad no number of blades will not help.
"Sagittal flare suppressed" means lens is coma free.
how about makeup tutorials? is it okay?
No cheaper.
i myself dont love a blurry background when it feels washy its always doing it when was it decided that there should always be the blur because i find it to be quite cliche
0.24"? That's just unbelievable.
No slip of the lip. 0.24 M. Sorry!
Lol. Though for a moment I'd gone mad. :D
The specs say 9.45 inches / 24 cm.
so macro youll need a ringlight like youre shooting crime scenes!
well, I suppose .24" is enough room for a ringe of standard 5mm LEDS, but it better be a flat surface, or what you want photograph won't get much light.
this lens cost 1600Euro in europe fckkk
Agree!! 1400$ is 1200€, so disgusting...
@Phil Jones65 I actually want this as my main lens! I currently have an A7r ii with the 55mm and a 16-35 f4. Since I mainly shoot in the dark, I really need a fast lens. My thoughts were, that with the crop mode on the A7R ii, you can have 55mm and ~85mm (cropped) with the Zeiss lens and 24mm and 35mm (cropped) with this sweet lens.
I am currently trying to sell my zoom, because I dont ever saw myself using 16mm, actually, I had it first on a crop camera which gave me 24mm as standard. Add crop and you get the 35mm that I am so craving right now ^^ 55mm is still too narrow for my everyday life but when I tested this lens in a local camera store, I knew this was the one within 10 seconds. Literally, i have never been convinced so quickly in my entire life :D Just peeked through the viewfinder, didn't even take a photo. It's lighter than the zoom, a little smaller and especially creates the nicest image i ever saw... sold! Lukily you can buy it for 1650 dollars equivalent in Switzerland, so at least some savings....
It costs closer to 1700 euro in my country.
how is $1399 cheap?? if you live here in the philippnes, with our low paycheck im sure you will say thats a very expensive prime lens.
Shit I live in america and thats expensive lol you can literally get a full frame with a 50mm and another lens for that price but glass does out live camera bodies so....... but yeah it is pricey. Really nice lens though. especially for street, landscape and astrophotography
@@raminolta What Canon and Nikon equivalent lenses? Canon and Nikon do NOT have a 24mm f/1.4 lens for their mirrorless systems.
CHEAPER!!? LOL
Cheaper than the competition
@@user-bm3rc3os6d What competition? Canon and Nikon do NOT have a 24mm f/1.4 lens for their mirrorless FF systems.
They priced this wrong IMO. Needs to come in lower than the Zeiss 16-35. I'd rather spend the $1400 and get that.
Well considering most were predicting it to be $2k, and the price is much less than the Nikon and Canon, while being smaller, lighter, faster in focus AND better in all areas of quality I feel they priced it better than right. The 16-35 will never ever give you any shallow DOF that this lens will, nor can the 16-35 deliver in low light like this can. It's priced amazingly well and much lower than everyone thought. It's a G Master, weather sealed, two XA elements, etc.
touche
Hello there Jonny Sins
Buy a Tele Vue telescope for Astrophotography much better
compare it to the batis
Yes, would love to see a comparison to the Batis 18mm, which I just used in Namibia for astrophotography. The Batis is an amazingly sharp lens. Sharper than the Sony 16-35 2.8 GM I rented earlier in the year.
Batis is not 1.4, it is larger, and does not have this AF motor than Sony has.
Yeah but IQ wise ?
Thanks Steve! I rented the Batis, but I think I'll be buying this new 24mm GM. Very exciting news.
I'm getting this as well as keeping the Batis 18 😉
Such huge ugly zoom lenses show up the lie at the heart of 'compact mirrorless FF cameras - terrible balance and Handling. Much better with primes.
Extremely misleading. Canon and Nikon do NOT have a 24mm f/1.4 lens for their mirrorless FF system.
BoxxyFan he’s clearly talking about their DSLR systems... he mentions several direct comparisons to the canon 24 L Mark ii ... you’re reaching. Also considering DSLR primes have been smaller than Sony’s primes (see 50mm 1.4, 35mm 1.4 and all of sigmas lineup for example) your point is completely void..
@@okay149 pro tip: e-mount is mirrorless, not DSLR like Sonys old a-mount.
@@BoxxyFan The ball.... you dropped it!
cringe
My primary set of lenses is now Sony 24mm 1.4 GM, Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm
1.8 and Sony 135mm 1.8 GM, exellennt set of lenses, highly recommended !
Although I will like to see a better new version of the 55mm, a 60mm
allround macro lens will be very nice !