The blonde woman is an intellectual lightweight. Camille's answers are predicated on the fact that even if you get "affirmative consent," you'll just have a bunch of women saying they signed under duress. You simply can't legislate the human condition. Not psychologically and not without authoritarian rule-making.
Someone is living in a false information bubble, either Laura Beth Nielsen or me, because what I have read about about cases like the new ‘Mattress Girl’ lawsuit has Paul Nungesser suing Columbia University for allowing Sulkowicz to harass him. Recently a lot of accused men have sued colleges over the way their cases were handled. This seems to contradict the claim implied by Nielsen that the colleges are down playing the rapes. I just wish Camille Paglia could refer to specific cases and data, she generalizes too much. If only Camille could show Laura videos from Zarna Joshi, Milo Stewart, and articles about Mattress Girl.
Camille normally does. I imagine she's a very polite person (part of her overall charm) and she seems to be holding back. She's much better in rapid fire, combative conversations. These whiny feminist videos -- where each woman is never interrupted and always speaks in circles --- never brings out the best in her. She's a tough woman.
UofA should count their lucky stars to have Paglia on their faculty all these years. It is amazing that she is not at one of the most major educational institutions. Of course, she would probably refuse on principle and they would be too afraid to have her on the faculty!
I can maybe understand using Title IX if a professor is involved in sexual impropriety, but if it involves two students, it has nothing to do with denying a woman access to educational opportunities. Even If it did, wouldn't you think that should be under the purview of a law that protects men as well? Speaking of Title IX abuse, I point you to the Harvard soccer team.
The woman in the middle's argument doesn't make sense if I'm understanding it correctly. Why would you having to report "crime" impact Title IX? Title IX is by definition not a criminal response, but an administrative response. You could have a 100 Title IX convictions, 100 Title IX findings of innocence, and you're crime reporting is no different because none of it registers as a "Crime." They are administration hearings no different than cheating. So why would one impact the other? The elephant in the room is the OCR's pressure on colleges and the "Dear Colleague Letter." That is what has caused this to spin out of control.
When Camille shuffles off her mortal coil, society will finally collapse
Amen
"I learned what I wanted to learn" - yeah, I can tell.
it's MADNESS! the future will LAUGH!... Camille wiped the table clean.
Fighting the postmodernist absurdity all these years is tiresome I'm sure.
The blonde woman is an intellectual lightweight. Camille's answers are predicated on the fact that even if you get "affirmative consent," you'll just have a bunch of women saying they signed under duress. You simply can't legislate the human condition. Not psychologically and not without authoritarian rule-making.
"the blonde woman."
Nielson talked way too much. Paglia talked way too little.
Someone is living in a false information bubble, either Laura Beth Nielsen or me, because what I have read about about cases like the new ‘Mattress Girl’ lawsuit has Paul Nungesser suing Columbia University for allowing Sulkowicz to harass him. Recently a lot of accused men have sued colleges over the way their cases were handled. This seems to contradict the claim implied by Nielsen that the colleges are down playing the rapes.
I just wish Camille Paglia could refer to specific cases and data, she generalizes too much. If only Camille could show Laura videos from Zarna Joshi, Milo Stewart, and articles about Mattress Girl.
Camille normally does. I imagine she's a very polite person (part of her overall charm) and she seems to be holding back. She's much better in rapid fire, combative conversations. These whiny feminist videos -- where each woman is never interrupted and always speaks in circles --- never brings out the best in her. She's a tough woman.
It is hilarious watching Camille's face when the other woman is trying to justify Affirmative Consent lol!! Her face says it all!
Camille was like get me out of here
4 years later..
LOL. The way Paglia Was Looking At The Cohen all through the intro.
UofA should count their lucky stars to have Paglia on their faculty all these years. It is amazing that she is not at one of the most major educational institutions. Of course, she would probably refuse on principle and they would be too afraid to have her on the faculty!
WHO will carry her torch after she's gone???
Camille is above this meeting.
The host is good at her job!
I can maybe understand using Title IX if a professor is involved in sexual impropriety, but if it involves two students, it has nothing to do with denying a woman access to educational opportunities.
Even If it did, wouldn't you think that should be under the purview of a law that protects men as well?
Speaking of Title IX abuse, I point you to the Harvard soccer team.
Sheer lunacy, where is the humanity, thank the gods for Camille Paglia!!
camille looks so bored lol
Im glad there can still be debate
The woman in the middle's argument doesn't make sense if I'm understanding it correctly. Why would you having to report "crime" impact Title IX? Title IX is by definition not a criminal response, but an administrative response. You could have a 100 Title IX convictions, 100 Title IX findings of innocence, and you're crime reporting is no different because none of it registers as a "Crime." They are administration hearings no different than cheating. So why would one impact the other? The elephant in the room is the OCR's pressure on colleges and the "Dear Colleague Letter." That is what has caused this to spin out of control.
Affirmative relatonship???This is crazy.
I prefer Camille's vision for the future of education by a long shot.
Overall, Paglia makes more sense in this debate.
The lawyer reminds me not to forget Orwell... lol! She is pathetic..
This Nielson is the offtrack...
the idea that she thinks schools only have to abide by free speech if they take federal money is inherently corrupt
With respect, Laura Beth seems to be a real mediocrity! Sad that this promoted in our universities...
I want mystery restored, no more micro anything....
don't like the blonde, she is nuts, Love Camille