Local gun store discusses AR-15 style rifle amid Trump assassination attempt

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
  • The investigation into the attempted assassination of former president Donald Trump is in it's early stages but authorities say the weapon used in the attack was an

ความคิดเห็น • 930

  • @AS768
    @AS768 หลายเดือนก่อน +221

    Listening to news media attenpt to talk about firearms is the worst.

    • @ShastaBean
      @ShastaBean หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      1:04 - arguably worse...unless he means he prefers an AR-10.

    • @nb347
      @nb347 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolute cringe 😵‍💫

    • @The_Black_Knight
      @The_Black_Knight หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Concur. The problem is people have no interest in being educated.

    • @octoman511
      @octoman511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ahhh does it offend you snowflake?

  • @BrandensOutdoorChannel
    @BrandensOutdoorChannel หลายเดือนก่อน +324

    She is lying. The military shoots out to 300 yards with iron sights.

    • @ronniemoore9289
      @ronniemoore9289 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      500 if you're a Marine.

    • @mikehardin1629
      @mikehardin1629 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Yeah, that is the military. The shooter was not prior military. In basic you spend hours every day training and spend time on the range learning to shoot at or beyond 300 yards. Most civilians rarely train to shoot a AR15 and because of cost of ammo now don't put as much down range. And most civilian ranges rarely extend beyond 25 yards. Active military spends most of their time shooting at targets from 50 to 300 yards over iron sights, big difference unless you have optics. Not much is known yet about the weapon or if it had optics, also the shooter wore glasses.

    • @ryandouglas8382
      @ryandouglas8382 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@mikehardin1629 He was a member of his firing range and the gun was his dads. They frequented there. Either way not hard to teach someone from 130yards to hit 9/10 times. All the outdoor firing ranges by my house are about a football field in length and that's in CA too

    • @scottdeeter6164
      @scottdeeter6164 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      This chick is clearly clueless

    • @ShastaBean
      @ShastaBean หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      shoots?
      Or actually hits 7" steel? I'd like to see that.
      Or are you talking silhouette full size?
      With ~1" of wind drift at 140 yards and a 2-3, or even 4 MOA gun (depending on ammo)...
      At 300 yards, you are talking 6 inches of windage and 6-9" groups, or even 12" from a bench or bipod w/rear bag.

  • @mikevincent9393
    @mikevincent9393 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    I'm screaming BS! Served in the Marine corps ,hit targets at 500 yards or more with iron sites only! Who is this little girl??
    She is poorly educated about this weapon

    • @dozersdady
      @dozersdady หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Dam right brother. Semper Fi

    • @originaloldpop8405
      @originaloldpop8405 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      reminds me of Nancy Pelousy trying to talk about firearms, "we need to ban all guns that have a thingy on them", she actually said that, I'd like to hear the ATF's definition of a "thingy"

    • @bitchimightbe3773
      @bitchimightbe3773 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Semper Fi till I die

    • @CS-fp1ik
      @CS-fp1ik หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      besides, she said an untrained shooter. btw, what rifle did you use that only had iron sights?

    • @user-km5kj8xh1x
      @user-km5kj8xh1x หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dozersdadybut she’s just saying it so the gun doesn’t get a bad reputation.

  • @user-ww4mo4gx3m
    @user-ww4mo4gx3m หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Limit of 50 yards with iron sights? .223 not designed to be lethal? This is ridiculous.

  • @DaveyCrockett1
    @DaveyCrockett1 หลายเดือนก่อน +311

    Wasn't the guns fault. Stop it.

    • @KadenthehamsterYT
      @KadenthehamsterYT หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly

    • @spoders92
      @spoders92 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is what the Dems wanted, to turn it into a gun control debate. So predictable.

    • @nef36
      @nef36 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No no you don't understand they're cursed and bring dark thoughts of darkness to your mind
      (unironically I think a lot of people leftward on this actually think holding a weapon is what tempts you)

    • @TKCreations2
      @TKCreations2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@nef36 no you could easily do more damage with explosives and molotov

    • @nef36
      @nef36 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TKCreations2 What?

  • @johndough2523
    @johndough2523 หลายเดือนก่อน +230

    She's about as qualified as the female Secret Service that were on scene

    • @commiesnzombies
      @commiesnzombies หลายเดือนก่อน

      tampon mafia

    • @fredmartin328
      @fredmartin328 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Barefoot and pregnant.

    • @RealCaptainJaws
      @RealCaptainJaws หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Or the armorer on Rust.

    • @ArmedFLGuy
      @ArmedFLGuy หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Maybe that secret service agent is her mom.

    • @spoders92
      @spoders92 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Probably sisters.

  • @shawnganesh2348
    @shawnganesh2348 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    Did she say this gun wasn’t made to kill?

    • @floppiwaffle4200
      @floppiwaffle4200 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Media cut the video in the middle of her question

    • @zerekneterval
      @zerekneterval หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I don't even know how you can say those words I keep getting all my comments removed

    • @stanb990
      @stanb990 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@zerekneterval old military lore
      Weapons are not meant to kill they're meant to incompacitate .
      Either Geneva or Hzgue mandates that bulkets not be design to infkict unnecessarily damage or suffer.
      And soldiers don't kill
      They inflict casualties on enemy personnel

    • @M224.7
      @M224.7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@shawnganesh2348 The 5.56 was made to injure enemies so they could still talk and be tortured as a pow so they could gather intel on their enemies plan. Of course it can kill in vital areas but wasn’t designed for that purpose.

    • @zerekneterval
      @zerekneterval หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@stanb990 potato, potato (saying doesn't work in text) she said injure specifically, you would be charged with attempted mur der if you used anything other than rubber bull ets because anything else is considered a lethal round

  • @Beltfedshooters
    @Beltfedshooters หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Gun shops should never talk to the media.

  • @bearintraining
    @bearintraining หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    Why do they need to go to a gun store to explain that its semi-automatic and AR doesn't stand for assault rifle.

    • @edthebumblingfool
      @edthebumblingfool หลายเดือนก่อน

      no its just an self loading rifle that fires a military round from high capacity magazines with miltary accesorries. Just because the Army doesnt use it doesnt make it less leathal. If clowns in America didnt have access to weapons like this a lot more schoolkids policemen and citizens would be alive today. Get over your dumb 1776 document and enter reality.

    • @NotPinocchio69
      @NotPinocchio69 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Because people are idiots

  • @Willis_S
    @Willis_S หลายเดือนก่อน +168

    "The 223 was designed to injure" just proves the ignorance of this video.

    • @BenNeal-ih4jo
      @BenNeal-ih4jo หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Actually she is right go research the m16 history it wasn't meant to kill but to wound

    • @gabecollins5585
      @gabecollins5585 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@BenNeal-ih4jo The 223 round and 5.56 round are both made to be a lethal round. Saying otherwise is like saying 9mm and 45 apc is not made to kill. Of course they are.

    • @alecubudulecu
      @alecubudulecu หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@BenNeal-ih4jowe researched m16 history and discovered you are wrong.

    • @dozersdady
      @dozersdady หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@alecubudulecuand what did you learn from your research

    • @XanthosAcanthus
      @XanthosAcanthus หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well, it is based on a varmint cartridge.

  • @williambates7467
    @williambates7467 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    'I disagree the 5.56 is extremely lethal'

  • @ninjabiatch101
    @ninjabiatch101 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

    Do people really still need to be explained to what an AR-15 is?

    • @Velomata
      @Velomata หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      :( Unfortunately, seems so.

    • @Ducttape995
      @Ducttape995 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      What the fuck is an 'AR15 styled" rifle??? What kind of story is this??

    • @ArionEquus
      @ArionEquus หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@Ducttape995 Colt still actually owns the trademark on the "AR-15" brand name. So any copy, derivative, or variant, goes by some other name. The only "real deal" AR-15 is manufactured by Colt, and everything else is technically just "Styled" like one. Despite being exactly the same thing.

    • @jerimiahgebel1525
      @jerimiahgebel1525 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      People think two men can have a baby…. So yes we definitely do need to explain what an ar15 is.

    • @38possum
      @38possum หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Ducttape995Armalite Rifle is what AR stands for. Lol

  • @MarshallArsenal
    @MarshallArsenal หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    Why does it matter? Do you blame your pencil for spelling mistakes? Or your car for speeding? Or the knife for cutting your finger?

    • @Catgat37
      @Catgat37 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I do blame my car for speeding

    • @Dylank-ys9wz
      @Dylank-ys9wz หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly!!!!!!!!

    • @brianlain4164
      @brianlain4164 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Catgat37because you are a clown

    • @forthelasttimeforever1169
      @forthelasttimeforever1169 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Catgat37I blame my foot !!!

    • @codysherrill9742
      @codysherrill9742 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Libtards do

  • @HandyAndy999
    @HandyAndy999 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    The store sales person is so incorrect about the 556/223 rds. It's a 22LR rounds but travels 3,000 ft/sec. with vicious results. It was designed when the round impacts, it countinues to tumble and tearing anything in the way and leaving a big hole when it exits.

    • @chriszackery2402
      @chriszackery2402 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      She is actually not wrong at all when it comes to a reason they carried it And you are not wrong either you both just didn’t give all the reasons only 1 each. There was many reasons but weight of carry and quantity was definitely a factor. You are right as well the only thing she was wrong about was saying it’s not meant to kill and just injure. The whole interview was actually pretty bad but I think what we should be focused on and be happy with is that unlike usual the media went and got and aired truth about AR15’s for educational reasons even if the presenters weren’t the best at explaining it. This was a good video for the gun community don’t bash a friend bud!

    • @HandyAndy999
      @HandyAndy999 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @chriszackery2402 I do agreed you're right. I was blindsided about her saying it wasn't meant to kill.just injured.

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah and I'll bet you're the American sniper too! They can Google things too you know! It's not unique to you.

    • @Quesoverga
      @Quesoverga หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Holy hell...... I served 19delta in the US Army. The cartridge was not designed to injure. It is lighter and a person could carry more ammo

    • @tubeonline629
      @tubeonline629 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's not a .22lr round, it's a .22 caliber projectile that has a copper jacket.

  • @Vedmack854
    @Vedmack854 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    Blaming the weapon is pointless.

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      NEWSFLASH:In a stunning move The US Supreme Court has just ruled 6-3 granting that guns have total immunity from prosecution. After extensive research, no precedent was found where a gun had been charged with a crime, except in cartoons and movies!

    • @ShastaBean
      @ShastaBean หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      if anything...the choice of rifle could legit be blamed for the miss.
      People should be thankful he chose an AR, and not something far more effective - like pretty much any deer rifle.

    • @octoman511
      @octoman511 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So is your opinion

    • @Vedmack854
      @Vedmack854 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@octoman511 it’s a fact, bro. You can’t blame an inanimate object. It’s a tool. Grow the Fck up.

    • @dozersdady
      @dozersdady หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ShastaBeantell us more about things you don't understand

  • @YoNicoo
    @YoNicoo หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    how are you gonna work at a gun store and not know anything about guns, talking bout .223 isnt meant to kill what is she smoking

    • @LivingtheDRdream
      @LivingtheDRdream หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly 😂

    • @emotionlessmarshmallow4581
      @emotionlessmarshmallow4581 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      she's actually right about what it was made for LOL

    • @Jose-el7rf
      @Jose-el7rf หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@emotionlessmarshmallow4581no she’s not🤣

    • @emotionlessmarshmallow4581
      @emotionlessmarshmallow4581 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Jose-el7rf bro. 223 ain’t shit

    • @casagrande9958
      @casagrande9958 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      .223 and more specifically 5.56 (since it's the standard military round) was more designed to maim rather than kill (not that it can't kill if you shoot it right). From what I understand, military doctrine states that they want to kill a certain number of enemies and maim a certain number of enemies. That way the enemy has to bring in personnel and material to remove the wounded. That's at least how it was years ago, I'm not sure if that's how it is now.

  • @stanb990
    @stanb990 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    50 yards 😂😂😂
    This is not s Marlin 60
    This woman is completely clueless

    • @quintonlloyd2393
      @quintonlloyd2393 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I thought the same as far as her talking about accuracy.

    • @turtlepopper
      @turtlepopper หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Considering she was holding a rifle without an optic or BUIs, I'd say she was 100% correct and you're clueless.

    • @ryanyoung7554
      @ryanyoung7554 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@turtlepopper facts

    • @ryanyoung7554
      @ryanyoung7554 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You clearly are clueless.

    • @TheChetsteadman
      @TheChetsteadman หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@turtlepopper She mentioned it had "open" sights. Looks like MBUS

  • @coyote520
    @coyote520 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Keep it on safety? Does she realize that the bolt has to be engaged to do so? Ffs

  • @kenyoung4881
    @kenyoung4881 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    “.223 is not designed to be lethal…” LOL 😂 where did they find this sales lady?

  • @adammclean2428
    @adammclean2428 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Yes! Finally the news says what AR stands for! AR does not stand for ASSAULT RIFLE!

  • @Gurn_Blanston
    @Gurn_Blanston หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    She thinks an AR-15 isn’t accurate beyond 50 yards? 😂

  • @iceLordgeneralSpeaking
    @iceLordgeneralSpeaking หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    They put the fudd on the screen with his 1911

  • @DJFLIPNO
    @DJFLIPNO หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    she's way better explaining how to make a killer sandwich smh

  • @YaYa-ke1zr
    @YaYa-ke1zr หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Ummm did she say you won’t be accurate past 50 yards AND the .223 was designed to injure.
    Girl bye.

  • @Pb_Slinger
    @Pb_Slinger หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    What is the actual point of this?

    • @sandmasterflex
      @sandmasterflex หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      An informative news piece.

    • @robertbinder7296
      @robertbinder7296 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@sandmasterflex "Informative". 😂🤣 She said that rifle is not accurate past 50 yards. Lol And it only gets worse after that.

  • @selohcin
    @selohcin หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Is it just me or did we learn nothing about what type of weapon the shooter used?

    • @christophergassen3789
      @christophergassen3789 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Nope its not just you, by saying an ar style type of gun does not say what gun was used. Why don't they take a picture of the gun that was actually used, show the make and model

  • @joerobo682
    @joerobo682 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    "AR style" is not a firearm. what model of rifle was it? what make? what chambering?

    • @twelvewingproductions7508
      @twelvewingproductions7508 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I'd say that was accurate. There are so many variances of that frame that it's fine to describe it that way. Same as they use the term 1911 style for that pistol type.

    • @joerobo682
      @joerobo682 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@twelvewingproductions7508 I've never heard anyone say 1911 style. it's a 1911 or it isn't. doesn't make a difference what company makes it. same with AR-15 . it's an AR-15 no matter what outfit made it or not. if it's not an AR it's not a "style" of anything. if the weapon was a Ruger 10/22 with a black folding stock then they need to say that. if they don't know then they should just say it was a rifle and not try to gin up more civil disarmament legislation.

    • @noahboat580
      @noahboat580 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​@@joerobo682Guns just have a silhouette to them to where people would designate it as "AR style" especially "assault rifles." I heard some law enforcement say the term "AK style rifle" instead of AK47, even though not many AKs in the US are truly in that designation-
      Its just identity is what I'm saying, and that rifle is AR style

    • @joerobo682
      @joerobo682 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@noahboat580 when they say "AR style" it's usually because it ain't anything close to that. AR style helps them put into the anti 2A category.

    • @johnmileso21
      @johnmileso21 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      “AR style” = looks scary

  • @jgibbs6159
    @jgibbs6159 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    YT censors everything now. a 556 is accurate out to 600 yds, this lady has no idea whats she is talking about.

    • @Woodchuck1965
      @Woodchuck1965 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Any rifle is only accurate out to the range the shooter can reliably hit the target. Whe qualifying in the Army I was about 90 to 95 % out to 200 meters after that is was more like 60 percent.

    • @kanjo4976
      @kanjo4976 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      My notifications were paused for two days after the attempt. Doesn’t matter too much cause 90% of my comments get deleted. Even if someone is insulting me and using derogatory language my comment is deleted and not theirs. Evil platform.

    • @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974
      @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@kanjo4976I deal with the same thing.
      TH-cam is shady as he'll

    • @HugoStiglitz88
      @HugoStiglitz88 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@kanjo4976FACTS. I can't stand it. They delete mine literally for no reason all the time
      they put some of us through more strict comment filters just because we don't agree with their dumb ideology

    • @nlabanok
      @nlabanok หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@kanjo4976"Evil platform"....and yet here you are.

  • @dough7612
    @dough7612 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cameron was actaully spot on and kept it professional. She obviously didnt give the reporter what she needed and they have bring in the other guy who almost gave them something juicy. Thanks Cameron for not falling into the trap!

  • @av8rgrip
    @av8rgrip หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lighten up Francis. No she isn’t lying. She is speaking from her knowledge base. Like any rifle, accuracy can vary widely. Ammo and optics can have significant affect on accuracy. Yes, infantry have to qualify out to 600m. Yes, basic military rifles don’t have optics and aren’t sub MOA shooters. She did fine explaining the rifle to the general public.

  • @Rickets1911
    @Rickets1911 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Please stop removing comments which don’t violate policy.

    • @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974
      @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gun control and censorship go hand in hand.
      We know where TH-cam stands.
      On the side of communism!

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey don't tell us how to run our forum. You want a say, start your own news forum! Other wise, accept ours, or you are free to go!

    • @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974
      @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🖕 TH-cam!

    • @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974
      @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @samstewart9249 that word "free" is starting to feel more like an illusion.
      Pew pew control and silencing go hand in hand. Both are evil

    • @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974
      @Dont.Tread.On.Me1974 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Pew pew control and silencing go hand in hand

  • @chloetaylor2713
    @chloetaylor2713 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    If the media says AR-15 style or AR style weapon you can tell that they fucking absolutely know nothing about guns

    • @lima4923
      @lima4923 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I mean, of all things to criticize the media for, this isn't one of them. AR style has a meaning, Colt's patent on the AR style rifle expired in the '70s, not every "AR" you see is an "AR" made by Colt or Armalite. Mine is an "SG", but anyone that looks at it would say it's an AR15. Ya know why..?
      Because it's an AR style rifle.

    • @lima4923
      @lima4923 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Soooo me thinks it's you who knows absolutely fucking nothing about guns.

    • @SmallMediumFat
      @SmallMediumFat หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lima4923they once said a sub 2000 was an ar style weapon

    • @CGT80
      @CGT80 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AR style is accurate, as it isn't mini 14 and it isn't an ak and AR style rifles if made to proper specs will take the same parts. It would be like talking about a heavy duty pickup or mini truck. They are both very specific variations of light duty trucks with multiple companies that make them, but the specs, looks, and function are very close between brands.

  • @PlymouthCop
    @PlymouthCop หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is the most cringeworthy interview I have ever heard. The gun store manager is not educated on the use of sights and other attachments. Hearing her attempt the weapon safety rules was definitely alarming that she couldn't get them down.

    • @area.man.
      @area.man. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At least the reporter clarified Armalite as the meaning behind the AR portion.

  • @wenkaiyang1487
    @wenkaiyang1487 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Why couldn't people be allowed to carry AK to Trump's rally to protect themselves?

  • @marcus-hp8wp
    @marcus-hp8wp หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Its not a military weapon grand pa😂 you know as much as she does😂

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If it weren't for Grandpas, you would be goose stepping and kissing Hitler! Get over yourself, as you age you will learn, hopefully!

  • @MoonShadow74
    @MoonShadow74 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Back in the days when the M-16 first came out; It WAS touted as a round that would tend to tumble when it hit a target instead just expanding and it would cause more damage to the enemy thus causing more wounds than the .30-06 in the old M-1s and M-14s. It would then require the enemy to use more resources to carry the wounded soldier away and to care for him in the back lines. So many people forget simple facts of history.

  • @zeroneg
    @zeroneg หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    This lady is not qualified to shoot the rifles she is selling. 50 yards? what?!?!

    • @alecwhatshisname5170
      @alecwhatshisname5170 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Tbf she was saying an inexperienced person using iron sights wouldn’t be accurate past 50yd which is technically true.

    • @zeroneg
      @zeroneg หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@alecwhatshisname5170 I appreciate you trying to clarify, but it really doesn't help. A first time shooter can, if they care to, spend a day on the range and make 300 yards with a 2 MOA precision. I just don't buy that she's makking that argument, though, since she stated that it isnt' for killing just injuring. Sales without experience apparently.

    • @ryta1203
      @ryta1203 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alecwhatshisname5170 I don't think it is technically true. If the rifle is zero'd, you know the zero and you've had some practice. Sure, maybe someone who has never fired any weapon before and knows literally nothing.. maybe.

    • @ryta1203
      @ryta1203 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zeroneg 100%. This is exactly what the Army does in basic training.

    • @johnc2438
      @johnc2438 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I got my training from Marines at Port Hueneme wayyy back in 1970. While they insisted that the M14, with its .308 round packed more punch at longer distances, they never once said that the M16s (military version of the AR rifle) we were training were just for injuring the enemy. They were designed so that the smaller .556 bullet would be quite lethal, albeit with a smaller range and smaller punch than the much heavier .308 round. And in Vietnam, where we were headed, most engagements (if we Seabees were unlucky enough to be in one) would be at ranges no more than a few hundred yards, at most. The M16, with its lighter weight and much lighter rounds made perfect sense where we worked. I guess I was a lucky sailor in Vietnam as I fired my weapon only on training ranges in the year-and-a-half I was there (wandered all over the Mekong Delta in boats, ferries, vehicles and in the air, from the coast on the Gulf of Thailand to Dan Nang up north). M16s and other AR-type rifles are very, very easy to shoot accurately (even with iron sights), almost from the first time you fire one. I qualified for a shooting medal my first time on on the range. So did most trainee shooters around me. The rounds are decidedly designed to kill, not merely "injure."

  • @iceLordgeneralSpeaking
    @iceLordgeneralSpeaking หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    She said 'a semi automatic which means it chambers another round after being fired' ... which is true, BUT SHE WAS VERY DECEPTIVE AND MADE IT SOUND LIKE IT WAS AUTOMATIC TO PPL WHO DIDNT KNOW BETTER.

    • @ninjabiatch101
      @ninjabiatch101 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@iceLordgeneralSpeaking It did feel like a bizarre way to phrase it.

    • @jonnywilson9117
      @jonnywilson9117 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When she meant "after each trigger pull" which to anyone that doesn't lick windows, well we know what it means.

    • @Terruhcutta
      @Terruhcutta หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Unfortunately, there are far too many foggy windows in the states these days if you catch my drift 🤣

  • @chillios2222
    @chillios2222 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    basically one of the most common firearms in the USA , a basic rifle

  • @cptsparklfingerz9210
    @cptsparklfingerz9210 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All cartridges are meant to destroy whatever it is it hits. All firearms are meant to direct said projectile. It’s the HUMAN who chooses what to destroy.

    • @CGT80
      @CGT80 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People are right, a gun has only one purpose....staple gun, paint gun, nerf gun, nail gun, dart gun, firearm......to emit a projectile. Many firearms are made specifically for sporting but of course they still fire a projectile at what the user points it at. They want to remove firearms but seem fine with knives, bats, vehicles, drugs, fists, improvised weapons, etc. We have a people problem and crime problem and still would have even if guns disappeared.

  • @wnathanielw
    @wnathanielw หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Aaaaand they're already blaming guns. Figures.

    • @sandmasterflex
      @sandmasterflex หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I didn't even get that from the video. If anything, it was informed and has a psa on gun safety.

  • @michaelgreen6278
    @michaelgreen6278 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow. I can’t believe a gun store owner actually proposed that.

  • @brianbickle7395
    @brianbickle7395 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    As has been pointed out , politicians calling for bans are protected by the very same!!!

    • @matthewb.7172
      @matthewb.7172 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Those ones are carried by trained, background-checked officers. Not sure what your point is

    • @That-Will-Do-It
      @That-Will-Do-It หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@matthewb.7172 The point is they do not have to worry about their own self protection. We the people do not have armed guards.

  • @stevesell8179
    @stevesell8179 หลายเดือนก่อน

    United States Marine Corp veteran here.I went to basic training in 1987 we were issued the M-16A2 rifle. A 20inch government barrel rh 1in7 twist muzzle velocity 3100fps at 52,000 chamber psi. Max effective range at a individual/ point target 550 meters max effective range 800 meters of an area target. We qualified at 200 meters 300 meters and 500 meters all with open sights. Now the civilian armalite (ar-15) is a 16 inch barrel only in semi automatic not capable of the high psi or velocity of the military version so not as effective. But any firearm is dangerous if not trained properly that is why I trained my daughter at an early age. Semper Fi

  • @mtgAzim
    @mtgAzim หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Why does everyone in this video sound like a first grader trying to discuss quantum physics?
    So embarrassing.

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Artificial intelligence! Lol

  • @LeroyTorres-ul8oj
    @LeroyTorres-ul8oj หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Manager is BEAUTIFUL 💛

  • @dominiquegobeil5831
    @dominiquegobeil5831 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Mayo style sauce is not mayo.

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol, lots of folks don't actually know there are several distinctly different mayos. Might want to do some research first or stick to something you know.

    • @dominiquegobeil5831
      @dominiquegobeil5831 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We got a fricking expert on the thread, I bet he's sone kind of AI NPC. Just making this place toxic.

    • @zerekneterval
      @zerekneterval หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@samstewart9249 dawg that's not true, anyone who's read a menu at a restaurant would know that unless they're just extremely slow

    • @dominiquegobeil5831
      @dominiquegobeil5831 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another one.

    • @zerekneterval
      @zerekneterval หลายเดือนก่อน

      @dominiquegobeil5831 ahhh I see this is how you have fun eh, you like to be toxic and then accuse others of the same after stating ignorant things or shoveling out bait huh Lil bud? Decide to grow up. I bet the people around, if there are any, would really appreciate it.

  • @danielaramburo7648
    @danielaramburo7648 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What if he used a bolt action deer hunting rifle? Or a single shot Stevens break action rifle? It’s not the rifle, it’s the intent of the user.

  • @ushankaman6143
    @ushankaman6143 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    i still havent been told exactly what rifle and what attachments the would-be assassin was using. all reports say "ar-15 style" or "carbine". it really irks me cuz these terms mean nothing

    • @Catgat37
      @Catgat37 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He was using a 300 win mag, 6-24×50 first focal plane scope, gun was mounted in a lead sled......the guy just really really sucked at shooting.

    • @ushankaman6143
      @ushankaman6143 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Catgat37 oh shit. thanks

    • @Catgat37
      @Catgat37 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ushankaman6143 lol....I am absolutely kidding. From what I understand the only attachment was iron sights. No knowing if they were zeroed, or for what distance.

    • @ushankaman6143
      @ushankaman6143 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Catgat37 what about the gun? any info as to what gun it was exactly?
      also little fun fact: apparently he was rejected from a shooting club cuz he was "a bad shot"

    • @Catgat37
      @Catgat37 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ushankaman6143 yeah, my wife just told me that this morning lol. And no, it does not appear they are releasing specifics on the gun at this time. Other than it is an "AR style rifle". What I really wonder is what caliber. People are speculating 5.56, but most likely because it is the most common chambering. He apparently bought 50 rounds for it. Not many ammo manufacturers have 50 round boxes of 5.56, although that doesn't mean anything.....because there are a few.

  • @steveanderson9290
    @steveanderson9290 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In terms of the philosophy behind the 5.56 NATO I found nothing she said to be incorrect, in fact, I was quite impressed. As for her range numbers, 150 yards is about the limit for a responsable, reliable, kill on a deer for instance. As for the wounding reference, she is absolutely right. Military doctrine states that a wound is superior to a kill because it often makes 3 soldiers combat ineffective rather than just one. Indeed, the wound rather than kill philosophy was one of the things that made the move to small caliber intermediate cartridges acceptable in order to gain the benefits of reduced weapon and ammo weight and reduced recoil. One of the requirements of the 5.56 NATO was that it had to have a wounding ability equal to or greater than the M1 Carbine round, not an impressive cartridge in anybody's book. Give her a break.

    • @smyers820gm
      @smyers820gm หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂😂 you’re as bad as she is and she’s a complete idiot 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @user-nc7jl6qi2u
    @user-nc7jl6qi2u หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Who shot the round from over 400 something yards away?

    • @towtruckmafia
      @towtruckmafia หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was 139 yards.

    • @commiesnzombies
      @commiesnzombies หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@towtruckmafia that shooters eyeglass prescription must have been from middle school

    • @zerekneterval
      @zerekneterval หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@commiesnzombies haha

    • @zerekneterval
      @zerekneterval หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@commiesnzombies got bumped in the crowd and dropped his contact lens

  • @marktownsend8187
    @marktownsend8187 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow. Honest reporting? I didn’t know that was still a thing.

  • @bearintraining
    @bearintraining หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "It's not just a military weapon"
    It literally isn't a military weapon. It's a civilian specific variant that carries the original name of one but not the capabilities of its predecessor.

    • @jaycaldwell654
      @jaycaldwell654 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There’s an awful lot of people using these on the battlefield, i think they don’t get your memo

  • @crazydiamond347
    @crazydiamond347 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The point I think she is trying to make is that the weapon isn't a good choice for an untrained individual.

  • @marckcarbonelloifveteran410
    @marckcarbonelloifveteran410 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The lady is correct, the 5.56 was designed for two reasons. #1. To carry more round , my combat load in Iraq was 7 magazines, 30 rounds each 210 rounds total. #2 The 5.56 was created with the idea that every time you wound a soldier it takes two people to carry them out, so you are taking three soldiers out of combat vs taking only one if you kill an enemy combatant. That was the doctrine during the Cold War. Now it does not means that the 5.56 NATO or the 223 are unable to kill someone. A 22Lr round can take a person down.

  • @marcus-hp8wp
    @marcus-hp8wp หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I can hit the target at 300 meters with open sights, hence i have the expert army bage. 36 out of 40 is reqiured at different distances in a timed scenario. It was a set up hit, Oswald story with a twist. Range cards are common sense grafts of thefeild of veiw outgoing and incoming. Too many open questions. If thats the best the Stupid Service can protect they need to downgrade to parking lot security guards, and i wouldnt leave my vehicle with thenm either.

    • @samstewart9249
      @samstewart9249 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Funny how everyone not in the job is an expert on it?

    • @dozersdady
      @dozersdady หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marcus-hp8wp 500 yards with iron sites if your a Marine 😉

  • @jackwagner547
    @jackwagner547 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does that girl still have a job because she don't know much about her merchandise.

  • @blueeyeddevil1
    @blueeyeddevil1 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    2:37 You cannot keep an AR15 “on safety” UNLESS there is a round in the chamber (i.e. the hammer must be cocked to effectuate the safety selector) But if there is a round in the chamber, then the rifle is not “unloaded.” Her first two firearm handling recommendations-while generally sound as separate statements-contradict each other in the case of the AR15

  • @ryanmullins2103
    @ryanmullins2103 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love how honest that guy was!

  • @justinshabtai
    @justinshabtai หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    One-in-TWENTY?! That is insane.

    • @Dmd265
      @Dmd265 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I bet it’s higher than that.

    • @user-kc2ss9gb3e
      @user-kc2ss9gb3e หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I thought everyone had one

    • @michaelgranholm7598
      @michaelgranholm7598 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      How is that insane again?

    • @SlyShotFox
      @SlyShotFox หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@michaelgranholm7598 because it needs to be more than that lol

    • @brianlain4164
      @brianlain4164 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is insane is that according to your logic we should ban cars because every day in America people get killed in car wrecks

  • @Castan0157
    @Castan0157 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The .223 bullet isn't big itself, but it's casing has a decent amount of powder, which makes it powerful. It's also designed to start tumbling once it hits a hard enough target, and thats what makes .223/5.56 lethal

  • @nateduquette3134
    @nateduquette3134 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    "Can carry alot of punch" what an expert

    • @gford8551
      @gford8551 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What did she say that was wrong?

    • @small-town-southern-man3573
      @small-town-southern-man3573 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gford8551The .223/5.56 round doesn’t carry a lot of punch.

    • @nateduquette3134
      @nateduquette3134 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gford8551 it's not wrong don't put words in my mouth, just not exactly professional. "Can carry a lot of punch" is just not how you describe muzzle velocity, maximum effective range, and um when has the military designed any projectile just to wound? Also ar-15 is not every single assault rifle or rifle period. She doesn't even sound convinced of what she is saying.

    • @Andrewy27
      @Andrewy27 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nateduquette3134 it's layman speak for "it has more deliverable energy on a target" without getting nerdy.
      Wildly enough, .308 (7.62×51 NATO) was specifically designed for Military use while .223 (5.56×45 NATO) was designed to be a small game cartridge.

    • @nateduquette3134
      @nateduquette3134 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Andrewy27 really? is that what that means? No fucking shit dude never did I say I didn't understand what she said all I fucking said was what? That she doesn't represent an expert opinion well.

  • @tonytony6945
    @tonytony6945 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    blah blah blah blah. ban guns blah blah blah

  • @blueeyeddevil1
    @blueeyeddevil1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    1:23 Notice the subtle use of propaganda here. The reporter offers part of the definition of “semiautomatic” by describing how the rifle will chamber a second round. What she carefully avoided was the critical part that distinguishes a semiautomatic rifle: you then have to pull the trigger a SECOND time to shoot the second round. The abbreviated piece she described is true for BOTH automatic and semiautomatic fire weapons. The critical distinction is that semiautomatic weapons do not automatically (hence the name) fire the next round. She (or, more likely, her writers) is deliberately avoiding that distinction because doing so still keeps the confusion in the public’s collective mind alive and well. It’s a cheap trick.

  • @stephenasbridge5251
    @stephenasbridge5251 หลายเดือนก่อน

    50 yards??? Speak for yourself woman

  • @frankrizzo5274
    @frankrizzo5274 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I love that saleswomen spot on gun safety.

    • @MMcguire85813
      @MMcguire85813 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      For real! What does it have to do with what happened!? It’s rediculous propaganda

    • @sandmasterflex
      @sandmasterflex หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@MMcguire85813 propaganda for what? I would rather the news run a story like this that provides people with information on the gun than just say it was the gun's fault.
      A news segment like this can go a way for calming peoples irrational fears and misconceptions.

  • @TechReviewbyIrdi
    @TechReviewbyIrdi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait what? We trained on 150-300 yds all the time. That is one big difference. Went to 6.5 now anyways.

    • @dozersdady
      @dozersdady หลายเดือนก่อน

      500 yards with iron sites in the Marines

  • @jonncockrell3606
    @jonncockrell3606 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Republican on Republican crime.

    • @markwhite6782
      @markwhite6782 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Donated money to the DNC, hardly Republican

    • @jeremiahbell8682
      @jeremiahbell8682 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Literally has a video where he says he hates republicans and Donald Trump

    • @joerobo682
      @joerobo682 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      sure he was a Republican. and I'm the King of Ireland.

    • @TheMaulam12345
      @TheMaulam12345 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joerobo682 WHAT IRELAND HAS TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS AMERICA JEEZ

    • @noahboat580
      @noahboat580 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@TheMaulam12345because they're bloody Irish!

  • @Ariothesmashbro
    @Ariothesmashbro หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    “Semer automatic firearm” this lady has no clue what she’s talking about 😂

  • @robertbolding4182
    @robertbolding4182 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The army didn't design those rifles to go out and shoot.

  • @matthewd.1805
    @matthewd.1805 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nobody ever addresses the numerous caliber cartridges that the AR15 platform can be chambered in.

  • @YouTube_Censors_Me
    @YouTube_Censors_Me หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hell I'm impressed they actually knew where the "AR" came from...

    • @Alfi-HEC74
      @Alfi-HEC74 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Obviously they knows

    • @NobleSavage44
      @NobleSavage44 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Heard the father contacted LEO’s first. Guess he knows where he bought it. 🙄

  • @stevenreyngold1166
    @stevenreyngold1166 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Virtually everything she said is incorrect.

  • @Quesoverga
    @Quesoverga หลายเดือนก่อน

    This girl has zero business explaining how toast is made

  • @albertvonschultz9137
    @albertvonschultz9137 หลายเดือนก่อน

    She had a few good tips But what good is an unloaded locked up firearm.

  • @Duck_Boi556
    @Duck_Boi556 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fact that the round is designed to injure is so not true at all

  • @camhuffman4694
    @camhuffman4694 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Mental heath y’all it’s like saying cars kill people no the car was driving with a human the human killed

  • @tedmaas3588
    @tedmaas3588 หลายเดือนก่อน

    She needs an education on how far the AR is accurate to..

  • @domnick7886
    @domnick7886 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The usmc used to shoot out to 500 yds with open sights . The army 300. Now, they both are using ACOG optics with a magnification of 4 or 6 power. Optics help a lot to see your target, but going beyond 300 yds. The atmosphere begins to come into play. The biggest being wind pushing bullet off line.

  • @Yovng.lorddd
    @Yovng.lorddd หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s always about the gun not the perpetrator say I’m starting to notice a pattern within😐

  • @natex46
    @natex46 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Someone retrain that poor girl

  • @bird4816
    @bird4816 หลายเดือนก่อน

    people working in gun stores are not necessarily experts on guns.

  • @babayaga9373
    @babayaga9373 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Iron sights on an AR are actuate out to 300yds easy…

    • @dozersdady
      @dozersdady หลายเดือนก่อน

      500 if you're a Marine 😉

  • @beckyloney4816
    @beckyloney4816 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    556 at 150 yds. Right.

  • @rancosteel
    @rancosteel หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just don’t have Alec Baldwin show you the gun safety portion.

  • @JaredMorrow
    @JaredMorrow หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only thing she was right about was the weight difference. Not the myth of wounding, or the accuracy with or without sight if it is zeroed.

  • @rotaman8555
    @rotaman8555 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Most of what that shop girl said was correct. The 5.56 round is very lethal and it is accurate out beyond 600 yards in the hands of a trained shooter. Also, it’s a tool and like any tool it can be used for good or evil. The fault lies with the shooter, not the gun.

  • @BertieW0oster
    @BertieW0oster หลายเดือนก่อน

    Right off the bat spewing that fudd lore that 556 was "not designed to be a lethal round, it was only made to injure" I knew the rest of her interview would be dubious.

  • @georgemcclary-yk7rx
    @georgemcclary-yk7rx หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally accurate reporting

  • @Clearanceman2
    @Clearanceman2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aren't there about 700,000 of these sold per year in the USA? It's the most common rifle in the USA by a lot.

  • @ALSPerson
    @ALSPerson หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was wondering how many people called bullshit on this girl. I joined the Army in 1976. We only had iron sights. We shot out to 500 yards but was taught the "maximum effective range) was 350 yards. Also, in the 70's and early 80's the Russians tried to get the United Nations to outlaw the 223 and an inhumane round because of how the bullet tumbled inside the human body for maximum damage. We had one soldier in the class ahead of mine at Ft. Bliss who shot himself in the shoulder to get out of the Army, but the bullet hit his shoulder bone and tumbled through his chest cavity and came out at his kidney. He died. This woman reminds me of the gun prop manager on the movie set "Rust" who said I know a lot, I shot with my daddy growing up. The newsperson was taken for a complete bullshit ride.

  • @gottroubletactical
    @gottroubletactical 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This lady has no clue of what shes talking about.

  • @MrErnest18045
    @MrErnest18045 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally, somebody know what they're talking about🎉

  • @bobg3633
    @bobg3633 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is this woman talking about things she dont know?? And she is in marketing?

  • @aaronvillarreal2812
    @aaronvillarreal2812 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Jeez is this the only qualified person we could find ?

  • @TrustInGod777
    @TrustInGod777 หลายเดือนก่อน

    did she really say you wouldnt be accurate using iorn sights past 50 yards with an AR-15 ? 🤦🏽‍♂️ and she sells guns…….

  • @Shaynepl
    @Shaynepl หลายเดือนก่อน

    "2.23 / 5.56 was designed to wound" Do you really think the military would use a cartridge that wasn't effective at killing the enemy? Come on...
    Also, keep it on safety? seriously? It's SAFE not safety. The way she talks makes it sound like someone tried to teach her about these guns 30 min before the interview and now she's sloppily regurgitating what she heard with the camera rolling. This is embarrassing for her and the store.

  • @rickeyammons9866
    @rickeyammons9866 หลายเดือนก่อน

    His patents should have had it locked up

  • @malalamalala6769
    @malalamalala6769 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who let’s these people sell firearms. Totally inaccurate information.

  • @Cobra13645
    @Cobra13645 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why hasn't the father of the shooter been held legally responsible?? If I bought a firearm that was used in a crime I'd be implicated for the crime 😅