ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2019
- Tested the rear wheel Drive Long Range 0-60 and Found it to be faster than I first go it.
MMP dyno test • Dyno Testing The Tesla...
Dragy 10Hz GPS Based Performance Meteramzn.to/2titn5M
Patreon - / i1tesla
T-shirts squareup.com/store/i1tesla
www.abstractocean.com?aff=I1Tesla Get 15% off your first order with Coupon Code - i1Tesla
Music by Epidemic Sound (www.epidemicsound.com)
Follow us on Twitter at / i1tesla
To join in depth conversations and see pics join us in our group at / i1tesla
To follow us on Facebook go to / i1tesla
Mailing address
Brian Jenkins
112-A Argus Lane
Mooresville, NC 28117 - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![เกิดใหม่ทั้งทีก็เป็นสไลม์ไปซะแล้ว ซีซั่น 3 - ตอนที่ 57 [ซับไทย]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pNhft3YZFRE/mqdefault.jpg)
Nice job of editing, Brian. There should be no question that the Model 3 RWD is quicker than what Tesla says.
I am a die hard car guy and I can’t wait to drop my GTI for one of these. The future is here. Rwd and electric torque. Of course I will have one. Thank you mr musk you are amazing.
Thank you!! Appreciate all the hard work and great videos.
Great work! I would love to see this test repeated for a LR, dual-motor Model 3 - and any other Model 3 variants that you can get your hands on.
Very in depth. Keep up the outstanding work.
Awesome explanation. I thought about buying a Draggy GPS but I figure I'd use it all of 3 times.
Happy Birthday Karen!~
Great Vid! Have a great week!
Happy Birthday, Karen!
Happy Birthday Karen. I hope you had a great day.
Happy Birthday Karen!!
It's my Birthday today, February 11th, too!!!
Great test! I feel like another good starting point would be when your foot touches the pedal, since some cars have a delay between when you touch the pedal and when the car starts moving. That should be accounted for. Maybe that's where the 5.2 sec number comes from.
Teslas definitely don't have that delay.
Awesome video. I have dual motor and was having trouble hitting the advertised 0 to 60 but maybe I’ll try again with a good charge.
Report back, please, especially if you have the dual motor with 19"!
Make sure you have obstacle awareness acceleration off in your settings it causes a take off delay
Awesome as usual. Any chance you can get your hands on a mid range model 3 to see if its slower? I know they advertise it as such, but I feel like mine is still pretty fast.
Happy Birthday Karen!
I was thinking maybe the difference could be the tires wearing in. When you get tires new they should be flat and even, but on different vehicles the camber can be slightly different or slightly different on each vehicle but still within "limits". Over time your tires have worn in to more closely match the settings on your car and are giving a slightly better grip. Again this would be a small difference, but then your improvements are slight.
Nice! Thinking about this method, it's 60hz instead of 10hz, and if you set up a marker at start and 1/4 mile, and go frame by frame, you can get more accurate than a draggy!!
1st Happy birthday Karen. Many happy returns!!! Funny thing I was wondering why my Tesla as slow. I have been driving in Chill mode. Lol how come your car looks so good with the stock 18” wheels. When I took the caps off mine . I don’t get the same look. Have you done anything to the rims?
I'd like to see someone with the newer mid range rwd models do some 0-60 testing.
I know a guy
I was wondering about that because when I bought my Model 3 in January 2019 the only RWD offered was mid-range
Great video, I’m ordering my LR AWD model 3 next month so I’ll have to test this out once I get it. Maybe it’s also faster than Tesla is advertising?
I think you should put the back seats emergency opening from the trunk installation, if recorded on patreon as I have opted for 15 dollars one which includes fun,bloopers,behind the scenes, content you don't post on TH-cam. Therefore I shall shift to the 10 Dollar one next month. But I still love your channel a lot and will watch every video of yours. Just a suggestion.
Happy 29th birthday Karen!
A car that gets faster as it ages. We are living in the future.
Have you considered what the ambient temperature was at the time of testing? Reason why I ask is because car batteries are most happy at about 60 degrees F.
For anyone curious, 2 years ago they added a 5% boost on the exact M3 LR RWD Tesla so it’s even faster now
To correlate your two timing methods you need to re-calculate your iPad run using your frame-by-frame FinalCut calculation. Do they match? If not, then one of the two isn't accurate.
And why exactly did you return the Dragy? That would have been a great way to do proper testing.
My Model 3 LR is about 2 to 3 km/h off. This is based on GPS and those neighbourhood flashing speed signs. So worse case scenario it's about 1.8 MPH off.
I liked the video, but i think it is flawed. Reason being is that the displayed 60mph is not truly 60mph.
You need the VBox because it's based off of GPS.
Manufacturers set various speed offsets to their vehicles. Just look at TeslaBjorn's video's. He does his 90km/hr tests, but the Model 3 needs to be at 94km/hr to truly be at 90.
Like i said.. i enjoyed the video. But the results are likely incorrect.
I think it's regulation for car for offset speed 5 mph
Good point, it would probably be between 63-65 actual 60mph
@@dkdanis1340 I highly doubt that there's any law requiring a 5 MPH offset. In my experience speedometers read just slightly higher than actual speed. In Bjorn's tests the difference is usually less than 5 km/h, which is only about 3 MPH.
But I agree that you really need a vbox or a drag strip to measure 0-60 times accurately.
No need VBox actually. Only need GPS of cell phone.
Drive at 63/64/65mph and see when it shows 60mph on phone. Then do the test again with 0-63/64/65mph.
@@ingmu I don't think that will work. Digital speedometer won't tell you instantaneous speed accurately enough.
Damn 4.5s is too slow. I need my car at 1.9s.
Better start saving up for the new Roadster, then!
Funny think, I swear my mid range feels faster now than when I took delivery in early December.
you should do a project that shows how to install a usb port in the glove box so that if you get broke into they can't steal your usb drive, (major flaw in sentry mode).
Good idea but the glove box will still be able to be opened as of now
@@i1Tesla maybe a secret place then, or a usb that is disguised as trash or a lockable usb safe?
i1Tesla With a crowbar? How can someone get in without the touchscreen command?
Is it confirmed everything will be saved to the USB? I don’t think we know yet
I appreciate your continued work informing us of our Model 3s. A couple of questions occurred to me on this test. Perhaps you can respond. Yes, from the video the surface looks flat. But we all know of circumstances (particularly when I am biking) where that is not exactly true. So I am wondering if you considered running the test over the same markers but in the opposite direction? Further, it may be nanoseconds different, but the crown of the road may also induce a small amount of tire friction. Did you consider running the test straddling the center? I am sure your results are, in gross terms, accurate. These questions are meant as possible refinements next time.
From the first test I did many months ago the GPS data shoed a 1% decline. That is why I went back to the same spot to do this test. That way the 1% grade would not be a factor.
For practical purposes, your test is valid. I would just point out that GPS elevation accuracy is generally felt to be about + or - 10 meters. Googling this will disclose all kinds of complicated formulas as to how GPS approximates elevation (and elevation changes). There is even an app for that. I mention this, not for you. Your test is fine. But others on the thread may be interested in digging deeper. Again, thanks for the information. Now I have a reference point to tell my skeptical friends about the impressive acceleration of the Model 3.@@i1Tesla
Could it be because it’s a permanent magnet motor now instead of the induction motor previously used?
how does the RWD compare to the AWD at i.e. 50% state of charge?
Careful. You call your first two measurements 4.52 and 4.53, but they were actually 4:52 and 4:53, which equate to 4.87 and 4.88. This is very similar, then, to your second set of measurements -- 4.97 and 4.93 -- at the lesser level of charge.
Great explanation and great catch.
Exactly right!
Nope. Hundreds of second work as hundreds of a second, not 1/60 of a second. A fraction of a second is not split as is a fraction of a minute (ie, into 60 separate pieces). His assessment is correct. 4.52 seconds is four and a half seconds.
@@briansingstock164 While you're right that 4.52 would be 4 1/2 seconds, what he observed was NOT 4.52, it was 4:52. You can see the clock ticking up to 59 before turning back over to 00.
Hmmm. This is interesting. We might need to see a similar video for the dual motor
I think dual motor speeds won't be increased anytime soon as they would really rather you buy that performance model. Makes no sense to allow them to get closer.
@@aussie2uGA if the rwd is at 4.5 why would you buy the dual motor? I think it could be closer to 4
Easy. From inception, the rear was officially 5.1, the dual 4.5, and the performance was 3.5. In the case of the Model S, ordering a dual motor made the car significantly quicker AND better efficiency. This is what was expected from the Model 3.
If we now find the lighter rear drive is uncorked to 4.5, the performance has been juiced down to 3.3 seconds, it’s harder to justify a dual motor for “performance”. You’re really now just buying it for AWD. My point was that I don’t see Tesla allowing the dual motor to get to 4.0 for instance, as many performance buyers may not pay the premium. Tesla is smart to allow at least a one second difference and pocket the extra profit.
@@aussie2uGA I guess we will just have to see when i1 makes the video
3D does 0-60 in about 4.2. Always has.
Whats the difference besides motors with the M3 LR RWD AND THE LR AWD?
sorry to say but your 4:52 number shows the video frames. That corresponds to a 4.86 second time, similar to what your ipad timer shows. How can I say that? The counter does not exceed 60 and you stated you where filming at 60 fps
60 frames per second film and 60 seconds in a minute. It works out
You might want to make sure your speedo is accurate. Most show about 2 over actual.
Then it was faster!
@@i1Tesla But in this case we are talking fractions of a second, aren't we?
0.1 seconds are 6 frames in a 60 fps video for example...
@@i1Tesla no, that would mean it shows 60 but it's actually 58
Outside wind speed the same on both days?
Can someone do these test again with the update that supposedly increased the power 5%?
4:52 is the same as 4 and 52/60sec
raven50x You what?
@@rkan2 Normally, I view this posts as people just trying to be difficult, but you are totally correct. I love this channel but he should definitely clarify.
What will be the times when the new update 2019.8.2 happens can you talk about that
Hey Boss, are you going to do another video with the 5% power increase? Maybe it can hit under 4.4sec. That would be excellent bragging rights...especially to Porsche owners...😉
I haven't got it on my 3 yet but when I get it I will
First...love your videos keep up the good work
It’s just like when you get a new computer fast at first week later no fast enough
60 on speedo is prob only 55 mph on radar. I would say 63-65 would be a better estimation.
What was the setting on drive mode
It seems like mine is consistently 5.1 or slower 0-60. Settings are all normal and I am a beta tester running 2019.9 so maybe that has something to do with it? It’s just sad because I remember the times when I got 4.6 and you’re doing it so I’m not sure why i can’t :( I just ran it at 95% too.
You got obstacle awareness acceleration off right
7:45 New Tesla owners love the speed. Yes, we get comfortable with the power and just want more! It is software limited. Tesla can change, add, take away anything software related. If someone comes out with a faster car, they will boost our T3 speed ..LOL...***FCPX editing..nice***
Consumer Reports tested M3LR 0-60 acceleration at only 5.3 s (www.consumerreports.org/fuel-economy-efficiency/vehicle-fuel-economy-vs-performance/) whereas all data I have seen from Tesla and YTubers puts it about 4.8 s for RWD and 4.5 s AWD. What's up with that 0.5 sec discrepancy?
I suggest you employ the fart app for that extra bit of boost.
You should have done it on the opposite direction to see whether it gives the same. You don't know whether it is a pure flat surface
I would rather have de LR RWD, more range and it stills has alot of power
a lot*
Lol 29 again nice 1...
Is this the stock default model 3 ?
Yes
Is the AWD faster than the 2WD?
Yes. About 4.4-4.3 seconds.
I see you still put up the referral code. Is that intentional?
Does anyone else see that the 0-60 is downhill?
Does this RWD use a permanent magnet motor?
All Model 3's have the same motor. The performance ones are the top rated motor. They have a larger power inverter to push the motor more
@@i1Tesla I read that the dual motors use an induction motor for the front and a permanent mag motor for the rear, I was wondering what the difference in performance is between them since it does say on the car sticker that the rear motor is perm. mag.
I just wanna know your thoughts since you actually have the car. I am considering ordering a rwd..
Yes the front motors are the same as the front motors on the S and X. They are great for highway speed and the rear is better for power and take off. I like the RWD car. If you don't need the AWD for weather then get the rear. If you want more power then get the AWD
it has to be measure as from you hit the pedal... if it feels better you can cheat yourself. You don’t harm bobody
Its sad Tesla changed motor and now its almost 6 seconds:
What’s the exact model? Standard range plus?
I hope Tesla doesn’t see your video so they don’t software change it 🙏🏼
Ricky Ho Change what?
I would not expect them to slow the cars except if a wear issue showed up. And I don't think the RWD models have much more in them.
But they could easily make a fast RWD version and should. Easily below 3 seconds. John Wayland made a 1970s datsun go under 2 seconds with RWD and forklift motors. Tesla is way too focused on 4WD and I think it's a crying shame. It's heavier, more complex, steals frunk room, potentially less efficient, it's bullshit. And then he whines he can't build it cheaper. Well maybe the glassroof and extra drivetrain and whatever else redundant junk is in the car makes it hard to lower the price.
Also the display should be in the steering wheel. Has no business in the center console.
Actually, all the Model 3s have the same size frunk. The spot is there for a front motor in my LR RWD 3.
@@gregorymurphy5055 I know
Unlike the S and X dual motors, the extra motor In the 3 was designed to add performance at the sacrifice of range and makes the cars faster.
Noise run away cool thanks Tesla gas engine are real noise
NOPE, should have kept the Dragy because this is not a scientific test at all doing 0-60 this way!
Its downhill
There is no such thing as a "P3D". Please just call them performance model 3's, that's what they are. Thank you!
Performance 3 Dual Motor. P3D
Slightly down hill....
2nd
its going downhill
#petrol till I die
Happy Birthday, Karen!
Happy Birthday Karen!