God bless Ed O'Neil. He's very aware of how much audiences relate to all the Married With Children cast. I have enjoyed his other work, from Dutch to Modern Family.
not even just 2 women couples. women in general are far more abusive in general. thing is they do it emotionally that cuts much deeper then a man physically slapping someone in the face. also most men don't go and report the abuse, because nobody listens to them. whereas women get every type of support. women are even believed when they make stuff up and destroy someone's life for their own entertainment. women are sociopaths.
@@sandasturner9529 I dunno man, look at Hilary Clinton. She had people assassinated for a number of reasons, including vanity. Also for investigating into her criminal history of having people assassinated.
Someone once made a comment like this to Madeleine Albright. She responded to the effect that if you think women are the kindler, gentler sex you misremember high school.
My wife works in a female dominate profession; nursing. The about of gossiping, backstabbing, bickering, and meanness is unbelievable. Not to say men are perfect, I've worked with a lot of bullies and bad bosses, but seething mutual hatred just isn't present in male dominated situations.
@@earthwormscrawl *Agreed, I work in a male dominated field; Manufacturing Engineering, we just go about or daily business.* Guys in the office and on the floor are just too damn busy for pettiness.
They don't call the peak of the British Empire the Victorian period just because they won so many victories, and Russia's Catherine wasn't considered "the Great" because of her fair and honest dealings.
@@bapparawal2457Easy: - empress wu ze tian from tang dynasty china, -Queen ranalova I from madagascar. -Queen kandake from kingdom of kush, -Queen nefertiti from ancient egypt, -Queen Rani of jhansi from india All of them are either warmonger, had lead troops in battle, or massacre family members or two.
And NOBODY holds onto a grudge like a woman. Men can fight and when it’s over they can become better friends. Women on the other hand will hold onto that 💩for YEARS.
Tell me about it. Sometimes when something they want doesn't come they hold it against you forever and even when you ask them directly they lie about it. Women aren't better, in fact most men too - especially those who always brag about "having the balls to say things to people's faces" avoid the true issues like the plague when being asked about them directly.
MORE WARS...........trust me on that one. Retired US Army special forces... And military trainer....I had to train females as a drill instructor......the drama... Wanted to gouge my eyes out.
Female monarchs started wars more often than male monarchs. This was found by academics who sought to prove that women in power would be peaceful. They found the exact opposite. I’m only surprised they published it.
My grandmother warned me about working in an office with women. She was in a wheelchair, but fiercely independent, so she worked in an office to support herself. She told me that women were catty and backstabby and that I should avoid women in groups. I won't say she was right about all women individually (nor did she mean it to be taken that way), but years of working in offices periodically has shown me she wasn't wrong.
Survival show with Bear Grylls. The wahmen just bickered. While the men made camp. Had a fire. Hunted for food. So let the bear have them. 😅😊🐻🐻 Grizzle grizzle
Yes, there most definitely would be wars, especially between countries. And the country that would get attacked first would have NO IDEA what they did wrong !!
1. A woman can do anything if she doesn't have to perform or experience it herself. 2. In war, suffering is delegated. 3. A woman can start a war for the same reason as a man, and on top of that, on the basis of feelings. 4. Women not only can feel more sympathy but also feel less sympathy than men. 5. Wars are not sparked by the impulsiveness of aggression, but by long-simmering anger. Men have started nearly all the wars because they have always been in the position where it's possible. In many modern countries this is not possible anymore unless it's about defence. So in other words this world would have no wars if no one would have such power. North Koreans fear Kim's sister more than Kim. She is a brutal example of how far women can go when they have power.
I had a female friend who once said that she is glad that wars are fought by men, if only women were to fight wars, they would be hundreds of times more destructive and violet.
That is not true man. I gotta say most men I met in my life are not any more up front when there is a real issue at hand than women are. That is just myth. I met a few men in my life what claimed that at least they have the balls to call out issues and bullcrap, but when it was something they did they would deny and lie about it. Talk about accountability and "having balls".
@@LecherousLizard That makes it no better. The way you're saying it you just justify hypocrisy anyway, and by calling my statement cute you're trying to put yourself above the point I am making without having to refute or put anything up against it, which to me means only one thing: I hit a nerve with you specifically ;)
@@im3phirebird81 Your anecdotal evidence is that the few men you know and which made a mistake that you know of had problems owning it up. Which means you've, at best, argued about a part of OP's statement and yet you think you got a "gotcha" on the entire thing. That's why I called it "cute". I, for example, not only have never seen a woman own up to her mistake, but they'd also almost always try to put the blame on somebody else at the same time, while men usually try to play it off to drop the subject instead of trying to incriminate someone else. I have also, at numerous time throughout my life, had to force what the problem is out of women, while men would just... you know, tell me if they had one. And you didn't "hit a nerve", that's just me not tolerating your bullshit.
I heard they did a study on wars started by male leaders vs female leaders. The ladies started far more wars per leader than the men. I didn't see the study, just heard it referenced but I can see it happening. From personal experience, the vast majority of disagreements that I've had with women were started by the women. I try to avoid unnecessary arguments whenever possible, unlike most ladies that I know.
Seen a few theories. One is that other countries attack assuming she's a weak ruler. The flipside to this is the queen may attack to preemptively show strength. Another is that kings historically had combat training and fought in wars where queens only saw it from their castles. This leads women to be more cavalier the lives of the armies. Possibly some entitlement thinking it's their duty to fight for her.
This! 💯 this! As a fellow woman, I 100% agree. Anytime I try voicing it though, of course I’m told I have “internalized misogyny”. I consider it personal experience of seeing my own sex get into fights over the stupidest shit though.
Exactly and there's historical evidence that female rulers are prone to war Victoria I of England (also bloody Mary of england) and Catherine the great of Russia all are good examples of how power doesn't discriminate gender when it corrupts someone even if the woman in power doesn't start the conflict do we really think the male leaders of this world like putin and Kim Jung Un are gonna take a female president seriously I doubt it especially for Kim
@@daltondennis7096Victoria wasn't in control she was merely a figurehead at the point she took the throne. You can mention Mary and Elizabeth I though and Elizabeth Báthory of Hungary.
It would be a DIFFERENT form of war based in social shunning and sanctions leading to starvation and famine. Imagine “I’m not talking to her again” but on a geopolitical scale
Margaret Thatcher lead the UK into their first war since WWII when she became their first Prime Minister in the late 70s/early 80s. A war many disagreed with Yet, when Nicola Sturgeon was the First Minister of Scotland, she had mooted plans of disbanding the army and replacing it with a Scottish Defence Force, a move that would involve removing nuclear submarines from the Gare Loch and Scotland as a whole. Many felt that would be a disaster for Scotland both defensively and financially. What that says is that it’s not your gender that defines what is best for your nation, but a mix of personal, political and values and outside influence that will define whether or not you’d take a nation to war Is wager at least 70% of Americans, male and female, would have had a hair-trigger response to 9/11 and attacked the First Nation to blame for those atrocities. It’s an understandable need for revenge, a focal point, someone to blame for something so horrific. As for it being the correct response? In the cold light of day almost 25 years later, people may so ‘no’ but at the time…
Geopolitics would be even more volatile, and more frequent skirmishes over lesser things, because there would be more emotions involved. Men on the other hand can keep suppressing their feelings until it eventually erupts all at once into a full scale hellscape. Just sayin’ 🤔
It would be ruined either way societies never last forever having men in power over women slows it some but the fall is inevitable especially in the west which is starting to look a lot like the end days of the ancient Roman's but like the Roman's I suspect the west will reform but will that reform change it for better only time can tell us that
She's only got 5.5k subs. And while she's pretty, she's not doing wiggle-chest videos. Less than a year, and she is climbing based upon calm wisdom. Nice!
No, there would be no wars because all of the developed nations infrastructures would deteriorate rapidly with no men. In addition, women would have to: follow orders, be disciplined, and display courage.
I know just as many males as females that don't do the things you mention above. Following orders can be a difficult thing. Do you still follow orders when they come from a place of corruption? I know more messy men than women who don't give a crap about living in filth (discipline). I personally could work on my discipline a bit. I like having somewhar orderly surroundings, but could never get myself to work out for the sake of it. And about displaying courage: Cowardice and courage is no gender-based trait. There are so many men in today's world who don't have the guts to sacrifice the slightest bit of their comfort to do what is right in the big picture, which is a big part of courage if you ask me. Many modern men are cowards.
Three thoughts come to mind: "Men and women were born to disagree. My wife, of course, disagrees with that. So I simply pointed out, if men and women were to agree with each other, we'd all be men."🤣 Secondly: "If women ruled the world, there'd never be any wars, just INTENSE NEGOTIATIONS every 28 days."🤣🤣 And finally: "Women have half the money, and all the 😻. But if you have all the 😻, its simply a matter of time till you have all the money."🤣🤣🤣
Like 250 ago al the british women were crying because the UK was on the way to become a global superpower....none of them was screaming fir more pearls and spices and sugar and tea and silk .
Anecdotally, I have noticed that dudes will fight at the drop of a hat. You see them in bars and if they look at eachother crooked it's a throw down. However, they're pretty easy to pull apart, then they hug or bump chests and then they're buying eachother a beer and the world is right. Women, however, tend to circle eachother and take a lot longer to get wound up, but when they decide to throw down someone's gonna end up in the hospital. One of them or someone who tries to intervene. Peeps be getting clawed and hair being yanked out. Maybe a bit dramatic but we have all see it. Ladies mean business and play for keeps. Might be fewer wars than men but if gals were in charge it would be Mutually Assured Destruction 😃
While usually I can see your point of view on topics(and usually agree with them), @the_lady_j_ , in this instance, I could not disagree with you more! That woman's question gives everything away. There would be a massive reduction in wars fought by Humans if the world was only females. If there were no males, most species, including Humans would die out. An extinct species would be incapable of waging wars.
I agree but if the question was what would happen if women had power over men I'm certain not only would there be more war but they'd probably last longer women in general are notorious for holding grudges and almost every queen in history was prone to even more violence than their male counterparts
Once my brother in-law stated this. I guffawed quite suddenly and loudly. Startled everyone there at the family Christmas. He obviously had little experience with women.
I've worked in two female dominated jobs, 98% women, and she's right. Men tend to be in your face, and haze, but if you stand up for yourself, you become one of the crew, and no hard feelings after.
We have let more and more women into politics and the overal work force over the past 100 years. I cannot say the world is a better place because of it…..
If women TRULY supported each other , the patriarchy would have been put to rest a long time ago . WOMENS sports would be the most watched thing . And IF women TRULY supported each other, Hillary would have been President already, and she wouldn't have been the first
There would be no wars. Wars require two opposing sides and some form of organized forces fighting each other. Women could never unite under a single cause without men around. It would be a free for all, yes, but not war.
Men value justice more. Women value fairness more. Women would start wars because they felt like they weren't being treated fairly. Men accept that they get the raw end of a deal because it is just.
MY GAWD! so much elegance, class, clear tone, great voice, great speaker charisma, with a straight forward dekiverance of based analysis, insta subscribe. I wanna learn how to talk like you!😮
Blud really said "women are more indirect with their disdain, so there'd be more wars." Sounds like more Cold Wars to me. More "I don't remember what we were fighting about" wars.
And they say.... Women wants to have the "last say" to other people. And if there's only women.... No one gets to get their "last say" because they talk over each other.
There would be less wars, but no one would talk to each other because of what Becca said about Ava about what Nikki did to Catherine. Female leaders have mostly gone to war because they had male soldiers to send.
To be honest, I paused after a second or two, just before getting to your response part of the video because I had to laugh so hard. This girl is crazy if she is asking that question. Glad you could give her the correct response.
As a male who has held several occupations and found myself being the only male present for a number of shifts, can tell you explicitly and emphatically that there indeed would be all kinna fighting and wars. Because emotions.
![[TH] VCT Pacific Stage 2 - Week 4 Day 3 // GEN vs TS | PRX vs ZETA](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nspkjQuZve0/mqdefault.jpg)
“Don’t try to understand women. Women understand women and they hate each other.” Al Bundy
God bless Ed O'Neil. He's very aware of how much audiences relate to all the Married With Children cast. I have enjoyed his other work, from Dutch to Modern Family.
Al Bundy was a prophet.
What do older women and dog doody have in common? The older they get, the easier they are to pick up.
-Al "four touchdowns one game" Bundy
I'm going to binge watch the show now 😂
@@BOMBON187
Al Bundy is an absolute SAVAGE! Luv that guy….
Yeah and violence isnt specific to just men either.
You don't say... highest domestic violence rate is... among two-women-couples.
I couldn't agree more
Lesbian relationships are the most violent coupling
not even just 2 women couples. women in general are far more abusive in general. thing is they do it emotionally that cuts much deeper then a man physically slapping someone in the face. also most men don't go and report the abuse, because nobody listens to them. whereas women get every type of support. women are even believed when they make stuff up and destroy someone's life for their own entertainment. women are sociopaths.
Women aren't less violent than men, they're simply less effective at it
"Men are by default indifferent to each other. Women are by default enemies to each other."
Schopenhauer paraphrased.
Men are by nature merely indifferent to one another; but women are by nature enemies.
Arthur Schopenhauer
that is one of the stupidest things i ever heard ngl
They'd go to war just for accidentally wearing the same outfit to a world summit.
I dunno bruh. I think women as a whole deserve a little more credit for being less _vain_ than that.
@@sandasturner9529
I dunno man, look at Hilary Clinton. She had people assassinated for a number of reasons, including vanity. Also for investigating into her criminal history of having people assassinated.
@@sandasturner9529 lol😂
Bruh, the internet is nothing BUT vain women
@@goldenhate6649Not really true
Someone once made a comment like this to Madeleine Albright. She responded to the effect that if you think women are the kindler, gentler sex you misremember high school.
I once had to do a group project with an all girls group......it felt like being in a trench with grenades and mortars flying all around.......
Honesty from a politician.
….and about fellow women, at that.
@@sufianramli😂😂😂
Q: How do you piss off a feminist? A: Treat them like an equal.
The one bully I had growing up was a female. Turns out she "liked" me and I didn't like her back so she decided to antagonize me.
*"If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts."*
- Camille Paglia
My wife works in a female dominate profession; nursing. The about of gossiping, backstabbing, bickering, and meanness is unbelievable. Not to say men are perfect, I've worked with a lot of bullies and bad bosses, but seething mutual hatred just isn't present in male dominated situations.
@@earthwormscrawl *Agreed, I work in a male dominated field; Manufacturing Engineering, we just go about or daily business.*
Guys in the office and on the floor are just too damn busy for pettiness.
I think 'grass huts' was a bit generous to be honest!
"Leaving decisions about sex in the relationship to the females is like taking your dog to the taxidermists for vacation". - also, Camille Paglia.
Yep agreed
They don't call the peak of the British Empire the Victorian period just because they won so many victories, and Russia's Catherine wasn't considered "the Great" because of her fair and honest dealings.
What Catherine the Great is known for: wars and horses.
@LecherousLizard well, one horse in particular
@@raoulduke344 That's the one we _know of._
@@LecherousLizard Aye, that's true. I don't think the complex rig of pulleys and fulcrums would just be dismantled after one horse died.
Except Queen Victoria was a figurehead who had no power.
Historically, almost every woman who has lead a nation has gone to war.
Yeah, history doesn't lie. Statistically speaking, female leaders are more likely to go to war than male leaders.
How much of world history do you westerners even know? Can you name 5 queens of non western world? 😂
@@bapparawal2457Easy:
- empress wu ze tian from tang dynasty china,
-Queen ranalova I from madagascar.
-Queen kandake from kingdom of kush,
-Queen nefertiti from ancient egypt,
-Queen Rani of jhansi from india
All of them are either warmonger, had lead troops in battle, or massacre family members or two.
@@bapparawal2457 hahhaah West Bad hahahahahaha
@@aetius7139 lol, that’s checkmate
And NOBODY holds onto a grudge like a woman. Men can fight and when it’s over they can become better friends. Women on the other hand will hold onto that 💩for YEARS.
Tell me about it. Sometimes when something they want doesn't come they hold it against you forever and even when you ask them directly they lie about it. Women aren't better, in fact most men too - especially those who always brag about "having the balls to say things to people's faces" avoid the true issues like the plague when being asked about them directly.
“Did we just become best friends?!”
“Yup!”
Tell your wife something she didn't like hearing and 20 years later she will remind you of having said that (happened to me just last week).
@@thomasg627"At least you were prettier back then. Dayuum."
Yup. Can you imagine. One country not talking to another because of a rumor. Or a country attacked because of some silly nonsense
"No wars, but every 28 days, some intense negotiations." - Robin Williams.
LOL I remember that show, the same one where Stalone did Shakespeare
No war because women don't like to fight women are only warmongers because other ppl fight them
😂😂
🌚💀🥲 damn bro. You really went there and *_cut really deep_*
No you'd have tense negotiations at all times and explosive but short wars every 28 days
MORE WARS...........trust me on that one. Retired US Army special forces...
And military trainer....I had to train females as a drill instructor......the drama... Wanted to gouge my eyes out.
I feel for you man sorry you had to go through that. 😂😅
Who wanted to gouge your eyes out ? You ? or the females you were training ?
If you ever watched women on an island try to survive, you realize just how much help women get in life.
Are you talking about that show by Bear Grylls? If so that is a good example.
@@acedaatlien9214 that's the one
If I remember correctly, when Queens were solely in power they tended to war more. Or at least have more battles in a war.
_$@me differen$e_
Female monarchs started wars more often than male monarchs. This was found by academics who sought to prove that women in power would be peaceful. They found the exact opposite. I’m only surprised they published it.
@@sandasturner9529shadow censorship?
Its clear that she doesn't know history, if she did she wouldn't have asked that question.
She probably doesn't know half of her own _"history"_ if ya catch my drift 🌚
I don't know history very well either, what part am I missing which you seem to be referencing in this comment
The WNBA is a great example of what the world would in fact look like if they completely ran the show.
They had to force it on tvs so people could watch.
Yup. They hate the most powerful and popular player Caitlin.
A woman would steal another’s Gucci handbag and the war would be on.
They could literally just borrow it for a night and the War would still be on
There would be no complex civilization, but yeah, wars over petty shit would be way more common.
They would just wear the same handbag and it would be on.
Judging by the WNBA, yes, yes there would.
Lord, if that isn’t the truth.
My grandmother warned me about working in an office with women. She was in a wheelchair, but fiercely independent, so she worked in an office to support herself. She told me that women were catty and backstabby and that I should avoid women in groups.
I won't say she was right about all women individually (nor did she mean it to be taken that way), but years of working in offices periodically has shown me she wasn't wrong.
She was correct. Say it without caveats.
It's not just offices. It's any place of work.
I've known a few women that work with all or nearly all men. They hate working with mostly women for the same reasons your grandmother cited.
Yes and women in the workplace tend to fight with each other more and hold grudges.
I wish someone warned me about it. My university life got ruined because of it.
“Bud, Never try to understand women! Women understand women and they hate each other.” Al Bundy, founder of NO MAM! 😂
You beat me to it
Trying to understand women is like trying to smell the color 9….
That army girl knows damn well how her basic training experience was. I remember screaming all the time coming from females rooms and fighting.
Survival show with Bear Grylls. The wahmen just bickered. While the men made camp. Had a fire. Hunted for food. So let the bear have them. 😅😊🐻🐻 Grizzle grizzle
Bear is not dumb enough for that...
Yes, there most definitely would be wars, especially between countries. And the country that would get attacked first would have NO IDEA what they did wrong !!
When the attacking country was asked "what's wrong?" It responded "nothing. It's fine"
@@Kommander_Rahnnbaha omg underrated comment
1. A woman can do anything if she doesn't have to perform or experience it herself.
2. In war, suffering is delegated.
3. A woman can start a war for the same reason as a man, and on top of that, on the basis of feelings.
4. Women not only can feel more sympathy but also feel less sympathy than men.
5. Wars are not sparked by the impulsiveness of aggression, but by long-simmering anger.
Men have started nearly all the wars because they have always been in the position where it's possible. In many modern countries this is not possible anymore unless it's about defence.
So in other words this world would have no wars if no one would have such power.
North Koreans fear Kim's sister more than Kim. She is a brutal example of how far women can go when they have power.
Lady J…..the destroyer of feminist hubris, and enlightening men how better to deal with certain types of selfish women. Winner!
I had a female friend who once said that she is glad that wars are fought by men, if only women were to fight wars, they would be hundreds of times more destructive and violet.
🤣 why do I imagine a woman trying to open a jar of pickles? Women would cause more wars but it wouldn't be more destructive or violent.
Umm, did you actually mean the color violet?. Or did some keyboard gremlin steal your N key?
@@kittehgo I really hate those gremli letter stealers. They are the wors
@@Bweyg *I reallly hae hose gremli leer sealers. hey are he wors
I think if women decided when, where and how to fight wars there would be a lot fewer physical casualties, but a lot more hurt feelings.
I concur with this statement. I’ve witnessed women taking others down behind each other’s backs.
Look at the drama in the WNBA for example…those women hate the golden goose they got
More wars, less scientific advancement, less things being built and fixed, that world would suck.
Devolve into a Mad Maxine world.
lmao what makes you think there'd be less scientific advancement???
Wars over hurt feelings. Additionally, women with power are infinitely more likely to become tyrannical. (cough)Elizabeth I (cough, cough).
Elizabeth of Bathory (Blood Countess)
catherine the great of russia
You literally picked Elizabeth as an example over her sister?
Wars to make others pale in comparison.
Don’t forget about Bloody Mary
Very true..this is why I have zero girlfriends..way too much drama 😂
Spot on there lady j , most women see other women as competition, in every aspect of there lives .
I am at a complete loss for words......an HONEST answer from a woman. And a very interesting, intelligent and gorgeous woman at that. You rock Lady J.
One important difference between men and women is that men don't tolerate BS while women empower it.
That is not true man. I gotta say most men I met in my life are not any more up front when there is a real issue at hand than women are. That is just myth. I met a few men in my life what claimed that at least they have the balls to call out issues and bullcrap, but when it was something they did they would deny and lie about it. Talk about accountability and "having balls".
@@im3phirebird81I'm betting those men were raised by single mothers.
@@im3phirebird81Cute. Now, did they call out other people's bullshit though?
Because women do neither.
@@LecherousLizard That makes it no better. The way you're saying it you just justify hypocrisy anyway, and by calling my statement cute you're trying to put yourself above the point I am making without having to refute or put anything up against it, which to me means only one thing: I hit a nerve with you specifically ;)
@@im3phirebird81 Your anecdotal evidence is that the few men you know and which made a mistake that you know of had problems owning it up.
Which means you've, at best, argued about a part of OP's statement and yet you think you got a "gotcha" on the entire thing.
That's why I called it "cute".
I, for example, not only have never seen a woman own up to her mistake, but they'd also almost always try to put the blame on somebody else at the same time, while men usually try to play it off to drop the subject instead of trying to incriminate someone else.
I have also, at numerous time throughout my life, had to force what the problem is out of women, while men would just... you know, tell me if they had one.
And you didn't "hit a nerve", that's just me not tolerating your bullshit.
I heard they did a study on wars started by male leaders vs female leaders. The ladies started far more wars per leader than the men. I didn't see the study, just heard it referenced but I can see it happening. From personal experience, the vast majority of disagreements that I've had with women were started by the women. I try to avoid unnecessary arguments whenever possible, unlike most ladies that I know.
Seen a few theories. One is that other countries attack assuming she's a weak ruler. The flipside to this is the queen may attack to preemptively show strength. Another is that kings historically had combat training and fought in wars where queens only saw it from their castles. This leads women to be more cavalier the lives of the armies. Possibly some entitlement thinking it's their duty to fight for her.
@@bryanwoods3373they started the wars, they weren’t attacked first.
This is WHY I love mature (older) women. They are knowledgeable, smarter, have common sense, and think with more than just EMOTIONS.
Wars guaranteed, on a lunar cycle.
I agree. More wars. Love you lady J
This! 💯 this! As a fellow woman, I 100% agree. Anytime I try voicing it though, of course I’m told I have “internalized misogyny”. I consider it personal experience of seeing my own sex get into fights over the stupidest shit though.
Exactly and there's historical evidence that female rulers are prone to war Victoria I of England (also bloody Mary of england) and Catherine the great of Russia all are good examples of how power doesn't discriminate gender when it corrupts someone even if the woman in power doesn't start the conflict do we really think the male leaders of this world like putin and Kim Jung Un are gonna take a female president seriously I doubt it especially for Kim
@@daltondennis7096Victoria wasn't in control she was merely a figurehead at the point she took the throne. You can mention Mary and Elizabeth I though and Elizabeth Báthory of Hungary.
The fact that this girl is a soldier asking this question makes me scared for the future of our military.
To quote Al Bundy "Do not try to understand women, women understand women and they all hate each other?"
Buttttt, if we had more women like you The Lady J then there would actually be PEACE, I’m just say’n 🤔
Word
It would be a DIFFERENT form of war based in social shunning and sanctions leading to starvation and famine. Imagine “I’m not talking to her again” but on a geopolitical scale
If there were only women wigs everywhere would be snatched on the daily.
It takes logic and reason to hold back from having so many wars.
Margaret Thatcher lead the UK into their first war since WWII when she became their first Prime Minister in the late 70s/early 80s. A war many disagreed with
Yet, when Nicola Sturgeon was the First Minister of Scotland, she had mooted plans of disbanding the army and replacing it with a Scottish Defence Force, a move that would involve removing nuclear submarines from the Gare Loch and Scotland as a whole. Many felt that would be a disaster for Scotland both defensively and financially.
What that says is that it’s not your gender that defines what is best for your nation, but a mix of personal, political and values and outside influence that will define whether or not you’d take a nation to war
Is wager at least 70% of Americans, male and female, would have had a hair-trigger response to 9/11 and attacked the First Nation to blame for those atrocities. It’s an understandable need for revenge, a focal point, someone to blame for something so horrific. As for it being the correct response? In the cold light of day almost 25 years later, people may so ‘no’ but at the time…
Geopolitics would be even more volatile, and more frequent skirmishes over lesser things, because there would be more emotions involved. Men on the other hand can keep suppressing their feelings until it eventually erupts all at once into a full scale hellscape. Just sayin’ 🤔
It would be ruined either way societies never last forever having men in power over women slows it some but the fall is inevitable especially in the west which is starting to look a lot like the end days of the ancient Roman's but like the Roman's I suspect the west will reform but will that reform change it for better only time can tell us that
I'd rather do a tour in Vietnam than date modern women.
I hear Vietnam is great for tourists these days
@@Obvioustroller Absolutely! Beautiful country!
Are we forgetting all the major female monarchs in history? Marie Therese, Catherine of Russia, Victoria etc.
Naw, there'd be no war if there were only women left. Mostly because humanity would completely die out in less than a year.
Most women wouldn’t survive the first two weeks, no clean water, no food, no electricity, no gas etc.
There have been female leaders, in the past, and almost all of them started wars. Another question asked from the class of ID 10 T!
Beautiful and intelligent lady nailed it!
I just found this channel, I absolutely love it. You are awesome
I saw her first!
Ain't she a bute!
She's only got 5.5k subs. And while she's pretty, she's not doing wiggle-chest videos. Less than a year, and she is climbing based upon calm wisdom.
Nice!
No, there would be no wars because all of the developed nations infrastructures would deteriorate rapidly with no men. In addition, women would have to: follow orders, be disciplined, and display courage.
I know just as many males as females that don't do the things you mention above. Following orders can be a difficult thing. Do you still follow orders when they come from a place of corruption? I know more messy men than women who don't give a crap about living in filth (discipline). I personally could work on my discipline a bit. I like having somewhar orderly surroundings, but could never get myself to work out for the sake of it. And about displaying courage: Cowardice and courage is no gender-based trait. There are so many men in today's world who don't have the guts to sacrifice the slightest bit of their comfort to do what is right in the big picture, which is a big part of courage if you ask me. Many modern men are cowards.
Three thoughts come to mind:
"Men and women were born to disagree. My wife, of course, disagrees with that. So I simply pointed out, if men and women were to agree with each other, we'd all be men."🤣
Secondly:
"If women ruled the world, there'd never be any wars, just INTENSE NEGOTIATIONS every 28 days."🤣🤣
And finally:
"Women have half the money, and all the 😻. But if you have all the 😻, its simply a matter of time till you have all the money."🤣🤣🤣
Every month it would be a blood bath!😂😂😂😂😂
Add to it the monthly excuse to act crazy but absolve you of any personal responsibility for your actions
That's a lot of truth for a 62 second video.... Love Lady J
More like 57 seconds because the first 5 is a lying tiktok video.
@@Bweyg Fair enough...
Like 250 ago al the british women were crying because the UK was on the way to become a global superpower....none of them was screaming fir more pearls and spices and sugar and tea and silk .
Lady J when your right your right.
Anecdotally, I have noticed that dudes will fight at the drop of a hat. You see them in bars and if they look at eachother crooked it's a throw down. However, they're pretty easy to pull apart, then they hug or bump chests and then they're buying eachother a beer and the world is right. Women, however, tend to circle eachother and take a lot longer to get wound up, but when they decide to throw down someone's gonna end up in the hospital. One of them or someone who tries to intervene. Peeps be getting clawed and hair being yanked out. Maybe a bit dramatic but we have all see it. Ladies mean business and play for keeps. Might be fewer wars than men but if gals were in charge it would be Mutually Assured Destruction 😃
Hence the term 'cat fight'....vicious.
Random Waffle House in Atlanta, Georgia has entered the chat.
This lady is amazingly awesome.
Has that soldier seen how women treat each other?! Yall are brutal to each other😂
While usually I can see your point of view on topics(and usually agree with them), @the_lady_j_ , in this instance, I could not disagree with you more! That woman's question gives everything away. There would be a massive reduction in wars fought by Humans if the world was only females. If there were no males, most species, including Humans would die out. An extinct species would be incapable of waging wars.
Oh that's true, I didn't even think about that. There wouldn't be enough time to even start more wars XD
I agree but if the question was what would happen if women had power over men I'm certain not only would there be more war but they'd probably last longer women in general are notorious for holding grudges and almost every queen in history was prone to even more violence than their male counterparts
ABSOLUTELY 💯😁 YOU ARE SO SMART 😁👍
Most women hate other women!! ❤you are a shining light.
Hmmm… there would be some serious nuclear cat fights for sure! 😂
Once my brother in-law stated this. I guffawed quite suddenly and loudly. Startled everyone there at the family Christmas. He obviously had little experience with women.
I've worked in two female dominated jobs, 98% women, and she's right. Men tend to be in your face, and haze, but if you stand up for yourself, you become one of the crew, and no hard feelings after.
Coughs in Catherine the great and Elizabeth the first 😂
We have let more and more women into politics and the overal work force over the past 100 years.
I cannot say the world is a better place because of it…..
If women TRULY supported each other , the patriarchy would have been put to rest a long time ago . WOMENS sports would be the most watched thing . And IF women TRULY supported each other, Hillary would have been President already, and she wouldn't have been the first
Imagine dem world leaders wearing the same exact dress unintentionally. Its gonna be fun.
There would be no wars. Wars require two opposing sides and some form of organized forces fighting each other. Women could never unite under a single cause without men around.
It would be a free for all, yes, but not war.
Men value justice more. Women value fairness more. Women would start wars because they felt like they weren't being treated fairly. Men accept that they get the raw end of a deal because it is just.
They’d also have wars over something someone did 20 years ago. They ain’t letting that shit go.
MY GAWD! so much elegance, class, clear tone, great voice, great speaker charisma, with a straight forward dekiverance of based analysis, insta subscribe. I wanna learn how to talk like you!😮
Last one, too. Excellent! Best of luck for the future pal 👍
Wars wouldn’t be fought over land or resources, they’d be fought over someone showing up wearing the same outfit or gossip getting back to someone.
You said everything, actually. Humans are humans - we love to have more than we should have( lands, food, water, cheap labourers… even prestige)
Leading women with no kings has historically shown a significant increase in the likelihood of going to war.
Someone mention Caitlyn Clark real quick I dare ya...
There's a fight right there... Hahahaha
"There'd be no war. Just a bunch of countries not speaking to each other!" Can't remember who said it.
Some smiles are as _drawn_ as the knives they hold beneath the dinner table.
Women would start wars believing they were the victim.
*FEMALE VICE PRESIDENT:*
_Why are we always at war !?_
*FEMALE PRESIDENT:*
_...Ya know it was that time of the month !_
Totally agree with you. I have been saying the exact same thing to people for years.
Blud really said "women are more indirect with their disdain, so there'd be more wars." Sounds like more Cold Wars to me. More "I don't remember what we were fighting about" wars.
This woman is a keeper.
Wars require organisation and coordination.
Women would just fight amongst themselves behind each other's back
This lady is giving off uncanny valley feels
There wouldn't be any wars because any dissenters of the group think would be put in a ditch as soon as she spoke up.
And they say.... Women wants to have the "last say" to other people.
And if there's only women.... No one gets to get their "last say" because they talk over each other.
And without the military lowering their standards for Women blondie NEVER would have made it past the first week of boot camp.
There would be less wars, but no one would talk to each other because of what Becca said about Ava about what Nikki did to Catherine.
Female leaders have mostly gone to war because they had male soldiers to send.
Yes, they would fight over cloths and makeup instead of against evil.
Violence is a human trait not a gender trait.
Wow - your perspective is so great. I don't know if you're right or wrong, but I do appreciate your POV.
To be honest, I paused after a second or two, just before getting to your response part of the video because I had to laugh so hard. This girl is crazy if she is asking that question. Glad you could give her the correct response.
As a male who has held several occupations and found myself being the only male present for a number of shifts, can tell you explicitly and emphatically that there indeed would be all kinna fighting and wars. Because emotions.